ABSTRACT
The complete genome sequence of the candidate probiotic strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FNZ042 was determined using a hybrid genome assembly comprising data from Illumina and PacBio sequencing platforms. The genome assembly comprised 3,265,637 bp, including the complete circular chromosome and three circular plasmids.
KEYWORDS: genomics, bioinformatics, probiotics, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FNZ042
ANNOUNCEMENT
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FNZ042, a candidate probiotic strain from the Fonterra Culture Collection (Palmerston North, New Zealand) deposited with the Australian Measurement Institute (deposit number V23/018420), was sourced from New Zealand cheddar cheese in 1989. Taxonomy was initially determined using traditional culture methods and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
A hybrid assembly approach combining Illumina and PacBio reads was employed. The strain was purity-streaked twice from the original −80°C glycerol stock. A single colony was incubated statically overnight (De Man–Rogosa–Sharpe (MRS) broth, 37°C) for master and working glycerol stocks and gDNA isolation for Illumina sequencing. DNA extraction for PacBio sequencing required an additional culturing step where 1 mL overnight culture was added to 12 mL of pre-warmed MRS broth and incubated at 37°C for 5 hours. For Illumina sequencing, >200 ng of total gDNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), a library prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Paired 150-bp reads (2,183,744 total reads) were analyzed and quality-controlled using fastQC v0.11.9 (1) and Trim Galore v0.6.7 (2), with adapters removed and read ends with quality below Q30 trimmed. For PacBio sequencing, >8.5 µg of total gDNA was isolated using the NucleoBond HMW DNA kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL, Düren, Germany), while library preparation and sequencing were performed by Novogene (Singapore) using the Sequel platform. PacBio subreads were quality-filtered and converted to FASTQ format using BamTools 2.5.1 (3), retaining subreads with a minimum length of 1 kb and minimum quality of 0.75. PacBio sequencing statistics were computed with NanoPlot 1.42.0 (4), resulting in 380,915 unfiltered subreads and N50 of 7,568 bp.
Contig circularity was determined following genome assembly using the Unicycler pipeline v0.4.8 in the “normal” mode (5). Genome assembly statistics were computed using QUAST v5.2.0 (6), SeqKit v2.5.1 (7), and Bakta v1.9.3 (8). The total genome length was 3,265,637 bp, G + C content 44.54%, N50 of 3,207,670 bp, and L50 of 1, with 3,034 predicted coding sequences and a final estimated genome coverage of 982-fold. This included the complete circular chromosome (3,207,670 bp) and three circular plasmids; pFNZ042-01 (46,689 bp), pFNZ042-02 (9,254 bp), and pFNZ042-03 (2,024 bp). Taxonomy was confirmed using the GTDB-Tk pipeline v2.3.2 (9). The public version of the assembly was annotated using PGAP (10), and all analyses were based on local annotation using Bakta.
No antimicrobial resistance (AMR) or virulence genes were detected, as defined by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendations (11), using the AMRFinderPlus pipeline v3.12.8 (12) and ResFinder v4.6.0 (13) at 80% sequence identity and 70% coverage of the reference sequence. Likewise, no known genes involved in biogenic amine synthesis were detected, as evaluated using KofamScan v1.3.0 (14–17). In vitro safety assessment was performed according to EFSA guidelines (18) using the ISO 10932|IDF 223:2010 standards for determining the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics in lactic acid bacteria (19). All MIC values were lower or equal to the EFSA cutoffs, except for tetracycline and chloramphenicol (Table 1A). However, a previous analysis of 10 L. plantarum strains showed that most were resistant to these antibiotics (20), and a recent survey suggests that a higher MIC cutoff should be used for L. plantarum to better differentiate between susceptible strains and those with acquired resistance (21). This could indicate intrinsic resistance in the species and therefore minimal potential for horizontal transfer. This is supported by the absence of these AMR genes in FNZ042. D-/L-lactate production was assessed using the Megazyme D-/L-Lactic Acid (Rapid) Assay Kit (Neogen, Bray, Ireland) following the manufacturer’s instructions, as 60:40 wt/vol (Table 1B), consistent with other L. plantarum probiotic strains (22). The high-quality genomic data generated for L. plantarum FNZ042 in this study, together with these safety assessments, will assist in the evaluation of this strain as a potential probiotic.
TABLE 1.
(A) MIC results (µg/mL) – noting that as per EFSA guidelines, evaluation of resistance to vancomycin, streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin is not required for L. plantarum strains | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ampicillin | Gentamycin | Kanamycin | Erythromycin | Clindamycin | Tetracycline | Chloramphenicol | ||||
L. plantarum FNZ042 | 2 | <1 | 8 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 64 | 16 | |||
EFSA guidelines for L. plantarum | 2 | 16 | 64 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 8 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by Fonterra Limited, New Zealand. Work in P.W.O.’s lab was supported by Science Foundation, Ireland, through a Center Award to APC Microbiome, Ireland (12/RC/2273_P2). We thank Dr James Dekker for reviewing the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Shalome A. Bassett, Email: shalome.bassett@fonterra.com.
David A. Baltrus, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number GCA_040356725.1. Sequencing reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers SRX24875441 (Illumina) and SRX24875442 (PacBio).
REFERENCES
- 1. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
- 2. Trim Galore. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/
- 3. Barnett DW, Garrison EK, Quinlan AR, Strömberg MP, Marth GT. 2011. Bamtools: A C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics 27:1691–1692. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F. 2016. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS One 11:e0163962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A. 2021. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 7:000685. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) . 2021. EFSA statement on the requirements for whole genome sequence analysis of microorganisms intentionally used in the food chain. EFSA J 19:e06506. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Frye JG, Haendiges J, Haft DH, Hoffmann M, Pettengill JB, Prasad AB, Tillman GE, Tyson GH, Klimke W. 2021. AMRFinderPlus and the reference gene catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence. Sci Rep 11:12728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91456-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, et al. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Elsanhoty RM, Ramadan MF. 2016. Genetic screening of biogenic amines production capacity from some lactic acid bacteria strains. Food Control 68:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Landete JM, Arena ME, Pardo I, Manca de Nadra MC, Ferrer S. 2010. The role of two families of bacterial enzymes in putrescine synthesis from agmatine via agmatine deiminase. Int Microbiol 13:169–177. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li L, Wen X, Wen Z, Chen S, Wang L, Wei X. 2018. Evaluation of the biogenic amines formation and degradation abilities of Lactobacillus curvatus from Chinese bacon. Front Microbiol 9:1015. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, Ogata H. 2020. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36:2251–2252. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M de L, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, et al. 2018. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J 16:e05206. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. International Dairy Federation . 2010. ISO 10932 | IDF 223: 2010 - Milk and milk products - Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics applicable to bifidobacteria and non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria (LAB)
- 20. Campedelli I, Mathur H, Salvetti E, Clarke S, Rea MC, Torriani S, Ross RP, Hill C, O’Toole PW. 2019. Genus-wide assessment of antibiotic resistance in Lactobacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01738-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01738-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ma Q, Pei Z, Fang Z, Wang H, Zhu J, Lee Y-K, Zhang H, Zhao J, Lu W, Chen W. 2021. Evaluation of tetracycline resistance and determination of the tentative microbiological cutoff values in lactic acid bacterial species. Microorganisms 9:2128. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9102128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Önning G, Palm R, Linninge C, Larsson N. 2022. New Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strains: well tolerated and improve infant microbiota. Pediatr Res 91:1849–1857. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01678-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number GCA_040356725.1. Sequencing reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers SRX24875441 (Illumina) and SRX24875442 (PacBio).