Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Nov 15;14:28206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78696-6

Magnetic hydrogel scaffold based on hyaluronic acid/chitosan and gelatin natural polymers

Ashraf Abou-Okeil 1, Rakia Refaei 1, Shaimaa E Moustafa 1, Hassan M Ibrahim 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11567962  PMID: 39548201

Abstract

Owing to their native extracellular matrix-like features, magnetic hydrogels have been proven to be promising biomaterials as tissue engineering templates In the present work, magnetic hydrogels scaffold based on chitosan, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, containing Fe3O4 as magnetic nanoparticles (IONPs) were prepared. The prepared hydrogels were loaded with ciprofloxacin hydrochloride as a model drug. The magnetic hydrogel was prepared using different volumes of chitosan, 1%, gelatin, 10%, and hyaluronic acid, 1% in glutaraldehyde as the crosslinking agent and Fe3O4 as magnetic nanoparticles. The hydrogel scaffold and magnetic scaffold hydrogel samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The porosity, mechanical properties, swelling degree, and antibacterial activity of the hydrogel scaffold were also determined as well as the drug release profiles of the hydrogels. SEM imaging revealed that the magnetic hydrogel scaffold showed a relatively rough morphology with an irregular surface. The data obtained indicated that the hydrogel surface has three-dimensional porous microstructures and the porosity varied depending on the hydrogel formulation. The breaking load of the hydrogel scaffold increased from 1.361 Kgf to 4.98 Kgf by increasing the glutaraldehyde concentration from 0.2 mL to 0.8 mL. Swelling degree values in water were from 250 to 2000% after 24 h. The antibacterial activity of the hydrogel scaffold ranged from 54% to about 97% for Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) and from about 26–92% for Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli). The ciprofloxacin hydrochloride loaded hydrogel has a sustained release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride over 10 h. The presence of IONPs gave a faster release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride.

Keywords: Magnetic hydrogel, Scaffold, Iron oxide, Chitosan, Gelatin, Hyaluronic

Subject terms: Drug discovery, Materials science, Nanoscience and technology

Introduction

Hydrogels are hydrophilic polymers made of three-dimensional viscoelastic networks that can hold many times their dry weight in water and swell in physiological conditions1,2. Hydrogels’ physical interactions and chemical cross-linking canhelp maintain their structural and physical integrity. They are used as vendors in the drug delivery system35. Hydrogel properties such as porous media and their shapes and particle size distribution have significant effect on the prepared hydrogels. Biomaterials are supposed to interact with biological structures to treat, augment, or regenerate tissue, organ, of the body6,7.

The use of gelatin in pharmaceutical and biomedical disciplines is extremely attractive because it is non-toxic, biodegradable, inexpensive, non-immunogenic, and has an excessive capacity to be used in many medical applications. It has additionally been used as a wound dressing811, hemostatic materials1215, sealant for vascular prosthesis16,17, drug delivery systems together with tough and gentle capsules18,19, hydrogels20, or microspheres2123and finishing agent24. The benefits of the use of gelatin over collagen encompass its water solubility and lesser cost. Because of their properly film-forming abilities, gelatin can be a good replacement to artificial plastics for making films to maintain food-stuffs25. Gelatin gel suggests non-cytotoxicity towards human cells and is biodegradable in nature25,26.

Chitosan is a natural and widely used polysaccharide composed of glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine27,28. It is made from chitin, which is derived primarily from crustacean exoskeletons29. It has been widely used in a variety of biomedical fields, including drug delivery, gene delivery, wound healing, cell imaging, surgical sutures, sensors, wastewater management, tissue engineering, antibacterial agents, food processing, tissue engineering medicine, and biotechnology. Chitosan’s biodegradability, bio-renewability, biocompatibility, muco-adhesiveness, antibacterial, hemostatic, cell compatible, and low toxic properties have made it one of the interesting advanced materials that have found broad applicability, not only in the biomedical also in the conventional pharmaceutical domain too30.

Hyaluronic acid, or hyaluronan (HA), is a biopolymer that can be modified and processed to create hydrogels for biomedical applications31. Because of their biocompatibility, tunable properties, and native bio functionality, HA hydrogels are becoming more versatile for a wide range of applications31. HA has inherent biological importance because of its ability to bind to receptors such as CD44, degrade via oxidative species and hyaluronidases, and play a role in development, wound healing, and adult tissue function and structure32. With these characteristics in mind, several HA hydrogel systems have already been clinically tested in human and veterinary patients, particularly as dermal fillers, intra-articular supplements, corneal and dermal wound repair, and post-surgical adhesion prevention33.

Ciprofloxacin is one of the antibiotics with bactericidal activities in the case of bone infection (osteomyelitis). Ciprofloxacin is the most commonly used fluoroquinolone for bacterial bone infections due to its low minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (0.25–2 µg/ml) for most pathogens that cause osteomyelitis, including Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Proteus mirabilis. Biomaterial implants that operate as a ciprofloxacin-controlled delivery system could be developed as an alternate treatment for osteomyelitis. Biomaterials used to build implants must be biocompatible, biodegradable, osteoconductive, angiogenic, and have mechanical strength to support the formation of bone tissue34.

Recently, because nanotechnology has emerged, diverse kinds of nanomaterials have been included in biopolymer-primarily based hydrogels to improve the physicochemical properties of the hydrogels. For example, gold nanoparticles had been integrated into a carrageenan-primarily based totally hydrogel for optical belonging modulation and managed the discharge of drugs35,36. , silver and magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4) had been used to increase growth, increase swelling efficiency, and improve drug transport systems37. , sodium montmorillonite (Na-MMT) nanoclay has been used to improve the dye adsorption capacity38. , and nanoclay and silver nanoparticles had been incorporated into carrageenan-primarily based totally films to have UV barrier and antimicrobial residences39.

Magnetic hydrogels with order structure, which are like in structure to the native mechanical microenvironment in vivo, are better suited for cell culture than ordinary hydrogels. For example, a sliced magnetic hydrogel was used with anisotropic design as a 3D cell culture substrate40. Even in a traditional 3D cell culture setup, cells could spontaneously form multicellular spheroids instead of loose aggregates. Magnetic hydrogels with ordered structures have also been employed in tissue regeneration to mimic native tissues and initiate their natural reparative process, including applications in nerves, skin, cartilage, and muscles41,42. As neural regeneration scaffolds, hydrogels can control neuronal development, causing neurons to form coordinated morphologies. Hydrogels with variable microstructure orientations can be generated by varying the magnetic field for diverse tissue engineering applications. Silica rods coated with magnetic nanoparticles was used to impart orientational order to collagen hydrogels under a magnetic field41. A small magnetic field can easily align these extremely anisotropic nanorods, influencing the development of normal human dermal fibroblasts. A recent study used magnetic collagen-based hydrogels with directed structures to drive growth. Human adipose stem cells were studied43, the actin filaments of human adipose stem cells are aligned with collagen fibers and MNPs. The structures may mimic both normal and diseased tissues, indicating a feasible strategy for tendon healing. Developed anisotropic collagen-based substrates were used to direct the growth of human mesenchymal stem cells44.

Owing to their native extracellular matrix-like features, magnetic hydrogels have been proved to be promising biomaterials as tissue engineering templates45,46. Many biological tissues present a specific organization of ordered structures, which is important for physiological functions41. Magnetic hydrogels with ordered structure can provide a template for directional growth of cells and control their behavior, which have attracted extensive researches46. The aim of the present work is to synthesize and characterize a magnetic hydrogel scaffold with ordered structure based on natural polysaccharides to be used as a template for directional growth of cells and control their behavior. The magnetic hydrogel scaffold will be loaded with ciprofloxacin hydrochloride as a model drug. The loading and release profiles of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride as well as the antibacterial properties of the magnetic hydrogel scaffold were also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Materials

FeCl3·6H2O and FeCl2·4H2O were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). NaOH (25 wt% in water).  Hyaluronic acid (HA) (average molecular weight 1.48*106 Da), supplied by Acros Organics was used. Chitosan of molecular weight (MMW, 480 kDa) and degree of deacetylation of 79.0% (Alfa Aesar Company) were used. Glutaraldehyde (50%) and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride were purchased from Fisher Company and used without further purification. Acetic acid and gelatin are of laboratory-grade chemicals. All chemicals were used without any further purification.

Methods

Synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (IONPs)

An aqueous solution of FeCl3·6H2O (1.1 g) (0.0037 mol) and FeCl2·4H2O (0.4 g) (0.002 mol), in the molar ratio 2Fe (III): 1Fe (II) in 100 mL in deionized water was prepared and kept at a constant temperature of 60C for 15 min (min) under vigorous stirring. Then under vigorous stirring and N2 gas a solution of ammonium hydroxide [20 mL NaOH (25%)] was added till the pH was reached to ∼11 at which a black suspension was formed. This suspension was then stirred at 50C for 2 h. IONPs, were separated from the aqueous solution by external magnet, washed with deionized water several times then dried at vacuum oven overnight. Figures1 and 2 show a schematic diagram of synthesis of IONPs and TEM image of the prepared IONPs, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

TEM image of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles.

Preparation of hydrogel

Chitosan, 1% (w/w) in 1% acetic acid, gelatin (10% w/w) in water, and HA (1% w/w) in 0.1 M HCl, solutions were prepared (Table 1) with continuous stirring until complete dissolution. Different volume ratios of each solution were added to each other’s (according to Table 1), mixed completely with continuous stirring for 1 h, then different amounts of glutaraldehyde (50%) as a crosslinking agent was added with stirring. The so obtained hydrogels were washed several times with distilled water to remove the unreacted materials, and then hydrogel samples were freeze dried and stored in desiccator until testing. The schematic diagram of the preparation process is shown in Fig. 3. And the mechanism of crosslinking is represented by Fig. 4.

Table 1.

Preparation of the hydrogel using different formulations.

Sample code Chitosan (1%)
(in 1% acetic acid)
(mL)
Gelatin (10%)
(In hot water)
(mL)
Glutaraldehyde
(50%)
(mL)
HA (1%)
(In 0.1 M HCl)
(mL)
H2O
(mL)
CHT-HA-GEL 1 12 4 0.2 4 0
CHT-HA-GEL 2 12 4 0.4 4 0
CHT-HA-GEL 3 12 4 0.6 4 0
CHT-HA-GEL 4 12 4 0.8 4 0
CHT-HA-GEL 5 9 4 0.8 4 3
CHT-HA-GEL 6 6 4 0.8 4 6
CHT-HA-GEL 7 9 3 0.8 4 4
CHT-HA-GEL 8 9 2 0.8 4 5
Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Preparation of the hydrogel using different formulations.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Crosslinking mechanism.

Preparation of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride loaded magnetic hydrogel samples

The ciprofloxacin hydrochloride loaded magnetic hydrogel samples were prepared by blending chitosan, gelatin, and HA solutions (According to sample CHT-HA-GEL 6) (Table 1). Typically, 100 mg of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride was added in presence of 0%, 1%, 2%, and 4% of IONPs (w/w) to formulation CHT-HA-GEL 6 (Table 1), respectively to prepare CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2 and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs, respectively at room temperature with stirring using magnetic stirrer, followed by adding 0.8 mL of glutaraldehyde (50%) as cross-linker. The obtained hydrogel samples were washed several times with distilled water to remove the unreacted materials. The final dried hydrogel samples were freeze dried and stored in desiccator until testing.

Testing and analysis

  1. Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared.

Infrared spectra were measured using high-resolution attenuated total reflection‐Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR) (JASCO FT/IR‐4700 spectrophotometer from Japan).

  • 2.

    Morphology characterization.

The surface and cross-sectional morphology of freeze-dried hydrogel samples were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using the JEOL JSM-6335 F. All samples are conditioned in a desiccator for 24 h. The samples were sectioned by scissors.

  • 3.

    Swelling rate (SR %).

The SR% of freeze-dried hydrogels was measured by immersion of a definite weight of the freeze-dried hydrogel in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution pH 7.2 at 37 °C. Typically, the initial weights (Wa) of the freeze-dried samples of hydrogel were determined before immersion, while the weights of the wet hydrogel (Wb) were recorded at different time intervals, reaching 24 h of incubation, after removing the surface water by smooth squeezing of the wet hydrogel with two filter papers. The swelling percentage (swelling rate) was determined by the following equation:

graphic file with name M1.gif
  • 4.

    In vitro drug release profile.

The release rate of from the hydrogels was measured by incubating 0.056 g of the freeze-dried hydrogel/ ciprofloxacin hydrochloride samples in 100 mL PBS (pH 4 and 7.2) at 37 °C in a shaking water bath. At different time intervals, 2.5 mL of the medium was taken, and 2.5 mL of fresh medium was added. The absorbance was recorded at 276 nm using an ultraviolet‐visible (UV‐Vis) spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU, UVmini‐1240). The released amount was measured using the following calibration curve (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Calibration curve of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride.

  • 5.

    Mechanical properties and the gelation time.

The compressive modulus of the hydrogels was evaluated using an Instron 3345, USA, equipped with a 500 kg load cell and a 152.4 mm diameter between two compression platens. The cylindrical samples of 34 mm diameter and 33 mm thickness were centered on the lower platen. The platen separation was adjusted when the installed software, Merlin, was programmed to compress the samples with crosshead platen at a speed equal to 25.4 mm/min47.

  • 6.

    Porosity determination.

The porosity of freeze-dried hydrogel scaffolds was determined using the following method48,49. In brief, all the freeze-dried hydrogel scaffolds were cut into rectangular pieces of 10 mm by 20 mm. The mass and volume of each scaffold before immersing in anhydrous methanol were recorded as W1 and V, respectively. After immersion in absolute methanol for 2 h, the mass of each saturated sample was recorded as W2. Finally, the porosity of the freeze-dried hydrogel scaffolds was determined in terms of the following equation:

graphic file with name M2.gif

Where W1 and W2 are the mass of the hydrogel before and after immersion in methanol, respectively, ρ is the density of absolute methanol at room temperature, and V is the volume of the hydrogel. Five parallel samples were used for the measurement.

  • 7.

    Antibacterial properties.

The antibacterial assessment was measured by the “bacterial count method” as reported elsewhere to find out the resistance of the hydrogel to different species of bacteria50, against the following bacteria strains:

a) “Gram-positive bacteria”: “Staphylococcus aureus” (S. aureus).

b) “Gram-negative bacteria”: “Escherichia coli” (E. Coli).

“According to that method, a liquid culture was prepared by mixing 0.5 g peptone and 0.3 g beef extract in 100 mL of water. 1 gm of the hydrogel samples was cut and put into 10 mL of liquid culture, to which 10 µL of microbe culture was added, and the tested samples were then incubated for 24 h at 37°C. From each incubated sample, 100 µL of the solution was taken, diluted, and distributed onto an agar plate. All plates were subjected to incubation for 24 hours, and the colonies formed were then counted. The percentage reduction was determined as follows:

graphic file with name M3.gif

Where C and A are the colonies counted from the plate of the control and treated samples, respectively.

  • 8.

    Vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM).

The magnetic properties were studied with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The hysteresis loops of magnetic prepared IONPs and magnetic hydrogel scaffold were investigated by the VSM technique at 298 K. The magnetization was recorded in an applied magnetic field of − 20,000 ≤ H (Oe) ≤ 20,000. The hysteresis loop and saturation magnetization were recorded.

Results and discussion

Preparation the hydrogel scaffold

FTIR

Figure 6 shows FTIR spectra of the CHT-HA-GEL 6 and its components. The characteristic peaks of chitosan such as, C = O band at 1644 cm−1, NH bending band at 1572 cm−1 and CH bending at 1357 cm−1 are present. Figure 6showed also, the noticeable peaks of gelatin including absorption peak at 3300 cm-1 for N–H stretching, the peak at 1629 cm-1 refers to the absorption band of C = O51. FTIR spectra of HA showed the bands at 1632 cm − 1, 1578 cm-1, and 1320 cm-1 correspond to amides, the band at 2928–2932 cm − 1 of C-H stretching, and broadband at 3200 and 3500 cm−1 because of the OH groups and N-H stretching vibration in the N-acetyl group. The major alcohol C-O stretch reached a high of 1023 cm − 152. Similar peaks were observed in the hydrogel prepared from chitosan, HA and gelatin in the FTIR pattern, with different intensities and peak positions in addition to the appearance of peak at 1638 cm-1 in the hydrogel which could be attributed to C = N stretching band of Schiff’s base53. This is can be explained by the interactions between the polymers with each other’s and also the interaction of the polymers with the crosslinking agent (glutaraldehyde)51.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

FTIR of HA, gelatin, chitosan, and CHT-HA-GEL 6.

Morphology of the prepared hydrogels

SEM images of CHT-HA-GEL 1, CHT-HA-GEL 2, CHT-HA-GEL 3, CHT-HA-GEL 4, CHT-HA-GEL 5, CHT-HA-GEL 6, CHT-HA-GEL 7, and CHT-HA-GEL 8 are shown in Fig. 7. All samples were porous and possess linked three-dimensional microstructures, as shown in Fig. 7. The creation of a cross-linked network in the gel is responsible for the connections between the pores. If these samples are utilized in tissue engineering applications, a well-connected porosity network can provide efficient nutrition and gas exchange, resulting in improved cell proliferation and survival. The pore size was in the range 60 μm to about 180 μm.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

SEM images of prepared hydrogel using different formulations.

Mechanical properties

The mechanical properties (Table 2) of the CHT-HA-GEL 1, CHT-HA-GEL 2, CHT-HA-GEL 3, CHT-HA-GEL 4, CHT-HA-GEL 5, CHT-HA-GEL 6, CHT-HA-GEL 7 and CHT-HA-GEL 8 are the most important factor in understanding the properties of these samples. The stiffness and workability of the samples might indicate the hydrogel’s application characteristics. The mechanical properties of the hydrogel under compression were plotted in Table 2 as a function of varied glutaraldehyde concentration (CHT-HA-GEL 1, CHT-HA-GEL 2, CHT-HA-GEL 3, and CHT-HA-GEL 4). Also, at different chitosan concentrations (CHT-HA-GEL 5 and CHT-HA-GEL 6) and different gelatin concentrations (CHT-HA-GEL 7 and CHT-HA-GEL 8) (Table 1). The breaking load of these samples increased from 1.361 Kgf to 4.98 Kgf by increasing the glutaraldehyde concentration from 0.2 mL to 0.8 mL which is accepted due to the stabilization of the hydrogel structure through crosslinking process54,55.

Table 2.

Mechanical properties of the prepared hydrogel.

Sample code Breaking load
(Kgf)
Maximum stress (Kgf/mm2) Maximum strain (mm/mm) Breaking strain
(%)
Breaking stress
(Kgf/mm2)
CHT-HA-GEL 1 1.361 0.0014 0.9770 97.7 0.0014
CHT-HA-GEL 2 1.9771 0.0021 0.9777 97.77 0.0021
CHT-HA-GEL 3 3.337 0.0035 0.9787 97.82 0.0035
CHT-HA-GEL 4 4.98 0.0052 0.9781 97.81 0.0052
CHT-HA-GEL 5 3.85 0.0175 1.024 102.4 0.0175
CHT-HA-GEL 6 3.9751 0.0041 1.014 101.5 0.0041
CHT-HA-GEL 7 2.624 0.0046 0.9980 99.88 0.0046
CHT-HA-GEL 8 7.7 0.0135 1.028 102.8 0.0135

As the concentration of glutaraldehyde increases the number of crosslinking bridges increases. Decreasing chitosan concentration and gelatin concentration have an inverse effect on the breaking load (Tables 1 and 2) which is logic due to the decrease of the functional groups available for crosslinking so decreasing the extent of crosslinking and by the way decreasing the stability of the hydrogel samples.

Porosity

Figure 8 illustrates the porosities of CHT-HA-GEL 1, CHT-HA-GEL 2, CHT-HA-GEL 3, CHT-HA-GEL 4, CHT-HA-GEL 5, CHT-HA-GEL 6, CHT-HA-GEL 7, and CHT-HA-GEL 8. It can be seen that the porosity varied depending on the hydrogel composition used. The increase in porosity could be attributed to a rise in the viscosity of the solution used to make the hydrogel, which effectively prevents bubbles from escaping. This phenomenon causes the porosity to increase and the creation of linked channels. The pore size was in the range 60 μm to about 180 μm.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Porosity % of the prepared hydrogels.

SR %

Figure 9 shows SR % of CHT-HA-GEL 1, CHT-HA-GEL 2, CHT-HA-GEL 3, CHT-HA-GEL 4, CHT-HA-GEL 5, CHT-HA-GEL 6, CHT-HA-GEL 7, and CHT-HA-GEL 8. The SR% of the hydrogel increased significantly within the first 1 h of immersion in water, and then gradually increased until 24 h of immersion, when it stabilized. At the equilibrium samples have its maximum SR%.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Swelling rate of the prepared hydrogels samples.

Antibacterial properties

The antibacterial activity of CHT-HA-GEL 1, CHT-HA-GEL 2, CHT-HA-GEL 3, CHT-HA-GEL 4, CHT-HA-GEL 5, CHT-HA-GEL 6, CHT-HA-GEL 7 and CHT-HA-GEL 8 is depicted in Fig. 10 as a percent reduction in CFU of Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria. As illustrated in Fig. 10, all hydrogels’ samples synthesized exhibit a strong antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria. The antibacterial activity of the hydrogels samples was ranged from 54% to about 97% for Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) and from about 26–92% for Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli). Increased chitosan content enhances the antibacterial activity of both Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Antibacterial activity of various hydrogel samples.

Preparation of magnetic hydrogel

SEM

Figure 11. shows SEM images of freeze-dried CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4. SEM images revealed that the freeze-dried samples surface was relatively irregular, with a granulated layer covering the entire sample, which was most likely caused by the crosslinking agent (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

SEM images of prepared hydrogel with different amount of magnetic nanoparticles.

VSM

VSM of prepared freeze-dried CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4 are studied by measuring magnetization as a function of field (Fig. 12). The magnetization was recorded in an applied magnetic field of − 20,000 ≤ H (Oe) ≤ 20,000 at room temperature. The hysteresis loop of synthesized nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 12 and the saturation magnetization of the prepared magnetic hydrogels formulations. It is clear from Fig. 12 that all samples have magnetic properties which increase by increasing the amount of IONPs.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

VSM curves of hydrogels formulation loaded with IOPNs and ciprofloxacin.

Drug loading and release

Loading of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride was confirmed by EDX measurement of the loaded freeze-dried hydrogel (CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0). Figure 13 proved the presence of fluorine in the EDX element analysis along with carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur. Presence of fluorine is a quiet proof of presence of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, as it is the only source of fluorine in the loaded freeze-dried hydrogel formulation (CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0).

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

EDX CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0.

Figure 14 reveals the release profile of CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4 to find out the effect of IONPs on the release profile of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. Figure 14 showed that all samples have a sustained release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride over a time about 10 h. It can be seen from Fig. 14 that presence of IONPs has an incremental effect on the release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride from CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4. That is the presence of IONPs gave a faster release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. This phenomenon can be a particularly important in many medical applications.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Release profile of ciprofloxacin in magnetic hydrogel.

SR %

SR % of CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4 was presented in Fig. 15. SR % of SR % of CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4 was increased significantly within the first 40 min of immersion in water, then marginally increased until 24 h of immersion after that the stabilization was achieved as the samples attained its maximum water retention capacity.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

SR % of the prepared hydrogels in presence and absence of MNPs.

Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 0, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 1, CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 2, and CHT-HA-GEL-CIPR-IONPs 4 was assessed using bacterial reduction percent against (S. aureus) and (E. coli), as shown in Fig. 16. All samples have high antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria. For Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus), the antibacterial activity was ranged from 94% to about 97%.

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

Antibacterial activity of magnetic hydrogels.

Conclusion

Magnetic hydrogels based different volumes of chitosan, 1%, gelatin, 10%, and hyaluronic acid, 1% in presence of glutaraldehyde as crosslinking agent and Fe3O4 as magnetic nanoparticles were prepared. The hydrogels scaffold and magnetic scaffold hydrogels samples were characterised by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The porosity, mechanical properties, swelling degree and the antibacterial activity of the hydrogels scaffold were also determined as well as the drug release profiles of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride loaded hydrogels. SEM imaging revealed that the magnetic hydrogels showed a relatively rough morphology with an irregular surface, also SEM showed that. The hydrogel surface has three-dimensional porous microstructures and the porosity varied depending on the hydrogel formulation. The breaking load of hydrogel scaffold increased from 1.361 Kgf to 4.98 Kgf by increasing the glutaraldehyde concentration from 0.2 mL to 0.8 mL. SR % values in water were from 250 to 2000% after 24 h. The antibacterial activity of the hydrogels scaffoldwas ranged from 54% to about 97% for Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) and from about 26–92% for Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli). The ciprofloxacin hydrochloride loaded hydrogel has a sustained release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride over a time about 10 h. Presence of IONPs gave a faster release of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride.

Author contributions

We certify that all authors have participated sufficiently in the work, including participation in the manuscript’s concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Das, D. et al. Biocompatible amphiphilic microgel derived from dextrin and poly (methyl methacrylate) for dual drugs carrier. Polymer. 107, 282–291 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Das, D., Roy, A. & Pal, S. A polysaccharide-based pH-sensitive hybrid hydrogel as a sustained release matrix for antimicrobial drugs. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater.5, 3348–3358 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Das, D. et al. Bioactive molecules release and cellular responses of alginate-tricalcium phosphate particles hybrid gel nanomaterials. (Basel) 7. (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Ulubayram, K., Eroglu, I. & Hasirci, N. Gelatin microspheres and sponges for delivery of macromolecules. J. Biomater. Appl.16 (3), 227–241 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das, R. et al. Novel pH-responsive graft copolymer based on HPMC and poly (acrylamide) synthesised by microwave irradiation: application in controlled release of ornidazole. Cellulose. 22, 313–327 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Williams, D. F. & Williams, D. F. The Williams Dictionary of Biomaterials (Liverpool University, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Griffin, G. J. Chemistry and Technology of Biodegradable Polymers (Blackie Academic and Professional, 1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jayasekara, R. et al. Biodegradability of a selected range of polymers and polymer blends and standard methods for assessment of biodegradation. J. Polym. Environ.13 (3), 231–251 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Choi, Y. S. et al. Study on gelatin-containing artificial skin: I. Preparation and characteristics of novel gelatin-alginate sponge. Biomaterials. 20 (5), 409–417 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ulubayram, K. et al. EGF containing gelatin-based wound dressings. Biomaterials. 22 (11), 1345–1356 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bindu, T. H. et al. Preparation and evaluation of chitosan-gelatin composite films for wound healing activity. Trends Biomaterials Artif. Organs. 24 (3), 122–130 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fahmy, H. M. et al. К-carrageenan/Na‐alginate wound dressing with sustainable drug delivery properties. Polym. Adv. Technol.32 (4), 1793–1801 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan, M. I. H. et al. Development of hydrocolloid bi-layer dressing with bio-adhesive and non-adhesive properties. Mater. Sci. Engineering: C. 69, 609–615 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rattanaruengsrikul, V., Pimpha, N. & Supaphol, P. In vitro efficacy and toxicology evaluation of silver nanoparticle-loaded gelatin hydrogel pads as antibacterial wound dressings. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.124 (2), 1668–1682 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Iwakura, A. et al. Gelatin sheet incorporating basic fibroblast growth factor enhances healing of devascularized sternum in diabetic rats. Circulation. 104 (suppl_1), pI–325 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sung, H. W. et al. Gelatin-derived bioadhesives for closing skin wounds: an in vivo study. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.10 (7), 751–771 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Madaghiele, M. et al. Collagen-and gelatine-based films sealing vascular prostheses: evaluation of the degree of crosslinking for optimal blood impermeability. J. Mater. Science: Mater. Med.20 (10), 1979–1989 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chakfe, N. et al. Biocompatibility and biofunctionality of a gelatin impregnated polyester arterial prosthesis. Polym. Polym. Compos.1 (4), 229–251 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Digenis, G. A., Gold, T. B. & Shah, V. P. Cross-linking of gelatin capsules and its relevance to their in vitro-in vivo performance. J. Pharm. Sci.83 (7), 915–921 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li, J. K., Wang, N. & Wu, X. S. Gelatin nanoencapsulation of protein/peptide drugs using an emulsifier-free emulsion method. J. Microencapsul.15 (2), 163–172 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tabata, Y. et al. In vitro sorption and desorption of basic fibroblast growth factor from biodegradable hydrogels. Biomaterials. 19 (19), 1781–1789 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Narayani, R. & Rao, K. P. Controlled release of anticancer drug methotrexate from biodegradable gelatin microspheres. J. Microencapsul.11 (1), 69–77 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cortesi, R., Nastruzzi, C. & Davis, S. Sugar cross-linked gelatin for controlled release: microspheres and disks. Biomaterials. 19 (18), 1641–1649 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aly, A. et al. Preparation and characterization of polyethylene glycol/dimethyl siloxane adduct and its utilization as finishing agent for cotton fabric. J. Nat. Fibers. 8 (3), 176–188 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gómez-Guillén, M. et al. Fish gelatin: a renewable material for developing active biodegradable films. Trends Food Sci. Technol.20 (1), 3–16 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang, M. et al. In vitro and in vivo study to the biocompatibility and biodegradation of hydroxyapatite/poly (vinyl alcohol)/gelatin composite. J. Biomedical Mater. Res. Part. A: Official J. Soc. Biomaterials Japanese Soc. Biomaterials Australian Soc. Biomaterials Korean Soc. Biomaterials. 85 (2), 418–426 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramezani, Z., Zarei, M. & Raminnejad, N. Comparing the effectiveness of Chitosan and nanochitosan coatings on the quality of refrigerated silver carp fillets. Food Control. 51, 43–48 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oushani, A. K. et al. Effects of dietary chitosan and nano-chitosan loaded clinoptilolite on growth and immune responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol.98, 210–217 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.do Vale, D. A. et al. Determining the wetting capacity of the chitosan coatings from Ucides cordatus and evaluating the shelf-life quality of Scomberomorus brasiliensis fillets. Food Control. 116, 107329 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bankoti, K. et al. Dual functionalized injectable hybrid extracellular matrix hydrogel for burn wounds. Biomacromolecules. 22 (2), 514–533 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Burdick, J. A. & Prestwich, G. D. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater.23 (12), H41–H56 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dicker, K. T. et al. Hyaluronan: a simple polysaccharide with diverse biological functions. Acta Biomater.10 (4), 1558–1570 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Highley, C. B., Prestwich, G. D. & Burdick, J. A. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.40, 35–40 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jin, H. H. et al. In vivo evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite/chitosan–alginate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.51 (5), 1079–1085 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hakeim, O. et al. The influence of chitosan and some of its depolymerized grades on natural color printing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.97 (2), 559–563 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Salgueiro, A. M. et al. κ-Carrageenan hydrogel nanocomposites with release behavior mediated by morphological distinct au nanofillers. Carbohydr. Polym.91 (1), 100–109 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Daniel-da-Silva, A. L. et al. Impact of magnetic nanofillers in the swelling and release properties of κ-carrageenan hydrogel nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym.87 (1), 328–335 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mahdavinia, G. R. et al. Effect of sodium montmorillonite nanoclay on the water absorbency and cationic dye removal of carrageenan-based nanocomposite superabsorbents. J. Polym. Res.19 (9), 1–13 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rhim, J. W. & Wang, L. F. Preparation and characterization of carrageenan-based nanocomposite films reinforced with clay mineral and silver nanoparticles. Appl. Clay Sci.97, 174–181 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hu, K. et al. Sliced magnetic polyacrylamide hydrogel with cell-adhesive microarray interface: a novel multicellular spheroid culturing platform. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8 (24), 15113–15119 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shi, Y., Li, Y. & Coradin, T. Magnetically-oriented type I collagen-SiO2@ Fe3O4 rods composite hydrogels tuning skin cell growth. Colloids Surf., B. 185, 110597 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu, Z. et al. Recent advances on magnetic sensitive hydrogels in tissue engineering. Front. Chem.8, 124 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wright, A. L. et al. Magnetic nanoparticle-mediated orientation of collagen hydrogels for engineering of tendon-mimetic constructs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.10, 797437 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tognato, R. et al. Fabrication of anisotropic collagen-based substrates for potential use in tissue engineering. Smart Mater. Struct.31 (7), 074001 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Seliktar, D. Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science. 336 (6085), 1124–1128 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Park, N. & Kim, J. Hydrogel-based artificial muscles: overview and recent progress. Adv. Intell. Syst.2 (4), 1900135 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gong, J. P. et al. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv. Mater.15 (14), 1155–1158 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Si, J. et al. Controlled degradable chitosan/collagen composite scaffolds for application in nerve tissue regeneration. Polym. Degrad. Stab.166, 73–85 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Santo, V. E. et al. Carrageenan-based hydrogels for the controlled delivery of PDGF-BB in bone tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules. 10 (6), 1392–1401 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abou-Okeil, A. et al. Hyaluronic acid/oxidized К-carrageenan electrospun nanofibers synthesis and antibacterial properties. BioNanoScience. 11 (3), 687–695 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huang, Y., Yu, H. & Xiao, C. pH-sensitive cationic guar gum/poly (acrylic acid) polyelectrolyte hydrogels: swelling and in vitro drug release. Carbohydr. Polym.69 (4), 774–783 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Servaty, R. et al. Hydration of polymeric components of cartilage—an infrared spectroscopic study on hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.28 (2), 121–127 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ostrowska-Czubenko, J., Pieróg, M. & Gierszewska-Drużyńska, M. State of water in noncrosslinked and crosslinked hydrogel chitosan membranes–DSC studies. Progress Chem. Application Chitin its Derivatives, (16): pp. 147–156 (2011) .
  • 54.Dodero, A. et al. Alginate-based hydrogels prepared via ionic gelation: an experimental design approach to predict the crosslinking degree. Eur. Polymer J.118, 586–594 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu, X. et al. Dual physically cross-linked hydrogels incorporating hydrophobic interactions with promising repairability and ultrahigh elongation. Adv. Funct. Mater.31 (3), 2008187 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is provided within the manuscript.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES