Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 Oct 29;18(10):e0012613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012613

High prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in school-age children in the villages adjacent to Lake Chamo in the southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Yenenesh Ayele 1, Teklu Wegayehu 1, Daniel Woldeyes 1, Fekadu Massebo 1,*
Editor: jong-Yil Chai2
PMCID: PMC11548786  PMID: 39471184

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis remains a challenge despite government efforts to eliminate the disease. This study aims to assess the prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in school-age children living in the villages surrounding Lake Chamo in southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia.

Methodology/Principal findings

A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to July 2023 in Shele Mela Kebele in Gamo Zone, South Ethiopia. Stool samples were collected from 597 school-age children. A singe Kato-Katz for helminths and formalin-ether concentration technique for protozoan parasites were used to process the samples. The intensity of Schistosoma mansoni infection among school-age children was determined by counting the number of eggs per gram of stool. Of the 597 children screened, 52.3% (95% CI: 48.4.4–56.4) were positive for Schistosoma mansoni. These findings showed that 55% of the infections were light, 30.3% were moderate, and 14.7% were heavy. The mean egg count of S. mansoni parasites was 182.1 eggs per gram. The prevalence of other intestinal parasites (Hymenolopis nana, Ascaris lumbricoides, Hookworm, Taenia species, Giardia lamblia and Entamoeba histolytica) was found to be 7.7% (46/597). The overall prevalence of S. mansoni co-infection with other intestinal parasites was 5.0% (30/597). Specifically, the co-infection rates were 1.5% for A. lumbricoides, 1.3% for H. nana, 1.0% for Taenia species, 0.2% for Hookworm, 0.2% for E. histolytica, and 0.2% for G. lamblia.

Conclusions/Significances

The study showed a high rate of S. mansoni infection among school-age children. This calls for immediate action, such as school-based deworming, to protect these children from the disease and reduce the burden. Further research is needed to understand the transmission of the infection by the intermediate host.

Author summary

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical parasitic disease that affects over 220 million people globally. Although there is a deworming mass drug administration (MDA) program for soil-transmitted helminths, the study area still needs to be integrated into the Praziquantel MDA. The study focused on school-age children to better understand the prevalence of the disease and recommend interventions. Hence, we assessed the prevalence and intensity of intestinal schistosomiasis among school-age children living in selected villages near Lake Chamo in the southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia. The results revealed that the prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni was 52.3%. The overall prevalence of other intestinal parasites (Hymenolopis nana, Ascaris lumbricoides, Hookworm, Taenia species, Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba histolytica) was 7.7%. We documented a 5% S. mansoni co-infection with all other intestinal parasites including A. lumbricoides, H. nana, Taenia species, Hookworm, E. histolytica, and G. lamblia. This implies a high prevalence of intestinal parasites in school-age children, necessitating immediate action to alleviate this burden. Implementing school-based mass drug administration (MDA) for schistosomiasis is advisable in the study villages.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical parasitic disease that affects more than 220 million people worldwide [1]. The tropical and sub-tropical regions are known to harbor the poorest individuals mostly affected by this disease [2]. Sub-Saharan African countries bear more than 90% of the schistosomiasis burden [3].

Seven species of Schistosoma parasites infect humans, namely Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma haematobium, Schistosoma japonicum, Schistosoma mekongi, Schistosoma intercalatum, Schistosoma guineensis, and Schistosoma malayensis [4]. Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium and S. japonicum are the most commonly found in human infections, with S. mansoni and S. haematobium being more prevalent in Africa [5]. Many parts of Africa have snail species that act as intermediate hosts for schistosomiasis. Biomphalaria species are intermediate hosts of intestinal schistosomiasis due to Schistosoma mansoni, while Bulinus species are intermediate hosts of urogenital schistosomiasis [6]. Schistosomiasis is a prevalent disease in Ethiopia, putting millions of people at risk of infection [7]. Two types of parasites, Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium, are commonly found in many areas in Ethiopia [8].

