Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2024 Nov 4;4(11):e0002954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002954

The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021–2022

Samnang Um 1,2,*, Channnarong Phan 1, Leng Dany 3, Khun Veha 4, Soklim Pay 5, Darapheak Chau 1
Editor: Abdur Razzaque Sarker6
PMCID: PMC11534221  PMID: 39495756

Abstract

Health insurance is essential in reducing or eliminating the financial constraint to accessing maternal health services caused by out-of-pocket payments. Also, it has a beneficial effect in minimizing maternal and child mortality. However, limited studies in Cambodia examined the association between health insurance coverage on antenatal care (ANC) utilization. Therefore, this study has examined the effect of health insurance coverage on ANC utilization in Cambodia. We utilized data from the 2021–2022 Cambodia Demographic and Health Surveys (CDHS), analyzing a total sample of 3,162 weighted women who gave birth within two years. Multiple logistic regression model using STATA V17 to assess the association between health insurance coverage with women who attended four or more ANC visits. About 24.9% of the women had health insurance coverage during 2021–2022. Most (86.1%) of women attended four or more ANC visits. Women with health insurance coverage were statistically significantly associated with attending four or more ANC visits with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1–2.4). Other factors significantly associated with attending four or more ANC visits include women with higher education (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2–7.7), secondary education (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5–3.5), richest households (AOR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5–6.8), and richer households (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2–2.8). Pregnant women with health insurance coverage who had completed at least secondary education and had a better wealth index were more likely to attend at least four ANC visits. Thus, providing health insurance coverage and improving women’s economic and educational may be essential to improving women’s access to maternal health services in Cambodia.

Introduction

Cambodia’s maternal mortality rate has significantly declined in the past decade. Data from the 2021–2022 Cambodia Demographic and Health Surveys (CDHS) show that maternal mortality had declined dramatically, from 488 to 154 per 100,000 live births between 2000 and 2021–2022 [1,2]. By 2030, the global maternal death ratio is expected to drop to less than 70 per 100,000 live births, according to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3.1 [3]. This achievement can be attributed to the country’s concerted effort to increase women’s access to maternal health services, particularly the initiative to increase institutional births [4]. Institutional births dramatically increased, from 19.3% to 98%, while the proportion of pregnant women attending four or more antenatal care (ANC) appointments increased considerably, from 9% to 86.1%, between 2000 and 2021–2022 [5]. In several studies, women who had health insurance had higher rates of using maternal health treatments, such as timely ANC and attending four or more ANC visits [69].

In 2019, the total population of Cambodia was 15.55 million, with 17.8% living below the national poverty line [10]. Since 2016, Cambodia has been classified as a lower-middle-income country, with gross domestic product (GDP) per capita from 302 US dollars in 2000 to 1,625 US dollars in 2021 [11]. Also, current expenditures on health per capita significantly increased from 20 US dollars in 2000 to 116 US dollars in 2020 [12]. Globally, 50% of people cannot access essential health services, as the World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2017 [13].

Cambodian National Social Security Fund (NSSF) has provided health insurance coverage to formal sector workers [14]. And poor households are covered by the Health Equity Fund (HEF), the co-financing mechanism of the government and development partners [15]. By 2025, the government intends to expand the reach of the NSSF health insurance program to include the entire population [16]. Data from CDHS 2021–2022 indicated that 22% of women and 13% of men aged 15–49 years have any health insurance, respectively [5]. Health insurance coverage is expected to provide financial risk protection and reduce disparities in access by facilitating greater uptake of maternal health services [13]. To our knowledge, limited published peer-reviewed studies assess the association between health insurance coverage and access to maternal health services among women of reproductive age in Cambodia using updated data. One prior study on health insurance coverage and its impact on maternal healthcare utilization in low- and middle-income countries utilized data from CDHS 2010 [8]. This study included all women and men aged 15–49 and pooled Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data in 30 low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) [8]. An additional study aimed to assess levels of health insurance coverage in 30 LMICs and examines the impact of health insurance status on the use of maternal health care in eight countries spanning sub-Saharan Africa (Burundi et al., Namibia, and Rwanda), West Asia (Albania), and South and Southeast Asia (Cambodia and Indonesia) [8]. Several pieces of evidence on the effect of health insurance coverage on ANC utilization have been published [69,1719]. The results indicate that women with health insurance coverage had higher odds of attending four or more ANC visits than those without health insurance coverage [69,1719]. Moreover, those women who reported exposure to media, married women, those with high education, those living in wealthy economic families, those who are unemployed, and those living in urban areas were more likely to attend four or more ANC visits [69,1719]. Given the limited study addressing this health concern among Cambodian women aged 15–49, we examined the effects of health insurance coverage on ANC utilization among women who had a live birth in the past two years in Cambodia. The findings will provide a broader perspective on levels of health insurance coverage and the impact of health insurance status on the use of maternal health care in Cambodia. Additionally, the study will enable policymakers to understand health insurance coverage among the adult population and proffer suggestions for improving universal health coverage in Cambodia.

Material and methods

Ethical statement

The CDHS 2021–2022 is publicly available, with all personal identifiers of study participants removed. Permission to analyze the data was granted by registering with the DHS program website at (URL: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm). Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/guardian of each participant under 18 before data collection. The Cambodia National Ethics Committee for Human Health Research (NECHR) approved the data collection tools and procedures for CHDS 2021–2022 for Health Research on 10 May 2021 (Reference number: 83 NECHR), and ICF’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) in Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Data source

We used data from the most recent CDHS (2021–2022), a household survey conducted every five years nationally representative of the population [5]. The two-stage stratified cluster sampling method collected the samples from all provinces. At the first stage, clusters, or enumeration areas (EAs) that represent the entire country (urban and rural), are randomly selected from the sampling frame using probability proportional (PPS) to cluster size. In the second stage, a complete listing of households was selected from each cluster using an equal probability systematic sampling. Then, interviews were conducted with women aged 15–49 years who were born in the five years preceding the survey in the complete list of selected households [5]. In total, 19,496 women aged 15–49 who had given birth in the last five years were interviewed face-to-face, using the survey standard questionnaire to collect information from women on several health indicators such as maternal health care service utilization, maternal and child health, nutrition, and reproductive health services [5]. Overall, 15,046 women who had not given birth in the past two years were excluded. Data restriction resulted in women who had a live birth in the past two years in a final analytic sample of 3,292 women (3,162 weighted women).

Measurements

Outcome variable

This study’s outcome was the number of ANC visits during the last pregnancy among women aged 15–49 years (coded as 0 = less than 4 ANC visits, including women who reported no ANC visits, and 1 = four or more ANC visits) [6,18,20].

Independent variables

The primary independent variable is maternal health insurance coverage (coded as 0 = no (reference and 1 = yes), including public and private insurance. The confounding variables included maternal factors: Women’s age in years (coded as 1 = 15–30 (reference) and 2 = 31–49), marital status (coded as 1 = married (reference) and 2 = not married), birth order (coded as 1 = 1 (reference), 2 = 2–3, and 3 = 4 or more), education (coded as 0 = no education (reference), 1 = primary, and 2 = secondary or higher), occupation (coded as 0 = not working (reference), 1 = professional, 2 = sales or services, 3 = agricultural, and 4 = manual labor). Individual household factors, including the household wealth index (coded as 1 = poorest (reference), 2 = poorest, 3 = medium, 4 = richer, and 5 = richest), were calculated following the principal component analysis (PCA) [5]. Cambodia’s geographical regions were grouped into four categories (coded as 1 = Plains (reference), 2 = Tonle Sap, 3 = Coastal/Sea, and 4 = Mountains), and place of residences (coded as 1 = urban (reference) and 2 = rural) was defined based on Cambodia’s General Population Census 2019 and adapted from the original CDHS 2021–2022 [5,10].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 17 (StataCorp LLC). We applied for the DHS standard sampling weight variable (v005/1,000,000). Then, we used the survey-specific STATA command "svy" for descriptive and analytical analysis. Women’s socio-economic and demographic characteristics were described using weighted frequency and percentage distributions.

Bivariate analysis using Chi-square tests assessed the association between the variables of interest (maternal and individual household characteristics) and ANC visits. All independent variables associated with ANC use at p-value ≤ 0.10 or that had a potential confounder variable [6,18] were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the independent factors related to ANC use [26]. Multicollinearity between original independent variables was checked, including women’s age, number of children ever born, education, wealth index, occupation, marital status, health insurance coverage, and place of residence. The result of the evaluating variance inflation factor (VIF) scores after fitting an Ordinary Least Squares regression model with the mean value of VIF was 1.53, which is less than the cutoff point, indicating no collinearity correlation among the independent variables [27].

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Table 1 describes the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the 3,162 women aged 15–49. The mean age was 22.2 years old (SD = 4.2 years); the age group of 15–29 years old accounted for 94.3%. The majority (95%) were currently married. More than 33.4% of women had their first child. Half of the women completed at least secondary education, while 10.6% had no formal education. Only 6.5% of workers were professionals, and 31.2% were unemployed. Of the sample, 20.7% of women were from the poorest households, and 19.7% were from poorer households. Sixty-two percent of the women lived in rural areas. Only 786 (24.9%) women aged 15–49 had health insurance coverage. 86.1% of women attended at least four ANC visits during pregnancy.

Table 1. Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of women (N = 3,162 weighted).

Variables Freq. %
Mean age at the time of birth (SD)  22.2(4.2)  
15–29 2,982 94.3
30–49 180 5.7
Marital status
Married 3,004 95.0
Not married 158 5.0
Birth order
1st child 1055 33.4
2nd or 3rd child 1197 37.9
4th child or higher 910 28.7
Educational
No education 334 10.6
Primary 1253 39.6
Secondary 1361 43.0
Higher 214 6.8
Occupation (N = 3,100)
Not working 986 31.2
Professional 205 6.5
Sales 579 18.3
Agricultural 445 14.1
Services 76 2.4
Manual labor 810 25.6
Wealth index
Poorest 655 20.7
Poorer 623 19.7
Middle 626 19.8
Richer 683 21.6
Richest 574 18.2
Residence
Urban 1202 38.0
Rural 1960 62.0
Region
Plain 1532 48.5
Tonle Sap 996 31.5
Coastal 201 6.4
Plateau/Mountain 432 13.7
Covered by health insurance
No 2376 75.1
Yes 786 24.9
Number of ANC visits
< 4 ANC 440 13.9
≥ 4 ANC 2722 86.1

Notes: Survey weights are applied to obtain weighted percentages. *Plains: Phnom Penh, Kampong Cham, Tbong Khmum, Kandal, Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, and Takeo; Tonle Sap: Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Pursat, Siem Reap, Battambang, Pailin, and Otdar Meanchey; Coastal/sea: Kampot, Kep, Preah Sihanouk, and Koh Kong; Mountains: Kampong Speu, Kratie, Preah Vihear, Stung Treng, Mondul Kiri, and Ratanak Kiri.

Factors associated with four or more ANC visits in Chi-square analysis

In bivariate analysis (Table 2), a higher proportion of women with health insurance coverage had a significant association with four or more ANC visits (91.6% vs. 84.2%, p < 0.001). Women aged 31–49 reported being more likely to attend four or more ANC visits (88.0% vs. 86.0%, p < 0.001). Also, married women reported four or more ANC visits than nonmarried women (86.6% vs. 76.2%, p  = 0.007). Women with no education were less likely to attend four or more ANC visits than those with higher education (71.0% vs. 95.6%, p < 0.001). Four or more ANC visits were higher among women working in professional (95.3%) and service (96.4%), respectively, compared to unemployed women (84.3%), with p <0.001). Additionally, four or more ANC visits were higher among women from the richer and richest on the wealth index (94.8% and 89.4%, respectively), compared to the poorer and poorest (73.9% and 86.9%, respectively, with p < 0.001). Lastly, women living in urban areas reported higher four or more ANC visits than in rural areas (91.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001).

Table 2. Maternal and household characteristics by women attending at least four antenatal care and delivery in a health facility (N = 3,162).

Variables Number of ANC visits p-value
Four or more Less than four
n = 2,722 n = 440
% %
Covered by health insurance
No 84.2 15.8 <0.001
Yes 91.6 8.4
Age at time of birth
15–30 86.0 14.0 <0.001
31–49 88.0 12.0
Marital status
Married 86.6 13.4 0.007
Not married 76.2 23.8
Birth order
1st child 88.4 11.6 <0.001
2nd or 3rd child 88.6 11.4
4th child or higher 80.1 19.9
Educational
No education 71.0 29.0 <0.001
Primary 84.1 15.9
Secondary 90.1 9.9
Higher 95.6 4.4
Occupation (N = 3,100)
Not working 84.3 15.7 <0.001
Professional 95.3 4.7
Sales 84.4 15.6
Agricultural 79.0 21.0
Services 96.4 3.6
Manual labor 89.9 10.1
Wealth index
Poorest 73.9 26.1 <0.001
Poorer 86.9 13.1
Middle 86.3 13.7
Richer 89.4 10.6
Richest 94.8 5.2
Residence
Urban 91.5 8.5 <0.001
Rural 82.7 17.3
Region
Plain 89.3 10.7 <0.001
Tonle Sap 86.6 13.4
Coastal 89.0 11.0
  Plateau/Mountain 72.2 27.8  

Notes: Survey weights are applied to obtain weighted percentages. *Plains: Phnom Penh, Kampong Cham, Tbong Khmum, Kandal, Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, and Takeo; Tonle Sap: Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Pursat, Siem Reap, Battambang, Pailin, and Otdar Meanchey; Coastal/sea: Kampot, Kep, Preah Sihanouk, and Koh Kong; Mountains: Kampong Speu, Kratie, Preah Vihear, Stung Treng, Mondul Kiri, and Ratanak Kiri.

Association between health insurance and maternal healthcare services utilization

Table 3 shows the results of the multiple logistic regression analysis of the association between health insurance coverage and maternal healthcare services utilization after controlling for the socio-demographic factors. Compared to women without health insurance, those with health insurance coverage were more likely to attend four or more ANC visits (AOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4). Women with higher education (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2–7.7), secondary education (AOR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5–3.5), and primary education (AOR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2–2.7) were more likely to have four or more ANC visits than women without any formal education. The odds of having four or more ANC visits were more significant for women from the wealthiest households than for those from the poorest households: richest households (AOR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5–6.8), richer households (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2–2.8), and middle households (AOR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.2). However, the odds of having four or more ANC visits were lower in unmarried women than in married women (AOR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3–0.8).

Table 3. Association between health insurance and four or more ANC visits in simple and multiple logistic regression model.

Variables Four or more ANC visits
Unadjusted (N = 3,162) Adjusted (N = 3,100)
OR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
Covered by health insurance
No Ref. Ref.
Yes 2.0*** (1.4–2.9) 1.6 * (1.1–2.4)
Age at time of birth
15–30 Ref. Ref.
31–49 1.2 (0.7–2.1) 1.1 (0.6–2.0)
Marital status
Married Ref. Ref.
Not married 0.5** (0.3–0.8) 0.5 ** (0.3–0.8)
Birth order
1st child Ref. Ref.
2nd or 3rd child 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.5)
4th child or higher 0.5*** (0.4–0.7) 0.7* (0.5–1.0)
Educational
No education Ref. Ref.
Primary 2.2*** (1.5–3.1) 1.8 ** (1.2–2.7)
Secondary 3.7*** (2.6–5.3) 2.3 *** (1.5–3.5)
Higher 8.9*** (4.3–18.3) 3.1 * (1.2–7.7)
Occupation (N = 3,100)
Not working Ref. Ref.
Professional 3.8*** (2.0–7.0) 1.4 (0.7–2.8)
Sales 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.7 (0.5–1.0)
Agricultural 0.7* (0.5–1.0) 1.0 (0.7–1.4)
Services 4.9** (1.8–13.5) 2.6 (0.9–7.2)
Manual labor 1.7** (1.2–2.3) 1.3 (0.9–1.9)
Wealth index
Poorest Ref. Ref.
Poorer 2.4*** (1.7–3.2) 1.7 ** (1.2–2.3)
Middle 2.2*** (1.6–3.1) 1.5 * (1.1–2.2)
Richer 3.0*** (2.1–4.2) 1.9 ** (1.2–2.8)
Richest 6.4*** (3.4–12.0) 3.2 ** (1.5–6.8)
Residence
Urban Ref. Ref.
Rural 0.4*** (0.3–0.6) 0.8 (0.5–1.1)
Region
Plain Ref. Ref.
Tonle Sap 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 1.2 (0.9–1.7)
Coastal 1.0 (0.6–1.5) 1.3 (0.8–2.1)
  Plateau/Mountain 0.3*** (0.2–0.4) 0.5*** (0.3–0.6)

Ref = reference value.

* p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001.

Notes: Survey weights are applied to obtain weighted percentages. *Plains: Phnom Penh, Kampong Cham, Tbong Khmum, Kandal, Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, and Takeo; Tonle Sap: Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Pursat, Siem Reap, Battambang, Pailin, and Otdar Meanchey; Coastal/sea: Kampot, Kep, Preah Sihanouk, and Koh Kong; Mountains: Kampong Speu, Kratie, Preah Vihear, Stung Treng, Mondul Kiri, and Ratanak Kiri.

Discussion

We analyzed the most recent 2021–2022 CDHS data to examine the relationship between health insurance coverage and receiving four or more ANC visits during pregnancy. Overall, 24.9% of women reported having health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age who gave birth within two years of the survey. This finding is slightly similar to lower-middle-income countries, where 27.3% of women had health insurance coverage [19]. This is higher than in low-income countries, where 7.9% of women have health insurance coverage [19]. However, lower than in upper-middle-income countries, 52.5% of women had health insurance coverage [19]. Since the formal launch of the Cambodia National Social Security Fund (NSSF) with the Health Insurance Scheme in 2008, the proportion of women with health insurance coverage has increased from 16% in 2014 to 22% in 2021–2022 [5]. This proportion exponentially increased due to the Royal Government of Cambodia’s implementation of the NSSF for all workers in the formal and informal sectors of the economy [10]. Moreover, it has plans to extend the healthcare benefits under the NSSF to the family members of the employees as well [16].

This study found that women with health insurance coverage were 1.6 times more likely to attend four or more ANC visits during pregnancy. Previous studies documented the positive relationship between health insurance and the number of ANC visits among women of reproductive age [8,9,19]. Health insurance eliminates the financial barrier to accessing maternal health services caused by out-of-pocket payments. It has a beneficial effect in reducing the number of low-birth-weight babies born and child mortality [17,21]. The result is more equitable access to care, potentially improving maternal health outcomes [9,19]. The MoH has since raised the minimum standard for ANC visits during pregnancy to at least four trips [20,22]. The dramatically significant increase in the highest prevalence of four or more ANC visits was an effort by the Royal Government of Cambodia, which has strengthened health facilities across the country, particularly in rural areas, improved infrastructure, provided essential medical equipment and supplies, increased the number of midwives, expanded antenatal care, and provided more skilled medical practitioners at childbirth to ensure safe delivery practices. Furthermore, to encourage early and routine ANC visits, the government is offering pregnant women a monetary incentive of 20 US dollars for each visit during a maximum of four ANC visits at any health facility with a contract with the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) [14,23].

This study found that increased education and household wealth index increased the likelihood of four or more ANC visits. Women with education and greater wealth index were more likely to attend four or more ANC visits. This aligns with previous evidence around socio-economic inequalities in maternal health service utilization in Cambodia and South Asia [24,25]. Education can increase women’s awareness of the importance of ANC, while higher wealth can provide the financial means and access necessary to attend at least four ANC visits [26]. Additionally, education gives women the power to decide whether to seek medical attention and enables them to recognize warning signs of pregnancy complications. Moreover, women from higher-income households were more likely to be able to cover the costs of care-seeking, including any related expenses and transportation [24,25]. Thus, in this study, women with higher education levels and household wealth indexes had the highest proportion of health insurance coverage.

This study has several strengths. First, it used the most recent women’s data from the 2021–2022 CDHS, an extensive representative national population-based household survey with a high response rate of 97%. Second, the recall bias has been minimized by limiting the analysis to the women’s most recent deliveries within the last two years preceding the survey [5]. Third, the complex survey design and sampling weights were incorporated into the analysis of descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and Logistic regression model, which enabled us to generalize our findings to the population of WRA in Cambodia. In addition, DHS data were collected using validated survey methods and highly trained data collectors, contributing to improved data quality [27]. Last, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report the association between health insurance coverage and ANC visits in Cambodia. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, we found significant associations between health insurance coverage and attendance at four or more ANC visits.

Despite this, there are several limitations. First, this study used a secondary analysis, so it did not address health institution factors of antenatal care utilization and service availability; hence, this study could not explore the quality of ANC services, though the quality of healthcare services plays a vital role in patient satisfaction and use. Second, the study’s cross-sectional nature could not assist in the temporal relationship of variables, including the number of years since women joined health insurance for ANC utilization. Therefore, further study should be conducted to identify factors related to health institutions. In addition, antenatal care utilization should be performed based on the new WHO guidelines revised in 2016 at the national level [22].

Moreover, longitudinal studies that address comprehensive variables should be studied. Third, we excluded other factors, such as maternal complications and women’s empowerment indicators, that could affect the use of maternal care. Lastly, CDHS did not assess a direct measure of maternal health literacy.

Conclusion

This is the first study to report the association between health insurance coverage and ANC visits in the healthcare setting in Cambodia. Cambodian pregnant women attend four or more antenatal care visits, which is slightly high. However, it still needs to be satisfactory. Health insurance coverage among women in Cambodia is relatively low. Moreover, we found that women with health insurance, women with education, and being rich in the wealth quintile were strong predictors of women attending four or more ANC visits. There is a need to pay close attention to improving the uptake of health insurance among women of reproductive age, especially targeting women with no education, from low-income families, and women who reside in rural areas. Policymakers may need to prioritize women of reproductive age in designing and implementing health insurance programs to increase their uptake. This would provide financial risk protection, facilitate access to maternal health services, and possible attainment of Cambodia’s SDG 3 targets.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank DHS-ICF, who approved the data used for this paper. And we thank Mr. Sopheap Suong, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, who provided helpful, professional proofreading.

Data Availability

The Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey data are publicly available from the website: (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin).

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health, and ICF International. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health, and ICF International. Available online: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/fr312/fr312.pdf. 2015.
  • 2.National Institute of Statistics PP, Cambodia, Ministry of Health Phnom Penh, Cambodia, The DHS Program, ICF, Rockville, Maryland, USA. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021–22. Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIS, MoH, and ICF. 2022. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR377/FR377.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The United Nations Development Programme. The Sustainable Development Goals by 2016– 2030. Available from: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Acuin CS, Khor GL, Liabsuetrakul T, Achadi EL, Htay TT, Firestone R, et al. Maternal, neonatal, and child health in southeast Asia: towards greater regional collaboration. Lancet. 2011;377(9764):516–25. Epub 20110125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62049-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7159081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Institute of Statistics (NIS) MoHM, and ICF. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021–22 Final Report. Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIS, MoH, and ICF. 2023. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR136/PR136.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Merga BT, Raru TB, Deressa A, Regassa LD, Gamachu M, Negash B, et al. The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilizations in Ethiopia: evidence from national survey. Front Health Serv. 2023;3:1101164. Epub 20231006. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1101164 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10587574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aboagye RG, Okyere J, Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Zegeye B, Amu H, et al. Health insurance coverage and timely antenatal care attendance in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):181. Epub 20220211. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07601-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8840787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang W, Gheda Temsah, and Lindsay Mallick. Health Insurance Coverage and Its Impact on Maternal Health Care Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. DHS Analytical Studies No. 45. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ahuru RR, Omon IJ, Nzoputam CI, Ekomoezor E. Health insurance ownership and maternal health service uptake among Nigerian women. HEALTH. 2021;12. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.National Institute of Statistics. Ministry of Planning. General population census of the Kingdom of Cambodia 2019. Available from: https://www.nis.gov.kh/nis/Census2019/Final%20General%20Population%20Census%202019-English.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The World Bank In Cambodia. Overview 2019. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/cambodia/overview. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Expenditure Database 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/nha/database/PHC_Country_profile/Index/en. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.World Health Organization (WHO); World Bank and WHO. Half the world lacks access to essential health services, 100 million still pushed into extreme poverty because of health expenses 2017. 2017. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/half-lacks-access/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.National Social Security Fund (NSSF). Health Insurance Scheme 2016. Available from: https://www.nssf.gov.kh/health-care-scheme-2/. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakamura H, Amimo F, Yi S, Tuot S, Yoshida T, Tobe M, et al. Implementing a sustainable health insurance system in Cambodia: a study protocol for developing and validating an efficient household income-level assessment model for equitable premium collection. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):17. Epub 20200131. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1126-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6995079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The Royal Government of Cambodia. National Social Protection Policy Framework 2016–2025. Phnom Penh: The Council of Ministers; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Likka MH, Handalo DM, Weldsilase YA, Sinkie SO. The effect of community-based health insurance schemes on utilization of healthcare services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol of quantitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018;16(3):653–61. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003381 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dadjo J, Ahinkorah BO, Yaya S. Health insurance coverage and antenatal care services utilization in West Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):311. Epub 20220307. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07698-9 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8899447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hooley B, Afriyie DO, Fink G, Tediosi F. Health insurance coverage in low-income and middle-income countries: progress made to date and related changes in private and public health expenditure. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008722 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9092126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ministry of Health. Guideline for implementation the service package of Antenatal Care Delivery and Post natal Care 2019. [updated 2019]. 3:[Available from: https://niph.org.kh/niph/uploads/library/pdf/GL220_NMCHC_anc_pnc_package_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Imo CK, De Wet-Billings N, Isiugo-Abanihe UC. The impact of maternal health insurance coverage and adequate healthcare services utilisation on the risk of under-five mortality in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Arch Public Health. 2022;80(1):206. Epub 20220913. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00968-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9472384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization Copyright © World Health Organization; 2016.; 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ministry of Information. Government Raises Allowances For Mothers And Children. Available from: https://www.information.gov.kh/articles/108509.
  • 24.Chham S, Radovich E, Buffel V, Ir P, Wouters E. Determinants of the continuum of maternal health care in Cambodia: an analysis of the Cambodia demographic health survey 2014. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):410. Epub 20210602. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03890-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8170811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee HY, Oh J, Kim R, Subramanian SV. Long-term trend in socioeconomic inequalities and geographic variation in the utilization of antenatal care service in India between 1998 and 2015. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(3):419–31. Epub 20200304. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13277 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7240766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thakkar N, Alam P, Saxena D. Factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care in India: Results from 2019–2021 National Family Health Survey. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0285454. Epub 20230508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285454 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10166529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Allen C, Fleuret J, Ahmed J, editors. Data quality in demographic and health surveys that used long and short questionnaires2020: ICF.
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002954.r001

Decision Letter 0

Abdur Razzaque Sarker

20 Jun 2024

PGPH-D-24-00222

Health insurance coverage and antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: Analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-22

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Um,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 04 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Abdur Razzaque Sarker, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This paper tried to examine the effects of health insurance coverage and antenatal care (ANC) utilization among pregnant women in Cambodia. Although the reviewers raised some concerns regarding this paper. My major concern is the analysis regarding the table 4 multiple logistic regression model where the authors showed a significant relationship among the insured and non-insured mother regarding the recommended ANC service utilization. The authors conclude compared to women without health insurance, those with health insurance coverage were 1.6 times more likely to attend four or more ANC visits. However, Table 4 also indicated that, most of the explanatory variables have a positive relationship with outcome variables. Even we observed that richest and higher educated mother utilized 3.2 and 3.1 times higher than their counterpart which is higher than having insurance variable. Therefore, I wondered education and wealth more important that having health insurances. Please clarify? The paper is fine, if the authors change the title of this paper to find out the determinants of ANC service utilization using Cambodia DHS data. However, to examine the effect of health insurance, I would like to see the reanalysis with two separate models for the mothers who were belonged to the health insurance coverage and who have not. Indeed, without propensity score matching, I believed the impact of health insurance on ANC service utilization may be questionable. See the related papers

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040062

https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw135

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: please correct 15-59 years as 15-49 years in line number 116 (page 4). Complete the line 133 -descriptive and analytical analysis or something like this. Make the line 141 correct, there is no verb in this sentence. Rewrite the sentence /line number149. Correct/rewrite line number 257,258. Read carefully the full text .

Reviewer #2: Thank you for sharing the manuscript and would like to congratulate them for their nice work. My few comments/clarification questions are incorporated in the manuscript.

1. Did the study assess the cut-off period to identify the association between access to maternal health and years of membership/participation in health insurance?

2. What is the particular interest of the researchers only using 2021-2022 data?

3. How do you assess the confounding effects of other variables such as income, level of education? Because those with better education and income are likely to attend 4 or more ANC visits.

4. Just for curiosity, is those women who did not attend any ANC visit categorized under less than 4 ANC visit?

5. Did the study assess the association between the number of years since they joined the insurance and ANC use?

Reviewer #3: Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript titled "Health insurance coverage and antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: Analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-22"

Title: I can see that title has two outcome variables (Health insurance coverage and ANC utilization) and no independent variable. It would be better to have this put to look a complete topic. Example; you can write, "Factors Associated with Health Insurance and ANC Utilization..........."

Methods: In the outcome variable section you stated that "This study's outcome was the number of ANC visits..." I can see that you left out another important outcome variable, i.e Health Insurance Coverage. Please update this section. Further, I can see that you used these two outcome variables very well in your result section (see Table 2 & Table 3).

Results: Update your topic that reflect the independent variables used in result. I gave a suggestion how the title can be improved.

Data sharing: Write a statement on data related to your study and indicate the URL link for the data

Reviewer #4: The manuscript adequately responds to the research question based on the predefined scope. This is a secondary analysis of data from a demographic and health survey. The author should be keen not to describe the survey in the methodology instead of the approaches of the current study. Minor comments are included in the attached manuscript for author review.

Reviewer #5: I am glad to have had the opportunity to review this pertinent and interesting paper. The paper addresses a relevant issue, both socially and scientifically; however, I believe some changes could clarify and improve the current manuscript.

Please find my comments below:

**Major Comment

• In methodology clarification of the independent variables could be provided using proper references to justify the categorization of the variables.

• Regarding results, in general, the section is clear. The discussion and conclusion also look good.

**Minor Comment

• There are some typos that must be addressed with proper care and also some sentences lack coherence. These issues should be taken care of.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Israt Jahan Kakoly

Reviewer #2: Yes: Alebel Yaregal Desale

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-00222.pdf

pgph.0002954.s001.pdf (937.1KB, pdf)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-00222_MN_1.pdf

pgph.0002954.s002.pdf (974.8KB, pdf)
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002954.r003

Decision Letter 1

Abdur Razzaque Sarker

21 Aug 2024

PGPH-D-24-00222R1

The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Um,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 20 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Abdur Razzaque Sarker, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

There is a great deal of room for improvement in both writing and grammar. I advise the authors to work with a writing coach or copy editor to improve the flow and readability of the text.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: Thank you for addressing all the comments

Reviewer #4: The authors have fairly attempted to address the previous comments. However, the manuscript still needs a thorough proof reading. More suggestions can be found in the attachment.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-00222_R1_reviewer_MN.pdf

pgph.0002954.s004.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002954.r005

Decision Letter 2

Abdur Razzaque Sarker

27 Sep 2024

PGPH-D-24-00222R2

The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Um,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 27 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Abdur Razzaque Sarker

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

There are still some typo errors. I would like to suggest a thorough copy edit of the revised version.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002954.r007

Decision Letter 3

Abdur Razzaque Sarker

18 Oct 2024

The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022

PGPH-D-24-00222R3

Dear Dr. Um,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Abdur Razzaque Sarker, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-00222.pdf

    pgph.0002954.s001.pdf (937.1KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-00222_MN_1.pdf

    pgph.0002954.s002.pdf (974.8KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pgph.0002954.s003.docx (26KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-00222_R1_reviewer_MN.pdf

    pgph.0002954.s004.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pgph.0002954.s005.docx (20KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_R3.docx

    pgph.0002954.s006.docx (18KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey data are publicly available from the website: (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin).


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES