Abstract
Dr Baumgarten analyses three possible justifications for doctors to decide that a patient is 'incompetent' to make or participate in medical decisions affecting him, and points out the difficulties of each. He argues that the degree to which a patient relinquishes control over decision-making which affects him will vary in different circumstances and should be explicitly agreed in the initial doctor-patient contract, rather as it often is when a client employs a professional to invest money on his behalf.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alfidi R. J. Controversy, alternatives, and decisions in complying with the legal doctrine of informed consent. Radiology. 1975 Jan;114(1):231–234. doi: 10.1148/114.1.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]