Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Birth Defects Res. 2023 Dec 28;116(1):e2294. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2294

Factors associated with infant sex and preterm birth status for selected birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011

Eva M Williford 1, Wei Yang 2, Meredith M Howley 1, Chen Ma 2, Ronnie T Collins 2, Kari A Weber 3, Dominique Heinke 4, Julie M Petersen 4, A J Agopian 5, Natalie P Archer 6, Andrew F Olshan 7, Lindsay A Williams 8, Marilyn L Browne 1,9, Gary M Shaw 2; National Birth Defects Prevention Study
PMCID: PMC11561737  NIHMSID: NIHMS2030239  PMID: 38155422

Abstract

Background:

Birth defects and preterm birth co-occur, with some overlapping risk factors. Many birth defects and preterm births tend to have a male preponderance. We explored potential risk factors impacting sex and preterm (<37 weeks of gestation) birth differences among infants with selected birth defects delivered from 1997 to 2011 using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).

Methods:

The NBDPS was a large multisite, population-based case–control study. Using random forests, we identified important predictors of male preterm, female preterm, and male term, each compared with female term births for each birth defect. Using logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios for associations between important predictors and sex-preterm birth status by birth defect.

Results:

We examined 11,379 infants with nine specific birth defects. The top 10 most important predictors of sex-preterm birth status from the random forests varied greatly across the birth defects and sex-preterm comparisons within a given defect group, with several being novel factors. However, one consistency was that short interpregnancy interval was associated with sex-preterm birth status for many of the studied birth defects. Although obesity has been identified as a risk factor for preterm birth and birth defects in other research, it was not associated with sex-preterm birth status for any of the examined defects.

Conclusions:

We confirmed expected associations for sex-preterm birth status differences and found new potential risk factors for further exploration among the studied birth defects.

Keywords: birth defects, preterm birth, random forests, sex

1 |. INTRODUCTION

In the United States, birth defects occur in approximately 3% of live births (Prevention, 2008). Preterm birth affects 10% of all births but 21% of infants with birth defects (Purisch & Gyamfi-Bannerman, 2017; Rasmussen et al., 2001; Reefhuis et al., 2015). Understanding birth defects and preterm births can be complex, as risk factors for many birth defects overlap with risk factors for preterm birth, including short interpregnancy interval (time from end of one pregnancy to the start of the next), pre-pregnancy obesity, no folic acid-containing supplement intake, pre-gestational diabetes, and maternal smoking (Dolan et al., 2009; Shaw, 2015).

Additionally, a preponderance of male sex has been observed for both preterm birth and some birth defects (Michalski et al., 2015; Shaw et al., 2003, 2021). This male excess is particularly striking among deliveries before 32 weeks of gestation (Shaw et al., 2021). Historically, a female preponderance has been observed among infants with neural tube defects; however, in recent years this difference has narrowed (Poletta et al., 2018; Shaw et al., 2020). To our knowledge, a comprehensive inquiry has not been made of potential maternal perinatal risk factors for the joint outcome of infant sex (male vs. female) and preterm birth status for a given birth defect. Identifying factors associated with sex and preterm birth differences for a given birth defect phenotype may stimulate new hypotheses regarding the etiologies of birth defects as well as preterm birth. More broadly, such consideration may enhance the understanding of sexual dimorphism and human development. In this study, we conducted exploratory analyses for potential risk factors impacting jointly defined sex and preterm birth groupings among selected birth defects by investigating data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).

2 |. METHODS

The NBDPS was a large multisite, population-based case–control study that included data from pregnancies with estimated delivery dates (EDD) from October 1997 through December 2011 ascertained through birth defects surveillance programs from selected geographic regions in 10 states (Arkansas, California, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Texas, and Utah) (Reefhuis et al., 2015). Institutional review board approval was obtained for each study site, and participants provided informed consent. Clinical geneticists reviewed medical record information on each case to determine eligibility and to classify cases as having isolated (one major birth defect), multiple (two or more major defects in more than one organ system), or complex birth defects (Reefhuis et al., 2015). In addition, birth defects attributed to a known chromosomal abnormality or single-gene condition were excluded. Infants with congenital heart defects (CHDs) were classified based on cardiac phenotype, complexity, and presence of non-cardiac birth defects (Botto et al., 2007).

Our analysis included infants with at least one of the following birth defects: spina bifida, D-transposition of the great arteries, tetralogy of Fallot, cleft palate without cleft lip, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency, transverse limb deficiency, craniosynostosis, or gastroschisis. We chose these nine birth defects (n = 12,276) for their well-defined phenotypic classification and larger sample sizes. Cases included live births, stillbirths (spontaneous loss at 20 weeks of gestation or later), and induced terminations. We included cases classified as having isolated, multiple, or complex defects in our analyses. We excluded cases with ambiguous or missing sex, or unknown gestational age at delivery. Our analysis excludes data from controls. For each specific birth defect, we categorized the infants into four distinct groups by sex (male or female) and gestational age at delivery dichotomized as term or preterm (≥37 or <37 weeks of gestation). We obtained gestational age from the infant’s birth or medical record. The outcome variable for this study was a composite of infant sex and gestational age at delivery with four levels: male preterm, female preterm, male term, and female term. We compared each sex-preterm birth combination to a common sex-preterm birth referent category (female term births).

As pre-gestational diabetes (i.e., type I or II) has been reported to be associated with these selected birth defects, infants whose mothers had these conditions were excluded from the analyses (n = 254, 2.1%) (Correa et al., 2008). We further excluded multiple births from the analyses (n = 560, 4.7% cases) since the etiologies of preterm birth may differ between singleton and multiple births (Tingleff et al., 2023).

Trained interviewers conducted computer-assisted telephone interviews in English or Spanish with participating women between 6 weeks and 24 months after their EDD. Women answered questions about their demographics, pregnancy history, health conditions, and other exposures before or during pregnancy. We considered four potential risk factors selected a priori for differences in sex and gestational age at delivery: (1) folic acid-containing supplement intake (yes or no) in early pregnancy, (2) maternal smoking (yes or no) in early pregnancy, (3) pre-pregnancy obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or <30 kg/m2), and (4) interpregnancy interval (no previous pregnancies, ≤12 months, or >12 months) (Dolan et al., 2009; Shaw et al., 2021). We defined interpregnancy interval as the difference in months between the date of conception of the index pregnancy and the end date of the last previous pregnancy before the index pregnancy. Early pregnancy is the critical period in embryonic development associated with most structural defects and was defined as the month before conception through the second month of pregnancy. The month before conception was included, as it is difficult to determine the exact date of conception.

For each birth defect, we used a multinomial, multivariable logistic regression model to analyze the association between the four-level outcome and the four potential risk factors selected a priori described above. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each model using female term as the referent outcome and adjusting for three other a priori potential risk factors. We used likelihood ratio tests to investigate all possible two-way statistical interactions between the four potential risk factors.

To further understand predictors of joint sex and preterm birth status among infants with birth defects, we conducted an exploratory (hypothesis-generating) analysis with random forests. We used this data-mining procedure to identify potential risk factors by birth defect. Random forests are a supervised machine-learning method that models a number of decision trees to classify observations as, for example male preterm versus female term, based on a set of predictors (Strobl et al., 2009). We ran three separate models (male preterm vs. female term, female preterm vs. female term, and male term vs. female term) for each defect. For our analysis, we modeled 5000 conditional inference trees (sufficiently large number of trees to achieve stable results) with 15 variables (square-root of the number of variables) randomly sampled to determine each split in a given tree with a minimum sum of weights in a node of five (results were stable across different random seeds) (Strobl et al., 2009). Since the variables differed in scale of measurement and to remove bias towards correlated variables, we utilized conditional inference trees, as they produce unbiased trees and use an adequate resampling method (Hothorn et al., 2006; Strobl et al., 2009). The variables were ranked based on the metric mean decrease accuracy (MDA) that was calculated for each variable as a measure of variable importance (Strobl et al., 2009).

We included a total of 241 variables in the random forests including dietary, demographic, and behavioral characteristics (Appendix A). For interview questions that asked about specific timing before and during pregnancy, separate variables for each month during early pregnancy were included (the month before conception, the first month of pregnancy, and the second month of pregnancy). Overall, missingness was low, ranging from 0% to 10% across the 241 variables, with only five variables having missing values for more than 5% of the women. We excluded women with missing responses for more than 10% of the variables considered (n = 752, 6.6%). For variables with ≤10% missing values, missingness was imputed with the most frequent response for categorical variables and the median for continuous variables (Schafer, 1999; Weber et al., 2018).

To quantify the associations between the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests and sex-preterm birth status, conventional aORs and 95% CIs were estimated from logistic regression models with Firth penalization (Firth, 1993).

Random forest analyses were performed using the Party Package in R software (V4.1.3). All other analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

3 |. RESULTS

We analyzed nine birth defects among 11,379 infants in total; the number of infants with each birth defect ranged from 465 to 2930 (Table 1). Infants with D-transposition of the great arteries had the lowest proportion of preterm birth (9.2%), whereas infants with gastroschisis had the highest (62.0%). Among control infants, 4.1% (n = 468) were male preterm, 3.8% (n = 428) were female preterm, 46.9% (n = 5311) were male term, and 45.1% (n = 5108) were female term births.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of preterm birth for selected defects.

Defect Total, N Preterm (<37 weeks gestation), n (%) Preterm (<35 weeks gestation), n (%)
Spina bifida 1204 295 (24.5) 189 (15.7)
D-transposition of the great arteries 732 67 (9.2) 20 (2.7)
Tetralogy of Fallot 1102 200 (18.2) 96 (8.7)
Cleft palate without cleft lip 1517 248 (16.4) 120 (7.9)
Cleft lip ± cleft palate 2930 390 (13.3) 172 (5.9)
Longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency 465 106 (22.8) 66 (14.2)
Transverse limb deficiency 667 133 (19.9) 78 (11.7)
Craniosynostosis 1516 172 (11.4) 77 (5.1)
Gastroschisis 1404 871 (62.0) 357 (25.4)

3.1 |. A priori selected potential risk factor results

The a priori selected potential risk factors were tabulated by sex and preterm birth status for each birth defect (Table 2). Among infants with spina bifida with mothers not taking a folic acid-containing supplement during early pregnancy, there was a higher proportion of males compared with females for both preterm (17.2% vs. 10.0%) and term (40.5% vs. 32.3%) births. Among infants with spina bifida, there was a higher proportion of male preterm births among mothers who had an interpregnancy intervals of ≤12 months (17.1%) compared with mothers in the other interpregnancy interval categories (12.4% for no previous pregnancies and 10.8% for >12 months). A similar pattern was observed among gastroschisis (36.7% male preterm births among mothers with interpregnancy intervals of ≤12 months, compared with 30% among those with no previous pregnancies and 30% among those with interpregnancy intervals >12 months). Among infants with longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency, regardless of sex, there was a higher proportion of preterm births among obese mothers (14.8% for males and 16.1% for females) compared with non-obese mothers (11.6% for males and 9.7% for females).

TABLE 2.

A priori potential risk factors by sex and preterm birth status.a

Male preterm Female preterm Male term Female term




Defect Characteristic nb (%*) nb (%) nb (%) nb (%)
Spina bifida Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 95 (10.8) 111 (12.7) 337 (38.5) 333 (38.0)
 No 50 (17.2) 29 (10.0) 118 (40.5) 94 (32.3)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 26 (12.6) 32 (15.5) 74 (35.7) 75 (36.2)
 No 121 (12.5) 111 (11.4) 386 (39.8) 353 (36.4)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 114 (13.8) 99 (11.9) 321 (38.7) 295 (35.6)
 ≥30 kg/m2 27 (9.3) 37 (12.8) 114 (39.5) 111 (38.4)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 38 (12.4) 32 (10.5) 131 (42.8) 105 (34.3)
 ≤12 months 43 (17.1) 33 (13.1) 79 (31.4) 97 (38.5)
 >12 months 66 (10.8) 72 (11.8) 246 (40.3) 227 (37.2)
 Total 150 (12.5) 145 (12.0) 470 (39.0) 439 (36.5)
D-transposition of the great arteries Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 34 (6.2) 15 (2.7) 348 (63.4) 152 (27.7)
 No 9 (5.4) 6 (3.6) 108 (64.3) 45 (26.8)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 5 (3.7) 8 (5.8) 90 (65.7) 34 (24.8)
 No 39 (6.7) 13 (2.2) 371 (63.8) 159 (27.3)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 34 (5.8) 21 (3.6) 372 (63.6) 158 (27.0)
 ≥30 kg/m2 6 (5.0) 1 (0.8) 81 (67.5) 32 (26.7)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 12 (5.7) 6 (2.9) 126 (60.3) 65 (31.1)
 ≤12 months 8 (6.2) 9 (6.9) 83 (63.9) 30 (23.1)
 >12 months 22 (6.0) 6 (2.9) 245 (66.2) 97 (26.2)
 Total 44 (6.0) 23 (3.1) 466 (63.7) 199 (27.2)
Tetralogy of Fallot Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 86 (10.0) 70 (8.1) 408 (47.3) 298 (34.6)
 No 20 (9.2) 18 (8.3) 121 (55.5) 59 (27.1)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 17 (9.6) 17 (9.6) 83 (46.9) 60 (33.9)
 No 89 (9.9) 69 (7.7) 446 (49.5) 297 (33.0)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 82 (9.8) 66 (7.9) 407 (48.8) 279 (33.5)
 ≥30 kg/m2 21 (9.5) 19 (8.6) 108 (48.9) 73 (33.0)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 49 (13.7) 30 (8.4) 166 (46.5) 112 (31.4)
 ≤12 months 16 (8.2) 17 (8.7) 91 (46.7) 71 (36.4)
 >12 months 40 (7.9) 39 (7.7) 266 (52.3) 164 (32.2)
 Total 110 (10.0) 90 (8.2) 540 (49.0) 362 (32.8)
Cleft palate without cleft lip Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 90 (7.8) 96 (8.4) 408 (35.5) 555 (48.3)
 No 20 (6.1) 28 (8.5) 116 (35.3) 165 (50.2)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 29 (9.0) 28 (8.7) 115 (35.8) 149 (46.4)
 No 86 (7.4) 99 (8.5) 412 (35.4) 567 (48.7)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 99 (8.4) 105 (8.9) 418 (35.3) 563 (47.5)
 ≥30 kg/m2 13 (4.8) 23 (8.5) 101 (37.1) 135 (49.6)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 41 (10.0) 38 (9.3) 142 (34.7) 188 (46.0)
 ≤12 months 27 (9.3) 27 (9.3) 121 (41.7) 115 (39.7)
 >12 months 47 (6.2) 59 (7.7) 255 (33.4) 402 (52.7)
 Total 117 (7.7) 131 (8.6) 536 (35.3) 733 (48.3)
Cleft lip ± cleft palate Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 201 (9.1) 96 (4.4) 1257 (57.0) 651 (29.5)
 No 64 (9.4) 24 (3.5) 375 (55.3) 215 (31.7)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 57 (8.4) 28 (4.1) 385 (56.9) 207 (30.6)
 No 204 (9.3) 93 (4.2) 1241 (56.5) 659 (30.0)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 205 (9.1) 94 (4.2) 1280 (57.0) 665 (29.6)
 ≥30 kg/m2 51 (9.7) 23 (4.4) 294 (55.8) 159 (30.2)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 89 (10.4) 42 (4.9) 491 (57.2) 236 (27.5)
 ≤12 months 43 (7.8) 24 (4.3) 299 (53.9) 189 (34.1)
 >12 months 125 (8.8) 51 (3.6) 822 (57.9) 423 (29.8)
 Total 267 (9.1) 123 (4.2) 1664 (56.8) 876 (29.9)
Longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 41 (11.7) 35 (10.0) 161 (45.9) 114 (32.5)
 No 12 (11.4) 16 (15.2) 43 (41.0) 34 (32.4)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 9 (9.2) 14 (14.3) 39 (39.8) 36 (36.7)
 No 43 (12.2) 36 (10.2) 163 (46.1) 112 (31.6)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 42 (11.6) 35 (9.7) 164 (45.3) 121 (33.4)
 ≥30 kg/m2 12 (14.8) 13 (16.1) 30 (37.0) 26 (32.1)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 24 (15.1) 20 (12.6) 67 (42.1) 48 (30.2)
 ≤12 months 6 (6.7) 8 (9.0) 49 (55.1) 26 (29.2)
 >12 months 22 (11.0) 22 (11.0) 83 (41.3) 74 (36.8)
 Total 54 (11.6) 52 (11.2) 208 (44.7) 151 (32.5)
Transverse limb deficiency Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 56 (11.2) 47 (9.4) 213 (42.4) 186 (37.1)
 No 18 (12.1) 10 (6.7) 73 (49.0) 48 (32.2)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 17 (13.0) 13 (9.9) 49 (37.4) 52 (39.7)
 No 55 (10.6) 42 (8.1) 238 (45.7) 186 (35.7)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 60 (11.7) 47 (9.2) 219 (42.8) 186 (36.3)
 ≥30 kg/m2 11 (9.4) 8 (6.8) 55 (47.0) 43 (36.8)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 32 (14.7) 19 (8.7) 89 (40.8) 78 (35.8)
 ≤12 months 14 (13.0) 10 (9.3) 52 (48.2) 32 (29.6)
 >12 months 28 (8.6) 26 (8.0) 147 (45.0) 126 (38.5)
 Total 76 (11.4) 57 (8.5) 293 (43.9) 241 (36.1)
Craniosynostosis Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 95 (7.8) 39 (3.2) 745 (61.1) 341 (28.0)
 No 21 (8.4) 11 (4.4) 131 (52.6) 86 (34.5)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 20 (7.9) 13 (5.2) 150 (59.5) 69 (27.4)
 No 97 (7.9) 38 (3.1) 733 (59.6) 362 (29.4)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 95 (8.0) 41 (3.5) 710 (60.1) 335 (28.4)
 ≥30 kg/m2 25 (8.4) 9 (3.0) 171 (57.2) 94 (31.4)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 33 (8.5) 14 (3.6) 237 (61.1) 104 (26.8)
 ≤12 months 34 (11.1) 14 (4.6) 170 (55.6) 88 (28.8)
 >12 months 50 (6.4) 22 (2.8) 475 (61.1) 230 (29.6)
 Total 121 (8.0) 51 (3.4) 904 (59.6) 440 (29.0)
Gastroschisis Folic acid-containing supplement usec
 Yes 295 (31.5) 288 (30.7) 170 (18.1) 185 (19.7)
 No 129 (30.8) 131 (31.3) 87 (20.8) 72 (17.2)
Maternal smokingc
 Yes 145 (30.2) 140 (29.2) 95 (19.8) 100 (20.8)
 No 272 (31.3) 280 (32.3) 163 (18.8) 153 (17.6)
Pre-pregnancy body mass index
 <30 kg/m2 408 (31.9) 386 (30.1) 247 (19.3) 240 (18.7)
 ≥30 kg/m2 19 (25.7) 28 (37.8) 14 (18.9) 13 (17.6)
Interpregnancy interval
 No previous pregnancies 206 (30.0) 215 (31.3) 126 (18.3) 140 (20.4)
 ≤12 months 87 (36.7) 68 (28.7) 41 (17.3) 41 (17.3)
 >12 months 127 (30.3) 127 (30.3) 92 (22.0) 73 (17.4)
 Total 441 (31.4) 430 (30.6) 269 (19.2) 264 (18.8)
a

Row percentages.

b

Numbers vary because of missing values.

c

Month before conception through the second month of pregnancy.

Multinomial, multivariable logistic regression results are presented in Table 3. For infants with spina bifida, compared with female term births, mothers of male preterm births were more likely to have not used folic acid-containing supplements (aOR [95% CI]: 1.95 [1.25–3.04]) and less likely to have pre-pregnancy obesity (aOR [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.36–0.97]). Additionally, mothers of male term births were less likely to have interpregnancy intervals of ≤12 months compared with mothers of female term births (aOR [95% CI]: 0.67 [0.46–0.97]). For infants with D-transposition of the great arteries, compared with female term births, mothers of female preterm births were more likely to be smokers (aOR [95% CI]: 4.22 [1.50–11.92]) or have an interpregnancy interval of ≤12 months (aOR [95% CI]: 5.14 [1.54–17.21]). For infants with cleft palate without cleft lip, compared with female term births, mothers of male preterm and male term births were more likely to have an interpregnancy interval ≤12 months (aOR [95% CI]: 2.01 [1.16–3.48] and 1.66 [1.22–2.27], respectively). For infants with craniosynostosis, compared with female term births, mothers of male preterm births were more likely to have an interpregnancy interval of ≤12 months (aOR [95% CI]: 1.76 [1.05–2.94]) and mothers of male term births were more likely to take folic acid-containing supplements (aOR [95% CI]: 0.70 [0.51–0.95]).

TABLE 3.

Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from multinomial regression models for associations between folic acid-containing supplement use,a,b maternal smoking,a,c pre-pregnancy obesity,d interpregnancy interval,e and sex and preterm birth status.

Male preterm Female preterm Male term



Defect Effect aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Spina bifida No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 1.95 (1.25–3.04) 0.91 (0.54–1.52) 1.36 (0.96–1.91)
Yes vs. no smoking 1.00 (0.60–1.66) 1.42 (0.87–2.32) 0.84 (0.58–1.22)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 0.59 (0.36–0.97) 0.92 (0.58–1.46) 0.96 (0.70–1.32)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 1.50 (0.93–2.42) 1.14 (0.69–1.87) 0.67 (0.46–0.97)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 1.20 (0.74–1.97) 1.03 (0.63–1.70) 1.21 (0.87–1.69)
D-transposition of the great arteries No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 0.72 (0.28–1.87) 0.60 (0.16–2.27) 1.08 (0.71–1.65)
Yes vs. no smoking 0.75 (0.27–2.10) 4.22 (1.50–11.92) 1.07 (0.68–1.70)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 0.66 (0.22–2.01) 0.30 (0.04–2.35) 1.16 (0.72–1.86)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 1.19 (0.45–3.13) 5.14 (1.54–17.21) 1.07 (0.66–1.76)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 0.94 (0.42–2.11) 1.23 (0.34–4.48) 0.79 (0.53–1.17)
Tetralogy of Fallot No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 0.90 (0.48–1.71) 1.13 (0.59–2.15) 1.42 (0.99–2.04)
Yes vs. no smoking 1.05 (0.57–1.94) 1.33 (0.71–2.48) 0.96 (0.66–1.40)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 1.10 (0.63–1.95) 1.05 (0.56–1.94) 1.07 (0.75–1.51)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 0.88 (0.44–1.74) 0.89 (0.46–1.74) 0.74 (0.51–1.09)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 1.89 (1.14–3.12) 0.98 (0.56–1.72) 0.94 (0.68–1.29)
Cleft palate without cleft lip No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 0.73 (0.42–1.28) 1.04 (0.64–1.68) 1.03 (0.77–1.37)
Yes vs. no smoking 1.41 (0.88–2.27) 1.09 (0.68–1.75) 1.06 (0.80–1.42)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 0.61 (0.33–1.13) 0.99 (0.59–1.63) 0.99 (0.74–1.34)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 2.01 (1.16–3.48) 1.64 (0.97–2.76) 1.66 (1.22–2.27)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 1.77 (1.10–2.85) 1.41 (0.89–2.22) 1.17 (0.89–1.55)
Cleft lip ± cleft palate No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 1.00 (0.71–1.42) 0.75 (0.45–1.26) 0.94 (0.76–1.15)
Yes vs. no smoking 0.85 (0.60–1.20) 0.91 (0.57–1.46) 0.98 (0.80–1.19)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 1.08 (0.75–1.55) 1.04 (0.63–1.71) 0.95 (0.76–1.19)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 0.76 (0.51–1.14) 1.06 (0.62–1.80) 0.79 (0.63–0.99)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 1.25 (0.90–1.74) 1.53 (0.98–2.39) 1.06 (0.87–1.30)
Longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 0.83 (0.37–1.86) 1.24 (0.57–2.72) 0.88 (0.51–1.52)
Yes vs. no smoking 0.51 (0.21–1.23) 1.31 (0.61–2.80) 0.78 (0.46–1.32)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 1.55 (0.71–3.42) 1.45 (0.63–3.34) 0.80 (0.44–1.46)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 0.63 (0.21–1.85) 0.90 (0.32–2.52) 1.68 (0.94–2.99)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 1.68 (0.83–3.38) 1.59 (0.75–3.38) 1.06 (0.63–1.76)
Transverse limb deficiency No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 1.30 (0.67–2.51) 0.95 (0.44–2.04) 1.13 (0.73–1.75)
Yes vs. no smoking 1.24 (0.65–2.37) 1.08 (0.53–2.24) 0.79 (0.51–1.25)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 0.87 (0.41–1.87) 0.83 (0.36–1.91) 1.07 (0.68–1.70)
≤ 12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 1.91 (0.85–4.31) 1.40 (0.58–3.33) 1.34 (0.80–2.26)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 2.00 (1.07–3.74) 1.20 (0.61–2.36) 0.92 (0.62–1.38)
Craniosynostosis No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 0.89 (0.52–1.54) 1.16 (0.56–2.40) 0.70 (0.51–0.95)
Yes vs. no smoking 1.17 (0.67–2.04) 1.94 (0.97–3.90) 1.15 (0.83–1.59)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 0.94 (0.56–1.58) 0.83 (0.38–1.78) 0.89 (0.66–1.19)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 1.76 (1.05–2.94) 1.66 (0.80–3.48) 1.00 (0.74–1.37)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 1.54 (0.93–2.56) 1.55 (0.76–3.19) 1.20 (0.90–1.60)
Gastroschisis No vs. yes folic acid-containing supplement use 1.23 (0.86–1.77) 1.12 (0.78–1.62) 1.34 (0.90–2.00)
Yes vs. no smoking 0.81 (0.58–1.14) 0.75 (0.53–1.05) 0.92 (0.63–1.34)
Yes vs. no pre-pregnancy obesity 0.70 (0.33–1.49) 1.22 (0.61–2.44) 0.93 (0.42–2.06)
≤12 months IPI vs. >12 months IPI 1.20 (0.73–1.96) 0.98 (0.59–1.62) 0.72 (0.41–1.24)
No prev. pregnancies vs. >12 months IPI 0.81 (0.55–1.18) 0.85 (0.59–1.24) 0.69 (0.46–1.03)

Note: The referent group is “female term”. The estimates in bold have statistically significant adjusted odds ratios.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPI, interpregnancy interval.

a

Month before conception through the second month of pregnancy.

b

Adjusted for maternal smoking, pre-pregnancy obesity, and interpregnancy interval.

c

Adjusted for folic acid-containing supplement use, pre-pregnancy obesity, and interpregnancy interval.

d

Adjusted for folic acid-containing supplement use, maternal smoking, and interpregnancy interval.

e

Adjusted for folic acid-containing supplement use, maternal smoking, and pre-pregnancy obesity.

3.2 |. Random forests results

Our analyses employing random forests sought to identify variables associated with the outcome in each of the three models (male preterm vs. female term, female preterm vs. female term, and male term vs. female term) by birth defect. Table 4 provides the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests, with female term as the referent outcome for each model by birth defect. Tables S1S9 present the aORs and corresponding 95% CIs for each logistic regression model with the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests for the studied defects.

TABLE 4.

Top 10 most important predictors from the random forests for each model by birth defect.

Spina bifida

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Lutein and zeaxanthin (μg/day) Wine intake Any type of fever during P2
Folic acid-containing supplement use during P2 Household income Work/school smoke exposure during B1-P2
Maternal race/ethnicity Diet quality index Nausea during P1
Showers at home Alcohol consumption during B1 Cantaloupe (1/4 melon)
Carrots, cooked (1/2 cup) Beer intake Interpregnancy interval
Household smoke exposure during B1-P2a Folate, DFE (μg/day) Refried beans (1 cup)
Paternal substance abuse during P2 Total carbohydrate (g/day) Household smoke exposure during B1
Baths at home Study site Tomatoes or tomato juice
Ice cream (1/2 cup) Thiamin (mg/day) Maternal residency ever moved B1-P2
Paternal race/ethnicity Parity Candy without chocolate (1 oz.)
D-transposition of the great arteries

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Bacon (2 slices) Showers at home Fertility treatment
Paternal education Orange juice Nausea during P1-P2
Betaine (mg/day) Bananas (1) Household income
Spinach/collard greens (1/2 cup) Magnesium (mg/day) Alanine (g/day)
Time spent per shower (min) Vitamin A, RAE (μg/day) Vasoactive medication use during B1-P3
Carrots, cooked (1/2 cup) Folate, DFE (μg/day) Magnesium (mg/day)
Nuts (1 oz) Anti-fever medication use during B1 Calcium (mg/day)
French fries (4 oz) Cigarette smoking during P1-P2 Urinary tract infection during P2
Baths at home Vitamin C (mg/day) Hot dogs
Paternal race/ ethnicity Copper (mg/day) Whole milk (8 oz. glass)
Tetralogy of Fallot

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Showers at home Liver (3–4 oz.) Mixed drink intake
String beans (1/2 cup) Number of people supported with household income Pie (slice)
Interpregnancy interval Parity Dark bread (slice)
Cottage/ricotta cheese (1/2 cup) Maternal age at delivery Total carbohydrate (g/day)
Carrots, cooked (1/2 cup) Carrots, raw (1/2 carrot or 2–4 sticks) Thiamin (mg/day)
Spinach/collard greens (1/2 cup) Alpha-carotene (μg/day) Gravidity
Eggs (1) Paternal education Folic acid-containing supplement use during B1
Organ meats/barbacoa/menudo/sweetbreads/tongue/intestines (3–4 oz.) Oranges (1) Cottage/ricotta cheese (1/2 cup)
Baths at home Maternal education Antihypertensive medication use during B1-P3
NSAIDs use during P1 Private well drinking water source Processed meats
Cleft palate without cleft lip

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Niacin (mg/day) Household income String beans (1/2 cup)
Glycemic index Broccoli (1/2 cup) Bananas (1)
Showers at home Baths at home Interpregnancy interval
Retinol (μg/day) Seizures Anti-anxiety medication use during B1-P1
Paternal race/ethnicity Timing of first prenatal visit Alcohol consumption during B1
Vitamin E (mg/day) Cantaloupe (1/4 melon) Butter (pat)
Anti-fever medication use during P2 Vitamin E (mg/day) Wine intake
Vitamin B12 (μg/day) Vitamin A, RAE (μg/day) Caffeine from tea (mg/day)
Total lipid (g/day) Beans/lentils (1/2 cup) Cake (slice)
Folate, DFE (μg/day) Any type of fever during B1 Birth control pill during P2
Cleft lip ± cleft palate

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Total choline (mg/day) Maternal education Father employed
Cantaloupe (1/4 melon) Lutein and zeaxanthin (μg/day) Number of people supported with household income
Timing of pregnancy discovery Folic acid-containing supplement use during P1 Parity
Salsa (1 cup) Paternal age at delivery Paternal race/ethnicity
Maternal residency ever moved B1-P2 Maternal age at delivery Maternal race/ethnicity
Caffeine from soda (mg/day) Cantaloupe (1/4 melon) Showers at home
Paternal race/ethnicity Broccoli (1/2 cup) Total carbohydrate (g/day)
Beans/lentils (1/2 cup) Chicken/turkey (4–6 oz.) Other cheese (slice or 1 oz.)
Carrots, cooked (1/2 cup) Cigarette smoking during P2 Copper (mg/day)
Peanut butter (1 Tbs) Magnesium (mg/day) Gravidity
Longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Fertility treatment Raw jalapeno peppers (1) String beans (1/2 cup)
Carrots, cooked (1/2 cup) Baths at home Pie (slice)
Vitamin E (mg/day) Anti-fever medication use during P1 White bread (slice)
NSAIDs use during B1 Tomatoes/tomato juice Maternal education
Folic acid-containing supplement use during B1 Potatoes, baked, boiled (1) or mashed (1 cup) Tomatoes/tomato juice
Household income Number of people supported with household income Peanut butter (1 Tbs)
Maternal education Vitamin E (mg/day) Paternal education
Wine intake Father employed Alpha- carotene (μg/day)
Cottage/ricotta cheese (1/2 cup) Peas/lima beans (1/2 cup) Hamburger (1 patty)
Yams/sweet potatoes (1/2 cup) Timing of first prenatal visit Diet quality index
Transverse limb deficiency

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Total choline (mg/day) Maternal race/ethnicity Oranges (1)
Total carbohydrate (g/day) Paternal race/ethnicity Paternal race/ethnicity
Caffeine from soda (mg/day) Vitamin E (mg/day) Glycemic index
Maternal age at delivery Nausea during P2 Vitamin C (mg/day)
Maternal residency ever moved B1-P2 Bananas (1) Chocolate (1 oz.)
Vitamin C (mg/day) Caffeine from soda (mg/day) Showers at home
Total lipid (g/day) Birth control pill during P1 Maternal race/ethnicity
Parity Total carbohydrate (g/day) Respiratory disease during P2
Alanine Baths at home Vasoactive medication use during B1-P3
Beer intake Bacon (2 slices) Vitamin E (mg/day)
Craniosynostosis

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Folic acid-containing supplement use during P1 Selenium (μg/day) Skim/low fat milk (8 oz. glass)
Baths at home Study site Potatoes, baked, boiled (1) or mashed (1 cup)
Study site Betaine (mg/day) Hamburger (1 patty)
Paternal race/ethnicity Baths at home Corn (1 ear or 1/2 cup)
White bread (slice) Other fruits (1/2 cup) Bacon (2 slices)
Thiamin (mg/day) Vitamin E (mg/day) Beef/pork/lamb, main dish (4–6 oz.)
Tortilla (1) Niacin (mg/day) Lutein and zeaxanthin (μg/day)
Riboflavin (mg/day) Medication for pregnancy nausea Fertility treatment
Vitamin E (mg/day) Maternal feelings about pregnancy Beef/pork/lamb, mixed dish
Copper (mg/day) Total choline (mg/day) Broccoli (1/2 cup)
Gastroschisis

Male preterm Female preterm Male term
Total caffeine (mg/day) Vitamin E (mg/day) Caffeine from coffee (mg/day)
String beans (1/2 cup) Cabbage/cauliflower/brussel sprouts (1/2 cup) Anti-fever medication use during P1-P2
Gravidity String beans (1/2 cup) Gravidity
Caffeine from coffee (mg/day) Cantaloupe (1/4 melon) Corn (1 ear or 1/2 cup)
Potato chips or corn chips (1 oz.) Caffeine from coffee (mg/day) Work/school smoke exposure during P2
NSAIDs use during P1 NSAIDs use during P1-P2 Skim/low fat milk (8 oz. glass)
Vitamin B6 (mg/day) Study site Interpregnancy interval
Broccoli (1/2 cup) Yellow squash (1/2 cup) Organ meats/barbacoa/ menudo/sweetbreads/tongue/intestines (3–4 oz.)
Parity Broccoli (1/2 cup) Avocado (1)
Wine intake Mixed drink intake Dark bread (slice)

Note: Predictors in bold have a statistically significant odds ratio less than one, and predictors in bold and italics have a statistically significant odds ratio greater than one (see Tables S1S9 for all model estimates from the logistic regressions). The referent group is “female term”.

Abbreviations: B1, month before conception; DFE, dietary folate equivalents; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; P1, first month of pregnancy; P2, second month of pregnancy; P3, third month of pregnancy; RAE, retinoic acid equivalents.

a

Household smoke exposure is defined by the presence of anyone in the household smoking cigarettes.

Household smoke exposure was among the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests for two of the models (in the male preterm vs. female term model and the male term vs. female term model) for infants with spina bifida (Table 4). Household smoke exposure in early pregnancy was identified as a risk factor for male preterm births (aOR [95% CI]: 1.34 [0.80–2.21]) but had a reduced aOR for male term births compared with female term births (aOR [95% CI]: 0.69 [0.45–1.06]) (Table S1). Consistent with the multinomial, multivariable logistic regression model with the a priori potential risk factors (Table 3), mothers of male preterm births were more likely to not take folic acid-containing supplements during the second month of pregnancy (aOR [95% CI]: 1.81 [1.14–2.85]) compared with mothers of female term births (Table S1).

There were no commonalities in the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests across the three models for infants with D-transposition of the great arteries or tetralogy of Fallot (Table 4). Mothers of female preterm births were more likely to smoke during the first 2 months of pregnancy compared with mothers of female term births (aOR [95% CI]: 3.17 [1.04–9.31]) (Table S2), consistent with the multinomial, multivariable logistic regression model for that association among infants with D-transposition of the great arteries (Table 3). Among infants with tetralogy of Fallot, mothers of male preterm births were more likely to have no previous pregnancies versus a >12 month interpregnancy interval (aOR [95% CI]: 1.73 [1.04–2.87]) compared with mothers of female term births (Table S3).

There were no commonalities in the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests across the three models for infants with cleft palate without cleft lip (Table 4). Mothers of male term births were more likely to have an interpregnancy interval of ≤12 months (aOR [95% CI]: 1.55 [1.13–2.12]) compared with mothers of female term births (Table S4), consistent with the multinomial, multivariable logistic regression model with the a priori potential risk factors (Table 3). Two commonalities, though not statistically significant, were observed in the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests among infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (Table 4): eating cantaloupe (in the male preterm vs. female term model and the female preterm vs. female term model) and paternal race/ethnicity (in the male preterm vs. female term model and the male term vs. female term model).

Among infants with longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency, vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol intake was identified among the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests in more than one model (in the male preterm vs. female term model and the female preterm vs. female term model) (Table 4). Mothers of male preterm births were more likely to have had fertility treatment compared with mothers of female term births (aOR [95% CI]: 3.97 [1.15–15.53]) among infants with longitudinal/intercalary limb deficiency (Table S6). For infants with transverse limb deficiency, total carbohydrate, caffeine from soda, vitamin C intake, maternal race/ethnicity, paternal race/ethnicity, and vitamin E intake were identified in the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests in more than one model (Table 3). Mothers of male preterm births were more likely to consume caffeine (mg per day) from soda (aOR [95% CI] for a 10-unit change: 1.05 [1.02–1.10]) compared with mothers of female term births (Table S7). The association of caffeine from soda with female preterm versus female term was not statistically significant.

For infants with craniosynostosis, frequency of baths at home and study site were identified in more than one model (in the male preterm vs. female term model and the female preterm vs. female term model) among the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests (Table 4). Among infants with craniosynostosis, compared with female term births, mothers of male preterm birth were less likely to not use folic acid-containing supplements during the first month of pregnancy (aOR [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.38–0.98]) (Table S8). Folic acid-containing supplement use in early pregnancy was found to be statistically significant for male term, but not for male preterm births compared with female term births in the a priori selected potential risk factors analysis (Table 3). Among infants with gastroschisis, caffeine consumption from coffee (mg per day) was identified as a top 10 most important predictor from the random forests by all three models.

4 |. DISCUSSION

The objective of this study was to perform exploratory and hypothesis generating analyses of sex and preterm birth differences to identify areas for future research. We investigated known and agnostically identified factors that might contribute to the differences in sex and gestational age at delivery for specific birth defects. Short interpregnancy interval (≤12 months) was associated with some sex-preterm birth status differences among many of the birth defects studied. While obesity has been associated with select birth defects and preterm birth in prior research (Challis et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2019; Stothard et al., 2009), it was not associated with any sex-preterm birth status differences.

The top 10 most important predictors identified agnostically from the random forests varied greatly across sex-preterm comparisons within each birth defect and across birth defects within a given sex-preterm birth comparison. Overall, the results from the logistic regression models suggested non-null associations with the top 10 most important predictors identified from the random forests. Findings were most consistent between the random forests and the multinomial, multivariable logistic regression models with a priori potential risk factors for sex-preterm birth status among infants with spina bifida, D-transposition of the great arteries, or tetralogy of Fallot. However, it is important to note that these modeling strategies have important differences (e.g., logistic regression is parametric whereas random forests are nonparametric), so we would not necessarily expect them to always agree.

In this exploratory analysis, we utilized random forests, a non-hypothesis-driven data-mining algorithm. This approach allowed us to investigate a large number of potential risk factors simultaneously and rank the variables for each model based on the MDA. Random forests confirmed some of the four a priori identified associations and allowed us to observe new potential risk factors for further exploration of sex-preterm birth status differences in future birth defects studies.

Caffeine consumption was identified as an important predictor for sex-preterm birth status multiple models among infants with transverse limb deficiency (caffeine from soda) or gastroschisis (caffeine from coffee). Previous NBDPS analyses have observed some small, elevated effect estimates between pre-pregnancy total caffeine consumption and birth defects, including transverse limb deficiency (Williford et al., 2023). We observed that the association of caffeine consumption from soda differed between male preterm and female preterm compared with female term births among infants with transverse limb deficiency. Among infants with gastroschisis the associations between caffeine consumption from coffee and sex-preterm birth status were not statistically significant. Inconsistent results have been observed in the literature for the association of caffeine consumption during pregnancy and risk of preterm delivery (Maslova et al., 2010).

Study site was identified among the top 10 most important predictors in two out of the three models among infants with craniosynostosis (male preterm vs. female term and female preterm vs. female term). Arkansas was more likely to have male preterm and female preterm births compared with many of the other study sites adjusted for all other predictors in the models. Among infants with craniosynostosis, 18.7% were preterm births in Arkansas (43% with gestational age at delivery of 36 weeks among preterm births). This is a larger percentage of craniosynostosis cases that were preterm births than other sites, which ranged from 4.1% (New York) to 14.0% (Georgia). The percentage of infants with craniosynostosis classified as isolated was consistent across study sites, ranging from 88% (California) to 93% (Arkansas). Case ascertainment for some pregnancy outcomes and prenatal diagnosis procedures differed over time for some sites (Reefhuis et al., 2015). This hypothesis generating analysis has identified study site as an area of future work in sex and preterm differences among infants with craniosynostosis.

Our findings are consistent with some of the prior research of infant sex and identified risk factors, although existing work has not examined the combined outcome of sex-preterm birth status among infants with birth defects. Others have observed that maternal cigarette smoking may negatively impact growth in male fetuses more than female fetuses (Shaw et al., 2003). In our analysis, we found maternal cigarette smoking in early pregnancy to be associated with female preterm births compared with female term births among infants with D-transposition of the great arteries. We did not find maternal cigarette smoking to be associated with male preterm or term births for any of the studied birth defects. A previous analysis explored folic acid use and infant sex among neural tube defects and reported more females in the two studies with pregnancies before mandatory folate fortification in the United States (Shaw et al., 2020). However, for infants with spina bifida, we observed that mothers of male preterm births were more likely to not be taking folic-acid supplementation during early pregnancy compared with mothers of female term births. Another study found older paternal age to be associated with female births among infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate, and gravidity to be associated with female births among infants with spina bifida (Rittler et al., 2004). We did not identify either of those variables among the top 10 most important predictors from the random forests for the models with either cleft lip or spina bifida. Discrepancies between our findings and those of previous research may be explained by a wide range of factors, including differences in data sources, methods, outcome definitions, and exposure assessments.

This study has many strengths including the large multi-site population-based design, the clinical classification of birth defects, and a detailed standardized questionnaire. The use of random forests allowed for the exploration of a large number of variables, capitalizing on the breadth of potential risk factors captured in these data, without concerns regarding correlations between the variables. Limitations of this study include that exposure data were collected after delivery, which could impact recall, and the potential for selection bias due to participation refusals and non-response. Our observations may be biased if a particular birth defect and sex combination was more likely to result in a pregnancy loss that was not ascertained (spontaneous pregnancy loss before 20 weeks gestation). Such bias could be further amplified if studied factors also increased the likelihood of the particular birth defect and sex combination to result in a pregnancy loss. In addition, our observations could be biased for some of the birth defects (e.g., craniosynostosis, D-transposition of the great arteries, or tetralogy of Fallot) that may not have been diagnosed in pregnancy terminations or losses which would bias the gestational age to term births (Heinke et al., 2020; Liberman et al., 2023; McPherson et al., 2017). For infants with gastroschisis, preterm delivery may be initiated by the provider due to the presence of the defect (Friedman et al., 2016); however, in our data we are unable to distinguish if the preterm delivery was spontaneous or provider-initiated. The literature suggests that spontaneous preterm birth occurs frequently and the optimal timing of delivery is not conclusive for infants with gastroschisis (Baer et al., 2019; Friedman et al., 2016; Goldstein et al., 2022). Thus, results may be biased and should interpreted with caution for defects such as gastroschisis, where there may be a preference for an early delivery at some facilities. We defined preterm birth using the standard definition of less than 37 weeks gestation at delivery. In our analysis of 11,379 infants with selected birth defects, 4.6% (n = 525) were delivered at 35 weeks gestation and 6.7% (n = 759) were delivered at 36 weeks gestation. There are two potential limitations of our definition of preterm birth, which could be explored in future work. We may have observed different results using other definitions of preterm birth (e.g., less than 32 weeks gestation) or by focusing on spontaneous preterm births (the reason for preterm birth was not collected in NBDPS). In addition, some of the outcome categories within each birth defect were small, resulting in imprecise estimates. The impact of predictor classification errors on the performance of random forests is unclear without formal bias analysis (Jiang et al., 2021). Lastly, there are alternative approaches for calculating variable importance for random forests (e.g., Gini impurity importance) (Strobl et al., 2007). We did not evaluate whether modifying the variable importance measure or tuning parameters might affect our results from random forests. A limitation of evaluating so many risk factors at once is the concern of multiple testing (365 estimates across the three models for the nine birth defects); some observed associations may be due to chance. We did not perform multiple comparison adjustment methods and presented all estimates and confidence intervals calculated as recommended by Rothman (1990) and Greenland (2008). Results should therefore be interpreted cautiously.

5 |. CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that there are differences in infant sex and preterm birth status and their predictors among the studied birth defects. Our analysis confirmed some known risk factors for preterm birth and birth defects (short interpregnancy interval and no folic acid-containing supplement use). Further exploration of the newly identified factors may help advance understanding of sex differences among birth defects and preterm birth.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cooperative agreements under PA #96043, PA #02081, FOA #DD09-001, FOA #DD13-003, and NOFO #DD18-001 to the Centers for Birth Defects Research and Prevention participating in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) and/or the Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy exposureS (BD-STEPS) and the New York Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention U01 DD001227. We thank the California Department of Public Health Maternal Child and Adolescent Health Division for providing data. We thank the participating families and staff from the NBDPS sites. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the California Department of Public Health.

Funding information

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Grant/Award Numbers: PA #96043, PA #02081, FOA #DD09-001, FOA #DD13-003, NOFO #DD18-001; New York Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Grant/Award Number: U01 DD001227

APPENDIX A: Variables from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study included in random forests.

Variable
Study site Arkansas, California, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, Utah
Maternal residency ever moved B1-P2 Yes, no
Season of date of conception Winter, spring, summer, fall
Maternal race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic white, Hispanic foreign born, Hispanic US born, non-Hispanic black, other
Paternal race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic white, Hispanic foreign born, Hispanic US born, non-Hispanic black, other
Maternal education Less than high school, high school, greater than high school
Paternal education Less than high school, high school, greater than high school
Maternal feelings about pregnancy Wanted to be pregnant, wanted to wait until later, did not want to become pregnant, did not care, pregnant despite consistent contraceptive use
Timing of pregnancy discovery Trimester 1, Trimester 2, or Trimester 3
Timing of first prenatal visit Trimester 1, Trimester 2, Trimester 3, none
Household income <$10,000, $10,000–50,000, >$50,000
Interpregnancy interval No previous pregnancies, ≤12 months, >12 months
Obesity Yes, no
Antihypertensive medication use during B1-P3 Yes, no
Anti-depressant medication use during B1 Yes, no
Anti-depressant medication use during P1 Yes, no
Anti-depressant medication use during P2 Yes, no
Anti-fever medication use during B1 Yes, no
Anti-fever medication use during P1 Yes, no
Anti-fever medication use during P2 Yes, no
Anti-folate medication use during B1 Yes, no
Anti-folate medication use during P1 Yes, no
Anti-folate medication use during P2 Yes, no
Anti-infective medication use during B1 Yes, no
Anti-infective medication use during P1 Yes, no
Anti-infective medication use during P2 Yes, no
Anti-psychotic medication use during B1 Yes, no
Anti-psychotic medication use during P1 Yes, no
Anti-psychotic medication use during P2 Yes, no
Anti-anxiety medication use during B1 Yes, no
Anti-anxiety medication use during P1 Yes, no
Anti-anxiety medication use during P2 Yes, no
Thyroid medication use during B1 Yes, no
Thyroid medication use during P1 Yes, no
Thyroid medication use during P2 Yes, no
Aspirin use during B1 Yes, no
Aspirin use during P1 Yes, no
Aspirin use during P2 Yes, no
NSAIDs use during B1 Yes, no
NSAIDs use during P1 Yes, no
NSAIDs use during P2 Yes, no
Opioid use during B1 Yes, no
Opioid use during P1 Yes, no
Opioid use during P2 Yes, no
Steroid use during B1 Yes, no
Steroid use during P1 Yes, no
Steroid use during P2 Yes, no
Vasoactive medication use during B1-P3 Yes, no
Antitussive use during B1 Yes, no
Antitussive use during P1 Yes, no
Antitussive use during P2 Yes, no
Epilepsy Yes, no
Seizures Yes, no
Respiratory disease during B1 Yes, no
Respiratory disease during P1 Yes, no
Respiratory disease during P2 Yes, no
Urinary tract infection during B1 Yes, no
Urinary tract infection during P1 Yes, no
Urinary tract infection during P2 Yes, no
Pelvic inflammatory disease during B1 Yes, no
Pelvic inflammatory disease during P1 Yes, no
Pelvic inflammatory disease during P2 Yes, no
Any type of fever during B1 Yes, no
Any type of fever during P1 Yes, no
Any type of fever during P2 Yes, no
Sexually transmitted infections during B1 Yes, no
Sexually transmitted infections during P1 Yes, no
Sexually transmitted infections during P2 Yes, no
Autoimmune disease Yes, no
Any thyroid disease Yes, no
Injury during B1 Yes, no
Injury during P1 Yes, no
Injury during P2 Yes, no
CT/CAT scan during B1 Yes, no
CT/CAT scan during P1 Yes, no
CT/CAT scan during P2 Yes, no
MRI during B1 Yes, no
MRI during P1 Yes, no
MRI during P2 Yes, no
Other X-ray or scan during B1 Yes, no
Other X-ray or scan during P1 Yes, no
Other X-ray or scan during P2 Yes, no
X-ray during B1 Yes, no
X-ray during P1 Yes, no
X-ray during P2 Yes, no
Surgery during B1 Yes, no
Surgery during P1 Yes, no
Surgery during P2 Yes, no
Birth control pill use during B1 Yes, no
Birth control pill use during P1 Yes, no
Birth control pill use during P2 Yes, no
Other birth control use during B1 Yes, no
Other birth control use during P1 Yes, no
Other birth control use during P2 Yes, no
Fertility treatment Yes, no
Nausea during P1 Yes, no
Nausea during P2 Yes, no
Medication for pregnancy nausea Yes, no
Chorionic villus sampling Yes, no
Folic acid-containing supplement use during B1 Yes, no
Folic acid-containing supplement use during P1 Yes, no
Folic acid-containing supplement use during P2 Yes, no
Cereal intake during B1 Yes, no
Cereal intake during P1 Yes, no
Cereal intake during P2 Yes, no
Food supplement intake during B1 Yes, no
Food supplement intake during P1 Yes, no
Food supplement intake during P2 Yes, no
Cigarette smoking during B1 Yes, no
Cigarette smoking during P1 Yes, no
Cigarette smoking during P2 Yes, no
Household smoke exposure during B1 Yes, no
Household smoke exposure during P1 Yes, no
Household smoke exposure during P2 Yes, no
Work/school smoke exposure during B1 Yes, no
Work/school smoke exposure during P1 Yes, no
Work/school smoke exposure during P2 Yes, no
Alcohol consumption during B1 Yes, no
Alcohol consumption during P1 Yes, no
Alcohol consumption during P2 Yes, no
Beer intake Yes, no
Wine intake Yes, no
Mixed drink intake Yes, no
Shots of liquor intake Yes, no
Other drink intake Yes, no
Paternal substance abuse during B1 Yes, no
Paternal substance abuse during P1 Yes, no
Paternal substance abuse during P2 Yes, no
Maternal substance abuse during B1 Yes, no
Maternal substance abuse during P1 Yes, no
Maternal substance abuse during P2 Yes, no
Frequency of showers at home <1 per day, 1 per day, <1 per day
Frequency of baths at home Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Hot tub/jacuzzi/sauna use during B1 Yes, no
Hot tub/jacuzzi/sauna use during P1 Yes, no
Hot tub/jacuzzi/sauna use during P2 Yes, no
Maternal active military duty Yes, no
Paternal active military duty Yes, no
Any household participation in occupational pesticide application Yes, no
Father employed Yes, no
Private well drinking water source Yes, no
Skim/low fat milk (8 oz. glass) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Whole milk (8 oz. glass) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Yogurt (1 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Ice cream (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Cottage or ricotta cheese (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Other cheese (1 slice or 1 oz. serving) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Margarine (pat) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Butter (pat) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Apples or pears (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Oranges (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Orange juice (1 glass) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Peaches, apricots, plums, or nectarines (1 fresh or 1/2 cup canned) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Bananas (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Other fruits, fresh, frozen, or canned (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Tomatoes (1) or tomato juice (small glass) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
String beans (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Broccoli (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Cabbage, cauliflower, or brussel sprouts (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Carrots, raw (1/2 carrot or 2–4 sticks) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Carrots, cooked (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Corn (1 ear or 1/2 cup frozen, canned) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Peas or lima beans (1/2 cup frozen, canned) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Yams or sweet potatoes (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Spinach or collard greens, cooked (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Beans or lentils, baked or dried (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Yellow squash (1/2 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Eggs (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Chicken or turkey (4–6 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Bacon (2 slices) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Hot dogs (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Processed meats, e.g., sausage, salami, bologna, chorizo, etc. (piece or slice) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Liver (3–4 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Hamburger (1 patty) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Beef, pork, lamb or cabrito as a sandwich or mixed dish, e.g., stew, casserole, lasagna, etc. Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Beef, pork, lamb or cabrito as a main dish, e.g., steak, roast, ham, etc. (4–6 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Fish (3–5 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Chocolate (1 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Candy without chocolate (1 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Pie (slice) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Cake (slice) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Cookies (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
White bread (slice), including pita bread Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Dark bread (slice), including wheat pita bread Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
French fried potatoes (4 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Potatoes, baked, boiled (1) or mashed (1 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Rice or pasta, e.g., Spanish rice, spaghetti, noodles, etc. (1 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Potato chips or corn chips (small bag or 1 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Nuts (small packet or 1 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Peanut butter (1 Tbs) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Oil and vinegar dressing, e.g., Italian (1 Tbs) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Cantaloupe (1/4 melon) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Avocado (1) or guacamole (1 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Raw chile peppers, jalapeno (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Salsa (1 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Chicken livers (1 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Organ meats, Barbacoa, Menudo, sweetbreads, tongue, intestines (3–4 oz.) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Tortilla (1) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Refried Beans (1 cup) Never or <1 per month, ≥1 per month
Maternal age at delivery Continuous (years)
Father age at delivery Continuous (years)
Number of previous live births Continuous
Gravidity Continuous
Number of people supported with household income Continuous
Time spent per shower Continuous (min)
Time spent per bath Continuous (min)
Number of jobs from B1-P1 Continuous
Diet quality index Continuous
Alanine Continuous (g)
Betaine Continuous (mg)
Calcium Continuous (mg)
Alpha-carotene Continuous (μg)
Beta-carotene Continuous (μg)
Total carbohydrate Continuous (g)
Total choline Continuous (mg)
Copper Continuous (mg)
Cystine Continuous (g)
Total lipid Continuous (g)
Iron Continuous (mg)
Folate Continuous (μg, dietary folate equivalents)
Glycemic index Continuous
Lutein and zeaxanthin Continuous (μg)
Methionine Continuous (g)
Magnesium Continuous (mg)
Niacin Continuous (mg)
Total protein Continuous (g)
Retinol Continuous (μg)
Riboflavin Continuous (mg)
Selenium Continuous (μg)
Thiamin Continuous (mg)
Vitamin E Continuous (mg, alpha-tocopherol)
Vitamin A Continuous (international units)
Vitamin A Continuous (μg, retinoic acid equivalents)
Vitamin B12 Continuous (μg)
Vitamin B6 Continuous (mg)
Vitamin C Continuous (mg)
Zinc Continuous (mg)
Caffeine from coffee Continuous (mg)
Caffeine from tea Continuous (mg)
Caffeine from soda Continuous (mg)
Total caffeine Continuous (mg)

Abbreviations: B1, month before conception; P1, first month of pregnancy; P2, second month of pregnancy; P3, third month of pregnancy.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The study questionnaires and process for accessing the data used in this study is described at https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/nbdps-public-access-procedures.html.

REFERENCES

  1. Baer RJ, Chambers CD, Ryckman KK, Oltman SP, Rand L, & Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL (2019). High risk of spontaneous preterm birth among infants with gastroschisis. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 179(1), 37–42. 10.1002/ajmg.a.60675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Botto LD, Lin AE, Riehle-Colarusso T, Malik S, & Correa A (2007). Seeking causes: Classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 79(10), 714–727. 10.1002/bdra.20403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Challis J, Newnham J, Petraglia F, Yeganegi M, & Bocking A (2013). Fetal sex and preterm birth. Placenta, 34(2), 95–99. 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Correa A, Gilboa SM, Besser LM, Botto LD, Moore CA, Hobbs CA, Cleves MA, Riehle-Colarusso TJ, Waller DK, & Reece EA (2008). Diabetes mellitus and birth defects. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(3), 237.e231–237.e239. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dolan SM, Callaghan WM, & Rasmussen SA (2009). Birth defects and preterm birth: Overlapping outcomes with a shared strategy for research and prevention. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 85(11), 874–878. 10.1002/bdra.20634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Firth D (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27–38. 10.2307/2336755 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Siddiq Z, D’Alton ME, & Wright JD (2016). Gastroschisis: Epidemiology and mode of delivery, 2005–2013. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215(3), 348.e341–348.e349. 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein MJ, Bailer JM, & Gonzalez-Brown VM (2022). Preterm vs term delivery in antenatally diagnosed gastroschisis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4(4), 100651. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenland S (2008). Multiple comparisons and association selection in general epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(3), 430–434. 10.1093/ije/dyn064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heinke D, Nestoridi E, Hernandez-Diaz S, Williams PL, Rich-Edwards JW, Lin AE, Van Bennekom CM, Mitchell AA, Nembhard WN, Fretts RC, Roberts DJ, Duke CW, Carmichael SL, Yazdy MM, & National Birth Defects Prevention Study. (2020). Risk of stillbirth for fetuses with specific birth defects. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 135(1), 133–140. 10.1097/aog.0000000000003614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hothorn T, Hornik K, & Zeileis A (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651–674. 10.1198/106186006X133933 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiang T, Gradus JL, Lash TL, & Fox MP (2021). Addressing measurement error in random forests using quantitative bias analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(9), 1830–1840. 10.1093/aje/kwab010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liberman RF, Heinke D, Lin AE, Nestoridi E, Jalali M, Markenson GR, Sekhavat S, & Yazdy MM (2023). Trends in delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects in an era of enhanced screening, 2004–2018. The Journal of Pediatrics, 257, 113366. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu B, Xu G, Sun Y, Du Y, Gao R, Snetselaar LG, Santillan MK, & Bao W (2019). Association between maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and preterm birth according to maternal age and race or ethnicity: A population-based study. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 7(9), 707–714. 10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30193-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maslova E, Bhattacharya S, Lin S-W, & Michels KB (2010). Caffeine consumption during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92(5), 1120–1132. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McPherson E, Nestoridi E, Heinke D, Roberts DJ, Fretts R, Yazdy MM, & Lin AE (2017). Alternatives to autopsy for fetal and early neonatal (perinatal) deaths: Insights from the Wisconsin stillbirth service program. Birth Defects Research, 109(18), 1430–1441. 10.1002/bdr2.1112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Michalski AM, Richardson SD, Browne ML, Carmichael SL, Canfield MA, VanZutphen AR, Anderka MT, Marshall EG, & Druschel CM (2015). Sex ratios among infants with birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2009. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 167a(5), 1071–1081. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Poletta FA, Rittler M, Saleme C, Campaña H, Gili JA, Pawluk MS, Gimenez LG, Cosentino VR, Castilla EE, & López-Camelo JS (2018). Neural tube defects: Sex ratio changes after fortification with folic acid. PLoS One, 13(3), e0193127. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Prevention C f. D. C. a. (2008). Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects—Atlanta, Georgia, 1978–2005. MMWR Weekly Report, 57(1), 1–5. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5701a2.htm [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Purisch SE, & Gyamfi-Bannerman C (2017). Epidemiology of preterm birth. Seminars in Perinatology, 41(7), 387–391. 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasmussen SA, Moore CA, Paulozzi LJ, & Rhodenhiser EP (2001). Risk for birth defects among premature infants: A population-based study. The Journal of Pediatrics, 138(5), 668–673. 10.1067/mpd.2001.112249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reefhuis J, Gilboa SM, Anderka M, Browne ML, Feldkamp ML, Hobbs CA, Jenkins MM, Langlois PH, Newsome KB, Olshan AF, Romitti PA, Shapira SK, Shaw GM, Tinker SC, Honein MA, & Study t. N. B. D. P. (2015). The national birth defects prevention study: A review of the methods. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 103(8), 656–669. 10.1002/bdra.23384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rittler M, López-Camelo J, & Castilla EE (2004). Sex ratio and associated risk factors for 50 congenital anomaly types: Clues for causal heterogeneity. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 70(1), 13–19. 10.1002/bdra.10131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothman KJ (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1(1), 43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schafer JL (1999). Multiple imputation: a primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15. 10.1177/096228029900800102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shaw GM (2015). Epidemiology of structural birth defects and preterm birth. In Stevenson DK, Cohen RS, & Sunshine P (Eds.), Neonatology: Clinical practice and procedures. McGraw-Hill Education. accesspediatrics.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1109791069 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Kaidarova Z, & Harris JA (2003). Differential risks to males and females for congenital malformations among 2.5 million California births, 1989–1997. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 67(12), 953–958. 10.1002/bdra.10129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shaw GM, Mayo JA, Eisenberg ML, Catalano R, & Stevenson DK (2021). Male-to-female ratios, race/ethnicity, and spontaneous preterm birth among 11 million California infants. American Journal of Perinatology, 38(7), 683–689. 10.1055/s-0039-3400449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shaw GM, Yang W, & Finnell RH (2020). Male-to-female ratios among NTDs and women’s periconceptional intake of folic acid. Birth Defects Research, 112(16), 1187–1193. 10.1002/bdr2.1708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, & Rankin J (2009). Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 301(6), 636–650. 10.1001/jama.2009.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, & Hothorn T (2007). Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 25. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Strobl C, Malley J, & Tutz G (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 323–348. 10.1037/a0016973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tingleff T, Räisänen S, Vikanes Å, Sandvik L, Sugulle M, Murzakanova G, & Laine K (2023). Different pathways for preterm birth between singleton and twin pregnancies: A population-based registry study of 481 176 nulliparous women. BJOG, 130(4), 387–395. 10.1111/1471-0528.17344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Weber KA, Yang W, Carmichael SL, Lupo PJ, Dukhovny S, Yazdy MM, Lin AE, Van Bennekom CM, Mitchell AA, Shaw GM, & National Birth Defects Prevention Study. (2018). An application of data mining to identify potential risk factors for anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 32(6), 545–555. 10.1111/ppe.12509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Williford EM, Howley MM, Fisher SC, Conway KM, Romitti PA, Reeder MR, Olshan AF, Reefhuis J, Browne ML, & National Birth Defects Prevention Study. (2023). Maternal dietary caffeine consumption and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011. Birth Defects Research, 115, 921–932. 10.1002/bdr2.2171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

Data Availability Statement

The study questionnaires and process for accessing the data used in this study is described at https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/nbdps-public-access-procedures.html.

RESOURCES