Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences logoLink to Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
. 2024 Nov 7;33:e60. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000489

Gender disparity and post-traumatic stress disorder and elevated psychological distress in humanitarian migrants resettled in Australia: the moderating role of socioeconomic factors

Demelash Woldeyohannes Handiso 1, Jacqueline A Boyle 2, Eldho Paul 1, Frances Shawyer 1,3, Joanne C Enticott 1,3,
PMCID: PMC11561526  PMID: 39506621

Abstract

Aims

Humanitarian migrants are at increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and elevated psychological distress. However, men and women often report varying degrees of stress and experience different challenges during migration. While studies have explored PTSD, psychological distress, gender, and resettlement stressors, they have not explored the interplay between these factors. This study aims to address that gap by investigating gender disparities in PTSD and psychological distress among humanitarian migrants in Australia, with a focus on the moderating role of socioeconomic factors.

Methods

This study used data from five waves of the Building a New Life in Australia (BNLA) survey, a longitudinal study of 2,399 humanitarian migrants who arrived in Australia in 2013. PTSD and psychological distress were measured using the PTSD-8 and Kessler-6 (K6) scales, respectively. We conducted generalised linear mixed-effect logistic regression analyses stratified by gender.

Results

Female humanitarian migrants exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of PTSD and psychological distress than males over five years of resettlement in Australia. Women facing financial hardship, unemployment, or residing in short-term housing reported greater levels of PTSD and distress compared to men.

Conclusions

Women facing financial hardship, inadequate housing, and unemployment exhibit higher rates of PTSD and psychological distress, underscoring the significant impact of socioeconomic factors. Addressing these challenges at both individual and systemic levels is essential for promoting well-being and managing mental health among female humanitarian migrants.

Keywords: common mental disorders, economic issues, gender differences, post-traumatic stress disorder, social factors

Introduction

A humanitarian migrant is an individual who relocates to another country due to being forcibly displaced or persecuted, often in search of refuge and protection (UNHCR, 2019). As per the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the number of people forcibly displaced in 2022 rose by 19 million to reach 108.4 million, marking the largest increase between years ever recorded. Among these, 35.3 million were refugees, and nearly half were women (Freedman, 2016; UNHCR, 2022).

Throughout the phases of pre-migration, migration and post-migration, humanitarian migrants may encounter mental health risks (Wessels, 2014). These risk factors include exposure to traumatic events, stressors associated with the asylum process and challenges in establishing a new life (Wessels, 2014). During resettlement, humanitarian migrants confront various challenges such as language barriers, financial difficulties, social integration crises, discrimination and other issues (Hynie, 2018). The gender of humanitarian migrants moulds their migration experiences, influencing adaptation and mental health (Boyd and Grieco, 2003).

Psychological distress and mental disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in migrants have profound social implications (Perreira and Ornelas, 2013). Mental disorders lead to personal anguish and economic strain on society, contributing to healthcare expenses and decreased productivity. Untreated PTSD can hinder migrants’ integration, escalating social tensions and hindering overall societal advancement. Women may experience additional burdens due to gender-related societal roles, such as childcare responsibilities (Llácer et al., 2007), weaker attachment to the labour market, more home-based roles and increased risk of sexual violence and abuse, contributing to the risk of development of conditions such as PTSD and elevated psychological distress (Vallejo-Martín et al., 2021). Despite the high rates of PTSD and elevated psychological distress among female humanitarian migrants, only about one-quarter seek assistance, be it through professional or informal channels (Slewa-Younan et al., 2015).

Factors including socioeconomic conditions contribute to the diminished mental well-being of humanitarian migrants in their host countries (Mwanri et al., 2022). Moreover, social inequalities in poor mental health among female humanitarian migrants arise from the challenges experienced during migration and the uneven distribution of social determinants of health. This acknowledgment highlights the complexities involved in understanding these inequities, ultimately manifesting as disparities in the mental health outcomes of humanitarian migrants (Bowleg, 2012; Hollander, 2013; Viruell-Fuentes et al., 2012). The overlap of being both a woman and a humanitarian migrant may consequently amplify disadvantages and the risk for developing mental disorders.

Despite the higher likelihood of PTSD and elevated psychological distress among female humanitarian migrants, there is limited research aiming to understand the primary drivers behind this trend (Due et al., 2018; Sullivan et al., 2020). This gap is particularly significant considering the increasing number of female humanitarian migrants resettling in Australia (Sullivan et al., 2020), coupled with the rising population of such migrants with unmet mental health needs (O’Neil, 2019; Straiton et al., 2014). This study assessed gender disparities in PTSD and elevated psychosocial distress among humanitarian migrants over time and aimed to identify the role of socioeconomic factors in the relationship between gender and PTSD, as well as elevated psychological distress. The findings from this research will enrich existing literature and provide insights to assist policymakers and service providers in developing more targeted interventions.

Methods

Data source, study participants and data collection procedure

We used data from ‘Building a New Life in Australia (BNLA): The Longitudinal Study of 2399 Humanitarian Migrants’, a unique data set from a nationally representative survey of humanitarian migrants from different cultural backgrounds who arrived in Australia and received permanent protection visas through Australia’s humanitarian programs between May and December 2013 (Australian Government: Department of Social Services, 2022). Data collectors acquired a list of all eligible participants from the Australian Government’s Department of Immigration and Border Protection and study participants provided consent to participate in the survey before data collection commenced. Data were collected longitudinally from 2013 to 2018 to increase understanding of the factors that determine how well humanitarian migrants build new lives in Australia in the first 5 years of resettlement (Australian Government: Department of Social Services, 2022).

The primary applicants were first asked to participate, and then other family members on the visa application were invited to join the study as secondary applicants (Australian Government: Department of Social Services, 2022). The survey tool was checked for internal consistency and translated into 19 languages to ensure that most participants could answer the survey in their primary language (Australian Government: Department of Social Services, 2022).

Outcome variables

PTSD and elevated psychological distress were measured using the PTSD-8 (Hansen et al., 2010) and Kessler-6 (K6) (Kessler et al., 2002, 2003) scales, respectively. Adapted from the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ), the PTSD-8 is a screening questionnaire that assesses the three PTSD clusters of intrusion, avoidance and hypervigilance according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (Hansen et al., 2010). It is as an effective screening tool for PTSD in vulnerable populations, including humanitarian migrants (Hansen et al., 2010). The PTSD-8 scale utilizes a four-point rating system ranging from ‘not at all’ (1) to ‘most of the time’ (4), resulting in a total score between 8 and 32. The presence of PTSD is determined if at least one item in each symptom domain is rated 3 (sometimes) or 4 (most of the time). The K6 is a shortened version of the K10, scoring between 6 and 30. A score of 19 or higher indicates elevated psychological distress. The internal consistency of the tools was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, resulting in 0.96 and 0.93 for PTSD-8 and Kessler-6, respectively (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021).

Covariates

Sociodemographic characteristics included age, marital status, level of education and gender. Socioeconomic factors included financial hardship, region of origin, housing arrangement and employment. Resettlement-related stressors include loneliness, trauma, experience of discrimination and chronic health conditions. See Supplementary file 1 for details.

Data analysis

All analyses were conducted using Stata version 17 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). Population sample weights provided by the data custodians were applied to all analyses. The sociodemographic characteristics of the cohort were summarized using frequencies, percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence rate of both PTSD and elevated psychological distress were compared between males and females across the five waves. Potential variables were identified from the BNLA database by reviewing previous publications in the mental health area of humanitarian migrants (Cooper et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021), and then the process of selecting variables for the final model involved the application of Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)adaptive methods. Cross-validations were employed to determine the alpha hyperparameters to ensure the optimal performance of the LASSO regression. Considering the longitudinal nature of the BNLA data where observations are non-independent and variances are unequal, the assumptions of the traditional logistic regression model are violated. Hence, a more suitable approach for this data set is a generalized linear mixed-effect logistic regression model. To explore whether socioeconomic factors moderate the association between gender and PTSD or elevated psychological distress, an interaction-effect analysis was conducted in the final model. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were presented in tables and line graphs, illustrating the moderating role of socioeconomic factors in the association between gender and PTSD and psychological distress. Results were deemed statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Missing data management

The management of missing data involved a preliminary examination of its potential impact on outcome variables through logistic regression. In instances where a significant association between missing data and outcome variables was identified, multiple imputations analysis was employed. Multiple imputation is a statistical technique used to address missing data by generating multiple plausible values for each missing observation. We conducted 20 imputations to enhance robustness, mitigate bias and accommodate variability (Dong and Peng, 2013). We compared the data set without imputation to the data set after multiple imputations using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and the log-likelihood ratio. After imputation, we opted for the data set after imputations because it showed the lowest AIC and the highest log-likelihood ratio value, indicating the best-fit model.

Ethical consideration

The BNLA data are publicly available to authorized researchers who have obtained permission from the Australian Government Department of Social Services. The Australian Institute of Family Studies ethics committee approved the data, which is registered with the National Health and Medical Research Council. The measures undertaken to ensure the truthfulness of responses to the government-administered survey included ensuring trust, confidentiality and anonymity, along with assurances against data misuse. Moreover, informed consent was obtained from all study participants involved in the BNLA study. Data were provided after signing a data usage and confidentiality deed. Demelash Handiso and Joanne Enticott obtained the permission to use the data set. The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee advised that a separate ethics application wasn’t necessary since this secondary data analysis within the overall BNLA program had already received approval (number: 2017-8041-8528).

Results

Sociodemographic factors

Over half of humanitarian migrants were male, accounting for 54.0% of the total and the majority of participants were married. Most of the study participants were from the Middle East (58.5% of females and 53.5% of males) and Central Asia (23.1% of females and 25.5% of males). Approximately half of the females (47.3%) and males (48.8%) had completed 6–12 years of schooling, while 8.9% of females and 10.9% of males held a university degree (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics by gender

Wave 1 (2399)

Wave 2 (1888)

Wave 3 (1767)

Wave 4 (1804)

Wave 5 (1780)

Variables

Categories

Male n (%)

Female n (%)

Male n (%)

Female n (%)

Male n (%)

Female n (%)

Male n (%)

Female n (%)

Male n (%)

Female n (%)

Age category

15–25

283 (21.7)

260 (23.7)

260 (24.8)

224 (26.7)

192 (20.5)

186 (22.5)

180 (18.5)

169 (20.3)

154 (16.4)

149(17.7)

26–35

582 (44.7)

480 (43.8)

525 (50.0)

409 (48.7)

475 (50.5)

408 (49.3)

488 (50.2)

411 (49.4)

456 (48.5)

421 (50.1)

36–45

236 (18.1)

189 (17.3)

157 (14.9)

114 (13.6)

152 (16.1)

130 (15.7)

168 (17.3)

138 (16.6)

189 (20.1)

151 (17.9)

46–55

122 (9.4)

100 (9.14)

68 (6.4)

63 (7.5)

78 (8.3)

69 (8.3)

86 (8.8)

69 (8.3)

82 (8.7)

75 (8.9)

56–80

78 (6.0)

66 (6.03)

39 (3.7)

29 (3.5)

42 (4.4)

35 (4.2)

51 (5.2)

44 (5.3)

59 (6.3)

44 (5.2)

Marital status

Married

8596 (5.9)

603 (55.1)

672 (64.0)

453 (53.9)

634 (67.5)

446 (53.8)

645 (66.2)

464 (55.8)

653 (69.4)

494 (58.8)

Separated

16 (1.2)

22 (2.0)

9 (0.8)

15 (1.8)

634 (67.5)

21 (2.5)

13 (1.3)

18 (2.1)

15 (1.6)

23 (2.7)

Divorced

8 (0.6)

34 (3.11)

7 (0.6)

30 (3.5)

6 (0.6)

22 (2.6)

7 (0.7)

21 (2.5)

8 (0.8)

26 (3.1)

Widowed

13 (1.0)

176 (16.1)

13 (1.2)

133 (15.8)

13 (1.3)

143 (17.2)

4 (0.4)

137 (16.4)

7 (0.7)

127 (15.1)

Never married

405 (31.1)

259 (23.7)

348 (33.1)

208 (24.7)

267 (28.4)

196 (23.6)

304 (31.2)

191 (22.9)

257 (27.3)

170 (20.2)

Years of education

Never attended school

158 (12.1)

213 (19.5)

117 (11.2)

161 (19.1)

111 (11.8)

168 (20.2)

125 (12.8)

167 (20.1)

116 (12.3)

156 (18.5)

<6 years school

272 (20.9)

208 (19.0)

216 (20.6)

150 (17.8)

205 (21.8)

165 (19.9)

202 (20.7)

156 (18.8)

199 (21.1)

168 (20.0)

6–12 years of school

635 (48.8)

518 (47.3)

524 (49.9)

406 (48.3)

456 (48.5)

385 (46.5)

469 (48.2)

387 (46.5)

456 (48.5)

404 (48.1)

Trade/Technical qualification

92 (7.1)

57 (5.16)

76 (7.2)

45 (5.3)

67 (7.1)

38 (4.5)

71 (7.3)

46 (5.5)

68 (7.2)

43 (5.1)

University degree

142 (10.9)

97 (8.9)

116 (11.0)

77 (9.1)

100 (10.6)

72 (8.7)

106 (10.8)

75 (9.0)

101 (10.7)

69 (8.2)

Region of origin

Middle East

697 (53.5)

641 (58.5)

554 (52.8)

497 (59.2)

507 (53.9)

477 (57.6)

534 (54.8)

497 (59.8)

527 (56.0)

498 (59.2)

Central Asia

332 (25.5)

253 (23.1)

258 (24.5)

180 (21.4)

241 (25.6)

199 (24.0)

256 (26.3)

201 (24.2)

224 (23.8)

191 (22.7)

Southern Asia

143 (11.0)

79 (7.2)

127 (12.1)

63 (7.5)

105 (11.2)

61 (7.4)

100 (10.2)

65 (7.8)

100 (10.6)

60 (7.1)

South-East Asia

57 (4.4)

63 (5.76)

51 (4.8)

56 (6.6)

40 (4.3)

51 (6.1)

34 (3.5)

31 (3.7)

40 (4.2)

50 (6.0)

Africa

71 (5.44)

57 (5.23)

59 (5.6)

43 (5.1)

46 (4.9)

40 (4.8)

49 (5.0)

37 (4.4)

49 (5.2)

41 (4.9)

Sampling weights were applied to derive prevalence estimates

The pattern of PTSD and psychological distress across the five waves

The pattern of PTSD and psychological distress among humanitarian migrants was the same across the five waves. A high proportion of both females and males developed PTSD and psychosocial distress over time. However, the prevalence was consistently higher in females across all five waves of the study, although the magnitude of differences decreased over time. In wave 1, the prevalence of positive PTSD screening was 8.2% higher for females compared to males (37.7% vs 29.5%) and for elevated psychological distress the prevalence was 9.6% higher for females (22.3% vs 12.7%). By wave 5, female prevalence of PTSD was 31.9% compared to 25.2% for males, showing a difference of 6.7% while 19.2% of females and 15.0% of males showed elevated psychological distress, indicating a difference of 4.2% (Fig. 1aand b). The overall mean and standard deviation for the PTSD-8 and K6 were 15.5 ± 7.0 and 12.6 ± 5.9, respectively. In terms of PTSD, the specific values for avoidance were 4.0 ± 2.2, intrusion was 7.6 ± 3.6 and hypervigilance was 2.8 ± 1.9.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Prevalence (trend) of PTSD and elevated psychological distress in males and females across five waves, error bars denote a 95% confidence interval; sampling weights were applied to derive prevalence estimates. a) Prevalence of PTSD across all waves and b) Prevalence of Psychological distress across all waves.

Pre-arrival experiences of trauma in males and females

Compared to men, a higher proportion of women experienced extreme living conditions before arriving in Australia while men were more likely to experience violence, imprisonment/kidnapping, torture and serious injury. Similar proportions of men and women reported experiencing murder or disappearance of family members pre-arrival (Supplementary file 2).

Factors associated with PTSD and elevated psychological distress in females and males

In univariate analysis, age, gender, geographical origin, financial hardship, chronic health conditions and experiences of discrimination and loneliness contributed to PTSD and elevated psychological distress among humanitarian migrants (Table 2). In final analysis, male humanitarian migrants over the age of 36 had an increased risk of PTSD compared to those in the 15–25 age group. Men from the Middle East were at a greater risk of developing PTSD than those from Africa. Furthermore, we found that each factor of financial hardship was significantly associated with an increase in both PTSD and elevated psychological distress for both genders. Self-reported chronic health conditions showed a negative association with psychological distress in both males and females, with a similar negative correlation observed for PTSD in males. Individuals who reported experiencing discrimination and loneliness were more likely to have psychological distress and PTSD compared to their counterparts (Table 3).

Table 2.

Univariate analysis for the association between PTSD and psychological distress and determinant factors

PTSD

PD

Male

Female

Male

Female

Variables

COR

COR

COR

COR

Age

15–25

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

26–35

1.7 (1.4, 2.1)

1.6 (1.3, 1.9)

1.7 (1.3, 2.2)

1.6 (1.3, 1.9)

36–45

3.2 (2.6, 4.0)

2.8 (2.3, 3.4)

2.8 (2.1, 3.7)

2.8 (2.3, 3.4)

46–55

3.2 (2.4, 4.1)

3.2 (2.5, 4.0)

2.7 (1.9, 3.7)

3.2 (2.5, 4.0)

56–80

3.3 (2.4, 4.3)

2.2 (1.6, 2.9)

2.2 (1.5, 3.2)

2.2 (1.6, 2.9)

Marital status

Married

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Separated

0.7 (0.4, 1.3)

0.8 (0.4, 1.2)

1.3 (0.7, 2.5)

2.2 (1.4, 3.4)

Divorced

0.8 (0.3, 1.8)

0.3 (0.01, 0.7)

1.7 (0.7, 3.8)

1.4 (1.1, 2.1)

Widowed

0.3 (0.1, 0.8)

0.4 (0.2, 0.5)

0.4 (0.1, 1.3)

1.4 (1.2, 1.7)

Never married

0.5 (0.4, 0.6)

0.4 (0.5, 1.21)

0.6 (0.5, 0.8)

0.6 (0.5, 0.8)

Pre-arrival education

Never attended school

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

<6 years of school

1.2 (0.9, 1.6)

1.1 (0.9, 1.3)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

1.1 (0.9, 1.3)

6–12 years of school

1.4 (1.2, 1.8)

1.1 (0.9, 1.3)

1.2 (0.9, 1.6)

1.1 (0.9, 1.2)

Trade/Technical qualification

2.3 (1.7, 3.2)

1.6 (1.2, 2.1)

1.8 (1.2, 2.6)

1.6 (1.2, 2.2)

University degree

2.1 (1.6, 2.7)

1.2 (0.9, 1.5)

1.4 (1.02, 2.02)

1.2 (0.9, 1.5)

Origin of country

Middle East

1.9 (1.4, 2.6)

1.8 (1.4, 2.5)

2.3 (1.5, 3.5)

1.8 (1.3, 2.5)

Central Asia

0.4 (0.3, 0.6)

1.1 (0.7, 1.4)

0.7 (0.4, 1.2)

1.0 (0.7, 1.4)

Southern Asia

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

0.6 (0.4, 0.9)

0.9 (0.5, 1.5)

0.6 (0.4, 0.9)

South-East Asia

0.6 (0.3, 0.9)

0.4 (0.2, 0.6)

0.3 (0.2, 0.8)

0.4 (0.2, 0.6)

Africa

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Financial hardship

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1–2

1.9 (1.7, 2.2)

1.7 (1.5, 2.0)

2.5 (2.1, 3.0)

1.7 (1.5, 2.02)

3–4

2.5 (2.1, 3.1)

2.8 (2.3, 3.4)

4.7 (3.7, 5.9)

2.8 (2.3, 3.4)

5–6

2.8 (1.9, 4.1)

3.4 (2.3, 4.9)

5.2 (3.5, 7.8)

3.4 (2.3, 4.9)

Current employment

Yes

1

1.3 (1.0, 1.6)

1.4 (1.1, 1.7)

No

1.6 (1.3, 1.9)

1.35 (1.0, 1.7)

1.0

1.0

Chronic health condition

Yes

2.4 (2.1, 2.8)

1.8 (1.6, 2.1)

4.5 (3.7, 5.5)

3.3 (2.7, 3.9)

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Loneliness

Yes

1.49 (1.3, 1.7)

1.8 (1.5, 2.1)

2.03 (1.7, 2.4)

1.8 (1.5, 2.2)

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Community support

Yes

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Some time

1.2 (1.04, 1.4)

1.3 (1.1, 1.5)

0.8 (0.7, 1.0)

1.3 (1.1, 1.5)

No

1.1 (0.9, 1.2)

1.2 (1.1, 1.4)

0.7 (0.6, 0.9)

1.2 (1.1, 1.4)

Trauma

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Yes

2.2 (1.7, 2.9)

3.4 (2.6, 4.6)

2.1 (1.4, 3.1)

3.4 (2.6, 4.6)

Experience of discrimination

Yes

1.5 (1.2, 1.9)

1.0

1.9 (1.4,2.4)

1.5 (1.2, 1.9)

No

1.0

0.6 (0.5, 0.8)

1.0

1.0

COR: crude odds ratio; sampling weights were applied to derive odds ratios.

Table 3.

Factors associated with psychological distress and PTSD stratified by gender of humanitarian migrants

Elevated psychological distress

Post-traumatic stress disorder

Variables

Male (AOR)

Female (AOR)

Male (AOR)

Female (AOR)

Age

15–25

1

1

26–35

1.1 (0.6, 1.6)

1.1 (0.7, 1.6)

1.3 (0.9, 1.8)

0.4 (0.3, 0.6)

36–45

1.1 (0.6, 1.8)

1.2 (0.8, 1.9)

2.1 (1.4, 3.2)*

0.5 (0.4, 0.7)

46–55

0.9 (0.5, 1.8)

1.1 (0.6, 1.8)

2.3 (1.5, 3.5)*

0.8 (0.6, 1.3)

56–80

0.8 (0.4, 1.7)

0.9 (0.4, 1.8)

2.2 (1.3, 3.6)*

0.6 (0.4, 1.1)

Marital status

Married

1

1

1

Separated

2.2 (0.7, 6.5)

1.5 (0.7, 3.0)

0.9 (0.4, 2.1)

1.2 (0.6, 2.2)

Divorced

1.4 (0.4, 5.2)

1.3 (0.6, 2.6)

1.1 (0.3, 3.8)

1.4 (0.8, 2.4)

Widowed

1.4 (0.6, 3.6)

0.3 (0.1, 0.9)

0.6 (0.2, 2.2)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

Never married

1.2 (0.8, 1.7)

0.2 (0.03, 0.7)

0.8 (0.6, 1.0)

0.6 (0.5, 1.9)

Pre-arrival education

Never attended school

1

1

1

<6 years of school

0.8 (0.4, 1.4)

1.1 (0.7, 1.7)

0.8 (0.6, 1.3)

1.2 (0.8, 1.7)

6–12 years of school

0.9 (0.5, 1.6)

1.1 (0.7, 1.8)

0.9 (0.6, 1.4)

1.1 (0.7, 1.6)

Trade/Technical qualification

1.0 (0.5, 2.1)

1.2 (0.6, 2.2)

0.9 (0.5, 1.7)

1.8 (0.9, 3.4)

University degree

0.8 (0.4, 1.6)

1.4 (0.8, 2.6)

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

1.3 (0.7, 2.4)

Region of origin

Middle East

2.9 (1.2, 6.9)*

1.5 (0.7, 3.0)

2.9 (1.8, 4.8)*

2.2 (1.2, 3.9)*

Central Asia

1.4 (0.5, 3.7)

1.3 (0.6, 2.5)

0.7 (0.4, 1.3)

1.4 (0.7, 2.6)

Southern Asia

1.2 (0.5, 3.0)

0.3 (0.1, 1.9)

1.9 (1.1, 3.4)*

1.2 (0.5, 2.5)

South-East Asia

0.8 (0.2, 2.7)

0.2 (0.1, 1.7)

0.8 (0.4, 2.0)

0.4 (0.1, 1.8)

Africa

1

1

1

Financial hardship

No

1

1

1

1

1–2

1.9 (1.5, 2.6)***

1.5 (1.1, 1.9)***

1.8 (1.4, 2.2)***

1.6 (1.3, 2.1)***

3–4

3.7 (2.5, 5.3)***

2.8 (1.9, 4.2)***

1.9 (1.4, 2.8)***

3.3 (2.3, 4.5)***

5–6

4.4 (2.3, 8.5)***

2.4 (1.2, 4.6)***

3.3 (1.9, 5.7)***

2.5 (1.4, 4.6)***

Housing

Own

1

Temporary

4.8 (1.6, 14.2)*

1.5 (0.5, 4.5)

8.2 (3.1, 22.3)*

2.5 (0.9, 6.4)

Short-term lease/contract

3.1 (1.1, 8.8)*

0.9 (0.3, 2.4)

8.9 (3.4, 23.7)*

2.1 (0.9, 5.1)

Long-term lease/contract

2.6 (0.9, 7.1)

0.8 (0.3, 1.9)

6.9 (2.7, 18.2)*

1.3 (0.6, 2.9)

Current employment

Yes

1

1

1

1

No

0.7 (0.5, 1.2)

0.8 (0.5, 1.4)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

1.1 (0.7, 1.8)

Chronic health condition

Yes

1.5 (1.1, 1.9)***

1.2 (0.9, 1.5)

1.8 (1.5, 2.2)***

1.6 (1.3, 1.9)***

No

1

1

1

1

Loneliness

Yes

1.7 (1.3, 2.3)***

2.0 (1.6, 2.7)***

1.9 (1.5, 2.4)***

1.5 (1.2, 2.0)***

No

1

1

1

1

Trauma

Yes

1.8 (1.1, 3.1)***

1.5 (0.9, 2.7)

1.9 (1.5, 2.4)***

2.6 (1.5, 4.2)***

No

1

1

1

1

Experience of discrimination

Yes

1.9 (1.2, 2.9)***

1.7 (1.1, 2.7)***

1.7 (1.2, 2.3)***

1.7 (1.1, 2.8)***

No

1

1

1

1

Received support

Yes

1

1

1

1

Sometimes

1.2 (0.8, 1.6)

1.9 (0.6, 1.3)

1.5 (1.2, 2.0)*

1.6 (1.1, 2.3)*

No

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

0.8 (0.5, 1.2)

1.3 (0.9, 1.6)

1.4 (0.9, 1.9)

AOR: adjusted odds ratio; sampling weights were applied to derive AOR estimates.

*

p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

In relation to socioeconomic moderators for gender and PTSD, humanitarian migrants experiencing financial hardship were more likely to experience PTSD, with women having a greater likelihood than men (Table 4). Women with financial hardship levels of 5–6, 3–4 and 1–2 had higher odds of developing PTSD compared to men with the same financial hardship levels, with specific odds ratios of (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 3.4–4.2) and (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 3.1–3.6), (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 4.4–5.2) and (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.8–2.0), and (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 2.2–2.6) and (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.5–1.7), respectively (Fig. 2a). Housing arrangement was another moderator for the association between PTSD and gender. Specifically, women (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.5–1.7) in short-term lease housing reported higher odds of PTSD compared to men (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.05–1.15) in similar housing arrangements (Fig. 3a). Although unemployment rates showed a slight decline from the first to the fifth wave, shifting from 38.6% (95% CI: 35.5–41.7) to 32.4% (95% CI: 29.15–35.8), employment status magnified gender disparities in PTSD. Unemployed women had a higher risk of PTSD compared to unemployed men, showing odds of (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3–2.1) (Fig. 3c). Females from the Middle East and Central Asia displayed higher odds of PTSD compared to male humanitarian migrants from the same region ((OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 3.8–4.6) vs (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.9–3.5); (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 2.5–2.7) vs (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.5–1.1), respectively), while men from South Asia exhibited higher odds of PTSD compared to women from South Asian countries (Fig. 2d).

Table 4.

Role of socioeconomic factors for association between gender and PTSD and elevated psychological distress

IE-PTSD

IE-PD

Male

Female

Male

Female

Variables

AOR

AOR

IE p-value for PTSD

AOR

AOR

IE p-value for PD

Age

15–25

1.0

1.3 (0.9, 1.9)

0.0132

0.088

26–35

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

1.5 (1.1, 2.1)*

36–45

1.4 (0.9, 2.1)

2.1 (1.4, 3.2)*

46–55

1.3 (0.9, 2.1)

1.6 (1.1, 2.6)*

56–80

1.3 (0.8, 2.1)

1.3 (0.7, 2.3)

Marital status

Married

1.0

0.044

0.079

Separated

0.8 (0.4, 1.8)

1.1 (0.5, 2.3)

Divorced

1.1 (0.3, 4.2)

1.4 (0.8, 2.5)

Widowed

0.8 (0.2, 2.7)

1.3 (0.9, 1.7)

Never married

0.8 (0.6, 1.1)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

Pre-arrival education

Never attended school

1.0

1.0

0.32

0.202

<6 years of school

0.9 (0.6, 1.4)

1.6 (0.1, 2.5)

6–12 years of school

1.2 (0.8, 1.8)

1.4 (0.9, 2.1)

Trade/Technical qualification

1.3 (0.7, 2.2)

2.5 (0.4, 4.6)

University degree

1.4(0.8, 2.2)

2.1(0.2, 3.6)

Region of origin

Middle East

3.2 (2.9, 3.5)***

4.2 (3.8, 4.6)***

<0.001

2.7 (2.5, 2.9)***

3.7 (3.4, 4.0)***

<0.001

Central Asia

0.8 (0.5, 1.1)

2.6 (2.5, 2.7)***

1.1 (0.6, 1.4)

2.9 (2.6, 3.2)***

Southern Asia

2.2 (1.8, 2.6)***

2.1 (1.8, 2.5)***

1.3 (0.5, 3.1)

0.8 (0.3, 2.3)

South-East Asia

0.8 (0.3, 2.1)

0.7 (0.3, 1.7)

0.7 (0.2, 2.3)

0.4 (0.1, 2.1)

Africa

1.0

1.0

1.0

Financial hardship

No

1.0

1.0

<0.001

<0.001

1–2

1.6 (1.5, 1.7)***

2.4 (2.2, 2.6)***

1.7 (1.5, 1.9)***

2.3 (2.0, 2.6)***

3–4

1.9 (1.8, 2.0)***

4.8 (4.4, 5.2)***

3.4 (3.0, 3.8)***

4.8 (4.3, 5.3)***

5–6

3.4 (3.1, 3.6)***

3.8 (3.4, 4.2)***

4.1 (3.9, 4.3)***

3.5 (3.3, 3.7)***

Current employment

Yes

1.0

<0.001

0.073

No

1.1 (0.8, 1.4)

1.7 (1.3, 2.1)***

Chronic health condition

Yes

1.3 (1.1, 1.6)***

1.7 (1.3, 2.2)***

<0.001

1.4 (1.1, 1.8)***

1.8 (1.4, 2.4)***

0.0007

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

Loneliness

Yes

1.6 (1.3, 2.1)***

1.9 (1.5, 2.6)***

<0.001

1.7 (1.3, 2.2)***

2.8 (2.1, 3.8)***

0.007

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Support from community group

Yes

1.0

1.0

0.0004

0.058

Some time

1.7 (1.6, 1.8)*

1.9 (1.8, 2.0)*

No

1.5 (1.4, 1.6)*

1.5 (1.4, 1.6)*

Housing

Own

0.2 (0.1, 0.3)***

0.4 (0.2, 0.6)***

0.7(0.6, 0.8)

0.2(0.1, 0.3)

Short-term lease/contract

1.1 (1.0, 1.2)

1.6 (1.5, 1.7)***

0.7 (0.6, 0.8)***

0.9 (0.7, 1.1)

Long-term lease/contract

0.8 (0.6, 1.0)

1.2 (0.9, 1.5)

0.5 (0.4, 0.6)***

0.7 (0.4, 1.0)

Trauma

No

1.0

1.0

0.0063

1.0

1.0

0.001

Yes

1.8 (1.2, 2.7)*

2.5 (1.6, 3.7)*

1.6 (0.9, 2.7)

2.3 (1.3, 3.7)

Experience of discrimination

Yes

1.6 (1.2, 2.3)*

2.2 (1.4, 3.4)*

0.0087

1.9 (1.2, 2.9)***

2.2 (1.4, 3.6)***

0.0001

No

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

AOR: adjusted odds ratio; IE: interaction effect; PD: elevated psychological distress; PTSD: post-traumatic stress disorder; sampling weights were applied to derive AOR estimates.

*

p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The moderation role of financial hardship and region of origin on the association between gender and PTSD and psychological distress (PD); error bars denote 95% confidence interval. (a) Moderating role of financial hardship in association between PTSD and gender; (b) Moderating role of financial hardship for association between Psychological distress and gender; (c) Moderating role of region of origin in association between Psychological distress and gender (d) Moderating role of region of origin in association between PTSD and gender. For example: Odds of developing PTSD for women with financial hardship levels of 5–6, 3–4 and 1–2 higher than men with the same financial hardship categories.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The moderation role of housing arrangement, employment status and support from religious groups on the association between gender and PTSD and psychological distress (PD); error bars denote a 95% confidence interval. (a) Moderating role of housing arrangement in association between PTSD and gender; (b) Moderating role of housing arrangement in association between Psychological distress and gender; (c) Moderating role of employment status in association between PTSD and gender.

Women facing financial hardship levels of 1–2 and 3–4 showed higher odds of elevated psychological distress compared to men ((OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 4.3–5.3) and (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 3.0–3.8), (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 2.0–2.6) and (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5–1.9), respectively). However, men experiencing financial hardship at level 5–6 exhibited higher odds of elevated psychological distress compared to females ((OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 3.9–4.3) and (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 3.3–3.7), respectively) (Fig. 2b). Housing arrangements significantly moderated elevated psychological distress for males. Specifically, among men, those residing in long-term lease housing arrangements or their own houses had a reduced risk of elevated psychological distress, showing odds of (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4–0.7) and (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1–0.3), respectively (Fig. 3b). Women from the Middle East faced a higher risk of elevated psychological distress compared to men from the same region ((OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 3.4–4.0) and (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 2.5–2.9), respectively). Similarly, women from Central Asia faced a higher risk of elevated psychological distress relative to men from the same region ((OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 2.6- 3.2) and (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6–1.4), respectively) (Fig. 2c).

Discussion

Overall findings

The escalating influx of humanitarian migrants to high income countries highlights the urgent need for a nuanced understanding of the social determinants impacting their mental health (Bambra et al., 2005; Compton and Shim, 2015; Landau and Achiume, 2017). In this study, we investigated gender disparities in PTSD and elevated psychological distress among humanitarian migrants from 2013 to 2018 longitudinally including the moderating role of socioeconomic factors. We found a higher prevalence of PTSD and elevated psychological distress among females compared to males. In the first wave, PTSD prevalence was 37.7% for females and 29.5% for males, with elevated psychological distress rates of 22.3% and 12.7%, respectively. By the last wave, PTSD prevalence decreased to 31.9% for females and 25.2% for males, while psychological distress rates were 19.2% for females and 15.0% for males.

Socioeconomic factors such as financial hardship, housing arrangements and region of origin moderated the association between gender and mental health. Women facing socioeconomically disadvantaged circumstances, such as moderate financial hardship and unemployment, exhibited higher rates of both PTSD and elevated psychological distress compared to men with similar disadvantages. However, men in short-term housing arrangements or experiencing high levels of financial hardship displayed increased odds of experiencing elevated psychological distress when compared to females in the same circumstances.

The higher prevalence of PTSD and elevated psychological distress in female compared to male humanitarian migrants aligns with the pattern observed in the general population (Enticott et al., 2022; Olff, 2017; Silove et al., 2017), although here absolute rates are lower for both sexes. Research indicates that gender disparities in mental health are rooted in social factors, particularly variations in gender roles and expectations (Van Droogenbroeck et al., 2018). These gendered patterns in social roles and positions arise due to unequal access to power and prestige, leading to disparities in opportunities, a disparity likely exacerbated within humanitarian migrant groups, especially in light of the impact of trauma (Hollander et al., 2011; Jarallah and Baxter, 2019). Addressing these social factors is essential for promoting better mental health outcomes and fostering greater gender equality within migrant communities (Mirowsky and Ross, 2003; Olff, 2017; Tolin and Foa, 2008).

Our research underscores financial hardship as a risk factor for PTSD and elevated psychological distress among humanitarian migrants, particularly impacting women. This finding resonates with previous studies conducted in Canada and the United States (Bulut and Brewster, 2021; Tang et al., 2007). Financial hardship can introduce various stressors among humanitarian migrants, including challenges in meeting basic needs, housing insecurity and social isolation, all contributing to the development of PTSD and elevated psychological distress (Torlinska et al., 2020). Interventions that effectively target financial stressors can decrease the likelihood of mental health issues and improve overall well-being (Sullivan et al., 2020).

A stable housing arrangement is a critical factor in alleviating mental health issues among males. Bulut and Brewster’s study observed that higher income and homeownership are linked to lower levels of mental health issues among migrants (Bulut and Brewster, 2021). In contrast, temporary housing contributes to stress, particularly for humanitarian migrants resettled in host countries. These findings indicate that short-term lease/temporary housing arrangements may be a contributing factor to the persistence of elevated psychological distress. This suggests that implementing policies that prioritize stable and secure housing options for migrants such as longer-term leases or other affordable housing options could alleviate psychological distress.

Both men and women from the Middle East had higher rates of PTSD than those from other regions in contrast to the findings from a systematic review that indicated that migrants from Africa experienced a higher rate of PTSD (Blackmore et al., 2020). This disparity suggests the need for further investigation to clarify the effect of the migrants’ region of origin on their mental health in Australia. We also found that the region of origin serves as a moderator in the relationship between gender and mental disorders in humanitarian migrants. Women from the Middle East and Central Asia exhibited a higher likelihood of experiencing elevated psychological distress and PTSD compared to men from the same regions. These findings align with previous research highlighting the influence of the migrants’ region of origin in shaping the mental health of women who have resettled in Australia (Cooper et al., 2019; Fozdar and Hartley, 2013). Our findings also align with a scoping review and a cross-sectional study conducted on migrant women from Middle Eastern countries in the United States (Almutairi et al., 2022; Bulut and Brewster, 2021) as well as research on humanitarian migrants resettled in high-income countries showing that women from Middle Eastern countries exhibit a higher magnitude of PTSD compared to migrants from other regions. The observed associations may be linked to the higher likelihood of trauma and discrimination experienced by women from these regions, historically marked by prolonged conflict and war (Tolin and Foa, 2008). Understanding the impact of the country of origin on the development of elevated psychological distress holds substantial implications for preventing and treating mental health issues among humanitarian migrants.

Understanding migrants’ experiences throughout the migration process is crucial for crafting effective interventions. This involves recognizing and addressing challenges such as cultural stereotyping, discrimination, social integration hurdles, trauma impacts and issues specific to the region of origin.

The limitations in previous research addressed by our study

While previous research has often focused on specific countries of origin, our study adopted a more inclusive approach, focusing on migrants from diverse regions worldwide. Unlike previous BNLA studies, which often had limited scope, examining only specific combinations or a reduced number of waves, our investigation encompassed all five waves within the database (Chen et al., 2017, 2019; Cooper et al., 2019; Nguyen et al., 2023; Stuart and Nowosad, 2020; Wu et al., 2021). While prior studies largely overlooked the critical role of socioeconomic factors in moderating the association between gender and mental disorders (Blackmore et al., 2020), our research filled this gap. A major strength of our paper compared to previous BNLA publications was the selection process of covariates involving LASSO regression to identify the key associated factors from the large number of available variables.

Policy implications

Our findings demonstrate that socioeconomic factors play a pivotal role in shaping mental health, closely aligning with the ongoing concerns of policymakers in Australia. This resonance underscores the urgency for implementing targeted interventions that address the needs of high-risk populations within the Australian policy framework (Australian Department of Health, 2017). In crafting effective policies to address mental illness, it’s imperative for policymakers and politicians to recognize and address the intricate interplay between social factors and mental well-being. Our study highlights the important role of socioeconomic factors in shaping the relationship between gender and mental health among humanitarian migrants establishing new lives in Australia. To improve the mental well-being of immigrant women, our findings suggest a re-evaluation of intervention strategies that target socioeconomic factors and address gender-specific issues impacting women’s mental health. A crucial focus should be on empowering immigrant women by providing enhanced employment opportunities, strengthening connections to the resettled country settings and taking steps to alleviate financial hardship, such as through economic support and social welfare programs. Prioritizing structural changes in the development of inclusive and gender-sensitive mental health initiatives can help mitigate the influence of these factors on the mental well-being of migrant women, promote equitable access to resources and foster a positive, supportive environment conducive to their overall mental health.

Strengths and limitations

Our study builds upon previous research, utilizing high-quality data from humanitarian migrants resettled in Australia (Australian Government: Department of Social Services, 2022). A key strength lies in its comprehensive gender-stratified analysis of 5 years of follow-up data to assess mental disorders among both sexes of humanitarian migrants. By delving into the moderating role of socioeconomic factors in the relationship between gender and mental illness, we offer insights for policymakers and program planners seeking to design interventions to address mental disorders. However, the study also had certain limitations. Data collection methods varied across waves; the first, third and fifth waves used computer-assisted self-interviews, while the second and fourth waves relied on telephone interviews. This inconsistency poses a potential for bias due to the differences in self-reporting methods. Furthermore, this study is constrained by the temporal scope of the employment status measurement, which is limited to the last 7 days. This narrow timeframe may not adequately capture the broader employment patterns and their potential impact on the mental health of humanitarian migrants. Moreover, the study utilized the K6 instead of the K10, potentially leading to a loss of information and a more limited screening of mental illness. Although multiple imputations have been implemented to handle missing data, we did not conduct a sensitivity analysis, which we acknowledge as a limitation of our study. This also study did not consider non-binary gender identities.

Conclusion

Comprehensively understanding PTSD, elevated psychological distress, gender disparities and the diverse influencing factors – especially socioeconomic aspects – among migrant women is crucial for effectively addressing their mental health needs following resettlement. Our research findings emphasize gender differences in PTSD and elevated psychological distress rates over the 5 years after resettlement in Australia, with socioeconomic factors playing a moderating role. Prioritizing efforts aimed at alleviating the socioeconomic stressors would provide crucial support for the mental well-being of female immigrants as they adapt to their new homes and help ensure a more positive and successful transition to their new lives.

Supporting information

Handiso et al. supplementary material 1

Handiso et al. supplementary material

Handiso et al. supplementary material 2

Handiso et al. supplementary material

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796024000489.

Availability of data and materials

The BNLA data are available for authorized people at the National Centre for Longitudinal Data website.

Author contributions

DH: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, and writing review & editing; JB: supervision, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, and writing; EP: formal analysis, methodology, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, and writing; FS: validation, visualization, writing – original draft, and writing; GM: validation, visualization, supervision, writing – original draft, and writing; JE: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, and writing review & editing.

Financial support

Not applicable

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Almutairi W, Seven M, Poudel‐Tandukar K and VanKim N (2022) Mental health disorders among Middle Eastern immigrant women living in the United States: A scoping review. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 58(4), 3079–3102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2021) National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing (accessed 29 September 2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. Australian Department of Health (2017) The Fifth National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan. http://www.ag.gov.au/cca (accessed 2 December 2023).
  4. Australian Government: Department of Social Services (2022) Building a New Life in Australia: The longitudinal study of Humanitarian migrants (BNLA). https://www.dss.gov.au/about-the-department/longitudinal-studies/research-and-publications/data-highlights-no2-2015-bnla-longitudinal-study-of-humanitarian%20migrants-findings-from-the-first-three-waves (accessed 29 September 2023).
  5. Bambra C, Fox D and Scott-Samuel A (2005) Towards a politics of health. Health Promotion International 20(2), 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackmore R, Boyle JA, Fazel M, Ranasinha S, Gray KM, Fitzgerald G, Misso M and Gibson-Helm M (2020) The prevalence of mental illness in refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 17(9), e1003337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowleg L (2012) The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—An important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health 102(7), 1267–1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd M and Grieco E (2003) Women and migration: Incorporating gender into international migration theory. Migration Information Source 1(35), 28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bulut E and Brewster KL (2021) Psychological distress in Middle Eastern immigrants to the United States: A challenge to the healthy migrant model? Social Science & Medicine 274, 113765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen W, Hall BJ, Ling L and Renzaho AM (2017) Pre-migration and post-migration factors associated with mental health in humanitarian migrants in Australia and the moderation effect of post-migration stressors: Findings from the first wave data of the BNLA cohort study. The Lancet Psychiatry 4(3), 218–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen W, Wu S, Ling L and Renzaho AM (2019) Impacts of social integration and loneliness on mental health of humanitarian migrants in Australia: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 43(1), 46–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Compton MT and Shim RS (2015) The social determinants of mental health. Focus 13(4), 419–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooper S, Enticott JC, Shawyer F and Meadows G (2019) Determinants of mental illness among humanitarian migrants: Longitudinal analysis of findings from the first three waves of a large cohort study. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10, 545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong Y and Peng CY (2013) Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springerplus 2(1), 222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Due C, Burford-Rice R, Augoustinos M and Denson L (2018) Help-seeking for mental health services in Australia among Afghan women with refugee backgrounds. The European Journal of Public Health 28(1), 047–050. [Google Scholar]
  16. Enticott JC, Dawadi S, Shawyer F, Inder B, Fossey E, Teede H, Rosenberg S, Ozols AI and Meadows G (2022) Mental health in Australia: Psychological distress reported in six consecutive cross-sectional national surveys from 2001 to 2018. Frontiers in Psychiatry 13, 815904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fozdar F and Hartley L (2013) Refugee resettlement in Australia: What we know and need to know. Refugee Survey Quarterly 32(3), 23–51. [Google Scholar]
  18. Freedman J (2016) Sexual and gender-based violence against refugee women: A hidden aspect of the refugee “crisis”. Reproductive Health Matters 24(47), 18–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hansen M, Andersen TE, Armour C, Elklit A, Palic S and Mackrill T (2010) PTSD-8: A short PTSD inventory. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 6, 101–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hollander AC (2013) Social inequalities in mental health and mortality among refugees and other immigrants to Sweden – Epidemiological studies of register data. Global Health Action 6(1), 21059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollander AC, Bruce D, Burström B and Ekblad S (2011) Gender-related mental health differences between refugees and non-refugee immigrants – A cross-sectional register-based study. BMC Public Health 11(1), 180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hynie M (2018) The social determinants of refugee mental health in the post-migration context: A critical review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 63(5), 297–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jarallah Y and Baxter J (2019) Gender disparities and psychological distress among humanitarian migrants in Australia: A moderating role of migration pathway? Conflict and Health 13(1), 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE and Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine 32(6), 959–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW and Walters EE (2003) Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry 60(2), 184–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Landau LB and Achiume ET (2017) Global trends: Forced displacement in 2015. Development and Change 48(5), 1182–1195. [Google Scholar]
  27. Llácer A, Zunzunegui MV, Del Amo J, Mazarrasa L and Bolůmar F (2007) The contribution of a gender perspective to the understanding of migrants’ health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 61(2), ii4–ii10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mirowsky J and Ross CE (2003) Social Causes of Psychological Distress. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mwanri L, Fauk NK, Ziersch A, Gesesew HA, Asa GA and Ward PR (2022) Post-migration stressors and mental health for African migrants in South Australia: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 19(13), 7914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nguyen TP, Slewa-Younan S and Rioseco P (2023) Trajectories of psychological distress and social integration in newly resettled refugees: Findings from the Building a New Life in Australia longitudinal study. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology 58(7), 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Neil A (2019) House of Assembly Select Committee on Housing Affordability. Australia: Migrant Resource Centre. [Google Scholar]
  32. Olff M (2017) Sex and gender differences in post-traumatic stress disorder: An update. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 8(4), 1351204. [Google Scholar]
  33. Perreira KM and Ornelas I (2013) Painful passages: Traumatic experiences and post-traumatic stress among immigrant Latino adolescents and their primary caregivers. International Migration Review 47(4), 976–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Silove D, Baker JR, Mohsin M, Teesson M, Creamer M, O’Donnell M, Forbes D, Carragher N, Slade T, Mills K, Bryant R, McFarlane A, Steel Z, Felmingham K and Rees S (2017) The contribution of gender-based violence and network trauma to gender differences in post-traumatic stress disorder. PLoS One 12(2), e0171879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Slewa-Younan S, Mond JM, Bussion E, Melkonian M, Mohammad Y, Dover H, Smith M, Milosevic D and Jorm AF (2015) Psychological trauma and help-seeking behaviour amongst resettled Iraqi refugees in attending English tuition classes in Australia. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 9(5), 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Straiton M, Reneflot A and Diaz E (2014) Immigrants’ use of primary health care services for mental health problems. BMC Health Services Research 14, 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stuart J and Nowosad J (2020) The influence of premigration trauma exposure and early postmigration stressors on changes in mental health over time among refugees in Australia. Journal of Traumatic Stress 33(6), 917–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sullivan C, Vaughan C and Wright J (2020) Migrant and Refugee Women’s Mental Health in Australia: A Literature Review. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang TN, Oatley K and Toner BB (2007) Impact of life events and difficulties on the mental health of Chinese immigrant women. Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health 9(4), 281–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tolin DF and Foa EB (2008) Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: A quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 1, 37–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Torlinska J, Albani V and Brown H (2020) Financial hardship and health in a refugee population in Australia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Migration and Health 9(1), 100030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. UNHCR (2019) Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status: Under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. [Google Scholar]
  43. UNHCR (2022) Refugee Data Finder UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/ (accessed 15 February 2023).
  44. Vallejo-Martín M, Sánchez Sancha A and Canto JM (2021) Refugee women with a history of trauma: Gender vulnerability in relation to post-traumatic stress disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 18(9), 4806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Droogenbroeck F, Spruyt B and Keppens G (2018) Gender differences in mental health problems among adolescents and the role of social support: Results from the Belgian health interview surveys 2008 and 2013. BMC Psychiatry 18(1), 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Viruell-Fuentes EA, Miranda PY and Abdulrahim S (2012) More than culture: Structural racism, intersectionality theory, and immigrant health. Social Science & Medicine 75(12), 2099–2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wessels WK (2014) The refugee experience: Involving pre-migration, in transit, and post-migration issues in social services. https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/280 (accessed 29 January 2024).
  48. Wu S, Renzaho AM, Hall BJ, Shi L, Ling L and Chen W (2021) Time-varying associations of pre-migration and post-migration stressors in refugees’ mental health during resettlement: A longitudinal study in Australia. The Lancet Psychiatry 8(1), 36–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Handiso et al. supplementary material 1

Handiso et al. supplementary material

Handiso et al. supplementary material 2

Handiso et al. supplementary material

Data Availability Statement

The BNLA data are available for authorized people at the National Centre for Longitudinal Data website.


Articles from Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES