Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1994 Jun 1;477(Pt 2):267–277. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020189

Changes in MEPP frequency during depression of evoked release at the frog neuromuscular junction.

J E Zengel 1, M A Sosa 1
PMCID: PMC1155627  PMID: 7932218

Abstract

1. Endplate potentials (EPPs) and miniature endplate potentials (MEPPs) were recorded from frog neuromuscular junctions bathed in Ringer solutions containing normal (1.8 mM) or high (3.6 mM) Ca2+. The peptide toxin mu-conotoxin GIIIA was added to the Ringer solution to prevent muscle action potentials and contraction. 2. The nerve was stimulated with conditioning trains of 200-4800 impulses applied at 20 impulses s-1 to characterize the effects of repetitive stimulation on changes in EPP amplitude and MEPP frequency under high quantal conditions. 3. MEPP frequency was dramatically increased during and immediately following repetitive stimulation under high quantal conditions, whereas EPP amplitude was greatly depressed. There was no effect of repetitive stimulation on MEPP amplitude. 4. Following the conditioning stimulation the increase in MEPP frequency decayed back to the control level with a time course that could be described by four exponentials. The time constants of these exponentials were very similar to those that describe the components of stimulation-induced increases in EPP amplitude and MEPP frequency observed under low quantal conditions when depression is absent. 5. The results of this study indicate that depression and the components of stimulation-induced increases in release (facilitation, augmentation and potentiation) can be present at the same time, suggesting that the mechanism of depression involves different underlying factors from the mechanism(s) responsible for increases in release. They also indicate either that depression selectively affects only those quanta destined to be released in direct response to the nerve action potential, which would suggest that EPPs and MEPPs arise from different pools of transmitter, or that depression in some way affects a step in the release process involved only in evoked release, and not asynchronous (spontaneous) release.

Full text

PDF
267

Images in this article

271Figure 3
on p.271

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. J., Takeda K., Umbach J. A. Inhibitors of calcium buffering depress evoked transmitter release at the squid giant synapse. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:145–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROOKS V. B., THIES R. E. Reduction of quantum content during neuromuscular transmission. J Physiol. 1962 Jul;162:298–310. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Betz W. J. Depression of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;206(3):629–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CURTIS D. R., ECCLES J. C. Synaptic action during and after repetitive stimulation. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:374–398. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cruz L. J., Gray W. R., Olivera B. M., Zeikus R. D., Kerr L., Yoshikami D., Moczydlowski E. Conus geographus toxins that discriminate between neuronal and muscle sodium channels. J Biol Chem. 1985 Aug 5;260(16):9280–9288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):574–585. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dennis M. J., Miledi R. Characteristics of transmitter release at regenerating frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1974 Jun;239(3):571–594. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doherty P., Hawgood B. J., Smith I. C. Changes in miniature end-plate potentials after brief nervous stimulation at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1984 Nov;356:349–358. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dudel J. Contribution of Ca2+ inflow to quantal, phasic transmitter release from nerve terminals of frog muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1992 Nov;422(2):129–142. doi: 10.1007/BF00370412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ELMQVIST D., QUASTEL D. M. PRESYNAPTIC ACTION OF HEMICHOLINIUM AT THE NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION. J Physiol. 1965 Apr;177:463–482. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eckert R., Chad J. E. Inactivation of Ca channels. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1984;44(3):215–267. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(84)90009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elmqvist D., Quastel D. M. A quantitative study of end-plate potentials in isolated human muscle. J Physiol. 1965 Jun;178(3):505–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Erulkar S. D., Rahamimoff R. The role of calcium ions in tetanic and post-tetanic increase of miniature end-plate potential frequency. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:501–511. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ginsborg B. L., Hirst G. D. The effect of adenosine on the release of the transmitter from the phrenic nerve of the rat. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):629–645. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HUBBARD J. I. REPETITIVE STIMULATION AT THE MAMMALIAN NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION, AND THE MOBILIZATION OF TRANSMITTER. J Physiol. 1963 Dec;169:641–662. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Howell J. N. A lesion of the transverse tubules of skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):515–533. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. JENKINSON D. H. The antagonism between tubocurarine and substances which depolarize the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1960 Jul;152:309–324. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klein M., Shapiro E., Kandel E. R. Synaptic plasticity and the modulation of the Ca2+ current. J Exp Biol. 1980 Dec;89:117–157. doi: 10.1242/jeb.89.1.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kusano K., Landau E. M. Depression and recovery of transmission at the squid giant synapse. J Physiol. 1975 Feb;245(1):13–32. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. LILEY A. W. The quantal components of the mammalian end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):571–587. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. LUNDBERG A., QUILISCH H. On the effect of calcium on presynaptic potentiation and depression at the neuro-muscular junction. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1953;111:121–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Large W. A., Rang H. P. Factors affecting the rate of incorporation of a false transmitter into mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1978 Dec;285:1–24. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Magleby K. L., Zengel J. E. A dual effect of repetitive stimulation on post-tetanic potentiation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Feb;245(1):163–182. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Magleby K. L., Zengel J. E. A quantitative description of stimulation-induced changes in transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Oct;80(4):613–638. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.4.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Magleby K. L., Zengel J. E. Augmentation: A process that acts to increase transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1976 May;257(2):449–470. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Magleby K. L., Zengel J. E. Long term changes in augmentation, potentiation, and depression of transmitter release as a function of repeated synaptic activity at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1976 May;257(2):471–494. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mallart A., Martin A. R. An analysis of facilitation of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1967 Dec;193(3):679–694. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mallart A., Martin A. R. The relation between quantum content and facilitation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):593–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McLachlan E. M. An analysis of the release of acetylcholine from preganglionic nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1975 Feb;245(2):447–466. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McLachlan E. M. Electrophysiological evidence for the second store of ACh in preganglionic nerve terminals. Brain Res. 1975 Nov 14;98(2):373–376. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meriney S. D., Grinnell A. D. Endogenous adenosine modulates stimulation-induced depression at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1991 Nov;443:441–455. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Molgo J., Comella J. X., Angaut-Petit D., Pecot-Dechavassine M., Tabti N., Faille L., Mallart A., Thesleff S. Presynaptic actions of botulinal neurotoxins at vertebrate neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol (Paris) 1990;84(2):152–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. OTSUKA M., ENDO M., NONOMURA Y. Presynaptic nature of neuromuscular depression. Jpn J Physiol. 1962 Dec 15;12:573–584. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.12.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sihra T. S., Nichols R. A. Mechanisms in the regulation of neurotransmitter release from brain nerve terminals: current hypotheses. Neurochem Res. 1993 Jan;18(1):47–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00966922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Silinsky E. M. Evidence for specific adenosine receptors at cholinergic nerve endings. Br J Pharmacol. 1980;71(1):191–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10925.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Silinsky E. M., Mellow A. M., Phillips T. E. Conventional calcium channel mediates asynchronous acetylcholine release by motor nerve impulses. Nature. 1977 Dec 8;270(5637):528–530. doi: 10.1038/270528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Silinsky E. M. The biophysical pharmacology of calcium-dependent acetylcholine secretion. Pharmacol Rev. 1985 Mar;37(1):81–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sosa M. A., Zengel J. E. Effect of glycerol treatment on transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. Brain Res. 1993 Sep 3;621(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90293-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sosa M. A., Zengel J. E. Use of mu-conotoxin GIIIA for the study of synaptic transmission at the frog neuromuscular junction. Neurosci Lett. 1993 Jul 23;157(2):235–238. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90745-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. TAKEUCHI A. The long-lasting depression in neuromuscular transmission of frog. Jpn J Physiol. 1958 Jun 15;8(2):102–113. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.8.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. THIES R. E. NEUROMUSCULAR DEPRESSION AND THE APPARENT DEPLETION OF TRANSMITTER IN MAMMALIAN MUSCLE. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:428–442. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zengel J. E., Magleby K. L. Augmentation and facilitation of transmitter release. A quantitative description at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Oct;80(4):583–611. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.4.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zengel J. E., Magleby K. L. Changes in miniature endplate potential frequency during repetitive nerve stimulation in the presence of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol. 1981 May;77(5):503–529. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.5.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zengel J. E., Magleby K. L. Differential effects of Ba2+, Sr2+, and Ca2+ on stimulation-induced changes in transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Aug;76(2):175–211. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.2.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES