ABSTRACT
The bacterial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus responds to the host environment by synthesizing a thick peptidoglycan cell wall, which protects the bacterium from membrane-targeting antimicrobials and the immune response. However, the proteins required for this response were previously unknown. Here, we demonstrate by three independent approaches that the penicillin-binding protein PBP4 is crucial for serum-induced cell wall thickening. First, mutants lacking various non-essential cell wall synthesis enzymes were tested, revealing that a mutant lacking pbp4 was unable to generate a thick cell wall in serum. This resulted in reduced serum-induced tolerance of the pbp4 mutant toward the last resort antibiotic daptomycin relative to wild-type cells. Second, we found that serum-induced cell wall thickening occurred in each of a panel of 134 clinical bacteremia isolates, except for one strain with a naturally occurring mutation that results in an S140R substitution in the active site of PBP4. Finally, inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin prevented serum-induced cell wall thickening and the resulting antibiotic tolerance in the USA300 strain and clinical MRSA isolates. Together, this provides a rationale for combining daptomycin with cefoxitin, a PBP4 inhibitor, to potentially improve treatment outcomes for patients with invasive MRSA infections.
KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, daptomycin, cell wall, peptidoglycan, antibiotic tolerance, PBP4
INTRODUCTION
Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of invasive infections, resulting in over 12,000 cases of bacteremia each year in the UK (1). Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infections are often treated with frontline beta-lactams such as oxacillin; however, treatment of invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is challenging, with patients suffering from high rates of relapse and chronic infections (2, 3). Treatment options include vancomycin and daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic first approved to treat MRSA bacteremia in 2003 (4–6). In its calcium-bound active form, it binds to the lipid phosphatidylglycerol, permeabilizing the bacterial membrane (4, 7, 8). This leads to a loss of intracellular ions and ATP as well as disruption to the cell wall biosynthetic and division machinery (4, 9–11). In vitro, daptomycin is rapidly bactericidal, but this is not the case in patients, where despite giving high doses of daptomycin intravenously, it can take several days to sterilize the bloodstream (12, 13). This slow rate of clearance allows S. aureus to disseminate around the body and leads to the development of secondary infections, such as infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and deep tissue abscesses (14). As a result, patients require long hospital stays and suffer from high mortality rates (15, 16). Specifically, daptomycin fails to cure 20%–30% cases of MRSA bacteremia and is associated with a 10%–20% mortality rate (12, 13, 17, 18). It is therefore important to understand why daptomycin treatment failure occurs so that new approaches can be developed to improve patient outcomes.
One explanation for daptomycin treatment failure is that the host environment induces daptomycin tolerance (19, 20). When S. aureus is incubated in human serum, the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 activates the GraRS two-component system (19). This leads to a reduction in the level of peptidoglycan-hydrolyzing autolysins present in the cell, enabling the cell wall to thicken (19). Since daptomycin must pass through the cell wall to reach its site of action, this thickened cell wall leads to a high level of daptomycin tolerance (19). However, while the reduction in autolysins enables the cell wall to remain thick, it is currently unknown what proteins are required to synthesize the cell wall in serum. Understanding this is crucial so that combination therapeutic approaches can be developed to prevent daptomycin tolerance and improve patient outcomes.
RESULTS
Non-essential cell wall biosynthesis genes are required for serum-induced cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance
The first aim of this study was to establish which S. aureus genes were required for cell wall thickening in human serum. As many proteins responsible for cell wall synthesis are essential and cannot be deleted, we used two mutant strains, each deficient in several non-essential enzymes involved in cell wall synthesis (21). These strains are known as the MIN mutants as they contain the minimum peptidoglycan machinery required for peptidoglycan synthesis (21). They have a normal growth rate and cell morphology but reduced peptidoglycan crosslinking and virulence (21). These mutants were constructed in two genetic backgrounds, Col and Newman, and each one lacks several genes, those encoding the monofunctional transglycosylases, SgtA and SgtB, the non-essential penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), PBP3 and PBP4, and the methicillin resistance factors, FmtA and FmtB (21). In addition, mecA was deleted to construct Col MIN (21).
First, we determined whether serum induced increased peptidoglycan accumulation in these strains using the D-alanine analog HCC-amino-D-alanine (HADA). This analog is incorporated specifically into the stem peptides of the peptidoglycan and so provides a direct measurement of the amount of de novo peptidoglycan synthesis which occurs during the incubation period (19, 22, 23). As expected from previous work (19), wild-type (WT) bacteria grown to mid-exponential phase in tryptic soy broth (TSB-grown) had a relatively thin wall, while bacteria which had been grown to exponential phase and then incubated for 16 h in human serum (serum-incubated) had a significantly thicker cell wall, as shown by accumulation of HADA (Fig. 1A and B). By contrast, the MIN strains demonstrated a significantly lower level of serum-induced peptidoglycan accumulation, indicating that non-essential cell wall synthetic machinery is required for this phenotype (Fig. 1A and B).
Fig 1.
Non-essential cell wall biosynthetic proteins are required for serum-induced cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance. (A) TSB-grown and serum-incubated cultures of Col WT and MIN and Newman WT and MIN were generated in the presence of HADA and de novo cell wall synthesis determined by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bars, 5 µm. (B) Fluorescence at the peripheral cell wall of 50 cells per condition per replicate of panel A was determined. TSB-grown and serum-incubated cultures of (C) Col WT and MIN and (D) Newman WT and MIN were exposed to 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin for 6 h and survival determined by CFU counts. Data in B represent the fluorescence of 50 cells per replicate (150 cells total per condition). *, P ≤ 0.05 as determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Data in C and D represent the geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of three independent replicates. *, P ≤ 0.05 as determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test; serum-incubated WT vs serum-incubated MIN at indicated time points.
To understand if the reduction in serum-induced peptidoglycan accumulation in the MIN strains affected antibiotic tolerance, we compared bacterial survival during daptomycin exposure for TSB-grown and serum-incubated cells. Loss of these non-essential cell wall synthesis enzymes did not affect the daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in either the Newman or Col genetic backgrounds, with Newman WT and MIN having an MIC of 0.5 µg mL−1 and Col WT and MIN having an MIC of 1 µg mL−1. In-line with this, there were no differences in the killing kinetics of the WT and mutant strains when TSB grown, demonstrating that the loss of non-essential cell wall synthetic enzymes did not affect daptomycin susceptibility (Fig. 1C and D). By contrast, both MIN strains were killed significantly more by daptomycin than the WT strains after serum incubation (Fig. 1C and D). Therefore, at least one of the enzymes lacked by the MIN strains was required for serum-induced peptidoglycan accumulation and daptomycin tolerance in serum.
PBP4 is required for serum-induced cell wall thickening and tolerance toward daptomycin
As Col MIN lacked seven enzymes relative to wild-type cells and Newman MIN lacked six (21), the next objective was to determine which of these enzymes was required for tolerance. To do this, mutants lacking each of the individual enzymes that had been deleted in the MIN strains were obtained from the Nebraska transposon mutant library (NTML) (24), except fmtB, for which a mutant could not be identified, and mecA, as this was only present in Col WT and not in Newman WT. None of these genes were required for growth, although a mutant lacking pbp3 showed a slight growth defect compared to the WT (Fig. S1). Each of these mutants was screened for its ability to accumulate peptidoglycan during incubation in serum. Single mutants in sgtA, sgtB, pbp3, and fmtA each incorporated the same amount of HADA as the WT strain during a 16-h incubation in human serum (Fig. 2A). By contrast, the mutant defective for pbp4 incorporated significantly less HADA than WT during serum incubation (Fig. 2A). Concordantly, the pbp4::Tn mutant showed a 20-fold reduction in serum-induced tolerance to daptomycin compared to the WT after 6 h exposure to the antibiotic (Fig. 2B). Complementation of the pbp4::Tn mutant with pbp4 expressed from its native promoter on a multi-copy plasmid restored the ability of the strain to accumulate peptidoglycan during the incubation in serum, whereas complementation with an empty plasmid did not (Fig. 2C). Complementation of the pbp4::Tn mutant with a functional copy of the gene also restored the serum-induced daptomycin tolerance phenotype, with the complemented strain surviving daptomycin exposure to a similar degree to the WT strain and 2 logs higher than the empty vector control at the 6-h time point (Fig. 2D). Therefore, PBP4 is required for peptidoglycan accumulation in serum and the resulting daptomycin tolerance.
Fig 2.
PBP4 is required for serum-induced cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance. (A) Cell wall thickening measured by HADA fluorescence (RFU) divided by OD600 of serum-incubated cultures of JE2 WT and indicated NARSA transposon mutants. (B) Survival presented as log10 CFU mL−1 of serum-incubated cultures of JE2 WT and indicated NARSA transposon mutants during a 6-h exposure to 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin. (C) Cell wall thickening measured by HADA fluorescence (RFU) divided by OD600 of serum-incubated cultures of JE2 WT, pbp4::Tn mutant, and pbp4::Tn mutant complemented with empty pCN34 or pCN34 containing a WT copy of pbp4. (D) Survival presented as log10 CFU mL−1 of serum-incubated cultures of JE2 WT, pbp4::Tn mutant, and pbp4::Tn mutant complemented with empty pCN34 or pCN34 containing a WT copy of pbp4 during exposure to 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin for 6 h. Data in A and C represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent repeats. Data in B and D represent the geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of at least three independent repeats. Data in A and C were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. Data in B and D were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. *, P ≤ 0.05, ***, P ≤ 0.0001, WT vs mutant or complemented mutant at indicated time points.
Serum-induced cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance occur in clinical isolates and are PBP4 dependent
The next objectives were to determine whether serum-induced cell wall thickening was a conserved phenotype in clinical isolates and, if so, to elucidate the mechanism and impact on daptomycin tolerance. To do this, we measured the amount of peptidoglycan synthesized by each of a panel of 134 clinical bacteremia isolates from clonal complex 22 (CC22) during a 16-h incubation in human serum (Table S1). CC22 is highly prevalent in the UK, causing over 50% of cases of MRSA bacteremia (25). The strains used here were collected from a single hospital in the UK from patients with S. aureus bacteremia between 2006 and 2012 (26). Each of the strains has been well characterized previously, including whole-genome sequencing, and phenotypic characterization, including determination of toxicity and biofilm formation (26). Although the degree of HADA fluorescence of the strains varied after incubation in serum, it was generally high, with the exception of one isolate (ASARM124; indicated with an arrow), which showed significantly reduced fluorescence compared to the others (Fig. 3A).
Fig 3.
Serum-induced cell wall thickening occurs in clinical isolates. (A) HADA fluorescence (RFU) divided by OD600 of serum-incubated cultures of a panel of clinical bacteremia isolates. Each data point represents the mean of three independent repeats of one clinical isolate. The arrow indicates ASARM124, the strain with a significantly reduced cell wall thickness in serum. TSB-grown and serum-incubated cultures of (B) ASARM141, (C) ASARM179, (D) ASARM184, (E) ASARM208, and (F) ASARM124 were generated in the presence of HADA, and de novo cell wall synthesis determined by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bars, 5 µm. (G) Fluorescence at the peripheral cell wall of 50 cells per condition per replicate of panels B–F was determined. ****, P ≤ 0.0001; ns, P > 0.05 as determined by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test.
To confirm that the reduced fluorescence of ASARM124 was due to reduced serum-induced cell wall thickening, TSB-grown and serum-incubated cultures of four clinical isolates which incorporated HADA into their cell walls during serum incubation (ASARM141, ASARM179, ASARM184, and ASARM208), along with the strain which did not (ASARM124), were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. In each case, TSB-grown cultures demonstrated very low levels of fluorescence at the cell periphery, indicating that they had thin cell walls (Fig. 3B through G). As expected, serum-incubated cultures of the four strains which showed high fluorescence in the plate reader assay also showed high levels of fluorescence by microscopy, demonstrating that cell wall thickening had occurred during the incubation in serum (Fig. 3B through E and G). By contrast, and in-line with the data in Fig. 3A, there was no significant increase in the fluorescence of the cell walls of ASARM124 when serum incubated compared to when TSB grown, confirming that ASARM124 did not undergo cell wall thickening during incubation in serum (Fig. 3F and G ).
The next objective was to understand why ASARM124 did not respond to serum by thickening its cell wall. To do this, we compared the sequences of the pbp4 genes encoded by each of the clinical isolates. This revealed that the amino acid sequences of PBP4 in each of these strains were identical, with the exception of ASARM124, the strain with a very low level of HADA incorporation. This isolate contained a non-synonymous mutation at position 420 of pbp4 (A > C), resulting in an S140R substitution. Serine 140 is in the active site of the enzyme, and so it is likely that this disrupts its catalytic activity (27). To confirm that this variant of PBP4 was less active, the pbp4::Tn mutant from the NTML was complemented with either the WT sequence of pbp4 present in the other isolates (pCC22-WT) or with the variant (pCC22-pbp4S140R). The ability of these strains to incorporate HADA during incubation in serum and become tolerant toward daptomycin was then measured. As expected, complementation with the WT copy of pbp4 led to significantly higher levels of HADA incorporation than the empty vector control (Fig. 3B). When the pbp4::Tn mutant was complemented with the pbp4 variant, no increase in HADA incorporation was seen compared to the empty vector control, demonstrating that the S140R PBP4 variant is not active (Fig. 4A). In-line with this, complementation with the WT pbp4 sequence led to significantly higher levels of daptomycin tolerance than the empty plasmid, whereas complementation with the variant pbp4 gene did not restore tolerance (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these experiments showed that peptidoglycan accumulation occurs when clinical isolates are incubated in serum and that this is dependent on PBP4.
Fig 4.
Serum-induced cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance in clinical isolates are PBP4 dependent. (A) HADA fluorescence (RFU) divided by OD600 of serum-incubated cultures of the JE2 pbp4::Tn mutant complemented with empty pCN34, pCN34 containing a WT copy of pbp4 (pCC22-WT), or pCN34 containing a copy of pbp4 containing the SNP (pCC22-pbp4S140R). (B) Log10 CFU mL−1 of serum-incubated cultures of the JE2 pbp4::Tn mutant complemented with empty pCN34, pCN34 containing a WT copy of pbp4 (pCC22-WT), or pCN34 containing a copy of pbp4 containing the SNP (pCC22-pbp4S140R) after a 6-h exposure to 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin. Data in A represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent repeats, and data in B represent the geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of three independent repeats. Data in A were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (**, P ≤ 0.01), and data in B were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (*, P ≤ 0.05; pCN34 vs pCC22 at indicated time points).
Inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin reduces serum-induced cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance in USA300 JE2 and clinical MRSA strains
As a final examination of the role of PBP4 in serum-induced tolerance, we used cefoxitin, a second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, which inhibits all PBPs at growth-inhibitory concentrations but, due to its high affinity for PBP4, selectively inhibits this PBP at lower concentrations (28, 29). Then MIC of cefoxitin in both JE2 WT and the pbp4::Tn mutant was 8 µg mL−1. First, we tested a range of concentrations of cefoxitin to determine the optimum concentration to use. JE2 WT was incubated in serum for 16 h with cefoxitin and HADA to determine a concentration which prevented cell wall thickening from occurring. Cefoxitin led to dose-dependent inhibition of HADA incorporation, with a concentration of 2 µg mL−1 resulting in the same level of HADA fluorescence as was observed for the pbp4::Tn mutant (Fig. 5A). Next, we investigated whether inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin reduced daptomycin tolerance. JE2 WT and the pbp4::Tn mutant were incubated in serum for 16 h supplemented or not with 2 µg mL−1 cefoxitin before 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin was added and survival measured. At the sub-MIC concentration of cefoxitin used, there was no loss of viability of S. aureus in serum, with CFU counts remaining at the starting inoculum (2 × 108 CFU mL−1) throughout the assay, as occurs in the absence of cefoxitin (Fig. 5B). Subsequent daptomycin challenge revealed that, as expected, the WT strain incubated in serum without cefoxitin had high levels of tolerance to the lipopeptide antibiotic, and this was significantly reduced in the pbp4::Tn mutant similarly incubated (Fig. 5C). However, WT cells incubated in serum containing cefoxitin had significantly reduced daptomycin tolerance, with bacterial killing occurring at levels similar to the pbp4::Tn mutant (Fig. 5C). The lack of effect of cefoxitin on the daptomycin tolerance of the pbp4::Tn mutant confirmed that the antibiotic acted via PBP4 and not via off-target effects.
Fig 5.
Inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin reduces cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance in JE2. (A) Cell wall thickening measured by HADA fluorescence (RFU/OD600) of JE2 WT after a 16-h incubation in serum supplemented with the indicated concentration of cefoxitin (FOX) or the pbp4::Tn mutant incubated in serum alone. (B and C) JE2 WT or the pbp4::Tn mutant were incubated in serum with or without 2 µg mL−1 cefoxitin (FOX) for 16 h before they were incubated (B) without or (C) with daptomycin at 80 µg mL−1 and survival measured over 6 h. Data in A represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent replicates. Data in B and C represent the geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of three independent replicates. Data in A were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (*, P ≤ 0.05; pbp4::Tn vs other conditions). Data in B and C were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (*, P ≤ 0.05; WT vs other conditions at indicated time points).
Next, we determined whether cefoxitin was also effective at reducing tolerance in the clinical MRSA strains. To do this, four clinical isolates were chosen which incorporated HADA into their cell walls during incubation in serum (ASARM141, ASARM179, ASARM184, and ASARM208), along with the strain containing the inactivating point mutation in pbp4 (ASARM124). Like JE2, these strains were all resistant to cefoxitin (MICs 8–16 µg mL−1). Supplementation of the serum with cefoxitin led to dose-dependent inhibition of HADA incorporation in each of the strains encoding WT PBP4 (Fig. 6A through D), whereas no significant reduction in fluorescence was observed in ASARM124 (Fig. 6E). For each of the strains with WT PBP4, 2 µg mL−1 cefoxitin was sufficient to reduce the fluorescence to the level of the strain lacking PBP4 (Fig. 6A through E), and so this concentration was chosen to determine whether cefoxitin was able to reduce daptomycin tolerance in these clinical strains.
Fig 6.
Inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin reduces cell wall thickening and daptomycin tolerance in clinical isolates. Cell wall thickening as measured by HADA fluorescence (RFU/OD600) of (A) ASARM141, (B) ASARM179, (C) ASARM184, (D) ASARM208, and (E) ASARM124 after a 16-h incubation in serum supplemented with the indicated concentration of cefoxitin. Survival as measured by log10 CFU mL−1 of (F) ASARM141, (G) ASARM179, (H) ASARM184, (I) ASARM208, and (J) ASARM124 following incubation for 16 h in serum supplemented or not with 2 µg mL−1 cefoxitin and the addition, or not, of 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin for 6 h. Data in A–E represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent replicates. Data in F–J represent the geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of three independent replicates. Data in A–E were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (*, P ≤ 0.05; serum alone vs serum supplemented with cefoxitin). Data in F–J were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test (*, P ≤ 0.05; daptomycin survival in serum alone vs serum supplemented with cefoxitin).
Next, each of these clinical strains was incubated for 16 h in human serum supplemented, or not, with 2 µg mL−1 cefoxitin before being exposed, or not, to 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin. As a sub-MIC concentration of cefoxitin was used, this antibiotic had no effect on bacterial survival during the 16-h incubation or in the following 6 h, with the initial inoculum of 2 × 108 CFU mL−1 remaining at the end of the assay (Fig. 6F through J). By 6 h, addition of daptomycin resulted in approximately a 1-log reduction in CFU counts of each of the strains with WT copies of PBP4 (Fig. 6F through I). In-line with the data above, the defective PBP4 in ASARM124 resulted in this strain showing reduced daptomycin tolerance compared to the other strains, with daptomycin alone causing a >2-log reduction in CFU counts (Fig. 6J). In each of the strains encoding WT PBP4, addition of cefoxitin significantly reduced daptomycin tolerance (Fig. 6F through I). However, in agreement with cefoxitin showing selectivity for PBP4 and PBP4 being required for tolerance, addition of this antibiotic had no effect on the daptomycin tolerance of ASARM124 (Fig. 6J). Taken together, inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin reduces the ability of S. aureus to accumulate peptidoglycan in serum and reduces daptomycin tolerance.
DISCUSSION
S. aureus is a major cause of chronic and relapsing infections due to a lack of effective clearance by antibiotics and the immune system. The thickened cell wall that S. aureus synthesizes during incubation in human serum may contribute to this, as it protects the bacterium from the last resort antibiotic daptomycin and from phagocytosis (19, 30). Inhibiting this cell wall thickening may therefore reduce antibiotic tolerance and increase clearance by immune cells. However, the proteins required for serum-induced cell wall thickening were unknown, and so the aims of this work were to determine the mechanism by which the cell wall thickens and to develop a combination therapeutic approach to inhibit it. This work demonstrates that PBP4 is crucial for peptidoglycan accumulation in serum and highlights its potential as a therapeutic target to enhance the efficacy of daptomycin.
PBP4 is an uncanonical PBP, lacking the transglycosylase domain possessed by the other PBPs and having only the transpeptidase domain, with which it crosslinks the peptidoglycan units together via a pentaglycine bridge (31). In addition, PBP4 lacks the cytoplasmic N-terminal mini-domain present in other staphylococcal PBPs and instead has a short, cytosolic C-terminal mini-domain which binds the cell division protein GpsB (32). The action of PBP4 results in the S. aureus cell wall being highly crosslinked, with crosslinks present in 80%–90% of peptidoglycan units and pbp4 mutants having a significantly less crosslinked wall than wild-type cells (29, 33). This is thought to provide extra strength to the wall and compensate for the relatively short glycan chain length, which averages 6 disaccharide units in S. aureus compared to up to over 500 in Bacillus subtilis (34, 35).
PBP4 is known to contribute to high-level beta-lactam resistance in MRSA; however, it has not been linked to daptomycin susceptibility previously (36, 37). Studies investigating synergy between daptomycin and beta-lactams identified that daptomycin and cefoxitin were not synergistic and that beta-lactams need to possess PBP1-targeting activity to synergize with daptomycin (38, 39). The mechanisms behind this are unclear, however, are thought to be due to beta-lactams affecting the properties of the cell envelope and/or increasing the binding of daptomycin (39–41). However, these experiments were carried out in laboratory media, and the activity of antibiotics in these media is not always reflective of efficacy under host conditions. Therefore, our finding that PBP4 is crucial for the development of daptomycin tolerance under host conditions raises the possibility that a PBP4 inhibitor may enhance daptomycin treatment efficacy in vivo.
While PBP4 is non-essential under laboratory conditions, it is important for virulence and survival inside the host, as for example, a deletion mutant shows reduced virulence in a murine osteomyelitis model (42). Clinical isolates with mutations in pbp4 have previously been identified; however, these mutations are not inactivating mutations and are thought to enable enhanced beta-lactam resistance (43, 44). To our knowledge, this is the first clinical bacteremia isolate identified with a deleterious mutation in pbp4. The importance of PBP4 for survival in the host and for beta-lactam resistance is likely to provide a strong selective pressure to retain PBP4 activity, meaning that targeting PBP4 to enhance daptomycin activity is likely to be effective in the vast majority of strains. Nevertheless, the finding here that serum induces cell wall thickening in over 99% of the clinical bacteremia isolates tested demonstrates that this phenomenon is not only frequent but also not confined to laboratory strains, occurring in strains which cause infections typically treated with daptomycin.
We have previously shown that inhibition of cell wall synthesis with fosfomycin reduces daptomycin tolerance; however, evidence that a daptomycin-fosfomycin combination is safe and effective is limited (19, 20). For example, one report demonstrated that while the combination therapy reduced rates of treatment failure compared to daptomycin monotherapy, there was no increase in patient survival rates, and combination therapy was associated with a higher number of adverse events (45). Therefore, while inhibition of cell wall synthesis is a promising strategy for enhancing daptomycin treatment efficacy, the choice of cell wall synthesis inhibitor needs to be carefully considered.
There has been much interest in combining daptomycin with a beta-lactam, and this combination is synergistic in vitro and in vivo (41, 46–49). However, the mechanism behind the synergy is not completely understood, and there is debate as to which beta-lactam is most effective. Additionally, in several trials, the daptomycin/beta-lactam combination was associated with a higher rate of adverse reactions than monotherapy (2, 12). However, to date, there has not been a large-scale trial investigating whether beta-lactams improve daptomycin efficacy (50). The SNAP trial is attempting to address this by recruiting 7,000 patients with S. aureus bacteremia to determine, among other treatment options, whether cefazolin increases daptomycin efficacy in MRSA bacteremia cases (50). However, to date, there are very little data informing on which beta-lactam is most effective in combination with daptomycin at treating the infection while minimizing adverse events, and no clinical trials combining daptomycin with cefoxitin have been performed.
Our data support that inhibition of PBP4, in this case with cefoxitin, was able to reduce daptomycin tolerance in each of the tested clinical MRSA strains. The concentration of cefoxitin used was below the EUCAST breakpoint concentration of 4 µg mL−1 and clinically achievable (51), demonstrating that this may be a viable therapeutic option to improve daptomycin treatment. However, clinical strains with extremely high (>128 ug mL−1) cefoxitin MICs have been reported, and it remains to be determined whether the cefoxitin/daptomycin combination would be effective in these cases (52).
Finally, it has also recently been shown that the cell wall thickening triggered by incubation in serum also conceals opsonins bound to surface proteins and lipoteichoic acid, reducing phagocytosis by neutrophils (30). Therefore, addition of cefoxitin into the treatment regimen may not only reduce daptomycin tolerance but also enhance killing by the immune system, leading to faster bacterial clearance and improved patient outcomes.
In summary, we have shown that cell wall thickening occurs in clinical bacteremia isolates in response to human serum and that it is dependent on PBP4. This provides a rationale for combining daptomycin with a PBP4 inhibitor to reduce antibiotic tolerance and improve patient outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
The bacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table 1. The clinical isolates used are shown in Table S1. These clinical strains were first described and sequenced by Recker et al. (26), and the accession numbers for the sequence data are in Table S1. S. aureus was grown in TSB for 16 h at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm) to reach stationary phase. When required, TSB was supplemented with erythromycin (10 µg mL−1) or kanamycin (90 µg mL−1).
TABLE 1.
Strains used in this study
Strain | Relevant characteristics | Reference/source |
---|---|---|
Newman | MSSA clinical isolate | (53) |
Newman MIN | Newman pbp3, pbp4, sgtA, sgtB, fmtA, and fmtB null mutant | (21) |
Col | Hospital-associated MRSA isolate | (54) |
Col MIN | Col pbp3, pbp4, sgtA, sgtB, fmtA, fmtB, and mecA null mutant | (21) |
USA300 JE2 | Community-acquired MRSA strain of the USA300 lineage isolated from a skin and soft tissue infection at the Los Angeles County jail, cured of plasmids | (24) |
JE2 sgtA::Tn | JE2 defective for SgtA. ErmR | (24) |
JE2 sgtB::Tn | JE2 defective for SgtB. ErmR | (24) |
JE2 pbp3::Tn | JE2 defective for PBP3. ErmR | (24) |
JE2 pbp4::Tn | JE2 defective for PBP4. ErmR | (24) |
JE2 fmtA::Tn | JE2 defective for FmtA. ErmR | (24) |
JE2 pbp4::Tn pCN34 | pbp4 Transposon mutant complemented with the empty pCN34 vector. ErmR KanR | This study |
JE2 pbp4::Tn pCN34-pbp4 | pbp4 Transposon mutant complemented with pbp4 amplified from JE2 in the pCN34 vector. ErmR KanR | This study |
JE2 pbp4::Tn pCC22-WT | pbp4 Transposon mutant complemented with pbp4 amplified from ASARM141, a CC22 clinical isolate encoding the WT version of PBP4 in the pCN34 vector. ErmR KanR | This study |
JE2 pbp4::Tn pCC22-pbp4S140R | pbp4 Transposon mutant complemented with pbp4 amplified from ASARM124, a CC22 clinical isolate encoding the S140R PBP4 variant in the pCN34 vector. ErmR KanR | This study |
To generate TSB-grown bacteria, stationary phase overnight cultures were diluted to 107 CFU mL−1 in TSB and incubated at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm) until 2 × 108 CFU mL−1. To generate serum-incubated cultures, TSB-grown bacteria were centrifuged and resuspended in human serum from male AB plasma (Sigma) and incubated for 16 h at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm). As S. aureus is unable to replicate in human serum, there was no change in CFU counts during this incubation in serum. Where appropriate, serum was supplemented with a sub-lethal concentration of cefoxitin (2 µg mL−1).
Construction of strains
The JE2 pbp4::Tn mutant was complemented by cloning the pbp4 gene along with its promoter and terminator regions into the multi-copy E. coli/S. aureus shuttle vector pCN34 (55). This vector contains the wild-type replicon of plasmid pT181, resulting in a copy number of ~20–25 plasmids/cell (55). pbp4 was amplified from JE2 using pbp4_Fw (5′- GATGCTTGAATCAATACGCTATGTCG -3′) and pbp4_Rev (5′- AGTCAGGTACCGTGTTGCCCCAAAATACCGC -3′) and from CC22 strains using pbp4_Fw and pbp4_CC22_Rev (5′- AGTCAGGTACCAGTATTGCCCCAAAATACCGTTC -3′). Fragments were then digested with EcoRI and KpnI and ligated into digested pCN34 using T4 ligase. Plasmids were transformed into E. coli DC10B, then electroporated into S. aureus RN4220, and transduced into the JE2 pbp4::Tn mutant using φ11.
Measurements of cell wall thickening by incorporation of HADA by fluorescence microscopy
De novo peptidoglycan synthesis was determined by measuring incorporation of HCC-amino-D-alanine, a fluorescent D-amino acid analog, which is incorporated into the pentapeptide chain of peptidoglycan as it is synthesized (19, 23, 56). TSB-grown cultures and serum-incubated cultures were generated as above with the addition of 25 µM HADA. Cultures were washed three times in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and spotted onto agarose on microscope slides. Cells in Fig. 1 were imaged using a Zeiss Axio Imager.A1 microscope coupled to an AxioCam MRm and a 100× objective using a DAPI filter set. The fluorescence of 50 cells per replicate (150 cells total) was quantified using Zen 2012 software (blue edition). Cells in Fig. 3 were imaged using an Olympus BX53 microscope and a 100× objective using a DAPI filter set and were analyzed with Cellsens software.
Measurements of cell wall thickening by incorporation of HADA by plate reader
Serum-incubated cultures were generated in the presence of 25 µM HADA before being washed in PBS and resuspended in PBS. Aliquots (200 µL) were transferred to black-walled 96-well plates, and the fluorescence measured using a TECAN Infinite 200 PRO microplate reader (excitation 405 nm; emission 460 nm). Fluorescence values were divided by OD600 readings to normalize for differences in cell density between samples. For the clinical isolates, cultures were grown for 16 h in 200 µL TSB in 96-well plates, before being diluted 10-fold, incubated in serum supplemented with 25 µM HADA in 96-well plates for 16 h, washed in PBS, and resuspended in PBS and fluorescence measured as above.
Bacterial antibiotic killing assay
TSB-grown and serum-incubated cultures were exposed to 80 µg mL−1 daptomycin [equivalent to peak serum concentrations in patients (57)] in serum for 6 h and CFU counts determined every 2 h for 6 h or at the 6-h time point only. TSB-grown cultures were centrifuged and resuspended in serum immediately before the daptomycin was added. Where appropriate, serum was supplemented with a sub-lethal concentration of cefoxitin (2 µg mL−1).
Determination of antibiotic MIC
MICs were determined using the broth microdilution protocol (58). Twofold serial dilutions of daptomycin or cefoxitin were prepared in 200 µL TSB per well in a 96-well plate. In the case of daptomycin, TSB was supplemented with 1.25 mM CaCl2. Wells were inoculated at 5 × 105 CFU mL−1 and incubated statically at 37°C for 16 h. The MIC was the lowest concentration with no visible growth.
Bacterial growth curves
Overnight cultures of S. aureus were inoculated at 5 × 105 CFU mL−1 into 200 µL TSB in a 96-well plate. The plate was incubated in a TECAN Infinite 200 PRO microplate reader for 16 h at 37°C with orbital shaking, and the optical density at 600 nm was measured every 15 min.
Statistical analyses
CFU data were log10 transformed and presented as the geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation. Non-CFU data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. All experiments consisted of at least three independent biological replicates and were analyzed by one-way or two-way ANOVA with appropriate post hoc multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism (V10.0) as described in the figure legends.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mariana Pinho (ITQB NOVA) is thanked for providing strains. Vladimir Pelicic (Imperial College London) is thanked for providing access to the fluorescent microscope. Simon Foster (University of Sheffield) is thanked for providing HADA. The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience Imaging Centre, BioSciences Institute, University College Cork, for technical assistance. All authors acknowledge the provision of strains by the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) Program under NIAID/ NIH Contract No. HHSN272200700055C.
This work was funded by a Science Foundation Ireland Frontier for the Future Program Award (reference: 21/FFP-A/9704) and a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (ref: 212258/Z/18/Z).
Contributor Information
Elizabeth V. K. Ledger, Email: eledger@ucc.ie.
Boudewijn L. de Jonge, Shionogi Inc., Florham Park, New Jersey, USA
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00961-24.
Table S1 and Figure S1.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Public Health England . 2024. Annual epidemiological commentary: Gram-negative, MRSA, MSSA bacteraemia and C. difficile infections, up to and including financial year 2022 to 2023. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/mrsa-mssa-and-e-coli-bacteraemia-and-c-difficile-infection-annual-epidemiological-commentary/annual-epidemiological-commentary-gram-negative-mrsa-mssa-bacteraemia-and-c-difficile-infections-up-to-and-including-financial-year-2022-to-2023
- 2. Jorgensen SCJ, Zasowski EJ, Trinh TD, Lagnf AM, Bhatia S, Sabagha N, Abdul-Mutakabbir JC, Alosaimy S, Mynatt RP, Davis SL, Rybak MJ. 2020. Daptomycin plus β-lactam combination therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a retrospective, comparative cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 71:1–10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chang F-Y, Peacock JE Jr, Musher DM, Triplett P, MacDonald BB, Mylotte JM, O’Donnell A, Wagener MM, Yu VL. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore) 82:333–339. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000091184.93122.09 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Taylor SD, Palmer M. 2016. The action mechanism of daptomycin. Bioorg Med Chem 24:6253–6268. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.05.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Nathwani D, Morgan M, Masterton RG, Dryden M, Cookson BD, French G, Lewis D, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on Community-onset MRSA Infections . 2008. Guidelines for UK practice for the diagnosis and management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections presenting in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:976–994. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ledger EVK, Sabnis A, Edwards AM. 2022. Polymyxin and lipopeptide antibiotics: membrane-targeting drugs of last resort. Microbiol (Reading) 168:001136. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhang T, Muraih JK, MacCormick B, Silverman J, Palmer M. 2014. Daptomycin forms cation- and size-selective pores in model membranes. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1838:2425–2430. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Muraih JK, Harris J, Taylor SD, Palmer M. 2012. Characterization of daptomycin oligomerization with perylene excimer fluorescence: stoichiometric binding of phosphatidylglycerol triggers oligomer formation. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1818:673–678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.10.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Grein F, Müller A, Scherer KM, Liu X, Ludwig KC, Klöckner A, Strach M, Sahl H-G, Kubitscheck U, Schneider T. 2020. Ca2+-daptomycin targets cell wall biosynthesis by forming a tripartite complex with undecaprenyl-coupled intermediates and membrane lipids. Nat Commun 11:1455. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15257-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Müller A, Wenzel M, Strahl H, Grein F, Saaki TNV, Kohl B, Siersma T, Bandow JE, Sahl H-G, Schneider T, Hamoen LW. 2016. Daptomycin inhibits cell envelope synthesis by interfering with fluid membrane microdomains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E7077–E7086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611173113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pogliano J, Pogliano N, Silverman JA. 2012. Daptomycin-mediated reorganization of membrane architecture causes mislocalization of essential cell division proteins. J Bacteriol 194:4494–4504. doi: 10.1128/JB.00011-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tong SYC, Lye DC, Yahav D, Sud A, Robinson JO, Nelson J, Archuleta S, Roberts MA, Cass A, Paterson DL, et al. 2020. Effect of vancomycin or daptomycin with vs without an antistaphylococcal β-lactam on mortality, bacteremia, relapse, or treatment failure in patients with MRSA bacteremia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 323:527–537. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pujol M, Miró J-M, Shaw E, Aguado J-M, San-Juan R, Puig-Asensio M, Pigrau C, Calbo E, Montejo M, Rodriguez-Álvarez R, et al. 2021. Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 72:1517–1525. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Vos FJ, Kullberg BJ, Sturm PD, Krabbe PFM, van Dijk APJ, Wanten GJA, Oyen WJG, Bleeker-Rovers CP. 2012. Metastatic infectious disease and clinical outcome in Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species bacteremia. Medicine (Baltimore) 91:86–94. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31824d7ed2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wang JT, Hsu LY, Lauderdale TL, Fan WC, Wang FDer. 2015. Comparison of outcomes among adult patients with nosocomial bacteremia caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 10:e0144710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lambert M-L, Suetens C, Savey A, Palomar M, Hiesmayr M, Morales I, Agodi A, Frank U, Mertens K, Schumacher M, Wolkewitz M. 2011. Clinical outcomes of health-care-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients admitted to European intensive-care units: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:30–38. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70258-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Moise PA, Amodio-Groton M, Rashid M, Lamp KC, Hoffman-Roberts HL, Sakoulas G, Yoon MJ, Schweitzer S, Rastogi A. 2013. Multicenter evaluation of the clinical outcomes of daptomycin with and without concomitant β-lactams in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and mild to moderate renal impairment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1192–1200. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02192-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Seaton RA, Gonzalez-Ruiz A, Cleveland KO, Couch KA, Pathan R, Hamed K. 2016. Real-world daptomycin use across wide geographical regions: results from a pooled analysis of CORE and EU-CORE. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 15:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0130-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ledger EVK, Mesnage S, Edwards AM. 2022. Human serum triggers antibiotic tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Commun 13:2041. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29717-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tickle ARH, Ledger EVK, Edwards AM. 2022. Human serum induces daptomycin tolerance in Enterococcus faecalis and viridans group streptococci. Microbiology (Reading) 168. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Reed P, Atilano ML, Alves R, Hoiczyk E, Sher X, Reichmann NT, Pereira PM, Roemer T, Filipe SR, Pereira-Leal JB, Ligoxygakis P, Pinho MG. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus survives with a minimal peptidoglycan synthesis machine but sacrifices virulence and antibiotic resistance. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004891. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kuru E, Radkov A, Meng X, Egan A, Alvarez L, Dowson A, Booher G, Breukink E, Roper DI, Cava F, Vollmer W, Brun Y, VanNieuwenhze MS. 2019. Mechanisms of incorporation for D-amino acid probes that target peptidoglycan biosynthesis. ACS Chem Biol 14:2745–2756. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kuru E, Tekkam S, Hall E, Brun YV, Van Nieuwenhze MS. 2015. Synthesis of fluorescent D-amino acids and their use for probing peptidoglycan synthesis and bacterial growth in situ. Nat Protoc 10:33–52. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fey PD, Endres JL, Yajjala VK, Widhelm TJ, Boissy RJ, Bose JL, Bayles KW. 2013. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. MBio 4:e00537-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. 2019. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:203–218. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Recker M, Laabei M, Toleman MS, Reuter S, Saunderson RB, Blane B, Török ME, Ouadi K, Stevens E, Yokoyama M, Steventon J, Thompson L, Milne G, Bayliss S, Bacon L, Peacock SJ, Massey RC. 2017. Clonal differences in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia-associated mortality. Nat Microbiol 2:1381–1388. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0001-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Navratna V, Nadig S, Sood V, Prasad K, Arakere G, Gopal B. 2010. Molecular basis for the role of Staphylococcus aureus penicillin binding protein 4 in antimicrobial resistance. J Bacteriol 192:134–144. doi: 10.1128/JB.00822-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Okonog K, Noji Y, Nakao M, Imada A. 1995. The possible physiological roles of penicillin-binding proteins of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Chemother 1:50–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02347729 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wyke AW, Ward JB, Hayes MV, Curtis NA. 1981. A role in vivo for penicillin-binding protein-4 of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Biochem 119:389–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05620.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ledger EVK, Edwards AM. 2024. Host-induced cell wall remodeling impairs opsonophagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by neutrophils. MBio 15:e0164324. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01643-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sauvage E, Kerff F, Terrak M, Ayala JA, Charlier P. 2008. The penicillin-binding proteins: structure and role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00105.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sacco MD, Hammond LR, Noor RE, Bhattacharya D, McKnight LJ, Madsen JJ, Zhang X, Butler SG, Kemp MT, Jaskolka-Brown AC, Khan SJ, Gelis I, Eswara P, Chen Y. 2024. Staphylococcus aureus FtsZ and PBP4 bind to the conformationally dynamic N-terminal domain of GpsB. Elife 13:e85579. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vollmer W, Seligman SJ. 2010. Architecture of peptidoglycan: more data and more models. Trends Microbiol 18:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Boneca IG, Huang Z-H, Gage DA, Tomasz A. 2000. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus cell wall glycan strands, evidence for a new beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase activity. J Biol Chem 275:9910–9918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.9910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hayhurst EJ, Kailas L, Hobbs JK, Foster SJ. 2008. Cell wall peptidoglycan architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:14603–14608. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804138105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chatterjee SS, Chen L, Gilbert A, da Costa TM, Nair V, Datta SK, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. 2017. PBP4 mediates β-lactam resistance by altered function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00932-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Chan LC, Gilbert A, Basuino L, da Costa TM, Hamilton SM, Dos Santos KR, Chambers HF, Chatterjee SS. 2016. PBP 4 mediates high-level resistance to new-generation cephalosporins in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3934–3941. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00358-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Berti A. D., Sakoulas G, Nizet V, Tewhey R, Rose WE. 2013. β-Lactam antibiotics targeting PBP1 selectively enhance daptomycin activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5005–5012. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00594-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Berti AD, Theisen E, Sauer J-D, Nonejuie P, Olson J, Pogliano J, Sakoulas G, Nizet V, Proctor RA, Rose WE. 2016. Penicillin binding protein 1 is important in the compensatory response of Staphylococcus aureus to daptomycin-induced membrane damage and is a potential target for β-lactam-daptomycin synergy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:451–458. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02071-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lew C, Mishra NN, Bayer AS, Rose WE. 2021. Β-lactam-induced cell envelope adaptations, not solely enhanced daptomycin binding, underlie daptomycin-β-lactam synergy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00356-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ono D, Yamaguchi T, Hamada M, Sonoda S, Sato A, Aoki K, Kajiwara C, Kimura S, Fujisaki M, Tojo H, Sasaki M, Murakami H, Kato K, Ishii Y, Tateda K. 2019. Analysis of synergy between beta-lactams and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents from the standpoint of strain characteristics and binding action. J Infect Chemother 25:273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Masters EA, de Mesy Bentley KL, Gill AL, Hao SP, Galloway CA, Salminen AT, Guy DR, McGrath JL, Awad HA, Gill SR, Schwarz EM. 2020. Identification of penicillin binding protein 4 (PBP4) as a critical factor for Staphylococcus aureus bone invasion during osteomyelitis in mice. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008988. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Argudín MA, Dodémont M, Taguemount M, Roisin S, de Mendonça R, Deplano A, Nonhoff C, Denis O. 2017. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected during a national survey conducted in Belgian hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:56–59. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Argudín MA, Roisin S, Nienhaus L, Dodémont M, de Mendonça R, Nonhoff C, Deplano A, Denis O. 2018. Genetic diversity among Staphylococcus aureus isolates showing oxacillin and/or cefoxitin resistance not linked to the presence of mec genes . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00091-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Miró JM, Entenza JM, Del Río A, Velasco M, Castañeda X, Garcia de la Mària C, Giddey M, Armero Y, Pericàs JM, Cervera C, Mestres CA, Almela M, Falces C, Marco F, Moreillon P, Moreno A, Hospital Clinic Experimental Endocarditis Study Group . 2012. High-dose daptomycin plus fosfomycin is safe and effective in treating methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4511–4515. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06449-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Mehta S, Singh C, Plata KB, Chanda PK, Paul A, Riosa S, Rosato RR, Rosato AE. 2012. β-Lactams increase the antibacterial activity of daptomycin against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and prevent selection of daptomycin-resistant derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6192–6200. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01525-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Rand KH, Houck HJ. 2004. Synergy of daptomycin with oxacillin and other beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2871–2875. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.2871-2875.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Barber KE, Werth BJ, Ireland CE, Stone NE, Nonejuie P, Sakoulas G, Pogliano J, Rybak MJ. 2014. Potent synergy of ceftobiprole plus daptomycin against multiple strains of Staphylococcus aureus with various resistance phenotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:3006–3010. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Geriak M, Haddad F, Rizvi K, Rose W, Kullar R, LaPlante K, Yu M, Vasina L, Ouellette K, Zervos M, Nizet V, Sakoulas G. 2019. Clinical data on daptomycin plus ceftaroline versus standard of care monotherapy in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02483-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Tong SYC, Mora J, Bowen AC, Cheng MP, Daneman N, Goodman AL, Heriot GS, Lee TC, Lewis RJ, Lye DC, et al. 2022. The Staphylococcus aureus network adaptive platform trial protocol: new tools for an old foe. Clin Infect Dis 75:2027–2034. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing . 2024. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 14.0, 2024.
- 52. Fernandes CJ, Fernandes LA, Collignon P, Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance . 2005. Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:506–510. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Baba T, Bae T, Schneewind O, Takeuchi F, Hiramatsu K. 2008. Genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman and comparative analysis of staphylococcal genomes: polymorphism and evolution of two major pathogenicity islands. J Bacteriol 190:300–310. doi: 10.1128/JB.01000-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, Deboy RT, Ravel J, Paulsen IT, Kolonay JF, Brinkac L, Beanan M, et al. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J Bacteriol 187:2426–2438. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Charpentier E, Anton AI, Barry P, Alfonso B, Fang Y, Novick RP. 2004. Novel cassette-based shuttle vector system for gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6076–6085. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6076-6085.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ledger EVK, Edwards AM. 2023. Growth arrest of Staphylococcus aureus induces daptomycin tolerance via cell wall remodelling. MBio 14:e0355822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03558-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Dvorchik BH, Brazier D, DeBruin MF, Arbeit RD. 2003. Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and safety following administration of escalating doses once daily to healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1318–1323. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1318-1323.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW. 2008. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1 and Figure S1.