Summary
Arterial disorders such as atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and aneurysm pose significant health risks, necessitating advanced interventions. Despite progress in artificial blood vessels and animal models aimed at understanding pathogenesis and developing therapies, limitations in graft functionality and species discrepancies restrict their clinical and research utility. Addressing these issues, bioengineered arterial equivalents (AEs) with enhanced vascular functions have been developed, incorporating innovative technologies that improve clinical outcomes and enhance disease progression modeling. This review offers a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in bioengineered AEs, systematically summarizing the bioengineered technologies used to construct these AEs, and discussing their implications for clinical application and pathogenesis understanding. Highlighting current breakthroughs and future perspectives, this review aims to inform and inspire ongoing research in the field, potentially transforming vascular medicine and offering new avenues for preclinical and clinical advances.
Subject areas: Cardiovascular medicine, Bioengineering
Graphical abstract
Cardiovascular medicine; Bioengineering
Introduction
The artery serves as an essential component of the human vascular system, responsible for the delivery of oxygen-rich blood from the heart to various tissues throughout the body.1 Despite their critical role, arteries are susceptible to a range of disorders, including atherosclerosis (AS), aneurysms, stenosis, and dissection, which can significantly compromise their function and lead to life-threatening diseases.2,3 For instance, AS is the pathological basis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), such as heart attack and stroke,4 which account for approximately 17 million global deaths annually, representing the leading cause of mortality worldwide.5 In clinical settings where saving a patient’s life is paramount, the restoration of arterial function often involves the bypassing or replacement of the affected arteries with either autologous or synthetic vessels.6 Besides, the pathogenesis of arterial diseases remains not fully understood, impeding the advancement of innovative therapeutic strategies and effective medication.7 Therefore, there is a pressing need for reliable tools that can accurately mimic both the physiological functions and pathological responses of human arteries for clinical and research purposes.
Currently, artificial grafts used in clinical practices for artery replacement are primarily composed of synthetic polymers, such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polyester (Dacron).8 These grafts are particularly effective for replacing large-diameter arteries such as the aorta and abdominal artery, where blood flow is rapid and occurs in a laminar fashion.9 Nevertheless, their application in smaller-diameter vessels is problematic due to the increased risk of thrombosis, attributable to slower and more turbulent blood flow which facilitates clot formation.10 Moreover, the inherent mechanical compliance mismatch between synthetic materials and the natural vascular tissue can lead to significant stress at the interface of the artery and the implant, potentially resulting in graft failure or neointimal hyperplasia.11 Additionally, these grafts produced from synthetic polymers may lack the capacity for adequate integration with the host’s tissues, manifesting deficiencies in crucial processes such as reendothelialization, muscularization, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, ultimately limiting their ability to transition from a foreign substance to a regenerated tissue. To address these challenges, there is a growing preference for living arterial equivalents (AEs) with biomimetic dimensions, structures, and physiological functions over rigid plastic conduits.
The concept of bioengineered blood vessels was first proposed by Weinberg and Bell in the 1980s,12 marking a significant milestone in the development of AEs as alternatives to conventional synthetic vascular grafts. With the advent of innovative biomaterials and flexible biofabrication techniques, the field of bioengineered AEs has seen considerable advancements. These biologically derived conduits are poised to transform clinical applications by closely replicating the mechanical and biological properties of native arteries.13 Not only do they facilitate the implantation process, but they also mitigate the adverse effects typically associated with synthetic products, such as clotting and stenosis,14 while promoting integration with the host through the incorporation of functional tissues such as endothelium and smooth muscles.15,16 Despite these achievements, consistent performance and long-term durability of these grafts continue to be a formidable challenge.
Given their high physiological relevance to human arteries, AEs also hold the potential for elucidating the pathogenesis of arterial diseases, serving as an alternative to traditional animal and 2D cell culture models. While in vivo and ex vivo models using experimental animals have provided invaluable insights into complex signaling pathways involved in arterial disease initiation and progression,17 discrepancies between species inevitably limit the applicability of these findings to human conditions.18 AEs, developed using human or patient-specific cells, are capable of precisely reflecting cellular responses to various stimuli, thus overcoming the limitations of animal experiments. Unlike 2D cultures, AEs offer a tissue-specific 3D microenvironment that supports controlled cell distribution, alignment, and dynamic biochemical and mechanical signals essential for promoting cellular functions and interactions.19,20 Furthermore, through thoughtful design, bioengineered AEs can be seamlessly integrated with cutting-edge techniques such as real-time biomedical imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) to conduct multifactorial analyses for accurate disease diagnosis and prognosis.21,22 However, constructing reliable and controllable AEs as in vitro models for studying arterial diseases under standardized and tunable blood flow conditions remains a critical research priority.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advances in bioengineered AEs and their applications in clinical practice and disease modeling (Figure 1). It begins by detailing the physiological features and functions of arteries, alongside prevalent pathogenic theories of arterial diseases, including AS, stenosis, aneurysm, and dissection. Subsequent sections systematically summarize the bioengineered technologies used to construct AEs, categorized into scaffold-based, cell-based, and dynamic devices, emphasizing their implications for clinical applications, and understanding of pathogenesis. Finally, it concludes by discussing current breakthroughs, challenges, and future perspectives in this rapidly evolving field.
Physiological function and pathological feature of the artery
To develop biomimetic artificial tissues/organs, it is crucial to understand the fundamental characteristics of their natural counterparts thoroughly. This section delves into the anatomy, structure, composition, function, and mechanical properties of human arteries crucial for bioengineered AEs (Figure 2). It also emphasizes the significance of comprehending pathogenesis and replicating pathological microenvironments for accurately modeling arterial diseases.
Anatomy and function of the artery
A detailed understanding of arterial anatomy and physiological functions is critical for the structural design, and selection of appropriate biomaterials, cells, and bioengineered techniques. Human arteries are composed of three distinct layers: the tunica intima, tunica media, and tunica adventitia.23 Each layer contains specialized vascular tissues, cells, and complex ECM components essential for performing specific physiological functions.24
The tunica intima includes an elastic layer composed of elastic fibers and an endothelial tissue made up of a single layer of endothelial cells (ECs).25 The primary function of the elastic layer is to provide elasticity and flexibility to the vessel wall, enabling it to adapt to dynamic pressure changes caused by blood flow.26 ECs are optimally arranged along the direction of blood flow to reduce blood flow resistance and maintain the stability of the vascular internal environment. These cells form a selectively permeable barrier through tight junctions, adherence junctions, and gap junctions, restricting nonspecific transendothelial migration of large molecules and cells.27 In addition, ECs maintain blood fluidity and prevent blood coagulation by releasing anticoagulant factors such as nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin, and tissue plasminogen activator, and by expressing thrombomodulin to inhibit platelet aggregation and fibrin formation.28,29 Besides, under inflammatory conditions, ECs upregulate the expression of intercellular adhesion molecules, selectins, and vascular cell adhesion molecules to promote the interaction between immune cells and ECs, guiding immune cells to migrate from the bloodstream to sites of inflammation or infection.30 Furthermore, under flow conditions, the EC initiates a signal to recruit SMCs and pericytes, contributing to the mechanical properties of the arterial wall that allow it to withstand high vascular pressures.31 The functional endothelium on the luminal surface is a critical component in the human artery and plays a significant role in the development of dependable bioengineered AEs.
The tunica media is the middle layer of the arterial wall, primarily composed of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and ECM (e.g., collagen, elastin) fibers. ECM fibers provide the main structural support for the tunica media, offering stability and elasticity to the vessel wall. SMCs can contract and relax, controlling the dilation and constriction of the aorta by this characteristic, thereby regulating the vessel’s internal diameter and resistance.32,33 Notably, SMCs exhibit different phenotypes based on their physiological or pathological states, primarily contractile and synthetic.34 While, the contractile SMCs are mainly responsible for vascular contraction, playing a crucial role in maintaining vascular tone and regulating blood pressure, the synthetic SMCs are involved in the synthesis of ECM proteins and regulating cell growth, especially during the repair and remodeling process after vascular injury.35,36,37 Therefore, the transformation of SMCs to the synthetic phenotype is a significant factor in the development of CVDs.38 Inhibition or reversal of this phenotypic transformation can slow down or even halt the process of cardiovascular remodeling, which is essential for constructing bioengineered AEs with long-term stability and functionality.
The tunica adventitia, the outermost layer, is composed of connective tissue that includes collagen and elastic fibers, vasa vasorum, adrenergic nerves, and lymphatic vessels.39 It provides structural support and elasticity, enabling the artery to withstand external pressures and protect the blood vessels. The adventitia houses various cell types, including fibroblasts, progenitor cells, and immune cells such as macrophages, T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells.40 These cells collaborate in the repair, remodeling, and tone regulation of blood vessels. In response to injury and stress, fibroblasts from the adventitia proliferate, differentiate into myofibroblasts, and migrate to the intima.41 They secrete factors that regulate the growth of ECs and VSMCs and recruit inflammatory and progenitor cells to the vessel wall.42 These processes are crucial for vascular repair and remodeling. In a majority of cases, the reconstruction of the adventitial layer is overlooked in the design and construction of bioengineered AEs. However, this layer not only provides necessary structural support and protection but also plays a crucial role in function, particularly in immune regulation, tissue remodeling, and integration, which is essential for reducing rejection reactions and enhancing the long-term stability and functionality of the implant.
Mechanical property and stimulation
Mechanical property
The natural arteries, endowed with densely packed and organized elastic and collagen fibers in the tunica media and adventitia, exhibit robust mechanical properties. Elastic fibers, with their excellent elasticity and recovery capabilities, are primarily responsible for the tissue’s extension and rebound after being subjected to force. In contrast, collagen fibers provide structural stability and tensile strength. Through stratification, directional arrangement, interweaving, spiral alignment, and guidance by ECM, these fibers form a complex network that can withstand pressure and maintain the structural integrity of the tissue. To prevent deformation and rupture from circulating blood flow, AEs should emulate key mechanical properties such as burst pressure, ultimate tensile strength, suture tension, and compliance.
Resembling the burst rupture of an inflating balloon, the burst pressure refers to the maximum pressure that a vascular vessel can withstand before an acute leak occurs and fails, depending mainly on the characteristics and arrangement of elastic and collagen fibers.43 The average burst pressure of small-diameter arteries (e.g., coronary artery) is 1681.6 ± 446.4 mmHg.44 To improve the burst pressure of the bioengineered AE, it is important to precisely control the strength and arrangement of ECM or ECM-mimicking fibers in the matrix.
Similar to burst pressure, the ultimate tensile strength measures an arterial vessel’s capacity to withstand tensile forces. This strength is enhanced by the orderly arrangement and proper cross-linking of extracellular matrix (ECM) fibers, which distribute stresses evenly and prevent the formation of local weak spots. For instance, the ultimate tensile strength ranges from 0.5–3 MPa in coronary arteries to 1.5–4 MPa in the radial, mammary, and saphenous veins, with strain values for natural blood vessels between 40 and 100%.11 Evaluating vascular tissue’s tensile strength can be performed through circumferential and longitudinal tensile strength tests.45
Suture tension, the maximum tension that arterial vessels can withstand during suturing, is a critical parameter in surgical procedures, especially in vascular anastomosis.46 Proper suture tension is essential for ensuring the stability of the anastomosis, promoting healing, preventing tissue damage, maintaining blood flow, and reducing postoperative complications. For example, a common femoral artery anastomosis usually requires a 5-0 Prolene suture, while a tibial artery may require a 6-0 or 7-0 Prolene suture.47,48 Inferior suture tension may lead to serious problems, including anastomosis narrowing, graft twisting, and angulation, which can affect the patency and dynamics of blood flow.49,50
Compliance in vascular grafts refers to the capacity for dimensional change in response to variations in intraluminal pressure.51 A mismatch between the compliance of a host artery and a graft can disrupt the hemodynamic flow and concentrate stress at the anastomosis, potentially leading to intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis.52,53 Arterial compliance, a key measure of elasticity, is commonly assessed in the central aorta, with an estimated compliance of 1.23 ± 0.48 mL/mmHg using the pulse pressure method.54 Dynamic radial compliance testing is an effective method to evaluate the compliance of grafts.55,56
A bioengineered AE, particularly for implantable grafts, should have mechanical performance similar to those of human arteries, ensuring that the graft can effectively mimic the function of natural arteries under physiological conditions and maintain structural and functional integrity after long-term implantation. Bioreactors are powerful tools for studying the effects of mechanical stimuli on the extracellular matrix structure and mechanical properties of engineered blood vessels, enabling optimal chemical biomechanical culture conditions.57
Hemodynamics
The association mechanism between hemodynamic conditions and vascular tissue is critical to mediate vascular physiopathology. Regulating flow signaling is crucial for developing arterial endothelium with physiological and pathological capabilities, and biomechanical analysis can identify patients prone to rapid plaque progression and destabilization.58 In general, the key mechanical stimulations caused by the blood flow involve shear stress, flow pattern, and wall pressure.
Shear stress is defined as the frictional force exerted by blood flow on ECs, with its magnitude being related to blood flow velocity, vascular diameter, and blood viscosity. Within the human arterial system, the normal range of shear stress values is approximately 10–70 dyne/cm2. The shear stress not only dictates cell alignment but also promotes the release of cytokines or biochemical factors from ECs.59,60 While physiological levels of shear stress can induce the release of NO from ECs, contributing to the regulation of vascular tone and offering beneficial effects such as inhibiting platelet aggregation, anti-inflammation, and anti-oxidation, excessively high shear stress may cause endothelial damage.61 In contrast, low oscillating shear stress may promote the formation of vascular diseases, such as AS.62
Flow pattern also plays a decisive role in regulating cell fates. In human arteries, the normal laminar flow pattern, characterized by orderly fluid layers parallel to the vessel wall, applies stable shear stress to ECs, promoting an anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic phenotype expression, which helps maintain the stability of the vascular internal environment.63 However, at arterial bends or bifurcations, the flow pattern may shift to turbulent or transitional flow, leading to ECs dysfunction and an increased risk of AS.64 This shift in flow pattern is accompanied by the generation of abnormal shear stress, which activates signaling pathways within ECs, causing significant changes in cell morphology and function, including cytoskeletal rearrangement and adjustments in intercellular junctions, ultimately promoting arterial wall remodeling and the progression of aneurysms.
Wall pressure is determined by the interplay of cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance, which is influenced by factors such as vascular geometry, compliance, and blood viscosity. The normal arterial blood pressure range for healthy adults is approximately a systolic pressure of 90–120 mmHg and a diastolic pressure of 60–80 mmHg.65 Wall pressure affects vascular function by ensuring blood flow, inducing vascular remodeling in response to chronic hypertension, regulating the release of endothelium-derived vasoactive substances, and deteriorating the degenerative progress of arterial walls in relevant diseases such as aneurysm and dissection.66,67
Pathogenesis of human arterial diseases
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory vascular disease, which is also related to the mechanisms of age-related diseases.68 The characterized by lipid deposition, inflammatory responses, and fibrosis within the arterial wall, leading to atherosclerotic plaque formation.69 These plaques can narrow arteries, disrupt blood flow, and increase the risk of heart disease and stroke.70
Among various hypotheses for explaining the pathogenesis of AS, the endothelial dysfunction theory is widely regarded as the central and dominant theory (Figure 3A).71 Accordingly, endothelial dysfunction is considered the initial trigger, where ECs are injured by abnormal hemodynamics, hyperlipidemia, and inflammatory stimulation, resulting in the decreased synthesis of NO and the increased expression of adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1, VCAM-1, selectins), facilitating the recruitment of monocytes and T cells.72,73 Meanwhile, lipids, particularly Ox-LDL, accumulate in the arterial intima, are taken up by macrophages, and transformed into lipid-rich foam cells. These cells, along with the ECM proliferation of SMCs, form plaques that can grow and cause arterial lumen stenosis.74
For in vitro modeling of AS, precise definition and control of the pathogenic microenvironment and condition is necessary. Key early events in the model must include endothelial dysfunction, marked by reduced NO production and increased adhesion molecule expression. The simulations that help to initiate AS include the introduction of inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), IL-1β, and IL-6, essential drivers of the inflammatory cascade at high concentrations in lesions.68 Another central is Ox-LDL, alongside the recruitment and activation of immune cells such as monocytes and lymphocytes.75 Additionally, hemodynamic changes such as alterations in shear stress and mechanical stress on vascular walls are crucial.
Thrombosis
Atherosclerosis not only thickens and hardens arterial walls but also exposes blood when its unstable plaques rupture, triggering thrombosis and heightening the risk of cardiovascular events. Thrombosis involves abnormal blood clotting within vessels, potentially leading to severe health issues such as stroke, heart attack, and deep vein thrombosis, collectively responsible for approximately 25% of global deaths.
Thrombosis is a complex physiological process that includes vascular endothelial cell injury, platelet adhesion and activation, activation of the coagulation cascade, and hemodynamic interactions (Figure 3B).76 Increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels activate calcium channels, resulting in red blood cell (RBC) damage and reduced deformability, thereby increasing blood viscosity.77 Elevated ROS levels and increased blood viscosity promote the activation of platelets responsible for hemostasis and thrombosis. Oxidative stress also induces the expression of adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1, VCAM-1) and inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, and MCP-1), enhancing the adhesion of platelets and ECs and promoting leukocyte migration to ECs, which further elevates the risk of thrombosis.78 Additionally, the shear rate of blood flow significantly influences platelet aggregation and activation; low shear rates favor aggregation, whereas high shear rates may enhance platelet activation.
Given the intricate nature of thrombosis, encompassing cell adhesion, platelet signaling, and the precise timing and location of clot formation, conventional research methods may struggle to accurately replicate this process. This challenge underscores the growing demand for advanced in vitro models.
Aneurysm
Different from AS which is associated with a process of arterial wall thickening and hardening, the aneurysm represents the tissue degenerative pathological process. An aneurysm is the result of localized abnormal dilation of the arterial wall, primarily due to structural weakening that renders it incapable of withstanding normal blood pressure, leading to permanent expansion, which is typically manifest in two forms: saccular (asymmetric outpouchings) or fusiform (circular dilation).79
Similar to the inflammatory mechanisms observed in AS, the formation and development of aneurysms are significantly influenced by inflammatory responses (Figure 3C). Inflammation typically initiates within the dysfunctional endothelium, regulated by nuclear factor-kappa B, secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-13, and MCP-1.80 This induces the recruitment of immune cells (monocytes, macrophages, T-cells), altering VSMC phenotypes. SMCs, key matrix-synthetic cells, proliferate with a pro-inflammatory phenotype,81 degrading the internal elastic lamina and promoting ECM remodeling.82 Both involved immune cells and phenotypically switched SMCs can express MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9) that gradually degrade arterial ECM. This cascade, in turn, recruits inflammatory cells, upregulates proteolytic enzymes, and reduces contractile gene/protein expression, such as myosin heavy chain and α-actin). Ultimately, these changes diminish collagen synthesis, exacerbate VSMC loss, and weaken the arterial wall, predisposing it to aneurysm rupture.
In the development of in vitro models of aneurysms, precise design of geometric morphology and hemodynamic conditions is pivotal. Aneurysms exhibit diverse and complex shapes, and accurately replicating these features is crucial for recreating the complexity of the hemodynamics signals within the local lesions, such as blood flow velocity, pressure distribution, and fluid shear forces. Besides, as the inflammation cascade is another critical pathogenic factor of the aneurysm, it is indispensable to establish biomimetic vascular tissue analogs that are responsive to relevant stimuli for the recapitulation of the tissue degenerative process.
Prevailing technologies for bioengineered arterial equivalents
Scaffold-based technologies
Mold-casting
Mold-casting is a straightforward engineering technique used to create AEs by casting a solution of biomaterials and cells into an annular mold, which then crosslinks to form the designed 3D structures.83 The first bioengineered blood vessel, constructed using such a method, was 7.5 cm long with a 6-millimeter inner diameter (Figure 4A).12 It comprised layers designed to mimic natural blood vessels, using collagen with SMCs, an additional wrapped dacron mesh, and an endothelial lining created by seeding ECs on the luminal surface. However, even with the reinforcement of a polyester mesh, its burst pressure only reaches 40 to 70 mmHg which is vulnerable to implantation. The inherent softness of natural polymers such as fibrin,84,85 gelatin,86 and elastin87 pose challenges in load-bearing applications despite the biological advantages.
Efforts to enhance the mechanical properties of natural hydrogels have involved modifying the crosslinking methods.90 For instance, chemical crosslinking, which creates strong covalent bonds between molecules, can significantly improve the mechanical strength of collagen compared to thermally induced self-assembly.91 This method also promotes a uniform network that distributes stress evenly, enhances resistance to enzymatic degradation, and improves stability.92 For instance, using Type I bovine collagen gel with transglutaminase-mediated crosslinking, which forms covalent amide bonds between protein fibers, significantly increases the burst pressure (71 ± 4 mmHg vs. 46 ± 3 mmHg). To reinforce the mechanical strength of hydrogels, other methods such as small molecule crosslinkers (e.g., glutaraldehyde,93 catechol compounds,94 genipin,95 and tannic acid96), photoinitiated crosslinking (ultraviolet97 or visible light98), and non-enzymatic glycation99 techniques have been applied, though some conditions may compromise cell viability.
Alternatively, interpenetrating network hydrogel paves a way to reinforce the mechanical properties of materials by integrating the merits of multiple components. For instance, an alginate/acrylamide double-crosslinked hydrogel exhibits excellent mechanical properties, in which the reversible crosslinking alginate offers elasticity while the acrylamide provides robust frames (Figure 4B). The elongation rate can optimally reach 196%, and the hydrogel tube, even after sewing, retains the shape perfectly before stretching, after stretching, and after perfusion. The small diameter graft (inner diameter: 0.2–1.2 mm) built with this material was implanted into a rabbit model for 28 days, demonstrating good patency.88 In addition, mold-casting based on 3D molds provides a new idea for the preparation of bioengineered arteries.
Besides improving the strength of biomaterials, the application of mechanical stimulation through bioreactors stimulates cells to synthesize and organize the matrix composition, thereby improving the mechanical properties of the construct.100,101,102 This process aids in forming tissue with an elastic modulus similar to that of natural tissue and promotes effective ECM production by cells.103 In a representative study, fibroblasts-laden fibrin tubes were mounted on a bioreactor that supplies pulsatile flow (pulse frequency: 0.5 Hz, peak circumferential strain: 7.3 ± 1.9%) to train the cell via cyclical distension and transmural flow (Figure 4C).89 Upon such dynamic cultures for 2–9 weeks, the vascular grafts were extensively remodeled by cells, encompassing circumferentially aligned collagen and other ECM component fibers, achieving mechanical anisotropy comparable to natural arteries, with burst pressures in the range of 1400–1600 mmHg and compliance similar to native arteries.
While traditional molding techniques face limitations in precisely controlling the microstructural organization, leading to suboptimal mechanical performance for clinical use, they are valuable as preclinical in vitro models to test drug efficacy, study disease mechanisms, and guide treatments.104,105
Electrospinning
Electrospinning is a technique that utilizes a high-voltage field to eject a polymer solution or melt, generating a polymer jet to produce polymer fibers.106 This method can replicate the microstructure of ECM,107 providing a wide range of fiber diameters and pore sizes (from nanometers to microns),108 a high surface area-to-volume ratio, and porosity structures that effectively promote tissue formation after cell seeding.
By using a rotating drum for fiber deposition, it is easy to construct vessel-like constructs with tunable microstructures.109 With the increased concentration of electrospun polymer solutions, the fiber diameter, pore size, porosity, and pore interconnectivity significantly increase.110 Adjustments to collector rotational speed or the use of metal plates can improve fiber orientation.111,112 For example, electrospun fibrin fibers can be wrapped around a mandrel forming a controlled microstructure with circumferential and longitudinal alignment (Figure 5A).113 The controlled surface morphology of the hollow fibrin ultrafine fiber tubes guides the formation of confluent ECs both in vitro and in vivo. Within 3-4 days in vitro, the cells immediately and controllably adhere to form confluent endothelial layers, while generating stable endothelialization can be observed after 4 weeks’ implantation, representing a promising approach for arterial bypass surgery.
Electrospinning offers strong adaptability in materials, enabling the combination of natural polymer (e.g., collagen,116 gelatin,117 fibrin,118 alginate119) with synthetic polymers (e.g., polylactic acid (PLA),120,121,122 polycaprolactone (PCL),120,123,124,125 poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)126,127,128) for co-spinning to optimize both bioactivity and mechanical properties. In constructing electrospun multilayer scaffolds for arterial grafts, varying materials, pore sizes, and fiber orientations allow for a flexible definition of each layer’s properties (mechanical, topological, biological), effectively mimicking the structure of native arteries.129 For instance, the technology to fabricate scaffolds from bovine gelatin and PCL involves sequential electrospinning and co-electrospinning.130 The sequential approach enables layer-by-layer structure development, whereas co-electrospinning achieves better fiber alignment and a more optimal pore area ratio. The resulting structure exhibits a yield strain of 38.72 ± 3.23% and a tensile strength of 3.46 ± 0.088 MPa. Furthermore, the mesh membrane produced by co-electrospinning enhances NIH3T3 fibroblasts' adhesion and proliferation, demonstrating excellent biocompatibility.
Another advantage of electrospinning lies in the incorporation of various bioactive factors for co-manufacturing, thereby enhancing bioactivity or anticoagulation. The fabrication of vascular grafts through the use of coaxial electrospinning involves the incorporation of heparin-VEGF and PCL (as the core) as well as a shell composed of a blend of PCL and gelatin (Figure 5B).114 The shell structure undergoes degradation to release heparin-VEGF, while the core provides mechanical strength. Upon implantation into the aorta of rats for a period of four months, they demonstrate smooth muscle cell regeneration and complete endothelialization, with a patency rate of 100%. The introduction of bioactive molecules provides an alternative option for small-diameter peripheral or arterial vascular remodeling and repair.
Electrospun vascular grafts, while beneficial, still exhibit several limitations that affect their clinical effectiveness and need addressing. First, the degradation of synthetic polymers can release by-products that potentially alter pH levels, disrupt cellular functions and growth, and may trigger local inflammatory responses.131,132 Second, controlling the degradation rate, which involves both hydrolytic and enzymatic processes, remains a challenge. Additionally, a critical issue is the mismatch of radial mechanical compliance at the anastomotic site, which can lead to intimal hyperplasia and ultimately graft failure.133,134 To overcome these issues, it is crucial to optimize the scaffold structure for uniform morphology and mechanical properties. Using melt electrospinning writing (MEW) provides superior control over the scaffold’s morphological structure. For instance, scaffolds with a wavy circumferential microfiber arrangement mimic natural collagen fiber alignment and exhibit physiological compliance (12.9 ± 0.6% per 100 mmHg),115 enhancing their potential for successful integration and function in clinical applications (Figure 5C).
Decellularized arterial tissue
Decellularized arterial tissue represents a significant advancement in replicating the natural ECM microenvironment, overcoming the limitations of artificial structures made from biomaterials. This technique, which involves removing cellular components while preserving essential ECM features such as microstructures and protein compositions, is critical for promoting cell adhesion, differentiation, and proliferation. It has been successfully applied to various tissues including blood vessels,135 skin,136 heart,137 lungs,138 liver,139 and kidneys.140,141
The process for decellularizing blood vessels typically combines physical (freeze-thaw cycles and agitation), chemical (detergents, chelating agents), and biological (enzymes) treatments.142 An example is the human umbilical artery (HUA), which, after decellularization, has been tested in sheep models for carotid artery bypass, showing initial success but also challenges such as immunological mismatch leading to occlusion (Figure 6A).143
Human vascular tissues, such as saphenous vein,145 human umbilical vein,146 and human common femoral artery,147 are ideal for creating decellularized grafts, though sourcing human tissues for large-scale production presents challenges. Alternatively, animal tissues (e.g., pig,148 bovine,149 ovine150) are considered, ensuring minimal immunogenicity and safety. The effectiveness of decellularization is leveled by the absence of nuclear material and dsDNA content below 50 ng/mg ECM (dry weight).142,151 Additionally, any toxic biochemical reagents (e.g., SDS,152,153 Triton X-100,154 and so forth) used in the process must be thoroughly removed to avoid adverse effects.
Commercially, decellularized vascular products from mammalian sources such as bovine carotid arteries are available, but these lack control over dimensions such as diameter, wall thickness, and length, limiting their use in personalized medicine. To address this, integrating decellularization with advanced bioengineered techniques has been explored (Figure 6B).144 For instance, vascular grafts enhanced with multiple layers (15–20 layers) of SMCs have been developed using a biodegradable polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh scaffold within a bioreactor, followed by decellularization, leaving a robust collagen ECM (Figure 6C).135 These bioengineered vessels, seeded with recipient-specific ECs, showed reduced neointimal hyperplasia and proliferative cell activity.
Moreover, transforming decellularized tissues into tractable biomaterials such as hydrogels or powders expands their application potential. For example, dECM bioink derived from porcine aortic tissue has been used to 3D bioprint dual-layered vascular grafts with adjustable dimensions, offering enhanced support for ECs and SMCs, and leading to functional AEs suitable for in vivo studies.155,156 This approach not only addresses dimensional limitations but also enhances the functionality and applicability of decellularized tissues in clinical settings.
3D bioprinting
3D bioprinting is a cutting-edge biofabrication technology that strategically places cells, biomaterials, and bioactive molecules in three-dimensional arrangements to reconstruct complex vascular structures in vitro.157,158,159 This technology incorporates various biofabrication strategies for crafting artificial blood vessel grafts and models, each offering unique benefits and challenges.
One approach is the classical layer-by-layer deposition, which provides meticulous control over the vascular architecture, allowing for the emulation of natural blood vessel multilayered tissue. Utilizing a high-viscosity nano-engineered bioink made from gelatin methacryloyl, polyethylene glycol diacrylate, and nanosilicate, this method encapsulates SMCs and extrudes them to form cylindrical structures (Figure 7A).160 ECs are subsequently seeded to complete the 3D bioprinted vessels. Despite its precision, this strategy typically relies on the use of high-viscosity bioinks to ensure stable material deposition and precise structure formation during the printing process. However, the viscous bioink can compromise cell viability due to the necessary high shear forces during printing.161
To address this problem by improving the printability of soft hydrogels, a suspension 3D bioprinting approach has been developed, which allows for the freeform deposition of low-viscosity bioinks into a supporting medium with shear-recovery properties.164 Using gelatin, which does not negatively impact cellular integration and is thermally reversible, as a support bath material, rheological analysis indicates that the gelatin slurry behaves and remains a Bingham plastic at room temperature (Figure 7B).162 Alginate hydrogel was used to print arterial tree structures (wall thickness: 1 mm, diameter: 1–3 mm) within this support bath, resulting in well-formed internal lumens and bifurcations.
An innovative method involves the sequentially suspended 3D bioprinting of different cell-laden bioinks to create multi-layered arterial models.165,166 Such a strategy first employs microgel-based biphasic (MB) bioink as a supportive embedding medium for 3D bioprinting, which facilitates the creation of complex external geometries of natural vessels (Figure 7C).163 Using sacrificial gelatin bioink enriched with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), embedded printing is performed into newly printed but uncrosslinked constructs. This process generates free-form vascular networks by leveraging the reversible self-healing behavior of the MB bioink. Following the photopolymerization of the suspension medium, the gelatin strands with HUVECs are liquefied at 37°C. The printed constructs are flipped, ensuring uniform adhesion of cells to the luminal surface, and post-cultivation results in the formation of a uniform, confluent endothelial layer. The sequentially suspended 3D bioprinting provides unmatched bioprinting capabilities to accelerate the replication of complex organ geometries and internal structures, facilitating the biomanufacturing of tissues and organs.
Coaxial 3D bioprinting, another impressive method, allows the simultaneous deposition of different cell types and bioinks, tailored for replicating the intricate, multi-layered vascular system.167 This method necessitates meticulous technical control over bioink flow and intermixing to fabricate composite cell-layered vessels. Using vascular tissue-specific bioink containing HUVECs and human aortic smooth muscle cells (HAoSMCs), and a reservoir-assisted triple coaxial nozzle (18G/14G/10G) where the intermediate and shell needles contain Ca2+-laden Pluronic F127, extrusion through the core nozzle supports vessel fabrication (Figure 7D).15 This triple coaxial cell printing technique directly constructs biomimetic vascular grafts composed of a separate endothelial layer and muscle layer (inner diameter: 2 mm, wall thickness: 1 mm). The technology also permits customized adjustments to bio-ink properties, facilitating the design of vessels with tailored elasticity and cell-supportive characteristics, holding promise for advancing cardiovascular therapies and enabling more personalized and effective medical solutions.
In short, selecting the right 3D bioprinting strategy depends on the specific requirements and intended functions of the fabricated blood vessels. While each method has its applications and limitations, ongoing advancements in 3D bioprinting technology are expected to further enhance artificial blood vessel performance and open new avenues for treating CVDs.
In vivo bioengineered biotubes
In vivo bioengineered techniques leverage the interaction between host tissues and implants to construct AEs, known as biotubes, by subcutaneously embedding specially designed molds.168 This process involves the immune system recognizing the implant as a foreign body, which stimulates the formation of fibrous capsules around the molds, ultimately forming biotubes. Additionally, the structure and size of the biotubes can be tailored according to the specifications of the implant.
This method has been used to create fully autologous vascular grafts directly within the body, eliminating issues such as immune mismatch or infection risks associated with ex vivo manufactured vascular structures. For example, a transparent nylon mold with a helical shell (inner diameter: 7 or 8 mm) and a core rod (outer diameter: 4 or 5 mm) was implanted in Beagle dogs' subcutaneous pouches for one or two months (Figure 8A).169 This resulted in the formation of a tubular collagen tissue within the mold, and after its removal, a 25 cm biotube (inner diameter: 4 mm) was obtained. When used as an arterial graft in dogs, arterial reconstruction occurred three months post-transplantation. Despite good biocompatibility, endothelialization, and vascular regeneration, these grafts may lack sufficient mechanical strength (unit breaking force: 0.7 N/mm, burst pressure: 1500 mmHg), which can lead to post-transplant rupture and aneurysm formation.
To further improve its mechanical properties, integration of polymer melts spinning technology with in vivo bioengineered has been explored, resulting in heat-treated medium-fiber-angle poly(ε-caprolactone) fiber skeletons-reinforced biotubes (hMPBs). These enhanced biotubes maintain their shape and structure even after common surgical manipulations such as coiling, folding, twisting, and clamping (Figure 8B).170 While polymer implants offer a simple, cost-effective solution with the potential for broad application, the bio-integration period for these grafts often spans several weeks, which may not suit acute surgical needs. Additionally, achieving the required lengths for procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting may be challenging with in situ engineered vessels.
Cell-based technologies
Cell-based technologies are advancing bioengineered by leveraging the natural tissue-forming capabilities of cells, bypassing the limitations of scaffolds-based techniques that can inhibit cell-cell interactions due to the presence of biomaterials.171,172 These methods utilize spheroidal cell aggregates and cell sheets, allowing cells to self-organize without scaffold interference. This approach eliminates biomaterials, significantly enhances cell density, and fosters robust cell-cell interactions, crucial for developing functional tissues. This shift toward scaffold-free bioengineered aims to more naturally and efficiently replicate the complexity of natural arteries.
Cell spheroids assembly
Cell spheroids serve as the foundational units for cell-based biofabrication, produced through various techniques including hanging-drop,173 low-adherence substrate,174 microwells,175 microfluidic.176 The assembly of these spheroids forms cellular structures without scaffolds and promotes extensive cell interactions and ECM production. A key aspect of this method involves safely manipulating these "biobricks" to construct complex structures.
Introduced in 2010, the cell spheroid assembly technique utilized primary human arterial fibroblasts cultured in a 60-well plate, leading to the development of a bioreactor integrated with a ring-shaped mold that could hold 4000 to 5000 micro-tissues (Figure 9A).177 After 14 days of flow and mechanical stimulation, fibroblasts reorganized along the vascular axis, forming small-diameter vessels (diameter: 3 mm, length: 5 mm, wall thickness: 1 mm).
The cell spheroid can also be magnetically assembled for the manufacturing of arterial grafts. In a representative study, magnetic nanoparticles were incorporated into the spheroids to facilitate the assembly and fusion of cellular aggregates, with thousands of magnetic cell spheroids assembled into a vascular tissue structure with a diameter of 5 mm (Figure 9B).178 Despite concerns over the impact on cell viability, optimization of nanoparticle internalization has enhanced cell vitality and maintained phenotype in this report.
Further integration with 3D bioprinting technology has allowed for the precise construction of tubular structures (diameter: 900 μm, wall thickness: 300 μm) using multicellular spheroids containing SMCs and fibroblasts on a template built by agarose rods, which fuse over a period of 5–7 days to form branched, large blood vessel-like structures (Figure 9C).179 By designing vessels of different shapes and using different cell types, intricate arterial structures are constructed in composition and architecture.
However, challenges remain in placing and stabilizing spheroids without supportive materials (e.g., agarose strands). To address this problem, an innovative assembly approach called the Kenzan method additionally uses a micro-needle array for precise 3D layering and stacking of spheroids, promoting three-dimensional organization and conferring specific tissue architecture and mechanical strength.159,181,182 Upon the spheroids fusion and removal of needle arrays, such a 3D assembly method can manufacture tubular constructs as vascular grafts (Figure 9D).180 The Kenzan approach has been successfully applied to reconstruct small-diameter blood vessels (diameter: 1.5 mm, length: 7 mm) using the spheroid of human dermal fibroblasts for the transplantation into an immunodeficient pig model, showing no immune rejection and maintaining structural integrity as a blood flow channel over three months.183
While promising for producing arterial grafts, the cell spheroid assembly method faces challenges in maintaining cell viability, enhancing mechanical strength, and scaling for industrial applications. Future research should focus on refining these techniques to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and clinical applicability of manufacturing arterial grafts.
Cell sheets assembly
Cell sheet technology differs from spheroid-based methods by cultivating cells into a paper-like structure that can be harvested intact without enzymes by simply adjusting the culture conditions.184,185,186 This technique allows for the wrapping of cell sheets around a temporary mandrel to create bio-conduits easily.
L'Heureux et al.187 pioneered a scaffold-free method for producing vascular grafts by cultivating layered sheets of ECs, SMCs, or other relevant cells, which are then rolled to form functional grafts. This cell sheet technique was used to assemble the first tissue-engineered blood vessel suitable for autologous small-diameter arterial reconstruction in adult patients.188 Dermis fibroblasts cultured to enhance ECM protein production fused into a uniform tissue after about 10 weeks, creating multilayered vessels with burst pressures over 3,000 mmHg9.
However, manually wrapping cell sheets may limit the development of artificial arteries with precise dimensions and cell alignment. Integrating technologies such as electrospinnig189 and surface engineering190 with cell sheets can produce size-tunable and morphology-controllable sheets. In a representative study, the stress-induced rolling membrane (SIRM) technique, which is based on the release of internal stress due to the stretching of the top layer, allows for the adhesion of two layers with different surface morphologies, resulting in the formation of a cohesive structure that can roll freely at one end, yielding a tube with controllable dimensions. Using the SIRM technology, vascular grafts with an inner diameter ranging from 10 μm to 2 mm can be fabricated (Figure 10A).191 Concurrently, through the rolling process, simple patterns on a 2D membrane are transformed into complex patterns within a 3D tube. These tubes are capable of simulating the unique inner layer of HUVECs, the middle layer of SMCs, and the outer layer of NIH3T3 fibroblasts, replicating their natural arrangement within the body.
Additionally, to replicate the 3D helical and interwoven organization of SMCs in natural vessels, aligned human mesenchymal stem cells (HMSCs) sheets were prepared on nanogrates and wrapped around a mandrel layer-by-layer (Figure 10B).192 After two weeks of maturation and removal from the mandrel, a tubular structure with circumferentially aligned HMSCs is formed, showing integration and uniform alignment after three weeks of perfusion maturation. Based on the cell sheet technology, the loss of scaffold-based mechanical support is compensated for by employing additional cell layers and extended maturation periods to mitigate the adverse effects on in vivo applications. However, in the pursuit of these improvements, it is also necessary to consider the increased material consumption and time costs.
Despite the innovative approach, cell sheets technology faces challenges including high costs, complex processes, and total production cycles for clinical availability (an average of 7.5 months).193,194,195 Issues such as inconsistent layer fusion due to individual variability, inadequate ECM formation in the short term, and difficulty in controlling graft geometry and mechanical properties during the rolling process affect the production consistency and quality of the grafts.
Bioengineered dynamic devices as arterial equivalents
Regular AEs, while dimensionally and structurally biomimetic, struggle with real-time imaging due to the thick arterial walls (>500μm) that reduce imaging quality and necessitate sectioning and staining. This complicates the observation of cellular responses and the integration of advanced technologies such as AI and big data, which could foster significant breakthroughs. Additionally, constructing these arterial models is both time-consuming and expensive, requiring vast quantities of cells and materials. Bioengineered dynamic devices, including organ-on-a-chip systems, are showing potential as tools for modeling human arteries. These devices may offer advantages over traditional isometric artery equivalents in certain aspects of pathological research and drug screening by providing more dynamic and physiologically relevant environments.
Using advanced bioengineered techniques, dynamic devices, such as vasculature-on-a-chip,196 capture complex flow dynamics seen in blood vessels, including the unstable turbulent flows at bifurcations and curvatures that expose ECs to uneven shear forces, potentially triggering inflammation and AS.197 Various specialized vascular structures have been engineered to replicate these conditions, including stenosis-integrated channel,198 continues channel,199 branching channels,200 H-shaped channel,201 T-shaped channel,202 Y-shaped channel,203 using techniques such as sacrificial molding,204,205 self-assembled microfluidic approaches,206,207 stereolithography, and 3D printing.208 Yet, these models often feature only a single endothelial layer, limiting their ability to explore interactions under pathological conditions between ECs and SMCs, which failed to be categorized as AEs.
In contrast, the AE dynamic device (or artery on-a-chip) should recapitulate the key physiological features of the human artery. For instance, the chip should reconstruct the dual-layered structure that separately embeds ECs and SMCs, resembling the characteristics of an arterial wall.209 Moreover, the device should be also able to provide physiological hemodynamic signals such as flow rate, flow pattern, and shear stress.
Various techniques are being explored to construct and shape rapidly perfused vascular-such as structures. Fabrication of biomimetic vascular structures via coaxial bioprinting techniques, utilizing a 3D-printed porous poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate mold. SMCs are suspended within a bioink composed of a mixture of alginate, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), and fibronectin, and then coaxially printed to obtain cell-laden vascular constructs (Figure 11A).210 After perfusion culture for seven days to allow for SMC stretching and migration to form a confluent layer on the luminal surface, HUVECs are seeded. Cultivation results in a multi-layered structure resembling that of a blood vessel.
To manufacture the in silico AEs with multi-layered structures and tunable geometries, 3D bioprinting has demonstrated its unique advantages. The construction of multi-layered arterial models with varying internal diameters and wall thicknesses was accomplished using sequentially suspended 3D bioprinting technique technology.211 These models are capable of simulating the complex geometric structures of human arteries (Figure 11B). The models were utilized for the in vitro simulation of the pathophysiological processes initiating arterial diseases. Through co-culture and the simulation of fluid shear stress (FSS), the models mature into functionally competent vascular tissues. By simulating local turbulent flow, researchers observed the onset of EC dysfunction, which is a hallmark of arterial diseases.
Except for the cellular interaction and hemodynamics, another essential dynamic factor is the arterial vascular wall undergoing continuous contraction and relaxation. The mechanical stimulation of the model through isometric and isotonic forces is crucial for the pathophysiological functions of the vasculature. This can be simulated using mechanisms of elongation and contraction. Techniques such as using a Transwell elastic membrane213 and vacuum control,214 have been employed to induce deformation. In in vitro models of early AS (Figure 11C),212 elastic membranes embedded in microfluidic devices can transmit non-uniform strain to VSMCs, ECs, and adhering monocytes. Stretchable microfluidic devices have been used to induce foam cell formation under low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and stretch treatments and to evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin in inhibiting foam cell formation.
Overall, the integration of microfluidic and bioengineered technologies in dynamic AE devices offers a promising pathway for advancing the simulation of human vascular structures and diseases, combining the simplicity, usability, and cost-effectiveness of traditional models with enhanced physiological relevance.
Bioengineered clinical-level arterial equivalents
Artificial blood vessels are imperative tools for clinical surgeries such as coronary artery bypass, treating peripheral artery disease, and establishing hemodialysis access. The implantation conditions, which involve exposure to strong blood pressure and a complex physiological microenvironment, require vascular grafts to meet stringent specifications. For successful implantation, these grafts must not only resist and facilitate effective blood flow but also maintain structural integrity post-implantation. They need to demonstrate essential mechanical properties such as ultimate tensile strength, suture retention, burst pressure, compliance, and long-term fatigue resistance qualities that are comparable to natural arteries to withstand physiological blood flow conditions, as detailed in section 2.2.1. Additionally, to ensure long-term success and integration with host tissue, the grafts must also mitigate risks such as acute thrombosis and stenosis and support cellular functions.215 This involves incorporating anti-thrombogenic properties and promoting endothelialization to prevent immune rejection, ensuring the grafts perform effectively in clinical settings. This section highlights recent progress in bioengineered AEs that have brought these technologies closer to clinical application, marking significant advancements in the field.
Before progressing to clinical trials, vascular grafts require thorough preclinical evaluations using both small (e.g., mice,216 rabbit217,218) and large animal models (e.g., dog,170 pig,219 sheep169). These evaluations primarily assess biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and initial biological responses to ensure the safety, efficacy, and functionality of the grafts. While many studies have reported on the in vivo performances of bioengineered AEs using animal models, the number of these products that advance to clinical trials remains limited. This discrepancy highlights the challenges in translating preclinical successes into clinically approved therapies.
The first bioengineered vascular graft used for the clinical trial was developed in 2001 using the cells from peripheral venous walls expanded and seeded onto biodegradable polymer conduits made from PCL and PLA copolymers, which was reinforced with woven PGA (diameter 10 mm, length 20 mm, thickness 1 mm). These scaffold-based tissue-engineered vascular grafts were implanted in a four-year-old patient with a single ventricle and pulmonary atresia,220 successfully recanalizing an occluded pulmonary artery without postoperative complications. Subsequent checks showed full patency and no adverse changes seven months post-implantation.
As an innovative way for bioengineered vascular grafts, cell sheet technology has been used for autologous small-diameter arterial reconstruction in adults.188 Fibroblasts isolated from patient’s own body are cultured to deposit ECM, forming detachable viscous sheets. These sheets are layered to create three-dimensional tissues or organs, exhibiting physiological mechanical strength. A clinical trial involving 10 end-stage renal disease patients demonstrated these grafts could withstand arterial pressures for at least three months, with ongoing monitoring up to 13 months post-implantation. However, the lengthy production time of 7.5 months poses significant logistical and cost challenges.221 Utilizing off-the-shelf allogeneic grafts that have been cryopreserved at −80°C post-production as an alternative can mitigate the potential risks associated with autologous tissue harvesting and processing, thereby demonstrating the feasibility and safety of transitioning to an allogeneic nonliving platform (Figure 12A).193
Another representative case for clinical application is the decellularized bioengineered biotubes. In particular, human VSMCs were seeded onto a PGA mesh scaffold within a bioreactor. Once the constructs have completed their ex vivo growth, they are decellularized to eliminate the potential for immunogenicity, thereby yielding human acellular vessels (HAVs) that possess compositional, biomechanical properties, and structural similarities to native vascular tissue. Currently, HAVs are undergoing clinical trials in adults for vascular trauma and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis.225 Thirteen patients lacking autologous venous repair have been treated with HAVs to repair various arteries, including the superficial femoral artery, common femoral artery (Figure 12B), popliteal artery, and brachial artery.222 All HAVs maintained primary patency, with no reported infections or amputations of the affected limbs, and no reports of HAVs conduit infections or mechanical failures during a 7-month follow-up period. For ESRD patients unsuitable for fistulas, hemodialysis access grafts represent the optimal choice for chronic hemodialysis. HAV implantation in the arms of adults with ESRD for hemodialysis has been reported (Figure 12C).223 After five years, one patient maintained primary patency, and ten patients maintained secondary patency (Figure 12D).224 Considering deaths and dropouts, the secondary patency rate at five years was 58.2%, providing ESRD patients with a long-term, durable, and functional hemodialysis access.
Despite advances, bioengineered AEs as vascular grafts face challenges such as the need for faster production and increased availability. Issues with mechanical properties in small-caliber grafts also persist, necessitating further development of reinforced in vivo engineered vessels. Moreover, graft infections remain a serious concern, requiring ongoing research to optimize treatment strategies. Epidemiologic studies, treatment evaluations, diagnostic imaging, and immunomodulatory approaches are crucial for addressing these challenges. Continued post-marketing clinical follow-up is essential to confirm the safety and efficacy of vascular grafts in clinical settings, enhancing therapeutic options for patients.
In vitro arterial disease models
Biomedical research is experiencing a significant shift toward human disease modeling, driven by the development of bioengineered tissue equivalents. These models circumvent the limitations posed by species differences in animal models and enable detailed studies of disease pathogenesis and the interactions of key factors by isolating the complex microenvironment of the disease sites.226,227,228 This approach holds immense potential for advancing the understanding of arterial diseases and enhancing drug discovery efforts. This section will focus on the in vitro disease models of arterial diseases including AS, stenosis, and aneurysm.
In vitro atherosclerosis model
To study of atherosclerosis mechanisms, a prerequisite is to build a human artery model that can reveal the interplays between ECs, SMCs, and ECM. The bioengineered AE mimics the anatomy and structure of the arterial wall and thus can intrinsically contribute to recapitulating the cellular activities and responses during atherosclerosis. To monitor the dynamic changes that occurred in the relevant process, the models adaptable to real-time bioimaging are desired. In this regard, the artery-on-a-chip devices exhibited unparalleled advantages over other bioengineered AEs. A new microfluidic-based arterial wall on-a-chip simulates the intima-media interface of the artery by co-culturing ECs and SMCs, as well as precisely controlling the ECM microenvironment (Figure 13A).229 This chip uses collagen and basement membrane matrix to simulate the sub-endothelial ECM layer and the 3D culture environment of SMCs in two hydrogel channels, respectively. Upon such a model, the study investigated the effects of vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3) and metformin in alleviating monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and smooth muscle cell migration induced by cytokines.
Upon the construction of functional AE, the successful establishment of an atherosclerotic model relies on the recreation of core pathogenic signals to stimulate cells for the recapitulation of the downstream initiation and progression events. To achieve this, a viable method uses enzymatically modified low-density lipoprotein (eLDL) and TNF-α to mimic the atherosclerotic environment under physiological shear stress in tissue engineered blood vessels (Figure 13B).105 This leads to the activation of ECs, accumulation of monocytes, formation of foam cells, and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Enzymatically modified LDL is more effective in producing foam cells than oxidized LDL,233 causing the upregulation of ICAM-1 and E-selectin in ECs, and readily inducing foam cell formation in SMCs234 and macrophages.233 The model also exhibits partial disease regression upon eLDL removal, demonstrating the potential for discovering effective therapies.
Besides the biochemical signals, the pathogenesis of AS is also significantly influenced by biomechanical stimuli, such as mechanical stress and hemodynamics that play critical roles in regulating cellular behaviors. The bioengineered AEs with regular geometries cultivated under laminar flows may face difficulties in providing these biomechanical signals. Therefore, the dynamic AE devices have gained attention. A stretchable microfluidic chip has been designed, integrating a microfluidic layer, an elastic PDMS membrane, and a pneumatic layer, which successfully constructed an early AS model capable of applying both FSS and cyclic stretch (Figure 13C).230 By precisely controlling fluid flow and vacuum, this model simulated the mechanical hemodynamic signals presenting in arteries. Equipped with this design, the study demonstrated the unique advantages of this model over 2D culture conditions in drug evaluation and screening. The AE device facilitated the discovery of new evidence regarding the cytotoxicity of the clinical drug probucol underscores its indispensable role in drug evaluation and screening, which is conducive to the study of the pathological microenvironment on the early occurrence of atherosclerosis.
Another innovative in vitro atherosclerosis model has utilized a creative 3D suspended coaxial bioprinting technology to construct a three-layered AE with controllable geometry and dimensions (Figure 13D).231 The model employed vascular tissue-derived decellularized extracellular matrix as a supportive bath for gel-embedded 3D bioprinting, as well as adjusting the printing path and speed to precisely control the inner diameter and wall thickness of the AE. This method overcame the limitations of traditional vascular models in terms of structural stability and geometric control. The direct construction of vascular models with adjustable geometries, including normal, stenotic, and tortuous shapes, simulated the complex hemodynamics in AS.
Currently, most of the established in vitro models focus on the early stage of atherosclerosis which only contributes to understanding the pathological mechanism of disease initiation (e.g., endothelial dysfunction, SMCs phenotype switch, foam cell formation). A few efforts attempted to construct the flatforms that are capable of recreating the build-up of atherosclerotic plaques composed of fibrose caps and necrotic cores, which are more significant to evaluate medications for the disease recovery.
Among the limited relevant reports, a three-dimensional human fibrous atherosclerotic plaque model that simulates late-stage atherosclerosis, marking an important step in the continuous study from lipid deposition and inflammatory responses in the early stages of the disease to plaque formation in the later stages (Figure 13E).232 Using the suspension droplet technique, spherical cellular structures that include a fibrous cap and necrotic core can be created using myeloid cells, THP-1 cells, and human umbilical vein smooth muscle cells. These cell spheres form structures in three-dimensional space that are similar to atherosclerotic plaques, mimicking the inflammatory microenvironment in the vascular subendothelial space induced by cholesterol. Despite this, the model still has some shortcomings, such as the precise control of the composition, structure, and dimension of the plaques, as well as the consistent production, which limits their applications for high-throughput screening.
In vitro thrombosis model
Thrombus formation is closely associated with changes in hemodynamics. The forces exerted by blood flow have a significant impact on thrombus size, growth rate, and the risk of embolization. Therefore, reconstructing the morphological characteristics of arteries at sites prone to thrombosis is crucial for exploring the mechanisms of thrombosis. Currently, a variety of technologies have enabled the creation of arterial models that include stenotic, convoluted, and branched structures. In one representative study, quantitative image analysis was utilized to reconstruct the thrombus formation process in an in vitro thrombosis model with controllable stenotic and cross-sectional profiles of the channel using partially cured PDMS (Figure 14A).235 Through image analysis, this study reveals that physical flow has a significant impact on thrombus formation, with narrower channels accelerating the growth of the thrombus and increasing the risk of embolism. The starting point and growth characteristics of the thrombus are influenced by the way it forms, showing different growth rates and binding strengths. Combined with image analysis technology, the analysis of the thrombosis process was quantitatively analyzed, and the accuracy of the study of the thrombosis growth pattern was improved by dividing the image into multiple sub-parts.
Additionally, the in vitro models can also be utilized to investigate the relationship between thrombus structure and the formation of high shear stress as well as Von Willebrand factor (VWF) platelet strings.198 By creating a stenotic artery model that replicates high shear flow conditions akin to atherosclerotic arteries, researchers used whole blood to induce macroscopic thrombi in a collagen-coated setup. The study demonstrated that the thrombus has a complex structure, which includes slender platelet aggregates (strings) that converge into a dense mass near the apex and abruptly end in the expansion region, forming a thrombus with microchannels that allow some blood flow through the main body of the thrombus. The findings of the study elucidate how VWF platelet strings rapidly form and bridge the vascular lumen under high shear stress, and how this structure can quickly create an occlusion or hemostasis while maintaining a certain porosity, offering the potential for the delivery of thrombolytic agents to the core of the thrombus.
Besides abnormal hemodynamics, thrombus formation involves complex interactions between cells, extracellular matrix (ECM), and biomolecules. Microfluidic chip technology provides a controlled platform to simulate these processes, accurately replicating blood flow and vascular structures. For instance, an "occlusive thrombosis-on-a-chip" device, using collagen and biochemical factors, initiates platelet activation and thrombus formation to assess antithrombotic drugs (Figure 14B).203 This study highlights that distal coagulation in such devices may obscure drug effects, offering a valuable tool for the early-stage evaluation of antithrombotic drugs.
3D bioprinting technology, which allows for the fabrication of detailed three-dimensional structures, is playing an increasingly significant role in the development of in vitro thrombosis models.237,238,239,240,241 It replicates vascular stenosis and branching while integrating ECM and cells to simulate thrombotic processes accurately. One innovative approach combines CT angiography (CTA) data, Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing, and microfluidic technology to produce in vitro models of both healthy and stenotic arteries (Figure 14C).236 SLA 3D printing is used to create molds for PDMS chips, facilitating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to analyze flow patterns and shear rates. The ECs are cultured on microfluidic chips, and blood flow studies reveal how vascular geometry affects platelet aggregation. Additionally, a biomimetic thrombosis-on-a-chip model, developed through 3D sacrificial bioprinting, features microchannels embedded in GelMA hydrogel and lined with ECs.242 This model induces thrombus formation and simulates thrombus dissolution with tPA perfusion, providing precise control over microchannel architecture and mimicking thrombus dynamics effectively.
While in vitro thrombosis models are crucial for understanding disease mechanisms and evaluating responses to drugs and medical devices, these devices are also helpful in observing and quantifying how environmental risks impact blood coagulation, platelet behavior, and thrombus stability. For instance, an in vitro model based on microfluidic technology has been developed to study the potential toxicity of microplastics (MPs) to the vascular system (Figure 14D).199 This model uses an optically assisted thrombus platform to simulate thrombus formation due to localized tissue injury induced by photothermal irradiation. Key aspects include microfluidic chip fabrication, endothelial cell seeding, and precise endothelial damage via ultraviolet irradiation. The study integrates optofluidic techniques with microfluidic technology to visualize and record MP invasion into thrombi, revealing that MPs strongly bind to fibrinogen and platelets, reducing fibrin-platelet binding strength and increasing the risk of thrombus shedding.
In vitro aneurysm model
For aneurysms, hemodynamic studies are crucial due to their direct link with arterial bulge growth and rupture. As aneurysms develop, the complex and variable hemodynamic conditions within them, such as flow patterns, velocity, volume, wall pressure, and shear stress, change dynamically. Additionally, aneurysms exhibit unique shapes and structures in different patients, manifesting personalized features. CFD models are employed to simulate blood flow in designed microvessels or channels to explore circulatory system diseases.243 An innovative approach involves 3D printing with water-soluble resin to create patient-specific cerebral artery phantom models (Figure 15A).244 Using a desktop SLA 3D printer and low-cost resin, intricate sacrificial molds are produced and then cast in transparent silicone rubber (PDMS) to create high-resolution, full-scale cerebral arterial models. These water-soluble resin molds, which dissolve completely, allow for the creation of PDMS models with high transparency and adjustable elasticity, enhancing blood flow modeling and CFD simulation validation.
Frontier technologies, such as AI, are becoming crucial in developing predictive models for the effects of blood flow dynamics on aneurysms. Through advanced deep learning algorithms and computational fluid dynamics, AI can analyze complex blood flow patterns and predict their impact on aneurysm walls, leading to more accurate diagnostic and treatment strategies. A notable development in this field is the Artificial Intelligence Velocimetry (AIV) framework (Figure 15B).245 This framework employs Physics-Informed Neural Networks to combine 2D image data from microfluidic experiments with the principles of fluid dynamics. It reconstructs three-dimensional blood flow fields without needing predefined boundary conditions by minimizing a loss function those accounts for data mismatches, physical law residuals, and boundary condition discrepancies. AIV technology addresses some challenges associated with traditional approaches to evaluating blood flow in intricate vascular networks. It serves as a beneficial diagnostic and monitoring aid for conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, particularly in scenarios where experimental data is limited.
Despite significant advancements in hemodynamic studies, the formation and progress of aneurysms also involve complex biological processes including inflammatory responses, cellular differentiation, and ECM degradation. Therefore, to fully explore the pathogenesis of aneurysms, it is crucial to develop in vitro models that not only reconstruct hemodynamics but also include functional vascular tissues. One study advanced this field by investigating cellular behavior under varying shear stress conditions, simulating hemodynamics using an enhanced liquid-assisted injection molding technique coupled with mechanically tuned GelMA hydrogel to reconstruct a 3D cerebral aneurysm model with clinically relevant dimensions (Figure 15C).246 The model employed a catheter with a 2.7 mm diameter and a compliant balloon with a 10 mm diameter, with water volume controlled to adjust the neck width and bulge diameter of the aneurysm model. Within the GelMA hydrogel, ECs and SMCs were cultured to mimic the vascular endothelium. This setup, under physiologically relevant hemodynamics, allows for the simulation of ECs forming a monolayer on SMCs under physiological wall shear stress, and the permeation of large molecules in the bulge area due to the absence of an endothelial layer. It effectively demonstrates differential cellular behaviors in response to the dynamic conditions in both the simulated vessel and aneurysm bulge regions.
The complexity of aneurysms, characterized by their irregular shapes, varying wall thicknesses, and diverse hemodynamic features, presents challenges for traditional modeling methods, which struggle with intricate structures. To overcome these challenges, innovative biofabrication strategies are crucial for enhancing the morphological and structural similarity of models to that of their natural counterparts. A pioneering study bioengineered an in vitro aneurysm model with intricate structures using 3D printing technology (Figure 15D).247 This model employs a gelatin-fibrin hydrogel as the printing medium for supporting the subsequent formation of endothelium on the luminal wall, closely mimicking the physiological mechanical properties of blood vessel walls. Owing to the transparency of the 3D printing platform, the model facilitates the use of microcatheters to introduce detachable coils into the 3D-printed aneurysms, enabling the monitoring of static plasma clotting within the aneurysm sac and around the coils. This setup not only assesses the biocompatibility and hemostatic efficacy of embolic devices but also provides valuable insights into the risk of aneurysm rupture and hemodynamic responses post-treatment.
Conclusion and future perspectives
Bioengineered AEs have contributed to incremental advancements in the field of vascular graft development and have provided valuable insights into pathogenic mechanisms. These AEs mimic the mechanical properties of native arteries, emulate the physiological functions of vascular tissues, and recapitulate the pathological responses of cells. A variety of innovative technologies including electrospinning, 3D bioprinting, decellularization, and self-assembly have been applied to promote the performances of AEs in different ways, such as improving biocompatibility, reducing immune reaction, and refining the mechanical characteristics.
Beyond grafting, AEs have significantly contributed to the advancement of in vitro disease modeling, providing simulations of human arterial conditions with improved accuracy compared to traditional models. Technologies such as microfluidic chips and 3D bioprinting enable the development of disease models for atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and aneurysms, enhancing our understanding of these conditions and facilitating the testing of new treatments. These advancements not only deepen our understanding of arterial diseases but also support the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.
Looking forward, the sophistication of AEs is expected to increase, aiming to closely mimic the intricate structures of natural arteries, including features such as the tunica adventitia, elastic membranes, and microvessels. This enhancement is crucial for both practical applications in vivo and for more effective in vitro disease modeling. Advanced biomaterials and biofabrication techniques such as 3D bioprinting and electrospinning will play pivotal roles in creating AEs with tunable mechanical properties that closely match those of native arteries, thereby improving their durability, functionality, and integration with host tissues.
In terms of 3D bioprinting, although the deposition in yielding-stress suspension baths has emerged as an effective way to construct complex tissues by enhancing spatial fidelity,248,249 such a methodology highly relies on the careful selection or formulation of the bath materials. Therefore, new innovative strategies remain required to fully unleash the potential of 3D bioprinting technique for constructing sophisticated tissue equivalents. For instance, microgravity or zero-gravity environment is envisioned to largely accelerate the development of tissue equivalents possessing more elaborate structures and functionalities, given that the levitation state of cells, materials, or bioinks helps to avoid the structure collapse and composition precipitation that usually occur under gravitational environment. Due to these advantages, 3D bioprinting in space has evoked increasing interest in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.250,251,252,253 More importantly, microgravity may cause diverse space diseases and health abnormality.254,255,256,257 Thus, it is meaningful to understand the changes in structures and functions of proteins, cells, or tissues under microgravity conditions.258,259,260 The exploitation of 3D bioprinted AEs and other tissue equivalents as in vitro models provides an attractive strategy to resolve these fundamental problems under simulated microgravity or in space,261,262,263 enabling tackling unknown medical challenges and offering promising healthcare solutions for astronauts in space.
Personalized medicine stands at the forefront of modern healthcare innovations, and the development of personalized AEs aligns perfectly with this trend. By using patient-derived cells and genetic profiling, AEs can be tailored to individual patients, enhancing compatibility and effectiveness. This personalized approach not only promises greater success in implantations but also transforms AEs into powerful platforms for studying vascular diseases in a patient-specific manner.
The convergence of AEs with cutting-edge techniques such as smart materials, AI, and big data is set to revolutionize the field of precise medicine. Smart materials that respond to environmental stimuli can be integrated into AEs to provide dynamic control over their physiological properties and biological responses.264,265,266 These advantages could endow the grafts with additional functions, such as tunable stem cell/drug delivery, dynamically defined mechanical properties, triggerable biodegradation, and promoted host cell integration, which might be meaningful to developing advanced regenerative strategies. AI and big data analytics can be used to analyze the vast amounts of data generated by in vitro models, identifying patterns and biomarkers that are indicative of disease progression and treatment efficacy. This integration will enable the development of accurately predictive in vitro arterial disease models, facilitating the discovery of new therapeutic targets and the evaluation of drug candidates.
In addition, despite these advancements, the clinical urgency for vascular grafts demands the development of readily available off-the-shelf AEs. To meet this need, advances in automation and scalability in AE production are essential. Techniques such as robotic-assisted 3D bioprinting could facilitate rapid, consistent manufacturing of AEs, ensuring timely availability for clinical use.267,268 The development of standardized protocols for the storage and preservation of cell-laden AEs will also be crucial for maintaining their viability and functionality. For in vitro disease models, the demand for high-throughput testing is driving the need for scalable models that can be produced and analyzed in large numbers. This will be essential for drug screening, target identification, and the study of disease mechanisms, ultimately accelerating the pace of medical discovery and innovation.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32201126, 32311540144), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7232344), the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (No2022R1A5A2027161), and Beijing Institute of Technology Teli Young Fellow Program (RCPT-20220029).
Author contributions
Xi Luo: Writing – original draft. Zherui Pang: Writing – original draft. Jinhua Li: Writing – review and editing. Minjun Anh: Data curation. Byoung Soo Kim: Writing – review and editing. Ge Gao: Supervision, funding acquisition, and conceptualization.
Declaration of interests
The authors have no competing interests or financial ties to disclose.
Contributor Information
Jinhua Li, Email: lijinhua@bit.edu.cn.
Byoung Soo Kim, Email: bskim7@pusan.ac.kr.
Ge Gao, Email: gaoge@bit.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Pittman R.N. Oxygen transport in the microcirculation and its regulation. Microcirculation. 2013;20:117–137. doi: 10.1111/micc.12017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Viles-Gonzalez J.F., Fuster V., Badimon J.J. Atherothrombosis: A widespread disease with unpredictable and life-threatening consequences. Eur. Heart J. 2004;25:1197–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matta A.G., Yaacoub N., Nader V., Moussallem N., Carrie D., Roncalli J. Coronary artery aneurysm: A review. World J. Cardiol. 2021;13:446–455. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i9.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Flora G.D., Nayak M.K. A brief review of cardiovascular diseases, associated risk factors and current treatment regimes. Curr. Pharmaceut. Des. 2019;25:4063–4084. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190925163827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jagannathan R., Patel S.A., Ali M.K., Narayan K.M.V. Global updates on cardiovascular disease mortality trends and attribution of traditional risk factors. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2019;19:44. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Naegeli K.M., Kural M.H., Li Y., Wang J., Hugentobler E.A., Niklason L.E. Bioengineering human tissues and the future of vascular replacement. Circ. Res. 2022;131:109–126. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boland J., Long C. Update on the inflammatory hypothesis of coronary artery disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2021;23:6. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01439-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li M.-X., Wei Q.-Q., Mo H.-L., Ren Y., Zhang W., Lu H.-J., Joung Y.K. Challenges and advances in materials and fabrication technologies of small-diameter vascular grafts. Biomater. Res. 2023;27:58. doi: 10.1186/s40824-023-00399-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.L'Heureux N., Dusserre N., Marini A., Garrido S., de la Fuente L., McAllister T. Technology insight: the evolution of tissue-engineered vascular grafts from research to clinical practice. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2007;4:389–395. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Doh G., Kim B., Lee D., Yoon J., Lim S., Han Y.S., Eo S. Hemodynamic principles in free tissue transfer: vascular changes at the anastomosis site. Arch. Hand Microsurg. 2021;26:285–292. doi: 10.12790/ahm.21.0118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Camasão D.B., Mantovani D. The mechanical characterization of blood vessels and their substitutes in the continuous quest for physiological-relevant performances. A critical review. Mater. Today. Bio. 2021;10 doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weinberg C.B., Bell E. A blood vessel model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells. Science. 1986;231:397–400. doi: 10.1126/science.2934816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maina R.M., Barahona M.J., Finotti M., Lysyy T., Geibel P., D’Amico F., Mulligan D., Geibel J.P. Generating vascular conduits: from tissue engineering to three-dimensional bioprinting. Innov. Surg. Sci. 2018;3:203–213. doi: 10.1515/iss-2018-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pashneh-Tala S., MacNeil S., Claeyssens F. The tissue-engineered vascular graft-past, present, and future. Tissue Eng., Part B. 2016;22:68–100. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gao G., Kim H., Kim B.S., Kong J.S., Lee J.Y., Park B.W., Chae S., Kim J., Ban K., Jang J., et al. Tissue-engineering of vascular grafts containing endothelium and smooth-muscle using triple-coaxial cell printing. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019;6 doi: 10.1063/1.5099306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bosch-Rué E., Delgado L.M., Gil F.J., Perez R.A. Direct extrusion of individually encapsulated endothelial and smooth muscle cells mimicking blood vessel structures and vascular native cell alignment. Biofabrication. 2020;13 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abbd27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zaragoza C., Gomez-Guerrero C., Martin-Ventura J.L., Blanco-Colio L., Lavin B., Mallavia B., Tarin C., Mas S., Ortiz A., Egido J. Animal models of cardiovascular diseases. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/497841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kastora S.L., Eley J., Gannon M., Melvin R., Munro E., Makris S.A. What went wrong with VEGF-A in peripheral arterial disease? A systematic review and biological insights on future therapeutics. J. Vasc. Res. 2022;59:381–393. doi: 10.1159/000527079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luna D.J., R Pandian N.K., Mathur T., Bui J., Gadangi P., Kostousov V.V., Hui S.-K.R., Teruya J., Jain A. Tortuosity-powered microfluidic device for assessment of thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy in whole blood. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:5742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62768-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Park W., Lee J.-S., Gao G., Kim B.S., Cho D.-W. 3D bioprinted multilayered cerebrovascular conduits to study cancer extravasation mechanism related with vascular geometry. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:7696. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43586-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Humphrey J.D., Schwartz M.A. Vascular mechanobiology: homeostasis, adaptation, and disease. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2021;23:1–27. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-092419-060810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Varzideh F., Mone P., Santulli G. Bioengineering strategies to create 3D cardiac constructs from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Bioengineering. 2022;9:168. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9040168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Y., Li X.S., Guex A.G., Liu S.S., Müller E., Malini R.I., Zhao H.J., Rottmar M., Maniura-Weber K., Rossi R.M., Spano F. A compliant and biomimetic three-layered vascular graft for small blood vessels. Biofabrication. 2017;9 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa6bae. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eble J.A., Niland S. The extracellular matrix of blood vessels. Curr. Pharmaceut. Des. 2009;15:1385–1400. doi: 10.2174/138161209787846757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jouda H., Larrea Murillo L., Wang T. Current progress in vascular engineering and its clinical applications. Cells. 2022;11:493. doi: 10.3390/cells11030493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sumpio B.E., Riley J.T., Dardik A. Cells in focus: endothelial cell. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002;34:1508–1512. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zihni C., Mills C., Matter K., Balda M.S. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;17:564–580. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809. doi: 10.1038/362801a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aquino J.B., Sierra R., Montaldo L.A. Diverse cellular origins of adult blood vascular endothelial cells. Dev. Biol. 2021;477:117–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu Y., Yazbeck R., Duan C. Anomalous mechanosensitive ion transport in nanoparticle-blocked nanopores. J. Chem. Phys. 2021;154 doi: 10.1063/5.0046086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Niklason L., Dai G. Arterial venous differentiation for vascular bioengineering. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2018;20:431–447. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chan-Park M.B., Shen J.Y., Cao Y., Xiong Y., Liu Y., Rayatpisheh S., Kang G.C.-W., Greisler H.P. Biomimetic control of vascular smooth muscle cell morphology and phenotype for functional tissue-engineered small-diameter blood vessels. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2009;88:1104–1121. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brozovich F.V., Nicholson C.J., Degen C.V., Gao Y.Z., Aggarwal M., Morgan K.G. Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle contraction and the basis for pharmacologic treatment of smooth muscle disorders. Pharmacol. Rev. 2016;68:476–532. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.010652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shi J., Yang Y., Cheng A., Xu G., He F. Metabolism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020;319:H613–H631. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00220.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sarelius I., Pohl U. Control of muscle blood flow during exercise: local factors and integrative mechanisms. Acta Physiol. 2010;199:349–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02129.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Palikuqi B., Nguyen D.H.T., Li G., Schreiner R., Pellegata A.F., Liu Y., Redmond D., Geng F., Lin Y., Gómez-Salinero J.M., et al. Adaptable haemodynamic endothelial cells for organogenesis and tumorigenesis. Nature. 2020;585:426–432. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2712-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Frismantiene A., Philippova M., Erne P., Resink T.J. Smooth muscle cell-driven vascular diseases and molecular mechanisms of VSMC plasticity. Cell. Signal. 2018;52:48–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Synofzik J., Heene S., Jonczyk R., Blume C. Ink-structing the future of vascular tissue engineering: a review of the physiological bioink design. Biodes. Manuf. 2024;7:181–205. doi: 10.1007/s42242-024-00270-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nerem R.M., Seliktar D. Vascular tissue engineering. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2001;3:225–243. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Majesky M.W. Adventitia and perivascular cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015;35:e31–e35. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xu F., Ji J., Li L., Chen R., Hu W. Activation of adventitial fibroblasts contributes to the early development of atherosclerosis: A novel hypothesis that complements the “Response-to-Injury Hypothesis” and the “Inflammation Hypothesis”. Med. Hypotheses. 2007;69:908–912. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu F., Liu Y., Shi L., Liu W., Zhang L., Cai H., Qi J., Cui Y., Wang W., Hu Y. NADPH oxidase p47phox siRNA attenuates adventitial fibroblasts proliferation and migration in apoE(-/-) mouse. J. Transl. Med. 2015;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0407-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cheng J., Jia Z., Guo H., Nie Z., Li T. Delayed burst of a gel balloon. J. Mech. Phys. Solid. 2019;124:143–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ciszek B., Cieślicki K., Krajewski P., Piechnik S.K. Critical pressure for arterial wall rupture in major human cerebral arteries. Stroke. 2013;44:3226–3228. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Matsumoto T., Sugita S., Nagayama K. In: Vascular Engineering: New Prospects of Vascular Medicine and Biology with a Multidiscipline Approach. Tanishita K., Yamamoto K., editors. Springer Japan; 2016. Tensile properties of smooth muscle cells, elastin, and collagen fibers; pp. 127–140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Roussis P.C., Giannakopoulos A.E., Charalambous H.P., Demetriou D.C., Georghiou G.P. Dynamic behavior of suture-anastomosed arteries and implications to vascular surgery operations. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2015;14:1. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-14-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lim S.Y., Yeo M.S.-W., Nicoli F., Ciudad P., Constantinides J., Kiranantawat K., Sapountzis S., Ho A.C.W., Chen H.-C. End-to-patch anastomosis for microvascular transfer of free flaps with small pedicle. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2015;68:559–564. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wayne Causey M., Eichler C. Infrainguinal bypass for critical limb ischemia: tips and tricks. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2014;27:59–67. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Seo M.H., Kim S.M., Myoung H., Lee J.H. Influence of vascular twisting on the supermicroanastomosis of superficial inferior epigastric artery. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2013;24:1772–1780. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31829024bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xue L., Lu Y., Qiu W., Zhou H., Zhang G., Jin Z., Lin M., Chen H., Rui Z., Zheng Y. Surgical experience of refined 3-cuff technique for orthotopic small-bowel transplantation in rat: a report of 270 cases. Am. J. Surg. 2009;198:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sonoda H., Takamizawa K., Nakayama Y., Yasui H., Matsuda T. Small-diameter compliant arterial graft prosthesis: Design concept of coaxial double tubular graft and its fabrication. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001;55:266–276. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<266::AID-JBM1014>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.El-Kurdi M.S., Hong Y., Stankus J.J., Soletti L., Wagner W.R., Vorp D.A. Transient elastic support for vein grafts using a constricting microfibrillar polymer wrap. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3213–3220. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Konig G., McAllister T.N., Dusserre N., Garrido S.A., Iyican C., Marini A., Fiorillo A., Avila H., Wystrychowski W., Zagalski K., et al. Mechanical properties of completely autologous human tissue engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous vein and mammary artery. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1542–1550. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bikia V., Rovas G., Pagoulatou S., Stergiopulos N. Determination of aortic characteristic impedance and total arterial compliance from regional pulse wave velocities using machine learning: an in-silico study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.649866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mulvany M.J. Small artery remodeling in hypertension. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2002;4:49–55. doi: 10.1007/s11906-002-0053-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Langille B.L., O'Donnell F. Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. Science. 1986;231:405–407. doi: 10.1126/science.3941904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Huang A.H., Niklason L.E. Engineering of arteries in vitro. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014;71:2103–2118. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1546-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gu S.Z., Ahmed M.E., Huang Y., Hakim D., Maynard C., Cefalo N.V., Coskun A.U., Costopoulos C., Maehara A., Stone G.W., et al. Comprehensive biomechanical and anatomical atherosclerotic plaque metrics predict major adverse cardiovascular events: A new tool for clinical decision making. Atherosclerosis. 2024;390 doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Francis S.E., Tu J., Qian Y., Avolio A.P. A combination of genetic, molecular and haemodynamic risk factors contributes to the formation, enlargement and rupture of brain aneurysms. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2013;20:912–918. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mohan D., Munteanu V., Coman T., Ciurea A.V. Genetic factors involves in intracranial aneurysms-actualities. J. Med. Life. 2015;8:336–341. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556916/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tsao P.S., Lewis N.P., Alpert S., Cooke J.P. Exposure to shear stress alters endothelial adhesiveness. Circulation. 1995;92:3513–3519. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.92.12.3513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Peiffer V., Sherwin S.J., Weinberg P.D. Does low and oscillatory wall shear stress correlate spatially with early atherosclerosis? A systematic review. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013;99:242–250. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kono K., Fujimoto T., Terada T. Proximal stenosis may induce initiation of cerebral aneurysms by increasing wall shear stress and wall shear stress gradient. Int. J. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng. 2014;30:942–950. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chiu J.-J., Chien S. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91:327–387. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00047.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dolan J.M., Kolega J., Meng H. High wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: a review. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2013;41:1411–1427. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0695-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gallo G., Volpe M., Savoia C. Endothelial dysfunction in hypertension: current concepts and clinical implications. Front. Med. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.798958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ma J., Li Y., Yang X., Liu K., Zhang X., Zuo X., Ye R., Wang Z., Shi R., Meng Q., Chen X. Signaling pathways in vascular function and hypertension: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2023;8:168. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01430-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Climie R.E., Alastruey J., Mayer C.C., Schwarz A., Laucyte-Cibulskiene A., Voicehovska J., Bianchini E., Bruno R.M., Charlton P.H., Grillo A., et al. Vascular ageing: moving from bench towards bedside. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2023;30:1101–1117. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kong P., Cui Z.-Y., Huang X.-F., Zhang D.-D., Guo R.-J., Han M. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: signaling pathways and therapeutic intervention. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2022;7:131. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00955-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012;32:2045–2051. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Fan J., Watanabe T. Atherosclerosis: Known and unknown. Pathol. Int. 2022;72:151–160. doi: 10.1111/pin.13202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fan J., Watanabe T. Inflammatory reactions in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J. Atherosclerosis Thromb. 2003;10:63–71. doi: 10.5551/jat.10.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Falk E. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006;47:C7–C12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bentzon J.F., Otsuka F., Virmani R., Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ. Res. 2014;114:1852–1866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Klouche M., May A.E., Hemmes M., Meßner M., Kanse S.M., Preissner K.T., Bhakdi S. Enzymatically modified, nonoxidized ldl induces selective adhesion and transmigration of monocytes and T-lymphocytes through human endothelial cell monolayers. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999;19:784–793. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.19.3.784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tomaiuolo M., Brass L.F., Stalker T.J. Regulation of platelet activation and coagulation and its role in vascular injury and arterial thrombosis. Interv. Cardiol. Clin. 2017;6:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bettiol A., Galora S., Argento F.R., Fini E., Emmi G., Mattioli I., Bagni G., Fiorillo C., Becatti M. Erythrocyte oxidative stress and thrombosis. Expet Rev. Mol. Med. 2022;24:e31. doi: 10.1017/erm.2022.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Li P., Ma X., Huang G. Understanding thrombosis: the critical role of oxidative stress. Hematology. 2024;29 doi: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2301633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lipp S.N., Niedert E.E., Cebull H.L., Diorio T.C., Ma J.L., Rothenberger S.M., Stevens Boster K.A., Goergen C.J. Computational hemodynamic modeling of arterial aneurysms: a mini-review. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:454. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Fennell V.S., Kalani M.Y.S., Atwal G., Martirosyan N.L., Spetzler R.F. Biology of saccular cerebral aneurysms: a review of current understanding and future directions. Front. Surg. 2016;3:43. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Starke R.M., Chalouhi N., Ding D., Raper D.M.S., McKisic M.S., Owens G.K., Hasan D.M., Medel R., Dumont A.S. Vascular smooth muscle cells in cerebral aneurysm pathogenesis. Transl. Stroke Res. 2014;5:338–346. doi: 10.1007/s12975-013-0290-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Frösen J., Cebral J., Robertson A.M., Aoki T. Flow-induced, inflammation-mediated arterial wall remodeling in the formation and progression of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg. Focus. 2019;47:E21. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hernandez-Sanchez D., Comtois-Bona M., Muñoz M., Ruel M., Suuronen E.J., Alarcon E.I. Manufacturing and validation of small-diameter vascular grafts: A mini review. iScience. 2024;27 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Helms F., Haverich A., Böer U., Wilhelmi M. Transluminal compression increases mechanical stability, stiffness and endothelialization capacity of fibrin-based bioartificial blood vessels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021;124 doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Al Kayal T., Losi P., Pierozzi S., Soldani G. A new method for fibrin-based electrospun/sprayed scaffold fabrication. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:5111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61933-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kim N.E., Park S., Kim S., Choi J.H., Kim S.E., Choe S.H., Kang T.w., Song J.E., Khang G. Development of gelatin-based shape-memory polymer scaffolds with fast responsive performance and enhanced mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8:6455–6462. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lamprou D., Zhdan P., Labeed F., Lekakou C. Gelatine and gelatine/elastin nanocomposites for vascular grafts: Processing and characterization. J. Biomater. Appl. 2011;26:209–226. doi: 10.1177/0885328210364429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhou L., Li Y., Tu Q., Wang J. A 3D printing mold method for rapid fabrication of artificial blood vessels. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023;662 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.130952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Syedain Z.H., Meier L.A., Bjork J.W., Lee A., Tranquillo R.T. Implantable arterial grafts from human fibroblasts and fibrin using a multi-graft pulsed flow-stretch bioreactor with noninvasive strength monitoring. Biomaterials. 2011;32:714–722. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pezzoli D., Cauli E., Chevallier P., Farè S., Mantovani D. Biomimetic coating of cross-linked gelatin to improve mechanical and biological properties of electrospun PET: A promising approach for small caliber vascular graft applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2017;105:2405–2415. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Madhavan K., Belchenko D., Motta A., Tan W. Evaluation of composition and crosslinking effects on collagen-based composite constructs. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1413–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Xue X., Hu Y., Wang S., Chen X., Jiang Y., Su J. Fabrication of physical and chemical crosslinked hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2022;12:327–339. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kanamori T., Habu T., Shinbo T., Sakai K. Difference in solute diffusivity in crosslinked collagen gels prepared under various conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2000;13:85–89. doi: 10.1016/S0928-4931(00)00180-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lee C.-S., Hwang H.S., Kim S., Fan J., Aghaloo T., Lee M. Inspired by nature: facile design of nanoclay–organic hydrogel bone sealant with multifunctional properties for robust bone regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202003717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Zafeiris K., Brasinika D., Karatza A., Koumoulos E., Karoussis I.K., Kyriakidou K., Charitidis C.A. Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite-chitosan-genipin composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2021;119 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wang Y., Li L., Ma Y., Tang Y., Zhao Y., Li Z., Pu W., Huang B., Wen X., Cao X., et al. Multifunctional supramolecular hydrogel for prevention of epidural adhesion after laminectomy. ACS Nano. 2020;14:8202–8219. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c01658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Qiao Y., Liu X., Zhou X., Zhang H., Zhang W., Xiao W., Pan G., Cui W., Santos H.A., Shi Q. Gelatin templated polypeptide co-cross-linked hydrogel for bone regeneration. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2020;9 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201901239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Piluso S., Flores Gomez D., Dokter I., Moreira Texeira L., Li Y., Leijten J., van Weeren R., Vermonden T., Karperien M., Malda J. Rapid and cytocompatible cell-laden silk hydrogel formation via riboflavin-mediated crosslinking. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020;8:9566–9575. doi: 10.1039/D0TB01731K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Girton T.S., Oegema T.R., Tranquillo R.T. Exploiting glycation to stiffen and strengthen tissue equivalents for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1999;46:87–92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199907)46:1<87::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhao J., Griffin M., Cai J., Li S., Bulter P.E., Kalaskar D.M. Bioreactors for tissue engineering: An update. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016;109:268–281. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hoenig E., Winkler T., Mielke G., Paetzold H., Schuettler D., Goepfert C., Machens H.-G., Morlock M.M., Schilling A.F. High amplitude direct compressive strain enhances mechanical properties of scaffold-free tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2011;17:1401–1411. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Bravo-Olín J., Martínez-Carreón S.A., Francisco-Solano E., Lara A.R., Beltran-Vargas N.E. Analysis of the role of perfusion, mechanical, and electrical stimulation in bioreactors for cardiac tissue engineering. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2024;47:767–839. doi: 10.1007/s00449-024-03004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Gemmiti C.V., Guldberg R.E. Fluid flow increases type Ⅱ collagen deposition and tensile mechanical properties in bioreactor-grown tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:469–479. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lee J.H., Chen Z., He S., Zhou J., Tsai A., Truskey G., Leong K.W. Emulating early atherosclerosis in a vascular microphysiological system using branched tissue-engineered blood vessels. Adv. Biol. 2021;5 doi: 10.1002/adbi.202000428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhang X., Bishawi M., Zhang G., Prasad V., Salmon E., Breithaupt J.J., Zhang Q., Truskey G.A. Modeling early stage atherosclerosis in a primary human vascular microphysiological system. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5426. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19197-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Li W., Yin Y., Zhou H., Fan Y., Yang Y., Gao Q., Li P., Gao G., Li J. Recent Advances in Electrospinning Techniques for Precise Medicine. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024;5 doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zhang M., Xu S., Wang R., Che Y., Han C., Feng W., Wang C., Zhao W. Electrospun nanofiber/hydrogel composite materials and their tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023;162:157–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yalcin Enis I., Gok Sadikoglu T. Design parameters for electrospun biodegradable vascular grafts. J. Ind. Textil. 2018;47:2205–2227. doi: 10.1177/1528083716654470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wang N., Peng Y., Zheng W., Tang L., Cheng S., Yang J., Liu S., Zhang W., Jiang X. A strategy for rapid construction of blood vessel-like structures with complex cell alignments. Macromol. Biosci. 2018;18 doi: 10.1002/mabi.201700408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bagherzadeh R., Najar S.S., Latifi M., Tehran M.A., Kong L. A theoretical analysis and prediction of pore size and pore size distribution in electrospun multilayer nanofibrous materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2013;101:2107–2117. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wu H., Fan J., Chu C.-C., Wu J. Electrospinning of small diameter 3-D nanofibrous tubular scaffolds with controllable nanofiber orientations for vascular grafts. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010;21:3207–3215. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hu J.-J., Chao W.-C., Lee P.-Y., Huang C.-H. Construction and characterization of an electrospun tubular scaffold for small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts: A scaffold membrane approach. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012;13:140–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Elliott M.B., Ginn B., Fukunishi T., Bedja D., Suresh A., Chen T., Inoue T., Dietz H.C., Santhanam L., Mao H.Q., et al. Regenerative and durable small-diameter graft as an arterial conduit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:12710–12719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905966116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Fahad M.A.A., Lee H.-Y., Park S., Choi M., Shanto P.C., Park M., Bae S.H., Lee B.-T. Small-diameter vascular graft composing of core-shell structured micro-nanofibers loaded with heparin and VEGF for endothelialization and prevention of neointimal hyperplasia. Biomaterials. 2024;306 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Weekes A., Wehr G., Pinto N., Jenkins J., Li Z., Meinert C., Klein T.J. Highly compliant biomimetic scaffolds for small diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) produced via melt electrowriting (MEW) Biofabrication. 2023;16 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad0ee1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Law J.X., Liau L.L., Saim A., Yang Y., Idrus R. Electrospun collagen nanofibers and their applications in skin tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017;14:699–718. doi: 10.1007/s13770-017-0075-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.El-Seedi H.R., Said N.S., Yosri N., Hawash H.B., El-Sherif D.M., Abouzid M., Abdel-Daim M.M., Yaseen M., Omar H., Shou Q., et al. Gelatin nanofibers: Recent insights in synthesis, bio-medical applications and limitations. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.McManus M.C., Boland E.D., Koo H.P., Barnes C.P., Pawlowski K.J., Wnek G.E., Simpson D.G., Bowlin G.L. Mechanical properties of electrospun fibrinogen structures. Acta Biomater. 2006;2:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Wang S., Ju J., Wu S., Lin M., Sui K., Xia Y., Tan Y. Electrospinning of biocompatible alginate-based nanofiber membranes via tailoring chain flexibility. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;230 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Vaz C.M., van Tuijl S., Bouten C.V.C., Baaijens F.P.T. Design of scaffolds for blood vessel tissue engineering using a multi-layering electrospinning technique. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Sukchanta A., Kummanee P., Nuansing W. Development and study on mechanical properties of small diameter artificial blood vessel by using electrospinning and 3d printing. J. Phys, Conf. Ser. 2021;2145 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2145/1/012037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Abdullah T., Saeed U., Memic A., Gauthaman K., Hussain M.A., Al-Turaif H. Electrospun cellulose nano fibril reinforced PLA/PBS composite scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. J. Polym. Res. 2019;26:110. doi: 10.1007/s10965-019-1772-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Banitaba S.N., Gharehaghaji A.A., Jeddi A.A.A. Fabrication and characterization of hollow electrospun PLA structure through a modified electrospinning method applicable as vascular graft. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2021;44:158. doi: 10.1007/s12034-021-02463-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Jin Q., Fu Y., Zhang G., Xu L., Jin G., Tang L., Ju J., Zhao W., Hou R. Nanofiber electrospinning combined with rotary bioprinting for fabricating small-diameter vessels with endothelium and smooth muscle. Compos. B Eng. 2022;234 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Rickel A.P., Deng X., Engebretson D., Hong Z. Electrospun nanofiber scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2021;129 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Zhao W., Li J., Jin K., Liu W., Qiu X., Li C. Fabrication of functional PLGA-based electrospun scaffolds and their applications in biomedical engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2016;59:1181–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wang S., Zhang Y. Preparation, structure, and in vitro degradation behavior of the electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide) ultrafine fibrous vascular scaffold. Fibers Polym. 2012;13:754–761. doi: 10.1007/s12221-012-0754-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Xie X., Chen Y., Wang X., Xu X., Shen Y., Aldalbahi A., Fetz A.E., Bowlin G.L., El-Newehy M., Mo X. Electrospinning nanofiber scaffolds for soft and hard tissue regeneration. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020;59:243–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Schiller T., Scheibel T. Bioinspired and biomimetic protein-based fibers and their applications. Commun. Mater. 2024;5:56. doi: 10.1038/s43246-024-00488-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Montoya Y., Cardenas J., Bustamante J., Valencia R. Effect of sequential electrospinning and co-electrospinning on morphological and fluid mechanical wall properties of polycaprolactone and bovine gelatin scaffolds, for potential use in small diameter vascular grafts. Biomater. Res. 2021;25:38. doi: 10.1186/s40824-021-00240-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Mndlovu H., Kumar P., du Toit L.C., Choonara Y.E. A review of biomaterial degradation assessment approaches employed in the biomedical field. npj Mater. Degrad. 2024;8:66. doi: 10.1038/s41529-024-00487-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Elsawy M.A., Kim K.-H., Park J.-W., Deep A. Hydrolytic degradation of polylactic acid (PLA) and its composites. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;79:1346–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Weston M.W., Rhee K., Tarbell J.M. Compliance and diameter mismatch affect the wall shear rate distribution near an end-to-end anastomosis. J. Biomech. 1996;29:187–198. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Salacinski H.J., Goldner S., Giudiceandrea A., Hamilton G., Seifalian A.M., Edwards A., Carson R.J. The mechanical behavior of vascular grafts: a review. J. Biomater. Appl. 2001;15:241–278. doi: 10.1106/NA5T-J57A-JTDD-FD04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Quint C., Kondo Y., Manson R.J., Lawson J.H., Dardik A., Niklason L.E. Decellularized tissue-engineered blood vessel as an arterial conduit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9214–9219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019506108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Jiang S., Zhuang Y., Cai M., Wang X., Lin K. Decellularized extracellular matrix: A promising strategy for skin repair and regeneration. Engineered Regeneration. 2023;4:357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2023.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Ott H.C., Matthiesen T.S., Goh S.-K., Black L.D., Kren S.M., Netoff T.I., Taylor D.A. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: Using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat. Med. 2008;14:213–221. doi: 10.1038/nm1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Petrella F., Spaggiari L. Artificial lung. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018;10:S2329–S2332. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Uygun B.E., Soto-Gutierrez A., Yagi H., Izamis M.L., Guzzardi M.A., Shulman C., Milwid J., Kobayashi N., Tilles A., Berthiaume F., et al. Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nat. Med. 2010;16:814–820. doi: 10.1038/nm.2170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.de Haan M.J., Witjas F.M., Engelse M.A., Rabelink T.J. Have we hit a wall with whole kidney decellularization and recellularization: A review. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering. 2021;20 doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Nishimura Y. Current status and future prospects of decellularized kidney tissue. J. Artif. Organs. 2023;26:171–175. doi: 10.1007/s10047-022-01366-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Crapo P.M., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3233–3243. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Fang S., Riber S.S., Hussein K., Ahlmann A.H., Harvald E.B., Khan F., Beck H.C., Weile L.K.K., Sørensen J.A., Sheikh S.P., et al. Decellularized human umbilical artery: Biocompatibility and in vivo functionality in sheep carotid bypass model. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2020;112 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Dahl S.L.M., Kypson A.P., Lawson J.H., Blum J.L., Strader J.T., Li Y., Manson R.J., Tente W.E., DiBernardo L., Hensley M.T., et al. Readily available tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011;3:68ra9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Schaner P.J., Martin N.D., Tulenko T.N., Shapiro I.M., Tarola N.A., Leichter R.F., Carabasi R.A., DiMuzio P.J. Decellularized vein as a potential scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. J. Vasc. Surg. 2004;40:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Jarrett F., Mahood B.A. Long-term results of femoropopliteal bypass with stabilized human umbilical vein. Am. J. Surg. 1994;168:111–114. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(94)80047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Wilshaw S.-P., Rooney P., Berry H., Kearney J.N., Homer-Vanniasinkam S., Fisher J., Ingham E. Development and characterization of acellular allogeneic arterial matrices. Tissue Eng. 2012;18:471–483. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ma X., He Z., Li L., Liu G., Li Q., Yang D., Zhang Y., Li N. Development and in vivo validation of tissue-engineered, small-diameter vascular grafts from decellularized aortae of fetal pigs and canine vascular endothelial cells. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2017;12:101. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0661-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Daugs A., Hutzler B., Meinke M., Schmitz C., Lehmann N., Markhoff A., Bloch O. Detergent-based decellularization of bovine carotid arteries for vascular tissue engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017;45:2683–2692. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1892-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Omid H., Abdollahi S., Bonakdar S., Haghighipour N., Shokrgozar M.A., Mohammadi J. Biomimetic vascular tissue engineering by decellularized scaffold and concurrent cyclic tensile and shear stresses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2023;34:12. doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06716-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Gilbert T.W., Sellaro T.L., Badylak S.F. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3675–3683. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Zhang X., Chen X., Hong H., Hu R., Liu J., Liu C. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: Recent trends and emerging strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Fernández-Pérez J., Ahearne M. The impact of decellularization methods on extracellular matrix derived hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 2019;9 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49575-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Luo Z., Bian Y., Su W., Shi L., Li S., Song Y., Zheng G., Xie A., Xue J. Comparison of various reagents for preparing a decellularized porcine cartilage scaffold. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:1417–1427. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456528/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Gao G., Lee J.H., Jang J., Lee D.H., Kong J., Kim B.S., Choi Y., Jang W.B., Hong Y.J., Kwon S., Cho D. Tissue engineered bio-blood-vessels constructed using a tissue-specific bioink and 3D coaxial cell printing technique: A novel therapy for ischemic disease. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201700798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Gao G., Park J.Y., Kim B.S., Jang J., Cho D.-W. Coaxial cell printing of freestanding, perfusable, and functional in vitro vascular models for recapitulation of native vascular endothelium pathophysiology. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2018;7 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Hou Y.-C., Cui X., Qin Z., Su C., Zhang G., Tang J.-N., Li J.-A., Zhang J.-Y. Three-dimensional bioprinting of artificial blood vessel: process, bioinks, and challenges. Int. J. Bioprint. 2023;9:740. doi: 10.18063/ijb.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Zhu J., Wang X., Lin L., Zeng W. 3D bioprinting for vascular grafts and microvasculature. Int. J. Bioprint. 2023;9 doi: 10.36922/ijb.0012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Kim S.-J., Kim M.-G., Kim J., Jeon J.S., Park J., Yi H.-G. Bioprinting methods for fabricating in vitro tubular blood vessel models. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2023;4 doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Gold K.A., Saha B., Rajeeva Pandian N.K., Walther B.K., Palma J.A., Jo J., Cooke J.P., Jain A., Gaharwar A.K. 3D bioprinted multicellular vascular models. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2021;10 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Vrana N.E., Gupta S., Mitra K., Rizvanov A.A., Solovyeva V.V., Antmen E., Salehi M., Ehterami A., Pourchet L., Barthes J., et al. From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures. Cell Tissue Bank. 2022;23:417–440. doi: 10.1007/s10561-021-09975-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Hinton T.J., Jallerat Q., Palchesko R.N., Park J.H., Grodzicki M.S., Shue H.-J., Ramadan M.H., Hudson A.R., Feinberg A.W. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 2015;1 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Fang Y., Guo Y., Wu B., Liu Z., Ye M., Xu Y., Ji M., Chen L., Lu B., Nie K., et al. Expanding embedded 3D bioprinting capability for engineering complex organs with freeform vascular networks. Adv. Mater. 2023;35 doi: 10.1002/adma.202205082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Lee A., Hudson A.R., Shiwarski D.J., Tashman J.W., Hinton T.J., Yerneni S., Bliley J.M., Campbell P.G., Feinberg A.W. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 2019;365:482–487. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ouyang L., Armstrong J.P.K., Lin Y., Wojciechowski J.P., Lee-Reeves C., Hachim D., Zhou K., Burdick J.A., Stevens M.M. Expanding and optimizing 3D bioprinting capabilities using complementary network bioinks. Sci. Adv. 2020;6 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Budharaju H., Sundaramurthi D., Sethuraman S. Embedded 3D bioprinting-an emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic & large vascularized tissue constructs. Bioact. Mater. 2024;32:356–384. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Kjar A., McFarland B., Mecham K., Harward N., Huang Y. Engineering of tissue constructs using coaxial bioprinting. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6:460–471. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Watanabe T., Kanda K., Yamanami M., Ishibashi-Ueda H., Yaku H., Nakayama Y. Long-term animal implantation study of biotube-autologous small-caliber vascular graft fabricated by in-body tissue architecture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2011;98:120–126. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Nakayama Y., Furukoshi M., Terazawa T., Iwai R. Development of long in vivo tissue-engineered “Biotube” vascular grafts. Biomaterials. 2018;185:232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zhi D., Cheng Q., Midgley A.C., Zhang Q., Wei T., Li Y., Wang T., Ma T., Rafique M., Xia S., et al. Mechanically reinforced biotubes for arterial replacement and arteriovenous grafting inspired by architectural engineering. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabl3888. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl3888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.De Pieri A., Rochev Y., Zeugolis D.I. Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast. NPJ Regen. Med. 2021;6:18. doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00133-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Narita T., Shintani Y., Ikebe C., Kaneko M., Campbell N.G., Coppen S.R., Uppal R., Sawa Y., Yashiro K., Suzuki K. The use of scaffold-free cell sheet technique to refine mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy for heart failure. Mol. Ther. 2013;21:860–867. doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Prestigiacomo V., Weston A., Suter-Dick L. Rat multicellular 3D liver microtissues to explore TGF-β1 induced effects. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods. 2020;101 doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.106650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Kim G., Jung Y., Cho K., Lee H.J., Koh W.-G. Thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel substrates micropatterned with poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel for adipose mesenchymal stem cell spheroid formation and retrieval. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2020;115 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kamoya T., Anada T., Shiwaku Y., Takano-Yamamoto T., Suzuki O. An oxygen-permeable spheroid culture chip (Oxy chip) promotes osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2016;232:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Hidalgo San Jose L., Stephens P., Song B., Barrow D. Microfluidic encapsulation supports stem cell viability, proliferation, and neuronal differentiation. Tissue Eng. C Methods. 2018;24:158–170. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Kelm J.M., Lorber V., Snedeker J.G., Schmidt D., Broggini-Tenzer A., Weisstanner M., Odermatt B., Mol A., Zünd G., Hoerstrup S.P. A novel concept for scaffold-free vessel tissue engineering: Self-assembly of microtissue building blocks. J. Biotechnol. 2010;148:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Mattix B.M., Olsen T.R., Casco M., Reese L., Poole J.T., Zhang J., Visconti R.P., Simionescu A., Simionescu D.T., Alexis F. Janus magnetic cellular spheroids for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2014;35:949–960. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Norotte C., Marga F.S., Niklason L.E., Forgacs G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5910–5917. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Itoh M., Nakayama K., Noguchi R., Kamohara K., Furukawa K., Uchihashi K., Toda S., Oyama J.-i., Node K., Morita S. Scaffold-free tubular tissues created by a bio-3D printer undergo remodeling and endothelialization when implanted in rat aortae. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Banerjee D., Singh Y.P., Datta P., Ozbolat V., O'Donnell A., Yeo M., Ozbolat I.T. Strategies for 3D bioprinting of spheroids: A comprehensive review. Biomaterials. 2022;291 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Lee H. Engineering in vitro models: bioprinting of organoids with artificial intelligence. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2023;4 doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Itoh M., Mukae Y., Kitsuka T., Arai K., Nakamura A., Uchihashi K., Toda S., Matsubayashi K., Oyama J.I., Node K., et al. Development of an immunodeficient pig model allowing long-term accommodation of artificial human vascular tubes. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2244. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10107-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Matsuda N., Shimizu T., Yamato M., Okano T. Tissue engineering based on cell sheet technology. Adv. Mater. 2007;19:3089–3099. doi: 10.1002/adma.200701978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Silva A.S., Santos L.F., Mendes M.C., Mano J.F. Multi-layer pre-vascularized magnetic cell sheets for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2020;231 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Sakaguchi K., Akimoto K., Takaira M., Tanaka R.-i., Shimizu T., Umezu S. Cell-based microfluidic device utilizing cell sheet technology. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022;2022 doi: 10.34133/2022/9758187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.L'Heureux N., Pâquet S., Labbé R., Germain L., Auger F.A. A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. Faseb. J. 1998;12:47–56. doi: 10.1096/fsb2fasebj.12.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.L'Heureux N., Dusserre N., Konig G., Victor B., Keire P., Wight T.N., Chronos N.A.F., Kyles A.E., Gregory C.R., Hoyt G., et al. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat. Med. 2006;12:361–365. doi: 10.1038/nm1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Tang H., Wang X., Zheng J., Long Y.-Z., Xu T., Li D., Guo X., Zhang Y. Formation of low-density electrospun fibrous network integrated mesenchymal stem cell sheet. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2023;11:389–402. doi: 10.1039/D2TB02029G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Falconnet D., Csucs G., Grandin H.M., Textor M. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3044–3063. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Yuan B., Jin Y., Sun Y., Wang D., Sun J., Wang Z., Zhang W., Jiang X. A strategy for depositing different types of cells in three dimensions to mimic tubular structures in tissues. Adv. Mater. 2012;24:890–896. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Jung Y., Ji H., Chen Z., Fai Chan H., Atchison L., Klitzman B., Truskey G., Leong K.W. Scaffold-free, human mesenchymal stem cell-based tissue engineered blood vessels. Sci. Rep. 2015;5 doi: 10.1038/srep15116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Wystrychowski W., McAllister T.N., Zagalski K., Dusserre N., Cierpka L., L'Heureux N. First human use of an allogeneic tissue-engineered vascular graft for hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Surg. 2014;60:1353–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Hu D., Li X., Li J., Tong P., Li Z., Lin G., Sun Y., Wang J. The preclinical and clinical progress of cell sheet engineering in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023;14:112. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03340-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Shahin-Shamsabadi A., Cappuccitti J. Anchored cell sheet engineering: a novel scaffold-free platform for in vitro modeling. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202308552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Chandra Sekar N., Khoshmanesh K., Baratchi S. Bioengineered models of cardiovascular diseases. Atherosclerosis. 2024;393 doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Kim S., Kim W., Lim S., Jeon J.S. Vasculature-on-a-chip for in vitro disease models. Bioengineering. 2017;4:8. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering4010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Kim D.A., Ku D.N. Structure of shear-induced platelet aggregated clot formed in an in vitro arterial thrombosis model. Blood Adv. 2022;6:2872–2883. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Chen L., Zheng Y., Liu Y., Tian P., Yu L., Bai L., Zhou F., Yang Y., Cheng Y., Wang F., et al. Microfluidic-based in vitro thrombosis model for studying microplastics toxicity. Lab Chip. 2022;22:1344–1353. doi: 10.1039/D1LC00989C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Xu Y., Deng P., Yu G., Ke X., Lin Y., Shu X., Xie Y., Zhang S., Nie R., Wu Z. Thrombogenicity of microfluidic chip surface manipulation: Facile, one-step, none-protein technique for extreme wettability contrast micropatterning. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2021;343 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Yeom E., Park J.H., Kang Y.J., Lee S.J. Microfluidics for simultaneous quantification of platelet adhesion and blood viscosity. Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep24994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Wang H.C., Zhao M.M., Wu L.Q. Fabrication of sandwich-like microfluidic chip with circular cross-section micro-channels. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 2018;32 doi: 10.1142/S0217979218502880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Berry J., Peaudecerf F.J., Masters N.A., Neeves K.B., Goldstein R.E., Harper M.T. An “occlusive thrombosis-on-a-chip” microfluidic device for investigating the effect of anti-thrombotic drugs. Lab Chip. 2021;21:4104–4117. doi: 10.1039/D1LC00347J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Dellaquila A., Le Bao C., Letourneur D., Simon-Yarza T. In vitro strategies to vascularize 3D physiologically relevant models. Adv. Sci. 2021;8 doi: 10.1002/advs.202100798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Kolesky D.B., Homan K.A., Skylar-Scott M.A., Lewis J.A. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:3179–3184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521342113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Haase K., Kamm R.D. Advances in on-chip vascularization. Regen. Med. 2017;12:285–302. doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Vila Cuenca M., Cochrane A., van den Hil F.E., de Vries A.A.F., Lesnik Oberstein S.A.J., Mummery C.L., Orlova V.V. Engineered 3D vessel-on-chip using hiPSC-derived endothelial- and vascular smooth muscle cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16:2159–2168. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Shakeri A., Wang Y., Zhao Y., Landau S., Perera K., Lee J., Radisic M. Engineering organ-on-a-chip systems for vascular diseases. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2023;43:2241–2255. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.318233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Jin Q., Bhatta A., Pagaduan J.V., Chen X., West-Foyle H., Liu J., Hou A., Berkowitz D., Kuo S.C., Askin F.B., et al. Biomimetic human small muscular pulmonary arteries. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaaz2598. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz2598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Ching T., Vasudevan J., Chang S.-Y., Tan H.Y., Sargur Ranganath A., Lim C.T., Fernandez J.G., Ng J.J., Toh Y.-C., Hashimoto M. Biomimetic vasculatures by 3D-printed porous molds. Small. 2022;18 doi: 10.1002/smll.202203426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Pan C., Xu J., Gao Q., Li W., Sun T., Lu J., Shi Q., Han Y., Gao G., Li J. Sequentially suspended 3D bioprinting of multiple-layered vascular models with tunable geometries for in vitro modeling of arterial disorders initiation. Biofabrication. 2023;15 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aceffa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Gu X., Xie S., Hong D., Ding Y. An in vitro model of foam cell formation induced by a stretchable microfluidic device. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43902-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Hong S., Song Y., Choi J., Hwang C. Bonding of flexible membranes for perfusable vascularized networks patch. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2022;19:363–375. doi: 10.1007/s13770-021-00409-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Zheng W., Jiang B., Wang D., Zhang W., Wang Z., Jiang X. A microfluidic flow-stretch chip for investigating blood vessel biomechanics. Lab Chip. 2012;12:3441–3450. doi: 10.1039/C2LC40173H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Niklason L.E., Lawson J.H. Bioengineered human blood vessels. Science. 2020;370 doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Chan A.H.P., Tan R.P., Michael P.L., Lee B.S.L., Vanags L.Z., Ng M.K.C., Bursill C.A., Wise S.G. Evaluation of synthetic vascular grafts in a mouse carotid grafting model. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Zhu T., Gu H., Ma W., Zhang Q., Du J., Chen S., Wang L., Zhang W. A fabric reinforced small diameter tubular graft for rabbits’ carotid artery defect. Compos. B Eng. 2021;225 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Fang Z., Xiao Y., Geng X., Jia L., Xing Y., Ye L., Gu Y., Zhang A.-y., Feng Z.-g. Fabrication of heparinized small diameter TPU/PCL bi-layered artificial blood vessels and in vivo assessment in a rabbit carotid artery replacement model. Biomater. Adv. 2022;133 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Mahara A., Somekawa S., Kobayashi N., Hirano Y., Kimura Y., Fujisato T., Yamaoka T. Tissue-engineered acellular small diameter long-bypass grafts with neointima-inducing activity. Biomaterials. 2015;58:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Shin'oka T., Imai Y., Ikada Y. Transplantation of a tissue-engineered pulmonary artery. N. Engl. J. Med. Overseas. Ed. 2001;344:532–533. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.L'Heureux N., McAllister T.N., De La Fuente L.M. Tissue-engineered blood vessel for adult arterial revascularization. N. Engl. J. Med. Overseas. Ed. 2007;357:1451–1453. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc071536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Sokolov O., Shaprynskyi V., Skupyy O., Stanko O., Yurets S., Yurkova Y., Niklason L.E. Use of bioengineered human acellular vessels to treat traumatic injuries in the Ukraine–Russia conflict. Lancet Reg. Health. Eur. 2023;29 doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Kirkton R.D., Santiago-Maysonet M., Lawson J.H., Tente W.E., Dahl S.L.M., Niklason L.E., Prichard H.L. Bioengineered human acellular vessels recellularize and evolve into living blood vessels after human implantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau6934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Jakimowicz T., Przywara S., Turek J., Pilgrim A., Macech M., Zapotoczny N., Zubilewicz T., Lawson J.H., Niklason L.E. Five year outcomes in patients with end stage renal disease who received a bioengineered human acellular vessel for dialysis access. EJVES Vasc. Forum. 2022;54:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Nickerson M.C., Thamba A., Rao V., Peterson D.B., Peterson D.A., Cuddy D.S. Expanded utility of human acellular vessel in hemodialysis access surgery and arterial aneurysm repair. Cureus. 2023;15 doi: 10.7759/cureus.46325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Loewa A., Feng J.J., Hedtrich S. Human disease models in drug development. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2023;1:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s44222-023-00063-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Leung C.M., de Haan P., Ronaldson-Bouchard K., Kim G.A., Ko J., Rho H.S., Chen Z., Habibovic P., Jeon N.L., Takayama S., et al. A guide to the organ-on-a-chip. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2022;2:33. doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Hofer M., Lutolf M.P. Engineering organoids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021;6:402–420. doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00279-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Su C., Menon N.V., Xu X., Teo Y.R., Cao H., Dalan R., Tay C.Y., Hou H.W. A novel human arterial wall-on-a-chip to study endothelial inflammation and vascular smooth muscle cell migration in early atherosclerosis. Lab Chip. 2021;21:2359–2371. doi: 10.1039/D1LC00131K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Zheng W., Huang R., Jiang B., Zhao Y., Zhang W., Jiang X. An early-stage atherosclerosis research model based on microfluidics. Small. 2016;12:2022–2034. doi: 10.1002/smll.201503241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Gao G., Park W., Kim B.S., Ahn M., Chae S., Cho W.-W., Kim J., Lee J.Y., Jang J., Cho D.-W. Construction of a novel in vitro atherosclerotic model from geometry-tunable artery equivalents engineered via in-bath coaxial cell printing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202008878. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Mallone A., Stenger C., Von Eckardstein A., Hoerstrup S.P., Weber B. Biofabricating atherosclerotic plaques: In vitro engineering of a three-dimensional human fibroatheroma model. Biomaterials. 2018;150:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Bhakdi S., Dorweiler B., Kirchmann R., Torzewski J., Weise E., Tranum-Jensen J., Walev I., Wieland E. On the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: enzymatic transformation of human low density lipoprotein to an atherogenic moiety. J. Exp. Med. 1995;182:1959–1971. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.6.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Chellan B., Reardon C.A., Getz G.S., Hofmann Bowman M.A. Enzymatically modified low-density lipoprotein promotes foam cell formation in smooth muscle cells via macropinocytosis and enhances receptor-mediated uptake of oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016;36:1101–1113. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Choi J.-S., Ham D.-H., Kim J.-H., Marcial H.B.F., Jeong P.-H., Choi J.-H., Park W.-T. Quantitative image analysis of thrombus formation in microfluidic in-vitro models. Micro and Nano Syst. Lett. 2022;10:23. doi: 10.1186/s40486-022-00166-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Costa P.F., Albers H.J., Linssen J.E.A., Middelkamp H.H.T., van der Hout L., Passier R., van den Berg A., Malda J., van der Meer A.D. Mimicking arterial thrombosis in a 3D-printed microfluidic in vitro vascular model based on computed tomography angiography data. Lab Chip. 2017;17:2785–2792. doi: 10.1039/C7LC00202E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Murphy S.V., Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Lee V.K., Kim D.Y., Ngo H., Lee Y., Seo L., Yoo S.-S., Vincent P.A., Dai G. Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8092–8102. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Kolesky D.B., Truby R.L., Gladman A.S., Busbee T.A., Homan K.A., Lewis J.A. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:3124–3130. doi: 10.1002/adma.201305506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Bertassoni L.E., Cecconi M., Manoharan V., Nikkhah M., Hjortnaes J., Cristino A.L., Barabaschi G., Demarchi D., Dokmeci M.R., Yang Y., Khademhosseini A. Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab Chip. 2014;14:2202–2211. doi: 10.1039/C4LC00030G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Miller J.S., Stevens K.R., Yang M.T., Baker B.M., Nguyen D.H.T., Cohen D.M., Toro E., Chen A.A., Galie P.A., Yu X., et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:768–774. doi: 10.1038/nmat3357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Zhang Y.S., Davoudi F., Walch P., Manbachi A., Luo X., Dell'Erba V., Miri A.K., Albadawi H., Arneri A., Li X., et al. Bioprinted thrombosis-on-a-chip. Lab Chip. 2016;16:4097–4105. doi: 10.1039/C6LC00380J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Gompper G., Fedosov D.A. Modeling microcirculatory blood flow: current state and future perspectives. WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine. 2016;8:157–168. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Nilsson D.P.G., Holmgren M., Holmlund P., Wåhlin A., Eklund A., Dahlberg T., Wiklund K., Andersson M. Patient-specific brain arteries molded as a flexible phantom model using 3D printed water-soluble resin. Sci. Rep. 2022;12 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14279-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Cai S., Li H., Zheng F., Kong F., Dao M., Karniadakis G.E., Suresh S. Artificial intelligence velocimetry and microaneurysm-on-a-chip for three-dimensional analysis of blood flow in physiology and disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100697118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Yong K.W., Janmaleki M., Pachenari M., Mitha A.P., Sanati-Nezhad A., Sen A. Engineering a 3D human intracranial aneurysm model using liquid-assisted injection molding and tuned hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2021;136:266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Jang L.K., Alvarado J.A., Pepona M., Wasson E.M., Nash L.D., Ortega J.M., Randles A., Maitland D.J., Moya M.L., Hynes W.F. Three-dimensional bioprinting of aneurysm-bearing tissue structure for endovascular deployment of embolization coils. Biofabrication. 2020;13 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abbb9b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.McCormack A., Highley C.B., Leslie N.R., Melchels F.P.W. 3D printing in suspension baths: keeping the promises of bioprinting afloat. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:584–593. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Daly A.C., Prendergast M.E., Hughes A.J., Burdick J.A. Bioprinting for the biologist. Cell. 2021;184:18–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Van Ombergen A., Chalupa-Gantner F., Chansoria P., Colosimo B.M., Costantini M., Domingos M., Dufour A., De Maria C., Groll J., Jungst T., et al. 3D bioprinting in microgravity: Opportunities, challenges, and possible applications in space. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023;12 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Windisch J., Reinhardt O., Duin S., Schütz K., Rodriguez N.J.N., Liu S., Lode A., Gelinsky M. Bioinks for space missions: The influence of long-term storage of alginate-methylcellulose-based bioinks on printability as well as cell viability and function. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023;12 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Sun W., Starly B., Daly A.C., Burdick J.A., Groll J., Skeldon G., Shu W., Sakai Y., Shinohara M., Nishikawa M., et al. The bioprinting roadmap. Biofabrication. 2020;12 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Mo X., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Zhou X., Zhang Z., Fang Y., Fan Z., Guo Y., Zhang T., Xiong Z. Satellite-based on-orbit printing of 3D tumor models. Adv. Mater. 2024;36 doi: 10.1002/adma.202309618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Afshinnekoo E., Scott R.T., MacKay M.J., Pariset E., Cekanaviciute E., Barker R., Gilroy S., Hassane D., Smith S.M., Zwart S.R., et al. Fundamental biological features of spaceflight: Advancing the field to enable deep-space exploration. Cell. 2020;183:1162–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Mao W., Huai Y., An L., Wang X., Ru K., Patil S., Zhang W., Ran F., Chen Z., Qian A. Microgravity inhibits cell proliferation and promotes senescence and apoptosis in embryonic stem cells. Space. Sci. Technol. 2024;4 doi: 10.34133/space.0104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Paulsen K., Thiel C., Timm J., Schmidt P.M., Huber K., Tauber S., Hemmersbach R., Seibt D., Kroll H., Grote K.H., et al. Microgravity-induced alterations in signal transduction in cells of the immune system. Acta Astronaut. 2010;67:1116–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.06.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Yan R., Zhang Y., Li Y., Wang J., Bibi H., Deng Y.-L., Li Y. Dragon’s blood protect rat blood-brain barrier dysfunction induced by simulated microgravity effect. Space. Sci. Technol. 2023;3 doi: 10.34133/space.0071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Blaber E., Marçal H., Burns B.P. Bioastronautics: The influence of microgravity on astronaut health. Astrobiology. 2010;10:463–473. doi: 10.1089/ast.2009.0415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Li Y., Huang L., Iqbal J., Deng Y. Investigation on P-glycoprotein function and its interacting proteins under simulated microgravity. Space. Sci. Technol. 2021;2021 doi: 10.34133/2021/9835728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Juhl O.J., Buettmann E.G., Friedman M.A., DeNapoli R.C., Hoppock G.A., Donahue H.J. Update on the effects of microgravity on the musculoskeletal system. npj Microgravity. 2021;7:28. doi: 10.1038/s41526-021-00158-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Moroni L., Tabury K., Stenuit H., Grimm D., Baatout S., Mironov V. What can biofabrication do for space and what can space do for biofabrication? Trends Biotechnol. 2022;40:398–411. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Ren Z., Harriot A.D., Mair D.B., Chung M.K., Lee P.H.U., Kim D.-H. Biomanufacturing of 3D tissue constructs in microgravity and their applications in human pathophysiological studies. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023;12 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Cubo-Mateo N., Podhajsky S., Knickmann D., Slenzka K., Ghidini T., Gelinsky M. Can 3D bioprinting be a key for exploratory missions and human settlements on the Moon and Mars? Biofabrication. 2020;12 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abb53a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Armstrong J.P.K., Stevens M.M. Using remote fields for complex tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Zhou H., Dong G., Gao G., Du R., Tang X., Ma Y., Li J. Hydrogel-based stimuli-responsive micromotors for biomedicine. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022;2022 doi: 10.34133/2022/9852853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Koetting M.C., Peters J.T., Steichen S.D., Peppas N.A. Stimulus-responsive hydrogels: Theory, modern advances, and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2015;93:1–49. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Wang Y., Pereira R.F., Peach C., Huang B., Vyas C., Bartolo P. Robotic in situ bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering. Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 2023;5 doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/acda67. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Dong H., Hu B., Zhang W., Xie W., Mo J., Sun H., Shang J. Robotic-assisted automated in situ bioprinting. Int. J. Bioprint. 2023;9:629. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]