Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular signaling. Ca2+ is a well-known second messenger that can be induced by G protein-coupled receptor activation through the primary canonical pathways involving Gαq- and Gβγ-mediated activation of phospholipase C-β (PLCβ). While some Gs-coupled receptors are shown to trigger Ca2+ mobilization, underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we evaluated whether Gs-coupled receptors including the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and the prostaglandin EP2 and EP4 receptors (EP2R and EP4R) that are endogenously expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells utilize common pathways for mediating Ca2+ mobilization. For the β2AR, we found an essential role for Gq in agonist-promoted Ca2+ mobilization while genetic or pharmacological inhibition of Gs or Gi had minimal effect. β-agonist-promoted Ca2+ mobilization was effectively blocked by the Gq-selective inhibitor YM-254890 and was not observed in ΔGαq/11 or ΔPLCβ cells. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis also suggests agonist-dependent association of the β2AR with Gq. For the EP2R, which couples to Gs, agonist treatment induced Ca2+ mobilization in a pertussis toxin-sensitive but YM-254890-insensitive manner. In contrast, EP4R, which couples to Gs and Gi, exhibited Ca2+ mobilization that was sensitive to both pertussis toxin and YM-254890. Interestingly, both EP2R and EP4R were largely unable to induce Ca2+ mobilization in ΔGαs or ΔPLCβ cells, supporting a strong dependency on Gs signaling in HEK293 cells. Taken together, we identify differences in the signaling pathways that are used to mediate Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells where the β2AR primarily uses Gq, EP2R uses Gs and Gi, and EP4R uses Gs, Gi, and Gq.
Keywords: β2-adrenergic receptor, Ca2+ mobilization, G protein-coupled receptor, heterotrimeric G proteins, prostaglandin E receptor
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are dynamic proteins that transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular signaling to ultimately induce a cellular response. GPCR activation by an agonist promotes interaction with heterotrimeric G proteins to induce GDP dissociation from the Gα subunit resulting in GTP binding, dissociation of Gα-GTP from Gβγ, and subsequent regulation of downstream effectors dependent on the specific G protein. These include regulation of adenylyl cyclase by Gs and Gi, activation of phospholipase C-β (PLCβ) primarily by Gq-family members, and activation of small G protein exchange factors by G12/13 (1, 2, 3). Ultimately, GPCRs are then further regulated by GPCR kinases and arrestins which function to modulate G protein signaling as well as GPCR trafficking (4).
Ca2+ mobilization is a well-known second messenger that can be induced by GPCR activation. The primary canonical pathway for GPCR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization involves Gαq-mediated activation of PLCβ, while Gβγ subunits from activated G proteins can also induce Ca2+ mobilization through PLCβ (5, 6, 7, 8). Indeed, recent studies support an independent role for Gαq and Gβγ in PLCβ activation with Gαq enhancing catalytic activity and Gβγ promoting membrane recruitment (9, 10). Activation promotes hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate which produces diacylglycerol to activate protein kinase C, and inositol trisphosphate (IP3) which binds to IP3 receptors localized at the endoplasmic reticulum to promote the release of Ca2+ (11).
Previous studies have thoroughly investigated GPCR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization through the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR). While several studies demonstrated the ability of endogenous or overexpressed β2AR to promote agonist-dependent Ca2+ mobilization in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells (12, 13, 14), more recent studies started to dissect the mechanism of this process and reached different conclusions regarding β2AR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells (15, 16). Stallaert et al. found that β2AR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293S cells was Gs-dependent but cAMP-independent and involved release of ATP with subsequent activation of Gq and PLCβ through P2Y purinergic receptors (15). In contrast, Galaz-Montoya et al. found that β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells involved PLCβ but did not involve cAMP, Gs, or Gi (16). Thus, one study found a critical role for Gs while the other found no apparent role for Gs. While the techniques used in these studies might have contributed to some of the differences in the conclusions, there are clear disparities in the potential role of Gs in β2AR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization.
Here, we sought to further characterize the role of G proteins in β2AR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization and expand on these studies to include additional Gs-coupled receptors to try to dissect whether there are any common features that contribute to GPCR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. Using Gα protein KO cells, G protein specific inhibitors, and endogenous GPCRs, we found significant differences in the signaling pathways that are used to mediate Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells where the β2AR primarily uses Gq, prostaglandin EP2 receptor (EP2R) uses Gs and Gi, and prostaglandin EP4 receptor (EP4R) uses Gs, Gi, and Gq.
Results
β-agonists selectively stimulate endogenous β2ARs to induce Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells
Since HEK293 cells endogenously express a low level of β2ARs (17, 18), we initially evaluated the ability of the βAR-selective full agonist isoproterenol (ISO) to induce Ca2+ mobilization. ISO induced robust and transient Ca2+ mobilization in a concentration-dependent manner with the peak response reached at ∼25 s after agonist addition (Fig. 1A). The onset of the peak response right-shifted at lower ISO concentrations suggesting time-sensitive kinetics of Ca2+ mobilization associated with the different agonist concentrations. Moreover, the kinetics associated with higher ISO concentrations (10 nM–100 nM) were transient while profiles associated with lower concentrations (0.1–1 nM) were reduced but more sustained. Extrapolation of the area under the curve (AUC) to generate the related logistic concentration-activity curve showed an ISO potency of ∼2 nM and a maximum response starting at 100 nM (Fig. 1B). To verify that the observed effects with ISO were due to activation of the β2AR, we preincubated the cells with the β2AR selective antagonist ICI-118551 (ICI). ISO induced a robust and transient Ca2+ elevation that was completely inhibited by ICI (Fig. 1C). We also evaluated Ca2+ mobilization induced by formoterol (FOR), a β2AR selective agonist that is used clinically to treat chronic asthma. FOR also induced a rapid and transient Ca2+ mobilization that was effectively inhibited by ICI, although the peak intensity was only about half of that seen with ISO (Fig. 1D). It is worth noting that ICI did not interfere with global cellular Ca2+ mobilization since stimulation with ionomycin (IONO), an ionophore that elevates intracellular Ca2+ independently of GPCR activation, was not impacted by preincubation with ICI (Fig. S1). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the endogenous β2AR in HEK293 cells effectively activates Ca2+ mobilization in an agonist-dependent manner.
Figure 1.
Ca2+mobilization induced by β-agonists. HEK293 cells endogenously expressing the β2AR were preincubated with the calcium dye FLUO-4 for 1 h; Ca2+ mobilization was then continuously monitored for up to 250 s after injection of β-agonist. A, Ca2+ mobilization upon stimulation with increasing concentrations of ISO was obtained using a FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader that allows eight different channels to inject simultaneously. Basal represents cells stimulated only with assay buffer in the absence of agonist. Values are shown as relative light units (RLU). B, the area under the curve (AUC) of each concentration-dependent ISO-generated curve from panel A was extrapolated and plotted as a concentration/activity curve. Concentration/activity values are shown as % AUC compared to the maximal ISO concentration. ISO (C) and FOR (D) mediated calcium mobilization at 10 μM concentration in the presence/absence of 10 μM ICI were obtained using a CLARIOstar Plus Plate Reader. The AUC was calculated from each of the curves in panels C and D and plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The ISO curve shown in panel C is the averaged signal from all ISO replicates (except Fig. 7) performed in WT cells throughout the study (n = 30). β2AR, β2-adrenergic receptor; FOR, formoterol; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; ICI, ICI-118551; ISO, isoproterenol.
Ca2+ mobilization induced by the β2AR is primarily mediated by Gq in HEK293 cells
Ca2+ mobilization induced by GPCR activation is mediated by two main mechanisms, one that involves Gq and results in Gαq-mediated activation of PLCβ and another that involves Gi/o and results in Gβγ-mediated activation of PLCβ (19, 20). While the β2AR has been shown to activate Gi (21, 22), a direct role for Gq in β2AR signaling has not been established. To dissect the possible contribution of Gi in β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization, we preincubated HEK293 cells for ten hours with or without pertussis toxin (PTX), a potent inhibitor of Gi family members. PTX treatment had no effect on ISO-promoted Ca2+ mobilization suggesting that it does not involve Gi (Fig. 2A). It is worth noting that preincubating the cells with PTX decreased IONO-mediated Ca2+ mobilization by ∼30% compared to untreated cells (Fig. S2A), although PTX treatment did not affect the peak response.
Figure 2.
β2AR-induced Ca2+mobilization is Gqdependent and Giindependent.A, HEK293 cells endogenously expressing the β2AR were preincubated with or without 100 ng/ml of the Gi inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX) for 10 h with FLUO-4 added for the last hour. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was then continuously monitored after injection of 10 μM ISO. B, cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h in the presence or absence of 1 μM of the Gq inhibitor YM-254890 (YM). Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was then continuously monitored after injection of 10 μM ISO. C, comparison of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization between WT HEK293 cells and CRISPR/Cas9 Gαq/11 KO HEK293 (ΔGαq/11) cells upon stimulation with 10 μM ISO. D, ΔGαq/11 cells were transiently transfected with increasing concentration (0–10 ng/0.35 cm2 of cells) of a plasmid encoding the Gαq protein. After 48 h, cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h, and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 10 μM ISO. The AUC was calculated from each of the curves in panels (A–C) and plotted as histograms. All data are shown as fold change over basal and are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ns = not significant. The ISO curve shown in panels (A–C) is the averaged signal from all ISO replicates (except Fig. 7) performed in WT cells throughout the study (n = 30). β2AR, β2-adrenergic receptor; AUC, area under the curve; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; ISO, isoproterenol.
We also dissected the possible contribution of Gq in β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. To initially assess this, we preincubated HEK293 cells with or without the selective Gq inhibitor YM-254890 (YM) before ISO stimulation. ISO did not promote a significant calcium response in cells treated with YM (Fig. 2B), suggesting a primary role for Gq in β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. We did not observe any effect of YM on IONO-mediated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization (Fig. S2B). To corroborate the role of Gq in β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization, we evaluated ISO effects in HEK293 cells that were knocked-out for Gαq/11 (ΔGαq/11) using CRISPR-Cas9. These cells did not generate any significant Ca2+ mobilization upon stimulation with ISO compared to WT cells (Fig. 2C). When Gq activity was restored in ΔGαq/11 cells by transfecting a plasmid encoding the Gαq subunit, ISO-promoted Ca2+ mobilization was restored in a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 2D). Taken together, these studies demonstrate a major contribution of Gq in β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells while excluding any involvement of Gi.
Gs activation contributes to the kinetics of β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization
While β2AR-mediated intracellular Ca2+ release has been previously correlated with Gs activation through either a cAMP-dependent or cAMP-independent mechanism in excitable cells (23, 24), a role for Gs in nonexcitable cells is less clear (15, 16). To probe the possible contribution of Gs signaling in Ca2+ dynamics upon β2AR activation, we stimulated HEK293 cells that were knocked-out for Gαs/olf (ΔGαs) using CRISPR-Cas9. First, we confirmed that such cells are indeed devoid of Gs signaling by transiently transfecting the intramolecular bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) cAMP sensor CAMYEL (25). While WT HEK293 cells had robust ISO-mediated cAMP accumulation, ΔGαs cells did not show any ISO-promoted cAMP confirming that ΔGαs cells lack Gs signaling (Fig. 3A). Next, we compared ISO-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in WT versus ΔGαs cells. The absence of Gs signaling had no impact on the peak β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization; however, the kinetics of the response in ΔGαs cells was more transient and the AUC was ∼30% lower compared to WT cells (Fig. 3B). IONO-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in ΔGαs cells also displayed a different profile compared to WT cells, although the quantified AUC in ΔGαs cells was modestly higher than in WT cells (Fig. S3A). Similar to what was observed in WT HEK293 cells, we did not see any effect of PTX preincubation on ISO-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in ΔGαs cells (Fig. 3C), while preincubation with YM completely abrogated ISO-promoted Ca2+ release in ΔGαs cells (Fig. 3D). Similar to WT cells, preincubation of ΔGαs cells with PTX statistically decreased the IONO-mediated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization when compared to untreated cells (Fig. S3B) while YM had a modest effect (Fig. S3C). These data further corroborate the predominance of Gq signaling in initiating Ca2+ release upon β2AR activation and suggest a potential role of Gs in the kinetics of this process.
Figure 3.
Gsactivation minimally contributes to β2AR-induced Ca2+mobilization.A, WT cells or CRISPR/Cas9 Gαs KO HEK293 (ΔGαs) cells were transiently transfected with the intramolecular BRET sensor CAMYEL to monitor cAMP production. After 48 h, cells were stimulated with or without 10 μM ISO, and the BRET signal was recorded. The data are expressed as the BRET ratio of acceptor/donor emission. B, comparison of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization between WT and ΔGαs cells upon stimulation with 10 μM ISO. C, ΔGαs cells were preincubated with or without 100 ng/ml PTX for 10 h with FLUO-4 added for the last hour. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 10 μM ISO. D, cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h in the presence or absence of 1 μM YM-254890. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 10 μM ISO. The AUC was calculated from each of the curves in panels (B–D) and plotted as histograms. All data are shown as fold change over basal and are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ns = not significant. The curve generated by ISO in panel B is the average signal of all the replicates (except Fig. 7) in WT cells (n = 30) through all the experimental conditions presented in this study. β2AR, β2-adrenergic receptor; AUC, area under the curve; BRET, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; ISO, isoproterenol; PTX, pertussis toxin.
The β2AR can recruit and activate Gq in BRET assays
Since our results support the involvement of Gq activation in β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells, we hypothesized that direct interaction between activated β2AR and Gq might occur. To investigate this, we took advantage of a panel of BRET biosensors that infer protein-protein interaction by virtue of their proximal energy exchange. In the first set of experiments, we transiently transfected HEK293 cells with β2AR fused to the BRET donor Renilla luciferase (β2AR-Rluc) together with the mini G protein constructs mGs, mGsi, and mGsq. These are engineered Gα subunits fused to the BRET acceptor Venus that retain the ability to couple to activated GPCRs, therefore serving as informative pharmacological tools to assess GPCR-mediated signaling (26). ISO induced β2AR coupling to the different mG proteins with potencies and efficacies dependent on the nature of the particular Gα subunit (Fig. 4A). mGs coupling to the β2AR was the most potent and efficient upon ISO stimulation, followed by mGsi, which showed an efficacy of ∼60% compared to mGs. ISO was also able to promote mGsq recruitment to the β2AR with an efficacy of ∼20% compared to mGs. These data support the preferential coupling of the β2AR to Gs and the established secondary coupling to Gi while also providing evidence for coupling to Gq. Due to the highly engineered nature of the mG constructs, we also evaluated the selectivity of these biosensors by determining mG coupling to the chemokine receptor CXCR4, which is canonically coupled to Gi. HEK293 cells transiently transfected with CXCR4-Rluc and stimulated with the agonist CXCL12 showed robust coupling to mGsi but no coupling to mGs or mGsq, corroborating the selectivity of these constructs (Fig. S4). We also evaluated if the β2AR-mediated mGsq recruitment could be modulated by different β-agonists including the endogenous agonists epinephrine and norepinephrine, as well as FOR, and ISO. This analysis showed that ISO was the most efficacious in recruiting mGsq followed by FOR (∼80% of ISO), epinephrine (∼60%) and norepinephrine (∼40%) (Fig. 4B). Notably, FOR showed a better potency compared to ISO but reduced efficacy which correlates with the diminished Ca2+ mobilization induced by FOR compared to ISO (Fig. 1D).
Figure 4.
BRET assay supports direct interaction between the β2AR and Gq. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with BRET donor β1AR-RlucII, β2AR-RlucII, or GRK2-RH-NanoLuc and BRET acceptor NES-Venus-mGs, -mGsi, -mGsq, or Gαq-Venus. After 48 h, cells were stimulated with increasing concentrations of the respective agonist and the BRET signal was recorded after 20 min stimulation and plotted as concentration/activity curves. A, β2AR-mediated recruitment of mG proteins upon stimulation with increasing concentrations of the full agonist ISO. Data are shown as % of maximal ISO-induced mGs recruitment. B, β2AR-mediated recruitment of mGsq upon stimulation with increasing concentrations of several β-agonists (ISO), epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NOR), and formoterol (FOR). Data are shown as % of maximal ISO-induced mGsq recruitment. C, β1AR- and β2AR-mediated recruitment of Gαq upon stimulation with increasing concentrations of ISO. Data are shown as % of maximal ISO-induced Gαq recruitment to the β2AR. D, activation of Gαq by endogenous β2AR upon stimulation with increasing concentrations of ISO in the presence/absence of 10 μM ICI. Data are shown as % of maximal ISO-induced Gαq activation in the absence of ICI. All normalized concentration/activity curves are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 4. β2AR, β2-adrenergic receptor; BRET, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer; GRK2-RH, regulator of G protein signaling homology; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; ICI, ICI-118,551; ISO, isoproterenol; Rluc, Renilla luciferase.
To further gauge Gq coupling to the β2AR we tested the activity of a BRET biosensor composed of the holo-Gαq subunit fused to the BRET acceptor Venus (Gαq-Venus) (27). HEK293 cells transiently transfected with β2AR-Rluc and Gαq-Venus induced Gαq recruitment to the β2AR upon stimulation with increasing concentrations of ISO (Fig. 4C). The potency of ISO-mediated Gαq-Venus recruitment was comparable to that of mGsq recruitment further supporting β2AR-mediated coupling to Gq. Importantly, we did not observe any ISO-mediated Gαq recruitment when assessing the closely-related β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR), supporting G protein subtype-selectivity for the β1AR. While the BRET biosensors described above are powerful tools to assess receptor/G protein interaction, they rely on overexpression of the receptor. To utilize a BRET assay with endogenous β2ARs, we took advantage of a recently described bimolecular BRET sensor system for Gq activation (28). This system involves the regulator of G protein signaling homology (RH) domain of GRK2 (GRK2RH) fused to NanoLuc (GRK2RH-Nluc) as BRET donor and Gαq-Venus as BRET acceptor. By virtue of the high affinity and specificity of GRK2RH for GTP-bound Gαq, this system should be able to evaluate Gq activation by endogenous β2ARs. HEK293 cells transiently transfected with GRK2RH-Nluc and Gαq-Venus showed a concentration-dependent Gq activation upon stimulation with ISO (Fig. 4D). This ISO-mediated Gq activation was effectively inhibited by ICI demonstrating that it was β2AR specific. Collectively, these results strongly support agonist-promoted coupling of the β2AR to Gq.
The prostaglandin EP2 receptor promotes Ca2+ mobilization in a Gs- and Gi-dependent manner
To assess if what we observed for β2AR-mediated calcium mobilization is recapitulated with other GPCRs canonically coupled to Gs, we studied the EP2R and EP4R. These receptors are endogenously expressed in HEK293 cells (18) and EP2R selectively couples to Gs while EP4R couples primarily to Gs and secondarily to Gi (29, 30, 31, 32). In addition, highly selective synthetic agonists exist for these two receptors: ONO-AE1-259-01 (ONO259) for the EP2R and ONO-AE1-329 (ONO329) for EP4R (33). We initially focused on EP2R-mediated signaling, assessing the ability of ONO259 to induce calcium mobilization in WT and ΔGαs HEK293 cells. ONO259 stimulation induced transient Ca2+ elevation with a peak at ∼50 s after addition in WT cells while the Ca2+ elevation was significantly attenuated in ΔGαs cells (Fig. 5A). When Gs was restored in ΔGαs cells by transfecting a plasmid encoding the Gαs subunit, ONO259-induced Ca2⁺ mobilization was rescued in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). We next dissected any contribution of Gi and Gq signaling in the EP2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization by blocking the corresponding G proteins with PTX or YM treatment as done for the β2AR. Preincubation of WT cells with PTX before agonist stimulation delayed the onset of EP2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization by ∼150 s and resulted in a significant decrease in the total Ca2+ response (Fig. 5C). Since ΔGαs cells show a residual Ca2+ elevation upon ONO259 stimulation, we determined if this could arise from Gi activation by evaluating the Ca2+ response in ΔGαs cells after PTX treatment (Fig. 5D). Interestingly, this showed no difference in the Ca2+ signal with or without PTX preincubation, suggesting a possible G protein-independent mechanism for the residual Ca2+ response. We also treated WT HEK293 cells with the Gq inhibitor YM for one hour before ONO259 stimulation. Inhibiting Gq modestly affected the kinetics of the Ca2+ response resulting in it being faster and more sustained than in the absence of YM and an overall ∼20% increase in the total Ca2+ response (Fig. 5E). Moreover, preincubation of ΔGαs cells with YM followed by ONO259 stimulation had no effect confirming that Gq has no significant role in EP2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. Thus, Ca2+ mobilization induced by the activation of the endogenous EP2R in HEK293 cells primarily relies on Gs signaling with a role for Gi in the kinetics of the response and no contribution from Gq.
Figure 5.
EP2R-mediated Ca2+mobilization is Gsand Gidependent and Gqindependent.A, comparison of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization between WT and ΔGαs HEK293 cells upon stimulation with 1 μM ONO259. B, ΔGαs cells were transiently transfected with increasing concentrations (0–5 ng/0.35 cm2 of cells) of a plasmid encoding the Gαs protein. After 48 h, cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h, and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 1 μM ONO259. (C) WT or (D) ΔGαs cells endogenously expressing the EP2 receptor were preincubated with or without 100 ng/ml PTX for 10 h with FLUO-4 added for the last hour. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 1 μM ONO259. (E) WT or (F) ΔGαs HEK293 cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h in the presence or absence of 1 μM YM-254890. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 1 μM ONO259. The AUC was calculated from each of the curves in panels (A, C–F) and plotted as histograms. All curve data are shown as fold change over basal and are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 6 except for panel (B) where n = 3. Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ns = not significant. The ONO259 curve shown in panels B, C, and E is the averaged signal from all ONO259 replicates (except Fig. 7) performed in WT cells throughout the study (n = 18). AUC, area under the curve; EP2R, prostaglandin EP2 receptor; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; PTX, pertussis toxin.
The prostaglandin EP4R promotes Ca2+ mobilization in a Gs-, Gi-, and Gq-dependent manner
We next explored EP4R-mediated signaling, which in addition to Gs can also couple to Gi (32). We initially investigated the ability of the EP4R selective agonist ONO329 to induce calcium mobilization in WT and ΔGαs HEK293 cells. ONO329 induced transient Ca2+ elevation with a peak at ∼40 s after injection in WT cells while the Ca2+ mobilization was significantly attenuated in ΔGαs cells (Fig. 6A). When Gs was restored in ΔGαs cells by transfecting a plasmid encoding the Gαs subunit, ONO329-induced Ca2⁺ mobilization was rescued in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6B). Preincubation of WT cells with PTX for ten hours before agonist stimulation also significantly decreased EP4R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization (Fig. 6C), and this effect was also conserved in ΔGαs cells (Fig. 6D), strongly supporting the concomitant role of Gi in the EP4R-mediated Ca2+ response. We also pretreated WT HEK293 cells with the Gq inhibitor YM prior to ONO329 stimulation (Fig. 6E). Similarly to Gi, blocking Gq signaling reduced EP4R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization although to a lesser degree, suggesting that Gq also has a role in EP4R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. However, the kinetics of the Ca2+ dynamics appeared to be different as it was faster and more sustained compared to that in the absence of YM. Finally, preincubation of ΔGαs cells with YM followed by ONO329 stimulation showed a modest albeit significant decrease in Ca2+ mobilization when compared to untreated ΔGαs cells, further supporting a role for Gq signaling in this process. In summary, Ca2+ mobilization induced by activation of the endogenous EP4R in HEK293 cells involves Gs, Gi, and Gq.
Figure 6.
EP4R-mediated Ca2+mobilization is Gs, Gi, and Gqdependent.A, comparison of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization between WT and ΔGαs HEK293 cells upon stimulation with 1 μM ONO329. B, ΔGαs cells were transiently transfected with increasing concentrations (0–5 ng/0.35 cm2 of cells) of a plasmid encoding the Gαs protein. After 48 h, cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h, and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 1 μM ONO329. (C) WT or (D) ΔGαs cells endogenously expressing the EP4 receptor were preincubated with or without 100 ng/ml PTX for 10 h with FLUO-4 added for the last hour. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 1 μM ONO329. (E) WT or (F) ΔGαs cells were preincubated with FLUO-4 for 1 h in the presence or absence of 1 μM YM-254890. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was continuously monitored after injection of 1 μM ONO329. The AUC was calculated from each of the curves in panels (A, C–F) and plotted as histograms. All curve data are shown as fold change over basal and are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 6 except for panel (B) where n = 3. Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The ONO329 curve shown in panels B, C, and E is the averaged signal from all ONO259 replicates (except Fig. 7) performed in WT cells throughout the study (n = 18). AUC, area under the curve; EP4R, prostaglandin EP4 receptor; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; PTX, pertussis toxin.
Contribution of extracellular Ca2+ and PLCβ to Gs-coupled receptor-mediated Ca2+ mobilization
To further dissect the mechanism of calcium mobilization induced by Gs-coupled receptors in nonexcitable cells, we examined the roles of extracellular calcium and PLCβ activity. Nonexcitable cells are believed to regulate extracellular calcium influx through mechanisms such as store-operated calcium entry (34, 35, 36) and transient receptor potential channels (37), which can be either GPCR-dependent or independent. To determine the contribution of these pathways to GPCR-mediated calcium mobilization, we compared calcium responses in the presence or absence of extracellular calcium. Preincubation of WT HEK293 cells in a calcium-free buffer led to a reduction in the calcium signal following ISO stimulation compared to cells in calcium-containing buffer (Fig. S5A), although this reduction was proportional to the decrease observed with IONO stimulation (Fig. S5B). A similar reduction was seen with the EP2R agonist ONO259 (Fig. S5C) and EP4R agonist ONO329 (Fig. S5D). Analysis of the AUC showed that all agonists induced similar calcium mobilization in the presence or absence of extracellular calcium when normalized to the IONO-derived AUC. These findings suggest that while extracellular calcium entry contributes to the overall calcium signal, it is not directly mediated by GPCRs and does not impact GPCR activity.
Given that the β₂AR mobilizes intracellular calcium via direct coupling to Gq while EP2R and EP4R primarily use Gs, we next investigated the involvement of PLCβ enzymes in calcium mobilization. We first tried the reported PLCβ inhibitor U73122. Unexpectedly, preincubation of HEK293 cells with U73122 significantly increased basal calcium levels and led to a complete loss in the ability of IONO to elevate calcium (Fig. S6A). This suggests that U73122 may have saturated the calcium mobilization system. While U73122 is generally regarded as a broad-spectrum PLCβ inhibitor, one previous study reported that it activated certain PLCβ isozymes (38). These findings raise questions about the inhibitory properties of U73122 and underscore the need for caution when interpreting data obtained with U73122.
To clarify the potential role of PLCβ in our system, we used a recently developed HEK293 cell line with CRISPR/Cas9-induced functional knockout of PLCβ1-4 isozymes (ΔPLCβ) (39). In ΔPLCβ cells, stimulation with ISO (Fig. 7A), ONO259 (Fig. 7B), and ONO329 (Fig. 7C) resulted in a significant reduction in receptor-mediated calcium mobilization compared to WT cells. In contrast, we did not observe any significant difference in IONO-mediated calcium elevation in WT versus ΔPLCβ cells (Fig. S6B). Taken together, these studies identify an important role for PLCβ in Gq-dependent (β2AR) and Gs-dependent (EP2R and EP4R) calcium mobilization.
Figure 7.
PLCβ enzymes contribute to β2AR, EP2R, and EP4R-mediated Ca2+mobilization. Comparison of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization between WT and ΔPLCβ HEK293 cells upon stimulation with (A) 10 μM ISO, (B) 1 μM ONO259, or (C) 1 μM ONO329. The AUC was calculated from each of the curves and plotted as histograms. All curve data are shown as fold change over basal and are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗∗p < 0.01. The ISO, ONO259, and ONO329 curves include the signal from replicates in the presence of extracellular Ca2+ performed in Fig. S5 (n = 6). β2AR, β2-adrenergic receptor; AUC, area under the curve; EP2R, prostaglandin EP2 receptor; EP4R, prostaglandin EP4 receptor; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; ISO, isoproterenol; PLCβ, phospholipase C-β.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the ability of several Gs-coupled GPCRs to promote agonist-dependent Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells. Using pharmacological and genetic approaches, we find that β2AR activated Ca2+ mobilization is predominantly mediated by Gq while proximity-based BRET analysis supports β-agonist-dependent coupling between the β2AR and Gq. To generalize what was observed for the β2AR, we find that the Gs-coupled EP2R mobilizes calcium in a Gs- and Gi-dependent manner while the closely related EP4R modulates calcium in a Gs-, Gi-, and Gq-dependent manner. Importantly, for all the GPCRs analyzed in this study, calcium mobilization was consistently linked to the activation of PLCβ enzymes, regardless of the differences in upstream G-protein network activation. Therefore, our studies suggest that calcium mobilization induced by GPCRs that primarily couple to Gs is largely dependent on the coupling promiscuity of the receptor rather than being governed only by the nature of the effector involved. Indeed, multiple G proteins regulated calcium signaling across activation of three different Gs-coupled GPCRs.
Classically, GPCRs modulate intracellular calcium by inducing either Gαq activation or Gi-derived Gβγ activation of PLCβ (5). Yet, Ca2+ elevation occurring from activation of Gs-coupled GPCRs in nonexcitable cells is also common, although mechanistic insight on how this occurs is lacking (40). The β2AR represents a good model to study since it canonically couples to Gs and secondarily to Gi and it can induce intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in some nonexcitable cells. In this context, previous studies correlated β2AR-induced Ca2+ mobilization with cAMP-dependent activation of Epac leading to a PLCβε-mediated increase in intracellular Ca2+ in HEK293 cells (12). Although in the present study we find that Gs is not required for β2AR-mediated calcium mobilization, we cannot exclude that PLCβε might contribute to the differences in Ca2+ kinetics that we observed in WT versus ΔGαs cells. In this regard, it is worth noting that GPCR-dependent Ca2+ mobilization only marks the initial spike of the induced calcium elevation prompted by the fast opening of the Ca2+ ion channels present in the endoplasmic reticulum. The subsequent rapid decay of the calcium signal denotes the equally rapid reuptake of Ca2+ ions driven by several GPCR-independent mechanisms, which, among others, involve calcium-binding proteins and the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (41, 42, 43). Since HEK293 cells that were knocked out for G proteins have been shown to promote cellular rewiring (44), the differences in the later kinetics of Ca2+ mobilization that we observed might also be governed by the different genetic backgrounds between WT and ΔGαs cells that lead to diverse regulation of those GPCR-independent mechanisms that rapidly remove Ca2+ ions from the cytosol. A deeper analysis of such kinetic mechanisms would be required to dissect this phenomenon.
Studies by Stallaert et al. reported that the β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells was dependent on Gs activation but independent of cAMP accumulation (15). The authors proposed a mechanism that involves the β2AR-induced and Gs-mediated extracellular release of ATP, resulting in activation of Gq-coupled P2Y purinergic receptors and leading to an increase in IP3-dependent intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, hence establishing signaling crosstalk between the β2AR and P2Y receptor. Although transactivation between the adrenergic and purinergic receptors has been described previously (45), this does not appear to play a significant role in β2AR-mediated calcium mobilization in HEK293 cells in our studies. Indeed, ISO stimulation of cells depleted of Gs induced robust Ca2+ mobilization comparable to that of WT cells. In this context, there are some notable experimental differences between our study and that of Stallaert et al. that may have contributed to the different responses. First, most of the experiments evaluating Ca2+ mobilization in Stallaert et al. used HEK293 cells overexpressing the β2AR while we used HEK293 cells with endogenous β2AR. While overexpression of a specific component of a signaling pathway may help stabilize and enhance the signal during detection, this can also change normal cellular networks and lead to altered cellular responses (46, 47, 48). In addition, while both studies used the same ΔGαs cell line developed by the Inoue laboratory, it is possible that subsequent cell culture led to differences in the clones. Such differences have previously been reported in WT HEK293 cells (49, 50). Finally, the Ca2+ detection methods used in the two studies might have contributed to differences. While we used the established fluorescent Ca2+ dye Fura-4 which is cell-permeable and does not require any modification to the cells, Stallaert et al. detected Ca2+ by transfecting the cells with the mCherry-obelin- or GFP-obelin-based Ca2+ sensitive BRET biosensors. While we have no clear explanation for the differences in the findings, perhaps a combination of β2AR expression level, clonal differences in the cell lines, and Ca2+ detection methods might have contributed to the observed differences.
In another article interrogating the molecular mechanism behind the β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization, Galaz-Montoya et al. show that β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization arises from the activation of the PLC/IP3 pathway in HEK293 cells and use PTX and protein kinase A inhibitors to conclude that Ca2+ mobilization is independent of Gs or Gi activation (16). Thus, this study supports the extraneity of Gs and Gi signaling to β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. The authors also show that activated β2AR was unable to induce a membrane potential similar to that induced by the M3-muscarinic receptor (M3R). Since the authors had previously shown that the M3R-induced membrane potential is mediated by Gq (51), they concluded that the β2AR does not activate Gq. This is in contrast with our findings, which clearly show that β2AR-mediated Ca2+ mobilization is Gq-dependent. Notably, the possibility that the β2AR can directly couple to Gq is an exciting finding that could lead to a re-consideration of the β2AR coupling promiscuity. It is worth noting that previous reports failed to establish a β2AR-Gq association in studies involving large-scale GPCR-G-protein association screening (52, 53, 54). These differences might be explained by the very low efficiency that Gq shows for the β2AR compared to Gs or Gi. Indeed, ISO stimulation recruited mGsq at only ∼20% of the mGs recruitment denoting a weak association upon β2AR activation. This is also in accordance with the first published report of the mG BRET sensors where it was shown that the β2AR weakly recruits mGsq (26). This weak association might be one reason why large screening studies did not detect Gq coupling to the β2AR as well as why activation of the β2AR did not induce an appreciable membrane potential compared to the Gq-coupled M3R. Indeed, β2AR has been reported to directly couple to Gq in a study using overexpression systems in which the Gαq protein was fused to the β2AR (55). Bringing in proximity two naturally interacting proteins greatly enhances their affinity, permitting the detection of their association even when they interact weakly. Further in-depth studies are needed to establish if Gq can couple to the β2AR in other cellular systems and whether such coupling has a physiological role.
Another interesting finding of our study reveals that different GPCRs that primarily couple to Gs can use different G protein networks to modulate intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. We studied the EP2 and EP4 receptors that are endogenously expressed in HEK293 cells and canonically coupled to Gs and Gs/Gi, respectively (29, 30, 31, 32). Unlike the β2AR, Gs activation was required to initiate EP2 and EP4 receptor-mediated Ca2+ mobilization. This is in line with previous reports identifying a role for Gs in cAMP-dependent and PKA-dependent Ca2+ mobilization upon EP2R or EP4R activation, respectively (56, 57). Interestingly, activation of Ca2+ mobilization by EP2R also involved Gi while activation of EP4R involved Gi and Gq. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that EP2R signaling can be modulated by Gi in addition to Gs and that EP4R signaling can be modulated by Gq in addition to Gs and Gi. A more extensive analysis is needed to further characterize the G-protein promiscuity of these two receptors. The evidence that EP2/4 receptor-mediated Ca2+ mobilization can be partially modulated by Gi or a combination of Gi and Gq activity is in accordance with recent reports that described two independent molecular mechanisms for Gi-dissociated Gβγ-dependent and Gq-dependent PLCβ activation. Indeed, Gβγ can activate PLCβ by increasing its membrane recruitment while Gαq enhances catalysis (9, 10). Although these mechanisms can operate independently, they can also cooperate to increase PLCβ activity as a product of the two separate contributions.
Another proposed mechanism links Gi-mediated activation of PLCβ to the hierarchical upstream activation of Gq. In this context, the activation of PLCβ by Gi-dissociated Gβγ cannot occur in the absence of the Gαq-mediated release of an autoinhibitory region in the catalytic site of PLCβ, therefore setting Gαq as a necessary master switch for Gβγ-mediated activation of PLCβ (58). A recent study expanded on this hierarchical Gq activation mechanism to explain how Gs-coupled receptor activation leads to intracellular Ca2+ elevation (39). They reported that Gβγ subunits released during Gs activation can stimulate specific PLCβ isozymes, although Gq priming by ATP or carbachol was found to be necessary for this process. While a role for Gs-derived Gβγ in Ca2+ mobilization is an important observation (39), our studies did not require Gq priming for Gs-coupled receptor-mediated Ca2+ mobilization for the β2AR, EP2R, or EP4R. Indeed, our studies as well as previous studies on β2AR-mediated calcium mobilization in HEK293 cells by Stallaert et al. (15) and Galaz-Montoya et al. (16) did not require Gq priming. Perhaps some of the differences in these studies can be attributed to clonal heterogeneity of HEK293 cells grown in different labs. A striking example of this was reported by the Lefkowitz lab who observed that the PTX-dependence of β2AR-mediated activation of ERK was highly variable in HEK293 cells grown by different individuals within the lab from completely PTX sensitive to completely insensitive (49). Thus, while Gβγ subunits from Gs appear to play an important role in calcium mobilization (39), a requirement for Gαq in Gβγ-mediated calcium mobilization is less clear.
In conclusion, this study highlights a previously unexplored intertwined network of G protein contributions to calcium signaling driven by the activation of several Gs-coupled GPCRs. This might pose the need for a more careful reevaluation of receptor coupling promiscuity correlated with specific signaling pathways, such as Ca2+ signaling. Ultimately, this study expounded the evidence of β2AR coupling to Gq, EP2R to Gi and EP4R to Gq in addition to the canonical G proteins associated with these receptors.
Limitations of study
Although we infer protein-protein interaction from the BRET analysis to support direct coupling of Gq to the activated β2AR, we acknowledge this as a potential limitation of the study since BRET analysis is a measure of proximity between two proteins tagged with a BRET donor and acceptor that are close enough to generate a signal (<10 nm). While we studied endogenous GPCRs in HEK293 cells, future studies should evaluate these signaling pathways in primary cells and establish whether these pathways have a physiological role.
Experimental procedures
Materials
All β-agonists, as well as the β2AR selective antagonist ICI were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. EP receptor agonists ONO259 and ONO329 were kindly provided by Dr Raymond B. Penn (Thomas Jefferson University). Compounds were dissolved in water with 1 mM ascorbic acid or in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich), stored as stock solutions at −20 °C, and then diluted in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (Corning Inc) for analysis. Costar ninety-six-well black, clear-bottom microplates for Ca2+ assays were from Corning. Fluo-4 NW Calcium Assay Kit was from Invitrogen. PTX was from Enzo Life Sciences, while YM was from Focus Biomolecules or Wako Pure Chemical Industries. U73122 was from Bio-Techne Tocris. Ninety-six-well, bottom-opaque, white microplates for BRET assays were from PerkinElmer. Renilla Luciferase substrate coelenterazine H was from Cayman Chemical Company. WT HEK293 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. HEK293/ΔGαs/olf, HEK293/ΔGαq/11, and HEK293/ΔPLCβ cells were generated and characterized previously (15, 39, 59).
Cell culture and transfection
WT HEK293 cells, ΔGαq/11 (ΔGNAQ/GNA11) cells, ΔGαs/olf (ΔGNAS/GNAL) cells and ΔPLCβ (ΔPLCB1/PLCB2/PLCB3/PLCB4) cells were maintained in minimum essential medium Eagle with Earle’s salts and L-glutamine (Corning Inc) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Corning Inc), 100 U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (P/S) (Gibco). Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Transient transfections were performed in suspension in a 96-well plate using Metafectene PRO (Biontex) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, two solutions were prepared and incubated separately for 5 min. One solution contained plasmid DNAs encoding for BRET acceptor and donor diluted in 25 μl per well of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco) containing 4.5 g/l D-glucose without phenol red while the other solution contained 0.5 μl per well of Metafectene Pro diluted in 25 μl per well of DMEM containing 4.5 g/l D-glucose without phenol red. For the Gq and Gs rescue experiments, ΔGαq/11 or ΔGαs cells were transiently transfected with increasing concentrations (0–10 ng/0.35 cm2 of cells) of a plasmid encoding the Gαq or Gαs protein. After the first incubation, the solutions were mixed, incubated for 20 min, added to 80,000 cells per well diluted in a final volume of 200 μl per well of DMEM without phenol red containing 4.5 g/l D-glucose, 10% fetal bovine serum, and P/S, and dispensed in 96-well, bottom-opaque, white microplates.
Calcium mobilization assay
We used the Fluo-4 NW Calcium Assay Kit (Invitrogen) to investigate calcium mobilization, and the experiments were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the day before the calcium assay, 80,000 cells/well in a final volume of 200 μl/well of complete DMEM without phenol red were plated in 96 well, clear-bottom, black plates, and incubated overnight. The following day, cell media were aspirated and replaced with fresh media with or without 100 ng/ml of PTX and incubated for 10 h according to the experimental set-up. One hour before reading, the media were removed and replaced with 100 μl/well of assay buffer or Hanks' balanced salt solution without Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the presence of 20 mM Hepes buffer containing 1× Fluo-4 NW calcium-dye mix and 2.5 mM probenecid in the presence/absence of 10 μM of ICI, 10 μM YM, or 10 μM U73122 according to the experimental setup, followed by 1 h incubation of the cells in the dark. Then, 20 μl/well of agonist or IONO diluted in the appropriate buffer were injected into each well to achieve the desired final concentration, and the signal was immediately recorded and monitored over time (up to 90 or 280 s) with a FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices) or a CLARIOstar Plus Plate Reader (BMG labtech). The FlexStation system has eight channels and uses a monochromator for detection while the CLARIOstar system has only one channel but has increased sensitivity due to the specific set of wave-length-dedicated filters. Before agonist injection, a basal signal was recorded for up to 50 s, which served to normalize the signal across experiments.
Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assay
In order to measure the real-time cAMP response, WT and ΔGαs HEK293 cells with endogenous β2AR were transfected with the BRET-based intramolecular cAMP sensor CAMYEL (both the donor and the acceptor are fused to the cAMP binding domain of exchange protein directly activated by cAMP) that upon cAMP binding undergoes a conformational change resulting in a change in the BRET signal (25). To evaluate mini-G protein recruitment, WT HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with β2AR or CXCR4 C terminally fused with donor RlucII (β2AR-RlucII or CXCR4-RlucII) along with acceptor NES-Venus-mGs, NES-Venus-mGsi, or NES-Venus-mGsq (26). For the assessment of Gαq recruitment, WT HEK293 cells were transiently cotransfected with plasmids for donor β2AR-RlucII or β1AR-RlucII and acceptor Gαq-Venus (27). To measure Gαq activation with endogenous β2AR, WT HEK293 cells endogenously expressing the β2AR were transiently transfected with donor GRK2RH-Nluc and acceptor Gαq-Venus. Forty-eight hours after transfection, media were removed and the cells were stimulated for 20 min with increasing concentrations of β-agonist or CXCL12 (at the concentration reported in the figure legends) in the presence of 5 μM coelenterazine H diluted with PBS to a final volume of 50 μl per well. Signals at 395 nm (donor) and 510 nm (acceptor) were recorded in an Infinite F500 plate reader (Tecan).
Statistical analysis and data representation
All generated curves and statistical analyses were done using GraphPad Prism version 10.2.0 (GraphPad Software; https://www.graphpad.com/features). All the calcium kinetic curves are displayed as fold change over basal (except for Figs. 1A and S6A, which are expressed as relative light units). To do this, a single value was calculated by averaging the basal signal before agonist injection from 0 to 50 s for each replicate. Then the ratio of each value (comprising all points from 0–280 s) over the average basal value was calculated and plotted as a kinetic curve over time. The AUC of each kinetic curve describing calcium dynamics was extrapolated by using the function “Area Under Curve” in GraphPad Prism, where the baseline was set to 1, and only the points above the baseline were considered. The concentration-activity curves were extrapolated by using the function “log (agonist) versus response (three parameters)” in GraphPad Prism. For normalization, we first subtracted the basal signal (wells stimulated with PBS in the absence of ligand) from each stimulated well, and the values of all replicates were then divided by the mean of the reference value considered in each experiment and multiplied by 100 for any given read-out. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments (each figure legend states the specific number of replicates). In particular, the curve generated by ISO, ONO259, and ONO329 in WT HEK293 cells shown is the averaged signal of all replicates performed in WT cells presented in this study (n = 30 for ISO; n = 18 for ONO259 and n = 18 for ONO259). Statistical significance was assessed by t test with Welch’s correction, ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Data availability
All study data are included in the article and SI Appendix.
Supporting information
This article contains supporting information.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr Raymond Penn for providing the EP2R and EP4R selective agonists, Dr Mikel Garcia-Marcos for the GRK2RH-Nluc and Gαq-Venus constructs, Dr Nevin Lambert for the NES-Venus-mGs, NES-Venus-mGsi and NES-Venus-mGsq constructs, Dr Michel Bouvier for the β2AR-RlucII construct, and Mr Sushrat Shah for technical support.
Funding and additional information
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (grants P01HL114471, R35GM122541, and R01 AI161296 to J. L. B.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. A. I. was funded by KAKENHI JP21H04791 and JP21H05113 from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS); JPMJFR215T and JPMJMS2023 from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST); JP22ama121038 and JP22zf0127007 from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).
Author contributions
F. D. P., A. I., and J. L. B. writing–review and editing; F. D. P. and J. L. B. writing–original draft; F. D. P. and J. L. B. conceptualization; F. D. P. investigation; F. D. P. formal analysis; J. L. B. supervision; A. I. and J. L. B. funding acquisition; A. I. resources.
Reviewed by members of the JBC Editorial Board. Edited by Henrik Dohlman
Supporting information
References
- 1.Gilman A.G. G proteins: transducers of receptor-generated signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987;56:615–649. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.003151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oldham W.M., Hamm H.E. Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;9:60–71. doi: 10.1038/nrm2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rosenbaum D.M., Rasmussen S.G.F., Kobilka B.K. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature. 2009;459:356–363. doi: 10.1038/nature08144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krupnick J.G., Benovic J.L. The role of receptor kinases and arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor regulation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1998;38:289–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.38.1.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smrcka A.V., Hepler J.R., Brown K.O., Sternweis P.C. Regulation of polyphosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C activity by purified Gq. Science. 1991;251:804–807. doi: 10.1126/science.1846707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taylor S.J., Chae H.Z., Rhee S.G., Exton J.H. Activation of the beta 1 isozyme of phospholipase C by alpha subunits of the Gq class of G proteins. Nature. 1991;350:516–518. doi: 10.1038/350516a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee S.B., Shin S.H., Hepler J.R., Gilman A.G., Rhee S.G. Activation of phospholipase C-beta 2 mutants by G protein alpha q and beta gamma subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:25952–25957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Smrcka A.V., Sternweis P.C. Regulation of purified subtypes of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C beta by G protein alpha and beta gamma subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:9667–9674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Falzone M.E., MacKinnon R. Gβγ activates PIP2 hydrolysis by recruiting and orienting PLCβ on the membrane surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301121120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Falzone M.E., MacKinnon R. The mechanism of Gαq regulation of PLCβ3-catalyzed PIP2 hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315011120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Berridge M.J. Inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol: two interacting second messengers. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987;56:159–193. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schmidt M., Evellin S., Weernink P.A.O., Dorp F.V., Rehmann H., Lomasney J.W., et al. A new phospholipase-C–calcium signalling pathway mediated by cyclic AMP and a Rap GTPase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:1020–1024. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stallaert W., Dorn J.F., Van Der Westhuizen E., Audet M., Bouvier M. Impedance responses reveal β2-adrenergic receptor signaling pluridimensionality and allow classification of ligands with distinct signaling profiles. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van der Westhuizen E.T., Breton B., Christopoulos A., Bouvier M. Quantification of ligand bias for clinically relevant β2 -adrenergic receptor ligands: implications for drug taxonomy. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014;85:492–509. doi: 10.1124/mol.113.088880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stallaert W., Van Der Westhuizen E.T., Schönegge A.-M., Plouffe B., Hogue M., Lukashova V., et al. Purinergic receptor transactivation by the β2 -adrenergic receptor increases intracellular Ca2+ in nonexcitable cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2017;91:533–544. doi: 10.1124/mol.116.106419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galaz-Montoya M., Wright S.J., Rodriguez G.J., Lichtarge O., Wensel T.G. β2-adrenergic receptor activation mobilizes intracellular calcium via a non-canonical cAMP-independent signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:9967–9974. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.787119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mundell S.J., Loudon R.P., Benovic J.L. Characterization of G protein-coupled receptor regulation in antisense mRNA-expressing cells with reduced arrestin levels. Biochemistry. 1999;38:8723–8732. doi: 10.1021/bi990361v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Atwood B.K., Lopez J., Wager-Miller J., Mackie K., Straiker A. Expression of G protein-coupled receptors and related proteins in HEK293, AtT20, BV2, and N18 cell lines as revealed by microarray analysis. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kadamur G., Ross E.M. Mammalian phospholipase C. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2013;75:127–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lyon A.M., Tesmer J.J.G. Structural insights into phospholipase C- β function. Mol. Pharmacol. 2013;84:488–500. doi: 10.1124/mol.113.087403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Daaka Y., Luttrell L.M., Lefkowitz R.J. Switching of the coupling of the beta2-adrenergic receptor to different G proteins by protein kinase A. Nature. 1997;390:88–91. doi: 10.1038/36362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ma X., Hu Y., Batebi H., Heng J., Xu J., Liu X., et al. Analysis of β2AR-Gs and β2AR-Gi complex formation by NMR spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117:23096–23105. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009786117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Benitah J.-P., Alvarez J.L., Gómez A.M. L-type Ca(2+) current in ventricular cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010;48:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Christ T., Galindo-Tovar A., Thoms M., Ravens U., Kaumann A.J. Inotropy and L-type Ca2+ current, activated by beta1 - and beta2 -adrenoceptors, are differently controlled by phosphodiesterases 3 and 4 in rat heart. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;156:62–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00015.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jiang L.I., Collins J., Davis R., Lin K.-M., DeCamp D., Roach T., et al. Use of a cAMP BRET sensor to characterize a novel regulation of cAMP by the sphingosine 1-phosphate/G13 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:10576–10584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609695200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wan Q., Okashah N., Inoue A., Nehmé R., Carpenter B., Tate C.G., et al. Mini G protein probes for active G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) in live cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:7466–7473. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qin K., Dong C., Wu G., Lambert N.A. Inactive-state preassembly of G(q)-coupled receptors and G(q) heterotrimers. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:740–747. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maziarz M., Park J.-C., Leyme A., Marivin A., Garcia-Lopez A., Patel P.P., et al. Revealing the activity of trimeric G-proteins in live cells with a versatile biosensor design. Cell. 2020;182:770–785.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Qu C., Mao C., Xiao P., Shen Q., Zhong Y.-N., Yang F., et al. Ligand recognition, unconventional activation, and G protein coupling of the prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 subtype. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabf1268. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nojima S., Fujita Y., Kimura K.T., Nomura N., Suno R., Morimoto K., et al. Cryo-EM structure of the prostaglandin E receptor EP4 coupled to G protein. Structure. 2021;29:252–260.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim N.H., Kim K.-S., Shin S.C., Kim E.E., Yu Y.G. Functional expression of human prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 (EP4) in E. coli and characterization of the binding property of EP4 with Gα proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021;25 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang S.-M., Xiong M.-Y., Liu L., Mu J., Wang M.-W., Jia Y.-L., et al. Single hormone or synthetic agonist induces Gs/Gi coupling selectivity of EP receptors via distinct binding modes and propagating paths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216329120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sugimoto Y., Narumiya S. Prostaglandin E receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:11613–11617. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R600038200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kodakandla G., Akimzhanov A.M., Boehning D. Regulatory mechanisms controlling store-operated calcium entry. Front. Physiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1330259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Avila-Medina J., Mayoral-Gonzalez I., Dominguez-Rodriguez A., Gallardo-Castillo I., Ribas J., Ordoñez A., et al. The complex role of store operated calcium entry pathways and related proteins in the function of cardiac, skeletal and vascular smooth muscle cells. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:257. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Trebak M., Zhang W., Ruhle B., Henkel M.M., González-Cobos J.C., Motiani R.K., et al. What role for store-operated Ca2+ entry in muscle? Microcirculation. 2013;20:330–336. doi: 10.1111/micc.12042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chakrabarti R., Chakrabarti R. Calcium signaling in non-excitable cells: Ca2+ release and influx are independent events linked to two plasma membrane Ca2+ entry channels. J. Cell Biochem. 2006;99:1503–1516. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Klein R.R., Bourdon D.M., Costales C.L., Wagner C.D., White W.L., Williams J.D., et al. Direct activation of human phospholipase C by its well known inhibitor U73122. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:12407–12416. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.191783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brands J., Bravo S., Jürgenliemke L., Grätz L., Schihada H., Frechen F., et al. A molecular mechanism to diversify Ca2+ signaling downstream of Gs protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:7684. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51991-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dhyani V., Gare S., Gupta R.K., Swain S., Venkatesh K.V., Giri L. GPCR mediated control of calcium dynamics: a systems perspective. Cell Signal. 2020;74 doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Berridge M.J., Bootman M.D., Roderick H.L. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:517–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Clapham D.E. Calcium signaling. Cell. 2007;131:1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Daverkausen-Fischer L., Pröls F. Regulation of calcium homeostasis and flux between the endoplasmic reticulum and the cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 2022;298 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Luttrell L.M., Wang J., Plouffe B., Smith J.S., Yamani L., Kaur S., et al. Manifold roles of β-arrestins in GPCR signaling elucidated with siRNA and CRISPR/Cas9. Sci. Signal. 2018;11 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aat7650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sumi Y., Woehrle T., Chen Y., Yao Y., Li A., Junger W.G. Adrenergic receptor activation involves ATP release and feedback through purinergic receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010;299:C1118–C1126. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00122.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhu X., Gilbert S., Birnbaumer M., Birnbaumer L. Dual signaling potential is common among Gs-coupled receptors and dependent on receptor density. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994;46:460–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cordeaux Y., Briddon S.J., Megson A.E., McDonnell J., Dickenson J.M., Hill S.J. Influence of receptor number on functional responses elicited by agonists acting at the human adenosine A 1 receptor: evidence for signaling pathway-dependent changes in agonist potency and relative intrinsic activity. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000;58:1075–1084. doi: 10.1124/mol.58.5.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li A., Liu S., Huang R., Ahn S., Lefkowitz R.J. Loss of biased signaling at a G protein-coupled receptor in overexpressed systems. PLoS One. 2023;18 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lefkowitz R.J., Pierce K.L., Luttrell L.M. Dancing with different partners: protein kinase A phosphorylation of seven membrane-spanning receptors regulates their G protein-coupling specificity. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002;62:971–974. doi: 10.1124/mol.62.5.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lin Y.-C., Boone M., Meuris L., Lemmens I., Van Roy N., Soete A., et al. Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4767. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kang H.J., Menlove K., Ma J., Wilkins A., Lichtarge O., Wensel T.G. Selectivity and evolutionary divergence of metabotropic glutamate receptors for endogenous ligands and G proteins coupled to phospholipase C or TRP channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:29961–29974. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.574483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Inoue A., Raimondi F., Kadji F.M.N., Singh G., Kishi T., Uwamizu A., et al. Illuminating G-protein-coupling selectivity of GPCRs. Cell. 2019;177:1933–1947.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hauser A.S., Avet C., Normand C., Mancini A., Inoue A., Bouvier M., et al. Common coupling map advances GPCR-G protein selectivity. eLife. 2022;11 doi: 10.7554/eLife.74107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Avet C., Mancini A., Breton B., Le Gouill C., Hauser A.S., Normand C., et al. Effector membrane translocation biosensors reveal G protein and βarrestin coupling profiles of 100 therapeutically relevant GPCRs. eLife. 2022;11 doi: 10.7554/eLife.74101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wenzel-Seifert K., Seifert R. Molecular analysis of beta(2) -adrenoceptor coupling to G(s)-, G(i)-, and G(q)-proteins. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000;58:954–966. doi: 10.1124/mol.58.5.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chang M.-C., Lin S.-I., Lin L.-D., Chan C.-P., Lee M.-S., Wang T.-M., et al. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates EP2, adenylate cyclase, phospholipase C, and intracellular calcium release to mediate cyclic adenosine monophosphate production in dental pulp cells. J. Endodontics. 2016;42:584–588. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hodeify R., Chakkour M., Rida R., Kreydiyyeh S. PGE2 upregulates the Na+/K+ ATPase in HepG2 cells via EP4 receptors and intracellular calcium. PLoS One. 2021;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pfeil E.M., Brands J., Merten N., Vögtle T., Vescovo M., Rick U., et al. Heterotrimeric G protein subunit Gαq is a master switch for Gβγ-mediated calcium mobilization by Gi-coupled GPCRs. Mol. Cell. 2020;80:940–954.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schrage R., Schmitz A.-L., Gaffal E., Annala S., Kehraus S., Wenzel D., et al. The experimental power of FR900359 to study Gq-regulated biological processes. Nat. Commun. 2015;6 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and SI Appendix.







