Abstract
Abscisic acid (ABA) is an important phytohormone with diverse applications. It currently relies on the fermentation of Botrytis cinerea, which suffers from limited availability of genetic engineering tools. Here, Yarrowia lipolytica was engineered to enable de novo biosynthesis of ABA. To overcome the rate-limiting P450 enzymes, systematic engineering strategies were implemented. Firstly, the dissolved oxygen was increased to boost the activity of P450 enzymes. Secondly, the expansion of endoplasmic reticulum was implemented to improve the functional expression of P450 enzymes. Lastly, rate-limiting enzymes were assembled to facilitate substrate trafficking. Moreover, ABA production was further improved by strengthening the mevalonate pathway. Finally, the engineered strain produced 1221.45 mg/L of ABA in a 5-L bioreactor. The study provides effective approaches for alleviating rate-limiting P450 enzymes to enhance ABA production and achieve competitive industrial-level ABA production in Y. lipolytica.
Keywords: Abscisic acid, Phytohormone, Sesquiterpene, Yarrowia lipolytica, P450 enzymes
Graphical abstract
1. Introduction
Abscisic acid (ABA), a sesquiterpenoid compound, was initially identified in plants during the 1960s [1]. As a pivotal phytohormone, ABA plays a crucial role in the agricultural sector, notably in regulating seed dormancy and cell elongation [2,3]. ABA also mediates adaptive responses to abiotic stress, such as drought or cold stress [4,5], and biotic stress, including pathogen infestation [6]. Moreover, studies have highlighted the potential health benefits of ABA supplementation. For instance, dietary intake of ABA-rich fruit extracts has been associated with lowered insulin and blood sugar concentrations in human [7]. Remarkably, elevated plasma ABA concentrations have been related to a decreased susceptibility to malaria infection [8].
ABA is widely distributed in higher plants and also in certain plant pathogenic fungi [9,10]. In plants, ABA is predominantly synthesized via the plastid methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway, whereas in fungi, it follows the mevalonate pathway (MVA) [11]. Efforts to unveil the biosynthetic pathway of ABA have been driven by its diverse functionality. In Botrytis cinerea, ABA synthesis initiates with farnesyl diphosphate (FPP). FPP is subjected to cyclization via α-ionylideneethane synthase (BcAba3), resulting in α-ionylideneethane. Then, two P450 enzymes (BcAba2 and BcAba2) facilitates the oxygenation of α-ionylideneethane to form α-ionylideneacetic acid and 1′,4′-trans-dihydroxy-α-ionylideneacetic acid, respectively. Ultimately, a dehydrogenase (BcAba4) catalyzes this compound to form ABA [12].
At present, ABA is industrially produced using the native fungus B. cinerea [13]. However, the process involves significant costs as a result of extensive separation procedures and extended fermentation durations. Furthermore, B. cinerea has limited genetic engineering tools available, posing significant challenges for metabolic engineering endeavors. Consequently, extensive exploration has been undertaken to establish ABA biosynthesis to heterologous hosts with more accessible molecular tools. Reconstructing the ABA biosynthesis pathway from B. cinerea has facilitated ABA production in heterologous microbes such as Aspergillus oryzae (8 mg/L) [12], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (11.4 mg/L) [14], and Y. lipolytica (263.5 mg/L) [15]. Recently, the production of ABA has a notable improvement compared with previous reports. Liu et al. engineered Y. lipolytica for overproducing ABA and achieved a final titer of 1.21 g/L by optimizing the MVA pathway, exogenous ABA synthesis pathway, mitochondrial localization strategy, and adding dodecane during fed-batch fermentation [16].
The biosynthetic pathway of ABA involves two P450 enzymes, BcAba1 and BcAba2, which were identified as the rate-limiting steps [15]. Low activity or poor expression of P450 enzymes is a widely encountered challenge in biotechnology and synthetic biology. However, previous ABA production focused mainly on engineering the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway and redox cofactor NADPH, no studies have focused on improving the expression and activity of P450 enzymes in the ABA biosynthesis pathway. Engineering P450 enzymes is considered a major challenge [17], and manipulating two P450s in series within heterologous microbes presents a significant obstacle in ABA biosynthesis.
The oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica is considered as a superior chassis cell for heterologous expression of P450s for terpenoid modification, which also has high concentration of acetyl-CoA [17,18]. In this study, Y. lipolytica was tailored as an alternative host for ABA production. In order to enhance the heterologous expression of P450s in ABA pathway, systematic metabolic engineering was implemented, including increasing dissolved oxygen, engineering the endoplasmic reticulum, and assembling rate-limiting P450 enzymes with short peptide tags (RIAD and RIDD) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the efficient conversion of acetyl-CoA to the downstream isoprenoid synthesis often acts as a bottleneck for terpene production in microbial chassis cells [19]. The established Y. lipolytica platform focused on overexpressing critical enzymes of the MVA pathway [15,16], while neglecting the manipulation of gene expression across the entire pathway. In this study, the complete MVA pathway was integrated into Y. lipolytica to enhance the synergistic effect of the pathway and drive the metabolic flux to the MVA pathway. The yield of ABA was gradually improved. Ultimately, Y. lipolytica was engineered to achieve a gram-scale ABA titer (1221.45 mg/L). This study not only improved abscisic acid production in yeast but also provided a generic method for manipulating multiple P450 enzymes in microbes.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the ABA biosynthesis pathway and summary of the metabolic strategies used in this study. BcAba3, B. cinerea α-ionylideneethane synthases; BcAba1, B. cinerea cytochrome P450; BcAba2, B. cinerea cytochrome P450; BcAba4, B. cinerea dehydrogenase; BcCpr1, B. cinerea cytochrome P450 reductase. FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; α-IE, α-ionylideneethane; α-IAA, α-ionylideneacetic acid; DH-α-IAA, 1′,4′-trans-dihydroxy-α-ionylideneacetic acid; ABA, abscisic acid.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Strains and media
The yeast strains were derived from Y. lipolytica Polf (ATCC MYA-2613) (Supplementary Table 1). Y. lipolytica Polf-Δku70 was derived from Polf by disrupting the KU70 gene to enhance homologous recombination efficiency [20]. Yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) medium (1 % yeast extract, 2 % tryptone, and 2 % glucose) was used for strain growth. Synthetic complete medium devoid of uracil (SC-Ura) or leucine (SC-Leu) was used for selecting strains harboring URA3-or LEU2-based plasmids, which contain 2 % glucose, 0.67 % yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.077 % amino acid mix lacking Ura or Leu, and 2 % agar. 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) plates (YPD plate + 0.8 g/L 5-FOA) were used to remove the URA3 marker. Shake-flask fermentation was conducted in 250 mL non-baffled or baffled flasks with 50 mL YPD80 medium (1 % yeast extract, 2 % tryptone, and 8 % glucose). The strains were cultured at 30 °C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm for 120 h, starting with an initial inoculation OD600 of 0.5.
Escherichia coli DH5α was applied to the construction of plasmids. The recombinant E. coli strains were cultivated at 37 °C in Lysogeny Broth supplemented 0.1 % ampicillin.
2.2. Plasmids and strain construction
The codon-optimized genes were synthesized by GenScript (Nanjing, China) (Supplementary Table 4). The endogenous genes, promoters and terminators were PCR amplified using Phanta Super Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), with the genome of Y. lipolytica Polf-Δku70 as the template. All gene fragments were obtained via PCR amplification using specific primers (Supplementary Table 3). PCR fragments were isolated using the DNA Fragment Purification Kit (Takara, Dalian, China), and the recombinant plasmids were prepared using the ClonExpress MultiS One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) (Supplementary Table 2). The methods for strain construction and positive clones verification were described previously [21].
2.3. Sample preparation for abscisic acid analysis
To quantify the intracellular ABA concentration, 1 mL of culture broth was centrifugated at 10, 000 g for 5 min, and the cell pellets were resuspended in water. This washing process was repeated. Subsequently, 1 mL of methanol and 0.5 g of glass beads were added. The mixture underwent thorough dispersion by employing a homogenizer through ten cycles, each lasting 10 s at 5500 rpm. Subsequently, centrifugation at 10000g for 5 min was conducted. Finally, the supernatant methanol was used for HPLC analysis.
To quantify the extracellular ABA concentration, 1 mL of the culture broth was centrifuged at 10000 g for 5 min, and the resulting supernatant was used for product quantification. In certain instances, the culture broth should be diluted prior to analysis.
2.4. Product quantification
The samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent 1260 Infinity II, USA) with an ultraviolet detector (Agilent 1260 VWD, USA). The HPLC detection were conducted with C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 4 μm) (Agilent Poroshell 120, USA). The injection volume is 5 μL and the temperature was maintained at 30 °C. The eluent was 70 % methanol and the pH is adjusted to 3.0 with phosphoric acid. Flow was set at 0.4 mL/min. The ABA concentrations were calculated from authentic calibration standards. Biomass and the concentration of glucose was measured as described before [21].
2.5. Fluorescence detection
A single colony was picked in 5 mL of YPD medium (200 rpm, 24 h). Afterward, red and green fluorescence were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy (Olympus FV3000, Japan). The excitation wavelengths were 485 nm (sfGFP) and 588 nm (mCherry).
2.6. Fed-batch fermentation
A single colony was picked to 5 mL YPD, then shaken at 200 rpm for 20–24 h until the OD600 reached approximately 5.0. The primary culture was inoculated in 500 mL non-baffled flasks with 100 mL YPD to initial inoculation OD600 of 0.5. Incubation of the shake flask to achieve the second seed culture with an OD600 of around 10.0.
The high-density fermentation was conducted in 5-L bioreactor (T&J Bioengineering Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) with an initial volume of 3 L. The second seed cultures were injected into the bioreactor to reach initial OD600 of 0.5. The culture medium contained 150 g/L glucose, 6 g/L yeast extract, 12 g/L ammonium sulfate, 1.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 6 g/L KH2PO4, 3 g/L Na2HPO4·12H2O, 3 mg/L CaCl2•2H2O, 1 mL/L trace metals stock (1000 × ), and 1 mL/L vitamins stock (1000 × ) [22]. The pH was controlled at 5.5 by automatically adding 10 M NaOH. The stirring speed was automatically adjusted between 300 and 1000 rpm and the air input was controlled at 6 vol per volume per minute (vvm) to maintain the dissolved oxygen (DO) at 30 %. The feeding glucose and ammonium sulfate with a C/N ratio of 30:1 was continuously pumped to meet consumption after 48 h. Samples were collected every 12 h to assess glucose concentration, dry cell weight (DCW), and ABA composition.
2.7. Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation for 3 biological replicates. All statistical evaluations (p-values) were performed using a two-tailed t-test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica for de novo biosynthesis of abscisic acid
The biosynthesis of ABA involves a gene cluster consisting of four biosynthetic genes, denoted as BcABA1-BcABA4, derived from B. cinerea, which catalyze a sequential four-step enzymatic process (Fig. 2A). Previously, Y. lipolytica was engineered for enhanced flux of MVA pathway and this corresponding strain, tHE, served as the starting strain for this work [23]. The modifications included the overexpression of truncated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (tHmg1) and farnesyl diphosphate synthase (Erg20). In order to construct the complete ABA biosynthesis pathway, the four biosynthetic genes, BcABA1- BcABA4 were integrated into the tHE strain. Different genetic constructs, varying in gene order and configuration, can impact the gene expression level [24]. Thus, the four genes were assembled in two configurations to explore the effects of different assembly modes of the multi-step heterologous pathway (Fig. 2B). The two assembly modes are: (A) BcABA1 and BcABA2 were integrated into the IntA site, BcABA3 and BcABA4 were integrated into the IntE2 site to generate the strains SM101; (B) BcABA1, BcABA2, BcABA3 and BcABA4 were integrated in the IntA site to generate the strains SM102. However, no ABA could be observed in the two resultant strains.
Fig. 2.
Reconstruction and optimization of abscisic acid pathway in Y. lipolytica. (A) Abscisic acid gene cluster, responsible for ABA biosynthesis, originates from the Botrytis cinerea. (B) Different gene configuration of abscisic acid gene cluster. (C) ABA production by strains expressing ABA gene cluster in different configuration. (D) Results of HPLC chromatograms of the engineered strain SM203, the control strain tHE and authentic ABA standard. (E) The effect of a second abscisic acid gene overexpression on the titer of ABA. (F) The effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on the titer of ABA.
It was speculated that the native Y. lipolytica cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) might be incompatible with heterologous cytochrome P450 enzymes (P450s, CYP) in ABA biosynthesis pathway. Therefore, the corresponding B. cinerea CPR gene, referred to as BcCPR1, was co-expressed in SM101 and SM102 to generate the strain SM201 and SM202, capable of producing detectable levels of ABA. Notably, strain SM201 produced 6.29 mg/L ABA, marking a 48.7 % increase compared to SM202 (4.23 mg/L) (Fig. 2C). There may be a transcriptional interference of multiple heterologous genes when the four genes were expressed in the same site in strain SM202 [24]. This also indicates co-expression of heterologous CYPs and their redox partners CPRs is highly significant to ensure maximal catalytic efficiency of heterologous CYPs.
Promoters are crucial elements that regulate gene expression levels. Generally, increasing promoter strength is a common method to enhance the transcriptional level of a target gene [25]. The TEF promoter (from the translation elongation factor 1-α gene) is a constitutive, strong promoter in Y. lipolytica, and when an 113bp intron is added to the TEF promoter, the resulting TEFin promoter is 17 times more potent than the TEF promoter [26]. Replacing the promoter in the BcABA3 and BcABA4 expression cassette with the strong TEFin promoter in SM201 led to a significant increase in ABA levels, from 6.29 mg/L to 9.67 mg/L (SM203, Fig. 2D). The results indicate that strong promoters are conducive to balancing the metabolic flux of the multi-step heterologous ABA biosynthesis pathway, thereby enhancing the synthesis of ABA in Y. lipolytica.
3.2. Identifying rate-limiting steps via multi-copy strategy
For multigenic pathway engineering, metabolic flux imbalances are a widely encountered challenge due to the accumulation of metabolic intermediates caused by the different expression strength of multiple genes in the pathway. The absence of commercial reference standards for intermediate metabolites has posed challenges in identifying metabolic bottlenecks in ABA pathway. Therefore, all the enzymes in ABA biosynthesis pathway were overexpressed in strain SM203 to explore the bottleneck, resulting in strains SM204-SM207 (Fig. 2E). The strain SM204 (BcABA1) and SM205 (BcABA1 and BcABA2) produced 19.80 and 24.60 mg/L ABA, respectively, representing a 2.05 and 2.54-fold increase in ABA titers compared to SM203. The overexpression of BcABA3 and BcABA4 in strain SM205 was continued to generate strain SM206 and SM207. Nevertheless, the concurrent expression of these genes led to a reduced ABA concentration compared to SM205 (Fig. 2E). It was speculated the expression of BcABA3 and BcABA4 caused the accumulation of intermediate that cannot be converted to ABA efficiently, which may have feedback inhibition on the enzyme. Consequently, the two P450 enzymes were considered the primary bottleneck in the ABA biosynthetic pathway, aligning with findings from prior studies [14,15].
In aerobically engineered microorganisms, the dissolved oxygen concentration is an important factor for the productivity during the fermentation process. In addition, BcABA1 and BcABA2 belong to the P450 enzyme family, which uses oxygen and the cofactor NAD(P)H (mediated by redox chaperones) to facilitate the incorporation of oxygen atoms into C–H bonds (Fig. 1) [18,27]. The hydroxylation reaction catalyzed by P450 enzymes requires oxygen, therefore, improving the oxygen supply is an important way to improve the efficiency of aerobic reactions and cell growth [17]. To evaluate the effect of oxygen availability on ABA production, different types of 250 mL shake flasks (non-baffled or baffled shaker) and bottle plug (silicone plugs and gauze) were used to cultivate SM205 for ABA production (Supplementary Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 2F, the titer of ABA varies greatly under different culture conditions. The highest titer of ABA (103.23 mg/L) was achieved in 250 mL baffled flasks with gauze as the bottle plug. Y. lipolytica is a strict aerobic microorganism, and the increased oxygen contributes to better growth. The biomass increases from 14.70 g/L to 28.30 g/L. Therefore, specific titers, expressed as mg/g DCW rather than mg/L, are used for strain evaluation, with the latter being less sensitive to variations in biomass. The highest specific titer (3.68 mg/g DCW) was obtained in 250 mL baffled flasks with gauze as the bottle plug. This suggests that the increased oxygen supply not only promotes cell growth but also boosts the efficiency of the ABA pathway in Y. lipolytica.
3.3. Rewiring endoplasmic reticulum size to enhance P450-mediated metabolic conversion
Most P450 enzymes are naturally situated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), with a few residing in mitochondria [28]. As membrane-bound proteins, confirming the subcellular localization of P450 enzymes in heterologous systems is crucial. This information can guide rational engineering efforts to enhance the expression and catalytic efficiency of these proteins. The prediction results of subcellular localization for BcAba1 and BcAba2 indicate their localization within the ER (Supplementary Fig. 1). To confirm the actual sublocation in Y. lipolytica, BcAba1 and BcAba2 were individually fused with sfGFP. Concurrently, the ER marker protein Sec61 was linked with mCherry. BcAba1-sfGFP and BcAba2-sfGFP were co-expressed with Sec61-mCherry, respectively, resulting in strain VA-01 and VA-02. Fluorescence microscopy revealed the colocalization of BcAba1-sfGFP and BcAba2-sfGFP with Sec61-mCherry (Fig. 3A). These findings indicate that the two P450 enzymes, BcAba1 and BcAba2, were localized to the ER, in accordance with the in silico results in native organisms.
Fig. 3.
The effects of abscisic acid production by endoplasmic reticulum engineering. (A) Visualized analysis of VA-01 and VA-02. The first row are BcAba1-sfGFP, Sec61-mCherry and merge image. The second row are BcAba2-sfGFP, Sec61-mCherry and merge image. (B) Illustration of different engineering targets (individual overexpression of YAS1/YAS2/HAC1/INO2/INO4 and knockout of OPI1/PAH1 for rewiring ER size to accommodate additional protein-folding loads. (C) Production of ABA in the strains with different engineering targets. The data is reported as the mean ± standard deviation from three distinct biological replicates. The statistical significance (p-value) was performed by a two-tailed t-test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
ER is a dynamic organelle and its dramatic expansion will facilitate the functional expression of ER-localized proteins. Furthermore, increasing the ER volume enhances the capacity for protein synthesis and folding within the ER, while simultaneously alleviating metabolic constraints caused by enzyme deficiencies [29]. Consequently, efforts are directed towards engineering Y. lipolytica to expand the ER, thereby increasing the probability of active expression and correct folding of P450s enzymes. The ER is regulated by numerous factors [28,30]. Notably, phospholipids constitute the predominant constituent of the ER membrane, the comprehensive regulation of phospholipid synthesis involves transcription factors such as INO2, INO4, and OPI1 [30]. Boosting the expression of INO2 or INO4 (which encode a transcription factor complex essential for controlling ER size) and deleting OPI1 gene (which encodes a suppressor for the INO2/INO4) are frequently targeted modifications for expanding the ER. The INO2 and INO4 complex has been extensively studied for improving the production of terpenoids in S. cerevisiae. Overexpression of YlINO2 resulted in ER membrane expansion and improved lipid production in Y. lipolytica [22]. Nevertheless, the impact of overexpressing INO2/INO4 on terpenoid engineering in Y. lipolytica has yet to be investigated. Additionally, YAS1/YAS2, has been identified to share some similarity with INO4/INO2, which upregulates genes involved in phospholipid synthesis [31]. The disruption of PAH1, encoding phosphatidic acid phosphatase, is a common strategy for expanding both the outer nuclear membrane and the ER, a phenomenon termed ER proliferation [32]. HAC1 acts as a transcription factor, regulating the unfolded protein response triggered by ER stress [22]. Due to the complex regulation of the organelle by numerous factors, manipulation of different targets had varying effects on product synthesis. For example, disrupting the PAH1 gene in S. cerevisiae resulted in an 8-fold increase in the accumulation of triterpenoid, β-amyrin, a 6-fold increase in medicagenic acid, and a 16-fold increase in saponins [32]. Although overexpressing INO4 and deleting OPI1 did not enhance squalene and protopanaxadiol production, overexpression of INO2 improved squalene and protopanaxadiol yields significantly, by 71-fold and 8-fold respectively [30]. The disruption of OPI1 significantly enhanced the yield of costunolide, whereas the production of parthenolide was enhanced by HAC1 overexpression [28].
Consequently, SM205 was engineered to increase the size of the ER by overexpression of INO2, INO4, YAS1, YAS2 and HAC1 and disruption of OPI1 and PAH1, with the aim of reducing ER stress (Fig. 3B). As demonstrated in Fig. 3C, both the deletion of PAH1 and the overexpression of HAC1 improved ABA production, with the knockout of PAH1 achieving the highest titer of 126.67 mg/L (SM213). Conversely, the overexpression of YAS1 or YAS2 led to a reduction in ABA production, potentially attributed to the fact that YAS1/YAS2 exclusively upregulates CYP genes in response to alkanes but not other P450 enzymes in the ABA biosynthetic pathway [31]. INO2/INO4 and OPI1 are key transcriptional regulators of phospholipid biosynthetic genes [28]. In addition to their role in regulating the ER, they also function as global regulators of lipid metabolism. Recent studies have shown that overexpression of INO2/INO4 upregulates genes involved in lipid biosynthesis, which shares acetyl-CoA as a common precursor with ABA synthesis [29]. Disruption of PAH1 not only leads to a significant expansion of the ER but also positively influences ER-associated P450 enzymes involved in sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis, such as artemisinic acid [32]. This may explain why PAH1 knockout enhances ABA production.
3.4. Facilitating substrate trafficking by assembling rate-limiting enzymes
Facilitating substrate trafficking within synthetic pathways is crucial for optimizing product yield through local confinement of the rate-limiting enzymes. Modular enzyme assembly approaches have been used to regulate these concentrations. This involves linking rate-limiting enzymes through either a short protein linker [33] or a peptide pair (Fig. 4A) [34]. These fusion closely mimic natural metabolic regulation mechanisms, facilitating the activation of enzyme cascades with elevated local concentrations of intermediates through enhanced enzyme proximity [35]. Notably, in the case of P450 enzymes, the fusion of CYP with CPR using a short protein linker has proven successful in facilitating electron delivery and improving the enzyme catalysis [36,37]. Additionally, the construction of multi-enzyme complexes, based on short peptide tags (RIAD and RIDD), has also been used to optimize the synthesis of terpenoids. The specific binding of the RIAD peptide to the RIDD dimer guides the fused enzymes to adopt a 2:1 binding stoichiometry, resulting in higher catalytic efficiency compared to enzyme fusion with a linker in some cases [33,38].
Fig. 4.
Effects of different assembly strategies of rate-limiting enzyme on the titers of abscisic acid. (A) Illustration of strategies for facilitating substrate trafficking by assembling rate-limiting enzymes in ABA biosynthesis pathway. S1 (Strategy1), rate-limiting enzymes fused with RIAD and RIDD. S2 (Strategy2), CYPs and CPRs fused by GGGGS3. (B) Changes of ABA titer by assembling rate-limiting enzymes. The data is reported as the mean ± standard deviation from three distinct biological replicates. The statistical significance (p-value) was performed by a two-tailed t-test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
To relieve the bottlenecks in ABA biosynthesis pathway, the P450 enzymes were fused through a short protein linker or a pair of short peptide tags described above. With the aim to improve electron transfer efficiency, the rate-limiting enzymes BcAba1 and BcAba2 were fused to BcCpr1 with different enzyme orientation via a short protein linker (GGGGS3). Here, four strains were constructed: SM301 (BcAba1-GGGGS3- BcCpr1), SM302 (BcAba2-GGGGS3- BcCpr1), SM303 (BcCpr1-GGGGS3- BcAba1), SM304 (BcCpr1-GGGGS3-Bcaba2). The RIDD or RIAD were attached to the C-terminus of BcAba1 and BcAba2, resulting in the strain SM305 (BcAba1-RIDD/BcAba2-RIAD). As shown in Fig. 4B, strain SM305 yielded 175.34 mg/L of ABA, marking a 38.4 % increase compared to the control strain SM213. The improved production of ABA in SM305 can be attributed to two factors. First, the assembly of BcAba1 and BcAba2 using RIDD/RIAD shortens the spatial distance between the rate-limiting enzymes, creating substrate channeling that improve abscisic acid synthesis. Second, the increased copies of BcAba1 with RIDD tags efficiently release the rate-limiting step. However, the direct fusion of rate-limiting enzymes results in a decrease of their functionality. One possible reason for this could be that the active site is located in the N- or C-terminal region, causing enzyme inactivation due to fusion expression [33]. Additionally, fusion of large enzyme may experience a reduction of the activity, potentially leading to complete loss of function [39].
3.5. Improving abscisic acid production by strengthening the mevalonate pathway
As a 15-carbon terpene derivative, ABA is synthesized by the MVA pathway in Y. lipolytica. The MVA pathway commences with acetyl-CoA, subsequently undergoing multiple reaction steps to generate the precursor FPP. Acetyl-CoA serves as a critical metabolic node, and its availability significantly influences the biosynthesis of terpenes. The efficient conversion of acetyl-CoA to the downstream isoprenoid synthesis often acts as a bottleneck for terpene production in microbial chassis cells [19]. Extensive engineering efforts have been attempted to drive cytosolic acetyl-CoA towards MVA [40]. Given the synergistic effect of MVA pathway throughout the entire continuum, the entire MVA pathway was overexpressed to divert acetyl‐CoA toward ABA synthesis. Specifically, tHMG1 was recognized as a critical rate-limiting enzyme in the MVA pathway, with copy number increased to two.
The eight genes in the MVA pathway (Fig. 5A) were distributed among four sets: (1) PFBAin-tHMG1-TCyc1t; (2) PEXP-IDI-TIDI and PGPD-ERG13-TERG13; (3) PFBAin-ERG10-TERG10, PTEF-ERG8-TERG8, and PFBAin-ERG19-TERG19; (4) PGPD-ERG20-TERG20 and PEXP-ERG12-TERG12.The four sets were iteratively integrated into SM305 strain, resulting in strain SM306-SM309. As shown in Fig. 5B, enhanced ABA production was observed following consecutive genomic integration events. Compared with SM305, the ABA titer in the resulting strains SM306-SM309 exhibited varying degrees of improvement, which exhibited ABA titer that were increased by 6.25 % (186.30 mg/L), 15.89 % (203.21 mg/L), 27.93 % (224.32 mg/L), and 36.90 % (240.08 mg/L), respectively. This study substantiates the significance of synergistic expression of complete MVA pathway, offering valuable insights for the overproduction of other terpenoids.
Fig. 5.
Enhancing the flux of the mevalonate pathway. (A) Schematic illustration of the MVA pathway leading to the production of ABA. (B) Boosting ABA production by fully utilizing the MVA pool. IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; GPP: geranyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate. The data is reported as the mean ± standard deviation from three distinct biological replicates. The statistical significance (p-value) was performed by a two-tailed t-test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
3.6. Fed-batch fermentation for abscisic acid production
To evaluate the potential of SM309 as ABA cell factory, high-density fermentation was carried out. Throughout the 192-h fermentation, glucose concentration, cell growth, and both extracellular and intracellular ABA concentration were monitored every 12 h (Fig. 6). During the fermentation process, glucose was consistently controlled at low levels. At 192 h, the OD600 peaked at approximately 324, meeting the requirement for significant product accumulation. The final titer of extracellular and intracellular ABA was 1046.24 and 175.34 mg/L, respectively, corresponding to a yield of 6.10 mg/g glucose and a productivity of 0.025 g/L/h. The results not only underscored the significance of the employed strategy in enhancing ABA synthesis but also demonstrated the remarkable capacity of the engineered Y. lipolytica for ABA production. However, there was an observed increase in the intracellular accumulation of ABA in fed-batch fermentation, which may cause a metabolic burden, limiting the development of a highly efficient microbial cell factory.
Fig. 6.
Abscisic acid production by strain SM309 in 5-L fed-batch fermentation. Quantification of extracellular and intracellular ABA, glucose and biomass was conducted every 12h.
4. Conclusion
In this study, Y. lipolytica was successfully engineered for the accumulation of ABA, scaling up production from milligrams to grams (Supplementary Fig. 1 to Fig. 7). We achieved the highest reported de novo ABA production from glucose in a heterologous yeast host by implementing various metabolic engineering strategies, such as constructing a synthetic ABA pathway, addressing rate-limiting steps, and enhancing the MVA pathway (Fig. 7). The strategies described here could serve as a valuable reference for enhancing the production of value-added compounds and improving the functional expression of P450 enzymes in yeasts.
Fig. 7.
Overview of the strain engineering process.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Mei-Li Sun: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Conceptualization. Ziyun Zou: Methodology, Data curation. Lu Lin: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro: Writing – review & editing. Kaifeng Wang: Visualization, Investigation, Data curation. Xiao-Jun Ji: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interest
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled, “Systematic metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for efficient production of phytohormone abscisic acid”.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2217817, 22408166), the Natural Science Found of Jiangsu Province (BK20240539), the Jiangsu Basic Research Center for Synthetic Biology (BK20233003), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M751420, GZC20231119), the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund Project (CX(22)3015), the Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Bio-Manufacture (XTC2204), and the Newton Advanced Fellowships (NAF\R1\201187).
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2024.10.004.
Contributor Information
Kaifeng Wang, Email: wangkf@njtech.edu.cn.
Xiao-Jun Ji, Email: xiaojunji@njtech.edu.cn.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Kato-Noguchi H., Tanaka Y., Murakami T., Yamamura S., Fujihara S. Isolation and identification of an allelopathic substance from peel of Citrus junos. Phytochemistry. 2002;61(7):849–853. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00382-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Finkelstein R.R., Gampala S.S.L., Rock C.D. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell. 2002;14(suppl_1):S15–S45. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kermode A.R. Role of abscisic acid in seed dormancy. J Plant Growth Regul. 2005;24(4):319–344. doi: 10.1007/s00344-005-0110-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mohapatra S.S., Poole R.J., Dhindsa R.S. Abscisic acid-regulated gene expression in relation to freezing tolerance in alfalfa 1. Plant Physiol. 1988;87(2):468–473. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.2.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zeinali Y.L., Reza H., Fatemeh R., Jalil K. Drought tolerance induced by foliar application of abscisic acid and sulfonamide compounds in tomato. J Stress Physiol Biochem. 2014;10(1):326–334. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gietler M., Fidler J., Labudda M., Nykiel M. Abscisic acid—enemy or savior in the response of cereals to abiotic and biotic stresses? Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(13):4607. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Booz V., Christiansen C.B., Kuhre R.E., Saltiel M.Y., Sociali G., Schaltenberg N., Fischer A.W., Heeren J., Zocchi E., Holst J.J. Abscisic acid stimulates the release of insulin and of GLP‐1 in the rat perfused pancreas and intestine. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(2) doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Glennon E.K.K., Adams L.G., Hicks D.R., Dehesh K., Luckhart S. Supplementation with abscisic acid reduces malaria disease severity and parasite transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(6):1266–1275. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yamamoto H., Inomata M., Tsuchiya S., Nakamura M., Oritani T. Metabolism of chiral ionylideneacetic acids on the abscisic acid biosynthetic pathway in cercospora. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000;64(12):2644–2650. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.2644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.González-Guzmán M., Apostolova N., Bellés J.M., Barrero J.M., Piqueras P., Ponce M.R., Micol J.L., Serrano R., Rodríguez P.L. The short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase ABA2 catalyzes the conversion of xanthoxin to abscisic aldehyde. Plant Cell. 2002;14(8):1833–1846. doi: 10.1105/tpc.002477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hirai N., Yoshida R., Todoroki Y., Ohigashi H. Biosynthesis of abscisic acid by the non-mevalonate pathway in plants, and by the mevalonate pathway in fungi. Biosc Biotech Biochem. 2000;64(7):1448–1458. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Takino J., Kozaki T., Sato Y., Liu C., Ozaki T., Minami A., Oikawa H. Unveiling biosynthesis of the phytohormone abscisic acid in fungi: unprecedented mechanism of core scaffold formation catalyzed by an unusual sesquiterpene synthase. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(39):12392–12395. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Panda S., Zhou K. Engineering microbes to overproduce natural products as agrochemicals. Syn Syst Biotechnol. 2023;8(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Otto M., Teixeira P.G., Vizcaino M.I., David F., Siewers V. Integration of a multi-step heterologous pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of abscisic acid. Microb Cell Factories. 2019;18(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1257-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arnesen J.A., Jacobsen I.H., Dyekjær J.D., Rago D., Kristensen M., Klitgaard A.K., Randelovic M., Martinez J.L., Borodina I. Production of abscisic acid in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. FEMS Yeast Res. 2022;22(1):foac015. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foac015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu L., Zhao K., Liu Z. Construction and regulation of the abscisic acid biosynthesis pathway in Yarrowia lipolytica. J Agric Food Chem. 2024;72(13):7299–7307. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Urlacher V.B., Girhard M. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in biotechnology and synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):882–897. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu B., Zhao X., Wang E., Zhou J., Li J., Chen J., Du G. Efficient heterologous expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes in microorganisms for the biosynthesis of natural products. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022:1–15. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2022.2029344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Daletos G., Katsimpouras C., Stephanopoulos G. Novel strategies and platforms for industrial isoprenoid engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(7):811–822. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ji Q., Mai J., Ding Y., Wei Y., Ledesma-Amaro R., Ji X.-J. Improving the homologous recombination efficiency of Yarrowia lipolytica by grafting heterologous component from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng Commun. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sun M.-L., Han Y., Yu X., Wang K., Lin L., Ledesma-Amaro R., Ji X.-J. Constructing a green oleaginous yeast cell factory for sustainable production of the plant-derived diterpenoid sclareol. Green Chem. 2024;26(9):5202–5210. doi: 10.1039/d3gc04949c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Su H., Shi P., Shen Z., Meng H., Meng Z., Han X., Chen Y., Fan W., Fa Y., Yang C., Li F., Wang S a. High-level production of nervonic acid in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica by systematic metabolic engineering. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):1125. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05502-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ma Y., Li W., Mai J., Wang J., Wei Y., Ledesma-Amaro R., Ji X.-J. Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica for sustainable production of the chamomile sesquiterpene (−)-α-bisabolol. Green Chem. 2021;23(2):780–787. doi: 10.1039/d0gc03180a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wong L., Engel J., Jin E., Holdridge B., Xu P. YaliBricks, a versatile genetic toolkit for streamlined and rapid pathway engineering in Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng Commun. 2017:568–577. doi: 10.1016/j.meteno.2017.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tong Y.J., Zhou J.W., Zhang L., Xu P. A golden-gate based cloning toolkit to build violacein pathway libraries in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10(1):115–124. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tai M., Stephanopoulos G. Engineering the push and pull of lipid biosynthesis in oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for biofuel production. Metab Eng. 2013:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu X., Cheng J., Zhang G., Ding W., Duan L., Yang J., Kui L., Cheng X., Ruan J., Fan W., Chen J., Long G., Zhao Y., Cai J., Wang W., Ma Y., Dong Y., Yang S., Jiang H. Engineering yeast for the production of breviscapine by genomic analysis and synthetic biology approaches. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):448–457. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02883-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shi Y., Dong T., Zeng B., Yao M., Wang Y., Xie Z., Xiao W., Yuan Y. Production of plant sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide in the Yeast cell factory. ACS Synth Biol. 2022;11(7):2473–2483. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Su B., Lai P., Deng M.-R., Zhu H. Global rewiring of lipid metabolism to produce carotenoid by deleting the transcription factor genes ino2/ino4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;264130400 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim J.-E., Jang I.-S., Son S.-H., Ko Y.-J., Cho B.-K., Kim S.C., Lee J.Y. Tailoring the Saccharomyces cerevisiae endoplasmic reticulum for functional assembly of terpene synthesis pathway. Metab Eng. 2019:5650–5659. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Silverman A.M., Qiao K., Xu P., Stephanopoulos G. Functional overexpression and characterization of lipogenesis-related genes in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(8):3781–3798. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7376-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Arendt P., Miettinen K., Pollier J., De Rycke R., Callewaert N., Goossens A. An endoplasmic reticulum-engineered yeast platform for overproduction of triterpenoids. Metab Eng. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.02.007. 40165-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xu Y., Wang X., Zhang C., Zhou X., Xu X., Han L., Lv X., Liu Y., Liu S., Li J., Du G., Chen J., Ledesma-Amaro R., Liu L. De novo biosynthesis of rubusoside and rebaudiosides in engineered yeasts. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3040. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30826-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kang W., Ma T., Liu M., Qu J., Liu Z., Zhang H., Shi B., Fu S., Ma J., Lai L.T.F., He S., Qu J., Wing-Ngor Au S., Ho Kang B., Yu Lau W.C., Deng Z., Xia J., Liu T. Modular enzyme assembly for enhanced cascade biocatalysis and metabolic flux. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4248. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12247-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Siu K.-H., Chen R.P., Sun Q., Chen L., Tsai S.-L., Chen W. Synthetic scaffolds for pathway enhancement. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.009. 3698-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zuo R., Zhang Y., Jiang C., Hackett J.C., Loria R., Bruner S.D., Ding Y. Engineered P450 biocatalysts show improved activity and regio-promiscuity in aromatic nitration. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00897-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhao F., Bai P., Liu T., Li D., Zhang X., Lu W., Yuan Y. Optimization of a cytochrome P450 oxidation system for enhancing protopanaxadiol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113(8):1787–1795. doi: 10.1002/bit.25934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhu H.-Z., Jiang S., Wu J.-J., Zhou X.-R., Liu P.-Y., Huang F.-H., Wan X. Production of high levels of 3S,3′S-Astaxanthin in Yarrowia lipolytica via iterative metabolic engineering. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70(8):2673–2683. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c08072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jia F., Narasimhan B., Mallapragada S. Materials-based strategies for multi-enzyme immobilization and co-localization: a review. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111(2):209–222. doi: 10.1002/bit.25136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu Q., Zhang G., Su L., Liu P., Jia S., Wang Q., Dai Z. Reprogramming the metabolism of oleaginous yeast for sustainably biosynthesizing the anticarcinogen precursor germacrene A. Green Chem. 2023;25(20):7988–7997. doi: 10.1039/d3gc01661g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








