ABSTRACT
Background and Aim
Globally, diabetes mellitus is a major public health concern affecting 10.5% of the population. Nearly 90% of these people have Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In Bhutan, T2DM is prevalent in 5.6% of the population, and around 60% are unaware of their diagnosis of diabetes. There is no baseline information on the rate and the risk factors for complications of diabetes in Bhutan. The study assessed the clinical profile and the risk factors for complications of T2DM at the Jigme Dorji Wangchuk (JDW) National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.
Methods
A descriptive cross‐sectional study was conducted at the JDW National Referral Hospital, Bhutan, from January to December 2019. Patients with T2DM attending diabetic clinics were included in the study. Demographic variables and metabolic profiles were recorded using a standard pro forma. Descriptive statistics were used to express the results. The association of clinical profiles with the microvascular complication was assessed using multivariate logistic analysis with statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Results
There were 292 patients with T2DM during the study period. The rate of microvascular complication is around 25% in T2DM. Among the complications, diabetic retinopathy occurred in over 51%, followed by neuropathy (29.7%) and nephropathy (18.9%). Over 1/3rd of patients had a duration of diabetes over 10 years with a mean duration of 6.3 (5.4) years, and around 44% (127/292) of them had poor glycemic control (HbA1C ≥ 7%). The age ≥ 60 years and the duration of diabetes ≥ 10 years were independent risk factors for microvascular complications in T2DM patients. Regular exercise prevents retinopathy (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.2–0.9, p = 0.026).
Conclusion
There is a microvascular complication in 1 in 4 of type 2 diabetic patients. Age over 60 years and a duration of diabetes of more than 10 years are independent risk factors for microvascular complications, and regular exercise is preventive for microvascular complications.
Keywords: diabetes complications, diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathies, diabetic neuropathies, diabetic retinopathy
Abbreviations
- BMI
body mass index
- CI
confidence interval
- FBS
fasting blood sugar
- HDL
high density lipoprotein
- HbA1C
glycosylated hemoglobin
- JDW
Jigme Dorji Wangchuk
- LDL
low density lipoprotein
- PPBS
post prandial blood sugar
- OR
odds ratio
- REBH
Research Ethical Board of Health
- STATA
statistical software for data science
- T2DM
type 2 diabetes mellitus
- WHO
World Health Organization
1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition that occurs when the body cannot produce enough or effectively use insulin and is induced by a genetic predisposition coupled with environmental factors [1]. The global prevalence of diabetes for the 20–79 age group is 10.5% and it is projected to rise to 12.2% by 2045 [2].
Diabetes is classified as Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hybrid forms of diabetes, other specific types, unclassified diabetes, and hyperglycemia first detected during pregnancy [3], among which T2DM is the most common type accounting for over 90% of the patients with diabetes [4].
The risk factors for T2DM include genetic susceptibility, obesity, unhealthy dietary habits, smoking and alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, and less physical activity [5, 6].
Diabetes affects many organ systems and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. Diabetes‐related complications are divided into vascular and nonvascular complications. The vascular complications of T2DM can present as macrovascular (coronary heart disease, peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease) and microvascular (retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy) complications [7, 8].
Microvascular complications mainly develop due to uncontrolled hyperglycemia, and the synergistic effects of smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and genetic and hereditary susceptibility also contribute [9].
The global prevalence of microvascular complications in people with T2DM ranges from 14.5% to 23.5% [10]. Of which the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy are 35%, 30%–50%, and 16%–87% respectively [11, 12, 13].
Intensive glycemic control can modestly reduce the onset or slow the progression of microvascular complications in T2DM by 1% to 10% [14]. Lifestyle changes including cessation of smoking and alcohol intake, staying physically active, managing dyslipidemia, and controlling blood pressure along with renal function monitoring are the other ways to prevent diabetic microvascular complications [15].
In Bhutan, based on a National Health Survey (2023), the prevalence of diabetes is 5.6%, and almost 60% of those with diabetes are unaware of their diagnosis. Among those aware of the diagnosis, nearly 1.3% of diabetic patients are not on treatment, 13.5% are on treatment with uncontrolled diabetes, and only 25.8% on treatment are with controlled blood sugar [16]. Anecdotal evidence shows a significant number of diabetic patients are either not on treatment or their blood sugar is poorly controlled, and expecting more complications of T2DM in Bhutan. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of complications of T2DM and risk factors associated with complications of T2DM.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design
This was a descriptive cross‐sectional study.
2.2. Study Site
The study was carried out at the diabetes clinic at the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck (JDW) National Referral Hospital, Thimphu Bhutan.
2.3. Study Period
The study was conducted over 1 year from January 1, 2019 to December 30, 2019.
2.4. Study Population
All the patients diagnosed with T2DM visited diabetic clinics at JDW National Referral Hospital during the study period.
2.5. Study Setting
Bhutan is a small land‐locked country in the Himalayas sandwiched between China and India with a total population of over 0.7million [17]. Healthcare in Bhutan is publicly owned and solely state‐funded. It has a three‐tiered health system with the Primary Health Center at the lowest level followed by district hospitals, regional referral hospitals, and the national referral hospital [17].
There are diabetic clinics at the regional and national referral hospitals. At the JDW National Referral Hospital, the diabetic clinic is conducted twice a week and it is run by a physician and a clinical nurse. The diabetes clinic has about 3500 patients registered for care of which over 90% are T2DM. On average, 90 patients visit the clinic on scheduled days. The nurse measures the pulse, blood pressure, and BMI as an initial screening process before being seen by the physician. For uncomplicated and euglycemic patients, blood investigations such as fasting and 2‐h postprandial blood sugar were monitored monthly and Hb1Ac, renal and liver functions, lipid profile, and 24‐h urinary protein level were reviewed every 3 months. A neurological and fundoscopic examination is advised every 6 months. Those with diabetic‐related complications and poor glycemic control were followed up more frequently. Diabetic patients are treated with oral diabetic agents or insulin depending on the blood sugar levels.
2.5.1. Inclusion Criteria
Patients diagnosed with T2DM were included in the study. Diagnosis of T2DM is made based on the American Diabetes Association guideline with the presence of one criterion of the following, fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (≥ 7 mmol/L) or 2 h plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (≥ 11.1 mmol/L) after 75 g glucose load or random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (≥ 11.1 mmol/L) in a patient with typical symptoms of diabetes, or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) [18].
2.5.2. Exclusion Criteria
Patients diagnosed with other categories of diabetes including type 1 diabetes, hybrid forms of diabetes, other specific types, unclassified diabetes, and hyperglycemia first detected during pregnancy (gestational diabetes mellitus and diabetes in pregnancy) were excluded from the study.
2.5.3. Sample Size Calculation
The sample size was determined using Cochran's formula for a single population proportion considering the following assumptions: 95% confidence interval (Z = 1.96), and 5% margin of error (e = 0.05). The prevalence (p) of T2DM is 23% (p = 0.23); and q = 1‐p; n = sample size.
Considering a 10% dropout rate, the final sample size was 310.
2.6. Sampling Method
A systematic random sampling method was used to select the patients. On average 90 patients visit each clinic day. Five patients were invited to participate in the study every clinic day. Every 18th patient was enrolled (90/5 = 18). This required 62 clinic days to complete data collection which accounted for government and public holidays on some of the diabetes clinic days.
2.7. Data Collection Procedures
An administrative clearance was obtained from the Ministry of Health, and an ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethical Board of Health, Bhutan (Reference No: REBH/Approval/2018/055, dated December 31, 2018). The patients with T2DM at the diabetic clinic were invited to participate in the study, and those who consented to participate were included in the study. After obtaining informed written consent, the investigators conducted the history and examination including fundoscopy and neurological examination, and reviewed the investigation reports. The demographic variables (age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, duration of diabetes, level of education, smoking status, alcohol intake, and physical activities) and the metabolic profiles (low‐density lipoprotein (LDL), high‐density lipoprotein (HDL), triglyceride, total cholesterol, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels) were recorded using a standard proforma. Complications of T2DM retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy were assessed and recorded.
Duplication of data due to frequent visits to the clinic was checked using the patient's name, and citizenship identity card number and removed from the final data set.
2.8. Operational Definition
2.8.1. Diabetic Neuropathy
The diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy is done based on the standard assessment for signs and symptoms using a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument [19].
2.8.2. Diabetic Nephropathy
Nephropathy was diagnosed based on 24‐h urinary protein > 300 mg/day, and or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [20].
2.8.3. Physical Activity
Based on the American Diabetic Association, a minimum of 150 min of moderate to vigorous exercises per week is recommended and considered adequate for people with diabetes [21].
2.8.4. Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI is an index calculated using the height and weight of a person to provide an estimate of body fat in males and females of any age. BMI calculation is shown:
BMI is classified as underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25–29.9) and obese (BMI ≥ 30) based on WHO classification [22].
2.9. Data Management
Data collectors and the nurses of diabetic clinics were trained on the study instrument, consent form, data collection procedure, and confidentiality of the respondents. The collected data were checked for completeness daily by the investigators to monitor the overall quality of the data collection process.
2.10. Data Analysis
Data was double entered in EpiData Entry (version 3.1, EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) and analyzed in EpiData analysis version 2.2.2.183 and STATA version 13.1. Descriptive data were presented as frequency, percentage, mean, or standard deviation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to find the association of clinical profiles with microvascular complications, and the statistical significance level was considered at p < 0.05 level.
2.11. Human Ethics and Consent to Participate Declarations
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of Health, Ministry of Health, Bhutan with reference number: REBH/Approval/2018/055, dated December 31, 2018 (Link to Ethical Review Board: https://www.moh.gov.bt/about/program-profiles/357-2/). Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic Profile
There were 292 patients with T2DM during the study period. More than 90% of the patients (266/292) were age 40 years and older; the majority of them were female (61.6%, 180/292), overweight and or obese (75%, 219/292), and illiterate (62,7%, 183/292). Over 1/3rd of patients had a duration of diabetes over 10 years with a mean duration of 6.3 (5.4) years (Table 1).
Table 1.
Sociodemographic profile of patients with T2DM at the JDW National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan, 2019.
Sociodemographic characteristics | n (%) |
---|---|
Age (years) | |
< 40 | 26 (8.9) |
40–59 | 138 (47.2) |
≥ 60 | 128 (43.9) |
Gender | |
Male | 112 (38.4) |
Female | 180 (61.6) |
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | |
< 18.5 | 1 (0.3) |
18.5–24.9 | 72 (24.7) |
≥ 25 | 219 (75.0) |
Duration of diabetes (years) | |
< 10 | 212 (72.7) |
10–19 | 70 (23.9) |
> 20 | 10 (3.4) |
Mean duration of diabetes, mean (SD) | 6.3 (5.4) |
Level of education | |
Illiterate | 183 (62.7) |
Primary/nonformal education | 52 (17.8) |
High school | 25 (8.5) |
Certificate/Diploma/Graduate | 20 (6.9) |
Monastic education | 12 (4.1) |
Smoking status | |
Yes | 7 (2.4) |
No | 285 (97.6) |
Alcohol intake | |
Yes | 14 (4.8) |
No | 278 (95.2) |
Physical exercise | |
≥ 150 min/week | 150 (51.4) |
< 150 min/week | 142 (48.6) |
3.2. Metabolic Profile
Over 2/3rd T2DM patients were hypertensive (35%, 103/292), more than 43% had poor glycemic control as evidenced by elevated levels of HbA1C (43.5%, 127/292), and around 22% had a high level of total cholesterol levels (n = 63). The details of the metabolic profiles of the study subjects are shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2.
Metabolic profile of patients with T2DM at the JDW National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan, 2019.
Metabolic parameters | Total | Male | Female |
---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
Hypertension | |||
Normal | 189 (64.7) | 76 (67.9) | 113 (62.8) |
Hypertension | 103 (35.3) | 36 (32.1) | 67 (37.2) |
HbA1C | |||
Good control (≤ 7%) | 165 (56.5) | 65 (58.1) | 100 (55.6) |
Poor control (> 7%) | 127 (43.5) | 47 (41.9) | 80 (44.4) |
HDL cholesterol | |||
≥ 40 mg/dL | 248 (84.9) | 90 (80.4) | 158 (87.8) |
< 40 mg/dL | 44 (15.1) | 22 (19.6) | 22 (12.2) |
LDL Cholesterol | |||
≥ 100 mg/dL | 115 (39.4) | 38 (33.9) | 77 (42.8) |
< 100 mg/dL | 177 (60.6) | 74 (66.1) | 103 (57.2) |
Total cholesterol | |||
< 200 mg/dL | 229 (78.4) | 89 (79.5) | 140 (77.8) |
≥ 200 mg/dL | 63 (21.6) | 23 (20.5) | 40 (22.2) |
Triglyceride | |||
> 150 mg/dL | 68 (3.4) | 28 (25.0) | 40 (22.2) |
≤ 150 mg/dL | 224 (96.6) | 84 (75.0) | 140 (77.8) |
Abbreviations: HbA1C, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.
3.3. Microvascular Complications
Of 292 patients with T2DM, over 25% (n = 74) had microvascular complications. Among the microvascular complications, more than half are retinopathy (51.4%, 38/74), and around 95% of the retinopathy is non‐proliferative (Table 3).
Table 3.
Types of microvascular complications in patients with T2DM at the JDW National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan, 2019.
Microvascular complications (n = 74) | n (%) |
---|---|
Retinopathy | 38 (51.4) |
Neuropathy | 22 (29.7) |
Nephropathy | 14 (18.9) |
Retinopathy (n = 38) | |
Nonproliferative | 36 (94.7) |
Proliferative | 2 (5.3) |
Number of complications (n = 74) | |
Any one complication | 45 (60.8) |
Any two complications | 21 (28.4) |
All three complications | 8 (10.8) |
3.4. The Association of Risk Factors for Complications of Type 2 Diabetes
The microvascular complications were significantly associated with age ≥ 60 years (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.8 ‐ 6.0, p < 0.001) and duration of diabetes ≥ 10 years (OR 11.9, 95% CI 6.2‐22.9, p < 0.001). Regular exercise was shown to have a preventive effect against the development of diabetic retinopathy (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2‐0.9, p < 0.026). The details of the association of risk factors for complications of diabetes are shown in Table 4.
Table 4.
Risk factors associated with microvascular complications in T2DM at the National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan, 2019.
Risk factors | Retinopathy | p‐value | Nephropathy | p‐value | Neuropathy | p‐value | Any one complication | p‐value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
Age group | |||||||||
< 60 years | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
≥ 60 years | 2.5 (1.2–5.0) | 0.012 | 3.1 (1.5–6.4) | 0.003 | 2.9 (1.8–7.5) | 0.021 | 3.3 (1.8–6.0) | < 0.001 | |
Gender | |||||||||
Male | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||
Female | 0.9 (0.5–1.9) | 0.879 | 0.7 (0.4–1.4) | 0.311 | 0.7 (0.1–0.2) | 0.478 | 0.8 (0.4–1.4) | 0.374 | |
Duration of Diabetes | |||||||||
< 10 years | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
≥ 10 years | 18.5 (4.6–7.7) | < 0.001 | 4.3 (1.8–10.7) | 0.001 | 14.5 (6.3–33.6) | < 0.001 | 11.9 (6.2–22.9) | < 0.001 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||||
< 18.5 | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
18.5‐24.9 | 3.5 (0.9–13.8) | 0.08 | 0.1 (0.4–3.4) | 0.85 | 0.6 (0.2–2.6) | 0.534 | 1.2 (0.4–3.3) | 0.745 | |
≥ 25 | 1.3 (0.4–4.5) | 0.693 | 0.4 (0.2–1.0) | 0.054 | 0.4 (0.1–1.1) | 0.065 | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) | 0.201 | |
HbA1C | |||||||||
Good control (< 7%) | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
Poor control (≥ 7%) | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) | 0.219 | 1.4 (0.7–2.9) | 0.304 | 1.6 (0.7–3.9) | 0.280 | 0.9 (0.6–1.8) | 0.978 | |
Total cholesterol | |||||||||
< 200 mg/dL | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
≥ 200 mg/dL | 0.3 (0.1–0.9) | 0.068 | 0.2 (0.0–0.8) | 0.022 | 0.2 (0.0–1.2) | 0.076 | 0.2 (0.7–0.6) | 0.004 | |
Triglyceride | |||||||||
≤ 150 mg/dL | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
> 150 mg/dL | 0.9 (0.4–1.7) | 0.681 | 0.8 (0.4–1.6) | 0.542 | 0.7 (0.3–1.7) | 0.389 | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) | 0.200 | |
Smoking | |||||||||
No | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
Yes | 1.1 (0.1–9.5) | 0.919 | 1.2 (0.1–9.9) | 0.897 | — | — | 0.6 (0.1–5.4) | 0.681 | |
Exercise for more than 150 min/week | |||||||||
No | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
Yes | 0.4 (0.2–0.9) | 0.026 | 0.7 (0.3–1.4) | 0.292 | 0.9 (0.4–2.3) | 0.894 | 0.8 (0.4–1.3) | 0.269 | |
Alcohol | |||||||||
No | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
Yes | 0.5 (0.1–3.9) | 0.512 | 0.5 (0.1–4.1) | 0.531 | 0.9 (0.1–7.6) | 0.955 | 0.3 (0.0–2.2) | 0.232 | |
Hypertension | |||||||||
Normal | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | — | ||||
Hypertension | 1.1 (0.5–2.2) | 0.828 | 1.1 (0.6–2.3) | 0.727 | 1.3 (0.5–3.1) | 0.566 | 1.2 (0.7–2.1) | 0.578 |
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; HbA1C, glycosylated hemoglobin; OR, odds ratio.
4. Discussion
In the current study, the rate of microvascular complications in T2DM was around 25%. A comprehensive review of literature conducted in the US on microvascular complications showed the same prevalence rate of 25% [23] and a similar rate (26%) was reported from Ethiopia [24].
In the present study, at least one complication was present (either retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy) in 60%, which is quite high. At least one complication present was significantly less in the prevalence study in China as compared to the present study finding (34% vs 60%) [25]. The differences in the rate of complications between the countries could be due to the difference in treatment regimens, compliance with the treatment, and the quality of medicines used for the treatment.
The prevalence of hypertension in type 2 diabetes in Bhutan is 35%. The cross‐sectional study conducted in other countries like Ethiopia (55%), Afghanistan (70%), and Tanzania (55%) is comparatively high as compared to hypertensive prevalence in the current study [26, 27, 28]. Bhutan is a mountainous country and the majority of the people walk to the office and back home unlike the people in other countries who drive cars wherever they go. Physical inactivity, a sedentary lifestyle, and an unhygienic diet must be factors for the higher prevalence rate of hypertension in other countries.
Factors associated with complications of diabetes are older age, early onset of diabetes, duration of diabetes, presence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and poor glycemic controls [23, 25, 26]. The current study showed only longer duration of diabetes (≥ 10 years) and the older age of the patients (> 60 years) are independently associated with microvascular complications of T2DM. Other factors like the presence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and poor glycemic control are not found to be associated with complications of diabetes in the current study. This is because, in the current study, there were only a few cases of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and patients with poor control of diabetes.
Regular exercise improves blood glucose control by sensitizing the insulin receptors, reduces cardiovascular risk factors associated with diabetes, improves dyslipidemia, and regulates BMI. Exercise prevents most of the complications of type 2 diabetes including microvascular and macrovascular complications [29]. Daily performing regular exercise (a minimum of 150 min of moderate to vigorous exercises per week) is found to have a preventive effect on retinopathy by almost 60% in the present study.
One interesting finding from this study is the higher proportion of overweight and obese diabetic population which stood at 75%. Although not analyzed in our study, obesity was related to poor glycemic control and dyslipidemia in the diabetic population [30, 31]. In the current study, around 44% of our participants had poor glycemic control with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.
5. Limitation
Since this was a single center‐based study, we were not able to assess the exact prevalence of the disease complications. As such, the actual burden of the disease could not be generalized for the whole country. Due to the scarcity of laboratory resources and a higher percentage of illiterate participants, the diagnosis of nephropathy might have been less accurate in our setting.
6. Conclusion
One in four patients with type 2 diabetes is having complications of diabetes. The relatively older patients with a longer duration of diabetes resulted in diabetic microvascular complications, and regular exercise is preventive for complications of diabetes. With the demographic transition of the aging diabetic population and the duration of diabetes, preventive measures to decrease microvascular complications need to be strengthened. Good glycemic control and regular screening of diabetic complications are recommended at the practice level. Lifestyle modification to avert adverse metabolic profile is recommended at the policy level.
Author Contributions
Tshering Norbu: conceptualization; methodology; investigation; validation; formal analysis; supervision; writing–review & editing; writing–original draft. Yeshey Dorjey: conceptualization; methodology; data curation; investigation; validation; visualization; formal analysis; supervision; writing–review & editing; writing–original draft. Sangay Tshering: conceptualization; methodology; writing–review & editing; Validation; Data curation; Writing–original draft. Namkha Dorji: conceptualization; methodology; data curation; validation; investigation; writing–review & editing. Guru Prasad Dhakal: conceptualization; methodology; data curation; validation; Investigation; writing–review & editing.
Disclosure
The lead author Yeshey Dorjey affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
Ethics Statement
This research was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of Health, Ministry of Health, Bhutan with Reference number: REBH/Approval/2017/072, dated 4/12/2017.
Consent
Informed written consent for publication was obtained from all the study participants who were included in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
A very heartfelt thank you to the Medicine department and the diabetic clinic, at JDW National Referral Hospital. The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Health and Khesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan for their support. No fund is involved in conducting this research.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Banday M. Z., Sameer A. S., and Nissar S., “Pathophysiology of Diabetes: An Overview,” Avicenna Journal of Medicine 10, no. 04 (2020): 174–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dysted M. P., Balázs Esztergályos S. G., Helman B., et al., IDF Diabetes Atlas [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/idfawp/resource-files/2021/07/IDF_Atlas_10th_Edition_2021.pdf.
- 3. WHO . Classification of Diabetes Mellitus 2019 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/325182/9789241515702-eng.pdf.
- 4. Forouhi N. G. and Wareham N. J., “Epidemiology of Diabetes,” Med (United Kingdom) [Internet 47, no. 1 (2019): 22–27, Available from: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2018.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bi Y., Wang T., Xu M., et al., “Advanced Research on Risk Factors of Type 2 Diabetes,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 28, no. SUPPL.2 (2012): 32–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bellou V., Belbasis L., Tzoulaki I., and Evangelou E., “Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Exposure‐Wide Umbrella Review of Meta‐Analyses,” PLoS One 13, no. 3 (2018): e0194127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chawla A., Chawla R., and Jaggi S., “Microvasular and Macrovascular Complications in Diabetes Mellitus: Distinct or Continuum,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 20, no. 4 (2016): 546–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Powers A. C., Niswender K. D., and Evans‐Molina C., “Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis, Classification, and Pathophysiology.” in Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, eds. Jameson J. L., Fauci A. S., Kasper D. L., Hauser S. L., Longo D. L. and Loscalzo J. (New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill Education, 2018. 20e. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Crasto W., Patel V., Davies M. J., and Khunti K., “Prevention of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America 50, no. 3 (2021): 431–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kosiborod M., Gomes M. B., Nicolucci A., et al., “Vascular Complications in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Prevalence and Associated Factors in 38 Countries (The Discover Study Program),” Cardiovascular Diabetology 17, no. 1 (2018): 150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Webber S., “International Diabetes Federation,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 102 (2013): 147–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gheith O., Farouk N., Nampoory N., Halim M. A., and Al‐Otaibi T., “Diabetic Kidney Disease,” Journal of nephropharmacology 5, no. 1 (2016): 49–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sobhani S., Asayesh H., Sharifi F., et al., “Prevalence of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 13, no. 1 (2014): 97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Boussageon R., Pouchain D., and Renard V., “Prevention of Complications in Type 2 Diabetes: Is Drug Glucose Control Evidence Based,” The British journal of general practice: The journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 67, no. 655 (2017): 85–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Viswanathan V., “Preventing Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 19, no. 7 (2015): 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. MOH. 5th National Health Survey [Internet]. Thimphu; 2023. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/Final_National-Health-Survey-2023.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Thinley N. W., T. D., T. T., J. S., “The Kingdom of Bhutan Health System Review.” World Health Organization. Regional Office for South‐East Asia (Health Systems in Transition; Vol, 2017). 7, No. 2. [Google Scholar]
- 18. ADA ., “Disclosures: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023,” Diabetes Care 46 (2023): S281–S282. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sartor C. D., Oliveira M. D., Campos V., Ferreira J. S. S. P., and Sacco I. C. N., “Cross‐Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument,” Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 22, no. 3 (2018): 222–230, Available from: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Persson F. and Rossing P., “Diagnosis of Diabetic Kidney Disease: State of the Art and Future Perspective,” Kidney International Supplements 8, no. 1 (2018): 2–7, Available from: 10.1016/j.kisu.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Advisor E. Updated ADA Guidelines on Physical Activity for People with Diabetes [Internet]. 2024. [cited Mar 25, 2024]. Available from: https://www.endocrinologyadvisor.com/diabetes/updated-ada-guidelines-on-physical-activity-for-people-with-diabetes/.
- 22. World Health Organization Expert Consultation Appropriate Body Mass Index for Asian Populations and Its Implications,” Lancet 363 (2004): 157–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Faselis C., Katsimardou A., Imprialos K., Deligkaris P., Kallistratos M., and Dimitriadis K., “Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” Current Vascular Pharmacology 18, no. 2 (2020): 117–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Merid F., Getahun F., Esubalew H., and Gezahegn T., “Diabetic Microvascular Complications and Associated Factors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Southern Ethiopia,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 15, no. July (2024): 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bui H. D. T., Jing X., Lu R., et al., “Prevalence of and Factors Related to Microvascular Complications in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Tianjin, China: A Cross‐Sectional Study,” Annals of Translational Medicine 7, no. 14 (2019): 325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Haile T. G., Mariye T., Tadesse D. B., Gebremeskel G. G., Asefa G. G., and Getachew T., “Prevalence of Hypertension Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” International Health 15, no. 3 (2023): 235–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Naseri M. W., Esmat H. A., and Bahee M. D., “Prevalence of Hypertension in Type‐2 Diabetes Mellitus,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) 78, no. May (2022): 103758, Available from: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mwimo J., Kimondo F. C., and Mboya I. B., “Prevalence of Hypertension and Associated Factors Among Diabetic Patients in Kilimanjaro Region, Northern Tanzania: A Hospital‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study,” Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health [Internet] 23, no. July (2023): 101387, Available from: 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Amanat S., Ghahri S., Dianatinasab A., Fararouei M., and Dianatinasab M., “Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology [Internet] no. 1228 (2020): 91–105, Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-1792-1_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bae J. P., Lage M. J., Mo D., Nelson D. R., and Hoogwerf B. J., “Obesity and Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Analysis of Physician Electronic Health Records in the US From 2009‐2011,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications 30, no. 2 (2016. Mar): 212–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hassan M. R., Jamhari M. N., Hayati F., et al., “Determinants of Glycaemic Control Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Northern State of Kedah, Malaysia: A Cross‐Sectional Analysis of 5 Years National Diabetes Registry 2014‐2018,” Pan African Medical Journal 39, no. 206 (2021), Available from: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.206.30410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.