Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2024 Jul 5;27(4):739–752. doi: 10.1007/s10456-024-09934-8

Somatic RIT1 delins in arteriovenous malformations hyperactivate RAS-MAPK signaling amenable to MEK inhibition

Friedrich G Kapp 1,✉,#, Farhad Bazgir 2,#, Nagi Mahammadzade 1,#, Mehrnaz Mehrabipour 2, Erik Vassella 3, Sarah M Bernhard 4,5, Yvonne Döring 4,5,6, Annegret Holm 1,7, Axel Karow 8, Caroline Seebauer 9, Natascha Platz Batista da Silva 10, Walter A Wohlgemuth 11, Aviv Oppenheimer 1, Pia Kröning 12, Charlotte M Niemeyer 1, Denny Schanze 13, Martin Zenker 13, Whitney Eng 14, Mohammad R Ahmadian 2, Iris Baumgartner 4,5, Jochen Rössler 1,15,16,
PMCID: PMC11564399  PMID: 38969873

Abstract

Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are benign vascular anomalies prone to pain, bleeding, and progressive growth. AVM are mainly caused by mosaic pathogenic variants of the RAS-MAPK pathway. However, a causative variant is not identified in all patients. Using ultra-deep sequencing, we identified novel somatic RIT1 delins variants in lesional tissue of three AVM patients. RIT1 encodes a RAS-like protein that can modulate RAS-MAPK signaling. We expressed RIT1 variants in HEK293T cells, which led to a strong increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Endothelial-specific mosaic overexpression of RIT1 delins in zebrafish embryos induced AVM formation, highlighting their functional importance in vascular development. Both ERK1/2 hyperactivation in vitro and AVM formation in vivo could be suppressed by pharmacological MEK inhibition. Treatment with the MEK inhibitor trametinib led to a significant decrease in bleeding episodes and AVM size in one patient. Our findings implicate RIT1 in AVM formation and provide a rationale for clinical trials with targeted treatments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10456-024-09934-8.

Keywords: Vascular anomalies, Vascular malformation, Arteriovenous malformation, RIT1, RAS-MAPK pathway, Trametinib

Introduction

Vascular anomalies are classified according to the Classification of the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) and are subdivided into vascular tumors and vascular malformations [1, 2]. While vascular tumors show increased cell proliferation, vascular malformations are thought to represent mainly non-proliferative lesions that originate from errors in vascular development. Most vascular malformations are caused by a somatic mosaic mutation in the affected tissue. Activation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway are thought to predominate in slow-flow malformations such as venous and lymphatic malformations [35], whereas variants activating the RAS-MAPK pathway are typically associated with fast-flow malformations such as AVM [69].

Extracranial AVM can occur anywhere in the body, most often in the soft tissue of extremities as well as the head and neck [10, 11]. AVM may become symptomatic with swelling, pain, pulsations, and bleeding. AVM located in the face may lead to major disfigurement and life-threatening complications [12]. Almost all AVM progress over time [13, 14], which may lead to tissue necrosis, bleeding complications, and hyperdynamic heart failure. Treatment is mainly interventional (embolization) and/or surgical resection; however, invasive therapies can activate the lesion and often lead to relapse [14]. However, the exact pathomechanism of AVM development and progression are poorly understood. Taken together, AVM belongs to the most aggressive vascular anomalies and are often difficult to treat, highlighting the need for novel treatment strategies.

In this project, we identified novel mosaic delins variants in RIT1 that were found in the lesional tissue of three patients with extracranial AVM. RIT1 acts as modulator of the RAS-MAPK pathway and has so far not been implicated in the development of AVM. We characterized these variants by assessing their effect on ERK phosphorylation in vitro, on vascular development in vivo in a zebrafish model, and the response to MEK inhibition. We further present data on the off-label use of trametinib in one patient.

Results

Novel RIT1 delins variants identified in AVM tissue from three patients

To identify underlying genotypic changes, a total of 691 samples of patients with vascular anomalies underwent next generation sequencing at three different centers for vascular anomalies. Out of these 691 samples, approximately 100 were from patients with an AVM. Three patients with an extracranial AVM were found to harbor a RIT1 mutation.

Patient 1 (P1) was a 3-year-old girl with an AVM of the right face. A capillary anomaly and swelling of the right cheek were noticed at birth (Fig. 1A). A diagnosis of an infantile hemangioma was initially made at an external hospital and propranolol was initiated at one month of age. The lesion did not respond to this therapy and a first episode of epistaxis occurred at 6 months of age, eventually leading to the diagnosis of a facial AVM on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (Fig. 1B, C). Following this bleeding event, a first catheter embolization with Onyx was performed. Two additional embolizations followed until the age of 22 months, the last intervention of which was combined with bleomycin electro-sclerotherapy [15]. The lesion did not respond to either therapy and the AVM progressed with intermittent life-threatening bleeding episodes (Online Resource 1). Due to progressive symptoms, the patient was then treated with extensive Onyx embolization of the AVM, and a biopsy was obtained for genetic analysis. These interventions, including the removal of a molar that was rooted within the AVM, alleviated the symptoms only slightly. Due to the nature and course of the disease, a hemimaxillectomy was considered. However, infiltration of the AVM into the orbit made a cure by this very invasive approach seem unlikely. We thus initiated off-label treatment with thalidomide (25 mg per day) when the patient was 2 years of age. Under this treatment—and after the last extensive embolization—the severity of bleeding episodes decreased over the next months before deteriorating again. Genetic testing of the biopsy of affected tissue identified a RIT1 delins variant (c.246_248delinsCCCTCT p.T83delinsPL (referred to as RIT1P1, hereafter)), with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 3.3%.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Three patients with somatic RIT1 variants identified in AVM tissue. a Patient P1 displays a capillary malformation and swelling of the right side of the face. b MRI of P1 at the age of 4 months, the image of a transversal T2 TSE sequence, in which an AVM could be detected; the extent of the lesion is labelled with red dashed line indicating soft tissue edema and flow-voids. c The MR angiography shows increased perfusion on the right side of the face (left side within the panel). d Patient P2 shows a prominent mass of the left cervical/nuchal area. e MR imaging (coronal T2 sequence with fat saturation), which shows the hyperintense isolated intramuscular lesion, flow-voids seen within the lesion representing high AVM flow, and disfiguring overgrowth. f MR angiography, which shows the large AVM connected to the subclavian and the thyrocervical trunk with multi-chambered central nidus. g Clinical aspect of the Patient P3 with swelling on the left forearm, close to the medial side of the elbow. h T2W sagittal images demonstrating a well-defined fusiform shaped hyperintense lesion involving the flexor muscle (pronator teres) of the forearm. Flow voids (red dashed line) are seen within the lesion representing arterial blood vessels. MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Patient 2 (P2) was a 42-year-old man with a first episode of neck pain at the age of 35 years. A continuously growing and pulsating vascular lesion was detected (Fig. 1D). MRA showed an isolated intramuscular AVM connected to the subclavian and the thyrocervical trunk on the right side with disfiguring diffuse muscle involvement including the splenius capitis muscle (Fig. 1E, F). Therapy with sirolimus was initiated but had to be discontinued due to suppurative osteomyelitis of the jaw within 3 weeks. At the age of 39 years, the patient received three direct intraarterial ethanol embolizations at monthly intervals without success. Although the initially dominating nidus of the AVM was completely shut down, there was a massive proliferation of microfistular AV shunts and an increase in tissue volume as a result. One year after embolization, debulking surgery was performed after the situation had stabilized. Histopathology showed typical findings of a diffuse intramuscular microfistular AVM. Ten months later, progression of the AVM was noted again and a combined approach with Onyx embolization and gross total resection was performed. Since then, the patient has been without complaints with stable disease and minimal radiological residuum. A RIT1 delins variant was identified in the resected tissue (c.242_248delinsTCCCTCT p.E81_T83delinsVPL (referred to as RIT1P2, hereafter) with a VAF of 6.0%.

P3 was a 17-year-old girl, who presented with a persistent prominence in the left forearm that was first noted one year before (Fig. 1G). At the time of the initial presentation, there was no associated pain, no functional deficit, no overlying skin changes, and only minimal swelling. An initial ultrasound was notable for a 5.4 cm × 1.1 cm × 4.7 cm intramuscular mass in the left forearm with diffuse internal vascularity seen on Doppler examination. An MRI of the lesion was notable for a solid enhancing mass in the left pronator teres muscle with imaging findings consistent with a solid neoplasm (Fig. 1H). She underwent an IR-guided biopsy of the lesion. Histopathology was consistent with an intramuscular fast-flow vascular anomaly. She was followed for the next two years and had progressive growth of the lesion associated with pain. Given the worsening of her symptoms, she underwent resection of the lesion. There were no complications and she has had minimal pain since. In the resected tissue, a RIT1 delins variant was identified (c.229delinsTTGGATACAA p.A77delinsLDTT (referred to as RIT1P3, hereafter) with a VAF of 13%.

RIT1 delins-induced ERK hyperphosphorylation can be reversed by pharmacological inhibition of MEK but not SHP2

All three delins variants are located close to the switch 2 domain of the RIT1 protein, a region that also harbors germline missense variants commonly associated with Noonan syndrome (Fig. 2A, B). To investigate the impact of these novel mutations on activation of the RAS pathway, we assessed ERK phosphorylation by Western blotting after the expression of RIT1 in the HEK293T cells. We expressed RIT1P1, RIT1P2, RIT1P3, RIT1 wildtype (RIT1wt), and two recurrent RIT1 mutations found in Noonan syndrome (p.F82L and p.M90I). All three novel RIT1 delins led to a significant increase in ERK phosphorylation, while overexpression of the two Noonan syndrome-associated RIT1 mutations only induced a modest ERK hyperphosphorylation (Fig. 2C, D). Additionally, we examined the effects of the RIT1 variants on PI3K/AKT signaling pathway activation by assessing the ratios of p-AKT (Thr308) as a substrate of PDK1 and p-AKT (Ser473) as the target of mTORC2 to the total levels of AKT. Interestingly, higher levels of phosphorylation at AKT-Threonine-308 were observed in the AVM associated delins, while the phosphorylation at Serine-473 remained unaffected (Online Resource 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

ERK phosphorylation after expression of RIT1 variants in vitro in HEK293T cells. a Protein structure of RIT1 predicted by AlphaFold, accessed through ensemble.org. The area labelled by the dashed red line indicates the switch 2 domain. b Schematic drawing of RIT1 functional domains of human RIT1 protein (green boxes = GTP-binding regions; red boxes = switch domain 1 and 2; blue arrows (upward) = two mutations typically found in Noonan syndrome; blue arrows (downward) = mutations identified in P1-P3. c Western blot after expression of RIT1 variants to assess RAS-MAPK pathway activation. Gamma tubulin served as loading control, FLAG-RIT1 confirms the expression of the construct, total ERK levels serve as a control to exclude the differential expression of ERK, and p-ERK measures the level of phosphorylate of ERK as a marker of RAS pathway activation. d Quantification of the ERK phosphorylation was measured in a total of three western blots for each variant (n = 3). One-way ANOVA. P value ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001, ns = not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD. EV = empty vector. e Western blot after expression of RIT1 variants and with or without treatment using a MEK inhibitor or SHP2 inhibitor. The same parameters were assessed as in panel d. f Quantification of the ERK phosphorylation was measured in a total of three western blots for each variant (n = 3). One-way ANOVA. P value **< 0.01; ****< 0.0001, ns = not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD

Since RAS proteins act downstream of SHP2 and upstream of MEK and ERK in the RAS-MAPK signaling pathway, we hypothesized that RIT1-induced ERK hyperphosphorylation exhibits a differential response to treatment with SHP2 and MEK inhibition (Online Resource 3). Indeed, treatment of HEK293T cells with the SHP2 inhibitor SHP099 showed no effects on ERK phosphorylation. In contrast, MEK inhibition with PD0325901 reversed ERK phosphorylation close to baseline levels (Fig. 2E, F).

RIT1 delins variants lead to the formation of AVM-like lesions in zebrafish embryos

Having shown that the RIT1 delins identified in AVM patients induced strong activation of the RAS-MAPK pathway, we next assessed whether their expression can lead to aberrant vascular development in the tail vasculature of zebrafish embryos. The zebrafish is an established model for the study of vascular development [16] that has also been applied to translational research [8, 17, 18]. To this end, we used plasmids, which contain the transcriptional upstream activating sequence (UAS) that controls the expression of wildtype or variant RIT1 linked to GFP via the self-cleaving peptide P2A. Activation of the UAS element and thus expression of RIT1 is dependent on the presence of the transcription factor Gal4. These plasmids were injected in the one-cell stage of Tg(fli1a:Gal4; UAS:RFP) embryos. While the plasmid integrated randomly into the DNA of cells of the zebrafish embryo, expression of RIT1-P2A-GFP was limited to endothelial cells that expressed Gal4 under the control of the endothelial fli1a promoter (Fig. 3A) [18]. Using this approach, we observed AVM-like lesions in the zebrafish embryo tail at 2 dpf. These lesions were characterized by aberrant connections between the dorsal aorta and the caudal vein. A common and severe phenotype exhibited a fusion of these arterial and venous vessels (Fig. 3B, Online Resource 4). In many embryos, the aorta and part of the caudal vein plexus directly downstream of the shunt at the proximal end of the AVM-like lesions were also fused, but a shunt could also be focal only (Online Resource 5 and 6). This fusion is in line with a recent study on rasa1 mutant zebrafish with a similar phenotype of a distal fusion [19]. A significantly higher rate of AVM-like lesions at 48 h post fertilization (hpf) was observed in embryos expressing RIT1P1−P3 delins compared to RIT1wt (66–75% vs 24%, Fig. 3C). Next, we treated injected embryos with 100 nM trametinib during early development. This early treatment significantly reduced the formation of AVM-like lesions (31–39%, Fig. 4A, B), thereby supporting the assumption that AVM formation is critically dependent on hyperactivation of the RAS-MAPK pathway. To mimic a targeted treatment more closely in patients, we next treated zebrafish embryos with established AVM-like lesions after injection of RIT1 delins with 100 nM trametinib from 48 hpf onwards and compared growth of the lesions in treated and untreated embryos over the following two days. DMSO-treated embryos in the control group showed a relative increase in the size of the lesion to 117.5%, while the size of the lesions in trametinib-treated embryos decreased to 83.4%; the difference between treated and untreated embryos was significant (Fig. 4C, D, Online Resource 7).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Endothelial-specific mosaic expression of RIT1 variants leads to the formation of AVM in zebrafish embryos. a Experimental layout: The plasmid containing human wildtype RIT1 or RIT1 variants, under the control of a UAS element and linked to GFP with a P2A sequence is mixed with transposase mRNA and injected into the one-cell stage of Tg(fli1a:Gal4; UAS:RFP) embryos. Thereafter, embryos are examined at 48 hpf. b Vascular network in the tail of an uninjected Tg(fli1a:Gal4; UAS:RFP), EV and RIT1 variants injected embryos. Arrows represent the direction of arterial and venous blood flow (red and blue arrow, respectively). Note the malformed vasculature with a fusion of the dorsal aorta and the caudal vein as well as dilation of the vessel. Scale bar 50 µm. c Quantification of the vascular anatomy at 48 hpf following the injection of plasmids containing the indicated RIT1 variants, with and without treatment. n = 3. Number of total examined embryos: EV = 66, RIT1WT = 92, RIT1P1 = 67, RIT1P2 = 97, RIT1P3 = 61. Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed. P value ****< 0.0001. Data are presented as mean ± SD. EV empty vector

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

RIT1 variants injected zebrafish embryos respond to early and late treatment with MEK inhibitor trametinib. a Experimental plan to assess the effect of trametinib on the RIT1 injected zebrafish embryos after early and late treatments. Embryos are treated with trametinib either from 14hpf or 48 hpf on followed by an examination at 48 hpf (early treatment) or 96 hpf (late treatment) respectively. Presence of vascular malformation is calculated for early treatment embryos. Malformation area is calculated before and after trametinib treatment for each embryo in the late treatment group. b Quantification of the vascular anatomy at 48 hpf following the injection of plasmids containing the indicated RIT1 variants and treatment at 14 hpf. Experiments were performed with three biological replicates. Number of total examined embryos post-treatment: RIT1WT = 73, RIT1P1 = 60, RIT1P2 = 51, RIT1P3 = 38. Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed. P value *< 0.05, ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001. Data are presented as mean ± SD. c Quantification of the relative change in the size of the AVM-like lesions after 2 days of treatment. Experiments were performed with three biological replicates. Number of total examined embryos: RIT1P1 = 48, RIT1P2 = 40, RIT1P3 = 46. Unpaired t-test, two-tailed. P value **< 0.01; ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001. Data are presented as mean ± SD. d Example of image analysis to measure the relative change of lesion size during trametinib treatment from 2 to 4 dpf. Scale bar 50 µm

Trametinib induced reduction in AVM size and bleeding frequency in P1

As described above, P1 had a refractory disease with recurrent life-threatening bleeding episodes. Due to the aggressive course of the disease, treatment with thalidomide [20] was started but was only transiently effective before symptoms deteriorated again (Fig. 5A–C). The MRI showed a large AVM of the right side of the face that was progressive over time (Fig. 5D and Online Resource 8). Because of increasing disease severity, off-label treatment with trametinib (0.25 mg per day (1/2 capsules), 0.023 mg/kg/d) was started at the age of 2 years and 6 months. Dosage was increased to 0.5 mg per day (1 capsule), 0.045 mg/kg body weight after one month. Trametinib led to a significant clinical response with a decrease in frequency and severity of bleeding episodes, a regression of the AVM as observed in the MRI (Fig. 5E), and a shrinking of the affected cheek (Fig. 5F). Due to improved disease control, the patient was able to attend preschool for the first time in her life. The patient tolerated trametinib treatment without significant adverse events and remained on this therapy for 9 months. At 2 years and 10 months of age, while on trametinib, the patient developed spontaneous rhinoliquorrhea and was diagnosed with a frontoethmoidal encephalocele, which, retrospectively, was already present in the first MRI at 6 months of age. She then underwent three neurosurgical operations; however, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak persisted and at the age of three years a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt was implanted. After the placement of the VP shunt, the rhinoliquorrhea stopped. The VP shunt was replaced after 3 months due to a defect of the parietal skin overlying the shunt line. One month later, the patient developed a pneumococcal meningitis with cerebral edema and herniation leading to death at the age of 3 years and 3 months. We hypothesize that the frontoethmoidal encephalocele with difficult dural closure was a predisposing factor for this lethal infection but cannot rule out a contribution of trametinib treatment to this event. However, due to the absence of other adverse events (such as neutropenia or skin toxicity), and the safety profile of trametinib that does not include immunosuppressive effects, we consider this tragic fatal event after 9 months of trametinib treatment as unrelated to this medication.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Response to targeted therapy in P1. a Patient P1 at 5 months of age. b Patient P1 at 6 months of age (after a bleeding episode). c Patient P1 at 28 months of age, showing a significant and progressive enlargement of the right cheek due to the AVM. d MRI (transversal T2 STIR) of the Patient P1 before the start of trametinib treatment; red dashed line indicates the extent of the AVM. e MRI (transversal T2 TSE Dixon) of the Patient P1 after 5 months of treatment with trametinib; red dashed line indicates the now smaller extent of the AVM. f Patient P1 at 38 months of age, reduced volume of the right cheek and fading of the capillary malformation can be noted

Discussion

In this report, we describe three novel somatic activating RIT1 delins variants in patients with peripheral fast-flow malformations. The exact prevalence of RIT1 variants as the cause for AVM cannot be determined precisely. However, with a total of three cases in the cohorts of vascular anomaly patients studied by this consortium, they are evidently much less common than variants of MAP2K1 or KRAS. Considering the total number of AVMs sequenced and of AVMs harbouring a RIT1 mutation, we roughly estimate the prevalence of RIT1 mutations in AVMs at approximately 1 out of 30. Nevertheless, we strongly recommend that RIT1 should be included in panels for genetic testing of patients with vascular malformations.

All three somatic mutations are located close to the switch 2 domain of RIT1, a domain that also harbors RIT1 germline mutations commonly associated with Noonan syndrome. Interestingly, similar delins at the switch 2 domain of the RAS GTPases KRAS and HRAS have been described in vascular anomalies previously [21]. RIT1 delins led to a strong ERK hyperphosphorylation that was much more pronounced than in Noonan-associated RIT1 missense changes. Considering the presumed role of RIT1 in the RAS-MAPK signaling pathway, treatment with a SHP2 inhibitor—as expected—did not influence ERK phosphorylation in cells transfected with the delins. In contrast, MEK inhibition completely rescued ERK hyperphosphorylation. These data suggest that RIT1 delins act through overactivation of the canonical RAS-MAPK pathway.

Additionally, we observed overactivation of AKT in our biochemical assay, hinting at a known but so far underappreciated interconnection and crosstalk between the RAS and the AKT/mTOR signaling pathways in vascular anomalies. AKT activation has also been observed in patients with loss-of-function mutations in RASA1 (an inhibitor of the RAS pathway), where a consistent endothelial overactivation of mTORC1 could be found [22]. This is in line with data from brain AVMs due to KRAS mutations [23] as well as in other diseases, in which KRAS mutations activate the mTOR signaling pathway [24]. While there is little published data on the use of sirolimus in patients with AVM, it is currently not considered a viable option by experts in the field of vascular anomalies. A larger study on sirolimus for different kinds of vascular anomalies found only a very low rate of responders [25]. We hypothesize that RIT1 delins close to the switch 2 region led to a distinct biochemical profile compared to missense mutations of Noonan syndrome, namely a stronger hyperphosphorylation of ERK, and—to a lesser extent—a phosphorylation of AKT at position T308. Exploring these functional differences of different mutations and the interaction of the RAS and the AKT/mTOR pathways might provide relevant insights into disease pathophysiology in the future.

To further assess the impact of the novel RIT1 variants on vascular development, we used an approach that mimics the endothelial mosaicism that occurs in patients. In our previous work, we assessed various TEK mutations by endothelial-specific mosaic expression in zebrafish embryos and observed the development of venous malformations [18]. In the current work, we observed that RIT1 mutations induced AVM-like lesions in zebrafish embryos, further confirming that overactivation of RAS-MAPK signaling caused by RIT1 delins has a deleterious effect on vascular development. We refer to these lesions as AVM-like, as we observe a fast-flow shunt and a fusion of artery and vein but are still studying the biology of these shunts in greater detail in order to better understand the degree of similarity with AVMs in patients. Additionally, we show that MEK inhibition not only normalized ERK phosphorylation in vitro but also restored normal vascular development and decreased AVM-like lesion size in vivo during early and late treatment, respectively. These data further validate RAS-MAPK hyperactivation as the major driving mechanism for AVM formation and maintenance in the presence of the novel RIT1 delins variants.

Trametinib is a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor and as such an inhibitor of the RAS signaling pathway. By specifically binding to MEK1 and MEK2, trametinib inhibits the growth factor-mediated cell signaling and cellular proliferation in various cancers [26]. Due to the identification of the underlying mutations of the RAS signaling pathway in patients with AVMs [2729] and certain complex lymphatic anomalies [3032], trametinib has been used in patients with these diseases as an experimental drug with some success. Larger case series or even clinical trials studying the effect of trametinib on vascular anomalies driven by RAS activation have not been studied so far. To our knowledge, two clinical trials are currently registered at clinicaltrials.gov, which will study the effect of trametinib on AVMs prospectively (NCT04258046, NCT06098872), with additional trials using alternative MEK inhibitors such as cobimetinib (NCT05125471).

Our in vitro and in vivo findings and the available literature encouraged us to the off-label use of trametinib in our severely affected patient P1, who indeed responded very well with a significant reduction of AVM size and associated complaints, such as bleeding episodes. Unfortunately, the patient developed fatal meningitis, most likely due to an incidental encephalocele. While we consider this event as not related to trametinib treatment, it further highlights the need for controlled studies in the field of vascular anomalies, to assess treatment efficacy and tolerability and to advance care for patients with these diseases into an era of evidence-based personalized medicine.

In summary, our work introduces RIT1 as a novel gene implicated in the pathogenesis of AVM. Functional testing in vitro and in vivo demonstrated the capacity of the novel RIT1 variants to hyperactivate the RAS-MAPK pathway and induce the development of AVM. MEK inhibition led to biochemical normalization, prevention of AVM formation, as well as a decreasing AVM size. We also present the first promising data on the use of trametinib in a patient with a somatic RIT1 mutation, encouraging further investigation of MEK inhibition in patients with AVM in future clinical trials. However, our n = 1 approach in this study precludes definitive conclusions regarding treatment efficacy and safety. Larger-scale studies are needed to validate our findings, to delineate a more precise estimation of the prevalence of RIT1 mutations, to characterize their functional consequences on the RAS pathway and neighboring signaling pathways, and to assess the broader applicability of MEK inhibition in patients with RIT1-mutated vascular malformations.

Materials and methods

Patients/study approval

All subjects, and/or their legal guardians, gave written informed consent to genetic investigations, which were carried out with approval by the institutional review boards of the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany (17-854-101), University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland (2017-01960), and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA (IRB-P00025772).

Genetic testing

RIT1 was tested in a total of 691 samples by the partners’ laboratories (235 in Magdeburg, 114 in Bern, 342 in Boston), including all types of vascular anomalies. Out of these samples, 118 were submitted for sequencing with the diagnosis of “AVM” (58 to Magdeburg, including by non-specialized centers, 35 to Bern, 25 to Boston). Brain AVMs were not included in the submitted samples. From these samples, one sample at each center harbored a RIT1 mutation. Since sequencing results at Magdeburg also revealed mutations (e.g. in TEK or GNAQ) that according to current knowledge do not occur in AVMs, we conclude that phenotyping by non-specialized centers was in part incorrect and estimate that roughly 30–40 true AVM samples were sequenced in Marburg. This would be in line with a recently published cohort from Germany that included 29 patients with mutations in the RAS pathway [33]. We thus estimate the prevalence of RIT1 mutations in AVMs at roughly 1 in 30 patients.

A tissue biopsy of the AVM of P1 was submitted to the Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Magdeburg, and the genomic DNA was extracted. Assuming a mosaic mutation as the cause of the disorder, ultradeep sequencing and enrichment using an Agilent SureSelect XT HS2 Custom Enrichment Panel with molecular barcoding (UMIs, 3 bp duplex) (Agilent Technologies) were performed. The library was sequenced on a NextSeq550 instrument (Illumina), 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads. The target regions had a mean coverage of > 3000× after demultiplexing. The varvis 1.20.0 analysis software (Limbus Medical Technologies GmbH) was used for analysis.

P2 has been included in the Bernese Congenital Vascular Malformation Registry, a prospective cohort of congenital extracranial/extraspinal vascular malformations that have been enrolling consecutive patients since 2008 [34]. As of October 2020, genetic testing is performed on tissue available from diagnostic biopsies of vascular malformations, using the TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500; Illumina) Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) gene panel.

Resected tissue from P3 underwent targeted DNA NGS testing via the OncoPanel assay at the Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics (CAMD) at Brigham and Women’s Hospital [35]. DNA was isolated using standard extraction methods (QIAGEN) and quantified with PicoGreen-based double-stranded DNA detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Indexed sequencing libraries were prepared from 50-ng sonically sheared DNA samples using Illumina TruSeq LT reagents (Illumina). Extracted DNA underwent targeted NGS using the KAPA HTP Library Preparation Kit (Roche), a custom RNA bait set (Agilent SureSelect) and sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq 2500 system.

Cell culture and western blot

Three million HEK293T cells were seeded in 10 cm cell culture plates supplemented with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) 12 h prior to transfection. At around 70% confluency levels cells were transfected using TurboFect transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher #R0532), with Flag-tagged RIT1 variants in pCDNA constructs or empty vector (EV) as the negative control. The medium was refreshed at the 24 h’ time point with MEK inhibitor (PD0325901, Selleckchem # S1036) and SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099, Selleckchem # S6388) being added to the transfected cells at 1 μM and 5 μM concentrations, respectively. At 48 h post-transfection, cells were washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer, containing 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal CA-630, 10% glycerol, 20 mM ß-glycerolphosphate, 1 mM Na-orthovanadate, EDTA-free inhibitor cocktail 1 tablet/50 ml. After the addition of Laemmli sample buffer, the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE (12.5% polyacrylamide). Blots were detected by immunoblotting using a mouse anti-γ-Tubulin antibody (Sigma #T5326), a mouse anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma #F3165), a rabbit anti-ERK antibody (Cell signaling technology #9102), and a rabbit anti-p-ERK antibody (Cell signaling technology #4370), a rabbit anti-AKT (Cell signaling technology #9272), a rabbit anti-p-AKT-Thr308 (Cell signaling technol-ogy #2965), a rabbit anti-p-AKT-Ser473 (Cell signaling technology #4060). The immunoblots were detected using an Odyssey Fc Imaging System (LI-CORE Biosciences) and analyzed by Image Studio Lite Ver 5.2.

Zebrafish husbandry

Maintenance and breeding of zebrafish (Danio rerio) were performed in the fish facility of the Developmental Biology, Institute for Biology I, University of Freiburg under standard conditions. Only embryos up to 5 days post-fertilization were used. All experiments were carried out in accordance with German laws for animal care and the Regierungspräsidium Freiburg.

Plasmid preparation

Plasmids were designed using ApE—A plasmid editor version 3.0.8. Homo sapiens RIT1 sequence was obtained from the online database Ensembl (Transcript ID: ENST00000368323.8), minimally codon optimized for Danio rerio and ordered as a plasmid including Tol2 sites, a UAS promoter, RIT1P2, and P2A-GFP from Twist Bioscience (South San Francisco, CA, USA). Plasmids were purified using Wizard Plus SC Minipreps DNA Purification Systems (Promega, Walldorf, Germany, A1330) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Mutagenesis

RIT1wt, empty vector (EV), as well as all other RIT1 mutations analyzed in this study were derived from the UAS:RIT1P2-P2A-GFP construct using Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis (New England Biolabs, E0554S). Corresponding mutagenesis primers were designed using NEBaseChanger version 1.3.3. All plasmids were sequenced by Eurofins genomics to confirm the expected sequence.

Tol2 transposase mRNA synthesis

8 µg of the plasmid that contains the transposase gene under control of the SP6 promoter were linearized using 4 µl of NotI-HF enzyme (New England Biolabs) for 1 h at 37 °C. The digested sample was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Capped Tol2 transposase mRNA was synthesized from purified DNA using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE™ SP6 Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting mRNA was separated into 5 µl aliquots and stored at − 20 °C to prevent freeze–thaw cycles.

Plasmid injection

The construct was then injected into Tg(fli1a:Gal4FFubs3; UAS:RFP) embryos at the one-cell stage together with Tol2 transposase mRNA [36], both at a concentration of 30 ng/µl. For better readability, Tg(fli1a:Gal4FFubs3; UAS:RFP) embryos injected with a gene of interest (e.g. UAS:RIT1P1-P2A-GFP) are abbreviated as fli1a:RIT1P1G0mosaic instead of Tg(fli1a:Gal4FFubs3; UAS:RFP) and Tg(UAS:RIT1P1-P2A-GFP)G0mosaic.

Microscopy

Imaging plates for confocal microscopy were prepared in 35 mm glass bottom dish with 1.5% agarose in egg water, 1-phenyl 2-thiourea (PTU) and tricaine mix using previously designed and 3D printed molds (Online resource 9). Embryos anesthetized with 0.168 mg/ml tricaine in egg water at room temperature and gently positioned laterally inside the trenches. Confocal microscopy images were acquired as z-stacks with ZEISS Celldiscoverer 7 with LSM 900. Images were obtained with the 488 nm and 561 nm lasers, with a slice interval of 2–4 μm with a 20X (NA 0.7) objective or as brightfield images with 5x (NA 0.35) objective unless otherwise specified. For brightfield timelapse experiments, the interval was set to 1 s.

Fluorescence microscopy images for pre and post late treatment was acquired with ZEISS Axio Examiner D.1 fixed stage fluorescence microscope. During acquisition embryos were placed in 3 ml of E3 medium with tricaine (0.168 mg/ml) at room temperature and imaged with 10X (NA 0.15) objective. During imaging both, RFP and GFP channels acquired and only RFP channel is exported for representative images.

Lightsheet microscopy was performed with ZEISS Lightsheet 7 using water immersion W Plan-Apochromat 10x (NA 0.5) M27 75 mm objective. Images were obtained with the 488 nm and 561 nm lasers using single illumination, pivot scan on, with a slice interval of 2 μm. Timelapse interval is set to 1 s.

The color cyan was assigned for GFP channel. Colored versions of the images are included in the supplementary information. Images and videos were exported as.tif and.AVI (uncompressed) files, respectively using Fiji software.

Pharmacological treatments

For pharmacological treatments, injected zebrafish embryos were randomized into control and treatment groups. From the 10-somite stage or from 48 hpf on, embryos of the treatment group were transferred in E3 Medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM Mg2SO4) containing 0.2 mM 1-phenyl 2-thiourea (PTU; Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany, P7629) and MEK1/2 inhibitor Trametinib (MedChemExpress, GSK1120212; 10 mg) using 100× stock solutions dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma, D2650). The treatment dose of trametinib was chosen at 100 nM, according to our previous publication [18], and by repeating of the toxicity assay in zebrafish embryos. Embryos of the control group were raised in E3 medium with 0.2 mM PTU and DMSO (equal amount to the treatment group). The response of the AVM-like lesion size to trametinib was calculated as follows: each embryo with an AVM-like lesion was imaged at the Axio Examiner, and the area of the lesion was divided by the area of the entire embryo to give a relative area of the malformation at 2 dpf. This was done to control for different embryo sizes and different embryo growth rates. This measurement was then repeated at 4 dpf (after treatment) and the relative area of the AVM-like lesion at 4 dpf was divided by the relative area 2 dpf, followed by multiplication with 100 to give a result in percent. A result greater than 100% showed an AVM-like lesion growing in size in relation to the embryo, a result less than 100% showed a regressing lesion.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test of significance for malformation rate analysis and early pharmacological treatments and two-tailed unpaired t-test for late pharmacological treatment experiments and one-way ANOVA for in vitro experiments in GraphPad Prism version 10.2.2. The legends of the figures include information on sample sizes and significance. P value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Analyzed data for zebrafish malformation rates and early pharmacological treatments was obtained from at least three independent experiments for each variant. The number of examined embryos is indicated in the figure legends for each variant. Data are presented as mean ± SD for all experiments. P value *< 0.05, **< 0.01; ***< 0.001; **** < 0.0001. The structure of the RIT1 protein is predicted using AlphaFold database [37, 38].

