Abstract
Background:
It is unknown whether people with aquaporin-4 antibody positive (AQP4-IgG+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) experience a prodrome, although a few cases report AQP4 + serology up to 16 years before the first attack.
Objectives:
To evaluate whether individuals with AQP4-IgG + NMOSD have prodromal neurologic symptoms preceding the first attack.
Methods:
We reviewed medical records of participants meeting the 2015 diagnostic criteria for AQP4-IgG + NMOSD from four demyelinating disease centres in the Canadian NMOSD cohort study CANOPTICS. We searched for neurologic symptoms occurring at least 30 days before the first attack.
Results:
Of 116 participants with NMOSD, 17 (14.7%) had prodromal neurologic symptoms. The median age was 48 years (range 25–83) at first attack; 16 (94.1%) were female. Participants presented with numbness/tingling (n = 9), neuropathic pain (n = 5), visual disturbance (n = 4), tonic spasms (n = 2), Lhermitte sign (n = 2), severe headache (n = 2), incoordination (n = 2), weakness (n = 1), psychosis (n = 1) or seizure (n = 1). Of eight who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain, orbits and/or spinal cord, five had T2 lesions. Within 1.5–245 months (median 14) from the onset of prodromal neurologic symptoms, participants experienced their first NMOSD attack.
Conclusions:
One in seven people with NMOSD experienced neurologic symptoms before their first attack. Further investigation of a possible NMOSD prodrome is warranted.
Keywords: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, prodrome, demyelinating diseases, neuroinflammatory diseases
Introduction
A prodrome is a set of early signs or symptoms that precedes the characteristic manifestations of disease. Parkinson disease, Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis (MS) are neurologic diseases with recognized prodromes.1–6 Common symptoms during the MS prodrome include cognitive impairment, fatigue, various types of pain, anxiety, depression, bladder dysfunction and headache.6–10 There has also been biological evidence of axonal degeneration in advance of MS clinical onset, as demonstrated by elevated levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL), in serum samples collected a median of 6 years before the first clinical attack. 11
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG).12,13 Attacks frequently involve the optic nerves or spinal cord and result in significant disability with poor recovery. 14 Unlike MS, it is unknown whether people with NMOSD experience a prodromal phase. However, several cases reported in the literature indicate presence of the pathogenic AQP4-IgG antibody detected from serum samples collected years before the first NMOSD attack. For example, one woman with her first NMOSD clinical attack at age 34 years had three blood samples from 10 years before onset that were retrospectively tested – all were found to be positive for AQP4-IgG. 15 A cohort of 16 individuals with both NMOSD and myasthenia gravis included 4 individuals with AQP4-IgG detectable between 4 and 16 years before disease onset. 16 In all four cases, the clinical onset of NMOSD was preceded by the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis; however, it is unknown whether participants had other early neurologic symptoms that may have been atypical for myasthenia. Another report described a 12-year-old with asymptomatic optic disc oedema detected on routine examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed evidence of a longitudinally extensive optic neuritis and serum was positive for AQP4-IgG. 17 These reports suggest that the pathogenesis of NMOSD could begin before the first typical attack. In addition, there has been growing evidence of subclinical disease activity in established NMOSD, including asymptomatic MRI lesions, microstructural visual system changes and elevated glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in some individuals between attacks.18–21
Comprehensive investigations into prodromal symptoms in the years before the first NMOSD attack are lacking. There have been several case series and case reports of symptoms in the days or weeks immediately before disease onset with some reports limited to infectious triggers of a first attack.22–25 Recognition and characterization of NMOSD prodromal symptoms could have implications for our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease, as well as its diagnosis and management. Importantly, detection of early features may support prompt diagnosis and greater ability to prevent neurologic disability.
Our aim was to evaluate the presence of prodromal neurologic symptoms in people with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD before the first NMOSD attack. We hypothesized that people with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD would have varying prodromal neurologic symptoms. Based on clinical experience, we speculated that sensory symptoms and pain may be part of an NMOSD prodrome. We reviewed the medical records of NMOSD participants enrolled in the multicentre observational Canadian NMOSD and other atypical demyelinating diseases cohort study (CANOPTICS).
Materials and methods
Study design, setting and participants
Eligible participants were selected from those enrolled in CANOPTICS at four Canadian demyelinating disease centres: St. Michael’s Hospital (Toronto), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto), the Ottawa Hospital (Ottawa) and the University of Manitoba (Winnipeg). For inclusion, participants were required to have a diagnosis of AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD by 2015 International Panel on NMO Diagnosis (IPND) criteria. 12 AQP4-IgG status was determined by serum samples using a cell-based or enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay. As per the CANOPTICS protocol, participants were 18 years or older at the time of recruitment, but the first attack was evaluated retrospectively and could occur at any age. Data of interest were retrospectively collected from the participants’ electronic medical records and CANOPTICS REDCap database. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of each centre and conducted in accordance with recognized ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Evaluation of clinical and imaging features
Prodromal neurologic symptoms were considered where symptoms occurred at least 30 days before the first typical NMOSD attack diagnosed by the treating neurologist and meeting 2015 IPND criteria. The 30-day cutoff was chosen to exclude symptoms that could have been directly related to the first NMOSD attack. We omitted episodes where the diagnosis of NMOSD was delayed, but in retrospect the symptoms and imaging features were consistent with an attack meeting 2015 IPND criteria. The presence of systemic prodromal symptoms was also documented where reported.
Prodromal neurologic symptoms were reviewed for clinical features (symptom quality and severity), timing (date of onset relative to the first attack, frequency, duration), outcome and associated radiological findings. It was noted whether participants had one or more than one type of symptom. Ophthalmology records were reviewed when available for participants with visual symptoms. We documented the time from the onset of the first prodromal neurologic symptom to the first NMOSD attack. Radiological reports were collected including computerized tomography (CT) head and MRI of the brain, orbits and/or spinal cord obtained at the time of the prodromal neurologic symptoms and at the time of first NMOSD attack. All cases were screened by at least one neurologist with expertise in demyelinating disease. Cases with prodromal neurologic symptoms, including their radiological findings, were reviewed by one neurologist with expertise in demyelinating disease and one senior neurology resident. A structured data collection form was used.
Baseline characteristics were noted from the time of first NMOSD attack onset including age, sex, ethnicity (Asian, African or Caribbean, European or White, Latin, Indigenous or unknown), pre-existing autoimmune disease (excluding thyroid disease), pre-existing malignancy and clinical phenotype of the first NMOSD attack (transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, area postrema syndrome, cerebral syndrome, brainstem or cerebellar syndrome, diencephalic syndrome and multifocal).
Statistical analysis
We analysed baseline characteristics at the time of the first NMOSD attack for three groups: (1) the whole cohort, (2) participants with prodromal neurologic symptoms and (3) participants without prodromal neurologic symptoms. For those with prodromal neurologic symptoms, we described quality, timing, duration and the outcome of such symptoms, and imaging features where available. Descriptive statistics were reported as frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables, and as median and range for continuous variables. We compared the differences in baseline characteristics between those with and without prodromal symptoms using chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. We set p < 0.05 as being statistically significant. We used Stata Statistical Software: Release 14 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
Of 116 participants with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, 17 (14.7%) had prodromal neurologic symptoms. The median age at first NMOSD attack was 48 years (range 25–83) and 16 were female (94.1% ratio 16:1). Participants experienced a variety of first NMOSD attacks, including transverse myelitis (n = 10), optic neuritis (n = 4), area postrema syndrome (n = 1), cerebral syndrome (n = 1) and brainstem or cerebellar syndrome (n = 1); participants with prodromal symptoms compared with those without were more likely to present with transverse myelitis as a first attack and less likely to present with optic neuritis. Other baseline characteristics for participants with prodromal neurologic symptoms were generally similar to those without prodromal neurologic symptoms, although there was a relative preponderance of women and people of African or Caribbean ethnicity (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics at first NMOSD attack.
All patients (n = 116) | Patients with prodromal neurologic symptoms (n = 17) | Patients without prodromal neurologic symptoms (n = 99) | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age at first NMOSD attack, median years (range) | 43 (5–85) | 48 (25–83) | 43 (5–85) | 0.17 |
Female, n (%) | 97 (83.6) | 16/17 (94.1) | 81/99 (81.8) | 0.40 |
Ethnicity, n (%) | 0.11 | |||
Asian a | 40 (34.5) | 4/17 (23.5) | 36/99 (36.3) | 0.418 |
African or Caribbean a | 32 (27.6) | 9/17 (52.9) | 23/99 (23.2) | 0.18* |
European or White a | 29 (25.0) | 4/17 (23.5) | 25/99 (25.3) | 1.00* |
Latin a | 3 (2.6) | 0/17 (0.0) | 3/99 (3.0) | 1.00* |
Indigenous | 3 (2.6) | 0/17 (0.0) | 3/99 (3.0) | |
Unknown | 8 (6.9) | 0/17 (0.0) | 8/99 (8.1) | |
Pre-existing autoimmune disease, n (%) | 0.94 | |||
Systemic lupus erythematosus | 6 (5.2) | 1/17 (5.9) | 5/99 (5.1) | |
Myasthenia gravis | 3 (2.6) | 0/17 (0.0) | 3/99 (3.0) | |
Rheumatoid arthritis | 1 (0.8) | 0/17 (0.0) | 1/99 (1.0) | |
Psoriasis | 1 (0.8) | 0/17 (0.0) | 1/99 (1.0) | |
Anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome | 1 (0.8) | 0/17 (0.0) | 1/99 (1.0) | |
Immune thrombocytopenia | 1 (0.8) | 1/17 (5.9) | 0/99 (0.0) | |
History of malignancy, n (%) | 0.02 | |||
Breast cancer a | 1 (0.8) | 1/17 (5.9) | 0/99 (0.0) | |
First attack type, n (%) | <0.001 | |||
Transverse myelitis a | 60 (51.7) | 10/17 (58.8) | 50/99 (50.5) | 0.20* |
Optic neuritis a | 40 (34.5) | 4/17 (23.5) | 36/99 (36.4) | 0.58* |
Area postrema syndrome a | 12 (10.3) | 1/17 (5.9) | 11/99 (11.1) | 1.00* |
Cerebral syndrome a | 6 (5.2) | 1/17 (5.9) | 5/99 (5.1) | 0.47 |
Brainstem or cerebellar syndrome a | 3 (2.6) | 1/17 (5.9) | 2/99 (2.0) | 0.27* |
Diencephalic syndrome a | 1 (0.9) | 0/17 (0.0) | 1/99 (1.0) | 0.45 |
Unknown a | 3 (2.6) | 0/17 (0.0) | 3/99 (3.0) | 1.00 |
Multifocal a | 10 (8.6) | 0/17 (0.0) | 10/99 (10.1) | 0.35* |
NMOSD: neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; AQP4-IgG: aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies.
Obtained using Fisher’s exact test.
Given low event rates, p-values should be interpreted with caution.
Participants developed prodromal neurologic symptoms a median of 14 months (range 1.5–245 months) before their first NMOSD attack. Of those with prodromal neurologic symptoms, half had numbness and/or tingling, nearly one-third had neuropathic pain and nearly one-quarter had visual disturbance. Other symptoms were rare (Table 2). Ten (58.8%) experienced more than one neurologic symptom. Symptoms were either constant (n = 10) or intermittent (n = 9). Six (35.3%) participants had symptoms that were still ongoing at the time of the first NMOSD attack (cases 1, 4, 8, 9, 11 and 17). Three (17.6%) had no recovery and three (17.6%) had partial recovery of symptoms. Twelve (70.6%) had complete resolution of symptoms before the first NMOSD attack, with a median symptom duration of 4 weeks (range 2 minutes–16 weeks). Four (23.5%) had a prodromal event that was highly consistent with their first NMOSD attack (Cases 8, 10, 13 and 15), such as prodromal tonic spasms followed by a first attack of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. In these cases, the median time between onset of prodromal neurologic symptoms and the first NMOSD attack was 18.5 months (range 12–92 months). Of those with prodromal neurologic symptoms, three (17.6%) participants had one or more prodromal systemic symptom including decreased appetite (n = 1), severe fatigue (n = 1), epigastric pain (n = 1) and exacerbation of underlying obstructive lung disease (n = 1). Individual cases are outlined in Table 3.
Table 2.
Summary of prodromal symptoms.
Participants with prodromal neurologic symptoms (n = 17) | |
---|---|
Type of prodromal neurologic symptoms, n (%) | |
Numbness and/or tingling | 9 (52.9) |
Neuropathic pain | 5 (29.4) |
Visual disturbance | 4 (23.5) |
Tonic spasms | 2 (11.8) |
Lhermitte sign | 2 (11.8) |
Severe headache | 2 (11.8) |
Incoordination | 2 (11.8) |
Weakness | 1 (5.9) |
Psychosis | 1 (5.9) |
Seizure | 1 (5.9) |
More than one neurologic symptom, n (%) | 10 (58.8) |
Timing of prodromal neurologic symptoms, n (%) | |
Constant | 10 (58.8) |
Intermittent | 9 (52.9) |
Duration and outcome of prodromal neurologic symptoms, n (%) | |
Still present at time of first attack | 6 (35.3) |
No recovery | 3/6 (50.0) |
Partial recovery | 3/6 (50.0) |
Complete resolution of symptoms | 12 (70.6) |
Symptom duration, median weeks (range) | 4 (0.0002–16) |
Time from prodromal neurologic symptom to first NMOSD attack, median months (range) | 14 (1.5–245) |
Prodromal systemic symptoms, n (%) | |
Decreased appetite | 1 (5.9) |
Severe fatigue | 1 (5.9) |
Epigastric pain | 1 (5.9) |
Exacerbation of underlying obstructive lung disease | 1 (5.9) |
NMOSD: neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Table 3.
Demographic and clinical data for patients with prodromal neurologic symptoms.
Case number | Sex and age at onset of prodromal neurologic symptoms | Pre-existing autoimmune disease or history of malignancy | Prodromal systemic symptoms | Prodromal neurologic symptoms | Neuroimaging at time of prodromal neurologic symptom | Median time from prodromal neurologic symptom to first NMOSD attack (months) | First NMOSD attack type | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Description | Timing and duration | Outcome | |||||||
1 | 50, F | No | No | Headache, sensory | Severe, stabbing, right-sided headache associated with left torso and left whole leg numbness | One episode of headache lasting several hours; sensory symptoms constant and still present at time of first attack | Complete resolution of headache; partial recovery of sensory symptoms | Yes, abnormal, right parietal lesion (18 × 7 × 29 mm) | 20 | LETM |
2 | 67, F | No | Decreased appetite | Sensory, incoordination | Jaw tingling and feeling of being pulled to the right | Constant lasting 3 weeks | Complete resolution | Yes, abnormal, lesion in the right genu of the corpus callosum (20 × 6 × 5 mm) | 8 | LETM |
3 | 21, F | No | No | Sensory, tonic spasm | Right arm numbness, tingling and involuntary muscle contraction | Intermittent over 8 weeks | Complete resolution | No | 42 | Unilateral ON |
4 | 26, F | No | No | Lhermitte sign, neuropathic pain | Electric sensation travelling down spine with neck flexion and burning pain involving the bilateral hands and feet | Electric sensation and burning pain constant and still present at time of first attack | Partial recovery | No | 5 | Bilateral ON |
5 | 31, F | SLE | No | Headache | Severe holocephalic headache | Intermittent over 4 weeks | Complete resolution | No | 1.5 | Area postrema |
6 | 66, F | No | Exacerbation of underlying obstructive lung disease with increased cough, nasal congestion and nocturnal respiratory symptoms | Weakness, sensory | Left knee flexion weakness (MRC grade 4/5), numbness and tingling, which slowly progressed to involve the right leg | Constant lasting 12 weeks | Complete resolution | Yes, abnormal, multiple non-specific subcortical white matter lesions | 5 | Brainstem or cerebellar |
7 | 73, F | No | No | Sensory, neuropathic pain | Left scapular tightness, itchiness and burning pain | Constant lasting 3 weeks | Complete resolution | No | 3 | LETM |
8 | 24, F | No | No | Psychiatric | Psychosis including auditory hallucinations, paranoia and disorganized thoughts | Constant and still present at time of first attack | No recovery | No | 12 | Cerebral syndrome |
9 | 26, F | No | No | Sensory, neuropathic pain | Numbness, tingling and burning pain in a patchy distribution involving the bilateral torso, thighs and forearms | Intermittent and still present at time of first attack | No recovery | Yes, normal MRI brain | 14 | LETM |
10 | 39, F | No | Profound fatigue and epigastric pain | Visual, Lhermitte sign | Left optic disc oedema on exam with no clinical symptoms; electric sensation in bilateral arms with neck flexion | Left optic disc oedema one-time finding on neurologic exam; Lhermitte sign constant lasting 3 weeks | Complete resolution of Lhermitte sign | Yes, normal MRI cervical spine | Left optic disc oedema 152; Lhermitte 92 | LETM |
11 | 81, F | No | No | Visual | Left inferior quadrantanopia | Constant and still present at time of first attack | Partial recovery | Yes, abnormal, right occipital periventricular lesion (46 × 16 × 32 mm) | 23 | LETM |
12 | 36, F | No | No | Sensory | Right arm and leg numbness and tingling | Constant lasting 4 weeks | Complete resolution | No | 2 | LETM |
13 | 48, F | Breast cancer | No | Incoordination, neuropathic pain, sensory, tonic spasm | Feeling of incoordination associated with bilateral arm and left leg burning pain, numbness and tingling, as well as right arm involuntary muscle contraction. Symptoms triggered by movement. | Intermittent over 16 weeks | Complete resolution | Yes, abnormal, small right linear intramedullary lesion from C5-6 | 18 | LETM |
14 | 37, F | No | No | Seizure | Generalized tonic–clonic seizure | One episode of unknown duration | Complete resolution | Yes, normal MRI brain | 11 | LETM |
15 | 64, F | Immune thrombocytopenia | No | Visual | Left eye monocular vision loss | One episode lasting 2 minutes | Complete resolution | Yes, normal CT/CTA head and neck | 19 | Bilateral ON |
16 | 40, M | No | No | Visual | Right eye monocular inferior altitudinal vision loss | Constant lasting 8 weeks | Complete resolution | No | 245 | LETM |
17 | 44, F | No | No | Sensory, neuropathic pain | Numbness, tingling and shock-like pain in all 4 limbs | Intermittent and still present at time of first attack | No recovery | No | 49 | Unilateral ON |
Twelve (70.6%) participants underwent one or more neuroimaging studies at the time of their prodromal neurologic symptoms (Table 4). Of seven participants who underwent CT head, one had an abnormal finding with a hypodense lesion in the right occipital periventricular region. Four out of seven participants (57.1%) had abnormal findings on MRI brain. These included the participant with the abnormal CT head, with the same right occipital periventricular lesion appearing hyperintense on T2 sequences with subtle patchy enhancement and mild diffusion restriction (Case 11; Figure 1; 3.a–d). Of the remaining three participants with abnormal MRI brain, one had a T2 hyperintense right parietal lesion (Case 1; Figure 1; 1.a–b), one had a T2 hyperintense lesion in the right genu of the corpus collosum with enhancement (Case 2) and one had non-specific T2 hyperintense subcortical white matter lesions (Case 6). One out of four participants had an abnormal MRI spine, revealing a small, linear, right intramedullary T2 hyperintense lesion from C5 to C6 with no enhancement (Case 13). Of the five participants with abnormal imaging findings, the findings in three were felt to potentially explain their prodromal neurologic symptoms (Cases1, 11 and 13). In each of these cases, the lesion did not have a typical appearance for NMOSD. 12
Table 4.
Neuroimaging at time of prodromal neurologic symptoms.
Patients with prodromal neurologic symptoms (n = 17) | Imaging abnormalities (not considered classic for NMOSD) | |
---|---|---|
CT head, n (%) | ||
Normal | 6/7 (85.7) | |
Abnormal | 1/7 (14.3) | Right occipital lesion |
MRI brain, n (%) | ||
Normal | 3/7 (42.9) | |
Abnormal | 4/7 (57.1) | Right parietal lesion (no contrast given) |
Right occipital lesion (enhancing) | ||
Callosal lesion (enhancing) | ||
Non-specific subcortical white matter lesions (no contrast given) | ||
MRI spine, n (%) | ||
Normal | 3/4 (75.0) | |
Abnormal | 1/4 (25.0) | Linear, right intramedullary lesion at C5–6 (no enhancement) |
Symptoms corresponding to lesion localization on MRI brain or spine, n (%) | 3/8 (37.5) | 1. Right parietal lesion with left torso and leg sensory symptoms (Case 1) 2. Right occipital lesion with left inferior quadrantanopia (Case 11) 3. Linear, right intramedullary lesion at C5–6 with bilateral arm and left leg sensory symptoms and neuropathic pain (Case 13) |
CT: computerized tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 1.
Select MRI brain and spinal cord images and optical coherence tomography in patients with prodromal neurologic symptoms preceding a diagnosis of AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. 1: Case 1, patient with severe right-sided headache and left torso and leg sensory symptoms. (1.a) Axial and (1.b) Sagittal T2 FLAIR show a T2 hyperintense lesion in the right parietal white matter, sparing the cortex. 2: Case 10, patient with prodromal Lhermitte sign and asymptomatic optic disc oedema. (2.a) Axial and (2.b) Sagittal T2 FLAIR at the time of the first NMOSD attack reveal T2 hyperintense lesions in the left cerebral peduncle and splenium of the corpus collosum. (2.c) Optical coherence tomography after asymptomatic left optic disc oedema shows retinal ganglion cell layer thinning in the left eye. 3: Case 11, patient with left inferior quadrantopia. (3.a) Axial T2 FLAIR and (3.b) Axial T1 post-contrast at the time of prodromal neurologic symptoms show a right occipital periventricular lesion with subtle patchy enhancement. (2.c) Diffusion weighted imaging and (2.d) Apparent diffusion coefficient show partial diffusion restriction.
OD: right eye; OS: left eye; RNFL: retinal nerve fibre layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer.
All participants with prodromal neurologic symptoms had MRI brain or spinal cord at the time of the first NMOSD attack (Table 5). Eleven (64.7%) had asymptomatic lesions in the brain (n = 9), optic nerve (n = 1) or spinal cord (n = 1). The asymptomatic lesions at the time of the first attack were thought to explain the prodromal neurologic symptoms in an additional two participants (18.2%). One participant had prodromal symptoms involving neuropathic pain and Lhermitte sign, with no imaging at the time of these symptoms. She then presented with a first attack of bilateral optic neuritis 5 months later. MRI spine at the time of her presentation with bilateral optic neuritis showed a T2 hyperintense lesion from T1 to T3, as well as an isolated lesion at T6 (Case 4). The other participant had asymptomatic left optic disc oedema 13 years before presenting with a first attack of transverse myelitis. MRI brain at the time of first attack revealed subtle left optic nerve atrophy (Case 10; Figure 1; 2.a).
Table 5.
Neuroimaging at time of first NMOSD attack.
Patients with prodromal neurologic symptoms (n = 17) | |
---|---|
MRI brain, orbits, or spine, n (%) | 17 (100.0) |
Asymptomatic lesions, n (%) | 11 (64.7) |
Location of asymptomatic lesions, n (%) | |
Brain | 9/11 (81.8) |
Optic nerve | 1/11 (9.1) |
Spinal cord | 1/11 (9.1) |
Do asymptomatic lesions explain prodromal symptoms, n (%) | |
Yes | 2/11 (18.2) |
No | 9/11 (81.8) |
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
Of the four participants with visual disturbance, two underwent ophthalmology assessment at the time of their symptoms. The first participant had left inferior quadrantanopia without any evidence to suggest optic neuritis on ophthalmologic examination (Case 11). The second participant had left optic disc oedema on examination by her neurologist. She later underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) which revealed left inferior ganglion cell layer thinning (Case 10; Figure 1; 2.c). This participant also experienced Lhermitte sign as a prodromal symptom and this was the primary reason for her inclusion in the study.
Discussion
A total of 1 in 7 participants out of 116 with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD experienced prodromal neurologic symptoms preceding the first NMOSD attack in this multicenter Canadian cohort. To our knowledge, this represents the first cohort study investigating prodromal symptoms in the years predating NMOSD. Our results, including abnormal MRI findings in certain cases, suggest that central nervous system (CNS) disease activity occurs in some individuals with NMOSD before the first typical attack. Although baseline characteristics of those who experienced prodromal neurologic symptoms were generally similar to those who did not, a relative predominance of women and participants of African or Caribbean ethnicity was observed. Notably prodromal symptoms did not appear to be accounted for by comorbidities in this cohort, as the proportions with history of autoimmune disease or malignancy were similar across groups. Further study is required to explore biomarkers such as MRI changes and serum GFAP and NfL levels that may be associated with prodromal symptoms in NMOSD. Association of prodromal neurologic symptoms with specific biomarkers may allow prodromal NMOSD to be identified, monitored, and potentially treated in the future to prevent a first disabling attack.
The observation that two-thirds of those with prodromal neurologic symptoms in this cohort underwent neuroimaging suggests that the treating physician felt the symptoms were enough to warrant investigation. Five of eight (62.5%) investigated with MRI brain, orbits and/or spine had abnormalities which were not classic for an NMOSD attack, including subcortical white matter lesions, a small lesion in the genu of the corpus callosum and a linear, short-segment spinal cord lesion. Enhancement of some of these lesions suggests that they appeared around the same time as the prodromal symptoms. In three cases, the prodromal neurologic symptoms localized to the lesion(s) identified on imaging. Thus, in some NMOSD patients, prodromal neurologic symptoms may be a reflection of mild CNS disease activity. Moreover, we observed asymptomatic optic disc oedema in one case, which was later associated with supportive findings on OCT and evidence of left optic nerve atrophy on MRI brain. In addition, there may be cases of prodromal neurologic symptoms in NMOSD that are not associated with MRI changes but could still reflect CNS inflammation.
There is evidence from studies of patients with established NMOSD that asymptomatic MRI lesions may occur during or between attacks, although the frequency has varied widely across studies, which may be in part due to whether patients were evaluated during a clinically quiescent phase and whether they were on therapy.26–28 Similarly, elevations in serum GFAP levels have been observed in some patients between attacks and may portend an increased risk of future attacks. 29 We did not have access to any serum samples collected at the time of the prodromal neurologic symptoms to evaluate GFAP and NfL levels, biomarkers associated with astroglial and neuronal pathology, but these tests would be useful to conduct in future cases, as well as testing for presence of the AQP4-IgG antibody.
The most common prodromal neurologic symptoms in this cohort were sensory symptoms and pain. These symptoms are non-specific but their character may be of relevance in flagging concern for prodromal NMOSD as opposed to another cause. Pain was typically neuropathic, described as severe, burning, electric and itching. Severe neuropathic pain is a hallmark of established NMOSD with estimated prevalence of >70% and increased frequency and severity compared with MS. 30 Tonic spasms, which were reported in two of our cases, are considered characteristic of NMOSD and in one study, were associated with an odds ratio of 22 comparing NMOSD to MS. 31 A Lhermitte sign should raise the question of a cervical cord demyelinating process even in the absence of other symptoms. Seizures have been reported as the first clinical sign of MS and MOGAD, but AQP4 + NMOSD should also be considered in the differential diagnosis. 32 Systemic prodromal symptoms reported in this study included fatigue, decreased appetite, epigastric pain, and exacerbation of obstructive lung disease, although we suspect that such symptoms may have been underreported by both participants and the treating neurologists, and warrant further investigation. There have been reports of elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels and myopathy preceding onset of NMOSD and in a large Chinese NMOSD registry there were four cases of pregnancy loss in the months preceding NMOSD onset.33,34 AQP4 is known to occur in high concentrations in the skeletal muscles, placenta and kidneys in addition to the brain, which might explain prodromal symptoms localizing to these tissues.
Strengths of this study include a detailed review of medical records and neuroimaging to identify neurologic symptoms preceding the first NMOSD attack from a multicentre, ethnically diverse cohort. Limitations include the retrospective nature of data collection, and thus the variability of the assessments that occurred including clinical documentation and neuroimaging. Participants may not have been asked about prior neurological symptoms as part of their assessment, resulting in a likely under-ascertainment of prodromal symptoms. There is also potential selection bias, as only individuals enrolled in CANOPTICS were eligible to participate in the study. Documentation of non-neurologic symptoms was sparse, and neuroimaging was only performed in a share of cases. In addition, formal ophthalmologic data were limited for participants with prodromal visual disturbance. The exclusion of symptoms that occurred within 30 days prior to the first NMOSD attack may also underestimate the number of individuals with prodromal neurologic symptoms. For a few of our cases, the prodromal neurologic symptoms could be interpreted as the early stages of the first attack or a missed first attack, as has been suggested with the MS prodrome. 35 However, if they were attacks, they did not demonstrate one of the core clinical characteristics of NMOSD by 2015 IPND criteria and raise the question of whether the clinical spectrum of NMOSD warrants further expansion. 12 It is possible that a first attack could evolve over more than 30 days, especially in participants who experienced a prodrome that was consistent with their first NMOSD attack. However, we found only two participants who had symptoms 60 days or less before the first attack. It is difficult to determine whether reported prodromal symptoms are related to the NMOSD disease process or if they represent a separate entity, but further biomarker studies may provide answers.
In conclusion, we found that 15% of this cohort with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD presented with prodromal neurologic symptoms before the first NMOSD attack. Participants experienced a variety of symptoms with diverse imaging findings. Prodromal neurologic symptoms did not appear to be related to comorbidities and while symptoms were non-specific, their character was typical for NMOSD. Our findings suggest that participants with NMOSD may not always manifest with neurologic symptoms, fulfilling the core clinical characteristics and associated imaging features from 2015 IPND diagnostic criteria at initial presentation. Further systematic investigation is needed to better understand the relationship between prodromal symptoms, imaging and fluid biomarkers, and the development of NMOSD.
Footnotes
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.L. has nothing to declare. R.A.M. receives research funding from CIHR, MS Canada, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, CMSC, the Arthritis Society and the US Department of Defense, and is a co-investigator on studies receiving funding from Biogen Idec and Roche Canada. G.F. has served as a member of the advisory board for Horizon Therapeutics. M.S.F. has received research or educational grants from Sanofi-Genzyme Canada. He has received consulting fees or honoraria from Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Biogen Idec, EMD Inc./EMD Serono/Merck Serono, Find Therapeutics, Hoffman La-Roche, Horizon Therapeutics, Novartis, Quanterix, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Canada Innovation. He has served as a member of a company advisory board, board of directors or other similar group for Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Actelion/Janssen (J&J), Atara Biotherapeutics, Bayer Healthcare, Celestra Health, EMD Inc./Merck Serono, Find Therapeutics, Hoffman La-Roche, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Setpoint Medical. He has been part of a speaker’s bureau for Hoffman La-Roche, Novartis, and EMD Inc. L.L. is a site investigator for studies funded by Roche, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis. He has received consultation fees from Alexion, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi Aventis. A.M. has received compensation for serving on an advisory board or data safety monitoring board for Biogen, Novartis, EMD Serono and Alexion. M.V.V. has received salary support as a co-investigator from National MS Society. A.K. has nothing to declare. D.L.R. has received research funding from MS Canada, the National MS Society, CMSC, University of Toronto Division of Neurology and Roche Canada. She has received speaker or consultant fees from Alexion, Biogen, EMD Serono, Horizon Therapeutics, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis and Touch IME.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This study received funding from MS Canada (EGID 918124).
Data Availability Statement: The data sets generated during and analysed during the current study are available in the Figshare repository, dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25225991.
ORCID iDs: Sydney Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8591-2062
Ruth Ann Marrie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1855-5595
Manav V Vyas
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-2540
Contributor Information
Sydney Lee, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ruth Ann Marrie, Departments of Internal Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Giulia Fadda, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mark S Freedman, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Liesly Lee, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexandra Muccilli, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, BARLO MS Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Manav V Vyas, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, BARLO MS Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea Konig, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, BARLO MS Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalia L. Rotstein, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, BARLO MS Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
References
- 1. Postuma RB, Aarsland D, Barone P, et al. Identifying prodromal Parkinson’s disease: Pre-motor disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 2012; 27(5): 617–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Amieva H, Le Goff M, Millet X, et al. Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: Successive emergence of the clinical symptoms. Ann Neurol 2008; 64(5): 492–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Marrie RA, Maxwell CJ, Rotstein DL, et al. Prodromes in demyelinating disorders, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer’s dementia. Rev Neurol 2024; 180: 125–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tremlett H, Munger KL, Makhani N. The multiple sclerosis prodrome: Evidence to action. Front Neurol 2022; 12: 761408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Disanto G, Zecca C, MacLachlan S, et al. Prodromal symptoms of multiple sclerosis in primary care. Ann Neurol 2018; 83(6): 1162–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Makhani N, Tremlett H. The multiple sclerosis prodrome. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17(8): 515–521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sinay V, Perez Akly M, Zanga G, et al. School performance as a marker of cognitive decline prior to diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2015; 21(7): 945–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cortese M, Riise T, Bjørnevik K, et al. Preclinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis: A prospective study of cognitive performance prior to first symptom. Ann Neurol 2016; 80(4): 616–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tremlett H, Marrie RA. The multiple sclerosis prodrome: Emerging evidence, challenges, and opportunities. Mult Scler 2021; 27(1): 6–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yusuf FLA, Ng BC, Wijnands JMA, et al. A systematic review of morbidities suggestive of the multiple sclerosis prodrome. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20(8): 799–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bjornevik K, Munger KL, Cortese M, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain levels in patients with presymptomatic multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77(1): 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 2015; 85(2): 177–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, et al. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 2005; 202(4): 473–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jiao Y, Fryer JP, Lennon VA, et al. Updated estimate of AQP4-IgG serostatus and disability outcome in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2013; 81(14): 1197–1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nishiyama S, Ito T, Misu T, et al. A case of NMO seropositive for aquaporin-4 antibody more than 10 years before onset. Neurology 2009; 72(22): 1960–1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Leite MI, Coutinho E, Lana-Peixoto M, et al. Myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A multicenter study of 16 patients. Neurology 2012; 78(20): 1601–1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Abdel-Mannan O, Klein A, Bachar Zipori A, et al. Radiologically isolated aquaporin-4 antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler 2022; 28(4): 676–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Flanagan EP, Weinshenker BG, Krecke KN, et al. Asymptomatic myelitis in neuromyelitis optica and autoimmune aquaporin-4 channelopathy. Neurol Clin Pract 2015; 5(2): 175–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ventura RE, Kister I, Chung S, et al. Cervical spinal cord atrophy in NMOSD without a history of myelitis or MRI-visible lesions. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016; 3(3): e224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Oertel FC, Kuchling J, Zimmermann H, et al. Microstructural visual system changes in AQP4-antibody–seropositive NMOSD. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2017; 4(3): e334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Solomon JM, Paul F, Chien C, et al. A window into the future? MRI for evaluation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder throughout the disease course. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2021; 14: 17562864211014389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Delgado-Garcia G, Lapidus S, Talero R, et al. The patient journey with NMOSD: From initial diagnosis to chronic condition. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 966428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, et al. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology 1999; 53(5): 1107–1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mirmosayyeb O, Ghaffary EM, Bagherieh S, et al. Post COVID-19 infection neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): A case report-based systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 60: 103697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Turco EC, Curti E, Maffini V, et al. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attack triggered by herpes zoster infection. Mult Scler Int 2020; 2020: 6151258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lee MY, Yong KP, Hyun JW, et al. Incidence of interattack asymptomatic brain lesions in NMO spectrum disorder. Neurology 2020; 95(23): e3124–e3128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Camera V, Holm-Mercer L, Ali AAH, et al. Frequency of new silent MRI lesions in Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease and aquaporin-4 antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4(12): e2137833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Carnero Contentti E, Lopez PA, Tkachuk V, et al. Frequency of new asymptomatic MRI lesions during attacks and follow-up of patients with NMOSD in a real-world setting. Mult Scler 2023; 29(10): 1240–1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Aktas O, Smith MA, Rees WA, et al. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein: A neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder biomarker. Ann Neurol 2021; 89(5): 895–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Asseyer S, Cooper G, Paul F. Pain in NMOSD and MOGAD: A systematic literature review of pathophysiology, symptoms, and current treatment strategies. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Candeias da Silva C, Bichuetti DB, Azevedo Silva SMC, et al. Movement disorders in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica: A clinical marker of neurological disability. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2018; 51: 73–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Li EC, Zheng Y, Cai MT, et al. Seizures and epilepsy in multiple sclerosis, aquaporin 4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Epilepsia 2022; 63(9): 2173–2191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen H, xi Zhang Q, Lian Z, et al. Muscle damage in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2017; 4(6): e400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang L, Zhou L, ZhangBao J, et al. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Pregnancy-related attack and predictive risk factors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92(1): 53–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Gasperi C, Hapfelmeier A, Daltrozzo T, et al. Systematic assessment of medical diagnoses preceding the first diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2021; 96(24): e2977–e2988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]