Abstract
The sustained success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a pathogen arises from its ability to persist within macrophages for extended periods and its limited responsiveness to antibiotics. Furthermore, the high incidence of resistance to the few available antituberculosis drugs is a significant concern, especially since the driving forces of the emergence of drug resistance are not clear. Drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can emerge through de novo mutations, however, mycobacterial mutation rates are low. To unravel the effects of antibiotic pressure on genome stability, we determined the genetic variability, phenotypic tolerance, DNA repair system activation, and dNTP pool upon treatment with current antibiotics using Mycobacterium smegmatis. Whole-genome sequencing revealed no significant increase in mutation rates after prolonged exposure to first-line antibiotics. However, the phenotypic fluctuation assay indicated rapid adaptation to antibiotics mediated by non-genetic factors. The upregulation of DNA repair genes, measured using qPCR, suggests that genomic integrity may be maintained through the activation of specific DNA repair pathways. Our results, indicating that antibiotic exposure does not result in de novo adaptive mutagenesis under laboratory conditions, do not lend support to the model suggesting antibiotic resistance development through drug pressure-induced microevolution.
Research organism: Other
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be the most challenging, constantly present infectious disease worldwide, with 7.5 million newly reported cases and 1.3 million deaths per year (World Health Organization, 2021). The resurgence of TB due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (World Health Organization, 2023) underscores the interconnected nature of global health and economic issues with TB incidence and control.
The causative agents of TB are members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) complex. These obligate pathogen bacteria can incur a sustained threat to humanity thanks to their long-term latency (Ehrt and Schnappinger, 2009) and their highly unresponsive nature to antibiotics (Hett and Rubin, 2008; Jankute et al., 2015). Understanding the treatment evasion mechanisms and the outstanding stress tolerance of mycobacteria are in the spotlight of TB research (Stallings and Glickman, 2010; Miggiano et al., 2020). Drug tolerance arises when certain bacterial populations are temporarily able to survive antibiotic pressure in the absence of drug resistance-conferring mutations. Upon exposure to bactericidal drugs, tolerant mycobacteria are eliminated at a lower rate than the fully susceptible population (Balaban et al., 2019). Several interconnected biological pathways are involved in the emergence and establishment of a drug-tolerant state (Boshoff et al., 2004; Walter et al., 2015) including metabolic slowdown, metabolic shifting, cell wall thickening, and transcriptional regulation-guided adaptation (Goossens et al., 2020). For example, several efflux pumps are upregulated under antibiotic stress (Louw et al., 2011; Wiuff et al., 2005). In addition to temporary drug tolerance, the occurrence of genotypic resistance against the few useable antituberculotics is also recurrent (Dookie et al., 2018). Interestingly, horizontal gene transfer, which is a major contributor to antibiotic resistance in other species does not appear to function in members of the M. tuberculosis complex (Gray and Derbyshire, 2018; Madacki et al., 2021). Therefore, any resistant genotype can only emerge by de novo mutagenesis.
It is now commonly accepted that the M. tuberculosis population within individual TB patients can be more heterogeneous than was traditionally thought (Hingley-Wilson et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2015). The coexistence of both drug-resistant and drug-sensitive strains in a single patient, or even several drug-resistant strains with discrete drug resistance-conferring mutations has been described in clinical isolates (Asare-Baah et al., 2021; Lozano et al., 2021; Pérez-Lago et al., 2016). Warren et al. found that the occurrence of mixed infections reached 19% of the examined patients in South Africa by using a PCR-based strain classification method (Warren et al., 2004). Mixed infections can result from (i) simultaneously or sequentially acquired infections by different strains or (ii) genomic evolution of a strain under mutagenic pressure within the host (termed microevolution) and consequent coexistence of several populations. Accordingly, the emergence of genetically encoded resistance may either be due to microevolution or to the spreading of already existing variants from polyclonal infections under drug pressure. The difference between these two underlying mechanisms for the emergence of drug resistance is highly relevant to the treatment of TB. The investigation of stress-induced mutagenesis in mycobacteria has been based on fluctuation assays (Ford et al., 2013; Gillespie et al., 2005) besides several indirect evidence from descriptive studies (Al-Hajoj et al., 2010; Navarro et al., 2017; Herranz et al., 2018; Ley et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2012). However, we propose that combining mutation accumulation assays, analyzed through whole-genome sequencing, with phenotypic fluctuation assays is essential for identifying the source of the antibiotic resistance phenotype. Some studies demonstrate the simultaneous presence of several subpopulations within the same host which they interpret as an indication of being prone to microevolution (Navarro et al., 2011; Pérez-Lago et al., 2016). It is also possible that certain strains have intrinsically higher mutability. For example, the lineage 2 strains of the Beijing genotype exhibited a higher mutation rate (Ford et al., 2011). On the other hand, others found stable M. tuberculosis genomes with no or only a few emerging genomic changes over prolonged periods of treatment (Herranz et al., 2018). Genotyping has enabled researchers to describe cases of co-infection by ≥2 different strains (mixed infection) or the coexistence of clonal variants of the same strain (Muwonge et al., 2013; Navarro et al., 2011; Shamputa et al., 2006). Introducing whole genome sequencing into this field still leaves the distinction between mixed infections with multiple similar strains and strains that have arisen by microevolution elusive. Depending on the elapsed time between two sample collections, the stepwise acquisition of mutations might be missed, and the observed diversity may reflect concurrently existing subclones rather than newly emerged mutations (Ley et al., 2019). In addition, a single sputum sample usually does not represent the whole genomic diversity of the infection (Liu et al., 2015; Shamputa et al., 2006). Cell culturing can also lead to additional artefacts (Doyle et al., 2018; Metcalfe et al., 2017). The lack of standardized reporting of genome sequencing analyses also limits our ability to draw conclusions on within-host microevolution (Ley et al., 2019). Therefore, although several factors such as drug pressure and disease severity have been suggested to drive within-host microevolution and diversity (O’Neill et al., 2015; Trauner et al., 2017) and it is now accepted that the M. tuberculosis population within individual patients can be heterogeneous, we could not find any unequivocal proof for explaining the mechanism of emergence of the observed genomic diversity which gives rise to drug resistance.
Therefore, to advance our knowledge on the effect of antibiotics on mycobacterial mutability, we conducted experiments under controlled laboratory conditions. We used Mycobacterium smegmatis (M. smegmatis) for our investigations. This non-pathogenic relative of the medically relevant Mycobacterium species shares most DNA metabolic pathways with the medically relevant strains. Davis and Forse compared the sequences of proteins involved in base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways in E. coli and their homologs in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis and found that there is a high degree of conservation between the DNA repair enzymes in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis (Davis and Forse, 2009; Kurthkoti and Varshney, 2012). Bioinformatic analyses of completely sequenced mycobacterial genomes, including M. tuberculosis (Camus et al., 2002), M. leprae (Silva et al., 2022), M. bovis (Garnier et al., 2003; Zimpel et al., 2017), M. avium, M. paratuberculosis, and M. smegmatis (Mohan et al., 2015) also demonstrated through the comparison of genes participating in many of the DNA repair/recombination pathways that the basic strategy used to repair DNA lesions is conserved (Singh, 2017; Singh et al., 2010). Durbach et.al, investigated mycobacterial SOS response and showed that the M. tuberculosis, M. smegmatis, and M. leprae LexA proteins are functionally conserved at the level of DNA binding (Durbach et al., 1997). In our earlier paper, we also compared the enzymes of thymidylate biosynthesis in M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis and found high conservation (Pecsi et al., 2012). Considering M. smegmatis is non-pathogenic and fast-growing, it provides an attainable model to obtain information on genomic changes under drug pressure in M. tuberculosis.
We systematically investigated the effects of currently used TB drugs on genome stability, tolerance/ resistance acquisition, activation of the DNA repair system, and the cellular dNTP pool. We focused particularly on drugs used in the standard treatment of drug-susceptible TB, comprising isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA), the so-called first-line antibiotics (Grace et al., 2019). We also used a second-line antibiotic, ciprofloxacin (CIP). We found that following exposure to these antibiotics, the activation of DNA repair pathways maintains genomic integrity, while non-genetic factors convey quick adaptation to stress conditions. Notably, even with prolonged antibiotic exposure exceeding 230 bacterial generations, we observed no significant increase in the mutation rate, suggesting the absence of de novo adaptive mutagenesis.
Results
Adapting stress conditions and assessing their impact on cell viability and morphology
For an efficient TB treatment, first-line antituberculotics are used in combination in the clinics (isoniazid – INH; ethambutol – EMB; rifampicin – RIF; pyrazinamide - PZA) (Trauner et al., 2017). To model this drug pressure in our study, we also combined the four first-line drugs in addition to applying them one by one. We added a second-line antibiotic, CIP. MitomycinC (MMC) and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation were used as positive controls for direct DNA damage (Crowley et al., 2006; O’Sullivan et al., 2008). We optimized the drug concentration for all applied treatments. First- and second-line antituberculosis drugs were used in sublethal concentrations to convey a measurable phenotypic effect while allowing to keep an adequate number of cells for the MA experiments on a plate and for the downstream measurements in liquid culture (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; Figure 1—figure supplement 2 and Table 1). In the first-line combination treatment, a 10-fold reduced concentration of each separately adjusted drug had to be applied in both liquid and agar media to allow the survival of enough cells for the analyses (Table 1). The fact that a lower dose of antibiotics applied in combination resulted in higher CFU reduction indicates the synergistic effect of the first-line antibiotics on M. smegmatis growth inhibition (Table 1). After an 8 hr drug treatment, we determined the viable cell count by CFU measurements (Table 1). The bacteriostatic drugs INH and EMB caused moderate CFU decrease in liquid cultures compared to the control (Table 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1), consistent with their mechanism of action (Alland et al., 2000). To quantify the phenotypic effect of the applied drug treatments in liquid cultures, we analyzed the cellular dimensions using microscopy (Figure 1 and Table 1). The observed morphological changes provided evidence of the treatments' effectiveness (Figure 1 and Table 1). Specifically, following RIF, CIP, and MMC treatments, we observed cells elongating by more than twofold, whereas INH and EMB treatments led to a reduction in cell length. The combination treatment did not affect the cell size (Figure 1 and Table 1).
Table 1. Summary of the applied drug treatments and their phenotypic consequences.
Treatment | Liquid culture experiments | Agar plate experiments | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Long name | Abbreviation | Mechanism of action | Subinhinitory concentration | CFU compared to control | Cell length [μm] | Cell width [μm] | Subinhinitory concentration | CFU compared to control |
First line antibiotics | Isoniazid | INH | Cell wall synthesis inhibitor | 150 μg/ml | 80% | 1.8±0.5 | 0.41±0.07 | 2 μg/ml | 2.2 % |
Ethambutol | EMB | 100 μg/ml | 70% | 2.0±0.8 | 0.55±0.17 | 0.2 μg/ml | 10.5 % | ||
Rifampicin | RIF | RNA synthesis inhibitor | 3 μg/ml | 60% | 6.6±2.4 | 0.68±0.09 | 25 μg/ml | 0.00052 % | |
Combination treatment | COMBO | WHO first line therapy | 10 μg/ml PZA, 15 μg/mL INH, 10 μg/ml EMB, 0.3 μg/mL RIF | 6% | 2.8±0.7 | 0.47±005 | 1 μg/ml PZA, 0.2 μg/mL INH, 0.02 μg/ml EMB, 2.5 μg/mL RIF | 0.39 % | |
Second line antibiotics | Ciprofloxacin | CIP | Gyrase inhibitor | 0.3 μg/ml | 20% | 11.1±4.0 | 0.59±0.1 | 0.3 μg/ml | 0.00018 % |
DNA damage controls | Mitomycin-C | MMC | DNA alkylation | 0.01 μg/ml | 20% | 9.8±4.6 | 0.68±0.11 | 0.0005 μg/ml | 0.96 % |
Ultraviolet radiation | UV | Pyr dimers, DSBs | ND | ND | ND | ND | 150 J/m2 | 11 % | |
N/A | Non-treated | Mock | N/A | N/A | 100% | 2.8±0.9 | 0.44±0.08 | N/A | 100 % |
We also assayed the clinically relevant drug PZA. However, M. smegmatis was reported to exhibit an intrinsic resistance to PZA (Zhang et al., 1999). Indeed, PZA treatment alone, even at high concentrations in acidic conditions, did not affect cell viability in our experiments (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Regardless of its inefficacy as a monotherapy, we included PZA in the combination treatment, as we could not rule out the possibility that PZA interacts with the other three drugs or that PZA elimination mechanisms are equally active in M. smegmatis under this regimen.
The genome of M. smegmatis remains stable even under antibiotic pressure
16 independent M. smegmatis MC2 155 lineages for each stress treatment condition and 56 lineages for the mock control were initiated and cultured from single colonies. The stress-treated lines and some of the mock lines were maintained through 60 days on agar plates. The rest of the mock lines were maintained through 120 days on agar plates. Drug-treated lineages were maintained for shorter times as more mutations were expected to arise under drug pressure. We measured an average generation time of 6.3±0.35 hr on the plate within the timeframe of a single passage. Therefore, bacteria produced on average 230 generations during the 60 day treatment. Following the treatment on solid plates, we expanded each lineage in a liquid culture without drug pressure and isolated genomic DNA. All lineages were sent to WGS to reveal the mutational events induced by the drug treatments. We set conditions to obtain at least 30–60 x sequencing depth for all positions per independent lineage. The ancestor colony was also sent for sequencing to detect already existing variations compared to the reference genome. According to the WGS results, our M. smegmatis ancestor strain carried 151 various mutations compared to the M. smegmatis reference genome deposited in the GenBank. These mutation hits were also found in all treated and untreated lineages and were omitted from further calculations as these are specific variations of our laboratory strain. We also removed those mutation hits that were found in any other independent lineage at the same position in any depth.
A surprisingly few new mutations were detected after carefully cross-checking the sequencing data. We found that a maximum of one mutation per lineage occurred during the 60 day drug treatments. Also, a maximum of one mutation per lineage was detected during the 60- or 120 day mock treatment (16 newly generated mutations for 56 lineages). We calculated a 1×10–10 mutation rate for our untreated M. smegmatis mc2155 strain. To our great surprise, the mutation rates of all treated lineages fell in one order of magnitude (4×10–11 - 3×10–10) except for the UV treatment used for positive control (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. Mutation accumulation (MA) experiment and the resulting genotypic and phenotypic changes in wild-type M.
smegmatis mc2155 strains under antibiotic pressure. (A) Experimental design. (B) Mutation rates determined through genome sequencing of the drug-treated cells as an output of the MA process. UV(+) serves as a control reference for DNA damage. Columns represent averages, and error bars indicate the standard deviations of three individually sequenced samples. Statistical significance is marked by an asterisk (*), with a p-value of 0.05. For numerical data see Figure 2—source data 1. (C) Phenotypic drug sensitivity in drug-treated strains. Three individual minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations are presented, with the mean indicated by a horizontal line. For numerical data see Figure 2—source data 2.
We analyzed each mutation except those obtained following the UV treatment and found no sign of adaptive changes (Table 2). The Excel file containing the positions of all obtained mutations, including those of the UV sample, is provided in the archive deposited for the article (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25028186).
Table 2. Analysis of the genomic changes detected in the mutation accumulation experiment using whole genome sequencing.
Chromosome position | Sample | Reference | Mutation | AA mutation | Gene code | UniProt protein name | Gene ontology (GO) | Experiment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5214897 | cip_b | A | AG | Leu87 frameshift 148stop | MSMEG_5116 | Uncharacterized protein | N/A | Mutation accumulation (MA) |
3614832 | cip_b | C | T | Pro139Leu | MSMEG_3554 | N5,N10-methylene-tetrahydromethanopterin reductase | xidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen [GO:0016705] | |
2208516 | cip_b | G | GA | Leu282 frameshift 283stop | MSMEG_2133 | Uncharacterized protein | N/A | |
5861538 | cip_c | G | GC | Leu168 frameshift | MSMEG_5792 | UPF0678 fatty acid-binding protein-like protein MSMEG_5792/MSMEI_5639 | intracellular transport [GO:0046907] | |
3415264 | cip_c | T | TC | Leu206 frameshift 257stop | MSMEG_3338 | Oxidoreductase, FAD/FMN-binding | FMN binding [GO:0010181]; oxidoreductase activity [GO:0016491] | |
2033295 | cip_c | A | AG | Leu72 frameshift 258stop | MSMEG_1954 | ABC1 family protein | N/A | |
1988098 | cip_c | A | AG | N/A | Intergenic region | intergenic | N/A | |
1533730 | inh_b | C | CTCG | Asp201_INSERTION | MSMEG_1431 | Cytochrome P450-terp (EC 1.14.-.-) | heme binding [GO:0020037]; iron ion binding [GO:0005506]; monooxygenase activity [GO:0004497]; oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen [GO:0016705] | |
994997 | inh_C | G | A | N/A | intergenic | N/A | ||
5777585 | inh_C | C | T | Val99Met | MSMEG_5688 | Regulatory protein, MarR | GO:0003700 DNA-binding transcription factor activity; GO:0006355 regulation of DNA-templated transcription | |
1508883 | mmc_a | C | G | Ala300Ala (neutral) | MSMEG_1407 | N/A | N/A | |
4598387 | mmc_a | C | G | Ala371Arg | MSMEG_4513 | Polyketide synthase | transferase activity, transferring acyl groups [GO:0016746] | |
6786854 | mmc_a | G | A | Trp104stop | MSMEG_6740 | 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (EC 3.5.99.7) | 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase activity [GO:0008660]; pyridoxal phosphate binding [GO:0030170]; amine catabolic process [GO:0009310] | |
5313643 | mmc_c | C | T | N/A | intergenic | N/A | N/A | |
1865825 | mock_b | G | GC | Ala351 frameshift | MSMEG_1780 | Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein | metal ion transmembrane transporter activity; metal ion transport; membrane; | |
3722101 | mock_b | A | C | Asn185Thr | MSMEG_3656 | ABC transporter, permease/ATP-binding protein | ||
58213 | mock_c | T | TC | N/A | MSMEG_0037 | tRNA-Leu | N/A | |
4104684 | mock_c | T | C | Val70Ala | MSMEG_4033 | TetR-family protein transcriptional regulator | GO:0006350, Sequence-specific dna binding transcription factor activity, Regulation of transcription, dna-dependent | |
5118524 | mock_c | C | CG | Asp89 frameshift 143stop | MSMEG_5021 | Alcohol dehydrogenase, zinc-containing | Oxidoreductase activity, Zinc ion binding, Oxidation-reduction process | |
5217666 | mock_g | G | A | Thr200Thr (neutral) | MSMEG_5119 | L-glutamate gamma-semialdehyde dehydrogenase | Mitochondrial matrix, Oxidation-reduction process, Proline biosynthetic process, 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase activity | |
2970975 | mock_i | T | C | Arg155Gly | MSMEG_2908 | 2-Keto-3-deoxy-gluconate kinase | kinase activity [GO:0016301] | |
2970982 | mock_i | C | T | Arg153Glu | MSMEG_2908 | 2-Keto-3-deoxy-gluconate kinase | kinase activity [GO:0016301] | |
3306164 | mock_i | G | A | Glu1151Glu (neutral) | MSMEG_3225 | Ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase 1 (EC 1.4.7.1) | 3 iron, 4 sulfur cluster binding [GO:0051538]; glutamate synthase (ferredoxin) activity [GO:0016041]; metal ion binding [GO:0046872]; glutamate biosynthetic process [GO:0006537]; glutamine metabolic process [GO:0006541] | Mutation accumulation (MA) |
5805844 | mock_i | C | T | Val237Val (neutral) | MSMEG_5721 | Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase | transferase activity, transferring acyl groups other than amino-acyl groups [GO:0016747] | |
4987517 | mock_j | G | A | Leu30Leu (neutral) | MSMEG_4890 | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase AhpD (EC 1.11.1.28) (Alkylhydroperoxidase AhpD) | alkyl hydroperoxide reductase activity [GO:0008785]; hydroperoxide reductase activity [GO:0032843]; peroxidase activity [GO:0004601]; peroxiredoxin activity [GO:0051920]; response to oxidative stress [GO:0006979] | |
6406902 | mock_j | T | TG | N/A | intergenic | N/A | N/A | |
491016 | mock_k | C | T | N/A | intergenic | N/A | N/A | |
2287781 | mock_k | G | A | Gly199Asp | MSMEG_2207 | Beta-ketothiolase | transferase activity, transferring acyl groups other than amino-acyl groups [GO:0016747] | |
3438752 | rif_a | A | AC | Arg17 frameshift 175stop | MSMEG_3366 | Isonitrile hydratase, putative | N/A | |
5773058 | rif_a | C | T | Glu67Lys | MSMEG_5682 | Uncharacterized protein | integral component of membrane [GO:0016021] | |
6220187 | CIPB0.3 | G | T | Trp53Cys | MSMEG_6151 | Alpha/beta hydrolase fold-1 | epoxide hydrolase activity [GO:0004301] | Fluctuation assay with CIP treatment |
We assessed the drug sensitivity of the MA strains by measuring the MIC of each drug on three randomly selected strains from both the mock-treated and stressed MA groups. Contrary to the mutation rate results obtained from genomic sequencing data, the MIC values for the MA strains were higher than those of the mock-treated strains (comparable data in line with Nyinoh, 2019), indicating phenotypic adaptation to the applied drugs (Figure 2C, Figure 2—source data 2). However, for the EMB treatment, we observed no increase in MIC, despite repeating the experiment several times.
The DNA repair system shows a treatment-specific activation pattern
To investigate a possible reason for detecting so few newly generated mutations under antibiotic pressure, we studied whether the DNA repair pathways and other elements of the stress response potentially involved (Romero et al., 2011) were activated under drug pressure. The mycobacterial DNA repair system is highly redundant, many of its enzymes have overlapping functions (Malshetty et al., 2010; Singh, 2017; Srinath et al., 2007). Although canonical mismatch repair proteins are thought to be missing, a recently described protein, NucS is encoded with a similar function (Castañeda-García et al., 2017). We investigated the expression pattern of DNA repair genes in all known DNA repair pathways in mycobacteria including NucS using RT-qPCR, a method suitable to accurately show changes in transcript levels. The measured relative expression levels are presented in Figure 3, grouped by functional relevance, with consistent heatmap coloring across all measurements. Figure 3—figure supplement 3 shows a clustered heatmap without prior functional grouping. Numerical data for expression level changes are provided in Figure 3—source data 1.
Figure 3. Changes in the expression of DNA repair genes upon stress treatments.
Gene expression changes are normalized to the mock-treated control using the SigA and Ffh reference genes. Upregulation is numerically interpreted as fold change; downregulation is interpreted as –1/ (fold change) in the heatmap. *p<0.1; **p<0.05. For raw data see Figure 3—source data 1.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Stability analysis of reference genes using the geNorm algorithm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Specificity assessment of the employed primers.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Heatmap with clustering for gene expression changes upon treatment.
Treatments with the two antibiotics affecting cell wall synthesis (INH and EMB) show similar patterns in the expression levels with an overall downregulation of DNA repair genes. On the contrary, CIP and MMC, drugs directly targeting DNA integrity induce a pattern marked by a moderate to strong overexpression of nucleotide excision and double-strand break (DSB) repair genes, respectively (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). DNA polymerases DinB2 and DnaE2 involved in these DNA repair pathways are also strongly overexpressed (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). RIF, the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor does not seem to induce any change in the expression pattern of the investigated genes except for the Ahp peroxiredoxin (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). As a result of the first line combination (COMBO) treatment, 14 out of 38 investigated genes are significantly (p<0.05) upregulated. More than fourfold upregulation can be measured for 5 members of the base excision repair pathway. In addition, the MutT2 dNTP pool sanitization enzyme and the error-prone DNA polymerases are also strongly upregulated. (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Interestingly, however, the DSB repair enzymes are exempt from this overall upregulation tendency (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). The strongest measured effect of all is the 17-fold expression increase of the KatG1 peroxidase (Figure 3). When the first line antibiotics were used one by one, significant expression change could only be observed upon the INH treatment (4/38 genes) and in the opposite direction (downregulation).
All but the combination treatment alters the size and balance of dNTP pools
It was shown that dNTP pools are crucial for genome maintenance and proper DNA synthesis (Kumar et al., 2010; Mathews, 2006; Nordman and Wright, 2008; Yao et al., 2013). Imbalanced or altered levels of dNTPs could cause an increased rate of DNA lesions and, therefore, may play a role in the development of drug resistance. Therefore, we measured cellular dNTP concentrations and ratios in the function of the applied drug treatments using a fluorescent detection-based method optimized in our lab (Szabó et al., 2020). We used MMC treatment as a positive control as this is a generally used positive control for DNA damage (Kurthkoti et al., 2008; O’Sullivan et al., 2008). To calculate cellular concentrations, we used the cellular volumes determined from measured cell dimensions Figure 1—source data 1. Interestingly, we found altered dNTP pools upon most treatments (Figure 4 and Figure 4—source data 1). The CIP treatment resulted in the most remarkable differences in particular for dATP and dTTP concentrations which increased ~ sevenfold accompanied by a decrease in the dGTP concentration (Figure 4F and H). RIF and MMC treatments promoted an increase in the dGTP and dCTP pools (Figure 4D–E). The INH treatment coincided with a decreased concentration of purine nucleotides (Figure 4B), while in EMB-treated cells we could measure very low levels of all dNTPs (Figure 4C and H). In the combination treatment, we could not measure significant differences (Figure 4A). The dGTP pool decreased in both absolute and relative terms across all treatments where dNTP pool changes were observed (Figure 4B–F and G, respectively). A smaller cell size coincides with a lower cellular dNTP concentration, while no clear correlation is observed between drug-induced cell length increase and dNTP pool expansion (Figure 4I).
Figure 4. First-line antituberculotic treatments and DNA damaging agents alter dNTP concentrations in the cell.
(A–F) Cellular dNTP concentrations in drug-treated M. smegmatis. dNTP levels were measured in cellular extracts and normalized to the average cell volume for each treatment, yielding the concentrations shown. Each drug treatment and dNTP quantification included a corresponding control to account for potential fluctuations in growth and experimental conditions. Note the different scales on the y-axis. Data bars represent the averages of three biological replicates each carried out in three technical replicates; error bars represent SE. The p-values from the t-tests calculated for the measured differences are provided in Figure 1—source data 1, with significance indicated in the figure by asterisks as follows (**) for p<0.04 and (*) for p<0.07. (G) dNTP pool compositions of drug-treated bacteria. The large error bars in the control data arise from the combination of individual controls measured for each treatment. (H) Summed molar concentration of all four dNTPs compared to the control for each treatment. The y-axis is on a log2 scale to equally represent both increases and decreases. (I) Correlation of relative cell size (determined from cell lengths, compared to control cells) to relative total dNTP concentration for each treatment.
Stress-induced drug tolerance is developed upon pretreatment with the sublethal concentration of CIP
To compare the result of the mutation accumulation experiment to a phenotype-based drug resistance assay, we chose the fluctuation assay generally used in the literature (Krašovec et al., 2019). Mutation rates in these tests are calculated based on the difference in the number of CFU values between cultures grown in regular broth compared to those in selecting broths. These assays assume that the resistance exclusively occurs upon one mutation event. Since the genetic background of a drug-tolerant colony is not confirmed, this presumption potentially leads to a significant misinterpretation of the actual mutation rate. For clarity, we refer to the mutation rate estimations in our phenotype-based resistance assay as the tolerance rate. For a valid comparison with the results of our mutation accumulation assay, we installed similar experimental conditions. Specifically, culturing was done on agar plates, the applied drug concentrations were in the same range as used during the mutation accumulation process, then colonies were washed off and CFU counting plates were streaked from the resuspended bacteria (Figure 5A). We found that the estimated rate of emergence of the tolerance for CIP is three orders of magnitude higher than the mutation rate calculated based on WGS (10–7 vs. 10–10, Figure 2B). Furthermore, following a 24–96 hr exposure to a sublethal 0.3 μg/ml dose of CIP, a phenotypic tolerance appears in a significant portion of the cells to an otherwise lethal 0.5 μg/ml dose (Figure 5B). The tolerant cell population increased with the length of the preincubation time before reaching a maximum (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Phenotypic ciprofloxacin (CIP) tolerance assay.
(A) Scheme of the fluctuation test used in the study. (B) Development of phenotypic resistance to a selecting CIP concentration following preincubation with a sublethal CIP concentration for various time periods. Data bars represent the averages of three biological replicates each carried out in three technical replicates; error bars represent SE.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Ciprofloxacin (CIP) tolerance of M. smegmatis preincubated for 96 hr on CIP-containing plates sent for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS).
To confirm that the rapid increase in drug tolerance following short-term exposure to CIP is linked to non-genetic factors, we repeated the experiment using the 96 hr preincubation time for DNA isolation and WGS. After pretreatment, DNA was isolated from colonies on five parallel plates for each of the three biological replicates, followed by WGS (Figure 5A, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). In all measured samples, we detected a single mutation in a gene encoding an uncharacterized protein probably involved in lipid metabolism (MSMEG_6151; Table 2).
We also sequenced the genomes of colonies grown at the higher CIP concentration (0.5 µg/ml) and detected no mutations.
Discussion
One of the reasons TB is still a great medical challenge is the frequent incidence of resistant cases. The main goal of our research was to get a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of drug resistance development in mycobacteria. We started with the hypothesis that long-term exposure to first-line antitubercular drugs increases mutability.
Drug resistance in M. smegmatis does not arise from increased mutation rates under antibiotic pressure
Measured and estimated mycobacterial mutation rates in the earlier literature are in the order of 10–10 /bp/generation (Ragheb et al., 2013, Kucukyildirim et al., 2016, Ford et al., 2011, Colangeli et al., 2014). This low constitutive mutation rate by itself does not explain the biological diversity observed in clinical isolates (Sun et al., 2012). This diversity might result from an elevated mutagenesis rate or the accumulation of different strains from the environment. We conducted a modelling study in M. smegmatis to investigate whether exposure to first-line antibiotics generates such biological diversity and if yes, by what possible molecular mechanism. We measured the appearance of drug-induced mutations in the genome in a mutation accumulation assay using WGS. We also examined the rapid occurrence of phenotypic tolerance. The difference between the results of the phenotypic and the mutation accumulation studies was surprisingly large. Even without pretreatment, a tolerance rate on the order of 10–7/generation was observed for CIP, consistent with literature data from fluctuation assays (Bergval et al., 2012; David, 1970). However, in the mutation accumulation assay, the number of mutations did not change significantly compared to the untreated control. The mutation rate increase was only significant in the case of the UV treatment serving as a positive control for the experiments (Figure 2B). Previous studies claiming mutation rate increase upon antibiotics treatment assessed mutation rates using fluctuation assays and no direct evidence of the change in the genetic material was shown (Gillespie et al., 2005; Kohanski et al., 2010). However, it should be noted that David’s study, which automatically classified bacteria growing in fluctuation assays as mutants without confirming genetic changes, also suggested that the term ‘acquired resistance’ in tubercle bacilli has only practical meaning and lacks experimental foundation (David, 1970). Our findings imply that the emergence of drug resistance in this study is solely attributed to phenotypic factors. Phenotypic changes upon antibiotic treatment have widely been investigated (Briffotaux et al., 2019) including potential bistability (Dubnau and Losick, 2006) and/or the upregulation of efflux pumps (Calgin et al., 2013; Machado et al., 2012). It is noteworthy that spontaneous mutagenesis is easily induced through UV treatment. Considering that mycobacterial species spread through air droplets, it is conceivable that the exposure of these droplets to environmental UV radiation could potentially lead to the generation of new mutations.
The combination treatment with frontline drugs induces an overall upregulation in the DNA repair pathways aimed at eliminating misincorporations
The intracellular lifestyle of the TB pathogen implies that these bacteria must face various stress conditions and damaging agents including reactive oxygen and nitrogen species inside macrophages. Therefore, stress-induced transcriptional changes in mycobacteria have been studied on genome-wide scales (Briffotaux et al., 2019, Li et al., 2017) and one study found a specific activation of the DNA repair system in response to CIP similar to ours (O’Sullivan et al., 2008). Although M. smegmatis is not an intracellular pathogen, it shares the DNA repair pathways with M. tuberculosis and is often used to study how mycobacteria deal with DNA lesions (Singh, 2017). We focused our investigation on stress-induced transcriptional changes that may account for the protection of genomic integrity under the drug pressure of first-line antituberculotic drugs.
Redox potential change is a well-known and common phenotypic response to INH in mycobacteria (Niki et al., 2012). The downregulation of KatG1 and Nei2 in response to our INH treatment (Figure 3) is in line with this and might indicate a reduced cellular redox potential. KatG1 is the enzyme that activates the prodrug INH (Niki et al., 2012), therefore, the downregulation of this enzyme decreases the active drug concentration and increases the tolerance of M. smegmatis against INH. In the case of the first-line combination treatment, however, KatG1 was highly upregulated, indicating high ROS levels in the cell (Wayne and Diaz, 1986). High ROS levels are known to cause damage to nucleobases and the nucleotide pool is a major effector of oxidative stress-induced genotoxic damage (Rai, 2010). In line with this, we observed upregulation in dNTP pool sanitation, base- and nucleotide-repair pathways which play crucial roles in preventing and repairing DNA damage caused by oxidative stress. The observed synergistic effect clearly results from the combination of first-line drugs, as we did not observe this effect when applying the drugs individually. The observed upregulation of the relevant DNA repair enzymes might account for the low mutation rate even under drug pressure. Notably, error-prone polymerases DinB2 and DnaE2 exhibited significant upregulation without inducing a mutator phenotype. This indicates that error-prone and error-free repair mechanisms are coactivated, predominantly resulting in error-free repairs.
dNTP pool alterations induced by frontline drugs neutralize each other in the combination treatment resulting in normal DNA precursor pools
The building blocks of DNA constitute a critical component within the molecular aspects of mutability. It has been shown that increased or imbalanced dNTP pools induce mutagenesis in prokaryotes Gon et al., 2011 and eukaryotes (Pai and Kearsey, 2017). To assess the impact of drug treatment on dNTP pools and its correlation with genome stability, we quantified the concentrations of dNTPs in cell extracts obtained from the drug-treated cells. When treating the cells with frontline drugs EMB and INH individually, the observed reductions in dNTP pool sizes and cell size (as illustrated in Figure 4H–I) aligned well with the concurrent downregulated transcript levels (Figure 3). Resting states of bacteria have also been characterized by a decrease in cell size and dATP levels (Rittershaus et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2016). These observations thus probably reflect the bacteriostatic effect of these drugs causing metabolic processes to enter a dormant state, accompanied by the downregulation of enzymes involved in dNTP synthesis. The combined treatment yielded the least significant alteration from the untreated control compared to all monotreatments (Figure 4). An elevation in the dNTP pools during cytostatic or cytotoxic treatment is more unexpected and suggests elevated DNA repair activity. This observation, particularly in the case of CIP treatment, aligns with the substantial increase in the expression of DNA repair synthesis genes, as depicted in Figure 3. Among all administered treatments, only the CIP treatment led to a notable dNTP imbalance and a substantial overall rise in dNTP pools, due to elevated levels of dTTP and dATP. This coincides with the largest changes in the expression of DNA repair genes, particularly those associated with the SOS response and homologous recombination (Figure 3). Interestingly, the dGTP level decreased with all drug treatments. This finding suggests that dGTP may play a role in a general stress response. It is noteworthy that not all dNTP imbalances are created equal. Specifically, an excess of dGTP has been identified as a significant contributor to mutations (Martomo and Mathews, 2002; Schmidt et al., 2019). It must be noted that in these (and most) organisms dGTP is the least abundant among dNTPs. However, in mycobacteria, a unique scenario exists where dGTP is the most abundant dNTP species (Pancsa et al., 2022) and mycobacterial genomes are characterized by a high GC content (Andersson and Sharp, 1996). A reduction in dGTP levels in this context may contribute to minimizing DNA lesions by enhancing proofreading efficiency.
Our results do not support drug resistance acquisition through drug-induced microevolution
Our hypothesis that systematic antibiotics treatment induces mutation rate increase in M. smegmatis failed, as we did not observe any significant impact of antibiotics on mutability in laboratory conditions. Only in the case of CIP treatment, a second-line TB drug known for directly inducing DNA damage, could we detect a slightly (but not significantly) elevated mutation rate. The treatment of M. smegmatis with the clinically used combination therapy drugs did not induce a mutator effect, quite the opposite. The observed activation of DNA repair processes likely mitigates mutation pressure, ensuring genome stability. However, to confirm this hypothesis, these investigations should be conducted using genetically modified DNA repair mutant strains.
If there is no indication for a priori drug resistance, TB patients are treated with the combination therapy of first-line antituberculotics. In at least 17% of the treatments, resistance to RIF or RIF+INH (called multidrug resistance) emerges (World Health Organization, 2023). There are two models for the development of drug-resistant TB: acquired and transmitted drug resistance. The acquired drug resistance model suggests that resistance is developed within patients with active TB through microevolution (Ley et al., 2019). Several studies suggest examples of microevolution (Al-Hajoj et al., 2010, Ssengooba et al., 2016) especially those involving the hypermutable Beijing Mtb lineage (Hakamata et al., 2020). However, it is crucial to note that distinguishing between acquired and transmitted resistance is not straightforward based solely on allele variants found in the sputum. In the transmitted resistance model, a patient accumulates a pool of mycobacteria with different genotypes during latent infection. This population mix is essentially clonal, as M. tuberculosis strains possess a highly conserved core genome (Gray and Derbyshire, 2018), but with several genetic allele variants having limited representation. The transition of the disease to an active phase, along with subsequent chemotherapy, leads to adaptive selection from the pre-existing pool of variants. The concept that certain TB cases involve mixed infections has been substantiated in clinical cases using phage typing and whole-genome sequencing (Bates et al., 1976; Boritsch and Brosch, 2017). The transmissibility of resistant variants has been confirmed through strain-specific PCR (Braden et al., 2001), and selective adaptation in a patient during chemotherapy has also been demonstrated (Hingley-Wilson et al., 2013). Furthermore, it has been shown that clonal complexity is reduced by culturing, leading to the underrecognition of polyclonal infections in culture-based diagnosis (Martín et al., 2010). The WHO estimates that a quarter of the world’s population is latently infected by M. tuberculosis, accumulating different TB strains throughout their lives (World Health Organization, 2021). Consequently, patients may harbor high heterogeneity, facilitating the spread and fixation of a genetic variant with some advantage in specific environmental conditions.
We acknowledge the limitations of using M. smegmatis as a model for the intracellular pathogen M. tuberculosis, which is associated with complex pathology. Nevertheless, given the conserved molecular mechanisms of genome maintenance in mycobacteria, we can conclude that the mycobacterial genome is not prone to microevolution upon prolonged exposure to the antibiotics employed in our study and the clinics.
Materials and methods
Key resources table.
Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strain, strain background (Mycobacterium smegmatis) | mc2-155 | Snapper et al., 1990 | GenBank: NC_008596.1 | |
Other | DAPI stain | Sigma | D9542 | 10 µg/ml |
Chemical compound, drug | Isoniazid | Sigma | I3377 | |
Chemical compound, drug | Ethambutol | Sigma | E4630 | |
Chemical compound, drug | Rifampicin | Sigma | R3501 | |
Chemical compound, drug | Pyrazinamide | Sigma | 40751 | |
Chemical compound, drug | Ciprofloxacin | Sigma | 17850 | |
Chemical compound, drug | Mytomicin-C | Sigma | 10107409001 | |
Commercial assay or kit | phenol:chloroform:IAA (25:24:1) | Sigma | Sigma: 3803 | For genomic DNA extraction |
Commercial assay or kit | Whole genome sequencing | Novogene Ltd., Beijing, China | Executed on Illumina 1.9 instruments with 600-basepair fragments as 2 × 150 bp paired-end sequencing |
|
Commercial assay or kit | RNeasy Mini kit | Qiagen | Qiagen: 74524 | Used with RNA protect bacteia reagent (Qiagen: 76506) and DNAse I (Qiagen: 79254) |
Commercial assay or kit | High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit | Applied Biosystems | Applied Biosystems: 4374967 | 95–105 ng total RNA was used for each reaction |
Other | Mytaq PCR premix | Bioline | Bioline: 25046 | For qPCR measurements |
Other | EvaGreen | VWR | VWR: #31000 | For qPCR measurements |
Software, algorithm | NucleoTIDY |
Szabó et al., 2020; http://nucleotidy.enzim.ttk.mta.hu |
V1.8 | |
Other | TEMPase Hot Start DNA Polymerase | VWR | VWR: 733–1838 | For dNTP measurements |
Other | methanol | Sigma | For dNTP isolation | |
Sequence-based reagent | NDP-1 | Szabó et al., 2020 | Primer for dNTP measurement | CCGCCTCCACCGCC |
Sequence-based reagent | FAM-dTTP | Szabó et al., 2020 | Probe for dTTP measurement | 6-FAM/ AGGACCGAG/ZEN/GCAAGAGCGAGCGA /IBFQ |
Sequence-based reagent | FAM-dATP | Szabó et al., 2020 | Probe for dTATP measurement | 6-FAM/ TGGTCCGTG/ZEN/GCTTGTGCGTGCGT /IBFQ |
Sequence-based reagent | FAM-dGTP | Szabó et al., 2020 | Probe for dTGTP measurement | 6-FAM/ ACCATTCAC/ZEN/CTCACACTCACTCC /IBFQ |
Sequence-based reagent | FAM-dCTP | Szabó et al., 2020 | Probe for dTCTP measurement | 6-FAM/ AGGATTGAG/ZEN/GTAAGAGTGAGTGG /IBFQ |
Sequence-based reagent | dTTP-DT1 | Szabó et al., 2020 | Template oligo for dTTP measurement | TCGCTCGCTCTTGCCTCGGTCCTTTATTTGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
Sequence-based reagent | dATP-DT1 | Szabó et al., 2020 | Template oligo for dATP measurement | ACGCACGCACAAGCCACGGACCAAATAAAGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
Sequence-based reagent | dCTP-DT1 template | Szabó et al., 2020 | Template oligo for dCTP measurement | CCACTCACTCTTACCTCAATCCTTTGTTTGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
Sequence-based reagent | dGTP-DT2 template | Szabó et al., 2020 | Template oligo for dATP measurement | GGAGTGAGTGTGAGGTGAATGGTTTCTTTCTTTGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
Software | FastQC | Babraham Bioinformatics https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ |
v.0.11.9 | |
Software | Trimmomatic |
Bolger et al., 2014; http://www.usadellab.org/cms/?page=trimmomatic |
Trimmomatic-0.38 | |
Software | Bowtie2 |
Langmead and Salzberg, 2012; https://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml |
2.5.4 | |
Software | Samblaster |
Faust and Hall, 2014; https://github.com/GregoryFaust/samblaster |
0.1.26 RRID:SCR_000468 |
|
Software | Samtools |
Li et al., 2009; https://www.htslib.org/ |
1.20 | |
Software | Picard | https://github.com/broadinstitute/picard | 2.23.3 RRID:SCR_006525 |
|
Software | GATK |
McKenna et al., 2010; https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us |
4.1.8.1 |
Bacterial strains, media, and growth conditions
M. smegmatis mc2155 (Snapper et al., 1990) strains were grown in Lemco broth (5 g/l Lab-Lemco, 5 g/l NaCl, 10 g/l Bacto peptone, 0.05% Tween-80) or on solid Lemco plates (6.25 g/l Lab-Lemco, 6.25 g/l NaCl, 12.5 g/l Bacto peptone, 18.75 g/l Bacto agar).
Optimization of stress treatment conditions in liquid cultures and agar plates
The applied concentrations of drugs were optimized using serial dilutions of the compounds. In the case of liquid cultures, we monitored growth on a logarithmic scale by measuring the number of colony-forming units (CFU) or the optical density (OD) at 600 nm (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). The PZA treatments were done in acidic broth (pH = 5.5 set using HCl). For agar plates, we determined the CFU of untreated mid-exponential phase (OD = 0.4–0.5) liquid cultures on both non-selective and drug-containing agar plates (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). We also monitored cell morphology in response to drug treatment. For further experiments, sublethal concentrations of drugs were chosen to obtain an adequate quantity of research material (DNA, RNA, dNTP) for downstream analysis while the effect of the treatment was clearly indicated by a decrease of viability and/or change in cell size and morphology. The concentrations of applied drugs and stress conditions are compiled in Table 1.
Stress treatment in liquid cultures
Cells were grown in 100 ml liquid culture until an OD (600)=0.1±0.02 was reached, then the appropriate quantity of drug (Table 1) was added to half of the cultures. The other half of the same culture was used as a control. We conducted the treatments for 8 hr. The cultures were then centrifuged (20 min, 3220 g, 4 °C) and the resulting pellets were used for downstream analysis. The total CFUs were determined for each culture. The generation time after the treatments was calculated using the formula:
where Td is the generation time, t is the time interval between measurements, and Nt and N0 are the final and initial population sizes, respectively.
Microscopic analysis of cell morphology upon treatments
For morphological studies, 200–200 µl stress-treated and control cells were retrieved before RNA or dNTP extraction and washed with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. The cells were then fixed in 4% PFA dissolved in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were stained with 10 µg/ml DAPI for 30 min at 37 °C, then streaked onto microscopy slides covered with 0.1% low melting agarose (Sigma). Imaging was done using phase-contrast and fluorescent modes on a Leica DM IL LED (Leica) microscope. The cell size and volume were quantified using the automated recognition of the BacStalk software (https://drescherlab.org/data/bacstalk/; Hartmann et al., 2020). The cell length distribution diagram was prepared using OriginPro 2018 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA.). The sample size, calculated means, and standard deviations are compiled in Figure 1—source data 1.
Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments
Sixteen independent M. smegmatis mc2 155 MA lines were initiated from a single colony for every treatment. The ancestor cell colony was generated by streaking a new single colony from plate to plate five times before the beginning of the treatments to ensure a single common ancestor. Lemco agar medium was used for the MA line transfers. The specific stress treatment conditions are summarized in Table 1. All MA lines were incubated at 37 °C. Every 3 days, a single isolated colony from each MA line was transferred by streaking to a new plate, ensuring that each line regularly passed through a single-cell bottleneck (Kibota and Lynch, 1996). Treatments were performed for 60 days. We calculated 6.3±0.35 hr of generation time on the plate in this experimental setup. Thus, each line passed through ∼230 cell divisions. Some mock treatments were performed for 120 days to ensure a presumably sufficient number of mutational events without stress treatment. Following the MA procedure, a single colony was transferred from all strains to a new plate without stress treatment and grew for another 3 days for expansion. Frozen stocks of all lineages were prepared in 20% glycerol at −80 °C.
Assessment of drug tolerance following MA experiments
The development of tolerance to the applied treatment was assessed by measuring the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of both the mock-treated and stressed MA strains. Three randomly chosen strains from both the mock-treated and stress-treated groups were resuscitated on plates containing the same stress conditions as those used in the MA experiment. Liquid cultures were inoculated and diluted to an OD(600) of 0.001 in sterile, round-bottom 96-well plates (Sarstedt). The wells contained the specific drug in serial dilution for both the stressed strains and control samples. Cells were grown at 37 °C without agitation. Plates were scanned and analyzed, and MIC values were determined based on the last well in which cell growth was observed.
DNA extraction
A single colony was inoculated into 10 ml liquid culture from all lineages, was grown until OD600 = 0.8–1.0, and harvested. For genomic DNA purification, five or six grown cultures of individual lineages from the same treatment with identical estimated cell numbers (based on OD measurements) were pooled before isolation. For cell disruption, the cells were resuspended in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 0.1 mm glass beads were added to a final volume of 1.5 ml. The cells were disrupted using a cell disruptor (Scientific Industries SI-DD38 Digital Disruptor Genie Cell Disruptor) in a cold room (at 4 °C). After centrifugation for 10 min at 3220 g, and at room temperature, DNA was extracted from the supernatant by phenol:chloroform:IAA (25:24:1) extraction followed by isopropanol precipitation. The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA was evaluated using UV photometry in a Nanodrop-2000 instrument and by agarose gel electrophoresis.
DNA library preparation and whole genome sequencing
The DNA library preparation and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was done at Novogene Ltd., Beijing, China. Sequencing was executed on Illumina 1.9 instruments with 600-basepair (bp) fragments as 2×150 bp paired-end sequencing. An average read depth of 267 was achieved across all samples.
WGS analysis and mutation identification
Three parallel pooled samples were sequenced for every treatment, each contained five or six individually treated MA lineages that add up to a subtotal of 15–18 individual lineages. FastQC was used to analyse the quality of the raw reads. In case if adapters and low-quality bases (Phred score <20) were present in the samples, bases were trimmed with Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014). We mapped our paired-end reads to M. smegmatis mc2 155 reference genome (GenBank accession number: NC_008596.1) by Bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). PCR duplicates were removed with the use of Samblaster (Faust and Hall, 2014). We converted SAM files to BAM files, and sorted them with SAM tools (Li et al., 2009). Read groups were replaced by the Picard tool. Single nucleotide variations (SNVs), insertions, and deletions were called from each alignment file using the HaplotypeCaller function of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (McKenna et al., 2010). We analyzed the frequency of occurrence (% of all reads of a pooled sample) of each SNV, insertions, and deletions (hits) with our in-house Python scripts and compared it to the frequency of occurrence of the same hits in every other lineage. We considered mutations as spontaneously generated mutations only in case if no other lineages carried that variant in any depth and if hits reached at least 6% frequency of the reads at the corresponding position (theoretically, a spontaneously generated mutation in a pooled sample emerges with 20% or 16.7% frequency when five or six lineages are pooled, respectively, however, we allowed some variety when choosing 6% as a lower limit and 39.9% as an upper limit). Sequencing data are available at European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) with PRJEB71590 project number. Please note that we incorporated some of our additional sequencing data into the analysis, curated under the umbrella project at the ENA along with the present dataset.
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
For RNA extraction, cell pellets were resuspended in 2 ml RNA protect bacteria reagent (Qiagen; cat. no.:76506), incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and centrifuged for 20 min at 3220 g and at 4 °C before storage at –80 °C. Total RNA extraction was performed with the Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit (cat. no.: 74524). To disrupt cells, 5×1 min of vortexing with glass beads in the manufacturer’s lysis buffer was performed followed by 1 min poses on ice. DNase digestion was performed on a column with Qiagen DNase I (cat. no.: 79254), for 90 min at room temperature. For quantitative and qualitative RNA analysis, spectrometry by Nanodrop 2000 and non-denaturing 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (50 min/100 V) were performed, respectively. cDNA synthesis was performed using the Applied Biosystems High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit with RNase Inhibitor (cat. no.: 4374967). 95–105 ng total RNA was used for each reaction.
Choosing the reference genes for the study
We tested SigA (MSMEG_2758), Ffh (MSMEG_2430), and ProC (MSMEG_0943) as possible reference gene candidates. SigA is a widely used reference gene in prokaryotes (Hirmondo et al., 2017; Madikonda et al., 2020; Milano et al., 2004) Ffh and ProC genes are shown to be stably expressed in other pathogenes (Gomes et al., 2018). Using GeNorm (Fu et al., 2020; Sundaram et al., 2019) analysis, SigA and Ffh proved to be stably expressed in our experimental system (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).
Gene expression quantification
qPCR measurements were performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System. Primers were designed using IDT DNA oligo customizer (https://eu.idtdna.com/), and were produced by Sigma Aldrich (for sequences, see Supplementary file 1). The qPCR reaction mixtures contained 7–7 nmoles of forward and reverse primers, 0.25 µl of the cDNA, Bioline Mytaq PCR premix (cat. no.: 25046), and VWR EvaGreen (cat. no.: #31000) in a total reaction volume of 10 µl. The thermal profile was as follows: 95 °C/10 min, 50 x (95 °C/10 s; 62 °C/10 s; 72 °C/10 s). Melting curves were registered between 55 °C and 95 °C with an increment of 0.5 °C (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). The applied primers and their measured efficiencies are compiled in Supplementary file 1. The qPCR data were analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro software and numerically shown in Figure 3—source data 1. Non-reverse transcribed controls and no-template controls were used to account for any irrelevant DNA contamination. three technical, and three biological replicates were used for all measurements.
dNTP extraction
dNTP extraction and measurement were performed according to (Szabó et al., 2020). Briefly, the cell pellets were extracted in precooled 0.5 ml 60% methanol overnight at −20 °C. After 5 min of boiling at 95 °C, the cell debris was removed by centrifugation (20 min, 13,400 g, 4 °C). The methanolic supernatant containing the soluble dNTP fraction was vacuum-dried (Eppendorf) at 45 °C. Extracted dNTPs were dissolved in 50 μl nuclease-free water and stored at –20 °C until use.
Determination of the cellular dNTP pool size
Determination of the dNTP pool size in each extract was as follows: 10 pmol template oligo (Sigma), 10 pmol probe (IDT), and 10 pmol NDP1 primer (Sigma) (see sequences in key resources table and Table 3) was present per 25 μl reaction. The concentration of each non-specific dNTP was kept at 100 μM. VWR TEMPase Hot Start DNA Polymerase (VWR) was used at 0.9 unit/reaction in the presence of 2.5 mM MgCl2. To record calibration curves, the reaction was supplied with 0–12 pmol specific dNTP. Fluorescence was recorded at every 13 s in a Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System or in a QuantStudio 1 qPCR instrument. The thermal profile was as follows: 95 °C 15 min, (60 °C 13 s)×260 cycle for dATP measurement, and 95 °C 15 min, (55 °C 13 s)×260 cycle for dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP measurements. Results were analyzed using the nucleoTIDY software (http://nucleotidy.enzim.ttk.mta.hu/; Szabó et al., 2020;). Results were given in molar concentrations for better comparison. To this end, cell volumes were calculated using the BacStalk software based on microscopic images for every treatment. Besides the graphical presentation of the result, numerical data can be found in Figure 4—source data 1.
Table 3. Oligonucleotides used for the dNTP measurements.
Name | Sequence (5'→3') |
---|---|
NDP-1 primer | CCGCCTCCACCGCC |
FAM-dTTP probe | 6-FAM/AGGACCGAG/ZEN/GCAAGAGCGAGCGA/IBFQ |
FAM-dATP probe | 6-FAM/TGGTCCGTG/ZEN/GCTTGTGCGTGCGT/IBFQ |
FAM-dGTP probe | 6-FAM/ACCATTCAC/ZEN/CTCACACTCACTCC/IBFQ |
FAM-dCTP probe | 6-FAM/AGGATTGAG/ZEN/GTAAGAGTGAGTGG/IBFQ |
dTTP-DT1 template | TCGCTCGCTCTTGCCTCGGTCCTTTATTTGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
dATP-DT1 template | ACGCACGCACAAGCCACGGACCAAATAAAGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
dCTP-DT1 template | CCACTCACTCTTACCTCAATCCTTTGTTTGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
dGTP-DT2 template | GGAGTGAGTGTGAGGTGAATGGTTTCTTTCTTTGGCGGTGGAGGCGG |
Tolerance assay
We used a modified version of fluctuation assays (Krašovec et al., 2019) for the estimation of the rate of emergence of tolerant cells upon preincubation with a sublethal dose of CIP (0.3 μg/ml). An initial 100 ml culture was grown to OD =0.4–0.5 (three biological replicates), was centrifuged for 30 min at 800 g and at 4 °C, then resuspended in 5 ml Lemco. 100 μL from this stock solution was streaked and cultured on a normal Bacto Agar plate, and Bacto Agar containing 0.3 μg/ml CIP. Parallel plates were incubated for 4, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr at 37 °C. Colonies were washed off the plate with 6 ml Lemco broth by incubation for 30 min on a rocking shaker. Then CFU was determined on Bacto agar plates containing 0.5 μg/ml CIP, and non-selective Bacto agar plates. Tolerance rates were calculated using the following formula:
: time of preincubation
: Number of colonies on non-selecting agar plates at reference time point
: Number of colonies on non-selecting agar plates at t hours
: Number of colonies on plates containing 0.5 μg/ml CIP at reference time point
: Number of colonies on plates containing 0.5 μg/ml CIP at t hours
: Number of newly emerging resistant colonies
: Number of growing colonies
: Generation time during pre-treatment
The tolerance assay was repeated on 15 parallel plates for each biological replicate to obtain enough cells for genomic DNA extraction for WGS. Plates containing 0.3 μg/ml CIP were incubated for 96 hr at 37 °C. Colonies were washed off the plates with 6 ml of Lemco broth. Genomic DNA was isolated and sent to WGS. CFU was also determined on Bacto Agar plates containing 0.5 μg/ml CIP and non-selective Bacto Agar plates (Figure 5—figure supplement 1).
Statistics
We used an initial F-test to test the equality of variances of the tested groups. If the F-test hypothesis was accepted (p<0.05), we used the two-way homoscedastic t-probe; if rejected, we used the two-way Welch’s t-probe to assess differences at a significance level p<0.05 if not stated otherwise. F- and t-statistics were counted for the ΔCt values (Yuan et al., 2006) of the qPCR results and for the concentrations normalized to the cell volume in the case of the dNTP measurements. For the statistical analysis of the mutation rates, we used the t-test on the natural logarithm of the obtained mutation rate values.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude for the assistance provided by Ádám Póti in the analysis of the WGS data. Funding this work was supported by the National Office for Research and Technology, Hungary [grant number OTKA-K115993 and OTKA-K138318 to JT, OTKA-PD128254 to RH]. Funding for open access charge: National Office for Research and Technology, Hungary.
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Contributor Information
Rita Hirmondó, Email: hirmondo.rita@ttk.hu.
Judit Toth, Email: toth.judit@ttk.hu.
Musa Ali, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
Bavesh D Kana, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Funding Information
This paper was supported by the following grants:
National Office for Research and Technology, Hungary K115993 to Judit Toth.
National Office for Research and Technology, Hungary PD128254 to Rita Hirmondó.
National Office for Research and Technology, Hungary K138318 to Judit Toth.
Additional information
Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Formal analysis, Investigation.
Formal analysis, Investigation.
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Additional files
Data availability
The data underlying this article are available in the Figshare repository (DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.26585884). Sequencing data are available at European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) with accession PRJEB71590.
The following datasets were generated:
ÉV Surányi. 2024. WGS on antibiotics-challenged Mycobacterium smegmatis. Array Express. PRJEB71590
Hirmondó R. 2024. Supplementary datasets for the eLife manuscript "Genetic Stability of Mycobacterium smegmatis under the Stress of First-Line Antitubercular Agents: Assessing Mutagenic Potential". figshare.
References
- Al-Hajoj SAM, Akkerman O, Parwati I, al-Gamdi S, Rahim Z, van Soolingen D, van Ingen J, Supply P, van der Zanden AGM. Microevolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a tuberculosis patient. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2010;48:3813–3816. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00556-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alland D, Steyn AJ, Weisbrod T, Aldrich K, Jacobs WR., Jr Characterization of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis iniBAC promoter, a promoter that responds to cell wall biosynthesis inhibition. Journal of Bacteriology. 2000;182:1802–1811. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.7.1802-1811.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersson SGE, Sharp PM. Codon usage in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Microbiology. 1996;142 ( Pt 4):915–925. doi: 10.1099/00221287-142-4-915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asare-Baah M, Séraphin MN, Salmon LAT, Lauzardo M. Effect of mixed strain infections on clinical and epidemiological features of tuberculosis in Florida. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2021;87:104659. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balaban NQ, Helaine S, Lewis K, Ackermann M, Aldridge B, Andersson DI, Brynildsen MP, Bumann D, Camilli A, Collins JJ, Dehio C, Fortune S, Ghigo JM, Hardt WD, Harms A, Heinemann M, Hung DT, Jenal U, Levin BR, Michiels J, Storz G, Tan MW, Tenson T, Van Melderen L, Zinkernagel A. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2019;17:441–448. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bates JH, Stead WW, Rado TA. Phage type of tubercle bacilli isolated from patients with two or more sites of organ involvement. The American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1976;114:353–358. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1976.114.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergval I, Kwok B, Schuitema A, Kremer K, van Soolingen D, Klatser P, Anthony R. Pre-existing isoniazid resistance, but not the genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drives rifampicin resistance codon preference in vitro. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e29108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boritsch EC, Brosch R. Evolution of mycobacterium tuberculosis: new insights into pathogenicity and drug resistance. Wiley; 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boshoff HIM, Myers TG, Copp BR, McNeil MR, Wilson MA, Barry CE. The transcriptional responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to inhibitors of metabolism. Novel Insights into Drug Mechanisms of Action. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:40174–40184. doi: 10.1074/JBC.M406796200/ATTACHMENT/A47C829A-5AA7-4DD3-822B-BE70C577B6D3/MMC2.PDF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braden CR, Morlock GP, Woodley CL, Johnson KR, Colombel AC, Cave MD, Yang Z, Valway SE, Onorato IM, Crawford JT. Simultaneous infection with multiple strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2001;33:e42–e47. doi: 10.1086/322635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briffotaux J, Liu S, Gicquel B. Genome-wide transcriptional responses of Mycobacterium to antibiotics. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:249. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calgin MK, Sahin F, Turegun B, Gerceker D, Atasever M, Koksal D, Karasartova D, Kiyan M. Expression analysis of efflux pump genes among drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates and reference strains. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2013;76:291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Camus JC, Pryor MJ, Médigue C, Cole ST. Re-annotation of the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Microbiology. 2002;148:2967–2973. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-10-2967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castañeda-García A, Prieto AI, Rodríguez-Beltrán J, Alonso N, Cantillon D, Costas C, Pérez-Lago L, Zegeye ED, Herranz M, Plociński P, Tonjum T, García de Viedma D, Paget M, Waddell SJ, Rojas AM, Doherty AJ, Blázquez J. A non-canonical mismatch repair pathway in prokaryotes. Nature Communications. 2017;8:14246. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colangeli R, Arcus VL, Cursons RT, Ruthe A, Karalus N, Coley K, Manning SD, Kim S, Marchiano E, Alland D. Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals slow growth and low mutation rates during latent infections in humans. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e91024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowley DJ, Boubriak I, Berquist BR, Clark M, Richard E, Sullivan L, DasSarma S, McCready S. The uvrA, uvrB and uvrC genes are required for repair of ultraviolet light induced DNA photoproducts in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Saline Systems. 2006;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1746-1448-2-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- David HL. Probability distribution of drug-resistant mutants in unselected populations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Applied Microbiology. 1970;20:810–814. doi: 10.1128/am.20.5.810-814.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis E, Forse L. In: Mycobacterium: Genomics and Molecular Biology. Parish T, Brown A, editors. Caister Academic Press; 2009. DNA repair: key to survival? pp. 79–117. [Google Scholar]
- Dookie N, Rambaran S, Padayatchi N, Mahomed S, Naidoo K. Evolution of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A review on the molecular determinants of resistance and implications for personalized care. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2018;73:1138–1151. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doyle RM, Burgess C, Williams R, Gorton R, Booth H, Brown J, Bryant JM, Chan J, Creer D, Holdstock J, Kunst H, Lozewicz S, Platt G, Romero EY, Speight G, Tiberi S, Abubakar I, Lipman M, McHugh TD, Breuer J. Direct whole-genome sequencing of sputum accurately identifies drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis faster than MGIT culture sequencing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2018;56:666–684. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00666-18/SUPPL_FILE/ZJM999096043S1.PDF. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubnau D, Losick R. Bistability in bacteria. Molecular Microbiology. 2006;61:564–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durbach SI, Andersen SJ, Mizrahi V. SOS induction in mycobacteria: analysis of the DNA-binding activity of a LexA-like repressor and its role in DNA damage induction of the recA gene from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;26:643–653. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5731934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehrt S, Schnappinger D. Mycobacterial survival strategies in the phagosome: defence against host stresses. Cellular Microbiology. 2009;11:1170–1178. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01335.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faust GG, Hall IM. SAMBLASTER: fast duplicate marking and structural variant read extraction. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2503–2505. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ford CB, Lin PL, Chase MR, Shah RR, Iartchouk O, Galagan J, Mohaideen N, Ioerger TR, Sacchettini JC, Lipsitch M, Flynn JL, Fortune SM. Use of whole genome sequencing to estimate the mutation rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during latent infection. Nature Genetics. 2011;43:482–486. doi: 10.1038/ng.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ford CB, Shah RR, Maeda MK, Gagneux S, Murray MB, Cohen T, Johnston JC, Gardy J, Lipsitch M, Fortune SM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutation rate estimates from different lineages predict substantial differences in the emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Nature Genetics. 2013;45:784–790. doi: 10.1038/ng.2656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu Y, Yang J, Fan S, Zhao S, Du R, Shah SMA, Akram M, Rong R, Yang Y. Selection and validation of optimal endogenous reference genes for analysis of quantitative PCR in four tissues pathologically associated with Kidney-yang deficiency syndrome following influenza A infection. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2020;20:244. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, Pryor M, Duthoy S, Grondin S, Lacroix C, Monsempe C, Simon S, Harris B, Atkin R, Doggett J, Mayes R, Keating L, Wheeler PR, Parkhill J, Barrell BG, Cole ST, Gordon SV, Hewinson RG. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. PNAS. 2003;100:7877–7882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1130426100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie SH, Basu S, Dickens AL, O’Sullivan DM, McHugh TD. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin on Mycobacterium fortuitum mutation rates. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005;56:344–348. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes AÉI, Stuchi LP, Siqueira NMG, Henrique JB, Vicentini R, Ribeiro ML, Darrieux M, Ferraz LFC. Selection and validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in Klebsiella pneumoniae using Reverse Transcription Quantitative real-time PCR. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:9001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27420-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gon S, Napolitano R, Rocha W, Coulon S, Fuchs RP. Increase in dNTP pool size during the DNA damage response plays a key role in spontaneous and induced-mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. PNAS. 2011;108:19311–19316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113664108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goossens SN, Sampson SL, Van Rie A. Mechanisms of drug-induced tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2020;34:1–21. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00141-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grace AG, Mittal A, Jain S, Tripathy JP, Satyanarayana S, Tharyan P, Kirubakaran R. Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;12:CD012918. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012918.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray TA, Derbyshire KM. Blending genomes: distributive conjugal transfer in mycobacteria, a sexier form of HGT. Molecular Microbiology. 2018;108:601–613. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hakamata M, Takihara H, Iwamoto T, Tamaru A, Hashimoto A, Tanaka T, Kaboso SA, Gebretsadik G, Ilinov A, Yokoyama A, Ozeki Y, Nishiyama A, Tateishi Y, Moro H, Kikuchi T, Okuda S, Matsumoto S. Higher genome mutation rates of Beijing lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during human infection. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:17997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75028-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann R, van Teeseling MCF, Thanbichler M, Drescher K. BacStalk: A comprehensive and interactive image analysis software tool for bacterial cell biology. Molecular Microbiology. 2020;114:140–150. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herranz M, Pole I, Ozere I, Chiner-Oms Á, Martínez-Lirola M, Pérez-García F, Gijón P, Serrano MJR, Romero LC, Cuevas O, Comas I, Bouza E, Pérez-Lago L, García-de-Viedma D. Mycobacterium tuberculosis acquires limited genetic diversity in prolonged infections, reactivations and transmissions involving multiple hosts. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;8:2661. doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2017.02661/FULL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hett EC, Rubin EJ. Bacterial growth and cell division: a mycobacterial perspective. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2008;72:126–156. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00028-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hingley-Wilson SM, Casey R, Connell D, Bremang S, Evans JT, Hawkey PM, Smith GE, Jepson A, Philip S, Kon OM, Lalvani A. Undetected multidrug-resistant tuberculosis amplified by first-line therapy in mixed infection. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2013;19:1138–1141. doi: 10.3201/eid1907.130313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirmondo R, Lopata A, Suranyi EV, Vertessy BG, Toth J. Differential control of dNTP biosynthesis and genome integrity maintenance by the dUTPase superfamily enzymes. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:6043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06206-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jankute M, Cox JAG, Harrison J, Besra GS. Assembly of the mycobacterial cell wall. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2015;69:405–423. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kibota TT, Lynch M. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli. Nature. 1996;381:694–696. doi: 10.1038/381694a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohanski MA, DePristo MA, Collins JJ. Sublethal antibiotic treatment leads to multidrug resistance via radical-induced mutagenesis. Molecular Cell. 2010;37:311–320. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krašovec R, Richards H, Gomez G, Gifford DR, Mazoyer A, Knight CG. Measuring microbial mutation rates with the fluctuation assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2019;1:60406. doi: 10.3791/60406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kucukyildirim S, Long H, Sung W, Miller SF, Doak TG, Lynch M. The rate and spectrum of spontaneous mutations in mycobacterium smegmatis, a bacterium naturally devoid of the postreplicative mismatch repair pathway. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2016;6:2157–2163. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.030130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar D, Viberg J, Nilsson AK, Chabes A. Highly mutagenic and severely imbalanced dNTP pools can escape detection by the S-phase checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:3975–3983. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurthkoti K, Kumar P, Jain R, Varshney U. Important role of the nucleotide excision repair pathway in Mycobacterium smegmatis in conferring protection against commonly encountered DNA-damaging agents. Microbiology. 2008;154:2776–2785. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/019638-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurthkoti K, Varshney U. Distinct mechanisms of DNA repair in mycobacteria and their implications in attenuation of the pathogen growth. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2012;133:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2011.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ley SD, de Vos M, Van Rie A, Warren RM. Deciphering within-host microevolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through whole-genome sequencing: the phenotypic impact and way forward. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2019;83:e00062-18. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00062-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X, Mei H, Chen F, Tang Q, Yu Z, Cao X, Andongma BT, Chou SH, He J. Transcriptome landscape of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2505. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Q, Via LE, Luo T, Liang L, Liu X, Wu S, Shen Q, Wei W, Ruan X, Yuan X, Zhang G, Barry CE, Gao Q. Within patient microevolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis correlates with heterogeneous responses to treatment. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:17507. doi: 10.1038/srep17507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Louw GE, Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC, Leon R, Jimenez A, Hernandez-Pando R, McEvoy CRE, Grobbelaar M, Murray M, van Helden PD, Victor TC. Rifampicin reduces susceptibility to ofloxacin in rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis through efflux. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2011;184:269–276. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201011-1924OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lozano N, Lanza VF, Suárez-González J, Herranz M, Sola-Campoy PJ, Rodríguez-Grande C, Buenestado-Serrano S, Ruiz-Serrano MJ, Tudó G, Alcaide F, Muñoz P, García de Viedma D, Pérez-Lago L. Detection of minority variants and mixed infections in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by direct whole-genome sequencing on noncultured specimens using a specific-DNA capture strategy. mSphere. 2021;6:e0074421. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00744-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Machado D, Couto I, Perdigão J, Rodrigues L, Portugal I, Baptista P, Veigas B, Amaral L, Viveiros M. Contribution of efflux to the emergence of isoniazid and multidrug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e34538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madacki J, Orgeur M, Mas Fiol G, Frigui W, Ma L, Brosch R. ESX-1-independent horizontal gene transfer by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. mBio. 2021;12:e00965-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00965-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madikonda AK, Shaikh A, Khanra S, Yakkala H, Yellaboina S, Lin-Chao S, Siddavattam D. Metabolic remodeling in Escherichia coli MG1655. A prophage e14-encoded small RNA, co293, post-transcriptionally regulates transcription factors HcaR and FadR. The FEBS Journal. 2020;287:4767–4782. doi: 10.1111/febs.15247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malshetty VS, Jain R, Srinath T, Kurthkoti K, Varshney U. Synergistic effects of UdgB and Ung in mutation prevention and protection against commonly encountered DNA damaging agents in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Microbiology. 2010;156:940–949. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.034363-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martín A, Herranz M, Ruiz Serrano MJ, Bouza E, García de Viedma D. The clonal composition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens could be modified by culture. Tuberculosis. 2010;90:201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martomo SA, Mathews CK. Effects of biological DNA precursor pool asymmetry upon accuracy of DNA replication in vitro. Mutation Research. 2002;499:197–211. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00283-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathews CK. DNA precursor metabolism and genomic stability. FASEB Journal. 2006;20:1300–1314. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-5730rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metcalfe JZ, Streicher E, Theron G, Colman RE, Penaloza R, Allender C, Lemmer D, Warren RM, Engelthaler DM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis subculture results in loss of potentially clinically relevant heteroresistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017;61:e00888-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00888-17/ASSET/E9C05F19-CAA5-4740-BDCB-462DBB394DE4/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZAC0111766600002.JPEG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miggiano R, Morrone C, Rossi F, Rizzi M. Targeting genome integrity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: From nucleotide synthesis to DNA replication and repair. Molecules. 2020;25:1205. doi: 10.3390/molecules25051205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milano A, Branzoni M, Canneva F, Profumo A, Riccardi G. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2358-furB operon is induced by zinc. Research in Microbiology. 2004;155:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2003.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohan A, Padiadpu J, Baloni P, Chandra N. Complete genome sequences of a Mycobacterium smegmatis laboratory strain (MC2 155) and isoniazid-resistant (4XR1/R2) mutant strains. Genome Announcements. 2015;3:e01520-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01520-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muwonge A, Kankya C, Olea-Popelka F, Biffa D, Ssengooba W, Berit D, Skjerve E, Johansen TB. Molecular investigation of multiple strain infections in patients with tuberculosis in Mubende district, Uganda. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2013;17:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Navarro Y, Herranz M, Pérez-Lago L, Martínez Lirola M, INDAL-TB. Ruiz-Serrano MJ, Bouza E, García de Viedma D. Systematic survey of clonal complexity in tuberculosis at a populational level and detailed characterization of the isolates involved. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49:4131–4137. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05203-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Navarro Y, Pérez-Lago L, Herranz M, Sierra O, Comas I, Sicilia J, Bouza E, García de Viedma D. In-depth characterization and functional analysis of clonal variants in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain prone to microevolution. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:694. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niki M, Niki M, Tateishi Y, Ozeki Y, Kirikae T, Lewin A, Inoue Y, Matsumoto M, Dahl JL, Ogura H, Kobayashi K, Matsumoto S. A novel mechanism of growth phase-dependent tolerance to isoniazid in mycobacteria. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:27743–27752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.333385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nordman J, Wright A. The relationship between dNTP pool levels and mutagenesis in an Escherichia coli NDP kinase mutant. PNAS. 2008;105:10197–10202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802816105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyinoh IW. Spontaneous mutations conferring antibiotic resistance to antitubercular drugs at a range of concentrations in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Drug Development Research. 2019;80:147–154. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill MB, Mortimer TD, Pepperell CS. Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis across evolutionary scales. PLOS Pathogens. 2015;11:e1005257. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Sullivan DM, Hinds J, Butcher PD, Gillespie SH, McHugh TD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA repair in response to subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2008;62:1199–1202. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pai C-C, Kearsey SE. A critical balance: dNTPs and the maintenance of genome stability. Genes. 2017;8:57. doi: 10.3390/genes8020057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pancsa R, Fichó E, Molnár D, Surányi ÉV, Trombitás T, Füzesi D, Lóczi H, Szijjártó P, Hirmondó R, Szabó JE, Tóth J. dNTPpoolDB: a manually curated database of experimentally determined dNTP pools and pool changes in biological samples. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;50:D1508–D1514. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pecsi I, Hirmondo R, Brown AC, Lopata A, Parish T, Vertessy BG, Tóth J. The dUTPase enzyme is essential in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e37461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Lago L, Rodríguez Borlado AI, Comas I, Herranz M, Ruiz-Serrano MJ, Bouza E, García-de-Viedma D. Subtle genotypic changes can be observed soon after diagnosis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2016;306:401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ragheb MN, Ford CB, Chase MR, Lin PL, Flynn JAL, Fortune SM. The mutation rate of mycobacterial repetitive unit loci in strains of M. tuberculosis from cynomolgus macaque infection. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rai P. Oxidation in the nucleotide pool, the DNA damage response and cellular senescence: Defective bricks build a defective house. Mutation Research. 2010;703:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rittershaus ESC, Baek SH, Sassetti CM. The normalcy of dormancy: common themes in microbial quiescence. Cell Host & Microbe. 2013;13:643–651. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romero D, Traxler MF, López D, Kolter R. Antibiotics as signal molecules. Chemical Reviews. 2011;111:5492–5505. doi: 10.1021/cr2000509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt TT, Sharma S, Reyes GX, Gries K, Gross M, Zhao B, Yuan JH, Wade R, Chabes A, Hombauer H. A genetic screen pinpoints ribonucleotide reductase residues that sustain dNTP homeostasis and specifies A highly mutagenic type of dNTP imbalance. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47:237–252. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shamputa IC, Jugheli L, Sadradze N, Willery E, Portaels F, Supply P, Rigouts L. Mixed infection and clonal representativeness of a single sputum sample in tuberculosis patients from a penitentiary hospital in Georgia. Respiratory Research. 2006;7:99. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva FJ, Santos-Garcia D, Zheng X, Zhang L, Han XY. Construction and analysis of the complete genome sequence of leprosy agent Mycobacterium lepromatosis. Microbiology Spectrum. 2022;10:e0169221. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01692-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh P, Patil KN, Khanduja JS, Kumar PS, Williams A, Rossi F, Rizzi M, Davis EO, Muniyappa K. Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrD1 and UvrA proteins suppress DNA strand exchange promoted by cognate and noncognate RecA proteins. Biochemistry. 2010;49:4872–4883. doi: 10.1021/bi902021d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A. Guardians of the mycobacterial genome: A review on DNA repair systems in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology. 2017;163:1740–1758. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snapper SB, Melton RE, Mustafa S, Kieser T, Jacobs WR., Jr Isolation and characterization of efficient plasmid transformation mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Molecular Microbiology. 1990;4:1911–1919. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb02040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Srinath T, Bharti SK, Varshney U. Substrate specificities and functional characterization of a thermo-tolerant uracil DNA glycosylase (UdgB) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. DNA Repair. 2007;6:1517–1528. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ssengooba W, de Jong BC, Joloba ML, Cobelens FG, Meehan CJ. Whole genome sequencing reveals mycobacterial microevolution among concurrent isolates from sputum and blood in HIV infected TB patients. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2016;16:371. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1737-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stallings CL, Glickman MS. Is Mycobacterium tuberculosis stressed out? A critical assessment of the genetic evidence. Microbes and Infection. 2010;12:1091–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun G, Luo T, Yang C, Dong X, Li J, Zhu Y, Zheng H, Tian W, Wang S, Barry CE, Mei J, Gao Q. Dynamic population changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis during acquisition and fixation of drug resistance in patients. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2012;206:1724–1733. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sundaram VK, Sampathkumar NK, Massaad C, Grenier J. Optimal use of statistical methods to validate reference gene stability in longitudinal studies. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0219440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szabó JE, Surányi ÉV, Mébold BS, Trombitás T, Cserepes M, Tóth J. A user-friendly, high-throughput tool for the precise fluorescent quantification of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates from biological samples. Nucleic Acids Research. 2020;48:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trauner A, Liu Q, Via LE, Liu X, Ruan X, Liang L, Shi H, Chen Y, Wang Z, Liang R, Zhang W, Wei W, Gao J, Sun G, Brites D, England K, Zhang G, Gagneux S, Barry CE, Gao Q. The within-host population dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vary with treatment efficacy. Genome Biology. 2017;18:1–17. doi: 10.1186/S13059-017-1196-0/TABLES/1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walter ND, Dolganov GM, Garcia BJ, Worodria W, Andama A, Musisi E, Ayakaka I, Van TT, Voskuil MI, de Jong BC, Davidson RM, Fingerlin TE, Kechris K, Palmer C, Nahid P, Daley CL, Geraci M, Huang L, Cattamanchi A, Strong M, Schoolnik GK, Davis JL. Transcriptional adaptation of drug-tolerant Mycobacterium tuberculosis during treatment of human tuberculosis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2015;212:990–998. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren RM, Victor TC, Streicher EM, Richardson M, Beyers N, Gey van Pittius NC, van Helden PD. Patients with active tuberculosis often have different strains in the same sputum specimen. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2004;169:610–614. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200305-714OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wayne LG, Diaz GA. A double staining method for differentiating between two classes of mycobacterial catalase in polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels. Analytical Biochemistry. 1986;157:89–92. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90200-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiuff C, Zappala RM, Regoes RR, Garner KN, Baquero F, Levin BR. Phenotypic tolerance: antibiotic enrichment of noninherited resistance in bacterial populations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2005;49:1483–1494. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.4.1483-1494.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2023. World Health Organization; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Wu ML, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. Mild nutrient starvation triggers the development of a small-cell survival morphotype in mycobacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:947. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao NY, Schroeder JW, Yurieva O, Simmons LA, O’Donnell ME. Cost of rNTP/dNTP pool imbalance at the replication fork. PNAS. 2013;110:12942–12947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309506110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN. Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Scorpio A, Nikaido H, Sun Z. Role of acid pH and deficient efflux of pyrazinoic acid in unique susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. Journal of Bacteriology. 1999;181:2044–2049. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.7.2044-2049.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimpel CK, Brandão PE, de Souza Filho AF, de Souza RF, Ikuta CY, Ferreira Neto JS, Camargo NCS, Heinemann MB, Guimarães AMS. Complete genome sequencing of Mycobacterium bovis SP38 and comparative genomics of Mycobacterium bovis and M. tuberculosis strains. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]