Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2005 May;43(5):2497–2499. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2497-2499.2005

Erythromycin-Resistant Group A Streptococcal Isolates Collected between 2000 and 2005 in Oahu, Hawaii, and Their emm Types

Guliz Erdem 1,*, Jacqueline Ford 2, Dwight Johnson 3, Lucienne Abe 2, Karen Yamaga 2, Edward Kaplan 3
PMCID: PMC1153719  PMID: 15872294

Abstract

We examined erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities with Etest methodology among 546 group A streptococcal isolates collected in Hawaii between February 2000 and November 2004. Erythromycin resistance was low (3.1%). No isolate was clindamycin resistant. The prevalence of erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci remains low in Hawaii.


The epidemiology of group A streptococcal (GAS) infections in Hawaii is unusual for the United States, with no seasonal differences in pharyngitis and impetigo rates (2, 9, 24). More important, the incidence rates for sequelae of GAS infections, such as acute rheumatic fever, have remained high (incidence of 9.5 to 12.4/100,000 persons/year) among Hawaiian and Polynesian ethnic groups (14). This unique public health problem dictates appropriate treatment of the GAS infections. Since macrolides are not infrequently used to treat GAS infections, the purpose of this study was to determine the current erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities of GAS isolates from Hawaii and to determine whether resistance is associated with the prevalence of specific emm types (1).

(These data were presented in part at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies in San Francisco, CA, in May 2004.)

A total of 546 GAS isolates collected in Hawaii between February 2000 and November 2004 was examined. With the exception of isolates collected in 2003, when 32 isolates were collected from healthy school children as part of a pharyngitis surveillance study, all strains were isolated from patients with clinical infections. Most isolates were from throat (440 isolates; 80.6%) and wound (89 isolates; 16.3%) cultures. Three cerebrospinal fluid, five deep tissue, eight blood, and one joint fluid isolate were included among the 546 strains studied. The numbers of isolates were 44, 81, 252, 32, and 137 for the years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

Etest methodology (AB Biodisk, Piscataway, NJ) was used to determine MICs for erythromycin and clindamycin according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) breakpoints (17, 18). The erythromycin-clindamycin double disk test was applied to resistant isolates (11) by using disks of erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) placed 15 mm apart. “Blunting” of the inhibition zone around the clindamycin disk proximal to the erythromycin disk was considered to be inducible resistance (7) (iMLSb phenotype), and susceptibility to clindamycin with no blunting indicated the M phenotype. PCR assays were used to identify the genetic mechanism of resistance of erythromycin-resistant GAS isolates. The mef(A), erm(B), erm(A), and erm(TR) resistance genes were detected by PCR amplification with primers described previously (5, 16, 19).

GAS isolates were characterized by emm sequencing as previously described (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/strepindex.htm). Thirty isolates were also characterized by M protein/T agglutination pattern analysis and by the serum opacity factor by previously described techniques (13).

Among the 546 isolates, only 17 (3.1%) were erythromycin resistant; 16 of them were from throat swabs of patients with pharyngitis, and 1 strain was from a patient with a wound infection (Table 1). The erythromycin MICs of the resistant strains were between 1 and 8 μg/ml. Twelve of the 17 resistant strains were isolated in 2002 (6.7% of the 2002 isolates). No changes in the population or rate of upper respiratory infections were noted in 2002. Two (12.5%) throat isolates which were resistant to erythromycin showed intermediate susceptibility to clindamycin. There were no isolates resistant to clindamycin.

TABLE 1.

Isolation years, sources, emm typing, MICs of erythromycin and clindamycin, phenotypes, and resistance genes identified in resistant GAS isolates

Isolate Yr isolated Source emm type MIC (μg/ml) for:
Phenotype Resistance gene(s)
Erythromycin Clindamycin
1 2001 Skin 114 3 0.94 iMLSb erm(A), erm(TR)
2 2001 Throat 58 2 0.125 iMLSb erm(A), erm(TR)
3 2002 Throat 1 1 0.19 M mef(A)
4 2002 Throat 58 8 0.5 iMLSb erm(A), erm(TR)
5 2002 Throat 12 3 0.75 cMLSb erm(B)
6 2002 Throat 1 2 0.19 M mef(A)
7 2002 Throat 94 6 0.25 iMLSb erm(A), erm(TR)
8 2002 Throat 28 3 0.19 M erm(B)
9 2002 Throat 49 4 0.19 M mef(A)
10 2002 Throat 101 1.5 0.25 M mef(A)
11 2002 Throat 28 2 0.125 M mef(A)
12 2002 Throat 89 4 0.125 M mef(A)
13 2002 Throat 4 3 0.25 M mef(A)
14 2002 Throat 69/65 3 0.19 M mef(A)
15 2004 Throat 4 6 0.064 M me(A)
16 2004 Throat 4 8 0.064 M erm(A), erm(TR), mef(A)
17 2004 Throat 94 8 0.19 iMLSb erm(A), erm(TR)

Five of the 17 (29.4%) erythromycin-resistant isolates were identified as having the iMLSb phenotype. The iMLSb phenotype isolates had the erm(A) and erm(TR) genes [the latter is a variant of the erm(A) gene]. Eleven isolates had the M phenotype. One isolate was resistant to both antibiotics (cMLSb phenotype) and had the erm(B) gene.

Five hundred sixteen isolates were characterized by sequencing the emm gene. The remaining thirty isolates were characterized by M protein/T agglutination pattern analyses and by serum opacity factor studies. Among the total 546 isolates studied, 70 different emm/M types were found. The most common emm types were emm 12, 1, 28, 4, 92, 22, 85, 81, 58, 49, 69/65, 101, 75, 74, and 77. These emm types comprised 387 of 546 isolates (70.9%). emm types 1 (2 isolates), 4 (3 isolates), 12, 28 (2 isolates), 58 (2 isolates), 49, 69/65, 89, 94 (2 isolates), 101, and 114 were identified among the 17 erythromycin-resistant isolates.

Discussion.

Widespread resistance to macrolides has been reported in several geographic areas (3-5, 10, 12, 15, 20, 23). Erythromycin resistance among the Hawaiian GAS isolates (3.1%) was lower than the 5.5% overall macrolide resistance rate found in the 2000-to-2001 PROTEKT US study and also lower than that found in a 2000-to-2003 U.S. surveillance study (8, 21). It is of interest that while Wittler et al. reported higher levels of resistance (9.5%) to erythromycin in a limited number of Hawaiian isolates a decade earlier (23), data from the present evaluation of a much larger number of GAS isolates indicated lower resistance rates in Hawaii. We are unable to compare present M protein types and sites of isolation with those reported in Wittler's earlier study.

Eleven different M protein-expressing types (emm 1, 4, 12, 28, 58, 49, 69/65, 89, 94, 101, and 114) were identified among the 17 erythromycin-resistant isolates. Several emm types, such as emm 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 28, 48, 58, 61, 75, 77, 89, 94, and 114, have been previously reported to have associations with erythromycin resistance (6, 7, 15, 21, 22). emm types 1, 4, 12, 28, 58, 89, 94, and 14 were also identified among our resistant isolates. The presence of the serum opacity factor gene has also been associated with erythromycin resistance (7). Interestingly, six of our resistant isolates belonged to five different emm sequence types known to lack this gene (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep.htm).

Knowledge of erythromycin resistance rates has considerable medical and public health significance in Hawaii, where the incidence rates of acute rheumatic fever and other sequelae remain high (2, 24). This is the first study done in Hawaii to determine whether erythromycin and clindamycin resistance has been associated with the prevalence of specific M protein types. Although uncommon emm types (when compared with isolates from the U.S. mainland) were identified, there was no preponderance of any specific emm type among the erythromycin-resistant GAS isolates. Overall, our data indicate that erythromycin resistance among GAS isolates has remained low in Hawaii through 2004 and that macrolides can be used in the treatment of GAS infections when indicated. However, high prevalence rates of nonsuppurative sequelae in Hawaii as well as rapid changes in macrolide resistance rates as observed in other communities in the United States and in other countries necessitate continuing vigilant surveillance for resistance.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants from the American Heart Association, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (grant P20RR018727-02), and the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (grant P20RR11091-06).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bisno, A. L., M. A. Gerber, J. M. Gwaltney, E. L. Kaplan, and R. H. Schwartz. 2002. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:113-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chun, L. T., D. V. Reddy, G. K. Yim, and L. G. Yamamoto. 1992. Acute rheumatic fever in Hawaii: 1966 to 1988. Hawaii Med. J. 51:206-211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coonan, K. M., and E. L. Kaplan. 1994. In vitro susceptibility of recent North American group A streptococcal isolates to eleven oral antibiotics. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 13:630-635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cornaglia, G., M. Ligozzi, A. Mazzariol, M. Valentini, G. Orefeci, R. Fontana, and the Italian Surveillance Group for Antimicrobial Resistance. 1996. Rapid increase of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin in Streptococcus pyogenes in Italy, 1993-1995. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2:339-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cresti, S., M. Lattanzi, A. Zanchi, F. Montagnani, S. Pollini, C. Cellesi, and G. M. Rossolini. 2002. Resistance determinants and clonal diversity in group A streptococci collected during a period of increasing macrolide resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1816-1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Detcheva, A., R. R. Facklam, and B. Beall. 2002. Erythromycin-resistant group A streptococcal isolates recovered in Sofia, Bulgaria, from 1995 to 2001. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3831-3834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dicuonzo, G., E. Fiscarelli, G. Gherardi, G. Lorino, F. Battistoni, S. Landi, M. De Cesaris, T. Petitti, and B. Beall. 2002. Erythromycin-resistant pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes recovered in Italy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3987-3990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doern, G. V., and S. D. Brown. 2004. Antimicrobial susceptibility among community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens in the USA: data from PROTEKT US 2000-01. J. Infect. 48:56-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erdem, G., L. Abe, R. Kanenaka, L. Pang, K. Mills, C. Mizumoto, K. Yamaga, and P. V. Effler. 2004. Characterization of a community cluster of group A streptococcal invasive disease in Maui, Hawaii. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 23:677-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fujita, K., K. Murono, M. Yoshikawa, and T. Murai. 1994. Decline of erythromycin resistance of group A streptococci in Japan. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 13:1075-1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giovonetti, E., M. P. Montanari, M. Mingoia, and P. E. Varaldo. 1999. Phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes strains in Italy and heterogeneity of inducibly resistant strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1935-1940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Green, M., J. M. Martin, K. A. Barbadora, B. Beall, and E. R. Wald. 2004. Reemergence of macrolide resistance in pharyngeal isolates of group A streptococci in southwestern Pennsylvania. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:473-476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnson, D. R., J. Sramek, E. L. Kaplan, R. Bicova, J. Havlicek, H. Havlickova, and P. Kriz. 1996. Laboratory diagnosis of group A streptococcal infections. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 14.Kurahara, D., A. Tozuda, A. Grandinetti, J. Najita, C. Ho, K. Yamamoto, D. V. Reddy, K. Macpherson, M. Iwamuro, and K. Yamaga. 2002. Ethnic differences in risk for pediatric rheumatic illness in a culturally diverse population. J. Rheumatol. 29:379-383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martin, J. M., M. Green, K. A. Barbadora, and E. R. Wald. 2002. Erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in schoolchildren in Pittsburgh. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:1200-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morosini, M., R. Canton, E. Loza, R. del Campo, F. Almaraz, and F. Baquero. 2003. Streptococcus pyogenes isolates with characterized macrolide resistance mechanisms in Spain: in vitro activities of telithromycin and cethromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:50-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.NCCLS. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. NCCLS document M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 18.NCCLS. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, eleventh informational supplement. NCCLS document M100-S12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 19.Oster, P., A. Zanchi, S. Cresti, M. Lattanzi, F. Montagnani, C. Cellesi, and G. M. Rossolini. 1999. Patterns of macrolide resistance determinants among community-acquired Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates over a 5-year period of decreased macrolide susceptibility rates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2510-2512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Palavecino, E. L., I. Riedel, X. Berrios, S. Bajaksouzian, D. Johnson, E. Kaplan, and M. R. Jacobs. 2001. Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Santiago, Chile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:339-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tanz, R. R., T. S. Stanford, V. D. Sortridge, W. Kabat, K. Kabat, E. Cederlund, J. Rippe, J. Beyer, S. Doktor, B. W. Beall, and the North American Streptococcal Pharyngitis Surveillance Group. 2004. Community-based surveillance in the United States of macrolide-resistant pediatric pharyngeal group A streptococci during 3 respiratory disease seasons. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:1794-1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Weiss, K., J. De Azavedo, C. Restieri, L. A. Galarneau, M. Gourdeau, P. Harvey, J. F. Paradis, K. Salim, and D. E. Low. 2001. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide-resistant group A Streptococcus strains in the province of Quebec, Canada. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:345-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wittler, R. R., S. M. Yamada, J. W. Bass, R. Hamill, R. A. Wiebe, and D. P. Ascher. 1990. Penicillin tolerance and erythromycin resistance of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in Hawaii and the Philippines. Am. J. Dis. Child. 144:587-589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yim, H. 1962. Rheumatic fever in Hawaii. Am. J. Dis. Child. 103:715-717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES