Abstract
Background:
Ultrasonography is an established and reliable method for assessing the spleen. Because of variation due to genetic and other environmental factors including malaria endemicity, interpretation of spleen sizes requires a knowledge of the normal reference range for a given population. This study aimed to identify spleen size reference ranges across age groups of healthy controls to serve as a baseline to assess changes in spleen size in patients with sickle cell disease.
Methods:
Using a cross-sectional study design, spleen size was measured in healthy people of different age groups and steady-state sickle cell disease patients (children and adults) using abdominal ultrasonography. Using the age-group-specific reference values obtained from the controls, spleens were classified into small, normal size or enlarged among the sickle cell disease patients.
Results:
The study consisted of 109 (34.8%) healthy controls and 204 (65.2%) steady-state sickle cell disease patients. The spleen was visualised in all the controls (n = 109) and in 107 (52.4%) sickle cell disease patients. Using cut-off values for spleen length among the controls across age groups (< 5 years (5.0–7.0 cm); 5–9 years (5.5–8.5 cm); 10–14 years (6.0–11.0 cm) and ⩾ 15 years (7.0–12.5 cm)), spleen size was classified as small (n = 18/204; 8.87%), normal (n = 68/204; 33.3%) and enlarged (n = 21/204; 10.3%) among the sickle cell disease patients.
Conclusion:
Model-based age-group reference ranges and percentile curves for splenic dimensions based on ultrasonography among normal controls in North-Eastern Nigeria were established and may be of value in assessing spleen sizes among sickle cell disease patients living in malaria-endemic regions of Africa.
Keywords: Ultrasound, spleen, reference ranges, sickle cell disease, Nigeria
Introduction
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited condition of red blood cells widely prevalent across Sub-Saharan Africa, affecting up to 3% of births in some parts of the continent. 1 The spleen is the largest organ in the reticuloendothelial system with an active role in immune defence against infection and is one of the earliest organs to be affected in patients with SCD. In SCD, the spleen initially enlarges, followed by progressive atrophy due to repeated episodes of vaso-occlusion and infarctions. 2 Part of the routine clinical evaluation of patients with SCD involves examining for the spleen. 3 However, clinical examination by palpation has a low sensitivity for the detection of splenic enlargement because the organ would have to enlarge two to three times its normal size before becoming palpable on abdominal examination. 4 Ultrasonography provides a non-invasive method of assessing the spleen size; it is the test of choice in most times because of its accuracy, low cost, flexibility and safety profile. 5 Despite the widespread use of ultrasonography in the clinical evaluation of splenic enlargement, there is no consensus on how to define splenomegaly among SCD patients; some authors have used spleen length to define splenomegaly,6,7 while others have used the spleen volume or index.8,9 In addition, various cut-off values for the spleen length including > 11, 10 > 12 11 and ⩾ 13 cm have been used to indicate enlarged spleen.12 –15
Furthermore, knowledge of normal spleen size in a healthy population is required to interpret changes in spleen size, as changes in spleen size occur due to population-specific variations in genetic and environmental factors (e.g. infections, such as malaria). Establishing a reference range for populations living in the same area as the patients’ population is needed to aid interpretation of ultrasonography assessments. However, few studies are available on normal spleen dimensions in children and adults in Africa, particularly those living in malaria-endemic regions.16 –18 The aim of this study was to identify spleen length reference ranges for healthy controls to serve as a baseline to assess changes in spleen size in patients with SCD.
Materials and methods
Study design and participants
This hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2020 to November 2021 at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital (UMTH), North-Eastern Nigeria. Steady-state SCD patients (children and adults) 19 on follow-up at the outpatient paediatric and haematology clinics during the study period were invited to take part. Healthy individuals consisting of medical students, children of hospital personnel and postoperative paediatric patients (without any acute or chronic illness likely to influence splenic size) on follow-up in the surgical clinic served as controls. The study participants were divided into four age groups: (1) less than 5 years; (2) 5–9 years; (3) 10–14 years and (4) 15 years and above.
Data collection
Clinical examination
Clinical data of the study participants were collected using a structured questionnaire. The spleen size was assessed by palpating the anterior axillary and mid-clavicular line by a single examiner. Palpable splenomegaly was reported as the distance in centimetres the spleen extends under the left coastal margin in the mid-clavicular line.
Sonographic evaluation
A board-certified radiologist with more than 15 years of experience in abdominal ultrasonography performed all the examinations using Logiq P5 Premium BT11 ultrasound scanner (GE Medical Systems, USA) equipped with a low-frequency (3–5 MHz) curvilinear transducer. The measurements were taken on images through the splenic hilum using electronic callipers. Splenic length, defined as the maximum distance between the dome and the tip of the spleen, was measured in a longitudinal view. Splenic width, defined as the maximum distance between the medial and lateral borders, was measured in a transverse view. Splenic depth, defined as the maximum anteroposterior dimension, was also measured on a transverse view. Spleen volume was determined using the formula – length × width × depth × 0.523. 20 Autosplenectomy was defined as the non-visualisation of the spleen in the splenic bed. 5 The spleen sizes of the SCD patients were compared with control values stratified by age. The spleen size was considered normal if the value fell within the 2.5th and 97.5th centile of the expected range for the age-specific group. Spleen sizes below and above the cut-off ranges were considered small-sized spleens or enlarged spleens, respectively.16,21
Statistical analysis
The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 25; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data were summarised using frequency and proportions while continuous data reported as mean and standard deviation (±) if normally distributed, or median and interquartile range if the data were skewed. Spearman’s correlation was used to determine the relationship between the various spleen dimensions. Model-based age-specific reference ranges for the various spleen dimensions were computed with age modelled as fractional polynomials using MedCalc® v.20.114 (MedCalc Statistical Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium). 22 Log-transformation of variables was applied before model fitting as needed. The model-based 2.5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97.5th percentiles of the (log-transformed) variables were then plotted against age. Comparison of spleen dimensions between controls and SCD patients was performed using non-parametric analysis. Scatter plots were drawn to assess the relationship between age and spleen length among the study participants. The level of significance was set at two-tailed p-value less than 0.05.
Results
Ultrasonography data were available for 109 of the controls (median age 14.0 years; range 1–34) and 204 of the SCD patients (median age 12.5 years; range 1–45). The haemoglobin (Hb) phenotypes of the SCD patients consisted of homozygous SCD (Hb SS; n = 196), sickle-haemoglobin C disease (Hb SC; n = 5) and sickle cell β-thalassaemia (Hb Sβ; n = 3). The spleen was clinically palpable in five of the SCD patients (2.4%) (range, 2–10 cm) but in none of the controls. Three of the Hb SS patients (aged 1, 6 and 24 years) had past history of acute splenic sequestration.
Sonographic evaluation of the spleen among the control participants
The spleen was visualised on ultrasonography in all the control participants. Spleen volume correlated highly with spleen width (rho = 0.891, p < 0.001), depth (rho = 0.920, p < 0.001) and length (rho = 0.858, p < 0.001). The various spleen dimensions by age groups and non-parametric reference limits are shown in Table 1. Specific (log-transformed) reference limits for spleen dimensions in relation to age are shown as curves in Figure 1(a)–(d).
Table 1.
Summary of splenic dimensions according to age groups and non-parametric reference ranges among the healthy controls (n = 109).
| Parameter | Number (n) | Mean (SD) | Non-parametric measures | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5th centile | 0.5 median | 97.5th centile | |||
| Spleen length (cm) | |||||
| <5 years | 21 | 6.3 (0.7) | 5.2 | 6.1 | 7.0 |
| 5–9 years | 22 | 6.8 (0.9) | 5.3 | 6.9 | 8.3 |
| 10–14 years | 21 | 8.0 (1.2) | 6.0 | 7.7 | 11.1 |
| ⩾15 years | 45 | 9.0 (1.4) | 7.2 | 8.8 | 12.5 |
| Spleen width (cm) | |||||
| <5 years | 21 | 6.3 (0.7) | 5.1 | 6.2 | 8.1 |
| 5–9 years | 22 | 7.1 (0.9) | 5.4 | 7.1 | 8.5 |
| 10–14 years | 21 | 8.1(1.3) | 6.2 | 7.7 | 10.7 |
| ⩾15 years | 45 | 9.2 (1.5) | 6.9 | 8.9 | 12.4 |
| Spleen depth (cm) | |||||
| <5 years | 21 | 2.6 (0.3) | 2.1 | 2.6 | 3.1 |
| 5–9 years | 22 | 3.0 (0.5) | 2.2 | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| 10–14 years | 21 | 3.3 (0.4) | 2.6 | 3.2 | 4.0 |
| ⩾15 years | 45 | 4.0 (0.8) | 2.9 | 3.9 | 5.8 |
| Spleen volume (cm3) | |||||
| <5 years | 21 | 54.0 (14.9) | 32.0 | 53.5 | 86.4 |
| 5–9 years | 22 | 76.9 (27.3) | 33.0 | 78.6 | 133.3 |
| 10–14 years | 21 | 117 (48.7) | 56.2 | 102.8 | 226.0 |
| ⩾15 years | 45 | 180.8 (87.0) | 80.0 | 152.7 | 414.7 |
SD: standard deviation.
Figure 1.
Curves of the model-based reference limits (2.5th–97.5th) for the spleen dimensions. Percentile curves of the age-based reference limits for splenic (a) length, (b) depth, (c) width and (d) volume.
Sonographic evaluation of the spleen among the SCD patients
Of the 204 SCD patients, the spleen was visualised in 107 (52.3%) and not visualised in 97 (47.5%) by ultrasonography. Based on the reference ranges generated from the control participants, spleen sizes were classified as small (18/204; 8.87%), normal (68/204; 33.3%) and enlarged (21/204; 10.3%) among the SCD patients (Figure 2(a)–(c)). Further classification of spleen size across age groups among the SCD patients is shown in Table 2. Enlarged spleens were more frequently found in children less than 5 years old by both spleen length (31%) and volume (35.7%), and among patients above 15 years of age (25% and 20% by length and volume, respectively). Small-sized spleens were more frequently encountered in the age group 10–14 years (21.1% and 31.6% by length and volume, respectively) (Table 2).
Figure 2.

Abdominal ultrasonography showing various spleen sizes among the SCD patients: (a) small-sized spleen (spleen length 4.3 cm) in a 7-year-old Hb SS female, (b) normal-sized spleen (spleen length 8.4 cm) in a 7-year-old Hb SS female child and (c) longitudinal view of an enlarged spleen in a 6-year-old Hb SS male (spleen length 9.9 cm) (Spleen sizes are compared to controls values as shown in Table 1).
Table 2.
Frequency of different spleen sizes among SCD patients (n = 107) by age group.
| Parameter | Reference range | Category of spleen size, n (%) | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit (2.5th centile) | Upper limit (97.5th centile) | Small | Normal | Enlarged | ||
| Spleen length (cm) | ||||||
| <5 years | 5.0 | 7.0 | 7 (17.7) | 22 (52.4) | 13 (31.0) | 42 |
| 5–9 years | 5.5 | 8.5 | 2 (7.7) | 21 (80.8) | 3 (11.5) | 26 |
| 10–14 years | 6.0 | 11.0 | 4 (21.1) | 14 (73.7) | 1 (5.3) | 19 |
| >15 years | 7.0 | 12.5 | 3 (15.0) | 12 (60.0) | 5 (25.0) | 20 |
| Spleen volume (cm3) | ||||||
| <5 years | 30.0 | 85.0 | 4 (9.5) | 23 (54.8) | 15 (35.7) | 42 |
| 5–9 years | 35.0 | 135.0 | 2 (7.7) | 17 (65.4) | 7 (26.9) | 26 |
| 10–14 years | 55.0 | 225.0 | 6 (31.6) | 12 (63.1) | 1 (5.3) | 19 |
| >15 years | 80.0 | 415.0 | 5 (25.0) | 11 (55.0) | 4 (20.0) | 20 |
Age-group-based reference ranges were generated from the corresponding spleen length and volume of the controls. The values were rounded up to the nearest integer. Spleen size below the 2.5th centile was considered small size; normal-sized spleen are dimensions between the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles and enlarged spleens are values above the 97.5th centiles.
Relationship between spleen size and age among the SCD patients and the controls
The mean spleen length (p = 0.0001) and volume (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the control group compared to SCD patients; this difference was particularly striking in those aged 10–14 years (Table 3). Of note, however, the spleen length was almost threefold higher among the SCD patients compared to the controls in the first 2 years of life, followed by a rapid decline in spleen size around the third year (Figure 3(a)). Also, the fitted line between spleen size and age had a positive slope among different age groups of the control group (Figure 3(b)), while the slope was negative across all age groups among the SCD patients (Figure 3(c)).
Table 3.
Comparison of spleen sizes between SCD patients and normal controls.
| Parameters | SCD patients (n = 107) | Controls (n = 109) | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean (SD) | Median | N | Mean (SD) | Median | ||
| Spleen length (cm) | |||||||
| <5 years | 42 | 6.4 (1.2) | 6.5 | 21 | 6.2 (0.6) | 6.1 | 0.423 |
| 5–9 years | 26 | 6.6 (1.3) | 6.5 | 22 | 6.8 (0.9) | 6.9 | 0.096 |
| 10–14 years | 19 | 7.0 (1.8) | 7.0 | 21 | 8.0 (1.2) | 7.7 | 0.004* |
| ⩾15 years | 20 | 9.9 (3.6) | 8.8 | 45 | 9.0 (1.3) | 8.8 | 0.921 |
| Total | 107 | 7.2 (2.3) | 6.7 | 109 | 7.8 (1.6) | 7.7 | 0.0001 * |
| Spleen width (cm) | |||||||
| <5 years | 42 | 6.7 (1.0) | 6.4 | 21 | 6.3 (0.7) | 6.2 | 0.137 |
| 5–9 years | 26 | 7.0 (1.3) | 7.0 | 22 | 7.1 (0.9) | 7.1 | 0.852 |
| 10–14 years | 19 | 7.2 (1.3) | 7.0 | 21 | 8.1 (1.3) | 7.7 | 0.012* |
| ⩾15 years | 20 | 9.1 (3.0) | 8.3 | 45 | 9.2 (1.5) | 8.9 | 0.286 |
| Total | 107 | 7.3 (1.8) | 6.9 | 109 | 8.0 (1.7) | 7.7 | 0.000* |
| Spleen depth (cm) | |||||||
| <5 years | 42 | 3.1 (0.7) | 3.1 | 21 | 2.6 (0.3) | 2.6 | 0.002* |
| 5–9 years | 26 | 3.1 (1.0) | 2.8 | 22 | 3.0 (0.5) | 2.9 | 0.923 |
| 10–14 years | 19 | 3.1 (0.9) | 3.0 | 21 | 3.3 (0.4) | 3.2 | 0.153 |
| ⩾15 years | 20 | 4.1 (1.5) | 3.7 | 45 | 4.0 (0.8) | 3.9 | 0.659 |
| Total | 107 | 3.3 (1.0) | 3.1 | 109 | 3.3 (1.0) | 3.1 | 0.166 |
| Spleen volume (cm3) | |||||||
| <5 years | 42 | 73.8 (33.7) | 66.4 | 21 | 53.9 (14.6) | 53.5 | 0.020* |
| 5–9 years | 26 | 85.7 (55.0) | 66.5 | 22 | 76.9 (28.0) | 78.6 | 0.979 |
| 10–14 years | 19 | 90.0 (60.0) | 70.4 | 21 | 117.0 (48.3) | 102.0 | 0.013* |
| ⩾15 years | 20 | 258.0 (270) | 145.7 | 45 | 183.6 (84.7) | 154.4 | 0.599 |
| Total | 107 | 114 (140) | 70.4 | 109 | 124 (80.8) | 99.5 | 0.002* |
SCD: sickle cell disease; SD: standard deviation.
Significant p-value by Mann–Whitney U test for within age-group analysis.
Figure 3.
Scatter plots showing the relationship between spleen length (Y-axis) and age (X-axis) among the SCD and controls. (a) Among the less than 5 years old, the spleen length was almost threefold larger in the SCD group (n = 42) in the first 2 years of life compared to the controls (n = 22), before decreasing abruptly around the third year, (b) in the control group (n = 109), the spleen length shows a progressive rise with increasing age up to the third decade before levelling off, (c) among the SCD patients (n = 107), the spleen length was similar in the less than 5 years old and those 5–9 years. The spleen length becomes static in those aged 10–14 years; after 15 years, the spleen length becomes variable with normal and enlarged spleens present. Fitted lines superimposed for all age groups.
Discussion
Ultrasonography is non-invasive, not associated with radiation exposure and provides real-time information. It is widely available in resource limited settings and routinely used to evaluate the size of internal organs, such as the spleen; 21 however, there are no standards for defining spleen size among SCD patients. We documented spleen size and volume in SCD patients and age-matched healthy individuals from the same geographical area in North-Eastern Nigeria. We documented spleen length and volume among apparently healthy participants from the same geographical area and used this as a reference for assessing spleen size among our SCD patients. We generated non-parametric (2.5th–97.5th percentiles) reference ranges according to four age groups and percentile curves to provide specific reference values for spleen sizes for individuals aged 1–36 years.
Our data on spleen length among the controls were similar to the previous findings among paediatric16 –18 and adult population in Africa.5,23,24 In contrast, the upper limit of spleen length in our controls aged < 5 years (median, 6.1 cm), 5–9 years (median 6.9 cm) and 10–14 years (median 7.7 cm) was smaller when compared among a normal population in the United States aged 2–4 years (median 7.4 cm), 6–8 years (median 8.2 cm) and 10–12 years (median 9.9 cm). 25 Our data for the upper limit of spleen length were also smaller than those recorded among comparable age groups in Europe. 21 In a study involving 631 American athletes, the spleen was larger in White Americans compared to the African American athletes. 26 These findings suggest that the spleen may be inherently smaller in the African population compared to the White population; contrary to the general notion of the spleen being bigger in areas where infections such as malaria are endemic. 27 Other studies from Nigeria have made similar observations of smaller spleen sizes among their population compared to published data among the White population.5,23,24 This underscores the importance of using population-specific reference values in classifying spleen sizes among individuals with SCD and other disease conditions affecting the spleen.
Spleen size assessment using length or volume
While most studies have used spleen length to define splenomegaly in SCD,6,7,10,12 –15 others used spleen volume8,9,28,29 or both length and volume.30,31 Given the strong positive correlation between spleen length and volume in our normal controls (rho = 86.4; p < 0.001), consistent with earlier reports,32,33 both parameters were used to classify spleen sizes in the current study. The ease of acquiring spleen length when compared to the cumbersome nature of assessing volume favours the use of spleen length to determine spleen size in routine clinical practice and future studies. Another drawback of using spleen volume lies with the use of the prolate ellipsoid volume method in its determination formula; because the spleen can become irregularly shaped in SCD patients due to the recurrent vaso-occlusion and infarctions, estimating volume using this formula may not be accurate. 26 Despite similarities in the range of values obtained for the different categories of spleen sizes using spleen length and volume, we noted a tendency for higher frequencies of enlargement when using spleen volume.
Comparison of spleen size between the SCD patients and controls
We noted a difference in the pattern of age-related increase in spleen size between the controls and SCD patients. Among the controls, the spleen length showed a progressive increase in children less than 5 years to the adult mean size of 9.0 cm before levelling off, consistent with reports from the United States, 25 Europe 21 and India. 34 The SCD patients in our cohort had larger spleens early in life, but the rate of increase in length was slow thereafter. Compared to the progressive increase in length observed in the control group, the spleen length remained steady in SCD patients aged 5–9 years group, with a slight increase in the 10–14 years group, before increasing to the adult (> 15 years) mean length of 9.9 cm. The slow increase in spleen length observed during childhood and adolescence among the SCD patients is indicative of progressive splenic injury, which counteracts the normal age-related physiological increase in spleen size observed in the control group.
Clinical implication
Although the spleen is usually relatively larger in infants and toddlers than in adults, 21 we observed a more than threefold increase in size of the spleen among the SCD patients compared to the normal controls in the first 2 years of life. This is not unexpected as obstruction of the interendothelial slits in the basement membrane by the relatively rigid sickled red blood cells could result in passive splenic enlargement. 35 Extra medullary haemopoiesis and infections may also account for enlarged spleens in early childhood among SCD patients.36,37 Also, the spleens among a quarter of the older SCD patients (n = 5/20) with visible spleens appeared to be markedly enlarged. It is not clear if the presence of compound heterozygosity for the Hb S gene may be associated with this finding (they consisted of three Hb SS, one Hb SC and one HbS thal). Patients with enlarged spleens may be prone to complications related to splenomegaly including subclinical red cells sequestration and hypersplenism resulting in worsening anaemia, splenic infarction and therefore may need close monitoring. 38 Furthermore, the finding of enlarged spleens in 31% (n = 13/42) of our SCD patients less than 5 years of age using ultrasonography compared to 4.8% (n = 2/42) by clinical examination aptly demonstrates the low sensitivity of the latter technique and the fact that the spleen may be enlarged two- to threefold before it becomes palpably enlarged. It is possible that red cell sequestration and hypersplenism occur within a spleen that is not palpable and so splenic ultrasonography may be a useful adjunct to clinical management.
Limitations
Being a hospital-based and single-centre study with small sample size for the controls used to generate the reference ranges may limit generalisability of the findings. Second, assessment of interobserver variability for the measurements obtained by ultrasound was not done; however, having a single board-certified radiologist to obtain all images in healthy participants and SCD patients brought about consistency and improved accuracy of comparison between the groups.
Conclusion
This study has provided reference ranges for spleen length across age groups (< 5 years (5–7 cm); 5–9 years (5.5–8.5 cm); 10–14 years (6–11 cm) and 15 years (7.0–12.5 cm)) and percentile curves for splenic dimensions for different ages based on ultrasonography among normal controls in North-Eastern Nigeria; this may be of value in assessing spleen sizes among SCD patients living in malaria-endemic regions. Regular spleen scans can help identify patients with enlarged spleens, who may require close monitoring for the development of complications, such as subclinical acute sequestration (especially in vulnerable age groups) and hypersplenism.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff of the Radiology and Haematology Departments of the UMTH for their assistance during the data collection and ultrasonography. They thank all the patients and their guardians.
Footnotes
Contributors: AIL and IB conceived and designed the project. AIL, AGF, and FMA coordinated the patient’s recruitment. AIL and AF performed the ultrasonography. AIL performed the statistical analysis. IB, CJ, and AA supervised the formal analysis. All the authors contributed significant intellectual content during the manuscript drafting or revision and accept responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethics approval: The study protocol was approved by the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital (UMTH/REC/ 20/606) and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) (REC reference number: 20-010) Ethics Review Boards.
Permission from patient(s) or subject(s) obtained in writing for publishing their case report: Written informed consent was obtained from the adults and parents/guardians of the paediatric participants.
Permission obtained in writing from patient or any person whose photo is included for publishing their photographs and images: NO, not applicable.
Confirm that you are aware that permission from a previous publisher for reproducing any previously published material will be required should your article be accepted for publication and that you will be responsible for obtaining that permission: YES.
Guarantor: Adama Isah Ladu
ORCID iDs: Adama Isah Ladu
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-8535
Abubakar Farate
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-1741
References
- 1. Grosse SD, Odame I, Atrash HK, et al. Sickle cell disease in Africa: a neglected cause of early childhood mortality. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41: S398–S405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Serjeant GR. The spleen in sickle cell disease. In: Bowdler AJ. (ed.) The complete spleen: structure, function, and clinical disorders. New York: Springer, 2002, pp. 251–257. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Emond AM, Collis R, Darvill D, et al. Acute splenic sequestration in homozygous sickle cell disease: natural history and management. J Pediatr 1985; 107: 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhang B, Lewis SM. A study of the reliability of clinical palpation of the spleen. Clin Lab Haematol 1989; 11: 7–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mustapha Z, Tahir A, Tukur M, et al. Sonographic determination of normal spleen size in an adult African population. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: e133–e135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ugwu AC, Saad ST, Buba EA, et al. Sonographic determination of liver and spleen sizes in patients with sickle cell disease at Gombe, Nigeria. CHRISMED J Health Res 2018; 5: 182–186. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Akinlosotu M, Adeodu O, Adegoke S, et al. Fetal hemoglobin level and its relationship with spleen size and malaria parasite density in Nigerian children with sickle cell anemia. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2018; 11: 133–139. [Google Scholar]
- 8. McCarville MB, Luo Z, Huang X, et al. Abdominal ultrasound with scintigraphic and clinical correlates in infants with sickle cell anemia: baseline data from the BABY HUG trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 1399–1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yakubu C, Olowoselu FO, Ezesobor C, et al. Sonographic determination of splenic volume in children with sickle cell anaemia in steady state. West Afr J Ultrasound 2017; 18: 34–40. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Okongwu CI, Fasola FA, Adekanmi AJ, et al. Morbidity pattern and interferon gamma level in sickle cell anemia patients with autosplenectomy. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21: 1615–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ojo OT, Shokunbi WA, Agunloye AM. Splenic size in sickle cell anaemia patients in a tertiary hospital. Niger Hospital Pract 2014; 13: 82–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Babadoko AA, Ibinaye PO, Hassan A, et al. Autosplenectomy of sickle cell disease in Zaria, Nigeria: an ultrasonographic assessment. Oman Med J 2012; 27: 121–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Luntsi G, Eze CU, Ahmadu MS, et al. Sonographic evaluation of some abdominal organs in sickle cell disease patients in a tertiary health institution in Northeastern Nigeria. J Med Ultrasound 2018; 26: 31–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fasola FA, Adekanmi AJ. Haematological profile and blood transfusion pattern of patients with sickle cell anaemia vary with spleen size. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2019; 17: 30–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kaushal L, Verma VK, Ahirwar CP, et al. Sonographic evaluation of abdominal organs in a sickle cell disease patient. Int J Med Res Rev 2014; 2: 202–208. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tsehay B, Shitie D, Afenigus A, et al. Sonographic evaluation of spleen size in apparently healthy children in north-west Ethiopia, 2020: time to define splenomegaly. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21: 318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ezeofor SN, Obikili EN, Anyanwu GE, et al. Sonographic assessment of the normal limits of the spleen in healthy school children in South-East Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2014; 17: 484–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Eze CU, Agwu KK, Ezeasor DN, et al. Sonographic biometry of spleen among school age children in Nsukka, Southeast, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2013; 13: 384–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ballas SK. More definitions in sickle cell disease: steady state v base line data. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gale HI, Bobbitt CA, Setty BN, et al. Expected sonographic appearance of the spleen in children and young adults with sickle cell disease: an update. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35: 1735–1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pelizzo G, Guazzotti M, Klersy C, et al. Spleen size evaluation in children: time to define splenomegaly for pediatric surgeons and pediatricians. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wayne P. CLSI defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory-approved guideline. CLSI document EP28-A3C. 3rd ed. 2008, https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/CLSI/preview_CLSI+EP28-A3C.pdf (accessed 19 October 2010).
- 23. Agwu KK, Okoye IJ, Ochie K. Sonographic splenic sizes in normal adult Nigerian population. West Afr J Radiol 2005; 12: 37–43. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ehimwenma O, Tagbo MT. Determination of normal dimension of the spleen by ultrasound in an endemic tropical environment. Niger Med J 2011; 52: 198–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rosenberg HK, Markowitz RI, Kolberg H, et al. Normal splenic size in infants and children: sonographic measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 119–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hosey RG, Mattacola CG, Kriss V, et al. Ultrasound assessment of spleen size in collegiate athletes. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40: 251–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chauhan R, Kapoor V, Vohra PA, et al. The ‘small spleen’ in malaria. J Assoc Physicians India 1996; 44: 483–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Abdullahi SU, Hassan-Hanga F, Ibrahim M. Ultrasonographic spleen size and haematological parameters in children with sickle cell anaemia in Kano, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2014; 21: 165–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Al-Salem AH, Al-Aithan S, Bhamidipati P, et al. Sonographic assessment of spleen size in Saudi patients with sickle cell disease. Ann Saudi Med 1998; 18: 217–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Eze CU, Offordile GC, Agwuna KK, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the spleen among sickle cell disease patients in a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2015; 15: 949–958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Olatunji AA, Olatunji PO. Splenic size determination in sickle cell anaemia: an ultrasonographic study. East Afr Med J 2001; 78: 366–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lamb PM, Lund A, Kanagasabay RR, et al. Spleen size: how well do linear ultrasound measurements correlate with three-dimensional CT volume assessments? Br J Radiol 2002; 75: 573–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bezerra AS, D’Ippolito G, Faintuch S, et al. Determination of splenomegaly by CT: is there a place for a single measurement? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1510–1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Arora N, Sharma PK, Sahai A, et al. Sonographic measurements of the spleen in relation to age; a prospective study in north Indian adults. J Anat Soc India 2010; 59: 177–181. [Google Scholar]
- 35. El Hoss S, Brousse V. Considering the spleen in sickle cell disease. Expert Rev Hematol 2019; 12: 563–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Topley JM, Rogers DW, Stevens MC, et al. Acute splenic sequestration and hypersplenism in the first five years in homozygous sickle cell disease. Arch Dis Child 1981; 56: 765–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rogers DW, Vaidya S, Serjeant GR. Early splenomegaly in homozygous sickle-cell disease: an indicator of susceptibility to infection. Lancet 1978; 2: 963–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Diagne I, Diagne-Gueye NR, Fall AL, et al. Epidemiology and course of splenomegaly in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease in Senegal. Arch Pediatr 2010; 17: 1017–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


