Skip to main content
JAAD Case Reports logoLink to JAAD Case Reports
. 2024 Sep 19;53:109–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2024.08.041

Papulonecrotic lesions and fever in an adult patient

Daniel R Antohi a,b, Michelle Toker a,b, Suraj Muddasani b, Michael Occidental b,c, Bijal Amin b,c, Breanne Mordorski a,b, Benedict Wu a,b,
PMCID: PMC11530857  PMID: 39493364

Presentation

A 40-year-old woman with untreated eczema presented with a fever and a painful eruption. Physical examination revealed numerous crusted papulonecrotic erosions and round plaques on the trunk and extremities (Fig 1, A-C). Laboratory evaluation revealed negative antinuclear and extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies, syphilis, human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and Epstein-Barr virus tests. The complete blood count and liver tests were unremarkable. A punch biopsy revealed an eroded epidermis with numerous necrotic keratinocytes and adjacent psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with a lichenoid and perivascular inflammatory cell infiltrate consisting of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and numerous neutrophils (Fig 2, A and B).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Upper extremities. A, Left arm at the time of presentation. B, Bilateral hands at presentation. C, Left leg at the time of presentation.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Histopathology. A, H&E, 5×. Low-power view shows an eroded epidermis with adjacent psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia and lichenoid inflammation. B, H&E, 20×. There are numerous necrotic keratinocytes within the epidermis.

Question 1: What is the most likely diagnosis based on the clinical presentation, laboratory studies, and histopathology?

  • A.

    Lues maligna

  • B.

    Sweet syndrome

  • C.

    Bullous vasculitis

  • D.

    Mucha-Habermann disease

  • E.

    Guttate psoriasis

Answers:

  • A.

    Lues maligna – Incorrect. The negative syphilis IgM/IgG test militates against lues maligna, a severe variant of secondary syphilis.

  • B.

    Sweet syndrome – Incorrect. Sweet syndrome would show dense neutrophilic infiltrate on histopathology with papillary dermal edema and absence of lichenoid dermatitis with perivascular lymphocytes.

  • C.

    Bullous vasculitis – Incorrect. The histopathology failed to reveal features compatible with leukocytoclastic vasculitis.

  • D.

    Mucha-Habermann disease – Correct. Mucha-Habermann disease (MHD) is an exuberant and severe febrile form of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta. MHD is characterized by parakeratosis, interface dermatitis with mainly lymphocytes and neutrophils, and extravasated erythrocytes on histopathology.1

  • E.

    Guttate psoriasis – Incorrect. Although psoriasiform hyperplasia can be seen in guttate psoriasis, a robust lichenoid inflammatory cell infiltrate with papulonecrotic lesions goes against guttate psoriasis.

Question 2: Which of the following is the most appropriate initial treatment in this clinical setting?

  • A.

    Phototherapy

  • B.

    Oral prednisone

  • C.

    Topical triamcinolone

  • D.

    Doxycycline

  • E.

    Methotrexate

Answers:

  • A.

    Phototherapy – Incorrect. The severe presentation with systemic symptoms would make phototherapy inappropriate.

  • B.

    Oral prednisone – Correct. Data regarding MHD treatment is limited, although commonly accepted first-line treatments include corticosteroids, systemic antibiotics, and phototherapy.2 Oral prednisone is appropriate, given its rapid onset of action.

  • C.

    Topical triamcinolone – Incorrect. For the widespread and ulcerative lesions, recommending topical therapies alone would not be appropriate.

  • D.

    Doxycycline – Incorrect. Although doxycycline is anti-inflammatory agent, the delayed onset of action would not be appropriate in this case.

  • E.

    Methotrexate – Incorrect. Similar to doxycycline, methotrexate would take longer to go into full effect and potentially lead to increased morbidity.

Question 3: The decision was made to add on the steroid-sparing agent, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); which of the following labs must be checked in this patient before starting MMF?

  • A.

    Peripheral blood flow cytometry

  • B.

    Liver tests

  • C.

    Urinalysis

  • D.

    Complete blood count

  • Ε.

    β-human chorionic gonadotropin

Answers:

  • A.

    Peripheral blood flow cytometry – Incorrect. Peripheral blood flow cytometry would be checked if there is a concern for systemic lymphoma. MMF has been associated with an increased risk of lymphoma and skin malignancies, but this is irrelevant to this case.

  • B.

    Liver tests – Incorrect. MMF may cause minor, temporary elevations in liver enzymes but does not commonly exert liver toxicity in immunocompetent patients. However, MMF may have hepatotoxic effects on patients with a history of solid organ transplants.

  • C.

    Urinalysis – Incorrect. MMF can cause urinary symptoms such as urgency, frequency, and dysuria; MMF does not cause nephrotoxicity.3

  • D.

    Complete blood count – Incorrect. MMF can cause dose-dependent, reversible neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and, on rare occasions, agranulocytosis.4

  • Ε.

    β-human chorionic gonadotropin – Correct. MMF is a teratogen and is associated with first-trimester loss, facial abnormalities, and anomalies of the distal limbs and other visceral organs.5

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.

Footnotes

Funding sources: None.

Patient consent: Consent for the publication of all patient photographs and medical information was provided by the authors at the time of article submission to the journal stating that all patients gave consent for their photographs and medical information to be published in print and online, with the understanding that this information may be publicly available.

IRB approval status: Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Teklehaimanot F., Gade A., Rubenstein R. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bellinato F., Maurelli M., Gisondi P., Girolomoni G. A systematic review of treatments for pityriasis lichenoides. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(11):2039–2049. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park H. The emergence of mycophenolate mofetilin dermatology: from its roots in the world of organ transplantation to its versatile role in the dermatology treatment room. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4(1):18–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vanhove T., Kuypers D., Claes K.J., et al. Reasons for dose reduction of mycophenolate mofetil during the first year after renal transplantation and its impact on graft outcome. Transpl Int. 2013;26(8):813–821. doi: 10.1111/tri.12133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kylat R.I. What is the teratogenic risk of mycophenolate? J Pediatr Genet. 2017;6(2):111–114. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAD Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES