Skip to main content
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics logoLink to CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
. 2024 Nov 15;30(11):e70079. doi: 10.1111/cns.70079

Endothelial Dysfunctions in Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Alzheimer's Disease: From Mechanisms to Potential Therapies

Qian Yue 1,2,3,4, Xinyue Leng 1,2, Ningqing Xie 5,6,7, Zaijun Zhang 5,6,7, Deguang Yang 7,3,4,, Maggie Pui Man Hoi 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11567945  PMID: 39548663

ABSTRACT

Recent research has shown the presence of blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown in Alzheimer's disease (AD). BBB is a dynamic interface consisting of a continuous monolayer of brain endothelial cells (BECs) enveloped by pericytes and astrocytes. The restricted permeability of BBB strictly controls the exchange of substances between blood and brain parenchyma, which is crucial for brain homeostasis by excluding blood‐derived detrimental factors and pumping out brain‐derived toxic molecules. BBB breakdown in AD is featured as a series of BEC pathologies such as increased paracellular permeability, abnormal levels and functions of transporters, and inflammatory or oxidative profile, which may disturb the substance transportation across BBB, thereafter induce CNS disorders such as hypometabolism, Aβ accumulation, and neuroinflammation, eventually aggravate cognitive decline. Therefore, it seems important to protect BEC properties for BBB maintenance and neuroprotection. In this review, we thoroughly summarized the pathological alterations of BEC properties reported in AD patients and numerous AD models, including paracellular permeability, influx and efflux transporters, and inflammatory and oxidative profiles, and probably associated underlying mechanisms. Then we reviewed current therapeutic agents that are effective in ameliorating a series of BEC pathologies, and ultimately protecting BBB integrity and cognitive functions. Regarding the current drug development for AD proceeds extremely hard, this review aims to discuss the therapeutic potentials of targeting BEC pathologies and BBB maintenance for AD treatment, therefore expecting to shed a light on the future AD drug development by targeting BEC pathologies and BBB protection.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, BBB protection, blood–brain barrier, influx and efflux transporter, paracellular permeability, vascular inflammation


Blood–brain barrier (BBB) works as a crucial structure separating central nervous system (CNS) and circulating system. The highly organized endothelial junctions and transporters strictly restricts substance exchange across BBB to maintain the homeostasis of CNS. In Alzheimer's disease, BBB breakdown has been widely detected, featured as a series of brain endothelial cell (BEC) pathologies, including increased permeability, abnormal levels and functions of influx and efflux transporters, as well as inflammatory and oxidative profile. The goal for BEC‐targeting treatment in AD is to maintain the integrity of BBB and accelerate the clearance of brain‐derived Aβ species through BBB. BEC‐targeting treatment for AD mainly focuses on regulating a series of pathological processes including inflammation, oxidative stress, autophagy, apoptosis, and several signaling such as angiogenic and Wnt/β‐catenin pathway, as well as modulating Aβ clearance pathway and so on. Targeting various BEC pathologies have shown therapeutic potentials in protecting BBB and improving cognitive functions in AD.

graphic file with name CNS-30-e70079-g001.jpg

1. Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia prevalent among people aged 65 and older. Current drug development mostly focuses on the neuron‐, or microglia‐related pathologies. Particularly, recent studies have highlighted the association between blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption and prodromal dementia in AD. BBB is a cellular barrier essential for separating brain parenchyma from circulatory system and is particularly important for maintaining brain homeostasis. BBB breakdown has been observed in human throughout the whole progression of AD. MRI has also detected BBB breakdown in preclinical AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), along with altered transporters (GLUT1, ABCB1 [P‐gp]). CSF biomarkers for BBB breakdown are also detected in early AD and AD progression when Aβ plaques and NFT are formed [214].

BBB breakdown, accompanied with invasion of neurotoxic, proinflammatory mediators, and impaired molecular transport is demonstrated to impair cognitive functions [12]. Increased permeability of water and small molecules detected by MRI [49], is found in MCI patients and AD, which is considered as biomarker to predict cognitive function [116]. Invasion of peripheral inflammatory mediators and disturbed influx and efflux transporters may accelerate AD progression by aggravating neuroinflammation and Aβ burden. Therefore, apart from the traditional targets for AD, BBB breakdown is probably a potential target for maintaining brain homeostasis and alleviate AD pathologies. Recently, many evidences have indicated the association between BBB impairment and neurodegenerative diseases, especially the therapeutic potential of targeting ECs [274]. Brain endothelial cell (BEC) is the most important part of BBB. Endothelial junctions and transporter proteins respectively consist of paracellular and biochemical barrier of BBB and guarantee the restricted permeability. Decreased level of junctional proteins and transporter proteins in endothelial cells directly lead to BBB leakiness and abnormality of efflux and influx transportation. In addition, pathological BECs exhibit proinflammatory and oxidative profiles, which facilitates the invasion of peripheral immune cells and aggravate neuroinflammation.

We will focus on the contributive role of Aβ pathology in BBB breakdown during AD progression, especially the pathologies of BECs. Previous studies have reported the toxicity of several forms of Aβ including monomer and fibrillary Aβ1‐42, soluble monomer of Aβ1‐40, and C‐terminal truncated Aβ1‐24 fragment on BECs. Fibril and oligomers of Aβ exert direct toxicity on BBB [166]. Soluble monomer Aβ1‐40 is pumped out of BBB in paracellular pathway. Therefore, BBB disruption can otherwise promote its clearance. Impaired integrity are also observed in Aβ25‐35‐induced BECs [80]. Moreover, the accumulation of zinc in amyloid plaques can induce the hyperpermeability of cerebral microvessels by triggering the accumulation of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen (PLG) in cerebral microvessels [157].

In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence of endothelial alterations in AD from both human tissues and disease models, including the changes in paracellular permeability, BBB influx and efflux transporters, vascular inflammatory and oxidative profile. Meanwhile, we will discuss the possible mechanisms underlying these pathological alterations. In the last, we will summarize the potential therapeutic agents able to ameliorate endothelial pathologies, ultimately enhance BBB integrity and improve cognitive functions in AD, expecting to discuss the therapeutic potentials of targeting BEC pathologies for AD treatment and shed a light on the future AD drug development.

2. An Overview of the Physiological Structure of the BBB

In the mature brain microvasculature, the BBB is a tightly regulated selectively permeable cellular barrier that regulate the movement of molecules across the blood and brain parenchyma. The BBB is composed of highly specialized BECs surrounded by pericyte and enwrapped by the endfeet of perivascular astrocytes, together with neurons and microglia and other glial cells in the neuropil, they termed the neurovascular unit. The BBB features are not intrinsic properties of the BECs. During early development, physical contact, and molecular interactions between neuronal and vascular cells (collectively known as neurovascular unit) coordinate the establishment of appropriate BBB features. The exchange of substances between blood and tissue fluid the brain occurs at the capillaries, which are microvessels composed of a continuous monolayer of non‐fenestrated endothelial cells interconnected by junctional proteins surrounded by a basement membrane. This constitutes the basis of the highly selective semipermeable interface of the BBB. Pericytes are embedded in the basement membrane and astrocytes wrap around capillary and pericytes with their endfeet. In adulthood, cells in the neurovascular unit continuously communicate with each other to promote BBB stabilization, maintenance, and immune quiescence. The function of the BBB depends on its properties as a physical barrier, a specific transport system, and a secretory tissue. The physical barrier is achieved by the formation of intercellular tight junction (TJ) and adherens junction (AJ) proteins to seal the capillary lining and restrict paracellular flow, typically only small‐sized polar solutes (MW < 400 kDa, hydrogen bonds < 8) are allowed. At the apical side, transmembrane proteins including occludin and claudins (claudin‐1, ‐3, ‐5 and −12) stabilized by zonula occludens (ZO‐1, ‐2 and ‐3) are the major components of TJ. At the basolateral side, vascular endothelial (VE)‐cadherin (VEC) and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1 (PECAM‐1) bind to actin cytoskeleton via catenins (α‐, β‐, γ‐catenin, and p120 catenin) for stabilization. Other components that contribute to endothelial tightness include junctional adhesion molecule (JAM‐A, ‐B, and ‐C), endothelial cell selective adhesion molecule (ESAM) as well as perivascular pericytes and astrocytes. These specialized structures seal the space between adjacent endothelial cells and control the paracellular diffusion of ions and solutes based on their size and charge, while restricting the passage of harmful substances such as pathogens and potentially toxic substances from the blood into the brain.

Essential molecular delivery system across BBB is mediated by vesicular pathways, which contribute to the biomedical barrier in BBB. Receptor‐(Insulin receptor, transferrin receptor, leptin receptor, receptor for advanced glycation end product) ([270]), carrier‐ (GLUT1, GLUT3, CAT1, LAT1, MCT1, CNT2), and adsorptive‐mediated transcytosis (endogenous substances like avidin, cationized albumin, and histones) mediate vesicular transport of larger molecules across BBB [160]. Functional proteins like insulin, transferrin and leptin are mainly delivered into brain by receptor‐mediated transcytosis (RMT). Metabolic substances like carbonhydrates, peptides, proteins, nucleotides, fatty acids, and monocarboxylates are mainly delivered by carrier mediated transcytosis (CMT). Nutrient transporters involved in CMT belongs to solute carrier (SLC) family [95]. Other SLC transporters (OCTs, OATs, OATPs, PEPTs, EAATs, and MAPTs) [214] and ATP‐binding cassette (ABC) family transporters mainly manipulate efflux of drugs or neurotoxic compounds from brain to blood [160].

3. Evidence of Pathological Alterations of BECs in BBB Reported in Numerous AD Models: Human, Animal and Cell

3.1. BBB Permeability

As mentioned above, TJ and AJ proteins expressed on BECs control the paracellular permeability of BBB. In AD, there is an increase in vascular permeability associated with abnormality of TJ and AJ proteins. In the following section, we will discuss about the changes of BBB permeability and associated alterations of junctional proteins reported in AD patients and animal or cellular models.

3.1.1. Increased BBB Permeability and BBB Leakage

Although current understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of AD still remain incomplete and uncertain, aging is a well‐established risk factor for AD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies using gadolinium (Gd)‐based contrast agents via intravenous injection, which can enhance the visibility of blood vessel and blood flow, is a widely used method for evaluating BBB permeability (K trans) and could detect subtle BBB damage in vivo. Studies using contrast‐enhanced MRI in living humans have demonstrated that aging‐associated neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by abnormal increase of BBB permeability [5, 55, 142, 151, 225]. Notably, increased BBB permeability occurs with natural aging and is aggravated in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [55, 142]. These early impairments in BBB barrier function precede observable neuroinflammatory responses, abnormal protein deposition, or neuronal damage, and occur first in the hippocampus with the evidence of pericyte degeneration [142, 151]. In addition, post‐mortem analysis of AD brain tissues showed the significant accumulation of plasma‐derived proteins including immunoglobulins, albumin, fibrinogen, and thrombin in the hippocampus and cortex. It indicates the substantial leakage and breakdown of the BBB in late stages [11, 23, 57, 81, 191, 193, 196, 281]. Invasion of fibrinogen and thrombin into brain can further aggravate neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity [84, 192].

Consistent with human data, in vivo imaging studies in various transgenic AD mouse models also demonstrated paracellular hyperpermeability and BBB leakage at late stage, for example, 8 months in Tg2576 mice and 16 months in 3 × Tg mice [38, 53]. In addition to paracellular hyperpermeability, morphological changes of brain vessel were also observed, including the thickening of cerebral small vessels [199], reduced angiogenesis [108], decreased capillary density [267], reduced cerebral blood flow [41], and increased fibrinogen deposition [35, 61]. These changes are likely associated with increased Aβ deposition within the walls of the microvessels in the brain. Interestingly, the onset of BBB breakdown varies among different types of transgenic AD mouse models, and it appeared to be associated with the specific mutations. Among these mutations, those affecting the presenilin (PSEN) appeared to have a more significant impact on BBB integrity, while mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP) and tau (MAPT) have comparatively weaker effects. The amount of mutations may also correlate with the onset of BBB damage. 5 × Tg‐AD mice exhibited the earliest onset of BBB damage at 4 months old, while 3 × Tg‐AD mice exhibited BBB damage at 5 months old. Table 1 presents the typical markers used as indicators of BBB leakage, such as increased extravasation of immunoglobulin‐G (IgG), Evans blue, and FITC‐Dextran, in transgenic mouse models of AD ([1]; Aluganti [4, 70]).

TABLE 1.

The phenotypes of BBB breakdown reported in numerous transgenic AD animal models. (P, Plaques; G, Gliosis; C, Cognitive impairment; the starting timepoints for these AD phenotype characterization are acquired from the website of Alzforum (https://www.alzforum.org/research‐models).)

Genetic background Mutations Time point detecting BBB breakdown Starting time point of AD pathology in Tg‐AD models BBB breakdown phenotypes Reference
C57BL/6

5 × Tg‐AD mice

APPSwedish (KM670/671NL), APPFlorida (I716V), APPLondon (V717I), PSEN1 (M146L), PSEN1 (L286V)

4 months

P:1–3 (1.5) months

G: 1–3 months

C: 6 months [170]

BBB breakdown, monolayer composed of isolated ECs revealed increased permeability [14]
C57BL/6 5 months BBB leakiness characterized by increased extravasation of immunoglobulin‐G (IgG) and decreased level of Claudin‐5
C57BL/6

Tg‐SwDl mice

APPSwedish, APPDutch (E693Q), APPIowa (D694N)

9 months

P:3 months

G: 6–24 months

C: 3, 9, 12 months

BBB leakiness was evaluated by immunostaining of immunoglobulin‐G (IgG) extravasation [3]
6 months Aβ deposition in brain microvessels
13 months Decreased expression of occluding. Isolated EC monolayer reveals increased permeability. [188]
C57/BL6

3 × Tg‐AD mice

APPSwedish, PSEN1 (M146V), and TAU (P301L)

5 months

P:6 months

G: 7 months

C: 4 months

BBB breakdown characterized as dystrophic astroglial phenotype (decreased levels of GFAP immunoreactive surface and decreased astrocyte process) [169]
C57BL6/129S 16 months BBB disruption was only observed at 16 months. Time‐dependent elevation in permeability index and reduction in vascular volume (measured by peak amplitude). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) included assessment of hippocampal structural integrity, blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability (blood–brain barrier perfusion index [BBBi]) and neurospectroscopy [38]
B6129SF2/J 6 months Aβ deposition at brain blood vessel was increased at 6 months, accompanied by increased pericyte coverage as well as activated endothelium to facilitate Aβ clearance [61]
C57BL6/J

APP/PS1 mice

APPSwedish, PSEN1 (L166P)

10 months

P: 6–8 weeks (cerebeal amyloidosis), 2 months (neocortex), 3 months (hippocampus) [189]

G: 6 weeks, secretion of cytokines and chemokines at later age

C: 7–8 months

Decreased expression of ZO‐1 and CD31‐GFAP colocalization. angiogenesis was also inhibited [108, 267]
C57BL/6
C57BL/6

APP/PS1 mice

APPSwedish, PSEN1dE9

6 months

P:4 months (cortex), 6 months (hippocampus)

G: 4 months (plaque associated), 8 months (microgliosis)

C: 6–10 months

ZO‐1, Claudin‐5 downregulation in cortex and hippocampus. Microvessel density decreases due to Aβ deposition [267]
C57BL/6

TgCRND8 mice

APPSwedish, APPIndiana

4–12 months

P: 3–5 months

G: 3–5 months

C: 3 months

Increased permeability BBB breakdown characterized by decreased CBF at 4 months and decreased AQP4 level and upregulation of PDGFRβ at 10 months [41]
6 months Fibrinogen deposition was increasing in brain blood vessel [35]
C57BL/6

Tg‐ArcSwe mice

APPArctic, APPSwedish

7 months

P: 5–6 months

G: 5–6 months (hippocampus, cortex, thalamus)

C: 4–8, 16 months

Increased dextran extravasation [70]
C57BL/6

APP23 mice

APPSwedish

12 months

P: 6 months

G: 6 months

C: 3 months

Obvious thickenings of cerebral small vessel and increased Aβ40 deposition in smooth muscle layer [199]
C57BL6J PS1V97L 6 months

P: 6–9 months (increased Aβ1‐42 and the ratio of Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40, and intracellular accumulation Aβ1‐42 of oligomer but rare plaques)

G: 9 months

C: 6–9 months [272]

Increased Evans Blue permeation and decreased TJ proteins [249]
C57BL/6

Tg2576 mice

APPSwedish (isoform 695)

8–12 months

P: 9 months (increased level of Aβ1‐42, Aβ1‐40), 11–13 months (Aβ deposition in cerebrovascular blood vessels)

G: 10–16 months

C: 10–15 months [170]

MRI scans showed greater extravasation at 12 months [53]
C57BL/6J ApoE‐PON1 double knockout mice 14 months

P: 14 months

G: 14 months

C: no data

Increased permeation of Evans blue dye into brain [4]
C57BL/6

PDAPPJ20 mice

APPSwedish, APPIndiana

12 months

P: 1 months (Aβ punctra in hippocampus), 5–7 months (diffuse amyloid plaque), 8–10 months (widespread plaques)

G: 6–9 months

C: 4 months (learning deficits), 6‐9 months (memory deficits) [170]

Augmented vascular permeability in the hippocampus [172]
Hybrid C3H/He‐C57BL/6

Tg (APPSwLon) mice

APPSwedish, APPLondon

No data Aβ1‐42 is increased at 3–4 months, no deposit at 2 years [103] NO data

3.1.2. Alterations of Junctional Proteins

The highly selective and semipermeable diffusion barrier properties of the BBB is primarily determined by the presence of tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs), which are composed of transmembrane proteins expressed on the apical and basolateral side of the endothelial plasma membrane respectively. TJ and AJ proteins are linked to the cytoskeleton machineries that control intracellular signaling networks. The increased BBB permeability observed in AD are likely the result of decreased levels and disorganization of TJ proteins, leading to the formation of gaps, and leaks in the BBB. It is established that claudin‐5 and occludin are essential components of TJs, and any dysregulation of these proteins significantly impact BBB integrity and barrier function [156, 280]. While there have been some studies investigating the changes in TJs and AJs in aging‐related neurodegenerative diseases, the research in human tissues is still relatively limited. In a recent study of post‐mortem analysis, it was observed the protein levels of claudin‐5 and occludin were selectively decreased in the cortical areas but not in the subcortical areas in sporadic AD patients when compared to age‐matched individuals that were normal or cognitively normal with extensive cortical Aβ deposits [246]. These findings were in line with the results from imaging studies in living human, which showed BBB hyperpermeability in MCI/AD patients was region specific, initiated and progressed from cortical areas such as the hippocampus [146]. Notably, cerebrovascular amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and vascular pathology did not appear to be major contributors to the decrease in TJ proteins, although the loss of TJ proteins was associated with the accumulation of insoluble Aβ species, particularly Aβ40 (but not insoluble full‐length Aβ1‐42), while the soluble Aβ species had not been analyzed in this study. The loss of synaptic marker synaptophysin, which indicated synaptic degeneration, was also found correlating with TJ loss. However, there was no inter‐dependence between these factors, suggesting TJs disruptions may contribute to AD pathogenesis in synergistic and additive manners to Aβ and neuronal pathologies. In addition to TJs, AJs also play crucial roles in stabilizing intercellular junctions and regulating permeability in response to immune signals. Results from another human post‐mortem study indicated the downregulation of AJ protein vascular endothelial (VE)‐cadherin in the brain vessels in both MCI and AD patients, along with increased levels of soluble VE‐cadherin in the blood plasma [44].

In line with human data, decreased expression level of TJ proteins including ZO‐1, Claudin‐5 and Occludin are also observed in numerous transgenic mice, including 5 × FAD mice (4–5 months) [14], APP/PS1 mice (6 months) [108, 267], and Tg‐SwDI mice (13 months) [188]. Apart from decreased level of TJs, downregulation of VE‐Cadherin in brain vessels is observed in AD patients. Similarly, reduced protein level of AJs (VE‐Cadherin, PECAM‐1) were also observed in APP/PS1 mice. Accordingly, increased plasma soluble VE‐Cadherin was observed in AD and MCI patients, as well as in APP‐Tg mice (21 months), which may also indicate disassembly of VE‐Cadherin and loss of VE‐cadherin in brain vessels [105].

Permeability changes are also observed in cellular level. Increased permeability is observed in in vitro isolated EC monolayer [14]. BMECs derived from iPSCs (extracted from AD patients bearing PSEN1 mutation) also show reduced TEER value, and elevated permeability of fluorescein. In parallel, expression of TJ proteins (Claudin‐5, Occludin) was also downregulated [179]. However, another research observes the upregulation of claudin‐5 and claudin‐3 in iPSCs‐derived BMEC from AD patients (PSEN1), although deceased TEER value and decreased level of VE‐cadherin both reflect the decreased endothelial integrity, while no significant difference in the expression of ZO‐1 and occludin. It is still not clear the underlying mechanism and physiological significance behind contradictory alterations of claudins [158]. Upregulation of TJ proteins may serve as the compensatory event upon BBB breakdown. In addition, downregulation of TJ proteins may also helpfully facilitate Aβ clearance though increase of paracellular permeability [92]. Increased permeability is also observed in various brain endothelial cell models under the stimulation of Aβ species. Expression level of ZO‐1 and Occludin are decreased in Aβ1‐42‐induced human cell line hCMEC/D3, accompanied by increased permeability of FITC‐dextran across endothelial monolayer [159]. Reduced level of VE‐cadherin is observed in Aβ‐stimulated human umbilical vascular endothelial cell line (HUVEC), as well as phosphorylation of β‐catenin, which is correlated with decreased level of TJ proteins and VE‐cadherin due to the internalization of β‐catenin and dissociation of AJ complex [204]. In Primary rat brain microvascular endothelial cells (rBMVECs), Aβ25‐35 also exerted endothelial disruptive effects [26]. Negative finding is also reported. Based on the BBB model established by brain microvessel endothelial cells (BMECs) derived from iPSCs (extracted from normal people with no disease), Aβ1‐42 in oligomeric or monomeric forms at nearly physiological concentration (0.5–2 μM) neither showed disruptive effect on BMECs as evaluated by the alteration of TEER, and permeability, even the treatment time was extended into 96 h [171].

Taken together, as the findings from AD patients and numerous AD models indicate, paracellular permeability of BBB is increased associated with AD pathologies, especially Aβ pathology (Figure 1). Hyperpermeability is accompanied by the downregulation or internalization of TJ and AJ proteins. However, apart from the level of junctional proteins, paracellular permeability of BBB also greatly depends on the structural support from astrocytes and pericytes. In transgenic AD mice, uncoupling of astrocyte endfeet‐endothelial cell or pericyte‐endothelial cell are observed. Decreased GFAP+ immunoreactive surface and astrocyte process [169], decreased colocalization of CD31 and GFAP [108], as well as decreased AQP4 level [41] are observed in 3 × Tg‐AD mice (6–7 months), APP/PS1 (6–9 months) mice, and TgCRND8 (14 months) mice, which indicate structural detachment between astrocyte endfeet and endothelial cells. In TgCRND8 mice, pericytes show abnormal hypertrophic processes with increased immunoreactivity of PDGFRβ [41]. In 3 × Tg‐AD mice (6 months), the coverage of pericyte coverage is also increased, which is explained as a compensatory mechanism to facilitate Aβ clearance through pericyte [61]. Therefore, the paracellular hyperpermeability of BBB under AD conditions is the jointly consequence of degeneration of BECs and dissociation of cell members in neurovascular unit.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The alterations of paracellular permeability in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and numerous AD models. In AD patients and animal models, blood–brain barrier (BBB) becomes leaky, manifested as downregulation of junctional proteins and uncoupling of neurovascular unit cell members. Increased invasion of blood‐derived detrimental mediators like fibrinogen and thrombin further aggravate brain pathologies. In in vitro cell models, numerous amyloid β (Aβ) species induce downregulation of junctional proteins. Activation of NF‐κB pathway and Ca2+/Calcineurin‐mediated MMPs upregulation are reported contributing to the downregulation of tight junction proteins, in which mitochondrial apoptosis and increased autophagy are also involved. The reorganization of cytoskeleton and adherens junction, like VE‐Cadherin are observed under the stimulation of hypoxia or inflammatory mediators, in which activation of RhoA/ROCK/MLC/MLCK is involved.

3.2. Influx Transporters

The normal function of brain greatly relies on the nutrient supply from peripheral blood system through CMT pathway. For instances, glucose transporters (GLUTs), monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) are required for carbohydrates influx. L‐type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), and cationic amino acid transporter 1 (CAT1) are required for influx of peptides and proteins. Concentrative nucleoside transporter 2 (CNT2) is required for nucleotides influx. Major facilitator superfamily domain‐containing protein 2 (Mfsd2a), long‐chain fatty acid transport protein‐1 (FATP1), ‐4, ‐5a, fatty acid‐binding proteins (FABP), and CD36 are required for influx of fatty acids especially docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) [130, 183]. LDLR could also uptake DHA with the assistance of APOE. Brain uptake of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) is mediated by scavenger receptor class B type I (SR‐BI) which belongs to RMT pathway [183]. Meanwhile, influx transport of functional molecules like insulin and insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) also depend on RMT pathway, which is essential for supporting the brain functions through insulin signaling pathway (mediated by insulin receptor or IGF receptor) [278].

3.2.1. Influx of Glucose

FDG‐positron emission tomography (PET) ([18F]Fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐d‐glucose) have detected impaired regional brain uptake of glucose in MCI and early AD patients [144]. In addition, BMEC‐derived from iPSC extracted from AD patients with PSEN1 mutation also display a reduction in glucose uptake. Impaired uptake of glucose may result from decreased expression of GLUT‐1 and GLUT‐3, which is observed in the post‐mortem of AD patients, although GLUT‐2 is increased and GLUT‐4 is unaltered [215]. More specifically, it is found that GLUT‐1 expresses at a lower level both on BMEC and in hippocampus in AD patients [212]. However, BMEC‐derived from iPSC extracted from AD patients with PSEN1 or PSEN2 mutation showed no significant alterations in glucose transporter isoforms including GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4. In addition, mRNA level of GLUT‐1 is also not altered in BMEC‐derived from iPSC with PSEN1 mutation [158]. Decreased expression of GLUT‐1 has been observed in several types of transgenic AD mice including APP/PS1 mice [175] and mice with APPSwedish (isoform 695) [199]. Findings based on cell models further indicated the association between GLUT downregulation and Aβ pathologies. Decreased expression of GLUT1 in hCMEC/D3 induced by Aβ1‐40 and Aβ1‐42 [216] and in Aβ25‐35‐induced HBMECs, in which reduction of GLUT3 is also observed [239].

In addition to reduced glucose uptake caused by downregulated level of GLUTs, PET‐FDG also detected decreased glucose metabolism in temporo‐parietal regions and posterior cingulate in AD patients, which may have association with Aβ burden indicated by probabilistic maps assessment [63]. However, in other regions like frontal lobes, striatum, and the thalamus, there seems no correlation between alteration of glucose metabolism and Aβ load. In addition, In BMEC with PSEN1 and PSEN2 mutations extracted from familial AD patients, a series of pathological cellular events were observed, including impaired glucose uptake, metabolism (glycolysis), mitochondrial dysfunction, lysosomal acidification, and autophagy [180]. Meanwhile, the findings indicated the stronger relationship between PSEN1 mutations with these pathological events.

3.2.2. Influx of Insulin and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor

Brain insulin is totally dependent on the supply of pancreas [76], and insulin receptor (INSR) on BBB is responsible for the influx of insulin. Other influx transport pathway is also discovered in the absence of insulin receptors [184]. INSR is closely associated with physiological events in various brain cells. For instances, INSR is reported correlated with the expression and activity of various transporters, production and degradation of Aβ, as well as TJ expression in BECs [150]. In hCMEC/D3 cells, knockdown of INSR lead to decreased level of ABCB1, ABCG2, OATP2A1, as well as the efflux activity of ABCB1 [150]. For astrocytes and neurons, insulin modulates the GLUTs expression and localization, which may affect glucose uptake and metabolism. In AD patients, it is observed the decreased uptake of insulin into brain and decreased CSF level of insulin [93], which is probably related to mis‐localized (not on the membrane surface), or reduced INSR on BBB, or decreased receptor affinity for insulin [210]. In severe AD cases, the reduction of INSR at mRNA level estimated 80% is reported [59]. Such decrease in expression of INSR may result from long‐term peripheral hyperinsulinemia occurred in AD adults due to vulnerability of insulin receptor upon diet, plasma glucose level, diabetes, or obesity [8]. While, in Aβ1‐42 (oligomeric or monomeric)‐induced hCMEC/D3, increased insulin influx is observed [171]. Decreased INSR and insulin level in AD brain may affect brain metabolism, especially mitochondrial homeostasis with INSR‐mediated signaling including PI3K/Akt and Ras/ERK/MAPK suppressed [140]. In 3 × Tg‐AD mice [64] and APP/PS1 mice [277], decreased level of cerebral insulin receptor‐β is also observed, accompanied with suppression of insulin signaling pathway (PI3K/Akt/GSK‐3β) [277], indicating the hypofunction of insulin pathway in AD cases. IGF‐1 is produced by liver and is transported into brain through IGF‐1 receptor expressed on BECs. Brain IGF‐1 exhibits a widely neuroprotective effect including promoting neurogenesis, stimulating microvascularization and glucose utilization. Overall expression of IGF‐1R was also reduced in AD patients [185], as well as its function. Impaired neuronal IR/IGF‐1R‐mediated signaling pathway was reported featured as decreased IRS‐1/‐2 proteins and decreased phosphorylation of IRS1 in AD patients [141]. Notably, administration of insulin and IGF‐1 could improve metabolic integrity in AD patients [42, 56], as well as improve cognitive function by alleviating synaptic loss, inhibiting tau phosphorylation and brain atrophy in AD patients [10].

3.2.3. Other Influx Transporters

Organic cationic transporters (OCTs) on are responsible for influx of endogenous compounds such as choline, thiamine, and L‐carnitine, as well as influx and efflux of cationic drugs. OCT2 and OCT3 also expresses on neurons and glial cells, mediating the transport of neurotransmitters, which is important for neuronal activity [99]. The reduction of OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3 have been reported in 3 × Tg‐AD mice [195]. The sufficient expression of LAT1 is important for influx of amino acids, as well as some drugs like L‐DOPA and gabapentin [71]. The downregulation of LAT‐1 downregulation was reported in APP/PS1 mice. However, contrary finding is also reported in APP/PS1 mice that the mRNA or protein level LAT1 and its function are unaltered [71]. Fatty acids are essential for the structural development and function of brain. Deficiency of n‐3 fatty acids has been reported correlated with a series of brain pathologies, such as neuroinflammation and cognitive decline [130]. In AD patients, low levels of n‐3 fatty acids in plasma, as well as decreased DHA in several regions including frontal gray, frontal white, and hippocampus have been detected [40, 201]. Meanwhile, CSF levels of fatty acids, cholesterol, and phospholipids are also reduced in AD postmortem brain [147]. Brain fatty acids is transported through various fatty acids transporters. Mice with human APOE4 mutations show reduced DHA influx [221]. Meanwhile, reduced levels of fatty acids transporters are also detected in AD mice with APPSwedish mutation, in which decreased level of Mfsd2a is found [199]. FATP1 (abluminal brain microvessel) also show reduction (96%) in Aβ25‐35‐induced hCMEC/D3 [265]. Therefore, lipid defects in AD conditions associate with reduced influx transport of fatty acids partially due to decreased level of specific transporters. In recent years, the abnormal metabolism of lipid is demonstrated as an important player during the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Fatty acids have been reported to modulate BBB functions, such as GLUT1 expression and glucose uptake [15]. Notably, a great number of studies have pointed out the therapeutic potentials of maintaining the functions of BBB and neurons by improving brain levels of fatty acids, such as Mfsd2a [22, 152, 235].

3.2.4. Influx of Aβ

Peripheral Aβ can be transported into brain through receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). Upregulation of RAGE is reported in Tg‐SwDl mice [188], APP/PS1 [277], APPSwedish‐Tg mice [199], and PS1V97L‐Tg mice [249], which may further aggravate Aβ burden in brain. Increased level of RAGE are also observed in Aβ1‐42‐ [118, 206] or Aβ25‐35‐ [239] stimulated cell models, accompanied with downregulation of efflux transporters like LRP and ABCB1 (P‐gp), which may severely hampers Aβ clearance through BBB. Increased RAGE induced by Aβ1‐42 is also demonstrated as the causative role in upregulation of MMPs and downregulation of junctional proteins [226]. In addition, organic anion‐transporting polypeptide 1a4 (OATP1A4) was reported participating in Aβ uptake, inhibition of which alleviates Aβ burden in brain [51, 87].

Taken together, as shown in Figure 2, various influx transporters responsible for influx of nutrients are downregulated in AD patients and other AD models, which may result in decreased uptake of glucose, insulin, as well as fatty acids. Accordingly, low level of glucose, insulin, and fatty acids subsequently lead to hypometabolic state and abnormality of cellular processes in AD brain. Moreover, these pathological conditions mutually induce each other, thus accelerating the disease progression. For instance, insulin and fatty acids could affect glucose metabolism by modulating mitochondrial respiration and GLUTs expression and localization. Therefore, the alterations of these influx transporters may be a detrimental factor for neuronal degeneration in AD brain. In addition, cell models also indicated the causative relationship between Aβ pathology or PSEN mutations and the reduction of these influx transporters and related abnormalities of physiological processes.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The alterations of influx transporters in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and numerous AD models. Influx transporters are responsible for supplying the nutrients and energy substances like glucose, which are necessary for the activity of brain cells. In AD patients and AD animal models, hypofunction, and decreased level of glucose transporter 1, 3 (GLUT1, 3), as well as insulin receptor or insulin like growth factor receptor (IGFR) are commonly observed, accompanied with decreased glucose uptake, energy metabolism, and reduced insulin signaling pathway. Similarly, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) levels of insulin is decreased, while plasma level is increased. Unsaturated fatty acids influx by Mfsd2a and FATP1 are also showed a decrease, which indicates the loss of protection on blood–brain barrier (BBB). However, in the contrary, the expression level and activity of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) are increased, which would result in increased Aβ influx that aggravate brain Aβ pathology.

3.3. Efflux Transporters (Correlated With Aβ Efflux)

3.3.1. LDL Receptors/PICALM/ATP‐Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters

In individuals with early AD, decreased function of efflux transporter ABCB1 (P‐gp) is detected by decreased intensity of verapamil (P‐gp ligand)‐PET in brain [144]. The reduction of several BBB efflux transporters, such as ABCB1 (P‐gp), ABCG2, OATP2B1, and ENT1 in AD patients is detected in Aβ‐accumulated brain districts like gray matter and hippocampus, while much abundant in cerebellum that are not affected by AD pathology [212]. In BMEC derived from iPSC extracted from AD patients with PSEN1 mutation, the protein and mRNA level of ABCB1 (P‐gp) were decreased [158]. Moreover the efflux activity of ABCB1 (P‐gp) is also reduced [179, 180]. Therefore, it indicates that the alterations of efflux transporter may correlate with Aβ pathology. In Tg‐SwDl mice, reduced level of efflux transporters including ABCB1 (P‐gp), ABCG2, and ABCC1 were also observed [188]. Decreased level of LRP‐1 is widely found in 3 × Tg‐AD mice [64], mice with APPSwedish mutation [199], and APP/PS1 mice [248]. Brain‐derived Aβ undergoes abluminal LDL receptor‐related proteins 1 (LRP1) reuptake and phosphatidylinositol‐binding clathrin assembly protein (PICALM)‐mediated transcytosis and is eventually removed out through several efflux transporters of ABC family [175] (ABCB1 [P‐gp], ABCG2, ABCG4, ABCC1) located at luminal side [214]. Therefore, it may indicate the decreased Aβ clearance through LRP1 under AD conditions. In vitro models also found the alteration of efflux transporters under Aβ stimulation. For example, in isolated rat brain capillary, Aβ1‐40 downregulates ABCB1 (P‐gp) expression and transport activity [73]. In hCMEC/D3, Aβ1‐42 induces ABCB1 (P‐gp) downregulation at mRNA and protein level, even its transcriptional promoter is inhibited [13]. However, Aβ may not be the causative factor in AD‐induced alteration of efflux transporters. In APP/PS1 mice, LRP1 decrease is observed in both cortex and hippocampi starting at 4 months when Aβ plaques are formed in cortex, but not in hippocampus [248]. Reduction of ABCB1 (P‐gp) function (50%) is detected before the occurrence of Aβ deposition in APP/PS1 mice [283].

3.3.2. Other ABC Transporters

ABCA1 [253], ABCG1 [232], ABCG4 [52], ABCA7 [102], ABCC1 [175], as well as ABCG2 [244] are mainly responsible for cholesterol efflux and also involved in BBB‐mediated Aβ clearance [19, 167]. Impaired cholesterol efflux capacity through these transporters in AD patients has been reported, accompanied with reduced Aβ clearance [133]. In AD patients, mRNA and protein level of ABCA1 is reported positively correlated with severity of dementia [2], which may be due to ABCA1‐mediated disruption of lipid architecture thus disturb cellular activities. ABCA1 is essential for APOE lipidation and APOE‐dependent Aβ clearance through LRP1, LDLR, and VLDLR [29]. APOE alleles exhibit different lipidation activity, thus have different impact on Aβ clearance velocity. APOE2, APOE3, and APOEJ are more efficient in assisting Aβ clearance compared to APOE4 allele [276]. ABCA1 upregulation in severe AD cases may also act as a compensatory mechanism intensifying Aβ clearance activity. In APOE4 targeted replacement mice, activation of ABCA1 could reduce APOE4‐mediated Aβ accumulation and tau phosphorylation [24]. However, in APP/PS1 mice, ABCA1 was decreased, accompanied by decreased level of APOE, LRP1, LDLR and brain Aβ accumulation and plasma level of cholesterol are increased [264], indicating impaired Aβ clearance activity and cholesterol transport. ABCA7 mediates Aβ clearance through microglia and BMECs [102]. The association between ABCA7 genetic variants and AD risk has been reported in different populations [120, 145, 181]. ABCC1 is responsible for the removal of HNE (4‐hydroxy‐2‐transnonenal, lipid peroxidation products). The production of HNE is related to the production of radical species induced by Aβ and could exert neurotoxicity by impairing the structure and functions of synaptosomal membrane proteins [32]. In AD patients, reduced ability of ABCC1 is reported accompanied with elevated level of HNE in brain [119, 134].

In addition, reduction of other efflux transporters like plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT) and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion proteins (MATE1) are also detected in capillaries from AD patients, which may lead to neurotoxicity by facilitating the accumulation of antipsychotic drugs in brain [195].

Taken together, as shown in Figure 3, various efflux transporters responsible for Aβ are downregulated especially in Aβ deposition‐districts in AD patients, and numerous AD models, indicating the association between Aβ pathology and alterations of efflux transporters and a subsequent accumulation of Aβ. However, compensatory increase of Aβ efflux against Aβ overload is also reported. For instances, in AD patients, there is a positive correlation between ABCA1 level and AD severity. In hCMEC/D3, oligomeric or monomeric Aβ1‐42 stimulates upregulation of LRP1 [171]. In addition, in AD animal models, compensatory increased Aβ clearance mediated by increased pericyte coverage and activated endothelium [61], as well as upregulation of CD36 in pericytes [110] are also reported. Such defensive increase of Aβ efflux transporter may occur during the whole disease progression. For example, in 3 × Tg‐AD mice (Aβ plaques are formed at 6‐month‐old, preceding which cognitive impairment occurs [3–6 months]), ABCA1 are upregulated during 3–6‐month‐old (before Aβ plaques are formed but cognitive impairment occurs) to maintain the equilibrium of Aβ influx and efflux transport against increased Aβ influx due to downregulated LRP1 and upregulated RAGE. At 18 months, ABCG2 and ABCB1 (P‐gp) are upregulated thus achieving net increase of Aβ efflux [52]. Therefore, although the alteration of various efflux transporters varies in a disease stage‐dependent pattern, while the net Aβ efflux activity might elevate as the disease gets severer.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The alterations of efflux transporters in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and numerous AD models. Efflux transporters expressed on blood–brain barrier (BBB) locate at both luminal and abluminal sides of brain endothelial cells, mainly responsible for pumping out brain‐derived toxic factors and excluding blood‐derived neurotoxic factors or drugs. Decreased expression and activity of efflux transporters that are responsible for amyloid β (Aβ) clearance are observed in gray matter and hippocampus where Aβ plaques distribute. Microglia ABCA7‐mediated Aβ reuptake is also impaired. However, opposite findings of improved Aβ clearance are also reported, for instance of increased ABCA1 mediated lipidation of APOE and pericyte CD36‐mediated Aβ reuptake. Upregulation of efflux transporters are also observed in in vitro cell models that are induced by inflammatory mediators or Aβ and late stage of AD mouse models.

3.4. Vascular Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

Brain vasculature exhibits proinflammatory and oxidative profile during the progression of AD. Increased production of proinflammatory mediators including cytokines, chemoattractant, adhesion molecules, and MMPs would accelerate the impairment of BBB permeability and transport system, thereafter contributing to BBB leakiness. Moreover, the upregulation of chemoattractant and adhesion molecules facilitate the infiltration of immune cells, which aggravating neuroinflammation and neuronal death through proinflammatory secretions. In the following sections, we will discuss about the specific proinflammatory and oxidative profile of brain vasculature reported in AD patients, animal models or cellular models.

3.4.1. Proinflammatory Mediators

Under AD conditions, vascular inflammation and oxidative stress manifested as activation of NFκB pathway interplay with various endothelial pathological events including hyperpermeability, alterations of influx and efflux transporters. AD brain exhibits a highly inflammatory status. Brain level of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α, IL‐1, IL‐6 and IL‐8, and MMPs (MMP‐3 and MMP‐9) are increased in AD patients [115]. Upon the stimulation of Aβ, isolated brain microvessels from AD patients secrete increased level of pro‐inflammatory factors including thrombin [255], TNFα, nitric oxide (NO) interleukins, and MMPs (MMP‐9) [219]. In vitro stimulation of Aβ1‐40 or Aβ1‐42 hCMEC/D3 cells upregulates mRNA expression of MCP‐1, GRO, IL‐1β, IL‐6 [224], and increased IL‐1β secretion [159]. Therefore, it may indicate the causative role of Aβ in vascular and endothelial inflammation. In vitro BMEC model (hCMEC/D3) has also demonstrated the important role of semicarbazide‐sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO/VAP‐1) in stimulating endothelial inflammation and angiogenesis that further lead to BBB hyperpermeability and leukocyte adhesion [203]. By evaluating the plasma and cerebrovascular tissues from AD patients, enzymatic activity of SSAO/VAP‐1 is found enhanced. In transgenic AD mouse model, it is also found that overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines or endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) could be mediated by brain endothelial RAGE [47, 54]. Especially, disrupted microvessels near Aβ plaque area exhibit increased RAGE, MMP secretion in 5 × FAD mice [100]. In addition to the brain vasculature, several factors correlated with vascular inflammation and oxidative stress, such as IFN‐γ‐induced protein 10 (IP‐10), pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A), total and intact proinsulin, glutathione S‐transferase alpha, and MMP‐1 are increased in the peripheral vascular system during LOAD progress [85].

3.4.2. Chemoattractant, Adhesion Molecules, and Infiltration of Immune Cells

A group of chemoattractant were upregulated in AD patients, including P‐selectin, E‐selectin, ICAM‐1, VCAM‐1, and plasma vesicle associated protein (PLVAP), among which ICAM1 and VCAM1 mediate firm adhesion, P‐selectin, and E‐selectin mediate the rolling of leukocytes along the endothelium, and PLVAP participates in transmigration across ECs [173]. A positive correlation between VCAM‐1 and severity of dementia has been identified by MRI [115]. Increased expression of E‐selectin, P‐selectin, ICAM‐1, and VCAM‐1 is also detected in brain vessels of the cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, meninges, and choroid plexus in transgenic AD mice bearing APP or tau mutations [21]. Neutrophils has been detected in meningeal or cortical blood vessels or even in brain parenchyma in AD patients indicated by increased neutrophils‐specific immunoreactivity of Capthepsin G [202]. In addition, macrophage [82, 263], CD4+, and CD8+ T cells [128] are also detected in brain parenchyma in AD patients. Therefore, it indicates that the high level of chemoattractant and increased immune cells infiltration in AD brain may participate in the neuroinflammation and disease progression. Aβ pathology may a key factor triggering the infiltration of immune cells. Increased monocyte migration is also observed in Aβ‐induced brain endothelial cell layer extracted from AD patients [198]. Meanwhile, increased transendothelial migration of monocyte (HL‐60, THP‐1) across human brain endothelial cell line model (HBMVEC) in induced by Aβ1‐40, such effects are probably mediated by RAGE and PECAM‐1 [58, 67]. In 5 × FAD mice, the infiltration of neutrophils through brain endothelium into brain parenchyma especially in Aβ‐rich cortical regions is also detected by two‐photon laser scanning microscopy [168].

3.4.3. Oxidative Stress

As CellRox (R) and DCFDA assays indicates that, BMEC derived from iPSC from AD patients with PSEN1 mutation showed highly oxidative status, and the effect is similar to the stimulation of 1 mM pyocyanin, a known oxidative stress inducer [179, 180]. ROS overproduction is also observed in in vitro Aβ‐induced hCMEC/D3 cells [28].

Taken together, as shown in Figure 4, brain vessels in AD patients or AD animal models exhibit a proinflammatory and oxidative profile, characterized as increased production of proinflammatory cytokines, chemoattractant, adhesion molecules, MMPs, NO, and ROS, which are detrimental to endothelial integrity and transporter system and may lead to BBB leakiness. Inflammatory endothelial cell layer facilitates the infiltration of immune cells into brain. These immune cells further trigger the neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits through specialized proinflammatory secretion profile. In addition, several plasma proteins in AD cases that are related to vascular inflammation and BBB hyperpermeability have also been found, eventually contributing to neuroinflammation and neuronal death. For example, increased perivascular accumulation of blood‐derived fibrinogen, thrombin is observed in AD patients [9] and the colocalization of these blood‐derived factors with Aβ is also reported [214]. It has been demonstrated in AD patients and animal models that leaky BBB facilitates the infiltration of fibrinogen, and fibrin are formed mainly around Aβ deposition district which then trigger the overproduction of ROS in microglia and aggravating neuroinflammation and neuronal death [137]. Activation of plasma protein factor XII (FXII)‐driven contact system is also observed in the plasma of AD patients, Tg6799 mouse, and Aβ1‐42‐induced C57BL/6. The causative role of circulating Aβ1‐42 in inducing contact system activation is demonstrated, the product of which, bradykinin in peripheral system or brain parenchyma could further induce BBB hyperpermeability, vascular degeneration, cytokine release, and neuroinflammation [262]. In TgCRND8 AD mice, it is found that deletion of FXII could reduce fibrinogen deposition, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration [35].

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The alterations of vascular inflammation and oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and numerous AD models. Vascular inflammation and oxidative stress are detected accompanied with leaky BBB in AD cases. Increased proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) et al. are observed in brain tissues. Leaky BBB facilitates the entrance of blood‐derived fibrinogen, thrombin and infiltration of immune cells which further trigger the glial inflammation and pericyte activation through cell–cell interaction. Vascular inflammation marker proteins are detected increased in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Vascular inflammation can be stimulated either by detrimental glial secretions or amyloid β (Aβ). Activation of RAGE by Aβ initiates Ca2+‐Calcineurin‐, NF‐κB‐, Nrf2 signaling‐, and decreased anti‐oxidative capacity‐mediated vascular inflammation and oxidative stress. Increased endothelial production of proinflammatory mediators, reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), and MMPs further downregulate junctional proteins and Aβ efflux transporters. Infiltration of immune cells across in vitro endothelial monolayer is observed mostly under the stimulation of proinflammatory mediators and hypoxia, possibly resulting from increased production of adhesion molecules and chemokines. Activated T cells, such as CD4+ T cells, T helper 1 (Th1) cells, and Th17 cells secrete a series of proinflammatory mediators which also stimulate vascular inflammation and immune cell infiltration.

4. Probable Signaling Pathways Responsible for Endothelial Pathologies

4.1. Paracellular Hyperpermeability

The toxicity of Aβ1‐42 oligomers on expressions of junctional proteins and endothelial integrity are widely investigated on immortalized mouse brain microvessel endothelial cell line, bEnd.3 cells. Apart from Aβ1‐42 oligomers, fibrillary Aβ1‐42, Aβ1‐40 monomer and dimer could also induce the reduction of claudin‐5 and occludin in bEnd.3, which may act as a defensive mechanism to increase Aβ transport as mentioned above [92, 118]. Abundant evidences about the molecular mechanisms underlying the alterations of junctional proteins induced by Aβ1‐42 are widely reported based on bEnd.3 cells. Among them, vascular inflammation acts as the causative role for other endothelial pathologies. Endothelial inflammation characterized as NFκB activation and ROS overproduction, was triggered by Aβ1‐42 oligomer and demonstrated capable of inducing the downregulation of ZO‐1 and Claudin‐5 [206]. Overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IFNγ) in bEnd.3 directly downregulates the level of junctional proteins (ZO‐1, Claudin‐5), while ABCG2 and ABCB1 are increased, probably as a defensive mechanism for Aβ clearance [222]. Additional treatment of anti‐inflammatory messenger annexin A1 restores expression of ZO‐1 and Claudin‐5 [162]. Chemoattractant CCL2 increases the internalization of Claudin‐5 and Occludin, thereafter leads to decreased membrane level of tight junctions and TEER reduction [209]. Apart from inflammatory responses, TJ downregulation is also the downstream events of several cellular pathological processes induced by Aβ. Activated autophagy (increased LC3II/LC3I and decreased phosphorylation of mTOR) [30], increased mitochondrial apoptosis (decreased Bcl‐2, increased Bax, cytochrome C, and increased cleavage of caspase‐9 and caspase‐3) and activated death receptor signaling pathway (increased cleavage of caspase‐8 and caspase‐12) [117] are all reported involved in inducing TJ downregulation. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is found involved in Aβ1‐42 oligomer‐induced TJ downregulation and treatment of ERS inhibitor, salubrinal could prevent TJ downregulation [34]. MMPs is widely acknowledged as an important role for TJ degradation. Increased secretion of MMPs (MMP‐9, MMP‐2) can be induced by Aβ1‐42 triggered activation of Ca2+‐calcineurin signaling, leading to TJ downregulation, and endothelial barrier dissociation [100]. Apart from Ca2+‐calcineurin pathway, it is reported that activation of NFκB pathway and combination between Sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) and receptor S1PR [98] can also upregulate MMPs and its associated effects.

The Effect of Aβ on AJ proteins is rarely studied in bEnd.3 cells. Therefore, we'll talk about the evidences in bEnd.3 cells about the signaling related to AJ alterations stimulated by other inducers. In lanthanum chloride‐induced stroke model, intracellular Ca2+ elevation in bEnd.3 is involved in the loss of VE‐cadherin and reorganization of cytoskeleton, accompanied by activated ROCK/MLC/MLCK pathway [249]. Increased phosphorylation of VE‐cadherin at Y731 site, dissociation of VE‐cadherin/β catenin complex [16] and further nuclear translocation of β catenin are observed in homocysteine‐induced hyperhomocysteinemia model. Homocysteine‐induced nuclear translocation of β catenin further inhibit the expression of Claudin‐5 and Claudin‐3 [17]. The activation of AKT/FoxO1 is identified as an upstream event for nuclear translocation of β‐catenin and increased accumulation of β‐catenin and FoxO, eventually inhibiting the gene expression of claudin‐5 [139]. In addition, nuclear translocation of β catenin can also be induced by IL‐6‐ and MCP‐1 [240]. Apart from modulating the expression of claudins, β‐catenin also modulates cytoskeleton via non‐muscle myosin light chain kinase (nmMLCK) [97] and vascular integrity via Wnt/β‐catenin signaling [107]. Leukocyte infiltration can also be suppressed [18]. Activation of RhoA signaling pathway is reported involved in the downregulation of junctional proteins. Activation of RhoA signaling mediated by hypoxia‐induced activation of adenosine A2A receptor potently downregulate the expression of claudin‐5 and VE‐cadherin and reorganize cytoskeleton architecture [247]. Connexins (Cx) are a group of proteins forming the gap junction channels for intercellular communication. It is reported that Cx43 is involved in stabilizing TJ proteins (ZO‐1 and claudin‐5) under CoCl2‐induced hypoxia condition. Similar stabilizing effect of connexin 43 on BBB is also observed in vivo. Cx43 is also involved in CoCl2‐induced HIF1α activation, AKT phosphorylation, and VEGF‐mediated angiogenesis [257]. Overexpression of BACE1 in endothelial cells is also observed involved in the reduction of Occludin in CAA models [36]. Metalloprotease meprin β (Mep1b) is able to cleave cell‐adhesion molecules, dysregulation of which is associated with BBB breakdown. Mep1b dysregulation is reported in AD. In bEnd.3, decreased expression of TJ proteins and monolayer integrity are observed followed by the overexpression of Mep1b [66]. Mep1b knock‐out in animal models in turn increase the TJ expression and BBB integrity (Figure 1).

4.2. Alteration of Efflux Transporters

Activation of RAGE/NFκB is responsible for Aβ1‐42‐induced ABCB1 (P‐gp) downregulation in cells [164] and on the luminal membrane of the brain capillary endothelium [164]. However, NFκB activation is also involved in the upregulation of ABCB1 (P‐gp) in HMGB1‐ [227] in L‐glutamate‐ or CBZ‐ [91] stimulated cells respectively. HMGB1 and L‐glutamate or CBZ mediate NFκB activation respectively through TLR4/RAGE and Pregnane X receptor (PXR). RAGE is not only involved in ABCB1 (P‐gp) downregulation. Under chronic hypoxic and hypoglycemic conditions, upregulation of RAGE mRNA and downregulation of LRP‐1 mRNA co‐occur [247]. Contrary finding is also reported that upregulation of RAGE is also responsible for Aβ‐induced activation of LRP‐1/PICALM/Rab11/ABCB1 (P‐gp), which further facilitates Aβ efflux [211]. Proinflammatory mediators are main inducers for NFκB activation. Therefore, downregulation of efflux transporters occurs after the stimulation of proinflammatory mediators. For example, LPS could downregulate ABCB1 (P‐gp), ABCG2, and ABCC1 [175]. Cellular prion protein (PrPC) is located on endothelium and involved in LRP‐1‐mediated Aβ efflux. In mouse brain endothelial cell line (MBEC4), TNF‐α treatment downregulates PrPC, accompanied with decreased Aβ clearance as indicated by decreased colocalization of intracellular Aβ and PrPC [254]. However, cytokine complex (IL‐17, IL‐6, TNF‐α) could increase the expression and transport activity of ABCB1 (P‐gp) (Rhodamine‐123) and ABCC1 (BCECF‐AM) [222]. Proinflammatory mediators can also affect the expression of ABCA1. In APP/PS1 mice with IL‐17A overexpressed and in bEnd.3 cells with external treatment of IL‐17A, ABCA1 is upregulated [250], in which ERK activation is involved [250]. Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), a mitochondrial cholesterol transporter [153] is reported involved in modulating ABCA1 expression. In adenovirus infection [153] or cholesterol and LDL‐induced bEnd.3 cells [154], increased expression of ABCA1 can be induced by StAR activation (Figure 3).

4.3. Vascular Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

1‐42‐induced endothelial inflammation in bEnd.3 cells is manifested as activated iNOS and increased NO production, as well as increased secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (IL‐6, TNF‐α, and MCP‐1) [206]. RAGE/NFκB is the main pathway that mediates Aβ‐induced endothelial inflammation. Activation of NLRP3/cleaved caspase 1/IL‐1β signaling is also involved in Aβ‐induced endothelial inflammation (Aβ25‐35) [245]. Aβ1‐40 could intensifies IL‐1β‐induced vascular inflammation through activating PI3K and NFκB in vascular smooth muscle cells [223]. Apart from proinflammatory effects, Aβ1‐42 also impairs anti‐inflammatory capacity, in which decreased annexin A1 (anti‐inflammatory messenger) is reported [162]. Aβ1‐42‐induced MMP upregulation is demonstrated mediated by activation of Ca2+‐calcineurin pathway [100].

NFκB nuclear translocation, decreased activation of Nrf‐2/NQO‐1/HO‐1 pathway and mitochondrial dysfunction (reduced MMP and increased level of caspase 3,8,9) [123] are involved in Aβ25‐35‐induced oxidative stress including increased NADPH oxidase activity [60], ROS production and inhibited antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, GSH). In addition, Aβ1‐42‐induced ROS overproduction is also accompanied with activation of ERK and cPLA2 [218]. CD36 is also reported involved in Aβ1‐40‐induced ROS overproduction [163].

Leucocyte infiltration across bEnd.3 monolayer is rarely reported under AD conditions, but in other disease models, such as OGD [27, 79]‐induced ischemia model, DKA‐ [39], PGE2‐ [165], and TNF‐α [126]‐ induced inflammation models. Upregulation of adhesion molecules like ICAM‐1 [165], VCAM‐1 [104], P‐selectin, and chemoattractant like CCL‐2, and CXCL‐1 [236] are observed in activated bEnd.3 cells. Immune cells that are reported infiltrating across bEnd.3 monolayer mainly include monocyte (THP‐1) (5%) [78], macrophage (IC21) [27], and lymphocyte (80%) (CD4+ T cell [88], CD8+ T cell [230]) [178]. Among different types of lymphocytes, Th1 and Th17 are most studied. Activated CD4+ T cells in CNS release a series of inflammatory cytokines aggravating neuroinflammation and vascular inflammation. T cells can be activated by cytokines. IL‐6 secreted from muramyl dipeptide (MDP)‐induced bEnd.3 further activates Th17 cells and lead to the secretion of a series of cytokines (IL‐17, IL‐6, IFNγ, and IL‐4) [132]. Among them, IL‐17 further upregulates CCL2 and CXCL1 on BMEC membrane, which facilitates lymphocyte infiltration [236]. Activated Th1 cells secrete IL‐1, TNF‐α, and IFN‐γ, which would aggravate leukocyte infiltration by upregulating ICAM‐1 and VCAM‐1 and other adhesion molecules [124] (Figure 4).

5. Biological Targets: A Focus on Endothelial Dysfunction

5.1. Overview of Intervenable Endothelial Factors

The manifestations of AD‐induced BBB damage mainly include increased paracellular permeability, abnormality of influx or efflux transporter and vascular inflammation that eventually leads to abnormal substance transport, including Aβ clearance and uptake of essential molecules. Therefore, to maintain the normal paracellular permeability, along with expression and activity of transporters are essential to protect brain homeostasis and reduce Aβ burden. We tabulated the reported effective therapies capable of protecting BBB integrity under numerous disease conditions, such as AD, ischemia stroke or hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and inflammation‐related disease such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (2019–2023) (Table 2). BBB protective compounds can be grouped into several classifications including natural products (herbal or human body‐derived compounds), peptide or proteins, nucleic acid therapeutics, chemical compounds, or some approved drugs and cellular therapy. In AD models, the strategy for BBB protection mainly aims to upregulate TJ or AJ proteins [245], enhance the expression of Aβ clearance transporters (LRP‐1, ABCB1 [P‐gp]) and ApoE clearance pathway [14], as well as other endothelial pathologies. The graphic illustration is shown in Figure 5.

TABLE 2.

The list of compounds that have therapeutical potentials on brain endothelial cell dysfunction in numerous diseases.

Disease models Disease models Compound Chemical classification Effects Mechanism of action Reference
Natural products
AD APP/PS1 mice, Aβ25‐35 induced bEnd.3 Lychee seed polyphenols Polyphenols Improve BBB integrity and cognitive function. TJ upregulation Autophagy pathway (ASC/LC3/AMPK/mTOR/ULK1) and pyroptosis pathway (NLRP3/Caspase 1/IL‐1β) [245]
AD 5 × FAD mice Crocus sativus extract Natural compound mixture Tighten cell‐based BBB model (IgG extravasation and Claudin‐5 expression) and reduce Aβ burden and neuroinflammation

Enhance Aβ clearance through BBB (ABCB1 [P‐gp], LRP1, ABCA1), enzymatic degradation (IDE, NEP) and ApoE clearance (ABCA1, ApoE, PPARγ)

Anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative compounds

[14]
AD 1‐42 induced bEnd.3 Hyperoside Flavanol glycoside Reverse the expression of ZO‐1, Claudin‐5, and Occludin and decrease MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 Suppress mitochondrial apoptosis as indicated by ratios of Bax/Bcl‐2, cleaved caspase‐9 (8, 12)/caspase‐9 (8, 12), as well as cytochrome c and caspase‐3 activity [117]
AD 1‐42 induced bEnd.3 Catapol Iridoid glucoside Decrease permeability, endothelial apoptosis and Increase ZO‐1, Claudin‐5, Occludin and LRP1, ABCB1 (P‐gp). Aβ efflux is enhances Decrease MMP2 and MMP9, inhibit RAGE. Mitochondrial and death receptor mediated apoptosis pathway is inhibited [118]
AD 1‐42 induced bEnd.3 cells EGb761, standard Ginkgo biloba extract Natural compound mixture Decrease BBB permeability and increase ZO‐1, Claudin‐5, and Occludin Decrease RAGE and ROS [226]
AD 25‐35 induced bEnd.3 Lutein Xanthophylls Increase endothelial cell survival and decrease oxidative stress Inhibit NFκB pathway and mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and activate Nrf2 pathway [123]
scienAD TgSwDI mice Oleocanthal Phenolic compound Increase Amyloid‐beta clearance Increase ABCB1 (P‐gp), LRP‐1 and APOE mediated clearance pathway and decrease IL‐1β [177]
AD APP/PS1 mice Pinocembrin Flavonoids Maintain neuropil ultrastructure and microvascular function, reduce glial reduction, inflammatory mediators Inhibit RAGE‐mediated transduction [122]
AD 1‐42 induced hBMECs Asiaticoside Trisaccharide triterpene Improve cell survival and restore mitochondrial membrane potential Decrease TLR4, MyD88, TRAF6, p‐NFκB p65 and p65 nuclear translocation [205]
AD 1‐42 induced HBMEC cells Zhenxin Xingshui Yizhi Fang Chinese herbal formulation Upregulate LRP1, GLUT1, and GLUT3 Inhibit caspase 3 mediate apoptosis and downregulate RAGE [239]
AD APP/PS1 mice Omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids Fatty acids Increase LRP‐1 and promote Aβ clearance Inhibit NFκB pathway, reduce IL‐1β, TNFα and suppress glial activation [248]
Nucleic acid therapeutics
AD PS19 tau‐Tg mice C3R−/− knockdown Gene‐knockdown Decrease VCAM‐1 and increase brain vessel cross‐section area Inhibit C3R mediated vascular inflammation and barrier integrity and microglial activation [174]
AD TgCRND8 mice (K670N, M671L and V717F) FXII‐ASO (antisense oligonucleotide) RNA knockdown Reduce neuroinflammation, fibrinogen deposition, neurodegeneration, and improved cognitive function Inhibit FXII‐mediated contact system activation [35]
AD APP/PS1 siR/PIO@RP RNA silencing and agonist Downregulate RAGE and activate PPARγ

Inhibit RAGE‐mediated neuroinflammation, repair NVU injury and facilitate LRP‐1‐mediated Aβ clearance

Activate PPARγ‐mediated neurotrophic effects

[241]
Proteins, peptides, or enzymes
AD 5 × FAD mice and Aβ1‐42 induced bEnd.3 cells Human recombinant annexin A1 Protein Upregulate ZO‐1 and Claudin‐5 and BBB integrity. pericyte‐derived annexin‐A1 also recover BBB integrity

Inhibit RhoA‐ROCK singling pathway.

Anti‐inflammatory messenger

[162]
AD

5 × FAD mice

Aβ‐induced bEnd.3 cells

Acrp30 A globular form adiponectin

Reduce proinflammatory cytokines and RAGE.

Endothelial reverse apoptosis, TJ disruption in Aβ‐induced bEnd.3

Suppressed inflammatory signaling through AdipoR1‐mediated NFκB [206]
AD APP/PS1 TNFI, TNF inhibitor (cTfRMAb‐TNFR), engineered by the fusion of the extracellular domain of the type II human TNF receptor (TNFR) to a chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the mouse transferrin receptor (TfR) Protein Reduce brain Aβ burden, neuroinflammatory markers, and parenchymal IgG, as well as improve cognitive function Inhibit TNF effect [31]
AD ApoE4‐targeted replacement mice CS‐6253, a peptide can activate ABCA1 Peptide Reversal of Aβ1‐42 accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation, as well as cognitive deficits and synaptic impairment Activate ABCA1, increased ApoE lipidation [24]
AD 1‐42 induced hCMEC/D3 Somatostatin Peptide Improve TJ proteins and regulate LRP1 and RAGE expression and increased Aβ reuptake Abrogate Aβ‐induced JNK phosphorylation and expression of IL‐1β and MMP‐2 [159]
AD Homozygous 3 × FAD mice L‐norvaline Amino acid Reduce BBB permeability, amyloid angiopathy, microgliosis, astrodegeneration Alleviate astrocyte and microglia pathology [169]
AD 25‐35 induced bEnd.3 CoQ10 Enzyme Prevent apoptosis and necrosis Inhibit NAPDH oxidase activity and reduce ROS and Ca2+. CoQ10 inhibits the entry of Aβ25‐35 into mitochondrial. [60]
Approved Drugs
AD TgCRND8 mice Dabigatran Anticoagulant drug Prevent memory decline, cerebral hypoperfusion, toxic fibrin deposition, T cells infiltration. AQP4 at astrocyte endfeet is maintained. AD related astrogliosis, pericyte alteration is also alleviated. Anti‐thrombin, anticoagulation, anti‐inflammatory effect, decrease fibrinogen. [41]
AD 1‐42 induced bEnd.3 cells Azelnidipine Calcium channel blocker drug Reduced superoxide anion production Inhibit ERK1/2 activation, cPLA2 phosphorylation and NFκB activation [218]
Others
AD Homocysteine‐induced AD Hydrogen sulfide Chemical compound Decrease microvascular permeability and upregulate claudin‐5, VE‐Cadherin Decrease MMP‐2, MMP‐9, ICAM‐1, GFAP, BDNF, synaptosomal Ca2+ and synaptic functional proteins [89]
AD Tg2576 mice High fat diet Diet therapy Improve learning function, decrease BBB leakage, and ventricles volume

Lipid metabolism, brain insulin signaling.

Insulin receptor is increased in hippocampus

[53]
Natural products
Ischemia stroke OGD/R induced bEnd.3 cells Acetyl‐11‐keto‐β‐boswellic acid Triterpenoid compound, a novel Nrf2 activator

Upregulate ZO‐1 and occludin

Preserve endothelial survival

Attenuate inflammation and oxidative stress

Increased phosphorylation of ERK

[1]
Ischemia stroke Chronic hypoxia and hypoglycemic condition (CHH) EGb761, standard Ginkgo biloba extract Natural compound mixture Increase LRP‐1 and decrease RAGE [247]
Ischemia stroke tMCAO/R Quercetin Flavonoids Decrease BBB permeability and ROS generation Activate Sirt1/Nrf/HO‐1 signaling [251]
Ischemia stroke Ischemia reperfusion induced rat Kaempferol Flavonoids Attenuate BBB disruption and inflammation Decrease NFκB p65 and nuclear translocation [112]
Ischemia stroke OGD/R induced endothelial‐astrocyte coculture system Geniposide Iridoid glycoside Decrease BBB permeability, increase TJ protein (ZO‐1, Claudin‐5, Occludin) Decrease MMP‐9, MMP‐2, inflammatory cytokines, increase BDNF, and astrocyte derived neurotrophic factor. [109]
Ischemia stroke MCAO model Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) Alkaloids Decrease BBB permeability, increase TJ proteins Inhibit the activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. [68]
Ischemia stroke MCAO wistar rats Alpha‐pinene Terpene Decrease BBB permeability Decrease TNF‐α and IL‐1β, suppress apoptosis as indicated by the ration of Bax/Bcl‐2 [96]
Ischemia stroke MCAO wistar rats Morin Flavonoids Decrease BBB permeability, neutrophil infiltration, cerebral damage, and increase TJ proteins Attenuate inflammation and ROS production via reducing TLR4, NFκB [94]
Ischemia stroke OGD‐induced cell models Myricetin Flavonoids Decrease endothelial permeability, oxidative stress, inflammation Increase NO production by upregulating peNOS (S1177)/NO pathway and stimulate eNOS coupling and activity in a Nrf2/Akt‐dependent manner [78]
Ischemia stroke MCAO SD rats and OGD‐induced BMECs Catalpol Iridoid glucoside Reduce neurological deficit, infarct volume, and protect vascular structure and promote angiogenesis Activate HIF‐1α/VEGF pathway [235]
Ischemia stroke MCAO mice and OGD‐induced bEnd.3 Medioresionol Furofuran type lignan Reduce brain infarct and BBB permeability, inhibite pyroptosis, promote neurobehavioral function, and TJ expression ameliorate pyoptosis (NLRP3/ASC/Cleaved caspase 1, IL‐1β, GSDMD‐NT), and mtROS by promote interaction of PGC‐1α and PPARα and increase PPARα nuclear translocation, further increase PAH and GOT1 to inhibt excess accumulation of phenylalanine induced mtROS and pyroptosis pathway [234]
Ischemia stroke OGD/R‐induced cell model Salvianolate lyophilized and Xueshuantong injection Herbal standardized preparations Increase TEER and decrease permeability and enhance TJ proteins Increase Ang‐1 and Tie‐2 but decrease Ang‐2 and VEGF. [258]
Ischemia stroke OGD/R induced bEnd.3 cells and SD rats with spinal cord injury 17β‐estradiol (E2) Steroid hormone Improve the TJ junctions and decreased brain spinal cord barrier injury Suppress NFκB pathway and subsequent MMP‐1b, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, MMP‐9, MMP‐10, MMP‐13 through recruitment of ERα [149]
Nucleic acid therapeutics
Ischemia stroke MCAO EC‐targeted overexpression of Krupple‐like factor 11 (KLF11) Gene overexpression Decrease BBB leakage and proinflammatory factors, preserve TJ levels PPARγ/KLF11 (Zhang, [271])
Ischemia stroke MCAO mice and OGD‐induced mBMECs Ablation of miR‐15a/16–2 microRNA cluster RNA knockdown Prevent BBB breakdown and infiltration of peripheral immune cells Inhibit miR‐15a/16–1 targeted‐inhibition of Claudin‐5 gene expression [129]
Subarachnoid hemorrhage SAH SD rats Mfsd2a upregulation Gene overexpression Reverse BBB damage Inhibit caveolae‐based transcellular transport by transporting omega‐3 fatty acids to protect BBB [273]
Intracerebral hemorrhage ICH rat model and BMECs miR‐126‐3p miRNA Attenuate BBB disruption miR‐126‐3p target VCAM‐1 gene and downregulate its expression [62]
Intracerebral hemorrhage ICH mice and BMECs Blnc1 siRNA siRNA Decrease permeability, apoptosis, inflammation, migration Suppress PPARγ/SIRT6‐mediated FoxO3 activation [243]
Approved Drugs
Ischemia stroke Hypoxia induced HBMECs Propofol Intravenous anesthetic drug Increase BBB integrity, upregulate ZO‐1 and decrease ZO‐1 phosphorylation

Probably inhibit HIF‐1α, VEGF, and CaMKII, as well as chelate Ca2+ uprsie

[33]
Ischemia stroke MCAO/R rats Dexamethasone, YAP agonist Chemical compound Improve neurological function, smaller brain infarct, TJ protein expression and decrease BBB permeability Activate Hippo/YAP/TAZ signaling [33]
Intracerebral hemorrhage Collagenase‐induced ICH model Minocycline Antibiotic drug Decreased BBB disruption and neurological deficits Decrease production of proinflammatory mediators and decrease DKK expression but increase Wnt1, β‐catenin and Occludin [228]
Chemical compounds
Ischemia stroke MCAO model, hypoxia induced bEnd.3 Agomelatine, melatonin receptor agonist Agonist of melatonin Upregulate claudin‐5 in the cerebral cortex and decrease macrophage infiltration

CD68, MCP‐1 is downregulated

Anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative compounds

[27]
Ischemia stroke MCAO/R Lithium Chemical element Increase BBB integrity, Increased Claudin‐5 and ZO‐1, decrease MMP‐9 Upregulate the activity of endothelial Wnt/β‐catenin signaling mediated by Gpr124 [86]
Ischemia stroke MCAO and OGD‐induced cell models Lithium Chemical element DecMPrease BBB permeability, inhibit MMP‐9 activity, and neutrophil invasion and increase T cell extravasation Activate MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway [74]
Ischemia stroke Ischemia reperfusion induced rat Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound Decreased BBB permeability Reduce lipid peroxidation and increase antioxidant enzymes [197]
Ischemia stroke MCAO rats TGR5 agonist, INT777 Chemical compound Decrease BBB permeability and increase TJ proteins Upregulate the expression of BRCA1 and Sirt1 [113]
Ischemia stroke OGD/R induced bEnd.3 cells 2,4,5‐trihydroxybenzaldehyde (TDB) Chemical compound Endothelial apoptosis Suppress miR‐34a, therefore upregulate Bcl‐2 and suppress caspase‐9/3 pathway. Maintain mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). [114]
Subarachnoid hemorrhage SAH SD rats Mitoquinone Mitochondrial target antioxidant Attenuate brain edema, increase Claudin‐5 Nrf2/PHB2/OPA1 pathway [269]
Cellular therapy
Ischemia stroke tMCAO and OGD‐induced bEnd.3 Intracranial injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) Cellular therapy Reduce infarct volume, improve behavioral function, IgG leakage, TJ loss, inflammatory cytokines, MMP‐9 expression, and activity AMPK and ICAM are involved in the modulatory effects of MSCs on MMP‐9 [37]
Ischemia stroke MCAO mice and OGD‐induced bEnd.3 Transplantation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells Cellular therapy Decrease BBB leakage and increase Claudin‐5 and β catenin

Effect is similar to Wnt7a, which increases β catenin and Claudin‐5

Activating Wnt/β catenin pathway

[231]
Others
Ischemia stroke Rat thromboembolic stroke model Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) Therapeutic intervention Reduce BBB injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and neurological deficits Reduce PDGF‐CC/PDGFRα pathway [75]
Natural products
Inflammation TNF‐α‐induced EC Honokiol Biphenolic phytochemical compound Neutrophil adhesion Decrease VCAM‐1 and inhibiting ubiquitination‐mediated IκBα degradation and NFκB nuclear translocation [77]
Inflammation LPS‐induced bEnd.3 cells Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) Mixture of saponins Increase TEER and decrease permeability. Upregulate TJ proteins Anti‐inflammatory effect and anti‐oxidative effect (PI3K/Akt/NRF2 or NFκB) [78]
Inflammation LPS‐induced bEnd.3 cells Chrysin (5,7‐dihydroxyflavone) Flavonoids Decrease leukocyte adhesion Inhibit MAPK and NFκB pathway and decrease VCAM‐1 [104]
Inflammation TNFα‐induced mice Secoisolariciresinol diglucoside Phytoestrogen Decrease leukocyte adhesion and migration, BBB permeability in vivo. In vitro found decreased monocyte adhesion and migration Decrease the expression of VCAM‐1 and VLA‐4 integrin, which are needed for leukocyte infiltration [186]
Inflammation LPS‐induced striatum injury in mice Kaempferol Flavonoids Maintain BBB integrity, decrease proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, COX‐2 Inactivate HMGB1/TLR4 [252]
Inflammation LPS‐induced mice and HBMECs trans‐10‐hydroxy‐2‐decenoic acid (10‐HDA) Acid Decrease BBB permeability, inhibit the degradation of TJ proteins

Inhibit proinflammatory mediators, cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and MMP‐2 and MMP‐9

Promote activation of AMPK/PI3K/AKT

[256]
Inflammation LPS‐induced mice and bEnd.3 cells 17β‐estradiol (E2) Steroid hormone Decrease monocyte adhesion and expression of acute‐phase proteins Anti‐inflammatory effect [65]
EAE EAE mice Vitamin D (1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3) Vitamin Decrease blood spinal cord barrier permeability Decrease neuroinflammation (NLRP3, caspase‐1, IL‐1β, CX3CR1, CCL17, RORc, and Tbx21) [46]
Inflammation IL‐1β‐induced pericyte coculture with ECs Melatonin Hormone Improve BBB integrity and upregulate ZO‐1, Claudin‐5, Occludin, and VE‐Cadherin Decrease pericyte secretion of MMP‐9 and upregulate TIMP‐1 via NOTCH3/NFκB [176]
Inflammation LPS‐induced mice Stearoylethanolamide Endocannabinoid neurotransmitter Support BBB integrity Restrict peripheral inflammation and leukocyte infiltration and inhibit microglial activation by cannabinoid receptors CB1/2 [90]
Inflammation LPS‐induced mice Fenretinide Synthetic retinoid derivative Decrease BBB permeability Nrf2 and NFκB pathway [111]
Oxidative stress H2O2‐induced bEnd.3 cells Glutathione Antioxidant in nature body Decreased NO, ROS, and improve TJ junction proteins Activate Nrf2 pathway [207]
Chemical compounds
EAE EAE mice CGS‐21680, A2A receptor specific agonist Small molecule compound Reverse TJ protein expression, decrease permeability, and neurologic deficiency Prevent Th1 stimulation and MLCK phosphorylation signaling [124]
Oxidative stress H2O2‐induced bEnd.3 cells Nicotinamide mononucleotide Nucleotide derived from ribose Prevent against apoptosis and inflammation Inhibit NFκB p65 and increase enzyme NAMPT, VEGF, and eNOS against apoptosis [48]
Multiple sclerosis TNFα and IFNγ induced in vitro BBB model Siponimod, approved for MS treatment by targeting S1P1 and S1P5 Small molecule drug Upregulate ZO‐1 and Claudin‐5, decrease MMP‐9 Activate PI3K/Akt pathway. [208]
Cellular therapy
Inflammation LPS‐treated rats Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) Cellular therapy Restore BBB permeability and endothelial barrier antigen and ABCB1 (P‐gp) expressing cells. Increase astrocyte filament around endothelial cell and VEGF‐A and eNOS elevations

Suppress VEGF‐A and VEGF‐A induced VEGFR2/eNOS activation and subsequent downregulation of TJ proteins.

Suppress LPS‐induced secretion of IL‐1β and VEGF‐A, respectively in microglia and astrocytes.

[161]
Natural products
Type‐2 Diabetes Cannabinoids Natural compound mixture Reverse BBB damage Anti‐inflammatory, anti‐apoptotic effects and upregulate TJ proteins [25]
Traumatic brain injury TBI mice Ginsenoside Rg1 Steroidal saponin

Enhance TIMP3 expression and MMPs proteolysis, restrict TJ protein degradations, and improve BBB integrity

Suppress apoptosis and NFκB mediated inflammation, increase GFAP, and VEGF

Inhibit exos‐miR‐21 release in peripheral blood flow to brain [266]
Traumatic brain injury TBI mice Ghrelin Hormone Restore vascular permeability, decrease apoptosis. Increase UCP‐2 and decrease caspase‐3 [127]
Traumatic brain injury TBI mice model All‐trans retinoic acid Retinoic acid Decrease BBB permeability Decrease HMGB1, mitochondrial apoptosis marker, microglial activation marker (TSPO), astrogliosis maker (GFAP, Serpina3n) [83]
Approved drugs
Type‐2 Diabetes High‐fat and high fructose‐fed mice Probucol Antihyperlipidemic drug Improve BBB integrity Anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative effects [131]
Chemical Compounds
Type‐2 Diabetes High‐fat diet induced mice Adenosine receptor 2a (Adora2a) antagonist Chemical compound Improve BBB integrity, TJ protein expression Decrease vascular inflammation [246]
Traumatic brain injury TBI mice DI‐3n‐butylphthalide Chemical compound Upregulate TJ proteins and improve neuronal survival Decrease ATG7/Beclin1/LC3II and mitochondrial apoptosis, as well as anti‐inflammatory, anti‐oxidative, anti‐apoptotic, and mitochondrion‐protective functions. [237]
Non treated Apolipoprotein M‐bound sphingosine 1‐phosphate (S1P) or S1PR1 agonist SEW2871 Signaling sphingolipid Maintain paracellular BBB permeability for small molecules in all cerebral microvessels and low levels of vesicle‐mediated transport in penetrating arterioles S1PR1 stimulation inhibits neuroinflammation and maintain BBB integrity [136]
Non treated hCMEC/D3 Exogenous Wnt ligand (Wnt3a) or LiCl (GSK inhibitor) Chemical compound Reduce permeability, Increase the activity of ABCB1 (P‐gp) and BCRP Activation of Wnt/β catenin pathway [101]

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Therapeutic strategies of targeting endothelial pathology in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD). The attempts of therapeutic strategies by protecting blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and function in AD in vivo models showed the effective outcomes including reduced Aβ burdens and improved cognitive functions. We also included some BBB protection strategies in other disease models, such as ischemia stroke, traumatic brain injury, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. BBB protection strategies mainly aim to alleviate neurovascular unit cell members mutual inducement, vascular inflammation, and oxidative stress, prevent cell apoptosis, inhibit autophagy pathway, reduce matrix metalloproteases, modulating proangiogenic pathway, activate Wnt/β‐catenin pathway, modulating mRNA expression, and other pathways. After treatment, upregulated junctional proteins, increased Aβ clearance, improved cell survival, and decreased vascular inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to the recovery of BBB integrity and function.

5.2. Vascular Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

5.2.1. Signaling Pathway

Vascular inflammation is an important factor causing BBB damage and can also induce abnormality of junctional proteins and transporters. Most of natural herbal products exert anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative effects. Inhibition of TLR4/NFκB is generally adopted strategies for the BBB protective effects of these herbal products in treating AD [123]. In AD, RAGE is the predominant receptor mediating Aβ pathology. Inhibition of RAGE‐mediated NFκB activation exerts BBB protective effects in AD model and Aβ‐mediated pathology [122].

The therapeutic effect of NFκB inhition is also reported in other neurodegenerative diseases like ischemia stroke [112]. Inhibition of TLR4/NFκB by Morin and inactivation of HMGB1/TLR4 by Kaempferol protect BBB in MCAO rats [94] and mice with LPS‐induced striatum injury [252].

Oxidative stress contributes to BBB leakage. Attenuating Aβ‐induced oxidative stress restores endothelial survival. It is found that antioxidant CoQ10 inhibits the entry of Aβ into mitochondrial and the hyperactivity of NAPDH oxidase, and overproduction of Ca2+ and ROS, eventually prevents EC apoptosis and necrosis [60]. Decreasing Ca2+ is proved to have BBB protective effect. Calcium channel blocker drug, Azelnidipine protects BBB against Aβ stimulation which involve the inhibition of superoxide anion overproduction and the inhibition of ERK/cPLA2/NFκB pathway is also involved [218]. Therefore, it indicates that Ca2+ uprise, NFκB activation and oxidative stress coexist under Aβ pathology. In ischemic stroke model, the antioxidant protein Nrf2 is shown as a potential target for BBB protection. Nrf2 activator, Acetyl‐11‐keto‐β‐boswellic acid upregulates TJ proteins and maintains EC survival against OGD stimulation [1]. Increased ERK phosphorylation and activation of HO‐1/Sirt1 are involved in Nrf2‐mediated BBB protective effects respectively reported in OGD model [1] and tMCAO mice [251]. Moreover, in hemorrhage rat model, Nrf2/PHB2/OPA1 pathway is related to the attenuation of brain edema and upregulation of claudin‐5 after the treatment of Mitoquinone [268]. In addition to NFκB and Nrf2, IL‐6R/gp130/JAK2/STAT3 pathway commonly mediates proinflammatory effect of IL‐6 and is involved in BBB impairment. In MCAO mice, inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 by tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) protects BBB integrity and upregulates TJ proteins [69].

5.2.2. Receptors and Ligands

Compounds by modifying receptors or ligands that mediate the vascular inflammation have shown BBB protective effects. C3a receptor (C3aR) activation participates in triggering VCAM‐1 mediated CD8+ T cell infiltration and Ca2+ elevation‐mediated reorganization of cadherin junction and cytoskeleton, as well as microglial activation. In Tau301S‐Tg mice, knockdown of C3aR attenuates VCAM‐1‐mediated vascular inflammation and microglial inflammation [174]. Cannabinoid receptors CB1/2 is reported as a potential target for BBB protection upon LPS stimuli. Stearoyl ethanolamide attenuates vascular inflammation and microglial activation in LPS‐induced mice model and the activation of CB1/2 is involved [90]. Similar finding is also reported in that cannabinoids treatment reverses BBB damage in type‐2 diabetes [25]. Adenosine A2A receptor in ECs closely relates to vascular inflammation [125]. CGS‐2180, a specific A2A receptor agonist protects BBB integrity against the stimulation of Th1 cells in EAE mice and the suppression of MLCK signaling is involved [124]. However, the pathological effect of A2A signaling differs according to disease conditions. In high‐fat diet induced type‐2 diabetes model, A2A receptor antagonism in turn improves BBB integrity and upregulates TJ proteins [246]. In ischemic mice, inactivation of A2A receptor protects the brain injury [279]. Shingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) protects BBB by inhibiting inflammation. The treatment of Apolipoprotein M‐bound S1P or S1P receptor 1 (S1P1) agonist SEW2871 maintain BBB permeability in ApoM‐deficient mice model (Mathiesen [136]). The protective role of S1P1 is also evidenced by an approved drug Siponimod which has affinity to S1P1 and S1P5 that protect BBB integrity in MS mcie. Siponimod upregulates ZO‐1 and Claudin‐5 by activating S1P1 and decrease MMP‐9 in TNFα‐ and IFNγ‐induced ECs by activating S1P5, in which the activation of PI3K/AKT is involved [208]. Activation of AMPK/PI3K/AKT is also involved in the anti‐inflammatory effects of trans‐10‐hydroxy‐2‐decenoic acid (10‐HDA) on LPS‐induced ECs [256]. Numerous studies have demonstrated the potentials of adiponectin and adiponectin receptor in ameliorating brain injury and glial inflammation [233]. In 5 × FAD mice and Aβ‐induced ECs, treatment of a globular form adiponectin (Acrp30) suppresses activation of RAGE/NFκB and endothelial apoptosis, meanwhile upregulates TJ proteins [206]. Proinflammatory cytokines dissociate BBB integrity and disturb transporter activity. Reducing the levels of cytokines show protective effect on BBB. For example, TNF inhibitor constructed by fusing the extracellular domain of TNF receptor with antibody against transferrin receptor improves BBB integrity and cognitive functions in APP/PS1 mice, meanwhile, the Aβ burden and neuroinflammation are also attenuated [31].

5.2.3. Approved Drugs

As mentioned above, factor XII‐induced contact‐system activation contributes to vascular inflammation. Knockdown of Factor XII mRNA by antisense oligonucleotide attenuates fibrinogen deposition and neuroinflammation [35]. Anticoagulant drug, dabigatran also shows BBB protective effects in TgCRND8 mice and inhibits inflammation‐, thrombin‐, fibrinogen‐mediated toxicity on ECs. Especially, Dabigatran maintains AQP4 protein levels at astrocytic endfeet, which is essential for structural coupling between astrocyte and endothelial cell. In addition, it inhibits astrogliosis and pericyte degeneration in TgCRND8 mice [41]. Therefore, it suggests that dabigatran is a promising drug for BBB protection. Another approved antihyperlipidemic drug probucol also exerts BBB protective effects in high‐fat diet induced type 2 diabetes model by attenuating inflammation and oxidative stress [131].

5.3. Autophagy Pathway

Contradictory findings on autophagy are suggested above, which is enhanced in Aβ‐induced ECs [30], however impaired in iPSCs (extracted from FAD patients)‐derived ECs with PSEN mutations [180]. Increased autophagy in Aβ‐induced EC maybe a defensive event for enhanced Aβ degradation and clearance. Enhanced autophagy involves decreased phosphorylation of mTOR. In hAPP (J20) mice and LDLR−/− mice, which respectively mimic AD and vascular dementia, inhibiting mTOR by rapamycin ameliorates BBB breakdown manifested as upregulated TJ proteins and attenuated vascular inflammation (Van [220]). Moreover, inhibition of mTOR reduces ROS and MMP‐9, as well as activates protective eNOS/NO. Therefore, it may indicate the therapeutic potential of mTOR inhibition and enhanced autophagy in BBB protection. However, decreased phosphorylation of mTOR may result in inhibited autophagy. Therefore, more evidences are required to clarify the relationship among BBB integrity, autophagy, and mTOR phosphorylation. Inhibiting autophagy pathway (ATG7/Beclin1/LC3II) by DI‐3n‐butylphthalide also upregulates junctional proteins (Occludin, β catenin) in TBI mice [238]. However, contradictory finding is reported in 3 × Tg‐AD mice that enhanced autophagy correlates with downregulation of TJ protein [30] and transporters (LRP‐1, ABCB1 [P‐gp]) [64]. Treatment of lychee seed polyphenols inhibits autophagy pathway (ASC/LC3/AMPK/mTOR/ULK1) and upregulates TJ proteins in AD animal model and Aβ‐induced ECs [245]. No matter the enhancement or inhibition of autophagy pathway, inhibition of mTOR always show therapeutic potentials on BBB.

5.4. Mitochondrial Apoptosis, Death Receptor Mediated Apoptosis and Pyroptosis

BBB breakdown is partially caused by EC death. Mitochondrial or death receptor mediated apoptosis and pyroptosis can lead to EC death. As suggested above, mitochondrial apoptosis and pyroptosis occur in numerous AD models. Suppression of mitochondrial apoptosis by hyperoside maintains endothelial integrity in Aβ‐induced ECs by upregulating TJ proteins and decreasing MMPs [117]. Inhibition of mitochondrial apoptosis or death receptor mediated apoptosis by catapol [118] and Zhenxin Xingshui Yizhi Fang [239] enhances Aβ efflux and glucose influx in Aβ‐induced ECs respectively due to upregulated efflux transporters (LRP‐1 and ABCB1 [P‐gp]), and influx transporters (GLUT1 and GLUT3). Asiaticoside, belonging to trisaccharide triterpene, reversed Aβ‐induced endothelial apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential, the underlying mechanism of which also involves inhibition of TLR4/MyD88/TRAF6/NFκB [205]. In other neurodegenerative diseases, inhibition of apoptosis also acts as a potential way for BBB protection. Inhibition of mitochondrial apoptosis protects BBB in MCAO rats (alpha‐pinene) [96] and attenuates inflammation in TBI mice (Ghrelin) [127].

Activation of pyroptosis pathway including the activation of NLRP3/Caspase‐1/IL‐1β is observed in APP/PS1 models and Aβ‐induced ECs. Inhibition of pyroptosis is involved in EC protective effects of lychee seed polyphenols in upregulating TJ expression and improving BBB integrity as well as cognitive function [245]. In ischemic stroke, medioresionol, belonging to Furofuran type lignan also protects BBB integrity in MCAO and OGD‐induced ECs by activating upstream signaling for pyroptosis including PGC‐1α/PPARα/PAH/GOT1, further inhibiting the overproduction of mitochondrial ROS and pyroptosis pathway (NLRP3/ASC/Caspase‐1/IL‐1β) [234].

5.5. Proangiogenic Pathway

Proangiogenic pathway mediates angiogenesis. Growth factors such as VEGF and angiopoietu (Ang) can trigger angiogenesis by activating proangiogenic pathway. BBB permeability is increased during angiogenesis. VEGF‐A produced by BMECs or astrocytes is known as a key factor for BBB breakdown through activating VEGFR2‐mediated proangiogenic pathway, which eventually results in eNOS‐mediated TJ downregulation [6]. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to LPS‐induced rats restores BBB integrity by reducing VEGF‐A level and suppressing VEGF‐A/VEGFR2/eNOS activation. MSCs transplantation downregulates VEGF‐A mainly by reducing its secretion from astrocytes and IL‐1β secretion by microglia, which could further stimulate the production of VEGF‐A from astrocytes [161]. However, phosphorylation of eNOS at S1177 is beneficial from endothelial function by improving NO production. For instance, myricetin protects endothelial integrity and attenuates inflammation by boosting eNOS/NO pathway via Nrf2/Akt‐dependent manner in OGD‐induced cell model [78]. Whereas, eNOS/NO uncoupling leads to decreased production of NO and ROS overproduction, thus contributes to BBB breakdown. The protective effect of myricetin also include maintaining eNOS/NO coupling and thus promoting the production of protective NO. The production of VEGF in BMECs depends on the activation of HIF1α. Inhibition of HIF‐1α/VEGF, along with Ca2+/CaMKII by propofol protects BBB integrity and upregulates ZO‐1 [33]. Findings about the protective role of proangiogenic pathway are also reported. Study shows that activation of endothelial HIF‐1α/VEGF pathway by catalpol protects vascular structure and neurological functions in MCAO and OGD‐induced ECs [229]. In H2O2‐induced EC model, increase of VEGF and eNOS are also involved in the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐apoptotic effects of nicotinamide mononucleotide, which mainly exerts protection by upregulating the cardiovascular protective enzyme NAMPT [48]. Similarly, activation of ANG‐1/Tie‐2 is involved in the effects of BBB protection and TJ upregulation by salvianolate lyophilized and xueshuantong injection in OGD/R‐induced cell model, accompanied with decrease of Ang‐2 and VEGF [258]. We also found that suppression of VEGF signaling is involved in Aβ oligomer or Aβ oligomer‐induced astrocyte secretion induced BEC dysfunctions [261]. Therefore, more investigations are still in need to elucidate the therapeutic strategies by targeting VEGF.

5.6. Wnt/β‐Catenin Pathway

Wnt/β‐catenin pathway regulates the expression of junctional proteins in ECs. Treatment of exogenous Wnt ligand, Wnt3a decreases BBB permeability and increases the activity of ABCB1 (P‐gp), and BCRP by activating Wnt/β‐catenin pathway [101, 135]. Upregulation of Wnt and β‐catenin is involved in BBB protective effects of minocycline in collagenase‐induced ICH model, accompanied with upregulated occludin and decreased production of proinflammatory mediators [228]. Activation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling mediated by Gpr124 also accounts for the protective effect of lithium in upregulating ZO‐1, claudin‐5, and decreasing MMP9 in MCAO/R model [86]. In addition, the protective effect of lithium on BBB integrity and vascular inflammation in MCAO/R animal model also involves the activation of MAPK/ERK1/2 [74]. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) are involved in maintaining BBB integrity. Study shows that activation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling is responsible for the protective effects of transplantation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells on MCAO mouse, in which BBB integrity is improved with claudin‐5 upregulated. Furthermore, Wnt7a treatment upregulate the expression of claudin‐5 and β‐catenin in OGD‐induced ECs [231].

5.7. Matrix Metalloproteinases

MMPs can digest TJ and basement membrane proteins, thus contributing to BBB leakage [182]. Astrocytes and pericytes secrete excessive MMPs under disease conditions, acting as extracellular stimuli for BBB disruption. In ECs, activation of NFκB signaling is responsible for MMPs upregulation. In OGD‐induced cell model and SD rats with spinal cord injury, 17β‐estradiol (E2) downregulates a series of MMPs, including MMP‐1b, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, MMP‐9, MMP‐10, MMP‐13, accompanied with upregulation of TJ proteins and the suppression of NFκB pathway via recruitment of estrogen receptor α is involved [149]. Intracranial injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) downregulates MMP‐9 expression and inhibits its activity, eventually improving the BBB integrity and attenuating neuroinflammation. Meanwhile, the downregulation of AMPK and ICAM‐1 are involved in this process [37]. Study also indicates the protective role of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase‐1 (TIMP1) in BBB protection, which can proteolyze MMPs. It is found that recombinant TIMP‐1 improves TJ proteins and transendotheial tightness and the activation of FAK signaling, suppression of RhoA, and F‐actin depolymerization are involved [217]. TIMP3 may also be a potential target to decrease MMPs level. A study reported that ginsenoside Rg1 could enhance TIMP3 and MMPs proteolyzation, therefore protect BBB integrity in TBI mice [266].

5.8. Aβ Clearance Pathway

Enhancing Aβ clearance via BBB is always the important goal for AD therapy. Main strategies include increasing Aβ clearance through efflux transporter ABCB1 (P‐gp)/LRP‐1‐mediated pathway and APOE‐mediated clearance pathway (ABCA1/APOE/PPARγ) [177], as well as downregulating influx transporter RAGE. Inhibition of vascular inflammation [248] and mitochondrial apoptosis [118] could also increase Aβ clearance and upregulation of related transporters. Specifically, in hAPP mice, blocking ABCB1 (P‐gp) internalization by nacodazole, a microtubule inhibitor maintains ABCB1 (P‐gp) level on membrane and enhances Aβ transport through BBB, reduces Aβ1‐40 and Aβ1‐42 in brain capillary brain [50]. APOE lipidation is required for Aβ clearance through LRP‐1. Hypolipidation of APOE4 contributes to Aβ accumulation in APOE4 carriers, accompanied by decreased ABCA1. In APOE4‐targeted replacement mice, the treatment of ABCA1 agonist, CS‐6253, activates ABCA1 and ABCA1‐mediated APOE lipidation, therefore resulting in reducing Aβ accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation, as well as improves cognitive function [24].

5.9. NVU Pathologies

NVU cells including astrocytes and pericytes envelop the BMECs [259] to maintain the BBB integrity, as well as other brain cells such as microglia [187, 282] and oligodendrocytes [275]. In AD cases, these NVU cells are skewed into detrimental profile and contribute to endothelial pathologies through detrimental secretions (cytokines, chemokines, et al.). CSF level of YKL‐40, a marker of microglial inflammation is significantly higher in CSF from MCI and AD patients. The correlation between increase of YKL‐40 and BBB leakiness (indicate by increased albumin quotient) is found in AD patient [148]. In our group, we have found that canthin‐6‐one from traditional Chinese medicine Kumu can protect BEC against the damage from LPS‐induced astrocytes, including maintaining the expression of TJ, AJ, and transporter proteins as well as alleviating endothelial inflammation. The underlying mechanism involves ameliorating NFκB, STAT3, MAPK, and NLRP3 pathway [260]. Loss of pericytes and detachment from BBB are observed in AD. In APP/PS1 mice, pericyte degeneration characterized as decreased proliferation, mitochondrial damage and increased mitophagy is detected. Study also shows the involvement of activation of CD36/PINK1/Parkin pathway in pericyte degeneration [110]. Pericytes also contribute to BBB breakdown through the secretion of MMP9 [143], proangiogenic factors and proinflammatory factors [190, 194]. The critical role pericyte in BBB breakdown is especially reported in AD model carrying APOE4 allele, in which TJ proteins downregulation [155], MMP‐9 elevation [20] along with pericyte degeneration are observed [72]. MMPs also mediate the BBB disruptive effect of AD‐stimulated astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [275]. AD astrocytes or pericytes can also induce BBB disruption through the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which further triggers the downregulation of claudin‐5/occludin and leukocyte infiltration via VEGFR2 and eNOS‐mediated pathway [6, 7]. Harmful secretions from NVU cells also affect the vasoactivity of brain vessels. For example, increased secretion of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) from astrocyte constricts capillary and arteriole respectively via modulating pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cell, which lead to decreased cerebral blood flow [45] (Figure 4). Studies have shown the therapeutic potentials of targeting NVU pathologies for BBB protection, especially astrogliosis and microgliosis. For example, L‐norvaline protects BBB integrity and alleviates cerebral amyloid angiopathy in 3 × Tg‐AD mice by alleviating astrogliosis and microgliosis [169]. Melatonin could inhibit MMP‐9 secretion from pericytes via inactivating NOTCH3/NFκB pathway, further protect BBB integrity against pericyte‐derived MMP‐9 in cerebral small vessel disease [176]. Other research also points out the therapeutic potentials of attenuating mitochondrial apoptosis in NVU cell members and carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are demonstrated potential target. Among them, pan‐CA inhibitors are approved by FDA for its effects in preventing cerebrovascular and neurovascular pathology in AD and stroke [106]. Similar findings are also observed in all‐trans retinoic acid‐treated TBI model [83]. Activated platelet‐derived growth factor CC (PDGF‐CC) contributes to BBB permeability in ischemia stroke via activating PDGFRα‐mediated signaling in astrocytes. Inhibition of PDGF‐CC/PDGFRα signaling pathway by remote ischemic conditioning restores the BBB integrity and neurological functions in thromboembolic stroke model [75] (Figure 5).

5.10. Other Potential Signaling

RhoA activation is a critical event during BBB hyperpermeability. Activation of RhoA‐ROCK pathway is observed in 5 × FAD mice and Aβ1‐42‐induced cell models. Human recombinant annexin A1 inhibits RhoA‐ROCK and reverses BBB breakdown, as well as upregulates ZO‐1 and claudin‐5 [162]. Studies also show the important role of transformer 2 alpha homolog (TRA2A)/LINC00662/ETS‐domain protein 4 (ELK4) axis in modulating BBB breakdown in AD. TRA2A is enriched in ECs in AD patients and ELK mediates inflammatory process [242]. In Aβ‐induced ECs, knockdown of TRA2A/LINC00662 induces upregulation of ELK4 and could decrease BBB permeability and upregulate TJ proteins [121]. Insulin pathway is important for cellular activities of various brain cells. Activation of insulin pathway may protect BBB integrity. It is found that high‐fat diet improves BBB integrity and cognitive function, in which upregulated insulin receptor, increased insulin signaling and lipid metabolism are involved [53]. TGR5 exhibits anti‐inflammatory, anti‐oxidative stress effects and could treat EAE [138]. BRCA1 is reported expressed in ECs and could improve endothelial survival [200]. And it is also found that deletion of BRCA1 aggravated AD pathology [213]. Upregulation of TGR5 and BRCA1 are observed in MCAO mice brain, seemingly to perform a defensive effect. In MCAO mice, treatment of TGR5 agonist activates BRCA1/Sirt1 pathway, thereafter improved BBB integrity, TJ expression and endothelial survival [113]. Hippo/YAP/TAZ pathway regulates tissue regeneration and cell proliferation [68] and PPARγ/Kruppel‐like factor 11 (KLF11) pathway, especially KLF11 could inhibit inflammatory stimuli‐induced endothelial activation [271]. These two pathways are demonstrated to modulate the expression of TJ proteins expression and protecting BBB integrity in MCAO/R mice. As we have suggested above the supportive role of Mfsd2a on BBB integrity and in AD mice, Mfsd2a is downregulated. Upregulation of Mfsd2a reverses BBB damage in subarachnoid hemorrhage rats, and such protection may attribute to the increased influx of omega‐3 fatty acids by Mfsd2a and inhibited caveolae‐based transcellular transport. PTEN/AKT/NEDD4‐2/MFSD2A axis modulates Mfsd2a level. It suggested that inhibiting NEDD4‐2‐mediated degradation of Mfsd2a by activating PTEN and AKT may be a potential therapeutic strategy to improve BBB integrity and decrease caveolae‐mediated transcytosis, which determines the restrict BBB permeability [43].

5.11. RNA Targeted Therapy

A series of microRNA‐targeted therapies are capable of protecting BBB integrity in ischemia stroke model or hemorrhage model by modulating the expression of BBB‐related genes. For instances, ablation of miR‐15a/16–1 could abolish its inhibition on claudin‐5 gene expression, therefore, upregulate the protein level of claudin‐5 in ischemic stroke [129]. Treatment of miR‐126‐3p inhibits the expression of VCAM‐1 gene, therefore decrease VCAM‐1‐induced vascular inflammation in cerebral hemorrhage model [62]. Brown fat enriched lncRNA 1(Blnc1) is reported upregulated in ICH brain. Blnc1 siRNA could improve BBB integrity and attenuates vascular inflammation through inhibiting PPARγ/SIRT6‐mediated FoxO3 activation in ICH brain [243]. Especially, Gao's group has developed a nano‐modulator termed siR/PIO@RP that can specifically target on damaged brain blood vessels. siR/PIO@RP is consisted of PPAR agonists and siRNA that targets RAGE expression, which has dual‐functions of activating PPARγ and downregulating RAGE. Treatment of siR/PIO@RP protects NVU system and improves cognitive functions, as well as reduces Aβ burden in APP/PS1 mice [241]. In addition, a series of chemical compounds are found capable of modulating RNA level or function. For examples, 2,4,5‐trihydroxybenzaldehyde (TDB) improves endothelial survival via suppressing miR‐34a, therefore inhibiting miR‐34a‐mediated activation of mitochondrial apoptosis in OGD‐induced cell model [114]. Moreover, ginsenoside Rg1 also exert BBB protective effects partially by inhibiting peripheral macrophage‐derived miR‐21 release, therefore suppressing brain NFκB activation in TBI mice [266].

In summary, targeting EC pathologies and BBB protection are effective in improving the cognitive functions in AD models. Attenuating inflammation or oxidative stress, autophagy, apoptosis, and pyroptosis seems effective in AD models. Especially, modulating several pathways mediated by NFκB, RhoA/ROCK, TRA2A/LINC00662, and mTOR pathway in ECs, as well as NVU pathologies especially gliosis show great therapeutic potentials. Although evidences about therapeutic effects of proangiogenic pathway, Wnt/β catenin pathway, MMPs‐mediated BBB dissociation even P‐gp or LRP‐1 mediated Aβ clearance in AD treatment are rare, their important roles in treating other neurodegenerative diseases implies great potentials in AD treatment. Compounds from natural products, approved drugs, RNA‐targeted therapies, or MSC transplantation have shown protective effects on BBB, however, it is hard to say the protective effects targeting on ECs rather than on other brain cells. BBB is a complexed structure, the cells in which mutually communicate. EC protection may results from the modulation on other brain cells. Therefore, therapies targeting on NVU pathologies such as gliosis and pericyte degeneration also improve BBB integrity. MSC transplantation can modulate NVU cells such as the expression of VEGF and MMP‐9 in astrocyte. For EC‐targeted therapies, firstly, EC‐specific targets including VCAM‐1 and Mfsd2a. C3R‐mediated VCAM‐1 and PTEN/AKT/NEDD4‐2/MFSD2A are proved as effective targets. In addition, Gao's group further suggested an EC‐targeted therapy by using nano‐system to achieve specific therapy via RAP, a peptide that can specifically bind to RAGE expressed on damaged blood vessels [241]. ABCA1 agonist, pan‐CA inhibitor, and recombinant TNF antibody can specifically modulate Aβ clearance, mitochondrial apoptosis, and vascular inflammation, implying their potentials in AD treatment. The approved drugs dabigatran, Azelnidipine, and pan‐CA inhibitor show BBB protective effects in AD and deserve further investigation to develop as auxiliary drugs for AD. In addition, more investigations are required to elucidate the contradictory findings about EC therapies, for example, which one is therapeutic, enhancement or inhibition on autophagy, and upregulation or downregulation of VEGF.

6. Indicators With Potential Clinical Applications

To evaluate BBB leakiness in clinic, the non‐invasive approaches are in need, such as image techniques and analysis of plasma or CSF. For image techniques, MRI image using Gd‐based contrast agent via intravenous injection is a widely used method for evaluating BBB permeability (K trans). FDG‐PET detects brain uptake of glucose and glucose metabolism, indirectly indicating the BBB functions. However, current image techniques are incapable of detecting protein distribution, such as TJ or AJ proteins, even the distribution of immune cells or plasma‐derived proteins such as fibrinogen, thrombin, and immunoglobulins in brain tissues. Plasma analysis can evaluate substance transport across BBB and vascular inflammation. CSF level of insulin reflects uptake of insulin into brain. Plasma level of n‐3 fatty acids and CSF level of DHA reflect DHA level in brain. CSF levels of fatty acids, cholesterol, and phospholipids reflect the cholesterol metabolism. Cell cholesterol efflux capacity of CSF are measured to reflect the cholesterol efflux from astrocytes. CSF levels of HNE can reflect ABCC1 ability. For vascular inflammation, the enzymatic activity of SSAO/VAP‐1 and activation of plasma protein FXII‐driven contact system can be evaluated by analyzing plasma samples. CSF levels of proinflammatory cytokines are used to reflect neuroinflammation. Especially, chemoattractants (P‐selectin, E‐selectin, ICAM‐1, VCAM‐1, PLVAP) can reflect vascular inflammation. Furthermore, several factors correlating with vascular degeneration are used to identify the progression of AD. That includes heart‐type fatty acid‐binding protein (hFABP) (associated with longitudinal atrophy of the entorhinal cortex and other LOAD‐vulnerable neuroanatomical regions), cortisol (associated with the integrity of the vascular system and risk of cardiovascular disorders), and Apolipoprotein A (Apo A) (associated with the integrity of the vascular system and risk of cardiovascular disorders) [85].

7. Conclusion and Perspectives

In this review, we have thoroughly described the BBB alterations including the changes in paracellular permeability, influx transporters, efflux transporters, and vascular inflammation reported in AD patients, AD transgenic animal models, and in vitro AD cell models. Preclinical and clinical evidence have both pointed out the existence of disruption of paracellular permeability, abnormality of transporter system, and vascular pathologies under AD conditions, all indicating the breakdown of BBB. Disrupted BBB is a risk factor for AD progression. As we have reviewed, increased paracellular permeability may aggravate AD pathologies by allowing the entrance of blood‐derived proinflammatory substances like fibrinogen and thrombin, which may aggravate neuroinflammation, amyloid deposition, and neurotoxicity. Dysfunctional influx transporter hampers the supply of glucose and nutrient molecules leading to hypometabolism which is harmful for neuronal activity. Downregulation or decreased activity of efflux transporters fails to eliminate neurotoxic molecules, especially Aβ species, eventually aggravating Aβ deposition and brain burdens. Therefore, repairing BBB breakdown may shed some lights on AD treatment. We summarized the therapeutic explorations in BBB protection under AD disease condition. To provide more evidences for the therapeutic potentials of BBB protection, we also included studies on other disease models, such as stroke, hemorrhage, and TBI. By inhibiting vascular inflammation, or NVU pathologies, preserving endothelial survival and BBB tightness, as well as transporter level and activity, ultimately promoted cognitive function and amyloid burden.

However, as we have noticed that the alterations of BBB are complicated and there are so many target signaling or specific targets. In addition, More evidences still need to figure out if it is an efficient therapeutic strategy for example by inhibiting VEGF/VEGFR pathway and autophagy pathway, upregulating ABCB1 (P‐gp) and ABCA1, activating Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. In addition, the onset of BBB breakdown differs in different cases. It can be detected earliest in the preclinical stage of AD or MCI patients. However, in transgenic AD models, the different onset stage of BBB breakdown is observed depending on different mutations. Therefore, treatment time needs carefully considering. Interfering BBB pathologies at early stages may exert better therapeutic effects. Taken together, BBB protection is an adjuvant therapeutic strategy, which may shed a light on the AD drug development, while more evidences are still needed to support the therapeutic potentials of BBB protection.

Author Contributions

Qian Yue: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, validation, visualization, writing – original draft. Xinyue Leng: validation, visualization. Ningqing Xie: validation, visualization. Zaijun Zhang: funding acquisition, writing – review and editing. Deguang Yang: writing – review and editing. Maggie Pui Man Hoi: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing – review and editing.

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 82404892), Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR (File no. 0023/2020/AFJ, 0035/2020/AGJ, partially supported by SKL‐QRCM (UM)‐2023–2025) and the University of Macau Research Grant (Project No. MYRG2022‐00248‐ICMS, MYRG‐CRG2022‐00010‐ICMS), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 82061160374), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong province (2024A1515012818), as well as the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (21623114).

Qian Yue is the first author.

Contributor Information

Zaijun Zhang, Email: zaijunzhang@163.com.

Deguang Yang, Email: yangguang98198@163.com.

Maggie Pui Man Hoi, Email: maghoi@um.edu.mo.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

  • 1. Ahmad S., Khan S. A., Kindelin A., et al., “Acetyl‐11‐Keto‐β‐Boswellic Acid (AKBA) Attenuates Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, Complement Activation and Cell Death in Brain Endothelial Cells Following OGD/Reperfusion,” Neuromolecular Medicine 21 (2019a): 505–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Akram A., Schmeidler J., Katsel P., Hof P. R., and Haroutunian V., “Increased Expression of Cholesterol Transporter ABCA1 Is Highly Correlated With Severity of Dementia in AD Hippocampus,” Brain Research 1318 (2010): 167–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rihani A., Sweilem B., Darakjian L. I., and Kaddoumi A., “Oleocanthal‐Rich Extra‐Virgin Olive Oil Restores the Blood–Brain Barrier Function Through NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibition Simultaneously With Autophagy Induction in TgSwDI Mice,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience 10 (2019): 3543–3554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Narasimhulu A., Chandrakala C. M., Bhardwaj D., Burge K. Y., and Parthasarathy S., “Alzheimer's Disease Markers in Aged ApoE‐PON1 Deficient Mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 67 (2019): 1353–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Anderson V. C., Tagge I. J., Li X., et al., “Observation of Reduced Homeostatic Metabolic Activity and/or Coupling in White Matter Aging,” Journal of Neuroimaging 30 (2020): 658–665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Argaw A. T., Asp L., Zhang J., et al., “Astrocyte‐Derived VEGF‐A Drives Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption in CNS Inflammatory Disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 122 (2012): 2454–2468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Argaw A. T., Zhang Y., Snyder B. J., et al., “IL‐1β Regulates Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeability via Reactivation of the Hypoxia‐Angiogenesis Program,” Journal of Immunology 177 (2006): 5574–5584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Arnold S. E., Arvanitakis Z., Macauley‐Rambach S. L., et al., “Brain Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes and Alzheimer Disease: Concepts and Conundrums,” Nature Reviews Neurology 14 (2018): 168–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Arvanitakis Z., Capuano A. W., Leurgans S. E., Bennett D. A., and Schneider J. A., “Relation of Cerebral Vessel Disease to Alzheimer's Disease Dementia and Cognitive Function in Elderly People: A Cross‐Sectional Study,” Lancet Neurology 15 (2016): 934–943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Arvanitakis Z., Wang H.‐Y., Capuano A. W., et al., “Brain Insulin Signaling, Alzheimer Disease Pathology, and Cognitive Function,” Annals of Neurology 88 (2020): 513–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Baloyannis S. J. and Baloyannis I. S., “The Vascular Factor in Alzheimer's Disease: A Study in Golgi Technique and Electron Microscopy,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 322 (2012): 117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Barisano G., Montagne A., Kisler K., Schneider J. A., Wardlaw J. M., and Zlokovic B. V., “Blood–Brain Barrier Link to Human Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease,” Nature Cardiovascular Research 1 (2022): 108–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Barrand M., “Beta Amyloid Effects on Expression of Multidrug Efflux Transporters in Brain Endothelial Cells,” Brain research 1418 (2011): 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Batarseh Y. S., Bharate S. S., Kumar V., et al., “Crocus Sativus Extract Tightens the Blood‐Brain Barrier, Reduces Amyloid β Load and Related Toxicity in 5XFAD Mice,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience 8 (2017): 1756–1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bazinet R. P. and Layé S., “Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Their Metabolites in Brain Function and Disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15 (2014): 771–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Beard R. S. and Bearden S. E., “Homocysteine Induces Phosphorylation of VE‐Cadherin at Y731 by Activating a Metabotropic‐to‐Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Cascade.”
  • 17. Beard R. S., Reynolds J. J., and Bearden S. E., “Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Mediates Phosphorylation of Vascular Endothelial Cadherin and Nuclear Localization of β‐Catenin in Response to Homocysteine,” Vascular Pharmacology 56 (2012): 159–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Beard R. S., Haines R. J., Wu K. Y., et al., “Non‐muscle Myosin Light Chain Kinase Is Required for β‐Catenin/FoxO1‐Dependent Downregulation of Claudin‐5 in Interleukin‐1β‐Mediated Brain Endothelial Cell Barrier Dysfunction,” Journal of Cell Science 127 (2014): 144550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Behl T., Kaur I., Sehgal A., Arun Kumar M., Uddin S., and Bungau S., “The Interplay of ABC Transporters in Aβ Translocation and Cholesterol Metabolism: Implicating Their Roles in Alzheimer's Disease,” Molecular Neurobiology 58 (2021): 1564–1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bell R. D., Winkler E. A., Singh I., et al., “Apolipoprotein E Controls Cerebrovascular Integrity via Cyclophilin A,” Nature 485 (2012): 512–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bell R. D. and Zlokovic B. V., “Neurovascular Mechanisms and Blood–Brain Barrier Disorder in Alzheimer's Disease,” Acta Neuropathologica 118 (2009): 103–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ben‐Zvi A., Lacoste B., Kur E., et al., “Mfsd2a Is Critical for the Formation and Function of the Blood–Brain Barrier,” Nature 509 (2014): 507–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bian Z., Yamashita T., Shi X., et al., “Accelerated Accumulation of Fibrinogen Peptide Chains With Aβ Deposition in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Mice and Human AD Brains,” Brain Research 1767 (2021): 147569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Boehm‐Cagan A., Bar R., Liraz O., Bielicki J. K., Johansson J. O., and Michaelson D. M., “ABCA1 Agonist Reverses the ApoE4‐Driven Cognitive and Brain Pathologies,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 54 (2016): 1219–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Brook E., Mamo J., Wong R., et al., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Disturbances in Diabetes‐Associated Dementia: Therapeutic Potential for Cannabinoids,” Pharmacological Research 141 (2019): 291–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cai Y., Lu Y., Niu F., Liao K., and Buch S., “Role of Sigma‐1 Receptor in Cocaine Abuse and Neurodegenerative Disease,” Sigma Receptors: Their Role in Disease and as Therapeutic Targets 964 (2017): 163–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cao Y., Wang F., Wang Y., and Long J., “Agomelatine Prevents Macrophage Infiltration and Brain Endothelial Cell Damage in a Stroke Mouse Model,” Aging (Albany NY) 13 (2021): 13548–13559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Carrano A., Hoozemans J. J. M., van der Vies S. M., Rozemuller A. J. M., van Horssen J., and de Vries H. E., “Amyloid Beta Induces Oxidative Stress‐Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Changes in Capillary Amyloid Angiopathy,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 15 (2011): 1167–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Castellano J. M., Deane R., Gottesdiener A. J., et al., “Low‐Density Lipoprotein Receptor Overexpression Enhances the Rate of Brain‐To‐Blood Aβ Clearance in a Mouse Model of β‐Amyloidosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (2012): 15502–15507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chan Y., Chen W., Wan W., Chen Y., Li Y., and Zhang C., “Aβ1–42 Oligomer Induces Alteration of Tight Junction Scaffold Proteins via RAGE‐Mediated Autophagy in bEnd. 3 Cells,” Experimental Cell Research 369 (2018): 266–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chang R., Knox J., Chang J., et al., “Blood–Brain Barrier Penetrating Biologic TNF‐α Inhibitor for Alzheimer's Disease,” Molecular Pharmaceutics 14 (2017): 2340–2349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cheignon C., Tomas M., Bonnefont‐Rousselot D., Faller P., Hureau C., and Collin F., “Oxidative Stress and the Amyloid Beta Peptide in Alzheimer's Disease,” Redox Biology 14 (2018): 450–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chen W., Xing‐Zhu J., Yan L., Ding X.‐W., Miao C.‐H., and Chen J.‐W., “Propofol Improved Hypoxia‐Impaired Integrity of Blood‐Brain Barrier via Modulating the Expression and Phosphorylation of Zonula Occludens‐1,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 25 (2019): 704–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Chen W., Chan Y., Wan W., Li Y., and Zhang C., “Aβ1‐42 Induces Cell Damage via RAGE‐Dependent Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in bEnd. 3 Cells,” Experimental Cell Research 362 (2018): 83–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Chen Z.‐L., Revenko A. S., Pradeep Singh A., MacLeod R., Norris E. H., and Strickland S., “Depletion of Coagulation Factor XII Ameliorates Brain Pathology and Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer Disease Mice,” Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology 129 (2017): 2547–2556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cheng X., He P., Yao H., Dong Q., Li R., and Shen Y., “Occludin Deficiency With BACE1 Elevation in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy,” Neurology 82 (2014): 1707–1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cheng Z., Wang L., Meijie Q., et al., “Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate Blood‐Brain Barrier Leakage After Cerebral Ischemia in Mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 15 (2018): 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Chiquita S., Ribeiro M., Castelhano J., et al., “A Longitudinal Multimodal In Vivo Molecular Imaging Study of the 3xTg‐AD Mouse Model Shows Progressive Early Hippocampal and Taurine Loss,” Human Molecular Genetics 28 (2019): 2174–2188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Close T. E., Cepinskas G., Omatsu T., et al., “Diabetic Ketoacidosis Elicits Systemic Inflammation Associated With Cerebrovascular Endothelial Cell Dysfunction,” Microcirculation 20 (2013): 534–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Conquer J. A., Tierney M. C., Zecevic J., Bettger W. J., and Fisher R. H., “Fatty Acid Analysis of Blood Plasma of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease, Other Types of Dementia, and Cognitive Impairment,” Lipids 35 (2000): 1305–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cortes‐Canteli M., Kruyer A., Fernandez‐Nueda I., et al., “Long‐Term Dabigatran Treatment Delays Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis in the TgCRND8 Mouse Model,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 74 (2019): 1910–1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Craft S., Baker L. D., Montine T. J., et al., “Intranasal Insulin Therapy for Alzheimer Disease and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Clinical Trial,” Archives of Neurology 69 (2012): 29–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Cui Y., Wang Y., Song X., et al., “Brain Endothelial PTEN/AKT/NEDD4‐2/MFSD2A Axis Regulates Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeability,” Cell Reports 36 (2021): 109327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Custodia A., Aramburu‐Núñez M., Rodríguez‐Arrizabalaga M., et al., “Biomarkers Assessing Endothelial Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease,” Cells 12 (2023): 962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Czigler A., Toth L., Szarka N., et al., “Prostaglandin E2, a Postulated Mediator of Neurovascular Coupling, at Low Concentrations Dilates Whereas at Higher Concentrations Constricts Human Cerebral Parenchymal Arterioles,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators 146 (2020): 106389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Oliveira D., Cardoso L. R., Mimura L. A. N., et al., “Calcitriol Prevents Neuroinflammation and Reduces Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption and Local Macrophage/Microglia Activation,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 11 (2020): 161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Deane R., Du Yan S., Submamaryan R. K., et al., “RAGE Mediates Amyloid‐β Peptide Transport Across the Blood‐Brain Barrier and Accumulation in Brain,” Nature Medicine 9 (2003): 907–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Deng X., Liang X., Yang H., et al., “Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) Protects bEnd. 3 Cells Against H2O2‐Induced Damage via NAMPT and the NF‐κB p65 Signalling Pathway,” FEBS Open Bio 11 (2021): 866–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Dickie B. R., Vandesquille M., Ulloa J., Boutin H., Parkes L. M., and Parker G. J. M., “Water‐Exchange MRI Detects Subtle Blood‐Brain Barrier Breakdown in Alzheimer's Disease Rats,” NeuroImage 184 (2019): 349–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ding Y., Zhong Y., Baldeshwiler A., Abner E. L., Bauer B., and Hartz A., “Protecting P‐Glycoprotein at the Blood–Brain Barrier From Degradation in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 18 (2021): 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Do T. M., Bedussi B., Chasseigneaux S., et al., “Oatp1a4 and an L‐Thyroxine‐Sensitive Transporter Mediate the Mouse Blood‐Brain Barrier Transport of Amyloid‐β Peptide,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 36 (2013): 555–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Do T. M., Dodacki A., Alata W., et al., “Age‐Dependent Regulation of the Blood‐Brain Barrier Influx/Efflux Equilibrium of Amyloid‐β Peptide in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease (3xTg‐AD),” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 49 (2016): 287–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Goldman E., Shirin D. G., Last D., et al., “High‐Fat Diet Protects the Blood–Brain Barrier in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model,” Aging Cell 17 (2018): e12818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Fang X., Fan F., Border J. J., and Roman R. J., “Cerebrovascular Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease and Transgenic Rodent Models,” Journal of Experimental Neurology 5 (2024): 42–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Farrall A. J. and Wardlaw J. M., “Blood–Brain Barrier: Ageing and Microvascular Disease—Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Neurobiology of Aging 30 (2009): 337–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ferreira S. T., “Brain Insulin, Insulin‐Like Growth Factor 1 and Glucagon‐Like Peptide 1 Signalling in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Neuroendocrinology 33 (2021): e12959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Fiala M., Liu Q. N., Sayre J., et al., “Cyclooxygenase‐2‐Positive Macrophages Infiltrate the Alzheimer's Disease Brain and Damage the Blood‐Brain Barrier,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 32 (2002): 360–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Fiala M., Zhang L., Gan X., et al., “Amyloid‐β Induces Chemokine Secretion and Monocyte Migration Across a Human Blood‐Brain Barrier Model,” Molecular Medicine 4 (1998): 480–489. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Freude S., Schilbach K., and Schubert M., “The Role of IGF‐1 Receptor and Insulin Receptor Signaling for the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease: From Model Organisms to Human Disease,” Current Alzheimer Research 6 (2009): 213–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Frontiñán‐Rubio J., Rabanal‐Ruiz Y., Durán‐Prado M., and Alcain F. J., “The Protective Effect of Ubiquinone Against the Amyloid Peptide in Endothelial Cells Is Isoprenoid Chain Length‐Dependent,” Antioxidants 10 (2021): 1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Fu L., Jiang G., Weng H., Dick G. M., Chang Y., and Kassab G. S., “Cerebrovascular miRNAs Correlate With the Clearance of Aβ Through Perivascular Route in Younger 3xTg‐AD Mice,” Brain Pathology 30 (2020): 92–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Fu X., Niu T., and Li X., “MicroRNA‐126‐3p Attenuates Intracerebral Hemorrhage‐Induced Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption by Regulating VCAM‐1 Expression,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 13 (2019): 866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Furst A. J. and Lal R. A., “Amyloid‐β and Glucose Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 26 (2011): 105–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Gali C. C., Fanaee‐Danesh E., Zandl‐Lang M., et al., “Amyloid‐Beta Impairs Insulin Signaling by Accelerating Autophagy‐Lysosomal Degradation of LRP‐1 and IR‐β in Blood‐Brain Barrier Endothelial Cells In Vitro and in 3XTg‐AD Mice,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 99 (2019): 103390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Gao H., Liang M., Andreas Bergdahl A., Hamren M. W. L., Dahlman‐Wright K., and Nilsson B.‐O., “Estrogen Attenuates Vascular Expression of Inflammation Associated Genes and Adhesion of Monocytes to Endothelial Cells,” Inflammation Research 55 (2006): 349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Gindorf M., Storck S. E., Ohler A., Scharfenberg F., Becker‐Pauly C., and Pietrzik C. U., “Meprin β: A Novel Regulator of Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 41 (2021): 31–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Giri R., Shen Y., Stins M., et al., “β‐Amyloid‐Induced Migration of Monocytes Across Human Brain Endothelial Cells Involves RAGE and PECAM‐1,” American Journal of Physiology‐Cell Physiology 279 (2000): C1772–C1781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Gong P., Zhang Z., Zou C., et al., “Hippo/YAP Signaling Pathway Mitigates Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption After Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury,” Behavioural Brain Research 356 (2019): 8–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Gong P., Zhang Z., Yichun Zou Q. I., et al., “Tetramethylpyrazine Attenuates Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Through the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway,” European Journal of Pharmacology 854 (2019): 289–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Gustafsson S., Gustavsson T., Roshanbin S., et al., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Integrity in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease With or Without Acute 3D6 Immunotherapy,” Neuropharmacology 143 (2018): 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Gynther M., Puris E., Peltokangas S., et al., “Alzheimer's Disease Phenotype or Inflammatory Insult Does Not Alter Function of L‐Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 in Mouse Blood‐Brain Barrier and Primary Astrocytes,” Pharmaceutical Research 36 (2019a): 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Halliday M. R., Rege S. V., Ma Q., et al., “Accelerated Pericyte Degeneration and Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Apolipoprotein E4 Carriers With Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 36 (2016): 216–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Hartz A. M. S., Zhong Y., Wolf A., LeVine H., Miller D. S., and Bauer B., “Aβ40 Reduces P‐Glycoprotein at the Blood–Brain Barrier Through the Ubiquitin–Proteasome Pathway,” Journal of Neuroscience 36 (2016): 1930–1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Haupt M., Zechmeister B., Bosche B., et al., “Lithium Enhances Post‐Stroke Blood‐Brain Barrier Integrity, Activates the MAPK/ERK1/2 Pathway and Alters Immune Cell Migration in Mice,” Neuropharmacology 181 (2020): 108357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. He Q., Ma Y., Fang C., et al., “Remote Ischemic Conditioning Attenuates Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption After Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment via Reducing PDGF‐CC,” Pharmacological Research 187 (2023): 106641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Hölscher C., “Brain Insulin Resistance: Role in Neurodegenerative Disease and Potential for Targeting,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 29 (2020): 333–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Hu H., Zhang X.‐x., Wang Y.‐y., and Chen S.‐z., “Honokiol Inhibits Arterial Thrombosis Through Endothelial Cell Protection and Stimulation of Prostacyclin,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 26 (2005): 1063–1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Hu S., Liu T., Yali W., et al., “Panax Notoginseng Saponins Suppress Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Barrier Disruption and Monocyte Adhesion on bEnd. 3 Cells via the Opposite Modulation of Nrf2 Antioxidant and NF‐κB Inflammatory Pathways,” Phytotherapy Research 33 (2019): 3163–3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Hu T., Sun R., Huang F., et al., “CD99 Mediates Neutrophil Transmigration Through the bEnd. 3 Monolayer via the Induction of Oxygen‐Glucose Deprivation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 526 (2020): 799–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Huang X., Qi J., Yixun S., et al., “Endothelial DR6 in Blood‐Brain Barrier Malfunction in Alzheimer's Disease,” Cell Death & Disease 15 (2024): 258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Hultman K., Strickland S., and Norris E. H., “The APOE ɛ4/ɛ4 Genotype Potentiates Vascular Fibrin(Ogen) Deposition in Amyloid‐Laden Vessels in the Brains of Alzheimer's Disease Patients,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 33 (2013a): 1251–1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Hultman K., Strickland S., and Norris E. H., “The APOE ε4/ε4 Genotype Potentiates Vascular Fibrin (Ogen) Deposition in Amyloid‐Laden Vessels in the Brains of Alzheimer's Disease Patients,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 33 (2013b): 1251–1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Hummel R., Ulbrich S., Appel D., et al., “Administration of All‐Trans Retinoic Acid After Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury Is Brain Protective,” British Journal of Pharmacology 177 (2020): 5208–5223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Iannucci J., Renehan W., and Grammas P., “Thrombin, a Mediator of Coagulation, Inflammation, and Neurotoxicity at the Neurovascular Interface: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 14 (2020): 762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Iturria‐Medina Y., Sotero R. C., Toussaint P. J., Mateos‐Pérez J. M., and Evans A. C., “Early Role of Vascular Dysregulation on Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Based on Multifactorial Data‐Driven Analysis,” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Ji Y.‐B., Gao Q., Tan X.‐X., et al., “Lithium Alleviates Blood‐Brain Barrier Breakdown After Cerebral Ischemia and Reperfusion by Upregulating Endothelial Wnt/β‐Catenin Signaling in Mice,” Neuropharmacology 186 (2021): 108474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Jia Y., Wang N., Zhang Y., Xue D., Lou H., and Liu X., “Alteration in the Function and Expression of SLC and ABC Transporters in the Neurovascular Unit in Alzheimer's Disease and the Clinical Significance,” Aging and Disease 11 (2020): 390–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Jung J., Eggleton P., Robinson A., et al., “Calnexin Is Necessary for T Cell Transmigration Into the Central Nervous System,” JCI Insight 3 (2018): e98410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Kamat P. K., Kyles P., Kalani A., and Tyagi N., “Hydrogen Sulfide Ameliorates Homocysteine‐Induced Alzheimer's Disease‐Like Pathology, Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption, and Synaptic Disorder,” Molecular Neurobiology 53 (2016): 2451–2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Kasatkina L. A., Heinemann A., Hudz Y. A., Thomas D., and Sturm E. M., “Stearoylethanolamide Interferes With Retrograde Endocannabinoid Signalling and Supports the Blood‐Brain Barrier Integrity Under Acute Systemic Inflammation,” Biochemical Pharmacology 174 (2020): 113783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Ke X.‐j., Cheng Y.‐f., Nian Y., and Di Q., “Effects of Carbamazepine on the P‐gp and CYP3A Expression Correlated With PXR or NF‐κB Activity in the bEnd. 3 Cells,” Neuroscience Letters 690 (2019): 48–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Keaney J., Walsh D. M., O'Malley T., et al., “Autoregulated Paracellular Clearance of Amyloid‐β Across the Blood‐Brain Barrier,” Science Advances 1 (2015): e1500472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Kellar D. and Craft S., “Brain Insulin Resistance in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches,” Lancet Neurology 19 (2020): 758–766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Khamchai S., Chumboatong W., Hata J., Tocharus C., Suksamrarn A., and Tocharus J., “Morin Attenuated Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Through Promoting Angiogenesis Mediated by Angiopoietin‐1‐Tie‐2 Axis and Wnt/β‐Catenin Pathway,” Neurotoxicity Research 40 (2022): 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Khan N. U., Miao T., Xiufeng J., Guo Q., and Liang H., “Brain Targeted Drug Delivery System,” in Carrier‐Mediated Transportation Through BBB (Elsevier, 2019), 129–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Khoshnazar M., Parvardeh S., and Bigdeli M. R., “Alpha‐Pinene Exerts Neuroprotective Effects via Anti‐Inflammatory and Anti‐Apoptotic Mechanisms in a Rat Model of Focal Cerebral Ischemia‐Reperfusion,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 29 (2020): 104977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Kim D.‐G. and Bynoe M. S., “A2A Adenosine Receptor Regulates the Human Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeability,” Molecular Neurobiology 52 (2015): 664–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Kim G. S., Yang L., Zhang G., et al., “Critical Role of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor‐2 in the Disruption of Cerebrovascular Integrity in Experimental Stroke,” Nature Communications 6 (2015): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Koepsell H., “Organic Cation Transporters in Health and Disease,” Pharmacological Reviews 72 (2020): 253–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Kook S.‐Y., Hong H. S., Moon M., Ha C. M., Chang S., and Mook‐Jung I., “Aβ1–42‐RAGE Interaction Disrupts Tight Junctions of the Blood–Brain Barrier via Ca2+−Calcineurin Signaling,” Journal of Neuroscience 32 (2012): 8845–8854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Laksitorini M. D., Yathindranath V., Xiong W., Hombach‐Klonisch S., and Miller D. W., “Modulation of Wnt/β‐Catenin Signaling Promotes Blood‐Brain Barrier Phenotype in Cultured Brain Endothelial Cells,” Scientific Reports 9 (2019): 19718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Lamartinière Y., Boucau M.‐C., Dehouck L., et al., “ABCA7 Downregulation Modifies Cellular Cholesterol Homeostasis and Decreases Amyloid‐β Peptide Efflux in an In Vitro Model of the Blood‐Brain Barrier,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 64 (2018): 1195–1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Lamb B. A., Bardel K. A., Kulnane L. S., et al., “Amyloid Production and Deposition in Mutant Amyloid Precursor Protein and Presenilin‐1 Yeast Artificial Chromosome Transgenic Mice,” Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999): 695–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Lee B. K., Lee W. J., and Jung Y.‐S., “Chrysin Attenuates VCAM‐1 Expression and Monocyte Adhesion in Lipopolysaccharide‐Stimulated Brain Endothelial Cells by Preventing NF‐κB Signaling,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (2017): 1424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Lee D., Cho S.‐J., Lim H. J., et al., “Alteration of Vascular Endothelial Cadherin in Alzheimer's Disease Patient and Mouse Model,” BioRxiv 430140 (2018): 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Lemon N., Canepa E., Ilies M. A., and Fossati S., “Carbonic Anhydrases as Potential Targets Against Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease and Stroke,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (2021): 772278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Lengfeld J. E., Lutz S. E., Smith J. R., et al., “Endothelial Wnt/β‐Catenin Signaling Reduces Immune Cell Infiltration in Multiple Sclerosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (2017): E1168–E1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Li A.‐D., Tong L., Nan X., et al., “miR‐124 Regulates Cerebromicrovascular Function in APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice via C1ql3,” Brain Research Bulletin 153 (2019): 214–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Li C., Wang X., Cheng F., et al., “Geniposide Protects Against Hypoxia/Reperfusion‐Induced Blood‐Brain Barrier Impairment by Increasing Tight Junction Protein Expression and Decreasing Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis in an In Vitro System,” European Journal of Pharmacology 854 (2019): 224–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Li J., Li M., Ge Y., et al., “β‐Amyloid Protein Induces Mitophagy‐Dependent Ferroptosis Through the CD36/PINK/PARKIN Pathway Leading to Blood–Brain Barrier Destruction in Alzheimer's Disease,” Cell & Bioscience 12 (2022a): 69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Li T., Zheng L.‐N., and Han X.‐H., “Fenretinide Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐Induced Blood‐Brain Barrier (BBB) and Depressive‐Like Behavior in Mice by Targeting Nrf‐2 Signaling,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 125 (2020): 109680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Li W.‐H., Cheng X., Yang Y.‐L., et al., “Kaempferol Attenuates Neuroinflammation and Blood Brain Barrier Dysfunction to Improve Neurological Deficits in Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Rats,” Brain Research 1722 (2019): 146361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Liang H., Matei N., McBride D. W., et al., “Activation of TGR5 Protects Blood Brain Barrier via the BRCA1/Sirt1 Pathway After Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Rats,” Journal of Biomedical Science 27 (2020): 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Liao L.‐X., Zhao M.‐B., Dong X., Jiang Y., Zeng K.‐W., and Peng‐Fei T., “TDB Protects Vascular Endothelial Cells Against Oxygen‐Glucose Deprivation/Reperfusion‐Induced Injury by Targeting miR‐34a to Increase Bcl‐2 Expression,” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 37959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Liebner S., Dijkhuizen R. M., Reiss Y., Plate K. H., Agalliu D., and Constantin G., “Functional Morphology of the Blood–Brain Barrier in Health and Disease,” Acta Neuropathologica 135 (2018): 311–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Lin Z., Sur S., Liu P., et al., “Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Relationship to Alzheimer and Vascular Disease,” Annals of Neurology 90 (2021): 227–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Liu C.‐Y., Bai K., Liu X.‐H., Zhang L.‐M., and Gu‐Ran Y., “Hyperoside Protects the Blood‐Brain Barrier From Neurotoxicity of Amyloid Beta 1–42,” Neural Regeneration Research 13 (2018): 1974–1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Liu C., Chen K., Yunwei L., Fang Z., and Guran Y., “Catalpol Provides a Protective Effect on Fibrillary Aβ1–42‐Induced Barrier Disruption in an In Vitro Model of the Blood–Brain Barrier,” Phytotherapy Research 32 (2018): 1047–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Liu J., Bai Y., Feng Y., et al., “ABCC1 Deficiency Potentiated Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss in Mice by Impairing Cochlear Antioxidant Capacity,” Redox Biology 74 (2024): 103218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Liu L.‐H., Jun X., Deng Y.‐L., et al., “A Complex Association of ABCA7 Genotypes With Sporadic Alzheimer Disease in Chinese Han Population,” Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 28 (2014): 141–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Liu Q., Zhu L., Liu X., et al., “TRA2A‐Induced Upregulation of LINC00662 Regulates Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeability by Affecting ELK4 mRNA Stability in Alzheimer's Microenvironment,” RNA Biology 17 (2020): 1293–1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Liu R., Li J.‐z., Song J.‐k., et al., “Pinocembrin Improves Cognition and Protects the Neurovascular Unit in Alzheimer Related Deficits,” Neurobiology of Aging 35 (2014): 1275–1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Liu T., Liu W.‐h., Zhao J.‐s., Meng F.‐z., and Wang H., “Lutein Protects Against β‐Amyloid Peptide‐Induced Oxidative Stress in Cerebrovascular Endothelial Cells Through Modulation of Nrf‐2 and NF‐κb,” Cell Biology and Toxicology 33 (2017a): 57–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Liu Y., Alahiri M., Ulloa B., Xie B., and Sadiq S. A., “Adenosine A2A Receptor Agonist Ameliorates EAE and Correlates With Th1 Cytokine‐Induced Blood Brain Barrier Dysfunction via Suppression of MLCK Signaling Pathway,” Immunity, Inflammation and Disease 6 (2018): 72–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Liu Z., Yan S., Wang J., et al., “Endothelial Adenosine A2a Receptor‐Mediated Glycolysis Is Essential for Pathological Retinal Angiogenesis,” Nature Communications 8 (2017): 584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Lopez‐Ramirez M. A., Fischer R., Torres‐Badillo C. C., et al., “Role of Caspases in Cytokine‐Induced Barrier Breakdown in Human Brain Endothelial Cells,” Journal of Immunology 189 (2012): 3130–3139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Lopez N. E., Gaston L., Lopez K. R., et al., “Early Ghrelin Treatment Attenuates Disruption of the Blood Brain Barrier and Apoptosis After Traumatic Brain Injury Through a UCP‐2 Mechanism,” Brain Research 1489 (2012): 140–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Lueg G., Gross C. C., Lohmann H., et al., “Clinical Relevance of Specific T‐Cell Activation in the Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease,” Neurobiology of Aging 36 (2015): 81–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Ma F., Sun P., Zhang X., Hamblin M. H., and Yin K.‐J., “Endothelium‐Targeted Deletion of the miR‐15a/16‐1 Cluster Ameliorates Blood‐Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Ischemic Stroke,” Science Signaling 13 (2020): eaay5686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Mallick R., Basak S., and Duttaroy A. K., “Fatty Acids and Evolving Roles of Their Proteins in Neurological, Cardiovascular Disorders and Cancers,” Progress in Lipid Research 83 (2021): 101116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Mamo J. C. L., Lam V., Brook E., et al., “Probucol Prevents Blood–Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Cognitive Decline in Mice Maintained on Pro‐Diabetic Diet,” Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research 16 (2019): 87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Manni M., Ding W., Stohl L. L., and Granstein R. D., “Muramyl Dipeptide Induces Th17 Polarization Through Activation of Endothelial Cells,” Journal of Immunology 186 (2011): 3356–3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Marchi C., Adorni M. P., Caffarra P., et al., “ABCA1‐and ABCG1‐Mediated Cholesterol Efflux Capacity of Cerebrospinal Fluid Is Impaired in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Lipid Research 60 (2019): 1449–1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Markesbery W. R. and Lovell M. A., “Four‐Hydroxynonenal, a Product of Lipid Peroxidation, Is Increased in the Brain in Alzheimer's Disease,” Neurobiology of Aging 19 (1998): 33–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Martin M., Vermeiren S., Bostaille N., et al., “Engineered Wnt Ligands Enable Blood‐Brain Barrier Repair in Neurological Disorders,” Science 375 (2022): eabm4459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Janiurek M., Mette R. S.‐K., Christoffersen C., Kucharz K., and Lauritzen M., “Apolipoprotein M‐Bound Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Regulates Blood–Brain Barrier Paracellular Permeability and Transcytosis,” eLife 8 (2019): e49405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. McLarnon J. G., “A Leaky Blood–Brain Barrier to Fibrinogen Contributes to Oxidative Damage in Alzheimer's Disease,” Antioxidants 11 (2021): 102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. McMillin M., Frampton G., Tobin R., et al., “TGR 5 Signaling Reduces Neuroinflammation During Hepatic Encephalopathy,” Journal of Neurochemistry 135 (2015): 565–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Meister S., Storck S. E., Hameister E., et al., “Expression of the ALS‐Causing Variant hSOD1G93A Leads to an Impaired Integrity and Altered Regulation of Claudin‐5 Expression in an In Vitro Blood–Spinal Cord Barrier Model,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 35 (2015): 1112–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Milstein J. L. and Ferris H. A., “The Brain as an Insulin‐Sensitive Metabolic Organ,” Molecular Metabolism 52 (2021): 101234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Moloney A. M., Griffin R. J., Timmons S., O'Connor R., Ravid R., and O'Neill C., “Defects in IGF‐1 Receptor, Insulin Receptor and IRS‐1/2 in Alzheimer's Disease Indicate Possible Resistance to IGF‐1 and Insulin Signalling,” Neurobiology of Aging 31 (2010): 224–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Montagne A., Barnes S. R., Sweeney M. D., et al., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Breakdown in the Aging Human Hippocampus,” Neuron 85 (2015): 296–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Montagne A., Nation D. A., Sagare A. P., et al., “APOE4 Leads to Blood–Brain Barrier Dysfunction Predicting Cognitive Decline,” Nature 581 (2020): 71–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Montagne A., Zhao Z., and Zlokovic B. V., “Alzheimer's Disease: A Matter of Blood–Brain Barrier Dysfunction?,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 214 (2017): 3151–3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Moreno‐Grau S., Hernández I., Heilmann‐Heimbach S., et al., “Genome‐Wide Significant Risk Factors on Chromosome 19 and the APOE Locus,” Oncotarget 9 (2018): 24590–24600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Moreno‐Grau S., Rodríguez‐Gómez O., Sanabria A., et al., “Exploring APOE Genotype Effects on Alzheimer's Disease Risk and Amyloid β Burden in Individuals With Subjective Cognitive Decline: The FundacioACE Healthy Brain Initiative (FACEHBI) Study Baseline Results,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 14 (2018): 634–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Mulder M., Ravid R., Swaab D. F., et al., “Reduced Levels of Cholesterol, Phospholipids and Fatty Acids in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Alzheimer's Disease Patients Are Not Related to Apolipoprotein E4,” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 12 (1998): 198–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Muszyński P., Kulczyńska‐Przybik A., Borawska R., et al., “The Relationship Between Markers of Inflammation and Degeneration in the Central Nervous System and the Blood‐Brain Barrier Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 59 (2017): 903–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Na W., Lee J. Y., Kim W.‐S., Yune T. Y., and Bong‐Gun J., “17β‐Estradiol Ameliorates Tight Junction Disruption via Repression of MMP Transcription,” Molecular Endocrinology 29 (2015): 1347–1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Nagano H., Ito S., Masuda T., and Ohtsuki S., “Effect of Insulin Receptor‐Knockdown on the Expression Levels of Blood–Brain Barrier Functional Proteins in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells,” Pharmaceutical Research (2021): 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Nation D. A., Sweeney M. D., Montagne A., et al., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Breakdown Is an Early Biomarker of Human Cognitive Dysfunction,” Nature Medicine 39 (2019): 1561–1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Nguyen L. N., Ma D., Shui G., et al., “Mfsd2a Is a Transporter for the Essential Omega‐3 Fatty Acid Docosahexaenoic Acid,” Nature 509 (2014): 503–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Ning Y.‐x., Ren S.‐l., Zhao F.‐d., and Yin L.‐h., “Overexpression of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Increases the Expression of ATP‐Binding Cassette Transporters in Microvascular Endothelial Cells (bEnd. 3),” Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 11 (2010): 350–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Ning Y., Chen S., Li X., Ma Y., Zhao F., and Yin L., “Cholesterol, LDL, and 25‐Hydroxycholesterol Regulate Expression of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein in Microvascular Endothelial Cell Line (bEnd. 3),” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 342 (2006): 1249–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Nishitsuji K., Hosono T., Nakamura T., Guojun B., and Michikawa M., “Apolipoprotein E Regulates the Integrity of Tight Junctions in an Isoform‐Dependent Manner in an In Vitro Blood‐Brain Barrier Model,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 286 (2011): 17536–17542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Nitta T., Hata M., Gotoh S., et al., “Size‐Selective Loosening of the Blood‐Brain Barrier in Claudin‐5‐Deficient Mice,” Journal of Cell Biology 161 (2003): 653–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Oh S. B., Kim J. A., Park S. J., and Lee J.‐Y., “Associative Interactions Among Zinc, Apolipoprotein E, and Amyloid‐β in the Amyloid Pathology,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 (2020): 802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Oikari L. E., Pandit R., Stewart R., et al., “Altered Brain Endothelial Cell Phenotype From a Familial Alzheimer Mutation and Its Potential Implications for Amyloid Clearance and Drug Delivery,” Stem Cell Reports 14 (2020): 924–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Paik S., Somvanshi R. K., and Kumar U., “Somatostatin Maintains Permeability and Integrity of Blood‐Brain Barrier in β‐Amyloid Induced Toxicity,” Molecular Neurobiology 56 (2019): 292–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Pardridge W. M., “Drug Transport Across the Blood–Brain Barrier,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 32 (2012): 1959–1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Park H. J., Shin J. Y., Kim H. N., Se Hee O., Song S. K., and Lee P. H., “Mesenchymal Stem Cells Stabilize the Blood–Brain Barrier Through Regulation of Astrocytes,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy 6 (2015): 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Park J.‐C., Baik S. H., Han S.‐H., et al., “Annexin A1 Restores Aβ1‐42‐Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption Through the Inhibition of RhoA‐ROCK Signaling Pathway,” Aging Cell 16 (2017): 149–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Park L., Wang G., Zhou P., et al., “Scavenger Receptor CD36 Is Essential for the Cerebrovascular Oxidative Stress and Neurovascular Dysfunction Induced by Amyloid‐β,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (2011): 5063–5068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Park R., Kook S. Y., Park J. C., and Mook‐Jung I., “Aβ1–42 Reduces P‐Glycoprotein in the Blood–Brain Barrier Through RAGE–NF‐κB Signaling,” Cell Death & Disease 5 (2014): e1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Park T. Y., Baik E. J., and Lee S. H., “Prostaglandin E2‐Induced Intercellular Adhesion Molecule‐1 Expression Is Mediated by cAMP/Epac Signalling Modules in bEnd. 3 Brain Endothelial Cells,” British Journal of Pharmacology 169 (2013): 604–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Parodi‐Rullán R., Ghiso J., Cabrera E., Rostagno A., and Fossati S., “Alzheimer's Amyloid β Heterogeneous Species Differentially Affect Brain Endothelial Cell Viability, Blood‐Brain Barrier Integrity, and Angiogenesis,” Aging Cell 19 (2020): e13258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Pereira C. D., Martins F., Wiltfang J., and Odete A. B., “ABC Transporters Are Key Players in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 61 (2018): 463–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Pietronigro E., Zenaro E., and Constantin G., “Imaging of Leukocyte Trafficking in Alzheimer's Disease,” Frontiers in Immunology 7 (2016): 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Polis B., Gurevich V., Assa M., and Samson A. O., “Norvaline Restores the BBB Integrity in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (2019): 4616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Poon C. H., Wang Y., Fung M.‐L., Zhang C., and Lim L. W., “Rodent Models of Amyloid‐Beta Feature of Alzheimer's Disease: Development and Potential Treatment Implications,” Aging and Disease 11 (2020): 1235–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Potjewyd G., Reverse Engineering a Human 3D Cell‐Based Model of the Neurovascular Unit to Investigate Blood‐Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease (University of Manchester, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Presa J. L., Pomilio C. J., Alaimo A., et al., “Increased Vascular Permeability to Evans Blue dye in the Hippocampus of PDAPPJ20 mice, model of Alzheimer' s Disease (AD): Potential Implication of ER Stress Mechanisms,” Medicina (Buenos Aires) 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Profaci C. P., Munji R. N., Pulido R. S., and Daneman R., “The Blood–Brain Barrier in Health and Disease: Important Unanswered Questions,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 217 (2020): e20190062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Propson N. E., Roy E. R., Litvinchuk A., Köhl J., and Zheng H., “Endothelial C3a Receptor Mediates Vascular Inflammation and Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeability During Aging,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 131 (2021): e140966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Puris E., Auriola S., Korhonen P., et al., “Systemic Inflammation Induced Changes in Protein Expression of ABC Transporters and Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Subunit 1 in the Cerebral Cortex of Familial Alzheimers Disease Mouse Model,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 110 (2021): 3953–3962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Qin W., Li J., Zhu R., et al., “Melatonin Protects Blood‐Brain Barrier Integrity and Permeability by Inhibiting Matrix Metalloproteinase‐9 via the NOTCH3/NF‐κB Pathway,” Aging (Albany NY) 11 (2019): 11391–11415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Qosa H., Batarseh Y. S., Mohyeldin M. M., El Sayed K. A., Keller J. N., and Kaddoumi A., “Oleocanthal Enhances Amyloid‐β Clearance From the Brains of TgSwDI Mice and In Vitro Across a Human Blood‐Brain Barrier Model,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience 6 (2015): 1849–1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Ransohoff R. M., Kivisäkk P., and Kidd G., “Three or More Routes for Leukocyte Migration Into the Central Nervous System,” Nature Reviews Immunology 3 (2003): 569–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Raut S., Patel R., and Al‐Ahmad A., “Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived Brain Endothelial Cells From Patients Suffering From Familial Form of Alzheimer's Disease Display Impaired Barrier Function and Cell Metabolism,” 2020.
  • 180. Raut S., Patel R., and Al‐Ahmad A. J., “Presence of a Mutation in PSEN1 or PSEN2 Gene Is Associated With an Impaired Brain Endothelial Cell Phenotype In Vitro,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 18 (2021): 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Reitz C., Jun G., Naj A., et al., “Variants in the ATP‐Binding Cassette Transporter (ABCA7), Apolipoprotein E ϵ4, and the Risk of Late‐Onset Alzheimer Disease in African Americans,” JAMA 309 (2013): 1483–1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Rempe R. G., Hartz A. M. S., and Bauer B., “Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Brain and Blood–Brain Barrier: Versatile Breakers and Makers,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 36 (2016): 1481–1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Rhea E. M. and Banks W. A., “Interactions of Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Apolipoproteins With the Blood‐Brain Barrier,” Pharmaceutical Research 38 (2021): 1469–1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Rhea E. M., Rask‐Madsen C., and Banks W. A., “Insulin Transport Across the Blood–Brain Barrier Can Occur Independently of the Insulin Receptor,” Journal of Physiology 596 (2018): 4753–4765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Rivera E. J., Goldin A., Fulmer N., Tavares R., Wands J. R., and de la Monte S. M., “Insulin and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor Expression and Function Deteriorate With Progression of Alzheimer's Disease: Link to Brain Reductions in Acetylcholine,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 8 (2005): 247–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Rom S., Zuluaga‐Ramirez V., Reichenbach N. L., et al., “Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside Is a Blood‐Brain Barrier Protective and Anti‐Inflammatory Agent: Implications for Neuroinflammation,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 15 (2018): 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Ronaldson P. T. and Davis T. P., “Regulation of Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity by Microglia in Health and Disease: A Therapeutic Opportunity,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 40 (2020): S6–S24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Rosas‐Hernandez H., Cuevas E., Raymick J. B., Robinson B. L., and Sarkar S., “Impaired Amyloid Beta Clearance and Brain Microvascular Dysfunction Are Present in the Tg‐SwDI Mouse Model of alzheimer's Disease,” Neuroscience 440 (2020): 48–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Rupp N. J., Wegenast‐Braun B. M., Radde R., Calhoun M. E., and Jucker M., “Early Onset Amyloid Lesions Lead to Severe Neuritic Abnormalities and Local, but Not Global Neuron Loss in APPPS1 Transgenic Mice,” Neurobiology of Aging 32 (2011): 2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Rustenhoven J., Aalderink M., Scotter E. L., et al., “TGF‐Beta1 Regulates Human Brain Pericyte Inflammatory Processes Involved in Neurovasculature Function,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 13 (2016): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Ryu J. K. and McLarnon J. G., “A Leaky Blood‐Brain Barrier, Fibrinogen Infiltration and Microglial Reactivity in Inflamed Alzheimer's Disease Brain,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 13 (2009): 2911–2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Ryu J. K., Petersen M. A., Murray S. G., et al., “Blood Coagulation Protein Fibrinogen Promotes Autoimmunity and Demyelination via Chemokine Release and Antigen Presentation,” Nature Communications 6 (2015): 8164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Salloway S., Gur T., Berzin T., et al., “Effect of APOE Genotype on Microvascular Basement Membrane in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 203‐204 (2002): 183–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Salmina A. B., Komleva Y. K., Lopatina O. L., and Birbrair A., “Pericytes in Alzheimer's Disease: Novel Clues to Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Pathogenesis,” Pericyte Biology in Disease 1174 (2019): 147–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Sekhar G. N., Fleckney A. L., Boyanova S. T., et al., “Region‐Specific Blood–Brain Barrier Transporter Changes Leads to Increased Sensitivity to Amisulpride in Alzheimer's Disease,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 16 (2019): 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Sengillo J. D., Winkler E. A., Walker C. T., Sullivan J. S., Johnson M., and Zlokovic B. V., “Deficiency in Mural Vascular Cells Coincides With Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption in Alzheimer's Disease,” Brain Pathology 23 (2013): 303–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Shadman J., Sadeghian N., Moradi A., Bohlooli S., and Panahpour H., “Magnesium Sulfate Protects Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity and Reduces Brain Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke in Rats,” Metabolic Brain Disease 34 (2019): 1221–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Shang, De S., Yang Y. M., Zhang H., et al., “Intracerebral GM‐CSF Contributes to Transendothelial Monocyte Migration in APP/PS1 Alzheimer's Disease Mice,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 36 (2016): 1978–1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Shang J., Yamashita T., Tian F., et al., “Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion Alters Amyloid‐β Transport Related Proteins in the Cortical Blood Vessels of Alzheimer's Disease Model Mouse,” Brain Research 1723 (2019): 146379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Singh K. K., Shukla P. C., Quan A., et al., “BRCA1 Is a Novel Target to Improve Endothelial Dysfunction and Retard Atherosclerosis,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 146, no. 949‐60 (2013): e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Skinner E. R., Watt C., Besson J. A. O., and Best P. V., “Differences in the Fatty Acid Composition of the Grey and White Matter of Different Regions of the Brains of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Control Subjects,” Brain 116 (1993): 717–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Smyth L. C. D., Murray H. C., Hill M., et al., “Neutrophil‐Vascular Interactions Drive Myeloperoxidase Accumulation in the Brain in Alzheimer's Disease,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications 10 (2022): 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Sole M., Esteban‐Lopez M., Taltavull B., et al., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Dysfunction Underlying Alzheimer's Disease Is Induced by an SSAO/VAP‐1‐Dependent Cerebrovascular Activation With Enhanced Aβ Deposition,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)–Molecular Basis of Disease 1865 (2019): 2189–2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Solito R., Corti F., Chen C.‐H., et al., “Mitochondrial Aldehyde Dehydrogenase‐2 Activation Prevents β‐Amyloid‐Induced Endothelial Cell Dysfunction and Restores Angiogenesis,” Journal of Cell Science 126 (2013): 1952–1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Song D., Jiang X., Liu Y., Sun Y., Cao S., and Zhang Z., “Asiaticoside Attenuates Cell Growth Inhibition and Apoptosis Induced by Aβ1‐42 via Inhibiting the TLR4/NF‐κB Signaling Pathway in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 9 (2018): 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Song J., Choi S.‐M., Whitcomb D. J., and Kim B. C., “Adiponectin Controls the Apoptosis and the Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Brain Endothelial Cells Through AdipoR1 Under Beta Amyloid Toxicity,” Cell Death & Disease 8 (2017): e3102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Song J., Kang S. M., Lee W. T., Park K. A., Lee K. M., and Lee J. E., “Glutathione Protects Brain Endothelial Cells From Hydrogen Peroxide‐Induced Oxidative Stress by Increasing nrf2 Expression,” Experimental Neurobiology 23 (2014): 93–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Spampinato S. F., Merlo S., Sano Y., Kanda T., and Sortino M. A., “Protective Effect of the Sphingosine‐1 Phosphate Receptor Agonist Siponimod on Disrupted Blood Brain Barrier Function,” Biochemical Pharmacology 186 (2021): 114465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Stamatovic S. M., Keep R. F., Wang M. M., Jankovic I., and Andjelkovic A. V., “Caveolae‐Mediated Internalization of Occludin and Claudin‐5 During CCL2‐Induced Tight Junction Remodeling in Brain Endothelial Cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 284 (2009): 19053–19066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Steen E., Terry B. M., Rivera E. J., et al., “Impaired Insulin and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor Expression and Signaling Mechanisms in Alzheimer's Disease–Is This Type 3 Diabetes?,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 7 (2005): 63–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Storck S. E., Hartz A. M. S., Bernard J., et al., “The Concerted Amyloid‐Beta Clearance of LRP1 and ABCB1/P‐Gp Across the Blood‐Brain Barrier Is Linked by PICALM,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 73 (2018): 21–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Storelli F., Billington S., Kumar A. R., and Unadkat J. D., “Abundance of P‐Glycoprotein and Other Drug Transporters at the Human Blood‐Brain Barrier in Alzheimer's Disease: A Quantitative Targeted Proteomic Study,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 109 (2021): 667–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Suberbielle E., Djukic B., Evans M., et al., “DNA Repair Factor BRCA1 Depletion Occurs in Alzheimer Brains and Impairs Cognitive Function in Mice,” Nature Communications 6 (2015): 8897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Sweeney M. D., Sagare A. P., and Zlokovic B. V., “Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Alzheimer Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders,” Nature Reviews Neurology 14 (2018): 133–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Szablewski L., “Glucose Transporters in Brain: In Health and in Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 55 (2017): 1307–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Tai Leon, Amyloid Beta Transport and Effects on Permeability in a Human Brain Endothelial Cell Line (United Kingdom: Open University, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Tang J., Kang Y., Huang L., Lei W., and Peng Y., “TIMP1 Preserves the Blood–Brain Barrier Through Interacting With CD63/Integrin β1 Complex and Regulating Downstream FAK/RhoA Signaling,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 10 (2020): 987–1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Teng T., Azelnidipine Attenuates Inflammatory Responses, Superoxide and Relevant Signaling Pathways Induced by Amyloid‐Beta in Mouse Cerebral Endothelial Cells (Columbia: University of Missouri, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Townsend K. P., Obregon D., Quadros A., et al., “Proinflammatory and Vasoactive Effects of Aβ in the Cerebrovasculature,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 977 (2002): 65–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Skike V., Candice E., Jahrling J. B., et al., “Inhibition of mTOR Protects the Blood‐Brain Barrier in Models of Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Cognitive Impairment,” American Journal of Physiology‐Heart, and Circulatory Physiology 314 (2018): H693–H703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Vandal M., Alata W., Tremblay C., et al., “Reduction in DHA Transport to the Brain of Mice Expressing Human APOE 4 Compared to APOE 2,” Journal of Neurochemistry 129 (2014): 516–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Voirin A.‐C., Perek N., and Roche F., “Inflammatory Stress Induced by a Combination of Cytokines (IL‐6, IL‐17, TNF‐α) Leads to a Loss of Integrity on bEnd. 3 Endothelial Cells In Vitro BBB Model,” Brain Research 1730 (2020): 146647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Vromman A., Trabelsi N., Rouxel C., Béréziat G., Limon I., and Blaise R., “β‐Amyloid Context Intensifies Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Induced Inflammatory Response and De‐Differentiation,” Aging Cell 12 (2013): 358–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Vukic V., Callaghan D., Walker D., et al., “Expression of Inflammatory Genes Induced by Beta‐Amyloid Peptides in Human Brain Endothelial Cells and in Alzheimer's Brain Is Mediated by the JNK‐AP1 Signaling Pathway,” Neurobiology of Disease 34 (2009): 95–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Wan J. J., Wang P. Y., Zhang Y., et al., “Role of Acute‐Phase Protein ORM in a Mice Model of Ischemic Stroke,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 234 (2019): 20533–20545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Wan W., Cao L., Liu L., et al., “Aβ1–42 Oligomer‐Induced Leakage in an In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Is Associated With Up‐Regulation of RAGE and Metalloproteinases, and Down‐Regulation of Tight Junction Scaffold Proteins,” Journal of Neurochemistry 134 (2015): 382–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Wang F., Ji S., Muxi Wang L., et al., “HMGB1 Promoted P‐Glycoprotein at the Blood‐Brain Barrier in MCAO Rats via TLR4/NF‐κB Signaling Pathway,” European Journal of Pharmacology 880 (2020): 173189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Wang G., Li Z., Li S., et al., “Minocycline Preserves the Integrity and Permeability of BBB by Altering the Activity of DKK1–Wnt Signaling in ICH Model,” Neuroscience 415 (2019): 135–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Wang H., Xiaogang X., Yin Y., et al., “Catalpol Protects Vascular Structure and Promotes Angiogenesis in Cerebral Ischemic Rats by Targeting HIF‐1α/VEGF,” Phytomedicine 78 (2020): 153300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Wang J., Li Y., Shen Y., et al., “PDL1 Fusion Protein Protects Against Experimental Cerebral Malaria via Repressing Over‐Reactive CD8+ T Cell Responses,” Frontiers in Immunology 9 (2019): 3157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Wang L., Geng J., Meijie Q., et al., “Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells Transplantation Protects Blood–Brain Barrier in a Mouse Model of Brain Ischemia via Wnt/β‐Catenin Signaling,” Cell Death & Disease 11 (2020): 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Wang N. and Westerterp M., “ABC Transporters, Cholesterol Efflux, and Implications for Cardiovascular Diseases,” Lipid Transfer in Lipoprotein Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease 1276 (2020): 67–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Wang S., Qiuhui Yao Y., Wan J. W., Huang C., Li D., and Yang B., “Adiponectin Reduces Brain Injury After Intracerebral Hemorrhage by Reducing NLRP3 Inflammasome Expression,” International Journal of Neuroscience 130 (2020): 301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Wang Y., Guan X., Gao C.‐L., et al., “Medioresinol as a Novel PGC‐1α Activator Prevents Pyroptosis of Endothelial Cells in Ischemic Stroke Through PPARα‐GOT1 Axis,” Pharmacological Research 169 (2021): 105640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Wang Z., Zheng Y., Wang F., et al., “Mfsd2a and Spns2 Are Essential for Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Transport in the Formation and Maintenance of the Blood‐Brain Barrier,” Science Advances 6 (2020): eaay8627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Wojkowska D. W., Szpakowski P., and Glabinski A., “Interleukin 17A Promotes Lymphocytes Adhesion and Induces CCL2 and CXCL1 Release From Brain Endothelial Cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (2017): 1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Wu F., Ke X., Kebin X., et al., “Dl‐3n‐Butylphthalide Improves Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery via Inhibiting Autophagy‐Induced Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption and Cell Apoptosis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24 (2020): 1220–1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Wu J., Yang J., Miao Y., et al., “Lanthanum Chloride Causes Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption Through Intracellular Calcium‐Mediated RhoA/Rho Kinase Signaling and Myosin Light Chain Kinase,” Metallomics 12 (2020): 2075–2083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Wu L., Zheng Q., Guo Y.‐y., et al., “Effect of Zhenxin Xingshui Yizhi Fang on Aβ25‐35 Induced Expression of Related Transporters in HBMEC Cell Model,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 260 (2020): 112783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Wylezinski L. S. and Hawiger J., “Interleukin 2 Activates Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells Resulting in Destabilization of Adherens Junctions,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 291 (2016): 22913–22923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Xia X., Wei Y., Huang Q., et al., “Counteracting Alzheimer's Disease via Normalizing Neurovascular Unit With a Self‐Regulated Multi‐Functional Nano‐Modulator,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Xie L., “MKL1/2 and ELK4 Co‐Regulate Distinct Serum Response Factor (SRF) Transcription Programs in Macrophages,” BMC Genomics 15 (2014): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Xie L., Wang Y., and Chen Z., “LncRNA Blnc1 Mediates the Permeability and Inflammatory Response of Cerebral Hemorrhage by Regulating the PPAR‐γ/SIRT6/FoxO3 Pathway,” Life Sciences 267 (2021): 118942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Xiong H., Callaghan D., Jones A., et al., “ABCG2 Is Upregulated in Alzheimer's Brain With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and May Act as a Gatekeeper at the Blood–Brain Barrier for Aβ1–40 Peptides,” Journal of Neuroscience 29 (2009): 5463–5475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Xiong R., Zhou X.‐G., Tang Y., et al., “Lychee Seed Polyphenol Protects the Blood–Brain Barrier Through Inhibiting Aβ (25–35)‐Induced NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation via the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1‐Mediated Autophagy in bEnd. 3 Cells and APP/PS1 Mice,” Phytotherapy Research 35 (2021): 954–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Yamamoto M., Guo D.‐H., Hernandez C. M., and Stranahan A. M., “Endothelial Adora2a Activation Promotes Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown and Cognitive Impairment in Mice With Diet‐Induced Insulin Resistance,” Journal of Neuroscience 39 (2019): 4179–4192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. Yan F.‐L., Zheng Y., and Zhao F.‐D., “Effects of Ginkgo Biloba Extract EGb761 on Expression of RAGE and LRP‐1 in Cerebral Microvascular Endothelial Cells Under Chronic Hypoxia and Hypoglycemia,” Acta Neuropathologica 116 (2008): 529–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Yan L., Xie Y., Satyanarayanan S. K., et al., “Omega‐3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Promote Brain‐To‐Blood Clearance of β‐Amyloid in a Mouse Model With Alzheimer's Disease,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 85 (2020): 35–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Yang H., Wang W., Jia L., et al., “The Effect of Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion on Blood‐Brain Barrier Permeability in a Transgenic Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model (PS1V97L),” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 74 (2020): 261–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Yang J., Kou J., Lalonde R., and Fukuchi K.‐i., “Intracranial IL‐17A Overexpression Decreases Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy by Upregulation of ABCA1 in an Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 65 (2017): 262–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Yang R., Shen Y.‐J., Chen M., et al., “Quercetin Attenuates Ischemia Reperfusion Injury by Protecting the Blood‐Brain Barrier Through Sirt1 in MCAO Rats,” Journal of Asian Natural Products Research 24 (2022): 278–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Yang Y.‐L., Cheng X., Li W.‐H., Liu M., Wang Y.‐H., and Guan‐Hua D., “Kaempferol Attenuates LPS‐Induced Striatum Injury in Mice Involving Anti‐Neuroinflammation, Maintaining BBB Integrity, and Down‐Regulating the HMGB1/TLR4 Pathway,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (2019): 491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Yassine H. N., Feng Q., Chiang J., et al., “ABCA1‐Mediated Cholesterol Efflux Capacity to Cerebrospinal Fluid Is Reduced in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of the American Heart Association 5 (2016): e002886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Yasutaka Y., Watanabe T., Nakashima A., et al., “Tumor Necrosis Factor‐α Reduces Beta‐Amyloid Accumulation Primarily by Lowering Cellular Prion Protein Levels in a Brain Endothelial Cell Line,” FEBS Letters 589 (2015): 263–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Yin X., Wright J., Wall T., and Grammas P., “Brain Endothelial Cells Synthesize Neurotoxic Thrombin in Alzheimer's Disease,” American Journal of Pathology 176 (2010): 1600–1606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. You M., Miao Z., Pan Y., and Fuliang H., “Trans‐10‐Hydroxy‐2‐Decenoic Acid Alleviates LPS‐Induced Blood‐Brain Barrier Dysfunction by Activating the AMPK/PI3K/AKT Pathway,” European Journal of Pharmacology 865 (2019): 172736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Yu W., Jin H., Sun W., et al., “Connexin43 Promotes Angiogenesis Through Activating the HIF‐1α/VEGF Signaling Pathway Under Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 41 (2021): 2656–2675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Yuan Q., Wang J.‐x., Li R.‐l., et al., “Effects of Salvianolate Lyophilized Injection Combined With Xueshuantong Injection in Regulation of BBB Function in a Co‐Culture Model of Endothelial Cells and Pericytes,” Brain Research 1751 (2021): 147185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Yue Q. and Hoi M. P. M., “Emerging Roles of Astrocytes in Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption Upon Amyloid‐Beta Insults in Alzheimer's Disease,” Neural Regeneration Research 18 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260. Yue Q., Yunshao X., Lin L., and Hoi M. P. M., “Canthin‐6‐one (CO) from Picrasma Quassioides (D.Don) Benn. Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐Induced Astrocyte activation and Associated Brain Endothelial Disruption,” Phytomedicine 101 (2022): 154108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261. Yue Q., Zhou X., Zhang Z., and Hoi M. P. M., “Murine Beta‐Amyloid (1–42) Oligomers Disrupt Endothelial Barrier Integrity and VEGFR Signaling via Activating Astrocytes to Release Deleterious Soluble Factors,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23 (2022): 1878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262. Zamolodchikov D., Chen Z.‐L., Conti B. A., Renné T., and Strickland S., “Activation of the Factor XII‐Driven Contact System in Alzheimer's Disease Patient and Mouse Model Plasma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (2015): 4068–4073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. Zenaro E., Pietronigro E., Bianca V. D., et al., “Neutrophils Promote Alzheimer's Disease–Like Pathology and Cognitive Decline via LFA‐1 Integrin,” Nature Medicine 21 (2015): 880–886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264. Zeng B., Zhao G., and Liu H. L., “The Differential Effect of Treadmill Exercise Intensity on Hippocampal Soluble aβ and Lipid Metabolism in APP/PS1 Mice,” Neuroscience 430 (2020): 73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265. Zeng F., Liu Y., Huang W., et al., “Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Up‐Regulation in Cerebral Endothelial Cells Mediates Cerebrovascular‐Related Amyloid β Accumulation After Porphyromonas Gingivalis Infection,” Journal of Neurochemistry 158 (2021): 724–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. Zhai K., Duan H., Wang W., et al., “Ginsenoside Rg1 Ameliorates Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption and Traumatic Brain Injury via Attenuating Macrophages Derived Exosomes miR‐21 Release,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 11 (2021): 3493–3507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Zhang S., Zhi Y., Li F., et al., “Transplantation of In Vitro Cultured Endothelial Progenitor Cells Repairs the Blood‐Brain Barrier and Improves Cognitive Function of APP/PS1 Transgenic AD Mice,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 387 (2018): 6–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Zhang S., Xuehui H., Guo S., et al., “Myricetin Ameliorated Ischemia/Reperfusion‐Induced Brain Endothelial Permeability by Improvement of eNOS Uncoupling and Activation eNOS/NO,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 140 (2019): 62–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269. Zhang T., Shancai X., Pei W., et al., “Mitoquinone Attenuates Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption Through Nrf2/PHB2/OPA1 Pathway After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats,” Experimental Neurology 317 (2019): 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270. Zhang W., Liu Q. Y., Haqqani A. S., et al., “Differential Expression of Receptors Mediating Receptor‐Mediated Transcytosis (RMT) in Brain Microvessels, Brain Parenchyma and Peripheral Tissues of the Mouse and the Human,” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 17 (2020): 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271. Zhang X., Tang X., Ma F., et al., “Endothelium‐Targeted Overexpression of Krüppel‐Like Factor 11 Protects the Blood‐Brain Barrier Function After Ischemic Brain Injury,” Brain Pathology 30 (2020): 746–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272. Zhang Y., Lu L., Jia J., et al., “A Lifespan Observation of a Novel Mouse Model: In Vivo Evidence Supports aβ Oligomer Hypothesis,” PLoS One 9 (2014): e85885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273. Zhao C., Ma J., Wang Z., et al., “Mfsd2a Attenuates Blood‐Brain Barrier Disruption After Sub‐Arachnoid Hemorrhage by Inhibiting Caveolae‐Mediated Transcellular Transport in Rats,” Translational Stroke Research 11 (2020): 1012–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274. Zhao L., Li Z., Vong J. S. L., et al., “Pharmacologically Reversible Zonation‐Dependent Endothelial Cell Transcriptomic Changes With Neurodegenerative Disease Associations in the Aged Brain,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 4413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275. Zhao M., Jiang X.‐F., Zhang H.‐Q., et al., “Interactions Between Glial Cells and the Blood‐Brain Barrier and Their Role in Alzheimer's Disease,” Ageing Research Reviews 72 (2021): 101483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276. Zhao N., Liu C.‐C., Qiao W., and Guojun B., “Apolipoprotein E, Receptors, and Modulation of Alzheimer's Disease,” Biological Psychiatry 83 (2018): 347–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277. Zhou A. L., Swaminathan S. K., Gali C. C., et al., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Insulin Resistance Decreases Insulin Uptake and Increases Amyloid Beta Uptake in Alzheimer's Disease Brain: Developing Topics,” Alzheimer's & Dementia 16 (2020): e047353. [Google Scholar]
  • 278. Zhou A. L., Swaminathan S. K., Salian V. S., et al., “Insulin Signaling Differentially Regulates the Trafficking of Insulin and Amyloid Beta Peptides at the Blood–Brain Barrier,” Molecular Pharmaceutics 21 (2024): 2176–2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279. Zhou Y., Zeng X., Li G., et al., “Inactivation of Endothelial Adenosine A2A Receptors Protects Mice From Cerebral Ischaemia‐Induced Brain Injury,” British Journal of Pharmacology 176 (2019): 2250–2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280. Zihni C., Mills C., Matter K., and Balda M. S., “Tight Junctions: From Simple Barriers to Multifunctional Molecular Gates,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 17 (2016): 564–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281. Zipser B. D., Johanson C. E., Gonzalez L., et al., “Microvascular Injury and Blood‐Brain Barrier Leakage in Alzheimer's Disease,” Neurobiology of Aging 28 (2007): 977–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282. Zlokovic B. V., “The Blood‐Brain Barrier in Health and Chronic Neurodegenerative Disorders,” Neuron 57 (2008): 178–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283. Zoufal V., Wanek T., Krohn M., et al., “Age Dependency of Cerebral P‐Glycoprotein Function in Wild‐Type and APPPS1 Mice Measured With PET,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 40 (2020): 150–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.


Articles from CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES