Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1995 Oct 1;488(Pt 1):243–248. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020962

Perception of movement at the human ankle: effects of leg position.

K M Refshauge 1, R C Fitzpatrick 1
PMCID: PMC1156717  PMID: 8568660

Abstract

1. Recent studies show that subjects perceive smaller ankle movements when they are upright in the standing position than when they are seated. To examine this improvement, the ability to perceive ankle movements was tested in five positions of body, knee and ankle. Subjects reported the direction of slow ramp movements of the ankles. 2. The threshold for perceiving ankle movements was unchanged when only one ankle was moved rather than both together. When seated with the knees bent and ankles slightly plantarflexed, subjects perceived movements of 0.65 deg at 0.05 deg s-1. However, when upright or when seated with their knees and ankles in the standing position, subjects perceived movements that were one-third of this size. 3. These findings show that the knee and ankle positions, rather than being upright, explain the better performance in the standing position. During standing, knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion stretch the calf muscles. Thus, enhanced input from intramuscular stretch receptors appears responsible for the better performance.

Full text

PDF
243

Images in this article

244Figure 1
on p.244

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appenteng K., Prochazka A. Tendon organ firing during active muscle lengthening in awake, normally behaving cats. J Physiol. 1984 Aug;353:81–92. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke D., Gandevia S. C., Macefield G. Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. J Physiol. 1988 Aug;402:347–361. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark F. J., Burgess R. C., Chapin J. W., Lipscomb W. T. Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Dec;54(6):1529–1540. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.6.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark F. J., Grigg P., Chapin J. W. The contribution of articular receptors to proprioception with the fingers in humans. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jan;61(1):186–193. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.61.1.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis J. N. The response to stretch of human intercostal muscle spindles studied in vitro. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):561–579. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferrell W. R., Gandevia S. C., McCloskey D. I. The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. J Physiol. 1987 May;386:63–71. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzpatrick R., McCloskey D. I. Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. J Physiol. 1994 Jul 1;478(Pt 1):173–186. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwin G. M., McCloskey D. I., Matthews P. B. The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain. 1972;95(4):705–748. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.4.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall L. A., McCloskey D. I. Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. J Physiol. 1983 Feb;335:519–533. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Macefield G., Gandevia S. C., Burke D. Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand. J Physiol. 1990 Oct;429:113–129. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthews P. B., Stein R. B. The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723–743. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ross H. E., Brodie E. E. Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1987 Feb;39(1):77–88. doi: 10.1080/02724988743000042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor J. L., McCloskey D. I. Detection of slow movements imposed at the elbow during active flexion in man. J Physiol. 1992 Nov;457:503–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES