Skip to main content
Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine logoLink to Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine
letter
. 2024 Sep 18;26(5):613–614. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0218

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Septoplasty for Nasal Valve Collapse: A Retrospective Study

Allen Green 1, Eric X Wei 2, Cherian K Kandathil 3, Gun Min Youn 1, Jay P Shah 1, Sam P Most 3,*
PMCID: PMC11564667  PMID: 37862050

Introduction

Nasal valve collapse (NVC) is a common cause of nasal airway obstruction, with substantial morbidity.1 NVC can occur either at the level of the external nasal valve or at the internal nasal valve.2 NVC or narrowing often occurs concomitantly with septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITR).3 Recently, a major insurer instituted a policy not authorizing repair of nasal vestibular stenosis (RNVS) unless prior septoplasty had been performed. This study investigates effectiveness of prior septoplasty in patients with likely NVC requiring RNVS.

Methods

This study was approved by the Sanford University Institutional Review Board.

Insurance claims data between 2007 and 2021 were obtained from the Merative™ Marketscan® Research Databases that includes national census-designated regions, and data from private insurance types (Table 1).4 As the ICD9/10 code for NVC (478.19/J34.89) is ill-defined, we utilized CPT codes (Supplementary Table S1) to isolate patients who underwent RNVS with or without extranasal rib/ear cartilage graft as a proxy for NVC and then identified nasal surgeries before their RNVS procedure.

Table 1.

Characteristics of repair of nasal vestibular stenosis patients

Characteristic RNVS without extra nasal graft, N = 12,304 RNVS with extra nasal graft, N = 1591 p
Age, mean (SD) 40.2 (13.2) 44.2 (12.5) <0.001
Gender, n (%)
 Male 6270 (51.0) 694 (43.6) <0.001
 Female 6034 (49.0) 897 (56.4)  
Age group, (years) n (%)
 18–34 4571 (37.2) 395 (24.8) <0.001
 35–44 2802 (22.8) 347 (21.8)  
 45–54 2744 (22.3) 446 (28.0)  
 55+ 2187 (17.8) 403 (25.3)  
Region, n (%)
 Northeast 2332 (19.0) 203 (12.8) <0.001
 North central 3044 (24.7) 346 (21.7)  
 South 4386 (35.6) 694 (43.6)  
 West 2443 (19.9) 325 (20.4)  
 Unknown 99 (0.8) 23 (1.4)  
Insurance type, n (%)
 Comprehensive 234 (1.9) 26 (1.6) 0.001
 EPO 227 (1.8) 48 (3.0)  
 HMO 1280 (10.4) 181 (11.4)  
 POS ± capitation 1217 (9.9) 125 (7.9)  
 PPO 7600 (61.8) 1001 (63.0)  
 CDHP 842 (6.8) 87 (5.5)  
 HDHP 904 (7.3) 122 (7.7)  

CDHP, Consumer Directed Health Plan; EPO, Exclusive Provider Organization; HDHP, High Deductible Health Plan; HMO, Health Maintenance Organization; POS, Point-of-sale; PPO, Preferred Provider Organization; RNVS, repair of nasal vestibular stenosis.

Patients under 18 years of age or with missing demographic data were excluded from this study. For demographic analysis, a Student's t-test (continuous variables) and chi-squared test (categoric variables) were utilized and a chi-squared test was used for prior septoplasty history analysis. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Among 13,895 patients who underwent RNVS, 1591 (11.5%) required an extranasal cartilage graft (Table 1). Compared with patients who underwent RNVS without a graft, patients who required a graft were older (44.2 years old vs. 40.2 years old; p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of these patients were female (56.4% vs. 49.0%; p < 0.001). In addition, a higher proportion of patients who required an extranasal graft during their RNVS procedure were from the south and west regions (p < 0.001) and were enrolled in Exclusive Provider Organization/Health Maintenance Organization/Preferred Provider Organization insurance plans (p = 0.001).

Patients who underwent isolated septoplasty (with or without ITR) before their RNVS surgery were more likely to require an extranasal graft during their RNVS procedure than patients with no history of isolated septoplasty (23.1% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Chi-squared analysis of septoplasty history in repair of nasal vestibular stenosis patients

Prior nasal procedure Count (%)
 
RNVS without extra nasal graft RNVS with extra nasal graft p
No septoplasty history 12,101 (88.8) 1530 (11.2) <0.001
Septoplasty ± ITR 203 (76.9) 61 (23.1)

ITR, inferior turbinate hypertrophy.

Discussion

This retrospective database study found that a minority of RNVS patients require an extranasal cartilage graft during their procedure. However, having prior isolated septoplasty (with or without ITR) was shown to increase the rate of requiring extranasal grafts for subsequent RNVS procedures. Although the majority of nasal obstruction patients undergo septoplasty, previous work5 has shown that nasal obstruction patients with NVC often have decreased benefit from septoplasty alone.3

Our findings demonstrate that patients with NVC who undergo RNVS procedure who had a prior isolated septoplasty have an increased risk of requiring an extranasal cartilage graft during their subsequent RNVS procedure. Therefore, patients who present with NVC would benefit from complete treatment, such as RNVS and septoplasty ± ITR initially, rather than trying to correct nasal obstruction using septoplasty ± ITR without performing an RNVS.

Our study is limited by the use of private insurance claims data that are subject to provider coding errors and may not be generalizable to publicly or uninsured populations. In addition, RNVS may also be used to treat stenosis related to cleft lip, trauma, or infection, in addition to NVC6; therefore, using RNVS procedures as a proxy for NVC may result in including patients who do not have NVC. Lastly, due to the lack of a CPT code for cadaveric cartilage grafts, which are commonly used in RNVS procedures, these grafts were not captured in this claims database. Overall, however, our study suggests that patients with NVC who had undergone prior septoplasty, with or without ITR, have an over two-fold risk of requiring an extranasal cartilage graft when undergoing subsequent NVC repair.

Authors' Contributions

A.G. contributed to methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and visualization. E.X.W. was involved in methodology, formal analysis, and writing—review and editing. C.K. carried out conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, and supervision. G.M.Y. carried out software and data curation. J.P.S. took care of software and data curation. S.P.M. was in charge of conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision, and project administration. All authors approve the current version of this article.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Data Availability

Data for this project were accessed using the Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences Data Core.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

The PHS Data Core is supported by a National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Science Clinical and Translational Science Award (UL1TR003142) and from Internal Stanford funding.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table S1

References

  • 1. Kandathil CK, Spataro EA, Laimi K, Moubayed SP, Most SP, Saltychev M. Repair of the lateral nasal wall in nasal airway obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20(4):307–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Moubayed SP, Most SP. Evaluation and management of the nasal airway. Clin Plast Surg. 2022;49(1):23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hismi A, Burks CA, Locascio JJ, Lindsay RW. Comparative effectiveness of cartilage grafts in functional rhinoplasty for nasal sidewall collapse. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022;24(3):240–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences. MarketScan Databases (Version 3.0) [Data set]. Redivis (RRID:SCR_023111). 2023. doi: 10.57761/kg3j-nh50 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chambers KJ, Horstkotte KA, Shanley K, Lindsay RW. Evaluation of improvement in nasal obstruction following nasal valve correction in patients with a history of failed septoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(5):347–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Menger DJ, Lohuis PJFM, Kerssemakers S, Trenité GJN. Postoperative management of nasal vestibular stenosis. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(6):381–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1

Data Availability Statement

Data for this project were accessed using the Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences Data Core.


Articles from Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES