Abstract

Exploratory synthesis of solids is essential for the advancement of materials science but is also highly time- and resource-intensive. Here, we demonstrate an efficient strategy to explore solid-state synthesis of quaternary cesium chlorides in the search space of CsnAIBCl6 (n = 2 or 3, A = Li, Na or K, and B = d or p-block metal), where the target compositions are selected from a pool of candidates based on computationally predicted stabilities and availability of viable precursor powders. Synthesizability of the targets is assessed by observing the evolution of starting phases upon heating under in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Laboratory synthesis is attempted for promising targets, and resulting materials are characterized by powder X-ray and neutron diffraction and subsequent Rietveld refinement. We focus on how computational predictions can be bridged to experimental characterizations in exploratory synthesis and report on successful and failed synthesis attempts for compounds of type Cs2AIBIIICl6, revealing underexplored variants including new polymorphs of Cs2LiCrCl6 and Cs2LiRuCl6, and a new compound Cs2LiIrCl6.
Introduction
Discovery of functional materials that lead to transformative technologies, from superconductors to secondary batteries, builds on the diversity of compounds accumulating from exploratory syntheses.1−3 Automation of synthesis and characterization4−7 and revealing of reaction mechanisms in situ with X-ray diffraction (XRD) are increasing the pace of such explorations for new materials.8−12 Recent large-scale, artificial intelligence (AI)-accelerated density functional theory (DFT) searches indicate that thousands of low-energy compounds could be awaiting synthesis.13−20 These computational predictions provide an opportunity to rationally prioritize targets in silico prior to synthesis experiments and, in turn, more efficiently bridge experimental knowledge gaps that may exist even in broadly studied chemistries. For example, countering a large anion such as Cl– with a similarly sized alkali cation like Cs+ offers a flexible close-packed framework composed of Cs-Cl12 units with other cations occupying octahedral voids to form a wide array of ternary and quaternary compounds such as CsM2+Cl3, Cs2NaYCl6 or other chloro-elpasolite or perovskite-derived structures in similar chemistries.21−26 Such chlorides are attractive for many applications from optoelectronics to energy storage,27,28 hence hundreds of such compounds have been studied over many decades.21 Still, a preliminary analysis of DFT-based structure predictions (Table 1) and cross-comparison with the solved experimental structures available in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)29 indicate numerous relatively stable quaternary Cs-chloride targets with stoichiometries and structures analogous to well-known families are either unexplored (absent from the ICSD and no obvious mentions in the literature) or underexplored (mentioned in the literature but either missing key structure information and/or not deposited to ICSD), revealing gaps in syntheses and accessible experimental structures despite the extent of the prior work.
Table 1. Quaternary Cs-Cl Targets Explored in the Present Studya.
| computational predictions | prior knowledge | synthesis | characterization | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| formula | predicted SG | Ed (eV/atom) | ICSD | literature | powder avail. | in-situ XRD | lab synthesis attempted ∼ 350 °C ambient | lab synthesis attempted 500 °C 5 GPa | powder XRD | powder ND |
| Cs2LiRhCl6 |
P m1 |
–0.065 | N | N | Y | Y | fail | |||
| Cs2LiIrCl6 |
P m1b
|
–0.026 | N | N | Y | Y (>350 °C) | Y | P63/mmc | ||
| Cs3KCdCl6 |
R c
|
–0.024 | N | N | Y | Y (liq.>430 °C) | Y | fail | ||
| Cs2NaDyCl6 |
Fm m
|
–0.019 | N |
Fm m(21,36) |
Y | Y (liq.>500 °C) | Y |
Fm m
|
||
| Cs3NaCdCl6 |
R c
|
–0.018 | N | N | Y | Y (liq.>490 °C) | fail | |||
| Cs2LiCrCl6 |
P m1b
|
–0.015 | N |
P m135
|
Y | Y (>300 °C) | Y | P6322 | P6322 | |
| Cs2KDyCl6 | C2/m | –0.015 | N | P21 | Y | Y (unknown) | Y | fail | ||
| Cs3KSnCl6 |
R c
|
–0.011 | N | N | Y | Y (liq.>350 °C) | Y | fail | ||
| CsK2TlCl6 | C2/c | –0.010 | N | N | N | |||||
| Cs2LiTiCl6 |
P m1 |
–0.009 | N | N | N | |||||
| Cs2LiVCl6 |
P m1 |
–0.004 | N |
P m135
|
Y | Y | w/ impurity | |||
| Cs2LiRuCl6 |
P m1b
|
0.005 | N | P632237 | Y | Y | P63/mmc | |||
| Cs2LiFeCl6 |
P m1 |
0.019 | N | N | Y | Y | w/ impurity | |||
Space groups (SG) shown are for the predicted structures. Ed is the decomposition energy with respect to the Materials Project (MP)19 convex hull, hence is a measure of the energetic tendency of formation of listed compounds wrt. phases in MP. Powder avail. is the commercial availability of starting binary chloride powders. XRD: X-ray diffraction, ND: neutron diffraction, Y: Yes, N: No.
The space group of the corresponding Li/M-site mixing with half occupancy experimental structures can be assigned to P63/mmc. See the text for discussion of partial ordering.
Here, we explore the efficacy of computation-assisted exploratory synthesis in the space of quaternary cesium chlorides, where target compositions are prioritized by the zero-temperature DFT stabilities, assessments of experimental reports, and commercial availability of precursor powders. This is followed by high-temperature in situ synchrotron XRD to observe the reactions and seek formation of the target and attempts of laboratory synthesis and structural characterization by powder XRD, neutron diffraction (ND), and Rietveld refinement for a promising subset. We present both successful and failed attempts to synthesize the selected CsnABCl6 targets and discuss the current and future role of AI, computation, and in situ experiments in improving exploratory synthesis in light of our results.
Results and Discussion
To find plausible CsnABCl6 (n = 2 or 3, A = Li, Na or K, and B = d or p-block metal) compounds that may have been missed in prior experimental studies of quaternary cesium chlorides, we first search for CsnABCl6 structures that are computationally stable or close to stable in the combined zero-temperature convex hull of crystals from Materials Project, OQMD, and GNoME databases13,18,19 (hence higher likelihood of experimental realization30). In this work, we selected the compounds that did not have a matching ICSD29 entry (by composition) at the time of the work as targets. Absence in the ICSD implies the structure may not have been available to the computational community for further exploration, and identifying compounds not in the ICSD is commonly considered a benchmark for experimental novelty.11,17,29,31−34
Nevertheless, literature has gaps in digitization and is ever-evolving, and there could be compounds not registered in the ICSD; therefore, we further perform a manual search to see if or to what extent the targets were reported experimentally outside the ICSD. We found mentions of certain compositions such as Cs2NaDyCl6 (as an elpasolite) and Cs2LiCrCl6 (as a 2L-type perovskite) and their lattice parameters in reports from decades ago21,35,36 but could not locate them in the recent literature. For the latter, in particular, we could not find any mentions after the original report. We found that Cs2LiRuCl6 single crystal with partially ordered cation arrangement was reported recently,37 but an ICSD entry was not currently available to us. In light of these computational, ICSD, and literature analyses, we conclude that the targets listed in Table 1 are worth pursuing solid-state exploratory synthesis, as their addition to structural databases upon potential synthesis and characterization would be valuable for downstream functional materials discovery research, as synthetic discovery often precedes the latter.1
Next, we prioritize compositions based on the commercial availability of their binary chloride powders, preferably in the target valence state of the metals. For instance, anhydrous TlCl3 and TiCl3 powders were not readily available to us; hence, the respective candidates were removed from consideration. Accordingly, in the first batch, we choose Cs2LiIrCl6, Cs3KCdCl6, Cs3NaCdCl6, Cs2LiCrCl6, Cs2NaDyCl6, Cs2KDyCl6, and Cs3KSnCl6 as initial targets for in situ synchrotron XRD to screen reaction temperature and synthesizability in a wide temperature range, which reduces the time and effort required for initial exploration during synthesis significantly. Figure 1 shows the in situ synchrotron XRD results for six of the initial targets, where the mixture of starting binary chloride powders is heated at the stoichiometric ratio. Each measurement takes approximately 20 min, including heating, cooling, and changing of the sample in the quartz capillary by a robot. This process allows fast screening of the structural evolution and synthesis temperature at the synchrotron facility. Based on in situ XRD, Cs2LiIrCl6 and Cs2LiCrCl6 appear to crystallize into a structure similar to the hexagonal 2L-type perovskites.38 Interestingly, Cs2LiCrCl6 shows a weak peak around 3.8° above ∼ 400 °C and Cs2LiIrCl6 shows a broad peak at a similar angle above ∼ 380 °C, which may have relevance for Cr and Ir ordering in these systems as described later. The XRD pattern for Cs2NaDyCl6 matches the cubic elpasolite structure (Figure S1) reported previously.21 Precursor mixtures targeting Cs3KCdCl6, Cs3NaCdCl6, and Cs3KSnCl6 show phase transformations, including melting (appearing as diffuse peaks), but the final crystalline phase(s) could not be identified. Synthesis attempts at a high pressure (5 GPa) to suppress melting and stabilize these three solids were not successful (Figure S2). Hence, realization of Cs3ABCl6 (A = Li, Na or K) type compounds, for which we could not find any experimental reports on, remains an open challenge.
Figure 1.
In-situ hot-stage synchrotron XRD heating profiles of the mixtures of binary starting chloride powders. The heating rate is 60 K/min. Labels next to the XRD profiles highlight approximate ranges of the presence of major peaks, where P is precursor powders, T is target, C is other crystalline phase(s) forming, and L is the liquid phase.
The in situ XRD realization of Cs2LiCrCl6 and Cs2LiIrCl6 motivated us to attempt laboratory synthesis of not only these phases but also reasonably stable variants with other d-block cations as shown in Table 1, namely Cs2LiVCl6, Cs2LiFeCl6, Cs2LiRhCl6, and Cs2LiRuCl6. For laboratory synthesis, we target 350–450 °C, which is the temperature range in which Cs2LiCrCl6 and Cs2LiIrCl6 start to form during the synchrotron XRD experiments (Figure 1). Among the mentioned compositions, laboratory synthesis was achieved for Cs2LiMIIICl6 with M = Cr, Ir, and Ru and confirmed with powder XRD and ND (Figure 2a). The details of Rietveld refinement are summarized in Table 2 and the crystallographic information files (CIFs). The Cs:Cr:Cl, Cs:Ir:Cl, and Cs:Ru:Cl ratios of resulting phases are semiquantitatively confirmed to be close to the ideal values of the stoichiometric Cs2LiMIIICl6 (Table S1). For M = Ru, 10% LiCl excess was used to suppress Cs2RuCl6 and isolate Cs2LiRuCl6 as the main phase (Figure S3), which is a strategy to drive certain reactions forward.39 Despite M = Cr, Fe, and V forming similar hexagonal CsMCl3 perovskites, we were able to isolate only the M = Cr variant in the quaternary form. For M = Fe, the quaternary phase can be present with impurity phases. For M = V and Rh, structural characterization was difficult as the target phase was not formed as a major phase (Figure S4).
Figure 2.
(a) Rietveld refinement of XRD and neutron diffraction (ND) profiles of quaternary Cs2LiMCl6 chlorides synthesized at 350–400 °C: M = Cr, Ru, and Ir. Predicted (ordered), experimental disordered, and experimental partially disordered structures are shown in (b), (c), and (d), respectively. Cs, Li, and M atoms are shown as gray, blue, and red spheres, respectively. Partially ordered structure is displayed also along the <110> direction. (Li/M)-Cl octahedra are shown, but Cl atoms are not shown for simplicity. For Li/Cr, synchrotron XRD is shown. Structures in (c) and (d) were further corroborated in cluster expansion (CE) driven Monte Carlo simulations.
Table 2. Summary of the Rietveld Refinement Results of Cs2LiCrCl6, Cs2LiIrCl6, and Cs2LiRuCl6 Synthesized at 350-400 °C with the P63/mmc or P6322 Modela.
| formula | Cs2LiCrCl6b | Cs2LiIrCl6 | Cs2LiRuCl6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| radiation source | synchrotron X-ray | neutron | X-ray (CuKα) | X-ray (CuKα) |
| wavelength (Å) | 0.354233 | 1.34171 | 1.5418 | 1.5418 |
| Rwp (%) | 5.27 [20.86] | 6.38 [9.71] | 12.9 [25.6] | 11.7 [14.5] |
| S = Rwp/Re | 3.61 [14.26] | 1.87 [2.84] | 2.68 [5.31] | 2.35 [2.91] |
| crystal system | hexagonal | hexagonal | hexagonal | |
| space group | P6322 | P63/mmc | P63/mmc | |
| Z | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| a (Å) | 12.4403(2) | 7.15306(10) | 7.16299(8) | |
| c (Å) | 6.06772(12) | 6.05619(10) | 6.05324(11) | |
| V (Å3) | 813.24(3) | 268.358(9) | 268.972(8) | |
| g (M3+)c | 0.5/0.711(8) | 0.491(3) | 0.52(2) | |
The numbers inside the brackets
in Rwp, Re, and S are those with the P
m1 ordered model.
Combined Rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffraction and the neutron diffraction.
Refined occupancy of M3+ with the restriction of g(Li) + g(M) = 1. Final refinements for CIF were performed with the fixed occupancy of 0.5, except for the Li/Cr case, where the occupancy in partially ordered chains was also refined.
By definition, DFT stability predictions are done
using a zero-temperature fully-ordered guess for the structure.
For instance, for M = Cr, Ru, and Ir, the respective structure has
the space group of P
m1 (Figure 2b). Unless treated separately (external to
DFT),40 finite temperature (or entropic)
effects, such as site mixing, are not captured. In the mentioned cases,
site mixing on Li and M sites with half occupancies would alter the
space group from P
m1 to P63/mmc and partial mixing can lead to
an intermediate P6322 superlattice structure
with
(Z = 3) unit cell37 (Figure 2c,d). While the XRD patterns are close to P63/mmc with half occupation of Li and
M cations, for M = Cr, the small peak at Q ∼
1.16 Å–1 supports the presence of the P6322 superlattice, where the Rietveld refinement
indicates 1/3 of Li/Cr chains remain disordered and 2/3 remain partially
ordered with alternating Li and Cr-rich sites (Table 2 and Figure S5). This superstructure is different from the previous report with
fully ordered P
m1 form (Table 1), where only the lattice parameter
was reported.35 In contrast, we found Cs2LiRuCl6 crystallizes into a site mixing Li/Ru variant
with the space group of P63/mmc (without a clear superlattice peak), suggesting no long-range ordering
of Li/Ru, which is different from the partially ordered Cs2LiRuCl6 reported before (Figure S3).37 Due to the higher atomic numbers
of Ru and Ir, Li/Ru and Li/Ir orderings are more detectable under
XRD compared to Li/Cr. In the case of Cs2LiIrCl6, which is reported for the first time here, a broad hump is observed
near the superlattice peak at Q ∼ 1.16 Å–1 as shown in Figures 1 and 2. This broad hump suggests
no long-range ordering of the Ir site, but its short-range ordering
close to the P6322 superlattice structure
is likely. TEM electron diffraction images of Cs2LiCrCl6 and Cs2LiIrCl6 (Figure S6) show the corresponding superlattice 10
spots along the diffuse streak along <110>.
Therefore, a short-range ordered superlattice structure is likely
for both, but for the latter, given also the XRD data with the absence
of long-range order of Li/Ir, the average structure can be represented
as a simple disordered structure with the space group of P63/mmc.
The 2L-type quaternary
Cs2LiMIIICl6 (P
m1) can be viewed as an
ordered variant of the known hexagonal ternary perovskites CsMIICl3 (M = Cr, Fe, and V), where the M site is occupied
by an alternating pattern of Li and M. While the electrostatic interactions
should favor Li/M cation ordering due to the valence difference, varying
degrees of site mixing between different cations on the B-sublattices
of double perovskites (mostly in oxides,41 but also halides42,43) or Li/metal sublattices in other
compounds44−47 are reported even for dissimilar cation oxidation states, hence
some degree of (full or partial) mixing of Li+ and similarly
sized d-metal M3+ cations here in Cs2LiMIIICl6 at finite temperatures is
not unexpected. In cases where there is negligible Li+/M3+ disordering in experiments, cluster expansion (CE) and Monte
Carlo (MC) simulations were shown to correctly estimate the Li+/M3+ disordering temperature to be too high to
be relevant in practice.48 Using similar
CE-driven MC simulations, we estimate a notable degree of Li+/Cr3+ mixing to be possible in temperature ranges comparable
to that accessed in our experiments (Figure S7), indicating that the extent of order/disorder for Li+/Cr3+ (or the similar Li+/M3+ pairs
here) would strongly depend on the experimental conditions and thermal
history. The CE-driven MC predicted stable configuration at 300 K
is similar to Watanabe et al.’s
(Z = 3) unit cell,37 but has all chains ordered, yielding a space
group of again P
m1. We find that at higher
temperatures where there is partial long-range order (e.g., 1000 K),
this structure partially disorders along (011) in a planar stacking
similar to Watanabe et al.’s P6322, where chains that extend along the c-direction across two adjacent
(011) planes remain mostly ordered and shifted by c/2 with respect
to each other, and the third (011) plane in sequence loses the long-range
order while maintaining short-range order. At more elevated temperatures
(e.g., 1500 K), the Li/Cr long-range order mostly vanishes, and most
chains/planes have antisite defects that reduce the structure on average
to P63/mmc. These findings
reconcile our results with the results in ref (37) and show that the low
to moderately high-temperature sequence for these materials likely
follows P
m1 (Z =
3 phase) → P6322 →P63/mmc. Hence, a spectrum from
partial or full disordering of Li and M may exist in the present samples
depending on the thermal history.
The present results summarized in Table 1 show that DFT-predicted stabilities can play a role in prioritizing targets for efficiently finding synthesizable compounds in experiments, where four out of ten laboratory-synthesis attempts yielded a phase close to what was targeted. There is no question that experts can use the intuition and geometrical heuristics such as tolerance factors49,50 to arrive at most of the formulations in Table 1, but the present results indicate that AI and computations are becoming effective in reliably finding such gaps in combinatorially large chemical spaces that are otherwise impractical to navigate experimentally in a single study, and in turn, making exploratory synthesis research more productive. More concretely, there are ∼280 charge-neutral CsnABCl6 (n = 2 or 3, A = Li, Na or K), ∼20 of which were in the ICSD at the time of writing, hence leaving a large space to manually navigate. On the other hand, of the ∼120 such charge-neutral candidates in our database of low-energy compounds with no match in the ICSD, 25 were on the convex hull, indicating higher synthesis likelihood. Further prioritization with decomposition energies yielded our initial short-list (Table 1), increasing the efficiency of exploration by roughly an order of magnitude. Besides, due to its dependence on the knowledge of other materials in the chemical space, stability is a highly informative metric that is difficult to match with intuition or heuristics. Stability assessment naturally improves with more data, for instance, our convex hull combines GNoME13 (the largest database of known stable materials) with other DFT databases,13,18,19 and therefore likely provides the most comprehensive stability assessment possible today. In our analysis above, using the MP hull alone would predict 40% more candidates as stable, adding more potential false positives to the short-list. We observe that using a more comprehensive database in computational guidance also enabled us to get the initial crystal structures accurately enough for downstream refinement in experiments. Lastly, computational guidance helps reduce the bias and improves confidence toward less usual targets, e.g., Cs2LiIrCl6 is less likely to be attempted in a more traditional exploratory synthesis setting considering the cost of Ir precursors and limited examples of (qua)ternary Ir halides.
Both computational and experimental steps presented here can be improved in the future. Automation of expensive computational treatments of temperature (e.g., site-mixing, vibrations, melting, etc.)11,31,40,51 or pressure effects,52 predictive methods for precursor selection,53−56 or determination of excess precursor requirements,39,57 language model assisted extraction of information buried in the chemistry literature,58−60 and utilization of a broader set of experimental databases61,62 can all provide significantly better guidance for synthesis and reduce time-consuming trial/error in synthesis (or single crystal growth) or expensive characterization (e.g., ND or single-crystal XRD for resolving occupancy of light elements). Lack of analogous compositions for a target in experimental databases (as in Cs3ABCl6) or ease of access to precursors (inferable from reaction data sets58) could be indicators of challenging synthesis and used to augment the computation-based rankings. The present in situ XRD experiments are geared toward rapid screening, but a robust solution of diffraction patterns, combination with pair functional distribution analysis, longer heating durations, and ability to robustly control chemical potentials, pressure or atmosphere would produce fewer false negative or false positive results.31,63−67 Finally, we emphasize that findability and accessibility of structural data play a crucial role in AI-accelerated exploratory synthesis.
Conclusions
In this work, we explored the gaps of experimental synthesis and characterization in the model space of Cs-based quaternary chlorides by prioritizing targets using DFT-based stability predictions, assessing synthesizability by tracking reactions in situ with synchrotron XRD, and subsequently performing laboratory synthesis of the products. We found that even in broadly studied chemistries like Cs-based chlorides, the compositional guidance provided by computational stabilities from large-scale DFT databases makes the synthesis attempts more efficient. The computationally predicted ordered structures for Cs2LiMCl6 (M: Cr, Ru, and Ir) served as a starting point for refinement and subsequent proposal of Li/M mixing in experimental structures due to entropic effects. Detailed diffraction experiments (X-ray and neutron) and subsequent careful refinements revealed that the extent of site mixing was different from prior reports for M = Cr and Ru, highlighting the sensitivity of ordering of monovalent and trivalent cations to the thermal history in the synthesized structures. Finally, the crystal structure data for previously unexplored (e.g., Cs2LiIrCl6) or underexplored Cs-chlorides synthesized in this work are made digitally available for downstream functional discovery searches by deposition to structure databases.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Prof. Anthony Cheetham and Prof. Ram Seshadri for valuable feedback on the manuscript, and Prof. Aron Walsh for stimulating discussions. We are also grateful for the valuable feedback from Dr. Alexander Gaunt. A.M. is grateful to Mr. Keigo Miyata and Ms. Masae Sawamoto for preparing the powder samples and preliminary analysis, and to Prof. Aichi Yamashita and Mr. Keigo Ono for supporting the synchrotron XRD and neutron diffraction, respectively. The synchrotron X-ray and neutron diffraction measurements were approved with 2023B1669/2023B1942 and 23617, respectively. A.M. and C.H.L. acknowledge the support from the Center of Neutron Science for Advanced Materials Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University. This work is partially supported by JST JPMJPR21Q8 and JSPS KAKENHI 20KK0124.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.4c10294.
Experimental and computational methods, EDX measurements, supplementary XRD patterns, TEM images, Monte Carlo simulation results, and experimental setup at synchrotron and supplementary references (PDF)
Author Contributions
∇ A.M. and M.A. contributed equally to this work.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Cheetham A. K.; Seshadri R.; Wudl F. Chemical Synthesis and Materials Discovery. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1 (7), 514–520. 10.1038/s44160-022-00096-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cava R. J.; Batlogg B.; van Dover R. B.; Murphy D. W.; Sunshine S.; Siegrist T.; Remeika J. P.; Rietman E. A.; Zahurak S.; Espinosa G. P. Bulk Superconductivity at 91 K in Single-Phase Oxygen-Deficient Perovskite Ba2YCu. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58 (16), 1676–1679. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamaya N.; Homma K.; Yamakawa Y.; Hirayama M.; Kanno R.; Yonemura M.; Kamiyama T.; Kato Y.; Hama S.; Kawamoto K.; Mitsui A. A Lithium Superionic Conductor. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10 (9), 682–686. 10.1038/nmat3066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szymanski N. J.; Rendy B.; Fei Y.; Kumar R. E.; He T.; Milsted D.; McDermott M. J.; Gallant M.; Cubuk E. D.; Merchant A.; Kim H.; Jain A.; Bartel C. J.; Persson K.; Zeng Y.; Ceder G. An Autonomous Laboratory for the Accelerated Synthesis of Novel Materials. Nature 2023, 624 (7990), 86–91. 10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J.; Cross S. R.; Miara L. J.; Cho J.-J.; Wang Y.; Sun W. Navigating Phase Diagram Complexity to Guide Robotic Inorganic Materials Synthesis. Nat. Synth. 2024, 3, 606–614. 10.1038/s44160-024-00502-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu R.; Kobayashi S.; Watanabe Y.; Ando Y.; Hitosugi T. Autonomous Materials Synthesis by Machine Learning and Robotics. APL Mater. 2020, 8 (11), 111110. 10.1063/5.0020370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Burger B.; Maffettone P. M.; Gusev V. V.; Aitchison C. M.; Bai Y.; Wang X.; Li X.; Alston B. M.; Li B.; Clowes R.; Rankin N.; Harris B.; Sprick R. S.; Cooper A. I. A Mobile Robotic Chemist. Nature 2020, 583 (7815), 237–241. 10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes A. S.; Stoumpos C. C.; Chen H.; Chica D.; Kanatzidis M. G. Panoramic Synthesis as an Effective Materials Discovery Tool: The System Cs/Sn/P/Se as a Test Case. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (31), 10814–10821. 10.1021/jacs.7b05423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinolich A. J.; Kurzman J. A.; Neilson J. R. Circumventing Diffusion in Kinetically Controlled Solid-State Metathesis Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (34), 11031–11037. 10.1021/jacs.6b06367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miura A.; Bartel C. J.; Goto Y.; Mizuguchi Y.; Moriyoshi C.; Kuroiwa Y.; Wang Y.; Yaguchi T.; Shirai M.; Nagao M.; Rosero-Navarro N. C.; Tadanaga K.; Ceder G.; Sun W. Observing and Modeling the Sequential Pairwise Reactions That Drive Solid-State Ceramic Synthesis. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33 (24), e2100312 10.1002/adma.202100312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montoya J.; Grimley C.; Aykol M.; Ophus C.; Sternlicht H.; Savitzky B.; Minor A.; Torrisi S.; Goedjen J.; Chung C.-C.; Comstock A.; Sun S. How the AI-Assisted Discovery and Synthesis of a Ternary Oxide Highlights Capability Gaps in Materials Science. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15, 5660–5673. 10.1039/D3SC04823C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoemaker D. P.; Hu Y.-J.; Chung D. Y.; Halder G. J.; Chupas P. J.; Soderholm L.; Mitchell J. F.; Kanatzidis M. G. In Situ Studies of a Platform for Metastable Inorganic Crystal Growth and Materials Discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111 (30), 10922–10927. 10.1073/pnas.1406211111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merchant A.; Batzner S.; Schoenholz S. S.; Aykol M.; Cheon G.; Cubuk E. D. Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery. Nature 2023, 624, 80–85. 10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griesemer S. D.; Xia Y.; Wolverton C. Accelerating the Prediction of Stable Materials with Machine Learning. Nat Comput Sci 2023, 3 (11), 934–945. 10.1038/s43588-023-00536-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y.; Baldassarri B.; Shen J.; He J.; Wolverton C. Thermal Stabilities Landscape of A2BB’O6 Compounds. arXiv 2024, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.19220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeni C.; Pinsler R.; Zügner D.; Fowler A.; Horton M.; Fu X.; Shysheya S.; Crabbé J.; Sun L.; Smith J.; Nguyen B.; Schulz H.; Lewis S.; Huang C.-W.; Lu Z.; Zhou Y.; Yang H.; Hao H.; Li J.; Tomioka R.; Xie T. MatterGen: A Generative Model for Inorganic Materials Design. arXiv 2023, 10.48550/arXiv.2312.03687. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun W.; Bartel C. J.; Arca E.; Bauers S. R.; Matthews B.; Orvañanos B.; Chen B.-R.; Toney M. F.; Schelhas L. T.; Tumas W.; Tate J.; Zakutayev A.; Lany S.; Holder A. M.; Ceder G. A Map of the Inorganic Ternary Metal Nitrides. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18 (7), 732–739. 10.1038/s41563-019-0396-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirklin S.; Saal J. E.; Meredig B.; Thompson A.; Doak J. W.; Aykol M.; Rühl S.; Wolverton C. The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): Assessing the Accuracy of DFT Formation Energies. npj Comput. Mater. 2015, 1 (1), 15010. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jain A.; Ong S. P.; Hautier G.; Chen W.; Richards W. D.; Dacek S.; Cholia S.; Gunter D.; Skinner D.; Ceder G.; Persson K. A. Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation. APL Mater. 2013, 1 (1), 011002 10.1063/1.4812323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Montoya J. H.; Winther K. T.; Flores R. A.; Bligaard T.; Hummelsho̷j J. S.; Aykol M. Autonomous Intelligent Agents for Accelerated Materials Discovery. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11 (32), 8517–8532. 10.1039/D0SC01101K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer G. The Synthesis and Structures of Complex Rare-Earth Halides. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1982, 14 (3), 141–219. 10.1016/0079-6786(82)90005-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan E. E.; Kent G. T.; Zohar A.; O’Dea A.; Wu G.; Cheetham A. K.; Seshadri R. Hybrid and Inorganic Vacancy-Ordered Double Perovskites A2WCl6. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35 (17), 7032–7038. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y.; Seshadri R.; Wilson S. D.; Cheetham A. K.; Valenti R. Origins of Temperature-Dependent Magnetism in Open-Shell 4d and 5d Halide Perovskites. arXiv 2024, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.14064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vishnoi P.; Zuo J. L.; Cooley J. A.; Kautzsch L.; Gomez-Torres A.; Murillo J.; Fortier S.; Wilson S. D.; Seshadri R.; Cheetham A. K. Chemical Control of Spin-Orbit Coupling and Charge Transfer in Vacancy-Ordered Ruthenium(IV) Halide Perovskites. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (10), 5184–5188. 10.1002/anie.202013383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson M. T.; Greenwood K. B.; Taylor G. A.; Poeppelmeier K. R. B-Cation Arrangements in Double Perovskites. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1993, 22 (3), 197–233. 10.1016/0079-6786(93)90004-B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kent G. T.; Morgan E.; Albanese K. R.; Kallistova A.; Brumberg A.; Kautzsch L.; Wu G.; Vishnoi P.; Seshadri R.; Cheetham A. K. Elusive Double Perovskite Iodides: Structural, Optical, and Magnetic Properties. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (32), e202306000 10.1002/anie.202306000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ji K.; Anaya M.; Abfalterer A.; Stranks S. D. Halide Perovskite Light-emitting Diode Technologies. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9 (18), 2002128 10.1002/adom.202002128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C.; Liang J.; Kim J. T.; Sun X. Prospects of Halide-Based All-Solid-State Batteries: From Material Design to Practical Application. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8 (36), eadc9516 10.1126/sciadv.adc9516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belsky A.; Hellenbrandt M.; Karen V. L.; Luksch P. New Developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): Accessibility in Support of Materials Research and Design. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 2002, 58 (3-1), 364–369. 10.1107/S0108768102006948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun W.; Dacek S. T.; Ong S. P.; Hautier G.; Jain A.; Richards W. D.; Gamst A. C.; Persson K. A.; Ceder G. The Thermodynamic Scale of Inorganic Crystalline Metastability. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2 (11), e1600225 10.1126/sciadv.1600225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leeman J.; Liu Y.; Stiles J.; Lee S. B.; Bhatt P.; Schoop L. M.; Palgrave R. G. Challenges in High-Throughput Inorganic Materials Prediction and Autonomous Synthesis. PRX Energy 2024, 3 (1), 011002 10.1103/PRXEnergy.3.011002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi H.; Katayama S.; Komura T.; Hinuma Y.; Yokoyama T.; Mibu K.; Oba F.; Tanaka I. Discovery of a Novel Sn(II)-Based Oxide β-SnMoO4 for Daylight-Driven Photocatalysis. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4 (1), 1600246 10.1002/advs.201600246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi H.; Seko A.; Tanaka I. Recommender System for Discovery of Inorganic Compounds. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8 (1), 217. 10.1038/s41524-022-00899-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M.; Singh S. P.; Shim S.; Park W. B.; Sohn K.-S. Discovery of a Quaternary Sulfide, Ba2–xLiAlS4:Eu2+, and Its Potential as a Fast-Decaying LED Phosphor. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 6697. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer G.; Gaebell H.-C. Halogen-Elpasolithe. III. Kubische und hexagonale Elpasolithe vom Typ Cs2LiMIIICl6 (MIII = Sc, Y, La-Nd, Sm-Lu, V, Cr, In). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1978, 445 (1), 147–151. 10.1002/zaac.19784450118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Morss L. R.; Siegal M.; Stenger L.; Edelstein N. Preparation of Cubic Chloro Complex Compounds of Trivalent Metals: Cs2NaMCl6. Inorg. Chem. 1970, 9 (7), 1771–1775. 10.1021/ic50089a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe K.; Kurita N.; Tanaka H.; Sugiyama H.; Uekusa H.; Diaz-Ortega I. F.; Nojiri H. Coupled Spin-1/2 Antiferromagnetic Chain Cs2LiRuCl6 with Partially Disordered Crystal Lattice. Physical Review B 2021, 103, 064419 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.064419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Reber C.; Guedel H. U.; Meyer G.; Schleid T.; Daul C. A. Optical Spectroscopic and Structural Properties of vanadium(3+)-Doped Fluoride, Chloride, and Bromide Elpasolite Lattices. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28 (16), 3249–3258. 10.1021/ic00315a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Miura A.; Ito H.; Bartel C. J.; Sun W.; Rosero-Navarro N. C.; Tadanaga K.; Nakata H.; Maeda K.; Ceder G. Selective Metathesis Synthesis of MgCr2S4 by Control of Thermodynamic Driving Forces. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7 (5), 1310–1316. 10.1039/C9MH01999E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- van de Walle A.; Asta M.; Ceder G. The Alloy Theoretic Automated Toolkit: A User Guide. Calphad 2002, 26, 539–553. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)80006-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vasala S.; Karppinen M. A2B′B″O6 Perovskites: A Review. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2015, 43 (1), 1–36. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li W.; Rahman N. U.; Xian Y.; Yin H.; Bao Y.; Long Y.; Yuan S.; Zhang Y.; Yuan Y.; Fan J. Regulation of the Order–disorder Phase Transition in a Cs2NaFeCl6 Double Perovskite towards Reversible Thermochromic Application. J. Semicond. 2021, 42 (7), 072202 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/072202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan W.; Niu G.; Xian Y.; Wu H.; Wang H.; Yin H.; Liu P.; Li W.; Fan J. In Situ Regulating the Order–disorder Phase Transition in Cs 2 AgBiBr 6 Single Crystal toward the Application in an X-ray Detector. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29 (20), 1900234 10.1002/adfm.201900234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clément R. J.; Lun Z.; Ceder G. Cation-Disordered Rocksalt Transition Metal Oxides and Oxyfluorides for High Energy Lithium-Ion Cathodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13 (2), 345–373. 10.1039/C9EE02803J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ito H.; Shitara K.; Wang Y.; Fujii K.; Yashima M.; Goto Y.; Moriyoshi C.; Rosero-Navarro N. C.; Miura A.; Tadanaga K. Kinetically Stabilized Cation Arrangement in Li3 YCl6 Superionic Conductor during Solid-State Reaction. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8 (15), e2101413 10.1002/advs.202101413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding F.; Doi A.; Ogawa T.; Ubukata H.; Zhu T.; Kato D.; Tassel C.; Oikawa I.; Inui N.; Kuze S.; Yamabayashi T.; Fujii K.; Yashima M.; Ou X.; Wang Z.; Min X.; Fujita K.; Takamura H.; Kuwabara A.; Zhang T.; Griffith K. J.; Lin Z.; Chai L.; Kageyama H. Anionic Sublattices in Halide Solid Electrolytes: A Case Study with the High-Pressure Phase of Li3 ScCl6. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202401779 10.1002/anie.202401779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito H.; Nakahira Y.; Ishimatsu N.; Goto Y.; Yamashita A.; Mizuguchi Y.; Moriyoshi C.; Toyao T.; Shimizu K.-I.; Oike H.; Enoki M.; Rosero-Navarro N. C.; Miura A.; Tadanaga K. Stability and Metastability of Li3YCl6 and Li3HoCl6. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2023, 96 (11), 1262–1268. 10.1246/bcsj.20230132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wolverton C.; Zunger A. Cation and Vacancy Ordering in LixCoO2. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 1998, 57 (4), 2242. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.2242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bartel C. J.; Sutton C.; Goldsmith B. R.; Ouyang R.; Musgrave C. B.; Ghiringhelli L. M.; Scheffler M. New Tolerance Factor to Predict the Stability of Perovskite Oxides and Halides. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5 (2), eaav0693 10.1126/sciadv.aav0693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vishnoi P.; Seshadri R.; Cheetham A. K. Why Are Double Perovskite Iodides so Rare?. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125 (21), 11756–11764. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02870. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tolborg K.; Klarbring J.; Ganose A. M.; Walsh A. Free Energy Predictions for Crystal Stability and Synthesisability. Digital Discovery 2022, 1 (5), 586–595. 10.1039/D2DD00050D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Amsler M.; Hegde V. I.; Jacobsen S. D.; Wolverton C. Exploring the High-Pressure Materials Genome. Phys. Rev. X 2018, 8 (4), 041021 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kovnir K. Predictive Synthesis. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 4835. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01484. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aykol M.; Merchant A.; Batzner S.; Wei J. N.; Cubuk E. D. Predicting Emergence of Crystals from Amorphous Matter with Deep Learning. arXiv 2023, 10.48550/arXiv.2310.01117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McDermott M. J.; McBride B. C.; Regier C. E.; Tran G. T.; Chen Y.; Corrao A. A.; Gallant M. C.; Kamm G. E.; Bartel C. J.; Chapman K. W.; Khalifah P. G.; Ceder G.; Neilson J. R.; Persson K. A. Assessing Thermodynamic Selectivity of Solid-State Reactions for the Predictive Synthesis of Inorganic Materials. ACS Central Science 2023, 9, 1957. 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aykol M.; Montoya J. H.; Hummelsho̷j J. Rational Solid-State Synthesis Routes for Inorganic Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (24), 9244–9259. 10.1021/jacs.1c04888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narayanan S.; Reid S.; Butler S.; Thangadurai V. Sintering Temperature, Excess Sodium, and Phosphorous Dependencies on Morphology and Ionic Conductivity of NASICON Na3Zr2Si2PO12. Solid State Ion. 2019, 331, 22–29. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kononova O.; Huo H.; He T.; Rong Z.; Botari T.; Sun W.; Tshitoyan V.; Ceder G. Text-Mined Dataset of Inorganic Materials Synthesis Recipes. Sci. Data 2019, 6 (1), 203. 10.1038/s41597-019-0224-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S. J.; Li S.; Venugopalan S.; Tshitoyan V.; Aykol M.; Merchant A.; Cubuk E. D.; Cheon G. Accurate Prediction of Experimental Band Gaps from Large Language Model-Based Data Extraction. arXiv 2023, 10.48550/arXiv.2311.13778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boiko D. A.; MacKnight R.; Kline B.; Gomes G. Autonomous Chemical Research with Large Language Models. Nature 2023, 624 (7992), 570–578. 10.1038/s41586-023-06792-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gates-Rector S.; Blanton T. The Powder Diffraction File: A Quality Materials Characterization Database. Powder Diffr. 2019, 34 (4), 352–360. 10.1017/S0885715619000812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gražulis S.; Chateigner D.; Downs R. T.; Yokochi A. F. T.; Quirós M.; Lutterotti L.; Manakova E.; Butkus J.; Moeck P.; Le Bail A. Crystallography Open Database - an Open-Access Collection of Crystal Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42 (Pt 4), 726–729. 10.1107/S0021889809016690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai J.; Xue Y.; Bjorck J.; Bras R. L.; Rappazzo B.; Bernstein R.; Suram S. K.; van Dover R. B.; Gregoire J. M.; Gomes C. P. Phase-Mapper: Accelerating Materials Discovery with AI. AI Mag. 2018, 39 (1), 15–26. 10.1609/aimag.v39i1.2785. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maffettone P. M.; Banko L.; Cui P.; Lysogorskiy Y.; Little M. A.; Olds D.; Ludwig A.; Cooper A. I. Crystallography Companion Agent for High-Throughput Materials Discovery. Nat Comput Sci 2021, 1 (4), 290–297. 10.1038/s43588-021-00059-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozaki Y.; Suzuki Y.; Hawai T.; Saito K.; Onishi M.; Ono K. Automated Crystal Structure Analysis Based on Blackbox Optimisation. npj Comput. Mater. 2020, 6 (1), 75. 10.1038/s41524-020-0330-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schuetzke J.; Schweidler S.; Muenke F. R.; Orth A.; Khandelwal A. D.; Breitung B.; Aghassi-Hagmann J.; Reischl M. Accelerating Materials Discovery: Automated Identification of Prospects from X-ray Diffraction Data in Fast Screening Experiments. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2024, 10.1002/aisy.202300501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Neilson J. R.; McDermott M. J.; Persson K. A. Modernist Materials Synthesis: Finding Thermodynamic Shortcuts with Hyperdimensional Chemistry. J. Mater. Res. 2023, 38 (11), 2885–2893. 10.1557/s43578-023-01037-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

