The primary strategy for combating schistosomiasis involves mass deworming at-risk individuals using praziquantel [1]. Ethiopia adheres to the WHO guidelines and implements mass drug administration (MDA) for school-age children as part of its deworming program whenever eligible for the MDA. While this approach has effectively reduced the disease burden in the community, it does not prevent reinfection if individuals come into contact with infected water sources [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to manage snails and maintain a hygienic environment to prevent water pollution from human waste.

Most people in villages near the southern Rift Valley lakes in Ethiopia rely on Lake Chamo and Lake Abaya, as well as the rivers that feed into these lakes, for irrigation, fishing, and other household activities. This increased contact with water bodies puts people at a higher risk of Schistosoma infection [9]. Even though most people have access to water bodies, school-age children are more likely to make swimming a regular activity and, therefore, may be at a higher risk of infection than other groups. The study specifically targeted school-age children to better understand the prevalence of the disease and suggest possible interventions.

Apart from the soil-transmitted helminths deworming program, the study area has yet to be included in the praziquantel MDA due to insufficient evidence on the prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis. The current study’s findings support the implementation of essential preventive measures for those at higher risk of infection. This data could assist in efforts to prevent the disease at healthcare facilities and within various governmental and non-governmental organizations. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the prevalence and intensity of intestinal schistosomiasis among school-age children living in selected villages near Lake Chamo in the southern Rift Valley lakes of Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Arba Minch University Institutional Review Board (IRB/1254/2022) approved the study protocol. We also obtained informed written consent and assent from all participants and their parents/guardians. All positive cases were treated in accordance with the national treatment guidelines.

Study area description

The study was conducted in Shele Mela Kebele (the smallest administrative unit), in the Arba Minch area district of South Ethiopia (Fig 1). Kebele consists of five sub-villages near Lake Chamo. Two health posts offer primary health care services in conjunction with the Kolla Shele Health Centre, located about 35 kilometers from Arba Minch town, the administrative Centre for the Gamo Zone.

Fig 1. Map of Shele Mela Kebele Arba Minch area district, Gamo zone, south Ethiopia.

Fig 1

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): (http://www.usgs.gov), Roads, Water (River, lakes))–from DIVA-GIS (https://esri.maps.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html).

Most people in the study area depend on agriculture as their primary source of income. They cultivate crops like bananas, avocados, mangoes, and maize and rely on irrigation from Lake Chamo, the Sille, and Sago rivers, which flow into the lake. It’s important to note that intestinal schistosomiasis has been recorded in the Health Centre registration book and is a significant public health concern in the current study area. The presence of water bodies and frequent human contact with water, such as washing clothes, swimming, irrigating plantations, and fishing, could increase the risk of schistosomiasis. The study village was selected based on observing Schistosoma cases in the Health Centre, the availability of water bodies, and the human activities associated with those water bodies.

Study design and period

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to July 2023 to determine the prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis and other intestinal parasitic infections in school-age children.

Study population, study participants and sampling technique

The study population was all school-age children (ages 5 to 15) in Shele Mela Kebele. We randomly selected households with school-age children in each sub-village to ensure that our samples were representative. The household lists were obtained from the registration book at the health post, and households with school-age children were extracted from the documents. After identifying the households from the lists, a statistician with no connection to the study conducted randomization. Trained data collectors visited the selected households, explained the study’s purpose, and obtained informed consent from the parents or guardians of the children. The children were then given instructions on collecting and providing stool samples for analysis.

Sample size determination

The single population proportion formula was used to calculate the sample size. This study comprised 597 school-age children. Because there had been no previous research in the area, the sample size was calculated using 50% of the prevalence.

Therefore, the sample was calculated as:

n=(Zα/2)2*Pq(d)2

Where, Z = is table value of 5% level of significance (z = 1.96)

α = is level of significance (α = 0.05 = 5%),

d = is error tolerance (d = 0.04),

p = proportion of success (p = 0.5 = 50%)

q = proportion of failure (q = 1-p) = 0.5

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study enrolled all school-aged children who lived in the selected households and voluntarily provided stool samples. Any child who was ill and receiving medication was excluded from the study. In addition, children whose parents or guardians did not provide consent were also excluded.

Stool sample collection and examination

The children were taught how to collect stool samples without contaminating them. They were given applicator sticks, clean paper, and a labelled stool cup with details about the participant, such as age and sex. A portion of each stool sample was used to prepare a Kato-Katz thick smear in the field. The remaining samples were placed in an icebox and transported to the College of Medicine and Health Sciences parasitological laboratory. They underwent parasite screening the same day, and any positive cases received immediate treatment.

Kato-Katz technique

Stool samples were collected from children in selected households, and a smear was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions for Kato-Katz thick smear preparation. An applicator stick was used to transfer a small portion of the stool sample onto a mesh-covered paper, which was then strained and screened with a spatula. The filtered sample was placed in the hole of a template at the center of a glass slide. After removing the template, the glass slide was covered with malachite green-soaked cellophane tape and pressed with another clean slide to spread the sample throughout the cellophane tape cover.

The slides were examined under an Olympus CX31 microscope with low-objective lenses (10 xs or 40 xs) within an hour of smear preparation. Positive results were confirmed with a medium power objective lens. The number of helminthes eggs present in the whole smear was counted and documented on the laboratory report form designed for this purpose.

Concentration technique

To prepare the sample, it was mixed with 10% formal saline in a test tube and filtered through a 350–450 μm mesh. 7 ml of the filtrate was poured into a 15 ml centrifuge tube, and 3 ml of diethyl ether was added to the test tube. The mixture was carefully mixed and then centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 4 minutes, resulting in three layers. The top layer (diethyl ether-organic debris mixture) and the supernatant were removed, and a drop of sediment was taken from the remaining layers. This sediment was then placed on a glass slide, covered with a cover slide, and examined under a low-power microscope. This technique was used to check if parasites were missed by the Kato-Katz technique for treating cases, not for reporting results, as our primary focus was intestinal schistosomiasis.

Quality assurance

The laboratory process began with a quality check of the chemicals and materials. Experienced laboratory technologists then applied the Kato-Katz and concentration techniques to diagnose.

Data management and analysis

To summarize the data, descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentages were used. The Kato-Katz thick smear method counted the total number of parasite eggs in the stool sample. This count was then multiplied by 24 to determine the number of eggs per gram of stool. Based on this count, infections were classified as light, moderate, or heavy. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was presented along with the prevalence data.

Results

Prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis infection

A total of 597 school-aged children participated in the study. Of these, 308 (51.6%) were female and 289 (48.4%) were male. The median age of the study participant was 8. Out of the 597 children who participated in the study, 312 of them were found to be infected with S. mansoni, which accounts for 52.3% (95% CI: 48.4.4–56.4) (Table 1).

Table 1. Intestinal Schistosoma and other intestinal parasites co-infection prevalence among school-age children (n = 597) in Shelle Mela, south Ethiopia (January to July 2023).

Parasites species Number of cases Percentage (95% CI)
S. mansoni 312 52.3 (48.2–56.3)
H. nana 8 1.3 (0.6–2.6)
A. lumbricoides 4 0.7 (0.2–1.7)
G. lamblia 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
Taenia species 3 0.5 (0.1–1.4)
S. mansoni + A. lumbricoides 9 1.5 (0.7–2.8)
S. mansoni + H. nana 8 1.3 (0.6–2.6)
S. mansoni + Taenia species 6 1.0 (0.4–2.2)
S. mansoni + Hookworm 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
S. mansoni + A. lumbricoides + H. nana 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
S. mansoni + A. lumbricoides + Taenia species 2 0.3 (0.04–1.2)
S. mansoni + E. histolytica 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
A. lumbricoides + E. histolytica 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
S. mansoni + G. lamblia 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
Total positive 358 60 (55.9–63.8)

Co-infection of S. mansoni and other intestinal parasites

The prevalence of co-infection of S. mansoni with other intestinal parasite was 5% (30/597; 95% CI: 3.4–7.1). There was co-infection of S. mansoni with all the parasites identified in this study. The study also documented the prevalence of triple infection, specifically S. mansoni with A. lumbricoides and Taenia, and S. mansoni with A. lumbricoides and H. nana. The prevalence of single infection of H. nana was 1.3% (8/597: 95% CI: 0.6–2.6), A. lumbricoides was 0.7% (4/597; 95% CI: 0.2–1.7), Taenia species was 0.5% (3/597; 95% CI: 0.1–1.4) and G. lamblia was 0.2% (1/597; 95% CI: 0.004–0.9) (Table 1).

Prevalence of other intestinal parasites infection

Of 597 study participants, 48 (8%; 95% CI: 5.9–10.5) were positive for other intestinal parasites. The H. nana and A. lumbricoides were relatively common among helminths. Prevalence of infections due to H. nana was 2.8% (95% CI: 1.7–4.5) (17/597), and A. lumbricoides was 2.8% (95% CI: 1.7–4.5) (17/597) was relatively higher than that of the rest. Prevalence of Hookworm infection was found to be the lowest (0.2%; 95% CI: 0.004–0.9)). Among protozoans, G. lamblia and E. histolytica infections were rarely identified (Table 2).

Table 2. Prevalence of other intestinal parasites co-infections among school-age children (n = 597) in Shele Mela, south Ethiopia (January to July 2023).

Parasite species identified Number of positives Prevalence
H. nana 17 2.8 (1.7–4.5)
A. lumbricoides 17 2.8 (1.7–4.5)
Taenia species 9 1.5 (0.7–2.8)
Hookworm 1 0.2 (0.004–0.9)
E. histolytica 2 0.3 (0.04–1.2)
G. lamblia 2 0.3 (0.04–1.2)

Parasite intensity

Among school-age children, the mean egg count of parasites was 182.1 eggs per gram. The intensity of S. mansoni infection ranged from light to heavy, with light (172/312: 55%; 95% CI: 49.4–60.7), moderate (95/312: 30.4%; 95% CI: 25.4–35.8), and heavy (45/312; 14.4%: 10.7–18.8). The mean number of eggs per gram of stool samples was 725.02 among heavily infected individuals, 195.8 in moderately infected ones, and 44.4 in lightly infected children. On the other hand, the parasite intensity of H. nana, A. lumbricoides, Taenia species, and Hookworm was moderate.

Discussion

The study aimed to assess the prevalence and burden of S. mansoni infection among school-aged children in Shele Mela, located in south Ethiopia. The results indicate that 52.3% of school-aged children were infected with S. mansoni. The infection severity varied from mild to severe, with about 55% of the cases classified as mild, 30% as moderate, and 15% as severe, based on the WHO guidelines.

The study reveals a high infection rate of S. mansoni among school-age children, consistent with other studies in different parts of the country [1012]. For instance, a 50% infection rate was found in Abbey and Didessa Valleys, Western Ethiopia [13]. Different prevalence rates have been reported across the country, with some areas showing higher prevalence than others [11,12,14]. Despite this variation, Schistosoma infection remains a significant public health concern in the country. The participants in the study have a habit of swimming and washing their clothes on river shores, increasing the risk of S. mansoni infection. Therefore, effective praziquantel deworming initiatives can lead to immediate health improvements, but their long-term success depends on a comprehensive approach. It’s essential to involve the community and raise awareness about the significance of sanitation and hygiene practices, such as improved latrine usage. These practices can support deworming efforts and significantly increase the likelihood of success.

This study revealed that the overall prevalence rate of intestinal parasites, including co-infections and triple infections, was 8%. The identified soil-transmitted helminths in this area included H. nana, A. lumbricoides, protozoa such as G. lamblia, and Taenia species, as documented in several studies across different regions [8]. The prevalence rate of co-infection of S. mansoni with other intestinal parasites, including Ascaris, H. nana, Taenia species, Hookworm, E. histolytica, and G. lamblia, was 7.8%. Moreover, this study identified a triple infection of S. mansoni with Ascaris, H. nana, and Taenia species. Multiple co-infections of diseases may be linked to poor hygiene conditions [15], indicating a lack of access to clean water and unhygienic conditions and contact with contaminated water.

In this study, the severity of infection caused by S. mansoni was determined by measuring the number of eggs in a gram of stool. Light infections were observed in 55.0% of the cases, moderate infections in 30.3%, and heavy infections in 14.7%. These findings are consistent with a previous study conducted in different parts of Ethiopia [16]. The majority (85.5%) of positive cases had mild to moderate infections, possibly due to the initial number of infecting cercariae. Cercariae are found where the intermediate host (snails) is present and could potentially infect children in small numbers as they enter and exit the lake, typically involving brief water contact. Schistosoma infection results in premunition, where the initial infection triggers the body to prevent another similar parasite from entering, regardless of its burden [17]. There was no deworming program for Schistosoma infection in the study area, so most children may live with the infection chronically with low to moderate burdens.

This study has several limitations and strengths. The study did not investigate the identification of intermediate hosts. The study also used a cross-sectional design, which may lead to over- or underestimation of prevalence as it captures only the current situation and may need to reflect changes over time accurately. The study did not report the results of the concentration technique to compare with the Kato-Katz method. There might be better options for other intestinal parasites, although it is the right choice for abdominal schistosomiasis. Therefore, the results may not accurately reflect the prevalence of other intestinal parasitic infections. While the transmission-related factors are well-established and well-described in the study area description and introduction section, there was a missed opportunity for further exploration. This could have significantly benefited the current study. Despite this, the study’s strengths, such as following standardized procedures conducted by experienced laboratory technicians, representative sampling, and minimized selection bias by including all school-age children in all selected households, still provide valid results that can aid the control program in reducing the disease burden.

Conclusions

The study identified that more than half of school-aged children were infected with S. mansoni, with varying levels of infection severity. Therefore, a school-based deworming programme against S. mansoni is recommended to reduce the disease burden in children. Moreover, to ensure the sustainability of the deworming programme, it is important to raise community awareness about the significance of proper waste disposal and hygiene practices such as latrine usage.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the parents/guardians for consenting to their children’s participation in the study and the laboratory technologists for their support. We are grateful for Dr. Thomas Torora’s contributions to mapping the study area.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The Norwegian Programme for Capacity Development in Higher Education and Research for Development (QZA-21/0162 to FM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. WHO GUIDELINE on control and elimination of human schistosomiasis. 2022. [PubMed]
  • 2.Aula OP, McManus DP, Jones MK, Gordon CA. Schistosomiasis with a focus on Africa. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021; 6: 109. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6030109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ajibola O, Gulumbe B, Eze A, Obishakin E. Tools for detection of Schistosomiasis in resource limited settings. Med Sci. 2018; 6: 39. doi: 10.3390/medsci6020039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gryseels B, Polman K, Clerinx J, Kestens L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1106–1118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deol AK, Fleming FM, Calvo-Urbano B, Walker M, Bucumi V, Gnandou I, et al. Schistosomiasis—Assessing progress toward the 2020 and 2025 Global Goals. N Engl J Med. 2019;381: 2519–2528. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kamel B, Laidemitt MR, Lu L, Babbitt C, Weinbaum OL, Mkoji GM, et al. Detecting and identifying schistosoma infections in snails and aquatic habitats: A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0009175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Negussu N, Mengistu B, Kebede B, Deribe K, Ejigu E, Tadesse G, et al. Ethiopia schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthes control programme: Progress and prospects. Ethiop Med J. 2017;55: 75–80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70521-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leta GT, Mekete K, Wuletaw Y, Gebretsadik A, Sime H, Mekasha S, et al. National mapping of soil-transmitted helminth and schistosome infections in Ethiopia. Parasites and Vectors. 2020;13: 437 doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04317-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olkeba BK, Boets P, Mereta ST, Mandefro B, Debesa G, Ahmednur M, et al. Malacological and parasitological surveys on Ethiopian Rift Valley Lakes: Implications for control and elimination of snail-borne diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19:142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tefera A, Belay T, Bajiro M. Epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni infection and associated risk factors among school children attending primary schools nearby rivers in Jimma town, an urban setting, Southwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0228007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jejaw A, Zemene E, Alemu Y, Mengistie Z. High prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni and other intestinal parasites among elementary school children in Southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15: 600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tadege B, Shimelis T. Infections with Schistosoma mansoni and geohelminths among school children dwelling along the shore of the Lake Hawassa, southern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0181547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Assefa A, Erko B, Gundersen SG, Medhin G, Berhe N. Current status of Schistosoma mansoni infection among previously treated rural communities in the Abbey and Didessa Valleys, Western Ethiopia: Implications for sustainable control. PLoS One. 2021;16: e0247312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zerdo Z, Bastiaens H, Anthierens S, Massebo F, Masne M, Biresaw G, et al. Prevalence, intensity and endemicity of intestinal schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis and its associated factors among school-aged children in Southern Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2022;12: 4586 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08333-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schmidlin T, Hürlimann E, Silué KD, Yapi RB, Houngbedji C, Kouadio BA, et al. Effects of hygiene and defecation behavior on helminths and intestinal protozoa infections in Taabo, Côte d’Ivoire. PLoS One. 2013;8: e65722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeleke AJ, Addisu A, Tegegne Y. Prevalence, Intensity, and associated factors of Schistosoma mansoni among school children in Northwest Ethiopia. J Parasitol Res 2020; 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perera DJ, Koger-pease C, Paulini K, Daoudi M, Ndao M. Beyond schistosomiasis: unraveling co-infections and altered immunity. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024; 37:e0009823 doi: 10.1128/cmr.00098-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012613.r001

Decision Letter 0

jong-Yil Chai, Yaobi Zhang

19 Aug 2024

Dear Dr Massebo,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "High prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in school-age children in the villages adjacent to Lake Chamo in southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia: an implication for schistosomiasis deworming?" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Yaobi Zhang, M.D., Ph.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: Yes, although the authors could describe a little more the parameters for the villages selected. They state households within villages randomly selected, which is fine, but not why certain villages surrounding the lake were selected. What was the criteria for deciding if the village was included? was there a maximum distance? Also, some more description of the study area itself, and why it hasn't been included previously in the PZQ program.

Reviewer #2: Yes.

Reviewer #3: -Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

Neither the objectives nor study hypothesis were stated.

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

Although a cross-sectional study design is suitable for assessing prevalence, it's challenging to evaluate alignment with the study's objectives without knowing them.

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

SAC 5-15 years was cited as study population, but no hypothesis was stated.

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

Hard to tell. The estimated sample size was 597 SAC, the total population of the study area is unknown. Again, no hypothesis was cited.

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

Inferential and descriptive statistics were used, but the conclusions were somehow vague.

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

I would assume ethical concerns were addressed since the Arba Minch University Institutional Review Board approved the

study protocol and informed written consent and assent was obtained as needed. Also, positive cases were treated in accordance

with the national treatment guidelines.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Yes, apart from the following: 1) the figure. Please describe what is being presented in the figure either in text or expand on the figure description.

2) It would be good to present the intensity as % prevalence of whole sample. ie ~28% of SAC in Shele Mela Kebele have light intensity infection X% moderate etc. This is because the WHO guidelines for elimination as a public health problem are tied to data presented in this manner

Reviewer #2: All prevalence estimates need to be accompanied by their 95% confidence intervals.

The results of the questionnaire also need to be presented.

Reviewer #3: -Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

No- The paper didn't demonstrate an analysis plan.

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

Despite findings being presented, it's hard to ascertain if they were complete as the study objectives were not stated. Also, it's unclear why urinary schistosomiasis wasn't investigated. It would've been logical to cite previous studies revealing the non-endemicity of urinary schistosomiasis if that was the case in the study area. On the contrary, data from the WHO/ESPEN portal reveals Arba Minch district (the area under investigation) is endemic to urinogenital schistosomiasis.

Kato-Katz and formol ether concentration techniques were both used for stool analysis. It’s unclear if:

- the outcomes were different by technique,

- one technique was used as first line screening and the other for confirmatory diagnosis.

It is necessary to state:

- why both techniques were used

- if prevalence/intensity varied by technique

- how prevalence and intensity were established using both diagnostic methods.

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Yes- Tables and narratives are clear. However, the results on prevalence and intensity were not disaggregated by gender or school enrolment/attendance. Also, it would've been excellent to appraise the knowledge of survey respondents on disease transmission and prevention. Furthermore, data wasn't disaggregated by the five sub villages in the Shelle Mela Kebele area.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Yes, though please provide the recommendation of school-based deworming in the area with a brief justification in the discussion, not just the conclusion

Reviewer #2: Yes.

Reviewer #3: -Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

Partially- It was concluded that 52.3% of SAC were infected with intestinal schistosomiasis, but the absence of S. haematobium in the study makes it challenging to conclude if S. mansoni is the predominant species in the study area. Also, it would be useful to confirm if STH deworming is required or not, given that Kato-Katz and formol ether techniques were used for stool analysis.

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

No- Study limitations were not mentioned.

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

Partially - Study falls short of investigating transmission factors like access to water sanitation and hygiene, including behavioural determinants of transmission amongst participants.

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Partially - Beyond MDA being recommended, the need for health education initiatives was not cited.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: As above, please provide prevalence of intensity class using total sampled as denominator as well as using total infected as denominator which is already presented

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Hyperlinks to sample consent forms, IRB requirements and questionnaires could better enhance the appraisal of reviewers.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Authors have presented an important and well performed survey of S. mansonii (SCH) in a seemingly underserved area of Ethiopia. The alarmingly high prevalence and intensity of SCH within the targeted communities will hopefully provide Government with sufficient evidence to roll out preventative chemotherapy to avoid further morbidity and mortality. The authors are commended on their effort.

A few minor comments, further to those above:

- Please provide a thorough review language used

- Please ensure references are used where appropriate, for example - methods section states health center registration records were checked. Convention states that a reference should be provided here, even if it is a government data set.

- Methods suggest only households with SAC were included in study. How were households with SAC identified. Was a community register used, then random households selected?

- Could authors provide the timing from sample collection to slide reading? This is important for results relating to hookworm - although identifying hookworm is not the primary objective of the study, would be useful nonetheless

- The calculation for the epg in the methods is repeated (ie mentioning multiplication by 24) this need only be in the article once

- Participant selection suggests samples given only upon consent, please expand a little here. Was informed consent involving information on the study objectives etc given prior to offering participation?

- IRB approval has been obtained for this study, but a statement of the IRB process/approval should be provided in the methods section.

- Please review the discussion section for some repetition

Reviewer #2: This is a straightforward parasitological study assessing the prevalence of S. mansoni in school children.

There are no line numbers, making it very difficult to provide detailed comments.

Title: The second part of the title is not relevant. The area has not received any treatment before. Thus, the high prevalence should automatically indicate the need for a control approach. It is not a question for debate.

There are some typos and grammatical errors that will need to be corrected. Kindly go through the entire text and address them. See the attached for further comments.

The discussion and recommendation could be expanded to consider the treatment of out-of-school children and other community members. Other control options could also be discussed.

The data on the socio-demographic information (other than age and gender) was not presented. The questionnaire should be added as an appendix to the study, and the rest of the data presented.

Please italicize S. mansoni and other scientific names throughout the text.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Ndellejong Cosmas Ejong

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-24-00946_reviewer.pdf

pntd.0012613.s001.pdf (960.8KB, pdf)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012613.r003

Decision Letter 1

jong-Yil Chai

8 Oct 2024

Dear Dr Massebo,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'High prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in school-age children in the villages adjacent to Lake Chamo in the southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Your revised manuscript is acceptable by PLoS NTD. Thanks for your kind cooperation.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012613.r004

Acceptance letter

jong-Yil Chai

24 Oct 2024

Dear Dr Massebo,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "High prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in school-age children in the villages adjacent to Lake Chamo in the southern Rift Valley of Ethiopia," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-24-00946_reviewer.pdf

    pntd.0012613.s001.pdf (960.8KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point by point response.docx

    pntd.0012613.s002.docx (31.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES