Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Oct 31;12:RP87258. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87258

A Pvr–AP-1–Mmp1 signaling pathway is activated in astrocytes upon traumatic brain injury

Tingting Li 1, Wenwen Shi 1, Margaret S Ho 2,3,, Yong Q Zhang 1,
Editors: Jiwon Shim4, Utpal Banerjee5
PMCID: PMC11527428  PMID: 39480704

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by external mechanical forces is a major health burden worldwide, but the underlying mechanism in glia remains largely unclear. We report herein that Drosophila adults exhibit a defective blood–brain barrier, elevated innate immune responses, and astrocyte swelling upon consecutive strikes with a high-impact trauma device. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of these astrocytes revealed upregulated expression of genes encoding PDGF and VEGF receptor-related (Pvr, a receptor tyrosine kinase), adaptor protein complex 1 (AP-1, a transcription factor complex of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway) composed of Jun-related antigen (Jra) and kayak (kay), and matrix metalloproteinase 1 (Mmp1) following TBI. Interestingly, Pvr is both required and sufficient for AP-1 and Mmp1 upregulation, while knockdown of AP-1 expression in the background of Pvr overexpression in astrocytes rescued Mmp1 upregulation upon TBI, indicating that Pvr acts as the upstream receptor for the downstream AP-1–Mmp1 transduction. Moreover, dynamin-associated endocytosis was found to be an important regulatory step in downregulating Pvr signaling. Our results identify a new Pvr–AP-1–Mmp1 signaling pathway in astrocytes in response to TBI, providing potential targets for developing new therapeutic strategies for TBI.

Research organism: D. melanogaster

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of adult disability due to limited neurological recovery (Joy et al., 2019). About 43% of people discharged after hospitalization for acute TBI develop long-term locomotor disability (Ma et al., 2014). TBI triggers primary neural injuries via rapid physical forces that damage axons, glia, and blood vessels (Chodobski et al., 2011; Daneshvar et al., 2015), followed by diverse secondary damage such as Wallerian axon degeneration (Büki and Povlishock, 2006) and blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction (Chodobski et al., 2011) in the central nervous system (CNS). The outcome of TBI is affected by various factors, including age and diet (Byrns et al., 2021; Katzenberger et al., 2016). In addition, glial cells are critical mediators in response to TBI in the mammalian brain (Mira et al., 2021). During TBI, astrocytes become active, a process characterized by swelling, scar tissue formation, and engulfment of neuronal debris (Liddelow et al., 2017; Sofroniew and Vinters, 2010), while microglia rapidly transform from their active state to phagocytose cell debris (Davalos et al., 2005).

Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal model organism for discovering new gene networks and investigating the molecular and cellular responses to CNS injury (Ayaz et al., 2008; Bier, 2005; Hoopfer et al., 2006; MacDonald et al., 2006). Drosophila astrocyte-like glia (henceforth astrocytes), the conserved counterparts for mammalian astrocytes, and ensheathing glia (ENG) constitute the major glial subclasses in the CNS (Doherty et al., 2009; Stork et al., 2014). A previous study revealed that Drosophila ENG perform the phagocytic function by the engulfment receptor Draper, which interacts with downstream signaling components, including ced-6, Shark, Src42a, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and matrix metalloproteinase 1 (Mmp1), in the glial engulfment process in response to axotomy (Awasaki et al., 2006; Doherty et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2017; Purice et al., 2017). Although ENG function upon axotomy has been well characterized, the response of other types of glia such as astrocytes to neural injury remains unclear.

In mammals, signaling by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) directs cell migration, alters cell shape, and plays a role in wound healing (Hoch and Soriano, 2003; Sil et al., 2018). Meanwhile, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling is critical for cell proliferation and survival, and vascular endothelial cell mitogenesis and permeability (Apte et al., 2019; Sakurai et al., 2005). Pvr, short for PDGF- and VEGF receptor-related, is the sole Drosophila ortholog of the PDGF and VEGF receptor families (Cho et al., 2002). Pvr interacts with different signaling molecules in a context-dependent manner. For example, Pvr regulates thorax closure during metamorphosis via the JNK signaling pathway (Ishimaru et al., 2004), but the Pvr-mediated wound-induced epidermal cell migration does not depend on JNK (Wu et al., 2009). The JNK/activator protein-1 (AP-1) signaling pathway is involved in different cellular processes, including cell migration (Pastor-Pareja et al., 2004), organ size control (Willsey et al., 2016), and cell death (Moreno et al., 2002). The JNK effector AP-1 complex, composed of heterodimeric Jun/Jun-related antigen (Jra) and Fos/kayak (kay), promotes transcription of genes including Mmp1 that functions in tissue remodeling, regulation of inflammatory processes, and metastasis of cancer cells (Egeblad and Werb, 2002; Page-McCaw et al., 2007; Parks et al., 2004).

Previous studies have implicated a role for ENG, Draper pathway, and the innate immune pathway in response to TBI (Doherty et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2017; Purice et al., 2017; Anonymous, 2013). However, whether astrocytes also play a role in TBI response remains elusive. Herein, using a Drosophila TBI model induced with a high-impact trauma (HIT) device (Anonymous, 2013), we found that TBI caused multiple defects including upregulated expression of innate immune genes and astrocyte swelling. To uncover the molecular pathways activated by TBI, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of astrocytes sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to profile TBI-induced genes. Interestingly, we showed that the expression of Pvr, AP-1, and Mmp1 was upregulated following TBI. Knockdown of Pvr or AP-1 expression in astrocytes rescued TBI-induced Mmp1 upregulation, while Pvr overexpression promoted Mmp1 expression via AP-1 upon TBI. Our findings identify a new Pvr–AP-1–Mmp1 signaling pathway that acts predominantly in astrocytes in response to TBI, and shed light on the mechanisms of astrocyte responses following TBI.

Results

TBI is induced in Drosophila adults by a HIT device

To analyze how brains respond to TBI, we applied consecutive strikes to adult flies using a HIT device to induce brain injury as described previously (Katzenberger et al., 2015). To quantify the degree of injury, we analyzed the mortality index at 24 hr after TBI (MI24), defined as the percentage of dead over the total flies tested. Consistent with a previous report (Anonymous, 2013), MI24 of 3-day-old adult flies was 20 ± 3.18% after four HIT strikes (Figure 1A). MI24 after six strikes was 71.88 ± 7.44%, suggesting that increasing the number of strikes results in a higher MI24 rate (Figure 1A). Given that TBI has been shown to disrupt the formation of the BBB in mammals and flies and blood–eye barrier (BEB) in flies (Rodríguez-Baeza et al., 2003; Sangiorgi et al., 2013; Katzenberger et al., 2015; Saikumar et al., 2020), we examined BBB/BEB integrity 2 hr after injecting tetramethylrhodamine-conjugated dextran (molecular weight = 10,000 Da) into adult fly abdominal segments (Bainton et al., 2005). The dye crossed the barrier and penetrated the retina and brain, indicating that both BBB and BEB were disrupted after HIT strikes (Figure 1B−G). The percentage of flies exhibiting dextran-permeable BBB increased as the number of strikes increased from 0 to 6, with six strikes resulting in severe BBB disruption (Figure 1G) but maintaining a moderate viability providing enough samples for phenotypic analysis. Based on these results, six HIT strikes administered at 5 min intervals were applied to induce TBI throughout the present study.

Figure 1. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is induced in adult flies by a high-impact trauma (HIT) device.

Figure 1.

(A) MI24 is the mortality index calculated from the percentage of dead over total flies. Increasing the number of strikes from 4 to 6 increases the MI24 value. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM; ***p<0.001, Student’s t-test). (B–E) The intactness of blood–eye barrier (BEB) and blood–brain barrier (BBB) before or after six strikes is indicated by the accumulated fluorescence intensity at the border of the eye (B, D) and brain (C, E), respectively. The examination was carried out at 2 hr after fluorescent dye injection. Arrows indicate the hemolymph exclusion line. Scale bar = 100 μm. (F) The percentage of permeable BEB with or without TBI (***p<0.001). (G) The percentage of permeable BBB following different numbers of strikes. Error bars denote SEM (**p <0.01 and ***p <0.001, Student’s t-test). (H) Histogram showing mRNA expression levels of innate immune response genes of the AMP family (Attc, DiptB, and Mtk) in the adult brain. Expression was increased in all cases following treatment. The RPL28 gene served as an internal reference. Results are means  ± SEM (***p <0.001, Student’s t-test). (I, J) The number of Dcp-1+ puncta (green) increased in injured adult brains 24 hr after TBI. Scale bar = 50 μm. (K) Quantification of Dcp-1+ puncta. Error bars denote SEM (**p<0.01, Student’s t-tests). Results are means  ± SEM. (L–M'') Apoptotic debris labeled with anti-Dcp-1 antibodies (Red). Glial and neuronal nuclei are labeled with anti-Repo (L) and anti-Elav (M) antibodies (blue), respectively. Scale bar = 20 μm.

In addition to disruption of BBB/BEB integrity, we also analyzed TBI-induced secondary damage such as local and systemic immune responses. Given that Toll and immune deficiency (Imd) are the two crucial innate immune response pathways in Drosophila (Valanne et al., 2011), and their common downstream genes encode antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that protect flies from TBI injury (van Alphen et al., 2022), we analyzed the expression of AMPs in adult fly brains at different time points after TBI. As shown by the real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results, expression of the AMP genes AttC, DiptB, and Mtk was significantly upregulated at 1 hr and reached a peak at 4 hr after injury (Figure 1H), consistent with previous reports (Barekat et al., 2016; Anonymous, 2013). Taken together, these results suggest that HIT strikes induce TBI reflected by BBB/BEB disruption and elevated expression of innate immune response genes.

TBI induces neuronal but not glial apoptosis in adult fly brains

Given that neurons and glia have been shown to undergo cell death during both primary and secondary injury responses upon TBI in humans (Ng and Lee, 2019), we performed immunostaining with an antibody against Death caspase-1 (Dcp-1), the homolog of human caspase-3, to detect apoptotic cells in our TBI model. Interestingly, the number of Dcp-1+ puncta was significantly increased in adult fly brains at 24 hr after TBI (Figure 1I and J), with a 2.47-fold increase compared to the number in uninjured controls (Figure 1K). Furthermore, we found that almost all Dcp-1+ puncta were co-localized with Elav rather than Repo, suggesting that neurons but not glia are apoptotic (Figure 1L−M''). These results suggest that, as in mammals, TBI also induces neuronal apoptosis in fruit flies.

TBI leads to astrocyte activation

In addition to the TBI-induced neuronal apoptosis mentioned above, glial cells also become reactive after nervous system injury (Burda and Sofroniew, 2014). It has been shown that ENG phagocytose neuronal debris upon axotomy (Doherty et al., 2009), but whether astrocytes respond to TBI remains unknown. To explore the potential role of astrocytes in the TBI response, R86E01-GAL4 (Kremer et al., 2017), an astrocyte-specific driver, was used to express UAS-mCD8::GFP to label astrocyte plasma membrane. In uninjured fly brains, GFP intensities in the cell bodies and processes of astrocytes were widely distributed throughout the brain (Figure 2A and D). While no significant change in GFP intensity was detected in brains at 4 hr after TBI (Figure 2B and D), the GFP intensity was significantly increased and the cell bodies of astrocytes were significantly enlarged at 24 hr after TBI in the central brain region, especially in the antennal lobes (ALs) (Figure 2C and D). Of note, these results were not affected by the presence of one or two UAS transgenes as the efficiency of R86E01-GAL4 in driving the expression of either was comparable as shown by the similar GFP levels (Figure 2A−C, I, and J).

Figure 2. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) alters glial morphology and upregulates Mmp1 expression.

Figure 2.

(A–C) Representative images of astrocyte membranes labeled with mCD8::GFP driven by the astrocyte driver R86E01-Gal4. Co-expression of UAS-Redstinger labels astrocyte nuclei. GFP intensities are increased at 4 hr (B) and 24 hr (C) after injury. The rectangle defined by white dash lines denotes antennal lobes. Scale bars = 100 μm. (D) Quantification of GFP intensity at different timepoints after TBI. Results are means ± SEM (**p<0.01, Student’s t-test). (E, F) MARCM (y w UAS-CD8::GFP hs-FLP; tubP-Gal80 FRT-40A/CyO; alrm-Gal4 UAS-CD8::GFP UAS-Dcr2/TM6 Tb Hu cross with FRT-40A flies) analysis reveals single astrocytes with evenly distributed GFP+ cellular processes without injury (E) and an increased number of GFP+ puncta at 24 hr after injury (F). Arrows denote GFP+ accumulations in astrocyte processes. White dots demarcate neuropils. Anti-Repo antibodies labeled glial nuclei. TO-PRO labeled all nuclei. Insets show the morphology of a glial soma before and after injury. Scale bar = 10 μm. (G) Quantification of GFP+ puncta in astrocyte processes before and after injury. (H) Quantification of the astrocyte soma diameter surrounding antennal lobes (ALs) after injury. Results are means  ± SEM (***p<0.001, Student’s t-test). (I–J'', M–N'') Representative images of ALs co-labeled with GFP and Mmp1 (magenta) in uninjured and injured adult brains. (J–J'') GFP-labeled astrocyte membranes (green) overlapped with Mmp1 (magenta) after injury. (N–N'') After injury, Mmp1 co-localizes with GFP-labeled ensheathing glia (ENG) (R56F03-Gal4) membranes (green). Arrows show Mmp1-GFP colocalization in (L'') and (P''). Scale bar = 20 μm. (K, L) Graph showing fluorescence intensity per pixel in each channel for the inset in (I'') and (J'') of the astrocyte membrane and Mmp1 along a line drawn through a cell body. (O, P) Graph showing fluorescence intensity per pixel in each channel for the inset in (M'') and (N'') of the ENG membrane and Mmp1 along a line drawn through the process of ENG. (Q) Quantification of Mmp1 intensity in (I–J'') and (M–N''). Ast is the short of astrocytes. Results are means ± SEM (**p <0.01, Student’s t-test).

In mammals, the hallmarks of astrocyte activation are hypertrophy of astrocytes and upregulated level of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (Pekny and Pekna, 2004). Given that there is no GFAP homolog in Drosophila (Doherty et al., 2009), we examined morphological changes in astrocytes at single-cell resolution following TBI by mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) on adult fly brains at 3–4 days after eclosion. The cell bodies of these astrocytes were located at the interface between neuropil and cortex regions, or in neuropils, and their cellular processes infiltrated into neuropils (Figure 2E). Interestingly, astrocytes in injured brains exhibited bright and distinct GFP+ accumulations associated with their cellular processes at 24 hr after TBI (Figure 2F and G). Quantitatively, the number of these accumulations per square nanometer in the cellular processes was significantly increased at 24 hr after TBI; the increase in the number of accumulations might be responsible for the increase in GFP intensity triggered by TBI (Figure 2G). Importantly, the diameter of astrocytes cell bodies was also increased at 24 hr after injury (Figure 2H). Taken together, these results show that astrocytes become reactive in adult brains at 24 hr after TBI.

Axotomy induces expression of injury-related proteins such as extracellular proteases the matrix metalloprotease (MMP) (Purice et al., 2017). In addition to the morphological changes in astrocytes, we observed upregulated expression of Mmp1 in TBI-treated brains (Figure 2I−J’’, M−N’’, and Q). These Mmp1+ signals were colocalized with membrane-bound mCD8::GFP driven by the astrocytes-specific driver R86E01-GAL4 or ENG-specific driver R56F03-GAL4 (Figure 2K, L, O and P), with a more dominant expression in ENG. These results suggest that Mmp1 might be produced from both types of glia after TBI.

Transcriptional profiling of astrocytes in adult flies reveals elevated expression of injury-related genes upon TBI

To further investigate how astrocytes respond to TBI, we analyzed transcriptional changes in astrocytes by RNA-seq (Figure 3A). Due to the tiny soma and morphological complexity, the analysis of a purified population of glial cells has been difficult and technically challenging. We have optimized a protocol for purifying astrocytes from adult Drosophila of R86E01-Gal4>UAS-Redstinger by FACS (see details in ‘Materials and methods’). As FACS removes most cell masses and RFP-negative cells, the remaining RFP+ cells are mostly viable, as shown by MitoTracker staining, and purity was 92.96% (RFP+ and MitoTracker+ cells/total cells) in uninjured brains (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–C’). Further analysis of the RNA-seq data showed that the astrocyte markers Eaat1 (110359 reads) and alrm (186413 reads) were highly expressed, while nSyb, a neuronal marker, was hardly detected (125 reads) at 4 hr after TBI, verifying the purity of FACS-sorted astrocytes. A principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the variance between different groups (no injury vs. 4 hr and 24 hr after injury) was greater than the variance within groups (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D). From analysis of five biological replicates for each time point (no injury, 4 hr, and 24 hr after injury), we obtained 539 million reads (an average of 36 million reads per sample) and aligned the RNA-seq reads to the Drosophila genome. We found that 93.67 ± 0.89% of reads mapped to the Drosophila genome (dm6 version). Using a cutoff of ≥2-fold differential expression (adj. p-value<0.01, Benjamini–Hochberg procedure), we identified 522 and 357 genes with altered expression at 4 hr (416 upregulated and 106 downregulated) and 24 hr (229 upregulated and 128 downregulated) after injury, respectively (Figure 3B−D; Supplementary file 2).

Figure 3. Transcriptome analysis of astrocytes reveals upregulation of injury-related and innate immunity genes.

(A) After dissection, Drosophila brains were disrupted and the cell suspension was subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Astrocyte cDNAs were amplified by the Smart-seq2 method and a cDNA library was constructed. A subset of upregulated genes from RNA-seq screening was validated by quantitative real-time PCR. (B, C) Volcano plots of the gene expression analysis; 522 differentially expressed genes (416 upregulated, 106 downregulated) in astrocytes were detected at 4 hr after injury (B), and 357 differentially expressed genes (229 upregulated, 129 downregulated) in astrocytes were detected at 24 hr after injury (C). The threshold for differential expression was set at log2FC = 1 with an adj. p<0.01. FC = fold change; adj. = adjusted (for multiple comparisons by the Benjamin–Hochberg procedure). (D) Heatmap of the expression of a small set of representative genes, including draper, Jra, and kay, previously identified as essential factors during glial clearance of severed axons. (E) Quantitative real-time PCR validation of a subset of upregulated genes from RNA-seq screening. Error bars represent SEM. Results are means ± SEM (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001 by Student’s t-tests).

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Sorting of adult astrocytes by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) To discriminate between healthy and damaged or dying cells, side scatter (SSC-A, log) and forward scatter (FSC-A, log) were plotted. Higher SSC-A signals indicate increased granularity and therefore likely dying cells. Thus, one should define the sorting gate as the population with the lower SSC-A signal (P1). (P2) Exclude cell clusters by sorting only events with a low FSC width (FSC-W) versus similar area (FSC-A) signal to get exact single cell. (P3) To gate for RFP+ cells, plotted the signal from the excitation of cells with the 568-nm laser (PE-Texas Red-A, log) against the signal from the SSC-A. The population with the higher PE-Texas Red-A signal was the candidate cells cluster. The strategy for FACS is shown on the lower-right corner. (B–C') A population of cells with strong RFP signal was purified from adult flies of R86E01-Gal4>UAS-Redstinger. (B, B') Confocal images of representative astrocytes before and after sorting by FACS. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C, C') As cell-permeant MitoTracker labels mitochondria of live cells, cells after FACS both labeled by RFP and MitoTracker. Scale bar = 10 μm. (D) A principal component analysis of all biological replicates (uninjured versus injured) revealing genes expressed at absolute value of logarithmic fold change (log2FC) > 1.0.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed genes at 4 hr and 24 hr after injury.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

Scatterplot showing GO functional enrichment results for differentially expressed genes of astrocytes in the brain at 4 hr (A) and 24 hr (B) after injury, p<0.01.

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of these upregulated genes revealed that a significant proportion were associated with endosomal transport, actin cytoskeleton, and wound healing (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Furthermore, we detected upregulated expression of components functioning in the innate immune response after TBI. For instance, expression of the components Relish and Dif of the Toll and Imd pathways was upregulated in astrocytes after TBI (Figure 3D), in agreement with a previous finding that Relish is necessary for TBI-induced secondary injuries (Swanson et al., 2020). In addition, expression of injury-related genes including chic, Jra, kay, rl, Cad96Ca, Idgf4, Stam, draper, Pvr, spict, Mmp1 and NijA, and receptor genes including Pvr, draper, AdoR, PGRP-SA, and NimA were upregulated in astrocytes at 4 hr or 24 hr after injury (Supplementary file 3). A set of endocytic trafficking genes was also identified, including Arpc1, Arpc2, cpa, cpb, Stam, and Chmp1. Subsequent RT-qPCR experiments confirmed the upregulation of all six genes tested at 4 hr and/or 24 hr after TBI (Figure 3E), supporting the robustness of the RNA-seq analysis. As a control, the astrocytes-specific alrm gene showed no upregulation upon TBI by RT-qPCR and RNA-seq. Taken together, these findings validate the approach of RNA-seq transcription profiling in detecting genes functionally related to injury responses in astrocytes following TBI.

Pvr and AP-1 are required for the upregulation of Mmp1 after TBI

Among the candidates exhibiting upregulated expression in astrocytes upon TBI, three receptors (Pvr, AdoR, and Draper), all acting upstream of and activating the JNK pathway (Ishimaru et al., 2004; Macdonald et al., 2013; Poernbacher and Vincent, 2018), emerged as new factors with uncharacterized functions in astrocytes (Figure 3D). The Drosophila RNA interference (RNAi) Screening Center Integrative Ortholog Prediction Tool identified orthologs of these three receptors, subunits of transcriptional factor AP-1 (composed of Jra and kay) of the JNK pathway, Mmp1, and endocytic trafficking genes in mouse and human (Table 1; Hu et al., 2011). These proteins mediate essential injury responses in vertebrates (Borea et al., 2016; Motz and Coukos, 2013; Shi et al., 2021). To examine a potential role of the receptors and their downstream signaling components in astrocytes after TBI, we quantified the immunostaining intensity of these proteins from projected images of the whole brain (including 20–30 slices with 1 µm per slice). As our RNA-seq analysis revealed elevated expression of JNK-related injury genes such as AP-1 and Mmp1 (Figure 3D, Table 1), we analyzed the expression of Mmp1, a transcriptional target of AP-1 (Purice et al., 2017), as a readout for the activity of JNK signaling in response to TBI. We found that upregulated Mmp1 expression induced by TBI was potently suppressed by knocking down the expression of Pvr, Jra, or kay (Figure 4A−D, F), indicating that Mmp1 upregulation is mediated by Pvr and AP-1, and predominantly occurs in astrocytes. We note that the location and intensity of Mmp1 signals are variable among different individuals (Figure 4), probably because the brain damage caused by HIT is not stereotypical.

Table 1. Upregulated genes related to receptors and endocytosis.

Genes in Drosophila Conserved genes in mouse Conserved genes in human 4 hr after injury(FC) 24 hr after injury (FC)
Pvr pdgfr/vegfr VEGFR 13.83 2.79
AdoR Adora2a ADORA2B 37.53 7.73
Mmp1 Mmp14 MMP14 26.35 4.79
Jra Jun JUN 3.58 1.18
kay FOSL2 FOS 6.23 1.77
cpa Capza2 CAPZA1 3.43 1.72
cpb Capzb CAPZB 2.01 1.25
Stam Stam2 STAM 2.14 1.46
Chmp1 Chmp1b CHMP1B 2.16 0.92
Vps24 Chmp3 CHMP3 2.11 0.87

FC: fold change.

Figure 4. Pvr, Jra, and kay are required for Mmp1 upregulation after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

(A–F) Knockdown of Pvr, Jra, or kay by R86E01-Gal4-driven RNAi in astrocytes suppresses Mmp1 upregulation after TBI. Scale bar = 100 μm. All images are projections of 25–30 μm immunostaining slices (one image per 1 μm slice). Arrows show Mmp1 signals. (F) Quantification of Mmp1 intensity in different genotypes. Results are means ± SEM (*p<0.05 by Student’s t-test).

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Overexpression of Jra or kay does not enhance the expression of TRE-RFP and Mmp1 in adult brain after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A, B'') Fly brains showing TRE-RFP expression before and 24 hr after TBI. (C–F'') overexpression of Jra or kay in astrocytes shows no apparent changes of RFP and Mmp1 staining signals compared with control flies with or without brain injury (TRE-dsRed/UAS-Jra or kay; R86E01-Gal4/+). Scale bar = 100 μm. (G, H) Knockdown of AdoR in astrocytes inhibits the expression of Mmp1 after TBI. However, Knockdown of AdoR in astrocytes does not inhibit the expression of dsRed. (I, J) Quantification of Mmp1 and dsRed intensity before and after injury in different genotypes. Data are present as means ± SEM; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 by Student’s t-tests.

Even though flies with Draper knockdown in astrocytes exhibited high mortality, analysis of escapers indicated that Mmp1 upregulation upon TBI was not completely inhibited by Draper knockdown (Figure 4E and F). Knockdown of the other receptor AdoR in astrocytes caused a weak inhibition of AP-1 and Mmp1 upregulation (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–A'', G–H'', I and J); TRE-dsRed that expresses the red fluorescent protein dsRed under the control of 4×AP-1 motifs (Chatterjee and Bohmann, 2012) was used as a reporter for AP-1 activity. As Pvr showed the strongest regulation on Mmp1 expression among the three receptors (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1), we focused on the potential role of Pvr in astrocytes following TBI in the present study. It is noteworthy to mention that although Draper expression was upregulated upon axotomy (MacDonald et al., 2006) and TBI (Figure 3D), inhibiting Draper expression in astrocytes did not suppress the Mmp1 upregulation after TBI (Figure 4E and F). Taken together, these results suggest that Pvr, but not Draper, and AP-1 are required for upregulated Mmp1 in astrocytes after TBI.

Pvr positively regulates AP-1 signaling and Mmp1 expression in astrocytes after TBI

We next investigated the genetic pathway by which Pvr functions in astrocytes in response to TBI. We examined the activity of AP-1 using the in vivo reporter TRE-dsRed (Chatterjee and Bohmann, 2012). In uninjured brains, we detected low TRE-dsRed levels, suggesting a basal AP-1 activity (Figure 5A–A''). Similar to Mmp1, TRE-dsRed levels were robustly upregulated at 24 hr after TBI, suggesting activation of JNK/AP-1 signaling (Figure 5B–B''). Importantly, TBI-induced expression of TRE-dsRed and Mmp1 was suppressed or further upregulated when inhibiting or overexpressing Pvr expression in astrocytes, respectively (Figure 5C−F''). Overexpression of Jra or kay alone did not affect expression of TRE-dsRed or Mmp1 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–F'', I and J), suggesting that overexpressing a single subunit of the AP-1 complex is not sufficient to upregulate AP-1 activity. While Pvr overexpression caused an increase in TRE-dsRed and Mmp1 expression levels, Jra or kay RNAi knockdown in the background of Pvr overexpression suppressed the increase (Figure 5G–L), indicating that Jra and kay act downstream of Pvr to mediate the injury response upon TBI. These results together show that Pvr is a receptor acting upstream of AP-1 signaling that promotes Mmp1 expression during the injury response in astrocytes (Figure 5M).

Figure 5. Pvr is required for AP-1 upregulation after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Figure 5.

(A−B'') Adult brains showing increased TRE-dsRed (an AP-1 reporter) expression at 24 hr after TBI. (C−D'') Overexpression of Pvr in astrocytes leads to upregulated dsREd expression compared with control flies. Scale bar = 100 μm. (E−F'') Knockdown of Pvr in astrocytes causes downregulation of dsRed expression compared with control flies after TBI. (G−H'') Overexpression of Pvr and knockdown of Jra at the same time in astrocytes causes downregulation of dsRed and Mmp1 after TBI compared with controls. (I−J'') Overexpression of Pvr and knockdown of kay in astrocytes at the same time causes downregulation of dsRed and Mmp1 after TBI compared with controls. (K, L) Quantification of Mmp1 (K) and dsRed (L) intensity. Results are means ± SEM. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, Student’s t-tests.

Disruption of endocytosis and endocytic trafficking enhances Pvr, AP-1, and Mmp1 upregulation upon TBI

How was the Pvr signaling induced by TBI regulated? It has been shown that VEGFR2 endocytosis proceeds in a clathrin-dependent manner (Simons et al., 2016). During clathrin-dependent endocytosis, scission needs Cdc42-interacting protein 4 (Cip4) to recruit dynamin and Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp), the activator of the Arp2/3 complex that mediates actin polymerization and promotes the movement of newly formed clathrin-coated vesicles (Brüser and Bogdan, 2017). VEGFRs are transmembrane RTKs that are activated when they locate at the cell membrane (Simons et al., 2016). We first investigated whether endocytosis is involved in Pvr signaling upon TBI. Shibire (shi) encodes a GTPase called dynamin that is responsible for fission of the vesicle from the membrane (van der Bliek and Meyerowitz, 1991). We analyzed the effect of endocytosis on Pvr signaling by blocking the activity of dynamin with a temperature-sensitive mutant, shits, in astrocytes. Interestingly, both Pvr (Figure 6A, B and E) and TRE-dsRed (Figure 6C, D and F) intensities were increased at 4 hr after TBI when dynamin activity was blocked at the non-permissive 32°C. As a control, expression of nLacZ under the same conditions as mutated dynamin did not exhibit a significant difference in the intensities of Pvr and TRE-dsRed at the permissive 23°C and the non-permissive 32°C after TBI (Figure 6A, B, E and F). These results suggest that Pvr signaling is facilitated when endocytosis is blocked.

Figure 6. Inhibition of dynamin activity increases the expression levels of Pvr and dsRed after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Figure 6.

(A, B) Representative Pvr immunostaining (green), dsRed (magenta), and β-gal intensity (gray) in control animals (TRE-dsRed;R86E01-Gal4>UAS-nLacZ) at 4 hr after TBI. All images are projections of 25–30 μm immunostaining slices (one image per 1 μm slice). (C, D) Representative Pvr immunostaining (green), dsRed (magenta), and Mmp1 intensity (gray) in shits-expressing animals (TRE-dsRed;R86E01-Gal4>UAS-shits) at 4 hr after TBI. For thermogenetic inactivation of dynamin, flies after TBI were incubated at intermittent temperature at 32°C (32°C for 30 min, and then back to 23°C for 30 min, for four rounds, 4 hr in total) until dissection. (E, F) Quantification of Pvr and dsRed intensity in different genotypes. Results are means ± SEM (*p<0.05).

In addition to Pvr, results from our transcription profiling analysis also revealed upregulation of the expression of actin dynamics and endocytic trafficking genes including Arpc2, cpa, and cpb following TBI (Supplementary files 1 and 2). To explore whether endocytic trafficking genes are involved in the injury response in astrocytes, we analyzed Mmp1 and TRE-dsRed expression when inhibiting the expression of Arpc2, cpa, or cpb. Interestingly, TBI-induced Mmp1 levels were further increased after knockdown of each of the three (Figure 7A–D and O); consistently, TRE-dsRed expression was also increased after knockdown of cpa or cpb (Figure 7H–K and P). These results indicate that genes involved in endocytosis and endocytic trafficking normally inhibit induction of AP-1 and Mmp1 by TBI in astrocytes.

Figure 7. Knockdown of endocytic trafficking-related genes up-regulates expression of AP-1 and Mmp1 upon traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Figure 7.

(A, H) Representative Mmp1 immunostaining (magenta) and dsRed intensity (magenta) in control animals (R86E01-Gal4) at 24 hr after TBI. (B–D, I–K) Knockdown of Arpc2, cpa, and cpb in astrocytes results in further upregulation of Mmp1 and dsRed upon TBI. All images are projections of 25–30 μm immunostaining slices (one image per 1 μm slice). (E–G, L–N) Knockdown of Stam, Chmp1, or Vps24, components of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), in astrocytes had no influence on Mmp1 and dsRed upregulation compared with control after TBI (A, H). All images are projections of 25–30 μm immunostaining slices (one image per 1 μm slice). (O, P) Quantification of Mmp1 and dsRed intensity in different genotypes. Results are means ± SEM (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, Student’s t-tests). (Q) Schematic diagram of Pvr–AP-1–MMP1 signaling activated by TBI in astrocytes. AP-1 transcription factor complex is composed of Jra and kay.

In addition, we also observed upregulated expression of a set of endosomal sorting genes, including Stam, Chmp1, and Vps24, that encode components of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) in astrocytes in response to TBI (Supplementary files 1 and 2). These genes are implicated in the formation of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) from multivesicular bodies (MVBs). Inhibiting expression of the ESCRT-0 subunit Stam and the ESCRT-III subunits Chmp1 or Vps24 in astrocytes however did not result in a significant difference in Mmp1 or TRE-dsRed expression levels compared with controls following TBI (Figure 7E–G, L–N, O and P), suggesting that endosome sorting in MVB may not affect Pvr signaling activity.

Discussion

Using a previously established a Drosophila TBI model, we found that TBI causes neuronal apoptosis, BBB/BEB disruption, and astrocyte swelling. Astrocytes respond to TBI by elevated Pvr expression, which in turn enhances the expression of the downstream effectors AP-1 and Mmp1. Our findings identify a new signaling pathway upregulated in astrocytes following TBI.

Unlike vertebrates, in which astrocytes become reactive (reactive astrogliosis) and actively clear neuronal and synaptic debris via phagocytosis upon axon injury (Liddelow and Barres, 2017), axon transection in Drosophila shows no immediate astrocytic response to injury (Doherty et al., 2009; Purice et al., 2017). Instead, Drosophila ENG express key components of the phagocytic machinery and engulf neuronal debris in response to axotomy (Doherty et al., 2009). Here, we examined the molecular and cellular changes of astrocytes after TBI. Upon TBI, astrocytes exhibited apparent damage response including enlarged soma and altered cellular processes containing more membrane-bound GFP+ accumulations (Figure 2A−J). These findings suggest that astrocytes are activated upon TBI, demonstrating a critical role for astrocytes in the injury response.

The innate immune response in Drosophila relies on the activation of multiple signaling pathways including NF-κB/Relish-mediated Imd and Doral/Dif-mediated Toll signaling pathways. Interestingly, our RNA-seq data revealed elevated expression of genes Relish and Dif in both pathways upon TBI (Figure 3D). However, the expressions of AMPs were minimum in astrocytes before TBI and no AMPs genes were identified in differentially expressed genes. Thus, AMPs genes were not activated in astrocytes, though upregulated AMP expressions were detected by bulk RNA-seq after TBI. In addition, expression of AP-1 (composed of Jra and kay) and Mmp1 was also upregulated, indicating that the AP-1 signaling pathway is activated in astrocytes following TBI. Even though upregulated Mmp expression in reactive glial responses is an evolutionarily conserved feature of Drosophila and mammalian glia (Cunningham et al., 2005; Purice et al., 2017), transmembrane receptors on astrocytes that regulate Mmp1 expression have not been identified. In mammals, knockdown of VEGF signaling in keratinocytes reduced angiogenesis and delayed wound healing (Rossiter et al., 2004). In Drosophila, studies of wound healing showed that Pvr likely acts upstream of actin regulatory proteins that promote actin polymerization to lead cells migration (Brock et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2009).

Through a combination of RNA-seq and genetic analyses, we identified Pvr as a new receptor in astrocytes; Pvr promotes Mmp1 expression via the transcription factor complex AP-1. At present, we do not know how Pvr promotes expression of AP-1 and Mmp1. But previous findings show that Pvr phosphorylates JNK to trigger the downstream signaling containing AP-1 during thorax closure in metamorphosis (Ishimaru et al., 2004). During development, the midline glia survival and migration are regulated by the ventral unpaired median and the midline precursor 1 (MP1) midline neurons, the sources of Pvr ligands, that is, PDGF- and VEGF-related factor 1–3 (Pvf1-3) (Learte et al., 2008). Additionally, epidermal cell-derived Pvf1 may be sequestered in the blood and exposed upon injury to bind Pvr receptors on wound-edge epidermal cells and initiate the extension of cell processes into the wound gap (Wu et al., 2009). Specifically, Pvr ligands bind to Pvr receptor to induce autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues, leading to JNK phosphorylation. Phosphorylated JNK (Bsk) then phosphorylates Jun/Jra transcription factors, triggering Jun/Jra association with Fos/kay, to form the AP-1 complex (Bogoyevitch and Kobe, 2006). In addition, glial AP-1 is essential for recovery, ensuring brain integrity and animal survival in the early post-TBI period (Byrns et al., 2021). Given that Pvr and AP-1 genetically interact in astrocytes upon TBI, it is likely that Pvr acts upstream of AP-1 and regulates its activity via JNK phosphorylation following brain injury. We speculate that Pvr ligands that may secret from injured cells to activate Pvr-positive astrocytes after TBI; activated Pvr then increases Mmp1 expression via AP-1 and secretion to the intercellular space to participate in injury response.

In addition to Pvr, our RNA-seq data also identified other receptors potentially functioning in astrocytes in response to TBI. Specifically, AdoR expression was upregulated after TBI (Supplementary file 2), and knockdown of AdoR expression in astrocytes led to inhibition of AP-1 after TBI (Figure 4—figure supplement 1G–J), though at a weaker extent compared with Pvr knockdown. In mammals, A2BR, a subtype of AdoR, was shown to stimulate VEGF production in various cell types (Borea et al., 2016). Pvr promotes the expression of adenosine deaminase-related growth factor A (Adgf-A), which inactivates extracellular adenosine, the ligand of AdoR (Zurovec et al., 2002). Furthermore, Pvr and AdoR collaborate in differentiating cells to maintain the expression of Adgf-A (Mondal et al., 2011). Thus, it is possible that Pvr and AdoR act independently or in a coordinated manner to regulate the injury response to TBI in astrocytes in Drosophila.

Our RNA-seq profiling also revealed upregulation of Draper. Previous studies revealed a role for Draper-mediated phagocytosis of axonal debris in ENG after axotomy (Lu et al., 2017; MacDonald et al., 2006); axotomy induces Wallerian-like degeneration (Büki and Povlishock, 2006; Tang-Schomer et al., 2010). Specifically, damage-associated molecular pattern proteins released from injured neurons bind to Draper and activate the JNK and JAK/STAT pathways in ENG (Doherty et al., 2014; Freeman, 2015; Macdonald et al., 2013). Here, our findings showed that Draper does not affect Mmp1 expression in astrocytes upon TBI. Although an increase in Draper expression was detected in astrocytes by RNA-seq, knockdown of its expression did not significantly suppress Mmp1 upregulation after TBI. Thus, Draper activates JNK/AP-1 and JAK/STAT signaling in ENG in response to axotomy (Doherty et al., 2014; Macdonald et al., 2013), whereas astrocytes respond to TBI via Pvr-mediated AP-1 signaling. Despite different pathways being activated in different types of glia upon brain injury, they may cooperate in response to TBI.

Endocytosis and trafficking of VEGFR, the mammalian Pvr homolog, regulate the specificity as well as the duration and strength of the signaling output (Simons et al., 2016). Once activated on the plasma membrane and translocated into the cytoplasm, VEGFRs are either shuttled to lysosomes for degradation or recycled back to the plasma membrane to replenish the receptor pool (Simons et al., 2016). Our findings showed that disruption of endocytosis by disrupting dynamin activity and inhibiting the expression of Arpc2, cpa, or cpb that regulate endocytic transport into early endosomes enhanced the AP-1 and Mmp1 upregulation in astrocyte following TBI (Figure 7A–D, H–K, O and P). As receptor endocytosis attenuates the strength or duration of many signaling processes by physically reducing the concentration of cell surface receptors accessible to the ligand (Jékely et al., 2005), blocking dynamin-mediated endocytosis and endocytic trafficking potentially results in accumulated Pvr receptors on the plasma membrane to activate the downstream effector AP-1, thereby enhancing the astrocytes response to TBI. On the other hand, ubiquitinated RTKs are recognized by ESCRT-0, followed by sequential recruitment of ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III onto the membranes of MVBs to form ILVs (Goh and Sorkin, 2013). Knockdown of the ESCRT-0 subunit Stam and the ESCRT-III subunits Chmp1 and Vps24 did not affect the expression of Pvr downstream signaling components (Figure 7E–G, L–N, O and P), suggesting that Pvr signal transduction was not regulated by endosomal sorting.

Considering the importance of VEGF signaling in a variety of cellular processes, including wound repair (Folkman and Klagsbrun, 1987), elucidating the downstream signaling mechanisms, as well as defining the full array of Pvr targets in healthy and diseased brains, will be critical for dissecting the protective or detrimental roles of VEGF in the context of brain injury. Given that the Pvr receptor, AP-1, and the MMP family of secreted proteases are all highly conserved across species, our work provides new insights into how VEGF signaling in glia mechanistically contributes to the TBI response in mammals.

Materials and methods

Drosophila stocks and husbandry

Flies were maintained on standard cornmeal medium at 25°C otherwise indicated. The following Drosophila strains were used: w1118, UAS-mCD8::GFP, R86E01-Gal4 (#45914; Bloomington), R54F03-Gal4 (#39157; Bloomington), UAS-Redstinger (#8547; Bloomington), UAS-Jra (#7216; Bloomington), UAS-kay (#7213; Bloomington), UAS-Pvr (#58429; Bloomington), UAS-nLacZ (#3955, Bloomington), PCNA-GFP (#25749; Bloomington) (Thacker et al., 2003), and TRE-dsRed (Chatterjee and Bohmann, 2012). UAS-draper-RNAi, UAS-Pvr-RNAi, UAS-Jra-RNAi, UAS-kay-RNAi, UAS-Arpc2-RNAi, UAS-cpa-RNAi, UAS-cpb-RNAi, UAS-Stam-RNAi, UAS-Vps24-RNAi, and UAS-Chmp1-RNAi flies were obtained from Tsinghua Fly Center (https://thfc.zzbd.org/en). yw UAS-CD8::GFP hs-FLP; tubP-Gal80 FRT-40A/CyO; alrm-Gal4 UAS-CD8::GFP UAS-Dcr2/TM6 Tb Hu (alrm-Gal4 is a specific driver in astrocytes [Doherty et al., 2009], a gift from Oren Schuldiner) and FRT-40A (a gift from Liqun Luo) were used for MARCM analysis of astrocytes. UAS-shibirets1 (Pfeiffer et al., 2012) was provided by Y. Zhong at Tsinghua University.

TBI assay

Construction and use of the HIT device were described previously (Anonymous, 2013). Deflection of the spring to 90° was the standard angle for strike. Mortality index at 24 hr (MI24) was determined by analyzing at least 120 flies (20 flies for each test).

Dye penetration assay

Dye penetration experiments were performed as previously described (Bainton et al., 2005). 10 kD Texas red-conjugated dextran (Molecular Probes) at 2.5 mM was injected into the soft tissue between two abdominal segments of the exoskeleton of flies with and without TBI. Flies were allowed to recover in fresh food tubes and photographed 2 hr later on a Zeiss microscope to detect the integrity of BEB. To detect the integrity of BBB, fly brains were dissected at 2 hr after injection and examined under an Olympus FluoView FV1000 microscope.

MARCM analysis

MARCM analysis in astrocytes was carried out largely following previous publications (Jia et al., 2019; Lee and Luo, 1999). Specifically, newly laid eggs were collected for a 4–5 hr interval and cultured at 18°C. Clones were induced by heat shock at 24 hr after larval hatching in a 37°C water bath for 15 min and flies were raised at 25°C after heat shock until immunohistochemistry analysis of adult brain.

Immunohistochemistry analysis and confocal microscopy

Brain tissues were dissected out from adult after specific treatments. Fixation and staining of adult brains were performed as previously described (Jia et al., 2019). Brains were mounted on slides in Vectashield mounting media (Vector Labs). Primary antibodies were used at the following dilutions: chicken anti-GFP (ab13970, Abcam) at 1:1000, mouse anti-Repo (8D12, DSHB) at 1:100, mouse anti-Elav (9F8A9, DSHB) at 1:100, mouse anti-Mmp1 (3A6B4, 3B8D12, and 5H7B11, DSHB) each at 1:20 for all three antibodies, rabbit anti-Pvr (McDonald et al., 2003) at 1:1000, rabbit anti-Dcp-1 (Asp216, Cell Signaling Technology [CST]) at 1:100, rabbit anti-pH3 (06–570, Millipore) at 1:1000, and mouse anti-β-gal (40-1a, DSHB) at 1:100. All secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488, 568, or 633 labeled; Molecular Probes) were used at a dilution of 1:1000. The nuclei dye To-Pro-3 Iodide (T3605, Thermo Fisher) was also used at a dilution of 1:1000. The cell-permeant MitoTracker (M22426, Thermo Fisher) was used at a concentration of 100 nM. For soma diameter analysis, we measured the average of long and short axes of astrocytes. All images were collected using an Olympus FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscope and processed with ImageJ. Serial images of 25–30 μm (one image per 1 μm slice) were projected for presentation and statistical analysis.

Astrocyte preparation for RNA-seq analysis

Flies were collected at 3 days after eclosion and treated with TBI. Brains from adult flies (R86E01-Gal4/UAS-Redstinger) with no injury, 4 hr after injury, and 24 hr after injury were dissected out in freshly prepared adult hemolymph saline (AHS) buffer, as previously described (Yang et al., 2016). Briefly, a total of ∼50 brains for each group was immediately transferred to an Eppendorf tube (1.5 mL) containing 200 µL AHS with Pronase (1 mg/mL; P5147, Sigma-Aldrich) and Dispase (1 mg/mL; LS02104, Worthington Biochemical Corporation). After tissue digestion for 30 min at 25°C, the enzyme medium was removed, followed by two brief, gentle washes with fresh AHS containing 2% PBS. Brain samples were then triturated by gently pipetting in 1 mL AHS through four fire-polished Pasteur pipettes with descending pore sizes (400 μm, 300 μm, 200 μm, and 100 μm) for a total of ∼20 min. Next, the dissociated cells were centrifuged for 10 min at 100 × g and the AHS was replaced with the same buffer to minimize any RNA content released from damaged cells during the trituration process. Finally, dissociated tissues were filtered through 45 μm filter and then put on ice. FACS sorting was performed according to the following gating procedure with 70 μm nozzle by BD FACS Aria: (1) an initial SSC-A/FSC-A gate to minimize debris; (2) an SSC-A/pe-Texa Ted-A gate to choose only red fluorescence positive cells. At this step, 1600 cells were sorted directly into ice-cold cell lysis buffer (oligo-dT30VN primer, ribonuclease inhibitor, dNTP mix) and stored at –80°C until all samples were ready for RNA extraction and cDNA amplification.

cDNA library preparation

A total of five biological replicates were collected for each condition (no injury, 4 hr after injury, and 24 hr after injury). Cell samples were sent to the Anoroad Company for RNA extraction. An Oligo-dT primer was introduced to the reverse transcription reaction for first-strand cDNA synthesis, followed by PCR amplification to enrich the cDNA and magbeads purification step was used to purify the products. Briefly, Smart-Seq2 method was used to amplify cDNA. Concentration and integrity of cDNA were assessed using Qubit 3.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) to ensure the cDNA length was around 1–2 kbp. After quality control, 40 ng cDNA was used to be fragmented at 350 bp by Bioruptor Sonication System (Diagenode Inc). To construct Illumina library, end repair, 3’ ends A-tailing, adaptor ligation, PCR amplification, and library validation were performed. PerkinElmer LabChip GX Touch and Step OnePlus Real-Time PCR System were used for library quality inspection. Qualified libraries were loaded on Illumina Hiseq platform for PE150 sequencing.

RNA-seq and data analysis

A total of 539 million reads (average 35.9 million reads per sample) was obtained. The fastq data were first processed with Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014) to remove Illumina adaptor. The remaining data was aligned against the UCSC D. melanogaster genome (dm6) using Hisat2 (Anonymous, 2013; Kim et al., 2019; Pertea et al., 2016) with the annotation file of the same version. On average, 92% of the initial reads were mapped to dm6. HTSeq was used to calculate the raw read counts of genes for each sample. DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014) was used to normalize the data. Transcripts were considered as significantly differentially expressed if their adjusted p-values were less than 0.01 (p<0.01) by the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Following normalization of the data, DESeq2 was used to perform pairwise comparisons between the control and experimental groups using parametric tests. Genes with absolute value of logarithmic fold change (log2FC) > 1.0 were qualified for the final set of DEGs. Volcano plots and heatmap were constructed for visualization of the resulting expression intensity data following the identification of DEGs and RNA-seq data normalization by the adjusted pvalue calculations.

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis

RT-qPCR was performed largely based on previous protocols (Zhao et al., 2020). Flies were treated with the same conditions as the RNA-seq experiment.RNA for AMPs analysis was extracted from whole fly brains by TriZol. RNA for confirming RNA-seq findings was isolated from more than 10,000 astrocytes sorted by FACS using the PicoPure RNA isolation kit (KIT0204, Life Technologies). cDNA was generated with SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (11752250, Invitrogen). For each gene, at least three pairs of qPCR primers were screened by standard curve analysis, and the best primer pairs were chosen based on their efficiency and specificity. Real-time qPCR was carried out by KAPA Library Quantification Kit (KR0389, KAPA Biosystems). Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary file 1.

Thermogenetic inhibition of endocytosis

For inhibition of endocytosis in astrocytes using UAS-Shits, crosses were reared and treated by HIT device at 23°C to avoid unintended inactivation. For thermogenetic inactivation, flies after TBI underwent intermittent temperature treatment at 32°C (32°C for 30 min, and then back to 23°C for 30 min, for four rounds, 4 hr in total) until dissection.

Statistical analysis

All statistical comparisons were performed using GraphPad Prism software, with significance indicated by ∗∗∗p≤0.001, ∗∗p≤0.01, ∗p≤0.05, and ns, p>0.05. One-way ANOVA was used to compare multiple group means. Student’s t-tests were used for statistical comparisons between the two groups.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0707100 and 2021ZD0203900 to YQZ), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31921002, 31830036, and 31861143031 to YQZ, 32170962 to MH and 31500839 to CX Mao), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program B grants (XDBS1020100 to YQZ), the 2030 Cross-Generation International Outstanding Young Scholars Program National Science and Technology Council Taiwan (113-2628-B-A49-007 to MH), and Brain Research Center National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan (MH). We thank Bloomington and Tsinghua stock centers for providing fly stocks. We are also grateful to Zhiguo Ma, Oren Schuldiner, Sean Speese, Yong Zhang, Zhiyong Liu, and the members of the Yong Q Zhang lab for discussion and suggestions.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Margaret S Ho, Email: margaret.ho@nycu.edu.tw.

Yong Q Zhang, Email: yqzhang@genetics.ac.cn.

Jiwon Shim, Hanyang University, Republic of Korea.

Utpal Banerjee, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2019YFA0707100 to Yong Q Zhang.

  • Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2021ZD0203900 to Yong Q Zhang.

  • National Science Foundation of China 31921002 to Yong Q Zhang.

  • National Science Foundation of China 31830036 to Yong Q Zhang.

  • National Science Foundation of China 31861143031 to Yong Q Zhang.

  • National Science Foundation of China 32170962 to Margaret S Ho.

  • Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program B XDBS1020100 to Yong Q Zhang.

  • National Science and Technology Council Taiwan 113-2628-B-A49-007 to Margaret S Ho.

  • Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan Higher Education Sprout Project to Margaret S Ho.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor, eLife.

Author contributions

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation.

Investigation, Methodology.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Primer sequences for the RT-qPCR analysis.
elife-87258-supp1.xlsx (9.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 2. DEGs after TBI.
elife-87258-supp2.xlsx (11.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 3. Upregulated gene list after TBI.
elife-87258-supp3.xlsx (57.7KB, xlsx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

Data has been deposited to GEO under accession GSE263447.

The following dataset was generated:

Li T, Shi W, Zhang YQ. 2024. A Pvr-AP-1-Mmp1 signaling pathway is activated in astrocytes upon traumatic brain injury. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE263447

References

  1. Anonymous A Drosophila model of closed head traumatic brain injury. PNAS. 2013;110:E4152–E4159. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N. VEGF in signaling and disease: beyond discovery and development. Cell. 2019;176:1248–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Awasaki T, Tatsumi R, Takahashi K, Arai K, Nakanishi Y, Ueda R, Ito K. Essential role of the apoptotic cell engulfment genes draper and ced-6 in programmed axon pruning during Drosophila metamorphosis. Neuron. 2006;50:855–867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayaz D, Leyssen M, Koch M, Yan J, Srahna M, Sheeba V, Fogle KJ, Holmes TC, Hassan BA. Axonal injury and regeneration in the adult brain of Drosophila. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28:6010–6021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0101-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bainton RJ, Tsai LTY, Schwabe T, DeSalvo M, Gaul U, Heberlein U. moody encodes two GPCRs that regulate cocaine behaviors and blood-brain barrier permeability in Drosophila. Cell. 2005;123:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barekat A, Gonzalez A, Mauntz RE, Kotzebue RW, Molina B, El-Mecharrafie N, Conner CJ, Garza S, Melkani GC, Joiner WJ, Lipinski MM, Finley KD, Ratliff EP. Using Drosophila as an integrated model to study mild repetitive traumatic brain injury. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:25252. doi: 10.1038/srep25252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bier E. Drosophila, the golden bug, emerges as a tool for human genetics. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2005;6:9–23. doi: 10.1038/nrg1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bogoyevitch MA, Kobe B. Uses for JNK: the many and varied substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2006;70:1061–1095. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00025-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borea PA, Gessi S, Merighi S, Varani K. Adenosine as a multi-signalling guardian angel in human diseases: when, where and how does it exert its protective effects? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2016;37:419–434. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brock AR, Wang Y, Berger S, Renkawitz-Pohl R, Han VC, Wu Y, Galko MJ. Transcriptional regulation of Profilin during wound closure in Drosophila larvae. Journal of Cell Science. 2012;125:5667–5676. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brüser L, Bogdan S. Adherens junctions on the move-membrane trafficking of E-cadherin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2017;9:a029140. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Büki A, Povlishock JT. All roads lead to disconnection?--Traumatic axonal injury revisited. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2006;148:181–193. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0674-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burda JE, Sofroniew MV. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron. 2014;81:229–248. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Byrns CN, Saikumar J, Bonini NM. Glial AP1 is activated with aging and accelerated by traumatic brain injury. Nature Aging. 2021;1:585–597. doi: 10.1038/s43587-021-00072-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chatterjee N, Bohmann D. A versatile ΦC31 based reporter system for measuring AP-1 and Nrf2 signaling in Drosophila and in tissue culture. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e34063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cho NK, Keyes L, Johnson E, Heller J, Ryner L, Karim F, Krasnow MA. Developmental control of blood cell migration by the Drosophila VEGF pathway. Cell. 2002;108:865–876. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00676-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chodobski A, Zink BJ, Szmydynger-Chodobska J. Blood-brain barrier pathophysiology in traumatic brain injury. Translational Stroke Research. 2011;2:492–516. doi: 10.1007/s12975-011-0125-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cunningham LA, Wetzel M, Rosenberg GA. Multiple roles for MMPs and TIMPs in cerebral ischemia. Glia. 2005;50:329–339. doi: 10.1002/glia.20169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Daneshvar DH, Goldstein LE, Kiernan PT, Stein TD, McKee AC. Post-traumatic neurodegeneration and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences. 2015;66:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, Littman DR, Dustin ML, Gan WB. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8:752–758. doi: 10.1038/nn1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Doherty J, Logan MA, Taşdemir OE, Freeman MR. Ensheathing glia function as phagocytes in the adult Drosophila brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:4768–4781. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5951-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Doherty J, Sheehan AE, Bradshaw R, Fox AN, Lu TY, Freeman MR. PI3K signaling and Stat92E converge to modulate glial responsiveness to axonal injury. PLOS Biology. 2014;12:e1001985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2002;2:161–174. doi: 10.1038/nrc745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Folkman J, Klagsbrun M. Angiogenic factors. Science. 1987;235:442–447. doi: 10.1126/science.2432664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeman MR. Drosophila central nervous system glia. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2015;7:a020552. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Goh LK, Sorkin A. Endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2013;5:a017459. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoch RV, Soriano P. Roles of PDGF in animal development. Development. 2003;130:4769–4784. doi: 10.1242/dev.00721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoopfer ED, McLaughlin T, Watts RJ, Schuldiner O, O’Leary DDM, Luo L. Wlds protection distinguishes axon degeneration following injury from naturally occurring developmental pruning. Neuron. 2006;50:883–895. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu Y, Flockhart I, Vinayagam A, Bergwitz C, Berger B, Perrimon N, Mohr SE. An integrative approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:357. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishimaru S, Ueda R, Hinohara Y, Ohtani M, Hanafusa H. PVR plays a critical role via JNK activation in thorax closure during Drosophila metamorphosis. The EMBO Journal. 2004;23:3984–3994. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jékely G, Sung HH, Luque CM, Rørth P. Regulators of endocytosis maintain localized receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in guided migration. Developmental Cell. 2005;9:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jia M, Meng D, Chen M, Li T, Zhang YQ, Yao A. Drosophila homolog of the intellectual disability-related long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 4 is required for neuroblast proliferation. Journal of Genetics and Genomics = Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2019;46:5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2018.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Joy MT, Ben Assayag E, Shabashov-Stone D, Liraz-Zaltsman S, Mazzitelli J, Arenas M, Abduljawad N, Kliper E, Korczyn AD, Thareja NS, Kesner EL, Zhou M, Huang S, Silva TK, Katz N, Bornstein NM, Silva AJ, Shohami E, Carmichael ST. CCR5 is a therapeutic target for recovery after stroke and traumatic brain injury. Cell. 2019;176:1143–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Katzenberger RJ, Chtarbanova S, Rimkus SA, Fischer JA, Kaur G, Seppala JM, Swanson LC, Zajac JE, Ganetzky B, Wassarman DA. Death following traumatic brain injury in Drosophila is associated with intestinal barrier dysfunction. eLife. 2015;4:e04790. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Katzenberger RJ, Ganetzky B, Wassarman DA. Age and diet affect genetically separable secondary injuries that cause acute mortality following traumatic brain injury in Drosophila. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2016;6:4151–4166. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.036194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kremer MC, Jung C, Batelli S, Rubin GM, Gaul U. The glia of the adult Drosophila nervous system. Glia. 2017;65:606–638. doi: 10.1002/glia.23115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Learte AR, Forero MG, Hidalgo A. Gliatrophic and gliatropic roles of PVF/PVR signaling during axon guidance. Glia. 2008;56:164–176. doi: 10.1002/glia.20601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee T, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 1999;22:451–461. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80701-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liddelow SA, Barres BA. Reactive astrocytes: production. Function, and Therapeutic Potential. Immunity. 2017;46:957–967. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, Bennett ML, Münch AE, Chung WS, Peterson TC, Wilton DK, Frouin A, Napier BA, Panicker N, Kumar M, Buckwalter MS, Rowitch DH, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Stevens B, Barres BA. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541:481–487. doi: 10.1038/nature21029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lu TY, Doherty J, Freeman MR. DRK/DOS/SOS converge with Crk/Mbc/dCed-12 to activate Rac1 during glial engulfment of axonal debris. PNAS. 2014;111:12544–12549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403450111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu TY, MacDonald JM, Neukomm LJ, Sheehan AE, Bradshaw R, Logan MA, Freeman MR. Axon degeneration induces glial responses through Draper-TRAF4-JNK signalling. Nature Communications. 2017;8:14355. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014;95:986–995. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. MacDonald JM, Beach MG, Porpiglia E, Sheehan AE, Watts RJ, Freeman MR. The Drosophila cell corpse engulfment receptor Draper mediates glial clearance of severed axons. Neuron. 2006;50:869–881. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Macdonald JM, Doherty J, Hackett R, Freeman MR. The c-Jun kinase signaling cascade promotes glial engulfment activity through activation of draper and phagocytic function. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2013;20:1140–1148. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. McDonald JA, Pinheiro EM, Montell DJ. PVF1, a PDGF/VEGF homolog, is sufficient to guide border cells and interacts genetically with Taiman. Development. 2003;130:3469–3478. doi: 10.1242/dev.00574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mira RG, Lira M, Cerpa W. Traumatic brain injury: Mechanisms of glial response. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021;12:740939. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.740939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mondal BC, Mukherjee T, Mandal L, Evans CJ, Sinenko SA, Martinez-Agosto JA, Banerjee U. Interaction between differentiating cell- and niche-derived signals in hematopoietic progenitor maintenance. Cell. 2011;147:1589–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Moreno E, Yan M, Basler K. Evolution of TNF signaling mechanisms: JNK-dependent apoptosis triggered by Eiger, the Drosophila homolog of the TNF superfamily. Current Biology. 2002;12:1263–1268. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00954-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Motz GT, Coukos G. Deciphering and reversing tumor immune suppression. Immunity. 2013;39:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ng SY, Lee AYW. Traumatic Brain Injuries: Pathophysiology and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2019;13:528. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Page-McCaw A, Ewald AJ, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8:221–233. doi: 10.1038/nrm2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Parks WC, Wilson CL, López-Boado YS. Matrix metalloproteinases as modulators of inflammation and innate immunity. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2004;4:617–629. doi: 10.1038/nri1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pastor-Pareja JC, Grawe F, Martín-Blanco E, García-Bellido A. Invasive cell behavior during Drosophila imaginal disc eversion is mediated by the JNK signaling cascade. Developmental Cell. 2004;7:387–399. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pekny M, Pekna M. Astrocyte intermediate filaments in CNS pathologies and regeneration. The Journal of Pathology. 2004;204:428–437. doi: 10.1002/path.1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nature Protocols. 2016;11:1650–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pfeiffer BD, Truman JW, Rubin GM. Using translational enhancers to increase transgene expression in Drosophila. PNAS. 2012;109:6626–6631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204520109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Poernbacher I, Vincent JP. Epithelial cells release adenosine to promote local TNF production in response to polarity disruption. Nature Communications. 2018;9:4675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07114-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Purice MD, Ray A, Münzel EJ, Pope BJ, Park DJ, Speese SD, Logan MA. A novel Drosophila injury model reveals severed axons are cleared through A Draper/MMP-1 signaling cascade. eLife. 2017;6:e23611. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rodríguez-Baeza A, Reina-de la Torre F, Poca A, Martí M, Garnacho A. Morphological features in human cortical brain microvessels after head injury: a three-dimensional and immunocytochemical study. The Anatomical Record. Part A, Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology. 2003;273:583–593. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.10069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rossiter H, Barresi C, Pammer J, Rendl M, Haigh J, Wagner EF, Tschachler E. Loss of vascular endothelial growth factor a activity in murine epidermal keratinocytes delays wound healing and inhibits tumor formation. Cancer Research. 2004;64:3508–3516. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Saikumar J, Byrns CN, Hemphill M, Meaney DF, Bonini NM. Dynamic neural and glial responses of a head-specific model for traumatic brain injury in Drosophila. PNAS. 2020;117:17269–17277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003909117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sakurai Y, Ohgimoto K, Kataoka Y, Yoshida N, Shibuya M. Essential role of Flk-1 (VEGF receptor 2) tyrosine residue 1173 in vasculogenesis in mice. PNAS. 2005;102:1076–1081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404984102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sangiorgi S, De Benedictis A, Protasoni M, Manelli A, Reguzzoni M, Cividini A, Dell’orbo C, Tomei G, Balbi S. Early-stage microvascular alterations of a new model of controlled cortical traumatic brain injury: 3D morphological analysis using scanning electron microscopy and corrosion casting. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2013;118:763–774. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.JNS12627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shi X, Luo L, Wang J, Shen H, Li Y, Mamtilahun M, Liu C, Shi R, Lee JH, Tian H, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Chung WS, Tang Y, Yang GY. Stroke subtype-dependent synapse elimination by reactive gliosis in mice. Nature Communications. 2021;12:6943. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27248-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sil S, Periyasamy P, Thangaraj A, Chivero ET, Buch S. PDGF/PDGFR axis in the neural systems. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2018;62:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Simons M, Gordon E, Claesson-Welsh L. Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2016;17:611–625. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathologica. 2010;119:7–35. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Stork T, Sheehan A, Tasdemir-Yilmaz OE, Freeman MR. Neuron-glia interactions through the Heartless FGF receptor signaling pathway mediate morphogenesis of Drosophila astrocytes. Neuron. 2014;83:388–403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Swanson LC, Trujillo EA, Thiede GH, Katzenberger RJ, Shishkova E, Coon JJ, Ganetzky B, Wassarman DA. Survival following traumatic brain injury in Drosophila Is increased by heterozygosity for a mutation of the NF-κB innate immune response transcription factor Relish. Genetics. 2020;216:1117–1136. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tang-Schomer MD, Patel AR, Baas PW, Smith DH. Mechanical breaking of microtubules in axons during dynamic stretch injury underlies delayed elasticity, microtubule disassembly, and axon degeneration. FASEB Journal. 2010;24:1401–1410. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-142844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Thacker SA, Bonnette PC, Duronio RJ. The contribution of E2F-regulated transcription to Drosophila PCNA gene function. Current Biology. 2003;13:53–58. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01400-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Valanne S, Wang JH, Rämet M. The Drosophila Toll signaling pathway. Journal of Immunology. 2011;186:649–656. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. van Alphen B, Stewart S, Iwanaszko M, Xu F, Li K, Rozenfeld S, Ramakrishnan A, Itoh TQ, Sisobhan S, Qin Z, Lear BC, Allada R. Glial immune-related pathways mediate effects of closed head traumatic brain injury on behavior and lethality in Drosophila. PLOS Biology. 2022;20:e3001456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. van der Bliek AM, Meyerowitz EM. Dynamin-like protein encoded by the Drosophila shibire gene associated with vesicular traffic. Nature. 1991;351:411–414. doi: 10.1038/351411a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Willsey HR, Zheng X, Carlos Pastor-Pareja J, Willsey AJ, Beachy PA, Xu T. Localized JNK signaling regulates organ size during development. eLife. 2016;5:e11491. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wu Y, Brock AR, Wang Y, Fujitani K, Ueda R, Galko MJ. A blood-borne PDGF/VEGF-like ligand initiates wound-induced epidermal cell migration in Drosophila larvae. Current Biology. 2009;19:1473–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yang CP, Fu CC, Sugino K, Liu Z, Ren Q, Liu LY, Yao X, Lee LP, Lee T. Transcriptomes of lineage-specific Drosophila neuroblasts profiled by genetic targeting and robotic sorting. Development. 2016;143:411–421. doi: 10.1242/dev.129163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhao K, Hong H, Zhao L, Huang S, Gao Y, Metwally E, Jiang Y, Sigrist SJ, Zhang YQ. Postsynaptic cAMP signalling regulates the antagonistic balance of Drosophila glutamate receptor subtypes. Development. 2020;147:dev191874. doi: 10.1242/dev.191874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zurovec M, Dolezal T, Gazi M, Pavlova E, Bryant PJ. Adenosine deaminase-related growth factors stimulate cell proliferation in Drosophila by depleting extracellular adenosine. PNAS. 2002;99:4403–4408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062059699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Jiwon Shim 1

This study represents a valuable finding on the neuron-glia communication and glial responses to traumatic brain injury (TBI). The data supporting the authors' conclusions on TBI analysis, RNA-seq on FACS sorted astrocytes, genetic analyses on Pvr-JNK/MMP1 are solid. However, cellular aspects of the response to TBI, statistical analysis, and molecular links between Pvr-AP1 are incomplete, which could be further strengthened in the future by more rigorous analyses.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Li et al report that upon traumatic brain injury (TBI), Pvr signalling in astrocytes activates the JNK pathway and up-regulates the expression of the well-known JNK target MMP1. The FACS sort astrocytes, and carry out RNAseq analysis, which identifies pvr as well as genes of the JNK pathway as particularly up-regulated after TBI. They use conventional genetics loss of function, gain of function and epistasis analysis with and without TBI to verify the involvement of the JNK-MMP1 signalling pathway downstream of PVR. They also show that blocking endocytosis prolongs the involvement of this pathway in the TBI response.

The strengths are that multiple experiments are used to demonstrate that TBI in their hands damaged the BBB, induced apoptosis and increased MMP1 levels. The RNAseq analysis on FACS sorted astrocytes is nice and will be valuable to scientists beyond the confines of this paper. The functional genetic analysis is conventional, yet sound, and supports claims of JNK and MMP1 functioning downstream of Pvr in the TBI context.

For this revised version the authors have removed all the unsupported claims. This renders their remaining claims more solid. However, it has resulted in the loss of important cellular aspects of the response to TBI, limiting the scope and value of the work.

The main weakness is that novelty and insight are both rather limited. Others had previously published that both JNK signalling and MMP1 were activated upon injury, in multiple contexts (as well as the articles cited by the authors, they should also see Losada-Perez et al 2021). That Pvr can regulate JNK signalling was also known (Ishimaru et al 2004). The authors claim that the novelty was investigating injury responses in astrocytes in Drosophila. However, others had investigated injury responses by astrocytes in Drosophila before. It had been previously shown that astrocytes - defined as the Prospero+ neuropile glia, and also sharing evolutionary features with mammalian NG2 glia - respond to injury both in larval ventral nerve cords and in adult brains, where they proliferate regenerating glia and induce a neurogenic response (Kato et al 2011; Losada-Perez et al 2016; Harrison et al 2021; Simoes et al 2022). The authors argue that the novelty of the work is the investigation of the response of astrocytes to TBI. However, this is of somewhat limited scope. The authors mention that MMP1 regulates tissue remodelling, the inflammatory process and cancer. Exploring these functions further would have been an interesting addition, but the authors did not investigate what consequences the up-regulation of MMP1 after injury has in repair or regeneration processes.

The statistical analysis is incorrect in places, and this could affect the validity of some claims.

Altogether, this is an interesting and valuable addition to the repertoire of articles investigating neuron-glia communication and glial responses to injury in the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). It is good and important to see this research area in Drosophila grow. This community together is building a compelling case for using Drosophila and its unparalleled powerful genetics to investigate nervous system injury, regeneration and repair, with important implications. Thus, this paper will be of interest to scientists investigating injury responses in the CNS using Drosophila, other model organisms (eg mice, fish) and humans.

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Anonymous

In this study, authors used the Drosophila model to characterize molecular details underlying traumatic brain injury (TBI). Authors used the transcriptomic analysis of astrocytes collected by FACS sorting of cells derived from Drosophila heads following brain injury and identified upregulation of multiple genes, such as Pvr receptor, Jun, Fos, and MMP1. Additional studies identified that Pvr positively activates AP-1 transciption factor (TF) complex consisting of Jun and Fos, of which activation leads to the induction of MMP1. Finally, authors found that disruption of endocytosis and endocytotic trafficking facilitates Pvr signaling and subsequently leads to induction of AP-1 and MMP1.

Overall, this study provides important clues to understanding molecular mechanisms underlying TBI. The identified molecules linked to TBI in astrocytes could be potential targets for developing effective therapeutics. The obtained data from transcriptional profiling of astrocytes will be useful for future follow-up studies. The manuscript is well-organized and easy to read.

However, the connection suggested by the authors between Pvr and AP-1, potentially mediated through the JNK pathway, lacks strong experimental support in my view. It's important to recognize that AP-1 activity is influenced by multiple upstream signaling pathways, not just the JNK pathway, which is the most well-characterized among them. Therefore, assuming that AP-1 transcriptional activity solely reflects the activity of the JNK pathway without additional direct evidence is unwarranted. To strengthen their argument, the study could benefit from direct evidence implicating the JNK pathway in linking Pvr to AP-1. This could be achieved through genetic studies involving mutants or transgenes targeting key components of the JNK pathway, such as Bsk and Hep, the Drosophila homologues of JNK and JNKK, respectively. Alternatively, employing p-JNK antibody-based techniques like Western blotting, while considering the potential challenges associated with p-JNK immunohistochemistry, could provide further validation. This important criticism regarding the molecular link between Pvr and AP-1 has been overlooked.

eLife. 2024 Oct 31;12:RP87258. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87258.3.sa3

Author response

Tingting Li 1, Wenwen Shi 2, Margaret S Ho 3, Yong Q Zhang 4

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Recommendations for the authors:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

To resolve and further test the claim that TBI did not induce cell proliferation:

How many brains did they analyse? Sample sizes must be provided in Figure S1.

As per reviewer’s suggestion, we removed one of the unsupported claims shown in Figure S1. The original Figure S1 is shown below with the sample number added.

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

The authors could either improve the TBI method or the detection of cells in S-phase, mitosis or cycling. They could use PCNA-GFP or BrdU, EdU or FUCCI instead and at least provide evidence that they can detect cells in S-phase in intact brains. Timing is critical (ie cell cycle is longer than in larvae) so multiple time points should be tested. Or they could use pH3 but test more time points and rather large sample sizes. If they are not able to provide any evidence, then their lack of evidence is no evidence. The authors should consider removing pH3 and PCNA-GFP related claims instead.

We have removed pH3 and PCNA-GFP related results and claims.

Other unsupported claims:

Figure 2A-C is not very clear what they are showing, but it is not evidence of astrocyte hypertrophy. It does not have cellular resolution and does not show the cell size, membranes, nor number

(1) We have avoided the term “hypertrophy” and changed the description throughout the text to “astrocyte swelling”.

(2) Images in the resolution of Figure 2E and 2F were able to show the enlarged soma of astrocytes, suggesting swelling.

What is the point of using RedStinger in Figure 2?

We used RedStinger to label the astrocyte nuclei.

Figure S5 is not convincing, as anti-Pvr does not look localised to specific cells. Instead, it looks like uniform background. If they really think the antibody is localised, they should do double stainings with cell type specific markers. If the antibody does not work, then remove the data and the claim. They could test with RNAi knock-down in specific cell types and qRT-PCR which cells express pvr instead.

We have removed the claim that “Pvr is predominantly expressed in astrocytes” and changed the description to “Immunostainings using the anti-Pvr antibodies revealed that endogenous Pvr expression is low in the control brains, yet significantly enhanced upon TBI. Reducing Pvr expression, but not Pvr overexpression, in astrocytes blocked the TBI-induced increase of Pvr expression (Figure S5)”.

Figure S6: it is unclear what they are trying to show, but these data do not demonstrate that astrocytes do not engulf debris after TBI, as there isn't sufficient cellular resolution to make such claim. Firstly, they analyse one single cell per treatment. Secondly, the cell projections are not visible in these images, and therefore engulfment cannot be seen. The authors could remove the claim or visualise whether astrocytes phagocytose debris or not either using clones or with TEM.

We agree with the reviewer that our images do not have the resolution to make this claim. We have removed Figure S6 and corresponding text description.

On statistics:

The statistical analysis needs revising as it is wrong in multiple places, eg Fig.1F,G,H; Figure 2D. They only use Student t-tests. These can only be used when data are continuous, distributed uniformly and only two samples are compared; if more than 2 samples, distributed uniformly, then use One-Way ANOVA and multiple comparisons tests. If data are categorical, use Chi-Square.

We have double checked and compared the experimental group to the control separately using the Student t-tests throughout the study.

Other points for improvement:

Figure 2E,F: what are GFP puncta and how are they counted?

I. Each GFP puncta looks like a little circle, likely representing a functional or dysfunctional structure. The biology of the GFP puncta is currently unkonwn.

II. We used the ImageJ to quantify the GFP puncta:

(1) Image- type-8 bits

(2) Process-subtract background (Rolling ball radio:10)

(3) Image-Adjust-Threshold-Apply

(4) Analyze-Measure-set measurements-choose “area” “limit to threshold”-OK

(5) Count the puncta number in the choosing area.

(6) Get the number of puncta per square micron.

All genotypes must be provided (including for MARCM clones), currently they are not.

We have shown the full genotype in the corresponding legend.

Figure 7O,P indicate on figure that these are RNAi

We have revised the labels to RNAi in Figure 7O,P.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

Several typos are present in the text.

We have read the manuscript carefully and corrected typos throughout.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Li T, Shi W, Zhang YQ. 2024. A Pvr-AP-1-Mmp1 signaling pathway is activated in astrocytes upon traumatic brain injury. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE263447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary file 1. Primer sequences for the RT-qPCR analysis.
    elife-87258-supp1.xlsx (9.6KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 2. DEGs after TBI.
    elife-87258-supp2.xlsx (11.3KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 3. Upregulated gene list after TBI.
    elife-87258-supp3.xlsx (57.7KB, xlsx)
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    Data has been deposited to GEO under accession GSE263447.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Li T, Shi W, Zhang YQ. 2024. A Pvr-AP-1-Mmp1 signaling pathway is activated in astrocytes upon traumatic brain injury. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE263447


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES