Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1984 Jun 15;220(3):795–801. doi: 10.1042/bj2200795

Membrane-potential-dependent changes of the lipid microviscosity of mitochondria and phospholipid vesicles.

P S O'Shea, S Feuerstein-Thelen, A Azzi
PMCID: PMC1153698  PMID: 6087795

Abstract

The effects of a transmembrane potential difference upon the lipid microviscosity of cytochrome oxidase vesicles (COVs) and rat liver mitochondria (RLM) were investigated. COVs and RLM were labelled with the fluorescent probe 1,6-diphenylhexa-1,3,5-triene (DPH). The fluorescence polarization of the probe was then measured when potentials of different magnitudes were induced across the membranes of these particles. It was shown that the absolute value of the microviscosity changes to quite a significant extent, owing to the imposition of large membrane potentials. On relaxation of the membrane potential the lipid microviscosity was also shown to return to the value before the induction of the potential. The largest change in lipid microviscosity was observed when coupled respiration was initiated. This occurred in both the COV system and the RLM system. The absolute value of the lipid microviscosity was shown to change by as much as 22% with the induction of membrane potentials, owing to respiration. To confirm the viscosity measurements made with DPH, lipid microviscosity was also measured with the spin-labelled fatty acid 5-doxyl stearate. Measurements of the order parameters indicated that, in agreement with the results of fluorescence experiments, viscosity changes occurred that were due to the induction of a membrane potential. The significance of these findings to the regulation of metabolism is briefly discussed, the main conclusion being that, although there is certainly a significant variation of lipid microviscosity with electric field, mechanistic interpretations will require further studies.

Full text

PDF
795

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Casey R. P., O'Shea P. S., Chappell J. B., Azzi A. A quantitative characterisation of H+ translocation by cytochrome c oxidase vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Apr 26;765(1):30–37. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(84)90153-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corda D., Pasternak C., Shinitzky M. Increase in lipid microviscosity of unilamellar vesicles upon the creation of transmembrane potential. J Membr Biol. 1982;65(3):235–242. doi: 10.1007/BF01869967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crowley J. M. Electrical breakdown of bimolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability. Biophys J. 1973 Jul;13(7):711–724. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86017-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Georgescauld D., Duclohier H. Transient fluorescence signals from pyrene labeled pike nerves during action potential. Possible implications for membrane fluidity changes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Dec 14;85(3):1186–1191. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)90667-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Halestrap A. P. The nature of the stimulation of the respiratory chain of rat liver mitochondria by glucagon pretreatment of animals. Biochem J. 1982 Apr 15;204(1):37–47. doi: 10.1042/bj2040037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heyn M. P. Determination of lipid order parameters and rotational correlation times from fluorescence depolarization experiments. FEBS Lett. 1979 Dec 15;108(2):359–364. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80564-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Houslay M. D., Dipple I., Gordon L. M. Phenobarbital selectively modulates the glucagon-stimulated activity of adenylate cyclase by depressing the lipid phase separation occurring in the outer half of the bilayer of liver plasma membranes. Biochem J. 1981 Sep 1;197(3):675–681. doi: 10.1042/bj1970675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson S. M., Bangham A. D. The action of anaesthetics on phospholipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Oct 14;193(1):92–104. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(69)90062-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson S. M., Miller K. W., Bangham A. D. The opposing effects of pressure and general anaesthetics on the cation permeability of liposomes of varying lipid composition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Apr 25;307(1):42–57. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson S. M., Miller K. W. The effect of pressure and the volume of activation on the monovalent cation and glucose permeabilities of liposomes of varying composition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jan 28;375(2):286–291. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(75)90196-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keynes R. D. Excitable membranes. Nature. 1972 Sep 1;239(5366):29–32. doi: 10.1038/239029a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Shea P. S., Chappell J. B. The relationship between the rate of respiration and the protonmotive force. The role of proton conductivity. Biochem J. 1984 Apr 15;219(2):401–404. doi: 10.1042/bj2190401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Shea P. S., Petrone G., Casey R. P., Azzi A. The current-voltage relationships of liposomes and mitochondria. Biochem J. 1984 May 1;219(3):719–726. doi: 10.1042/bj2190719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sauerheber R. D., Gordon L. M., Crosland R. D., Kuwahara M. D. Spin-label studies on rat liver and heart plasma membranes: do probe-probe interactions interfere with the measurement of membrane properties? J Membr Biol. 1977 Feb 24;31(1-2):131–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01869402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schreier S., Polnaszek C. F., Smith I. C. Spin labels in membranes. Problems in practice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Dec 15;515(4):395–436. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(78)90011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shinitzky M., Barenholz Y. Fluidity parameters of lipid regions determined by fluorescence polarization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Dec 15;515(4):367–394. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(78)90010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shinitzky M., Inbar M. Microviscosity parameters and protein mobility in biological membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 16;433(1):133–149. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90183-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES