Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1995 Nov 1;488(Pt 3):721–728. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021003

Specific motifs in the external loops of connexin proteins can determine gap junction formation between chick heart myocytes.

A Warner 1, D K Clements 1, S Parikh 1, W H Evans 1, R L DeHaan 1
PMCID: PMC1156737  PMID: 8576861

Abstract

1. Gap junction formation was compared in the absence and presence of small peptides containing extracellular loop sequences of gap junction (connexin) proteins by measuring the time taken for pairs of spontaneously beating embryonic chick heart myoballs to synchronize beat rates. Test peptides were derived from connexin 32. Non-homologous peptides were used as controls. Control pairs took 42 +/- 0.5 min (mean +/- S.E.M.; n = 1088) to synchronize. 2. Connexins 32 and 43, but not 26, were detected in gap junction plaques. The density and distribution of connexin immunolabelling varied between myoballs. 3. Peptides containing conserved motifs from extracellular loops 1 and 2 delayed gap junction formation. The steep portion of the dose-response relation lay between 30 and 300 microM peptide. 4. In loop 1, the conserved motifs QPG and SHVR were identified as being involved in junction formation. In loop 2, the conserved SRPTEK motif was important. The ability of peptides containing the SRPTEK motif to interfere with the formation of gap junctions was enhanced by amino acids from the putative membrane-spanning region. 5. Peptides from loop 1 and loop 2 were equivalently effective; there was no synergism between them. 6. The inclusion of conserved cysteines in test peptides did not make them more effective in the competition assay.

Full text

PDF
721

Images in this article

723Figure 1
on p.723

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becker D. L., Evans W. H., Green C. R., Warner A. Functional analysis of amino acid sequences in connexin43 involved in intercellular communication through gap junctions. J Cell Sci. 1995 Apr;108(Pt 4):1455–1467. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.4.1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M. V., Barrio L. C., Bargiello T. A., Spray D. C., Hertzberg E., Sáez J. C. Gap junctions: new tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron. 1991 Mar;6(3):305–320. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90241-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruzzone R., Haefliger J. A., Gimlich R. L., Paul D. L. Connexin40, a component of gap junctions in vascular endothelium, is restricted in its ability to interact with other connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 Jan;4(1):7–20. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clapham D. E., Shrier A., DeHaan R. L. Junctional resistance and action potential delay between embryonic heart cell aggregates. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Jun;75(6):633–654. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.6.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dahl G., Nonner W., Werner R. Attempts to define functional domains of gap junction proteins with synthetic peptides. Biophys J. 1994 Nov;67(5):1816–1822. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80663-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl G., Werner R., Levine E., Rabadan-Diehl C. Mutational analysis of gap junction formation. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):172–182. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81803-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harfst E., Severs N. J., Green C. R. Cardiac myocyte gap junctions: evidence for a major connexon protein with an apparent relative molecular mass of 70,000. J Cell Sci. 1990 Aug;96(Pt 4):591–604. doi: 10.1242/jcs.96.4.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar N. M., Gilula N. B. Molecular biology and genetics of gap junction channels. Semin Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;3(1):3–16. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4682(10)80003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mandelboim O., Berke G., Fridkin M., Feldman M., Eisenstein M., Eisenbach L. CTL induction by a tumour-associated antigen octapeptide derived from a murine lung carcinoma. Nature. 1994 May 5;369(6475):67–71. doi: 10.1038/369067a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyer R. A., Laird D. W., Revel J. P., Johnson R. G. Inhibition of gap junction and adherens junction assembly by connexin and A-CAM antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;119(1):179–189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Monaghan P., Perusinghe N., Carlile G., Evans W. H. Rapid modulation of gap junction expression in mouse mammary gland during pregnancy, lactation, and involution. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994 Jul;42(7):931–938. doi: 10.1177/42.7.8014476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rahman S., Evans W. H. Topography of connexin32 in rat liver gap junctions. Evidence for an intramolecular disulphide linkage connecting the two extracellular peptide loops. J Cell Sci. 1991 Nov;100(Pt 3):567–578. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.3.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Warner A. Gap junctions in development--a perspective. Semin Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;3(1):81–91. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4682(10)80009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Werner R., Levine E., Rabadan-Diehl C., Dahl G. Formation of hybrid cell-cell channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5380–5384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. White T. W., Bruzzone R., Wolfram S., Paul D. L., Goodenough D. A. Selective interactions among the multiple connexin proteins expressed in the vertebrate lens: the second extracellular domain is a determinant of compatibility between connexins. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(4):879–892. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.4.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES