Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1976 Dec;2(4):163–172. doi: 10.1136/jme.2.4.163

Medical practice: defendants and prisoners.

P Bowden
PMCID: PMC1154515  PMID: 1003433

Abstract

It is argued in this paper that a doctor cannot serve two masters. The work of the prison medical officer is examined and it is shown that his dual allegiance to the state and to those individuals who are under his care results in activities which largely favour the former. The World Health Organisation prescribes a system of health ethics which indicates, in qualitative terms, the responsibility of each state for health provisions. In contrast, the World Medical Association acts as both promulgator and guardian of a code of medical ethics which determines the responsibilities of the doctor to his patient. In the historical sense medical practitioners have always emphasized the sanctity of the relationship with their patients and the doctor's role as an expert witness is shown to have centered around this bond. The development of medical services in prisons has focused more on the partnership between doctor and institution. Imprisonment in itself could be seen as prejudicial to health as are disciplinary methods which are more obviously detrimental. The involvement of medical practitioners in such procedures is discussed in the light of their role as the prisoner's personal physician.

Full text

PDF
163

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett D. H. Community psychiatry. Community Health (Bristol) 1973 Sep-Oct;5(2):58–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowden P. Liberty and psychiatry. Br Med J. 1975 Oct 11;4(5988):94–96. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5988.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gunn J. Disasters, asylums, and plans: forensic psychiatry today. Br Med J. 1974 Sep 7;3(5931):611–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5931.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Illich I. Clinical damage, medical monopoly, the expropriation of health: three dimensions of iatrogenic tort. J Med Ethics. 1975 Jul;1(2):78–80. doi: 10.1136/jme.1.2.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ormrod R. The debate between psychiatry and the law. The forty-eighth Maudsley Lecture, delivered before the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 15 November 1974. Br J Psychiatry. 1975 Sep;127:193–203. doi: 10.1192/bjp.127.3.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES