Abstract
In this study, n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives were evaluated in vitro against Giardia lamblia (G. lamblia), Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Entamoeba histolytica (E. histolytica). The potential mechanism of action determination was approached by in silico analysis on G. lamblia and T. vaginalis triosephosphate isomerase (GlTIM and TvTIM, respectively), and on E. histolytica thioredoxin reductase (EhTrxR). Enzyme inactivation assays were performed on recombinant GlTIM and EhTrxR. Compound T-167 showed the best giardicidal activity (IC50 = 25.53 nM) and the highest inactivation efficiency against GlTIM without significantly perturbing its human homolog. Compounds T-142 and T-143 showed the best amoebicidal (IC50 = 9.20 nM) and trichomonacidal (IC50 = 45.20 nM) activity, respectively. Additionally, T-143 had a high activity as giardicial (IC50 = 29.13 nM) and amoebicidal (IC50 = 15.14 nM), proposing it as a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent. Compounds T-145, and T-161 were the best EhTrxR inhibitors with IC50 of 16 µM, and 18 µM, respectively.
Keywords: Quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide; antiprotozoal activity; Giardia lamblia; Trichomonas vaginalis; Entamoeba histolytica
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Parasitic diseases, particularly those caused by protozoa, constitute a significant global health concern, impacting more than one billion individuals worldwide, with a pronounced prevalence among populations in low-income countries. Among these diseases, American trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, giardiasis, amoebiasis, and trichomoniasis are included1. While the first two bear a commonality in that they are classified as Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) and are commonly studied together, the last three are customarily grouped considering their carbohydrate metabolism and that they lack mitochondria2.
Giardiasis is one notable protozoan disease caused by Giardia lamblia (G. lamblia), responsible for approximately 280 million cases of diarrhoea annually in humans3–4. The symptoms of giardiasis encompass diarrhoea, abdominal bloating, cramps, malabsorption, and weight loss3,5. It has been associated with intestinal dysbiosis and the subsequent development of chronic post-infection inflammatory bowel syndrome6. The pharmacological treatment options for giardiasis involves nitroimidazoles (such as metronidazole, tinidazole, secnidazole, and ornidazole), benzimidazoles (albendazole, and mebendazole), nitazoxanide, furazolidone, quinacrine, chloroquine, and paromomycin. These treatments exhibit varying levels of effectiveness, ranging from 40% to 90%. However, these treatments are reported to have important side effects, including pancreatitis, diarrhoea, and even neuropathies7.
Trichomoniasis is the disease caused by Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), which is one of the two most common women’s sexually transmitted infection2. A total of 270 million cases of trichomoniasis are reported annually8. The current treatment for trichomoniasis is using nitroimidazoles such as metronidazole and tinidazole. However, these drugs have severe side effects, including gastritis, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, seizures, and difficulty breathing, often leading to treatment abandonment9, as well as the development of parasite resistance to these drugs10.
Amoebiasis is another relevant protozoan disease caused by Entamoeba histolytica (E. histolytica), the second leading cause of death by parasitic diseases, recording 40,000 to 100,000 deaths annually11. The infection by E. histolytica may result in amoebic colitis and hepatic abscesses, though in some cases the infection is asymptomatic9. Nitroimidazoles such as metronidazole, tinidazole, secnidazole, and ornidazole are the current treatment for amoebiasis; among these, metronidazole is the most common, for its availability and low cost, and secnidazole, and their use holds the same challenges already described.
In common, these parasitic diseases (giardiasis, amoebiasis, and trichomoniasis) share the use of metronidazole, as the first line of treatment2,8,12; however, failed treatment and parasite resistance have been reported13–15. Besides, this drug causes genotoxicity in human cells, mutagenicity in bacteria, and carcinogenicity in rodents9. Additionally, metronidazole has been related to potential carcinogenic, teratogenic, and embryogenic effects with long treatment use or high doses16. The long treatment use has been linked to peripheral neuropathy, convulsions, and cerebellar ataxia17. This data makes it relevant to develop new and improved treatments with higher efficacy and a lowered or null toxicity towards humans.
On the other hand, quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide (QNO) is a scaffold to develop new bactericidal, antimycobacterial, antitumoral, fungicidal, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant agents18–23. In particular, QNOs have trichomonacidal24, trypanocidal25,26, and leishmanicidal activity27,28. In the last decade, our research group has followed a systematic approach to determine the biological effect of the introduction of short-chain ester substitutions (methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and iso-propyl, and n-butyl and iso-butyl) at 7-position on the quinoxaline 1,4-N-oxide ring, resulting in a series of compounds (7EQNOs) that exhibit noteworthy trypanocidal and leishmanicidal effects achieving efficacy within the low micromolar range, with comparable or better activity than reference drugs29–32.
Similarly, comparable successes regarding giardicidal, trichomonacidal, and amoebicidal activities have been reported for methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and iso-propyl derivatives of esters of QNO, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values better than reference drug metronidazole20,33–35. These results emphasise their potential as broad-spectrum antiparasitic agents. In recent studies, the mode of action of QNOs revealed that these types of compounds act through the inhibition of important parasitic proteins, such as T. vaginalis triosephosphate isomerase (TvTIM), as it plays an important role in efficient energy production since it is part of the glycolytic pathway35, and E. histolytica thioredoxin reductase (EhTrxR) which is important for the redox homeostasis of the parasite34. Thus, these types of compounds may act selectively against parasitic cells and have low to null effects against human cells.
Considering the need for alternative, more effective giardicidal, trichomonacidal, and amoebicidal agents, and the favourable reported effect that QNO has for one-, two- and three-carbon esters at 7-position, in this study, the antiparasitic effect of extending to a four-carbon ester at 7-position in the newly synthesised n-butyl and iso-butyl esters of QNO was explored. The potential inhibitory effects that these derivatives may have on the drug targets, GlTIM and TvTIM, as well as on the EhTrxR, was analyzed through molecular docking studies. Finally, the inhibitory effects of some of the best derivatives on the enzyme activity of GlTIM and EhTrxR were evaluated.
Material and methods
N-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives
The n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives (T-137 to T-170) were synthesised using the Beirut reaction as described by Gomez-Caro et al. in 201136, and were structurally elucidated by NMR, FT-IR, and UPLC-MS analysis32.
Biological evaluation
G. lamblia WB strain, T. vaginalis GT3 strain, and E. histolytica strain HM1-IMSS were used in all experiments, all parasitic strains were obtained from the Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitarias, Hospital de Pediatría, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. In vitro susceptibility assays to determine IC50 values were performed using a method previously described37. For this, 4 × 104 G. lamblia; 6 × 103 E. histolytica, or 4 × 104 T. vaginalis trophozoites were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C with different concentrations of quinoxaline derivatives T-137 to T-170 (0.5 ng/mL to 10 μg/mL) using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.05%) as solvent. Metronidazole and albendazole were used as positive controls, and parasites in the medium without drugs containing DMSO (0.05%) were included as negative controls. At the end of the incubation period, trophozoites were washed and subcultured for another 48 h in a fresh medium without drugs. Then, trophozoites were counted with a haemocytometer and the IC50 was calculated by Probit analysis. Experiments were carried out in triplicate and repeated at least twice.
Cytotoxic evaluation
The murine macrophage cell line J774.2 was maintained in culture flasks with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, and 100 U/mL antibiotic-antifungal mixture (Gibco). Cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and humidity. Murine macrophage cell line J774.2 is maintained at Laboratorio de Estudios Epidemiológicos, Clínicos, Diseños Experimentales e Investigación, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca. Macrophages were washed and viability was assessed by the MTT colorimetric assay. In a 96-well microplate, 1 × 105 macrophages were added per well and a dose-response assay was performed. Compounds were evaluated using serial dilutions to determine half-maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) values in triplicate considering 0.2% DMSO as negative control.
Molecular docking analysis
A molecular docking analysis was conducted to evaluate the possible interaction of all n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives against three potential enzymatic targets: GlTIM, TvTIM, and EhTrxR. The ligand structures were drawn with Marvin Sketch 21.13, and energy was minimised with OpenBabel software, saved in pdb format. The protein receptor TIM from G. lamblia, was obtained from the AlphaFold database from the Uniprot access code P36186, which is the unmutated model of PDB:2DP3; TIM from T. vaginalis, and TrxR from E. histolytica structures were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), access codes PDB:3QSP and 4A5L, respectively. Water molecules, co-crystalised ligands, and ions were removed from the protein structures, and they were then energy minimised using the Yasara Energy Minimization Server before docking simulation, protein structures were analysed to confirm that minimization did not alter catalytic site residue orientation significantly, Supplementary Figures S1–S3 show overlapping structures. All docking simulations were performed with gnina software v1.0.338.
The TIM structures were 3D aligned using PyMol software, and molecular docking analysis for both was done on the catalytic site coordinate space (X= −8.704, Y = 31.659, and Z= −14.097) using 24 Å in each axis with 1 Å spacing in the Grid Box, additionally for GlTIM two other docking sites were explored, interface, and a site near Cys222 considering same Grid Box dimensions. For TrxR, a blind docking was carried out in SwissDock server, and the two highest populated clusters were considered for two docking sites encompassing redox-active site and NADPH-binding site (X= −8.26, Y= −19.502, and Z= −4.903, and X = 7.292, Y= −18.324, and Z= −11.892, respectively) using 24 Å in each axis with 1 Å spacing in the Grid Box. After to assess specificity towards parasitic TIM, molecular docking was conducted in human TIM (PDB: 4POC) considering the same conditions and docking space as parasitic proteins. The results were analysed considering the lowest binding free energy (BFE) for each protein–ligand complex, which were later analysed to determine the molecular interactions between protein and ligand utilising the Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler (PLIP) software39.
Inhibition of GlTIM and HsTIM enzyme activity
Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) pLys bacteria containing the plasmid pET3a-HisTEV with the gene coding for GlTIM wild type were grown in LB medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin and incubated at 37 °C40. When the cultures reached Abs600 = 0.8, they were induced to express the recombinant enzyme using 0.4 mM IPTG and incubated overnight at 30 °C with shaking at 180 rpm. After induction and growth, the bacteria were collected by centrifugation (6500 rpm, 15 min) and suspended in 40 mL of lysis buffer (pH 8.0) containing 50 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The bacterial suspension was disrupted by sonication and centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 1 h, at 4 °C. Protein purification was performed via IMAC using a Profinity Ni2+ charged resin previously equilibrated with lysis buffer. The soluble protein fraction was mixed with the equilibrated Ni2+ charged resin and incubated at room temperature with shaking for 30 min. Then, the column was washed with the same buffer (10 column volumes) to remove proteins without the His-tag sequence. The desired proteins were eluted with lysis buffer containing 200 mM imidazole and adjusted to pH 8.0. The purified protein was concentrated using Amicon ultrafiltration units. The purity of the enzymes was analysed via sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (16% SDS–PAGE gel) and stained with colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue. The enzyme concentration was spectrophotometrically determined (Spectrophotometer Cary 50, Varian Inc.) at 280 nm using the extinction coefficient ε280 = 26,600 M−1 cm−1.
Expression of human TIM (HsTIM) was performed by using the E. coli BL21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIL strain (Stratagene) containing the plasmid pET3a-HisTEV with the gene coding for HsTIM. Expression and purification steps were as above-mentioned for GlTIM. The enzyme concentration was spectrophotometrically determined (Spectrophotometer Cary 50, Varian Inc.) at 280 nm using the extinction coefficient ε280 = 33,460 M−1 cm−1.
For the inhibition assays, freshly purified recombinant GlTIM was incubated at 0.2 mg/mL for 2 h at 37 °C in the presence of 500 μM of each n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives. After incubation, the samples were diluted, and 5 ng/mL were taken to measure their enzymatic activity. Enzyme activity was spectrophotometrically measured (Spectrophotometer Cary 50, Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) by following DHAP synthesis with a coupled system that followed the oxidation of NADH at 340 nm41. Results are expressed as the percent activity versus each compound at 500 μM, with the enzyme activity without any drug set as 100%. Additionally, GlTIM and HsTIM (separately) were incubated at 0.2 mg/mL for 2 h at 37 °C in the presence of 5, 10, 50, 150, 250, 350, and 500 μM of the T-167 derivative. Results are expressed as the percent activity versus T-167 concentration. All results represent the arithmetic mean of at least four independent experiments.
Inhibition of EhTrxR
Recombinant E. histolytica thioredoxin reductase (EhTRXR) was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) as His-tag (N-terminal) recombinant proteins using pET28a vector, and it was purified using IMAC as previously described42. 5,5′-Dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) reductase activity was measured by monitoring the production of thionitrobenzoate at 405 nm in a reaction mixture comprising 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA, 300 µM NADPH, 5 mM DTNB, and 0.1 µM EhTRXR. Activity was calculated using the molar extinction coefficient at 405 nm of 13.6 mM−1cm− 1 and considering that 1 mol of NADPH yields 2 mol of thionitrobenzoate42. The enzyme assays were performed at 30 °C, in a final volume of 50 μL, and using a Multiskan Ascent one-channel vertical light path filter photometer (Thermo Electron Co.). All results represent the arithmetic mean of at three independent experiments.
Results and discussion
Twenty-eight n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives were synthesised through the Beirut reaction. All compounds were characterised by infra-red (IR), proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR), and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) for further biological evaluation (See Supplementary Material).
Biological activity
Table 1 summarises the IC50 values determined for n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline series against G. lamblia, T. vaginalis, and E. histolytica. Albendazole and metronidazole were used as reference drugs.
Table 1.
Antiparasitic activity (IC50) of n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives against G. lamblia, T. vaginalis, and E. histolytica.
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | R2 | R3 | R7 | G. lamblia (IC50 nM) |
T. vaginalis (IC50 nM) |
E. histolytica (IC50 nM) |
Cytotoxicity (Macrophages J774.2) (nM) |
| T-137 | -CH3 | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 77.01 ± 9.43 | 257.76 ± 6.29 | 83.3 ± 1.57 | 58390 ± 1125 |
| T-138 | -OCH3 | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 48.48 ± 1.50 | 88.29 ± 11.98 | 40.4 ± 4.49 | 46240 ± 3263 |
| T-139 | -OCH2CH3 | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 47.39 ± 5.75 | 103.41 ± 2.87 | 34.47 ± 7.18 | > 200000 |
| T-140 | -OC(CH3)3 | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 49.18 ± 2.66 | 101.03 ± 3.99 | 29.24 ± 2.66 | > 200000 |
| T-141 | -OCH2 C6H5 | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 70.70 ± 1.22 | 165.79 ± 6.10 | 40.22 ± 2.44 | >200000 |
| T-142 | -C6H5 | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 36.82 ± 0.66 | 81.54 ± 3.95 | 9.2 ± 1.32 | 17650 ± 2143 |
| T-143 | -HN-p-C6H4Cl | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 29.13 ± 5.83 | 45.20 ± 6.99 | 15.14 ± 2.33 | 50280 ± 2801 |
| T-144 | -NH-[2,4(CH3)2C6H3] | -CH3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 46.07 ± 1.18 | 118.15 ± 4.73 | 47.26 ± 4.73 | ND |
| T-145 | -CH3 | -CF3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 40.32 ± 6.72 | 107.50 ± 16.13 | 57.78 ± 6.72 | > 200000 |
| T-146 | -OCH2CH3 | -CF3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 26.11 ± 6.22 | 101.96 ± 2.49 | 64.66 ± 3.73 | > 200000 |
| T-148 | -C6H5 | -CF3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 39.16 ± 3.46 | 82.92 ± 8.06 | 16.12 ± 3.46 | 48370 ± 1648 |
| T-149 | -C4H3S | -CF3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 27.26 ± 2.27 | 97.71 ± 9.09 | 18.17 ± 2.27 | ND |
| T-150 | -C10H7 | -CF3 | CH3(CH2)3- | 51.64 ± 2.27 | 123.93 ± 2.27 | 36.14 ± 1.14 | > 200000 |
| T-151 | -NH-C6H5 | -C6H5 | CH3(CH2)3- | 113.74 ± 4.38 | 153.11 ± 3.28 | 65.62 ± 2.19 | 44140 ± 3454 |
| T-155 | -CH3 | -CH3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 157.17 ± 4.72 | 191.75 ± 6.29 | 58.16 ± 1.57 | 87220 ± 213 |
| T-156 | -OCH3 | -CH3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 95.77 ± 4.49 | 248.41 ± 5.99 | 59.85 ± 5.99 | ND |
| T-157 | -C6H5 | -CH3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 43.40 ± 1.32 | 152.57 ± 6.58 | 55.24 ± 5.26 | 34220 ± 3037 |
| T-158 | -NHC6H5 | -CH3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 62.00 ± 1.27 | 164.49 ± 10.13 | 37.96 ± 2.53 | > 200000 |
| T-159 | -NH-[2,4(CH3)2C6H3] | -CH3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 94.52 ± 3.54 | 105.15 ± 1.18 | 30.71 ± 5.91 | > 200000 |
| T-161 | -HN-p-C6H4Cl | -CH3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 120.01 ± 1.16 | 137.49 ± 3.50 | 29.13 ± 3.50 | ND |
| T-163 | -C6H5 | -CF3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 34.55 ± 2.30 | 100.20 ± 5.76 | 57.58 ± 2.30 | ND |
| T-164 | -C4H3S | -CF3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 106.80 ± 9.21 | 118.16 ± 10.53 | 27.26 ± 5.26 | 43850 ± 1890 |
| T-165 | -C4H3O | -CF3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 101.39 ± 2.36 | 124.97 ± 2.36 | 30.65 ± 2.36 | 81840 ± 3586 |
| T-166 | -C10H7 | -CF3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 41.31 ± 2.07 | 82.62 ± 4.13 | 50.6 ± 5.17 | ND |
| T-167 | -CH3 | -CF3 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 25.53 ± 1.34 | 90.03 ± 6.72 | 64.5 ± 5.38 | 25400 ± 81.5 |
| T-168 | -CH3 | -C6H5 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 39.45 ± 2.63 | 149.94 ± 14.47 | 49.98 ± 2.63 | 28530 ± 1687 |
| T-169 | -NHC6H5 | -C6H5 | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 98.43 ± 2.19 | 115.93 ± 5.47 | 43.74 ± 2.19 | > 200000 |
| T-170 | -CH3 | -NH-[2,4(CH3)2C6H3] | (CH3)2CHCH2- | 108.70 ± 3.55 | 129.96 ± 8.27 | 33.08 ± 2.36 | > 200000 |
| Albendazole | 48.99 ± 5.65 | 1827.844 ± 86.68 | 43981.31 ± 2468 | ||||
| Metronidazole | 1150.97 ± 40.90 | 210.3295 ± 8.76 | 251.2269 ± 5.48 | ||||
Giardicidal activity
Ten n-butyl derivatives (T-138, T-139, T-142-T-146, and T-148-T-150) had better giardicidal activity than reference drugs albendazole and metronidazole (IC50 values of 48.99, and 1150.97 nM, respectively). For n-butyl series, the effect of the aromatic ring size when comparing T-148, T-149, and T-150 suggests that steric effect at 2-position is an important factor, as two-member ring T-150 is the least active compound. From bio-isosteres phenyl and thienyl, the latter is most active suggesting that the addition of the sulphur atom favours biological activity. The introduction of an ester favours activity, as the change from ketone T-137 to ester T-138 leads to a 1.6-fold increase in activity, the length or size of the ester has a negligible effect, as T-138, T-139, and T-140 have almost identical IC50 values. On the other hand, the nature of the ester plays a more noteworthy role, as the change from an aliphatic ester to an aromatic ester (T-141) causes a 1.4-fold decrease in giardicidal activity. The introduction of substituted benzamides at 2-position favours activity, where chloro-substituted on the phenyl ring is more active than dimethyl-substituted. The introduction of trifluoromethyl group at 3-position leads to an increased giardicidal activity.
For iso-butyl series, like n-butyl series, bulkier aromatic rings led to a decreased giardicidal activity when comparing T-163, and T-166 (phenyl vs naphthyl) which is further emphasised by comparing with T-167 introducing a methyl group instead of a bulkier aromatic ring, being the most giardicidal compound. Unlike n-butyl, introducing heterocycles at 2-position leads to a 3.1-fold decrease going from phenyl to thienyl or furyl (T-163 vs. T-164 and T-165), and nearly identical IC50 values between the latter. Analysis of the benzamide substitution at 2-position shows that unsubstituted ring T-158 is more active than dimethyl and chloro-substituted derivatives T-159 and T-161. Introduction of a phenyl ring at 3-position going from T-158 to T-169 results in a 1.5-fold decrease in activity, suggesting a detrimental effect of multiple bulky groups at 2-, and 3-position. Isomers comparison only reflects minor giardicidal activity differences for T-157 vs. T-168, and T-159 vs. T-170, and the bulkier group position effect is mixed, in the former case the bulkier at 3-position slightly favours while the latter is the bulkier at 2-position, suggesting the importance of their presence not their position. Like for n-butyl series the introduction of a trifluoromethyl group at 3-position leads to an increased giardicidal activity.
It was observed that for 7-position substitution, most derivatives are favoured by n-butyl chain substitution (6 out of 9 compounds) with differences in giardicidal activity going from 1.2 to 4.1-fold higher activity; still, there are derivatives (3 out of 9 compounds) that are favoured by iso-butyl chain substitution, but these only show 1.1- to 1.6-fold higher activity.
In 2020, Barbosa et al. reported the giardicidal activity of methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and iso-propyl quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivative series with IC50 values 1.4–10930 nM33. There are 13 analogues between Barbosa’s study and the derivatives here reported, in eight of these compounds n-butyl and iso-butyl derivatives have a better giardicidal activity than all four previously reported series, for example, n-butyl, and iso-butyl derivatives T-137 and T-155 are 3- and 1.3-fold more active than its methyl analogue; n-butyl and iso-butyl derivatives with aliphatic esters at 2-position were ∼6–200-fold more active than their methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and iso-propyl analogues; n-, and iso-butyl derivatives T-142, and T-157 were ∼3–20-fold more active than their methyl, ethyl, and iso-propyl analogues. On the other hand, n-butyl derivative T-146 is 4-fold less active than its n-propyl, and iso-propyl derivatives; n-butyl and iso-butyl derivatives T-148, and T-163 are ∼6–10-fold less active than their methyl and iso-propyl analogues. Altogether, for the most part, the elongation of the chain at 7-position results in an increased giardicidal activity, still, there are few derivatives for which chain elongation results detrimental. A summary of the structure–activity relationship of the n-butyl and iso-butyl series is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Structure–activity relationship summary for giardicidal activity.
Cytotoxicity of a drug is not the only important characteristic to cope with the pathogenesis of G. lamblia. It is known that the attachment of the trophozoites to the microvillus border of the small intestine is a crucial step for causing disease. Therefore, we assayed three compounds that were among the more effective in giardicidal effect (T-143, T-146, and T-167) and a compound with low giardicidal effect (T-161) against the WB strain to analyse the concentration effect on the number of detached and surviving cells. These four compounds were highly effective against G. lamblia trophozoites; detachment and cytotoxicity took impact with concentrations as low as 25 µM after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C (Figure 2). The observed effect for T-143 and T-167 showed a first step of cell detachment followed by a pronounced fall of trophozoites viability (Figure 2(A,C), respectively). T-143 and T-146 had the highest cytotoxic effect on giardia trophozoites (Figure 2(A,B), respectively). Detachment of trophozoites in cultures incubated with T-146 or T-161 was undetectable, with their impact directly through cytotoxicity (Figure 2(B)).
Figure 2.
Effects of T-143 (A), T-146 (B), T-161 (C), and T-167 (D) on attachment and viability of G. lamblia trophozoites in increasing concentrations of the compounds.
GlTIM molecular docking analysis
To know the potential mechanism of action of n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives were evaluated by molecular docking based on two criteria: binding free energy (BFE) and protein-ligand interaction profile (PLIP) against triosephosphate isomerase of G. lamblia.
For triosephosphate isomerase from G. lamblia (GlTIM), three potential sites were considered relevant to determine the inhibitory potential: residues part of the catalytic dyad (GlTIM: K13, and H96) or nearby residues (GlTIM: C14, Q65 and E98) and residues near to C222; additionally, the human triosephosphate isomerase (HsTIM) was included to determinate a potential species-specific selectivity. The results are shown in Supplementary Table 1. BFE scores for the n-butyl and iso-butyl series at the active site range from −5.37 to −6.79 kcal/mol.
The presence of phenyl benzamides both substituted and unsubstituted at 2-position is the most common substituent in the quinoxaline derivatives scored with higher BFE values for GlTIM active site binding: T-143, T-144, and T-151 for n-butyl derivatives, and T-158, T-159, T-161, and T-169 for iso-butyl derivatives. Similarly, the presence of aromatic ring substitutions at 2- or 3-position favours BFE value: T-150, T-142, T-148, and T-149 for n-butyl series, and T-157, T-165, T-166, and T-168 (3-position) for iso-butyl series. Altogether, pointing towards the importance of aromatic substituents at 2- and 3-position. The most common interaction profiles involve catalytic dyad K13, additionally with residues C14, E98, G176, and G238, which are in the vicinity of the catalytic dyad and hold a potential that if blocked, the enzymatic activity may be hindered. From the n-butyl series T-143 (Figure 3(A)) (−6.43 kcal/mol, π-cation K13, H-bond E98), and T-150 (Figure 3(A)) (−6.78 kcal/mol, π-cation, and salt bridge K13, H-bond C14, and N15), while for the iso-butyl series T-159 (Figure 3(B)) (−6.79 kcal/mol, π-cation K13, H-bond C14, and E98) may be proposed with the most potential to behave as GlTIM inhibitors, having highest BFE and interactions blocking access to catalytic cavity may be proposed with the most potential to behave as GlTIM inhibitor.
Figure 3.
(A) Lead compounds structures for n-butyl series docked on GlTIM: T-143 (cyan), T-150 (pink). Interactions: yellow/underlined: catalytic residues, blue label: T-143 only, red label: T-150 only, green label: shared, black label: not interacting. (B) Lead compound structure (T-159) for iso-butyl series docked on GlTIM. Interactions: yellow/underlined: catalytic residues, blue label: interacting, black label: not interacting.
Figure 7.
Structure–activity relationship summary for trichomonacidal activity.
Exploration of alternative docking sites for GlTIM revealed that the interface may be proposed as a better binding site for quinoxaline derivatives than the active site, as the BFE scores are better for this site than the active. The tendencies observed for the active site hold true for this site as well, as benzamides and other aromatic substituents at 2-position favoured BFE score. Most of the interactions that these compounds hold is with residues Y68, R99, M103, E105, and Q109, which reside at the cavity entrance of the interface and in the near vicinity of the catalytic site, thus suggesting that these may act as gatekeepers, not by directly interacting with the catalytic residues but by blocking the access to the cavity. Moreover, such interactions established between these compounds and the mentioned aminoacyl residues can possibly perturb the association between the two GlTIM monomers, as reported for T. cruzi TIM43. T-150, and T-169 (Figure 4) show the best-predicted interaction on this site. The docking analysis near C222 (omeprazole derivatising residue)44,45 did not show any significant potential for any of the quinoxaline derivatives, as they are unlikely to form covalent bonds with C222; therefore, this inhibition may hardly occur in this study.
Figure 4.
The top two n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline derivatives bound at the GlTIM interface, blocking the access to the cavity: T-150 (cyan), and T-169 (magenta). Yellow/underlined: catalytic residues, blue residues are the most common interactions among quinoxaline derivatives.
Additional to the results observed for the top BFE scored compounds, it is noteworthy that the predicted interaction between T-167 and the active site of HsTIM did not show involvement of the important catalytic residue K13, thus being consistent with the behaviour observed in the in vitro assays, the docking pose is presented in Figure 5(A). While the docking for T-167 at the interface shows interactions between the ligand and both interface chains at the cavity entrance suggesting that this could be a stable binding pose that permits inhibition Figure 5(B).
Figure 5.
The predicted docking pose for T-167, the newly found GlTIM inhibitor, on the active site (A), and on the interface (B). Yellow residues at (A) panel represent the catalytic dyad.
GlTIM enzymatic evaluation
We were able to perform enzyme inhibition assays on the recombinant GlTIM for the most promising in silico (T-143), and the most giardicidal derivatives (T-146, and T-167), and low giardicidal agent and moderate in silico potential (T-161). One of the highest antigiardial concentrations (500 µM) of T-143, T-146, T-161, and T-167 was tested through enzyme inhibition assays on the recombinant GlTIM (Figure 6(A)). As shown, T-167 was the most effective of these four compounds in inhibiting GlTIM (99.7%), whereas T-143, T-146, and T-161 only inhibited GlTIM in 43.7%, 37.3%, and 19.7%, respectively. Based on these enzyme inhibition results, we analysed the effects of T-167 in ranging concentrations against GlTIM and HsTIM (Figure 6(B)). As low as 10 µM concentration of T-167 inhibited GlTIM enzyme activity above 20%, whereas HsTIM was unaffected.
Figure 6.
In vitro enzyme inhibition effects of T-143, T-146, T-161, and T-167 on GlTIM. (A) High concentration of these compounds shows the highest inhibitory efficiency to GlTIM of T-167 when compared with T-143, T-146, and T-161. (B) Kinetics of the inhibitory effects of T-167 demonstrates its species-specific action.
Kinetics of the enzyme inhibition seems to indicate a three-step mechanism in which low concentrations of T-167 (<10 to 50 µM) decrease enzyme activity of GlTIM above 70% with almost no HsTIM affectation as opposed to known inhibitor omeprazole which attains 70% inhibition at about 300 µM44. In the second phase of GlTIM inhibition, it maintains a residual activity of ∼25% in a range of 50 to 350 µM concentrations of T-167. During this “stationary phase” of the inhibition process of GlTIM, the HsTIM is minimally affected by losing no more than 10% of its activity. After this, GlTIM activity is drastically and wholly inhibited by 500 µM, as opposed to omeprazole causing similar effect by 750 µM44. Significantly, when GlTIM activity is completely depleted, the HsTIM retains more than 75% of its activity.
Integrating in silico predictions and in vitro observations, we may argue that although, T-167, was “lower” ranked in the predicted GlTIM inhibition through interactions with its active site (-6.14 kcal/mol), it shows a high efficiency as a new molecule with exceptional giardicidal effects (IC50 25.53 nM), and a potent GlTIM inhibitory activity. The predicted interactions can be further discussed, in addition to interacting with the catalytic residue K13, T-167 interacts with the key amino acid residues S216 and G176 of GlTIM, which play important roles in the conformational switch from open to closed of the flexible loop 6. S216 belongs to the highly conserved YGGS motif (residues 213–216 in loop 7) that interacts with loop 6 (residues 171–181) when the catalytic lid is in the closed conformation46,47. In GlTIM, there is an H-bond between Nδ2 of N221 and the peptide oxygen atom of S216, which also is H-bonded with S174 and G178. Molecular dynamics assays previously proposed that the affectation at this region directly impacts the enzyme activity of GlTIM by impairing the hinge of the catalytic lid48.
Besides, T-167 interacts with N15 residue, which has been pointed out in other TIMs as an inductor of critical structural changes in the interface (leading to loss of enzyme activity) when a negative charge is introduced at that position40. Moreover, T-167 interacts with E105, which is contained in a conserved cluster of residues formed by N65, D77, R98, E104 (equivalent to E105 in GlTIM), and K112 between the two subunits of TIMs. In this cluster, the two subunits are oriented face to face with ∼10Å distance between residues 105 of the two subunits. E105 is essential because its affectation can disrupt contacts of the amino acid side chains in the conserved cluster. This leads to a perturbation of the water network in which the water–protein and water–water interactions that join the two subunits are significantly weakened and diminished49.
Trichomonacidal activity
For n-butyl series, the effect of the aromatic ring size when comparing T-148, T-149, and T-150 suggests that steric effect at 2-position is an important factor, as two-member ring T-150 is the least active compound. The bio-isostere effect observed for trichomonacidal activity favours phenyl over thienyl at 2-position, suggesting sulphur atom addition results detrimental to trichomonacidal activity. The introduction of an ester at 2-position favours activity, as the change from ketone T-137 to ester T-138 leads to a nearly 3-fold increase in activity, the size of ester has only a minor effect, as small-size ester T-138 has an IC50 of 88 nM, and mid-size T-139, T-140, and T-146 have IC50 values around 100 nM, the change from an aliphatic ester to aromatic ester results in almost a 2-fold decrease in trichomonacidal activity. The introduction of substituted benzamides at 2-position favours trichomonacidal activity, where chloro-substituted on the phenyl ring T-142 is the most active trichomonacidal agent from both series is 2.6-fold more active than dimethyl substituted T-144. The introduction of a trifluoromethyl at 3-position leads to a 2.4-fold increased trichomonacidal activity for T-137 vs. T-145 and a nearly negligible effect for T-142 vs. T-148, and T-139 vs. T-146.
For iso-butyl series, unlike n-butyl series, bulkier aromatic rings led to an increased trichomonacidal activity when comparing T-163, and T-166 (phenyl vs naphthyl). Like n-butyl, the introduction of heterocycles at 2-position resulted in a slightly decreased trichomonacidal activity ∼1.2-fold decrease going from phenyl to thienyl or furyl (T-163 vs T-164 and T-165). Change from oxygen to sulphur atom for T-164 and T-165 has a negligible effect as these derivatives have nearly identical IC50 values. Introduction of substituted benzamide favours trichomonacidal activity, where dimethyl substituted on the phenyl ring is 1.3-fold more active than chloro- substituted, unsubstituted benzamide is least active. Introduction of a phenyl ring at 3-position going from T-158 to T-169 results in a 1.4-fold increase in activity, suggesting a favourable effect of multiple bulky groups at 2-, and 3-position. Isomers comparison reflects minor trichomonacidal activity differences for T-157 vs. T-168, and T-159 vs. T-170, and the bulkier group position effect is mixed, in the former case the bulkier at 3-position slightly favours while the latter is the bulkier at 2-position, suggesting the importance of their presence not their position. The introduction of trifluoromethyl at 3-position leads to an increased trichomonacidal activity.
It was observed that most derivatives (5 out of 9 compounds) are favoured by n-butyl chain substitution at 7-position with differences in trichomonacidal activity going from 1.2 to 3-fold higher activity; still, there are derivatives (4 out of 9 compounds) that are favoured by iso-butyl chain substitution, but these only show 1.1- to 1.5-fold higher activity. A similar biological behaviour was observed for G. lamblia.
The biological activity reported for each of the n-butyl and iso-butyl ester quinoxaline derivatives have better antiprotozoal effect (IC50 values ranging from 47–257 nM) than the methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and iso-propyl ester quinoxaline derivatives previously reported by Palos et al. (2021) (IC50 values ∼1000–10000 nM). Our quinoxaline derivatives were one to two orders of magnitude more effective, indicating that the elongation of the ester chain drastically favoured trichomonacidal activity. Palos et al. (2021) also reported clear improved trichomonacidal activity for compounds bearing trifluoromethyl at 3-position, however, for n-butyl and iso-butyl derivatives in most cases introduction of trifluoromethyl results in a slight decrease in activity. Regarding 2-position, in the current study, most compounds were benefitted from aromatic substitutions regarding their trichomonacidal activity, meanwhile, in Palos et al.’s study esters and alkyl chains substitutions also favour the antiparasitic activity35. A summary of the structure-activity relationship of the n-butyl and iso-butyl series is presented in Figure 7.
TvTIM molecular docking analysis
To predict potential mechanism of action of n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives were evaluated by molecular docking based against triosephosphate isomerase of T. vaginalis.
For TvTIM one potential active site was considered to determine the inhibitory potential: residues part of the catalytic dyad (TvTIM: K11, and H94) and nearby residues (TvTIM: A12, E63, and E96); additionally, the HsTIM was included to determinate a potential selectivity. The results are shown in Supplementary Table 2. BFE scores for the n-butyl and iso-butyl series range from −6.07 to −8.68 kcal/mol, all compounds except T-137, T-138, T-139, T-155, and T-156 have a binding energy better than reported TIM inhibitor EQX-2035.
The presence of aromatic ring substitutions at 2-position T-142, T-148, and T-150 for n-butyl series, and T-157, T-163, T-166, and T-168 (3-position) for iso-butyl series. Similarly, the presence of phenyl benzamides both substituted and unsubstituted T-143, T-144, and T-151 for n-butyl, and T-158, T-161, and T-169 for iso-butyl. Altogether, pointing towards the importance of aromatic substituents at 2- and 3-position.
Twelve from the fourteen n-butyl derivatives bear an interaction with at least one residue from the catalytic dyad, while T-148 (Figure 8) bears interaction with both residues from the dyad, thus suggesting that this is the most promising derivative among the n-butyl series to act as a TvTIM inhibitor. Additionally, T-148 has a high trichomonacidal activity suggesting that its mode of action may be related to TvTIM inhibition.
Figure 8.
Lead compound structure for n-butyl series docked on TvTIM and control EQX-20: T-148 (cyan), EQX-20 (white). Interactions: yellow/underlined: catalytic residues, blue label: T-148 only, red label: EQX-20 only, green label: shared.
In the case of the iso-butyl series, eleven of the fourteen derivatives bear interaction with at least one residue from the catalytic dyad, and seven of these eleven derivatives hold hydrophobic interactions with both residues from dyad K11 and H94: T-158, T-161, T-164, T-165, T-168, and T-169, these last two being the most promising TvTIM inhibitors. All other interactions near the catalytic dyad occur with Ala12, Glu63, and Glu96, all of which are residues oriented towards the dyad (Figure 9). Notably, all compounds had a better BFE score towards parasitic than human protein, thus suggesting their good trichomonicidal activity may be related to their potential to behave as moderate to high selective inhibitors of TvTIM.
Figure 9.
Lead compounds structures for iso-butyl series docked on TvTIM and control EQX-20: T-168 (cyan), T-169 (pink), EQX-20 (white). Interactions: yellow/underlined: catalytic residues, blue label: T-168 only, red label: T-169 only, green label: shared, black label: not interacting (EQX-20 all interact except catalytic residues).
Amoebicidal activity
For n-butyl series, the effect of the aromatic ring size when comparing T-148, T-149, and T-150 suggests that steric effect at 2-position is an important factor, as two-member ring T-150 is the least active compound. Phenyl and thienyl at 2-position function as true bio-isosteres, as they have nearly identical amoebicidal activity. The introduction of an ester favours activity, ester length plays only a minor role, as mid-size esters T-139, and T-140 have IC50 values around 30 nM, while small ester T-138 and bulkier T-141 have IC50 values around 40 nM. On the other hand, the nature of the ester plays a negligible role, as the change from an aliphatic ester to an aromatic ester (T-141) causes nearly no change in amoebicidal activity. The introduction of substituted benzamides at 2-position favours activity, where chloro-substituted on phenyl ring is ∼3-fold more active than dimethyl-substituted. The introduction of a trifluoromethyl at 3-position leads to a 1.75- and 1.88-fold decrease in amoebicidal activity for T-142 vs. T-148 and T-139 vs. T-146 respectively, while a 1.4-fold increase for T-137 vs. T-145.
For iso-butyl series, unlike n-butyl series, bulkier aromatic rings led to an increased amoebicidal activity when comparing T-163, and T-166 (phenyl vs. naphthyl). The introduction of heterocycles at 2-position resulted in an increased amoebicidal activity ∼2-fold increase going from phenyl to thienyl or furyl (T-163 vs. T-164 and T-165). Change from oxygen to sulphur atom for T-164 and T-165 has a negligible effect as these derivatives have nearly identical IC50 values. Introduction of benzamide at 2-position favours amoebicidal activity, where dimethyl and chloro- substituted on the phenyl ring have nearly identical IC50 values around 30 nM, while unsubstituted benzamides are least active around 40 nM. Introduction of a phenyl ring at 3-position going from T-158 to T-169 results in a 1.16-fold decrease in activity, suggesting a minor detrimental effect of multiple bulky groups at 2-, and 3-position. Isomers comparison reflects minor amoebicidal activity differences for T-157 vs. T-168, and T-159 vs. T-170, and the bulkier group position effect is mixed, in the former case the bulkier at 3-position slightly favours while the latter is the bulkier at 2-position, suggesting the importance of their presence not their position. The introduction of a trifluoromethyl group at 3-position leads to a slight decrease in amoebicidal activity. Still, there are derivatives which bear a trifluoromethyl group at 3-position which have an important amoebicidal activity.
Most derivatives (7 out of 9 compounds) are favoured by n-butyl chain substitution at 7-position with differences in amoebicidal activity going from 1.1 to 5.5-fold higher activity; still, there are derivatives (2 out of 9 compounds) that are favoured by iso-butyl chain substitution, but these only show 1.5-fold higher activity. A similar biological behaviour was observed against G. lamblia, and T. vaginalis.
Two previous studies using esters of methyl and ethyl20, and n-propyl and iso-propyl34 quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives have been reported. All compounds reported in these two previous studies show a lower amoebicidal activity (IC50 ∼300–2000 nM) than n-butyl and iso-butyl derivatives reported in the present study (IC50 9–83 nM), thus suggesting that the chain elongation at 7-position enhance the biological activity. The findings in Duque-Montaño and Soto-Sanchez’s studies contrast with this study, as in this study trifluoromethyl group at 3-position slightly lowers activity. Earlier investigations revealed that aromatic rings, aliphatic chains, and esters substitutions 2-position favoured amoebicidal activity, which coincides with our findings that aromatic rings and esters favour amoebicidal activity. A summary of the structure–activity relationship of the n-butyl and iso-butyl series is presented in Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Structure–activity relationship summary for amoebicidal activity.
EhTrxR molecular docking analysis
To know the potential mechanism of action of n-butyl and iso-butyl quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives were evaluated by molecular docking against thioredoxin reductase of E. histolytica.
In the case of thioredoxin reductase from E. histolytica (EhTrxR) two potential active sites were considered as relevant to determine the inhibitory potential: the residues that naturally interact with the NADPH binding site (K122, G160, A163, H182, R183, and R291) and redox active site (C140, C143), which have a slight overlap, such finding agreed to the sites predicted by Soto-Sánchez et al. (2020) using MOE software34. The results obtained are shown in Supplementary Table 3. BFE scores for the n-butyl and iso-butyl series range from −6.46 to −8.63 kcal/mol at the NADPH site, all having a higher affinity than metronidazole (−4.76 kcal/mol) and −6.15 to −8.4 kcal/mol for active site. The interaction profile observed for the different derivatives shows that interactions with NADPH binding residues are the most commonly present, while interactions with catalytic residue C140 rarely appears, and with C143 does not occur.
The presence of phenyl benzamides both substituted and unsubstituted at 2-position is the most common substituent in the quinoxaline derivatives scored with higher BFE values for EhTrxR active site binding: T-143, T-144, and T-151 for n-butyl derivatives, and T-158, T-159, T-161 at 2-position, and T-170 at 3-position for iso-butyl derivatives. Similarly, the presence of aromatic ring substitutions at 2- or 3-position favours BFE value: T-150, T-142, T-148, and T-149 for n-butyl series, and T-157, T-163, T-165, T-166, and T-168 (3-position) for iso-butyl series. Altogether, pointing towards the importance of aromatic substituents at 2- and 3-position. These same characteristics are preserved for the active site docking, where these same compounds are scored top suggesting that these substituents at 2- and 3-position favour EhTrxR inhibition at two different docking sites.
For the n-butyl series, of the 14 derivatives, 11 bear at least two polar (H-bond, salt bridge, or π-cation) interactions with the residues that bind NADPH to EhTrxR (K122, G160, A163, H182, R183, and R291) all five from the top-scored fulfilled this criterion: T-141, T-143, T-144, T-150, and T-151. The benzamide-substituted T-143, T-144, and T-151 orientation on the binding pocket suggests that the amide geometry favours this binding (Figure 11), thus suggesting their potential as EhTrxR inhibitors. The docking centre on the active site resulted in all compounds bound to a nearby cavity but without interactions with the catalytic triad, thus suggesting that the quinoxaline derivatives do not behave as inhibitors at the disulphide active site (C140, and C143).
Figure 11.
Compounds from the n-butyl series bearing benzamide substituents docked on the NADPH site of EhTrxR and docked pose for metronidazole (right), (residues displayed bind NADPH to EhTrxR).
For the iso-butyl series, of the fourteen derivatives, ten bear at least two polar (H-bond, salt bridge, or π-cation) interactions with the residues that bind NADPH to EhTrxR. Interestingly, T-158, T159, and T161 are three of the top-scored that bear interactions with three residues that bind NADPH. After considering both criterion BFE and PLIP, it is suggested that T-159 has the highest potential to behave as EhTrxR, with a BFE of −8.63 kcal/mol and three interactions with residues that bind NADPH (Figure 12), and as a second potential derivative from this series is T-161 with BFE −7.84 kcal/mol and three polar interactions with NADPH-binding residues. Derivative T-161 was shown in vitro that it holds an inhibitory activity against EhTrxR.
Figure 12.
The most promising compound T-159 (magenta) docked on the NADPH site of EhTrxR, and control metronidazole (white), (orange: NADPH binding residues, underlined: interacting residues).
EhTrxR enzymatic evaluation
We evaluated the putative inhibitory effect of quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives on disulphide reductase activity of recombinant EhTrxR using DTNB as direct disulphide substrate. The compounds were evaluated through enzyme inhibition assays on the recombinant EhTrxR (Figure 13(A)) at concentration of 100 µM. As shown, the compounds T-140, T-142, T-143, T-146, T-148, T-149, T-155, T-157, T-163, and T-169 exhibited an inhibitory effect between 50 to 75%. In addition, the compounds T-145, and T-161 presented an inhibitory effect higher than 75%. The assays showed that the compounds T-145, and T-161 were the best inhibitors, with IC50 values of 16 ± 1 µM, and 18 ± 3 µM, respectively (Figure 13(B)).
Figure 13.
Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives on EhTrxR activity. (A) Inhibition of disulphide reductase activity; assays were performed at 30 °C and pH 7.0 in the presence of 5 mM DTNB, 300 µM NADPH, 0.1 µM EhTRXR, in the absence or in the presence of 100 μM of the respective compound. The activities were normalised to measurements performed in the absence of the compounds. (B) EhTRXR disulphide reductase activity inhibition profiles at different concentrations of T-145, or T-161. The activities were normalised to measurements performed in the absence of the compounds. All results are displayed as mean ± standard error of three independent experiments.
The activity observed for both inhibitors T-145, and T-161, shows IC50 values of 16, and 18 µM respectively, as opposed to T-116 reported by Sóto-Sánchez et al. in 2020 which showed an inhibition of 28 µM34, thus proposing them as better inhibitors that these previous findings. Substitutions at 7-position show that the change from a 3-carbon alkyl of T-116 chain to 4-carbon of T-145, and T-161 favours EhTrxR inhibition, similarly it may be observed that trifluoromethyl substitution is present at 3-position in both T-116, and T-145 suggesting a potential benefit of including such substituent. While T-116 bears an ethyl ester at 2-position, T-145 bears an acetyl group, and T-161 bears a 4-chlorobenzamide (Figure 14), not a clear tendency as to type of substitution is most favourable, instead suggesting that not a single functional group is responsible for the inhibition. Additionally, putting the in silico predicted behaviour and observed inhibition it is possible to propose that T-145, and T-161 may act as inhibitors at the NADPH binding site, as they are predicted to interact with residues important for the binding of the natural dinucleotide ligand Ala163, and Arg183.
Figure 14.
Structures for previously reported EhTrxR inhibitor T-116, and newly found EhTrxR inhibitors T-145, and T-161.
Cytotoxic activity
The compounds were measured their cytotoxic activity against macrophages J774.2, where they ranged from 17650 to over 200000 nM (Table 1), thus showing selectivity index values ranging from 190 to 7660-fold more active against parasites over macrophages. The selectivity indices for the most active compounds T-142 (1918-fold more active E. histolytica versus macrophages), T-143 (1726-, 1112-, and 3321-fold more active for G. lamblia, T. vaginalis, and E. histolytica versus macrophages respectively), and T-167 (994-fold more active against G. lamblia versus macrophages). Additional to the selectivity of the most active compounds it was observed that all tested quinoxalines showed selectivity over 102-fold more activity against parasites over mammalian macrophages, thus presenting these series of compounds as potentially safe candidates for further studies.
Conclusions
In this study, n-butyl, and iso-butyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives were tested as new giardicidal, amoebicidal, and trichomonacidal agents. Five compounds (T-143, T-146, T-149, T-155, and T-167) had better giardicidal activity (IC50 < 30 nM), and five compounds (T-138, T-142, T-143, T-148, and T-167) had better trichomonacidal activity (IC50 < 90 nM) that reference drugs, albendazole, and metronidazole. Both biological activity effects are favoured by the presence of aliphatic esters at 2-position, and trifluoromethyl group at 3-position on the quinoxaline ring. Additionally, compounds with better amoebicidal activity than reference drugs were T-142, T-143, T-148, and T-149. Interestingly, compound T-143 is highlighted as the best broad-spectrum activity. This biological effect is favoured by the presence of aromatic ketones and substituted amides at 2-position.
The predicted GlTIM inhibition quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives on the active site was favoured by the presence of aromatic rings at 2- or 3- position, either as ketones, benzamides, or esters, permitting important BFE values and interactions with catalytic residue: K13, and neighbouring residues E98, G176. Interestingly, in vitro enzyme inhibition assays demonstrated that compound T-167 is a potent and specific GlTIM inhibitor that wholly inactivates parasitic protein, while leaving over 75% of human TIM activity unhindered. Although, others pharmacological targets for T-167 in G. lamblia cannot be discarded, our results strongly support that its giardicidal effects could be understood through the inhibition of GlTIM.
The predicted TvTIM inhibition was favoured, like GlTIM, by the presence of aromatic rings at 2- or 3- position, either as ketones, benzamides, or esters, permitting better BFE values than reported inhibitor EQX20 (-6.46 kcal/mol), and interactions with catalytic residues: K11, and H94, and neighbouring residues E63, and E96. The highest potential for TvTIM inhibition was observed for T-148 (-7.44 kcal/mol), T-168 (-7.94 kcal/mol), and T-169 (-7.41 kcal/mol). Therefore, the moderate trichomonacidal activity of T-148 may be proposed because of the inhibition of TvTIM.
The predicted EhTrxR inhibition potential was favoured by the presence of aromatic rings and benzamides at 2- or 3-position, permitting interactions with G160, A163, and R183, which are residues that participate in the NADPH natural binding, displaying T-159 the best inhibitory potential, although, in in vitro studies had a low inhibition. Compounds T-145, and T-161 were the best EhTrxR inhibitors with IC50 of 16 ± 1 µM, and 18 ± 3 µM, respectively. Therefore, it’s necessary to continue exploring the potential binding site for these derivatives.
Finally, these results support the use of esters of quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives to develop new specific inhibitors of GlTIM and EhTrxR as potent giardicidal and amoebicidal agents, respectively. Although, more studies are necessary to know the specific binding site on the pharmacological targets.
Contributions statement
Conceptualisation, G.R. and A.G.G.; methodology, A.G.G., O.S.S., L.Y.M., G.L.V., J.I.M.M., T.D.M., L.K.V.J., S.P.G., L.C.R., D.G.A., A.M.R., A.D.P.G., and E.O.P.; computational studies data interpretation and analysis, A.G., T.D.M., L.K.V.J.; validation, G.R., and A.G.; formal analysis, A.G.G., and G.R.; investigation, A.G.G., O.S.S.; resources, G.R.; data curation, L.Y.M., G.L.V., D.G.A., and G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.G., and G.R.; writing—review and editing, A.G,G., O.S.S., T.D.M., L.K.V.J., L.Y.M., G.L.V., D.G.A., A.M.R., and G.R.; visualisation, A.G.G., and G.R.; supervision, G.R., L.Y.M., G.L.V., D.G.A., and A.M.R.; project administration, G.R.; funding acquisition, G.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement
The financial support was obtained from Secretaria de Investigacion y Posgrado from Instituto Politecnico Nacional, grant number: SIP-20230935 and SIP-20240460. Additionally, this research was partially funded by Programa de Recursos Fiscales para Investigación from Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, grant number 2019/062.
Ethical statement
This study was except of ethical approval by Comite de Etica en Investigacion del Instituto Nacional de Pediatria (CONBIOETICA-09-CEI-025–20161215) as it did not involve human subjects and/or the harming of any animal, and all procedures followed standard methodologies to use laboratory-cultured parasite cells.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
The data that support this study can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.Soto‐Sánchez J, Ospina‐Villa JD.. Current status of quinoxaline and quinoxaline 1,4‐di‐ N ‐oxides derivatives as potential antiparasitic agents. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2021;98(4):683–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cano PA, Islas-Jácome A, González-Marrero J, Yépez-Mulia L, Calzada F, Gámez-Montaño R.. Synthesis of 3-tetrazolylmethyl-4H-chromen-4-ones via Ugi-azide and biological evaluation against Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia and Trichomona vaginalis. Bioorg Med Chem. 2014;22(4):1370–1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Einarsson E, Ma’ayeh S, Svärd SG.. An up-date on Giardia and giardiasis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;34:47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Escrig JI, Miyamoto Y, Delgado Aznar A, Eckmann L, Debnath A.. Antigiardial and antiamebic activities of fexinidazole and its metabolites: new drug leads for giardiasis and amebiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68(1):e0073123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Duplessis CA, Gutierrez RL, Porter CK.. Review: chronic and persistent diarrhea with a focus in the returning traveler. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2017;3(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Beatty JK, Akierman SV, Motta JP, Muise S, Workentine ML, Harrison JJ, Bhargava A, Beck PL, Rioux KP, McKnight GW, et al. Giardia duodenalis induces pathogenic dysbiosis of human intestinal microbiota biofilms. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47(6):311–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mørch K, Hanevik K.. Giardiasis treatment: an update with a focus on refractory disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2020;33(5):355–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Benítez-Cardoza CG, Brieba LG, Arroyo R, Rojo-Domínguez A, Vique-Sánchez JL.. Triosephosphate isomerase as a therapeutic target against trichomoniasis. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2021;246:111413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carrero JC, Reyes-López M, Serrano-Luna J, Shibayama M, Unzueta J, León-Sicairos N, de la Garza M.. Intestinal amoebiasis: 160 years of its first detection and still remains as a health problem in developing countries. Int J Med Microbiol. 2020;310(1):151358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Graves KJ, Reily C, Tiwari HK, Srinivasasainagendra V, Secor WE, Novak J, Muzny CA.. Identification of trichomonas vaginalis 5-nitroimidazole resistance targets. Pathogens. 2023;12:652–663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roy M, Chakraborty S, Srivastava SK, Kaushik S, Jyoti A, Srivastava VK.. Entamoeba histolytica induced NETosis and the dual role of NETs in amoebiasis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;118:110100–110112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lalle M, Hanevik K.. Treatment-refractory giardiasis: challenges and solutions. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;volume 11:1921–1933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Muñoz Gutiérrez J, Aldasoro E, Requena A, Comin AM, Pinazo MJ, Bardají A, Oliveira I, Valls ME, Gascon J.. Refractory giardiasis in Spanish travellers. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2013;11(2):126–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nabarro LEB, Lever RA, Armstrong M, Chiodini PL.. Increased incidence of nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London: 2008–2013. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(8):791–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Graves KJ, Novak J, Secor WE, Kissinger PJ, Schwebke JR, Muzny CA.. A systematic review of the literature on mechanisms of 5-nitroimidazole resistance in Trichomonas vaginalis. Parasitology. 2020;147(13):1383–1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Upcroft P, Upcroft JA.. Drug targets and mechanisms of resistance in the anaerobic protozoa. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(1):150–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Srikanth B, Lakshmi G, Hari A.. Metronidazole induced cerebellar ataxia. Indian J Pharmacol. 2013;45(3):295–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carta A, Corona P, Loriga M.. Quinoxaline 1,4-dioxide: a versatile scaffold endowed with manifold activities. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(19):2259–2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burguete A, Pontiki E, Hadjipavlou‐Litina D, Ancizu S, Villar R, Solano B, Moreno E, Torres E, Pérez S, Aldana I, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new quinoxaline derivatives as antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory agents. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;77(4):255–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Duque-Montaño BE, Gómez-Caro LC, Sanchez-Sanchez M, Monge A, Hernandez-Baltazar E, Rivera G, Torres-Angeles O.. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of new ethyl and methyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide against Entamoeba histolytica. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21(15):4550–4558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vieira M, Pinheiro C, Fernandes R, Noronha JP, Prudêncio C.. Antimicrobial activity of quinoxaline 1,4-dioxide with 2- and 3-substituted derivatives. Microbiol Res. 2014;169(4):287–293. no [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheng G, Sa W, Cao C, Guo L, Hao H, Liu Z, Wang X, Yuan Z.. Quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxides: biological activities and mechanisms of actions. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rivera G, Ahmad Shah SS, Arrieta-Baez D, Palos I, Mongue A, Sánchez-Torres LE.. Esters of quinoxaline 1′4-di-N-oxide with cytotoxic activity on tumor cell lines based on NCI-60 panel. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16(3):953–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carta A, Loriga M, Paglietti G, Mattana A, Fiori PL, Mollicotti P, Sechi L, Zanetti S.. Synthesis, anti-mycobacterial, anti-trichomonas and anti-candida in vitro activities of 2-substituted-6,7-difluoro-3-methylquinoxaline 1,4-dioxides. Eur J Med Chem. 2004;39(2):195–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Benitez D, Cabrera M, Hernández P, Boiani L, Lavaggi ML, Di Maio R, Yaluff G, Serna E, Torres S, Ferreira ME, et al. 3-Trifluoromethylquinoxaline N, N ′-dioxides as anti-trypanosomatid agents. identification of optimal anti-T. cruzi agents and mechanism of action studies. J Med Chem. 2011;54(10):3624–3636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Torres E, Moreno-Viguri E, Galiano S, Devarapally G, Crawford PW, Azqueta A, Arbillaga L, Varela J, Birriel E, Di Maio R, et al. Novel quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives as new potential antichagasic agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;66:324–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Estevez Y, Quiliano M, Burguete A, Cabanillas B, Zimic M, Málaga E, Verástegui M, Pérez-Silanes S, Aldana I, Monge A, et al. Trypanocidal properties, structure–activity relationship and computational studies of quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives. no. Exp Parasitol. 2011;127(4):745–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barea C, Pabón A, Pérez-Silanes S, Galiano S, Gonzalez G, Monge A, Deharo E, Aldana I.. New amide derivatives of quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide with leishmanicidal and antiplasmodial activities. no. Molecules. 2013;18(4):4718–4727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Villalobos-Rocha JC, Sánchez-Torres L, Nogueda-Torres B, Segura-Cabrera A, García-Pérez CA, Bocanegra-García V, Palos I, Monge A, Rivera G.. Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi and anti-leishmanial activity by quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(6):2027–2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chacón-Vargas KF, Andrade-Ochoa S, Nogueda-Torres B, Juárez-Ramírez DC, Lara-Ramírez EE, Mondragón-Flores R, Monge A, Rivera G, Sánchez-Torres LE.. Isopropyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives induce regulated necrosis-like cell death on Leishmania (Leishmania) mexicana. no. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(1):45–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chacón-Vargas KF, Nogueda-Torres B, Sánchez-Torres LE, Suarez-Contreras E, Villalobos-Rocha JC, Torres-Martínez Y, Lara-Ramírez EE, Fiorani G, Krauth-Siegel RL, Bolognesi ML, et al. Trypanocidal activity of quinoxaline 1,4 di-N-oxide derivatives as trypanothione reductase inhibitors. Molecules. 2017;22(2):220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.González-González A, Sánchez- Sánchez O, Krauth-Siegel RL, Bolognesi ML, Gómez-Escobedo R, Nogueda-Torres B, Vázquez-Jiménez LK, Saavedra E, Encalada R, Espinoza-Hicks JC, et al. In vitro and in silico analysis of new n-butyl and isobutyl quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives against Trypanosoma cruzi as trypanothione reductase inhibitors. no. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barbosa-Cabrera E, Moo-Puc R, Monge A, Paz-González AD, Bocanegra-García V, Rivera G.. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide against Giardia lamblia. LDDD. 2020;17(4):428–433. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soto-Sánchez J, Caro-Gómez LA, Paz-González AD, Marchat LA, Rivera G, Moo-Puc R, Arias DG, Ramírez-Moreno E.. Biological activity of esters of quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1,4-di-N-oxide against E. histolytica and their analysis as potential thioredoxin reductase inhibitors. no. Parasitol Res. 2020;119(2):695–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Palos I, Moo-Puc R, Vique-Sánchez JL, Benítez-Cardoza CG, Monge A, Villalobos-Rocha JC, Paz-González AD, Rivera G.. Esters of quinoxaline-7-carboxylate-1,4-di-N-oxide as Trichomonas vaginalis triosephosphate isomerase inhibitors. Acta Pharm. 2021;71(3):485–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gómez-Caro LC, Sánchez-Sánchez M, Bocanegra-García V, Rivera G, Monge A.. Synthesis of quinoxaline 1,4-di-n-oxide derivatives on solid support using room temperature and microwave-assisted solvent-free procedures. no. Quím Nova. 2011;34(7):1147–1151. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cedillo-Rivera R, Chávez B, González-Robles A, Tapia A, Yépez-Mulia L.. In vitro effect of nitazoxanide against Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis and Trichomonas vaginalis Trophozoites. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2002;49(3):201–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.McNutt AT, Francoeur P, Aggarwal R, Masuda T, Meli R, Ragoza M, Sunseri J, Koes DR.. GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning. J Cheminform. 2021;13(1):43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adasme MF, Linnemann KL, Bolz SN, Kaiser F, Salentin S, Haupt VJ, Schroeder M.. PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein–ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W530–W534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Enríquez-Flores S, Rodríguez-Romero A, Hernández-Alcántara G, Oria-Hernández J, Gutiérrez-Castrellón P, Pérez-Hernández G, de la Mora-de la Mora I, Castillo-Villanueva A, García-Torres I, Méndez ST, et al. Determining the molecular mechanism of inactivation by chemical modification of triosephosphate isomerase from the human parasite Giardia lamblia : A study for antiparasitic drug design. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2011;79(9):2711–2724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Plaut B, Knowles JR.. pH-dependence of the triose phosphate isomerase reaction. Biochem J. 1972;129(2):311–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arias DG, Regner EL, Iglesias AA, Guerrero SA.. Entamoeba histolytica thioredoxin reductase: Molecular and functional characterization of its atypical properties. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1820(12):1859–1866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Téllez-Valencia A, Olivares-Illana V, Hernández-Santoyo A, Pérez-Montfort R, Costas M, Rodríguez-Romero A, López-Calahorra F, Tuena De Gómez-Puyou M, Gómez-Puyou A.. inactivation of triosephosphate isomerase from Trypanosoma cruzi by an agent that perturbs its dimer interface. J Mol Biol. 2004;341(5):1355–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reyes-Vivas H, de la Mora-de la Mora I, Castillo-Villanueva A, Yépez-Mulia L, Hernández-Alcántara G, Figueroa-Salazar R, García-Torres I, Gómez-Manzo S, Méndez ST, Vanoye-Carlo A, et al. Giardial triosephosphate isomerase as possible target of the cytotoxic effect of omeprazole in Giardia lamblia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(12):7072–7082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.García-Torres I, de la Mora-de la Mora I, Marcial-Quino J, Gómez-Manzo S, Vanoye-Carlo A, Navarrete-Vázquez G, Colín-Lozano B, Gutiérrez-Castrellón P, Sierra-Palacios E, López-Velázquez G, et al. Proton pump inhibitors drastically modify triosephosphate isomerase from Giardia lamblia at functional and structural levels, providing molecular leads in the design of new antigiardiasic drugs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1860(1 Pt A):97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sampson NS, Knowles JR.. Segmental movement: definition of the structural requirements for loop closure in catalysis by triosephosphate isomerase. Biochemistry. 1992;31(36):8482–8487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kursula I, Salin M, Sun J, Norledge BV, Haapalainen AM, Sampson NS, Wierenga RK.. Understanding protein lids: structural analysis of active hinge mutants in triosephosphate isomerase. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004;17(4):375–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Reyes-Vivas H, Diaz A, Peon J, Mendoza-Hernandez G, Hernandez-Alcantara G, De la Mora-De la Mora I, Enriquez-Flores S, Dominguez-Ramirez L, Lopez-Velazquez G.. Disulfide bridges in the mesophilic triosephosphate isomerase from giardia lamblia are related to oligomerization and activity. J Mol Biol. 2007;365(3):752–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rodríguez-Almazán C, Arreola R, Rodríguez-Larrea D, Aguirre-López B, Tuena de Gómez-Puyou M, Pérez-Montfort R, Costas M, Gómez-Puyou A, Torres-Larios A.. Structural basis of human triosephosphate isomerase deficiency: mutation E104D is related to alterations of a conserved water network at the dimer interface. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(34):23254–23263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support this study can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.