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors first and foremost acknowledge the patients and their families for providing their information and allowing us to conduct this work. We further acknowledge the Center for Vascular Anomalies at the Freiburg Center for Rare Diseases, the Hilda Biobank at the Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Freiburg, Germany, the Lighthouse Core Facility and Life Imaging Center (LIC) in Freiburg, Germany, and the zebrafish facility in the Institute of Biology I Zoology (Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Driever) at the University of Freiburg, Germany for their contribution. Four of the authors of this publication are members of the Vascular Anomalies Working Group (VASCA WG) of the European Reference Network for Rare Multisystemic Vascular Diseases (VASCERN)—Project ID: 769036. Five of the authors are members of the German Reference Network for Vascular Anomalies. FK was supported by the charity cycling tour “Tour der Hoffnung” and received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF): EJPRD Joint Transnational Call 2023, NARRATIVE; FKZ 01GM2405). NM was part of the International Master Program in Biomedical Sciences (IMBS) and acknowledges the support received throughout the program. FB and MRA received funding from the German Research Foundation (Grant numbers: DFG AH 92/8-3 and IRTG 1902-p6) and the Foundation for Ageing Research of the HHU Düsseldorf. AH received the Walter Benjamin Fellowship from the German Research Foundation (Project number: 458322953). IB (Principle Investigator) and JR (Co-Investigator) were supported by the Swiss national Research Foundation, Synergia Grant CRSII5_193694 2021-2024.

Abbreviations

AVM

Arteriovenous malformation

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

dpf

Days post fertilization

hpf

Hours post fertilization

PTU

1-Phenyl 2-thiourea

ISSVA

International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

NGS

Next generation sequencing

VP

Ventriculoperitoneal

Author contributions

Friedrich G. Kapp: clinical care of patient, conceptualization of the study, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. Farhad Bazgir: in vitro analyses, formal analysis. Nagi Mahamammadzade: in vivo analyses, formal analysis. Mehrnaz Mehrabipour: in vitro analyses. Sarah M. Bernhard, Axel Karow, Caroline Seebauer, Walter A. Wohlgemuth: clinical care of patients, Annegret Holm, Whitney Eng: clinical care of patients, original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. Whitney Eng, Denny Schanze, and Martin Zenker: genetic analyses. Aviv Oppenheimer: in vivo analyses. Pia Kröning: writing—original draft preparation. Charlotte M. Niemeyer, Yvonne Döring, Mohammad R. Ahmadian: resources. Iris Baumgartner and Jochen Rössler: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, resources. All authors provided intellectual input, critical feedback, discussed results, and approved the final manuscript. Authors Friedrich G. Kapp, Farhad Bazgir, Nagi Mahammadzade, Iris Baumgartner and Jochen Rössler contributed equally to this work.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Competing interests

Friedrich G. Kapp has received consulting fees from Novartis. Jochen Rössler is currently an employee of Novartis Pharma. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Friedrich G. Kapp, Farhad Bazgir and Nagi Mahammadzade have contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Friedrich G. Kapp, Email: friedrich.kapp@uniklinik-freiburg.de

Jochen Rössler, Email: jochen.roessler@insel.ch.

References

  • 1.Mulliken JB, Glowacki J (1982) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(3):412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D, Alomari A, Baselga E, Berenstein A, on behalf of the ISSVA Board and Scientific Committee (2015) Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Pediatrics 136(1):e203–e214. 10.1542/peds.2014-3673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Limaye N, Wouters V, Uebelhoer M, Tuominen M, Wirkkala R, Mulliken JB, Vikkula M (2009) Somatic mutations in angiopoietin receptor gene TEK cause solitary and multiple sporadic venous malformations. Nat Genet 41(1):118–124. 10.1038/ng.272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Limaye N, Kangas J, Mendola A, Godfraind C, Schlögel MJ, Helaers R, Vikkula M (2015) Somatic activating PIK3CA mutations cause venous malformation. Am J Hum Genet 97(6):914–921. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keppler-Noreuil KM, Rios JJ, Parker VER, Semple RK, Lindhurst MJ, Sapp JC, Biesecker LG (2015) PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS): diagnostic and testing eligibility criteria, differential diagnosis, and evaluation. Am J Med Genet A 167(2):287–295. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Couto JA, Huang AY, Konczyk DJ, Goss JA, Fishman SJ, Mulliken JB, Greene AK (2017) Somatic MAP2K1 mutations are associated with extracranial arteriovenous malformation. Am J Hum Genet 100(3):546–554. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Konczyk DJ, Goss JA, Smits PJ, Huang AY, Al-Ibraheemi A, Sudduth CL, Greene AK (2019) Arteriovenous malformation associated with a HRAS mutation. Hum Genet 138(11):1419–1421. 10.1007/s00439-019-02072-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Al-Olabi L, Polubothu S, Dowsett K, Andrews KA, Stadnik P, Joseph AP, Kinsler VA (2018) Mosaic RAS/MAPK variants cause sporadic vascular malformations which respond to targeted therapy. J Clin Investig 128(4):1496–1508. 10.1172/JCI98589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goss JA, Konczyk DJ, Smits PJ, Kozakewich HPW, Alomari AI, Al-Ibraheemi A, Greene AK (2019) Intramuscular fast-flow vascular anomaly contains somatic MAP2K1 and KRAS mutations. Angiogenesis 22(4):547–552. 10.1007/s10456-019-09678-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Timbang MR, Richter GT (2020) Update on extracranial arteriovenous malformations: a staged multidisciplinary approach. Semin Pediatr Surg 29(5):150965. 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2020.150965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.El Sissy FN, Wassef M, Faucon B, Salvan D, Nadaud S, Coulet F, Eyries M (2022) Somatic mutational landscape of extracranial arteriovenous malformations and phenotypic correlations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 36(6):905–912. 10.1111/jdv.18046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Coulie J, Boon L, Vikkula M (2022) Molecular pathways and possible therapies for head and neck vascular anomalies. J Oral Pathol Med 51(10):878–887. 10.1111/jop.13318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Utami AM, Azahaf S, de Boer OJ, van der Horst CMAM, Meijer-Jorna LB, van der Wal AC (2021) A literature review of microvascular proliferation in arteriovenous malformations of skin and soft tissue. J Clin Transl Res 7(4):540–557 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu AS, Mulliken JB, Zurakowski D, Fishman SJ, Greene AK (2010) Extracranial arteriovenous malformations: natural progression and recurrence after treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(4):1185. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d18070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McMorrow L, Shaikh M, Kessell G, Muir T (2017) Bleomycin electrosclerotherapy: new treatment to manage vascular malformations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(9):977–979. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reischauer S, Stone OA, Villasenor A, Chi N, Jin S-W, Martin M, Stainier DYR (2016) Cloche is a bHLH-PAS transcription factor that drives haemato-vascular specification. Nature 535(7611):294–298. 10.1038/nature18614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rödel CJ, Otten C, Donat S, Lourenço M, Fischer D, Kuropka B, Abdelilah-Seyfried S (2019) Blood flow suppresses vascular anomalies in a Zebrafish model of cerebral cavernous malformations. Circ Res 125(10):e43–e54. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bell LM, Holm A, Matysiak U, Driever W, Rößler J, Schanze D, Kapp FG (2022) Functional assessment of two variants of unknown significance in TEK by endothelium-specific expression in zebrafish embryos. Hum Mol Genet 31(1):10–17. 10.1093/hmg/ddab196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Greysson-Wong J, Rode R, Ryu J-R, Chan JL, Davari P, Rinker KD, Childs SJ (2023) rasa1-related arteriovenous malformation is driven by aberrant venous signalling. Development 150(18):dev201820. 10.1242/dev.201820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boon LM, Dekeuleneer V, Coulie J, Marot L, Bataille A-C, Hammer F, Vikkula M (2022) Case report study of thalidomide therapy in 18 patients with severe arteriovenous malformations. Nat Cardiovasc Res 1(6):562–567. 10.1038/s44161-022-00080-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eijkelenboom A, van Schaik FMA, van Es RM, Ten Broek RW, Rinne T, van der Vleuten C, Rehmann H (2019) Functional characterisation of a novel class of in-frame insertion variants of KRAS and HRAS. Sci Rep 9(1):8239. 10.1038/s41598-019-44584-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kawasaki J, Aegerter S, Fevurly RD, Mammoto A, Mammoto T, Sahin M, Chan J (2014) RASA1 functions in EPHB4 signaling pathway to suppress endothelial mTORC1 activity. J Clin Investig 124(6):2774–2784. 10.1172/JCI67084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yan D, Hao Q, Chen Y, Li Z, Zhang H, Yuan K, Zhao Y (2022) mTOR-FABP4 signal is activated in brain arteriovenous malformations in humans. J Mol Med 100(9):1287–1297. 10.1007/s00109-022-02237-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pang M, Zhang G, Shang C, Zhang Y, Chen R, Li Z, Li Q (2023) Advances in the study of KRAS in brain arteriovenous malformation. Cerebrovasc Dis. 10.1159/000535139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ji Y, Chen S, Yang K, Zhou J, Zhang X, Jiang X, Zhang Y (2021) A prospective multicenter study of sirolimus for complicated vascular anomalies. J Vasc Surg 74(5):1673-1681.e3. 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wright CJM, McCormack PL (2013) Trametinib: first global approval. Drugs 73(11):1245–1254. 10.1007/s40265-013-0096-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Edwards EA, Phelps AS, Cooke D, Frieden IJ, Zapala MA, Fullerton HJ, Shimano KA (2020) Monitoring arteriovenous malformation response to genotype-targeted therapy. Pediatrics 146(3):e20193206. 10.1542/peds.2019-3206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lekwuttikarn R, Lim YH, Admani S, Choate KA, Teng JMC (2019) Genotype-guided medical treatment of an arteriovenous malformation in a child. JAMA Dermatol 155(2):256–257. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nicholson CL, Flanagan S, Murati M, Boull C, McGough E, Ameduri R, Maguiness S (2022) Successful management of an arteriovenous malformation with trametinib in a patient with capillary-malformation arteriovenous malformation syndrome and cardiac compromise. Pediatr Dermatol 39(2):316–319. 10.1111/pde.14912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Foster JB, Li D, March ME, Sheppard SE, Adams DM, Hakonarson H, Dori Y (2020) Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis effectively treated with MEK inhibition. EMBO Mol Med 12(10):e12324. 10.15252/emmm.202012324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gordon K, Moore M, Van Zanten M, Pearce J, Itkin M, Madden B, Mansour S (2022) Case report: progressive central conducting lymphatic abnormalities in the RASopathies. Two case reports, including successful treatment by MEK inhibition. Front Genet 13:e1001105. 10.3389/fgene.2022.1001105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li D, March ME, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Kao C, Seiler C, Pinto E, Hakonarson H (2019) ARAF recurrent mutation causes central conducting lymphatic anomaly treatable with a MEK inhibitor. Nat Med 25(7):1116–1122. 10.1038/s41591-019-0479-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schmidt VF, Kapp FG, Goldann C, Huthmann L, Cucuruz B, Brill R (2024) Extracranial vascular anomalies driven by RAS/MAPK variants: spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations. J Am Heart Assoc 13(8):e033287. 10.1161/JAHA.123.033287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bernhard SM, Tuleja A, Laine JE, Haupt F, Häberli D, Hügel U, Baumgartner I (2022) Clinical presentation of simple and combined or syndromic arteriovenous malformations. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 10(3):705–712. 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garcia EP, Minkovsky A, Jia Y, Ducar MD, Shivdasani P, Gong X, Dong F (2017) Validation of OncoPanel: a targeted next-generation sequencing assay for the detection of somatic variants in cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141(6):751–758. 10.5858/arpa.2016-0527-OA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kwan KM, Fujimoto E, Grabher C, Mangum BD, Hardy ME, Campbell DS, Chien C-B (2007) The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn 236(11):3088–3099. 10.1002/dvdy.21343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Hassabis D (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596(7873):583–589. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, Velankar S (2022) AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 50(D1):D439–D444. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angiogenesis are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES