Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2024 Nov 1;14(11):287. doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04128-x

Cloning, heterologous expression and characterization of β-glucosidase deriving from Moniliophthora perniciosa (Stahel) Aime and Phillips Mora

Alison Borges Vitor 1, Keilane Silva Farias 3, Geise Camila Araújo Ribeiro 2, Carlos Priminho Pirovani 3, Raquel Guimarães Benevides 1, Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães Pereira 4, Sandra Aparecida de Assis 2,
PMCID: PMC11530418  PMID: 39493291

Abstract

Β-glucosidase (BGLs) act synergistically with endoglucanases and exoglucanases and then are of great interest for biomass conversion into bioethanol. Thus, the aim of the current study is to produce a recombinant β-glycosidase from Moniliophtora perniciosa expressed in Escherichia coli cells. Enzyme coding sequence expression was confirmed through Sanger sequencing after using wheat bran (WB) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) as fungal growth media. Synthetic gene betaglyc-GH1 with optimized codons for E. coli expression was cloned in pET-28a. β-glucosidase recombinant (GH1chimera) was purified using a nickel column and its identity was confirmed through mass spectrometry. The recombinant enzyme presented an apparent molecular mass of 53.23 kDa on SDS-PAGE. Recombinant β-glucosidase has shown hydrolytic activity using p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glycopyranoside (pNPG) as substrate and maximum activity at pH 4.6 and 65 °C. Thus, the results indicate that the application of the GH1chimera in the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials to obtain glucose monomers can be efficient.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-04128-x.

Keywords: Recombinant production, Witches' broom disease, Cellulases, Sugarcane bagasse, Biomass conversion

Introduction

Biofuels have been considered the most promising alternative to be used in the future to replace petroleum-based fuels, given the decreased availability of non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels. This scenario led several countries to intensify their production to reduce their expenses, mainly with imported fuels (Sakdasri et al. 2017; Soni et al. 2023). Therefore, biofuels deriving from biomass conversion processes, such as biodiesel, bioethanol and biogas, are sustainable and renewable energy sources capable of significantly reducing CO2 production (Seboka et al. 2023; Kouhgardi et al. 2023). In addition, biofuels’ burning leads to reduced particles, carbon oxide and sulfur oxide emission levels in comparison to emissions resulting from fossil fuels. Biofuels emerge as renewable and inexhaustible energy sources used to replace fossil fuels in the transport sector. Their greatest political and economic advantage lies in mitigating countries’ dependence on oil and natural gas suppliers (Ogunkunle et al., 2021; Hans and Duraipandian 2023). The use of enzymes as catalysts is an alternative to improving biodiesel production through transesterification. Biocatalysts enable promptly using unrefined raw materials, such as vegetable and animal seed oils, without the need to separate free fatty acids, which can be found in large amounts from the raw material (Lucas et al. 2020; Velvizhi et al. 2023; Cerón-Ferrusca et al. 2023).

Companies use microorganisms to produce enzymes based on their commercial goals. Among them, one finds bacterial genera such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Pseudomonas Streptomyces and Cellulomonas. Fungal genera like Aspergillus, Trichoderma and A. nidulans are also used for this purpose and many of them are known for their biotechnological potential (Yang et al. 2019; Tiwari et al. 2017; Li et al. 2018). However, there are still several obstacles to the process of using enzymes as catalysts for biofuel production purposes, with emphasis on their high cost.

Enzymes, such as amyloses, cellulases, lignins, lipases and phospholipids, are quite promising when it comes to producing 1st and 2nd generation ethanol (Robak and Balcerek 2018; Vasić and Knez 2021). The economic sector in the production and consumption of enzymes accounts for approximately 25–30% of the total cost of producing biofuels from sugars derived from lignocellulose. Enzymes’ trade recorded an annual growth rate of approximately 2.9% from 2017 to 2021 (Patel et al. 2023). Genetic engineering can be used to produce new, more resistant, and highly thermostable enzyme proteins. The introduction of a new generation of inexpensive enzymes with high specific activity under improved conditions can help to increase companies’ purchasing power to use enzymes for biofuel production purposes (Salihu et al. 2015; Singhania et al. 2021). Heterologous enzymes have been expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli), Bacilli (i.e., Bacillus subtilis) and dairy bacteria (i.e., Lactobacillus lactis) (Liu et al. 2013). Because E. coli’s genome is well-featured and given the wide variety of strains and instruments available for genetic manipulation purposes, this bacterial species is the most common system used to produce recombinant proteins. It is so because of its fast growth ability, high cell density, as well as its ability to synthesize several copies of genes presenting strong promoters based on using economically viable substrates (Yildirim et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2020).

Moniliophtora perniciosa (Aime and Phillips-Mora 2005) produces cellulases by breaking lignocellulosic layers, and this process enables it to infect different Theobroma cacao L. (cacao) organs and trigger cocoa witch’s broom disease. Almeida et al. (2022) studied the production, characterization, and application of β-glucosidase from Moniliophthora perniciosa in the hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse and found that the enzyme showed an optimum pH of 4.5 and 60 °C. There is no information in the literature about the characterization process applied to recombinant BGL enzymes from Moniliophtora perniciosa (Meraz-Pérez et al. 2021; García-Peñas and Sharma 2023). β-glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) (BGL) act synergistically with both endoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.4) and exoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.91), a fact that turns them into enzymes of great interest to be used for biomass conversion purposes. However, the main obstacles to lignocellulosic material conversion into glucose monomers used for fermentation in alcohol lie in cellulases’ inhibition by oligosaccharides and the lack of their adequate production by certain microorganisms used for biomass decomposition purposes (Pandey et al. 2021). Thus, in the current study, the synthetic gene betaglyc-GH1 β-glucosidase from Moniliophtora perniciosa has been cloned and heterologously expressed in E. coli for the first time.

Experimental

Determining M. perniciosa culture conditions

Moniliophthora perniciosa was obtained at Bahia State’s Microorganism Culture Collection of the State University of Feira de Santana (UEFS) under identification number CCMB257. The reactivation was done in a Potato Dextrose Agar (BDA) medium, with incubation in B.O.D. at 27 °C. Cellulolytic complex induction was carried out based on using liquid medium comprising NH4H2PO4—7 g; K2HPO4—1.5 g; MgSO4—0.5 g; CaCl2—0.3 g; FeSO4.7H2O—0.184 g; ZnSO4.7H2O—0.178 g; MnCl24H2O—0.158 g; Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC, as the only carbon source)—5 g; H2O—1 L q.s.p., as well as WY liquid medium comprising the following constituents: 40 g wheat bran; 6 g yeast extract; 1 g K2HPO4; 0.2 g MgSO4; 0.2 g KCL and distilled water q.s.p. 1 L.

Design of specific primers used to investigate the enzyme genes

Sequence 10942_g was acquired based on its identification in the genome signature of Moniliophthora perniciosa, which was kindly provided by Doctor Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães Pereira from the Genomics and Gene Expression Laboratory—UNICAMP (http://bioinfo08.ibi.unicamp.br/wbdatlas/overview). Sequences of cellulases belong to the GH1 family (Glycosyl Hydrolases 1) of fungal phylogenetically related to M. perniciosa available at CAZYmes (Carbohydrate-Active enzymes Database) and NCBI (National Center for Information on Biotechnology) were aligned with the sequence of M. perniciosa in the BLASTP tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). It was done to identify the observed protein domains, as well as to confirm both the family and function of each enzyme. In addition, the number of residues and protein domains’ positions were also recorded. Domains and conserved regions (active site) as well as their parts and residues involved in the catalysis of the enzyme were analyzed in Prosite Software before obtaining the synthetic gene (Sigrist et al. 2013). Smart Database (Letunic and Bork 2018), Pfam (El-Gebali et al. 2018) and InterPro (Mitchell et al. 2018) tools were used to identify the estimated signal peptide, as well as pI and MW, and also carbohydrate binding and transmembrane helix verification sites, whenever applicable.

To remove RNA, the adopted protocol followed the manufacturer's instructions (Trizol reagent, Invitrogen®). Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was carried out following the reverse transcription technique based on the use of the enzyme M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega®). PCR was performed using the TopTaq Master Mix (Invitrogen®) enzyme to test the efficiency of GH1-N-Terminal-F primers (5′-CGAGTTACCAGATCGAAGGTTCA -3′- Tm of 56.3 °C)—GenBank: ESK96275.1 (size = 1409 bp). Oligo(dT)12–18 bp was added to the reaction (5′-TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT -3′ Tm at 34.3 °C) instead of the reverse primer (Reverse). The PCR amplification product, purified based on the polyethylene glycol (PEG) cleaning protocol (Hassan and Kala, 2013), was sequenced by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Bahia State, employing the Sanger method (https://plataformas.fiocruz.br/). The electropherogram resulting from this sequencing process was analyzed in Geneious Prime software (version 2020.0.4).

Protein sequence analysis

The nucleotide sequence recovered with good quality was translated into the bioinformatics resource portal known as Expasy (https://www.expasy.org/), which comprises several scientific resources, databases and computer tools. After the translation process was over, the sequence was subjected to a comparative analysis to investigate its similarity to complete sequences of Glycosil Hydrolases belonging to the GH1 family deposited in the NCBI, using blast (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Subsequently, the sequence was aligned in the Clustal online tool (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) also used to align the nucleotide sequence deriving from the sequencing, called GH1.1. The sequence derived from the M. perniciosa genome (10942_g) was provided by Professor Gonçalo Amarante Pereira (http://www.lge.ibi.unicamp.br/vassoura) and the sequence ESK96275.1 by NCBI (Moniliophthora roreri) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Complementary DNA (cDNA) viability was investigated through conventional PCR; cDNA amplification reactions were initially tested in conventional thermocyclers (Biocycler®- MJ96G).

Transforming Escherichia coli bacteria into an optimized synthetic gene

A synthetic gene ‘betaglyc-GH1’ (Genone®) inserted in the pET-28a (+) plasmid, with NdeI (CATATG) and XhoI (CTCGAG) restriction sites, kanamycin resistance and an insertion size of 1,416 bp was used in the current study. The expression vector pET28a_betaglic-GH1 (Genone®) presented a total size of 6700 bp. E. coli strains were reactivated in 2 mL of Luria Bertani Broth, Miller (L.B.) (Himedia®) at 37 °C, 180 rpm, for 16 h, to get electrocompetent cells. Subsequently, samples were centrifuged at 20,379 × g for 2 min, inoculated in 100 mL L.B. and incubated at 37 °C at 180 rpm until reaching optical density (OD) at 600 nm ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 (VersaMax® Microplate Reader). The culture was incubated on ice for 10 min and centrifuged in 50-mL Falcon tubes at 4,200 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the bacterial pellet was resuspended using 10 ml of 100 mM magnesium chloride. After this, the samples were centrifuged at 4,200 rpm for 10 min. Sequentially, the precipitate was resuspended in 25 ml of 100 mM calcium chloride. Samples were incubated on ice for 30 min and, after the incubation time, centrifuged for 10 min at 4,200 rpm. The pellet was resuspended in 5 mL of a solution comprising calcium chloride solution (100 mM) added with 15% glycerol. Finally, cells were stocked in 750 μL of 50% glycerol and stored at − 80 °C. A synthetic Gene (pET28a_betaglyc-GH1) was transformed into E. coli using 1 μL of electrocompetent Rosetta strain (DE3) (Thermo Fisher Scientific®) for long-term storage purposes. Transformed cells were packed in Petri dishes (with the aid of a Drigalski loop) covered with LB-agar medium containing antibiotics, such as kanamycin (50 μg/mL−1) and chloramphenicol (34 μg/mL−1), to enable selecting colonies transformed with PET28a_betaglic-GH1. Subsequently, plates were incubated in an oven at 37 °C, in a reversed way.

Grown colonies were re-inoculated in 3 mL of Luria Bertani Broth Miller broth comprising kanamycin (50 μg/mL−1) and chloramphenicol (34 μg/mL−1) after 16 h of incubation. One (1) mL aliquot was removed from the broth after 16 h of incubation at 37 °C at 180 rpm. Then, the colonies were added with 1 mL of 50% Glycerol and stored at -80 °C. The portion left over from the inoculation was used for Plasmid mini-preparation purposes.

β-glucosidase protein recombinant glycosidase expression, biochemical characterization and SDS-PAGE analysis

Preserved cultures were reactivated in 3 mL of L.B. added with 3 μL kanamycin broth (50 μg/mL−1) and chloramphenicol (34 μg/mL−1), as well as incubated under stirring (at 180 rpm) at 37 °C for 16 h to start the recombinant β-glucosidase expression. The following day, the culture was centrifuged at 5000 rpm (Eppendorf ® 5810 R) at 4 °C for 10 min to remove the saturated medium. Subsequently, the bacterial pellet was inoculated in 5 mL of L.B. broth based on using the same antibiotics mentioned above; a pET28a colony without an insert was used as a control. All tubes were incubated at 37 °C under constant stirring at 180 rpm until reaching an optical density (D) ranging from 0.7 to 1.0 at 600 nm (VersaMax® Microplate Reader). An aliquot of the cultured cells was removed (without induction), and another was subjected to permanent storage in glycerol. The culture remainder was added to the broth, along with IPTG (isopropylthio-β-galactoside) (Omega Biotek®) at a final concentration of 0.4 nmol L−1 to induce gene expression for 4 h. An aliquot of bacterial culture was collected and inoculated with the plasmid at 37 °C to evaluate gene expression. The samples collected were centrifuged at 13,000 g for 2 min. After discarding the supernatant, the bacterial culture pellet was resuspended in 400 μL lysis buffer added with lysozyme (Binding Buffer 1x + lysozyme 50 µg mL−1) and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, samples were packed in ice and ultrasonicated (3 pulses of 8 s on and 20 s off, at 70% amplitude) in a Sonics Sonicator machine (Vibra-Cell vcx 130®).

After this procedure was over, 30 μL of each lysed culture was collected and identified, as follows: total extract without IPTG (ET-S) and total extract with IPTG (ET-C), which was added with 90 μL of distilled water and 30 μL of Sample Buffer TA 5 × (10% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 2.3% SDS, and 0.0625 M Tris–HCl at pH 6.8). The remaining 370 μL of sample was used to check centrifuge solubility at 12,000 × g for 15 min (it was done to separate soluble (FS) from insoluble (IF) fractions) and stored at − 20 °C. Electrophoresis was carried out on 12.5% polyacrylamide and sodium dodecyl sulfate gel (SDS-PAGE) to qualitatively assess gene expression as described by Laemmli (Laemmli 1970). The amino terminal of the recombinant protein expressed with the herein adopted vector has a 6-histidine tag. Fractions containing enzyme were initially purified by layer chromatography on a nickel column (HisTrap™ HP®). Pellets of the soluble (FS) and insoluble (FNI) fractions were resuspended in 10 mL of lysis solution and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Samples were sonicated in a Sonics Sonicator machine (Vibra-Cell vcx 130®) for 20 min, based on a 6-mm probe (in diameter) at 70% amplitude. Sonication was carried out based on using 10 cycles of 10 pulses (8 s), which were interspersed with 25-s resting in ice for cooling purposes. Protein extract derived from lysed cells was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min.

After these procedures were over, the soluble fraction (FS) was maintained at − 20 °C, for further analysis. The insoluble fraction pellet (FNI) was re-suspended with binding buffer 1X buffer comprising urea (6 M) and sonicated again for 3 min using a Sonics Sonicator machine (Vibra-Cell vcx 130®) at 10 pulses (30 s) and 70% amplitude. The supernatant was used for purification purposes. Initially, the column was sanitized with 10 mL of strep buffer and 5 mL of ultrapure water and after, it was loaded with 5 mL of buffer charge buffer 1X. The elution of the retained protein recombinant fractions (FS) and (FNI) was assessed as the imidazole concentration increased (from 50 to 500 mmL−1). Samples collected throughout the process were subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE analysis.

Protein Identity Confirmation

Purified enzyme peptides obtained from segmented SDS-PAGE bands were prepared for biomass spectrometry analysis, based on the protocol described by (Marques et al. 2013). Triptych peptides were subjected to reverse phase chromatography in AGILENT 1290® Infinity II UHPLC and continuously injected into the AGILENT 6545 Q-TOF® mass spectrometer, where peptide spectra were produced (Dewapriya et al. 2018). MS/MS spectra were analyzed in Agilent spectrum mill MS Proteomics Workbench Rev B.06.00.203 and the protein sequence of the recombinant β-glucosidase enzyme was compared to the NCBIprot database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/).

Detecting and determining the activity of recombinant β-glucosidase

Specific enzyme activity (U/mg) was determined according to the method described by (Matsuura et al. 2021), with some modifications. 500 μL of enzyme extract and 2 mL of chromogenic p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) substrate—at the concentration of 4 mM and prepared in 50 mM sodium citrate buffer, were incubated for 20 min (temperature and pH were determined based on the central composite experimental design). The reaction was interrupted by adding 2.5 mL of sodium carbonate 0.1 M. The released p-nitrophenol was quantified through spectrophotometry at 420 nm (Spectrophotometer Cary 50 UV–Visible, Varian Inc.). The enzyme activity unit was defined as the number of enzymes required to release 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol per reaction minute. Reaction buffer, rather than enzyme extract, was used for total white. The whole experiment was carried out in triplicate. Total protein amount (mg mL−1) was determined by the method of Bradford (1976) using the Cary 50 UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Varian Inc ®) Specific enzyme activity was expressed as U mg−1.

Temperature and pH effects on β-glucosidase activity were investigated using Doehlert experimental planning for two variables. The pH was investigated at 5 different levels (from 4 to 8; the central point was 6.0) using citrate–phosphate buffer (pH 4, 5 and 6) and phosphate buffer (pH 7 and 8), as described in Table 1. The temperature was assessed at 3 different levels (from 30 to 70 °C; the central point was 50 °C). Results observed for enzyme activities were statistically compared to each other through analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mean values were compared to each other through the F test in Statistic software, version 7.0. Analyses applied to means and standard deviations were performed in Prism 5.0 and Microsoft Office Excel software.

Table 1.

Doehlert experimental design for the optimization of recombinant β-glucosidase activity by evaluating different pH and different temperature

Assay pH Temperature (°C) Activity (μmol/min)
1 5 (− 0.5) 70 (+ 0.866) 0.2535 ± 0.0131
2 7 (+ 0.5) 70 (+ 0.866) 0.1788 ± 0.0406
3 4 (− 1.0) 50 (0.0) 0.0630 ± 0.0186
4 (CP*) 6 (0.0) 50 (0.0) 0.3761 ± 0.0153
4 (CP*) 6 (0.0) 50 (0.0) 0.3866 ± 0.0153
4 (CP*) 6 (0.0) 50 (0.0) 0.3795 ± 0.0153
5 8 (+ 1.0) 50 (0.0) 0.1459 ± 0.0361
6 5 (0.0) 30 (− 0.866) 0.0000 ± 0.0106
7 7 (+ 0.5) 30 (− 0.866) 0.0000 ± 0.0073

*CP Central Point, replicated three times

Results and discussion

Determining M. perniciosa culture conditions

Filamentous fungi emerge as good producers of cellulases deriving from carbon sources that have great degradation potential, favorable chemical composition, and physical conditions capable of enabling microorganisms to have more contact with the substrate (Arntzen et al. 2020). Reactive M. perniciosa in potato agar and dextrose (BDA) medium has shown satisfactory growth in the 7, 14 and 21-day growth periods (Fig. 1, Supplementary Material). M. perniciosa presented satisfactory basidiocarp and basidiospore production after 7-day growth in WY medium, as well as maintaining its life cycle contiguous to the growth profile of commercial medium CMC (Fig. 1). This medium contains carboxymethyl cellulase deriving from cellulase, which is an elementary water-soluble industrial polymer that is easily degraded by fungi (Khoirunnisa et al. 2020; Giwa et al. 2023).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

M. perniciosa grown in different culture media versus cultivation time: 1- WY (medium with wheat bran); 2- CMC (medium with carboxymethylcellulase); and in natural—growth times: A-7 days; B-14 days; and C-21 days

According to (Zhao et al. 2019), wheat bran is an important carbon source activated by 56 regulatory genes that lead to cellulase production in filamentous fungi. Its composition contains approximately 56% carbohydrates, 13%–18% protein, 12% water, and 3.5% fat, as well as high cellulose, arabinose and xylose levels. It presents high nutritional value, good porosity, adaptation to particle size, and adequate consistency for anchoring and enzymatic excretion purposes. Wheat bran, due to its suitable composition for fungal growth, has been used in many studies with different fungal species: Myceliopthor athermophila BJA, Penicillium sp, Penicillium oxalicum cepa HP7-1, Trichoderma reesei NCIM 1186, Penicillium citrinum NCIM 768, Aspergillus sp., Trichoderma sp. and Penicillium sp and Thermoascus crustaceusem (Phadtare et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2019; Lodha, et al. 2020; Fadel et al. 2020; Garbin et al. 2021; Santos et al. 2021), cultured in half-solid medium and added with it for 8 days.

Design of specific primers used to investigate the enzyme genes

The direct primer linked to the gene sequence (10942_g SCAF_35 58,049 60,269 1) was defined and selected based on using the OligoAnalyzer online tool, version 3.1—Integrated DNA Technologies® (https://www.idtdna.com/PrimerQuest/Home/Index)—after the following parameters were checked: ring temperature (Tm), CG content rate and secondary structures’ formation (Hairpin, Self-dimer and Hetero-dimer). Investigations focused on the M. perniciosa genome enabled the identification of a partial GH1 family sequence under GenBank database identification n. EEB95782.1. Searches conducted at Prosite only enabled the identification of GH1 family "signature 2″. "Signature 1″, which is often found in the N-terminal portion, was not herein observed because this part of the sequence was not sequenced (or noticed). Analysis performed in the blast tool enabled the finding of the GH1 family of the fungal species M. roreri (ESK96275.1), which has both signatures and size similar to those of beta-glycosidases belonging to the GH1 family. The N-terminal signature found in the GH1 family of the fungal species M. roreri (ESK96275.1) was used to sequence the N-Terminal region of GH1-Mper (EEB95782.1).

It was possible to see that' signature 1′ was well preserved in the genus Moniliophthora (Alignments’ results are available in Appendix 1) by aligning the M. roreri’s GH1 region (ESK96275.1) with Hypsizygus marmoreus GH1. This region was used to design a new primer (GH1-N-Terminal-F) and, consequently, to enable full protein expression without cuts in its structure. Several amplification attempts were made based on the use of a reverse primer, genetic sequence (10942_g SCAF_35 58,049 60,269 1) and genome with GH1-N-Terminal-F, (5- CGAGTTACCAGATCGAAGGTTCA -3'- Tm of 56.3 °C), but they were all unsuccessful. Oligo(dT)12–18 bp (5- TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT -3' Tm 34.3 °C), rather than the reverse primer of 10942_g SCAF_35 58,049 60,269 was added to the reaction later on to take advantage of the initial part of the sequence and to enable amplifying the region of interest. Satisfactory results were observed in both extractions. The 28 S and 18 S bands were intact, although 28 S was more intense. This result has evidenced effective RNA extraction (Fig. 2—Supplementary Material). However, samples extracted from fungi grown in the WY medium presented more intense bands than those extracted from fungi grown in CMC (Fig. 2B—Supplementary Material). Based on sequencing analysis conducted in Geneious Prime software (version 2020.0.4), the sample could retrieve approximately 91.2% of the sequence. Table 1 shows the sequence corresponding to the GH1.1 sequencing.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparative analysis of amino acid residue identity among GH1.1, 10942_g and ESK96275.1 sequence (sequence deriving from cDNA sequencing, sequence found in the database and sequence deriving from the genome, respectively) highlighted in yellow. Region corresponding to the signature of the active site is highlighted in yellow: (*) Identity of all amino acid residues aligned in the indicated column, (:)Similarity among amino acid residues aligned in the indicated column, (.) Low similarity among amino acid residues aligned in the indicated column, ( −) No similarity among amino acid residues aligned in the indicated column

Protein sequence analysis

The sequencing process resulted in the following sequence, which was translated into the bioinformatics resource portal Expasy (Gasteiger et al. 2003). GH1.1, which is represented in Fig. 2, resulted in a polypeptide of 345 amino acids, whereas the other sequences (ESK96275.1 and 10942_g) presented 467 and 469 amino acid residues, respectively. After translation, the amino acid sequence of GH1.1 was subjected to comparative analysis to check its similarity to complete sequences of Glycosyl Hydrolases belonging to the GH1 family, which was deposited in the NCBI, using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The aforementioned sequence recorded 90.88% similarity to the ESK96275 sequence (beta-glucosidase Moniliophthora roreri MCA 2997).

Alignment among protein sequences GH1.1 (resulting from sequencing), ESK96275 of beta-glucosidase Moniliophthora roreri MCA 2997 (resulting from alignment) and 10942_g SCAF_35 58049 60269 (resulting from the genome) was carried out in the Clustal online tool (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). Protein sequences presented a high degree of similarity. Comparative analysis between amino acid residues of GH1.1 and sequences “10942_g” and “ESK96275.1” has shown 92.15% similarity, whereas GH1.1 and ESK96275 recorded 87.77% similarity. However, some regions did not align at all, including the signature of the active site highlighted in yellow, which shows four different amino acids. Prosite Software (Sigrist et al. 2013) made it possible to visualize conserved regions in the sequences evaluated in this study (active site). In addition, the sequence was subjected to smart database tools (Letunic et al. 2018) such as Pfam (El-Gebali et al. 2018) and InterPro (Mitchell et al. 2018) to identify signal peptide and other protein domains in it.

The analysis applied to both sequences allowed visualization of the signature pattern of the active site region for all sequences containing nine amino acid residues (IYVTENGFA). Although there was a change in 4 amino acid residues (KLPC), these amino acids aligned in the column (highlighted in green) indicated similarity (Fig. 2); this finding may be associated with incomplete sequencing in this region.

Catalytic reactions of β-glucosidases in GH1 took place based on glycomyomyation and deglycoyllation steps, according to which glutamate (Glu) is the prevalent residue of both the active and preserved sites. Two Glu residues account for acid–base catalysis and Nucleophilic, one of them acts as a nucleophile (conserved as motif I / VTENG), whereas the second residue acts as acid catalyst / general base (conserved as tfnep'motif) (Stepper et al. 2013; Romero-Téllez et al. 2019; Erkanli et al. 2024).

Protein domains were visualized to gather more information about the sequences cited in this study, which were analyzed in the online tool available at (http://pfam.xfam.org/search/sequence). Results have confirmed that the analyzed sequence belonged to Glycosyl hydrolase family 1. Although it does not have a complete domain because it is a partial sequence, it presents proteins of domains previously deposited in the database. Based on the information presented above, complementary sections of the ESK96275.1 and 10942_g SCAF_35 58049 60269 sequences of these proteins included the active site region and GH1.1 to produce a chimeric sequence that has resulted in the corresponding GH1chimera (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

GH1chimera amino acid residue sequence (recombinant β-glucosidase)

Again, alignment among the ESK96275 (beta-glucosidase of Moniliophthora roreri MCA 2997), 10942_g SCAF_35 58049 60269 (genome) and GH1chimera sequences was carried out in the Clustal online tool (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). This alignment has shown high similarity among these three sequences. GH1chimera and ESK96275 recorded 93.79% similarity, whereas GH1chimera and 10942_g SCAF_35 58049 60269 recorded 93.60% similarity. The GH1chimeric sequence corresponding to beta-glucosidase was later reversibly translated in online software available at (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_backtranseq/). This process resulted in the nucleotide sequence > GH1chimera which was recommended for synthetic beta-glycosidase gene synthesis.

Transforming Escherichia coli bacteria into an optimized synthetic gene

Cloning and heterologous expression are considered as alternatives to increase enzyme production. The use of these enzymes makes industrial processes less expensive, especially when done in association with low-cost generating substrates.

The Escherichia coli bacterial system has interesting genetic characteristics well described in the literature: ease of obtaining, having an abundance of commercially available strains and vectors, presenting rapid growth kinetics and having a strong capacity to express recombinant genes with high yields (Rosano et al. 2019; Shahzadi et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2022). According to (Cantoia et al. 2021), when the E. coli bacteria inoculated in a glucose-rich medium has an initial saturated culture dilution of 1/100, it can reach the stationary phase in a few hours. E. coli Rosetta (DE3) was used here as a host for the expression of GH1chimera. Figure 4 shows the electrophoretic profile (in 1% Agarose gel) of plasmid DNA extracted from cells transformed with the synthetic gene PET28a_betaglic-GH1.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Reverse-translated GH1chimera sequence corresponding to β-glucosidase

According to the literature, the pET-28a system is currently used for recombinant proteins’ expression in Escherichia coli since it allows the expression of the recombinant protein fused to 6 histidine residues at the amino-terminal (N-terminal) or carboxy-terminal (C-terminal), which in its turn enables purification through affinity chromatography techniques, based on Sepharose resins-nickel combinations (Hassan and Kalam 2013; Ferreira et al. 2018; Ko et al. 2021; Leonhardt et al. 2023). Plasmid DNA was extracted from the cell and quantified; it reached a concentration of 232.3 ng/μL.

Expression, biochemical characterization and SDS-PAGE analysis applied to GH1chimera (recombinant β-glycosidase)

The bioinformatics analysis carried out in the Portals Expasy and ProtParam tools enabled predicting the theoretical molecular mass of β-glucosidase (GH1chimera), which reached 53.23 kDa, as well as estimating its pI and MW, which reached 5.45 and 53,200, respectively. The analyzed β-glucosidase did not present a transmembrane helix. E. coli cells (Rosetta DE3) presented several proteins (Fig. 5) which were used as parameters in other assessments. Recombinant β-glucosidase protein (GH1chimera) induced by IPTG presented a band corresponding to electrophoretic migration proportional to the theoretical mass predicted in 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel, as well as in soluble and insoluble fractions, where it was possible to see larger bands when it was induced in IPTG and in the insoluble fraction (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Electrophoretic profile of GH1chimera production induction times in 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel stained with bright Coomassie blue, wherein: (M) molecular marker; (pET28a) non-transformed E. Coli cells; cell cultures: (− IPTG) without IPTG induction and (+ IPTG) with IPTG induction; (FS) soluble fraction; (FNI) Insoluble fraction

In this sense, an expression study carried out with the filamentous fungal species Talaromyces emersonii allowed the identification of β-glucosidase with 55.8 kDa from glycosyl hydrolase family 1, which had the potential to be used for cellulose manipulation purposes (Collins et al. 2007). The fungal species Neosartorya fischeri NRRL181 expressed four betaglycosidases from the GH1 family (BGLs). It encoded a polypeptide with 529 amino acid residues the gene was cloned into pET28-a and overexpressed in Escherichia coli, with a molecular weight of ~ 60 kDa (Ramachandran et al. 2012). A cellulolytic fungus (YDJ216) was isolated from a compound and identified as Aspergillus sp. BGL1 and BGL2. BGL1 and BGL2 molecular masses were estimated at 97 kDa and 45 kDa, respectively, based on SDS-PAGE. The two enzymes presented similar enzymatic properties, as well as optimal activity at pH 4.0–4.5 and 60 °C when the p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glycopyranoside (pNPG) substrate was used (Oh et al. 2018). Similar results were described by (Sathe et al. 2017), who obtained stable β-glucosidase derived from Methylococcus capsulatus in E. coli with an expressed protein of 50.7 kDa. The beta-glucosidase gene of Auricularia heimuer, which encodes a likely polypeptide comprising 860 amino acids, was cloned and successfully expressed in E. Coli. This finding evidenced target bands ranging from 100 to 135 kDa (Sun et al. 2020).

The recombinant β-glucosidase (GH1chimera) deriving from the soluble fraction (FS) was eluted on a gradual imidazole concentration increase (from 50 to 500 mm L−1) in affinity chromatography conducted with a nickel column (Fig. 6). It was possible to see the recombinant protein at all tested gradient concentrations, even in small amounts—it was successfully purified. However, it was not possible to identify specific activity in the insoluble fraction, since the enzyme was denatured in this fraction.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Electrophoretic profile in 12.5% purification SDS-PAGE gel with elution fractions defined by chromatography—(M): molecular marker; (ET): total extract; (FN): Uninteracted fraction; (50–500 Mm): different elutions for imidazole concentrations of recombinant β-glucosidase

Thus, it is recommended to both apply and obtain the recombinant protein in its soluble form, with its correct structural conformation. To properly analyze the structural properties of a given protein or enzyme, it is necessary to isolate it so it can be assessed in its pure form. The ideal purification strategy to be adopted depends not only on the features of the protein of interest but also on the properties of contaminants found in the crude extract (Pessoa-JR and Kilikian 2005; Sánchez-Trasviña et al. 2021).

The gel band corresponding to the size of the expressed protein was excised from the gel and subsequently subjected to mass spectrometry analysis to identify the GH1chimera sequence. Most studies conducting protein quantification supported by mass spectrometry use analytical methods adjusted for peptides. Consequently, they heavily rely on efficient and impartial protein digestion protocols to prepare samples. MS-based proteomics is an essential technology used to feature complex biological systems, including relative or absolute protein expression levels and post-traditional protein modifications.

The most common method used to analyze medium-to-high-complex protein samples in large-scale proteomics is based on protein digestion using trypsin endoprotease. Triptych peptides were subjected to analysis and sequencing based on liquid chromatography-tandem MS (LC–MS/MS) (Montiel-León et al. 2018). Identification procedures were performed through initial peptide digestion in trypsin, which generated peptides with varying masses. Peptide sequences were compared to the NCBL database. Results have shown an identity rate of 91.53% for Moniliophthora roreri MCA 2997 (ESK96275.1). Supplementary material (Fig. 7) depicts the identified sequence and the location of 470 peptides. Cross-tracking was carried out in the Clustal online tool (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). This analysis identified 98.72% of highly significant coverage with recombinant enzymes belonging to the GH1-β glucosidase family of the fungal species Moniliophthora perniciosa, which presented 10 peptides different from the GH1chimera sequence in the current study.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Recombinant β-glycosidase characterization the M. perniciosa. Contour surface used to determine optimum pH and temperature for the activity of the purified recombinant β-glucosidase enzyme

Detecting and determining recombinant β-glucosidase activity

Reducing costs with enzymatic production by improving fermentation media is a primordial step to enable its industrial application. Optimization is traditionally done by varying one parameter while keeping the other's constant. However, this approach is more time-consuming and cannot detect the best means, mainly due to a lack of analysis applied to interactions among different factors (Damaso et al. 2004). One of the most used strategies to identify the relative significance of different parameters and find the ideal conditions for enzyme occurrence in statistical experiments is factorial design (Uhoraningoga et al. 2018; Boateng et al. 2023).

Table 2 shows total protein values, the amount of enzyme capable of catalyzing the conversion of 1 μmol of substrate per minute, and the specific activity of recombinant β-glucosidase in chromogenic p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glycopyranoside (pNPG) substrate after purification. Total protein values in the LB medium of the soluble fraction subjected to different elutions ranged from 0.196 mg/mL to 0.065 mg/mL, in comparison to the crude extract produced by the fungus, which recorded a total protein value of 0.057 mg/mL.

Table 2.

Enzyme activity of crude extract and recombinant β-glucosidase

Fraction Imidazole concentration Total protein (mg/mL) Enzyme activity (μmol/min) Specific activity (U/mg)
Soluble LB Medium Crude extract 0.057 ± 0.004 0.07 ± 0.0004 1.23 ± 0.01
50 mM 0.196 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.004 0.18 ± 0.02
75 mM 0.126 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.004 0.46 ± 0.03
150 mM 0.095 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.002 0.47 ± 0.02
250 mM 0.081 ± 0.007 0.02 ± 0.003 0.27 ± 0.04
500 mM 0.065 ± 0.009 0.003 ± 0.003 0.05 ± 0.04

An amount of recombinant enzyme capable of catalyzing the conversion of 1 μmol of substrate per minute to the same medium ranged from 0.003 μmol/min to 0.06 μmol/min compared to the total extract fermented to crude extract by the fungus 0.07 μmol/min. Specific activity varies from 0.05 U/mg to 0.47 U/mg in the first minute. The crude extract showed a specific activity value of 1.23 U/mg.

The optimization of the recombinant β-glucosidase enzyme from Moniliophthora perniciosa aims at obtaining cellulase to be used for industrial applications focused on lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis processes. Table 1 describes enzymatic activity results observed for recombinant β-glycosidase obtained under pH and temperature conditions tested at full factorial arrangement 22, using Doehlert experimental design.

The results (Table 1) have shown optimum activity at 50 °C and pH 6.0 Moniliophthora perniciosa is a strong candidate for use in cellulase production. The production of the carboxymethylcellulase enzyme was investigated by Santana et al. (2023), who described the optimum pH and temperature at 7.2 and 47 °C, respectively. The CMCase retained 88.66% of residual activity after 30 min of incubation at 90 °C. The CMCase retained 88.66% of residual activity after 30 min of incubation at 90 °C. Due to the characteristic of thermal stability, this enzyme will be studied to be expressed in recombinant microorganisms.

In the studies of Almeida et al. (2022), crude extract containing β-glucosidase was used to determine pH and temperature optimum. The optimal values of enzymatic activity were pH 4.5 and 60 °C, and the authors reported that BGL was a stable enzyme at all observed temperatures (50–90 °C). Then, the same experimental design was used in this study to compare crude enzyme with recombinant enzyme.

The production of CMC enzyme was higher in the concentration of 7.0 g L−1 of yeast extract and 19 days fermentation time. CMCase showed optimum pH and temperature at 7.2 and 47 °C, respectively. The carboxymetilcellulase retained 88.66% of its residual activity after 30 min of incubation at 90 °C. Due to the characteristic of thermal stability, this enzyme will be studied to be expressed in recombinant microorganisms.

Furthermore, recombinantly produced enzymes are highly specific and capable of functioning under mild temperature conditions (Periyasamy et al. 2023). The optimum pH ranging from 4.5 to 5.5 is a common characteristic of β-glucosidase, in addition to favoring its use for biofuel production purposes (Benevides et al. 2022; Ribeiro and Assis 2023).

Both pH and temperature values have influenced enzyme activity, which was lower in citrate–phosphate buffer at pH 5.0 and 30 °C—critical values were presented by the model. The model expressed by the Equation below was generated by following the association between pH and temperature in enzymatic activity, based on regression analysis applied to experimental data.

Aμmol/min=-4.1234+0.8641×pH-0.0690×pH2+0.0689×Temperature-0.0006×Temperature2-0.0006×pH×Temperature.

This model was subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Table 3). Data were analyzed through the Fischer test, according to which the F value is defined as quadratic regression mean: quadratic error mean ratio. The F value calculated based on ANOVA results (26.3584) was much higher than the tabled F value observed under these conditions (9.01), and it indicated its 95% significance level. R2 = 0.977 indicated that 99.5% variation was explained by the model. The variation observed in the model was significantly higher than likely random variations. Therefore, the model is reliable and appropriate to represent effects, correlations and interactions among temperature, pH and enzymatic activity.

Table 3.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of optimization of recombinant β-glucosidase activity evaluating different pH and different temperature

Variation source Sq df MQ Calculated F Tabled F
Regression 0.2510 5 0.0502 26.3584 9.01
Residue 0.0057 3 0.0019
Lack of adjustment 0.005655 1 0.005655 0.0000 0.00
Pure error 0.000057 2 0.000029
Total SQ 0.256665 8
r2 = 0.9777

SQ quadratic sum, df degree of freedom, MQ quadratic mean, CI confidence interval

Contour and response surfaces generated from the analyzed data, adopted reaction conditions and maximum enzymatic activity were observed in a wide range of temperature (35–65 °C) and pH (4.2–6.7) values. It covered the central point of the experiment (Fig. 7). The combination of temperature and pH conditions set for the central point (50 °C and pH 5.5) was satisfactory for this enzyme’s performance. This wide range of maximum performance enabled exploring several temperature and pH combinations, and it emphasized the potential versatility of the enzyme to be used in several specific processes (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

pH and Temperature Optimization: Response surface observed for temperature and pH effects on recombinant β-glucosidase activity and purified recombinant β-glucosidase

Most fungal BGLs have activity temperatures ranging from 40 to 50 °C, as well as significant pH values ranging from 4.0 to 6.0 (Yang et al. 2023). Thermophilic fungal species Myceliophthora thermophila M.7.7 cultivated a in solid state with optimal enzymatic activity at 60 °C and pH 5.0, on substrate 4 nitrophenyl β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) (Bonfá et al. 2018). Parietal or intracellular BGLs generally have an ideal pH closer to neutrality, while extracellular BGLs show good catalytic activity at lower pH values. The fungal species Penicillium verruculosum expressed the β-glucosidase gene rPvBGL and showed maximum enzymatic activity at pH 4.6 and 65 °C, in a study carried out by (Volkov et al. 2020).

Fungal BGLs cloned and expressed in a heterologous way and in model organisms are strong candidates to be used for industrial purposes. Among them, one finds Aspergillus sp., Trichoderma sp. and Penicillium sp. (Fadel et al. 2020). BGL1 in Aspergillus sp. YDJ216 extracellular β-glucosidase has shown optimally active enzyme properties at pH 4.0–4.5 and 60 °C (Oh et al. 2018). Heterologous expression of a new β-1,4-glucosidase deriving from the Aspergillus fresenii and its enzymatic characters, and the bgl T2 gene expressed in E. coli, recorded the highest activity at 55 °C and pH 5.5 (Yang et al. 2019).

According to Santa-Rosa et al. (2018), β-glucosidase deriving from Penicillium sp. recorded higher enzyme activity at pH rates ranging from 0 to 7.0, as well as optimal activity at pH 6.0. Cassia Pereira et al. (2015), observed that β-glycosidase deriving from Myceliophthora thermophila recorded optimal enzyme activity at 70 °C and that the enzyme kept more than 93% of its original activity when it was incubated at 55 °C.

The optimal temperature observed for β-glucosidase deriving from fungal species M. heterothallica was within the optimum temperature range of enzymes produced by different fungi. Several fungal β-glucosidases remain stable for a short period-of-time at high temperatures, although they denature at high temperatures for long exposure times (Liu et al. 2013). Although enzymes from different organisms show significant changes in properties and functions, economic production, high hydrolytic efficiency, and high tolerance to unfavorable conditions are essential features required by industrial processes. Enzyme activity was optimal at pH 4.5 and 65 °C (Garbin et al. 2021).

With respect to Talaromyces pinophilus, the recombinant protein presented optimal pH 4.0, as well as good thermostability, since 70% of maximum enzymatic activity was maintained after 1 h at 60 °C (Trollope et al. 2018). β-glucosidase deriving from Aspergillus aculeatus (BGLA) was herein expressed, featured and had the molecular mechanism of its acid denaturation thoroughly investigated. BGLA presented maximum activity at pH 5.0–6.0. Its optimum temperature was 70 °C (Li et al. 2018).

β-glucosidase production through solid-state cultivation of the fungal species Thermoascus crustaceusem in low-cost culture medium (comprising agro-industrial residues) recorded optimal enzyme activity at pH 4.5 and 65 °C. β-glucosidase maintained its catalytic activity when it was incubated at a pH ranging from 4.0 to 8.0 and at a temperature ranging from 30 to 55 °C (Garbin et al. 2021). Recombinant enzymes have been a viable alternative for commercialization, due to their high specificity and production quantity. It is possible to observe in the works of Dadwal and Sharma (2023), in which a β-glucosidase from the fungus Myceliophthora thermophila (MtBgl3c) was cloned and expressed heterologously in E. coli with optimum pH and temperature of 5.0 and 55 °C, respectively. In studies with the fungus Trichoderma harzianum it was possible to develop a recombinant β-glucosidase with substantial catalytic activity in the pH range of 3.0–5.0 and at temperatures of 40–60 ℃ (Sun et al. 2022).

Based on the Pareto chart, temperature and pH had a significant influence on the activity of the BGL enzyme as well as on the interaction between these pH and temperature variables (Fig. 9). These features are essential to enabling enzymatic synthesis. According to Yang et al. (2020), featuring a new β-glucosidase heterogeneously deriving from Aspergillus fresenii has contributed to its application in biotechnology and, subsequently, in industrial fields, such as bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials. These results are like those observed for M. perniciosa extract in the present study, which evidenced this enzyme’s preference for temperatures higher than 50 °C, as well as for more acidic pH values since it did not present maximum activity at pH levels above neutrality.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Pareto chart plotted to determine pH and temperature influence on the activity of the recombinant β-glucosidase

Conclusions

The present study has successfully grown the fungal species M. perniciosa in agro-industrial materials to produce extracellular β-glucosidase. The molecular identification of this enzyme enabled synthesizing the synthetic gene betaglyc-GH1 (Genone®) inserted in the plasmid pET-28a (+), which was cloned and successfully expressed in E. coli with a size of 53.23 kDa. This protein has a domain of the preserved glycosyl hydrolase family 1, besides being an intracellular enzyme without a signal peptide. Partially purified β-glucosidase presented optimum activity in pNPβG substrate at 50 °C and pH 6.0. Future studies will establish a set of genetic transformation procedures for M. perniciosa, based on using genetic engineering in association with bioinformatics and methods focused on improving or suppressing β-glucosidases expression. It will be done to further explore its functions since this enzyme has great potential to be used in cellulose saccharification processes, as well as to contribute to the use of lignocellulosic residues and to reduce the accumulation of this material in the environment.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) by two doctoral scholarships (88882.447813/2019-2101, 88882.447821/2019-2101). We would like to thank the Graduate Program in Biotechnology of the State University of Feira de Santana (UEFS/FIOCRUZ), the State University of Santa Cruz-UESC, the State University of Southwest Bahia—UESB, the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Bahia (FAPESB) and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development).

Author contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants. Animal model was used and the study protocol for the experimental use of the animals was approved by the by the Animal Ethics Committee of the State University of Feira de Santana (006/2013) according to the standard operating procedures (SOPs).

References

  1. Aime MC, Phillips-Mora W (2005) The causal agents of witches’ broom and frosty pod rot of cacao (chocolate, Theobroma cacao) form a new lineage of Marasmiaceae. Mycologia 97(5):1012–1022. 10.3852/mycologia.97.5.1012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida LES, Ribeiro GCA, Assis SA (2022) β-Glucosidase produced by Moniliophthora perniciosa: Characterization and application in the hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 69(3):96–973. 10.1002/bab.2167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arntzen MØ, Bengtsson O, Várnai A, Delogu F, Mathiesen G, Eijsink VGH (2020) Quantitative comparison of the biomass-degrading enzyme repertoires of five filamentous fungi. Sci Rep. 10.1038/s41598-020-75217-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benevides RG, Assis SA, Vitor AB, Ribeiro GC, Santana CS, Almeida LES (2021) Recombinant fungal cellulases for the saccharification of sugarcane bagasse. https://www.intechopen.com; IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/77121
  5. Boateng ID, Kuehnel L, Daubert CR, Agliata J, Zhang W, Kumar R, Flint-Garcia S, Azlin M, Somavat P, Wan C (2023) Updating the status quo on the extraction of bioactive compounds in agro-products using a two-pot multivariate design. A comprehensive review. Food Funct 14(2):569–601. 10.1039/D2FO02520E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonfá EC, de Souza Moretti MM, Gomes E, Bonilla-Rodriguez GO (2018) Biochemical characterization of an isolated 50 kDa beta-glucosidase from the thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila M.7.7. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 13:311–318. 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradford M (1976) A Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–254. 10.1006/abio.1976.9999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cerón-Ferrusca M, Romero R, Martínez SA, Ramírez-Serrano A, Natividad R (2023) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: a perspective on catalytic processes. Processes 11(7):1952–1952. 10.3390/pr11071952 [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins CM, Murray PG, Denman S, Morrissey JP, Byrnes L, Teeri TT, Tuohy MG (2007) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of two distinct β-glucosidase genes, bg1 and aven1, with very different biological roles from the thermophilic, saprophytic fungus Talaromyces emersonii. Mycol Res 111(7):840–849. 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dadwal A, Sharma S, Satyanarayana T (2023) Biochemical characteristics of Myceliophthora thermophila recombinant β-glucosidase (MtBgl3c) applicable in cellulose bioconversion. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 53(10):1187–1198. 10.1080/10826068.2023.2177869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Damaso MCT, de Castro AM, Castro RM, Andrade CMMC, Pereira N (2004) Application of xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus IOC-4145 for enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob and sugarcane bagasse. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115(1–3):1003–1012. 10.1385/abab:115:1-3:1003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cantoia A, Aguilar Lucero D, Ceccarelli EA, Rosano GL (2021) Chapter Two - From the notebook to recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: design of expression vectors and gene cloning. In: Kelman Z, O’Dell WB (eds) ScienceDirect. Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0076687921003323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. De Cassia PJ, Leite RSR, do Prado HFA, Bocchini Martins DA, Gomes E, da Silva R (2014) Production and characterization of β-glucosidase obtained by the solid-state cultivation of the thermophilic FungusThermomucor indicae-seudaticae N31. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175(2):723–732. 10.1007/s12010-014-1332-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dewapriya P, Khalil ZG, Prasad P, Salim AA, Cruz-Morales P, Marcellin E, Capon RJ (2018) Talaropeptides A-D: structure and biosynthesis of extensively n-methylated linear peptides from an australian marine tunicate-derived Talaromyces sp. Front Chem 6:394. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, Eddy SR, Luciani A, Potter SC, Qureshi M, Richardson LJ, Salazar GA, Smart A, Sonnhammer EL, Hirsh L, Paladin L, Piovesan D, Tosatto SC, Finn RD (2018) The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucl Acids Res 47(D1):D427–D432. 10.1093/nar/gky995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Erkanli ME, El-Halabi K, Kim JR (2024) Exploring the diversity of β-glucosidase: classification, catalytic mechanism, molecular characteristics, kinetic models, and applications. Enzyme Microb Technol 173:110363. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2023.110363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fadel M, AbdEl-Halim S, Sharada H, Yehia A, Ammar M (2020) Production of glucoamylase, α-amylase and cellulase by Aspergillus oryzae F-923 cultivated on wheat bran under solid state fermentation. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 10.9734/jabb/2020/v23i430149 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferreira RG, Azzoni AR, Freitas S (2018) Techno-economic analysis of the industrial production of a low-cost enzyme using E. coli: the case of recombinant β-glucosidase. Biotechnol Biofuels. 10.1186/s13068-018-1077-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Garbin AP, Garcia NFL, Cavalheiro GF, Silvestre MA, Rodrigues A, Paz MFD, Fonseca GG, Leite RSR (2021) β-glucosidase from thermophilic fungus Thermoascus crustaceus: production and industrial potential. An Acad Bras Ciênc. 10.1590/0001-3765202120191349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. García-Peñas A, Sharma G (2023) New materials for a circular economy. [s.l] Mater Res Forum LLC. 10.21741/9781644902639 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2003) ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucl Acids Res 31(13):3784–3788. 10.1093/nar/gkg563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Giwa AS, Ali N, Mohammed SA (2023) Cellulose degradation enzymes in filamentous fungi, a bioprocessing approach towards biorefinery. Mol Biotechnol. 10.1007/s12033-023-00900-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Han M, Lugani Y, Chandel AK, Rai R, Kumar S (2021) Production of first- and second-generation ethanol for use in alcohol-based hand sanitizers and disinfectants in India. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 10.1007/s13399-021-01553-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hans R, Duraipandian T (2023) Immunoassay-based evaluation of rOmp28 protein as a candidate for the identification of Brucella species. J Med Microbiol. 10.1099/jmm.0.001718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hassan MHJ, Kalam MA (2013) An overview of biofuel as a renewable energy source: development and challenges. Proc Eng 56:39–53. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.087 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaur K, Phutela UG (2016) Enhancement of paddy straw digestibility and biogas production by sodium hydroxide-microwave pretreatment. Renew Energy 92:178–184. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.083 [Google Scholar]
  27. Khoirunnisa SA, Oetari A, Sjamsuridzal W (2020) Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-degrading ability of Rhizopus azygosporus UICC 539 at various temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on current progress in mathematics and sciences (ISCPMS2019). 10.1063/5.0007875.
  28. Ko H, Kang M, Kim M-J, Yi J, Kang J, Bae J-H, Sohn J-H, Sung BH (2021) A novel protein fusion partner, carbohydrate-binding module family 66, to enhance heterologous protein expression in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 10.1186/s12934-021-01725-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kouhgardi E, Zendehboudi S, Mohammadzadeh O, Lohi A, Chatzis I (2023) Current status and future prospects of biofuel production from brown algae in North America: progress and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 172:113012. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113012 [Google Scholar]
  30. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227(5259):680–685. 10.1038/227680a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leonhardt F, Gennari A, Paludo GB, Schmitz C, da Silveira FX, Moura DCDA, Renard G, Volpato G, Volken de Souza CF (2023) A systematic review about affinity tags for one-step purification and immobilization of recombinant proteins: integrated bioprocesses aiming both economic and environmental sustainability. 3Biotech. 10.1007/s13205-023-03616-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Letunic I, Bork P (2017) 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucl Acids Res 46(D1):D493–D496. 10.1093/nar/gkx922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li Y, Hu X, Sang J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Lu F, Liu F (2018) An acid-stable β-glucosidase from Aspergillus aculeatus: Gene expression, biochemical characterization and molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Biol Macromol 119:462–469. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu L, Yang H, Shin H, Chen RR, Li J, Du G, Chen J (2013) How to achieve high-level expression of microbial enzymes. Bioengineered 4(4):212–223. 10.4161/bioe.24761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lodha A, Pawar S, Rathod V (2020) Optimised cellulase production from fungal co-culture of Trichoderma reesei NCIM 1186 and Penicillium citrinum NCIM 768 under solid state fermentation. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):103958. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103958 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lucas AJS, Rocha M, Saad CDM, Prentice C (2020) Efeitos das diferentes condições de processo na avaliação da hidrólise enzimática de barata cinérea (Nauphoeta cinerea). Braz J Dev 6(7):48885–48898. 10.34117/bjdv6n7-510 [Google Scholar]
  37. Marques ET, Filipe J, Śląski J, Pinheiro A (2013) Microchip electrophoretic analysis of phaseolin patterns and its comparison with currently Used SDS-PAGE Techniques. Chromatographia 76(17–18):1163–1169. 10.1007/s10337-013-2511-x [Google Scholar]
  38. Mat Aron NS, Khoo KS, Chew KW, Show PL, Chen W, Nguyen THP (2020) Sustainability of the four generations of biofuels – A review. Int J Energy Res 44(12):9266–9282. 10.1002/er.5557 [Google Scholar]
  39. Matsuura S, Ikeda T, Chiba M, Yamamoto K (2021) Efficient production of γ-aminobutyric acid by glutamate decarboxylase immobilized on an amphiphilic organic-inorganic hybrid porous material. J Biosci Bioeng 131(3):250–255. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Meraz-Pérez IM, Carvalho MR, Sena KF, Soares YJB, Estrela Junior AS, Lopes UV, dos Santos Filho LP, Araújo SA, Soares VLF, Pirovani CP, Gramacho KP (2021) The Moniliophthora perniciosa – Cacao pod pathosystem: structural and activated defense strategies against disease establishment. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 115:101656. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101656 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mitchell AL, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Blum M, Bork P, Bridge A, Brown SD, Chang H-Y, El-Gebali S, Fraser MI, Gough J, Haft DR, Huang H, Letunic I, Lopez R, Luciani A, Madeira F, Marchler-Bauer A, Mi H, Natale DA (2018) InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucl Acids Res 47(D1):D351–D360. 10.1093/nar/gky1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Montiel-León JM, Munoz GSVD, Amyot M, Sauvé S (2018) Evaluation of on-line concentration coupled to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of neonicotinoids and fipronil in surface water and tap water. Anal Bioanal Chem 410(11):2765–2779. 10.1007/s00216-018-0957-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ogunkunle O, Ahmed NA (2021) Overview of biodiesel combustion in mitigating the adverse impacts of engine emissions on the sustainable human–environment scenario. Sustainability 13(10):5465. 10.3390/su13105465 [Google Scholar]
  44. Oh JM, Lee JP, Baek SC, Kim SG, Jo YD, Kim J, Kim H (2018) Characterization of two extracellular β-glucosidases produced from the cellulolytic fungus Aspergillus sp. YDJ216 and their potential applications for the hydrolysis of flavone glycosides. Int J Biol Macromol 111:595–603. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pandey P, Kuila A, Tuli DK (2021) Chapter 6 - Cellulase: An overview. In: Tuli DK, Kuila A (eds) ScienceDirect; Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128218822000156
  46. Patel AK, Dong C-D, Chen C-W, Pandey A, Singhania RR. (2023) Chapter 3 - Production, purification, and application of microbial enzymes. In: Brahmachari G (ed) ScienceDirect; Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780443190599000190
  47. Periyasamy S, Beula Isabel J, Kavitha S, Karthik V, Mohamed BA, Gizaw DG, Sivashanmugam P, Aminabhavi TM (2023) Recent advances in consolidated bioprocessing for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into bioethanol – A review. Chem Eng J 453:139783. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139783 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pessoa Junior A, Kilikian BV (2005) Purificação de produtos biotecnológicos. Repositorio.usp.br. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/001461485
  49. Phadtare P, Joshi S, Satyanarayana T (2017) Recombinant thermo-alkali-stable endoglucanase of Myceliopthora thermophila BJA (rMt-egl): Biochemical characteristics and applicability in enzymatic saccharification of agro-residues. Int J Biol Macromol 104(Pt A):107–116. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ramachandran P, Tiwari MK, Singh RK, Haw J-R, Jeya M, Lee J-K (2012) Cloning and characterization of a putative β-glucosidase (NfBGL595) from Neosartorya fischeri. Process Biochem 47(1):99–105. 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ribeiro GC, Assis SA (2023) Production of β-glucosidase by Rhodotorula oryzicola and use of enzyme for hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse delignified. J Food Sci Technol 60(11):2761–2771. 10.1007/s13197-023-05783-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Robak K, Balcerek M (2018) Review of second-generation bioethanol production from residual biomass. Food Technol Biotechnol. 10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Romero-Téllez S, Lluch JM, González-Lafont À, Masgrau L (2019) comparing hydrolysis and transglycosylation reactions catalyzed by Thermus thermophilus β-Glycosidase. A Combined MD and QM/MM Study. Front Chem. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rosano GL, Morales ES, Ceccarelli EA (2019) New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: A 5-year update. Protein Sci 28(8):1412–1422. 10.1002/pro.3668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sakdasri W, Sawangkeaw R, Ngamprasertsith S (2017) An entirely renewable biofuel production from used palm oil with supercritical ethanol at low molar ratio. Braz J Chem Eng 34(4):1023–1034. 10.1590/0104-6632.20170344s20150660 [Google Scholar]
  56. Salihu A, Abbas O, Sallau AB, Alam MZ (2015) Agricultural residues for cellulolytic enzyme production by Aspergillus niger: effects of pretreatment. 3Biotech 5(6):1101–1106. 10.1007/s13205-015-0294-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sánchez-Trasviña C, Flores-Gatica M, Enriquez-Ochoa D, Rito-Palomares M, Mayolo-Deloisa K (2021) Purification of modified therapeutic proteins available on the market: an analysis of chromatography-based strategies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.717326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Santana ML, Júnior GL, de Assis SA (2023) Production and characterization of carboxymethylcellulase by submerged fermentation of Moniliophthora perniciosa. Catal Res 3(2):1–21. 10.21926/cr.2302019 [Google Scholar]
  59. Santa-Rosa PS, Souza AL, Roque RA, Andrade EV, Astolfi-Filho S, Mota AG, Nunes-Silva CG. (2018). Production of thermostable β-glucosidase and CMCase by Penicillium sp. LMI01 isolated from the Amazon region. 31, 84–92. 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.11.005
  60. Santos FA, Carvalho-Gonçalves LCT, Cardoso-Simões ALC, Santos SFM (2021) Evaluation of the production of cellulases by Penicillium sp. FSDE15 using corncob and wheat bran as substrates. Bioresour Technol Rep 14:100648. 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100648 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sathe SS, Soni S, Ranvir VP, Choudhari VG, Odaneth AA, Lali AM, Chandrayan SK (2017) Heterologous expression and biochemical studies of a thermostable glucose tolerant β-glucosidase from Methylococcus capsulatus (bath strain). Int J Biol Macromol 102:805–812. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Seboka AR, Ewunie GA, Morken J, Feng L, Adaramola MS (2023) Potentials and prospects of solid biowaste resources for biofuel production in Ethiopia: a systematic review of the evidence. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 10.1007/s13399-023-04994-0 [Google Scholar]
  63. Shahzadi I, Al-Ghamdi MA, Nadeem MS, Sajjad M, Ali A, Khan JA, Kazmi I (2021) Scale-up fermentation of Escherichia coli for the production of recombinant endoglucanase from Clostridium thermocellum. Sci Rep. 10.1038/s41598-021-86000-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sigrist CJA, de Castro E, Cerutti L, Cuche BA, Hulo N, Bridge A, Bougueleret L, Xenarios I (2013) New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucl Acids Res 41:D344–D347. 10.1093/nar/gks1067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Singhania RR, Ruiz HA, Awasthi MK, Dong C-D, Chen W, Patel AK (2021) Challenges in cellulase bioprocess for biofuel applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 151:111622. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111622 [Google Scholar]
  66. Soni SK, Sharma A, Soni R (2023) Microbial enzyme systems in the production of second generation bioethanol. Sustainability 15(4):3590. 10.3390/su15043590 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stepper J, Dabin J, Eklof JM, Thongpoo P, Kongsaeree P, Taylor EJ, Turkenburg JP, Brumer H, Davies GJ (2013) Structure and activity of the Streptococcus pyogenes family GH1 6-phospho-β-glucosidase SPy1599. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69(1):16–23. 10.1107/S0907444912041005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sun J, Ma Y, Xu X, Liu Z, Zou L (2020) Molecular cloning and bioinformatics analyses of a GH3 beta-glucosidase from Auricularia heimuer. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 34(1):850–859. 10.1080/13102818.2020.1807407 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sun N, Liu X, Zhang B, Wang X, Wei N, Tan Z, Li X, Guan Q (2022) Characterization of a novel recombinant halophilic β-glucosidase of Trichoderma harzianum derived from Hainan mangrove. BMC Microbiol. 10.1186/s12866-022-02596-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tiwari S, Prasad V, Chauhan PS, Lata C (2017) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens confers tolerance to various abiotic stresses and modulates plant response to phytohormones through osmoprotection and gene expression regulation in rice. Front Plant Sci. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Trollope K, Nel DW, Volschenk H (2018) The heterologous expression potential of an acid-tolerant Talaromyces pinophilus β-glucosidase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Folia Microbiol 63(6):725–734. 10.1007/s12223-018-0613-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Uhoraningoga A, Kinsella G, Henehan G, Ryan B (2018) The goldilocks approach: a review of employing design of experiments in prokaryotic recombinant protein production. Bioengineering 5(4):89. 10.3390/bioengineering5040089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Vasić K, Knez Ž, Leitgeb M (2021) Bioethanol production by enzymatic hydrolysis from different lignocellulosic sources. Molecules 26(3):753. 10.3390/molecules26030753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Velvizhi G, Jennita Jacqueline P, Shetti NP, Latha K, Mohanakrishna G, Aminabhavi TM (2023) Emerging trends and advances in valorization of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels. J Environ Manage 345:118527. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Volkov PV, Rozhkova AM, Zorov IN, Sinitsyn AP (2020) Cloning, purification and study of recombinant GH3 family β-glucosidase from Penicillium verruculosum. Biochimie 168:231–240. 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wu G, Tham PE, Chew KW, Munawaroh HSH, Tan IS, Wan-Mohtar WAAQI, Sriariyanun M, Show PL (2023) Net zero emission in circular bioeconomy from microalgae biochar production: a renewed possibility. Biores Technol 388:129748. 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yang H, Shi Z, Xu G, Qin Y, Deng J, Yang J (2019) Bioethanol production from bamboo with alkali-catalyzed liquid hot water pretreatment. Biores Technol 274:261–266. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang Y, Fu X, Cui F, Sun L, Zan X, Sun W (2023) Biochemical and structural characterization of a glucan synthase GFGLS2 from edible fungus Grifola frondosa to synthesize β-1, 3-glucan. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 10.1186/s13068-023-02380-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yang Y, Wang J, Guo H, Cao Y (2020) The enzymatic characters of heterologous expressed novel β-1, 4-glucosidase originated from Aspergillus fresenii. 3Biotech 10(6):239. 10.1007/s13205-020-02229-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Yildirim Z, Çelik E (2017) Periplasmic and extracellular production of cellulase from recombinant Escherichia coli cells. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 10.1002/jctb.5008 [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhao G, Ding L-L, Pan Z-H, Kong D-H, Hadiatullah H, Fan Z-C (2019) Proteinase and glycoside hydrolase production is enhanced in solid-state fermentation by manipulating the carbon and nitrogen fluxes in Aspergillus oryzae. Food Chem 271:606–613. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhou L, Ma Y, Wang K, Chen T, Huang Y, Liu L, Li Y, Sun J, Hu Y, Li T, Kong Z, Wang Y, Zheng Q, Zhao Q, Zhang J, Gu Y, Yu H, Xia N, Li S (2022) Omics-guided bacterial engineering of Escherichia coli ER2566 for recombinant protein expression. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107(2–3):853–865. 10.1007/s00253-022-12339-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES