Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1979 Sep;5(3):133–138. doi: 10.1136/jme.5.3.133

Self-ownership, abortion and infanticide.

E F Paul, J Paul
PMCID: PMC1154740  PMID: 490573

Abstract

Doctors have been placed in an anomalous position by abortion laws which sanction the termination of a fetus while in a woman's womb, yet call it murder when a physician attempts to end the life of a fetus which has somehow survived such a procedure. This predicament, the doctors' dilemma, can be resolved by adopting a strategy which posits the right to ownership of one's own body for human beings. Such an approach will generate a consistent policy prescription, one that sanctions the right of all pregnant women to abortions, yet grants the fetus, after it becomes viable as a potentially independent person, a right to its own body. The doctors' dilemma is surmounted, then, by requiring that abortions of viable fetuses be performed in a manner that will produce a live delivery. Hence, infanticide and termination of viable fetuses are proscribed.

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Sher George. Hare, abortion, and the Golden Rule. Philos Public Aff. 1977 Winter;6(2):185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES