Skip to main content
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research logoLink to Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
. 2024 Nov 10;19:740. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05240-7

Is intercalary frozen autograft augmented with intramedullary cement and bridging plates fixation a durable reconstruction?

Zhuoyu Li 1,2,3, Zhiping Deng 1,2,3, Yongkun Yang 1,2,3, Qing Zhang 1,2,3, Xiaohui Niu 1,2,3, Weifeng Liu 1,2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC11552321  PMID: 39523407

Abstract

Aims

We analysed the survival, complications, and function of frozen autograft augmented with intramedullary cement and bridging plates fixation for intercalary bone defect reconstruction in primary bone sarcomas.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 72 patients with primary bone sarcomas (34 males, 38 females) between January 2016 and June 2023. The average age was 22.0 ± 13.6 years (6 to 61 years) and the pathological type included osteosarcoma (55), followed by adamantinoma (5), Ewing’s sarcoma (4), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (4), chondrosarcoma (3), and malignant tenosynovial giant cell tumor (1). The oncological outcomes included local control, metastasis, progression-free survival and overall survival. The functional outcomes were evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS-93), the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and the motion of the joint.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 50.0 ± 27.4 months (12 to 99 months). 10 patients died of the disease, 9 patients were alive with disease and 53 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. The average 5-year overall survival of autograft was 85.8% (95% CI, 72.1-93.1%). The average MSTS-93 score was 96% ( 67–100%) and the average TESS score was 98% (74–100%). Twenty-four patients (33.3%) had at least one complication in the follow-up period. The most common complications were nonunion (9.7%, 7/72) and local recurrence (9.7%, 7/72), followed by leg length discrepancy (6.9%, 5/72), infection (5.6%, 4/72), implant failure (4.2%, 3/72), delayed union (2.8%, 2/72), and graft fractures (1.4%, 1/72). Tumor site was an independent risk factor for bone nonunion (OR, 22.23; p = 0.006).

Conclusions

We presented a large technique series for preventing autograft-related complications (especially for autograft fractures) of intercalary frozen autograft reconstruction. This method showed promising functional outcomes and provided durable reconstruction.

Level of evidence

level IV therapeutic study.

Keywords: Intercalary frozen autograft, Intramedullary cement, Bridging plates, Function, Complications

Introduction

For bone tumours located in the diaphysis and metaphysis of long bones, intercalary resection and reconstruction is an ideal procedure as it preserves the native joint and ligaments and provides better proprioception and a more normal function [1]. Intercalary reconstruction techniques have been widely reported, including intercalary endoprostheses, allografts, inactivated autografts, allograft prosthetic composites (APC), vascularised fibula and its composites, distraction osteogenesis and Masquelet techniques [2–11]. Endoprostheses provide immediate stability and weight bearing, however, the incidence of mechanical complications and long-term failure is quite high [2]. Allografts require bone banking and have a high incidence of fracture, infection and nonunion [7].

Inactivated autograft is a reconstructive technique mainly used in Japan, China, and in the developing countries, while biological reconstruction is now favoured to allograft and autograft in US, UK, and Europe, particularly when the resection involves major joints [12–16]. The advantages of recycled autografts include no need for bone banking, no transmission of viral or bacterial diseases and the ability to reattach preserved soft tissues and ligaments [16]. Several methods for tumour bone inactivation are available, including autoclaving, external irradiated autografts, absolute ethanol inactivation, liquid nitrogen inactivated autografts, and pasteurised autografts [5, 17–19]. However, infection and graft fracture are the most common complications of frozen autografts [20]. Previous studies have reported that intramedullary bone cement can reduce the incidence of complications and graft failures in intercalary allografts, but few reports were found in intercalary inactivated autograft augmentation reconstruction [21].

This study aims to analyse the effect of intramedullary bone cement combined with bridging plates in recycled inactivated autografts and to answer the following questions: (1) What is the overall survival rate of frozen autografts augmented with intramedullary bone cement combined with bridging plate fixation? (2) What is the complication rate of frozen autograft augmented with intramedullary bone cement combined with bridging plate fixation according to the modified Henderson classification? (3) What is the function of frozen autograft augmented with intramedullary bone cement combined with bridging plate fixation?

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 85 patients who underwent intercalary frozen autograft reconstruction which was prospectively collected at our institution between January 2016 and July 2023 (Table 1). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Patients who underwent intercalary frozen autografts augmented with intramedullary bone cement and bridging dynamic compression plates and were followed up for at least 1 year were included in the study. Eight patients (9.4%) were excluded due to loss of follow-up or incomplete datasets. Five patients (5.9%) were excluded because they received intramedullary nailing fixation.

Table 1.

The general demographics of all patients

Variable Total (n, %)
No. 72
Size (mean, cm) 17.9 ± 6.2 (9–34)
Gender
 Male 34
 Female 38
Age (mean, years) 22.0 (6–61)
Tumor types
 Osteosarcoma 55 (76%)
 Adamantinoma 5 (7%)
 Ewings Sarcoma 4 (6%)
 UPS 4 (6%)
 Chondrosarcoma 3 (4%)
 Malignant TGCT 1 (1%)
Grade
 Low 48 (23%)
 High 121 (58%)
Reconstructed section
 Metadiaphyseal 52 (72%)
 Diaphyseal 20 (28%)
Chemotherapy
 Yes 55 (76%)
 No 17 (24%)
Radiotherapy
 Yes 9 (12%)
 No 63 (88%)
Follow-up (mean, months) 50.0 ± 27.4 (12–99)

UPS = undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; TGCT = tenosynovial giant cell tumor

The demographic data of all patients are shown in Table 2. There were 34 males and 38 females. The mean age at diagnosis was 22.0 ± 13.6 years (6 to 61 years). The diagnosis of all patients was confirmed by preoperative biopsy pathology. The most common pathological type was osteosarcoma (55 cases), followed by adamantinoma (5 cases), Ewing’s sarcoma (4 cases), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (4 cases), chondrosarcoma (3 cases), and malignant tenosynovial giant cell tumour (1 case). Thirty-nine cases were located in the femur, 26 in the tibia, and 7 in the humerus. The mean length of curvilinear reconstruction was 17.9 ± 6.2 cm (9 to 34 cm). Fifty-two cases involved the metaphysis and 20 only the diaphysis. Fifty-six patients were treated with chemotherapy. Nine patients were treated with radiotherapy.

Table 2.

All complications and causes of autograft removal

Complications Femur, n (%) Tibia, n (%) Humerus, n (%)
Nonunion 1 (14.3%) 1 (14.3%) 5 (71.4%)
Recurrence 4 (57.1%) 3 (42.9%) 0 (0.0%)
Infection 3 (75.0%) 1 (25.0%) 0 (0.0%)
LLD 3 (60.0%) 2 (40.0%) -
Implant failure 0 (0.0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.6%)
Delayed union 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Fracture 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)

The surgical technique has been described in our previous study [22]. After en-bloc resection of the tumour, the attached soft tissue was excised and the intramedullary contents were removed using a reamer or curette. We use a 4-mm-diameter Stern’s needle to perforate the cortex along the long axis of the bone at intervals of 2 cm to prevent fracture during liquid-nitrogen freezing. The bone was immersed in liquid nitrogen for 30 min, thawed at room temperature (25 ℃) for 15–20 min, and rewarmed in saline for 15 min. Antibiotic bone cement was then filled into the medullary cavity of the frozen bone using a bone cement gun and the bone cement should be 0.5 cm away from the osteotomy site, ensuring full contact between host-graft bone junction. Subsequently, the frozen autograft is reconstructed using dynamic compression plates and the length of the plate should span the autografts. Generally, one plate is used for the upper extremities and two for the lower extremities (Figs. 1 and 2). The bridging plates were fixed with at least 4 screws at the host bone and no additional bone grafting was used in the initial procedure.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A 16-year-old female with osteosarcoma of the left tibia. (A-B) X-ray and T2-weighted MRI showed tumor was located in the left tibial diaphysis. (C-D) The autogenous bone was inactivated in liquid nitrogen. (E) Immediate postoperative image shows bridging plate fixation combined with intramadullary cement. (D) At 3 months postoperatively, the proximal and distal osteotomy sites began to unit. (E) At 12 months postoperatively, both the proximal and distal osteotomy lines had well had excellent consolidation. (F-G) Five years after surgery, the autograft is still in good condition

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A 15-year-old male with osteosarcoma of the right femur. (A-B) X-ray and T2-weighted MRI showed the tumor involvement in the right femoral diaphysis. (C) Immediate postoperative image bridging plate fixation combined with intramadullary cement. (D) At 3 months postoperatively, the proximal and distal osteotomy lines began to unit. (E) At 12 months postoperatively, both the proximal and distal osteotomy lines are well integrated. (F-G) Five years after surgery, the autograft is still in good conditions

The primary study endpoint in this study was cumulative graft survival, and graft failure was defined as graft removal for any reason. The secondary study endpoint was the complication rate, and complications were recorded according to the modified Henderson classification proposed by the International International Society for Limb Salvage [23]. Union time of metaphyseal and diaphyseal osteotomy sites were recorded. Bone union was confirmed when more than 75% of the cortex at the junction bridged to the frozen graft at the host bone diaphysis in both X-ray views (AP or lateral view) or any CT plane. Delayed union was defined as union 2 years after surgery. Nonunion was defined as no partial bony junction between host bone and grafts 2 years postoperatively or additional surgery for promoting union at the graft-host junction. The graft fracture was defined as a fracture away from the graft-host bone junction. We used the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS-93) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) score to evaluate the function, and function was assessed only in patients who retained their frozen bone implants at the last follow-up [24, 25]. Sixty-two patients were available for functional evaluation at the last follow-up.

Statistical analysis

The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyse autograft overall survival, including revision for any reason and removal of autograft as endpoints indicating failure. The data was evaluated with SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York) and GraphPad Prism software version 10 (USA). A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically different.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 50.0 ± 27.4 months (12 to 99 months). 47% (34/72) of patients were followed up for more than 5 years. At the last follow-up, 10 patients died of the disease, 9 patients were alive with evidence of disease and 53 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. Seven patients had local recurrence and 18 patients had distant metastases (11 lung metastases, 4 lung and bone metastases, and 3 bone metastases). Of the seven patients with local recurrence, five patients had soft-tissue recurrences and two patients had host-bone recurrences. The autografts were removed in six patients for local recurrence. Three patients underwent hip disarticulation and three patients underwent endoprosthetic replacement. One patient underwent resection of musculus vastus lateralis and had a re-recurrence at 15 months postoperatively, followed by quadriceps resection, with no recurrence at the final follow-up.

The 5-year overall survival rate for frozen autografts was 85.8% (95% CI, 72.1–93.1%; Fig. 3). Of the 7 patients who had complications leading to implant removal, 6 cases were due to local recurrence and one was the deep infection. 33.3% (24/72) of patients had at least one complication. The most common complications were nonunion (29.2%, 7/24) and local recurrence (29.2%, 7/24), followed by leg length discrepancy (20.8%, 5/24), infection (16.6%, 4/24), implant failure (12.5%, 3/24), delayed union (8.3%, 2/24), and graft fractures (4.2%, 1/24). By reconstruciton sites, non-mechanical complications (Type IV and Type V) occurred mainly in the femur (6/11, 54.5%) and tibia (4/11, 36.4%), and nonunion occurred mostly in the humerus (5/7, 71.4%). No structural failure difference was found between the upper and lower extremities.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier curve showed the overall survival of frozen autografts

In four patients who had the postoperative infection, three patients had superficial infection and accepted debridement. While one patient had deep infection and autograft was then removed, antibiotic spacers and intravenous antibiotics were used before further reconstruction was carried out. The endoprosthetic reconstruction was performed after the infection was controlled. Five patients had leg length discrepancy (LLD), however no cases had surgical indications. All patients with LLD accepted conservative treatment using shoe lifts. One patient had with a distal tibial fracture due to external violence, therefore the patient underwent cast immobilisation and the fracture united after 3 months of conservative treatment.

Of the 7 nonunion cases, 5 cases were located in the humerus, 1 case in the femur and 1 case in the tibia (Fig. 4). There were 52 metaphyseal and 92 diaphyseal osteotomy sites. Nonunion occurred in 9 osteotomy sites. 77.8% (7/9) of nonunion cases occurred in the diaphyseal and 22.2% (2/9) of nonunion cases occurred in the metaphyseal osteotomy sites. Five (71.4%) of nonunion cases were sixteen years of age and older. Both nonunion cases in the lower extremities underwent revision surgery. However, only one patient accepted secondary autologous bone grafting. Multivariate logistic regression showed tumor site (humerus) was an independent risk factor for bone nonunion (OR, 22.23; p = 0.006).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A 48-year-old female underwent resection of humeral osteosarcoma and reconstruction of frozen autograft. (A) Immediate postoperative AP radiograph showed bridging plate fixation combined with intramadullary cement. Osteotomy lines can be easily identified. (B) At 14 months postoperatively, There is persistent pseudarthrosis of the distal autograft-host junction and the screw fractured. (C) Autologous bone grafting and additional plate fixation were performed at the distal graft-host bone junction. (D) AP radiographswere made 30 months after the initial procedure and the union of the distal osteotomy line was still not seen. The patient rejected reoperation because of the acceptable joint function of the upper extremity

For the 62 patients available for functional evaluation, the mean MSTS-93 score was 96% ± 6% (67–100%) and the TESS score was 98% ± 4% (74–100%). Pain and emotional acceptance scores ranged from 4 to 5. Function, support, walking and gait scores ranged from 2 to 5. Regarding knee function, the mean active flexion angle was 131° (80° to 140°). For shoulder function, the mean active flexion angle was 170° (120° to 180°) and the mean active abduction angle was 168° (90° to 180°).

Discussion

Reconstructive techniques for intercalary bone defects have been widely reported, including intercalary endoprostheses, inactivated autografts, massive allografts, vascularised fibula, distraction osteogenesis and Masquelet technique. Endoprosthetic reconstruction is the most common reconstruction method worldwide. However, there is a high incidence of mechanical complications (18-57%) and long-term implant failures for endoprosthetic reconstruction [2]. Allograft reconstruction is a widely used biologic reconstruction technique, which also has a high mechanical complication rate (25-73%) and may require vascularised fibula to improve outcomes [7, 26, 27]. Inactivated autograft is a less costly and well-matched biological reconstruction. Due to economic, religious, and cultural reasons, Inactivated autografts are widely used in East and Southeast Asian countries [4, 8, 15, 18, 28–30].

Previous studies have reported several methods of tumour bone inactivation and reimplantation, including autoclaving, absolute ethanol inactivation, external irradiation, liquid nitrogen inactivation, and pasteurisation [12–16]. Takeuchi recently described that liquid nitrogen inactivated, irradiated, and pasteurized autografts had similar rates of complications, graft survival and similar limb function (survival: freezing: 88%; irradiation: 83%; and pasteurisation: 88%) [8]. Several previous studies have reported frozen autografts can retain more osteoinductive capacity, which may lead to better bone union after reconstruction [31–36]. Marcove et al. firstly described cryosurgery for the palliative treatment of primary and metastatic bone tumours [37]. Tsuchiya et al. firstly described the clinical outcomes of liquid nitrogen-inactivated autografts for bone defect reconstruction, with an infection rate of 11%, a fracture rate of 7% and a nonunion rate of 7% [4]. Our institution used absolute ethanol inactivation for autograft reconstruction before 2015, with a high complication rate (graft fracture 20.4%, infection 20.4%, nonunion 17.3%, and implant failure 7.9%), and the 5-year survival rate of inactivated bone was only 55% [38]. Therefore, we used liquid nitrogen inactivation for autograft reconstruction after 2015. Our previous study reported preliminary results of liquid nitrogen-inactivated autografts, with a total complication rate of 14.3% and no autograft was removed [22].

The 5-year overall survival rate of frozen autografts reported in this study was 85.8%, which is comparable to previously reported graft survival rates (80–89%) [39–45]. Miwa et al. reported a 5-year frozen autograft survival rate of 88.8% for plate fixation, while the 5-year survival rate of frozen autografts was 71.1% for intramedullary nailing fixation [46]. A systematic review by Huang et al. reported 362 allografts for risk factors of reconstruction failure and found that intramedullary nailing fixation alone had a significantly higher rate of nonunion than plate fixation (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.23 to 4.10) and the risk of fracture was lower for frozen autografts than allografts (OR = 0.3, 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.64) [20]. The most common mode of autograft failure in previous studies was infection, followed by local recurrence. The most common mode of autograft failure in this study was local recurrence (85.7%, 6/7), followed by infection (14.2%, 1/7). We believed that the possible reason may be bone cement combined with bridging plates reduced the incidence of deep infection and mechanical complications, while the predominance of high-grade sarcomas (77.8%) of this cohort resulted in a higher percentage of local recurrences.

The complication rate of frozen autograft reconstruction in this study was 33.3% (24/72), which was comparable with previous studies [40–44]. Ozaki et al. firstly reported the reconstructive outcomes of 26 intramedullary cement-augmented allografts and 19 noncement-augmented allografts. 15.8% (3/19) of noncement-augmented allografts had autograft fractures and no fractures occurred in cement-augmented allografts [47]. 21.1% of noncement-augmented and 3.8% of cement-augmented allografts had deep infection. Gupta et al. used intramedullary bone cement combined with locking plates for the reconstruction of intercalary allografts and had a graft fracture rate of 4.3% (2/46) and a deep infection rate of 8.6% (4/46) [21]. Wisanuyotin et al. reported on a biomechanical analysis of the augmentation effect of bilateral locking plates with different configurations on femoral allografts and found that a dual lateral-medial LP with bone cement augmentation providing the strongest fixation of the femur in terms of axial compression and lateral bending stiffness [48]. Our results support this conclusion and only one patient (1.4%) had graft fracture, which is lower than former studies [20, 39, 42–44].

Yang et al. reported the results of 33 intercalary frozen autograft reconstructions with a total complication rate of 28.1% (fracture rate, 6.1%) and a mean MSTS-93 score of 87.2% (70–100%) [39]. Tian et al. presented a fracture incidence of 62.5% (10/16) in periprosthetic frozen autograft reconstructions about the knee, and eight cases had knee dislocations [49]. Intramedullary cement augmented fixation combined with bridging plates was not used in 9 out of 10 fracture cases, and we believe that the lack of plate reconstruction or a strong internal fixation is responsible for the high fracture incidence. Takeuchi et al. reported gender and the use of intramedullary nailing only was an independent risk factor for bone nonunion. Our study showed reconstruction site (humerus) was an independent risk factor for bone nonunion. We believed that the use of unilateral bridging plate fixation only in the upper extremity does not provide enough fixation, which may increase the risk of upper extremity nonunion. Moreover, 39 cases were skeletally immature patients in our study. For cases where the osteotomy line was located in the metaphysis, the incidence of LLD was 12.8%, but no severe LLD (≥ 4 cm) was found. All patients were treated conservatively with shoe lifts. For patients with severe LLD, distraction osteogenesis may be an acceptable treatment choice for leg lengthening [11].

The mean MSTS-93 score in this study was 96% with good active mobility of the knee and shoulder. Such excellent functional results may be related to the preservation of the surrounding joint muscle attachment points and ligaments. However, this study only assessed functional outcomes in patients who retained frozen bone grafts at the last follow-up and did not consider functional outcome scores in patients with amputation or revision surgery, which may lead to an overestimation of functional outcomes. Nevertheless, we still believe that intercalary frozen bone grafts are a satisfactory reconstruction. Meanwhile, future studies should focus on comparing the functional outcomes of different reconstruction techniques, such as intercalary endoprostheses, allografts, and inactivated autografts.

There were also some limitations in this study. Firstly, there was inevitable selection bias. The percentage of high-grade osteosarcoma in this study was 77.8% (56/72), which was higher than that reported in previous studies (33–53%). This may be because our institution is a sarcoma referral centre in China and treats more high-grade sarcoma patients. Secondly, the lack of a control group in this study is because our centre almost rarely uses intramedullary nailings and non-bridging plates for inactivated autograft fixation after using intramedullary bone cement combined with bridging plates, which limits comparisons of the results of different reconstruction techniques. Finally, the sample size of this study remains limited. We believe a larger sample size and longer follow-up (≥ 10 years) are needed to validate the long-term reconstructive effect of frozen autografts.

Author contributions

Concept and design: Weifeng Liu; data collection: Zhiping Deng, Yongkun Yang; drafting of the article: Zhuoyu Li; critical revision of the article: Qing Zhang and Xiaohui Niu. Zhuoyu Li and Zhiping Deng contributed equally to this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China Grant No (2023YFB4706300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (62171017), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L212042), and Beijing Municipal Health Commission (BJRITO-RDP-2024).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, and the ethical standards of the institutional research committee.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zucchini R, Staals EL, Fiore M, Campanacci L, Giannini C, Manfrini M et al. Intercalary reconstruction of the distal femur with or without physeal preservation: results and impact on limb growth. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Smolle MA, Andreou D, Tunn PU, Leithner A. Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(7):445–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Crimì A, Joyce DM, Binitie O, Ruggieri P, Letson GD. The history of resection prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2023;47(3):873–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsuchiya H, Wan SL, Sakayama K, Yamamoto N, Nishida H, Tomita K. Reconstruction using an autograft containing tumour treated by liquid nitrogen. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(2):218–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Outani H, Takenaka S, Hamada K, Imura Y, Kakunaga S, Tamiya H, et al. A longterm follow-up study of extracorporeal irradiated autografts in limb salvage surgery for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors: a minimum follow-up of 10 years after surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2020;121(8):1276–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aponte-Tinao LA, Ayerza MA, Muscolo DL, Farfalli GL. Should fractures in massive intercalary bone allografts of the lower limb be treated with ORIF or with a new allograft? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(3):805–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanders PTJ, Spierings JF, Albergo JI, Bus MPA, Fiocco M, Farfalli GL, van de Sande MAJ, Aponte-Tinao LA, Dijkstra PDS. Long-term clinical outcomes of Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction for Lower-Extremity bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(12):1042–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takeuchi A, Tsuchiya H, Setsu N, et al. What are the complications, function, and survival of Tumor-devitalized autografts used in patients with limb-sparing surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors? A Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group multi-institutional study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023;481(11):2110–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Demiralp B, Ege T, Kose O, Yurttas Y, Basbozkurt M. Reconstruction of intercalary bone defects following bone tumor resection with segmental bone transport using an Ilizarov circular external fixator. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:1004–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharma A, Sharma A, Tomar S, Mishra A, Kashyap A, Maini L. Is Masquelet technique a successful viable treatment in reconstructing large tumor bone gaps in adolescent and adult? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11:348–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bozzo A, Aysola V, Yeung CM, Healey JH, Prince DE. Distraction Osteogenesis Reconstruction following resection of bone sarcomas: Surgical, Functional, and oncological outcomes from a prospective trial analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 May 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Takeuchi Y, Sakamoto A, Noguchi T, Toguchida J, Matsuda S. Recycled bone grafts treated with extracorporeal irradiation or liquid nitrogen freezing after malignant tumor resection. J Surg Oncol. 2024;129(7):1364–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Igarashi K, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Hayashi K, Nishida H, Kimura H, et al. The long-term outcome following the use of frozen autograft treated with liquid nitrogen in the management of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Bone Joint J. 2014;96–B(4):555–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oike N, Kawashima H, Ogose A, Hatano H, Ariizumi T, Kaidu M, et al. Long-term outcomes of an extracorporeal irradiated autograft for limb salvage operations in musculoskeletal tumours: over ten years’ observation. Bone Joint J. 2019;101–B(9):1151–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsuchiya H, Nishida H, Srisawat P, Shirai T, Hayashi K, Takeuchi A, et al. Pedicle frozen autograft reconstruction in malignant bone tumors. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(3):340–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zekry KM, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Takeuchi A, Higuchi T, Abe K, et al. Intercalary frozen autograft for reconstruction of malignant bone and soft tissue tumours. Int Orthop. 2017;41(7):1481–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khattak MJ, Umer M, Haroon-ur R, Umar M. Autoclaved tumor bone for reconstruction: an alternative in developing countries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:138–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee SY, Jeon DG, Cho WH, Song WS, Kim BS. Are pasteurized autografts durable for reconstructions after bone tumor resections? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:1728–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hindiskere S, Doddarangappa S, Chinder PS. What are the challenges and complications of sterilizing autografts with liquid nitrogen for malignant bone tumors? A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:2505–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang S, Li H, Xing Z, Ji T, Guo W. Factors influencing Nonunion and Fracture following Biological Intercalary Reconstruction for Lower-Extremity Bone tumors: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(12):3261–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gupta S, Kafchinski LA, Gundle KR, et al. Intercalary allograft augmented with intramedullary cement and plate fixation is a reliable solution after resection of a diaphyseal tumour. Bone Joint J. 2017;99–B(7):973–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li Y, Yang Y, Huang Z, Shan H, Xu H, Niu X. Bone defect reconstruction with autologous bone inactivated with liquid nitrogen after resection of primary limb malignant tumors: an observational study. Med (Baltim). 2020;99(24):e20442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Henderson ER, O’Connor MI, Ruggieri P, et al. Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours: a modified system including biological and expandable reconstructions. Bone Joint J. 2014;96–B(11):1436–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993(286):241–6. [PubMed]
  • 25.Davis AM, Wright JG, Williams JI, et al. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:508–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wheeler DL, Enneking WF. Allograft bone decreases in strength in vivo over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005:36–42. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Liu Q, He H, Duan Z, Zeng H, Yuan Y, Wang Z, Luo W. Intercalary allograft to reconstruct large-segment diaphysis defects after resection of Lower Extremity Malignant Bone Tumor. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:4299–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pan KL, Chan WH, Ong GB, Premsenthil S, Zulkarnaen M, Norlida D, et al. Limb salvage in osteosarcoma using autoclaved tumor-bearing bone. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Han I, Kim JH, Cho HS, Kim HS. Low-heat treated autograft versus allograft for intercalary reconstruction of malignant bone tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(7):823–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu P, Chen C-F, Chen C-M, et al. Intraoperative extracorporeal irradiation and frozen treatment on tumor-bearing autografts show equivalent outcomes for biologic reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:877–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K. Effects of liquid nitrogen treatment on the proliferation of osteosarcoma and the biomechanical properties of normal bone. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(3):374–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tanzawa Y, Tsuchiya H, Shirai T, Hayashi K, Yo Z, Tomita K. Histological examination of frozen autograft treated by liquid nitrogen removed after implantation. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(6):761–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Araki Y, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Takeuchi A, Miwa S, Igarashi K, Higuchi T, Abe K, Taniguchi Y, Yonezawa H, Morinaga S, Asano Y, Nojima T, Taki J, Tsuchiya H. A viability analysis of Tumor-Bearing Frozen Autograft for the Reconstruction after Resection of malignant bone tumors using 99m Tc-MDP scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(1):25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Singh VA, Nagalingam J, Saad M, Pailoor J. Which is the best method of sterilization of tumour bone for reimplantation? A biomechanical and histopathological study. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Do Phuoc H, Hoang PN, Binh DT, Huynh Minh T. Hip reconstruction with a combination of prosthesis and recycled autograft treated with liquid nitrogen in metastatic subtrochanteric fracture can improve quality of life: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022;95:107278. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Takata M, Sugimoto N, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Hayashi K, Nishida H, et al. Activity of bone morphogenetic protein-7 after treatment at various temperatures: freezing vs. pasteurization vs. allograft. Cryobiology. 2011;63(3):235–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marcove RC, Miller TR, Cahan WC. The treatment of primary and metastatic bone tumors by repetitive freezing. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1968;44:532–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ding Y, Niu XH, Liu WF, et al. Excision-alcoholization-replantation method in management of bone tumors. Chin J Orthop. 2011;31:652–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang J, Li W, Feng R, Li D. Intercalary frozen autografts for reconstruction of bone defects following meta-/diaphyseal tumor resection at the extremities. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Subhadrabandhu S, Takeuchi A, Yamamoto N, et al. Frozen autograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction in malignant bone tumors. Orthopedics. 2015;38:e911–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Abdelaal AHK, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Takeuchi A, Miwa S, Tsuchiya H. Epiphyseal sparing and reconstruction by frozen bone autograft after malignant bone tumor resection in children. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:892141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shimozaki S, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Nishida H, Hayashi K, Tanzawa Y, Kimura H, Takeuchi A, Igarashi K, Inatani H, Kato T, Tsuchiya H. Pedicle versus free frozen autograft for reconstruction in malignant bone and soft tissue tumors of the lower extremities. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:156–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ogura K, Miyamoto S, Sakuraba M, Fujiwara T, Chuman H, Kawai A. Intercalary reconstruction after wide resection of malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity using a composite graft with a devitalized autograft and a vascularized fibula. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:861575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Paholpak P, Sirichativapee W, Wisanuyotin T, Kosuwon W, Jeeravipoolvarn P. Clinical results of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumor treated by wide resection and recycling autograft reconstruction using liquid nitrogen. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2015;11(2):114–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Subhadrabandhu S, Takeuchi A, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Nishida H, Hayashi K, Miwa S, Tsuchiya H. Frozen autograft-prosthesis Composite Reconstruction in malignant bone tumors. Orthopedics. 2015;38(10):e911–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miwa S, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Takeuchi A, Igarashi K, Bangcoy MLS, Taniguchi Y, Morinaga S, Asano Y, Tsuchiya H. Graft survivals after Reconstruction using tumor-bearing frozen bone in the extremities. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(15):3926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W. Intramedullary, antibiotic-loaded cemented, massive allografts for skeletal reconstruction. 26 cases compared with 19 uncemented allografts. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68(4):387–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wisanuyotin T, Paholpak P, Sirichativapee W, Sirichativapee W, Kosuwon W. Effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of the dual locking plate for femoral allograft fixation: finite element analysis and biomechanical study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tian Z, Yang Y, Zhang P, Wang X, Yao W. Inactivation and replantation of the knee joint: an infeasible surgical method. World J Surg Oncol. 2024;22(1):33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES