Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Nov 4;19(11):e0313064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313064

Versatile properties of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers: In vitro exploration of antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities, network pharmacology analysis, and In-silico molecular docking simulation

Mai Ali Mwaheb 1,*, Nashwa Mohamed Reda 2,*, Mohammad S El-Wetidy 3,*, Asmaa H Sheded 4, Fatimah Al-Otibi 5, Gadah A Al-Hamoud 6, Mohamed A Said 7, Esraa A Aidy 8
Editor: Hamida Hamdi Mohammed Ismail9
PMCID: PMC11534206  PMID: 39495776

Abstract

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. has been used in folk medicine against several diseases. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the chemical composition of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers and their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer properties. Besides, network pharmacology and molecular docking were used to explore the potential antitumor effect of active metabolites of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. against breast and liver cancer. The results revealed many bioactive components known for their antimicrobial and anticancer properties. Furthermore, scavenging activity was obtained, which indicated strong antioxidant properties. The plant extract exhibited antimicrobial activities against Aspergillus brasiliensis (MIC of 0.625 mg/mL), Candida albicans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at MICs of 1.25 mg/mL. The results revealed proapoptotic activities of the O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. extract against MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and HepG2 cell lines, where it induced significant early apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at sub-G1 phases, besides increasing the expression levels of p53, cyclin D1, and caspase 3 (p <0.005). The network pharmacology and molecular docking analysis revealed that the anticancer components of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower extract targets the PI3K-Akt pathway. More investigations might be required to test the mechanistic pathways by which O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. might exhibit its biological activities in vivo.

Introduction

Natural products, like plant extracts, contain unlimited and diverse chemical components, which enable countless prospects for the discovery of new drugs [1]. It was reported that about 80% of the world’s population gets their primary healthcare from traditional medicine, according to data from the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. Herbal medicines reflect a long history of human interactions with the environment, particularly in Africa. Several plant components in traditional medicine have been used to treat infectious and chronic diseases for decades [3]. Although allopathic remedies may treat different medical conditions, many individuals are returning to herbal therapies because of their availability, low prices, fewer side effects, and lower cost [3].

Because natural therapeutic agents are attractive and come in a wide variety of chemical forms from plants, animals, and microbes, the main focus of pharmaceutical research has been on finding new and effective anticancer medication from natural sources. Natural sources have been the source of more than 60% of the latest anticancer medications [4]. Based on their composition, ecology, phytochemicals, and ethnopharmacological qualities. Effective anticancer medicines have been produced in large part through the use of plants and their derivatives. Vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide, topotecan, irinotecan, podophyllotoxin, and paclitaxel are a few examples of plant derivatives. Several other plant-derived bioactive chemicals, like gimatecan and elomotecan, are in the clinical development phase as anti-cancer agents due to their unique action [5, 6]

Traditional medicine, which predominantly employs plant-based treatments, is now thought to provide primary medical care to 60% of the worldwide population and 80% of those living in developing countries. Although herbs were valued for their centuries-old medicinal, flavoring, and aromatic properties, their significance was temporarily eclipsed by synthetic items in the contemporary era. Because of the oral transmission of that knowledge from one generation to the next, it is critical to chronicle the medicinal and aromatic plants associated with traditional wisdom [7]. Additionally, the blind reliance on artificial substances has ended, and people are turning back to natural therapy in the hopes of security and safety [8].

Currently, 60% of the world’s population and 80% of those living in underdeveloped nations are believed to receive basic medical care through traditional medicine, which primarily uses plant-based remedies. In the modern age, synthetic products briefly overshadowed the importance of herbs, despite their long history of use as flavoring, aromatic, and therapeutic ingredients. The medicinal and aromatic plants, linked to traditional wisdom, should be documented since this knowledge is passed down orally from one generation to the next [7]. There has also been a shift away from the heedless dependence on synthetic drugs, with individuals returning to natural remedies for stability and safety [8].

The widespread emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) due to the inappropriate use of antimicrobials has significantly limited the therapeutic options available and has had a detrimental impact on human and animal health, leading to higher rates of treatment failures and increased severity of illnesses [9]. This evolving AMR presents a global health challenge and has garnered the attention of the World Health Organization (WHO) as one of the most critical issues facing medical science. Hence, there is an urgent need to discover and develop new antimicrobial agents to combat emerging antimicrobial resistance [1016]. Medicinal plants contain diverse chemical compounds with promising biological activities, including antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties [1719]. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill., a member of the Cactaceae family, has long been used in traditional medicine to treat various diseases. It is now gaining attention due to the antimicrobial activities exhibited by its bioactive compounds against numerous organisms. These compounds can be isolated from various parts of the plant, including cladodes, roots, flowers, fruits, and seeds [2023].

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death across genders and age groups [24]. The potential of natural products to serve as anticancer agents due to their phytochemical composition is extensively studied. These compounds demonstrate relatively high safety profiles in pharmaceutical settings and offer promising prospects for cancer treatment. Plant-derived chemicals are estimated to contribute to more than half of all anticancer drugs [25]. There is growing interest in natural compounds for chemotherapy, alongside ongoing efforts to identify novel molecular target-based compounds. Opuntia fruits and young stems have traditionally been used in folk medicine to treat various conditions, including burns, inflammation, nausea, allergies, diabetes, and hypertension [26, 27]. Several studies have identified well-known anticancer compounds in members of the Cactaceae family. Examples include Stenocereus stellatus, rich in the triterpene botulinic acid, which affects the proliferation of Hela cells [28], and dihydroactinidiolide and 2,4-ditert-butylphenol detected in the extract of Pereskia bleo, demonstrating anticancer activity against MCF-7 and A594 cells [29, 30]. Other studies have highlighted the significant anticancer properties of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. seed oil against adenocarcinoma cell lines Colo-320 and Colo-741 [31]. Additionally, various extracts of O. ficus-indica fruit juice have shown anticancer activities against brain cancer U87-MG, colon cancer HT-29 [32] and Caco2 [3335], prostate cancer PC3 [35], and ovarian cancer cells (OVCA420, SKOV3) [36]. This may be attributed to the rich phytochemical composition of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill., including malic acid, quinic acid, aconitic acid, cinnamonic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and other methanolic and flavonoid compounds with well-known anticancer activities [37].

Many physiological and pathological processes in modern medicine involve complex cellular and molecular mechanisms of action that cannot be fully understood without biochemical and molecular tools [38]. In the era of artificial intelligence and large datasets, network pharmacology has emerged as a novel, multidisciplinary field at the forefront of systematic drug research. It has been widely utilized in herbal medicine research, focusing on molecular relationships between drugs and treatment objectives from a holistic system and biological network perspective [39]. Molecular docking, a tool aiding in drug design, predicts binding patterns and validates interactions between drugs and target proteins [40]. Numerous experts in herbal medicine are exploring the use of molecular docking and network pharmacology to investigate drug and disease mechanisms. This study model involves a series of assessments of the phytochemical components of herbal medicines and disease targets to anticipate key components, targets, and pathways in disease therapy using existing databases.

It’s worth noting that previous studies have primarily focused on extracts from the stems, fruits, seeds, and cladodes of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill., with fewer investigations concerning its flower parts. Moreover, some studies overlooked certain cancers, such as liver cancer, while focusing mainly on colon and breast cancer. The current study provides a novel investigation of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers, with an emphasis on their antibacterial, antioxidant, and anticancer effects. While prior studies focused on the stems, fruits, seeds, and cladodes, this study delves into the lesser-known flower components. Furthermore, the integration of network pharmacology and molecular docking analysis focuses on breast and liver cancer pathways, particularly the PI3K-Akt pathway. This combination method sheds fresh light on the bioactive components of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers and their potential therapeutic applications, filling gaps in the existing literature. Additionally, the current study aims to explore the antimicrobial potential of methanol extracts of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. against some selected bacterial and fungal species.

Materials and methods

Collection of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers

Flowers of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. were harvested in May 2022 (the blossoming date) from the Giza governorate, Egypt. Latitude and longitude coordinates are 30° 0’ 47.0016’’ N, and 31° 12’ 31.8708’’ E, respectively. For biological and phytochemical investigations, the samples were individually air-dried in sheds, ground into a powder, and stored in tight-sealed round flasks. The Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Egypt, verified the plant’s identity.

O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower parts for extraction

1.5 kg of the air-dried flowers were ground into a coarse powder, dissolved in petroleum ether, and then extracted one at a time using a maceration method with 70% methanol (5×2L) at room temperature until the material was completely extracted. After gathering the filtrates, they were vacuum-dried at 40°C to yield 60 g of net weight (w/w) [41].

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

The organic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. was analyzed using the 5977C GC/MSD instrument equipped with a polar (DB-Wax) column and MSD-5975C detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). The machine is equipped with a split-spitless injector at the split ratio of 10:1, a Quick-Swap assembly, an HP-5MS fused silica capillary column (5% phenyl/95% dimethylpolysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. with 0.25 μm film thickness), and an Agilent autosampler model 7693 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Sample preparation and processing were according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The relative composition of the extract components was determined based on the peak area measured by the HP-5MS column without the correction factor. The separated compounds were identified by searching the library of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST14) at https://chemdata.nist.gov/ and the NIST Mass Spectral Search Program (Version 2.2) as described before [42]. The chemical structures of the resulting compounds were drawn by the web-based data visualization platform MolView v2.4 (https://molview.org/), while the molecular weights and chemical formulas were obtained from the chemicals database of PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Also, the chemical classification of compounds was obtained by the web-based application ClassyFire: https://cfb.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/ [43].

Antioxidant activity by free radical scavenging (DPPH) assay

The organic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. was tested for its possible antioxidant activity using the chemical compound 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) [44]. Briefly, serial dilutions (0, 0.75, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) were prepared with distilled water for each extract or ascorbic acid that acts as a positive control in a 96-well plate. Then, 150μl of the DPPH solution (0.1 mM) was added to each well and incubated in the dark for 30 min. Later, the colorimetric changes were assessed at 517 nm by the microplate reader Synergy 2 (BioTek Inc., Vermont, United States). The inhibition percentage of DPPH free radical scavenging activity was calculated at the average of triplicates as follows:

%scavengingactivity=AcAt/Ac×100

Where “Ac” is the absorbance of DPPH (concentration 0 μg/mL) and “At” is the absorbance of the sample (extract or ascorbic acid). The experiment was repeated in triplicate, and average percentages were calculated.

Antimicrobial activity of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower parts

Microbial strains and culture conditions

The antimicrobial activity of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower extract was tested against six strains of bacteria and fungi: S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli (ATCC 25922), P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), C. albicans (ATCC 10231), S. cerevisiae (ATCC 9763), and A. brasiliensis (ATCC 16404). No clinical isolates were tested in this study.

The tested organisms were prepared before antimicrobial testing as described by Ramírez-Moreno et al. (2017) with some modifications [45]. Except for A. brasiliensis, which was incubated at 25°C ± 1 for 48 hours, the microorganisms were inoculated into 100 mL of tryptic soy broth medium and incubated at 35°C ± 1. Afterwards, a fresh culture was created by streaking a loopful of broth on Sabaroud Dextrose Agar for fungi and Tryptic Soy Agar for bacteria. Additionally, bacterial suspensions were prepared by inoculating 3–4 colonies into sterile saline with an adjustment of turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland using a DensiCHEK© optical device. That adjustment results in a suspension containing approximately 1–2 x 108 CFU/mL. These suspensions were diluted by 5% in Muller-Hinton broth (MHB), which resulted in an approximate concentration of 1.0 × 106 CFU/mL.

Determination of the minimal inhibition concentration (MIC)

The MICs of the extracts were determined using the microdilution method. First, a stock solution of the plant extract was prepared by adding 100 μl of condensed extract to 900 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) [46]. This was serially diluted to obtain various concentrations ranging from 0.019 to 10 mg/ml. A 10 μl aliquot of bacterial suspensions was put on a sterile 96-well plate containing 100 μl of MHB and 100 μl of serial dilutions of the extract. A positive control (without extract) and a negative control (broth only) were included on each microplate. The incubation was done at 35°C for 24 hours, except for A. brasiliensis, which was incubated at 25°C for 48 hours. After incubation, wells were checked for any visual growth, and the optical density of the inoculated wells was measured at 600 nm and 340 nm for bacteria and fungi, respectively. The MIC was read in triplicate.

Determination of the minimal bactericidal and fungicidal concentration (MBC and MFC)

MBC was determined by streaking 10 μl of broth from those wells with no visible growth or turbidity on the Muller-Hinton agar plate. After incubation, the plates are examined for growth. The MBC and MFC were defined as the minimum concentration of extract that prevents the growth of microbes on culture media [47].

Anticancer activities of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower parts

Human cell culture

In the current study, three cell lines were used for the determination of the anticancer activity of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. The cells included the human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, MDA-MB-123, and the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2). The cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, United States). All cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) (GIBCO, Thermo Fischer Scientific, NY, United States), which was supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% L-glutamine (GIBCO, Thermo Fischer Scientific, NY, United States). The cells were incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. The culture medium was changed every three days (subculture), and all culture work was performed in a biological safety cabinet under aseptic techniques.

Cell viability assay by SRB (Sulforhodamine-B)

The sulforhodamine-B (SRB) method was applied to determine cytotoxicity [48]. Cells were seeded at a concentration of 4 × 103 cells/well in 96-well microtiter plates, and after 24 hours, they were allowed to attach before being incubated with O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. The cells were then treated with various concentrations (0, 10, 50, 75, 100, 400, 800, and 1000 μg/mL) of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. extract for 48 hours using paclitaxel as positive control. The optical density (O.D.) of each well was measured spectrophotometrically at 570 nm using an ELISA microplate reader (TECAN Sunrise, Germany). The mean values were estimated as the percentage of cell viability as follows: O.D. (treated cells) / O.D. (control cells) × 100. The IC50 value (the concentration that produces 50% inhibition of cell growth) of plant extract was calculated using dose-response curve-fitting models (Graph-Pad Prism software, version 7).

Apoptosis assay

The apoptotic effect of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. was assessed by the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with PI (BioLegend Co., San Diego, CA, United States). After calculating the IC50, cells were treated with the methanolic extract at the IC50 concentration and compared to the untreated cells. The following day, 0.25% trypsin/EDTA (GIBCO, Thermo Fischer Scientific, NY, USA) was used to collect the cells after they had been washed with PBS. The cells were then incubated for 15 minutes on ice in the dark using a combination of PI and Annexin V-FITC. The apoptosis/necrosis was detected by the BD FACSCanto II cell analyzer (BD Biosciences, CA, United States) at an emission of 530 nm (for Annexin V FITC) and >575 nm (for PI). A dot plot was used to estimate the percentage of different cellular statuses as follows: the lower right corner expressed early apoptosis (positive in annexin V-FITC), the upper left expressed necrosis (positive for PI), the upper right showed the dead cells/late apoptosis (positive in both annexin V-FITC and PI), and the lower right showed the live cells (negative in both annexin V-FITC and PI) [49]. The experiment was repeated in triplicate, and average percentages were calculated.

Cell cycle assay

Cell cycle analysis represents an early methodology utilizing PI reagents for the univariate examination of cellular DNA via flow cytometry. Cells were exposed to the methanolic extract at the IC50 concentration and juxtaposed with untreated cells. In brief, following a 24-hour incubation period, cells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and detached using trypsin/EDTA (GIBCO, Thermo Fischer Scientific, NY, United States). Subsequently, the cells were fixed with 1 mL of 70% ice-cold ethanol for 30 minutes on ice. Afterwards, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, incubated with RNase A (10 mg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and PI (50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 10 minutes. The resulting stained cells’ cell cycle arrest was assessed using the BD FACSCanto II cell analyzer (BD Biosciences, CA, United States) with emission >575 nm. The outcomes were depicted via a histogram, delineating distinct regions corresponding to the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases, and the sub-G1 phase indicative of dead cells. The cell counts, at all phases, were collectively compared [50]. The experiment was replicated in triplicate, and average percentages were computed.

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) analysis

As previously mentioned, the efficacy of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. as a prooxidant was evaluated by screening the ROS generation using the DCFDA/H2DCFDA Cellular ROS Assay Kit (ABCAM, Cambridge, UK) and flow cytometer [51]. Briefly, the treated and non-treated cells were incubated for 24 hours, then harvested and washed with PBS, as previously mentioned. Later, the cells were treated with 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) and kept at 37°C for 30 minutes. After washing twice with PBS, the cells were analyzed by flow cytometer at an emission of 530 nm (FL1 channel) and 150 mV [50]. The experiment was repeated in triplicate.

Western blot analysis

The impact of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. on various cellular proteins was investigated. Cells were plated at a density of 1 × 106 cells per plate in a DMEM-complete medium and incubated in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C until reaching 50% confluence. Subsequently, cells were treated with the methanolic extract at the IC50 concentration, in comparison to untreated cells, and incubated for 24 hours. On the day of detection, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, harvested, and incubated on ice with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, United States) for 30 minutes on an orbital shaker. The resulting protein lysate was separated and quantified using the colorimetric Bradford protein assay (ABCAM, Waltham, MA, United States) at an absorbance of 595 nm. Subsequently, equal volumes of protein lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10% Precast SDS-PAGE gel) at 100 V for one hour. The separated proteins were then transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane using a semi-dry method. The PVDF membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk for one hour and subsequently incubated with various primary antibodies targeting cellular proteins such as p53, cyclin D1, caspase 3, and β-actin. Following incubation, the membranes were probed with Luminol HRP chemiluminescence substrate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) and visualized using a c-digit blot scanner (LI-COR, Nebraska, United States). The resulting band intensity was quantified using ImageJ software version 1.51.8 (National Institutes of Health, USA). The experiment was conducted in triplicate.

Network pharmacology

Screening of active ingredients from O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and gathering their targets

The retrieval of 2D structure files (SDF), PubChem IDs, and SMILES (S1 Table) for five active ingredients, representing the primary and predominant metabolites of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill., previously identified via LC-MS and MS/MS, was performed utilizing the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) [52]. These active metabolites (2D structure files) underwent further filtration based on their drug-likeness (QED > 0.3) and oral bioavailability (Lipinski’s rule) using ADMET Lab 2.0 (https://admetmesh.scbdd.com/service/evaluation/index [53] (S1 Table). Additionally, their potential biological targets were predicted through the BindingDB server (https://www.bindingdb.org/rwd/bind/index.jsp) [54] and the Swiss target prediction web tool (http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/?) [55] (S2 Table). Subsequently, the compiled biological targets (261 targets) were annotated using the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/) [56] to obtain the UniProt IDs corresponding to their genes (S2 Table).

Gathering of breast cancer target genes and prediction of active ingredients for breast cancer treatment

The DisGeNET database (https://www.disgenet.org/) was queried for genes associated with cancer, specifically using the search terms breast cancer and liver cancer (S3 and S4 Tables) [57]. Employing the Venn diagram intersection feature of FunRich 3.1.3 software, the data retrieved for genes linked to breast cancer (2579 genes annotated with UniProt) and liver cancer (1543 genes annotated with UniProt) were juxtaposed with the previously predicted target diseases of active metabolites from O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. (261 targets) [58].

Constructing a protein-protein interaction network

The STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/) was utilized to acquire the Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, and further analysis and enhancement were performed using Cytoscape 3.9.0 software. Initially, potential therapeutic targets for breast and liver cancers were input into the STRING online database, with parameters and constraints set (species limited to Homo sapiens, and filtered through a combined score ≥ 0.95 as the threshold). The PPI network results were downloaded in TSV format and imported into Cytoscape 3.9.0 software to create a network diagram for visualization. Using the CytoHubba plug-in, each node in the network was calculated, and core target genes were identified through screening.

Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis

The Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using FunRich 3.1.3 software to identify significant GO terms. GO terms with P-values below 0.05 and enrichment scores exceeding 5 were considered noteworthy and subjected to further analysis. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis results were evaluated using ShinyGO 0.77 (http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/go/) [59], employing an adjusted P-value threshold of 0.05 for pathway identification. Visualization analysis, including creating bubble charts and histograms, was conducted using the online tools available on the bioinformatics platform (http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/).

Molecular docking

Molecular docking studies were conducted to investigate the binding affinity of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. metabolites against the target enzyme, PI3K. The MOE software version 2019.0102 was utilized for molecular docking simulations [60]. The database of active metabolites underwent energy minimization, hydrogen addition, and partial charge calculation for preparation, followed by saving in mdb extension format [61]. The target enzyme, PI3K, was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org) with PDB ID: 5xgj and underwent preparation and validation through MOE’s automatic quick preparation tool. Docking simulations were performed using Amber10 Forcefield, and ligand-protein complex interactions were evaluated through pose visualization and scoring functions [62]. Docking studies were validated by assessing the root mean square deviation (RMSD) values for co-crystalized ligand-protein isozymes (PI3K: 1.2683).

Results

The phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers

In the current study, the GC-MS analysis revealed that the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers contain many bioactive components, which are known for their antimicrobial and anticancer properties. As shown in Table 1, there was a wide distribution of organic compounds, which included derivatives of gluconic acid, glyceric acid, malic acid, threonic acid, D-ribose, and hexadecanoic acid. Also, a wide variety of monosaccharides, carbohydrates, and carbohydrate conjugates were estimated at a retention time (RT) of 7.401, 8.083, 10.642, 11.655, and 13.212 minutes. Other metabolites included some aromatic methanolic compounds such as benzoic acid derivatives (Vanillic acid, Isobutyl phthalate, Monoamyl phthalate, and Phenyllactic acid derivatives), fatty acids (hexadecanoic acid, octanoic acid, and Phenyllactic acid derivatives), lactones, and other methanolic derivatives such as p-Coumaric acid (Fig 1).

Table 1. Chemical composition of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers.

RT (min) Area (Ab*s) Formula Name Classification MW (Amu) %
6.332 2888539 C22H53NO7Si5 Gluconic acid, 2-methoxime, tetra(trimethylsilyl)-, trimethylsilyl ester Organosilicon compound 583.267 2.4
7.401 568174 C17H42O5Si4 Beta-L-Arabinopyranose, 1,2,3,4-tetrakis-O-(trimethylsilo) Monosaccharides 438.211 0.5
7.526 50665619 C12H32O3Si3 1,2,3-tris-(trimethylsilanyloxy)-propane Organosilicon compounds 308.166 42.5
8.083 411829 C12H30O4Si3 Propanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester Carbohydrates and carbohydrate conjugates 322.145 0.4
8.44 1036103 C11H28O2Si2 2-Methyl-1,4-bis(trimethylsiloxy)butane Organosilicon compounds 248.163 1
8.74 4000589 C11H28O2Si2 2-Ethyl-1,3-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)propane Organosilicon compounds 248.163 3.4
9.447 1799823 C13H30O5Si3 Butanedioic acid, [(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, bis(trimethylsilyl) ester Organosilicon compounds 350.14 1.5
9.622 1094692 C15H37NO4Si3 d-Erythro-pentose, 2-deoxy-3,4,5-tris-O-(trimethylsilyl)-, O-methyloxime Organosilicon compounds 379.203 0.9
9.76 3745410 C11H23NO3Si2 L-Proline, 5-oxo-1-(trimethylsilyl)-, trimethylsilyl ester Amino acid derivative 273.122 3.1
10.028 382522 C16H40O5Si4 2,3,4-trihydroxybutyric acid tetrakis (trimethylsilyl) derivative. Organosilicon compounds 424.195 0.4
10.479 1461908 C14H24O4Si2 Benzoic acid, 4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester Benzoic acids and derivatives 282.111 1.2
10.642 271543 C20H52O5Si5 Ribitol, 1,2,3,4,5-pentakis-O-(trimethylsilyl) Monosaccharides 512.266 0.3
10.804 1584738 C18H45NO5Si4 D-Ribose, 2,3,4,5-tetrakis-O-(trimethylsilyl) Organosilicon compounds 438.211 1.3
11.292 4815624 C14H32O5Si3 D-Ribonic acid, 2,3,5-tris-O-(trimethylsilyl)-, gamma.-lactone Gamma-Butyrolactones 364.156 4
11.655 15775347 C22H55NO6Si5 D-Fructose, 1,3,4,5,6-pentakis-O-(trimethylsilyl)- Monosaccharides 540.261 13.2
11.999 1938379 C16H22O4 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methyl propyl) ester Benzoic acids and derivatives 278.152 1.6
12.23 2357663 C17H34O2. Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester Fatty acid esters 270.256 2
12.374 883009 C15H24O3Si2 Cinnamic acid, p-(trimethyl siloxy)-, trimethylsilyl ester Cinnamic acids and derivatives 308.126 0.7
12.581 1084906 C14H32O5Si3 D-Arabinonic acid, 2,3,5-tris-O-(trimethylsilyl)-, gamma. -lactone Lactones 364.156 0.9
12.825 2659800 C19H40O2Si Hexadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester Organosilicon compounds 328.28 2.2
13.212 2319358 C17H42O5Si4 D-Xylopyranose, 1,2,3,4-tetrakis-O-(trimethylsilyl)- Monosaccharides 438.211 1.9
13.7 6429101 C20H36O3Si2 (4-hydroxyphenyl) octanoic acid, di-TMS Fatty acid, Phenoxy compounds 380.22 5.4
13.825 2246851 C20H30O2Si2 3,6-Dioxa-2,7-disilaoctane, 2,2,7,7-tetramethyl-4,5-diphenyl-,- Organosilicon compounds 358.178 1.9
14.489 2157183 C19H36O5Si3 Benzenepropanoic acid, alpha.,4-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]–, trimethylsilyl ester Fatty acid, Phenoxy compounds 398.176 1.8
15.102 6580849 C13H16O4 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester Benzoic acids and derivatives 278.152 5.5

Fig 1. Structures of the methanolic compounds obtained from the GC-MS analysis.

Fig 1

Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant properties of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. were estimated versus the ascorbic acid using a DPPH assay (Fig 2). The obtained results showed strong antioxidant activity for the methanolic extract. The scavenging activity was noticed at concentrations > 6 μg/mL, where the highest scavenging activity (41%) was recorded at the concentration of 100 μg/mL, compared to 98% at the same concentration of ascorbic acid.

Fig 2. DPPH assay of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers.

Fig 2

Antimicrobial activity

The methanolic extract of O. ficus indica (L.) Mill. flowers exhibited remarkable antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria and fungi. The extract was most effective against Aspergillus brasiliensis, which inhibited growth at MIC 0.625 mg/mL and was killed at MFC 2.5 mg/mL. The optimum MICs against other tested fungi (Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were obtained at a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL. The MBCs and MFCs obtained at a concentration of 5 mg/mL was optimal for S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. cerevisiae, while for C. albicans, it was 2.5 mg/mL. Indeed, it is evident that the extract has better antifungal than antibacterial activity (Table 2).

Table 2. MBC and MIC of different strains treated with the methanolic extract of O. ficus indica (L.) Mill. flowers.

Organism MICs (mg/mL) MBCs and MFCs (mg/mL)
E. coli 1.25 5
P. aeruginosa 1.25 5
S. aureus 1.25 5
S. cerevisiae 1.25 5
C. albicans 1.25 2.5
A. brasiliensis 0.625 2.5

Anticancer properties

Cytotoxic activity

In the current study, the anticancer properties of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers were evaluated against three cell lines: MCF-7 (breast), MDA-MB-231 (breast), and HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) cells. The cytotoxic analysis of the cells treated with serial dilutions of the extract revealed a significant decline in cellular viability, while the cellular toxicity levels were highest at the highest concentration (Fig 3). The inhibition concentrations at 50% of cellular viability (IC50) were calculated for all cell lines. The results showed that MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 had IC50s of 10 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL, respectively, whereas HepG2 cells had a higher IC50 of 80 μg/mL (Fig 3A). Paclitaxel, which was used as a positive control, showed IC50 values of 6.3 μg/mL, 7 μg/mL, and 9.3 μg/mL against MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and HEPG2, respectively (Fig 3B).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Cytotoxic activity of (A) O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and (B) Paclitaxel as a positive control. The IC50 was evaluated against MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and HEPG2 cell lines.

Apoptosis assay

The proapoptotic properties of the plant extract were assessed by flow cytometry to investigate the apoptotic or necrotic behavior using the principle of Annexin V for the detection of apoptosis level and propidium iodide (PI) for necrosis (Fig 4). For each cell line, the cells treated with the extract at the IC50 concentration were compared to the untreated cells. As shown in Fig 4A, the results revealed that the extract induced significant early apoptosis in all cell lines. Furthermore, for HepG2 and MCF-7 cells, a portion of the cells underwent late apoptosis behavior or was completely dead at the IC50 dose. The total apoptotic effects were calculated for each cell line by combing both early and late apoptosis percentages as follows; HepG2 (~49%), MCF-7 (28%), and MDA-MB-231 (25%) (Fig 4B).

Fig 4. Annexin V/PI assay of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers against different cancer cell lines.

Fig 4

(A) Dot plots of the flow cytometric analysis of the treated and untreated cells; the quadrant was set to indicate the live cells (lower left corner), early apoptosis (lower right corner), late apoptosis (upper right corner), and necrosis (upper left corner). (B) A graphic bar chart to show the percentages of total apoptosis (early and late apoptosis) of IC50-treated and untreated cells. *** indicated the statistical significance of the results at a P-value <0.001 compared to control untreated cells.

Cell cycle assay

To study if O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. was able to induce any significant cell cycle arrest in the tested cells, the cell cycle analysis was evaluated using the PI staining protocol and flow cytometry (Fig 5). A significant increase in the levels of the S phase was noticed in the treated HepG2 cells at 1.58% compared to 0.53% in the control cells (p < 0.05). In the breast cancer cell lines, we couldn’t detect any significant cell cycle arrest; however, there were strong elevations of the sub-G1 levels. That might illustrate the cytotoxic activity of that extract in the tested cell lines.

Fig 5. Cell cycle assay of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers against different cancer cell lines.

Fig 5

(A) Histograms of the flowcytometric analysis of the treated and untreated cells; four areas were marked to indicate the cell cycle stages of G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases, in addition to the sub-G1 region. (B) A graphic bar chart to express the percentages of all cell cycle stages of the treated and control cells. (C) A graphic bar chart to express the percentages of cell cycle stages included in the cellular arrest for each cell line.

ROS assay

ROS analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers to act as a prooxidant agent against cancer cells by increasing ROS production. The results showed a clear shift in the DCFDA histogram peaks of the treated HepG2 and MCF-7 cells compared to the untreated control. That indicated the oxidative stress by increasing the early production of ROS at 24 hours, which reduced the non-fluorescent H2DCFDA compound to a green fluorescent DCFDA compound (Fig 6). MDA-MB-231 had a very slight shifting of the fluorescent DCFDAA compared to the untreated cells.

Fig 6. ROS assay of the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers against different cancer cell lines.

Fig 6

DCFDA and flow cytometry were used to assess the oxidative stress in the cells treated with the IC50 concentration of the plant extract. (A) HepG2; (B) MCF-7; (C) MDA-MB-231.

Western blot analysis

To validate the above-mentioned results of the anticancer activities of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers, western blot analysis was used to investigate the change in the expression levels of some cellular proteins involved in the apoptotic pathway. The immunoblotting analysis was performed against the tumor suppressor protein p53, the apoptotic mediator protein caspase 3, and the regulator of cell cycle progression, cyclin D1. All experiments were evaluated against the housekeeping protein β-actin (Fig 7). In HepG2 and MCF-7, the plant extract drove the cells towards apoptosis by increasing the expression levels of p53. The cell cycle arrest was activated in these cell lines by a significant increase in the levels of cyclin D1 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the reduction of apoptosis suppression by increasing the levels of caspase 3 was remarkable in HepG2 and MCF-7. For MDA-MB-231, the levels of p53 significantly increased in the cells treated with the plant extract, whereas no significant changes were produced in the levels of cyclin D1 and caspase 3.

Fig 7. Immunoblotting analysis of cells treated with the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers at the IC50 concentration.

Fig 7

(A) Western blot results for each cell line. (B) A graphic bar chart to show the changes in the intensity levels of the studied proteins in the IC50-treated and untreated cells. *** indicated the statistical significance of the results at a P <0.001 compared to control untreated cells.

Network pharmacology

Screening of candidate ingredients

Five active metabolites present in O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. were identified using SwissTarget, the BindingDB server, and ADMET Lab 2.0. Following these screening procedures, a total of four metabolites and 261 targets were identified. Upon integration with the targets associated with breast cancer (2579) and liver cancer (1543), sourced from the DisGeNET database using FunRich 3.1.3 software’s Venn diagram intersection, 148 common targets were identified, depicted in Fig 8. Ultimately, four metabolites from O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. were found to be linked with these shared targets as active constituents.

Fig 8. Venn diagram of active metabolites (AM) targets and disease targets [breast cancer (BC) and liver cancer (LC)].

Fig 8

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction and analysis

Selecting the species "human" from the String database resulted in a network graph with 145 nodes and 1674 edges (Fig 9). Using the TSV file produced from this website and the cytoHubba plug-in Cytoscape, the top ten genes are SRC, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3CD, JAK2, EGFR, IGF1R, MET, KDR, and STAT3 (Fig 10 and S5 Table).

Fig 9. PPI network of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. used as potential targets for breast and liver cancers.

Fig 9

Fig 10. O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. metabolites target network.

Fig 10

The green polygon is for O. ficus-indica, the blue rectangles are for metabolites, the orange circles are for the top ten ranked targets by the PPI network, and the yellow circles are for the rest.

Three of these genes, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, and PIK3CD, are anticancer-related targets of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. These genes interconnect, interact, and collaborate to suppress the development of breast and liver tumors (Fig 10). This suggested that O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. has an anticancer role against breast or liver cancer since the network regulates the key genes.

GO and KEGG pathway analysis of candidate targets

Enrichment analysis of the 148 identified candidate targets was conducted using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) through Funrich and ShinyGO 0.77. The analysis encompassed three main aspects: cellular components, molecular functions, and biological processes. Selection criteria for each aspect were based on a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Noteworthy cellular components, molecular functions, and biological processes were singled out based on higher enrichment scores (>5), depicted in Fig 11 and S6 Table.

Fig 11. GO enrichment analysis of results for cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill.

Fig 11

The histogram representation revealed the predominant involvement of candidate targets in processes such as protein phosphorylation, negative regulation of apoptosis, and up-regulation of gene expression, among others. Molecular functions exhibited participation in ATP binding, protein serine/threonine kinase activity, and enzyme binding, among others. Cellular components were predominantly associated with the cytosol, plasma membrane, and cytoplasm. The top 20 pathways, significant at P < 0.05, were visualized through a bubble diagram (Fig 12 and S7 Table), highlighting several cancer-related signaling pathways. Notably, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway emerged as the most significant (Fig 12).

Fig 12. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of results for cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill.

Fig 12

Further examination of the pathway (Fig 13), sourced from KEGG, elucidated its involvement in regulating protein synthesis, glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, cell cycle, and apoptosis. Additionally, it illustrated synergistic regulation and crosstalk between the NF-ĸB and p53 pathways. These findings suggest a potential antitumor role of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. against breast and liver cancer by modulating the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway [6365].

Fig 13. PI3K-Akt pathway.

Fig 13

Molecular docking

To further elucidate the active constituents and their potential targets and mechanisms in treating either breast or liver cancer sourced from O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill., the most prominent core target, PI3K, identified through an analysis of the protein-protein interaction network, KEGG pathways, and GO enrichment, was chosen for a virtual screening docking simulation study against four active metabolites of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software. The findings revealed interactions between all four active metabolites and the core target. Notably, the metabolite with the highest binding affinity to PI3K (CID: 20393) exhibited a binding score of -6.6382 kcal/mol, forming two hydrogen bonds and one ionic interaction with the amino acid residue Lys802 (Table 3 and Fig 14). Compounds (CID: 5366701) and (CID: 520339) demonstrated moderate binding scores of -6.5918 and -6.5911 kcal/mol, respectively, with binding modes involving hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions with Lys802 and Ile848 residues. Conversely, metabolite (CID: 601548) exhibited the weakest binding affinity among the series, with a binding score of -5.2800 kcal/mol, characterized by only one weak hydrophobic interaction with the Asp933 residue (Table 3).

Table 3. Docking simulation results of active metabolites against the PI3K enzyme.

Active metabolites PubChem ID (CID) Binding Score kcal/mol Key amino acid residues Type of binding
20393 -6.6382 Lys802 2 H-Bonds, Ionic
5366701 -6.5918 lle848 Hydrophobic
Lys802 H-Bond
520339 -6.5911 lle848 Hydrophobic
Lys802 H-Bond
601548 -5.2800 Asp933 Hydrophobic

Fig 14. The 2D binding of the active metabolites with a standard PI3K enzyme inhibitor.

Fig 14

A) (A) CID: 20393, (B) CID: 5366701, (C) CID: 520339, (D) CID: 601548, and (E) 2D binding interactions of the co-crystallized ligand of PI3K.

Discussion

Cancer, including breast cancer, ranks among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, particularly affecting women and contributing to premature death [25, 66, 67]. Despite its widespread use, chemotherapy, the primary cancer treatment, is associated with well-documented side effects [68]. Consequently, there is a concerted effort to develop novel therapeutic strategies utilizing alternative compounds to improve treatment outcomes [69]. Natural products, akin to chemotherapy, are pivotal in both cancer prevention and treatment [70], owing to the diverse array of phytochemicals present in plants that exhibit potent anticancer properties.

The GC-MS analysis of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower extract led to 25 compounds. The highest percentages of methanolic constituents were occupied by 1,2,3-tris-(trimethylsilanyloxy)-propane (42.5%), followed by D-fructose and 1,3,4,5,6-pentakis-O-(trimethylsilyl)- (13.2%). Organosilicon compounds represent 57.5% of the total compounds, followed by fatty acid derivatives (17.5%) and monosaccharides and carbohydrates (16.3%). Following these findings, 35 compounds were detected in the GC-MS analysis of the leaves and stem methanolic extracts of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. with a similar classification of polysaccharides and fatty acids [71]. Another study showed that the seed oil of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. had antibacterial activity against S. cerevisiae and E. coli, anticancer activity against the PC-3 cells (prostate carcinoma) and the A2780 cell line (ovarian carcinoma), and antiviral activity against the herpes simplex type (2HSV-2) virus [47]. However, malic, quinic, and aconitic acids are known as the most abundant organic acids in the peels and cladodes of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill.; they were not detected in the flowers or seeds [37]. On the other hand, gallic acid and caffeic acid derivatives were detected in the flower extracts [37], which are known for their antimicrobial [72] and anticancer properties [73, 74].

Some of the newly discovered compounds had previously been studied for their anticancer activities. Previous studies showed that cinnamic acid derivatives had potential antibacterial [75], autophagy [76], anthelmintic [77], anti-inflammatory, and anti-tyrosinase activities [78], besides their sustainability to reduce the effects of carcinogenic chemicals such as furan and α-dicarbonyl compounds [79]. A previous study showed that gluconic acid derivatives might affect the tumor prognosis by reducing the pH, which increases the acidity of the tumor microenvironment [80]. Poly- and mono-saccharides of glucuronic acid, xylose, galactose, mannose, arabinose, or ribose were considered anticancer polysaccharides because of their immunomodulatory activity, safety usage, and few side effects [81]. Another study showed that the propanoic acid 2,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester might be responsible for the antiangiogenic potential and anticancer activities of the Rumex vesicarius stem extract [82].

Numerous investigations have been conducted on the cactus pear fruit owing to its methanolic compounds’ antioxidant properties, which are crucial for safeguarding human health against degenerative ailments such as cancer, diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, arteriosclerosis, and gastrointestinal issues [8385]. Studies on human Jurkat T-cell strains have demonstrated that the poly-methanolic compounds derived from O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. induce hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane and augment the intracellular calcium pool [86]. In this study, we assessed the anticancer potential of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. against various cell lines, with IC50 values of 5 μg/mL for MCF-7, 10 μg/mL for MDA-MB-232, and 80 μg/mL for HEPG2, respectively. Previous research has indicated that the alkaloid extract from Opuntia species exhibits significant cytotoxic effects on MCF-7 cells while displaying minimal cytotoxicity towards normal cell lines [87]. Another study indicated that the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. peel had significant anticancer activity against MDA-MB-231 and HepG2 cancer cell lines with IC50 values of 2.00 ± 0.19 and 3.85 ± 0.24, respectively [88]. Additionally, another study highlighted the impact of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. fruit methanolic extract and its betalain pigment, indicaxanthin, on the proliferation of the human colon cancer cell line Caco2 [34].

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance, one of the major drawbacks of the intensive use of antimicrobial agents, including antibiotics and antifungals, necessitates the search for natural compounds with antimicrobial activity to overcome the harmful effects of these microorganisms. For these reasons, in this study, the methanolic extract of the flowers of a famous medicinal plant, O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill., was tested against different microorganisms, including gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus), gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa), and fungi (C. albicans, A. brasiliensis, and S. cerevisiae). This study revealed that this extract provided a promising antimicrobial property for all tested organisms. Our findings were consistent with previous studies that illustrated the antimicrobial potency of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. extracts in a variety of solvents against different bacterial and fungal strains such as S. aureus, Bacillus subtilis, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumonia, and E. coli [8992]. It was reported in a recent study that O. ficus indica (L.) Mill. extracts can inhibit the growth of S. aureus, Salmonella typhi, Helicobacter pylori, and E. coli, with the highest antibacterial activity against S. aureus and low activity seen against Salmonella typhi [90]. Another study showed that the ethanolic extract of the O. ficus indica (L.) Mill. has excellent antimicrobial activity against E. coli isolated from patients with UTI [93].

Our investigation underscores the antifungal efficacy of the O. ficus indica (L.) Mill. extract, particularly notable against A. brasiliensi. Similarly, preceding research has documented robust antimicrobial attributes of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. oil against yeasts (Candida parapsilosis and Candida sake) and fungi (Aspergillus niger, Penicillium digitatum, and Fusarium oxysporum) [94]. Another study delineated the antimicrobial potency of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. oil against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, S. cerevisiae, and Penicillium digitatu, albeit with Aspergillus niger displaying the highest resistance to O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. oil among other species [47]. Researchers attribute the antimicrobial attributes of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. to the presence of phytochemicals in the tested plant extracts, including methanolic, flavonoids, and carotenoids. Nonetheless, variations in the chemical composition of these phytochemicals, diverse mechanisms of action of their bioactive constituents, varied concentrations, potential interactions with other components, and even the extraction method contribute to differences in antimicrobial activity [95, 96].

In our study, the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers exhibited robust antioxidant activity, likely attributed to the presence of methanolic compounds, tocopherols, and sterols. Similar observations have been made in previous investigations regarding the free radical scavenging activities of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. seed oil [47, 97], fruit [98], and flowers [21]. Additionally, Lu et al. (2019) demonstrated that the pectin polysaccharides and antioxidant activity of the flower extract augment the medicinal utility of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. in traditional Chinese medicine [99].

The methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers demonstrated promising anticancer effects, eliciting a potential proapoptotic response and inducing cell cycle arrest in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and HepG2 cells. Furthermore, treatment with the extract resulted in prooxidant activity in MCF-7 and HepG2 cells, characterized by increased oxidative stress and ROS production. Concurrently, expression levels of p53, caspase 3, and cyclin D1 were upregulated in MCF-7 and HepG2 cells. Consistent with our findings, prior studies have shown that isorhamnetin glycosides or cladode flour extracts of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. induce cytotoxic activities against colon cancer cell lines HT29 and Caco-2 via apoptosis modulation through the caspase cascade [35]. Another study indicated a dose-dependent apoptotic effect of the methanolic fruit extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. against Caco-2 cells by upregulating the tumor suppressor gene p16INK4a [34]. Similarly, the chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562 underwent apoptotic behavior following treatment with betanin derived from O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. fruits [100]. Additionally, alkaline fractions of the fruit extract induced cytotoxic activities against HT-29 and Caco2 cells, accompanied by an increase in caspase 3 levels [35]. Moreover, the methanolic extract of the fruit enhanced ROS levels in ovarian cancer cells (OVCA420, SKOV3), demonstrating significant proapoptotic properties mediated through the NF-κB/p-SAPK/JNK/p-AKT signaling pathway [36]. Kim et al. (2015) demonstrated significant cytotoxicity of different extracts of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. stems against SW480 colon and MCF7 breast cancer cells, evidenced by reduced COX-2 expression levels and an elevated Bax/Bcl2 ratio indicative of apoptosis [101].

Moreover, the utilization of network pharmacology and the PPI network approach elucidated the significance of three pivotal genes (PIK3CA, PIK3CB, and PIK3CD) as potential anticancer targets associated with O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. These genes form the central axis of the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, primarily regulating processes such as protein synthesis, glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, metabolism, cell cycle, and apoptosis. Additionally, this pathway facilitates synergistic and regulated cross-talk between the NF-ĸB and p53 pathways. These findings align with biological assay studies, demonstrating O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. potential proapoptotic effects and ability to induce cell cycle arrest in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and HepG2 cells, suggest a significant role for O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. in treating breast and liver cancers by modulating the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Molecular docking simulations further validated the impact of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. active ingredients on their presumed target, PI3K, as a potential mechanism for breast or liver cancer treatment. Remarkably, the highly bound active metabolite (CID: 20393) was successfully bound to PI3K, specifically to the key amino acid residue Lys802, validating its potential inhibitory effect on the target enzyme and supporting its anticancer properties [102]. These studies, coupled with our findings, underscore the potential cytotoxicity and anticancer activities of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill.

This study shows that O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower extract has promising antioxidant, antibacterial, and anticancer effects, however, there are still significant limitations. While the in vitro results are promising, the bioavailability, metabolism, and toxicity of the substances in vivo are unclear, necessitating additional research and clinical trials to establish their safety and efficacy in humans. Furthermore, differences in plant growth circumstances and extraction processes can affect chemical composition, resulting in inconsistent results. Standardization of these processes is required to ensure reproducibility. Molecular docking suggests potential anticancer pathways, particularly via the PI3K-Akt pathway, although these hypotheses require experimental validation. The extract’s selectivity for cancer cells over normal cells was not adequately investigated, raising worries about potential adverse effects. The study also focused on a small number of microbes and cancer cell lines; therefore, expanding the research to include other pathogens and cancer types, as well as investigating combinations with existing treatments, would provide a more complete knowledge of the extract’s therapeutic potential. Overall, the results are encouraging, but more research is needed to confirm the clinical significance and safety of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers.

Conclusion

Owing to the phytochemical constituents play an important role in biological activities, O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flower extract has many bioactive compounds that reveal significant antibacterial and antifungal activities against tested microorganisms. Thus, the current study emphasized that O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. flowers act as natural sources and could be used as alternative eco-friendly antimicrobial agents to control clinical bacterial and fungal pathogens. Moreover, analysis of the phytochemical profiles obtained from the methanolic extract of O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. suggested potential therapeutic effects against breast and liver cancer. This effect may be mediated by a group of key genes, including SRC, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3CD, JAK2, EGFR, IGF1R, MET, KDR, and STAT3, through various pathways such as the PI3K-Akt pathway. These findings were elucidated using combined network pharmacology and molecular docking methods. Further investigations are warranted to validate the mechanistic pathways through which O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill. exhibits its biological activities in vivo.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The active metabolites of O. ficus-indica and their drug-likeness and oral bioavailability using ADMET Lab 2.0.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s001.xlsx (30.4KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. The prediction of the biological targets by the binding DB server, the Swiss target prediction web tool, and the UniProt database.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s002.xlsx (295.7KB, xlsx)
S3 Table. Results of the DisGeNET database for cancer-associated genes of O. ficus-indica using the key terms breast cancer and liver cancer.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s003.xlsx (248.1KB, xlsx)
S4 Table. Top ten in network string interactions short (2) ranked by MCC method.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s004.xlsx (10.3KB, xlsx)
S5 Table. GO enrichment analysis of results for cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s005.xlsx (12.1KB, xlsx)
S6 Table. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of results for breast and liver cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s006.xlsx (13.1KB, xlsx)
S7 Table. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of results for breast and liver cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s007.xlsx (11KB, xlsx)
S1 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s008.tiff (625.5KB, tiff)
S2 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s009.tiff (2.1MB, tiff)
S3 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s010.tiff (58.1KB, tiff)
S4 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s011.tiff (72.4KB, tiff)

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Research supporting project number (RSP2024R114), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The research was supported by a grant from the Research Supporting Project Number (RSP2024R114), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

References

  • 1.Badraoui R, Siddiqui AJ, Bardakci F, Ben-Nasr H. Ethnopharmacology and ethnopharmacognosy: Current perspectives and future prospects. In: Adnan M, Patel M, Snoussi M, editors. Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology of medicinal and aromatic plants, steps towards drug discovery. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oyebode O, Kandala NB, Chilton PJ, Lilford RJ. Use of traditional medicine in middle-income countries: a WHO-SAGE study. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(8):984–991. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Duraipandiyan V, Ayyanar M, Ignacimuthu S. Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Efferth T. Editorial: Chemoprevention of cancer by natural products. Cancer Lett. 2019;459:13–14. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sauter ER. Cancer prevention and treatment using combination therapy with natural compounds. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2020;13(3):265–285. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1738218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sak K. Anticancer action of plant products: changing stereotyped attitudes. Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2022;3(4):423–427. doi: 10.37349/etat.2022.00092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mahmoud T, Gairola S. Traditional knowledge and use of medicinal plants in the Eastern Desert of Egypt: a case study from Wadi El-Gemal National Park. J Med Plants 2013;1(6): 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bodeker G, Ong C-K, Grundy C, Burford G, Shein K, et al. WHO global atlas of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. Kobe, Japan: WHO Centre for Health Development. 2005; Volume 1. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/43108 (accessed on December 2023).
  • 9.Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109(7):309–318. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Friedman ND, Temkin E, Carmeli Y. The negative impact of antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(5):416–422. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022; 399 (10325):629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.WHO. Antimicrobial resistance. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on December 2023).
  • 13.O’Neill, J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. 2016. https://apo.org.au/node/63983 (accessed on December 2023).
  • 14.WHO. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed (accessed on December 2023).
  • 15.Hailu W, Helmy YA, Carney-Knisely G, Kauffman M, Fraga D, Rajashekara G. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of foodborne pathogens isolated from dairy cattle and poultry manure amended farms in northeastern Ohio, the United States. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(12):1450. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miethke M, Pieroni M, Weber T, Brönstrup M, Hammann P, Halby L, et al. Towards the sustainable discovery and development of new antibiotics. Nat Rev Chem. 2021;5(10):726–749. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00313-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vaou N, Stavropoulou E, Voidarou C, Tsigalou C, Bezirtzoglou E. Towards advances in medicinal plant antimicrobial activity: A Review study on challenges and future perspectives. Microorganisms. 2021;9(10):2041. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9102041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nortjie E, Basitere M, Moyo D, Nyamukamba P. Extraction Methods, Quantitative and qualitative phytochemical screening of medicinal plants for antimicrobial textiles: A review. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(15):2011. doi: 10.3390/plants11152011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reddy S, Barathe P, Kaur K, Anand U, Shriram V, Kumar V. Antimicrobial resistance and medicinal plant products as potential alternatives to antibiotics in animal husbandry In: Kumar V, Shriram V, Paul A, Thakur M. editors. Antimicrobial resistance: Underlying mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Springer; 2022. pp. 357–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mohamed NFR, Geetha R, Ganesh PS. In vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial activity of Opuntia ficus-indica seed oil. J Pharm Res Int. 2021; 33(74B):490–496. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i47B33148 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ammar I, Bardaa S, Mzid M, Sahnoun Z, Rebaii T, Attia, et al. Antioxidant, antibacterial and in vivo dermal wound healing effects of Opuntia flower extracts. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;81:483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Amrane-Abider M, Imre M, Herman V, Debbou-Iouknane N, Zemouri-Alioui S, Khaled S, et al. Bioactive compounds and in vitro antioxidant and anticoccidial activities of Opuntia ficus-indica flower extracts. Biomedicines. 2023;11(8):2173. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fiad M, El-Masry R, Gomaa A, Awad A. Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of Opuntia ficus-indica, seeds and peels extracts. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020;47(2):587–596. doi: 10.21608/zjar.2020.94497 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chavda VP, Nalla LV, Balar P, Bezbaruah R, Apostolopoulos V, Singla RK, et al. Advanced phytochemical-based nanocarrier systems for the treatment of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(4):1023. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Omara T, Kiprop AK, Ramkat RC, Cherutoi J, Kagoya S, Moraa Nyangena D, et al. Medicinal plants used in traditional management of cancer in Uganda: A Review of ethnobotanical surveys, phytochemistry, and anticancer studies. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:3529081. doi: 10.1155/2020/3529081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abou-Elella FM, Ali RFM. Antioxidant and anticancer activities of different constituents extracted from Egyptian prickly pear Cactus (Opuntia Ficus-Indica) Peel. Biochem Anal Biochem.. 2014;3(2):1000158. doi: 10.4172/2161-1009.1000158 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Harlev E, Nevo E, Solowey E, Bishayee A. Cancer preventive and curative attributes of plants of the Cactaceae family: A review. Planta Med. 2013;79(9):713–722. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kinoshita K, Yang Y, Koyama K, Takahashi K, Nishino H. Inhibitory effect of some triterpenes from cacti on 32Pi-incorporation into phospholipids of HeLa cells promoted by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Phytomedicine. 1999;6(2):73–77. doi: 10.1016/s0944-7113(99)80038-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Malek SN, Shin SK, Wahab NA, Yaacob H. Cytotoxic components of Pereskia bleo (Kunth) DC. (Cactaceae) leaves. Molecules. 2009;14(5):1713–1724. doi: 10.3390/molecules14051713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nurestri AS, Sim K, Norhanom A. Phytochemical and cytotoxic investigations of Pereskia grandifolia Haw.(Cactaceae) leaves. J Biol Sci. 2009;9(5):488–493. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2009.488.493 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Becer E, Kabadayı H, Meriçli F, Meriçli AH, Kıvançlı B, Vatansever S. Apoptotic effects of Opuntia ficus indica L. seed oils on colon adenocarcinoma cell lines. Proceedings. 2018; 2(25):1566. doi: 10.3390/proceedings2251566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Okur ME, Karakaş N, Karadağ AE, Uludağ D, Polat D.Ç. Investigation of antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. fruit extract. Istanbul J Pharm 2019; 9 (3):154–160. doi: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2019.19035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chavez-Santoscoy RA, Gutierrez-Uribe JA, Serna-Saldívar SO. Phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity and in vitro cancer cell cytotoxicity of nine prickly pear (Opuntia spp.) juices. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2009;64(2):146–152. doi: 10.1007/s11130-009-0117-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Naselli F, Tesoriere L, Caradonna F, Bellavia D, Attanzio A, Gentile C, et al. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of whole extract and isolated indicaxanthin from Opuntia ficus-indica associated with re-activation of the onco-suppressor p16(INK4a) gene in human colorectal carcinoma (Caco-2) cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450(1):652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Antunes-Ricardo M, Moreno-García BE, Gutiérrez-Uribe JA, Aráiz-Hernández D, Alvarez MM, Serna-Saldivar SO. Induction of apoptosis in colon cancer cells treated with isorhamnetin glycosides from Opuntia ficus-indica pads. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2014;69(4):331–336. doi: 10.1007/s11130-014-0438-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Feugang JM, Ye F, Zhang DY, Yu Y, Zhong M, Zhang S, et al. Cactus pear extracts induce reactive oxygen species production and apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Nutr Cancer. 2010;62(5):692–699. doi: 10.1080/01635581003605508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang J, Rani N, Jakhar S, Redhu R, Kumar S, Kumar S, et al. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.—anticancer properties and phytochemicals: current trends and future perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1236123. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1236123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cragg GM, Grothaus PG, Newman DJ. Impact of natural products on developing new anti-cancer agents. Chem Rev. 2009;109(7):3012–3043. doi: 10.1021/cr900019j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Y, Xin H, Li W, Shen N, Cui Y. Ginkgo biloba endopleura: An unexplored industrial waste as a potential source of flavonoids, lipids and anti-lung cancer compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022;189(11):115851. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115851 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meng XY, Zhang HX, Mezei M, Cui M. Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2011;7(2):146–157. doi: 10.2174/157340911795677602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mahato N, Sinha M, Sharma K, Koteswararao R, Cho MH. Modern extraction and purification techniques for obtaining high purity food-grade bioactive compounds and value-added co-products from citrus wastes. Foods. 2019;8(11):523. doi: 10.3390/foods8110523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Djoumbou Feunang Y, Eisner R, Knox C, Chepelev L, Hastings J, Owen G, et al. ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy. J Cheminform. 2016;8:61. doi: 10.1186/s13321-016-0174-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sadgrove NJ, Padilla-González GF, Phumthum M. Fundamental Chemistry of Essential Oils and Volatile Organic Compounds, Methods of Analysis and Authentication. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(6):789. doi: 10.3390/plants11060789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liang N, Kitts DD. Antioxidant property of coffee components: assessment of methods that define mechanisms of action. Molecules. 2014;19(11):19180–19208. doi: 10.3390/molecules191119180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ramírez-Moreno E, Cariño-Cortés R, Cruz-Cansino NdS, Delgado-Olivares L, Ariza-Ortega JA, Montañez-Izquierdo VY, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of cactus pear (Opuntia) seed oils. J Food Qual. 2017;2017(1):3075907. doi: 10.1155/2017/3075907 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aruwa C, Amoo S, Kudanga T. Extractable and macromolecular antioxidants of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes: Phytochemical profiling, antioxidant and antibacterial activities. S Afr J Bot. 2019;125:402–10. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.08.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alqurashi AS, Al Masoudi LM, Hamdi H, Abu Zaid A. Chemical composition and antioxidant, antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial and anticancer potentials of Opuntia ficus-indica seed oil. Molecules. 2022;27(17):5453. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Orellana EA, Kasinski AL. Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay in cell culture to investigate cell proliferation. Bio Protoc. 2016;6(21):e1984. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lakshmanan I, Batra SK. Protocol for Apoptosis Assay by Flow Cytometry Using Annexin V Staining Method. Bio Protoc. 2013;3(6):e374. doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.El-Wetidy MS, Ahmad R, Rady I, Helal H, Rady MI, Vaali-Mohammed M-A, et al. Urolithin A induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by inhibiting Bcl-2, increasing p53-p21 proteins and reactive oxygen species production in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2021;26(3):473–493. doi: 10.1007/s12192-020-01189-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Degl’Innocenti D, Ramazzotti M, Sarchielli E, Monti D, Chevanne M, Vannelli GB, et al. Oxadiazon affects the expression and activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase and acylphosphatase in human striatal precursor cells: A possible role in neurotoxicity. Toxicology. 2019;411:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.10.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kim S, Cheng T, He S, Thiessen PA, Li Q, Gindulyte A, et al. PubChem Protein, Gene, Pathway, and Taxonomy Data Collections: Bridging Biology and Chemistry through Target-Centric Views of PubChem Data. J Mol Biol. 2022;434(11):167514. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xiong G, Wu Z, Yi J, Fu L, Yang Z, Hsieh C, et al. ADMETlab 2.0: an integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W5–W14. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Khan MRUZ, Trivedi V. Molecular modelling, docking and network analysis of phytochemicals from Haritaki churna: role of protein cross-talks for their action. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2220036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gfeller D, Grosdidier A, Wirth M, Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissTargetPrediction: a web server for target prediction of bioactive small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Web Server issue):W32–W38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pang T, Liu C, Yao J, Li J, Li Z, Lou H, et al. Mechanisms of the Bushen Huoxue formula in the treatment of osteoarthritis based on network pharmacology-molecular targets. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(32):e29345. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Abou-Taleb H.A, Sayed AM, Refaat H, Alsenani F, Alaaeldin E, Mokhtar FA, et al. Network pharmacological analysis of the red sea sponge Hyrtios erectus extract to reveal anticancer efficacy of corresponding loaded niosomes. Mar Drugs 2022;20(10):628. doi: 10.3390/md20100628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fonseka P, Pathan M, Chitti SV, Kang T, Mathivanan S. FunRich enables enrichment analysis of OMICs datasets. J Mol Biol. 2021;433(11):166747. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huang M, Yang S, Tai WCS, Zhang L, Zhou Y, Cho WCS, et al. Bioinformatics identification of regulatory genes and mechanism related to hypoxia-induced PD-L1 inhibitor resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):8720. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Molecular Operating Environment (MOE),2022.02 Chemical Computing Group ULC, 910–1010 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC H3A 2R7, Canada 2024. https://www.chemcomp.com/Research-Citing_MOE.htm. (accessed on 01 January 2024).
  • 61.Said MA, Albohy A, Abdelrahman MA, Ibarhim HS. Remdesivir analog as SARS-CoV-2 polymerase inhibitor: virtual screening of a database generated by scaffold replacement. RSC advances. 2022;12(35):22448–22457. doi: 10.1039/d2ra00486k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Said MA, Albohy A, Abdelrahman MA, Ibrahim HS. Importance of glutamine 189 flexibility in SARS-CoV-2 main protease: Lesson learned from in silico virtual screening of ChEMBL database and molecular dynamics. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;160:105744. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Noel B, Singh SK, Lillard JW Jr, Singh R. Role of natural compounds in preventing and treating breast cancer. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2020;12(1):137–160. doi: 10.2741/S544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Narayanankutty A. Natural Products as PI3K/ Akt Inhibitors: Implications in Preventing Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2021;14(5):760–769. doi: 10.2174/1874467214666210120152657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nurcahyanti ADR, Jap A, Lady J, Prismawan D, Sharopov F, Daoud R, et al. Function of selected natural antidiabetic compounds with potential against cancer via modulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR cascade. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;144:112138. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Singla RK, Wang X, Gundamaraju R, Joon S, Tsagkaris C, Behzad S, et al. Natural products derived from medicinal plants and microbes might act as a game-changer in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(33):11880–11924. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2097196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol. 2022;95(1130):20211033. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Prager GW, Braga S, Bystricky B, Qvortrup C, Criscitiello C, Esin E, et al. Global cancer control: responding to the growing burden, rising costs and inequalities in access. ESMO Open. 2018;3(2):e000285. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.de la Mare JA, Contu L, Hunter MC, Moyo B, Sterrenberg JN, Dhanani KC, et al. Breast cancer: current developments in molecular approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2014;9(2):153–75. doi: 10.2174/15748928113086660046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rani N, Singla RK, Redhu R, Narwal S, Sonia, Bhatt A. A Review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its role against cancer. Curr Top Med Chem. 2022;22(18):1460–1471. doi: 10.2174/1568026622666220601165005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Alghamdi A, Alshehri W, Sajer B, Ashkan M, Ashy R, Gashgari R, et al. Biological Activities and GC-MS Analysis of Aloe vera and Opuntia ficus-indica Extracts. J Chem. 2023;2023: 6504505. doi: 10.1155/2023/6504505 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kahkeshani N, Farzaei F, Fotouhi M, Alavi SS, Bahramsoltani R, Naseri R, et al. Pharmacological effects of gallic acid in health and diseases: A mechanistic review. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(3):225–237. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.32806.7897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bhattacharya S, Muhammad N, Steele R, Peng G, Ray RB. Immunomodulatory role of bitter melon extract in inhibition of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma growth. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):33202–9. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Slimen IB, Najar T, Abderrabba M. Opuntia ficus-indica as a source of bioactive and nutritional phytochemicals. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences (JFNS). 2016;4(6):162–169. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20160406.14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Deng Z, Li C, Luo D, Teng P, Guo Z, Tu X, et al. A new cinnamic acid derivative from plant-derived endophytic fungus Pyronema sp. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31(20):2413–2419. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1311890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Endo S, Hoshi M, Matsunaga T, Inoue T, Ichihara K, Ikari A. Autophagy inhibition enhances anticancer efficacy of artepillin C, a cinnamic acid derivative in Brazilian green propolis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497(1):437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mancilla-Montelongo G, Castañeda-Ramírez GS, Torres-Acosta JFJ, Sandoval-Castro CA, Borges-Argáez R. Evaluation of cinnamic acid and six analogues against eggs and larvae of Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2019;270:25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Taofiq O, Heleno SA, Calhelha RC, Fernandes IP, Alves M.J, Barros L, et al. Phenolic acids, cinnamic acid, and ergosterol as cosmeceutical ingredients: Stabilization by microencapsulation to ensure sustained bioactivity. Microchem J. 2019;147:469–477. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.03.059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lee SM, Zheng LW, Jung Y, Hwang GS, Kim YS. Effects of hydroxycinnamic acids on the reduction of furan and α-dicarbonyl compounds. Food Chem. 2020;312:126085. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fu LH, Qi C, Lin J, Huang P. Catalytic chemistry of glucose oxidase in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(17):6454–6472. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00891k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Guo R, Chen M, Ding Y, Yang P, Wang M, Zhang H, et al. Polysaccharides as Potential Anti-tumor Biomacromolecules -A Review. Front Nutr. 2022;9:838179. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.838179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Farooq M, Abutaha N, Mahboob S, Baabbad A, Almoutiri ND, Wadaan MAAM. Investigating the antiangiogenic potential of Rumex vesicarius (humeidh), anticancer activity in cancer cell lines and assessment of developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(2):611–622. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.11.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Walia A, Kumar N, Singh R, Kumar H, Kumar V, Kaushik R, et al. Bioactive compounds in ficus fruits, their bioactivities, and associated health benefits: a review. J Food Qual. 2022;6597092:1–19. doi: 10.1155/2022/6597092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Akacha A, Badraoui R, Rebai T, Zourgui L. Effect of Opuntia ficus indica extract on methotrexate-induced testicular injury: a biochemical, docking and histological study. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022;40(10):4341–4351. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1856187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Harrabi B, Ben Nasr H, Amri Z, Brahmi F, El Feki A, Zeghal K, et al. Chemical composition, nutritional value, antioxidative, and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities of Opuntia stricta cladode. ACS Omega. 2024;9(24):26724–26734. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Aires V, Adote S, Hichami A, Moutairou K, Boustani ES, Khan NA. Modulation of intracellular calcium concentrations and T cell activation by prickly pear polyphenols. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;260(1–2):103–110. doi: 10.1023/b:mcbi.0000026061.57326.28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Abdulazeem L, Al-Alaq FT, Alrubaei HA, Al-Mawlah YH, Alwan WK. Anti-cancer activity of Opuntia polyacantha alkaloid extract on human breast cancer cell line. J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;10(7):1753–1754. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Önem E, Kendir G, Akkoç S, Erzurumlu Y, Muhammed MT, Özaydın AG. Biochemical contents and antiquorum sensing, antiproliferative activities of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) mill. peel extract. South African Journal of Botany. 2022;150: 296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2022.07.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ennouri M, Ammar I, Khemakhem B, Attia H. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Opuntia ficus-indica f. inermis (cactus pear) flowers. J Med Food. 2014;17(8):908–914. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2013.0089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Iftikhar K, Siddique F, Ameer K, Arshad M, Kharal S, Mohamed Ahmed IA, et al. Phytochemical profiling, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities of hydroethanolic extracts of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) fruit and pulp. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;11(4):1916–1930. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bargougui A, Tag H.M, Bouaziz M, Triki S. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, total phenols and flavonoids content of four cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) cultivars. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2019;12(3):1353–1368. doi: 10.13005/bpj/1764 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.El-Beltagi H.S, Mohamed H.I, Elmelegy A.A, Eldesoky S.E, Safwat G. Phytochemical screening, antimicrobial, antiaxidant, anticancer activities and nutritional values of cactus (Opuntia ficus indicia) pulp and peel. Fresenius environmental bulletin. 2019; 28(2A):1534–1551. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pourmajed R, Jabbari Amiri M, Karami P, Khaledi A. Antimicrobial effect of Opuntia ficus-indica extract on Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(3):634–636. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Khémiri I, Essghaier Hédi B, Sadfi Zouaoui N, Ben Gdara N, Bitri L. The antimicrobial and wound healing potential of Opuntia ficus indica L. inermis extracted oil from Tunisia. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2019;2019: 9148782. doi: 10.1155/2019/9148782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mudzengi CP, Murwira A, Tivapasi M, Murungweni C, Burumu JV, Halimani T. Antibacterial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of selected species used in livestock health management. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):1054–1060. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1287744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Benramdane E, Chougui N, Ramos PAB, Makhloufi N, Tamendjari A, Silvestre AJD, et al. Lipophilic compounds and antibacterial activity of Opuntia ficus-indica root extracts from Algeria. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11161. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Gharby S, Harhar H, Charrouf Z, Bouzobaa Z, Boujghagh M, Zine S. Physicochemical composition and oxidative stability of Opuntia ficus-indica seed oil from Morocco. Acta Horticulturae. 2013;1(1067):83–88. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1067.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Butera D, Tesoriere L, Di Gaudio F, Bongiorno A, Allegra M, Pintaudi AM, et al. Antioxidant activities of sicilian prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) fruit extracts and reducing properties of its betalains: betanin and indicaxanthin. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(23):6895–901. doi: 10.1021/jf025696p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lu Y-M, Xie J-J, Peng C-G, Wang B-H, Wang K-C, Li L-J. Enhancing clinical efficacy through the gut microbiota: a new field of traditional Chinese medicine. Engineering. 2019;5(1):40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sreekanth D, Arunasree MK, Roy KR, Chandramohan Reddy T, Reddy GV, Reddanna P. Betanin a betacyanin pigment purified from fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica induces apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemia Cell line-K562. Phytomedicine. 2007;14(11):739–746. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2007.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kim J, Soh SY, Shin J, Cho CW, Choi YH, Nam SY. Bioactives in cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) stems possess potent antioxidant and pro-apoptotic activities through COX-2 involvement. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(13):2601–2606. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wang H, Wang Y, Li C, Wang H, Geng X, Hu B, et al. Structural basis for tailor-made selective PI3K α/β inhibitors: a computational perspective. New J Chem. 2021;45:373–382. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ04216A [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. The active metabolites of O. ficus-indica and their drug-likeness and oral bioavailability using ADMET Lab 2.0.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s001.xlsx (30.4KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. The prediction of the biological targets by the binding DB server, the Swiss target prediction web tool, and the UniProt database.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s002.xlsx (295.7KB, xlsx)
S3 Table. Results of the DisGeNET database for cancer-associated genes of O. ficus-indica using the key terms breast cancer and liver cancer.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s003.xlsx (248.1KB, xlsx)
S4 Table. Top ten in network string interactions short (2) ranked by MCC method.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s004.xlsx (10.3KB, xlsx)
S5 Table. GO enrichment analysis of results for cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s005.xlsx (12.1KB, xlsx)
S6 Table. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of results for breast and liver cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s006.xlsx (13.1KB, xlsx)
S7 Table. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of results for breast and liver cancer treatment of O. ficus-indica.

(XLSX)

pone.0313064.s007.xlsx (11KB, xlsx)
S1 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s008.tiff (625.5KB, tiff)
S2 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s009.tiff (2.1MB, tiff)
S3 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s010.tiff (58.1KB, tiff)
S4 Raw image

(TIFF)

pone.0313064.s011.tiff (72.4KB, tiff)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES