Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2024 Oct 22;11:1441369. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1441369

Environmental triggers of pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid: a case control study

Corey Stone 1,2,3, Grace Bak 1,3, Daniel Oh 1,3, Cathy Zhao 1,3, Supriya Venugopal 1,3, Kuldeep Kumar 2, Dedee F Murrell 1,3,*,†,#
PMCID: PMC11537152  PMID: 39502648

Abstract

Background

Previous case–control studies have suggested that environmental factors including exposure to pesticides and organic materials, diet and medications have an important role in the pathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris. These studies lacked geographical population controls and had less than three controls per case.

Objective

To identify environmental and occupational risk factors associated with the development of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and bullous pemphigoid (BP).

Method

Cases were patients with PV (n = 25) and BP (n = 29) recruited from 2009 to 2017. Controls for PV (n = 72) and BP (n = 84) were recruited from the general population via electoral commission matching, matched for age, sex, residential location, and ethnicity. Data about demographics, environmental exposures and occupational exposures, was collected using a structured questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression analysis was undertaken using SPSS software to identify significant variables.

Results

Significant factors associated with PV included the daily consumption of leeks (odds ratio (OR) 3.6; p = 0.025), mustard oil (OR = 4.4; p = 0.049), tomatoes (OR = 4.735; p = 0.032), multivitamins (OR 3.6; p = 0.009), alcohol (0.039), and calcium supplements (OR = 44, p < 0.001). Other associated factors included the number of lifetime sunburns (p = 0.019), high levels of mental stress (p < 0.001), and the use of lime household cleaning products (p < 0.001), Significant factors associated with BP included the daily consumption of green or herbal tea (OR = 3.7; p = 0.004), fish oil (OR = 5.7; p < 0.001), calcium supplements (OR = 6.1; p < 0.001), multivitamins (OR = 2.6; p = 0.043), and glucosamine (OR = 3.0; p = 0.046). The use of lime household cleaning products (p < 0.001) and high levels of mental stress (p = 0.007) were also associated with BP.

Conclusion

Dietary factors containing thiol groups such as leeks, tomatoes, and mustard oil may be potential triggers for PV. High levels of mental stress, the use of supplementary medications such as calcium and multivitamins, and chemical cleaning products containing lime may be associated with an increased risk of developing both PV and BP. Lifestyle changes should be part of routine management for these patients.

Keywords: autoimmune blistering disease, bullous disease, pemphigus, pemphigoid, epidemiology, case–control

Introduction

Autoimmune blistering disease (AIBD) are a rare group of chronic and potentially life-threatening skin and mucosal diseases caused by autoantibodies targeting skin adhesion proteins (1). Among AIBDs the most common are bullous pemphigoid (BP), caused by autoantibodies targeted at hemidesmosomes in the dermal-epidermal junction and resulting in subepidermal blistering, pemphigus vulgaris (PV), and pemphigus foliaceous (PF) which are triggered by autoantibodies targeting intraepithelial desmosomes and resulting in intraepidermal blistering.

Although genetic predispositions have been identified in both bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus, environmental factors in the pathogenesis of AIBDs is yet to be established despite playing an inexplicably important role in the initiation and exacerbation of the disease process.

Pemphigus is caused by antibody mediated (type II) hypersensitivity reactions where IgG antibodies bind to intracellular desmosomal proteins desmoglein1 and desmoglein3. This binding induces disruption of the intercellular adhesive function of desmogleins leading to separation of neighbouring keratinocytes, a process referred to as acantholysis (loss of coherence between cells). Clinically, PV is characterised by thin-walled flaccid blisters, containing transudate fluid, which easily rupture leading to pruritic and painful erosions.

Despite being observed worldwide, pemphigus vulgaris has varied prevalence in different ethnic groups with a worldwide incidence of 0.1 to 0.5 per 100,000 population. In Finland the incidence is approximately 0.76 new cases per million per year whereas in Israel, rates are reported to be 16.1 per million per year (2). This is attributable to increased prevalence of several distinct HLA class II genes, specifically HLA-DRB1*04, HLA-A*10, and a genomic segment on 8q11.23 which spans ST18 gene (3, 4). Pemphigus prevalence in men and women is approximately equal with the average age of onset between the fourth and sixth decade, with rare cases occurring in pediatric populations. However, genetic predisposition alone is insufficient to lead to the development of the disease as an inciting trigger is often identified.

Numerous case–control studies of pemphigus patients have attempted to implicate a variety of environmental and occupational factors as triggers for PV disease onset. Studies to date have focussed on a wide range of potential triggers including organophosphate pesticides, heavy metals, medications, ultraviolet (UV) exposure, viral infections, emotional stress, and tobacco use (5–9). Suspected dietary factors include thiol compounds (garlic, leek, chives, onion, shallot), phenols (black pepper, red chillies, mango, cashew), tannins (tea, red wine, spices, raspberry, cranberry, blackberry), isothiocyanates (mustard, horseradish, cauliflower), and phycocyanins (Spirulina platensis alga) (10–15).

Despite some environmental exposures being linked to initiation of disease, all studies were suboptimal in design with only 1–2 controls per case and controls being recruited from dermatology clinics, i.e., patients with existing dermatological disease rather than three to four controls per case matched for geographical residence.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune skin disease of the pemphigoid group, characterised by autoantibodies against structural proteins of the hemidesmosomes, BP180 and BP230 (16). The clinical manifestations of BP involve tense subepidermal blisters forming on urticarial plaques, erythematous, or normal skin with associated pruritus (17). The presence of a precipitating trigger is identifiable in less than 15% of BP patients which suggests that environmental factors may not contribute as strongly to the development of BP as in PV (18). To date the strongest association with disease is the presence of other comorbidities such as cerebrovascular incident, or a neurodegenerative disease (19, 20). Numerous case–control studies have found that BP patients were more likely to have a history of neurological disease, and it is hypothesised that the molecular mimicry between the similar epithelial and neuronal isoforms of the BP antigens is attributable to this association (21, 22).

A number of medications have also been linked to increased risk of BP including dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) inhibitors, neuroleptics, and diuretics (23–25). A proposed mechanism by which drugs may alter the antigenic properties of the skin is through binding to molecules within the lamina lucida of the basement membrane zone (BMZ), thereby acting as neoantigens and triggering the formation of anti-BMZ antibodies (26, 27). Similarly, a number of vaccinations have been postulated to induce or unmask subclinical BP by triggering a non-specific immune response in individuals with an immunologic predisposition (28).

Several case reports have described BP to be induced or exacerbated by exposure to ultraviolet light in the form of radiation therapy, psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) or UVB therapy, and from local trauma from thermal or electrical burns, however none of these potential triggers have been explored in a case control study (29–38).

The pathogenic mechanism through which external agents could initiate or exacerbate PV and BP are not yet understood. Environmental factors may induce biological processes in the skin which lead to the exposure of self-antigens and the production of autoantibodies. This may be mediated by cytokine dysregulation or molecular mimicry leading to the development of humoral autoimmunity (39, 40). These processes underlie findings of epidemiological studies comparing environmental exposures between those with and without AIBD. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the associations of PV and BP with environmental and occupational risk factors previously reported in the literature.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research and Ethics Committee (number STG/08/66).

Case subjects were patients recruited from an academic dermatology clinic specialising in blistering disease. Inclusion criteria for patients with PV or BP were as follows: age ≥ 18 years, a diagnosis of PV or BP based on clinical, histopathological, and immunohistologic criteria. Interviews with patients were conducted during their scheduled appointments or over the telephone. The Australian Electoral Commission provided a list of 50 controls per case that were matched for age (± 2 years), birth gender, and residential location (within 10 km) through electoral records (41). Controls were first screened by name to match for ethnicity as closely as possible. The names and addresses of the controls were searched on the White Pages search engine (a public database) to obtain their telephone numbers. Control subjects were recruited by postal letter and phone call and those who agreed were interviewed for approximately 30 min over the telephone by the same clinicians who interviewed the cases. We attempted to recruit four to five controls per case however this was not possible for all cases. The medium number of cases per control recruited for BP was 3 (range 1–4) and the medium number of cases per control for PV was 3 (range 1–7) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Number of matched controls per case.

Bullous pemphigoid Pemphigus vulgaris
Number of controls Occurrences Occurrences
1 2 3
2 7 4
3 11 15
4 9 1
5 0 1
6 0 0
7 0 1

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to participation in the case–control study.

A total of 25 PV patients (11 males, 14 females) and 72 control subjects (32 males, 40 females), and 29 BP patients (11 males, 18 females) and 84 control subjects (35 males, 49 females) were enrolled in the study (Figures 13). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire where cases were asked to reflect on their ‘usual lifestyle habits’ for the 12 months preceding disease onset and controls asked to reflect their usual lifestyle habits over the preceding 12 months. A number of distractor questions were included, thought not to be relevant to onset of either diseases.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris cases and matched controls demonstrating age and gender matching for each case.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pemphigus vulgaris cases and matched control demonstrating location matching of each patient.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Bullous pemphigoid cases and matched controls demonstrating location matching of each patient.

Information included demographic factors, smoking history, supplement intake, immunisation history, alcohol intake, dietary factors, travel history, use of personal hygiene and household cleaning products, and occupational factors including the duration and mode of exposure (direct contact or vapour/fumes) to pesticides, organic product, heavy metals and other substances. Information on the daily duration of sunlight exposure and history of sunburns was collected. The use of hormonal medications and supplements, previous pregnancies, and subjective levels of emotional stress in the 12 months prior to diagnosis were also recorded (Supplementary material S1). The questionnaire given to case subjects included an additional section with questions regarding disease onset and duration, the distribution of lesions, previous treatments and hospitalisations, and current disease activity (active or in remission).

SPSS software was used to calculate chi-square and conditional logistic regression. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each variable were calculated. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Pemphigus vulgaris

In total 25 PV patients and 72 control subjects matched for age, birth gender, residential location and in most cases, ethniciticy, were enrolled in the study (Table 2). Of the 25 PV patients there were 11 males (42%) and 14 females (58%). The median age at diagnosis was 47 years with a range of 18 years to 81 years. The largest proportion of patients were Caucasian (48%). The remaining were of Middle Eastern (24%), Asian (24%) and South Asian (4%) descent. Active disease was present in 8 patients (32%) 17 patients (68%) were in remission. Of the 12 patients (48%) who had been previously hospitalised due to their condition, 10 patients reported 1–2 hospital admissions in total and two patients reported 3–5 hospital admissions in total. Overall, PV patients reported an average of 2 new blisters per month.

Table 2.

Distribution of matching factors between cases and controls.

Bullous pemphigoid Pemphigus vulgaris
Cases Controls Cases Controls
Age <60 3 12 19 53
60–70 10 26 2 6
70–80 10 29 3 10
>80 6 17 1 3
Ethnicity Caucasian 24 78 11 55
Asian 4 5 8 12
Middle Easter 1 1 6 5
Sex Female 18 49 14 40
Male 11 35 11 32

Dietary factors including the daily consumption of leeks (OR = 3.6; p = 0.025), mustard oil (OR = 4.4; p = 0.049), alcohol (p = 0.039), and tomatoes (OR = 4.735; p = 0.032) were significantly associated with pemphigus (Table 3). The daily use of supplementary medications including multivitamins (p = 0.009) and calcium (p < 0.001) were also found to be significant. High levels of self-reported emotional stress (categorised as “moderate”, “severe”, or “extreme”) in the 12 months leading up to diagnosis was a significant risk factor for pemphigus as was the number of lifetime sunburns (p = 0.019).

Table 3.

Significant and marginally insignificant factors for pemphigus vulgaris.

Pemphigus vulgaris
Factor p Value
Previous travel to rural areas of Brazil/Columbia 0.088
Digoxin 0.088
DPP4-I 0.088
Daily tea consumption 0.071
Smoking 0.71
Calcium channel blocker 0.063
Daily celery consumption 0.062
Daily mustard oil consumption 0.049
Organic product vapour/fumes 0.045
Daily hot chocolate consumption 0.04
Daily EtOH consumption 0.039
Daily consumption of tomatoes 0.032
Daily consumption of leeks 0.025
Lifetime sunburns 0.019
Daily consumption of multivitamins 0.009
Alternative medications 0.001
Daily calcium supplement 0.001
Mental stress 0.001
Lime cleaning product 0.001

Refer to Supplementary material S1 for full list of questions and definitions of alternative medications.

Occupational exposure to organic products such as grass clippings, crops, compost, or animal manure (p = 0.045) and the use of lime household cleaning products (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with pemphigus patients whilst smoking was not associated (p = 0.944).

Bullous pemphigoid

Data from 29 BP patients and 84 control subjects (35 males, 49 females) were enrolled in this case–control study. Of the 29 BP patients, 11 (37.9%) were male and 18 (62.1%) were female and the control group comprised 35 males (41.6%) and 49 females (58.3%). The median age at diagnosis was 72 years with a range of 46 years to 88 years. The largest proportion of patients in the BP group was Caucasian (79.3%) and the remainder of the patients were of Middle Eastern (3.4%), Asian (10.3%), South Asian (3.4%) and South American (3.4%) descent. Eight patients (27.6%) had active disease and 21 (72.4%) were in remission. Of the 7 patients (24.1%) who had been previously hospitalised due to their condition, 6 patients had been admitted 1–2 times and only 1 patient who had been admitted 3–5 times. Flares of new blisters every month was reported in a total of 13 patients (44.8%) and there was an average of 4.2 new blisters per month reported in this group overall.

The daily consumption of green or herbal tea (OR = 3.7; p = 0.004) was found to increase the likelihood of developing BP (Table 4). The use of supplementary medications such as fish oil (p < 0.001), calcium (p < 0.001), multivitamins (p = 0.043), and glucosamine (p = 0.046) were also found to be associated with BP. Other significant environmental exposures included mental stress (p = 0.007) and the use of lime as a household cleaning product (p < 0.001).

Table 4.

Significant and marginally insignificant factors for bullous pemphigoid.

Bullous pemphigoid
Factor p Value
Lifetime sunburns 0.106
Exposure to heavy metals 0.098
Celery 0.094
Digoxin 0.088
DPP4-I medication 0.088
Daily echinacae 0.087
Daily hot chocolate 0.072
Smoking 0.682
Calcium channel blocker 0.063
Tomatoes 0.061
Daily glucosamine 0.046
Daily multivitamins 0.043
Mental stress 0.007
Daily green/herbal tea 0.004
Daily alternative medication use 0.001
Daily fish oil supplement 0.001
Daily calcium supplement 0.001
Lime cleaning product 0.001

Refer to Supplementary material S1 for full list of questions and definitions of alternative medications.

Occupational factors including exposure to pesticides, heavy metals, organic products, petroleum, general waste, asbestos, and latex were not statistically significant.

Discussion

This is the first study to conduct detailed one-on-one questionnaires, including distractors, of PV and BP patients with three to four very well matched controls per case. Various environmental factors were investigated as suggested from prior studies undertaken.

Dietary factors

Compounds such as phenols, thiols, and tannins (polyphenolic compounds) which are found in many of the causative medications associated with pemphigus are also present in high concentrations in a number of foods (42, 43). An experimental study has found that allyl compounds, found in garlic, leek, and onion, can provoke acantholysis in human skin cultured in vitro, with the acantholytic effect being most prominent in pemphigus prone tissue from an HLA-DR4+ donor, an HLA class II gene with a known association with pemphigus vulgaris (44). This suggests that histocompatability antigens can make the skin biochemically more susceptible to exogenous acantholytic factors. Tannic acid added to normal skin culture in vitro has also been shown to cause acantholytic changes (45).

Clinically, Ruocco et al. reported a case of 49-year-old male who developed pemphigus after consuming a large quantity of garlic. Without any conventional treatment the pemphigus cleared after a few months whilst on a garlic-free diet, however the pemphigus quickly returned after unintentionally consuming a strongly garlic-spiced meal (14). Foods high in isothiocyanate-producing glucosides (mustard seeds, and mustard oil), phenols (mangoes, black pepper, and nuts) and tannins (red chili pepper, tea, red wine, cherry, raspberry, cranberry, and blackberry) have also been linked with pemphigus (42).

Our study found significant associations (p < 0.05) between pemphigus and the daily consumption of leeks (p = 0.025), tomatoes (p = 0.032), mustard oil (p = 0.049), hot chocolate drinks (p = 0.04), and alcohol (p = 0.039). Marginally insignificant associations (p = 0.05–0.10) were also found with celery (p = 0.062), and green or herbal tea (p = 0.071).

A number of supplements were found to be associated with BP including glucosamine, calcium, multivitamins and fish oil. Dietary factors and the use of supplements are yet to be associated with BP in the literature to date. The novel findings of our study suggest the need for further research in this area.

Mental stress

Our study found that moderate to extreme levels of stress in the 12 months prior to diagnosis significantly increased the likelihood of both PV (p < 0.001) and BP (p = 0.007).

There is a known association between the immune system and the nervous system, and epidemiological studies have identified emotional stress as a precipitating factor in the occurrence of many autoimmune diseases and the exacerbation of symptoms (46). The role of psychogenic immunomodulation in the pathogenesis of bullous disorders continues to be an emerging area of research.

Several case studies and reports have identified emotional stress as a precipitating factor in the development and exacerbation of pemphigus. In a study of 13 consecutive pemphigus patients, Cremniter et al. reported the presence of a life stressor in the year preceding diagnosis in 12 patients (47). In five cases the event was classified as traumatic, i.e., distressing beyond the range of usual human experience, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental health Disorders.

In a study of 10 PV patients, the four patients with poor disease outcomes had elevated initial serum levels of TNF-α compared to those with good disease outcomes, 3 of whom reported severe emotional stress in the month leading up to disease exacerbation (48). This suggests that pre-treatment serum TNF-α levels may be an important prognostic indicator for pemphigus in correlation with stress levels.

Interestingly no studies have explored a link between psychosocial stressors and BP. This a perplexing gap in the literature considering the interconnected nature of the skin, nervous system, and immune system, which has frequently been brought to light in the context of BP’s association with neurological disease (49).

Psychosocial stress can induce neurogenic inflammation where neuroendocrine hormones alter or amplify cytokine production, resulting in immune dysregulation and possibly autoimmunity (50). It is also possible that stress interacts with other known risk factors such as altering the immune response to latent herpesvirus which has been linked to both PV and BP (51). This raises the question of whether stress interacts with other environmental factors to disrupt tolerance to self-tissues initiating an autoimmune event. Recall bias and the subjective nature of self-reported emotional stress may represent limitations to the validity of these findings.

Ultraviolet exposure

Phototherapy (psoralen, UVB, and UVA) for the treatment of other dermatological conditions, such as psoriasis and mycosis fungoides, has been documented as a likely trigger for the development of BP. In these cases, BP lesions typically appear on pre-existing psoriatic lesions suggesting that phototherapy could trigger antigenic changes in the skin (52, 53).

The pathogenic mechanism through which external agents could provoke or exacerbate BP are not yet understood; however, a postulated theory is that in predisposed individuals with low titres of circulating autoantibodies tissue damage leads to recruitment of complement, inflammatory cells and circulating antibodies resulting in the formation of bullae (54).

Our study found a higher number of lifetime sunburns in PV patients than in controls (p = 0.019) however no such association was found with BP. A larger study with greater statistical power may be needed to affirm this association.

Occupational exposures

Occupational exposures comprise a broad spectrum of potential chemicals and agents implicated in the pathogenesis of pemphigus in both case reports and case–control studies. Organophosphate pesticides block the nicotinic acetylcholinesterase channel, leading to the accumulation of acetylcholine and subsequent downregulation of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors (55). As acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) on keratinocytes function to regulate expression of desmogleins, chronic downregulation of AChRs may compromise cell–cell adhesion and induce blister formation (49). Active radicals of chemical compounds or their metabolites such as heavy metals and waste products may facilitate autoimmunity by altering desmosomal proteins in the skin or by interacting with immune mediators to activate B- and T-lymphocytes (56).

A multi-centre study by Brenner et al. found that exposure to pesticides and occupational exposure to metal vapours was significantly associated with an increased risk of PV (57). Valikhani et al. from Iran also reported that PV patients were approximately 3 times more likely to have been exposed to occupational pesticides than controls (52, 58).

Our study found that PV and BP were associated with increased exposure to lime cleaning products (p = 0.001) when compared to controls, however a statistically significant relationship was not found for pesticides, heavy metals, organic products and other substances including petroleum, general waste, asbestos, and latex. PV was found to be associated with exposure to organic products (grass clippings, crops, compost, or animal manure) in vapour form (p = 0.045) and the use of household lime cleaning products.

Smoking

Several studies have reported a lower percentage of current or former smokers in pemphigus patients compared to individuals without pemphigus (6, 53, 54, 59).

Nicotine has been found to interact with nicotinic AChRs on keratinocytes to promote cell–cell adherence, prevent acantholysis and stimulate the healing of erosions (54, 60). Due to smoking being less common amongst female patients with pemphigus in other studies, it is postulated that smoking exerts anti-oestrogenic effects which could be protective against pemphigus, in a similar way to the inverse relationship between endometrial cancer and smoking.

There is particular interest in the potential of cholinergic drugs as a novel therapeutic approach to pemphigus lesions (61). Our study did not find an association between PV (p = 0.71) or BP (p = 0.68) and smoking.

Limitations

Although control subjects were matched for age, sex, and residential location, it was not possible to match for patient ethnicity in every case due to ethical limitations. Ethnicity represents genetic predisposition to AIBD. We attempted to overcome this by choosing to interview controls whose family names were from the same ethnic group. This study was also susceptible to recall bias as patients were more likely to have scrutinised potential triggers to their disease and positively respond to questions regarding previous exposures. The presence of unequal cluster size present a statistical limitation in this study. Oversampling minority classes would lead to decreased generalisability and undersampling majority classes would lead to weaker statistical power. Due to the small sample size in this study weighting was also not used as it would have lead to overfitting. The small sample size and class imbalance are both statistical limitations in this study, therefore findings from this study are hypothesis generating only.

The use of a validated questionnaire including standardised instruments for measuring subjective parameters, such as stress, would be beneficial in future studies. Information and recall bias related to under- or over-reporting of food intake was also identified as a limitation in the dietary component of the questionnaire. The retrospective nature of our study was another limitation.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by grants from the Australasian Blistering Diseases Foundation for research fellows CS, CZ and SV with DM; GB and DO were Honours/ILP students with DM from UNSW Faculty of Medicine.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research and Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

CS: Writing – original draft, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis. GB: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. DO: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. CZ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. SV: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. KK: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. DM: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1441369/full#supplementary-material

Data_Sheet_1.pdf (383.6KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Schmidt E, Zillikens D. The diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune blistering skin diseases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2011) 108:399–405. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Porro AM, Seque CA, Ferreira MCC, Simões MM, Enokihara S. Pemphigus vulgaris. An Bras Dermatol. (2019) 94:264–78. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20199011, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou S, Wakelin SH, Allen J, Wojnarowska F. Blister fluid for the diagnosis of subepidermal immunobullous diseases: a comparative study of basement membrane zone autoantibodies detected in blister fluid and serum. Br J Dermatol. (1998) 139:27–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sarig O, Bercovici S, Zoller L, Goldberg I, Indelman M, Nahum S, et al. Population-specific association between a polymorphic variant in ST18, encoding a pro-apoptotic molecule, and pemphigus vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol. (2012) 132:1798–805. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.46, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brenner S, Tur E, Shapiro J, Ruocco V, D'Avino M, Ruocco E, et al. Pemphigus vulgaris: environmental factors. Occupational, behavioral, medical, and qualitative food frequency questionnaire. Int J Dermatol. (2001) 40:562–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2001.01266.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Valikhani M, Kavusi S, Chams-Davatchi C, Daneshpazhooh M, Barzegari M, Ghiasi M, et al. Pemphigus and associated environmental factors: a case-control study. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2007) 32:256–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02390.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bastuji-Garin S, Turki H, Mokhtar I, Nouira R, Fazaa B, Jomaa B, et al. Possible relation of Tunisian pemphigus with traditional cosmetics: a multicenter case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. (2002) 155:249–56. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.3.249, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wohl Y, Dreiher J, Cohen AD. Pemphigus and dyslipidaemia: a case-control study. Br J Dermatol. (2009) 161:1418–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09474.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meibodi NT, Nahidi Y, Mahmoudi M, Javidi Z, Rastin M, Sheikh A, et al. Evaluation of coexistence of the human herpesvirus type 8 (HHV-8) infection and pemphigus: evaluation of coexistence of the HHV-8 infection and pemphigus. Int J Dermatol. (2010) 49:780–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04398.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruocco V, Peluso G, Pisani M. Pemphigus vulgaris in only one of two monozygotic twins. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1985) 12:587–9. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(85)80104-3, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fedeles F, Murphy M, Rothe MJ, Grant-Kels JM. Nutrition and bullous skin diseases. Clin Dermatol. (2010) 28:627–43. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.03.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brenner S, Wolf R. Possible nutritional factors in induced pemphigus. Dermatology. (1994) 189:337–9. doi: 10.1159/000246874, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tur E, Brenner S. Diet and pemphigus: in pursuit of exogenous factors in pemphigus and fogo selvagem. Arch Dermatol. (1998) 134:1406–10. doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.11.1406, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ruocco V, Brenner S, Lombardi ML. A case of diet-related pemphigus. Dermatology. (1996) 192:373–4. doi: 10.1159/000246417, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chorzelski TP, Hashimoto T, Jablonska S, Amagai M, Ishii K, Olszewska M, et al. Can pemphigus vulgaris be induced by nutritional factors? Eur J Dermatol. (1996) 6:284–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bağcı IS, Horváth ON, Ruzicka T, Sárdy M. Bullous pemphigoid. Autoimmun Rev. (2017) 16:445–55. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pietkiewicz P, Gornowicz-Porowska J, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Bartkiewicz P, Dmochowski M. Bullous pemphigoid and neurodegenerative diseases: a study in a setting of a central European University Dermatology Department. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2016) 28:659–63. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0459-4, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Venning VA, Wojnarowska F. Induced bullous pemphigoid. Br J Dermatol. (1995) 132:831–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb00739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Titou H, Kerrouch H, Frikh R, Hjira N. The association between bullous pemphigoid and comorbidities: a case-control study in Moroccan patients. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panonica Adriat. (2022) 31:7-. doi: 10.15570/actaapa.2022.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee S, Rastogi S, Hsu DY, Nardone B, Silverberg JI. Association of bullous pemphigoid and comorbid health conditions: a case–control study. Arch Dermatol Res. (2021) 313:327–32. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02100-2, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen J, Li L, Chen J, Zeng Y, Xu H, Song Y, et al. Sera of elderly Bullous pemphigoid patients with associated neurological diseases recognize Bullous pemphigoid antigens in the human brain. Gerontology (Basel). (2011) 57:211–6. doi: 10.1159/000315393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ruocco E, Wolf R, Caccavale S, Brancaccio G, Ruocco V, Schiavo AL. Retraction notice to “Bullous pemphigoid: associations and management guidelines: facts and controversies” [Clin. Dermatol. 31(2013) 400-412]. Clin Dermatol. (2018) 36:278–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.11.001, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bastuji-Garin S. Drugs associated with bullous pemphigoid. A case-control study. Arch Dermatol. (1996) 132:272–6. doi: 10.1001/archderm.132.3.272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lloyd-Lavery A, Chi CC, Wojnarowska F, Taghipour K. The associations between Bullous pemphigoid and drug use: a UK case-control study. JAMA Dermatol (Chicago, Ill). (2013) 149:58–62. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamadermatol.376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kridin K, Avni O, Damiani G, Tzur Bitan D, Onn E, Weinstein O, et al. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitor (DPP4i) confers increased odds of bullous pemphigoid even years after drug initiation. Arch Dermatol. (2023) 315:33–9. doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02317-9, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bean SF, Good RA, Windhorst DB. Bullous pemphigoid in an 11-year-old boy. Arch Dermatol. (1970) 102:205–8. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1970.04000080077015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Park KY, Kim BJ, Kim MN. Amlodipine-associated bullous pemphigoid with erythema multiforme-like clinical features. Int J Dermatol. (2011) 50:637–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04417.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Walmsley N, Hampton P. Bullous pemphigoid triggered by swine flu vaccination: case report and review of vaccine-triggered pemphigoid. J Dermatol Case Rep. (2011) 5:74–6. doi: 10.3315/jdcr.2011.1081, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Perl S, Rappersberger K, Fodinger D, Anegg B, Honigsmann H, Ortel B. Bullous pemphigoid induced by PUVA therapy. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). (1996) 193:245–7. doi: 10.1159/000246255, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pfau A, Hohenleutner U, Hohenleutner S, Eckert F, Landthaler M. UV-A-provoked localized bullous pemphigoid. Acta Derm Venereol. (1994) 74:314–6. doi: 10.2340/0001555574317319, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sacher C, Konig C, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Krieg T, Hunzelmann N. Bullous pemphigoid in a patient treated with UVA-1 phototherapy for disseminated morphea. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). (2001) 202:54–7. doi: 10.1159/000051588, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ghura HS, Johnston GA, Milligan A. Development of bullous pemphigoid after split-skin grafting. Br J Plast Surg. (2001) 54:447–9. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2001.3601, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Albergo RP, Gilgor RS. Delayed onset of bullous pemphigoid after PUVA and sunlight treatment of psoriasis. Cutis. (1982) 30:621–4. PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abel EA, Bennett A. Bullous pemphigoid: Occurrence in psoriasis treated with psoralens plus long-wave ultraviolet radiation. Arch Dermatol. (1979) 115:988–9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1979.04010080052026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Macfarlane AW, Verbov JL. Trauma-induced bullous pemphigoid. Clin Exp Dermatol. (1989) 14:245–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1989.tb00944.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Isohashi F, Konishi K, Umegaki N, Tanei T, Koizumi M, Yoshioka Y. A case of bullous pemphigoid exacerbated by irradiation after breast conservative radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (2011) 41:811–3. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr049, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kluger N, Mandelin J, Santti K, Jeskanen L, Nuutinen P. Bullous pemphigoid triggered by radiotherapy for breast cancer. Presse Med. (2017) 46:128–30. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.09.019, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Duschet P, Schwarz T, Gschnait F. Bullous pemphigoid after radiation therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1988) 18:441–4. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70066-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tchernev G, Orfanos CE. Antigen mimicry, epitope spreading, and the pathogenesis of pemphigus. Tissue Antigens. (2006) 68:280–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2006.00677.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chan LS. Epitope spreading in paraneoplastic pemphigus: autoimmune induction in antibody-mediated blistering skin diseases. Arch Dermatol. (2000) 136:663–4. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.5.663, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) . “Supply of elector information for use in medical research or a health screening program.” Updated: 14 February; (2024).
  • 42.Brenner S, Srebrnik A, Goldberg I. Pemphigus can be induced by topical phenol as well as by foods and drugs that contain phenols or thiols. J Cosmet Dermatol. (2003) 2:161–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00098.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Lo Schiavo A, Brunetti G, Guerrera LP, Wolf R. Pemphigus: etiology, pathogenesis, and inducing or triggering factors: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. (2013) 31:374–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brenner S, Ruocco V, Wolf R, de Angelis E, Lombardi ML. Pemphigus and dietary factors. In vitro acantholysis by allyl compounds of the genus Allium. Dermatology. (1995) 190:197–202. doi: 10.1159/000246684, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Feliciani C, Ruocco E, Zampetti A, Toto P, Amerio P, Tulli A, et al. Tannic acid induces in vitro acantholysis of keratinocytes via IL-1alpha and TNF-alpha. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. (2007) 20:289–99. doi: 10.1177/039463200702000209, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Winsa B, Adami HO, Bergstrom B, Gamstedt A, Dahlberg PA, Adamson U, et al. Stressful life events and graves’ disease. Lancet. (1991) 338:1475–9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92298-G, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cremniter D, Baudin M, Roujeau JC, Prost C, Consoli SG, Francés C, et al. Stressful life events as potential triggers of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. (1998) 134:1486–7. doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.11.1486, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ragab N, Abdallah M, El-Gohary E, Elewa R. Stress and serum TNF-alpha levels may predict disease outcome in patients with pemphigus: a preliminary study. Cutis. (2011) 87:189–94. PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lai YC, Yew YW, Lambert WC. Bullous pemphigoid and its association with neurological diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2016) 30:2007–15. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13660, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stojanovich L, Marisavljevich D. Stress as a trigger of autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev. (2008) 7:209–13. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2007.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ader R, Cohen N, Felten D. Psychoneuroimmunology: interactions between the nervous system and the immune system. Lancet (London, England). (1995) 345:99–103. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90066-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Danno K, Takigawa M, Horio T. Alterations in lectin binding to the epidermis following treatment with 8-Methoxypsoralen plus long-wave ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol. (1984) 82:176–9. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12259746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.George PM. Bullous pemphigoid possibly induced by psoralen plus ultraviolet a therapy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. (1995) 11:185–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.1995.tb00166.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dănescu S, Chiorean R, Macovei V, Sitaru C, Baican A. Role of physical factors in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid: case report series and a comprehensive review of the published work. J Dermatol. (2015) 43:134–40. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ray DE, Richards PG. The potential for toxic effects of chronic, low-dose exposure to organophosphates. Toxicol Lett. (2001) 120:343–51. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00266-1, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fania L, Zampetti A, Guerriero G, Feliciani C. Alteration of cholinergic system in keratinocytes cells produces acantholysis: a possible use of cholinergic drugs in pemphigus vulgaris. Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. (2012) 11:238–42. doi: 10.2174/1871523011202030238, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pietkiewicz P, Gornowicz-Porowska J, Bartkiewicz P, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Dmochowski M. Reviewing putative industrial triggering in pemphigus: cluster of pemphigus in the area near the wastewater treatment plant. Posteȩpy Dermatol Alergol. (2017) 34:185–91. doi: 10.5114/ada.2017.67840, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Esmaili N, Chams-Davatchi C, Valikhani M, Daneshpazhooh M, Balighi K, Hallaji Z, et al. Pemphigus vulgaris in Iran: a clinical study of 140 cases. Int J Dermatol. (2007) 46:1166–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03334.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sullivan TP, Elgart GW, Kirsner RS. Pemphigus and smoking. Int J Dermatol. (2002) 41:528–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.15135.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Grando SA, Dahl MV. Nicotine and pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. (2000) 136:1269. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.10.1269, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Grando SA. New approaches to the treatment of pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc. (2004) 9:84–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1087-0024.2004.00826.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data_Sheet_1.pdf (383.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.


Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES