Abstract
Bacillus thuringiensis crystal (Cry) proteins have been expressed in commercial transgenic crops for nearly 30 years, providing safe and effective control of insect pests and significantly reducing the application of hazardous chemical pesticides. B. thuringiensis crystal proteins have also been shown to target parasitic nematodes, including plant parasitic nematodes. Recently, transgenic soybean crops expressing Cry14Ab have been shown to provide control against the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines, marking the first time a crystal protein is being commercialized in transgenic crops for control of a nematode pest. However, apart from H. glycines and the free-living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, the breadth of nematode activity of Cry14Ab, e.g., against gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes (GINs), has not been reported. Here we study the efficacy of Cry14Ab against a wide range of gastrointestinal nematode parasites (GINs) in vitro and in vivo. We find that Cry14Ab is effective in vitro against the barber’s pole worm Haemonchus contortus larvae, small strongyles cyathostomin larvae, the hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum adults, the roundworm Ascaris suum L4 larvae, and the whipworm Trichuris muris adults. In rodents infected with GIN parasites, Cry14Ab is effective as an in vivo anthelmintic against the hookworms A. ceylanicum and N. americanus, against the mouse parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri, and against the roundworm A. suum. Cry14Ab also variably reduces the reproduction of the whipworm T. muris in vivo. Using optimized profile Markov Models, we looked for other putative anthelmintic Cry proteins and, within this list, identified a Bt crystal protein, GenBank accession no. MF893203, that we produced and demonstrated intoxicated GINs. This protein, with 90% amino acid identity to Cry14Ab, is active against C. elegans, A. ceylanicum adults, and A. suum L4 larvae in vitro. MF893203 was given the official designation of Cry14Ac. Cry14Ac is also an effective in vivo anthelmintic against A. ceylanicum hookworms in hamsters and intestinal A. suum in mice. Taken together, our results demonstrate that Cry14Ab and Cry14Ac have wide therapeutic utility against GINs.
Author summary
Gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes or worms pose a significant threat to global health, causing illness in millions-billions of people and animals. Current treatments have limitations, including concerns about drug resistance. We are exploring a promising new approach using natural Crystal (Cry) proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacteria, which are already widely used as safe and effective insecticides. To date, we have focused on the anthelmintic (deworming) properties of Bt Cry protein Cry5Ba. Here, our research demonstrates that a newly characterized and different Bt Cry protein, Cry14Ab, can also effectively target and kill various types of harmful parasitic nematodes in both laboratory and animal models. Moreover, we identify another related Bt protein, Cry14Ac, with similar activities against parasitic nematodes. These findings highlight the potential of Bt proteins as a novel class of deworming medications, offering hope for the development and clinical deployment of safer and more effective treatments against parasitic nematode infections.
Introduction
Bacillus thuringiensis or Bt is a common gram-positive soil bacterium that produces pesticidal proteins [1]. The best studied are three-domain crystalline (Cry) proteins that accumulate in parasporal crystal inclusions during sporulation [1]. Each Cry protein kills only a narrow set of target invertebrates, including major insect pests [2]. Cry proteins are biodegradable and safe to all vertebrates, including humans, as well as to most beneficial invertebrates [3]. As such, Cry proteins have been used for decades to kill insect vectors of disease as well as insect crop pests in conventional and organic farming [1], accounting for ~90% of biopesticides sold worldwide [4]. Cry proteins have been produced in transgenic crops such as corn, cotton, and soybean that were planted on a cumulative total of 1.5 billion hectares from 1996 to 2022 [5,6]. More than a dozen Cry proteins produced by transgenic crops have been studied and approved as safe for human consumption by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [7,8]. Hundreds of Cry proteins in >50 different families have been identified and characterized [9,10].
Although commercial use of Bt and Bt Cry proteins to date has only applied to insect pests, studies have suggested Bt Cry proteins, closely related to those that target insects by sequence and structure [11–14], are also relevant for controlling nematode pests, the most prevalent and ubiquitous eukaryotic parasites on earth. With regards to human and animal pests, orally-delivered Cry5Ba protein has been shown to be therapeutically effective in mammalian hosts against a wide array of gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) parasites, including hookworms, ascarids, barber’s pole worm, and Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri [15–24]. With regards to plant pests, transgenic tomato roots expressing the Cry protein Cry5Ba showed protection against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognito, inhibiting the establishment of infection sites and reducing progeny production 3-fold [25]. This latter use of a nematode-active Cry protein is the closest to the current use of Cry proteins against insect pests.
Based on this result, the related Cry protein, Cry14Ab1 (hereafter Cry14Ab), was explored for control of Heterodera glycines, the soybean cyst nematode, one of the most important disease agents of soybeans worldwide [26] (Cry14Ab falls broadly into the phylogenetic family of Cry proteins that target nematodes such as Cry5B [14,27]). Transgenic soybean plants expressing Cry14Ab significantly impaired the reproduction of H. glycines in both greenhouse and field trials [27]. These transgenic Cry14Ab soybean plants have received regulatory approval from the US EPA and FDA for deployment against H. glycines [28,29], suggesting they may be released soon as a commercial trait.
Apart from H. glycines, the activity of Cry14Ab against other nematode pests has not been reported. Indeed, although the related protein Cry14Aa has been identified as having activity against free-living nematodes or stages of nematodes [14,30,31], to date no Cry14A protein family member has been demonstrated to have anthelmintic activity, e.g., therapeutic activity against GIN parasitic infections [32,33]. Because of the approval of Cry14Ab in a food crop, we set out to examine if Cry14Ab has anthelmintic properties as well. Here, we test Cry14Ab against GIN parasites in vitro and in vivo. Using optimized profile Markov Models to identify novel anthelmintic family proteins in sequence databases such as UniProt, we also uncover a new anthelmintic member of this family, now called Cry14Ac1 (or abbreviated here as Cry14Ac) and explore its anthelmintic properties.
Results
Cry14Ab can be produced as IBaCC
We recently reported on a novel, safe, and scalable method for production of the nematode-active Cry5Ba proteins for use as an anthelmintic, called IBaCC for Inactivated Bacteria with Cytosolic Crystal(s) [20,22,24]. We cloned Cry14Ab downstream of the cry3Aa promoter to express it in vegetative cells and then transformed the construct into Bacillus thuringiensis 4D8 cells in which we had deleted the spo0A gene to prevent sporulation. As with Cry5Ba, Cry14Ab was robustly produced in vegetative cells in Δspo0A cells under control of the cry3Aa promoter (Fig 1A and 1B). These cells were then inactivated (killed) with essential oil treatment as described [24], resulting in no live cells (Fig 1C).
Cry14Ab is effective against GINs in vitro
Cry14Ab IBaCC was then quantitated against bovine serum albumin by SDS-PAGE and used in dose-response bioassays against the larval stages of two important veterinary GIN parasites, the blood-feeding parasite of sheep, Haemonchus contortus, and a common parasite of horses, cyathostomins, small strongyles that encompass 40 species and that commonly occur as coinfections of 15–25 species [34]. Cry14Ab IBaCC is highly effective against the larval stages of H. contortus (Fig 2A) and cyathostomins (Fig 2B), with complete inhibition of development at 5 ng/mL (about 10X more potent than Cry5Ba IBaCC at 56 ng/mL or ~400 pM; [22]). Given that Cry14Ab is a 132 kilodalton (kDa) protein, this 5 ng/mL dose represents a concentration of 38 pM.
We tested Cry14Ab IBaCC in vitro against the parasite stages of GINs that infect or are closely related to those that infect humans. Adult A. ceylanicum parasites, which are prominent hookworm parasites of humans especially in Southeast Asia [35], were harvested from infected hamsters and treated with varying doses of Cry14Ab IBaCC in 48-well format. Twenty-four hours later, the motility of the parasites was measured as a proxy for nematode health/intoxication using the Worminator system set up in our laboratory [21]. As shown, the motility of the hookworms was significantly inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 3A).
We also tested lysed Cry14Ab IBaCC against intestinal L4 staged Ascaris suum (pig roundworm) parasites. We recently reported on a new system that allows for robust development of A. suum parasites in mice past the lung phase and into the intestinal L4 stage [20,21]. A. suum is a very close relative of, if not the same species as, Ascaris lumbricoides (human roundworm) [36–38]. We harvested fourth staged (L4) parasite A. suum larvae from the intestines of infected mice and studied their motility in 96-well format over time using the touch 3–0 scale ([39]; this stage of A. suum is too small to be read with our Worminator). Cry14Ab IBaCC was also highly effective against this parasite in vitro (Fig 3B).
A third major human GIN is whipworm. We tested lysed Cry14Ab IBaCC in vitro against this parasite, in particular mouse whipworm or Trichuris muris. As determined by our Worminator system [21], Cry14Ab IBaCC completely inhibited the motility of whipworm adults at 72 hr. at a dose of ~800 nM (110 μg/mL; Figs 3C and S1).
Cry14Ab is an effective anthelmintic in vivo
Given the in vitro activity of Cry14Ab against GINs, we next tested the in vivo anthelmintic activity of Cry14Ab to cure parasitic infections in rodents. Cry14Ab was given as a single oral dose to hamsters infected with either A. ceylanicum (Fig 4A) or N. americanus (Fig 4B) hookworms, which together encompass the two hookworm genera that infect humans. In both cases, significant reductions in parasite burdens and reproduction (fecal egg counts) were seen in Cry14Ab IBaCC treated groups relative to control groups. For example, single dose 20 mg/kg Cry14Ab reduced A. ceylanicum hookworm burdens by 68% and fecal egg counts by 92%. Single dose 50 mg/kg nearly eliminated N. americanus burdens. The doses used in Fig 4 would, at a molar level, not show any effects using other anthelmintics, e.g., albendazole.
We also looked at the impact of Cry14Ab on luminal feeding GINs. A double oral dose of Cry14Ab IBaCC was given to mice infected with A. suum that progressed to the intestinal phase. As shown (Fig 5A), a near complete (95%) elimination of intestinal Ascaris burdens relative to control was seen. Similarly, a single oral dose of Cry14Ab IBaCC of mice infected with Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri led to significant reductions in intestinal worm burdens and parasite reproduction (fecal egg counts) (Fig 5B).
As we saw effects on the whipworms in vitro, we tested whether Cry14Ab would have impacts on whipworm infections in vivo. Since T. muris is present in the cecum and since we currently lack a formulation to protect Cry14Ab through the stomach and small intestine, we injected solubilized Cry14Ab protein directly into the small intestine of mice infected with T. muris and followed fecal egg counts. The experiment was repeated three times. In two of three experiments, Cry14Ab treatment resulted in a dramatic reduction in whipworm reproduction (S2 Fig).
The newly uncovered and related protein Cry14Ac is also anthelmintic
The Liesegang laboratory has reported on an in silico approach for detecting and characterizing novel pesticidal proteins from publicly available sequence databases based on optimized profiling using hidden Markov models (HMM) methodology [40]. In the case of Cry proteins, the group is represented by several CRY-HMMs to account for the sequence diversity and modular nature of the protein class. The search was narrowed down based on HMM scores and domain signatures similar to those of known nematicidal Cry proteins according the IDOPS tool. This HMM tailored to recognize nematicidal Cry proteins was used on UniProt, giving rise to a number of putative anthelmintic Cry proteins. These were synthesized as genes and expressed. Among these, we found that the protein encoded by GenBank accession no. MF893203 was highly active against GINs (see below). MF893202 has 90% amino acid identity with Cry14Ab (S3 Fig), with 87% amino acid identity in the bioactive domain (crystal protein domains 1+2+3) and 94% amino acid identity in the crystallization domain (C terminal domain). MF893203 was previously identified in a Bt strain that also contained a Cry21Aa-family protein, but the biological activity of MF893203 was unknown at that time, and whether or not it had anti-nematode activity was not determined [41]. As such, MF893203 did not receive an official Cry protein designation [41]. As demonstrated below, M893203 is an anthelmintic and has now received the official designation of Cry14Ac1 (hereafter Cry14Ac).
We generated Cry14Ac IBaCC cells [24] (Fig 6A). To test for anti-nematode activity, we exposed fourth larval stage (L4) C. elegans, both wild-type and bre-5(ye17) mutants that are resistant to Cry5Ba [31,42], to Cry14Ac IBaCC. We found that Cry14Ac IBaCC is highly active against C. elegans and that, unlike Cry5Ba, is able to qualitatively intoxicate the bre-5(ye17) resistance mutant (Fig 6B), which lacks the functional receptor for Cry5Ba [43].
To test if Cry14Ac is also active against GINs, we used Cry14Ac IBaCC to treat in vitro parasitic intestinal stages of hookworms (A. ceylanicum) and roundworms (A. suum). Cry14Ac IBaCC was highly effective against both parasites in vitro (Fig 7).
We also tested the anthelmintic activity of Cry14Ac in vivo against A. ceylanicum hookworm infections in hamsters and intestinal A. suum infections in mice. Single dose Cry14Ac (10 mg/kg) as IBaCC resulted in ~70% elimination of hookworm burdens and fecal egg counts (Fig 8A and 8B). Double dose Cry14Ac (20 mg/kg) as IBaCC resulted in strong (80%) reduction in A. suum intestinal burdens (Fig 9).
Discussion
Here for the first time we demonstrate that Cry14A family proteins target human and animal parasitic nematodes. This work was motivated by the recent expression and regulatory approval of Cry14Ab expression in soybeans for transgenic control of the soybean cyst nematode. It was not known whether this protein, useful against plant-parasitic nematodes when expressed in transgenic plants, would have good efficacy against GINs.
Indeed, we find Cry14Ab protein is highly effective against the environmental larval stages of two important parasites in veterinary medicine, H. contortus (ovine host) and cyathostomins (equine host). Cry14Ab is also effective in vitro against intestinal parasitic stages of GINs in genera that encompass the three major parasites of humans: hookworms (Ancylostoma), roundworms (Ascaris), and whipworms (Trichuris). On a molar level, the GIN parasites are extremely sensitive to this protein in vitro, showing strong intoxication in the 40–800 nM range.
In parallel with results in vitro, we demonstrated that Cry14Ab is also an effective anthelmintic in vivo. Cry14Ab IBaCC is active against infections of two human hookworm species, A. ceylanicum and N. americanus, in hamsters. The efficacy is significant and high, albeit lower than that of our published Cry5Ba IBaCC data against the same hookworm infections (although the exact same doses were not used [24]). Cry14Ab is also a highly effective anthelmintic against luminal GINs, namely A. suum and H. polygyrus bakeri infections in mice, with efficacy similar to that published for Cry5Ba [20,24]. For the first time, we also report the variable efficacy of a Cry protein against T. muris whipworms, with Cry14Ab leading to significant reductions in fecal egg counts when injected directly into the intestine in two of three experiments. These data suggest potential for further optimization of this protein against whipworms, e.g., via improved formulation and delivery.
Using a novel in silico method to detect and cluster pesticidal proteins, we also detected a new anthelmintic member of the Cry14A family, Cry14Ac. Cry14Ac readily overcomes a C. elegans strain resistant to Cry5Ba, indicating that it must, to some extent, use a different receptor than the bre-5-associated Cry5Ba glycosphingolipid receptor [43]. Moreover, Cry14Ac is effective in vitro against A. ceylanicum hookworm adults and A. suum L4 larvae. Cry14Ac is also an effective anthelmintic in hamsters infected with A. ceylanicum hookworms and mice infected with intestinal A. suum roundworms. In the case of hookworms, Cry14Ac efficacy appears to be superior to that of Cry14Ab.
An interesting question to consider is whether Cry14Ab expressed in a transgenic soybean plant can have any anthelmintic effect, e.g., on GIN-infected farm animals. Although the levels of Cry14Ab expression in various tissues in these plants is not reported, Cry proteins can be expressed at levels ranging from 0.003–0.5% of total soluble protein in the plant [44,45]. Based on these data, we believe that the level of expression would not be sufficient to deliver an effective anthelmintic dose in normal feed.
This investigation also indicates that deep data mining techniques in silico are useful for uncovering new nematode-active Cry proteins. This study also demonstrates that the Cry14A family of proteins can broadly play an impactful role in the control and treatment of GIN parasites. Additional anthelmintics are critically needed as parasitic recalcitrance to synthetic anthelmintics continues to increase among human, livestock, and companion animal populations [24,46,47]. This report is also the first instance to demonstrate that multiple members of a single family of Cry proteins are anthelmintics and only the second, after Cry5Ba, to demonstrate that Bt Cry proteins have anthelmintic activity in vivo against a range of parasitic GINs. The ability of Cry14Ac to overcome Cry5Ba resistance suggests that multiple Cry protein families (e.g., Cry5B, Cry14A) may be productively stacked (combined) to prolong their anthelmintic efficacy, as occurs in natural Bt strains and has been engineered into transgenic plants [48–50].
Given the global burden of GIN infections, the pressing need for new therapeutic options, and the increasing threat of anthelmintic resistance, this research represents a promising advancement in the field. The broad-spectrum activity of Cry14Ab, combined with its safety profile as part of approved transgenic crops and along with Cry14Ac, make these proteins promising candidates for further development as a novel anthelmintics.
Materials and methods
Microbiology methods
Escherichia coli 5α cells (NEB) were used for cloning and maintained on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium including ampicillin (100 μg/ml) at 37° C or erythromycin (300 ug/ml) at 30° C. E. coli dam-/dcm- (NEB) cells were used to generate nonmethylated plasmids for Bt transformations and similarly maintained on LB medium with appropriate antibiotics. Bt strains were maintained at 30° C with LB medium, including erythromycin (10ug/ml) for plasmid maintenance when appropriate. Solid media contained 1.6% agar. The Bt strains used here are Bt HD1 4D8, into which we generated a spo0A deletion (HD1 4D8 Δspo0A) as part of another study (manuscript in preparation) and Bt 407 Δspo0A::kan [24,51].
To express Cry14Ab1, called Cry14Ab throughout this manuscript, DNA encoding Cry14Ab1 (GenBank accession no. KC156652) was transcriptionally fused between the cry3A promoter region -635 to +18 [52] and the cry5B terminator in the shuttle vector pHT3101 [53], by Genscript (Piscataway, NJ), as previously done for cry5B expression [24]. Later, DNA encoding Cry14Ac (GenBank accession no. MF893203) was synthesized and cloned by Genscript into the expression cassette of pHY170 (aka pKF45 [54]), a pHT3101-derived plasmid which contains the promoter region of cry3A -635 to ATG and the downstream terminator of cry5B. Nonmethylated plasmids were sequenced again prior to use. For cry14Ab, electrocompetent HD1 4D8 Δspo0A cells and 407 Δspo0A::kan cells were subsequently transformed with the empty vector pHT3101 or the above cry14Ab construct (pHY171, Pcry3A-cry14Ab, aka pKF36). For cry14Ac, electrocompetent 407 Δspo0A::kan cells were subsequently transformed with the empty vector pHT3101 or the above cry14Ac construct (pHY172, Pcry3A-cry14Ac, aka pDH13). Bt isolates harboring pHT3101 (empty vector), pHY171 (Pcry3A-cry14Ab), or pHY172 (Pcry3A-cry14Ac) were confirmed by PCR.
Production and characterization of IBa and IBaCC
To produce any IBaCC, a single vegetative colony of Cry5Ba (Cry5Ba1), Cry14Ab-, or Cry14Ac-expressing asporagenous Bt was incubated in 3X LB at 25°C with shaking at 125rpm for 3 days. Cry14Ab-expressing Δspo0A Bt was similarly incubated in a 350L fermenter at a biomanufacturing facility with constant monitoring and adjustments of pH and oxygen levels at 25°C with 150 rpm agitation for 48 h. Exhausted expression cultures were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended to 10% initial volumes in ice-cold water, then processed to IBa (Inactivated Bacteria with empty vector, i.e., no Cry protein) or IBaCC as previously described [24]. Briefly, 10X concentrated cell suspensions were treated with 0.1% terpene for 15 minutes at room temperature and washed three times with ice-cold water and centrifugation. Lab-cultured IBa and IBaCC samples were additionally subjected to organic extraction with food-grade corn oil prior to water washes, to remove residual terpene. Samples of concentrated IBa/IBaCC suspensions were used to analyze Cry protein quantification, IBaCC cell viability, and assays for nematicidal bioactivity. The IBa (inactivated bacteria with empty vector) and IBaCC cells were observed using an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with a UPlanFl 100x/1.30 Oil Ph3 objective (Fig 1B).
Cry protein content of IBaCC preparations were quantified by SDS-PAGE relative to Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich) standards analyzed by densitometry using ImageJ software [55]. Cell and BSA samples were denatured in Laemmli sample buffer for denaturing SDS-PAGE using cast or precast acrylamide gels (Bio-Rad) with tris-glycine running buffer.
For the experiment shown in Fig 1C, two cultures of pHY171 (Pcry3A-cry14Ab) were grown in LB overnight at 30° C in 10 μg/ml erythromycin till saturation. The next day, 100 μl of each culture was inoculated in 3X LB at 30° C with 10 μg/ml erythromycin and agitated at 250 rpm for three days. Exhausted cultures were harvested and one was processed to IBaCC with our standard protocol (see above); the remaining culture was concentrated down 10-fold to match the IBaCC sample. After each sample was appropriately diluted, 100 μl was plated onto a LB plate and incubated at 30° C overnight. Growth or lack of growth was recorded the following day. The data represent the average of three independent experiments.
To make IBaCC lysate (lysed IBaCC), IBaCC was lysed by vortexing in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH6.5, 250 mM NaCl, mutanolysin (35 U/mL), lysozyme (20 mg/mL), and 0.02% Pluronic F127. This suspension was rotated overnight at room temperature and then centrifuged at 5000xg for 20 min at 4° C to pellet crystals, which were washed 3X in cold sterile water and stored in the same.
Animal experiments
Caenorhabditis elegans
Caenorhabditis elegans was maintained using standard techniques [56]. The following strains were used in this study: N2 Bristol (wild type) and bre-5(ye17) [42]. For images shown in Fig 6B, 20–40 L4 hermaphrodites were incubated in 160 μl S-medium supplemented with 20 μl Escherichia coli OP50 (OD600 ~ 3) and either 1) 20 μl S-medium, or (2) 20 μl IBa (inactivated bacteria with empty vector) suspended in S-medium or (3) 20 μl Cry protein IBaCC (final Cry protein concentration 50 μg/mL per well) suspended in S-medium in 48-well format. The images were taken after six days of incubation at 25°C. Pictures are representative from two independent trials.
Parasites and hosts
Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Necator americanus hookworm life cycles were maintained in hamsters as previously described [18] with the exception that N. americanus was maintained with use of 2 mg/liter dexamethasone in the drinking water. H. polygyrus bakeri life cycle was maintained in Swiss Webster mouse as previous described [18]. Trichuris muris life cycle was maintained in B6/STAT6KO mice as previously described [39]. Ascaris suum infectious-staged eggs were from Joseph F. Urban, Jr. at United States Department of Agriculture and shipped to University of Massachusetts Medical School. All rodent experiments were carried out under protocols approved by the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (IACUC; PROTO202000044, PROTO202000071). The procedures for collection of fecal samples from sheep were approved by University of Rhode Island’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol AN2021-013. The procedures for collection of fecal samples from horses were approved by University of Kentucky’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol 2021–3879. All housing and care of laboratory animals used in this study conform to the National Institutes of Health (N.I.H., U.S.A.) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in Research (see 18-F22) and all requirements and all regulations issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.), including regulations implementing the Animal Welfare Act (P.L. 89–544) as amended (see 18-F23).
In vitro experiments
Larval development assays for H. contortus and cyathostomins (Fig 2) were carried out as described [17,22]. Reagents for hookworm culture medium (HCM), including RPMI 1640 medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin, and fungizone antimycotic, were all purchased from Gibco, USA. Adult A. ceylanicum hookworms harvested from the intestines of infected hamsters day 20 post-inoculation (PI) were assayed in vitro using the Worminator system to measure motility as previously reported [21] with the following modifications: 25 mM Hepes pH 7.2, 96-well format, 100 μL hookworm medium per well. For the Cry14Ab experiment, the AMU for 100% motility was 141; for the Cry14Ac experiment, 137.
A. suum L4 parasites (day 12 harvested from the intestines of B6/STAT6KO mice; [20]) were exposed to no protein, 50 μg/ml, and 100 μg/mL Cry proteins for 5 days (37 °C, 5% CO2) in RPMI 1640 with (all final concentrations) 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 5% fetal bovine serum, anti-microbials (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin; 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B). One adult parasite per well were placed in 100 μl medium in a 96-well format with the designated treatment using 5 wells/condition (mixed gender) and then set up 4 independent times for Cry14Ab (lysed IBaCC) and 2 independent times for Cry14Ac (IBaCC). A. suum L4s were scored on a 0 to 3 scale (0, nonmotile even when touched; 1, nonmotile unless touched; 2, slowly motile; 3, fully motile) as described previously [23]. The L4 stage (instead of the adult stage) is used for A. suum as STAT6KO mice expel this parasite after they reach the L4 intestinal stage but before they reach the adult intestinal stage.
Adult T. muris in vitro assays were carried out using one adult per well (3–6 male and 3–6 female worms per condition) harvested between days 35–40 PI and placed in buffer (same as for A. suum above) in a volume of 300 μL in 48-well plates. IBaCC lysate was used for these studies as intact IBaCC is not accessible to whipworms. Whipworm motility was measured using the Worminator system set up in our laboratory [21]. The AMU for 100% motility was 100.
In vivo experiments
The A. ceylanicum and N. americanus in vivo experiments were carried out as described previously [18,19,24]. For curative Cry14Ab IBaCC experiments in hamsters against A. ceylanicum only, cimetidine was given per os 15 min ahead of Cry5B administration, as previously described [18]. Experiments using H. polygyrus bakeri were carried out as described previously [24]. To determine the in vivo efficacy of Cry14Ab IBaCC and Cry14Ac IBaCC against intestinal A. suum, experiments were carried out as described previously [20], except B6/STAT6KO mice were inoculated per os with 5000 infective A. suum eggs. Treatment occurred on days 12 and 13 PI and intestinal burdens determined on day 18 PI. Intact IBaCC was used for all these in vivo experiments.
For the T. muris in vivo experiments, the Cry14Ab was solubilized to make it accessible to the whipworm parasites. IBaCC lysate (see above) was solubilized in 20 mM citrate buffer pH 3 [57] that contained 0.1% Pluronic F-127 (Sigma-Aldrich, P2443). The solubilization process was carried out at 4 °C, with periodic mixing during a 30-minute incubation. After solubilization, the tubes were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3500g. The resulting supernatant containing the soluble Cry14Ab protein was then transferred to an Amicon 50 kDa centrifugal filter (Millipore-Sigma, UFC905008) and concentrated. The concentrated soluble Cry14Ab protein was then immediately used for in vivo experiments.
To get pre-treatment parasite egg counts, feces were collected from individual mice on day 35 PI. Mice were treated with 500 μL of pH 3 solubilized Cry14Ab (50 mg/kg) on day 36 PI via direct injection into the distal small intestine of the mice to bypass the stomach. Control animals received 500 μL citrate buffer alone via direct instillation. Feces were collected overnight day 42–43 PI for fecal egg counts and then mice sacrificed for whipworm burdens [39]. For all in vivo experiments, worm burdens per host animal are shown.
Statistics
All graphs were produced and statistical analyses (one-tailed Student’s t test) carried out using GraphPad Prism v10. All the data used in plots are included in S1 Table.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All the crystal proteins used in this research can be found at Genbank: Cry14Ab1 has accession no. KC156652 and Cry14Ac has accession no. MF893203. All other relevant information are in the manuscript and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This work was financially supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants R01-AI056189 to R.V.A. and USDA-NIFA-AFRI Grant no. 2021-67015-34574 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture to K.H.P. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sanahuja G, Banakar R, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P. Bacillus thuringiensis: a century of research, development and commercial applications. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9: 283–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van Frankenhuyzen K. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;101: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bravo A, Gómez I, Porta H, García-Gómez BI, Rodriguez-Almazan C, Pardo L, et al. Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins insecticidal activity. Microb Biotechnol. 2013;6: 17–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kumar J, Ramlal A, Mallick D, Mishra V. An overview of some biopesticides and their importance in plant protection for commercial acceptance. Plants. 2021;10: 1185. doi: 10.3390/plants10061185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Isaaa. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2019: Biotech Crops Drive Socio-Economic Development and Sustainable Environment in the New Frontier. ISAAA Brief No. 55. Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA; 2019.
- 6.Tabashnik B. E. Carrière Y. Wu Y. Fabrick J.A. Global perspectives on field-evolved resistance to transgenic Bt crops. J Econ Entomol. 2023; in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Betz FS, Hammond BG, Fuchs RL. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000;32: 156–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koch MS, Ward JM, Levine SL, Baum JA, Vicini JL, Hammond BG. The food and environmental safety of Bt crops. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6: 283. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crickmore N, Berry C, Panneerselvam S, Mishra R, Connor TR, Bonning BC. A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol. 2020; 107438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center. In: Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center [Internet]. [cited 1 Mar 2023]. https://www.bpprc.org
- 11.Best HL, Williamson LJ, Heath EA, Waller-Evans H, Lloyd-Evans E, Berry C. The role of glycoconjugates as receptors for insecticidal proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2023;47. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li J, Wang L, Kotaka M, Lee MM, Chan MK. Insights from the Structure of an Active Form of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry5B. Toxins (Basel). 2022;14: 823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hui F, Scheib U, Hu Y, Sommer RJ, Aroian RV, Ghosh P. Structure and glycolipid binding properties of the nematicidal protein Cry5B. Biochemistry. 2012;51: 9911–9921. doi: 10.1021/bi301386q [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wei J-Z, Hale K, Carta L, Platzer E, Wong C, Fang S-C, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins that target nematodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 2760–2765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cappello M, Bungiro RD, Harrison LM, Bischof LJ, Griffitts JS, Barrows BD, et al. A purified Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein with therapeutic activity against the hookworm parasite Ancylostoma ceylanicum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 15154–15159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hu Y, Georghiou SB, Kelleher AJ, Aroian RV. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry5B protein is highly efficacious as a single-dose therapy against an intestinal roundworm infection in mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4: e614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hu Y, Miller M, Zhang B, Nguyen T-T, Nielsen MK, Aroian RV. In vivo and in vitro studies of Cry5B and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist anthelmintics reveal a powerful and unique combination therapy against intestinal nematode parasites. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12: e0006506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu Y, Nguyen T-T, Lee ACY, Urban JF Jr, Miller MM, Zhan B, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry5B protein as a new pan-hookworm cure. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2018;8: 287–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hu Y, Zhan B, Keegan B, Yiu YY, Miller MM, Jones K, et al. Mechanistic and single-dose in vivo therapeutic studies of Cry5B anthelmintic action against hookworms. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6: e1900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Urban JF Jr, Nielsen MK, Gazzola D, Xie Y, Beshah E, Hu Y, et al. An inactivated bacterium (paraprobiotic) expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry5B as a therapeutic for Ascaris and Parascaris spp. infections in large animals. One Health. 2021;12: 100241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chicca J, Cazeault NR, Rus F, Abraham A, Garceau C, Li H, et al. Efficient and scalable process to produce novel and highly bioactive purified cytosolic crystals from Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10: e0235622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sanders J, Xie Y, Gazzola D, Li H, Abraham A, Flanagan K, et al. A new paraprobiotic-based treatment for control of Haemonchus contortus in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance. 2020. pp. 230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2020.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Urban JF Jr, Hu Y, Miller MM, Scheib U, Yiu YY, Aroian RV. Bacillus thuringiensis-derived Cry5B has potent anthelmintic activity against Ascaris suum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li H, Abraham A, Gazzola D, Hu Y, Beamer G, Flanagan K, et al. Recombinant Paraprobiotics as a New Paradigm for Treating Gastrointestinal Nematode Parasites of Humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01469-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li X-Q, Tan A, Voegtline M, Bekele S, Chen C-S, Aroian RV. Expression of Cry5B protein from Bacillus thuringiensis in plant roots confers resistance to root-knot nematode. Biol Control. 2008;47: 97–102. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arjoune Y, Sugunaraj N, Peri S, Nair SV, Skurdal A, Ranganathan P, et al. Soybean cyst nematode detection and management: a review. Plant Methods. 2022;18: 110. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00933-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kahn TW, Duck NB, McCarville MT, Schouten LC, Schweri K, Zaitseva J, et al. A Bacillus thuringiensis Cry protein controls soybean cyst nematode in transgenic soybean plants. Nat Commun. 2021;12: 3380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Current and previously registered Section 3 plant-incorporated protectant (PIP) registrations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2020. https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/current-and-previously-registered-section-3-plant-incorporated
- 29.Biotechnology Notification File No. 000172. CFSAN Note to the File. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2022; 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/158266/download
- 30.Griffitts JS, Huffman DL, Whitacre JL, Barrows BD, Marroquin LD, Müller R, et al. Resistance to a bacterial toxin is mediated by removal of a conserved glycosylation pathway required for toxin-host interactions. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 45594–45602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308142200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Griffitts JS, Whitacre JL, Stevens DE, Aroian RV. Bt toxin resistance from loss of a putative carbohydrate-modifying enzyme. Science. 2001;293: 860–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1062441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cantón L, Lanusse C, Moreno L. Chemical agents of special concern in livestock meat production. New Aspects of Meat Quality. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 785–808. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dasenaki ME, Kritikou AS, Thomaidis NS. Meat safety: II Residues and contaminants. Lawrie’s Meat Science. Elsevier; 2023. pp. 591–626. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Macdonald SL, Abbas G, Ghafar A, Gauci CG, Bauquier J, El-Hage C, et al. Egg reappearance periods of anthelmintics against equine cyathostomins: The state of play revisited. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2023;21: 28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Colella V, Bradbury R, Traub R. Ancylostoma ceylanicum. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37: 844–845. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2021.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Easton A, Gao S, Lawton SP, Bennuru S, Khan A, Dahlstrom E, et al. Molecular evidence of hybridization between pig and human Ascaris indicates an interbred species complex infecting humans. Elife. 2020;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou C, Lei Y, Zhao S, Shi Q, Ouyang S, Wu X. Human-type and pig-type Ascaris hybrids found in pigs. Vet Parasitol. 2022;302: 109646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Leles D, Gardner SL, Reinhard K, Iñiguez A, Araujo A. Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species? Parasit Vectors. 2012;5: 42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hu Y, Ellis BL, Yiu YY, Miller MM, Urban JF, Shi LZ, et al. An extensive comparison of the effect of anthelmintic classes on diverse nematodes. PLoS One. 2013;8: e70702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Díaz-Valerio S, Lev Hacohen A, Schöppe R, Liesegang H. IDOPS, a profile HMM-based tool to detect pesticidal sequences and compare their genetic context. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 664476. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Verduzco-Rosas LA, García-Suárez R, López-Tlacomulco JJ, Ibarra JE. Selection and characterization of two Bacillus thuringiensis strains showing nematicidal activity against Caenorhabditis elegans and Meloidogyne incognita. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2021;368. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnaa186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Marroquin LD, Elyassnia D, Griffitts JS, Feitelson JS, Aroian RV. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin susceptibility and isolation of resistance mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2000;155: 1693–1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Griffitts JS, Haslam SM, Yang T, Garczynski SF, Mulloy B, Morris H, et al. Glycolipids as receptors for Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin. Science. 2005;307: 922–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Koul B, Yadav R, Sanyal I, Amla DV. Comparative performance of modified full-length and truncated Bacillus thuringiensis-cry1Ac genes in transgenic tomato. Springerplus. 2015;4: 203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Koul B, Srivastava S, Sanyal I, Tripathi B, Sharma V, Amla DV. Transgenic tomato line expressing modified Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ab gene showing complete resistance to two lepidopteran pests. Springerplus. 2014;3: 84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu M, Panda SK, Luyten W. Plant-based natural products for the discovery and development of novel anthelmintics against nematodes. Biomolecules. 2020;10: 426. doi: 10.3390/biom10030426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ahuir-Baraja AE, Cibot F, Llobat L, Garijo MM. Anthelmintic resistance: is a solution possible? Exp Parasitol. 2021;230: 108169. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2021.108169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pacheco S, Gómez I, Chiñas M, Sánchez J, Soberón M, Bravo A. Whole genome sequencing analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis GR007 reveals multiple pesticidal protein genes. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 758314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hassan AA, Youssef MA, Elashtokhy MMA, Ismail IM, Aldayel M, Afkar E. Isolation and identification of Bacillus thuringiensis strains native of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Biol Pest Contr. 2021;31. doi: 10.1186/s41938-020-00352-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhao J-Z, Cao J, Li Y, Collins HL, Roush RT, Earle ED, et al. Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21: 1493–1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lereclus D, Agaisse H, Gominet M, Chaufaux J. Overproduction of Encapsulated Insecticidal Crystal Proteins in a Bacillus thuringiensis spo0A Mutant. Nat Biotechnol. 1995;13: 67–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Agaisse H, Lereclus D. Structural and functional analysis of the promoter region involved in full expression of the cryIIIA toxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13: 97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lereclus D, Arantès O, Chaufaux J, Lecadet M. Transformation and expression of a cloned delta-endotoxin gene in Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1989;51: 211–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Morrison M. Broadening the Scope of Phage-Assisted Continuous Evolution. Ph.D., Harvard University. 2021.
- 55.Bischof LJ, Huffman DL, Aroian RV. Assays for toxicity studies in C. elegans with Bt crystal proteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;351: 139–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77: 71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kho MF, Bellier A, Balasubramani V, Hu Y, Hsu W, Nielsen-LeRoux C, et al. The pore-forming protein Cry5B elicits the pathogenicity of Bacillus sp. against Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 2011;6: e29122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]