Skip to main content
NCBI home page
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Nov 8;13:RP97298. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97298

Neuropeptide Bursicon and its receptor-mediated the transition from summer-form to winter-form of Cacopsylla chinensis

Zhixian Zhang 1, Jianying Li 1, Yilin Wang 1, Zhen Li 1, Xiaoxia Liu 1, Songdou Zhang 1,2,✉
Editors: John Ewer3, K VijayRaghavan4
PMCID: PMC11548876  PMID: 39514284

Abstract

Seasonal polyphenism enables organisms to adapt to environmental challenges by increasing phenotypic diversity. Cacopsylla chinensis exhibits remarkable seasonal polyphenism, specifically in the form of summer-form and winter-form, which have distinct morphological phenotypes. Previous research has shown that low temperature and the temperature receptor CcTRPM regulate the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis by impacting cuticle content and thickness. However, the underling neuroendocrine regulatory mechanism remains largely unknown. Bursicon, also known as the tanning hormone, is responsible for the hardening and darkening of the insect cuticle. In this study, we report for the first time on the novel function of Bursicon and its receptor in the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis. Firstly, we identified CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β as two typical subunits of Bursicon in C. chinensis, which were regulated by low temperature (10 °C) and CcTRPM. Subsequently, CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β formed a heterodimer that mediated the transition from summer-form to winter-form by influencing the cuticle chitin contents and cuticle thickness. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CcBurs-R acts as the Bursicon receptor and plays a critical role in the up-stream signaling of the chitin biosynthesis pathway, regulating the transition from summer-form to winter-form. Finally, we discovered that miR-6012 directly targets CcBurs-R, contributing to the regulation of Bursicon signaling in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis. In summary, these findings reveal the novel function of the neuroendocrine regulatory mechanism underlying seasonal polyphenism and provide critical insights into the insect Bursicon and its receptor.

Research organism: Other

eLife digest

A bug known as pear psylla is a common pest on pear trees in China and other East Asian countries. It feeds off the sap of young leaves and shoots, causing damage to the trees and decreasing the amount of fruit they produce. To survive all-year round, pear psylla changes its body between distinct summer- and winter-forms, a phenomenon known as seasonal polyphenism. In winter, cooler temperatures trigger young pear psylla to darken and thicken the protective cuticle layer coating their bodies. However, the mechanisms behind this seasonal transformation are not fully understood.

One possible regulator of this process is the hormone Bursicon which is known to control cuticle development in juvenile insects. The hormone has two subunits that join to form dimers, which then activate specific receptors that initiate signaling pathways within the insect’s body. Here, Zhang et al. used molecular biology and genetic techniques to study the role of Bursicon dimers in seasonal polyphenism in pear psylla.

Bursicon can assemble either as a homodimer (made up of two identical subunits), or a heterodimer (made up two different subunits). Zhang et al. found that low temperatures triggered the formation of both homodimers and heterodimers of Bursicon. However, only the heterodimers activated a receptor, called CcBurs-R, which enabled the pear psylla to transition into their winter-form. The team also identified a small molecule called a micro RNA that regulates this switch by decreasing the production of the CcBurs-R receptor.

The findings by Zhang et al. advance our understanding of how seasonal polyphenism operates in pear psylla. Many other insects display seasonal polyphenism, and further research could reveal whether Bursicon plays a similar regulatory role across different species.

Introduction

Polyphenism is a transformation phenomenon of phenotypic plasticity, where a single genome produces multiple distinct phenotypes in response to environmental cues (Simpson et al., 2011). In recent years, polyphenism has garnered increasing attention and has become a focal point of research, such as ecology, evolutionary biology, epigenetics, and entomology. Nature presents us with numerous remarkable examples of polyphenism. For instance, we observe seasonal polyphenism in psylla (Butt and Stuart, 1986) and butterflies (Daniels et al., 2014; Baudach and Vilcinskas, 2021), sexual and wing polyphenism in aphids and planthoppers (Xu et al., 2015; Shang et al., 2020), caste polyphenism in ants and honeybees (Kucharski et al., 2008; Bonasio et al., 2012), sex determination in reptiles and fish regulated by temperature and social factors (Janzen and Phillips, 2006; Liu et al., 2017), and environmentally induced polyphenism in plants (Gratani, 2014). Undoubtedly, polyphenism plays a major contributor to the population dynamics of insects worldwide (Noor et al., 2008). Numerous studies have reported that insect polyphenism is influenced by a range of external environment factors, such as temperature, population density, photoperiod, and dietary nutrition (Simpson et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2011; An et al., 2012a; Zhang et al., 2019). Additionally, internal neuro-hormones, including insulin, dopamine, and ecdysone, have been found to play crucial roles in insect polyphenism (Ma et al., 2011; Uehara et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2015; Vellichirammal et al., 2017). However, the specific molecular mechanism underling temperature-dependent polyphenism still requires further clarification.

Cacopsylla chinensis (Yang & Li) is a pear psylla belonging to the Hemiptera order, which causes severe damage to trees and fruits in the major pear production areas across East Asian countries, including China and Japan (Hildebrand et al., 2000; Wei et al., 2020). This phloem-sucking psylla inflicts harm on young shoots and leaves in both adult and nymph stages, leading to stunted and withered pear trees (Ge et al., 2019). Furthermore, C. chinensis secretes a substantial amount of honeydew and acts as a vector for plant pathogenic microorganisms, such as the phytoplasma of pear decline disease and Erwinia amovora (Hildebrand et al., 2000). Importantly, this pest demonstrates strong adaptability to its environment and exhibits seasonal polyphenism, manifesting as summer-form (SF) and winter-form (WF), which display significant differences in morphological characteristics throughout the seasons (Ge et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2023). The summer-form has a lighter body color and causes more severe damage, while the winter-form, in contrast, has a brown to dark brown body color, a larger body size, and stronger resistance to weather conditions (Ge et al., 2019; Tougeron et al., 2021). In a previous study, Zhang et al. demonstrated that a low temperature of 10 °C and the temperature receptor CcTRPM regulate the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis by affecting cuticle thickness and chitin content (Zhang et al., 2023). Up to now, no insect hormones or neuropeptides underling this seasonal polyphenism in C. chinensis have been identified.

Bursicon, also known as the tanning hormone, was initially discovered in the 1960s through neck-ligated assays. It serves a highly conserved function in insects by inducing the clerotization and melanization of the new cuticle in larvae and facilitating wing expansion in adults (Dewey et al., 2004). Bursicon is a heterodimer neuropeptide composed of two subunits, Bursicon-α and Bursicon-β, which exert their effects through the leucine-rich repeats-containing G- protein-coupled receptor, also known as the Bursicon receptor (Luo et al., 2005). In Drosophila, flies with mutated Bursicon receptor, such as the rk gene, or deficient in one of the Bursicon subunits, exhibit improper tanning and altered body shape (Luan et al., 2006). Similarly, in the model insect Tribolium castaneum, RNA interference experiments have demonstrated that the Bursicon receptor (Tcrk) is not only required for cuticle tanning, but also crucial for the development and expansion of integumentary structures (Bai and Palli, 2010). Interestingly, it has been reported that Bursicon homodimers can activate the NF-kB transcription factor Relish, leading to the induction of innate immune and stress genes during molting (An et al., 2012b). Consequently, insects exposed to cold conditions exhibit larger body size and darker cuticular melanization than those reared in warmer environments (Shearer et al., 2016). Given this background, Bursicon and its receptor are expected to play a significant role in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which are approximately 23 nucleotides in length and belong to a class of small noncoding RNAs, play a crucial role in the regulation of posttranscriptional gene expression (Lucas and Raikhel, 2013). Increasing studies have shown that miRNAs are important in insect polyphenism, such as miR-31, miR-9, and miR-252, as well as hormone signaling, for example, miR-133 in dopamine synthesis (Yang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2020; Shang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2023). However, there have been no reports on miRNAs targeting Bursicon and its receptor. Therefore, studying the molecular mechanism of miRNA regulation of the Bursicon receptor at the post-transcriptional level would be highly innovation. In this study, we conducted bioinformatics analysis, qRT-PCR, and western blot to identify two Bursicon subunits (CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β) and their association with low temperature of 10 °C. We then employed RNAi, cuticle staining, and transmission electron microscopy to study the effects of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β on cuticle content, cuticle thickness, and the transition percent from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis. Furthermore, we identified CcBurs-R as the Bursicon receptor and investigated its role in the transition from summer-form to winter-form. Finally, through in vivo and in vitro assays, we discovered that miR-6012 targets CcBurs-R and is involved in the seasonal polyphenism. These efforts not only shed light on the novel function of Bursicon and its receptor in mediating the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis, but also enhance our understanding of the neuroendocrine basis of insect seasonal polyphenism.

Results

Investigation of the relationship between nymph phenotype, cuticle pigment absorbance, and cuticle thickness during the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis

In C. chinensis, exposure to a low temperature of 10 °C triggers the activation of the temperature receptor CcTRPM, leading to the transition from summer-form to winter-form by influencing cuticle tanning and cuticle thickness (Zhang et al., 2023). To elucidate the association between these parameters and the cuticle tanning threshold, we investigated nymph phenotypes, cuticle pigment absorbance levels, and cuticle thickness in C. chinensis over varying time intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under either 10 °C or 25 °C temperature conditions. Nymphs exhibited a light yellow and transparent hue at 3, 6, and 9 days, while those at 12 and 15 days displayed shades of yellow-green or blue-yellow under 25 °C conditions. Conversely, under 10 °C conditions, nymphs darkened at the abdomen’s end at 3, 6, and 9 days, developed numerous light black stripes on their thorax and abdomen at 12 days, and presented an overall black-brown appearance with dark brown stripes on the left and right sides of each thorax and abdominal section at 15 days (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Notably, the dorsal and ventral sides of the abdomen exhibited a pronounced black-brown coloration at 10 °C. The UV absorbance of the total pigment extraction at a wavelength of 300 nm significantly increased following 10 °C exposure for 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days compared to the 25 °C treatment group (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Moreover, cuticle thicknesses exhibited an increase following 10 °C exposure for 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days compared to the 25 °C treatment group (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C).

Molecular identification of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β in C. chinensis

Sequence analysis showed that the open reading frame (ORF) of CcBurs-α (GenBank: OR488624) is 480 bp long, encoding a predicted polypeptide of 159 amino acids. The polypeptide had a molecular weight of 17.45 kDa and a theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of 6.13. The complete ORF of CcBurs-β (GenBank: OR488625) is 405 bp, encoding a polypeptide of 134 amino acid residues. The predicated molecular weight of CcBurs-β was 15.21 kDa and a theoretical pI of 5.24. Amino acid sequence alignment analysis revealed that CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β shared high amino acid identity with homologs from other selected insect species (Figure 1A and B). Both subunits contained eleven conserved cysteine residues, marked with red stars. Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A–B) indicated that CcBurs-α was most closely related to the DcBurs-α homologue (Diaphorina citri, XP_008468249.2), while CcBurs-β was most closely related to DcBurs-β (D. citri, AWT50591.1) among the selected species. The potential tertiary protein structure and molecular docking of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were constructed using the Phyre2 server and PyMOL-v1.3r1 software (Figure 1C). To investigate the identities of homodimers and heterodimers of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β, SDS-PAGE with reduced and non-reduced gels was used. When expressed as individual subunits, they formed α+α and β+β homodimers, as the molecular size of α or β doubled in the non-reduced gel compared to the reduced gel (Figure 1D). When co-expressed, most α and β subunits formed the CcBurs-α+β heterodimer (Figure 1D).

Figure 1. Molecular characteristic of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β in C. chinensis.

(A) Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences of CcBurs-α with homologs from five other insect species. Black represents 100% identity, red represents 75% identity, and blue represents <75% identity. CcBurs-α (C. chinensis, OR488624), DcBurs-α (Diaphorina citri, XP_008468249.2), ApBurs-α (Acyrthosiphon pisum, XP_001946341.1), MpBurs-α (Myzus persicae, XP_022171710.1), HvBurs-α (Homalodisca vitripennis, XP_046670477.1), DmBurs-α (Drosophila melanogaster, CAH74223.1). The corresponding GenBank accession numbers are as follows. (B) Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences of CcBurs-β with homologs from five other insect species. Black represents 100% identity, red represents 75% identity, and blue represents <75% identity. CcBurs-β (C. chinensis, OR488625), DcBurs-β (D. citri, AWT50591.1), HvBurs-β (H. vitripennis, XP_046671521.1), NvBurs-β (Nezara viridula, AZC86173.1), LsBurs-β (Laodelphax striatellus, AXF48186.1), DmBurs-β (D. melanogaster, CAH74224.1). The corresponding GenBank accession numbers are as follows. (C) Predicted protein tertiary structures of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β. (D) Western blot analysis of Bursicon proteins using anti-His-Tag antibody with non-reduced and reduced SDS-PAGE. The left numbers indicate the positions of pre-stained protein markers. Lanes of α, β, and α+β represent separate expression of CcBurs-α, CcBurs-β, or co-expressed of α+β. Monomers were not present under non-reduced conditions. (E-F) Relative mRNA expression of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β after 25 °C or 10 °C treatments at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days (n=3). (G-H) Effect of temperature receptor CcTRPM knockdown on the mRNA expression of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β at 3, 6, and 10 days under 10 °C condition (n=3). Data in 1E-1H are shown as the mean ± SE with three independent biological replications, with at least 50 nymphs for each biological replication. Statistically significant differences were determined using pair-wise Student’s t-test in SPSS 26.0 software, and significance levels were denoted by ***p<0.001.

Figure 1—source data 1. Labelled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (reduced gel).
Figure 1—source data 2. Original, uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (reduced gel).
Figure 1—source data 3. Labelled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (non-reduced gel).
Figure 1—source data 4. Original, uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (non-reduced gel).

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Investigation of the relationship between nymph phenotype, cuticle pigment absorbance, and cuticle thickness during the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) The nymph morphology during the transition from summer form to winter form of C. chinensis at varying time intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days). (B–C) The absorbance of total cuticle pigment and cuticle thickness of nymphs in C. chinensis under different temperature conditions.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Phylogenetic tree analysis of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β with its homologs in other insect species.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

HvBurs-α (Homalodisca vitripennis, XP_046670477.1), PsBurs-α (Phenacoccus solenopsis, QEY08365.1), DvBurs-α (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, XP_050533746.1), RmBurs-α (Rhopalosiphum maidis, XP_026815117.1), MsBurs-α (Melanaphis sacchari, XP_025201519.1), AgBurs-α (Aphis gossypii, XP_027848520.1). DvBurs-β (D. vitifoliae, XP_050533747.1), MpBurs-β (Myzus persicae, XP_022171709.1), MsBurs-β (M. sacchari, XP_025201526.1), RmBurs-β (R. maidis, XP_026815130.1), AgBurs-β (A. gossypii, XP_027848521.1), AcBurs-β (Adelges cooleyi, XP_050428069.1).
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Spatio-temporal expression patterns of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A–B) Melting curve for qRT-PCR primers of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β. (C-D) The relative mRNA expression of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β at different development ages of summer-form and winter-form by qRT-PCR (n=3). First, second, third, fourth, and fifth are the nymphs at the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth instar, separately. A-1d, A-3d, and A-7d are the adults on the first day, third day, and seventh day, respectively. (E-F) Tissue expression patterns of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β in both summer-form and winter-form by qRT-PCR (n=3). The data in S1C-S1F are shown as the mean ± SEM with three independent biological replications of at least 50 nymphs for each biological replication. Statistically significant differences were determined with the pair-wise Student’s t-test in SPSS 20.0 software, and significance levels were denoted by *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4. RNAi efficiency of CcTRPM after dsRNA treatment at 3, 6, and 10 days by qRT-PCR under 10 °C condition (n=3).

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

Open in a new tab

The temporal expression profile revealed that both CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were ubiquitous in all developmental stages, with lower expression in eggs and nymphs and higher expression in adults of both summer-form and winter-form (Figure 1—figure supplement 3C–D). Increased gene expression levels may potentially contribute to the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis. Spatially,,CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were detected in all investigated nymph tissues and were expressed most prominently in the head (Figure 1—figure supplement 3E–F). In addition to the midgut, both CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β also showed high expression in other selected tissues of the winter-form compared to the summer-form, especially in the head and cuticle, except the midgut. Results from temperature treatment exhibited that the mRNA expression of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β significantly increased after 10 °C treatment for 3, 6, and 10 days compared to 25 °C treatment (Figure 1E and F). Meanwhile,,qRT-PCR results indicated that the transcription levels of both CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were noticeably down-regulated after successful knockdown of the temperature receptor CcTRPM by RNAi at 3, 6, and 10 days (Figure 1G–H, Figure 1—figure supplement 4). These data suggest that CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β are regulated by a low temperature of 10 °C and CcTRPM, and may serve as down-stream signals involved in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis.

CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were essential for the transition from summer-form to winter-form

To investigate the role of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β in the transition from summer-form to winter-form of C. chinensis, newly hatched first instar nymphs of summer-form were fed with dsCcBurs-α, dsCcBurs-β, or dsEGFP. qRT-PCR results exhibited that feeding dsCcBurs-α or dsCcBurs-β extremely reduced the expression of the target gene under 10 °C conditions. The RNAi efficiencies of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were approximately 66–78% and 69–79% at 3, 6, and 10 days compared to dsEGFP feeding (Figure 2A and B).

Figure 2. Neuropeptide Bursicon was essential for the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

(A-B) RNAi efficiency of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β after dsRNA treatment at 3, 6, and 10 days by qRT-PCR under 10 °C condition (n=3). (C-I) Effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β on absorbance of total cuticle pigment, relative cuticle chitin content, cuticle thickness of the thorax, transition percent, and phenotypic changes of first instar nymphs compared to dsEGFP treatments (n=9). Data in 2 A and 2B are shown as the mean ± SE with three independent biological replications, with at least 50 nymphs for each replication. Data in 2 C, 2E, and 2 G are presented as mean ± SE with three biological replications, with three technical replications for each biological replication. Data in 2 H are presented as mean ± SE with nine biological replications. Statistically significant differences were determined using pair-wise Student’s t-test, and significance levels were denoted by ***p<0.001. Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05), as determined by ANOVA followed by a Turkey’s HSD multiple comparison test in SPSS 26.0 software.

After successful knockdown of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, or both, the UV absorbance of total pigment extraction at a wavelength of 300 nm in dsCcBurs-α-treated (0.18), dsCcBurs-β-treated (0.19), and dsCcBurs-α+β-treated (0.07) nymphs was dramatically lower than that in dsEGFP-treated nymphs (0.85) under 10 °C condition (Figure 2C). This finding indicates that CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β play a prominent role in cuticle pigment formation in the winter-form in C. chinensis. Moreover, both the results of cuticle chitin content determination and cuticle ultrastructure observation indicated that knockdown of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β,or both markedly reduced the cuticle chitin content (about 0.33, 0.32, 0.14) and cuticle thicknesses (about 1.44, 1.53, 0.73 μm) compared with dsEGFP-treated nymphs (1.00, 3.39 μm) under 10 °C condition, respectively (Figure 2D–G). Interestingly, the results of pigmentation absorbance and cuticle thickness after CcBurs-α or CcBurs-β knockdown were similar to those after CcTRPM knockdown (Supplementary file 1b). Additionally, dsCcBurs-α feeding (25.48%), dsCcBurs-β feeding (26.03%), or both feeding (11.84%) obviously decreased the transition percent from summer-form to winter-form compared to dsEGFP feeding (84.02%) (Figure 2H–I). Together, these data suggest that the two subunits of Bursicon, CcBurs-α, and CcBurs-β, are essential for the transition from summer-form to winter-form of C. chinensisby affecting cuticle contents and thickness.

CcBurs-R was identified as the Bursicon receptor in C. chinensis

To study the role of neuropeptide Bursicon in seasonal polyphenism, we identified a leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor and named it as Bursicon receptorCcBurs-R (GenBank: OR488626). The open reading frame of CcBurs-R is 3498 bp long and encodes an 1165 amino acid protein with a predicted molecular weight of 118.61 kDa, a theoretical pI of 8.64, and seven predicted transmembrane domains. Multiple alignment analysis showed a high degree of conservation in the transmembrane domains of CcBurs-R with Burs-R sequences from other four selected insect species (Figure 3A). Phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that CcBurs-R is most closely related to the DcBurs-R homologue (D. citri, KAI5703609.1) in an evolutionary relationship, and both are important Hemiptera pest of fruit trees (Figure 3B). The potential tertiary protein structure of CcBurs-R and its molecular docking with CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β were constructed using the online server Phyre2 and modified with PyMOL-v1.3r1 software (Figure 3C).

Figure 3. CcBurs-R was identified as the Bursicon receptor in C. chinensis.

(A) Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences of the CcBurs-R transmembrane domain with homologs from four other insect species. The transmembrane domain from TM1 to TM6 is indicated by blue horizontal lines. CcBurs-R (C. chinensis, OR488626), DcBurs-R (D. citri, KAI5703609.1), MpBurs-R (M. persicae, XP_022172830.1), AgBurs-R (Aphis gossypii, XP_027844917.2), RmBurs-R (Rhopalosiphum maidis, XP_026817427.1). The corresponding GenBank accession number is as follows. (B) Phylogenetic tree analysis of CcBurs-R with its homologs in six other insect species.BtBurs-R (Bemisia tabaci, XP_018898471.1), NlBurs-R (N. lugens, XP_022198758.2). (C) Predicted protein tertiary structure of CcBurs-R and its binding with CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β. (D-E) Effect of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β knockdown on the mRNA expression of CcBurs-R at 3, 6, and 10 d, respectively (n=3). (F) CcBurs-α+β heterodimer protein could rescue the CcBurs-R expression after knockdown of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β together. (G) Relative mRNA expression of CcBurs-R after 25 °C or 10 °C treatment at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days (n=3). (H) Effect of temperature receptor CcTRPM knockdown on the mRNA expression of CcBurs-R at 3, 6, and 10 days (n=3).Data in 3D-3H are shown as the mean ± SE with three independent biological replications, with at least 50 nymphs for each replication. Statistically significant differences were determined using pair-wise Student’s t-test in SPSS 26.0 software, and significance levels were denoted by ***p<0.001. Different letters above the bars indicated statistically significant differences (p<0.05), as determined by ANOVA followed by a Turkey’s HSD multiple comparison test in SPSS 26.0 software.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Spatio-temporal expression patterns of CcBurs-R in both summer-form and winter-form by qRT-PCR (n=3).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Concentration-response relationships for peptides tested on Ccburs-R.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

Open in a new tab

Development expression pattern indicated that CcBurs-R had relatively lower levels of expression in eggs and nymphs, but extremely higher levels in adult stages (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–B). The mRNA level of CcBurs-R was higher in each developmental stage of the winter-form than summer-form, suggesting its important role in the transition from summer-form to the winter-form. In terms of tissue-specific expression, CcBurs-R was found to be present in all determined tissues, with relatively higher expression in five tissues (head, cuticle, midgut, wings, and foot) of winter-form than summer-form (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). To confirm that CcBurs-R is the Bursicon receptor of C. chinensis, we employed a fluorescence-based assay to quantify calcium ion concentrations and investigate the binding affinities of bursicon heterodimers and homodimers to the Bursicon receptor across varying concentrations. Our findings suggest that activation of the receptor by the burs α-β heterodimer leads to significant alterations in intracellular calcium ion levels, whereas stimulation with burs α-α and burs β-β homodimers, in conjunction with Adipokinetic hormone (AKH), maintains consistent intracellular calcium ion levels.Consequently, this research definitively identifies CcBurs-R as the Bursicon receptor (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). In addition, we determined the effect of CcBurs-α or CcBurs-β knockdown on its mRNA expression. qRT-PCR results showed that RNAi-mediated knockdown of CcBurs-α or CcBurs-β significantly decreased CcBurs-R expression after dsRNA feeding at 3, 6, and 10 days compared to the dsEGFP group under 10 °C condition (Figure 3D–E). Moreover, the heterodimer protein of CcBurs-α+β fully rescued the effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown on CcBurs-R expression, while α+α or β+β homodimers did not (Figure 3F). Additional results demonstrated that 10 °C treatment markedly increased CcBurs-R expression compared to 25 °C treatment, and CcTRPM knockdown obviously decreased the mRNA level of CcBurs-R compared to the dsEGFP treatment (Figure 3G–H). Therefore, these findings indicate that CcBurs-R is the Bursicon receptor of C. chinensis and is regulated by a low temperature of 10 °C and CcTRPM.

CcBurs-R regulated the transition from summer-form to winter-form

The function of CcBurs-R in seasonal polyphenism was further investigated using RNAi technology. qRT-PCR results revealed that RNAi efficiency was 66–82% after dsCcBurs-R feeding for 3, 6, and 10 days compared to the dsEGFP treatments (Figure 4A). As shown in Figure 4B–F, the total pigment extraction at a wavelength of 300 nm (0.14 vs 0.85), cuticle chitin content (0.31 vs 1.00), and cuticle thicknesses (1.34 μm vs 3.39 μm) were all significantly decreased in dsCcBurs-R-treated nymphs compared to the dsEGFP control. Expectedly, the results of pigmentation absorbance and cuticle thickness after CcBurs-R knockdown were similar to those of CcTRPM, CcBurs-α, or CcBurs-β knockdown (Supplementary file 1b). In addition, RNAi-mediated down-regulation of CcBurs-R expression markedly affected the transition percent from summer-form to winter-form compared to dsEGFP feeding (26.70% vs 83.79%), while feeding the heterodimer protein of CcBurs-α+β (200 ng/μL) could fully rescue the effect of CcBurs-R knockdown on the transition percent (Figure 4G–H). Therefore, our results suggest that CcBurs-R mediates the transition from summer-form to winter-form by directly affecting cuticle contents and thickness.

Figure 4. CcBurs-R directly mediated the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis. (A) RNAi efficiency of CcBurs-R after dsRNA treatment at 3, 6, and 10 days by qRT-PCR under 10 °C condition (n=3). (B-H) Effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown of CcBurs-R on the absorbance of total cuticle pigment, relative cuticle chitin content, cuticle thickness of the thorax, transition percent, and phenotypic changes of first instar nymphs compared to dsEGFP treatments under 10 °C condition (n=9). (I-J) Relative mRNA expression of CcTre1 and CcCHS1 afterknockdown of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R at 10 d, separately (n=3). Data in 4 A, 4I, and 4 J are shown as the mean ± SE with three independent biological replications, with at least 50 nymphs for each replication. Data in 4B, 4 C, and 4E are presented as mean ± SE with three biological replications, with three technical replications for each biological replication. Data in 4 G are presented as mean ± SE with nine biological replications. Statistically significant differences were determined using pair-wise Student’s t-test, and significance levels were denoted by **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001. Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05), as determined by ANOVA followed by a Turkey’s HSD multiple comparison test in SPSS 26.0 software.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Since CcTre1 and CcCHS1, two rate-limiting enzyme genes in the chitin biosynthesis pathway, have been demonstrated to be involved down-stream in this transition of C. chinensis, we next investigated the relationship between Bursicon signal and these two genes. The results showed that the mRNA levels of CcTre1 and CcCHS1 were obviously decreased in dsCcBurs-α, dsCcBurs-β, or dsCcBurs-R feeding nymphs on the sixth day compared to the control (Figure 4I–J) This data indicates that CcBurs-R functions up-stream of the chitin biosynthesis pathway and is involved in the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis.

miR-6012 directly targeted CcBurs-R by inhibiting its expression

To determine if miRNAs are involved in the regulation of the Bursicon hormone in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis, we amplified the 3’UTR of CcBurs-R and predicted relevant miRNAs. Four miRNAs, including miR-6012, miR-375, miR-2796, and miR-1175, were predicted to have binding sites in the 3’UTR of CcBurs-R by two software programs, miRanda and Targetscan (Figure 5A). To confirm the target relationship, in vitro dual-luciferase reporter assays were performed. After introducing the 3’UTR full sequence of CcBurs-R into the pmirGLO vector, the relative luciferase activity was significantly reduced compared to the negative control in the presence of agomir-6012, while there was no change with the other three miRNAs (Figure 5B). Next, in vivo, RNA immunoprecipitation results showed that the expression levels of CcBurs-R and miR-6012 increased approximately 15-fold and 23-fold, respectively, in the Ago-1 antibody-mediated RNA complex of agomir-6012 fed nymphs compared to the IgG control (Figure 5C and Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–B). FISH results indicated that CcBurs-R and miR-6012 had opposite expression trends during the developmental stages and were co-expressed in the third instar nymphs (Figure 5D). Co-localization implies direct interaction between miR-6012 and CcBurs-R, while the opposite expression pattern suggests that miRNAs have inhibitory effects on target genes. qRT-PCR results also revealed that low temperature prompted the expression of CcBurs-R, while miR-6012 had an inhibitory effect (Figure 5E–F). These data suggest that miR-6012 directly targets CcBurs-R by inhibiting its expression.

Figure 5. miR-6012 directly targeted CcBurs-R to inhibit its expression.

(A) Predicted binding sites of four miRNAs in the 3’UTR of CcBurs-R. (B) In vitro confirmation of the target relationship between miR-6012 and CcBurs-R using dual luciferase reporter assays. (C) In vivo validation of miR-6012 directly targeting CcBurs-R using RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay. (D) Co-localization of miR-6012 and CcBurs-R in different development stages of C. chinensis using FISH. (E) Effect of different temperature treatments on the expression of miR-6012 by qRT-PCR. (F) Effect of miR-6012 agomir and antagomir treatments on the mRNA level of CcBurs-R at 6 days under 10 °C conditions. Data in 5B and 5 F are presented as the mean ± SE with nine biological replicates. Results of 5 C and 5E are indicated as the mean ± SE with six or three biological replicates. Statistically significant differences were determined using pair-wise Student’s t-test, and significance levels were denoted by **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001. Different letters above the bars represent statistically significant differences (p<0.05), as determined by ANOVA followed by a Turkey’s HSD multiple comparison test in SPSS 26.0 software.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Enrichment of miR-6012 by antibody against Ago1 in agomir-6012 treated group compared with agomir-NC group.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Open in a new tab

miR-6012 mediated the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis by targeting CcBurs-R

To decipher the function of miR-6012 in regulating seasonal polyphenism, we increased its abundance by feeding agomir-6012 to the first instar nymphs. qRT-PCR results indicated that the expression levels of miR-6012 were markedly higher at 3, 6, and 10 days after agomir-6012 feeding compared to the agomir-NC control (Figure 6A). Furthermore, the results showed that agomir-6012 treatments significantly affected pigmentation absorbance, cuticle chitin content,cuticle thicknesses, the transition percent from summer-form to winter-form, and morphological phenotype compared to the negative control of agomir-NC feeding (Figure 6B–H). Additionally, agomir-6012 feeding also inhibited the mRNA expression of CcTre1 and CcCHS1 (Figure 6I). Together, these results display that miR-6012 plays an important role in the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis.

Figure 6. miR-6012 targeted CcBurs-R to mediate the seasonal polyphenism in C. chinensis.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

(A) Expression of miR-6012 after agomir-6012 treatment at 3, 6, and 10 days by qRT-PCR under 10 °C condition (n=3). (B-H) Effect of agomir-6012 treatment on absorbance of total cuticle pigment, relative cuticle chitin content, cuticle thickness of the thorax, transition percent, and phenotypic changes of first instar nymphs compared to agomir-NC treatments under 10 °C condition (n=9). (I) Relative mRNA expression of CcTre1 and CcCHS1 after agomir-6012 treatment at 6 days, separately (n=3). Data in 6 A and 6I are shown as the mean ± SE with three independent biological replications, with at least 50 nymphs for each replication. Data in 6 C and 6E are presented as mean ± SE with three biological replications of three technical replications for each biological replication. Data in 6B and 6 G are presented as mean ± SE with nine biological replications. Statistically significant differences were determined using pair-wise Student’s t-test, and significance levels were denoted by **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

Discussion

Polyphenism is a conserved adaptive mechanism in species ranging from insects to mammalian, and evidence is mounting that it also extends to many nematode and fish species (Stockton et al., 2018; Yang and Andrew Pospisilik, 2019). Seasonal polyphenism can provide overwintering species with better adaptability to extreme climates through beneficial shifts in morphology, physiology, or behavior (Simpson et al., 2011). Physiological studies have shown that the neuroendocrine hormone system communicates environmental signals to facilitate downstream morphology and physiology transformation (Zera and Denno, 1997; Overgaard and MacMillan, 2017). Having a good model is extremely important for answering specific scientific questions (Bhardwaj et al., 2020). In C. chinensis, cuticle pigment absorbance and cuticle thickness, both have an increasing trend over time under 10 °C conditions, and showed very high correlation with the nymph phenotype of cuticle tanning during the transition from summer-form to winter-form (Zhang et al., 2023; Figure 1—figure supplement 1). To clarify the role of neuropeptide Bursicon in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis, we identified two Bursicon subunits, CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β, in this study. The SDS-PAGE results of non-reduced and reduced gels showed that CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β can form both homodimers (α+α or β+β) and a heterodimer (α+β) (Figure 1D). During the transition of the C. chinensis between two forms, this study focused on the overall phenotypic changes. Therefore, for qPCR experiments, whole C. chinensis samples were selected for analysis. Temporal expression patterns showed that CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β have very similar gradually increasing expression trends and higher expression in winter-form than summer-form (Figure 1—figure supplement 3C–D), indicating that Bursicon may play a significant role in winter-form. This result is consistent with the report on gypsy moths, where transcript levels of Ldbursicon in adult stages were higher than in larvae (Zhang et al., 2022b). The transcript levels of both subunits were higher in the head and cuticle of winter-form compared to summer-form, implying a potential role of Bursicon in seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis (Figure 1—figure supplement 3E–F; Luan et al., 2006).

As the transition of C. chinensis from summer-form to winter-form is regulated by a low temperature of 10 °C and CcTRPM, we next determined the effect of 10 °C treatment and CcTRPM RNAi on the expression of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β. As expected, 10 °C treatment significantly increased the expression of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β, while CcTRPM RNAi markedly decreased their mRNA levels (Figure 1E–H). This is the first report on the relationship between the neuropeptide Bursicon and low temperature. Further results from RNAi-mediated knockdown of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, or both showed that Bursicon prominently regulates the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis by affecting cuticle pigment content, cuticle chitin content, and cuticle thickness (Figure 2C–I). Moreover, the presence of both thin and thick chitin layers observed in the dsEGFP treatment of Figure 2D could potentially be ascribed to the chitin content in the insect midgut or fat body as previously discussed (Zhu et al., 2016). It is notable that during the process of cuticle staining, the chitin located in the midgut and fat body of C. chinensis may exhibit green fluorescence, leading to the appearance of a thin chitin layer.In many insects, such as Drosophila and T. castaneum, Bursicon is believed to be the main hormone responsible for cuticle tanning (Luo et al., 2005; Bai and Palli, 2010). However, the knockdown of Bursicon subunits did not cause visible defects in cuticle sclerotisation or pigmentation of Bombyx mori and Lymantria dispar adults (Huang et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2022b). The insect cuticle typically comprises three distinct layers (endocuticle, exocuticle, and epicuticle), with the thickness of each layer varying among different insect species. Cuticle differentiation is closely linked to the molting cycle of insects (Mrak et al., 2017). In our study, nymphal cuticles exhibited normal differentiation patterns, characterized by a thin epicuticle and comparable widths of the endocuticle and exocuticle following dsEGFP treatment, as illustrated in Figures 2F and 4F. Conversely, nymphs treated with dsCcBurs-α, dsCcBurs-β, and dsCcburs-R displayed impaired development, manifesting only the exocuticle without a discernible endocuticle layer. These findings suggest that bursicon genes and their receptor play a pivotal role in regulating insect cuticle development (Costa et al., 2016). These researches indicate that Bursicon may not be necessary for cuticle tanning in all insects. Although the reactions involved in cuticle tanning are well-known, further studies are needed to understand how Bursicon mediates the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis.

To further elucidate the role of the Bursicon signal in seasonal polyphenism, we identified the Bursicon receptor of CcBurs-R in C. chinensis. Temporal and spatial expression patterns of CcBurs-R were very similar to those of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β, and it also had higher expression in winter-form than summer-form (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). By comparing its expression profiles with those in other insects, we can conclude that the spatio-temporal expression of the Bursicon receptor is related to the specificity of insect species. The activation of CcBurs-R by the burs α-β heterodimer exhibited a robust dose-dependent pattern. Conversely, no activation was observed when CcBurs-R was transfected with an empty vector or exposed to burs α-α and burs β-β homodimers or AKH (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). In D. melanogaster, Bursicon comprises two cystine knot polypeptides, pburs and burs, which are known to stimulate a G protein-coupled receptor, DLGR2 (Luo et al., 2005). Through a radioligand receptor assay, specific and high-affinity interactions between C. chinensis burs α-β heterodimer and CcBurs-R were successfully confirmed. A recent study indicated that silencing of Burs-α,Burs-β,or its receptor significantly affected the reproduction of T. castaneum (Bai and Palli, 2010). Knockdown of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, or both obviously decreased the expression of CcBurs-R, while feeding the heterodimer protein of α+β fully rescued CcBurs-R expression after knockdown of CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β together, which further confirmed the relationship between subunits and the receptor (Figure 3D–F). 10 °C treatment clearly improved the expression of CcBurs-R, but CcTRPM RNAi sharply reduced its mRNA level (Figure 3G–H). Notably, the elimination of CcBurs-R in C. chinensis obviously affected cuticle pigment content, cuticle chitin content, and cuticle thickness, leading to the failure of the transition from summer-form to winter-form (Figure 4B–H). Feeding the α+β heterodimer protein fully rescued the defect in the transition percent and morphological phenotype after CcBurs-R knockdown (Figure 4G–H). Following the administration of dsCcBur-R to C. chinensis, the expression of CcBurs-R exhibited a reduction of approximately 66–82% as depicted in Figure 4A, rather than complete suppression. Activation of endogenous CcBurs-R through feeding of the α+β heterodimer protein results in an increase in CcBurs-R expression, with the effectiveness of the rescue effect contingent upon the dosage of the α+β heterodimer protein. Consequently, the capacity of the α+β heterodimer protein to effectively mitigate the impacts of CcBurs-R knockdown on the conversion rate is clearly demonstrated. Therefore, these findings strongly support our hypothesis that Bursicon and its receptor are essential for the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis. Actually, seasonal polyphenism is a complex process that may be regulated by multiple cascade reactions. Further studies are needed to clarify the regulatory mechanism of Bursicon and its receptor in mediating the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis.

In animals, miRNAs are essential for tissue development and behavioral evolution (Lucas and Raikhel, 2013). Previous studies have reported that many miRNAs function upstream of the neurohormone signaling pathway in insect polyphenism (Suderman et al., 2006). For example, miR-133 controls behavioral aggregation by targeting the dopamine synthesis gene in Locusts (Yang et al., 2014), and miR-9b targets insulin receptors to mediate dimorphism and wing development in aphids (Shang et al., 2020). In this study, we identified miR-6012 as a regulator of CcBurs-R in the Bursicon hormone signaling pathway for the first time. We found that miR-6012 was inhibited by a low temperature of 10 °C and targeted CcBurs-R by binding to its 3’UTR. When nymphs were treated with agomir-6012, they exhibited lower cuticle pigment content, reduced cuticle chitin content, and thinner cuticle thickness compared to the agomir-NC control under 10 °C condition. In addition, agomir-6012 treatment markedly decreased the transition percent from summer-form to winter-form and affected the morphological phenotype compared to the control. The significant decreased in CcTre1 and CcCHS1 expression after agomir-6012 treatment suggested that miR-6012 also functions as the upstream regulator of chitin biosynthesis signaling.

In conclusion, our study uncovered a novel role of Bursicon and its receptor in regulating the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis, in addition to their known functions in cuticle-hardening of nymphs and wing expansion of adults. In Figure 7, we proposed a molecular working model to describe this novel mechanism. Under 10 °C conditions, the Bursicon signaling pathway is first activated in the head of C. chinensis by low temperature and CcTRPM. Then, CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β form a heterodimeric neuropeptide that acts on its receptor CcBurs-R to mediate the transition from summer-form to winter-form by affecting cuticle pigment content, cuticle chitin content, and cuticle thickness. Moreover, miR-6012 targets CcBurs-R to modulate the function of the Bursicon signaling pathway in this seasonal polyphenism. As a result, the first instar nymphs of summer-form develop into third instar nymphs of winter-form to better adapt to low-temperature adversity. Future research will focus on: (1) studying the combined effect of Bursicon with other neuro-hormones on the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis, (2) identifying the down-stream signaling of Bursicon in mediating this phenomenon through multi-omics and RNAi approaches.

Figure 7. Schematic model of the novel functions of Bursicon signaling in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis in response to low temperature.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

Under 10 °C conditions, low temperature significantly upregulated the expression of the Bursicon signaling pathway. CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β then formed a heterodimeric neuropeptide to activate their receptor CcBurs-R, which mediated the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis by acting on the chitin biosynthesis pathway. Furthermore, low temperature inhibited the expression of miR-6012, relieving its inhibitory effects on CcBurs-R. miR-6012 directly targeted CcBurs-R, contributing to the novel function of Bursicon signaling in seasonal polyphenism. Finally, the first instar nymphs of summer-form developed into third instar nymphs of winter-form in C. chinensis.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing

C. chinensis populations of summer-form and winter-form were collected in June and December 2018, respectively, from pear orchards in Daxing, Beijing, China. The nymphs and adults of summer-form were reared on host plants in a greenhouse under conditions of 25 ± 1°C, a photoperiod of 12 L:12D, and a relative humidity of 65 ± 5% (Zhang et al., 2023). Meanwhile, the nymphs and adults of winter-form were reared at 10 ± 1°C with a photoperiod of 12 L:12D and a relative humidity of 25 ± 5% in an artificial incubator. Unless otherwise specified, the photoperiod of all subsequent treatments was 12 L: 12D. Korla fragrant pear seedlings, 2–3 years old with a height of 50–80 cm, were used as host plants and received conventional water and fertilizer management.

Gene identification and sequence analysis

From the transcriptome database of C. chinensis, we obtained the predicted sequences of Bursicon subunits and its receptor. After sequencing validation, we named them CcBurs-α (GenBank accession number: OR488624), CcBurs-β (GenBank accession number: OR488625), and CcBurs-R (GenBank accession number: OR488626). The physicochemical properties of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R were analyzed using the online bioinformatics ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). The putative transmembrane domains of CcBurs-R were identified using the online software SMART (Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool). The tertiary protein structures of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R were predicted using the online server Phyre2 (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index) and modified with PyMOL-v1.3r1 software. Homologous protein sequences from different insect species were searched using BLASTP in the NCBI database. Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences for CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R with other homologs were performed using DNAman software. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method in MEGA10.1.8 software.

Bursicon protein expression and determination

To express the Bursicon proteins in HEK293T cells, we first inserted the ORF sequences of CcBurs-α or CcBurs-β into the modified vector pcDNA3.1-his-P2A-mCherry to construct the recombinant vectors of pcDNA3.1-CcBurs-α-his-P2A-mCherry and pcDNA3.1-CcBurs-β-his-P2A-mCherry using the pEASY-Basic Seamless Cloning and Assembly Kit (Cat# CU201, TransGen, Beijing, China) (Supplementary file 1a). After confirming the sequences through sequencing and obtaining endotoxin-free plasmids, the recombinant vectors of CcBurs-α or CcBurs-β were transfected into HEK293T cells either individually or simultaneously following the protocol of TransIntro EI Transfection Reagent (Cat# FT201, TransGen, Beijing, China). Control cells were transfected with the blank vector pcDNA3.1-his-P2A-mCherry (without CcBurs-α or CcBurs-β cDNA insert). After 6–10 hr of transfection, the serum-free DMEM cell culture medium was replaced with fresh medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. After another 24 hr of incubation, the medium was replaced again with serum-free DMEM. The medium was collected and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min to remove cell debris after 48 h (An et al., 2012a). The expressed Bursicon proteins were purified using Ni-NTA His·bind resin (Cat# 70666, Merck, Germany). Then, western blotting was conducted to separate and identify these proteins using 15% SDS-PAGE (for reduced gel) and 12% SDS-PAGE (for non-reduced gel) with ProteinFind Anti-His Mouse Monoclonal Antibody (Cat# HT501, TransGen, Beijing, China). Lastly, the protein bands were imaged using enhanced chemiluminescence with the Azure C600 multifunctional molecular imaging system (USA).

Heterologous expression and calcium mobilization assay

To construct the recombinant expression vector, the open reading frame sequence of Ccburs-R was integrated into a pcDNA3.1(+)-mCherry vector using the Vazyme ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Cat#C112, China) (homologous arm primers listed in Supplementary file 1a). The recombinant vector was prepared with the EndoFree Mid Plasmid Kit (catalog no. DP108, Tiangen, Beijing, China) and transfected into cultured cells in 96-well black plates or confocal dishes. The transiently transfected cells were cultured for 1–2 days in a 37 °C incubator, then stained with the Beyotime green fluorescent probe Fluo-4 AM (Cat# S1061, China) for approximately 30 min. Subsequently, Ca2+ imaging and calcium concentration were assessed using Leica SP8 confocal microscopy (Wetzlar, Germany) and MD i3x microplate reader (San Jose, USA) following treatment with various dilutions of Bursicon protein.

qRT-PCR for mRNA and miRNA

Samples for the temporal expression profile were collected at different developmental stages of summer form and winter form, including egg; nymphs of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth instar; and adults of the first, third, and seventh day. For the tissue expression pattern, six types of tissue (head, cuticle, midgut, fat body, wings, and foot) were dissected from both summer-form and winter-form of fifth instar nymphs. To examine the effect of different temperature treatments on the expression of mRNAs and miRNAs, the newly hatched first instar nymphs of summer form were treated at 25°C and 10°C, respectively. Whole C. chinensis samples were collected at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days after different temperature treatments. For the effect of CcTRPM knockdown on the transcription level of CcBurs-α,CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R under 10 °C conditions, the newly hatched 1st instar nymphs of summer-form were fed with CcTRPM dsRNA, and the whole C. chinensis samples were collected on the third, sixth, and tenth day after dsRNA feeding. Each sample was performed in three replications, with approximately 100 individuals for each replication of egg samples and at least 50 insects were included for each nymph or adult sample. All samples were immediately stored at –80 °C for total RNA extraction.

Total RNAs were isolated from the above C. chinensis samples using TRNzol Universal (Cat# DP424, TIANGEN, Beijing, China) and miRcute miRNA isolation kit (Cat# DP501, TIANGEN, Beijing, China) for mRNA and miRNA, respectively, based on the manufacturer’s protocol. The first-strand cDNA of mRNA or mature miRNA was synthesized from 500 ng or 1 μg of total RNAs using PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Cat# RR047A, Takara, Kyoto, Japan) or miRcute Plus miRNA First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Cat# KR211, TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the instruction manual. The relative gene expression was quantified using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (Cat# RR820A, Takara, Kyoto, Japan) or miRcute Plus miRNA qPCR Detection Kit (Cat# FP411, TIANGEN, Beijing, China) in a total 20 μL reaction mixture on a CFX96 Connect Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The conditions were as follows: denaturation for 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, and then 60 °C for 30 s. Ccβ-actin (GenBank accession number: OQ658571) or U6 snRNA was used as the internal reference gene for qRT-PCR in C. chinensis (Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2023).To check for specificity, melting curves were analyzed for each data point (Figure 1—figure supplement 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). The 2-ΔΔCT method (CT means the cycle threshold) was used to quantify gene expression of qRT-PCR data, where ΔΔCT is equal to ΔCTtreated sample -ΔCTcontrol (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

dsRNA synthesis and RNAi experiments

The synthesis of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and the stem-leaf device for dsRNA feeding was conducted as previously described (Zhang et al., 2023). Briefly, MEGAscript RNAi kit (AM1626, Ambion, California, USA) was used to synthesize dsRNA in vitro using primers ligated with T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequences at both ends (Supplementary file 1a). The dsRNAs were further purified with the phenol/chloroform method, air dried, dissolved in diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated nuclease-free water, and stored at –80 °C for later use. The purity and concentration of dsRNA were measured using ultraviolet spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis.

For RNAi experiments, newly hatched first instar nymphs of summer-form were fed with dsRNAs (500 ng/μL) targeting different genes and then divided into three groups. (1) Whole C. chinensis samples were collected at 3, 6, and 10 d after dsRNAs feeding under 10 °C conditions for the RNAi efficiency analysis and gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR. (2) Whole C. chinensis nymph samples were collected at 12–15 days after dsRNA feeding for total cuticle pigment analysis, comparison of cuticle ultrastructure, cuticle chitin staining with WGA-FITC, and determination of cuticle chitin content under 10 °C condition using the following methods. (3) Morphological characteristics were observed every two days, and the number of summer-form and winter-form individuals was counted until the third instar under 10 °C condition, following the previous description (Zhang et al., 2023). For the rescue experiments, the dsRNA of CcBurs-R and proteins of burs α-α, burs β-β homodimers, or burs α-β heterodimer (200 ng/μL) were fed together.

miRNA prediction and target validation with CcBurs-R

To study the post-translation function of CcBurs-R, the 3’UTR sequence of CcBurs-R was amplified using the specific primers (Supplementary file 1a) and the 3’-Full RACE Core Set with PrimeScript RTase kit (Cat# 6106, Takara, Kyoto, Japan). Two software programs, miRanda and Targetscan, were employed to predict miRNAs targeting CcBurs-R, following previously described methods (Zhang et al., 2023). The following methods were used to validate the target relationship between miRNAs and CcBurs-R.

In vitro luciferase reporter gene assays

The full sequence of the 3’UTR or 3’UTR sequence with binding sites removed from CcBurs-R was amplified and inserted downstream of the luciferase gene in the pmirGLO vector (Promega, Wisconsin, USA) to construct recombinant plasmids. Agomir-6012 and antagomir-6012, chemically synthesized and modified RNA oligos with the same sequence or anti-sense oligonucleotides of miR-6012, were obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Agomir-NC and antagomir-NC, provided by the manufacturer, were used as negative controls. Approximate 500 ng of the recombinant plasmid and 275 nM of agomir were co-transfected into HEK293T cells using the Calcium Phosphate Cell Transfection Kit (Cat# C0508, Beyotime, Nanjing, China). After 24 hr of co-transfection, the activity of the luciferase enzymes was determined following the protocol of the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Cat# E1910, Promega, Wisconsin, USA).

In vivo RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation assay (RIP)

The RIP assay was performed using theMagna RIP Kit (Cat# 17–704, Merck, Millipore, Germany) (Zhang et al., 2023). Fifty nymphs were collected after feeding with agomir-6012 or agomir-NC for 24 hr, and crushed with an auto homogenizer in ice-cold RIP lysis buffer. Magnetic beads were incubated with 5 μg of Ago-1 antibody (Merck, Millipore, Germany) or IgG antibody (Merck, Millipore, Germany) to form a magnetic bead-antibody complex. The target mRNAs were pulled down by the magnetic bead-antibody complex from the supernatants in the RIP lysates. The immunoprecipitated RNAs were released by digestion with protease K and quantification of CcBurs-R and miR-6012. Each experiment had six replicates.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

The antisense nucleic acid probes for CcBurs-R (5’-GCGCUUGUGCUGCUUCUGCU-3’) were labeled with FAM, and miR-6012 (5’-UGACCGACUAGAGUAGCGGCUU-3’) was labeled with FITC (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). In short, nymph samples at different stages were immersed in Carnoy’s fixative for 24–48 hr at room temperature. After washing and decolorization, the samples were pre-hybridized three times using the hybridization buffer without the probes kept in the dark. For co-localization, two fluorescent probes (1 μM) were combined to hybridize the samples for about 12 hr in the dark. DAPI (1 μg/mL) was used to stain cell nuclei. The signals were observed and the images were recorded using a Leica SP8 confocal microscopy (Weztlar, Germany). To exclude false positives, RNAi-treated samples or no-probe samples were used as negative controls.

Treatments of agomir-6012 and antagomir-6012

To study the temperature-dependent response threshold of miR-6012, the expression profiles of miR-6012 at various time points (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) subsequent to exposing C. chinensis to temperatures of 10°C and 25°C were measured. To examine the effect of miR-6012 on the mRNA expression of CcBurs-R,CcTre1, and CcCHS1, summer-form first instar nymphs were fed with agomir-6012 (1 μM) or antagomir-6012 (1 μM). Whole C. chinensis samples were first collected at 3, 6, and 10 days after feeding for agomir efficiency determination. Then, samples were collected at 6 days after treatment for total RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis. Agomir-NC and antagomir-NC were fed as a negative control.

To explore the function of miR-6012 in seasonal polyphenism, summer-form first instar nymphs were fed with agomir-6012 (1 μM) or agomir-NC (1 μM). Subsequently, cuticle ultrastructure comparison, cuticle chitin staining with WGA-FITC, determination of cuticle chitin content, and observation of morphological characteristics were performed as described in the following methods.

Analysis of total cuticle pigment and cuticle chitin contents

To compare the difference in cuticle contents between summer-form and winter-form nymphs, the total cuticle pigment and cuticle chitin contents were determined. For the measurement of total cuticle pigment, the cuticle of dsRNA-treated nymphs was dissected and treated with acidified methanol (with 1% concentrated hydrochloric acid). The cuticle tissues were then ground and placed in a thermostatic oscillator at 200 rpm for 24 hr under 25 °C conditions. The total pigment extraction was obtained after filtering and centrifuging the supernatants through a 0.45 μm filter membrane. Pigments were not modified during extraction and the UV absorbance of the total pigment extraction at different wavelengths was determined using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) as previously described (Futahashi et al., 2012; Osanai-Futahashi et al., 2012).

For the analysis of cuticle chitin content, WGA-FITC staining was conducted as previously described (Xie et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023). Briefly, nymph samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and subjected to a gradient concentration dehydration with sucrose solution (10%, 20%, 30%). The dehydrated samples were then embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Cat# 4583, SAKURA, Ningbo, China) after the pre-embedding stages at –25 °C. Ultra-thin sections (approximately 70 nm thickness) of the embedded material were cut using a Leica freezing ultra-cut microtome (CM1850, Leica, Weztlar, Germany). The sections were stained with WGA-FITC (50 μg/mL) and DAPI (10 μg/mL) for 15 min, followed by rinsing three times with sterile PBS buffer. Fluorescence images were acquired using a Leica SP8 confocal microscopy (Weztlar, Germany). To further quantify the cuticle chitin content, a chitin Elisa kit (Cat# YS80663B, Yaji Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used according to the previously described method (Zhang et al., 2023).

In order to determine the cuticle tanning threshold in C. chinensis, we examined the nymph phenotypes, cuticle pigment absorbance, and cuticle thickness levels in multiple time points (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under two distinct temperatures of 10°C and 25°C. Each experimental condition encompassed nine independent biological replicates, with a minimum of 30 whole nymphs analyzed in each replicate for comprehensive assessment.

Transmission electron microscopy assay

The TEM assay was performed as previously described (Ge et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2022a; Zhang et al., 2023). In short, nymph samples without heads were fixed in 4% polyformaldehyde (PFA) for 48 hr, followed by post-fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1.5 hr. The samples were then dehydrated in a standard ethanol/acetone series, infiltrated, and embedded in a spurr medium. Subsequently, super thin sections (–70 nm) of the thorax were cut and stained with 5% uranyl acetate followed by Reynolds’ lead citrate solution. The same dorsal region of the thorax was specifically chosen for subsequent fluorescence imaging or transmission electron microscopy assessments aimed at quantifying cuticle thickness. Lastly, the sections were observed, photographed, and measured using an HT7800 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 120 kv. Regarding the measurement of cuticle thickness, use the built-in measuring ruler on the software to select the top and bottom of the same horizontal line on the cuticle. Measure the cuticle of each nymph at two close locations. Six nymphs were used for each sample. Randomly select 9 values and plot them.

Statistical analysis

Figures preparation and statistical analysis were performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0 software and IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0, respectively. All data were shown as means ± SE (Standard Error of Mean) with different independent biological replications. Student’s t-test was performed for pairwise comparisons to determine statistically significant differences between treatments and controls (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison test was used for multiple comparisons in SPSS Statistics 26.0 (different letters denoted by p<0.05).

Acknowledgements

Thanks for the insect rearing by graduated students of Dongyue Zhang and Shili Meng from China Agricultural University. We appreciated transmission electron microscopy sample preparation from the microscopy laboratories of China Agricultural University. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202291) and China Agriculture Research System (CARS-28).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Songdou Zhang, Email: sdzhang2013@cau.edu.cn.

John Ewer, Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile.

K VijayRaghavan, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 32202291 to Songdou Zhang.

  • China Agricultural Research System CARS-28 to Xiaoxia Liu.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Resources, Software, Formal analysis.

Resources, Software, Formal analysis.

Data curation, Methodology.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. The primers used in current study and comparison of pigmentation and cuticle thickness after genes knockdown.

(a) List of primers used in this study. (b) Comparison of pigmentation and cuticle thickness after CcTRPM, CcBurs-a, CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R knockdown.

elife-97298-supp1.docx (25.9KB, docx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

The published article includes all data generated or analyzed during this study. The full sequences of CcBurs-α, CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R were submitted to GenBank database of NCBI (Accession number: OR488624, OR488625, and OR488626).

The following datasets were generated:

Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon alpha gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488624

Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon beta gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488625.1

Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon receptor gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488626.1

References

  1. An S, Dong S, Wang Q, Li S, Gilbert LI, Stanley D, Song Q. Insect neuropeptide bursicon homodimers induce innate immune and stress genes during molting by activating the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. PLOS ONE. 2012a;7:e34510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. An C, Fei X, Chen W, Zhao Z. The integrative effects of population density, photoperiod, temperature, and host plant on the induction of alate aphids in Schizaphis graminum. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2012b;79:198–206. doi: 10.1002/arch.21005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai H, Palli SR. Functional characterization of bursicon receptor and genome-wide analysis for identification of genes affected by bursicon receptor RNAi. Developmental Biology. 2010;344:248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baudach A, Vilcinskas A. The European map butterfly Araschnia levana as a model to study the molecular basis and evolutionary ecology of seasonal polyphenism. Insects. 2021;12:325. doi: 10.3390/insects12040325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhardwaj S, Jolander LSH, Wenk MR, Oliver JC, Nijhout HF, Monteiro A. Origin of the mechanism of phenotypic plasticity in satyrid butterfly eyespots. eLife. 2020;9:e49544. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonasio R, Li Q, Lian J, Mutti NS, Jin L, Zhao H, Zhang P, Wen P, Xiang H, Ding Y, Jin Z, Shen SS, Wang Z, Wang W, Wang J, Berger SL, Liebig J, Zhang G, Reinberg D. Genome-wide and caste-specific DNA methylomes of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator. Current Biology. 2012;22:1755–1764. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Butt BA, Stuart C. Oviposition by summer and winter forms of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) on dormant pear budwood. Environmental Entomology. 1986;15:1109–1110. doi: 10.1093/ee/15.5.1109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Costa CP, Elias-Neto M, Falcon T, Dallacqua RP, Martins JR, Bitondi MMG. RNAi-mediated functional analysis of bursicon genes related to adult cuticle formation and tanning in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0167421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Daniels EV, Murad R, Mortazavi A, Reed RD. Extensive transcriptional response associated with seasonal plasticity of butterfly wing patterns. Molecular Ecology. 2014;23:6123–6134. doi: 10.1111/mec.12988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dewey EM, McNabb SL, Ewer J, Kuo GR, Takanishi CL, Truman JW, Honegger HW. Identification of the gene encoding bursicon, an insect neuropeptide responsible for cuticle sclerotization and wing spreading. Current Biology. 2004;14:1208–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Futahashi R, Kurita R, Mano H, Fukatsu T. Redox alters yellow dragonflies into red. PNAS. 2012;109:12626–12631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207114109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ge Y, Zhang L, Qin Z, Wang Y, Liu P, Tan S, Fu Z, Smith OM, Shi W. Different predation capacities and mechanisms of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on two morphotypes of pear psylla Cacopsylla chinensis (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0215834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gratani L. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Advances in Botany. 2014;2014:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2014/208747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hildebrand M, Dickler E, Geider K. Occurrence of Erwinia amylovora on insects in a fire blight orchard. Journal of Phytopathology. 2000;148:251–256. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0434.2000.00504.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang J, Zhang Y, Li M, Wang S, Liu W, Couble P, Zhao G, Huang Y. RNA interference-mediated silencing of the bursicon gene induces defects in wing expansion of silkworm. FEBS Letters. 2007;581:697–701. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Janzen FJ, Phillips PC. Exploring the evolution of environmental sex determination, especially in reptiles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2006;19:1775–1784. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kucharski R, Maleszka J, Foret S, Maleszka R. Nutritional control of reproductive status in honeybees via DNA methylation. Science. 2008;319:1827–1830. doi: 10.1126/science.1153069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu H, Todd EV, Lokman PM, Lamm MS, Godwin JR, Gemmell NJ. Sexual plasticity: A fishy tale. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2017;84:171–194. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu XY, Zou ZW, Zhang C, Liu X, Wang J, Xin TR, Xia B. Knockdown of the Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene using RNA interference inhibits synthesis of trehalose and increases lethality rate in Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) Insects. 2020;11:605. doi: 10.3390/insects11090605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Luan H, Lemon WC, Peabody NC, Pohl JB, Zelensky PK, Wang D, Nitabach MN, Holmes TC, White BH. Functional dissection of a neuronal network required for cuticle tanning and wing expansion in Drosophila. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:573–584. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3916-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lucas K, Raikhel AS. Insect microRNAs: biogenesis, expression profiling and biological functions. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2013;43:24–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Luo CW, Dewey EM, Sudo S, Ewer J, Hsu SY, Honegger HW, Hsueh AJW. Bursicon, the insect cuticle-hardening hormone, is a heterodimeric cystine knot protein that activates G protein-coupled receptor LGR2. PNAS. 2005;102:2820–2825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409916102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma Z, Guo W, Guo X, Wang X, Kang L. Modulation of behavioral phase changes of the migratory locust by the catecholamine metabolic pathway. PNAS. 2011;108:3882–3887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015098108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mrak P, Bogataj U, Štrus J, Žnidaršič N. Cuticle morphogenesis in crustacean embryonic and postembryonic stages. Arthropod Structure & Development. 2017;46:77–95. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Noor MAF, Parnell RS, Grant BS. A reversible color polyphenism in American peppered moth (Biston betularia cognataria) caterpillars. PLOS ONE. 2008;3:e3142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Osanai-Futahashi M, Tatematsu KI, Yamamoto K, Narukawa J, Uchino K, Kayukawa T, Shinoda T, Banno Y, Tamura T, Sezutsu H. Identification of the Bombyx red egg gene reveals involvement of a novel transporter family gene in late steps of the insect ommochrome biosynthesis pathway. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:17706–17714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.321331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Overgaard J, MacMillan HA. The integrative physiology of insect chill tolerance. Annual Review of Physiology. 2017;79:187–208. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shang F, Niu J, Ding BY, Zhang W, Wei DD, Wei D, Jiang HB, Wang JJ. The miR-9b microRNA mediates dimorphism and development of wing in aphids. PNAS. 2020;117:8404–8409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919204117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shearer PW, West JD, Walton VM, Brown PH, Svetec N, Chiu JC. Seasonal cues induce phenotypic plasticity of Drosophila suzukii to enhance winter survival. BMC Ecology. 2016;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0070-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Simpson SJ, Sword GA, Lo N. Polyphenism in insects. Current Biology. 2011;21:R738–R749. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stockton DG, Wallingford AK, Loeb GM. Phenotypic plasticity promotes overwintering survival in a globally invasive crop pest, Drosophila suzukii. Insects. 2018;9:105. doi: 10.3390/insects9030105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Suderman RJ, Dittmer NT, Kanost MR, Kramer KJ. Model reactions for insect cuticle sclerotization: cross-linking of recombinant cuticular proteins upon their laccase-catalyzed oxidative conjugation with catechols. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2006;36:353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tougeron K, Iltis C, Renoz F, Albittar L, Hance T, Demeter S, Le Goff GJ. Ecology and biology of the parasitoid Trechnites insidiosus and its potential for biological control of pear psyllids. Pest Management Science. 2021;77:4836–4847. doi: 10.1002/ps.6517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Uehara H, Senoh Y, Yoneda K, Kato Y, Shiomi K. An FXPRLamide neuropeptide induces seasonal reproductive polyphenism underlying a life-history tradeoff in the tussock moth. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e24213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vellichirammal NN, Gupta P, Hall TA, Brisson JA. Ecdysone signaling underlies the pea aphid transgenerational wing polyphenism. PNAS. 2017;114:1419–1423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617640114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wei M, Chi H, Guo Y, Li X, Zhao L, Ma R. Demography of Cacopsylla chinensis (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) reared on four cultivars of Pyrus bretschneideri (Rosales: Rosaceae) and P. communis pears with estimations of confidence intervals of specific life table statistics. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2020;113:2343–2353. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xie J, Peng G, Wang M, Zhong Q, Song X, Bi J, Tang J, Feng F, Gao H, Li B. RR-1 cuticular protein TcCPR69 is required for growth and metamorphosis in Tribolium castaneum. Insect Science. 2022;29:1612–1628. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xu HJ, Xue J, Lu B, Zhang XC, Zhuo JC, He SF, Ma XF, Jiang YQ, Fan HW, Xu JY, Ye YX, Pan PL, Li Q, Bao YY, Nijhout HF, Zhang CX. Two insulin receptors determine alternative wing morphs in planthoppers. Nature. 2015;519:464–467. doi: 10.1038/nature14286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang M, Wei Y, Jiang F, Wang Y, Guo X, He J, Kang L. MicroRNA-133 inhibits behavioral aggregation by controlling dopamine synthesis in locusts. PLOS Genetics. 2014;10:e1004206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang CH, Andrew Pospisilik J. Polyphenism - A window into gene-environment interactions and phenotypic plasticity. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10:132. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zera AJ, Denno RF. Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Annual Review of Entomology. 1997;42:207–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang CX, Brisson JA, Xu HJ. Molecular mechanisms of wing polymorphism in insects. Annual Review of Entomology. 2019;64:297–314. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-112448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang B, Zhao L, Ning J, Wickham JD, Tian H, Zhang X, Yang M, Wang X, Sun J. miR-31-5p regulates cold acclimation of the wood-boring beetle Monochamus alternatus via ascaroside signaling. BMC Biology. 2020;18:184. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00926-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang JL, Chen SJ, Liu XY, Moczek AP, Xu HJ. The transcription factor Zfh1 acts as a wing-morph switch in planthoppers. Nature Communications. 2022a;13:5670. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33422-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang CS, Sun LL, Xie JM, Cao CW. RNAi-based functional analysis of bursicon genes related to wing expansion in gypsy moths. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2022b;139:104398. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2022.104398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang SD, Li JY, Zhang DY, Zhang ZX, Meng SL, Li Z, Liu XX. miR-252 targeting temperature receptor CcTRPM to mediate the transition from summer-form to winter-form of Cacopsylla chinensis. eLife. 2023;12:RP88744. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhu KY, Merzendorfer H, Zhang W, Zhang J, Muthukrishnan S. Biosynthesis, turnover, and functions of chitin in insects. Annual Review of Entomology. 2016;61:177–196. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

John Ewer 1

This important study reports that the neurohormone, bursicon, and its receptor, play a role in the seasonal polyphenism of the bug Cacopsylla chinensis. Low temperature activates the bursicon signaling pathway during the transition from the summer to the winter form, affecting cuticle pigment and thickness as well as chitin content. The solid experiments reveal how bursicon signaling, which is modulated by the microRNA miR-6012, regulates features of polyphenism related to the exoskeleton, although it is less clear what the upstream regulatory events are.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Bursicon is a key hormone regulating cuticle tanning in insects. While the molecular mechanisms of its function are rather well studied--especially in the model insect Drosophila melanogaster, its effects and functions in different tissues are less well understood. Here, the authors show that bursicon and its receptor play a role in regulating aspects of the seasonal polyphenism of Cacopsylla chinensis. They found that low temperature treatment activated the bursicon signaling pathway during the transition from summer form to winter form and affect cuticle pigment and chitin content, and cuticle thickness. In addition, the authors show that miR-6012 targets the bursicon receptor, CcBurs-R, thereby modulating the function of bursicon signaling pathway in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis. This discovery expands our knowledge of the roles of neuropeptide bursicon action in arthropod biology.

Reviewer comments on revised version

(a) Major concerns

(1) The revision did not respond to the major concern regarding the threshold response that defines polyphenism. Therefore, it still falls short of the claims made, since the claims were not revised either. Specifically, the authors now include a time series of tanning at two different temperatures, demonstrating the time points at which the induced tanning proceeds (Fig. S1). However, the appropriate response to that comment would have temperatures on the x-axis, not time. Intermediate temperatures are needed to test whether the induction is a threshold response or simply a continuous norm of reaction.

(2) The authors also did not respond to the major comment regarding environmental induction of miR-6012 expression. Rather, Fig. 5E shows a time series under two temperatures, similar to the tanning time series. To test whether its induction is a threshold response (again, what defines polyphenism), a series of induction conditions is needed. Fig. 5E simply shows changes in expression over time under one induction temperature (25 ºC).

(3) Although the manuscript title has been changed, little to nothing else in the revised text addresses the concern that this study is about tanning in psyllids, not seasonal polyphenism. The other traits making up the polyphenism, as well as their threshold response, were not measured.

In summary, this revision failed to address most of the chief concerns of the review summary. This manuscript should be reframed as a study of tanning in a species other than Drosophila, and any claims about polyphenism (that is, an environmentally induced threshold trait) still need to be tested.

Regarding the other concerns raised by the reviewers:

(4) Issues related to the assignment of the receptor used as a bursicon receptor were satisfactorily addressed.

(5) Experiments regarding the timing of cuticle production presented in Supplementary Figure 1 are valuable, albeit, there are still some inaccuracies: (i) the layering of the cuticle is not given accurately as there are more than the 3 layers indicated in the manuscript; (ii), the reduced endocuticle in all relevant dsRNA cases suggests a massive molting defect that may underline the involvement of bursicon in molting in general, potentially masking its effect on morph transition. In other words, the phenotype is too strong to allow for the interpretation of its function with respect to morph transition. It would have been necessary to apply different concentrations of dsRNA in order to address this point. (iii) The developmental timing at 10oC vs. 25oC seem to be similar, although duration would be expected to be longer at 10oC; (iv) It would have been nice to see the days of development also for dsRNA injected animals.

(6) Another unresolved point regards the source and target tissue of bursicon signaling. Admittedly, this problem is difficult to solve in a small insect species.

eLife. 2024 Nov 8;13:RP97298. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97298.3.sa2

Author response

Zhixian Zhang 1, Jianying Li 2, Yilin Wang 3, Zhen Li 4, Xiaoxia Liu 5, Songdou Zhang 6

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Public Review:

Summary:

Bursicon is a key hormone regulating cuticle tanning in insects. While the molecular mechanisms of its function are rather well studied--especially in the model insect Drosophila melanogaster, its effects and functions in different tissues are less well understood. Here, the authors show that bursicon and its receptor play a role in regulating aspects of the seasonal polyphenism of Cacopsylla chinensis. They found that low temperature treatment activated the bursicon signaling pathway during the transition from summer form to winter form and affect cuticle pigment and chitin content, and cuticle thickness. In addition, the authors show that miR-6012 targets the bursicon receptor, CcBurs-R, thereby modulating the function of bursicon signaling pathway in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis. This discovery expands our knowledge of the roles of neuropeptide bursicon action in arthropod biology.

However, the study falls short of its claim that it reveals the molecular mechanisms of a seasonal polyphenism. While cuticle tanning is an important part of the pear psyllid polyphenism, it is not the equivalent of it. First, there are other traits that distinguish between the two morphs, such as ovarian diapause (Oldfield, 1970), and the role of bursicon signaling in regulating these aspects of polyphenism were not measured. Thus, the phenotype in pear psyllids, whereby knockdown bursicon reduces cuticle tanning seems to simply demonstrate the phenotypes of Drosophila mutants for bursicon receptor (Loveall and Deitcher, 2010, BMC Dev Biol) in another species (Fig. 2I, 4H). Second, the study fails to address the threshold nature of cuticular tanning in this species, although it is the threshold response (specifically, to temperature and photoperiod) that distinguishes this trait as a part of a polyphenism. Whereas miR-6012 was found to regulate bursicon expression, there no evidence is provided that this microRNA either responds to or initiates a threshold response to temperature. In principle, miR-6012 could regulate bursicon whether or not it is part of a polyphenism. Thus, the impact of this work would be significantly increased if it could distinguish between seasonal changes of the cuticle and a bona fide reflection of polyphenism.

Thanks for your valuable suggestion. We concur with the review’s comment that cuticle tanning does not equate to the C. chinensis polyphenism. To better reflect the core focus of our research, we have revised the title to "Neuropeptide Bursicon and its receptor mediated the transition from summer-form to winter-form of Cacopsylla chinensis".

In response to the reviewer's inquiry regarding the threshold nature of cuticular tanning in C. chinensis, we have included a detailed analysis of the phenotypic changes (including nymph phenotypes, cuticle pigment absorbance, and cuticle thickness) during the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis at distinct time intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under different temperature conditions (10°C and 25°C). As shown in Figure S1, nymphs exhibit a light yellow and transparent coloration at 3, 6, and 9 days, while nymphs at 12 and 15 days display shades of yellow-green or blue-yellow under 25°C conditions. At 10°C conditions, the abdomen end turns black at 3, 6, and 9 days. By the 12 days, numerous light black stripes appear on the chest and abdomen of nymphs at 10°C. At 15 days, nymphs exhibit an overall black-brown appearance, featuring dark brown stripes on the left and right sides of each chest and abdominal section. Furthermore, the end of the abdomen and back display a large black-brown coloration at 10°C (Figure S1A). The UV absorbance of the total pigment extraction at a 300 nm wavelength markedly increases following 10°C exposure for 6, 9, 12, and 15 days compared to the 25°C treatment group (Figure S1B). Cuticle thicknesses also increased following 10°C exposure for 6, 9, 12, and 15 days compared to the 25°C treatment group (Figure S1C). The detailed results (L122-143), materials and methods (L647-652), and discussion (L319-322) have been added in our revised manuscript.

Regarding the response of miR-6012 to temperature, we have already determined its expression at 3, 6, 10 days under different temperatures in the previous Figure 5E. We now included additional time intervals (9, 12, 15 days) in the updated Figure 5E. Our results indicate a significant decrease in the expression levels of miR-6012 after 10°C treatment for 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days compared to the 25°C treatment group. Detailed information regarding this has been integrated into the Materials and Methods (Line 608-610) of our revised manuscript.

Strengths:

This study convincingly identifies homologs of the genes encoding the bursicon subunits and its receptor, showing an alignment with those of another psyllid as well as more distant species. It also demonstrates that the stage- and tissue-specific levels of bursicon follow the expected patterns, as informed by other insect models, thus validating the identity of these genes in this species. They provide strong evidence that the expression of bursicon and its receptor depend on temperature, thereby showing that this trait is regulated through both parts of the signaling mechanism.

Several parallel measurements of the phenotype were performed to show the effects of this hormone, its receptor, and an upstream regulator (miR-6012), on cuticle deposition and pigmentation (if not polyphenism per se, as claimed). Specifically, chitin staining and TEM of the cuticle qualitatively show difference between controls and knockdowns, and this is supported by some statistical tests of quantitative measurements (although see comments below). Thus, this study provides strong evidence that bursicon and its receptor play an important role in cuticle deposition and pigmentation in this psyllid.

The study identified four miRNAs which might affect bursicon due to sequence motifs. By manipulating levels of synthetic miRNA agonists, the study successfully identified one of them (miR-6012) to cause a cuticle phenotype. Moreover, this miRNA was localized (by FISH) to the cuticle, body-wide. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstrated function for this miRNA, and this study provides a good example of using a gene of known function as an entry point to discovering others influencing a trait. Thus, this finding reveals another level of regulation of cuticle formation in insects.

Weaknesses:

(1) The introduction to this manuscript does not accurately reflect progress in the field of mechanisms underlying polyphenism (e.g., line 60). There are several models for polyphenism that have been used to uncover molecular mechanisms in at least some detail, and this includes seasonal polyphenisms in Hemiptera. Therefore, the justification for this study cannot be predicated on a lack of knowledge, nor is the present study original or unique in this line of research (e.g., as reviewed by Zhang et al. 2019; DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-112448). The authors are apparently aware of this, because they even provide other examples (lines 104-108); thus the introduction seems misleading as framed.

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. We have added the paper of Zhang et al. 2019 which recommended by reviewer (DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-112448) in Line 57 of our revised manuscript. The statement has been revised to “However, the specific molecular mechanism underling temperature-dependent polyphenism still require further clarification” in Line 60-61 of our revised manuscript.

(2) The data in Figure 2H show "percent of transition." However, the images in 2I show insects with tanned cuticle (control) vs. those without (knockdown). Yet, based on the description of the Methods provided, there appears to be no distinction between "percent of transition" and "percent with tanning defects". This an important distinction to make if the authors are going to interpret cuticle defects as a defect in the polyphenism. Furthermore, there is no mention of intermediate phenotypes. The data in 2H are binned as either present or absent, and these are the phenotypes shown in 2I. Was the phenotype really an all-or-nothing response? Instead of binning, which masks any quantitative differences in the tanning phenotypes, the authors should objectively quantify the degree of tanning and plot that. This would show if and to what degree intermediate tanning phenotypes occurred, which would test how bursicon affects the threshold response. This comment also applies to the data in Figures 4G and 6G. Since cuticle tanning is present in more insect than just those with seasonal polyphenism, showing how this responds as a threshold is needed to make claims about polyphenism.

We appreciate your insightful comments. As shown in Figure 1 of our published paper (Zhang et al., 2013; doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88744.3) and Figure 2C-2I of the current manuscript, the transition from summer-form to winter-form entails not only external cuticular tanning but also alterations in internal cuticular chitin levels and cuticle thickness. While external cuticular tanning serves as a prominent and easily observable indicator of this transition, it is crucial to acknowledge that internal changes also play a significant role and should be taken into consideration. Therefore, we propose that the term "percent of transition" may be more suitable than "percent with tanning defects" to describe this process accurately.

In order to provide a more visually comprehensive understanding of the phenotypic changes during the transition from summer-form to winter-form, we have included images at different time points (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under different temperature conditions in Figure S1A of our revised manuscript. Specifically, under the 10°C condition, nymphs exhibit abdomen tanning after 6 and 9 days of treatment, while the thorax remains untanned. By days 12 to 15, both the abdomen and thorax of the nymphs show tanning, resulting in the majority of summer-form nymphs transitioning into winter-form, as depicted in Figure 2I for comparison. This observation indicates the presence of a critical threshold for cuticle tanning of C. chinensis following exposure to 10°C. Nymphs that did not undergo the transition to winter-form succumbed to the cold, highlighting the absence of intermediate phenotypes at 12-15 days under the 10°C condition. The UV absorbance of the total pigment extraction at a 300 nm wavelength markedly increases following 10°C exposure for 6, 9, 12, and 15 days compared to the 25°C treatment group (Figure S1B). Additionally, cuticle thickness shows an increase following 10°C exposure for 6, 9, 12, and 15 days compared to the 25°C treatment group (Figure S1C). These results highlight the relationship between the threshold of cuticular tanning and the transition process. The detailed description and information have been added in Results (L122-143), Materials and Methods (L647-652), and Discussion (L319-322) of our manuscript.

(3) This study also does not test the threshold response of cuticle phenotypes to levels of bursicon, its receptor, or miR-6012. Hormone thresholds are the most widespread and, in most systems where polyphenism has been studied, the defining characteristic of a polyphenism (e.g., Nijhout, 2003, Evol Dev). Quantitative (not binned) measurements of a polyphenism marker (e.g., chitin) should be demonstrated to result as a threshold titer (or in the case of the receptor, expression level) to distinguish defects in polyphenism from those of its component trait.

Thanks for your valuable feedback. We have supplemented additional data on the phenotypes (Figure S1A), cuticle pigment absorbance (Figure S1B), cuticle thickness (Figure S1C), expression levels of bursicon (Figure 1E and 1F), its receptors (Figure 3G), and miR-6012 (Figure 5E) corresponding to nymphs treated over different time periods (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under both 10°C and 25°C conditions in our revised manuscript.

While all these identified markers exhibit a strong correlation with the transition from summer-form to winter-form, it is important to note that they are not suitable as definitive thresholds due to the nature of relative gene expression quantification and chitin content assessment, rather than absolute quantitation. Further, given that tanning hormones are neuropeptides present in trace amounts in insects, unlike steroid hormones, determining their titers poses a considerable challenge.

(4) Cuticle issue:

(a) Unlike Fig. 6D and F, Figs. 2D and F do not correspond to each other. Especially the lack and reduction of chitin in ds-a+b! By fluorescence microscopy there is hardly any signal, whereas by TEM there is a decent cuticle. Additionally, the dsGFP control cuticle in 2D is cut obliquely with a thick and a thin chitin layer. This is misleading.

Thanks for your insightful feedback. We have replaced the previous WGA chitin staining images in the dsCcbursα+β treatment of Figure 2D with new representative images aligning with Figure 2F. Furthermore, the presence of both thin and thick chitin layers observed in the dsEGFP treatment of Figure 2D could potentially be ascribed to the chitin content in the insect midgut or fat body as previously discussed (Zhu et al., 2016). It is notable that during the process of cuticle staining, the chitin located in the midgut and fat body of C. chinensis may exhibit green fluorescence, leading to the appearance of a thin chitin layer. A detailed analysis and elucidation of these observations have been added in the discussion section (Lines 347-352) of our revised manuscript.

Zhu KY, Merzendorfer H, Zhang W, Zhang J, Muthukrishnan S. Biosynthesis, Turnover, and Functions of Chitin in Insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2016;61:177-196. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023933.

(b) In Figs. 2F and 4F, the endocuticle appears to be missing, a portion of the procuticle that is produced post-molting. As tanning is also occurring post-molting, there seems to be a general problem with cuticle differentiation at this time point. This may be a timing issue. Please clarify.

Thank you for your suggestion. The insect cuticle typically comprises three distinct layers (endocuticle, exocuticle, and epicuticle), with the thickness of each layer varying among different insect species. Cuticle differentiation is closely linked to the molting cycle of insects (Mrak et al., 2017). In our study, nymphal cuticles exhibited normal differentiation patterns, characterized by a thin epicuticle and comparable widths of the endocuticle and exocuticle following dsEGFP treatment, as illustrated in Figure 2F and 4F. Conversely, nymphs treated with dsCcBurs-α, dsCcBurs-β, and dsCcburs-R displayed impaired development, manifesting only the exocuticle without a discernible endocuticle layer. These findings suggest that bursicon genes and their receptor play a pivotal role in regulating insect cuticle development (Costa et al., 2016). We have added some discussion about these results in Lines 356-367 of our revised manuscript.

Mrak, P., Bogataj, U., Štrus, J., & Žnidaršič, N. (2017). Cuticle morphogenesis in crustacean embryonic and postembryonic stages. Arthropod structure & development, 46(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2016.11.001

Costa, C. P., Elias-Neto, M., Falcon, T., Dallacqua, R. P., Martins, J. R., & Bitondi, M. (2016). RNAi-mediated functional analysis of Bursicon genes related to adult cuticle formation and tanning in the Honeybee, Apis mellifera. PloS one, 11(12), e0167421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167421

(c) To provide background information, it would be useful analyze cuticle formation in the summer and winter morphs of controls separately by light and electron microscopy. More baseline data on these two morphs is needed.

Thanks for your valuable feedback. To provide more background information about cuticle formation, we supplied the results of nymph phenotypes, cuticle pigment absorbance, and cuticle thickness at distinct time intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under different temperatures of 10°C and 25°C in Figure S1 of our revised manuscript. Hope these results can help better understand the baseline data on these two morphs.

(d) For the TEM study, it is not clear whether the same part of the insect's thorax is being sectioned each time, or if that matters. There is not an obvious difference in the number of cuticular layers, but only the relative widths of those layers, so it is difficult to know how comparable those images are. This raises two questions that the authors should clarify. First, is it possible that certain parts of the thoracic cuticle, such as those closer to the intersegmental membrane, are naturally thinner than other parts of the body? Second, is the tanning phenotype based on the thickness or on the number of chitin layers, or both? The data shown later in Figure 4I, J convincingly shows that the biosynthesis pathway for chitin is repressed, but any clarification of what this might mean for deposition of chitin would help to understand the phenotypes reported. Also, more details on how the data in Fig. 2G were collected would be helpful. This also goes for the data in Fig. 4 (bursicon receptor knockdowns).

Thanks for your great comment. The TEM investigation adhered to a standardized protocol was used as previous description (Zhang et al., 2023), Initially, insect heads were uniformly excised and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Subsequently, a consistent cutting and staining procedure was executed at a uniform distance above the insect's thorax. The dorsal region of the thorax was specifically chosen for subsequent fluorescence imaging or transmission electron microscopy assessments with the specific objective of quantifying cuticle thickness. Regarding the measurement of cuticle thickness, use the built-in measuring ruler on the software to select the top and bottom of the same horizontal line on the cuticle. Measure the cuticle of each nymph at two close locations. Six nymphs were used for each sample. Randomly select 9 values and plot them. The related description has been added in the Materials and Methods (Line 660-668) of our revised manuscript.

Zhang, S.D., Li, J.Y., Zhang, D.Y., Zhang, Z.X., Meng, S.L., Li, Z., & Liu, X.X. (2023). MiR-252 targeting temperature receptor CcTRPM to mediate the transition from summer-form to winter-form of Cacopsylla chinensis. eLife, 12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88744

(5) Tissue issue:

The timed experiments shown in all figures were done in whole animals. However, we know from Drosophila that Bursicon activity is complex in different tissues. There is, thus, the possibility, that the effects detected on different days in whole animals are misleading because different tissues--especially the brain and the epidermis, may respond differentially to the challenge and mask each other's responses. The animal is small, so the extraction from single tissue may be difficult. However, this important issue needs to be addressed.

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. We express our heartfelt appreciation to the reviewer for their valuable input regarding the challenges involved in dissecting various tissue sections from the diminutive early instar nymphs of C. chinensis. In light of the metamorphic transition of C. chinensis across developmental stages, this study concentrated on examining the extensive phenotypic alterations. Consequently, intact samples of C. chinensis were specifically chosen for for qPCR analysis. The related descriptions have been added in the Materials and Methods (Line 513, 517, 553, 555, and 613) and Discussion (Line 327-329) of our revised manuscript.

(6) No specific information is provided regarding the procedure followed for the rescue experiments with burs-α and burs-β (How were they done? Which concentrations were applied? What were the effects?). These important details should appear in the Materials and Methods and the Results sections.

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. For the rescue experiments, the dsRNA of CcBurs-R and proteins of burs α-α, burs β-β homodimers, or burs α-β heterodimer (200 ng/μL) were fed together. The concentration of heterodimer protein of CcBurs-α+β was 200 ng/μL. The heterodimer protein of CcBurs-α+β fully rescued the effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown on CcBurs-R expression, while α+α or β+β homodimers did not (Figure 3F). Feeding the α+β heterodimer protein fully rescued the defect in the transition percent and morphological phenotype after CcBurs-R knockdown (Figure 4G-4H). We have added the detailed methods of rescued experiments and specific concentrations in the Materials and Methods (Line 561-563), and Results (Line 263) of our revised manuscript.

(7) Pigmentation

(a) The protocol used to assess pigmentation needs to be validated. In particular, the following details are needed: Were all pigments extracted? Were pigments modified during extraction? Were the values measured consistent with values obtained, for instance, by light microscopy (which should be done)?

Thanks for your excellent comment. Our protocol for pigment extracted as detailed in Bombyx mori, the cuticles were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and then dissolved in 30 milliliters of acidified methanol (Futahashi et al., 2012; Osanai-Futahashi et al., 2012). Thus, all cuticle pigments were dissected and treated with acidified methanol. Pigments were not modified during extraction. The details description have been integrated into the Materials and Methods (Line 630-633) of our revised manuscript.

Futahashi, R., Kurita, R., Mano, H., & Fukatsu, T. (2012). Redox alters yellow dragonflies into red. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(31), 12626–12631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207114109

Osanai-Futahashi, M., Tatematsu, K. I., Yamamoto, K., Narukawa, J., Uchino, K., Kayukawa, T., Shinoda, T., Banno, Y., Tamura, T., & Sezutsu, H. (2012). Identification of the Bombyx red egg gene reveals involvement of a novel transporter family gene in late steps of the insect ommochrome biosynthesis pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry, 287(21), 17706–17714. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.321331

(b) In addition, pigmentation occurs post-molting; thus, the results could reflect indirect actions of bursicon signaling on pigmentation. The levels of expression of downstream pigmentation genes (ebony, lactase, etc) should be measured and compared in molting summer vs. winter morphs.

Thanks for your valuable suggestion. Actually, we already studied the function of some downstream pigmentation genes, including ebony, Lactase, Tyrosine hydroxylase, Dopa decarboxylase, and Acetyltransferase. The variations in the expression patterns of these genes are closely tied to the molting dynamics of nymphs undergoing transitions between summer-form and winter-form. These findings will put in another manuscript currently being prepared for submission, thus detailed outcomes are not suitable for inclusion in the current manuscript.

(8) L236: "while the heterodimer protein of CcBurs α+β could fully rescue the effect of CcBurs-R knockdown on the transition percent (Figure 4G 4H)". This result seems contradictory. If CcBurs-R is the receptor of bursicon, the heterodimer protein of CcBurs α+β should not be able to rescue the effect of CcBurs-R knockdown insects. How can a neuropeptide protein rescue the effect when its receptor is not there! If these results are valid, then the CcBurs-R would not be the (sole) receptor for CcBurs α+β heterodimer. This is a critical issue for this manuscript and needs to be addressed (also in L337 in Discussion).

Thanks for your insightful suggestion. Following the administration of dsCcBur-R to C. chinensis, the expression of CcBurs-R exhibited a reduction of approximately 66-82% as depicted in Figure 4A, rather than complete suppression. Activation of endogenous CcBurs-R through feeding of the α+β heterodimer protein results in an increase in CcBurs-R expression, with the effectiveness of the rescue effect contingent upon the dosage of the α+β heterodimer protein. Consequently, the capacity of the α+β heterodimer protein to effectively mitigate the impacts of CcBurs-R knockdown on the conversion rate is clearly demonstrated. We have added additional discussion in Line 396-403 of our revised manuscript.

(9) Fig. 5D needs improvement (the magnification is poor) and further explanation and discussion. mi6012 and CcBurs-R seem to be expressed in complementary tissues--do we see internal tissues also (see problem under point 2)? Again, the magnification is not high enough to understand and appreciate the relationships discussed.

Thanks for your valuable suggestion. In order to enhance the resolution of the magnified images, we conducted FISH co-localization of miR-6012 and CcBurs-R in 3rd instar nymphs and obtained detailed zoomed-in images. As shown in the magnified view of Figure 5D, miR-6012 and CcBurs-R appear to exhibit complementary expression patterns in tissues. During the FISH assays, epidermis transparency of C. chinensis was achieved via decolorization treatment. Noteworthy observations from Figure 3G and Figure 5E reveal an inverse correlation in the expression profiles of CcBurs-R and miR-6012. Consequently, the FISH results distinctly highlight a significant disparity in the expression levels of CcBurs-R and miR-6012 within the same tissue. We have added related explanation and discussion in Line 291-293 of our revised manuscript.

(10) The schematic in Fig. 7 is a useful summary, but there is a part of the logic that is unsupported by the data, specifically in terms of environmental influence on cuticle formation (i.e., plasticity). What is the evidence that lower temperatures influence expression of miR-6012? The study measures its expression over life stages, whether with an agonist or not, over a single temperature. Measuring levels of expression under summer form-inducing temperature is necessary to test the dependence of miR-6012 expression on temperature. Otherwise, this result cannot be interpreted as polyphenism control, but rather the control of a specific trait.

Thanks for your great suggestion. We actually conducted the assessment of miR-6012 expression at specific time intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) under different temperatures of 10°C and 25°C. As depicted in Figure 5E, the expression levels of miR-6012 were notably reduced at 10°C compared to 25°C. Additionally, the evaluation of agomir-6012 expression level of C. chinensis under 25°C conditions at various time points (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days) revealed no significant changes. Hence, we suggest that the impact of miR-6012 on the seasonal morphological transition is influenced upon temperature.

Recommendations for the authors:

The authors report a novel role of Bursicon and its receptor in regulating the seasonal polyphenism of Cacopsylla chinensis. They found that low temperature treatment (10°C) activated the Bursicon signaling pathway during the transition from summer-form to winter-form, which influences cuticle pigment content, cuticle chitin content, and cuticle thickness. Moreover, the authors identified miR-6012 and show that it targets CcBurs-R, thereby modulating the function of Bursicon signaling pathway in the seasonal polyphenism of C. chinensis. This discovery expands our knowledge of multiple roles of neuropeptide bursicon action in arthropod biology. However, the m

anuscript does have several major weaknesses, described under "Public review", which the authors need to address.

Major issues:

(1) L152-154 Fig S2E and S2F: Bursicon has been shown to be expressed in the CNS in a specific set of neurons. For example, In the larval CNS of Manduca sexta, bursicon expression is restricted to the subesophageal ganglion (SG), thoracic ganglia, and first abdominal ganglion. Pharate pupae and pharate adults show expression of this heterodimer in all ganglia. In Drosophila larvae, expression of a bursicon heterodimer is confined to abdominal ganglia. The additional neurons in the ventral nerve cord express only burs. In pharate adults, bursicon is produced by neurons in the SG and abdominal ganglia. I am wondering where bursicon subunits are expressed in the C. chinensis CNS? Since the authors have the antibodies, it would be useful to include immunocytochemical staining of bursicon alpha and beta in the CNS. The qPCR results from head or other tissues (Fig S2E and S2F) is not the most informative way to document localization of gene expression. Regarding the qPCR results, they show that the cuticle and the fat body express CcBurs-α and CcBurs-β. Can the authors confirm this unexpected results independently?

Thanks for your insightful comment. In this study, we did not directly used antibodies targeting bursicon subunits, instead, the bursicon subunits along with a histidine tag were integrated into the expression vector pcDNA3.1 using homologous recombination. The experimental procedures were executed as follows: initially, the histidine tag was fused to the pcDNA3.1-mCherry vector through homologous recombination to generate the recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1-his-mCherry. Subsequently, the amino acid sequences of the two bursicon subunits were introduced into the pcDNA3.1-his-mCherry vector via homologous recombination to produce the recombinant plasmids pcDNA3.1-CcBurs-α-his-mCherry and pcDNA3.1-CcBurs-β-his-mCherry. Finally, the P2A sequence was incorporated into the vector using reverse PCR to yield the recombinant plasmids pcDNA3.1-CcBurs-α-his-P2A-mCherry and pcDNA3.1-CcBurs-β-his-P2A-mCherry. Consequently, the bursicon subunits, along with the histidine tag, were capable of generating fusion proteins with the histidine tag. Western blot analysis was conducted using antibodies targeting the histidine tag, enabling the detection of histidine expression, which corresponds to the expression of the bursicon subunits. However, they are not suitable to conduct the in vivo immunocytochemical staining of bursicon alpha and beta in the CNS.

Due to the diminutive size of the C. chinensis nymphs, dissection of the central nervous system (CNS) was unfeasible, precluding specific assessment of bursicon expression in the CNS. Prior literature has documented the expression of bursicon subunits in the epidermis and fat body of C. chinensis. Studies suggest that bursicon subunits not only play a role in the melanization and sclerotization processes of insect epidermis but also have significant roles in insect immunity (An et al., 2012). The presence of bursicon subunits in the epidermis, gut, and fat body of C. chinensis may indicate their crucial roles in the immune functions of these tissues. Further investigation is required to elucidate the specific immune functions they perform, hinting at the potential expression of these bursicon subunits in these two tissues.

An, S., Dong, S., Wang, Q., Li, S., Gilbert, L. I., Stanley, D., & Song, Q. (2012). Insect neuropeptide bursicon homodimers induce innate immune and stress genes during molting by activating the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. PloS one, 7(3), e34510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034510

(2) L222: "CcBurs-R is the Bursicon receptor of C. chinensis". Is this statement supported by affinity binding assay results?

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. We employed a fluorescence-based assay to quantify calcium ion concentrations and investigate the binding affinities of bursicon heterodimers and homodimers to the bursicon receptor across varying concentrations. Our findings suggest that activation of the receptor by the burs α-β heterodimer leads to significant alterations in intracellular calcium ion levels, whereas stimulation with burs α-α and burs β-β homodimers, in conjunction with Adipokinetic hormone (AKH), maintains consistent intracellular calcium ion levels. Consequently, this research definitively identifies CcBurs-R as the bursicon receptor. For further details, please refer to the Materials and Methods (Lines 493-504), Results (Lines 231-239), and Discussion (Lines 377-384) of our revised manuscript.

(3) L245 Figure 4I-4J: Since knockdown of bursicon and its receptor cause a decrease pigment accumulation in the cuticle, it would be useful to examine 1-2 rate limiting enzyme-encoding genes in the bursicon regulated cuticle darkening process if possible (as was done for genes involved in cuticle thickening).

Thanks for your excellent comment. Following the further study, a thorough analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of bursicon and its receptor on the expression levels of Lactase, Tyrosine hydroxylase, Dopa decarboxylase, Acetyltransferase, and the effects of RNA interference targeting these genes on the seasonal morphological transition. The findings underscored their role in the bursicon-mediated cuticle darkening process. However, as this section is slated for inclusion in an upcoming manuscript intended for submission, it is deemed unsuitable for incorporation into the current manuscript.

Minor issues:

(1) L75 "stronger resistance (Ge et al., 2019; Tougeron et al., 2021)". Stronger resistance to what? Stronger resistance to environmental stress or weather condition? Please clarify.

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. We have changed the statement to “stronger resistance to weather condition” in Line 75 of our revised manuscript.

(2) L132 Figure 1A and 1B: Bursicon sequence was first identified and functionally characterized in Drosophila melanogaster: is there any reason why Drosophila bursicon sequences were not included in the comparison?

Thanks for your excellent comment. We have added the sequence of Burs-α and Burs-β of D. melanogaster in the sequence alignment results of Figure 1A and 1B of our revised manuscript.

(3) Although the authors clearly identify and validate the function for the bursicon genes and its receptor's, there is no mention of whether duplicates of this gene are also present in the pear psyllid. This has been known to happen in otherwise conserved hormone pathways (e.g., insulin receptor in some insects), so a formal check of this should be done.

Thanks for your excellent comment. As shown in Figure S2A-S2B and 3B, there are two bursicon subunit genes and only one bursicon receptor gene in our selected insect species, for examples Drosophila melanogaster, Diaphorina citri, Bemisia tabaci, Nilaparvata lugens, and Sogatella furcifera. In our transcriptome database of C. chinensis, we also only identified two bursicon subunit genes and only one bursicon receptor gene.

(4) Line 41: Here, as in the title, "fascinating" is a subjective judgement that does not improve a study's presentation.

Thanks for your great comment. We have changed "fascinating" to "transformation" in Line 41 and also revised the title of our revised manuscript.

(5) Line 44: What makes some fields "cutting-edge" and others not?

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. The expression of "in cutting-edge fields" has been deleted in Line 44 of our revised manuscript.

(6) Line 97: This is a peculiar choice of reference for the concept of slower development in cold temperatures. The concept of degree-days and growth rates is old and widespread in entomology.

Thanks for your insightful comment. The reference of Nyamaukondiwa et al., 2011 in Line 95 has been deleted in our revised manuscript.

(7) Lines 149-150: What justifies the assumption that higher levels of expression mean a more important role? This gene might be just as necessary for development of the summer form, even if expressed at lower levels.

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. This sentence has been revised to “Increased gene expression levels may potentially contribute to the transition from summer-form to winter-form in C. chinensis.” in Line 168-169 of our revised manuscript.

(8) The blue arrow in Fig. 7 is confusing.

Thanks for your excellent suggestion. In Figure 7, the blue arrow represents the down-regulated expression of miR-6012. We have added a description about the blue arrow in Figure 7 of our revised manuscript.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon alpha gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488624
    2. Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon beta gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488625.1
    3. Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon receptor gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488626.1

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Labelled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (reduced gel).
    elife-97298-fig1-data1.tif (106.7KB, tif)
    Figure 1—source data 2. Original, uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (reduced gel).
    elife-97298-fig1-data2.tif (2.4MB, tif)
    Figure 1—source data 3. Labelled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (non-reduced gel).
    elife-97298-fig1-data3.tif (247.3KB, tif)
    Figure 1—source data 4. Original, uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 1D (non-reduced gel).
    elife-97298-fig1-data4.tif (9.6MB, tif)
    Supplementary file 1. The primers used in current study and comparison of pigmentation and cuticle thickness after genes knockdown.

    (a) List of primers used in this study. (b) Comparison of pigmentation and cuticle thickness after CcTRPM, CcBurs-a, CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R knockdown.

    elife-97298-supp1.docx (25.9KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist
    elife-97298-mdarchecklist1.pdf (242.9KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    The published article includes all data generated or analyzed during this study. The full sequences of CcBurs-α, CcBurs-β, and CcBurs-R were submitted to GenBank database of NCBI (Accession number: OR488624, OR488625, and OR488626).

    The following datasets were generated:

    Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon alpha gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488624

    Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon beta gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488625.1

    Zhang Z, Li J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu X, Zhang S. 2024. Cacopsylla chinensis Bursicon receptor gene, complete sequence. NCBI Nucleotide. OR488626.1

    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES