Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2021 Feb 22;7:1483. Originally published 2018 Sep 18. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16225.2

Case Report: Two cases of rare head injuries from Nepal

Joe M Das 1,a, Apar Pokharel 2, Rashmi Sapkota 1, Manish Mishra 1, Ashish Babu Aryal 1
PMCID: PMC11541069  PMID: 39512492

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

The term "dal" has been defined. A new figure of the computed tomogram scan of the head (bone window) at the level of the anterior skull base has been included and the numbers denoting the figures have been rearranged. A more detailed description of the craniofacial fracture has been included in the text and in the figure legend of the 3D skull image.

Abstract

Background: There are a number of ways in which one can sustain a head injury. Even if you are doing simple household activities or going out for a morning walk, you cannot be sure of what type of injury awaits you. The source of injury may be a pressure cooker whistle acting as a projectile or a hailstone falling from the sky. Such injuries are common in Nepal, considering the socio-demographic and geographic conditions. In this article, we present two such very rare cases of head injury.

Case Reports: The first case is a middle-aged woman who sustained an accidental injury to the face associated with fracture of frontal sinus and frontal contusion, following the impact from a high momentum projectile in the form of the pressure regulator of a pressure cooker. She underwent craniotomy and removal of the foreign body. In the second case, an elderly man sustained minor injury to the head following the fall of hail. The abrasions and contusions produced by the hail were managed conservatively. Since he did not have any clinical evidence of head injury, other than multiple abrasions with contusions in the scalp, he did not undergo any imaging studies. He did not have any neurological deficits. The postoperative period was uneventful for the first patient and she was followed up for one month. The second patient was lost to follow-up.

Conclusion: Successful management of two very rare cases of head injuries from Nepal are reported. Proper care and maintenance of the house-hold utensils that are constantly used may protect people from head injuries. Though natural calamities cannot always be avoided, simple measures like using an umbrella while going outdoors may protect individuals from head injuries due to hailstones.

Keywords: Craniocerebral trauma, Craniotomy, Skull base, Frontal sinus, Cerebrospinal fluid, Contusions

Introduction

The pressure cooker (PC) is an essential utensil for cooking in Asian kitchens, especially in Nepal and India, and are mostly handled by women. Accidental injury from such a commonly used utensil can sometimes be grievous. Most of the reports of injuries from PCs concern burns due to sudden opening of the lid and releasing of steam under very high pressure 1 . There is one previous report in which a mandible fracture occurred along with burns 2 and one in which brain damage occurred due to the cooker blast 3 . However, there are only five reports of accidental head injury due to a pressure regulator projectile to date 48 . Ours is the sixth case, and the second producing a craniofacial injury, published in the literature, which describes successful management.

Hail is a variant of weather which can be occasionally harmful as well as dangerous. It is a form of precipitation and consists of balls or irregular lumps of ice known as hailstones. Hailstones are composed mostly of ice and measure 5–50 mm in diameter. Hail is produced by cumulonimbus clouds otherwise known as thunderstorm clouds, which are transparent ice or made up of alternating layers of transparent and translucent ice, at least 1 mm thick 9 . Though hailstones are of small size usually, sometimes they are large enough to kill a person if it falls on the head. A previous newspaper report of a “hailstone massacre”, which occurred centuries ago details this scenario 10 . The second case reported here is a case of mild head injury produced by falling hailstones. Surprisingly, head injury produced by hailstone has never been reported previously in the literature, to the best of our knowledge.

Case 1

A 55-year-old woman, with no known comorbidities, was cooking dal (a dish made of simmered and usually pureed and spiced legumes, as defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary) using a pressure cooker at night. The patient doubted why there was no whistling after the expected time, and so tried to gently lift the pressure regulator, which suddenly gave way and was thrust into her face, like a projectile, near the right eye. There was no history of loss of consciousness, nasal bleed or seizures, though she had one episode of vomiting. She was a chronic smoker and occasional drinker of alcohol.

When she reached our emergency room in June 2018, her vital signs were stable. She had a wound of size 4×2 cm in between the right eye and root of nose, which was deep and still had the cooker whistle lodged. There was cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) mixed with blood in the periphery of the wound and there was mechanical ptosis of right eye. The patient was conscious and oriented. Emergency X-ray of skull ( Figure 1) and computed tomography (CT) of the head ( Figure 2) were done, which showed the foreign body just lateral to the root of nose on the right side with the right lateral wall of the nostril fractured and pushed inside. The force of the projectile led to a right naso-orbital fracture extending from the inferomedial orbital rim across the maxilla (just medial to the zygomaticofacial foramen) to the right nasal wall. The fracture also involved both anterior and posterior walls of the right frontal sinus and was associated with pneumocephalus and a 1×1 cm sized left frontal contusion ( Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 1. Plain X-ray of skull, antero-posterior and lateral views showing the radio-opaque foreign body stuck in the anterior cranial fossa floor.

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Plain Computed Tomogram of the face and skull (3D reconstruction) showing the foreign body and its relation to the right orbit and a right naso-orbital fracture extending from the inferomedial orbital rim across the maxilla (just medial to the zygomaticofacial foramen) to the right nasal wall.

Figure 2.

Figure 3. Plain Computed Tomogram of the brain (axial cuts) showing the left frontal contusion and metal artefact due to foreign body.

Figure 3.

Figure 4. Plain Computed Tomogram of the head (bone window – axial cuts) at the level of frontal base showing the location of the projectile and the fractured right frontal sinus.

Figure 4.

The patient underwent emergency bifrontal craniotomy. The right frontal sinus fracture with dural tear of size 0.5×1 cm was noted and the foreign body ( Figure 5) was retrieved through the fracture from the cranial aspect ( Figure 6). The frontal sinus was exteriorized and packed with muscle and bone wax applied across the defect. Anterior cranial fossa was carpeted with pedicled pericranial flap and the wound was closed after replacing the bone flap. The wound at the site of foreign body was seen by our otorhinolaryngologist and was closed in layers. The nasal mucosa was intact and there was no injury to nasolacrimal duct. The fractured nasal bone was not disturbed as it could cause stenosis of the right nostril.

Figure 5. The retrieved foreign body measuring 3.0 × 2.5 cm in size.

Figure 5.

Figure 6. Intra-operative picture showing the fractured right frontal sinus with the foreign body in situ.

Figure 6.

The patient was started on Meropenem 2 g thrice a day, Vancomycin 1 g twice a day and Metronidazole 500 mg thrice a day as antibiotics, and levetiracetam 500 mg twice a day as anticonvulstant, which were continued for one week. The patient’s vision was fully preserved. The post-operative period was uneventful. Post-operative CT scan of brain showed resolving frontal contusion and she was discharged on post-operative day 8. When she came for follow-up after one month, she was asymptomatic, the wound had healed fully and there was no CSF leak.

Case 2

An 85-year-old man presented to our neurosurgery out-patient department in May 2018 with complaint of headache following falling of hailstones on his head three days previously. He was a chronic smoker and alcoholic and did not have any comorbidities. He had no history of previous hospital admissions.

Following the incident, the patient did not lose consciousness, vomit, or have a seizure. He also did not have any nasal or ear bleed. On clinical examination, he was neurologically intact and there was no papilledema on examination of the fundus. The patient had three healing abrasions with contusions, each the size of around 1 × 1 cm with local tenderness. Two abrasions were located in the left frontal region, behind hairline and one in the right parietal region, behind hairline ( Figure 7). There was no clinical evidence of infection or skull fracture. Radiological imaging was not warranted and he was managed with 37.5 mg of tramadol hydrochloride and 325 mg of acetaminophen twice a day for five days. Though he was instructed to come for follow-up after one week, he did not turn up.

Figure 7. Scalp contusions and abrasions in the left frontal region produced by the impact of falling hailstones.

Figure 7.

Discussion

The pressure cooker (PC), invented by the French-born British physicist Denis Papin in 1679, is a hermetically sealed pot that produces steam heat to cook food quickly. The PC heats water to produce very hot steam and as a result, the temperature inside it will increase to around 130° C, which is much higher than the maximum heat produced by ordinary cookware. The main advantage of this much high temperature is that it penetrates food quickly so that cooking time is reduced without diminishing vitamin and mineral content 11 . The problem faced high altitude areas, like Nepal, is that boiling happens at low temperature due to reduced atmospheric pressure. PCs will increase the pressure so that cooking occurs at the appropriate temperature.

PC pressure regulator projectile injury to the face was first reported by Chattopadhyay et al in 2010 4 . Altogether, there are five reports of this type of case ( Table 1), four of them with significant ocular trauma. The case reported by Gupta et al. was similar to our case and had significant head injury 5 . In that case, the foreign body lodged transorbitally and was operated on promptly, even though the patient’s vision was lost by the injury and led to the development of a brain abscess subsequently. Our patient was lucky enough for her eye to escape from the direct impact of foreign body and from further complications of surgery.

Table 1. Reports of craniofacial injuries caused by pressure regulator projectile of pressure cookers to date.

Author (year) Age of
patient
Sex Site of
impact
Neurological
examination
X-ray/CT finding Structures
involved
Procedure
done
Outcome
Chattopadhyay
SS et al. (2010) 4
32 y F Right
upper
eye lid
Vision – PL
GCS-13
Disorganized globe with
impacted nozzle
Right globe with
autoevisceration
of ocular
contents
Glass ball
ocular implant
was placed
and scleral
laceration
repaired
Not mentioned
Gupta OP
et al. (2013) 5
47 y F Left
forehead
and eye
Vision – No PL
GCS – 13
Metallic foreign
body inside left orbit
with basifrontal
contusion with
pneumocephalus
Left orbital wall,
frontal sinus and
globe
Evisceration
of left eye
with removal
of foreign
body
Developed
brain abscess
after 1 month,
which was
evacuated. Final
neurological
outcome - good
Dobariya
et al. (2014) 6
29y M Left
upper
eye lid
Vision – No PL
GCS – 14
Intruded whistle in left
orbit. No fracture
Left globe with
autoevisceration
of ocular
contents
Scleral
laceration
repaired
Not mentioned
Atreya
et al. (2016) 7
62y F Right
parotid
region
Right LMN
facial palsy
Rectangular shadow
over mandibular region
Subcutaneous
tissue and facial
nerve
Removal
and primary
closure
Not mentioned
Singh AK
et al. (2016) 8
26 y F Between
root of
nose
and right
eye ball
Vision – No PL
GCS – 15
Fracture of medial
orbital wall with
penetration of the
foreign body for 3
centimetres inside the
bony orbit
Right globe with
autoevisceration
and exposed
uveal tissue with
oedematous
upper lid
Evisceration,
suturing of
sclera and
conjunctiva.
Skin
lacerations
left to heal
by secondary
intention
3 months -
referred
to ocularist
for custom-
made ocular
prosthesis
Our case 55 y F Between
root of
nose and
right eye
ball
Vision
– Normal
GCS – 15
Foreign body just
lateral to the root of
nose on the right side
with the right lateral
wall of nostril fractured
and pushed inside.
There was fracture
involving the right
frontal sinus with
pneumocephalus and
1×1 cm sized left frontal
contusion
Right orbital
wall, nasal bone,
frontal sinus,
frontal lobes
Bifrontal
craniotomy
and removal
of foreign
body followed
by primary
closure
1 month
– Neurologically
intact

CT – Computed tomogram, y – years, M – Male, F – Female, PL – Perception of light, GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale Score, LMN – Lower motor neuron

PCs can maintain high temperature (121°C) and proper pressure (1 kg/cm 2) inside for cooking. The pressure is controlled inside by the vent weight (pressure regulator) and its spring action - excess steam goes out through the vent tube. Sometimes it can get blocked due to imperfect cleaning, excessive volume of water or overfilling with green leaves 12 . Then excess steam will accumulate inside, which can push the PC’s lid or pressure regulator out with huge force. Such accidents can be reduced by proper maintenance of the cooker, cleaning the lid and vent valve and filling the objects inside the cooker up to the appropriate level.

The projectile of a pressure regulator will almost always be directed towards the face (especially orbit) and skull. As has been reported previously, it is always safe to perform a craniotomy followed by removal of the foreign body for all foreign bodies, which have breached the dura, to prevent inadvertent damage to vital structures 13 . The patient had pneumocephalus with frontal sinus fracture, which was suggestive of a breach in the dura. If the foreign body is directly taken out blindly without exposing it through craniotomy, there is a chance that injury can occur to the brain as well as to the bridging vein at anterior skull base, if any 14 . This was the rationale for approaching the foreign body via cranium.

Hail is a form of frozen precipitation (hydrometeor) which originates in a thunderstorm cloud, scientifically known as cumulonimbus (thundercloud), which is composed of water droplets and ice crystals. There are upward forces in such clouds known as updrafts, and they carry raindrops upward into very cold areas of the atmosphere. In such areas, water droplets become super-cooled and freeze when coming into contact with condensation nuclei (small aerosols), thus forming small hailstones. The updraft then dissipates and these hailstones fall down. But these will be brought back into another updraft, and will be lifted up again. A layer of ice will get added to the hailstone and it grows in size with each ascent. Once a hailstone becomes too heavy to be supported by the updraft, it falls down from the cloud 15 . The main factors present in thunderstoms that are favorable to hail formation are strong updrafts, large liquid water contents, large cloud-drop sizes, and great vertical height 16 . Hail usually falls during severe thunderstorms in the warm season, when the temperature on the surface of the earth rises above 20 °C 9 .

Hailstone is an individual unit of hail. By convention, any frozen precipitation having a diameter of 5 mm or more is classified as hailstone, whereas smaller particles of similar origin are known as either ice pellets or snow pellets 17 . In the Cambridge dictionary, hailstone is defined as “a small, hard ball of ice that falls from the sky like rain” 18 . Most of the hail storms are made up of hailstones of different sizes. Usually only the large ones pose serious risk to people caught in the open. According to the Guinness book of world records, the heaviest hailstones ever recorded weighed approximately 1 kilogram and are reported to have killed 92 people in the Gopalganj area of Bangladesh on 14 April 1986 19 . The largest hailstone recently recovered in the USA fell in Vivian, South Dakota on June 23, 2010 with a diameter of 8 inches and a circumference of 18.62 inches. It also weighed almost 1 kilogram 20 . One of the most lethal hailstorms in history, leading to the death of hundreds of nomads, occurred around AD 850 close to the glacial Roopkund Lake in the remote Himalayan Gahrwal region 10 .

Even though there is a high frequency of occurrence of thunderstoms in the tropics, hail is actually less common in these regions, compared to the mid-latitudes, as the atmosphere over the tropics is warmer over a much greater height. Hail is common in mountain ranges because mountains force horizontal winds to move suddenly upwards (orographic lifting). This intensifies the updrafts within thunderstorms which makes hail more likely 21 . Hence hail is relatively common in Nepal.

There has been no report of hail falling on the head and producing injury, though hail is known to cause widespread damage to farms, houses, animals and humans. The present case did not have any criteria for radiological imaging as per the Canadian CT rule 22 . Moreover, the patient presented three days after the incident. In Nepal, patients may not be presenting immediately after the injury, either because they have only mild symptoms or they have to travel a long distance to reach a tertiary care hospital. The main limitation of this case is that there is no proper follow-up.

Conclusion

Head injury can occur wherever you are – it does not matter whether you are indoors or outdoors. Here this fact is stressed with the help of two different and extremely rare types of head injuries. Some simple manoeuvres, such as proper maintenance of equipment and utensils you are working with or taking an umbrella while going for a morning walk, may protect individuals from such calamities.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from both patients.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved

References

  • 1. Perera VA, Karunadasa K, Perera C: A case series of domestic pressure cooker burns. Ceylon Med J. 2012;57(1):49. 10.4038/cmj.v57i1.4206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gundeslioglu AO, Yenidunya MO: Burn and mandible fracture due to pressure cooker explosion. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(5):1631–3. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ef2ed3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Calderon-Miranda WG, Escobar-Hernandez N, Moscote-Salazar LR, et al. : Traumatic brain injury due to pressure cooker explosion in a child: case report. Romanian Neurosurgery. 2016;30(2):300–302. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chattopadhyay SS, Mukhopadhyay U, Saurabh K: An unusual case of penetrating ocular trauma with a pressure cooker. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(2):89–90. 10.4103/0974-620X.64234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gupta OP, Roy K, Ghosh S, et al. : An unusual penetrating transorbital craniocerebral injury. The Indian Journal of Neurotrauma. 2014;11(1):53–6. 10.1016/j.ijnt.2013.12.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dobariya V, Sheikh KM, Shastri M, et al. : An unusual case of penetrating ocular trauma with a pressure cooker whistle. Delhi J Ophthalmol. 2014;24:207–208. 10.7869/djo.44 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Atreya A, Kanchan T, Nepal S: Pressure Cooker-A Potential Hazard in Domestic Setting. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(54):181–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Singh AK: An Unusual Intraorbital Foreign Body. Delhi J Ophthalmol. 2016;27(3):213–4. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Akhmedovic IS: About the Mechanism of the Hail Formation. Science Discovery. 2014;2(2):27–33. 10.11648/j.sd.20140202.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Orr D: Giant Hail Killed More than 200 in Himalayas. The Telegraph. 2004; accessed June 22, 2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 11. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica: Pressure cooker. Encyclopædia Britannica.accessed June 22, 2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sandhir RK, Sandhir M: Accidental pressure cooker lid blow-out. Burns. 1992;18(5):438. 10.1016/0305-4179(92)90057-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Das JM, Chandra S, Prabhakar RB: Penetrating brain injury with a bike key: a case report. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015;21(6):524–6. 10.5505/tjtes.2015.43958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhang D, Chen J, Han K, et al. : Management of Penetrating Skull Base Injury: A Single Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017: 2838167. 10.1155/2017/2838167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. The National Severe Storms Laboratory. accessed June 22,2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Considine DM, Considine GD: Precipitation and hydrometeors. In: Considine DM, Considine GD, eds. Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia. 8 thed. New York: Springer Science+Business Media;1995;2538. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6918-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Glossary of meteorology. accessed on June 22,2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cambridge dictionary. accessed on June 22,2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Guinness Book of World Records. accessed on June 22,2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Arndt D: Official Documentation of the Verification of the Vivian, SD record setting hailstone of 2010.2010; accessed on June 22, 2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hail. National Environment Agency. accessed on 22 June,2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Davey K, Saul T, Russel G, et al. : Application of the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule to Patients With Minimal Head Injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(4):342–350. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.30538.r320004

Reviewer response for version 2

Mustafa Ismail 1

This article provides valuable insights into rare head injuries from unconventional causes, such as a pressure cooker projectile and a hailstorm. Its detailed case reports highlight the importance of proper safety measures and awareness in preventing such incidents. The successful management of these injuries enhances clinical understanding and serves as a useful reference for neurosurgeons encountering similar cases.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Neurosurgery

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2021 Feb 23. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.30538.r79981

Reviewer response for version 2

Amit Agrawal 1

No new comments.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Partly

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Partly

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2020 Aug 12. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17719.r67439

Reviewer response for version 1

Amos O Adeleye 1

This is generally an interesting clinical vignette by these authors, especially the first case. We are of the opinion actually that the authors have enough literature base as well as the clinical materials of the first case to do this write-up simply as a case-based literature review of head injury/traumatic brain injury from projectiles from house-hold pressure cookers.

The second case does not warrant any scientific report in our opinion, not by the near normal clinical acute-event / immediate post-event period status of the patient, as well as the very minimal body harm to the patient.

Having said that, we like to make some of the observations below concerning the authors’ otherwise well-written paper.

The figure 2, the plain 3-D reconstruction of the cranial CT bone windows, contains more information that just ‘the foreign body and its relation to the orbit’. There is the impression of a right naso-orbital fracture extending from the inferomedial orbital rim across the maxilla (just medial to the zygomasticofaical foramen) to the right nasal wall. One would expect all this to reflect in the authors’ case description (and the figure legend) by way of emphasis on the apparent destructive impact of the house-hold utensil turned projectile.

Case 1

“A 55-year-old woman, with no known comorbidities, was cooking dal using a pressure….”

What’s ‘dal’ please, for us international readers?

“There was fracture involving the right frontal sinus with pneumocephalus and 1×1 cm sized left frontal contusion (Figure 3).”

The figure 3 referred to here is a brain, not a bone, window of the cranial CT. The frontal sinus fracture being described could therefore hardly be appreciated. We had actually wondered why the authors did not render some of the images at this frontobasal level in the bone windows. That’s what would have been more instructive for this part of the work

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Partly

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Clinical neurological surgery,

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2020 Oct 30.
Joe M Das 1

Thank you for looking into our article in detail and providing constructive feedback.

The article has been amended as suggested.

  1. The term "dal" has been explained.

  2. A detailed description of the facial fracture is included.

  3. A new figure showing the fractured frontal sinus has been provided.

F1000Res. 2020 Nov 11.
Joe M Das 1

This is generally an interesting clinical vignette by these authors, especially the first case. We are of the opinion actually that the authors have enough literature base as well as the clinical materials of the first case to do this write-up simply as a case-based literature review of head injury/traumatic brain injury from projectiles from house-hold pressure cookers. - Thank you.

The second case does not warrant any scientific report in our opinion, not by the near normal clinical acute-event / immediate post-event period status of the patient, as well as the very minimal body harm to the patient. - We still would like it to be published as there are not many reports on the harms this natural calamity can do to humans.

Having said that, we like to make some of the observations below concerning the authors’ otherwise well-written paper.

The figure 2, the plain 3-D reconstruction of the cranial CT bone windows, contains more information that just ‘the foreign body and its relation to the orbit’. There is the impression of a right naso-orbital fracture extending from the inferomedial orbital rim across the maxilla (just medial to the zygomasticofaical foramen) to the right nasal wall. One would expect all this to reflect in the authors’ case description (and the figure legend) by way of emphasis on the apparent destructive impact of the house-hold utensil turned projectile. - We have added the details of the fracture in the case description and figure legend, as suggested.

Case 1

“A 55-year-old woman, with no known comorbidities, was cooking dal using a pressure….”

What’s ‘dal’ please, for us international readers? We have added a simple definition of dal.

“There was fracture involving the right frontal sinus with pneumocephalus and 1×1 cm sized left frontal contusion (Figure 3).”

The figure 3 referred to here is a brain, not a bone, window of the cranial CT. The frontal sinus fracture being described could therefore hardly be appreciated. We had actually wondered why the authors did not render some of the images at this frontobasal level in the bone windows. That’s what would have been more instructive for this part of the work.  We have added a new image of the bone window at the frontobasal level.

F1000Res. 2018 Dec 3. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.17719.r40762

Reviewer response for version 1

Amit Agrawal 1

In this article the authors report two interesting cases of head injuries. One is due to accidental explosion of a man-made device and another one is due to a natural calamity.

In the second case, it is interesting to note that hailstorm is a natural phenomenon, and there are number of incidences reported in news ranging from minor injuries to fatal incidences both to humans as well as to livestock.

As the authors have suggested, the systematic information for such injuries is lacking. This single case can be taken as message that we need to further expand the scope of the incidence and impact of injuries due to natural calamities on human life.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Partly

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Partly

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2020 Nov 11.
Joe M Das 1

In this article the authors report two interesting cases of head injuries. One is due to accidental explosion of a man-made device and another one is due to a natural calamity.

In the second case, it is interesting to note that hailstorm is a natural phenomenon, and there are number of incidences reported in news ranging from minor injuries to fatal incidences both to humans as well as to livestock.

As the authors have suggested, the systematic information for such injuries is lacking. This single case can be taken as message that we need to further expand the scope of the incidence and impact of injuries due to natural calamities on human life.  Thank you for understanding the major reason for including the second report in our article.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES