Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 24.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2024 Sep 2;150(13):1064–1066. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069917

Restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy in patients with acute MI and anemia: 6-month mortality in the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial

Tabassome Simon 1, Brandon M Herbert 2, Maria Mori Brooks 2, Shaun G Goodman 3, John H Alexander 4, Philippe Gabriel Steg 5, Renato D Lopes 4,6, Shahab Ghafghazi 7, Claire Bouleti 8, Howard A Cooper 9, Eric L McCamant 10, Kevin R Bainey 11, Herbert D Aronow 12, J Dawn Abbott 13, Caroline Alsweiler 14, Marnie Bertolet 2, Dean A Fergusson 15, Andrew M Goldsweig 16, Paul C Hébert 17, Jeffrey L Carson 18, on behalf of the MINT Trial Investigators
PMCID: PMC11548830  NIHMSID: NIHMS2005625  PMID: 39221566

Anemia is common in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and impacts prognosis. Unlike most clinical settings in which a restrictive strategy is recommended, the optimal hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in MI patients and anemia remains uncertain(1,2,3).

From April 2017 to April 2023, the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial (4) randomly assigned 3504 patients with acute MI and anemia (hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL) to a restrictive (transfusion when the Hb ≤ 8g/dL) or liberal blood transfusion strategy (transfusion when the Hb ≤ 10g/dL). The assigned transfusion strategy was implemented throughout the index hospitalization up to 30 days. All-cause death at 6-months was a pre-specified secondary outcome (5). At 6-months, clinical sites obtained vital status and date/cause (cardiac, non-cardiac, unknown) of death by telephone follow-up, proxy or hospital records. The protocol was approved by participating institutions’ review boards or ethics committees; patients or surrogates provided written informed consent.

Cumulative incidence functions incorporating competing risks and chi-square statistics were used to compare risks of all-cause death and of cause-specific death by assigned arm. Corresponding hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from Fine and Gray competing risk models with assigned transfusion strategy as the only independent variable. Patients who discontinued participation or were lost to follow-up were censored at the last date known to be alive or date of withdrawal. HRs were computed for the entire follow-up period, and a landmark analysis was conducted from 30 days to 6 months. All data and trial materials will be made publicly available at the NHLBI Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center (BioLINCC; https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov) by December 28, 2025, two years after publication of the primary manuscript for the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion Trial, as stipulated by the NIH.

Trial participants (4) had a mean age of 72.1 years, 45.5% were female, 55.8% had type 2 MI and 81.3% had non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI). One-third had a prior history of MI, one-third had heart failure, and nearly half had renal insufficiency. At 30 days (4), the primary outcome, composite death or non-fatal MI, was numerically more frequent in the restrictive arm than in the liberal arm (16.9% vs. 14.5%, risk ratio (RR)=1.15; 95% CI, 0.99–1.34; P=0.07).

Vital status at 6 months was obtained for 3,419 (97.6%) patients. Overall, 729 patients died by 6 months, of whom 262 died from cardiac causes (35.9%), 314 from non-cardiac causes (43.1%) and 153 from unknown causes (21.0%). The proportion of deaths attributed to cardiac causes was greater in the first 30 days after randomization (48.0%) than from day 31 through 6 months (26.6%). At 6 months, 376 patients (21.7%) in the restrictive arm and 353 patients (20.5%) in the liberal arm had died (HR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.93–1.24). During the first 30 days, death occurred in 9.9% and 8.4% of the patients in the restrictive and liberal arms respectively (RR=1.19; 95% CI, 0.96–1.49)(4). Beyond 30 days, 13.1% and 13.2% of patients died in restrictive and liberal arms respectively (RR=0.99, 95% CI (0.81–1.20) Figure 1A).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Cumulative Incidence Function Estimates for All-Cause Death (1A), and for Cause-Specific Death (cardiac cause of death (1B), non-cardiac cause (1C), unknow cause of death (1D) by Assigned Transfusion Strategy (Landmark).

The 6-month hazard of cardiac death was 52% greater in the restrictive arm as compared to the liberal arm (9.0% vs. 6.1%, HR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.19–1.94, p<0.001, mostly driven by events within 30 days Figure 1B), whereas rates of non-cardiac and unknown cause death had similar patterns from 0–30 days and beyond 30 days (Figure 1C, 1D, with overall HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.70–1.08) for non-cardiac causes, and HR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.64–1.21 for unknown causes, respectively). This finding is not surprising given that blood flow impacts myocardial oxygen delivery, and thus, the restrictive strategy, with lower hemoglobin concentrations, may result in worsened myocardial ischemia.

This analysis has several limitations. Cause of death was based on clinician’s judgment and not centrally adjudicated, and the open-label design of the trial, as with all transfusion strategy trials, may have influenced the classification of cause of death. Six-month mortality was a prespecified outcome, but cause of death was not. MINT was not designed or powered to detect a difference between transfusion strategies on 6-month death. MINT also has several notable strengths. MINT is the largest transfusion strategy randomized trial in the setting of MI and included representative elderly patients with STEMI or NSTEMI, mostly type 1 and type 2 MIs, and patients with multiple comorbidities similar to routine clinical practice.

The main findings from the 6-month analysis of MINT are that overall mortality in patients with acute MI and anemia was high and did not differ by transfusion strategy. The exploratory landmark analysis showed that most of the increase in all-cause mortality in the restrictive strategy occurred in first 30-days, when cardiac death was significantly higher, and mortality was similar in both trial arms from 31 days to 6 months

Funding:

The trial was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (U01 HL133817, U01HL132853) and the Canadian Blood Services and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health (grant 342193); For France, this work was in part supported by the RHU iVASC grant ‘#ANR-16-RHUS-00010’ from the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Tabassome Simon: Research Grant Support to my institution from Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Daichy-Sankyo, Glaxo-Smith-Kline and French Ministry of Health, speaker or consulting honoraria (e.g; DSMB, Advisory Board and Educational Events) from Ablative solutions; Air Liquide; Astrazeneca; Sanofi; Servier Novartis; 4Living Biotech

Brandon M. Herbert: None.

Maria Mori Brooks: DSMB member for Cerus Corporation.

Shaun G. Goodman: Research grant support (e.g., steering committee or data and safety monitoring committee) and/or speaker/consulting honoraria (e.g., advisory boards) from: Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, CYTE Ltd., Daiichi-Sankyo/American Regent, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, JAMP Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/C, Pendopharm/Pharmascience, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, Valeo Pharma; and salary support/honoraria from the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Canadian Heart Research Centre and MD Primer, Canadian VIGOUR Centre, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Centre for Clinical Research, Duke Clinical Research Institute, New York University Clinical Coordinating Centre, PERFUSE Research Institute, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre Clinical Trials and Translation Unit, TIMI Study Group (Brigham Health).

John H. Alexander: Research grants to Duke University from Artivion/CryoLife, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Ferring, the U.S. FDA, Humacyte, and the U.S. NIH and advisory board or consulting payments from AbbVie, Artivion/CryoLife, AtriCure, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ferring, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novostia, Pfizer, Portola, Theravance, and Veralox

Philippe Gabriel Steg: research grants from Bayer, Merck, Sanofi, Servier; has been a speaker or consultant for Amarin, Amgen, As- traZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen, Lexicon, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, PhaseBio, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier. Senior Associate Editor for Circulation.

Renato D. Lopes: Research grants or contracts from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis; funding for educational activities or lectures from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novo Nordisk; and funding for consulting or other services from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk.

Shahab Ghafghazi:

Claire Bouleti: Research grants or contract from Janssen, Pfizer; consulting and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Howard A. Cooper: None

Eric L. McCamant:

Kevin R. Bainey: None

Herbert D. Aronow: None

J. Dawn Abbott: Consulting Abbott, Medtronic, Penumbra. Research Boston Scientific, Recor, Med Alliance, Shockwave, Microport

Caroline Alsweiler: Consulting Duke University

Marnie Bertolet: None

Dean A. Fergusson: None

Andrew M. Goldsweig: Consulting – Philips, Inari Medical Speaking – Philips, Edwards Lifesciences

Paul C. Hébert: DSMB member of Cerus Corporation.

Jeffrey L. Carson: DSMB member for Cerus Corporation.

Non standard Abbreviations and Acronyms

MINT trial

the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion trial

MI

Myocardial Infarction

Hb

Hemoglobine

HR

Hazard Ratio

CI

Confidence Interval

RR

Risk Ratio

Footnotes

Article Information: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02981407

References

  • 1.Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Guyatt G, Valentine S, Dennis J, Bakhtary S, Cohn CS, Dubon A, Grossman BJ, Gupta GK, et al. Red Blood Cell Transfusion: 2023 AABB International Guidelines. JAMA. 2023;330:1892–1902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ducrocq G, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Puymirat E, Lemesle G, Cachanado M, Durand-Zaleski I, Arnaiz JA, Martínez-Sellés M, Silvain J, Ariza-Solé A, et al. Effect of a Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Major Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: The REALITY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021;325:552–560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cooper HA, Rao SV, Greenberg MD, Rumsey MP, McKenzie M, Alcorn KW; Panza JA Conservative versus liberal red cell transfusion in acute myocardial infarction (the CRIT Randomized Pilot Study. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1108–1111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carson JL, Brooks MM, Hébert PC, Goodman SG, Bertolet M, Glynn SA, Chaitman BR, Simon T, Lopes RD, Goldsweig AM, et al. Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:2446–2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carson JL, Brooks MM, Chaitman BR, Alexander JH, Goodman SG, Bertolet M, Abbott JD, Cooper HA, Rao SV, Triulzi DJ, et al. Rationale and design for the myocardial ischemia and transfusion (MINT) randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2023;257:120–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES