Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2024 Sep 1;17(9):1966–1971. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1966-1971

Prevalence of bluetongue virus disease in a small ruminant population in Kalat, Balochistan, Pakistan

Shafiq Ahmad 1, Muhammad Shafee 2,, Abdul Razzaq 3, Farhad Badshah 4,5,6, Naimat Ullah Khan 7, Eliana Ibáñez-Arancibia 8,9,10, Patricio R De los RíosEscalante 10,11, Hafiz Muhammad Arif 2, Abid Hussain 1
PMCID: PMC11536745  PMID: 39507781

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Bluetongue is a vector-borne, emerging disease that poses a severe threat to most domesticated animals. A cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of bluetongue virus (BTV) disease in apparently healthy sheep and goats in Kalat, Balochistan.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 270 serum samples (sheep: 150 and goat: 120) were collected and screened for the detection of anti-BTV antibodies using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The data regarding different contributory risk factors were also collected using a predesigned questionnaire.

Results:

It revealed that overall, 27.4% (74/270, 95% confidence interval, χ2 = 1.71, p = 0.12) prevalence in both sheep and goat populations. The highest prevalence of 47% (32/68) was recorded in Surab city with the lowest prevalence of 15.49% (11/71) in the Manguchar area. In contrast, in Kalat 28.1% (9/32), Daan area 24% (12/50), and Marap area 22.44% (11/49), seropositivity was recorded. Upon sex bases, antibodies were almost equally found in both male 28.57% (8/28) and female 27.27% (66/242) animal populations. Moreover, all four breeds (Balochi, Khurasani, Lehri, and Rakhshani) were equally and potentially seropositive. The Khurasani breed was the most susceptible to 34.69% (17/49), followed by the Balochi breed, 45/145 (31%) seropositivity. The prevalence of BTV was 16.66% (1/6) in Rakhshani breed and 15.71% (11/70) in Lehri breed., Ticks were found in almost 21% of animals, while 93% of animals were reared on open grazing in rangelands.

Conclusion:

This study clearly indicates widespread BTV infection in small ruminants in the study area that may pose serious threats to livestock farming. Further extensive studies are recommended to study the prevalence of disease in different agroecological zones of the province. This also warns the high-ups to manage concrete efforts to eradicate and control the disease in the area.

Keywords: antibodies, Balochistan, bluetongue virus, competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Kalat

Introduction

Bluetongue virus (BTV) is one of the primary causes of economic losses to farmers and has been included in the World Organization for Animal Health’s (WOAH) lists of notifiable diseases [1]. It is an arthropod-borne non-contagious disease that mostly occurs in sheep and some other wild and domestic ruminants [2]. The disease is caused by BTV that belongs to a member of the genus Orbivirus [3]. BTV is spread by different species of Culicoides (biting midges), which are most abundant and active in humid and hot climates. Among 1400, only 20 species of Culicoides midges are documented to be responsible for transmitting the disease [4]. Globally, up to 3 billion US$ economic losses have been reported [5]. Pathogenesis usually involves vascular endothelial damage, resulting in hyperemia and gynecological problems [3]. Clinical manifestations include excessive salivation, fever, conjunctival and nasal discharge, cyanosis of the tongue, generalized hyperemia, and facial edema [6]. Different factors such as immune status, age, breed, nutritional status, environmental stress, and the infecting viral strain are responsible for the severity of the disease [7, 8]. In goats and cattle, infection is usually asymptomatic, but sheep are more commonly infected [9]. It is a self-limiting disease in the acute stage, and so far, 27 different serotypes have been recognized throughout the World, including the Indo-Pak subcontinent, China, Iran, and Afghanistan. Recently, in Pakistan (Balochistan), serotypes 8 and 9 have been recognized using real-time polymerase chain reaction [10]. Various techniques, such as the hemagglutination-inhibition test, serum neutralization test, agar gel diffusion, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), are employed to detect BTV infection [3]. The competitive-ELISA (c-ELISA) is a rapid diagnostic assay that can widely be used to detect immunoglobulins in the very early stages of infection and is also recommended by WOAH for international trade [11, 12]. The semi-arid climate, low/poor quality feed, meager animal husbandry practices, low-cost infrastructure, and nomadic culture are some of the major constraints to the local livestock sector, leading to high economic losses throughout the province [13].

Balochistan, the largest province in Pakistan, has over 50% of its population relying directly on agriculture and livestock rearing. The preference for small ruminants is influenced by the inhabitants’ transhumant, nomadic lifestyle and various geographical factors within the province. The absence of diagnostic facilities in these remote rural areas leads to significant direct and indirect economic losses for farmers. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and identify contributory risk factors of BTV in sheep and goat herds in Kalat, Balochistan, Pakistan.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval and Informed consent

The institutional ethical committee of the Center for Advanced Studies in Vaccinology and Biotechnology (CASVAB), University of Balochistan, Quetta, approved this study (Approval no. CASVAB/04/18). Samples were collected without any harm to animals and with the verbal consent of farmers strictly following the established animal welfare guidelines.

Study period and location

The study was conducted from April to July-2018. For this study, sheep and goat populations from five diverse epidemiological units, Surab (Sikandarabad), Kalat, Dan, Manguchar, and Marap, within Baluchistan province, were selected (Figure-1). District Kalat, is situated between longitudes 65°49’50” and 67°27’56” East and latitudes 27°55’55” and 29°37’43” North, with moderate summer and mild to severe cold in winter season. Over 70% of its inhabitants depend on livestock rearing, particularly sheep and goats, for their livelihood [14].

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Geographical location of district Kalat, Balochistan. Stars indicate blood sampling sites [Source: The map was generated using ArcGIS 10.8].

Sample collection

Blood samples were collected from 270 small ruminants, including Balochi and Khurasani sheep breeds (n = 150) and goat breeds, including Lhari and Rukhshani (n = 120), which were randomly selected and previously unvaccinated. The serum was separated, collected in relabeled tubes, and stored at –20°C. Moreover, all other relevant information about risk factors was recorded over a predesigned questionnaire.

Detection of the antibodies

All reagent materials were allowed to equilibrate at room temperature (25°C) for 30 min before use. For the detection of antibodies against the VP7 protein, a commercial c-ELISA kit (ID Screen, Grabels, France) was used. The principle of this assay involves competition between the antibodies present in the serum samples and the conjugated antibodies for binding to the antigen-coated plate. The assay outcomes were determined by measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader (Bio-Tec, Vermont, USA), consistent with procedures previously implemented by Sohail et al. [10].

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as a percentage of signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio using the formula Signal-to-noise percentage = Optical density (OD) value of the sample/Mean OD value of negative control. The S/N value of <70% was considered positive for the presence of anti-VP7 antibodies, as instructed by the manufacturer.

The collected data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., NY, USA). The correlation between BTV and different risk factors was determined. Chi-square test was applied with univariate analysis.

Results

Prevalence of anti-VP7 antibodies

Overall, 27.4% (74/270) of seropositive animals were recorded in the sheep and goat populations of the study area. Animals in Surab City had the highest prevalence of 47% (32/68), followed by Kalat at 28.1% (9/32) and Dan at 24% (12/50) area. However, the lowest prevalence was observed in the Mangochar 15.49% (11/71) and Marap 22.44% (11/49) area (Figure-2).

Figure-2.

Figure-2

Prevalence of bluetongue disease in Kalat area, Balochistan, Pakistan.

Contributory risk factors

In this study, slightly higher seropositivity was observed in female (29%) than male (27%) animals (Table-1). Similarly, a more productive age was seen as more prone to disease, and statistically significant results (confidence interval [CI] = 95%, p = 0.009) were recorded. However, none of the animals under 6 months of age were found positive. However, animals in the 6–36-month age group had the highest prevalence at 39.5% (32/81). In contrast, 22.58% (42/186) seropositivity was seen in ≥36-month age group.

Table-1.

Relationship between potential risk factors and BTV infection in Kalat, Balochistan.

Risk factors Number of animals Number of positive animals Number of negative animals Seroprevalence (%) χ2 p-value
Animals 270 74 196 27.4 1.71 0.120
 Sheep 150 46 104 30.4
 Goat 120 28 92 23.3
Age 9.41 0.009
 <6 months 3 00 3 0
 6–36 months 81 32 49 39.50
 >36 months 186 42 144 22.58
Sex 0.025 0.515
 Male 28 8 20 28.57
 Female 242 66 176 27.27
Breed 7.69 0.053
 Balochi 145 45 100 31.03
 Rakhshani 6 1 5 16.66
 Khurasani 49 17 32 34.69
 Lehri 70 11 59 15.71
Grazing style 400.65 0.009
 Open 251 00 251 93
 Close 19 00 19 7
Ticks 0.00 0.800
 Yes 57 00 57 21
 No 213 00 213 79
Area 31.14 0.560
 Marap 49 11 38 22.44
 Dan 50 12 38 24
 Surab 68 30 38 44
 Kalat 32 12 20 37.5
 Manguchar 71 9 62 12.67

BTV=Bluetongue virus

All four different breeds (Balochi, Khurasani, Lehri, and Rakhshani) of the area were found to be seropositive. However, Balochi and Khurasani breed animals were more seropositive than Lehri and Rakhshani (Figure-3).

Figure-3.

Figure-3

Seropositivity of anti-VP7 antibodies in different breeds of small ruminants in Kalat, Balochistan, Pakistan.

Almost 93% (CI = 95%; χ2 = 400.5, p = 0.009) of animals were grazing in rangelands with mountainous terrain, and only 21% were found infested with external body ticks.

Discussion

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of BTV infection in small ruminant population in Kalat, Balochistan, Pakistan. BTV represents a significant economic threat as a vector-borne disease affecting sheep and goats. Various diagnostic methods exist, each with inherent limitations, including prolonged processing times, potential cross-reactivity, and reduced sensitivity. Nevertheless, advancements over the past two decades, particularly in the development of c-ELISA, have markedly improved the efficacy of serological assays, yielding excellent results in the detection and monitoring of the disease [9]. Although, very limited data is available regarding the prevalence of BTV in Pakistan. However, in a recent study from Balochistan [10] comprising four districts, the overall prevalence was 47.26% (414/876, CI, 95%) as compared to 27% (74/271) prevalence using c-ELISA in this study. These findings corroborate with a recent study from four districts of Balochistan, which reported 47.26% prevalence [10]. Similarly, in an earlier study from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 44% prevalence was recorded [15]. In contrast, in a recent study from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 50% prevalence has been reported [16]. Likewise, in the recent study from Southern Punjab, Pakistan, a very high seroprevalence (70%) was observed in the camel population [17]. All these studies from various provinces of Pakistan indicate an alarming situation. Similarly, a 14% infection rate was reported from Telangana, India [18], 28% in the northeastern part of India [19], and 39.3% in Chattogram, Bangladesh [20]. On the other hand, 47.8% seroprevalence was reported in sheep and goat populations in Jordan [21], 30.3% in southern and 4.7% in northeastern China [22], and 95% in Egypt [23].

Afghanistan and Iran are two neighboring countries of the province, with higher seroprevalence reports from both countries. In a report from Afghanistan, 68.6% sheep, 71.8% goats, and 48.6% cattle were found seropositive using the c-ELISA kit [24]. Similarly, in Iran, 57.59% of sheep, 65.65 % of goats, and 27.63% of cattle have been reported to be seropositive [25]. These reports clearly indicate a serious threat to Pakistan due to the free movement and mass transportation of animals between Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran. However, relatively less seropositivity in our study may also be due to the cold climate of the area, and less tick infestation in the animals may have restricted the seroconversion of the disease. Considering the higher specificity and sensitivity (100%, CI = 99.84%–100%) of the c-ELISA kit for BTV, the true picture of seroprevalence is presented in this study. To date, no vaccination is carried throughout Pakistan against BTV infection.

In this study, the prevalence of BTV was found to be slightly higher in sheep at 30.4% compared to 23.3% in goats. However, a recent study from other regions of Balochistan [10] has reported a relatively higher prevalence, with 44% in sheep and 51% in goats. This variation in prevalence rates could be attributed to differences in tick infestation levels among the animal populations studied.

Variable frequencies of seropositivity were observed among different breeds of animals in the study area. Notably, a relatively higher prevalence of infection was found in Balochi and Khurasani breeds compared to Rakhshani and Lehri breeds. Despite these differences, this study indicates that all breeds examined were approximately equally susceptible to infection. This finding contrasts with studies from the Mediterranean Sea and Northern Europe, where animal breeds were reported to have no significant association with differences in seroconversion rates [11].

Almost all age groups in this study were equally susceptible to the disease except early age (<6 months). These findings corroborate with a previous study [10], that almost all age groups are susceptible to infection. In this study, younger animals were found to be uninfected. This might be due to the very low number of samples (3/270) and additionally, older animals have more time (life longevity) to acquire infection from infected animals [26]. Moreover, the increased burden of infection might also be associated with decreased temperature and relative high humidity, which favor the growth of vectors [27, 28].

At present, China has banned the import of ruminants and their related products from Iraq after a report of a bluetongue outbreak by the WOAH [29]. Earlier, China banned imports from the Netherlands and Belgium, as the imported animals (sheep and cows) exhibited mouth ulcers, fever, and bluetongue [29].

Conclusion

BTV is highly prevalent in small ruminants, both sheep and goat in the study area. Age, sex, and species of the animals were found significantly associated with the disease prevalence. Although this was an exploratory study, further detailed studies are needed to probe the genotype and serotype of the virus circulating in the area with the culicoides involved, which will surely be helpful in devising the disease control strategy in the area.

Authors’ Contributions

SA and MS: Study design and experimentation. AR: Supervised the laboratory work and facilitation. FB and NUK: Statistical analysis and drafted and reviewed the manuscript. EIA and PRDR-E: Critical review and statistical analysis. HMA and AH: Sample collection and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded and supported under the MECESUP UCT 0804 project, University of Temuco, Temuco, Chile.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliation.

References

  • 1.Weaver S.C, Reisen W.K. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;85(2):328–345. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McVey D.S, Melissa K, Chengappa M.M. Laboratory diagnosis. In:Veterinary Microbiology. 3rd ed. United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2013. p. 18. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saminathan M, Singh K.P, Khorajiya J.H, Dinesh M, Vineetha S, Maity M, Rahman A.F, Misri J, Malik Y.S, Gupta V.K, Singh R.K, Dhama K. An updated review on bluetongue virus:Epidemiology, pathobiology, and advances in diagnosis and control with special reference to India. Vet. Q. 2020;40(1):258–321. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2020.1831708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pandrangi A. Etiology, pathogenesis and future prospects for developing improved vaccines against bluetongue virus:A review. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;7(3):68–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alkhamis M.A, Aguilar-Vega C, Fountain-Jones N.M, Lin K, Perez A.M, Sánchez-Vizcaíno J.M. Global emergence and evolutionary dynamics of bluetongue virus. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):21677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78673-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh K.P, Saminathan M, Dinesh M, Khorajiya J.H, Umeshappa C.S, Sahoo D, Rahman A.T.F, Singh R, Tripathi B.N. Epidemiology and pathology of bluetongue virus in India:A systematic review. Indian J. Vet. Pathol. 2021;45(3):151–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yilmaz V, Yildirim Y, Otlu S. The seroprevalence of Bluetongue Virus infection in cattle in the Kars Dıstrıct of Turkey. Isr. J. Vet. Med. 2012;67(4):232–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saminathan M, Singh K.P, Vineetha S, Maity M, Biswas S.K, Reddy G.B.M, Milton A.A.P, Chauhan H.C, Chandel B.S, Ramakrishnan M.A, Gupta V.K. Factors determining the clinical outcome of bluetongue virus infection in adult mice. Indian J. Vet. Pathol. 2018;42(4):239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vineetha S, Singh K.P, Maity M, Sharma G.K, Saminathan M, Sonalika M, Sahoo D, Singh R, Gupta V.K. Pathological changes in native sheep experimentally infected with bluetongue virus 10. Indian J. Vet. Pathol. 2019;43(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sohail T, Yaqub T, Shafee M, Abbas T, Nazir J, Ullah N, Rabbani M, Chaudhary M.H, Mukhtar N, Habib M, Ul Rahman A, Malik A.I, Ghafoor A, Zahoor M.Y, Shabbir M.Z. Seroprevalence of Bluetongue virus in small ruminants in Balochistan province, Pakistan. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018;65(5):1272–1281. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Koumbati M, Mangana O, Nomikou K, Mellor P.S, Papadopoulos O. Duration of bluetongue viraemia and serological responses in experimentally infected European breeds of sheep and goats. Vet. Microbiol. 1999;64(4):277–285. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00255-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daif S, El Berbri I, Lhor Y, Fassi Fihri O. Serological and molecular prevalence study of bluetongue virus in small domestic ruminants in Morocco. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):19448. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24067-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Raziq A, Younas M, Rehman Z. Continuing education article prospects of livestock production in Balochistan. Vet. J. 2010;30(3):181–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ahmed S, Shafee M, Razzaq A, Niazi M.R, Wahid A, Khan G, Khan A.H. Status of animal health with emphasis of Bluetongue Virus disease in Kalat Region, Balochistan. Pak-Euro J. Med. Life Sci. 2019;2(2):44–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akhtar S, Djallem N, Shad G, Thieme O. Bluetongue virus seropositivity in sheep flocks in North West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997;29(4):293–298. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01093-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Malik A.I, Ijaz M, Yaqub T, Avais M, Shabbir M.Z, Aslam H.B, Aqib A.I, Farooqi S.H, Sohail T, Ghaffar A, Ali A, Khan A. Sero-epidemiology of bluetongue virus (BTV) infection in sheep and goats of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Acta Trop. 2018;182:207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shabbir M.Z, Sohail T, Ul-Rahman A, Abbas T, Ali Q, Rehman Z.U, Khan I, Yaqub T, Muhammad J, Ahmad Khan S, Imran M.S, Basit M.A, Ullah S, Habib M, Gardezi S.A.M, Bashir A, Ahmad M, Abubakar M, Abbas M, Subhani A, Yasein G, Altaaf F, Aziz M.H, Hussain R, Zohaib A, Chaudhry U, Wensman J.J. Sentinel surveillance of selected veterinary and public health pathogens in camel population originating from Southern Punjab province, Pakistan. Acta Trop. 2020;205:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Naresh G, Putty K, Reddy Y.N, Jyothi Y.K. Type-specific seroprevalence of bluetongue in India during 2018 and 2019. Vet. World. 2020;13(10):2092–2096. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2092-2096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barman N.N, Patil S.S, Kurli R, Deka P, Bora D.P, Deka G, Ranjitha K.M, Shivaranjini C, Roy P, Suresh K.P. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of livestock diseases in North Eastern Region of India. Vet. World. 2020;13(1):80–91. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.80-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Munmun T.K, Islam S, Zamil S, Rahman M.A, Abedin J, Ahad A, Islam A. Seroprevalence and risk factors of bluetongue virus in sheep of Chattogram, Bangladesh. Vet. World. 2022;15(6):1589–1594. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1589-1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hijazeen Z.S, Ismail Z.B, Al-Majali A.M. Prevalence and risk factors of some arthropod-transmitted diseases in cattle and sheep in Jordan. Vet. World. 2020;13(1):201–205. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.201-205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu F, Gong Q.L, Zhang R, Chen Z.Y, Wang Q, Sun Y.H, Sheng C.Y, Ma B.Y, Li J.M, Shi K, Zong Y, Leng X, Du R. Prevalence and risk factors of bluetongue virus infection in sheep and goats in China:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2021;161(Pt A):105170. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hosny W.A.E.W, Baheeg E.M, Aly H.A.E.R, Abd El Nabi S.S, Hanna N.M. Field serological investigation for peste des petits ruminants, foot-and-mouth disease, and bluetongue diseases in illegally introduced animals in Egypt. Vet. World. 2020;13(8):1661–1666. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1661-1666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ali A.M, Dennison T, Schauwers S.A, Ziay G, Qanee A.H. Bluetongue virus sero survey in sheep, goats and cattle flocks of Afghanistan. 2014. Available from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali-Safar-Maken Ali/publication/269396828_Authors_Dr_Maken_Ali/links/548935670cf2ef344790acbc/ Retrieved on 19-02-2024.
  • 25.Bakhshesh M, Otarod V, Mehrabadi M.H.F. Large-scale seroprevalence and risk factors associated with bluetongue virus in Iran. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020;179:104994. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Radostits O.M, Gay C.C, Hinchcliff K.W, Constable P.D. A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. Vet. Med. 2007;10:2045–2050. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ma J.G, Zhang X.X, Zheng W.B, Xu Y.T, Zhu X.Q, Hu G.X, Zhou D.H. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Bluetongue virus infection in Tibetan sheep and yaks in Tibetan Plateau, China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017;2017:5139703. doi: 10.1155/2017/5139703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Badshah F, Ullah K, Kamal M, Rafiq N, Usman T, De Los Ríos-Escalanteand P.R, Said M.B. Epidemiological analysis of anaplasmosis in cattle from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Vet. World. 2023;16(11):2287–2292. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.2287-2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Available from: https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/china-bans-imports-of-ruminants-animals-from-iraq-due-to-bluetongue-disease/107281023 . Retrieved on 01-02-2024. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES