Class II Transactivator (CIITA) is a master regulator of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II) gene expression. The expression of CIITA is highly restricted to cells or tissues expressing MHC class II. Also, CIITA does not appear to directly bind to DNA. Thus, CIITA works as a non-DNA-binding co-activator with remarkable specificity for MHC class II genes.
The regulation of MHC class II expression, finely tuned and controlled at a cell-type-specific level, is predominantly managed by the CIITA [1]. CIITA induces the expression of MHC class II molecules on the surface of antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells. MHC class II molecules are crucial for presenting viral antigens to CD4+ T helper cells, thereby initiating a specific immune response. By promoting MHC class II expression, CIITA facilitates the presentation of viral peptides to CD4+ T cells. This activation is essential for the proliferation of helper T cells and their secretion of cytokines during the viral infections, which coordinate the immune response, including the activation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and B cells [1,2]. In addition to the immune cells, CIITA known to be expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [3]. Also, recently, Dezhbord et al. [4] have shown that CIITA expression is induced by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in primary normal human hepatocytes. Thus, CIITA has a role in the non-immune cells during the infections including viruses.
Some viruses have evolved mechanisms to evade the immune system by interfering with CIITA expression or function, eventually regulating MHC class II expression(Table 1). To identify immune evasion mechanisms against opportunistic herpes viruses, it is necessary to understand the regulation of immune responses by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) regarding endogenous MHC class II regulation. Using Kasumi-3 cells as a myeloid progenitor cell model endogenously expressing MHC class II (HLA-DR), altered surface levels of HLA-DR were attributed not to increased endocytosis and degradation, but rather to reduced HLA-DR transcripts caused by decreased expression of CIITA [5]. Additionally, in HCMV-infected human fibroblasts and endothelial cells, HCMV disrupts IFN-γ-stimulated MHC class II expression by inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway and its disruption prevents the upregulation of CIITA and activation of MHC class II transcription [6]. The Epstein–Barr virus is also known to evade the immune response by inhibiting CIITA. An important regulator of EBV lytic replication, termed Zta (BZLF1, ZEBRA, EB1), is a transcription and replication factor. Expression of Zta in Raji cells has been shown to inhibit the expression of CIITA and Zta-mediated repression is specific to the CIITA promoter [7]. Additionally, LANA, a major latent protein encoded by Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), is critical for the maintenance, replication, and efficient segregation of the viral genome. LANA down-regulates MHC class II expression and presentation by inhibiting the transcriptional activity on CIITA promoter. The inhibition of CIITA by LANA of KSHV is independent of IL-4 or IFN-γ signaling but depends on the direct interaction of LANA with IRF-4, an activator of the CIITA promoter [8]. In addition, it has been reported that the hepatitis C virus suppresses the cell surface expression of HLA-DR, as well as the promoter activity of CIITA, the IFN-γ activation site (GAS), and HLA-DR in HT1080 cells, which are known to be sensitive to HLA-DR induction by IFNs [9].
Table 1.
Role of CIITA in viral infections
| Viruses | Mechanisms |
|---|---|
| Immune evasion by viruses | |
| HCMV | HCMV decreases MHC Class II (HLA-DR) by reducing CIITA levels and inhibiting the Jak/Stat pathway |
| EBV | CIITA is repressed by EBV transcription factor, Zta |
| KSHV | IRF-4-mediated CIITA transcription is blocked by KSHV encoded LANA |
| HCV | HCV inhibits HLA-DR by inhibition of promoter of CIITA |
| HIV | Tat protein by HIV interferes with the function of CIITA by competing with CIITA for binding to cyclin T1 |
| ASFV | CIITA is important for productive ASFV infection. |
| Enhancing anti-viral immunity | |
| HIV | CIITA inhibits viral replication by blocking the function of the viral transactivator Tat |
| SARS-CoV-2 | CIITA upregulates CD74/p41, which inhibits cathepsins and prevents genome release into the cytoplasm |
| EBOV | |
| HTLV-1 | CIITA inhibits viral replication by blocking the function of the viral transactivators Tax-1 and Tax-2 |
| HTLV-2 | |
| HBV | CIITA inhibits viral replication by ERK regulation |
HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ASFV, African swine fever virus; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; EBOV, Ebola virus; HTLV-1, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1; HTLV-2, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2; HBV, hepatitis B virus.
Conversely, through CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening in porcine cells infected with African swine fever virus (ASFV), it was found that MHC class II-related expression factors and membrane proteins, including CIITA, RFXANK, RFXAP, SLA-DMA, and SLA-DMB, play a crucial role in productive ASFV infection. Targeted knockouts of these genes led to rather severe viral replication defects [10].
CIITA is part of the IFN-stimulated immune response and it plays a role in the antiviral response as well as in antigen presentation(Table 1). Low CIITA levels have been associated with disease severity in both children and adults with COVID-19 [11]. Recently, Bruchez and colleagues demonstrated that CIITA induces resistance to viral infection by activating the expression of the p41 isoform of CD74. This isoform inhibits viral entry by blocking cathepsin-mediated processing of the glycoprotein of Ebola virus and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), thereby preventing viral fusion. Further analysis revealed that CD74 p41 can block the endosomal entry pathway of SARS-CoV-2 [12]. In addition, CIITA induces antiviral activity against other pathogenic filoviruses through the inhibition of viral glycoprotein-mediated entry [12].
To inhibit the expression of MHC class II molecules, Tat protein of HIV interferes with the function of CIITA by competing with CIITA for binding to cyclin T1, a subunit of the transcription elongation factor P-TEFb complex which is crucial for HIV transcription [13]. But conversely, CIITA can inhibit the replication of HIV by blocking the function of the viral transactivator Tat [13,14]. Also, CIITA acts as a restriction factor against human T cell leukemia virus-1 (HTLV-1) and human T cell leukemia virus-2 (HTLV-2) by targeting their viral transactivators, Tax-1 and Tax-2, respectively. CIITA inhibits Tax-1-mediated NF-κB activation. Furthermore, nuclear bodies containing CIITA bind Tax-1/RelA, thereby blocking the activation of NF-κB-controlled genes in the nucleus [15-18]. Therefore, CIITA effectively contributes to antiviral defense by promoting antigen presentation against viruses and suppressing viral gene expression through targeting the activity of viral transcriptional activators.
In the current Clinical and Molecular Hepatology issue, Dezhbord et al. [4] unveiled a novel antiviral mechanism of CIITA on hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in the infected hepatocytes. Achieving a complete cure for HBV is challenging with the existing nucleos(t)ide analogs and interferon therapies. To overcome the limitations of these current treatments in completely curing HBV, there is a growing need for drug candidates that target new therapeutic mechanisms of the virus [19,20]. Dezhbord et al. [4] confirmed that CIITA inhibits virus replication in hepatocytes by downregulating hepatocyte nuclear factors HNF1α and HNF4α via ERK1/2 signaling pathways, which are critical for viral replication. Moreover, HBx hinders CIITA function by directly binding to it, potentially leading to resistance against CIITA’s inhibition of HBV. This underscores its potential utility as a novel transcriptional regulator with anti-HBV properties for therapeutic intervention against HBV infection. Thus, Dezhbord et al.’s study provided a novel antiviral mechanism of CIITA that involves the modulation of the ERK pathway to restrict HBV transcription in the hepatocytes.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (RS-2024-00335243), and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF- 2022M3A9I2017587).
Abbreviations
- CIITA
class II transactivator
- MHC
class II
- IIFN-γ
interferon gamma
- HCMV
human cytomegalovirus
- KSHV
Kaposi’s sarcomaassociated herpesvirus
- ASFV
African swine fever virus
- SARS-CoV-2
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- HTLV
human T cell leukemia virus
- HBV
hepatitis B virus
Footnotes
Authors’ contribution
CR Lee drafted the manuscript. SG Park edited and finalized the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Reith W, LeibundGut-Landmann S, Waldburger JM. Regulation of MHC class II gene expression by the class II transactivator. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:793–806. doi: 10.1038/nri1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.León Machado JA, Steimle V. The MHC class II transactivator CIITA: Not (Quite) the odd-one-out anymore among NLR proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1074. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xie XW, Mei MH, Liao WJ, Qian LH, Yu X, Fei R, et al. Expression of CIITA-related MHCII molecules in tumors linked to prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2009;34:681–688. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dezhbord M, Kim SH, Park S, Lee DR, Kim N, Won J, et al. Novel role of MHC class II transactivator in hepatitis B virus replication and viral counteraction. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024;30:539–560. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sandhu PK, Buchkovich NJ. Human cytomegalovirus decreases major histocompatibility complex class II by regulating class II transactivator transcript levels in a myeloid cell line. J Virol. 2020;94:e01901-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01901-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller DM, Rahill BM, Boss JM, Lairmore MD, Durbin JE, Waldman JW, et al. Human cytomegalovirus inhibits major histocompatibility complex class II expression by disruption of the Jak/Stat pathway. J Exp Med. 1998;187:675–683. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.5.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Balan N, Osborn K, Sinclair AJ. Repression of CIITA by the Epstein-Barr virus transcription factor Zta is independent of its dimerization and DNA binding. J Gen Virol. 2016;97:725–732. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cai Q, Banerjee S, Cervini A, Lu J, Hislop AD, Dzeng R, et al. IRF-4-mediated CIITA transcription is blocked by KSHV encoded LANA to inhibit MHC II presentation. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003751. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saito K, Ait-Goughoulte M, Truscott SM, Meyer K, Blazevic A, Abate G, et al. Hepatitis C virus inhibits cell surface expression of HLA-DR, prevents dendritic cell maturation, and induces interleukin-10 production. J Virol. 2008;82:3320–3328. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02547-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pannhorst K, Carlson J, Hölper JE, Grey F, Baillie JK, Höper D, et al. The non-classical major histocompatibility complex II protein SLA-DM is crucial for African swine fever virus replication. Sci Rep. 2023;13:10342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36788-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Girona-Alarcon M, Argüello G, Esteve-Sole A, Bobillo-Perez S, Burgos-Artizzu XP, Bonet-Carne E, et al. Low levels of CIITA and high levels of SOCS1 predict COVID-19 disease severity in children and adults. iScience. 2022;25:103595. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bruchez A, Sha K, Johnson J, Chen L, Stefani C, McConnell H, et al. MHC class II transactivator CIITA induces cell resistance to Ebola virus and SARS-like coronaviruses. Science. 2020;370:241–247. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kanazawa S, Okamoto T, Peterlin BM. Tat competes with CIITA for the binding to P-TEFb and blocks the expression of MHC class II genes in HIV infection. Immunity. 2000;12:61–70. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Forlani G, Turrini F, Ghezzi S, Tedeschi A, Poli G, Accolla RS, et al. The MHC-II transactivator CIITA inhibits Tat function and HIV-1 replication in human myeloid cells. J Transl Med. 2016;14:94. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0853-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Forlani G, Abdallah R, Accolla RS, Tosi G. The MHC-II transactivator CIITA, a restriction factor against oncogenic HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 retroviruses: similarities and differences in the inhibition of Tax-1 and Tax-2 viral transactivators. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:234. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Forlani G, Abdallah R, Accolla RS, Tosi G. The major histocompatibility complex class II transactivator CIITA inhibits the persistent activation of NF-κB by the human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax-1 oncoprotein. J Virol. 2016;90:3708–3721. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03000-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Casoli C, De Lerma Barbaro A, Pilotti E, Bertazzoni U, Tosi G, Accolla RS. The MHC class II transcriptional activator (CIITA) inhibits HTLV-2 viral replication by blocking the function of the viral transactivator Tax-2. Blood. 2004;103:995–1001. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tosi G, Pilotti E, Mortara L, De Lerma Barbaro A, Casoli C, Accolla RS. Inhibition of human T cell leukemia virus type 2 replication by the suppressive action of class II transactivator and nuclear factor Y. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12861–12866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601589103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim SW, Yoon JS, Lee M, Cho Y. Toward a complete cure for chronic hepatitis B: Novel therapeutic targets for hepatitis B virus. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022;28:17–30. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mak LY, Hui RW, Fung J, Seto WK, Yuen MF. The role of different viral biomarkers on the management of chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29:263–276. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
