In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. The probability of success for block 3 in the bot condition should be 0.70, as correctly stated in Table 1 and the second paragraph of the Results section. However, in Figure 1, this value is incorrectly shown as 0.95. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appear below.
Figure 1.
Successes and crossings per type of agent and block in Study 1. (A) Probability of success in each block per type of agent. The horizontal dashed line represents chance level (50%). (B) Mean number of crossings in each block per type of agent. Error bars depict 95% confidence intervals.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.