Abstract
Background
Globally, diarrhea continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for children under five, with an annual rate of 149 million cases of illness and 760,000 deaths. This study aimed to assess prevalence and contributing factors of diarrhea among children under-five years in Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods
A community based cross-sectional study was conducted on 1387 participants from February to June 2023. A multistage sampling method was conducted. Structured and pretested questionnaires were used to collect the data. Data were entered in to Epi data and exported to STATA for analysis. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with diarrhea with p-value < 0.05.
Results
The prevalence of diarrheal disease among children under five was 17.16%. Child’s age 12 to 23 months [AOR = 16.642; 95% CI: (3.119, 88.805)], protected drinking water [AOR: 0.629; 95% CI: (0.840, 0.928)], health insurance [AOR = 0.571;95% CI: (0.386, 0.844)], institutional delivery [AOR = 0.426, 95% CI: (0.256, 0.707)], water shortage [AOR = 1.570, 95% CI: (1.083, 2.277)], and vaccinated for measles [AOR = 0.124, 95% CI: (0.065, 0.236)] were associated with diarrhea.
Conclusion
Age of children, source of drinking water, health insurance, place of delivery, family size, water shortage, liquid waste disposal, and measles vaccination were significantly associated with diarrhea among under five children. Interventions targeting improvements in drinking water sources, health insurance coverage, sanitation practices, and vaccination rates are crucial for mitigating the impact of diarrheal disease among children under five years in Awi Zone.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-024-05191-2.
Keywords: Associated factor, Awi Zone, Diarrhea, Prevalence, Under five children
Introduction
Diarrhea is defined as the passage of 3 or more loose or liquid stools within a day [1, 2]. It is usually a symptom of gastrointestinal infection, which can be caused by a variety of bacterial, viral, and parasitic organisms which is spread through contaminated food or drinking-water, or from person to person as a result of poor hygiene [3].
Globally, diarrhea continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children which accounting for around 149 million deaths among children under five in 2019 [4]. Worldwide, World Health Organization (WHO) revealed that diarrhea is the second leading cause of death among under-five children, which accounting for about 1.7 billion cases and 760, 000 mortality every year [5, 6].
In Africa, diarrhea disease is the leading cause of mortality responsible for an estimated 30 million cases and 333,000 children death [5, 7, 8]. Diarrhea disease associated with mortality is more concentrated in Sub-Saharan African countries (88 per 1000 live births) [9]. It is the cause of reduced food appetite, energy intake, nutrient loss and mal-absorption [10]. The burden of diarrhea diseases in developing countries is higher than developed countries, where hygiene and sanitation are poor, and low vaccination coverage [4, 11]. In Sub-Saharan and South Asia countries, diarrhea accounted about 90% of deaths [12].
In Ethiopia, three-fourths of the health problems of under five children are communicable diseases which are caused due to poor environmental health conditions arising from unsafe and inadequate water supply and poor hygienic and sanitation practices [13].
According to data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey indicates that 11.79% of children in Ethiopia had diarrhea in the 2 weeks before the survey [14]. Furthermore, other studies in different parts of Ethiopia indicated that the prevalence of childhood diarrhea was in the range of 13.5 to 30.5% [15–19]. Different studies showed that, diarrhea among children under the age of 5 years were significantly influenced by the family size [20], wealth index [21, 22], sex [23], place of residence, mothers’ educational status, mothers’ age, child’s age [21–24], vaccination status [21, 22], place of birth [15], birth order [21, 25], types of drinking water sources [20], liquid waste disposal [22], toilet facilities [20], hand washing at critical time, solid waste disposal [10], and member of health insurance [21]. The illness burden and risk of diarrhea in children varied greatly even among these small studies. There is little knowledge regarding the factors that contribute to childhood diarrhea, despite the higher child mortality rate and high prevalence of diarrhea. Thus, determining the risk factors for diarrhea is critical to the successful implementation of child health intervention programs, to the overall evaluation of resource needs and intervention priorities, and to the reduction of diarrhea among children under five in the Awi Zone through the strengthening of healthcare systems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated risk factor of diarrhea among under-five children in Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods and materials
Study design, setting and period
A community-based cross-sectional study design was employed to investigate the problem in Awi zone from February to June 2023. Awi zone is one of ten zones in Amhara region of Ethiopia, with an estimated total population of 982,942 of whom 491,865 are men and 491,077 women according to Central Statistical Agency, 2007 [26]. The zone has 15 districts, six urban and nine rural, which bordered on the west by Benishangul-Gumuz Region, on the north by west Gondar Zone and on the east by West Gojjam Zone. It is located 114 km from Bahir Dar, the capital of Amhara region, and 449 km from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. Awi zone elevations vary from 1,800 to 3,100 m above sea level, with an average altitude of about 2,300 m. It has five governmental hospitals, 46 health centers, 125 private clinics and one hospital in the zone that provide preventive and curative services to the community [27]. Women/caregivers were interviewed to get information about the history of under five children in the five years preceding the surveys.
Study and source population
The source of population was all under-five children living in the Awi zone, while all under-five children lived in randomly selected kebeles in the Awi Zone were the study population.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Mothers/caregivers-child pairs lived in Awi Zone at least for 6 months prior to data collection was incorporated under this study. However, Mothers/caregivers-child pairs had resided in the research area for less than 6 months prior to data collection (those visiting), as well as those who were not volunteer to participate, caregiver with mental illness, and severely ill were excluded from this study.
Sample size determination and sampling technique
Sample size was computed based on single population proportion formula by using: confidence level = 95% [28], margin of error (d) = 3%, design effect = two (Awi zone-districts-kebeles-households), and the prevalence of diarrhea among under five children in Mecha district, North West Ethiopia (p = 0.18), which is that gave a relatively larger sample size was taken into consideration and 10% non- response rate [29].
The final sample size was estimated as 630.02 × 2 = 1260.04 by adding 10% non-response rate becomes 1387.
Household numbers having under-five children were taken from health extension workers registration books. The youngest child was selected for a household having two or more under 5 years of children. Multistage sampling technique was employed to select study subject among the fifteen districts which were stratified into urban and rural. Eight districts (three urban and five rural districts) were selected by lottery method from a cluster created sample frame as primary sampling unit. Similarly, six urban and twenty nine rural kebeles from each urban and rural district were chosen using simple random sampling technique in second stage. The first household was selected randomly at the center of the kebeles and the subsequent households were selected systematically and sampling interval used for selected kebeles was calculated by dividing the total number of households in each kebeles to the allocated sample size. Mothers/ caregivers who have under-five year children were the respondents in a household. Finally, a total of 1387 households were selected with probability proportional to population size using systematic random sampling technique.
Data collection technique and quality control
The data was collected by using a face-to-face interviewer-administered questionnaire which was adapted from different literature, including socio-economic and demographic, environmental and community related, health and child caring related factors and an observation checklist was also applied and submitted as supplement file (Additional file 1).
The data was conducted by eight data collectors and two supervisors with a degree holder in public health officers or nurses. Further, measurement and observational checklist was also used. The training was given for three days for data collectors and supervisors prior to the start of the data collection process about interview technique, how to maintain quality of data, and ethical issue. Daily supervision and follow-up were done by the supervisors and principal investigators. Original questionnaire was prepared in English and then translated into Amharic and Agewegna (local languages) and translated back to English to check consistency, and the pretest was done on the data collection instrument before conducting the study. The vaccination history of the children was validated by checking against immunization cards. The questionnaire was pre-tested on 5% of study participants in kebeles not included in the main survey before the actual survey and necessary modifications were done. The collected data quality consistency and completeness were checked; the data were entered into Epi data 4.0.2 software by two data clerks, and then exported to STATA 14 for analysis.
Variables of the study
Outcome variable
The outcome variable for this study was occurrence of diarrhea, reported by the mother/caregivers of the child and coded as “Yes = 1” and “No = 0”. In this study, socio-economic and demographic variables (place of residence, education status of the mother, occupational status of mother, household wealth index, age of the child, sex of the child, marital status of mother, number of children less than 59 months in HH, family size, current age of mother, birth order, media exposure and religion of mother), environmental and community related variables (toilet facility for HH, shortage of water for HH, source of drinking water for HH, distance to fetch water, solid waste disposal system, liquid waste disposal system, type of floor of house made), and behavioral and health caring related variables (measles vaccination, duration of breast feeding status, Knowledge of mothers/caregivers on diarrhea prevention and transmission, age at complementary feeding, place of delivery, health insurance, mother’s hand washing at critical times) were included.
Data management and analysis
The data was entered and cleaned in Epi info version 4.0.2 and analyzed using STATA 14. The frequency and percentages of the variables were presented using descriptive statistics. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done. Binary logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between dependent and independent variables. The binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the diarrheal disease. Hence, diarrheal disease was classified as either yes (coded as 1) or not (coded as 0). The ratio of the success (Yi=1) probability, P (xi) to that of 1-P(xi) (failure (Y = 0) probability) is given by: is known as the odds of success.
In terms of the odds, the logistic model can be written as:
and the odds in favor of success for multivariable logistic regression will be.
The odds of some event happening is defined as the ratio of the probability of occurrence to the probability of non-occurrence. The binary logistic regression analysis requires the assumptions of observations are independent and no perfect correlation between the independent variables. Additionally, the relationship between continuous predictors and the outcome should be linear. Bivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to identify factors associated with diarrhea. Bivariable logistic regression analysis, with the crude odds ratio (COR) was carried out to identify associations between the diarrhea and each independent variable. All variables with p-value < 0.2 in the bivariable logistic regression analysis were chosen for the multivariable logistic regression analysis to compensate confounders [30]. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio was used to determine factors associated with diarrhea among under-five children which were expressed at a 95% confidence interval. Significant predictors were defined as factors with a p-value of less than 0.05.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants
In this study, a total of 1387 households with under-five children were included and a complete response was obtained from all (100%) respondents. Out of total respondents, the prevalence of diarrhea varies based on place of residence; children living rural areas were 908 (65.47%). About more than half of the children 783 (56.45%) were males. About 746 (53.79%) mothers/caregivers were in the age group of 25–34 years. The majority of mothers 1319 (95.10%) were married at the time of the study, and 736(53.06%) were unable to read and write [Table 1].
Table 1.
characteristics | categories | frequency | percentage |
---|---|---|---|
residence | urban | 479 | 34.53 |
rural | 908 | 65.47 | |
sex of child | male | 783 | 56.45 |
female | 604 | 43.55 | |
religion | orthodox | 1310 | 94.38 |
other | 78 | 5.62 | |
educational status of mother/caregiver | no education | 736 | 53.06 |
primary | 347 | 25.02 | |
secondary and above | 304 | 21.92 | |
marital status | married | 1319 | 95.10 |
other*a | 68 | 4.90 | |
Main occupation of mothers/caretakers | farmer | 778 | 56.09 |
Employed | 78 | 5.62 | |
housewife | 455 | 32.80 | |
other*b | 76 | 5.48 | |
age of mother | below 24 | 125 | 9.01 |
25–34 | 748 | 53.93 | |
35 and above | 514 | 37.06 | |
child birth order | first | 337 | 24.30 |
2–3 | 514 | 37.06 | |
4–5 | 327 | 23.58 | |
6 and above | 209 | 15.07 | |
family size of house hold | 5 and less than | 620 | 44.70 |
above 5 | 767 | 55.30 | |
Number of children in the family | one | 1050 | 75.70 |
two and above | 337 | 24.30 | |
Age of the child in months | less than 6 | 124 | 8.94 |
6–11 | 208 | 15.00 | |
12–23 | 388 | 27.97 | |
24–59 | 667 | 48.09 | |
wealth index of house hold | poor | 562 | 40.52 |
middle | 287 | 20.69 | |
Rich | 538 | 38.79 | |
media exposure | No | 671 | 48.38 |
Yes | 716 | 51.62 |
∗a Widowed, divorced, or separated *b daily laborer, merchant
Environmental and community characteristics of households
Of the total participants, 1287 (92.79%) had latrines and 211 (15.21%) respondents use unprotected drinking water source [Table 2].
Table 2.
characteristics | categories | frequency | percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Main source of drinking water | unprotected | 211 | 15.21 |
protected | 1176 | 84.79 | |
Round trip distance to fetch water | =<30 min | 746 | 53.79 |
> 30 min | 641 | 46.21 | |
water shortage | no | 387 | 27.90 |
yes | 1000 | 72.10 | |
Solid waste disposal system | improper | 621 | 44.77 |
proper | 766 | 55.23 | |
liquid waste disposal system | improper | 983 | 70.87 |
proper | 404 | 29.13 | |
Type of floor of house made from | mud | 1086 | 78.30 |
cement | 301 | 21.70 | |
toilet facility for household | no | 100 | 7.21 |
yes | 1287 | 92.79 |
Behavioral and health caring practice of the children
From the total study participants, 1295 (93.37%) of respondents were delivery from health facility and 92(6.63%) were from home. About 997(71.88%) had knowledge about the mode of transmission and prevention mechanisms of diarrheal diseases; 721 (51.98%) gave supplementary food to their children at 6 months [Table 3].
Table 3.
characteristics | categories | frequency | percentage |
---|---|---|---|
place of delivery | home | 92 | 6.63 |
health facility | 1295 | 93.37 | |
The child initiated complementary feeding at 6 month | no | 547 | 39.44 |
yes | 721 | 51.98 | |
not starting | 119 | 8.58 | |
child vaccination | no | 284 | 20.48 |
yes | 1103 | 79.52 | |
duration of breast feeding | less than 24 months | 789 | 56.89 |
24 and above months | 598 | 43.11 | |
Soap use for hand washing at critical time | No | 346 | 24.95 |
Yes | 1041 | 75.05 | |
Knowledge of mothers/caretakers on diarrhea prevention and transmission | poor | 390 | 28.12 |
good | 997 | 71.88 | |
health insurance | No | 314 | 22.64 |
Yes | 1073 | 77.36 |
Prevalence of diarrhea and its associated factors among under-five children
The finding of this study revealed that the prevalence of diarrhea among under five children in Awi zone was 17.16% with 95% confidence interval of 15.26–19.24 in last two weeks preceding of the data collection date (Fig. 1).
In bivariable logistic regression analysis, age of child in months, child birth order, number of under five children in the household, educational status of mother, marital status of mother, family size of household, media exposure, main source of drinking water, round trip distance of fetch water, water shortage, liquid waste disposal system, solid waste disposal system, type of floor of house made, place of delivery, child initiated complementary feeding at 6 month, child vaccination for measles, Soap use for hand washing at critical time, knowledge of mothers/caretakers on diarrhea prevention, and health insurance were identified as candidate variables for the multivariable logistic regression analysis. In this study, age of children, type of drinking water source, health insurance, place of delivery, family size, water shortage, liquid waste disposal system, and child vaccination against measles showed that statistically significant association among under-five children diarrhea [Table 4].
Table 4.
Characteristics | Categories | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age of the child in months | less than 6 | 1 | 1 | |
6–11 | 1.573(0.773,3.199) | 2.067(0.429,9.950) | 0.365 | |
12–23 | 2.860(1.508,5.423) | 16.642(3.119,88.805)* | 0.001 | |
24–59 | 1.744(0.928,3.277) | 10.901(2.062,57.631)* | 0.005 | |
child birth order | first | 1 | 1 | |
2–3 | 1.383(0.948,2.017) | 1.094(0.691,1.732) | 0.701 | |
4–5 | 1.437(0.953,2.167) | 0.759(0.415,1.387) | 0.370 | |
6 and above | 1.049(0.643,1.709) | 0.591(0.294,1.184) | 0.138 | |
Number of children in the family | one | 1 | 1 | |
two and above | 1.447(1.063,1.970) | 1.271(0.877,1.840) | 0.205 | |
educational status of mother/caregiver/ | no education | 1 | 1 | |
primary | 0.968(0.694,1.350) | 1.083(0.723,1.622) | 0.700 | |
secondary+ | 0.694(0.475,1.013) | 0.723(0.436,1.198) | 0.207 | |
marital status | married | 1 | 1 | |
other*a | 1.656(0.939,2.921) | 1.503(0.806,2.801) | 0.200 | |
family size of household | 5 and less than | 1 | 1 | |
above 5 | 1.470(1.102,1.959) | 1.669(1.096,2.542)* | 0.017 | |
media exposure | No | 1 | 1 | |
Yes | 0.724(0.547,0.959) | 0.800(0.572,1.118) | 0.191 | |
Main source of drinking water | unprotected | 1 | 1 | |
protected | 0.574(0.405,0.815) | 0.629(0.426,0.928)* | 0.020 | |
Round trip distance to fetch water | =<30 min | 1 | 1 | |
> 30 min | 1.357(1.026,1.795) | 1.141(0.840,1.549) | 0.399 | |
Water shortage | No | 1 | 1 | |
Yes | 1.560(1.114,2.185) | 1.570(1.083,2.277)* | 0.017 | |
Solid waste disposal system | improper | 1 | 1 | |
proper | 0.730(0.552,0.965) | 1.032(0.740,1.440) | 0.853 | |
liquid waste disposal system | improper | 1 | 1 | |
proper | 0.529(0.375,0.748) | 0.587(0.394,0.874)* | 0.009 | |
Type of floor of house made from | mud | 1 | 1 | |
cement | 0.640(0.441,0.930) | 0.864(0.551,1.356) | 0.526 | |
place of delivery | home | 1 | ||
health facility | 0.395(0.250,0.627) | 0.426(0.256,0.707)* | 0.001 | |
The child initiated complementary feeding at 6 month | No | 1 | 1 | |
yes | 0.804(0.602,1.072) | 0.981(0.715,1.345) | 0.905 | |
No starting | 0.414(0.215,0.797) | 0.741(0.149,3.689) | 0.715 | |
child vaccination (measles) | no | 1 | 1 | |
yes | 0.680(0.491,0.940) | 0.124(0.065,0.236)* | < 0.001 | |
Soap use for hand washing at critical time | No | 1 | 1 | |
Yes | 0.624(0.461,0.845) | 0.818(0.558,1.200) | 0.304 | |
Knowledge of mothers/caretakers on diarrhea prevention | poor | 1 | 1 | |
good | 0.636(0.473,0.854) | 0.752(0.517,1.093) | 0.135 | |
health insurance | No | 1 | 1 | |
yes | 0.529(0.375,0.748) | 0.571(0.386,0.844)* | 0.005 |
*Significance at p-value ≤ 0.05; COR: crude odds ratio; AOR: adjusted odds ratio
This study revealed that the children’s exposure to diarrhea was increased when they completed their first 11 months of life and the risk was highest at the age of 12–23 months. Children whose group of age 12 to 23 months were 16.642 times (AOR = 16.642; 95% CI: 3.119, 88.805) and 24 to 59 months were 10.901 times (AOR = 10.901; 95% CI: 2.062, 57.631) higher risk of developing diarrhea compared to those whose age were less than 6 months. This study also showed that children who deliver in health institution were 0.426 times less likely to develop diarrhea compared to their counterparts [AOR = 0.426; 95% CI: 0.256, 0.707]. Children living in households with shortage of water were 1.570 times more likely to develop diarrhea as compared to their counterparts [AOR = 1.570; 95% CI: 1.083, 2.277].
Additionally, the odds of having diarrheal diseases in children whose family have appropriate liquid waste disposal were 0.587 times less likely compared with a family that practiced inappropriate liquid waste disposal [AOR = 0.587; 95% CI: 0.394, 0.874]. Children living in households who had above five family member were 1.667 times more likely to develop diarrheal disease compared to children living in households with five or less family member [AOR = 1.667; 95% CI: 1.096, 2.542].
This study also showed that children who get measles vaccination were 0.124 times less likely to develop diarrhea compared to their counterpart [AOR = 0.124, 95% CI: 0.065, 0.236].
Regarding to drinking water source, households that used improved water sources decreases the likelihood of childhood diarrhea by 0.629 times compared to households that used unimproved water source [AOR = 0.629; 95% CI: 0.840,0.928]. Pertaining member of health insurance, the odds of developing diarrhea in children living in households who were a member of health insurance were 0.571 times (AOR = 0.571; 95% CI: 0.386, 0.844) less likely as compared to children living in households who were not a member of health insurance [Table 4].
Discussion
This study was conducted to assess the prevalence of diarrhea and its associated factors among children under-five years in Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. The finding of this study revealed that the two weeks prevalence of childhood diarrhea among under-five years was 17.16% (95% CI: 15.26–19.24%). This finding was comparable with the study conducted in the West Gojjam zone (18%) [31]. The result this finding was higher as compared with studies done in East Gojjam zone (6.5%) [32], Malaysia (4.4%) [33], Kamashi district (14.5%) [34], EDHS 2016 report (12%) [35], and Dale District, Sidama zone, Southern Ethiopia (13.6%) [36]. However, the finding was lower as compared with study conducted in Burundi (32.6%) [37], and Arba-Minch rural community (31%) [38]. The difference might be attributed to the variation in the socio demographic, behavioral, and environmental factors of study households compared to other studies like, people’s way of life, educational levels of the community, maternity care of child’s immunization, and nutritional differences.
Age of children has showed a statistically significant association with diarrhea occurrence in which the odds of developing diarrhea among children in the age groups 12– 23 months and 24–59 months were 16.642 and 10.901 times higher as compared with children aged below 6 months respectively. This finding was supported by previous studies conducted in Ethiopia [39], Uganda [40], Eritrea [41], Oromia Region [22], Arba Minch District [16], and Dale District, Sidama zone, Southern Ethiopia [36]. The study from the Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia also supports this finding in which the odds of developing diarrhea was 1.94 times higher among children aged from 12 to 24 months when compared to children aged below 6 months [42]. This could be due to children in this age groups are the time of crawling and mouthing whatever they get even their feces that causing diarrhea pathogens, making this aged children at a more risk of developing diarrheal diseases. In addition to this, this age is the transition from an exclusive breastfeeding, and starting of solid complementary foods which is poor in hygiene to children whose immunity was not well developed [43].
Additionally, children from household with more than five family members had 1.669 times higher risk of diarrhea than children from households with less than or equal to five family members. This result is consistent with previous studies conducted in rural settings of Dangila district, Ethiopia [5], and rural areas of North Gondar zone, Ethiopia [44]. Similarly, study in Ethiopia [45] showed that children who were from households who had greater than six family members were 1.41 times more likely to develop diarrhea as compared to children who were from households who had less than five family members. This could be due to more family members living in the household, it is expected that children will be more susceptible to diarrhea due to parents’ decreased level of care and attention, as well as the increased risk of disease transmission through contaminated food and water, poor personal hygiene, and unsanitary surroundings [46].
Findings on measles vaccination revealed that children who were vaccinated for measles were less risk to experience diarrhea as compared to those children who were not vaccinated. This finding was in agreement with the previous study conducted in Ethiopia [45], low-income and middle-income countries [47], rural settings of Danglia district, Ethiopia [5], and Amhara region [30], which found that the diarrhea disease was high during outbreak of measles. A child who is vaccinated against measles has advantage to minimize a developing of measles infection. Measles is extremely contagious disease measles damages epithelial cells and weakens the immune system, which can result in infections of various organ systems and protein-losing enteropathy. As a result, children may develop measles, which indirectly causes diarrhea as a complication to measles [48].
Furthermore, children living in household having water shortage had 1.570 times higher chance of getting diarrhea occurrence as compared to household having no water shortage. The findings from rural settings of Danglia district, Ethiopia [5] also showed that households with water shortage increases the chance of diarrhea occurrence by 18 times as compared to households having no water shortage. This could be explained by the fact that households having water shortage could not keep their personal hygiene as necessary [49].
This finding reveled that liquid waste disposal system was significantly associated with diarrhea among under five children. The odds of diarrhea among children lived in household with appropriate liquid waste disposal system were 0.587 times less likely as compared to children lived in household with improper liquid waste disposal system. This study was consistent with a studies conducted in Senegal [50], Somali region [18], and Oromia region [22]. This could be the reason that liquid waste contains different diarrheal pathogen, which can be easily distributed by flies, that pathogens may contaminate foods and water that child eat and drink.
In this study, place of delivery was significantly associated with diarrhea among under five children. Children born at health facilities were 0.426 times less likely to develop diarrheal disease compared to delivery at home. The finding is consistent with other studies conducted in Ethiopia [51], and Jawi district, Ethiopia [15]. In addition to this, a study conducted in Wama Hagelo District, West Ethiopia is consistent with our finding which showed that under-five children born at health facilities had 79% less risk of developing diarrhea compared to home delivery [20].This can be explained by the fact that mothers who give birth at health institution know more about how to prevent diarrheal illness and how to care for their children. Moreover, mothers who gave birth in health institution are given information on exclusive breast feeding, which might decrease the chance of getting an infection that may lead to diarrheal disease.
In present study, the incidence of diarrhea was significantly associated with a source of drinking water supply. Children from household who used protected sources of drinking water were 0.629 times less likely to develop diarrhea compared to their counterparts. This result is consistent with several study findings done in Medebay Zana district, Ethiopia [52], Ethiopia [21], Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia [53], and Cameroon [54]. This is because contaminated water supplies, which usually considers as a main source of water borne diseases may carry diarrhea-causing pathogens that may lead to diarrhea. Additionally, a study conducted in Pakistan demonstrates that the involvement of the water and sanitation expansion program reduced the likelihood of diarrhea in children [55].
According to this study the odds of developing diarrhea among children living in households who were a member of health insurance were 0.571 times lower as compared to children living in households who were not a member of health insurance. This finding was supported by a study conducted in Ethiopia [45]. This might be due to the fact that households who have not community based health insurance may not access health care services easily.
Strength and limitation of the study
The strength of this study was the study employed a variety of data gathering techniques, such as on-site observation, to evaluate latrine utilization practices. Additionally, a pretest was conducted before to the real data collection in order to ensure the quality of the data, and a consistent data gathering method. As limitation, the study was a cross-sectional survey, which may not help establish a temporal relationship between the possible risk factors of children under five year old diarrhea and difficult to entertain the seasonal effect on diarrhea disease. The data was self-reported; there might also be a possibility of recall and social desirability biases that will result in underreporting and misreporting of events. Although the recall period of illnesses, in this case, was limited to only 2 weeks preceding the survey. Mothers/Caregivers of the child were questioned about their children’s health status in the two weeks prior to the survey, which might measure their perceptions rather than actual morbidity that might have an impact on the outcome [56].
Conclusion
The prevalence of childhood diarrhea disease was high in Awi zone. The household family size, age of child in months, liquid waste disposal system, place of delivery, drinking water source, member of health insurance, measles vaccination, and water shortage of family were significantly associated with diarrhea among under five children in Awi zone, northwest Ethiopia. These finding implies a need for public health interventions, such as increased vaccination coverage, increase the coverage of health insurance, strengthening and scaling up of behavioral change packages of the community regarding to keeping hygiene and sanitation of the community and their environment, access to a clean source of drinking water to prevent the high incidence of diarrhea disease among children. Furthermore, integrated efforts are needed from the government organization with inline concerned stakeholders and non-governmental organization to improve water shortage in households, and institutional deliveries to reduce the burden of diarrheal disease among children under five years in Awi Zone. In addition, the findings of this study will serve as baseline evidence and gave the way for other researchers to conduct more rigorous studies on diarrhea by including seasonal effect.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Injibara University for giving ethical letters and financially support. The authors are grateful to the supervisors, data collectors and study participants who committed themselves throughout the study period and the selected district administrative for writing permission letters.
Abbreviations
- CI
Confidence interval
- COR
Crude odds ratio
- AOR
Adjusted Odds Ratio
- HH
Household
Author contributions
All authors contributed to design, data analysis, drafting or revising the article, have agreed on the journal to which the article will be submitted, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
The financial support was provided by Injibara University. The funding organization had no role in data collection, analysis, and write-up of the report.
Data availability
The data used to support the study findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was carried out after receiving an ethical clearance endorsement from Injibara University College of Natural and Computational Science Research and Community service vice dean with a reference number of CNCS/PG/R/CS/V/Dean/255/23 and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent of the respondent formal letter of permission was obtained from administrative bodies of the district and then from the respective Kebeles (lower administrative). After explaining the objective and procedure of the study, written informed consent was taken from the parents / legal guardians of the under-five children to confirm willingness to participate in the study. For this purpose, a one-page consent form was attached to the cover page of each questionnaire stating the general purpose of the study and issues of confidentiality, which were discussed by data collectors before proceeding to the survey. The consent form was read and their thumb print impression was taken to replace signature for illiterate respondents. Unique identification household number was used to ensure confidentiality of individual participants’ information. The study participants were informed that all the collected data can only be used for the objective of the study. For those not willing to take part in the study, their right was respected to withdraw from the study. All responses were kept confidential and children with diarrhea during the visit were advised to seek treatment.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Organization WH. Diarrhoeal disease fact sheet. World Heal Organ Media Cent, 2017: pp. 1–4.
- 2.Gidudu J, et al. Diarrhea: case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2011;29(5):1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.UNICEF. Diarrhoeal disease 2018.
- 4.Owusu DN, et al. Prevalence and determinants of diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections among children aged under five years in West Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys. Int Health. 2024;16(1):97–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ayalew AM, et al. Assessment of Diarrhea and its Associated factors in under-five children among Open Defecation and Open Defecation‐Free Rural settings of Dangla District, Northwest Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018(1):4271915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.WHO. Diarrheal diseases: World Health Organization 2013.
- 7.Troeger C, et al. Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(9):909–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jin Y, et al. Cause-specific child mortality performance and contributions to all-cause child mortality, and number of child lives saved during the Millennium Development goals era: a country-level analysis. Global Health Action. 2018;11(1):1546095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mamo A. H.A., Assessment of prevalence and related factors of diarrheal diseases among under-five year’s children in Debrebirehan referral hospital, Debrebirehan town, Amhara region, Ethiopia, April 11/2014,Open Access Library Journal, 2014, 1, 1 – 14,Feburuary11/2018. 2018.
- 10.Wasihun AG, et al. Risk factors for diarrhoea and malnutrition among children under the age of 5 years in the Tigray Region of Northern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0207743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Workie GY, Akalu TY, Baraki AG. Environmental factors affecting childhood diarrheal disease among under-five children in Jamma district, South Wello Zone, Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Collaborators GN. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Neurology. 2019;18(5):459. The Lancet. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Andualem Anteneh AA, Abera AK, Kumie. Assessment of the impact of latrine utilization on diarrhoeal diseases in the rural community of Hulet Ejju Enessie Woreda, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region. 2010.
- 14.EDHS. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016 2016.
- 15.Gessesse DN, Tarekegn AA. Prevalence and associated factors of diarrhea among under-five children in the Jawi district, Awi Zone Ethiopia, 2019. Community based comparative cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2022. 10: p. 890304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Mohammed S, Tamiru D. The Burden of Diarrheal Diseases among children under five years of age in Arba Minch District, Southern Ethiopia, and Associated Risk factors: a cross-sectional study. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014(1):654901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Melese M, et al. Prevalence of diarrhea, intestinal parasites, and associated factors among under-five children in Dabat District, Northwest Ethiopia: multicenter cross-sectional study. Environ Health Insights. 2023;17:11786302231174744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hashi A, Kumie A, Gasana J. Prevalence of diarrhoea and associated factors among under-five children in Jigjiga District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia. Open J Prev Med. 2016;6(10):233–46. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dagnew AB, et al. Prevalence of diarrhea and associated factors among under-five children in Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bekele D et al. Determinants of diarrhea in under-five children among health extension model and non-model families in Wama Hagelo district, west Ethiopia: community-based comparative cross-sectional study. J Multidisciplinary Healthc, 2021: pp. 2803–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Fenta SM, Nigussie TZ. Individual-and community‐level risk factors Associated with Childhood Diarrhea in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of 2016 Ethiopia demographic and Health Survey. Int J Pediatr. 2021;2021(1):8883618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alemayehu K, et al. Prevalence and determinants of Diarrheal diseases among under-five children in Horo Guduru Wollega Zone, Oromia Region, Western Ethiopia: A Community‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2021;2021(1):5547742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saha J, et al. Occurrence of diarrheal disease among under-five children and associated sociodemographic and household environmental factors: an investigation based on National Family Health Survey-4 in rural India. Children. 2022;9(5):658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Demissie GD, et al. Diarrhea and associated factors among under five children in sub-saharan Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys of 34 sub-saharan countries. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wolde D, et al. The burden of diarrheal diseases and its associated factors among under-five children in Welkite Town: a community based cross-sectional study. Int J Public Health. 2022;67:1604960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Population EOot, Commission HC. Summary and statistical report of the 2007 population and housing census: population size by age and sex. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Population Census Commission; 2008.
- 27.Mitiku HD et al. Hierarchical Analysis of Contraceptive Compliance Among Rural Reproductive Age Group Women in Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Patient preference and adherence, 2022: pp. 1279–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.McIlroy A, Barnett S. Building customer relationships: do discount cards work? Managing Service Quality: An International Journal; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dessalegn M, Kumie A, Tefera W. Predictors of under-five childhood diarrhea: Mecha District, West Gojam, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2011;25(3):192–200. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Azage M, et al. Childhood diarrhea in high and low hotspot districts of Amhara Region, northwest Ethiopia: a multilevel modeling. J Health Popul Nutr. 2016;35:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dessalegn M, Tefera KA, Dessalegn W. M, Kumie A, Tefera W. Predictors of under-five childhood diarrhea: Mecha District, West Gojam. Ethiopia Ethiop J Health Dev 25(3), 2011.
- 32.Anteneh A. Assessment of the impact of latrine utilization on diarrhoeal diseases in the rural community of Hulet Ejju Enessie Woreda, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2010;24(2):210. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aziz FAA, et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with diarrhoeal diseases among children under five in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study 2016. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fenta A, Alemu K, Angaw DA. Prevalence and associated factors of acute diarrhea among under-five children in Kamashi district, western Ethiopia: community-based study. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.ICF CS. a.C.E.a., ICF, C.S.a.C.E.a. Ethiopian demographic and health survey;. 2016 p. 551.
- 36.Melese B, et al. Prevalence of diarrheal diseases and associated factors among under-five children in Dale District, Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Diouf K. e.a., Diarrhoea prevalence in children under five years of age in rural Burundi: an assessment of social and behavioural factors at the household level. Glob Health Action 2014 7(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Mohammed S, Tamiru TM. Morbidity and associated factors of diarrheal diseases among under five children in Arba-Minch district, Southern Ethiopia. Sci J Public Health. 2012;1(2):102. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Messelu Y, Trueha K. Application of multilevel binary logistic regressionsanalysis in determining risk factors of diarrhealmorbidity among under five children in Ethiopia. Public Health Res. 2016;6(4):110–8. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bbaale E. Determinants of diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection among under-fives in Uganda. Australasian Med J. 2011;4(7):400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Woldemicael G. Diarrhoeal morbidity among young children in Eritrea: environmental and socioeconomic determinants. J Health Popul Nutr, 2001: pp. 83–90. [PubMed]
- 42.Sinmegn Mihrete T, Asres Alemie G, Shimeka A, Teferra. Determinants of childhood diarrhea among underfive children in Benishangul Gumuz regional state, north West Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sahiledengle B, et al. A multilevel analysis of factors associated with childhood diarrhea in Ethiopia. Environ Health Insights. 2021;15:11786302211009894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Getachew A, et al. Diarrhea prevalence and Sociodemographic Factors among under-five children in rural areas of North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Int J Pediatr. 2018;2018(1):6031594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Negesse Y, et al. Trends and determinants of diarrhea among under-five children in Ethiopia: cross-sectional study: multivariate decomposition and multilevel analysis based on bayesian approach evidenced by EDHS 2000–2016 data. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Organization WH. Diarrhoea: why children are still dying and what can be done. 2009.
- 47.Kotloff KL, et al. The incidence, aetiology, and adverse clinical consequences of less severe diarrhoeal episodes among infants and children residing in low-income and middle-income countries: a 12-month case-control study as a follow-on to the global enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS). Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(5):e568–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rybolt A, et al. Protein-losing enteropathy associated with Clostridium difficile infection. Lancet. 1989;333(8651):1353–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Godana W, Mengistie B. Determinants of acute diarrhoea among children under five years of age in Derashe District, Southern Ethiopia. Rural Remote Health. 2013;13(3):35–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Thiam S, et al. Prevalence of diarrhoea and risk factors among children under five years old in Mbour, Senegal: a cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6(04):43–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tiku M, Zeru MA, Belay DB. Spatio-temporal distributions and determinants of diarrhea among under-five children in Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1369872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Asfaha KF, et al. Determinants of childhood diarrhea in Medebay Zana District, Northwest Tigray, Ethiopia: a community based unmatched case–control study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ashole Alto A, Godana W, Gedamu G. Impact of Community-Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene on Prevalence of Diarrheal Disease and Associated Factors among under‐five children: a comparative Cross‐sectional study in selected woredas of Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Adv Public Health. 2020;2020(1):8237101. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ayuk TB, et al. Prevalence of diarrhoea and associated risk factors among children under-five years of age in Efoulan health district-Cameroon, sub-saharan Africa. MOJ Public Health. 2018;7(6):259–64. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ali M, Abbas F, Shah AA. Factors associated with prevalence of diarrhea among children under five years of age in Pakistan. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;132:106303. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Curtis V, et al. Structured observations of hygiene behaviours in Burkina Faso: validity, variability, and utility. Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(1):23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the study findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.