Summary
Current solid- and liquid-state electrode materials with extreme physical states show inherent limitation in achieving the ultra-stable batteries. Herein, we present a colloidal electrode design with an intermediate physical state to integrate the advantages of both solid- and liquid-state materials. The colloidal electrode was designed based on the inherent water competition effect of (SO4)2− from the aqueous electrolyte and inherently water-soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG)/ZnI2 from the cathode. The constructed aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery demonstrated ultra-stable cycling performance with Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and a capacity retention of 86.7% over 10,700 cycles, without requiring anodic modification. In addition, the battery also exhibits compatibility with multiple operating conditions including fluctuating charging, limited self-discharging rate, different charging statuses, and fast charging. Moreover, the battery also shows practical potential by integrating with a photovoltaic solar panel charging. This design provides a broad platform for building the next-generation aqueous batteries with ultra-long lifetime.
Subject areas: electrochemical energy storage, electrochemistry, materials science
Graphical abstract

Highlights
-
•
We present a soft colloidal electrode design with an intermediate physical state
-
•
The colloidal electrode was designed through the inherent water competition effect
-
•
The constructed aqueous battery demonstrated ultra-stable cycling performance
Electrochemical energy storage; Electrochemistry; Materials science.
Introduction
The development of electrode materials is crucial for creating ultra-stable cycling performance of batteries that can reduce daily costs.1,2,3,4,5,6 Currently, the efficient lifespan of lithium-ion batteries is approximately 2,000 cycles, or around 10 years, with a capacity retention ratio of about 80%.7,8 In contrast, aqueous batteries, known for their reliable safety and low costs, typically have a more limited cycling lifespan.9,10,11,12 To facilitate the development of ultra-long-lifetime batteries, we analyzed current battery construction characteristics and proposed our innovative solution.
Current battery constructions include various configurations such as liquid||liquid, solid||liquid||solid, solid||solid||solid, liquid||liquid||liquid, and solid||liquid||liquid structures.13,14,15,16,17,18 Typical prototypes encompass redox-flow batteries, metal-ion batteries, all-solid-state batteries, molten salt batteries, and liquid-electrode batteries.19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 These constructions rely on solid and liquid materials with extreme physical states. The charge storage process in batteries is determined by the accommodation ability of charge carriers in electrode materials and the shuttling ability of charge carriers in electrolytes, which must tolerate repeated atomic stress within solid-state materials.29 This inherently limits the battery lifespan. Liquid-state materials, while promising for charge carriers shuttling, face challenges with uncontrolled species migration in liquid-state electrodes.30 Overall, conventional battery materials offer advantages such as species fixation in solid-stage electrode materials and the absence of rigid atomic structure in liquid-electrode materials, but they also suffer from the disadvantages of each other’s strengths. These practical conditions suggest that an effective combination of solid- and liquid-state materials could be a promising solution for developing next-generation ultra-stable batteries.
Based on our theoretical analysis of current battery constructions, we proposed and designed colloidal electrode materials with an intermediate physical state, rather than extreme solid or liquid states. This approach aims to combine the advantages of both solid- and liquid-state materials while avoiding their respective disadvantages. The non-extreme physical states refer to materials whose physical states are intermediate between solids and liquids. Colloidal electrode materials offer competitive fixation properties for redox-active species compared to conventional solid-state electrodes, while preventing the particle cracking or pulverization observed in conventional solid-state electrode materials, such as inorganic and organic particles. This approach, in principle, promises prolonged cycling stability. The soft, colloidal electrode material was realized through an inherent water competition effect between the (SO4)2– species from the aqueous electrolyte and inherently water-soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG)/ZnI2 from the cathode, forming an aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery (Figure 1A). The colloidal electrode, devoid of a rigid lattice structure, effectively avoids lattice fatigue during repeated battery cycles and secures active species, thereby preventing capacity loss caused by the migration of redox-active species, such as iodide shuttling in aqueous Zn-I batteries (Figure 1B).31 Electrochemical performance demonstrated an ultra-long battery cycling lifespan exceeding 10,700 cycles. Furthermore, the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery showed compatibility with various operating conditions, including fluctuating charging, limited self-discharging, different charging statuses, and fast-charging properties. Additionally, we demonstrated the integrity of the battery by charging it with a photovoltaic solar panel under sunlight, indicating the potential for practical applications. This battery design provides a broad platform for developing next-generation ultra-stable battery chemistries.
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of the construction of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery
(A) Illustration of the water competition effect between (SO4)2− and PEG.
(B) Optical images of the insoluble PEG in 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution.
Results and discussion
Water competition effect demonstration
The water competition effect between (SO4)2– ions and PEG species was investigated by dissolving PEG polymer in a 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution. To track the migration of PEG molecules, we colored them using yellow-colored iodine species. The inherently water-soluble PEG formed a separate layer on the surface of the 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution (Figures 1B, S1A, and Video S1). In contrast, PEG is fully soluble in deionized water (Figure S1B and Video S2). These distinct observations indicate that the presence of ZnSO4 inhibits the dissolution of PEG by reducing its interactions with water molecules that occur during the normal dissolution process. This difference in solubility suggests a water competition effect between ZnSO4 and PEG, where ZnSO4 controls the water content within PEG, resulting in limited PEG dissociation and the formation of a separate PEG colloid layer. This dual-layer structure meets the basic requirement for battery construction, providing immiscible electrolyte and cathode portions. Additionally, the iodide species are effectively retained within the PEG matrix, favoring stable battery cycling performance (Figure S1C).
To further confirm the origin of the water competition effect between ZnSO4 and PEG, we added ZnI2 to the PEG/H2O mixture. The ZnI2 fully dissolved, forming a transparent, colloid-like solution, indicating that the water competition effect is primarily determined by (SO4)2– anions rather than Zn2+ cations. The unique property supports the battery’s effective operation by allowing only Zn2+ cations to shuttle between the 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous electrolyte and the PEG colloid cathode for charge balancing during battery charging and discharging (Figure S2). Additionally, the limited water molecules within the PEG colloid further facilitate Zn2+ migration (Figure S2), while the redox-active iodine species were efficiently encapsulated in the PEG colloid. Therefore, we designed the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery using this inherent water competition effect between (SO4)2− from the aqueous electrolyte and PEG from the cathode for ultra-stable aqueous Zn-I batteries.
Electrochemical performance
The electrochemical performance of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery was thoroughly evaluated. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves, scanned at 2 mV s−1 by controlling the voltage variation, exhibited a pair of redox peaks at 1.41 (oxidative) and 1.03 (reductive) V vs. Zn/Zn2+, confirming the typical Zn-I redox chemistry, with the typical redox pairs of Zn/Zn2+ and I/I− (Figure 2A).32 Additionally, the potential PEG molecular rearrangement was observed during battery operation. During the charging process of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery, PEG molecules responded to the applied electric field, as indicated by the increasing capacitance in the redox-inactive region (Figure S3A). Specifically, the CV curve of the battery showed capacitance-type current in the charging voltage range of 0.9–1.2 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ (Figure S3B) and in the discharging voltage range of 1.5–1.3 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ (Figure S3C). This capacitance-type response current was opposite to the normal redox peaks, where oxidative peaks occur at higher voltages and reductive peaks at lower voltages (Figure S3). This response current in the redox-inactive region indicated a capacitance-type charge storage process of PEG molecules in the cathode. This capacitance behavior is triggered after a short voltage increase, from 0.85 to 0.9 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ (Figures 2A and S3B), suggesting a potential PEG molecular rearrangement process driven by the applied electric field, which reverses during discharging (Figure S3D). This rearrangement explains why the capacitance behavior indicator is positioned opposite to the normal redox peaks. Further calculations of the electrostatic potential of the PEG molecular segments showed that O sites had concentrated electronegativity around −24 kcal mol−1, while the –CH2– site showed slight electro-positivity around 6 kcal mol−1, suggesting the presence of dipoles responsive to the applied electric field (Figure S3E). The polymeric PEG chains form a matrix with localized electrostatic fields that can host ions during battery charging and discharging.
Figure 2.
Electrochemical performance of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery
(A) CV curve of the battery.
(B and C) Rate performance of the battery.
(D–G) Specific capacities and Coulombic efficiencies (D and F) and voltage profiles (E and G) of the battery.
Rate performance of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery was tested under various current densities of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mA cm−2. The battery demonstrated an 87.4% capacity retention after a 10-fold increase in operating current density, with voltage profiles showing consistent redox plateaus (Figures 2B and 2C). The lower Coulombic efficiency observed in the initial stages of the rate performance tests can be attributed to battery’s activation process (Figure 2B), which often results in a temporary decrease in efficiency. This activation effect is more pronounced when the battery is cycled at lower current densities (Figure 2D). The electrochemical kinetics was further analyzed using redox peaks polarization of CV curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The anodic and cathodic peaks exhibited voltage polarizations of 0.14 and 0.12 V, respectively (Figure S4A). Additionally, the EIS spectrum of the battery showed a charge transfer impedance of approximately 30 Ohms and an internal resistance of less than 5 Ohms (Figure S4B), indicating normal battery impedance.
Long-term galvanostatic charging and discharging tests of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery were conducted at 0.05 and 0.5 mA cm−2. After the initial battery activation and molecular rearrangement, the battery exhibited stable cycling performance over 800 and 9,700 cycles, with Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and capacity retentions of 93.7% and 83.6% at 0.05 and 0.5 mA cm−2, respectively (Figures 2D and 2F). The batteries showed consistent voltage profiles, confirming stable cycling performance and promising a long battery lifetime (Figures 2E and 2G). Long-term cycling performance of the battery was further confirmed by repeated testing. When cycling the battery at 0.5 mA cm−2, it continued to exhibit Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and a capacity retention of 77.8% over 10,000 cycles (Figure S5A). Furthermore, the battery maintained consistent voltage profiles throughout the entire cycling test process (Figure S5B). Additionally, the battery cycling performance has been demonstrated with a 5-fold increase in the iodide loading amount, showing stable cycling results (Figure S6). After a thorough evaluation and comparison with other research efforts, our work demonstrates comparable or even superior electrochemical performance (Table S1). Note that the PEG/ZnI2 solution is vulnerable to oxidation when exposed to the ambient environment, causing the color to turn pale yellow. This oxidation may impact the battery’s initial activation process (Figures S7A–S7C).
Electrochemical performance under multiple operating conditions
Fluctuating charging
Practical photovoltaic charging often faces the challenge of fluctuating power due to inconsistent sunlight. To demonstrate the compatibility of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with such fluctuating charging conditions, we tested the batteries by charging them at fluctuating current densities of 0.025, 0.05, 0.3, and 0.2 mA cm−2, while discharging them at a consistent current density of 0.05 mA cm−2. As a result, the battery exhibited Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and an 88.7% capacity retention ratio over 750 cycles (Figure 3A). The operating process of the battery revealed consistent tracked voltage profiles in response to the current profiles, indicating stable battery operation (Figures 3B–3E). These results demonstrate the compatibility of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with fluctuating charging behavior.
Figure 3.
Fluctuating charging performance of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery
(A) Specific capacities and Coulombic efficiencies during repeated cycling tests.
(B–E) Corresponding voltage (B and D) and current (C and E) profiles of the battery during cycling tests.
Battery self-discharging
Battery self-discharging is a significant factor for practical daily use. To measure the self-discharging rate of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery, we tested the battery by galvanostatically charging it at 0.05 mA cm−2 to 1.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+, followed by resting for 10, 50, 100, and 200 h, respectively, and then discharging it directly (Figure 4A). The Coulombic efficiency parameter was used to evaluate the self-discharging rate. Prior to the resting periods, the battery underwent an initial activation treatment. The battery demonstrated Coulombic efficiencies of 88.92%, 61.28%, 50.32%, and 48.28% after resting for 10, 50, 100, and 200 h, respectively (Figures 4B–4E). Generally, the battery showed a gradual decrease in Coulombic efficiencies with increasing resting time. The increase in Coulombic efficiency observed in the initial stages of the self-discharging tests is likely due to the premature battery condition following the initial activation process after assembly. Overall, the Coulombic efficiency values after long-term resting periods, such as 200 h, provide a reliable measure of the battery’s self-discharging rate. Additionally, the charging capacity after each resting and discharging cycle remained nearly constant, demonstrating the effectiveness of the PEG/ZnI2 colloidal cathode in fixing the redox-active iodide species on the cathode side and preventing uncontrolled migration loss, thereby promoting an ultra-long battery lifespan.
Figure 4.
Self-discharging test of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery
Overall (A) and individual voltage profiles (B–E) during the battery self-discharging tests.
Various charging statuses
In daily use, batteries often start operating from various charging states rather than being fully charged. To demonstrate the compatibility of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with such conditions, we tested the battery by galvanostatically charging it at 0.05 mA cm−2 to different cutoff voltages of 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+, followed by galvanostatic discharging at the same current density. The battery demonstrated Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and consistent voltage profiles (Figures 5A and 5B). Furthermore, the charging voltage profiles were consistent regardless of the charging cutoff voltages (Figure 5C), indicating the battery compatibility with different charging statuses. After the tests, the battery continued to operate stably, showing Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and 86.7% capacity retention after around 10,700 cycles (Figure 5D), indicating its long-term cycling efficiency. The battery demonstrated stable voltage profiles throughout the cycling tests (Figure S8), confirming its reliable cycling performance.
Figure 5.
Compatibility of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with various charging statuses
Continuous voltage profiles (A), capacity and Coulombic efficiency values (B), representative voltage profiles for each charging status condition (C), and subsequent long-term cycling tests (D).
Fast-charging performance
Fast-charging performance is crucial in current practical battery applications to improve charging efficiency.33 We demonstrated the fast-charging performance of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery by galvanostatically charging it at 0.5 mA cm−2 and discharging it at 0.05 mA cm−2. After the initial activation process, the battery delivered Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and a 90% capacity retention ratio over 2,100 cycles, with an 87.4% capacity retention during 10-fold fast charging compared to that charged at 0.05 mA cm−2 (Figure 6A). In response to the applied current densities, the battery exhibited consistent voltage profiles, indicating stably fast-charging capability (Figures 6B–6E).
Figure 6.
Fast-charging performance of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery
(A) Specific capacity and Coulombic efficiency values of the battery.
(B–E) Voltage (B and D) and current (C and E) profiles of the battery during fast-charging tests.
Practical integration with photovoltaic solar panel charging
The integration potential of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with a practical photovoltaic solar panel was demonstrated by charging the batteries using a 10 V, 3 W, 300 mA photovoltaic solar panel under sunlight (Figure 7A). The photovoltaic solar panel exhibited an output voltage of approximately 8 V (Figure 7B). After adjusting the angle of the photovoltaic solar panel, the batteries connected in parallel were charged under a solar panel output voltage of around 9 V (Figure 7C). Following this practical photovoltaic solar panel charging, from 1 to 1.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ (Video S3), the charged aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid batteries were connected in series and used to power a 12 V, 1.5 W LED panel both during daytime and at night (Figures 7D–7F, Videos S4 and S5).
Figure 7.
Practical integration demonstration of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with photovoltaic solar panel charging
(A) Local sunlight during the demonstration.
(B) Using the photovoltaic solar panel with an 8 V output voltage to directly power a 10 V LED panel.
(C) Using the photovoltaic solar panel with a 9.14 V output to charge the batteries in parallel.
(D–F) Photovoltaic solar panel-charged 12 V LED panel during daytime (E) and at night (F).
Conclusion
In this article, we developed an aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery utilizing the inherent water molecular competition effect between (SO4)2– ions from the electrolyte and PEG molecules from the cathode. The (SO4)2– ions act as a molecular valve to limit the water content in PEG, thereby forming a colloidal state that combines the advantages of species fixation in solid-state electrode materials and the lack of rigid atomic structure in liquid-state electrode materials. The PEG/ZnI2 colloid, with its intermediate physical state, demonstrated ultra-stable cycling performance, achieving Coulombic efficiencies approaching 100% and a capacity retention of 86.7% over 10,700 cycles. Additionally, the battery exhibited compatibility with various operating conditions, including fluctuating charging, a limited self-discharging rate, different charging statuses, and fast-charging capability. Moreover, the battery demonstrated compatibility with practical photovoltaic solar panel charging conditions, suggesting its potential for large-scale static energy storage applications. The design concept of colloidal electrodes provides a broad platform and new perspective for developing next-generation ultra-stable battery chemistries.
Limitations of the study
This study primarily focuses on the modification of cathode/electrolyte interface using the water competition effect. However, achieving balanced electrochemical performance typically requires modifications to both the anode/electrolyte and cathode/electrolyte interfaces. Additionally, our demonstrations were conducted using untreated zinc foils, which may limit the performance. Furthermore, the colloidal cathode is ionically conductive but lacks electronic conductivity, which constrains the overall kinetic performance of the battery.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and any requests should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Kaiqiang Zhang (kaiqiangzhang@njtech.edu.cn).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
-
•
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supplementary tables and figures.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22109069) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20221446).
Author contributions
Conceptualization, K.Z. and J.Y.; methodology, K.Z., J.Y., and Y.W.; investigation, K.Z., C.W., L.W., and C.M.; writing – original draft, K.Z.; writing – review and editing, K.Z., J.Y., and Y.W.; funding acquisition, K.Z. and J.Y.; resources, K.Z., J.Y., and Y.W.; supervision, K.Z. and J.Y.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| ZnSO4 | Sigma-Aldrich | CAS No.: 7446-19-7 |
| Polyethylene glycol | Sigma-Aldrich | CAS No.: 25322-68-3 |
| ZnI2 | Sigma-Aldrich | CAS No.: 10139-47-6 |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| Gaussian 16 package | Gaussian, Inc. | https://gaussian.com/ |
| Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) | https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/ |
| Multiwfn 3.7 program | Beijing Kein Research Center for Natural Sciences | http://sobereva.com/multiwfn/ |
Method details
Demonstration of water competition effect
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) (CAS No.: 25322-68-3) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The PEG has a molecular range of 3500–4500. The PEG colloid was prepared by dissolving 1 g of PEG in 20 mL of deionized water with continuous stirring. This PEG colloid was colored using iodine for the subsequent water molecular competition demonstration with ZnSO4 (CAS No.: 7446-19-7). The selective water competition effect between the ZnSO4 aqueous electrolyte and PEG colloid was demonstrated by adding the colored PEG colloid to a 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution, followed by mixing. Ultimately, the PEG colloid separated from the 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution. The colored PEG colloid was also added to deionized water as a control experiment. All experiments were conducted at room temperature in an ambient environment. UV-Vis spectra of the ZnSO4/H2O solutions were collected on a Shimadzu UV-2456 spectrophotometer.
Electrolyte preparation
The 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution was prepared by dissolving ZnSO4 in deionized water for the subsequent battery assembly.
Preparation of current collector
An activated carbon slurry was prepared by dispersing activated carbon, carbon black, and polyvinylidene fluoride binder (in a weight ratio of 7:2:1) in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone solvent, followed by constant stirring to form a uniform milky slurry. The current collector was then prepared by casting the slurry onto a carbon paper host and vacuum drying at 60°C for 8 h. The dried carbon paper was then cut into round discs with a diameter of 14 mm.
Preparation of PEG/ZnI2 colloid cathode
The PEG/ZnI2 colloid cathode was prepared by dissolving 1 g of PEG and 0.3 g of ZnI2 (CAS No.: 10139-47-6) in 20 mL of deionized water. The PEG/ZnI2 colloid was then loaded onto the as-prepared current collector with a loading amount of 25 μL cm−2, with iodide loading amount of approximately 0.4 mg cm−2, followed by drying with an air blower. The cathode preparation process was conducted in an ambient environment. The colloid cathode with a larger iodide loading amount was prepared by increasing the amount of ZnI2 5-fold.
Battery assembly process
Coin–type aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid batteries were fabricated using Zn foil (50 μm in thickness) as the anode, 60 μL of 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution as the electrolyte, and the PEG/ZnI2 colloid as the cathode. The battery assembly process was conducted at room temperature in an ambient environment.
Electrochemical tests
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery were scanned at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mV s−1 within a voltage range of 0.8–1.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ using a CHI-760 (Chenhua) electrochemical workstation. Additionally, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the battery was recorded under an amplitude of 5 mV in a frequency range of 10 mHz to 105 Hz. Rate performance and continuous charging and discharging tests were performed using a LANHE tester. Specifically, the rate performance was recorded at current densities of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mA cm−2, while long-term continuous cycling tests were conducted at current densities of 0.05 and 0.5 mA cm−2. All capacity values were calculated based on the loaded amounts of iodide.
Multiple operating condition tests
The aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery was further tested under various operational conditions, including fluctuating charging current densities, self-discharging during resting, different charging cut-off voltages, and fast-charging performances. Fluctuating charging was tested by charging the battery at current densities of 0.025, 0.05, 0.3, and 0.2 mA cm−2 in a single charging process, followed by discharging at 0.05 mA cm−2. Self-discharging rate was measured by charging the battery at 0.05 mA cm−2 to 1.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+, then resting for 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 h, followed by direct discharging to 0.8 V vs. Zn/Zn2+. The battery was also tested by charging to 1.6, 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, and 1.2 V vs. Zn/Zn2+, followed by discharging to 0.8 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ at 0.05 mA cm−2. The fast-charging performance was evaluated by charging the battery at 0.5 mA cm−2 and discharging at 0.05 mA cm−2.
Integration ability with photovoltaic solar panel charging
The integration potential of the aqueous Zn||PEG/ZnI2 colloid battery with a photovoltaic solar panel was demonstrated by directly charging the batteries in parallel to 1.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+ using a photovoltaic solar panel (10 V, 3 W, 300 mA) under local sunlight. The batteries were then connected in series to power an LED lamp (12 V, 1.5 W).
Theoretical calculations
The lowest-energy geometry for the PEG molecule was determined in gas phase using the Gaussian 16 package, employing tight convergence criteria. Calculations utilized the B3LYP hybrid functional (Becke 3-parameter exchange functional combined with Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional) and the 6-31G (d, p) basis set for all atoms. The results of the molecular electrostatic potential were calculated using the Multiwfn 3.7 program, with.fch files converted and supplied by the Gaussian 16 package.34 Visualization of the molecular electrostatic potential plot was performed using Visual Molecule Dynamics software.35
Published: October 22, 2024
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111229.
Contributor Information
Kaiqiang Zhang, Email: kaiqiangzhang@njtech.edu.cn.
Jilei Ye, Email: yejilei@njtech.edu.cn.
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Lu Y., Chen J. Prospects of organic electrode materials for practical lithium batteries. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020;4:127–142. doi: 10.1038/s41570-020-0160-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xu J., Cai X., Cai S., Shao Y., Hu C., Lu S., Ding S. High-energy lithium-ion batteries: recent progress and a promising future in applications. Energy Environ. Mater. 2023;6 doi: 10.1002/eem2.12450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li Y.-M., Wang Z.-W., Li W.-H., Zhang X.-Y., Yin C., Li K., Guo W., Zhang J.-P., Wu X.-L. Trinary nanogradients at electrode/electrolyte interface for lean zinc metal batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2023;61 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang J.-L., Liu H.-H., Zhao X.-X., Zhang X.-Y., Zhang K.-Y., Ma M.-Y., Gu Z.-Y., Cao J.-M., Wu X.-L. Janus binder chemistry for synchronous enhancement of iodine species adsorption and redox kinetics toward sustainable aqueous Zn-I2 batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:6628–6637. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c12638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yi X., Fu H., Rao A.M., Zhang Y., Zhou J., Wang C., Lu B. Safe electrolyte for long-cycling alkali-ion batteries. Nat. Sustain. 2024;7:326–337. doi: 10.1038/s41893-024-01275-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sun R., Xia P., Guo X., Dong S., Xu F., Zhang Y., Lu S., Zheng Q., Fan H. Ternary Zn3V3O8 superstructure and synergistic modification of separator promote high performance and stable zinc ion battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;486 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fan E., Li L., Wang Z., Lin J., Huang Y., Yao Y., Chen R., Wu F. Sustainable recycling technology for Li-ion batteries and beyond: challenges and future prospects. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:7020–7063. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woody M., Arbabzadeh M., Lewis G.M., Keoleian G.A., Stefanopoulou A. Strategies to limit degradation and maximize Li-ion battery service lifetime-critical review and guidance for stakeholders. J. Energy Storage. 2020;28 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liang Y., Yao Y. Designing modern aqueous batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022;8:109–122. doi: 10.1038/s41578-022-00511-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang F., Zhang W., Wexler D., Guo Z. Recent progress and future advances on aqueous monovalent-ion batteries towards safe and high-power energy storage. Adv. Mater. 2022;34 doi: 10.1002/adma.202107965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang H., Liu X., Li H., Hasa I., Passerini S. Challenges and strategies for high-energy aqueous electrolyte rechargeable batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:598–616. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee J.W., Haram M.H.S.M., Ramasamy G., Thiagarajah S.P., Ngu E.E., Lee Y.H. Technical feasibility and economics of repurposed electric vehicles batteries for power peak shaving. J. Energy Storage. 2021;40 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yao Y., Lei J., Shi Y., Ai F., Lu Y.-C. Assessment methods and performance metrics for redox flow batteries. Nat. Energy. 2021;6:582–588. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00772-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang L., Li X., Yang M., Chen W. High-safety separators for lithium-ion batteries and sodium-ion batteries: advances and perspective. Energy Storage Mater. 2021;41:522–545. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Banerjee A., Wang X., Fang C., Wu E.A., Meng Y.S. Interfaces and interphases in all-solid-state batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:6878–6933. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ding Y., Guo X., Qian Y., Xue L., Dolocan A., Yu G. Room-temperature all-liquid-metal batteries based on fusible alloys with regulated interfacial chemistry and wetting. Adv. Mater. 2020;32 doi: 10.1002/adma.202002577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang K., Jiang K., Chung B., Ouchi T., Burke P.J., Boysen D.A., Bradwell D.J., Kim H., Muecke U., Sadoway D.R. Lithium-antimony-lead liquid metal battery for grid-level energy storage. Nature. 2014;514:348–350. doi: 10.1038/nature13700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang K., Ge Y., Yu Q., Zhang P., Feng Y., Tie Z., Ma J., Jin Z. Self-stratified aqueous biphasic Zn-I and Zn-Br batteries enabled by spontaneous phase separation and halogen extraction effects of ionic liquids. Energy Storage Mater. 2024;67 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103296. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang G., Zhu Y., Hao Z., Lu Y., Zhao Q., Zhang K., Chen J. Organic electroactive materials for aqueous redox flow batteries. Adv. Mater. 2023;35 doi: 10.1002/adma.202301898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tang H., Duan L., Liao J., Sheng X., Xu J., Zhou X. Magnesium ion-doped layered oxide cathodes for alkali-metal ion batteries: recent research progress and outlook. Energy Storage Mater. 2023;62 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhan X., Li M., Li S., Pang X., Mao F., Wang H., Sun Z., Han X., Jiang B., He Y.-B., et al. Challenges and opportunities towards silicon-based all-solid-state batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2023;61 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meng J., Hong X., Xiao Z., Xu L., Zhu L., Jia Y., Liu F., Mai L., Pang Q. Rapid-charging aluminium-sulfur batteries operated at 85 °C with a quaternary molten salt electrolyte. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:596. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44691-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meng J., Tang Q., Zhou L., Zhao C., Chen M., Shen Y., Zhou J., Feng G., Shen Y., Huang Y. A stirred self-stratified battery for large-scale energy storage. Joule. 2020;4:953–966. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen M., Gong Y., Zhao Y., Song Y., Tang Y., Zeng Z., Liang S., Zhou P., Lu B., Zhang X., Zhou J. Spontaneous grain refinement effect of rare earth zinc alloy anodes enables stable zinc batteries. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024;11 doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li J., Liu Z., Han S., Zhou P., Lu B., Zhou J., Zeng Z., Chen Z., Zhou J. Hetero nucleus growth stabilizing zinc anode for high-biosecurity zinc-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023;15:237. doi: 10.1007/s40820-023-01206-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li Z., Cao W., Hu T., Hu Y., Zhang R., Cui H., Mo F., Liu C., Zhi C., Liang G. Deploying cationic cellulose nanofiber confinement to enable high iodine loadings towards high energy and high-temperature Zn-I2 battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024;63 doi: 10.1002/ange.202317652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu T., Lei C., Wang H., Xu C., Ma W., He X., Liang X. Practical four-electron zinc-iodine aqueous batteries enabled by orbital hybridization induced adsorption-catalysis. Sci. Bull. 2024;69:1674–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hao J., Yuan L., Zhu Y., Bai X., Ye C., Jiao Y., Qiao S.-Z. Low-cost and non-flammable eutectic electrolytes for advanced Zn-I2 batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62 doi: 10.1002/anie.202310284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zeng X.-X., Xu Y.-T., Yin Y.-X., Wu X.-W., Yue J., Guo Y.-G. Recent advances in nanostructured electrode-electrolyte design for safe and next-generation electrochemical energy storage. Mater. Today Nano. 2019;8 doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2019.100057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Noto V.D., Vezzù K., Crivellaro G., Pagot G., Sun C., Meda L., Rutkowska I.A., Kulesza P.J., Zawodzinski T.A. A general electrochemical formalism for vanadium redox flow batteries. Electrochim. Acta. 2022;408 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.139937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen G., Kang Y., Yang H., Zhang M., Yang J., Lv Z., Wu Q., Lin P., Yang Y., Zhao J. Toward forty thousand-cycle aqueous zinc-iodine battery: simultaneously inhibiting polyiodides shuttle and stabilizing zinc anode through a suspension electrolyte. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023;33 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202300656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang K., Yu Q., Sun J., Tie Z., Jin Z. Precipitated iodine cathode enabled by trifluoromethanesulfonate oxidation for cathode/electrolyte mutualistic aqueous Zn-I batteries. Adv. Mater. 2024;36 doi: 10.1002/adma.202309838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li S., Wang K., Zhang G., Li S., Xu Y., Zhang X., Zhang X., Zheng S., Sun X., Ma Y. Fast charging anode materials for lithium-ion batteries: current status and perspectives. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202200796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lu T., Chen F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012;33:580–592. doi: 10.1002/jcc.22885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996;14:33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
-
•
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supplementary tables and figures.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.







