Abstract
Background:
The role of circulating progenitor cells (CPC) in collateral formation that occurs in the presence of chronic total occlusions (CTO) of a coronary artery is not well established. In stable patients with a CTO, we investigated whether CPC levels are associated with (a) collateral development and (b) ischemic burden, as measured by circulating high sensitivity troponin-I (hsTn-I) levels.
Methods:
CPCs were enumerated by flow cytometry as CD45med+ blood mononuclear cells expressing CD34 and both CD34 and CD133 epitopes. The association between CPC counts and both Rentrop collateral grade (0, 1, 2, or 3) and hsTn-I levels were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.
Results:
In 89 patients (age 65.5, 72% male, 27% Black), a higher CPC count was positively associated with a higher Rentrop collateral grade; [CD34+ adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.49 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.95, 2.34) P = 0.082] and [CD34+/CD133+ OR 1.57 95% CI (1.05, 2.36) P = 0.028]. Every doubling of CPC counts was also associated with lower hsTn-I levels [CD34+ β −0.35 95% CI (−0.49, −0.15) P = 0.002] and [CD34+/CD133+ β −0.27 95% CI (−0.43, −0.08) P = 0.009] after adjustment.
Conclusion:
Individuals with higher CPC counts have greater collateral development and lower ischemic burden in the presence of a CTO.
Keywords: Chronic Total occlusion, Circulating progenitor cell, Collaterals
1. Introduction
Progenitor and stem cells in the circulation are largely derived from the bone marrow and contribute to repair of the vasculature and myocardium after injury [1–4]. Circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) that express the cluster of differentiation (CD) 34 epitope have the potential to differentiate into several distinct lineages that contribute to endogenous repair capacity such as hematopoietic cells (identified by their expression of the CD34 epitope on CD45med cells), and nonhematopoietic mesenchymal progenitor cells, which lack CD45 expression [5–8]. CD133 is a 5-transmembrance antigen that is lost during maturation and therefore identifies an early CPC-enriched subpopulation [9,10].
In the setting of injury, progenitor cells migrate from the bone marrow into the circulation, to the culprit tissue and contribute to repair and regeneration [11–13]. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients have a variable ability to mobilize progenitor cells [14,15]. Moreover, low CPC counts are an independent indicator of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in a variety of cardiovascular syndromes [14,16–20].
A chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary artery is a 100% occlusion that is present for over 3 months and is encountered in 15–30% of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography [21]. CTOs are associated with greater ischemia than non-CTO lesions [22]. Collaterals develop over time in response to myocardial ischemia and more profuse development of collaterals has been associated with lower ischemic burden [23]. A previous small study of 35 patients with ≥90% occlusion of the coronary arteries demonstrated an association between higher CD34+ CPC counts and greater collateral circulation [24], but larger studies investigating the role of CPCs in populations with a CTO are lacking. Additionally, whether CPC numbers are directly associated with the ischemic burden, estimated as circulating high sensitivity troponin-I (hsTn-I) levels [25–28], remains unknown. In this prospective cohort of patients with stable CAD with a CTO, we aimed to investigate the association between CD34+ and CD34+/CD133+ CPCs and (a) collateral development and (b) ischemia, estimated with circulating hsTn-I levels. We hypothesized that higher CPC levels will be associated with more robust collateral development and with lower levels of hsTn-I.
2. Methods
2.1. Patients
We studied participants with stable CAD and a CTO enrolled in the Emory Cardiovascular Biobank (NCT00378924), a prospective cohort of patients referred for clinically indicated cardiac catheterization at three Emory healthcare sites in Atlanta, GA between May 2004 and March 2018 [29]. Exclusion criteria included (1) history of cardiac transplantation, (2) history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and (3) acute coronary syndrome at presentation.
A CTO was defined as 100% luminal diameter stenosis with absence of antegrade flow on angiography of known or assumed 3 months duration [30]. CTO collateral grade was determined by the Rentrop classification score [31], with a score of 0: having no visible collaterals, 1: having collaterals without filling of the epicardial segment, 2: having partial epicardial artery filling and 3: having complete filling of the epicardial coronary artery. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from questionnaires and medical records included age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), history of smoking, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), history of myocardial infarction (MI), history of chronic kidney disease, history of heart failure (HF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (defined by most recent transthoracic echocardiography or ventriculography), diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 6.5 or treatment with insulin or oral antidiabetic medications), hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg, or treatment with anti-hypertensive medications), dyslipidemia (total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein >130 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein <40 mg/dL or treatment with lipid-lowering medications) as previously described [29]. The study was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board. All subjects provided written informed consent.
2.2. CPC Assays
CPCs were measured in peripheral blood samples collected in EDTA tubes before the catheterization procedure. Samples were incubated with fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antihuman mouse antibodies within 4 hours of collection and enumerated using flow cytometry as CD45med cells co-expressing CD34 and CD133. 300 μL of peripheral blood was incubated with 7 μL of fluorochrome-labeled isothiocyanate CD34 (BD biosciences, San Jose, California), PerCP-CD45 (BD Biosciences), and 5 μL APC-CD133 (Miltenyi, Bergish Gladbach, Germany) in the dark for 15 minutes [32]. Then, 1.5 mL ammonium chloride lysing buffer was added to lyse red blood cells. 1.5 mL of staining median phosphate buffered saline with 3% heat-inactivated serum and 0.1% sodium azide was added to stop the lysing reaction [32]. Then, 100 μL of Accucheck Counting Beads (Cat#: PCB100; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) were added to act as an internal standard for direct estimation of the target cell subset concentrations [32]. At least 2.5 million events were acquired from the cytometer. Flow cytometry data was analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, Oregon) with the filter set at CD45med cells. The exclusion of CD45bright cells helped to eliminate lymphoblasts and the exclusion of CD45− cells helped eliminate nonhematopoietic progenitors such as mesenchymal or osteoprogenitor cells. CPC counts (CD34+ and CD34+/CD133+) were measured using CD45med+ filter and are reported as cell counts per mL [32]. In 20 samples that were repeatedly analyzed on 2 occasions by 2 technicians, the percent repeatability coefficients were calculated as the standard deviation of differences between pairs of measurements/mean of measurements x 100. The repeatability coefficients were 2.9% for CD34+ and 4.8% for CD34+/CD133+ [33].
2.3. HsTn-I Assay
Blood samples were collected before cardiac catheterization and were stored at −80 °C. Measurements were performed using the Architect analyzer (Abbott Laboratories North Chicago, IL), with a detection limit of 1.2 ng/L and an interassay coefficient of variation of <10% at 4.7 ng/L.
2.4. Statistical analysis
Patient characteristics were summarized using medians, interquartile ranges (IQR), frequency counts and percentages as appropriate. Baseline differences between patients were assessed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables or the chi-squared test for categorical variables. CPC and hsTn-I levels were log2 transformed prior to analysis. A multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between CPC counts and Rentrop collateral grade of 0, 1, 2, or 3. The associations between CPC levels and hsTn-I levels were evaluated using a multivariate linear regression model. Models were adjusted for age [34], sex [35], race (Black vs. non-Black) [36], BMI [37], HF history [19], and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [18] as these have been shown to be correlated to CPC levels. All analyses were performed using SPSS software, Stata/BE 17.0. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. CPC levels and Rentrop collateral grade
Eighty-nine patients with a CTO and CPC measurements were enrolled (3 with Rentrop collateral grade 0, 22 with grade 1, 37 with grade 2, and 27 with grade 3). Baseline clinical characteristics by collateral development are shown in Table 1. There were no statistically significant associations between the demographic and clinical characteristics with collateral development in patients with CTO in the multivariate ordinal logistic model.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics by Rentrop Collateral Classification.
| Outcomes | Rentrop Class 0–1 N = 25 | Rentrop Class 2 N = 37 | Rentrop Class 3 N = 27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (IQR) | 66.1 (61.4, 77.0) | 63.3 (54.3, 71.4) | 70.7 (58.1, 82.0) |
| Sex (Men) | 17 (68%) | 28 (76%) | 19 (70%) |
| Race (Black) | 9 (36%) | 12 (32%) | 3 (11%) |
| Hypertension | 25 (100%) | 35 (95%) | 26 (96%) |
| Dyslipidemia | 16 (64%) | 29 (78%) | 21 (78%) |
| Diabetes | 10 (40%) | 19 (51%) | 7 (26%) |
| History of Smoking | 18 (72%) | 27 (73%) | 18 (67%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) (IQR) | 28.4 (23.5, 31.1) | 28.1 (23.0, 30.9) | 28.2 (25.1, 33.9) |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) (IQR) | 68.0 (36.1, 80.7) | 70.6 (55.3, 97.0) | 73.5 (51.9, 93.1) |
| Chronic Kidney Disease | 7 (28%) | 8 (22%) | 3 (11%) |
| LVEF (%) (IQR) | 55 (45, 60) | 55 (35, 60) | 55 (55, 60) |
| History of MI | 9 (36%) | 12 (32%) | 7 (26%) |
| History of HF | 8 (32%) | 15 (41%) | 6 (22%) |
| HsTn-I (ng/L) (IQR) | 14.4 (8.1, 22.8) | 7.0 (3.8, 17.8) | 5.1 (3.4, 11.0) |
| Disease Severity | |||
| 1 Vessel | 8 (32%) | 11 (30%) | 9 (33%) |
| 2 Vessel | 11 (44%) | 15 (41%) | 10 (37%) |
| 3 Vessel | 6 (24%) | 11 (30%) | 8 (30%) |
| Circulating Progenitor Cells (cells/mL) | |||
| CD34+ (IQR) | 1150 (780, 1980) | 1170 (710, 1900) | 1600 (1010, 2440) |
| CD34/CD133+ (IQR) | 560 (480, 960) | 570 (370, 790) | 750 (540, 1190) |
Values are median (IQR) or n (%).
CTO = chronic total occlusion; BMI = body mass index; IQR = interquartile range; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MI = myocardial infarction; HF = heart failure; hsTn-I = high sensitivity troponin-I.
There was a nominal trend toward a higher CPC count in those with greater Rentrop collateral grade, Table 1, Fig. 1. After multivariate adjustment with age, sex, race, BMI, HF history, and chronic kidney disease, CPC counts were independent predictors of collateral grade. Thus, in fully adjusted models, every doubling of the CPC count was associated with a ≥ 50% higher Rentrop collateral grade [CD34+ Odds ratio (OR) 1.49 95% CI (0.95, 2.34) P = 0.082] and [CD34+/CD133+ OR 1.57 95% CI (1.05, 2.36) P = 0.028], Table 2.
Fig. 1.

Rentrop Collateral Grade by CPC Level.
Unadjusted bar graph of Rentrop collateral grade and circulating progenitor cell count tertiles. CPC = circulating progenitor cell level.
Table 2.
Relationship between CPC counts and Collateral Development Assessed as the Rentrop Collateral Grade.
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | P Value | Model 1 OR (95% CI) | P Value | Model 2 OR (95% CI) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD34+ (per 100% increase) | 1.51 (0.98, 2.34) | 0.064 | 1.52 (0.98, 2.39) | 0.064 | 1.49 (0.95, 2.34) | 0.082 |
| CD34+/CD133+ (per 100% increase) | 1.48 (1.01, 2.14) | 0.043 | 1.60 (1.08, 2.39) | 0.018 | 1.57 (1.05, 2.36) | 0.028 |
Relationships were demonstrated using ordinal logistic regression models. CPCs were log2 transformed. Rentrop collateral grade was scored 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race (black vs. non-black).
Model 2 adjusted for model 1 + BMI, HF history, and chronic kidney disease.
CPC = circulating progenitor cell; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; BMI = body mass index; HF = heart failure.
3.2. CPC levels and hsTn-I levels
Every doubling of CPC count was also associated with lower hsTn-I levels [for CD34+ cells, β = −0.36 95% CI (−0.51, −0.16) P = 0.002] and [for CD34+/CD133+, β = −0.26 95% CI (−0.42, −0.07) P = 0.011]. This remained significant after full adjustment [CD34+ β −0.35 95% CI (−0.49, −0.15) P = 0.002] and [CD34+/CD133+ β −0.27 95% CI (−0.43, −0.08) P = 0.009], Table 3.
Table 3.
Relationship between CPC counts and HsTn-I Levels.
| Unadjusted β (95% CI) | P Value | Adjusted Model 1 β (95% CI) | P Value | Adjusted Model 2 β (95% CI) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD34+ (per 100% increase) | −0.36 (−0.51, −0.16) | 0.002 | −0.36 (−0.51, −0.15) | 0.002 | −0.35 (−0.49, −0.15) | 0.002 |
| CD34+/CD133+ (per 100% increase) | −0.26 (−0.42, −0.07) | 0.011 | −0.28 (−0.43, −0.08) | 0.008 | −0.27 (−0.43, −0.08) | 0.009 |
Relationships were demonstrated using linear regression models. CPCs and hsTn-I were log2 transformed.
Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race (black vs. non-black).
Model 2 adjusted for model 1 + BMI, HF history, and chronic kidney disease.
CPC = circulating progenitor cell; HsTn-I = high sensitivity troponin-I; CI = confidence interval; BMI = body mass index; HF = heart failure.
In the unadjusted model, a higher Rentrop collateral grade was also associated with a lower hsTn-I level. Each unit increase in Rentrop collateral grade was associated with a 30% lower hsTn-I level [β = −0.30; 95% CI (−0.50, −0.02) P = 0.040].
4. Discussion
Novel findings of our study are that a higher CPC count was independently associated with greater collateralization, indicating the important role of CPCs in collateral formation in the presence of a CTO. No other demographic or clinical characteristic was a predictor of collateralization. A higher CPC count was also associated with a lower ischemic burden, determined as lower levels of hsTn-I.
4.1. CPC levels and collaterals
Ischemia from myocardial injury triggers the upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha that stimulates expression of stromal cell derived factor-1 to permit homing of CPCs to site of injury [38–40]. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha also stimulates nitric oxide-dependent matrix metallopeptidase 9 production that promotes synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that in turn stimulates CPC-dependent angiogenesis [38,41]. Although differentiation of CPCs into the newly formed vasculature has been suggested as one mechanism linking CPCs to angiogenesis [12,13,42,43], the paracrine actions of CPCs by the transfer of exosomes and activation of local angiogenic pathways are likely the predominant mechanisms [44–47].
The association between CPC levels and collateral development has not been well established previously. Although one small study of 35 patients showed an association of high CD34+ cell counts with robust collateral circulation in obstructive CAD ≥ 90% stenosis [24], there have not been larger studies, to our knowledge, to support his relationship. Additionally, this relationship has not been previously described in patients with CTO. In patients with CTO, another study showed a positive correlation between the proportion of the homing signal C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-expressing CD34+ cells and the Rentrop collateral score [48]. Our data supplements these findings by showing a positive correlation between the absolute number of CD34+ and CD34/CD133+ cell levels and the extent of collateral circulation, suggesting that endogenous regenerative capacity has an important role in coronary collateral development in patients with CTO. Interestingly, no other characteristics contributed to collateral development.
Why some individuals with CAD have fewer CPCs compared to others is not well understood. CPCs are lower in women compared to men [35], in Black compared to white participants [36] and with persistent injury from exposure to cardiovascular risk factors [16], aging [34], renal insufficiency [18], advanced peripheral artery disease [17] and heart failure [19]. Lower CPC counts are a reflection of lower progenitor cell levels in the bone marrow and, additionally, may imply abnormalities in the mobilization of the progenitor cells from the bone marrow [14,15]. In settings of ischemia, some studies have shown a transient lowering of CPC counts [49], implying homing of CPCs into the injured myocardium [50]. Although not previously studied in settings of chronic ischemia, our data demonstrates that those with endogenously high CPC counts had more robust collaterals than those with lower counts.
4.2. CPCs, collaterals and hsTn-I
Another novel finding of this study is the association between higher CPC levels and lower ischemic burden, measured as hsTn-I levels. CTO lesions are associated with high levels of ischemia [22,51–54]. Patients with CTO and poorly developed collaterals have higher levels of ischemia than those with well-developed collaterals as demonstrated with non-invasive imaging [23] and circulating hsTn-I levels [55]. Our data supports these observations, as the extent of collateralization was inversely associated with hsTn-I levels. Furthermore, we found that a higher CPC count was associated with lower hsTn-I levels, a novel finding, suggesting that endogenous regenerative capacity, through enhanced collateral development reduces the ischemic burden of a CTO. Additionally, two phase 2, single-arm clinical trials have shown that among patients with nonobstructive CAD, patients that received CD34+ cell therapy showed improvement in microvascular coronary blood flow and decreased angina after CD34+ cell therapy [56,57]. Thus, decreased ischemic burden, may also be mediated by angiogenesis at the microvascular level.
It has been well established that higher CPC counts are associated with lower adverse cardiovascular event rates in patients with CAD [16,58]. Similarly, high hsTn-I levels are associated with higher risk of incident adverse events [59]. Implications from our findings are that at least partly, individuals with high CPC counts have lower adverse event rates because of lower levels of chronic ischemia possibly secondary to greater collateral development [60,61].
4.3. Limitations
Strengths of our study include enrollment of a diverse population including women and Black participants. We used high-throughput technology (flow cytometry) for quantification of CPCs by standardized and reproducible assay techniques. Our study had a few limitations. Given the limited sample size of 89 patients, our findings may not be fully representative of the entire population. We only studied patients with clinically indicated cardiac catheterization, and therefore our results may not apply to the general population. We also did not measure the functional capacity of CPCs, but previous studies have shown correlations between CPC numbers and their proliferative potential [62]. The cross-sectional nature of this analysis does not prove causation between CPC counts and collateralization, and thus longitudinal data is required. Additionally, we evaluated the degree of collateralization by Rentrop scoring system instead of functional tests such as the collateral flow index.
5. Conclusion
In the presence of a CTO, individuals with higher CPC counts have greater collateral development and lower ischemic burden.
Acknowledgements
A. A. Q. has been supported by NIH grants P01HL154996-01A1, R33HL138657-05, U54AG062334-01, P30DK111024-07S2, R61HL154116-01, R01HL109413-07, R01HL166004-01, 15SFCRN23910003, 5P01HL086773-09, 5P01HL101398-05, and 1P20HL113451-04.
Abbreviations:
- CPC
Circulating progenitor cell
- CAD
Coronary artery disease
- CTO
Chronic total occlusion
- CD
Cluster of differentiation
- BMI
Body mass index
- eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
- MI
Myocardial infarction
- HF
Heart failure
- LVEF
Left ventricular ejection fraction
- CI
Confidence interval
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Daniel A. Gold: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Pratik B. Sandesara: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Conceptualization. Bryan Kindya: Data curation. Matthew E. Gold: Writing – review & editing. Vardhmaan Jain: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. Nishant Vatsa: Writing – review & editing. Shivang R. Desai: Writing – review & editing. Adithya Yadalam: Writing – review & editing. Alexander Razavi: Writing – review & editing. Malika Elhage Hassan: Writing – review & editing. Yi-An Ko: Methodology, Formal analysis. Chang Liu: Methodology, Formal analysis. Ayman Alkhoder: Data curation. Alireza Rahbar: Data curation. Mohammad S. Hossain: Data curation. Edmund K. Waller: Supervision, Data curation, Conceptualization. Wissam A. Jaber: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Conceptualization. William J. Nicholson: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Conceptualization. Arshed A. Quyyumi: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interest
None.
References
- [1].Asahara TM, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM, Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis, Science 275 (1997) 964–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Lin Y, DW, Solovey A, Hebbel RP, Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood, J. Clin. Invest 105 (2000) 71–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Asahara T, HM, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM, Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization, Circ. Res 85 (1999) 221–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Urbich C, SD, Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization and role in vascular biology, Circ. Res 95 (2004) 343–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Waller EK, JO, Lund-Johansen F, Huang S, Nguyen M, Guo GR, Terstappen L, The “common stem cell” hypothesis reevaluated: human fetal bone marrow contains separate populations of hematopoietic and stromal progenitors, Blood 85 (1995) 2422–2435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Fadini GPLD, Dimmeler S, Critical reevaluation of endothelial progenitor cell phenotypes for therapeutic and diagnostic use, Circ. Res 110 (2012) 624–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Lin YWD, Solovey A, Hebbel RP, Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood, J. Clin. Invest 105 (2000) 71–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Yang J, ML, Kamei N, Alev C, Kwon SM, Kawamoto A, Akimaru H, Masuda H, Sawa Y, Asahara T., CD34+ cells represent highly functional endothelial progenitor cells in murine bone marrow, PLoS One (2011) 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Yin AH, SM, Zanjani ED, Almeida-Porada G, Ogawa M, Leary AG, Olweus J, Kearney J, Buck DW, Ac133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, Blood 90 (1997) 5002–5012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Gehling UM, SE, Schumacher U, Wagener C, Panetel K, Otte M, Schuch G, Schafhausen P, Mende T, Kilic N, Kluge K, Schafer B, Hossfeld DK, Fiedler W, In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from ac133-positive progenitor cells, Blood 95 (2000) 3106–3112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Kawamoto A, HI, Kusano K, Murayama T, Oyamada A, Silver M, Hulbert C, Gavin M, Hanley A, Ma H, Kearney M, Zak V, Asahara T, Losordo DW, CD34-positive cells exhibit increased potency and safety for therapeutic neovascularization after myocardial infarction comapred with total mononuclear cells, Circulation 114 (2006) 2163–2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Asahara TMT, Sullivan A, Silver M, Van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM, Isolation of putative progenitor cells for angiogenesis, Science 275 (1997) 965–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Kinnaird TSE, Burnett MS, Epstein SE, Bone marrow-derived cells for enhancing collateral development, Circ. Res 95 (2004) 354–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Tahhan AS, MH, Raad M, Almwaqqat Z, Alkhoder A, Sandesara PB, Mohamed-Kelli H, Hayek SS, Kim JH, O’Neal WT, Topel ML, Grant AJ, Sabbak N, Heinl RE, Gafeer MM, Obideen M, Kaseer B, Abdelhadi N, Ko YA, Liu C, Hesaroieh I, Mahar EA, Vaccarino V, Waller EK, Quyyumi AA, Progenitor cells and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes, Circ. Res 122 (2018) 1565–1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Moazzami K LB, Hammadah M, Ramadan R, Al Mheid I, Kim JH, Alkhoder A, Obideen M, Levantsevych O, Shah A, Liu C, Bremner JD, Kutner M, Sun YV, Waller EK, Ghaini I, Raggi P, Vaccarino V, Quyyumi AA. Association between change in circulating progenitor cells during exercise stress and risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. JAMA Cardiol. 5:147–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Dhindsa DS, SD, Jin Q, Sandesara PB, MEhata A, Liu C, Tahhan AS, Nayak A, Ejaz K, Hooda A, Moazzami K, Islam SJ, ROgers SC, Almuwaqqat Z, Mokhtari A, Hesaroieh I, Ko YA, Sperling LS, Waller EK, Quyyumi AA, Circulating progenitor cells and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, Int. J. Cardiol 373 (2023) 7–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Hayek SS, JM, Tahhan A, Awad M, Yadalam A, Ko YA, Healy S, Hesaroieh I, Ahmed H, Gray B, Sher SS, Ghasemzadeh N, Patel R, Kim J, Waller EK, Quyyumi AA, Circulating progenitor cells identify peripheral arterial disease in patients with coronary artery disease, Circ. Res 119 (2016) 564–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Mehta A, AT, Liu C, Dhindsa DS, Nayak A, Hooda A, Moazzami K, Islam SJ, Rogers SC, Almuwaqqat Z, Mokhtari A, Hesaroieh I, Ko YA, Waller EK, Quyyumi AA, Circulating progenitor cells in patients with coronary artery disease and renal insufficiency, JACC Basic Tranl Sci. 5 (2020) 770–782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Samman TA, MH, Sandesara PB, Hayek SS, Kalogeropoulos AP, Alkhoder A, Kelli H. Mohamed, Topel M, Ghasemzadeh N, Chivukula K, Ko YA, Aida H, Hesaroieh I, Mahar E, Kim JH, Wilson P, Shaw L, Vaccarino V, Waller EK, Quyyumi AA, Progenitor cells and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, Circ. Heart Fail 10 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Patel RS, QL, Ghasemazadeh N, Eapen DJ, Moss LD, Janua AU, Manocha P Kassem H. Al, Veledar E, Samady H, et al. , Circulating CD34+ progenitor cells and risk of mortality in a population with coronary artery disease, Circ. Res 116 (2015) 289–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Fefer PKM, Cheema AN, et al. , Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian multicenter chronic Total occlusions registry, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 59 (2012) 991–997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Schumacher SPDR, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. , Recovery of myocardial perfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions is comparable to hemodynamically significant non-occlusive lesions, Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv 93 (2019) 1059–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].GH C, Collateral Circulation in Chronic Total Occlusions - An Interventional Perspective, Curr. Cardiol. Rev 11 (2015) 277–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Kocaman SA YM, Yahci M, Sahinarslan A, Turkoglu S, Arslan U, Kursunluoglu N, Ozdemir M, Timurkaynak T, Cemri M, Abaci A, Boyaci B, Cengel A Endothelial progenitor cells (CD34+KDR+) and monocytes may provide the development of good coronary collaterals despite the vascular risk factors and extensive atherosclerosis. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 11:290–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].HD W, Pathobiology of troponin elevations: do elevations occur with myocardial ischemia as well as necrosis, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 57 (2011) 2406–2408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Suleiman MSLV, Caputo M, et al. , Short periods of regional ischaemia and reperfusion provoke release of troponin I from the human hearts, Clin. Chim. Acta 284 (1999) 25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Sabatine MSMD, de Lemos JA, et al. , Detection of acute changes in circulating troponin in the setting of transient stress test-induced myocardial ischaemia using an ultrasensitive assay: results from TIMI 35, Eur. Heart J 30 (2009) 132–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].McDonough JLAD, Van Eyk JE, et al. , Troponin I degradation and covalent complex formation accompanies myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, Circ. Res 84 (1999) 9–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Ko YAHS, Sandesara P, Samman Tahhan A, Quyyumi A, Cohort profile: the Emory cardiovascular biobank (EmCAB), BMJ Open 7 (2017) e018753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Mehran RCB, Godino C, et al. , Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary inter-vention for chronic total occlusions, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv 4 (2011) 952–961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Rentrop KP, MC, Blanke H, Phillips RA, Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 5 (1985) 587–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Mahar EA, LM, Hayek SS, Quyuumi AA, Waller EK, Flow cytometric data analysis of circulating progenitor cell stability, Data Brief. 10 (2017) 346–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Al Mheid I, SH, Ko YA, Age and human regenerative capacity impact of cardiovascular risk factors, Circ. Res 119 (2016) 801–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Heiss C, SK, Niesler U, Ziemann J, Kelm M, Kalka C, Impaired progenitor cella ctivity in age-related endothelial dysfunction, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 45 (2005) 1441–1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Matthew L, Topel SSH, Yi-An Ko, Sandesara Pratik B., Tahhan Ayman Samman, Hesaroieh Iraj, Mahar Ernestine, Martin Greg S., Waller Edmund K., Quyyumi Arshed A., Sex differences in circulating progenitor cells, J. Am. Heart Assoc 6 (2017) e006245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Ayman Samman Tahhan MH, Kelli Heval Mohamed, Kim Jeong Hwan, Sandesara Pratik B., Alkhoder Ayman, Kaseer Belal, Gafeer Mohamad Mazen, Topel Matthew, Hayek Salim S., O’Neal Wesley T., Obideen Malik, Yi-An Ko, Liu Chang, Hesaroieh Iraj, Mahar Ernestine, Vaccarino Violar, Waller Edmund K., Quyyumi Arshed A., Circulating progenitor cells and racial differences, Circ. Res 123 (2018) 467–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Mehta A, QM, Li X, Desai SR, D’Souza MS, Ho AH, Islam SJ, Dhindsa DS, Almuwaqqat Z, Nayak A, Alkhoder AA, Hooda A, Varughese A, Ahmad SF, Mokhtari A, Hesaroieh I, Sperling LS, Ko YA, Waller EK, Quyyumi AA, Vascular regenerative capacity and the obesity paradox in coronary artery disease, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 41 (2021) 2097–2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Fadini GPMA, Dhindsa DS, Bonora BM, Sreejit G, Nagareddy P, Quyyumi AA, Circulating stem cells and cardiovascular outcomes: from basic science to the clinic, Eur. Heart J 0 (2019) 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Ceradini DJ, AK, Callaghan MJ, Tepper OM, Bastidas N, Kleinman ME, Capla JM, Galiano RD, Levine JP, Gurtner GC, Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hyposic gradients through hif-1 induction of sdf-1, Nat. Med 10 (2004) 858–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Ceradini DJ, GG, Homing to hypoxia: Hif-1 as a mediator of progenitor cell recruitment to injured tissue, Trends Cardiovasc. Med 15 (2005) 57–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Melincovici CSBA, Susman S, Marginean M, Mihu C, Istrate M, Moldovan IM, Roman AL, Mihu CM, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis, Romanian J. Morphol. Embryol 59 (2018). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Takahashi TKC, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner J, Asahara T, Ischemia and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells for neovascularization, Nat. Med 5 (1999) 434–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Shintani SMT, Ikeda H, Ueno T, Honma T, Katoh A, Sasaki K, Shimada T, Oike Y, Imaizumi T, Mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction, Circulation 103 (2001) 2776–2779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Mathiyalagan PLY, Kim D, Misener S, Thorne T, Kamide CE, Klyachko E, Losordo DW, Hajjar RJ, Sahoo S, Angiogenic mechanisms of human CD34+ stem cell exosomes in the repair of ischemic Hindlimb, Circ. Res 120 (2017) 1466–1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Beltrami CBM, Shatikumar S, Shearn AI, Rajakaruna C, Laftah A, Sessa F, Spinetti G, Petretto E, Angelini GD, Emanueli C, Human pericardial fluid contains exosomes enriched with cardiovascular-expressed MicroRNAs and promotes therapeutic angiogenesis, Mol. Ther 25 (2017) 679–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Vicencio JMYD, Sivaraman V, Das D, Boi-Doku C, Arjun S, Zheng Y, Riquelme JA, Kearney J, Sharma V, Multhoff G, Hall AR, Davidson SM, Plasma exosomes protect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 65 (2015) 1525–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Sahoo SMP, Hajjar RJ, Pericardial fluid exosomes: A new material to treat cardiovascular disease, Mol. Ther 25 (2017) 568–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Yang C, XH, Jiang X, Lei X, Bai L, Xu F, Relation between C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 levels and the presence and extent of angiographic coronary collaterals in patients with chronic total coronary occlusion, Am. J. Cardiol 118 (2016) 1136–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Musialek PTL, Kostkiewicz M, Majka M, Szot W, Walter Z, Zebzda A, Pieniazek P, Kadzielski A, Banys RP, Olszowska M, Pasowicz M, Zmudka K, Tracz W, Randomized transcoronary delivery of CD34+ cells with perfusion versus stop-flow method in patients with recent myocardial infarction: early cardiac retention of 99mTc-labeled cells activity, J. Nud. Cardiol 18 (2011) 104–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Hofmann MWK, Meyer GP, Menke A, Arseniev L, Hertenstein B, Ganser A, Knapp WH, Drexler H, Monitoring of bone marrow cell homing into the infarcted human myocardium, Circulation 111 (2005) 2198–2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Rinfret SSP, Reducing ischemia with CTO PCI: good news, But Questions Remain, JACC Cardiovasc. Interv 14 (2021) 1419–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Sachdeva RAM, Flynn SE, Werner GS, Uretsky BF, The myocardium supplied by a chronic total occlusion is a persistently ischemic zone, Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv 83 (2014) 9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Galassi ARWG, Tomasello SD, et al. , Prognostic value of exercise myocardial scintigraphy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions, J. Interv. Cardiol 23 (2010) 139–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Gold DA SP, Jain V, Gold ME, Vatsa N, Desai SR, Elhage Hassan M, Yuan C, Ko YA, Alkhoder A, Ejaz K, Alvi Z, Rahbar A, Murtagh G, Jaber WA, Nihcolson WJ, Quyyumi AA, High Sensitivity Troponin Level and Benefits of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization, J. Am. Heart Assoc 12 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Börekçi AGM, Şeker T, et al. , Coronary collateral circulation in patients with chronic coronary total occlusion; its relationship with cardiac risk markers and SYNTAX score, Perfusion 30 (2015) 457–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Henry TD BMC, Wei J, Corban MT, Quesada O, Joung S, Kotynski CL, Wang J, Lewis M, Schumacher AM, Bartel RL, Takagi H, Shah V, Lee A, Sietsema WK, Losordo DW, Lerman A. Autologous CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy Increases Coronary Flow Reserve and Reduces Angina in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Corban MTTT, Albers D, Sebaali F, Lewis BR, Bois J, Gulati R, Prasad A, Best PJM, Bell MR, Rihal CS, Prasad M, Ahmad A, Lerman LO, Solseth ML, Winters JL, Dietz AB, Lerman A, IMPROvE-CED trial: intracoronary autologous CD34+ cell therapy for treatment of coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries, Circ. Res 130 (2022) 326–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Rigato M, AA, G.P. Fadini, Levels of circulating progenitor cells, cardiovascular outcomes and death, Circ. Res 118 (2016) 1930–1939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Samman Tahhan ASP, Hayek SS, Hammadah M, Alkhoder A, Kelli HM, Topel M, O’Neal WT, Ghasemzadeh N, Ko YA, Gafeer MM, Abdelhadi N, Choudhary F, Patel K, Beshiri A, Murtagh G, Kim J, Wilson P, Shaw L, Vaccarino V, Epstein SE, Sperling L, Quyyumi AA, High-sensitivity troponin I levels and coronary artery disease severity, progression, and long-term outcomes, J. Am. Heart Assoc 7 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Joelle Elias LPCH, van Dongen Ivo M, Claessen Bimmer E.P.M., Jose PS, Henriques Impact of collateral circulation of survival in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervervention with a concomitant chronic total occlusion, JACC Cardiovasc. Interv 10 (2017) 906–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Fujii T, MN, Ohno Y, Nakazawa G, Shinozaki N, Matsukage T, Yoshimachi F, Ikari Y, Collateral filling efficiency of comorbid chronic total occlusion segment on short-term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, Int. J. Cardiol 230 (2017) 346–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Rustemeyer P, WW, Jurk K, Kovller A, Optimized flow cytometric analysis of endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood, J. Immunoass. Immunochem 27 (2006) 77–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
