Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2024 Sep 1;17(9):1983–1989. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1983-1989

Prevalence and determination of species distribution of Eimeria in poultry from the Swabi district, Pakistan

Noreen Begum 1, Sumaira Shams 1, Farhad Badshah 1,2,3, Irfan Khattak 4,, Muhammad Salman Khan 1, Naimat Ullah Khan 4, Warda Naz 5, Eliana Ibáñez-Arancibia 6,7,8, Patricio R De los Ríos-Escalante 8,9, Seema Hassan 1, Mourad Ben Said 10,11
PMCID: PMC11536746  PMID: 39507795

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Coccidiosis, caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Eimeria, is a significant concern in poultry farming, leading to substantial economic losses worldwide. In Pakistan, poultry is a major component of the agricultural sector, with both broiler and egg-laying chickens playing crucial roles in meeting the country’s protein needs. Despite the importance of the poultry industry, there is limited data on prevalence and species distribution of Eimeria in different types of chickens in District Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. This study aims to estimate the prevalence and determine the distribution of Eimeria species in broiler and egg-laying chickens in this region.

Materials and Methods:

Nine hundred fecal samples were collected from broiler (380) and egg-laying domestic chickens (520) in District Swabi, Pakistan. Microscopic analysis was used to identify Eimeria parasites in all samples. After microscopic examination for positive identification, Eimeria species were determined using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays.

Results:

Microscopic examination identified Eimeria oocysts in 44.4% (400/900) of the samples. Eimeria parasite infection significantly varied based on chicken type, age, and gender (p < 0.05). The study found that broiler chickens (52.63%, 235/450), young chickens (4–6 weeks) (55.5%, 285/500), and females (52.2%, 200/380) were more infected with Eimeria spp. than egg-laying domestic chickens (38.5%, 200/520), adults (above 6 weeks) (28.8%), and males (36.7%, 165/450). PCR indicated a distribution rate of 42.5% (170/400) Eimeria tenella, 26.25% (105/400) Eimeria acervulina, 20% (80/400) Eimeria maxima, and 11.25% (45/400) Eimeria mitis. None of Eimeria necatrix, Eimeria brunetti, or Eimeria praecox was found in the study.

Conclusion:

This study underlines the essential requirement for targeted interventions due to the prevalence and predominance of E. tenella among identified Eimeria species. Future research should focus on refined sampling strategies and investigate the clinical significance of these parasites for effective disease management in the local poultry industry.

Keywords: coccidiosis, domestic chickens, Eimeria species, microscopic and molecular identification, Pakistan, prevalence

Introduction

The poultry industry significantly contributes to job generation and provides a vital animal protein source [1]. Asian countries have surpassed the growth rates of Australia and New Zealand in global chicken production. Notably, China, the US, Brazil, Russia, Mexico, India, and Pakistan have emerged as key players in the global chicken production market recently [2].

In Pakistan, the poultry sector is a robust contributor to the national economy, constituting 2.3% of GDP [3]. In addition, it significantly influences the stability of beef and mutton prices [4]. Poultry coccidiosis, a damaging bird disease prevalent worldwide, poses a significant challenge to the poultry industry. The financial impact of this ailment is significant due to increased mortality, reduced weight gain, and heightened necrotic enteritis susceptibility [5].

Eimeria oocysts, first identified in chickens’ ceca in 1891 [6], reveal the seriousness of the matter in light of historical context. Poultry coccidiosis, caused by species within the genus Eimeria of the phylum Apicomplexa and family Eimeriidae, is an enteric parasitic disease. This is the most common and economically damaging intestinal parasite disease for chickens worldwide [7]. Approximately 1800 species in the Eimeria genus inhabit the intestinal mucosa of diverse mammals and birds, underscoring its prevalent threat as a parasite [5].

Eimeria species, recognized for their monoxenous nature, depend solely on a single host for their life cycle due to their host specificity [8]. The seven coccidian species, including Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria brunetti, Eimeria maxima, Eimeria tenella, Eimeria necatrix, Eimeria praecox, and Eimeria mitis, exhibit varying degrees of pathogenicity. Among Enterococci species, E. necatrix and E. tenella are the most pathogenic, whereas the lesser pathogens include E. acervulina, E. brunetti, and E. maxima. In contrast, E. mitis and E. praecox are generally considered less pathogenic [9].

Each Eimeria species occupies a unique location within the intestine, highlighting their specialized parasitic behavior. The genus’s direct life cycle involves both sexual and asexual multiplication phases, encompassing gametogony (sexual reproduction and gamete creation), schizogony (agamogony/merogony), and sporogony formation [10]. Effective control measures are crucial, as most transmission happens through the fecal-oral route.

The global coccidiosis challenge is addressed through the application of anticoccidial drugs as a widespread control method [11]. The diagnosis of coccidiosis relies on various factors, including clinical features, host gut pathology, parasite morphology at different stages of parasitism, and the pre-patent period [12]. Identification of Eimeria species can be laborious and demands specialized knowledge. To address these limitations, recent advancements have introduced polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, which offer a more efficient and precise means of identifying the Eimeria species infecting chickens [9].

Avian coccidiosis is a globally prevalent protozoan disease impacting poultry production, with a prevalence of 5% to 70% [2]. It is common in developing nations like Egypt and Pakistan. Pakistan’s poultry sector ranks as the second-largest in the country, supplying both broiler meat and eggs from domesticated chickens. This sector, producing 0.767 million tons of broiler meat and 12.857 million eggs yearly, contributes 4.8% to the agriculture sector’s value addition.

Despite the poultry industry’s significance, data on the prevalence and determination of species distribution of Eimeria in various types of chickens in Pakistan, especially in the Swabi district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), remains limited. Understanding the epidemiology of Eimeria infections is vital for implementing effective control measures to reduce the burden of coccidiosis. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and distribution of Eimeria species in broiler and egg-laying chickens within District Swabi, Pakistan. Through the use of both microscopic examination and PCR assays, the study aims to estimate the dominant Eimeria species and analyze their relationship with factors such as chicken type, age, and gender.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan (Approval no. AWKUM//Zoo/2021/3965). This approval ensured that all procedures related to the humane and ethical treatment of poultry during sample collection. The study was conducted with a commitment to animal welfare, and all measures were taken to minimize any potential distress or harm to the birds involved. Ethical considerations were addressed by obtaining verbal informed consent from all participants, ensuring their voluntary participation and confidentiality of their responses.

Study period and location

The study was conducted from July 2021 to July 2022. The study area is District Swabi in Pakistan’s KPK province, which is part of the Mardan Division. It is located between the Indus and Kabul rivers. Before becoming a district in 1988, Swabi was a tehsil within the Mardan District. Swabi’s district is currently divided into four Tehsils: Swabi, Topi, Lahore, and Razar.

Study design and sampling method

This study employed a cross-sectional analysis to estimate coccidiosis prevalence in broiler and egg-laying domestic chickens in District Swabi. Based on the previously reported prevalence rate of Eimeria infection in broiler chickens in Pakistan, which is 65% reported by Bachaya et al. [13], the sample size was calculated using the following formula:

n = [Z2 x p x (1-p)]/e2

Where n is the sample size, Z is the critical value of the standard normal distribution for a 95% confidence level (1.96), p is the estimated prevalence rate (65% = 0.65), and e is the desired margin of error (5% = 0.05).

Applying this formula, the minimal sample size required for our study, considering the 65% prevalence rate, was 350 samples from each of broiler and egg-laying chickens, resulting in a minimum total of 700 samples. Consequently, nine hundred fecal samples were collected and analyzed from broilers (380) and egg-laying chickens (520) in District Swabi, Pakistan.

Sample and data collection

The fecal samples (n = 900) were evenly collected across the four Tehsils of District Swabi. Each Tehsil contributed 225 samples, encompassing 380 from broilers and 520 from domestic egg-laying chickens. This balanced allocation captured the varied dynamics of coccidiosis prevalence within distinct poultry populations. Supplementary information vital to the study was acquired through a questionnaire. The structured questionnaire focused on key parameters, including breed, gender, and age of the sampled avian subjects. These additional data unveiled potential correlations between coccidiosis prevalence and demographic factors.

Morphological identification of Eimeria oocysts from fecal samples

Following the collection of fecal samples, the Laboratory of Epidemiology and Public Health (College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, AWKUM) analyzed the presence of Eimeria species. Morphological identification was achieved using the fecal flotation technique. In this method, a saturated solution of sodium chloride was used. Subsequently, the filtrate from samples was centrifuged to isolate the oocysts. The centrifugation process, conducted at 400× g for 10 min, facilitated the settling of the oocysts. The supernatant was then carefully discarded, and the Eimeria oocysts in the sediment underwent two rounds of washing with distilled water at 2500× g for 10 min each. This meticulous process ensured Eimeria’s purification of oocysts for accurate morphological identification under microscopic examination.

Molecular identification of the Eimeria species

To accurately identify Eimeria species, genomic DNA was extracted from positive samples using the PureLink™ Microbiome DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Subsequently, the extracted genomic DNA from all samples was subjected to a PCR assay. This PCR reaction was performed in a thermal cycler (Kyratec SC300G-R2 Australia), using species-specific primers designed for all seven Eimeria species. Refer to the table below for the specific primers, it employed in the amplification of genomic DNA (Table-1) [14, 15].

Table-1.

Species-specific primers used in PCR for the detection of each Eimeria species.

Eimeria specie Primer name Primer sequences (5’- 3’) Amplicon size (bp) Annealing temperature (°C) References
Eimeria acervulina Ac-01F AGTCAGCCACACAATAATGGCAAACATG 811 62 [14]
Ac-01R AGTCAGCCACAGCGAAAGACGTATGTG
Eimeria brunetti Br-01F TGGTCGCAGAACCTACAGGGCTGT 626 65 [14]
Br01R TGGTCGCAGACGTATATTAGGGGTCTG
Eimeria tenella Tn-01F CCGCCCAAACCAGGTGTCACG 539 62 [14]
Tn-01R CCGCCCAAACATGCAAGATGGC
Eimeria praecox Pr-01F AGTCAGCCACCACCAAATAGAACCTTGG 354 60 [14]
Pr-01R GCCTGCTTACTACAAACTTGCAAGCCCT
Eimeria mitis Mt-01F TATTTCCTGTCGTCGTCTCGC 327 58 [15]
Mt-01R GTATGCAAGAGAGAATCGGGA
Eimeria maxima Mx-01F GGGTAACGCCAACTGCCGGGTATG 272 60 [14]
Mx-01R AGCAAACCGTAAAGGCCGAAGTCCTAGA
Eimeria necatrix Nc-01F TTCATTTCGCTTAACAATATTTGGCCTCA 200 58 [14]
Nc-01R ACAACGCCTCATAACCCCAAGAAATTTTG

PCR=Polymerase chain reaction

The PCR reactions were conducted in a total volume of 25 μL for each reaction, comprising 12. 5 μL mastermix (Thermo Scientific DreamTaq Green PCR Mastermix, Thermo Fisher Scientific), which included 3 μL genomic DNA, 1.5 μL each of reverse and forward primers, and 6.5 μL nuclease-free water. Standard cycle parameters were as follows: 1× (5 min at 94°C), 30× (1 min at 94°C, 90 s at 57°C, and 2 min at 72°C), and 1× (7 min at 72°C). After PCR amplification, the products were separated using 1.25% agarose gel electrophoresis, providing a visual representation of the amplified genes of Eimeria species. This approach allowed the precise identification and differentiation of Eimeria species based on their distinct primers (Table-1) [14, 15].

Statistical analysis

The data were imported into Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Office, Redmond, WA, USA) and subsequently analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18 software (IBM Corp., NY, USA). Coccidiosis prevalence was computed across various chicken groups, considering factors such as age, gender, month, and area. In addition, the prevalence of distinct Eimeria species was calculated. The Chi-square test was employed to scrutinize prevalence, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

Microscopic examination

Microscopic examination of fecal samples revealed Eimeria oocysts in 44.5% (400/900) of the investigated samples. The examination revealed various Eimeria oocysts, identified as oval and round bodies, under the microscope on prepared slides, as illustrated in Figure-1.

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Microscopic observation images of Eimeria parasites (a: Eimeria tenella, b: Eimeria maxima, c: Eimeria acervuline, and d: Eimeria mitis).

The prevalence of infection varied significantly according to several risk factors. In particular, broiler chickens exhibited a significantly higher infection rate (52.6%, 200/380) than egg-laying domestic chickens (38.5%, 200/520, p = 0.009). Young chickens (4–6 weeks old) had the highest infection rate among all age groups, with 55.5% (285/500) of samples tested positive. This was significantly higher than the prevalence in adult chickens (28.8% (115/400), p = 0.000). Finally, female chickens harbored Eimeria oocysts more frequently than males, with infection rates of 52.2% (235/450) and 36.7% (165/450), respectively (p = 0.003) (Table-2).

Table-2.

Prevalence rates of Eimeria parasites, revealed by microscopy, in overall and according to risk factors.

Risk factors Classes Total number Positive samples Prevalence rates (% ± C.I.1) p-value Khi2
Category Egg-laying domestic chickens 520 200 38.5±0.043 0.009* 6.779
Broiler chickens 380 200 52.6±0.051
Age Young (4–6 weeks) 500 285 55.5±0.043 0.000* 28.514
Adults (above 6 weeks) 400 115 28.8±0.045
Gender Male 450 165 36.7±0.045 0.003* 8.505
Female 450 235 52.2±0.047
Total 900 400 44.4±0.033
1

:C.I.: 95% confidence interval,

*

Statistically significant, p < 0.05

Molecular identification

PCR amplification, performed on the 400 microscopically positive samples, confirmed the presence of four distinct Eimeria species in District Swabi (Figure-1). E. tenella emerged as the predominant culprit, infecting a staggering 42.5% (170/400) of the examined samples. Following closely were E. acervulina (26.3%, 105/400) and E. maxima (20%, 80/400), while E. mitis constituted a smaller portion (11.3%, 45/400). Notably, no evidence of E. necatrix, E. brunetti, or E. praecox was detected (Table-3).

Table-3.

Distribution rates of each Eimeria species detected by molecular method performed on the 400 samples positive to the genus by microscopic examination.

Eimeria species Positive sample Distribution rate (%)
Eimeria tenella 170 42.5
Eimeria acervulina 105 26.3
Eimeria maxima 80 20.0
Eimeria mitis 45 11.3
Eimeria brunetti 0 0
Eimeria necatrix 0 0
Eimeria praecox 0 0
Eimeria spp. 400 100

Discussion

The prevalence of coccidiosis in District Swabi, Pakistan, is in line with several reports on poultry health and parasitology from India [16], Pakistan [17, 18], Iraq [19], and Saudi Arabia [20]. In this study, the microscopic examination of 900 fecal samples yielded compelling results, revealing a substantial prevalence of Eimeria oocysts at 44.4%. This prevalence rate falls within the range observed in similar studies conducted in Nigeria [21] and Pakistan [22], highlighting the persistent challenge of coccidiosis in poultry farming. Our findings include records from diverse geographical regions, demonstrating variations in coccidiosis prevalence influenced by factors such as climate, management practices, and regional epidemiology. Our prevalence rate estimated at the District Swabi aligns with broader trends observed in South Asian poultry farming, where Eimeria infections continue to pose a significant threat to flock health [21].

Furthermore, our results highlight the multifactorial nature of coccidiosis prevalence, and the identification of chicken type, age, and gender as influencing factors in the District Swabi study is consistent with this understanding. Broiler chickens, young chickens (4–6 weeks), and females demonstrated higher susceptibility, a pattern observed across various poultry farming environments. In particular, younger chickens consistently exhibit increased vulnerability to Eimeria infections due to developing immune systems. The predisposition of broiler chickens to higher infection rates is a common finding, underscoring the importance of tailored management practices for specific poultry types. The heightened susceptibility of females aligns with the study of Oljira et al. [23] on gender-related variations in disease susceptibility among poultry, reflecting hormonal and physiological differences.

Moreover, the conformity of these findings with global trends enhances the robustness of the District Swabi study. This alignment emphasizes the universality of certain risk factors that influence Eimeria infection, transcending geographical boundaries. Integrating these results into our extensive database will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the multifaceted factors shaping coccidiosis prevalence, fostering a comprehensive approach to poultry health management. By drawing parallels with our findings, the District Swabi study not only reinforces existing knowledge reported by Bachaya et al. [13] but also contributes region-specific insights. This information is invaluable for tailoring interventions to the unique dynamics of poultry farming in District Swabi, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of local disease management strategies.

The application of PCR assays to confirm the presence of various Eimeria species in District Swabi provides a molecular dimension to our understanding, aligning seamlessly with the advanced techniques present in our database on Parasitology. The distribution rates uncovered for E. tenella, E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. mitis in the District Swabi study are consistent with global patterns observed in similar investigations. In particular, numerous studies globally have reported the prevalence of E. tenella in poultry populations [18]. For instance, a study conducted by Bachaya et al. [18] found E. tenella to be a prevalent species, particularly associated with severe clinical manifestations of coccidiosis. This aligns with the District Swabi study, which emphasizes the ubiquity of E. tenella and its potential impact on poultry health and productivity. In addition, Ahad et al. [24] provide insights into the distribution of E. acervulina in the Kashmir valley from February to January for 1 year. Their findings, similar to those of the District Swabi study, indicate that E. acervulina is a commonly identified species in poultry. Furthermore, Ahad et al. [24] highlighted the association between E. acervulina and milder clinical symptoms, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the species’ impact on poultry production. A study conducted by Ahad et al. [24] has underscored the prevalence of E. maxima in poultry populations in the Kashmir Valley. Our identification of E. maxima aligns with the findings of Ahad et al. [24] emphasizing the widespread distribution of these species. Ahad et al. [24] also reported variations in pathogenicity among different Eimeria species, providing a valuable context for understanding the potential consequences of E. maxima infections. However, the presence of E. mitis in our study corresponds to studies such as that of Ahad et al. [24]. These researchers investigated the prevalence of Eimeria species in various regions of the Kashmir Valley, highlighting the diverse distribution of E. mitis. Their work contributes to the global understanding of E. mitis as a component of coccidiosis, providing context for the District Swabi study’s identification of these particular species.

The absence of E. necatrix, E. brunetti, and E. praecox in the positive samples, as determined by PCR, corresponds with the sporadic occurrences reported by Ahad et al. [24] and Ayaz et al. [25]. These reports also indicated that the prevalence of certain Eimeria species can exhibit regional variability. Molecular techniques employed in the present study not only enhance the accuracy of species identification but also contribute valuable data on the distribution and prevalence of specific Eimeria species within the local poultry population [24]. Ayaz et al. [25] have highlighted the global distribution of Eimeria species, emphasizing variations influenced by factors such as climate, management practices, and host characteristics. Our study enriches this understanding by providing region-specific insights into the prevalence of Eimeria species. The use of advanced molecular tools aligns with the contemporary trends in parasitology research, ensuring a more detailed characterization of the Eimeria landscape in the local poultry industry.

The dominance of E. tenella among the identified Eimeria species in District Swabi has critical implications for poultry health. Ahad et al. [24] emphasized that E. tenella is often associated with severe clinical manifestations of coccidiosis, including significant economic losses in affected flocks. The prevalence of this species in District Swabi underscores the urgency of targeted interventions to reduce the impact of coccidiosis on the local poultry industry. The proactive approach advocated by our study aligns with the best practices recommended in our database, emphasizing the importance of preventive measures to curb the spread of coccidiosis [20]. Tailored interventions, considering the prevalent Eimeria species, are crucial for reducing the economic burden on the poultry industry and safeguarding flock health [26]. Integrating these findings into our collective knowledge base facilitates a more targeted and context-specific approach to coccidiosis management, ensuring sustainable practices for local poultry stakeholders.

This study paves the way for future research in the management of coccidiosis. Our findings emphasize the ongoing importance of developing and fine-tuning approaches to counteract poultry parasitism. Focusing on refined sampling strategies is in line with the developing methodologies detailed by Haug et al. [27]. Sophisticated sampling methods, including molecular and spatial analyses, effectively uncover intricate epidemiological patterns. By adopting advanced sampling methods and examining complex health and economic consequences of Eimeria parasites, future studies can refine and enhance poultry management techniques, both locally for District Swabi and globally against coccidiosis.

Conclusion

Our study in District Swabi, Pakistan, offers unique insights into the prevalence of coccidiosis and the distribution of Eimeria species among the local poultry population. With the use of microscopic examinations and molecular techniques such as PCR assays, the intricacies of coccidiosis in the region have been further elucidated. The significance of specific Eimeria species, their prevalence, and the associated economic and health consequences emphasize the need for targeted strategies in poultry agriculture for long-term success. Our findings, recognized for their limitations and potential biases, expand the current knowledge base and pave the way for upcoming investigations. To improve the comprehension of coccidiosis trends, develop innovative disease management tactics, and boost the well-being of the poultry sector in District Swabi, suggestions for fine-tuned sampling techniques and supplementary diagnostic approaches are suggested.

Authors’ Contributions

NB and SS: Conceptualization and methodology. WN, NUK, SH, FB, and MSK: Software and validation. NB and IK: Formal analysis. NB and IK: Investigation, writing–original draft preparation, and data analysis. WN and MBS: Data curation. IK, MBS, and PDLRE: Writing-review and editing and data analysis. EIE and MBS: visualization. NB, SS, and IK: Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project (No. MECESUP UCT 0804), University of Temuco, Temuco, Chile, for funding the study.

Footnotes

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project (No. MECESUP UCT 0804), University of Temuco, Temuco, Chile, for funding the study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

References

  • 1.El-Sabrout K, Khalifah A, Mishra B. Application of botanical products as nutraceutical feed additives for improving poultry health and production. Vet. World. 2023;16(2):369–379. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.369-379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khater H.F, Ziam H, Abbas A, Abbas R.Z, Raza M.A, Hussain K, Younis E.Z, Radwan I.T, Selim A. Avian coccidiosis:Recent advances in alternative control strategies and vaccine development. Agrobiol. Rec. 2020;1:11–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rashid M, Akbar H, Bakhsh A, Rashid M.I, Hassan M.A, Ullah R, Hussain T, Manzoor S, Yin H. Assessing the prevalence and economic significance of coccidiosis individually and in combination with concurrent infections in Pakistani commercial poultry farms. Poult. Sci. 2019;98(3):1167–1175. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yenibehit N. Market integration and price transmission analysis of foreign and Ghanaian beef and mutton markets;the effect of crude oil price and exchange rate fluctuations. Cogent. Food. Agric. 2023;9(2):2260611. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martins R.R, Silva L.J, Pereira A.M, Esteves A, Duarte S.C, Pena A. Coccidiostats and poultry:A comprehensive review and current legislation. Foods. 2022;11(18):2738. doi: 10.3390/foods11182738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iqbal S, Tanveer S, Maqbool N. Avian coccidiosis-a critical review. Mun. Ent. Zool. 2022;17:1155–1175. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.López-Osorio S, Chaparro-Gutiérrez J.J, Gómez-Osorio L.M. Overview of poultry Eimeria life cycle and host-parasite interactions. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:384. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abdullah S.H, Dyary H.O. Cryptosporidiosis:Neglected zoonosis of global importance. In:Zoonosis. Vol. 2. Unique Scientific Publishers, Faisalabad, Pakistan. 2023:249–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olufemi A, Olatoye I, Oladele D. Morphometric and molecular identification of Eimeria species from commercial chickens in Nigeria. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. 2020;9(4):104–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mesa-Pineda C, Navarro-Ruíz J.L, López-Osorio S, Chaparro-Gutiérrez J.J, Gómez-Osorio L.M. Chicken coccidiosis:From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Front Vet. Sci. 2021;8:787653. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.787653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abdisa T, Hasen R, Tagesu T, Regea G, Tadese G. Poultry coccidiosis and its prevention, control. J. Vet. Res. 2019;1(1):1. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adams D.S. Novel Methods for Controlling and Diagnosing Avian Coccidiosis. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bachaya H.A, Abbas R.Z, Raza M.A, Iqbal Z, Rehman T.U, Baber W, Hussain R. Existence of coccidiosis and associated risk factors in broiler chickens in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. Vet. J. 2015;35(1):81–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chere M.A, Melese K, Megerssa Y.C. Molecular characterization of Eimeria species in broiler chickens, Ethiopia. Vet. Med. (Auckl) 2022;13:153–161. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S357432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alam M.Z, Dey A.R, Parvin S, Akter S, Rony S.A. ITS1-PCR based identification of chicken Eimeria species in poultry litter from Mymensingh district, Bangladesh. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2021;8(3):489–493. doi: 10.5455/javar.2021.h538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yaqub M, Shah S.A, Rafiq M, Kamil S.A, Tariq M, Allaie I.M. Transverse study of Eimeria spp. infection in broiler and layer chickens in central Kashmir. J. Parasit. Dis. 2023;47:265–270. doi: 10.1007/s12639-022-01563-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jamil M, Mansoor M. Prevalence of coccidiosis in broiler chickens in District Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. J. Zool. St. 2016;3(3):41–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bachaya H.A, Raza M.A, Khan M.N, Iqbal Z, Abbas R.Z, Murtaza S, Badar N. Predominance and detection of different Eimeria species causing coccidiosis in layer chickens. J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 2012;22(3):597–600. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ahmed A.M, AlBakri H.S. Phenotypic and genotypic identification of Eimeria species in backyard chicken in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 2021;35(Supp 1–3):41–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mares M.M, Al-Quraishy S, Abdel-Gaber R, Murshed M. Morphological and molecular characterization of Eimeria spp. Infecting domestic poultry Gallus gallus in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Microorganisms. 2023;11(3):795. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11030795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lawal J.R, Jajere S.M, Ibrahim U.I, Geidam Y.A, Gulani I.A, Musa G, Ibekwe B.U. Prevalence of coccidiosis among village and exotic breed of chickens in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Vet. World. 2016;9(6):653. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.653-659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ali H, Naqvi F, Tariq N. Prevalence of coccidiosis and its association with risk factors in poultry of Quetta, Pakistan. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2014;2(4):554–558. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oljira D, Melaku A, Bogale B. Prevalence and risk factors of coccidiosis in poultry farms in and around Ambo Town, Western Ethiopia. Am. J. Sci. Res. 2012;7(4):146–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ahad S, Tanveer S, Malik T.A. Seasonal impact on the prevalence of coccidian infection in broiler chicks across poultry farms in the Kashmir valley. J. Parasit. Dis. 2015;39(4):736–740. doi: 10.1007/s12639-014-0434-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ayaz M.M, Akhtar M, Hayat C.S, Hafeez M.A, Haq A. Prevalence of coccidiosis in broiler chickens in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pak. Vet. J. 2003;23(1):51–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Blake D, Marugan-Hernandez V, Tomley F. Spotlight on avian pathology:Eimeria and the disease coccidiosis. Avian Pathol. 2021;50:209–213. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2021.1912288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haug A, Thebo P, Mattsson J.G. A simplified protocol for molecular identification of Eimeria species in field samples. Vet. Parasitol. 2007;146((1–2)):35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES