Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To assess the socioeconomic inequality in postnatal care (PNC) utilisation and its contributors among women in 14 sub-Saharan African countries with high maternal mortality.
Design
Community-based cross-sectional study using Demographic Health Survey
Setting
Africa countries with the highest maternal mortality ratio (14 countries)
Participants
All women who had given birth within 2 years prior to the survey (n=64 912)
Primary outcomes
Postnatal care utilisation
Results
The percentage of women who had PNC utilisation was lowest in Ethiopia (23.4%: 95% CI: 22.1%, 24.7%) and highest in The Gambia (91.5%: 95% CI: 90.6%, 92.4%). There was statistically significant pro-rich inequality in the PNC utilisation in all countries except Liberia, meaning PNC utilisation was disproportionately concentrated among women from wealthier households. The weighted Erreygers Normalized Concentration Index (ECI) ranged from 0.0398 in The Gambia to 0.476 in Nigeria; the second-highest inequality was in Cameroon (0.382), followed by Guinea (0.344). The decomposition analysis revealed that the wealth index was the largest contributor to inequality in PNC utilisation in seven countries: Benin, Burundi, The Gambia, Guinea, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania. In contrast, educational status emerged as the primary contibutor in Cameroon and Zimbabwe, media exposure in Mali and Mauritania, and distance to healthcare facilities in Ethiopia. However, in Liberia, the weighted ECI of 0.0012 with a p value of 0.96 indicate that there is no significant socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation, suggesting that the distribution of PNC utilisation is almost equal across different socioeconomic groups.
Conclusion
Our study revealed a pro-rich inequality in PNC utilisation across all included sub-Saharan African countries with high maternal mortality, except Liberia. This implies that PNC utilisation disproportionately favours the wealthy. Therefore, financially better-off women are more likely to utilise PNC services compared to those who are poor. Addressing the identified contributors of socioeconomic inequalities in PNC utilisation in each country remains crucial for achieving equity in PNC utilisation.
Keywords: Health Equity, Public Health, Primary Health Care
Strengths and limitations of this study.
Since our study focused exclusively on single-country data analysis, it offers a unique opportunity to examine socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation within each of the 14 sub-Saharan African countries. This approach allows us to highlight country-specific health system interventions that have the potential to improve equity in PNC utilisation
In addition, using the weighted ECI and Wagstaff decomposition analysis, our findings provide precise estimates of inequality in PNC utilisation across these countries.
However, there are some limitations. As the survey relied on respondents’ reports, there may be a possibility of recall bias.
Moreover, restricting our study to the most recent birth (last birth) may have underestimated socioeconomic-related inequalities.
Introduction
The postnatal period extends from birth to 42 days afterward,during which the majority of maternal deaths occur.1 Mothers are at hightened risk during this time due to excessive bleeding, hypertensive disorders, and sepsis.2 The World Health Organisation (WHO) report showed that from 2000 to 2020, the global maternal mortality ratio (MMR) declined by 34%, from 342 deaths to 223 deaths per 100,000 live births.3 However, maternal mortality remains unacceptably high. Approximately 287 000 mothers died in 2020, and nearly 95% of all maternal death occurred in sub-Saharan African countries4; more than two-thirds of maternal deaths occur in the postnatal period.5 The main reasons for high rates of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan African countries are inadequate healthcare facilities, lack of access to healthcare service, and the failure of pregnant women to use available health facilities due to religious beliefs and cultural customs.6 However, most of maternal deaths can be prevented with postpartum care services for mothers.7
According to the WHO definition, postnatal care (PNC) consists of various preventive services and assessments aimed at identifying and managing complications related to birth during the first six weeks after delivery.8 Promoting antenatal care and skilled birth alone is not enough to improve maternal health. Therefore, the WHO recommends that mothers and newborns receive PNC within the first 24 hours after birth, regardless of the place of birth, along with at least three additional visits for both mothers and newborns9. Attending all recommended visits helps ensure the health of mothers and newborns by spotting and addressing complications related to childbirth
For several years, strategies to promote universal access to PNC have been recommended, as these interventions can significantly reduce maternal and neonatal mortality.11 12 However, despite government programs and policy initiatives, follow-up care after childbirth is remain inadequate. Moreover, many mothers tend to seek PNC only in cases of complications. There are various factors that prevent women from seeking PNC, such as low economic status, lack of education, and poor follow-up services in healthcare.13 In addition, previous empirical studies have revealed factors that influence the use of PNC services. These factors include residence, marital status, religion, age, employment status, antenatal care visit, place of delivery and parity.14,20
Several studies examine socioeconomic inequality in maternal health service utilisation in sub-Saharan African countries.21,25 However, only one study looks at PNC as maternal healthcare.26 There is still a lack of studies assessing socio-economic inequality and its contibutors in PNC utilisation. While more than two-thirds of maternal deaths are linked to insufficient utilisation of PNC,5 there has not been a systematic analysis of population data to examine the socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation in sub-Saharan African countries with high maternal mortality. Such an analysis can help track progress toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 3.1 and 3.2, ensuring that disadvantaged populations are not left behind. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation and its contributors in top 14 SSA countries with high maternal mortality using the Demographic Health Survey (DHS).
Methods
Data sources and context
We used data from the DHS collected in 14 sub-Saharan African countries (Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe), through a community-based cross-sectional study design. The DHS is a nationwide survey that collects information about maternal and child health, fertility, reproductive health, mortality, nutrition and health behaviours among adults in over 85 countries.27 The countries included in the analysis were chosen due to their high MMR in Africa28 and the availability of recent DHS, as presented in table 1. We used the WHO threshold to classify MMR as follows: <100 (very low), 100–299 (low), 300–499 (high), 500–999 (very high) and over 1000 (extremely high) maternal death per 100,000 live births.3 In our study, we grouped the high, very high and extremely high categories as ‘high’. We then identified the top 14 countries with high MMR using recent DHS data from 2015 onwards to examine socioeconomic inequality in PNC after the Millennium Development Goal agenda were completed in 2015. However, countries with high MMR but without recent DHS data were not included in the analysis.
Table 1. Sub-Saharan African countries with high maternal mortality included in the analysis and sample size.
| Country | MMR (per 100 000 live births) | DHS year | DHS sample size |
| Sierra Leone | 1120 | 2019 | 3888 |
| Nigeria | 917 | 2018 | 12 601 |
| Mauritania | 766 | 2021 | 4502 |
| Liberia | 661 | 2019/20 | 2233 |
| The Gambia | 597 | 2019/20 | 3431 |
| Guinea | 576 | 2018 | 3057 |
| Mali | 562 | 2018 | 3938 |
| Burundi | 548 | 2016/17 | 5279 |
| Cameroon | 529 | 2018 | 3782 |
| Tanzania | 524 | 2022 | 4360 |
| Zimbabwe | 458 | 2015 | 2373 |
| Ethiopia | 401 | 2016 | 4085 |
| Benin | 397 | 2017/18 | 5428 |
| Uganda | 375 | 2016 | 5955 |
DHSDemographic Health Survey
Among the included countries, Sierra Leone had the highest MMR at 1120 deaths per 100,000 live births, while Uganda had the lowest at 375 deaths per 100,000. Countries with the highest MMR often lack good healthcare infrastructure, including a shortage of skilled provider, insufficient medical facilities, and limited access to prenatal and PNC. They also face issues like high fertility rate, low life expectancy, political instability, and humanitarian crises. Overall, these countries have weak health systems with limited funding, poor governance, and inadequate healthcare financing.29 30
Sampling procedures and sample size
The DHS programme employs a two-stage sampling design. The countries are divided into clusters or enumeration areas, which serve as the primary sampling units (PSUs). The selection of PSUs is typically based on a sampling frame derived from recent census data or other population information sources. A subset of clusters is selected using probability proportional to size sampling. The size of each cluster is proportionate to its population size. The number of selected clusters may vary depending on the desired sample size and the survey objectives. Within each selected cluster, a systematic sampling method is used to select households. This involves creating a list of households within each cluster and systematically selecting a predetermined number of households from the list. Within each selected household, eligible participants are identified based on the survey criteria. For this study, we used individual record data sets containing information from all eligible women aged 15 to 49 years. The source population for this study included all women who had given birth within 2 years prior to the survey. In total, 64 912 mother were part of this analysis, with a sample sizes ranging from 2233 (Liberia) and 12 601 (Nigeria) (see table 1). Data from each country were analysed separately.
Measurement of variables
PNC utilisation is defined as women who reported receiving PNC either at a health facility or at home from a skilled provider (doctor, nurse, midwife, health officer, auxiliary nurse and community nurse) within the first 48 hours after giving birth.31 The PNC utilisation was binary and was coded as ‘1’ if women used PNC and ‘0’ otherwise.
Our study includes individual and community-level variables.16 18 20 32 Individual-level variables include the age of the mother recorded in completed years (15–24, 25–34, 35+), employment status (not working, professional, agriculture and others), marital status (married, not married), head of household (male, female), educational status of mother (no education, primary, secondary and higher), educational status of husband (no education, primary, secondary and higher) and parity (1–5 and 5+). Wealth status (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest) is included as a household-level variable.
In addition, the DHS assessed woman’s autonomy in healthcare decisions by asking ‘who usually decides on your healthcare?’ The responses were coded as follows: ‘1’ for when the women decided alone; ‘2’ for joint decisions with their partner, and ‘3’ for when the partner decided alone.33 Women who made decisions alone or with their partner were recorded as ‘1’, while those whose partners made decisions alone were recoded as ‘0’. In this contex, ‘0’ indicates a lack autonomy in healthcare decision-making, while ‘1’ indicates autonomy.
The variable ‘pregnancy wantedness’ was divided into three categories: ‘wanted then’, ‘wanted later’ and ‘wanted no more’. ‘Wanted then’ indicates that women desired the pregnancy at the time it happened. ‘Wanted later’ means women did not initially want the pregnancy, but accepted it over time. ‘Wanted no more’ refers that the pregnancy was entirely unwanted.34 The other variable is ‘desire to have more children’. This was assessed in DHS by asking currently married women ‘Do you want to have a/another child?’ The possible responses were (1) wants within 2 years, (2) wants after 2 years, (3) undecided, (4) want no more and (5) sterilised respondent or partner). We recoded the response so that women who answered as undecided, want no more, or sterilised (respondent or partner) were given a code of ‘0’, while those who answered ‘wants within 2 years’ or ‘wants after 2 years’ recieved a code of ‘1’. Here, ‘0’ indicates no desire for more children, and ‘1’ indicates a desire to have more children. Moreover, three variables were used to assess the mother’s media exposure status: listening radio, reading a newspaper and watching television, and labelled as ‘yes’ if mother has exposure to either of the three media sources at least once a week or ‘no’ if a mother has exposure to none of them.27
While, the community-level variables include a place of residence (rural, urban), and the difficulty of getting nearest health services (big problem, not big problem). The mothers were asked whether the distance to the health facility a significant problem for them was or not, to assess the difficulty of reaching the nearest health facility.
Equity stratifier/dimension of inequality
PNC utilisation inequality was measured using economic status as an equity stratifier. Economic status was assessed using data from DHS through a wealth index, which considers various assets owned by households. Examples of these assets include farmland, livestock, building materials, radios/TVs, refrigerators, and sanitation infrastructuree. The wealth index was created using principal component analysis for urban and rural areas separately. This approach generates uncorrelated components, with the first principal component explaining the most variability in the data.35 The asset score, a continuous variable, rank households from the lowest to the highest and wealth index is divided into five categories: poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest.36
Data management and statistical analysis
The data from 14 countries were extracted, cleaned, recoded and analysed separately using STATA V.16 statistical software. We presented descriptive statistics through tables, figures and narratives. We conducted a weighted data analysis using individual sample weights for women to consider the complex design of the DHS multi-stage cluster sampling. In addition, we adjusted our analyses for clustering and stratification using the svyset Stata command.
To assess the socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation, a concentration index (CI) was calculated. The index for an unbound variable varies from −1 to 1; for bounded variables, it ranges from µ−1 to 1−µ.37 Healthcare inequality is decomposed based on the assumption that the health variable is a linear function of the explanatory variables. In this study, the health variable is PNC utilisation, which is a binary variable that ranges from 0 to 1. Therefore, we used Erreygers Normalized Concentration Index (ECI), that, a modified version of the CI.38 Mathematically, ECI can be defined as:
where ECI is Erreygers concentration index, µ is the mean of the PNC utilisation and CI(y) is the generalised concentration index. Then, the ECI with the SE was reported in this study.
The concentration curve was used to show socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation graphically. The curve demonstrates the cumulative share of PNC utilisation on the y-axis against and the cumulative share of women ranked by the wealth index on the x-axis, arranged from the poorest to richest. If the concentration curve lies at a 45° line (the line of perfect equality), everyone will have the same condition for PNC utilisation regardless of wealth status, indicating that there is no socioeconomic inequality (ECI=zero). On the other hand, when the curve lies above the line of equality (when the ECI takes a negative value), the PNC utilisation will be concentrated among the poor (pro-poor). However, if the ECI value is positive, the curve will be below the line of equality, indicating the PNC utilisation is concentrated among the rich (pro-rich).39 Therefore, a concentration curve can be examined visually to determine if it is above or below the line of equality. The ECI with its p value was calculated to assess the statistical significance of the difference between the concentration curve and the line of perfect equality.
A modified Wagstaff decomposition method was used to identify the relative contribution of different factors to the socioeconomic-related inequality in PNC utilisation.37 39 In any linear additive regression model predicting a health outcome (y)39:
The concentration index for y, CI, is given as:
where ‘y’ is the socioeconomic inequality of PNC utilisation, is a set of the socioeconomic determinants of PNC utilisation, is the coefficient of , is the mean of y, is the mean of , is the CI for , is the generalised CI for the error term (), is the elasticity of y with respect to .40
Patient and public involvement
We used publicly available secondary data for the analysis; patients and the public were not directly involved in the design, analysis and interpretation of the findings.
Results
Sociodemographic and economic characteristics of respondents
The mean age of respondents was highest in Burundi (29.1 years) and lowest in Cameroon and Zimbabwe (26.9 years). The highest proportions of women were in the age group 24–34 years in all countries included in the analysis except Liberia (online supplemental table 1). Urban residents accounted for the majority of respondents in Sierra Leone (69.44%), while rural residents dominated in the remaining 13 countries, with the highest numbers in Burundi (83.6%), followed by Uganda (81.7%) and Ethiopia (79.4%). The proportion of participants who did not attend formal education ranged from 0.97% in Zimbabwe to 74.9% in Guinea.
Postnatal care utilisation
The PNC utilisation was lowest in Ethiopia (23.4%: 95% CI: 22.1%, 24.7%) and highest in The Gambia (91.5%: 95% CI: 90.6%, 92.4%). The percentage of PNC utilisation exceeded 50% in 12 of the 14 countries. In Ethiopia (23.4%) and Nigeria (45.4%), fewer than half of the women used PNC (figure 1). As shown in figure 1, the level of PNC utilisation was highest among women in the richest household quintile across all countries.
Figure 1. Proportion of women using postnatal care, by wealth index, by country.
Socioeconomic-related inequality in postnatal care utilisation
The results of the ECI analyses are displayed in online supplemental table 2. There was statistically significant pro-rich inequality in the PNC utilisation in all countries except Liberia; meaning PNC utilisation was disproportionately concentrated among women from richer households. The weighted ECI ranged from 0.0398 in The Gambia to 0.476 in Nigeria; the second-highest inequality was in Cameroon (0.382), followed by Guinea (0.344) and Mauritania (0.330). Concentration indices were less than 0.1 in three countries (Sierra Leone, The Gambia and Liberia), indicating a relatively equitable utilisation of PNC. However, in Liberia, the weighted ECI of 0.0012 with a p value of 0.96 indicate that there is no significant socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation; suggesting that the distribution of PNC utilisation is almost equal across different socioeconomic groups. The concentration curves for PNC utilisation for all countries are displayed in figure 2.
Figure 2. Concentration curves for postnatal care utilisation in 14 sub-Saharan African countries with high maternal mortality.
Decomposition of socioeconomic-related inequality in PNC utilisation
The decomposition analysis identifies the contribution of each determinant to the overall socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation. Key metrics such as coefficient (along with thier significant levels), elasticity, CI and percent contribution were calculated to determine the factors that contribute to socioeconomic inequality (online supplemental table 3).
The decomposition analysis revealed that the wealth index was the largest contributor to inequality in PNC utilisation in seven countries: Benin, Burundi, The Gambia, Guinea, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania. In contrast, educational status emerged as the primary contibutor in Cameroon and Zimbabwe, media exposure in Mali and Mauritania, and distance to healthcare facilities in Ethiopia. The second largest contributor to inequality in PNC utilisation varied across countries. Media exposure was the second most significant factor in Benin, Cameroon, The Gambia and Tanzania, while the wealth index held this position in Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, Uganda and Mauritania. In Guinea and Mali, place of residence was the second largest contributor, and in Tanzania, it was parity. Notably, in Burundi, Nigeria and Sierra Leone, educational status ranked as the second largest contributor to inequality in PNC utilisation.
The elasticity was assessed to measure the change in PNC utilisation with a one-unit change in the independent variables.41 42 The elasticity value could be positive or negative, signifying an increase or decrease in PNC utilisation corresponding to a positive change in the independent variables. Importantly, the distance to health facilities showed negative elasticity in all countries except Mauritania and Nigeria, suggesting that women who faced significant challenges in accessing health facilities were less likely to utilise PNC. Similarly, parity during the index pregnancy exhibited negative elasticity across all countries, except for Burundi, Cameroon, and Uganda, indicating that the higher parity was associated with reduced likelihood of PNC utilisation. In contrast, educational status demonstrated positive elasticity in all countries, except The Gambia, Mauritania, and Uganda, implying that women with formal education were more likely to have PNC utilisation.
Discussion
This study highlights a significant pro-rich inequality in PNC utilisation, with varying level of inequality across the 14 countries. These findings align with previous studies conducted in Cambodia,43 Ghana,44 Western China,45 46 Zimbabwe,47 Namibia,48 Sri Lanka,49 India,13 Bangladesh50 and Ethiopia.51 52 Evidence indicates a strong association between PNC utilisation and economic class; better PNC utilisation being more prominent among the rich than the poor.50 This disparity suggests that economically disadvantaged women face significant barriers to accessing PNC services, hindering their ability to benefit from universal PNC access. To address this issue, it is essential to promote intersectoral collaboration among development sectors and implement system-wide integrated activities aimed at reducing poverty, enhancing PNC service, and promoting equity.
Moreover, the decomposition analysis showed that the inequalities in PNC utilisation were mainly attributed to women’s wealth status in seven countries followed by educational status in five countries and media exposure in four countries. Previous studies have also documented that wealth is a significant factor in PNC utilisation, suggesting that being in a rich household substantially increases the uptake of PNC services.2053,55 Women who cannot afford to pay for direct and indirect medical costs still face difficulties to access health facilities, even though PNC services are provided for free in most areas.56 The primary concern of poor households is meeting their basic needs, leaving them with limited financial resources for healthcare expenses.57 Therefore, it is crucial for the government to implement interventions and initiatives as well as to expand existing community-based programmes aimed at empowering women to generate their own income. This would enhance their economic self-sufficiency, and improve their access to health services.
This study revealed that women educational status is a significant contributor to the overall socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation. Previous studies have also highlighted a strong positive relationships between educational attainment and the utilisation of PNC.45,4749 51 58 59 The possible explanation could be that higher educational attainment often correlates with better economic resources, enabling women to take control of their health and facilitating easier access to health services. Education enhance individuals’ understanding of the benefits of preventive healthcare and increase awareness of available health services. Moreover, it improves individuals’ capacity to promote health by influencing their lifestyle and enhancing the utilisation of healthcare services through better knowledge, attitudes and practices.60 This implies that program planners and decision-makers should consider targeted interventions to minimise socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation. This could involve increasing access to education to enhance women’s educational status.
Our study showed that media exposure is a positive contributor to socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation. This finding is consistent with the studies done in Ethiopia,52 58 Benin,55 Bangladesh61 and South Asia.62 This may be because mass media serve as an important means of disseminating health information, which can increase women’s knowledge and attitudes toward health service utilisation.63 As a result, this can lead to an improved service utilisation, including PNC. Moreover, mass media is a popular and cost-effective public health promotional tool that influences women’s health care-seeking behaviour by increasing health knowledge and attitudes toward healthy living.64
Strengths and limitations of the study
Since our study focused exclusively on single-country data analysis, it offers a unique opportunity to examine socioeconomic inequality in PNC utilisation within each of the 14 sub-Saharan African countries. This approach allows us to highlight country-specific health system interventions that have the potential to improve equity in PNC utilisation. In addition, by using ECI, tailored for binary outcomes, our findings provide precise estimates of inequality in PNC utilisation across these countries.
However, there are some limitations. Our source population includes all women who have given birth within the 2 years prior to the survey. This timeframe may pose challenges for women when recalling specific details related to the questions asked by the data collectors, leading to potential recall bias. In addition, restricting our study to the most recent birth (last birth) may have underestimated socioeconomic-related inequalities.
Conclusions
Our study revealed a pro-rich inequality in PNC utilisation across all included sub-Saharan African countries with high maternal mortality, except Liberia. This implies that PNC utilisation disproportionately favours the wealthy. Therefore, financially better-off women are more likely to utilise PNC services compared to their poorer counterparts. It is essential to address the identified contributors of socioeconomic inequalities in PNC utilisation in each country achieve equity in access to these service.
supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We are very thankful to the major DHS program that permitted us to use the survey data sets.
Footnotes
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Prepublication history and additional supplemental material for this paper are available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076453).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.
Ethics approval: The ethics approval was not required for this particular study, since the data is secondary and the DHS data is available to the general public by request in different formats from the measure DHS website http://www.measuredhs.com. To conduct our study, we registered and requested the dataset from DHS online archive and received approval on 06 February 2023 to access and download the data files.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Contributor Information
Samrawit Mihret Fetene, Email: samrimih21@gmail.com.
Elsa Awoke Fentie, Email: elsaawoke91@gmail.com.
Ever Siyoum Shewarega, Email: eversiyoum@yahoo.com.
Atitegeb Abera Kidie, Email: atitegebabera@gmail.com.
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
References
- 1.Konje ET, Hatfield J, Sauve R, et al. Late initiation and low utilization of postnatal care services among women in the rural setting in Northwest Tanzania: a community-based study using a mixed method approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06695-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tessema GA, Laurence CO, Melaku YA, et al. Trends and causes of maternal mortality in Ethiopia during 1990-2013: findings from the Global Burden of Diseases study 2013. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:160. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4071-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/depression-global-health-estimates Available.
- 4.Word Health Organization Maternal mortality report 2023 n.d.
- 5.Ronsmans C, Graham WJ, Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368:1189–200. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tey N-P, Lai S. Correlates of and barriers to the utilization of health services for delivery in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Sci World J. 2013;2013:423403. doi: 10.1155/2013/423403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lawn JE, Kerber K, Enweronu-Laryea C, et al. 3.6 million neonatal deaths--what is progressing and what is not? Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:371–86. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.World Health Organization WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. 2014. [PubMed]
- 9.World Health Organization . WHO recommendations on maternal health: guidelines approved by the WHO guidelines review committee. 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 10.World Health Organization . Unicef: Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice. 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization The World health report: 2005: make every mother and child count. 2005. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Sines E, Syed U, Wall S, et al. Postnatal care: A critical opportunity to save mothers and newborns. Pol Perspect on Newborn Health. 2007;1 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Singh A, Padmadas SS, Mishra US, et al. Socio-Economic Inequalities in the Use of Postnatal Care in India. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berhe A, Bayray A, Berhe Y, et al. Determinants of postnatal care utilization in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0221161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Akunga D, Menya D, Kabue M. Determinants of Postnatal Care Use in Kenya. apst. 2014;28:1447–59. doi: 10.11564/28-3-638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tessema ZT, Yazachew L, Tesema GA, et al. Determinants of postnatal care utilization in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta and multilevel analysis of data from 36 sub-Saharan countries. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46:175. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00944-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khaki JJ, Sithole L. Factors associated with the utilization of postnatal care services among Malawian women. Malawi Med J. 2019;31:2–11. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v31i1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Somefun OD, Ibisomi L. Determinants of postnatal care non-utilization among women in Nigeria. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:21. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1823-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lwelamira J, Safari J, Stephen A. Utilization of Maternal Postnatal Care Services among Women in Selected Villages of Bahi District, Tanzania. Curr Res J Soc Sci. 2015;7:106–11. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fetene SM, Gebremedhin T. Uptake of postnatal care and its determinants in Ethiopia: a positive deviance approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:601. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04933-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Samuel O, Zewotir T, North D. Decomposing the urban-rural inequalities in the utilisation of maternal health care services: evidence from 27 selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Reprod Health. 2021;18:216. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01268-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alam N, Hajizadeh M, Dumont A, et al. Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in sub-Saharan African countries: a multiyear and multi-country analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McTavish S, Moore S, Harper S, et al. National female literacy, individual socio-economic status, and maternal health care use in sub-Saharan Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1958–63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abekah-Nkrumah G. Trends in utilisation and inequality in the use of reproductive health services in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1541. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7865-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ogundele OJ, Pavlova M, Groot W. Inequalities in reproductive health care use in five West-African countries: A decomposition analysis of the wealth-based gaps. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:44. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01167-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goli S, Nawal D, Rammohan A, et al. Decomposing the socioeconomic inequality inutilization of maternal health care services in selected countries of SouthAsia and Sub-Saharan Africa. J Biosoc Sci. 2018;50:749–69. doi: 10.1017/S0021932017000530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa and Rockville: CSA and ICF. 2016. https://dhsprogram.com Available.
- 28.WHO: World Health Organization, UNICEF, United Nations Population Fund and The World Bank . Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2020 WHO. Geneva: 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Souza JP, Day LT, Rezende-Gomes AC, et al. A global analysis of the determinants of maternal health and transitions in maternal mortality. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12:e306–16. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00468-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dahab R, Sakellariou D. Barriers to Accessing Maternal Care in Low Income Countries in Africa: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:4292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.WHO recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045989 Available. [PubMed]
- 32.Kawuki J, Gatasi G, Sserwanja Q. Prevalence of adequate postnatal care and associated factors in Rwanda: evidence from the Rwanda demographic health survey 2020. Arch Public Health. 2022;80:208. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00964-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aragaw FM, Teklu RE, Belay DG, et al. Individual and community level predictors of women’s autonomy in health care decision-making among youth in East African countries: a multilevel analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e066975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ameyaw EK, Budu E, Sambah F, et al. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hasan MM, Uddin J, Pulok MH, et al. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Child Malnutrition in Bangladesh: Do They Differ by Region? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.UNHCR The UN Refugee Agency. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download/?url=cMOR7Y Available.
- 37.Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ. 2005;14:429–32. doi: 10.1002/hec.953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Erreygers G. Correcting the Concentration Index. J Health Econ. 2009;28:504–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wagstaff A, O’Donnell O, Doorslaer E, et al. Analyzing health equaity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. World Bank Publications; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E, Watanabe N. On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J Econom. 2003;112:207–23. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00161-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shifti DM, Chojenta C, Holliday EG, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in short birth interval in Ethiopia: a decomposition analysis. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1504. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09537-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jain K, Goli S, Arokiasamy P. Are self reported morbidities deceptive in measuring socio-economic inequalities. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:750–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dingle A, Powell-Jackson T, Goodman C. A decade of improvements in equity of access to reproductive and maternal health services in Cambodia, 2000-2010. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fenny AP, Asuman D, Crentsil AO, et al. Trends and causes of socioeconomic inequalities in maternal healthcare in Ghana, 2003–2014. IJSE. 2019;46:288–308. doi: 10.1108/IJSE-03-2018-0148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu X, Gao W, Yan H. Measuring and decomposing the inequality of maternal health services utilization in western rural China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang R, Li S, Li C, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities and determinants of maternal health services in Shaanxi Province, Western China. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0202129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lukwa AT, Siya A, Odunitan-Wayas FA, et al. Decomposing maternal socioeconomic inequalities in Zimbabwe; leaving no woman behind. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:239. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04571-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zere E, Tumusiime P, Walker O, et al. Inequities in utilization of maternal health interventions in Namibia: implications for progress towards MDG 5 targets. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-9-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Siriwardhana DD, Pathmeswaran A, Wickremasinghe AR. Socioeconomic inequality and determinants of postnatal home visits made by public health midwives: An analysis of the Sri Lanka Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0215816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aziz S, Basit A, Sultana S, et al. Inequalities in women’s utilization of postnatal care services in Bangladesh from 2004 to 2017. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06672-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bobo FT, Yesuf EA, Woldie M. Inequities in utilization of reproductive and maternal health services in Ethiopia. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0602-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gebre E, Worku A, Bukola F. Inequities in maternal health services utilization in Ethiopia 2000-2016: magnitude, trends, and determinants. Reprod Health. 2018;15:119. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0556-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chi H, Jung S, Subramanian SV, et al. Socioeconomic and geographic inequalities in antenatal and postnatal care components in India, 2016-2021. Sci Rep. 2024;14:10221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59981-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aziz S, Basit A, Sultana S, et al. Inequalities in women’s utilization of postnatal care services in Bangladesh from 2004 to 2017. Sci Rep. 2022;12:2747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06672-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, et al. Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in Benin: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:194. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1846-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Banke-Thomas A, Ayomoh FI, Abejirinde I-OO, et al. Cost of Utilising Maternal Health Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10:564–77. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Scorgie F, Blaauw D, Dooms T, et al. “I get hungry all the time”: experiences of poverty and pregnancy in an urban healthcare setting in South Africa. Glob Health. 2015;11:37. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0122-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mezmur M, Navaneetham K, Letamo G. Socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2298-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Prusty RK, Gouda J, Pradhan MR. Inequality in the Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Odisha, India. Int J Popul Res. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/531485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ahmed S, Creanga AA, Gillespie DG, et al. Economic status, education and empowerment: implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Khan MN, Kumar P, Rahman MM, et al. Inequalities in Utilization of Maternal Reproductive Health Care Services in Urban Bangladesh: A Population-Based Study. Sage Open. 2020;10:2158244020914394. doi: 10.1177/2158244020914394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fatema K, Lariscy JT. Mass media exposure and maternal healthcare utilization in South Asia. SSM Popul Health. 2020;11:100614. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ononokpono DN, Odimegwu CO. Determinants of Maternal Health Care Utilization in Nigeria: a multilevel approach. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:2. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rahman M, Curtis SL, Chakraborty N, et al. Women’s television watching and reproductive health behavior in Bangladesh. SSM Popul Health. 2017;3:525–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


