Table 2.
Statistical analysis of the changes in the suitability of Zelkova carpinifolia.
| Scenario | Ensemble Type |
Loss (km2) |
Loss % |
Absent (km2) |
Absent (%) |
Stable (km2) |
Stable (%) |
Gain (km2) |
Gain (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LGM Current |
Committee averaging |
157,322.4 | 8.0 | 1,494,887.0 | 76.3 | 25,648.5 | 1.3 | 281,916.4 | 14.4 |
|
Current-RCP2.6 2070 |
Committee averaging |
117,678.5 | 6.0 | 1,703,189.8 | 87.5 | 22,912.1 | 1.2 | 103,181.6 | 5.3 |
|
Current-RCP4.5 2070 |
Committee averaging |
139,989.4 | 7.2 | 1,665,532.3 | 85.5 | 39,547.2 | 2.0 | 101,910.6 | 5.2 |
|
Current-RCP8.5 2070 |
Committee averaging |
185,703.2 | 9.5 | 1,611,732.4 | 82.8 | 76,474.5 | 3.9 | 73,058.9 | 3.8 |
|
LGM Current |
Weighted mean |
222,430.9 | 11.3 | 1,519,185.8 | 77.5 | 17,136.2 | 0.9 | 201,603.1 | 10.3 |
|
Current-RCP2.6 2070 |
Weighted mean |
122,563.7 | 6.3 | 1,750,199.5 | 90.1 | 6293.1 | 0.3 | 63,075.3 | 3.2 |
|
Current-RCP4.5 2070 |
Weighted mean |
143,156.0 | 7.4 | 1,707,859.1 | 87.9 | 17,601.5 | 0.9 | 73,477.5 | 3.8 |
|
Current-RCP8.5 2070 |
Weighted mean |
186,805.4 | 9.6 | 1,653,622.6 | 85.1 | 48,981.4 | 2.5 | 52,697.9 | 2.7 |