Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2024 Nov 18;12:e18529. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18529

Chemical constituents and biological activities of endophytic fungi from Fagopyrum dibotrys

Qiqi Xie 1,#, Yujie Jia 1,#, Jiwen Tao 1, Tongliang Bu 1, Qing Wang 1, Nayu Shen 1, Xinyu Zhang 1, Yirong Xiao 2, Lin Ye 3, Zhao Chen 4, Huahai Huang 5, Qingfeng Li 1, Zizhong Tang 1,
Editor: Vladimir Uversky
PMCID: PMC11580677  PMID: 39575167

Abstract

Background

Fagopyrum dibotrys is an important wild food and feed germplasm resource. It has high nutritional and medicinal value and is rich in natural products, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, coumarins, and alkaloids. Endophytic fungi in F. dibotrys have emerged as valuable sources of natural products. However, studies on the biological activity and chemical composition of these endophytic fungi remain limited.

Methods

In this paper, a new method to obtain natural active ingredients by fermentation of endophytic fungi from medicinal plants was proposed. Then the antioxidant and pathogenic activities of the endophytic fungi extracts were determined in vitro. In addition, secondary metabolites produced by endophytic fungi with medicinal activity were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

Results

Among the 95 endophytic fungal strains in F. dibotrys, four strains with high phenol yields were selected by reaction: Alternaria alstroemeriae (J2), Fusarium oxysporum (J15), Colletotrichum karsti (J74), and Colletotrichum boninense (J61). Compared with those of various extracts, the ethyl acetate fractions of A. alstroemeriae (J2), F. oxysporum (J15), and C. boninense (J61) exhibited superior antioxidant and antibacterial properties. The results indicated that the fungal extract was an excellent natural antioxidant and might be a potential antibacterial agent. The DPPH free radical clearance of A. alstroemeriae was 94.96 ± 0.004%. These findings indicated that A. alstroemeriae had strong antioxidant activity. In addition, the extract of A. alstroemeriae had good antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, with MICs of 0.5 and 0.05 mg/mL, respectively. The chemical constituents of the ethyl acetate extract from A. alstroemeriae were further analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). We noted that A. alstroemeriae can create a variety of medicinal substances that have high value in medicine, such as caffeic acid (884.75 ng/mL), 3-phenyllactic acid (240.72 ng/mL) and norlichexanthone (74.36 ng/mL).

Discussion

In summary, many valuable active substances and medicinal substances can be obtained through the study of endophytic fungi of F. dibotrys.

Keywords: Endophytic fungi, Microbe, Antioxidant, Antibacterial activity, Chemicalcomposition, F. dibotrys

Introduction

Fagopyrum dibotrys, a perennial species within the genus Rhizopyrum, has significant medicinal and economic value. Due to its moderate feed value, high total phenol (TP) content and agronomic role, buckwheat may have significant advantages in production, conservation and utilization in the Mediterranean region (Er & Keles, 2021). The plant is found mainly in China, India and Nepal and grows in river valleys, swamps and shrubs at altitudes between 250 and 3,200 m. At present, this plant is considered to have anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and other properties (Xie et al., 2023). F. dibotrys contains many flavonoids, terpenes, steroids, organic acids and volatile components, as well as essential amino acids and vitamins (Zhu, 2016; Guo et al., 2022).

Endophytic fungi represent crucial resources for the development of new natural products. They provide essential means to discover pharmacodynamic compounds from secondary metabolites and solve the scarcity problem of traditional Chinese medicinal plants (Ma et al., 2023). Endophytes, one of the sources of natural products, exhibit significant physiological activities (Ancheeva, Daletos & Proksch, 2020). Their primary components include polyketones, terpenes, steroidal fats, and phenols (Liu & Liu, 2018). Their main effects include antioxidant (Fu et al., 2017), hypoglycemic (Mustafa et al., 2022), anticancer (Hazafa et al., 2020), weight loss (Montalbano et al., 2021), anti-inflammatory (Maleki, Crespo & Cabanillas, 2019), and antimicrobial effects (Shamsudin et al., 2022; Sunil & Xu, 2019). Moreover, both the growth rate and yield of endophytic fungi significantly increase under in vitro conditions (Zhao et al., 2019). Consequently, plant endophytic fungi can fill the defects that bioactive substances are not easy to obtain and cost is high at present. The results of this study lay a foundation for the development of endophytic fungi with high efficiency and low toxicity (Zhu et al., 2023).

Oxidative stress is a state of imbalance between oxidation and antioxidant action in the body, which is considered to be an important factor leading to aging and disease (Pisoschi & Pop, 2015). If antioxidant mechanisms in the body cannot effectively eliminate ROS, an imbalance in cell homeostasis can occur and cause further irreversible damage, such as cell dysfunction, protein damage and DNA damage. Studies have shown that oxidative stress is linked with diseases such as vascular dementia (Chen & Zhong, 2014), kidney disease (Daenen et al., 2018), diabetes, obesity, cancer, aging and osteoporosis (Kimball, Johnson & Carlson, 2021). Currently, the widely used antioxidants include butyl hydroxy anisole, dibutyl hydroxy toluene and tert-butylhydroquinone (Gulcin, 2020). Although these substances have strong antioxidant activity, they have highly toxic side effects and are expensive; However, their application in the fields of food and medicine is limited (Xu et al., 2021). In recent years, with people’s attention to health, natural antioxidants from plants have attracted attention because of their unique characteristics such as easy extraction, safety and high efficiency (Neha et al., 2019). Consequently, natural antioxidants have become a focal point of research in food, medicine, and other fields.

Bacterial infections can cause a range of diseases that can affect multiple tissues and organs, such as the blood, lymphatic system, skin, liver, and heart (Nasr, Radhakrishnan & D’Agati, 2013). Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a class of gram-negative opportunistic bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known for its easy colonization, rapid mutation, and multidrug resistance (Chevalier et al., 2017; Marei, 2020). This bacterium is commonly associated with respiratory infections (Holger et al., 2022), pulmonary infection (Malhotra, Hayes & Wozniak, 2019) and keratitis (Subedi, Vijay & Willcox, 2018). Clarifying the characteristics of bacteria, along with their clinical manifestations and treatment options for infections, is crucial for the prevention and control of bacterial diseases.

In recent years, secondary metabolites from endophytic fungi have not only replaced medicinal plants as a substantial resource for screening natural active compounds and lead compounds for new drugs but also have broad application prospects and research value in terms of biological control and other aspects (Cao et al., 2021). This development offers a novel approach to discover new antibacterial agents from endophytic fungi. Furthermore, the extraction of endophytic fungal metabolites plays a crucial role in ensuring the rational use of valuable medicinal plant resources in China (Ravi et al., 2022). F. dibotrys, a valuable herb in traditional Chinese medicine, has a wide array of applications (Ma et al., 2023). However, studies on endophytic fungi from F. dibotrys and their mechanisms of action are still rare and need to be further explored. In this context, the aim of our research is to clarify the antibacterial and antioxidant activities, as well as the chemical constituents, of endophytic fungal extracts from F. dibotrys.

Materials & Methods

Experimental materials

In 2022, to research the wild germplasm resources of F. dibotrys, the biochemistry and molecular biology research group collected plants of 40 strains of F. dibotrys from 40 locations at different latitudes and longitudes in Southwest China (Sichuan Meishan city, Ya’an city, Chengdu city, Deyang city, Leshan city and Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture). To ensure the quality of the experimental materials, after the plants were uprooted, the samples were packed into plastic bags and immediately sent to the laboratory for further study.

Isolation of endophytic fungi

The roots, stems and leaves of the plants were cut into small pieces. The samples were washed twice with distilled water, disinfected with 75% ethanol for 2 min, soaked with 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min, washed with 75% ethanol for 1 min and finally washed twice with distilled water. When the samples were dry, they were added to potato dextrose agar medium (100 µg/L ampicillin was added to prevent bacterial contamination) and cultured at 28 °C for one week. During this period, fungal mycelia of different shapes and colors were picked out and purified, cultured at 28 °C for 5–7 days, and stored at 4 °C (Shen et al., 2023).

Screening of endophytic fungi producing polyphenols

The endophytic fungi were cultured in fresh potato dextrose broth for one week (160 rpm, 28 °C). The filtrate of the culture medium was obtained by filtering the culture medium with sterile gauze. The conditions for the colorimetric reaction were consistent with those described previously (Shen et al., 2023). In simple terms, 0.1% FeCl3 and 0.1% K3 [Fe(CN)6] were mixed and added to the culture filter. The final mixture in the test tube appears blue, indicating that the endophytic fungus has produced polyphenols after fermentation.

Identification of endophytic fungi producing polyphenols

The color, humidity, pigmentation and flatness of the fungal strains were observed using a CX21 FS1 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The phenol-producing endophytic fungi were identified by the ITS strain identification method. Fungal DNA was obtained following the directions from the kit (Rapid DNA extraction test kit, Tiangen, Beijing, China). PCR amplification was subsequently performed using an ITS1-forward primer (TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG) and an ITS4-reverse primer (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) (Cymbionics). The amplification procedure consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min for 35 cycles, and finally extension at 72 °C for 5 min. (Tian et al., 2022). PCR products were sent to Chengdu Qingke Biosequencing Technology Company for sequencing. Next, the ITS region sequences were compared with existing species sequences in the GenBank database. The phylogenetic tree of phenol-producing endophytic fungi was constructed in MEGA 11.0 software.

Preparation of endophytic fungus fermentation fluid extract

The fermentation mixture was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm and 4 °C for 15–20 min. After centrifugation, the precipitate was discarded, and the supernatant was collected. The supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22 µm aqueous filter membrane and set aside for further study. The fermentation mixture was extracted with equal volumes of ethyl acetate, n-butanol, petroleum ether, chloroform and other solvents for 10 min for a total of 3 times. The extracted liquid was then transferred to a rotary evaporator, concentrated under reduced pressure, and further processed using a freeze dryer. The final product was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and subjected to testing for biological activity (Hoque et al., 2023).

Determination of total polyphenols content

The gallic acid standard solution was prepared according to a previously described method (Marchut-Mikołajczyk et al., 2023). Water (1 mL) and sample mixture (1 mL) were added to a beaker. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added. After 5 min, 1 mL of 20% sodium bicarbonate reagent was added, and then distilled water was added to 10 mL. The absorbance value (A760) was obtained after reacting for 2 h. A standard curve was drawn with the absorbance as the vertical coordinate and the gallic acid mass concentration as the horizontal coordinate: y = 0.00302 ×−0.00978, R2 = 0.9905.

Antioxidant activity

In this study, we evaluated the antioxidant activities of six different concentrations of the extract (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 2 mg/mL). The assessment methods included DPPH, ABTS, and hydroxyl radical- and superoxide anion-scavenging assays. Ascorbic acid (Vc) was used as a positive control. Three replicates of each analysis were performed to ensure the reliability of the results.

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrohydrazyl radical-scavenging activity

In accordance with the methods described by Gauchan et al. (2020), 150 µL of 0.2 mM DPPH was mixed with a sample mixture with a concentration gradient of equal volume. Ethanol was used as the control. After 30 min of light-blocking treatment, 300 µL of the mixture was placed on the enzyme label plate, and the absorbance at 517 nm was detected.

The DPPH free radical clearance was calculated as follows:

Clearance rate/%=1AbAa/Ac×100%

where Ac represents the absorbance of 150 µL of DPPH solution and 150 µL of anhydrous ethanol. Ab represents the absorbance of 150 µL of DPPH solution mixed with 150 µL of gradient sample solution. Aa represents the absorbance of 150 µL of gradient sample solution in 150 µL of anhydrous ethanol.

Hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity

In accordance with the methods described by Dhayanithy, Subban & Chelliah (2019), 150 µL samples with different concentrations were added to 50 µL of 8 mM ferrous sulfate, 50 µL of 8 mM salicylic acid and 50 µL of 8 mM H2O2. Distilled water was used as a control. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Finally, 300 µL of the mixture was placed on the enzyme-coated plate, and the absorbance at 510 nm was detected.

The scavenging rate of hydroxyl free radicals was calculated as follows:

Clearance rate/%=1AbAa/Ac×100%,

where Ab represents the absorption value of the sample mixture containing 150 µL and the reaction mixture containing 150 µL. Ac represents the absorption value of 150 µL distilled water and 150 µL reaction mixture. Aa represents the light absorption value after the hydrogen peroxide was replaced with distilled water.

ABTS free radical-scavenging activity

In accordance with the methods described by Santos et al. (2020), the ABTS mother liquor was obtained by absorbing ABTS (7 mM) and adding 2.45 mM potassium persulfate, and the mixture was incubated at 28 °C for 18 h. The ABTS mother liquor was diluted with phosphoric acid (PBS) solution until the absorption (734 nm) reached 0.7 ± 0.02, and the ABTS working liquor was prepared. For each sample, 150 µL of ABTS working mixture was added. Ethanol was used as the control. After 30 min of protection from light, 300 µL of the mixture was placed on the enzyme-coated plate, and the absorbance at 734 nm was detected.

The scavenging rate of ABTS free radicals was calculated as follows:

Clearance rate/%=1AbAa/Ac×100%

where Ac represents the absorbance of 150 µL of ABTS solution and 150 µL of anhydrous ethanol. Ab indicates the absorbance of 150 µL of ABTS solution mixed with 150 µL of sample. Aa represents the absorbance of a 150 µL sample with 150 µL anhydrous ethanol.

Superoxide anion radical-scavenging activity

In accordance with the methods described by Wang et al. (2009), 300 µL of Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.2, 0.05 M) was mixed with 150 µL of sample mixture and incubated at 25 °C for 10 min. Fifty microliters of pyrogallol (25 mM) was quickly added. Distilled water was used as a control. After 4 min, 50 µL of HCl (8 M) was added to terminate the reaction. The absorption value of the 300 µL mixture was measured at 320 nm.

The superoxide anion radical-scavenging rate was calculated as follows:

Clearance rate/%=1AbAa/Ac×100%

where Ab represents the absorbance of 150 µL of sample or 150 µL of reaction mixture. Ac represents the absorbance of 150 µL of distilled water or 150 µL of reaction mixture. Aa represents the absorbance of distilled water instead of pyrogallol.

Antibacterial activity

Minimum inhibitory concentration

The antibacterial activities of the fungal extracts were determined using the Oxford cup method. Escherichia coli (ATCC25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC9027), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC6633) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC6538) were incubated in sterile nutrient broth at 37 °C for 12 h, and 150 µL of the suspension was uniformly coated on a Petri dish. Once the bacterial mixture was dry, each Petri dish was divided into three parts, and a sterilized Oxford cup was placed in each section. Each fungal extract was diluted with nutrient broth (0.5, 1 and 3 mg/mL). Then, 150 µL of extract, 0.5% DMSO and 100 µg/L chloramphenicol were added to the Oxford cup for the negative and positive controls, respectively. The culture plate was placed horizontally in a constant-temperature incubator and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h (Nishad et al., 2021). After incubation, the results were observed, and the diameter of the inhibition zone was recorded. If the diameter was greater than 7.8 mm, the solution in the Oxford cup was considered to have an inhibitory effect.

Minimum bactericidal concentration

A mixture of 100 µL of fungal extract with antibacterial activity (0.2–3 mg/mL) and 100 µL of bacterial suspension was inoculated into aseptic nutrient agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The number of bacterial colonies on the medium was then counted. If the number of colonies was less than 10, the agent was considered to have bactericidal properties (Toghueo, 2019).

Fluorescence microscopy

According to Paul et al. (2021), biofilms can be effectively observed by fluorescence microscopy. Four species of bacteria were treated with the endophytic fungal extract at a concentration equivalent to 2 MICs. The treated bacteria were then placed on a slide and incubated at 37 °C. After 48 h, the slide was rinsed 4 to 5 times with normal saline water to remove any nonadherent bacteria. The biofilm generated on the slide was stained with 0.1% acridine orange. The formation and characteristics of the biofilms were then examined under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Analysis of the bioactive compounds by LC–MS

Data were collected as previously described in Shen et al. (2023). Specifically bioactive compound mass spectrometry detection.

Data analysis

The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations from three independent sets of observations. Single-factor variance analysis (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A p value of less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) was considered statistically significant for determining differences between groups.

Results

Screening of endophytic fungi that produce polyphenols

Polyphenol-producing fungi were screened using the Folin–Ciocalteu color rendering test. Polyphenols in fermentation broth can produce a blue color on FeCl3-K3 [Fe(CN)6], as shown in Fig. S1. Among the tested strains, nine exhibited a blue reaction with the chromogenic agents. Among these, four strains presented the deepest coloration, providing preliminary evidence of their high phenol production capabilities. These strains were further identified for their potential in subsequent chemical and pharmacological studies.

Identification of endophytic fungi that produce polyphenols

Following purification, the morphological characteristics of the endophytic fungi on the agar plates were observed, as detailed in Table S1. The selected mycelium samples were then subjected to microscopic observation and identification, as shown in Fig. S2. The ITS rDNA sequences of the fungi were subsequently identified and matched, and the results are presented in Table 1. The sequence similarity among these identified fungi was found to be at least 99%. The phylogenetic tree of the phenol-producing strains isolated from F. dibotrys is depicted in Fig. 1. The strains were identified as A. alstroemeriae (J2), F. oxysporum (J15), C. karsti (J74), and C. boninense (J61).

Table 1. Study on endophytic strains of phenol-producing fungi from F. dibotrys.

NO Genus Most closely related strain Ident (% ) Accession.
J2 Alternaria sp. A. alstroemeriae 100.00% OP482339.1
J15 Fusarium sp. F. oxysporum 100.00% OP714469.1
J74 Colletotrichum sp. C. karsti 99.65% OQ652534.1
J61 Colletotrichum sp. C. boninense 100.00% MF062469.1

Figure 1. Adjacent tree of ITS sequence of phenol-producing endophytic fungi of F. dibotrys.

Figure 1

The number on the node is the boot score obtained from 1,000 replicates. Mucor racemose was selected as the outer group.

Determination of total polyphenol content

Extracts of A. alstroemeriae (J2), F. oxysporum (J15), C. karsti (J74) and C. boninense (J61) were treated with different solvents. The resulting mixtures contained different total phenols, as detailed in Table S2 and illustrated in Fig. 2. The total phenol contents of the fungal extracts ranged from 13.75 ± 5.25 to 135.25 ± 0.33 mg GAE/g. A. alstroemeriae had a higher polyphenol content than did F. oxysporum, C. karsti and C. boninense. Among the four solvents, ethyl acetate was the most effective, yielding 135.25 ± 0.33 mg GAE/g for A. alstroemeriae, 92.74 ± 4.68 mg GAE/g for F. oxysporum, and 129.64 ± 4.28 mg GAE/g for C. boninense. For C. karsti, the use of n-butanol had greater efficiency; its extraction rate was 97.76 ± 4.31 mg GAE/g. A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti and C. boninense extracted from petroleum ether had lower polyphenol contents, with values of 26.49 ± 7.25, 53.96 ± 4.31, 13.75 ± 5.25 and 28.96 ± 6.55 mg GAE/g, respectively.

Figure 2. Total phenol content of J2, J15, J61, J74 extracts.

Figure 2

(a–d) indicate significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05).

Consequently, polar solvents were more effective at extracting higher quantities of polyphenols from A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, and C. boninense. In contrast, moderately polar solvents were more suitable for extracting polyphenols from C. karsti.

Antioxidant activity

Table S2, Figs. 3, 4, 5 and 6 show the antioxidant activities. As shown in Fig. 3, the scavenging abilities for ABTS, hydroxyl free radicals, DPPH free radicals and superoxide free radicals increased with increasing extract concentration. At a concentration of 2 mg/mL, the ethyl acetate extracts from A. alstroemeriae exhibited more potent antioxidant effects than did the other organic solvents. In the four types of free radical assays, the scavenging capacity of the ethyl acetate extract for DPPH was almost equivalent to that of vitamin C (Vc), reaching the highest level (Fig. 3C, P < 0.05).

Figure 3. Antioxidant activities of the J2 extracts.

Figure 3

(A) ABTS scavenging activity. (B) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. (C) DPPH radical scavenging activity. (D) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity. (A–D) Significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05).

Figure 4. Antioxidant activities of the J15 extracts.

Figure 4

(A) ABTS scavenging activity. (B) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. (C) DPPH radical scavenging activity. (D) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity. (A–D) Significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05).

Figure 5. Antioxidant activities of the J61 extracts.

Figure 5

(A) ABTS scavenging activity. (B) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. (C) DPPH radical scavenging activity. (D) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity. (A–D) Significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05).

Figure 6. Antioxidant activities of the J74 extracts.

Figure 6

(A) ABTS scavenging activity. (B) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. (C) DPPH radical scavenging activity. (D) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity. (A–D) Significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05).

Table S2 shows that ethyl acetate had the strongest scavenging ability after extraction of A. alstroemeriae, where the IC50 DPPH was 0.02048 ± 0.009 mg/mL, the IC50 ABTS was 0.049 ± 0.005 mg/mL, the IC50OH was 0.08 ± 0.001 mg/mL, and the IC50O2− was 0.28 ± 0.005 mg/mL). For n-butanol extract, the IC50ABTS was 0.034 ± 0.002 mg/mL, the IC50OH was 0.96 ± 0.02 mg/mL, the IC50DPPH was 0.14368 ± 0.004 mg/mL, and the IC50⋅O2− was 1.54 ± 0.004 mg/mL.

For F. oxysporum, ethyl acetate extraction had the best antioxidant effect and the lowest IC50 value (P < 0.05). The IC50ABTS was 0.051 ± 0.0002, the IC50OH was 0.25 ± 0.006, the IC50DPPH was 0.08 ± 0.001, and the IC50O2− was 0.65 ± 0.041 (Table S2). For C. karsti, n-butanol extraction had the best antioxidant effect and the lowest IC50 (P < 0.05). The IC50ABTS was 0.098 ± 0.001, the IC50OH was 0.7 ± 0.005, the IC50DPPH was 0.08 ± 0.005, and the IC50O2− was 0.66 ± 0.039 (Table S2). For C. boninense, ethyl acetate extraction had the best antioxidant effect and the lowest IC50 value (P < 0.05). The IC50ABTS was 0.073 ± 0.003, the IC50OH was 0.57 ± 0.005, the IC50DPPH was 0.01 ± 0.032, and the IC50O2− was 0.23 ± 0.006 (Table S2).

Our results showed that ethyl acetate was the most effective extraction agent. The endophytic fungi responded to antioxidant mechanisms by scavenging free radicals. The ability to effectively remove free radicals and protect cells from oxidative damage may be attributed to the different polyphenol contents in the various extracts.

Antibacterial activity

The inhibitory effects of extracts of A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti and C. boninense were measured using the four bacteria mentioned in section “Antioxidant activity”. A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti, and C. boninense had antibacterial effects on all the tested bacteria. However, the antibacterial efficacies varied depending on the solvent used for extraction, as detailed in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 shows that A. alstroemeriae extracted with ethyl acetate had antibacterial effects on the tested bacteria, with MIC values between 0.5 and 2 mg/mL. Each of the extracts had an inhibitory effect on E. coli. Moreover, the n-butanol extract also had a good inhibitory effect on the tested bacteria, except for P. aeruginosa. Only S. aureus and E. coli were strongly inhibited by the use of trichloromethane. The petroleum ether extract had a strong inhibitory effect only on E. coli. For F. oxysporum, only the ethyl acetate extract had an inhibitory effect on the tested bacteria. For C. karsti, only the n-butanol extract inhibited the tested bacteria. The ethyl acetate extract of C. boninense showed strong antibacterial activity. The MIC values were between 0.5 and 2 mg/mL. All extracts had inhibitory effects on S. aureus and E. coli. These results indicated that ethyl acetate could be used to extract A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum and C. boninense.

Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (mg/mL) of the J2, J15, J74 and J61 extracts.

Extracts Gram-positive bacteria Gram-negative bacteria
S.aureus B. subtills E. coli P. aeruginosa
J2
Ethyl acetate 0.5 2 0.5 1
n-Butanol 2 Nd 1 2
Chlorom 2 Nd 1 Nd
Petroleum ether Nd Nd 1 Nd
J15
Ethyl acetate 2 2 1 2
n-Butanol 2 2 2 Nd
Chlorom Nd Nd 2 2
Petroleum ether Nd Nd Nd Nd
J74
n-Butanol 2 2 2 2
Ethyl acetate Nd Nd 2 Nd
Chlorom Nd Nd Nd Nd
Petroleum ether Nd Nd Nd Nd
J61
Ethyl acetate 0.5 1 0.5 0.5
n-Butanol 1 2 1 Nd
Chlorom 1 Nd 0.5 2
Petroleum ether 2 Nd 2 2

Notes.

nd
not detected (result higher 3.00 mg/mL)

Table 3. Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (mg/mL) of the J2, J15, J74 and J61 extracts.

Extracts Gram-positive bacteria Gram-negative bacteria
S.aureus B. subtills E. coli P. aeruginosa
J2
Ethyl acetate 2 Nd 2 Nd
n-Butanol Nd Nd Nd Nd
Chlorom Nd Nd Nd Nd
Petroleum ether Nd Nd Nd Nd
J15
Ethyl acetate 2 Nd Nd Nd
n-Butanol Nd Nd Nd Nd
Chlorom Nd Nd Nd Nd
Petroleum ether Nd Nd Nd Nd
J74
n-Butanol Nd Nd Nd Nd
Ethyl acetate Nd Nd Nd Nd
Chlorom Nd Nd Nd Nd
Petroleum ether Nd Nd Nd Nd
J61
Ethyl acetate 2 2 2 Nd
n-Butanol 2 1 Nd Nd
Chlorom 2 Nd Nd Nd
Petroleum ether Nd Nd Nd Nd

Notes.

nd
not detected (result higher 3.00 mg/mL)

Table 3 shows the MBCs. A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum and C. boninense showed good bacteriostatic effects after extraction with ethyl acetate, except for P. aeruginosa. The concentrations of MBCs ranged from 1.0–2.0 mg/ml. There was no obvious inhibitory effect on P. aeruginosa. Moreover, the four extracts of C. karsti showed no bactericidal activity against the four kinds of bacteria, and the four different extracts showed no antibacterial activity.

Acridine orange can bind to nucleic acids to produce green fluorescence. As shown in Fig. 7, bacterial cells not treated with the fungal extract remained active and emitted strong green fluorescence (Fig. 7A). In contrast, when the bacterial cells were treated with the fungi extracted with ethyl acetate, a reduction in fluorescence was observed. These results indicated that the use of ethyl acetate as the extraction agent achieved antibacterial effects by destroying the bacterial membrane but had no effect on P. aeruginosa (Figs. 7B7D). These findings implied that ethyl acetate extracts can effectively inhibit cell proliferation and disrupt cellular processes, likely through interactions with the cell membrane structure.

Figure 7. Effects of ethyl acetate extracts from endophytic fungi on cell membrane integrity of E. coli, S. aureus, and B. subtills by fluorescence microscope.

Figure 7

(A) Untreated bacterial cells; (B) bacterial cells treated with J2 extracts at 2MIC; (C) bacterial cells treated with J15 extracts at 2MIC; (D) bacterial cells treated with J61 extracts at 2MIC. The scale bar was 100 µm.

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

The chemical constituents of A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti and C. boninense were determined by LC–MS to explore the functions of their metabolites. The relationships among their metabolites and their antibacterial and antioxidant activities were determined, and the results are presented in Table 4. Chromatograms of the metabolites of the four fungi are shown in Fig. S3. The compounds detected by LC–MS included phenolic acids, such as caffeic acid, syringic acid, and ferulic acid; hydroxybenzoic acids, such as gallic acid, gentian acid, haematommic acid; flavonoids (quercetin and taxifolin); coumarins (aesculetin); phenylacetic acids (vanillin, homogentisic acid, and homovanillic acid); anthrones (e.g., hematommone and norlichexanthone); and simple phenols (4-methylcatechol and catechol). In addition, organic acids, such as citric acid, azelaic acid, ala-phe, alpha-linolenic acid, and acetic acid; hormones such as epinephrine, (±)-abscisic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid; and simple sugars such as d-fructose and d-ribose were included.

Table 4. The identification of the chemical composition of endophytic fungi extracts by LC-MS analysis.

NO Name of identified compound RT(min) Formula m/z Adduction Endophytic fungi (ng/ml)
J61 J15 J74 J2
1 4-Methylcatechol 2.9 C7H8O2 123.044 [M-H] 6.04 1.48 1.32 nd
2 Aesculetin 4.4 C9H6O4 177.019 [M-H] 2.76 2.77 12.44 1.52
3 Aesculetin 4.2 C9H6O4 177.019 [M-H] 12.00 1.77 6.09 1.20
4 Caffeic acid 4.4 C9H8O4 179.034 [M-H] 19.86 nd nd 9.61
5 Caffeic acid 4.2 C9H8O4 179.034 [M-H] 36.75 11.93 9.34 884.75
6 Caffeic acid 4.0 C9H8O4 179.035 [M-H] nd 0.59 0.56 7.26
7 Catechol 4.0 C6H6O2 109.028 [M-H] 5.69 1.01 9.62 2.62
8 Divaricatinic acid 5.8 C11H14O4 209.082 [M-H] 7.90 1.03 4.32 nd
9 Ferulic acid 5.0 C10H10O4 193.050 [M-H] 37.98 24.01 44.84 nd
10 Ferulic acid 5.2 C10H10O4 193.050 [M-H] 6.20 2.72 2.63 nd
11 Gallic acid 4.2 C7H6O5 169.014 [M-H] nd nd 1.19 2.65
12 Gentisic acid 4.2 C7H6O4 153.019 [M-H] 3.36 nd 3.90 11.98
13 Gentisic acid 3.8 C7H6O4 153.019 [M-H] 46.98 5.10 8.11 8.77
14 Haematommic acid 3.3 C9H8O5 195.030 [M-H] 32.79 1.20 1.69 0.73
15 Haematommone 7.1 C16H10O7 313.036 [M-H] 8.31 nd nd nd
16 Haematommone 7.2 C16H10O7 313.036 [M-H] 7.10 nd nd nd
17 Homogentisic acid 5.0 C8H8O4 167.034 [M- H] 2.44 14.83 11.89 3.57
18 Homogentisic acid 5.4 C8H8O4 167.034 [M- H] 2.87 1.23 nd 0.91
19 Homovanillic acid 7.0 C9H10O4 181.050 [M- H] 2.80 1.71 nd 0.81
20 Isovanillic acid 4.5 C8H8O4 167.034 [M-H] 2.48 1.29 3.36 1.31
21 Norepinephrine 4.7 C8H11NO3 168.066 [M-H] nd nd nd 16.67
22 norlichexanthone 7.1 C14H10O5 257.046 [M-H] nd nd nd 74.36
23 Quercetin 6.2 C15H10O7 301.036 [M-H] 11.03 1.29 3.39 0.83
24 Quercetin 6.3 C15H10O7 301.036 [M-H] 6.74 0.61 2.13 0.83
25 Syringic acid 4.8 C9H10O5 197.045 [M-H] 2.21 nd 1.14 nd
26 Syringic acid 4.3 C9H10O5 197.045 [M-H] 2.63 nd 1.16 0.37
27 Taxifolin 5.1 C15H12O7 303.052 [M-H] 2.21 nd nd 1.16
28 Vanillin 4.4 C8H8O3 151.039 [M-H] 6.09 1.93 3.52 4.15
29 (±)-Abscisic acid 6.1 C15H20O4 263.129 [M-H] 30.79 24.21 24.73 34.28
30 (±)-Abscisic acid 5.8 C15H20O4 263.129 [M-H] 4.93 3.75 5.26 6.31
31 (Z)-9,12,13-trihydroxyoctadec-15-enoic acid 7.6 C18H34 O5 329.234 [M-H] 21.06 21.16 47.1 25.59
32 1,5,6,7-TETRAHYDRO-4H-INDOL-4-ONE 4.1 C8 H9 N O 134.060 [M-H] 2.75 nd nd 1.43
33 12-Hydroxyoctadecanoic acid 11.7 C18 H36 O3 299.260 [M-H] 278.40 360.43 232.45 138.16
34 13(S)-HOTrE 9.7 C18H30 O3 293.213 [M-H] 2.34 3.64 3.30 6.42
35 2,6-Dihydroxy-4-Methoxytoluene 4.8 C8 H10 O3 153.055 [M-H] 278.40 360.43 232.45 138.16
36 2-Hydroxybenzyl alcohol 3.5 C7 H8 O2 123.044 [M-H] 89.03 nd 23.00 15.96
37 2-Hydroxycinnamic acid 5.5 C9 H8 O3 163.039 [M-H] nd nd 2.54 0.73
38 2-Methoxycinnamic acid 4.9 C10H10O3 177.055 [M-H] 3.10 1.82 1.44 0.62
39 2-Methylglutaric acid 2.0 C6 H10 O4 145.050 [M-H] 46.37 14.08 19.08 62.31
40 2-Oxobutyric acid 0.8 C4 H6O3 101.023 [M-H] 12.89 18.79 8.08 42.68
41 3-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid 4.7 C8 H8 O3 151.039 [M-H] 862.25 7.66 140.82 9.78
42 3-Hydroxypicolinic acid 1.8 C6 H5 N O3 138.019 [M-H] 27.36 27.13 28.06 32.08
43 3-Phenyllactic acid 4.9 C9 H10O3 165.055 [M-H] 142.81 334.27 81.61 240.72
44 3-Phosphoglyceric acid 14.1 C3 H7 O7P 184.984 [M-H] 12.46 10.57 12.18 12.08
45 4-Acetamidobutanoic acid 1.8 C6 H11 N O3 144.066 [M-H] 5.67 1.85 1.90 79.83
46 4-Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 14.3 C18 H30 O3 S 325.185 [M-H] 110.56 138.27 107.13 72.28
47 4-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid 3.9 C6 H10O3 129.055 [M-H] 14.20 121.83 4.86 13.83
48 4-Oxoproline 0.9 C5 H7N O3 128.034 [M-H] 5.46 50.36 8.56 307.42
49 6-Hydroxycaproic acid 4.4 C6 H12 O3 131.070 [M-H] 32.57 43.55 17.25 72.32
50 7-Methylxanthine 0.8 C6 H6 N4 O2 165.040 [M-H] 4.74 9.05 2.96 38.49
51 9-HpODE 8.5 C18 H32O4 311.223 [M-H] 20.97 49.99 74.16 19.92
52 Ala-Phe 7.2 C12 H16 N2 O3 235.109 [M-H] 273.59 nd 98.17 nd
53 alpha-Hydroxyhippuric acid 3.9 C9 H9N O4 194.046 [M-H] 7.27 11.68 5.49 51.88
54 alpha-Linolenic acid 12.4 C18 H30 O2 277.218 [M-H] 6.58 9.25 22.26 4.94
55 Anthranilic acid 5.0 C7 H7 N O2 136.040 [M-H] 113.21 2.04 189.24 2.00
56 Azelaic acid 5.5 C9 H16O4 187.097 [M-H] 304.69 110.84 27.58 66.58
57 Benzoic acid 4.6 C7H6O2 121.029 [M-H] 81.58 53.66 120.92 82.07
58 Citric acid 1.3 C6 H8O7 191.019 [M-H] 12.86 3.57 6.54 111.38
59 D-Fructose 0.8 C6H12O6 179.056 [M-H] 6.61 98.86 3.84 298.18
60 Indole-3-acetic acid 5.8 C10 H9 N O2 174.055 [M-H] 150.03 3.86 134.91 18.18

Notes.

nd
not detect

A total of 52 compounds were identified in A. alstroemeriae, with caffeic acid, 3-phenyllactic acid, and norlichexanthone being the predominant compounds at concentrations of 884.75 ng/mL, 240.72 ng/mL and 74.36 ng/mL, respectively. A total of 47 compounds were identified from F. oxysporum, the main component of which was ferulic acid (44.84 ng/mL). Fifty-one compounds were identified from the C. karsti extract, the main component of which was 3-phenyllactic acid (334.27 ng/mL). Fifty-five compounds were identified from C. boninense extracts, the main components of which were caffeic acid (36.75 ng/mL), ferulic acid (37.98 ng/mL) and gentisic acid (46.98 ng/mL). In conclusion, the metabolites of these four fungal strains included primarily phenolic and organic acids, which may contribute to their biological activity.

Discussion

F. dibotrys, a variety of buckwheat, is renowned as both a medicinal and edible plant, exemplifying the concept of food–medicine homology. This perennial herb predominantly grows in hillside grasslands and forest understories in northern China. Characterized by its cold and bitter taste, F. dibotrys is believed to influence the stomach and liver channels in traditional practices, offering detoxification benefits, blood pressure reduction, and intestinal health improvements (Valido et al., 2022). F. dibotrys contains flavonoids, terpenoids and enzymes (Jing et al., 2016); the flavonoids include mainly rutin, quercetin, and epicatechin.

Endophytic fungi have the unique ability to survive in plant tissues without causing harm to their host. They can produce a variety of bioactive substances during growth and have the potential for new drug development. Endophytes are also important sources of natural products (Hasan et al., 2022). Studies have shown that polyphenols have antitumor activity, which provides new ideas for the development of drugs for cancer prevention and treatment (Li et al., 2022). In addition, phenolic substances play important roles in antioxidation, free radical scavenging, and other pharmacological activities (Loffredo et al., 2017).

Consequently, the development of endophytic fungi that produce polyphenolic compounds holds considerable potential in the fields of medicine, food, and beyond. For example, Marchut-Mikołajczyk et al. (2023) reported that Bacillus cereus and Bacillus mycoides, which were isolated from Urtica dioica, may be potential sources of biosurfactants and polyphenols. Marsola et al. (2022) obtained Phomopsis archeri from Brunfelsia uniflora, a fungus that produces cellulase and lassase and has antioxidant effects. Coriolopsis rigida, a fungus isolated from rice, can yield hydroxyphenylacetamide, which has shown potent antioxidant activity (Dantas et al., 2023).

In this study, we focused on the phenol-producing properties of endophytic fungi from F. dibotrys. The endophytic fungi A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti and C. boninense, which have high phenol yields and are particularly worthy of further investigation, were selected. Our findings indicated that, compared with nonpolar solvents, both small and large polyphenols were more efficiently extracted using polar and medium-polar solvents. This observation was consistent with previous research in the field (Nakilcioğlu-Taş & Ötleş, 2021).

The extract of A. alstroemeriae presented the highest antioxidant activity, and caffeic acid, a component of this extract, has been recognized for its effectiveness against bacterial, fungal, viral, and other diseases (Khan et al., 2021). caffeic acid is not only a potent antioxidant but also has anticancer and anti-inflammatory effects (Habtemariam, 2017). Compared with that of the conventional antioxidant vitamin C (Vc), the antioxidant capacity of the A. alstroemeriae extract was significantly lower. Standard antioxidants are purified small molecules, whereas plant endophytic fungal extracts are mixtures of multiple ingredients. The natural secondary metabolites within these extracts have emerged as significant sources of new antimicrobial agents because of their unique biological activities. For example, the endophytic fungus Alternaria sp. of Salvia miltiorrhiza had strong antibacterial effects on experimental bacteria, with the lowest inhibitory concentrations ranging from 86.7 to 364.7 µM (Tian et al., 2017).

Our study revealed that four endophytic fungal strains exhibited inhibitory effects on the tested bacterial strains, although the extent of inhibition varied among the different extracts. In recent years, researchers have reported that the inhibitory effect of endophytic fungi on microorganisms is closely related to the extraction solvent. Debalke (Wang et al., 2023) reported that the ethyl acetate extract of Colletotrichum sp. had inhibitory effects on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and our results were consistent with these findings. Among the endophytes studied, A. alstroemeriae presented the best antioxidant and bactericidal activities. This may be related to the presence of organic acids and phenolic compounds in the extracts. Among all the ingredients, 3-phenyllactic acid and norlichexanthone were the principal antibacterial compounds. Norlichexanthone has been shown to have antibacterial benefits; for example, it can inhibit the formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and reduce virulence gene expression (Baldry et al., 2016). Techaoei et al. (2020) reported the antibacterial potential of 2-naphthalenemethanol produced by the plant endophytic fungus Aspergillus cejpii.

Bacterial cells rely on their membrane structure for proper internal activities. Antimicrobial compounds can kill pathogenic bacteria by destroying cell membranes (Zhang et al., 2018). Among them, phenolic substances have abundant hydroxyl group types, numbers, substitution positions, and saturated side chains and have good antibacterial performance. Phenolic substances have good lipid solubility and can directly enter bacterial cell membranes and interfere with or even destroy the membrane structure, thus inhibiting the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria to host cells (Lyu et al., 2020; Stasiuk & Kozubek, 2010). For example, in a study by Naveed et al. (2018), phenolic acid (chlorogenic acid) was found to play an important role in human diseases not only as an antibacterial agent but also in regulating lipid metabolism, sugars and other pathological processes in hereditary and healthy metabolic diseases. Our findings further confirmed that the extracts from A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, and C. boninense possessed robust antibiofilm capabilities, potentially leading to their complete eradication.

A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti, and C. boninense are useful endophytic fungi. Substances produced by endophytic fungi were further analyzed by LC–MS. Notably, some of the substances identified are very difficult to extract directly from the plant. However, endophytic fungi can act as containers to aid in production. Quercetin, a flavonol compound known for its tumor-inhibitory, free radical-fighting, antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties (Hosseini et al., 2020), is traditionally extracted directly from plants. However, this extraction process is difficult and costly, posing challenges to medical and economic advancements. Our results suggest that endophytic fungi may serve as effective alternatives for the generation of these natural products. Through the fermentation of A. alstroemeriae, valuable compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, organic acids, and auxins can be produced.

Phenolic acids are biologically active compounds known for their lack of adverse side effects (Staszowska-Karkut & Materska, 2020). Coumarin, owing to its antioxidant properties, can mitigate oxidative damage and influence various physiological and biochemical processes (Chang, Alasalvar & Shahidi, 2019). The hydroxyl group present in hydroxybenzoic acid enhances its antioxidant efficacy (Li et al., 2020). Flavonoids can directly damage the bacterial envelope and can also act on specific molecular targets of these microbes (Donadio et al., 2021). Plant hormones regulate plant growth, development, and stress response (Chen et al., 2020).

Based on the above results, A. alstroemeriae from F. dibotrys was determined to have strong biological activity; thus, this strain might be a promising molecular source for future studies. Notably, secondary metabolites such as paclitaxel, a potent anticancer drug, inhibit mitosis and induce apoptosis, making it one of the most successful natural anticancer agents (Zhu & Chen, 2019; Marupudi et al., 2007). Quercetin, abscisic acid, and indoleacetic acid may be related to the growth mechanism of host plants (Zhang et al., 2022). Quercetin regulates IAA oxidation by delaying the dioxygenase activity of auxin oxidation 1 (DAO2) proteins, which belong to the 1-oxyglutaric acid and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily, to mediate auxin signaling in plants (Singh et al., 2021). Abscisic acid plays important roles in several physiological processes in plants, such as stomatal closure, epidermal wax accumulation, leaf senescence, bud dormancy, seed germination, osmoregulation, and growth inhibition (Chen et al., 2020). Indoleacetic acid is a plant hormone that not only regulates plant growth and development but also plays important roles in microbe–plant interactions and interacts with the metabolites of Xanthomonas aeruginosa (Djami-Tchatchou et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2022). These results suggest that A. alstroemeriae may have positive effects on the growth quality and yield of F. dibotrys through its interaction with specific fungal hosts.

Building on these insights, we propose a novel approach that leverages the inherent advantages of endophytic fungi, namely, their high utilization value, compact size, and rapid anabolic capabilities. Through the optimization of fermentation conditions, we can expedite and increase the production of target metabolites, thereby increasing their biochemical efficacy (Zhao et al., 2022; Al-Sarraj & Daigham GE, 2022). Therefore, the medicinal value of endophytic fungi of F. dibotrys warrants further exploration and study.

Conclusions

This study revealed that the endophytic fungus F. dibotrys has potent antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Specifically, the phenolic compounds in A. alstroemeriae extracts contribute to these antioxidant and antibacterial activities, whereas flavonoids, including compounds such as paclitaxel, offer anticancer benefits. In summary, our findings suggest a novel approach to harness F. dibotrys for the extraction of innovative medicinal substances. In particular, A. alstroemeriae within F. dibotrys has emerged as a promising candidate for natural antioxidant and antibacterial applications. Nonetheless, the broader application of endophytic fungi in medicine warrants additional, in-depth research.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Data.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. LC-MS.
peerj-12-18529-s002.xlsx (494.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Supplementary Figures and Tables.
peerj-12-18529-s003.pdf (565.9KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Sequence.
peerj-12-18529-s004.fasta (11.4KB, fasta)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-4

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Sichuan Sharing and Service Platform of Scientific and Technological Resource (Enzyme Resource) of China (Project No 2020JDPT0018) and the Technology Department of Sichuan Province International Cooperation Program of China (Project No 2023YFH0043). This work was also supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1200105). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Qiqi Xie conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Yujie Jia conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Jiwen Tao conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Tongliang Bu conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Qing Wang conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Nayu Shen conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Xinyu Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Yirong Xiao conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Lin Ye conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Zhao Chen conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Huahai Huang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Qingfeng Li conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Zizhong Tang conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The A. alstroemeriae, F. oxysporum, C. karsti, and C. boninense sequences are available at GenBank: OP482339.1, OP714469.1, OQ652534.1, and MF062469.1, respectively.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available in the Supplemental File.

References

  • Ancheeva, Daletos & Proksch (2020).Ancheeva E, Daletos G, Proksch P. Bioactive secondary metabolites from endophytic fungi. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2020;27(11):1836–1854. doi: 10.2174/0929867326666190916144709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Baldry et al. (2016).Baldry M, Nielsen A, Bojer MS, Zhao Y, Friberg C, Ifrah D, Glasser Heede N, Larsen TO, Frøkiær H, Frees D, Zhang L, Dai H, Ingmer H. Norlichexanthone reduces virulence gene expression and biofilm formation in staphylococcus aureus. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0168305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao et al. (2021).Cao D, Sun P, Bhowmick S, Wei Y, Guo B, Wei Y, Mur LAJ, Sun Z. Secondary metabolites of endophytic fungi isolated from Huperzia serrata. Fitoterapia. 2021;155:104970. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2021.104970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang, Alasalvar & Shahidi (2019).Chang SK, Alasalvar C, Shahidi F. Superfruits: phytochemicals, antioxidant efficacies, and health effects—a comprehensive review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2019;59(10):1580–1604. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1422111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2020).Chen K, Li GJ, Bressan RA, Song CP, Zhu JK, Zhao Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2020;62(1):25–54. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen & Zhong (2014).Chen ZC, Zhong CJ. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience Bulletin. 2014;30(2):271–281. doi: 10.1007/s12264-013-1423-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chevalier et al. (2017).Chevalier S, Bouffartigues E, Bodilis J, Maillot O, Lesouhaitier O, Orange N. Structure, function and regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa porins. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2017;41(5):698–722. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Daenen et al. (2018).Daenen K, Andries A, Mekahli D, Van SA, Jouret F, Bammens B. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Pediatric Nephrology. 2018;34(6):975–991. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dantas et al. (2023).Dantas SBS, Moraes GKA, Araujo AR, Chapla VM. Phenolic compounds and bioactive extract produced by endophytic fungus Coriolopsis rigida. Natural Product Research. 2023;37(12):2037–2042. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2022.2115492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dhayanithy, Subban & Chelliah (2019).Dhayanithy G, Subban K, Chelliah J. Diversity and biological activities of endophytic fungi associated with Catharanthus roseus. BMC Microbiology. 2019;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1386-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Djami-Tchatchou et al. (2021).Djami-Tchatchou AT, Li ZA, Stodghill P, Filiatrault MJ, Kunkel BN. Identification of indole-3-acetic acid-regulated genes in pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Strain DC3000. Journal of Bacteriology. 2021;204(1):e0038021. doi: 10.1128/JB.00380-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Donadio et al. (2021).Donadio G, Mensitieri F, Santoro V, Parisi V, Bellone ML, De Tommasi N, Izzo V, Dal Piaz F. Interactions with microbial proteins driving the antibacterial activity of flavonoids. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(5):13050660. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellatif et al. (2022).Ellatif SA, Abdel Razik ES, Al-Surhanee AA, Al-Sarraj F, Daigham GE, Mahfouz AY. Enhanced production, cloning, and expression of a xylanase gene from endophytic fungal strain trichoderma harzianum kj831197.1: unveiling the in vitro anti-fungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2022;8(5):8050447. doi: 10.3390/jof8050447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Er & Keles (2021).Er M, Keles G. Buckwheat conservation as hay or silage: agronomic evaluation, nutritive value, conservation quality, and intake by lactating dairy goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2021;53(2):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02655-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fu et al. (2017).Fu M, Xu Y, Chen Y, Wu J, Yu Y, Zou B, An K, Xiao G. Evaluation of bioactive flavonoids and antioxidant activity in Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae (Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’) during storage. Food Chemistry. 2017;230:649–656. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gauchan et al. (2020).Gauchan DP, Kandel P, Tuladhar A, Acharya A, Kadel U, Baral A, Shahi AB, García-Gil MR. Evaluation of antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic properties of bioactive compounds produced from endophytic fungi of Himalayan yew (Taxus wallichiana) in Nepal. F1000Research. 2020;9:23250.2. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23250.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gulcin (2020).Gulcin İ. Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview. Archives of Toxicology. 2020;94(3):651–715. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02689-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guo et al. (2022).Guo X, Luo Z, Zhang M, Huang L, Wang H, Li Y, Qiao X, Li A, Wu B. The spatiotemporal regulations of epicatechin biosynthesis under normal flowering and the continuous inflorescence removal treatment in F. dibotrys. BMC Plant Biology. 2022;22(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03761-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Habtemariam (2017).Habtemariam S. Protective effects of caffeic acid and the alzheimer’s brain: an update. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2017;17(8):667–674. doi: 10.2174/1389557516666161130100947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hasan et al. (2022).Hasan AEZ, Julistiono H, Bermawie N, Riyanti EI, Arifni FR. Soursop leaves (Annona muricata L.) endophytic fungi anticancer activity against HeLa cells. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022;29(8):103354. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hazafa et al. (2020).Hazafa A, Rehman KU, Jahan N, Jabeen Z. The role of polyphenol (flavonoids) compounds in the treatment of cancer cells. Nutrition and Cancer. 2020;72(3):386–397. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1637006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holger et al. (2022).Holger DJ, Rebold NS, Alosaimy S, Morrisette T, Lagnf A, Belza AC Coyne, AJK, El Ghali A, Veve MP, Rybak MJ. Impact of ceftolozane-tazobactam vs. best alternative therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa lower respiratory tract infections. Infectious Diseases and Therapy. 2022;11(5):1965–1980. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00687-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoque et al. (2023).Hoque N, Khan ZR, Rashid PT, Begum MN, Sharmin S, Hossain MJ, Rana MS, Sohrab MH. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic properties of endophytic fungi isolated from Thysanolaena maxima Roxb., Dracaena spicata Roxb. and Aglaonema hookerianum Schott. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2023;23(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04185-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hosseini et al. (2020).Hosseini A, Razavi BM, Banach M, Hosseinzadeh H. Quercetin and metabolic syndrome: a review. Phytotherapy Research. 2020;35(10):5352–5364. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jing et al. (2016).Jing R, Li HQ, Hu CL, Jiang YP, Qin LP, Zheng CJ. Phytochemical and pharmacological profiles of three fagopyrum buckwheats. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(4):17040589. doi: 10.3390/ijms17040589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khan et al. (2021).Khan F, Bamunuarachchi NI, Tabassum N, Kim YM. Caffeic acid and its derivatives: antimicrobial drugs toward microbial pathogens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2021;69(10):2979–3004. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kimball, Johnson & Carlson (2021).Kimball JS, Johnson JP, Carlson DA. Oxidative stress and osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021;103(15):1451–1461. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2020).Li T, Li X, Dai TT, Hu P, Niu XQ Liu, CM. Binding mechanism and antioxidant capacity of selected phenolic acid- β-casein complexes. Food Research International. 2020;129:108802. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2022).Li M, Zheng Y, Zhao J, Liu M, Shu X, Li Q, Wang Y, Zhou Y. Polyphenol mechanisms against gastric cancer and their interactions with gut microbiota: a review. Current Oncology. 2022;29(8):5247–5261. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu & Liu (2018).Liu JJ, Liu G. Analysis of secondary metabolites from plant endophytic fungi. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018;1848:25–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8724-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Loffredo et al. (2017).Loffredo L, Perri L, Nocella C, Violi F. Antioxidant and antiplatelet activity by polyphenol-rich nutrients: focus on extra virgin olive oil and cocoa. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2017;83(1):96–102. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyu et al. (2020).Lyu JI, Ryu J, Jin CH, Kim DG, Kim JM, Seo KS, Kim JB, Kim SH, Ahn JW, Kang SY, Kwon SJ. Phenolic compounds in extracts of hibiscus acetosella (cranberry hibiscus) and their antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Molecules. 2020;25(18):25184190. doi: 10.3390/molecules25184190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma et al. (2023).Ma N, Yin D, Liu Y, Gao Z, Cao Y, Chen T, Huang Z, Jia Q, Wang D. Succession of endophytic fungi and rhizosphere soil fungi and their correlation with secondary metabolites in F. dibotrys. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2023;14:1220431. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1220431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maleki, Crespo & Cabanillas (2019).Maleki SJ, Crespo JF, Cabanillas B. Anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids. Food Chemistry. 2019;299:125124. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Malhotra, Hayes & Wozniak (2019).Malhotra S, Hayes D, Wozniak DJ. Cystic fibrosis and pseudomonas aeruginosa: the host-microbe interface. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2019;32(3):e00138-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00138-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchut-Mikołajczyk et al. (2023).Marchut-Mikołajczyk O, Chlebicz M, Kawecka M, Michalak A, Prucnal F, Nielipinski M, Filipek J, Jankowska M, Perek Z, Drozdzyński P, Rutkowska N, Otlewska A. Endophytic bacteria isolated from Urtica dioica L.- preliminary screening for enzyme and polyphenols production. Microbial Cell Factories. 2023;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02167-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marei (2020).Marei EM. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its virulent bacteriophages. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2020;23(4):491–500. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2020.491.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsola et al. (2022).Marsola SJ, Jorge LF, Meniqueti AB, Bertéli MBD, De Lima TEF, Bezerra JL, Lopes AD, Gazim ZC, Do Valle JS, Colauto NB, Linde GA. Endophytic fungi of Brunfelsia uniflora: isolation, cryopreservation, and determination of enzymatic and antioxidant activity. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2022;38(6):94. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marupudi et al. (2007).Marupudi NI, Han JE, Li KW, Renard VM, Tyler BM, Brem H. Paclitaxel: a review of adverse toxicities and novel delivery strategies. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2007;6(5):609–621. doi: 10.1517/14740338.6.5.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Montalbano et al. (2021).Montalbano G, Mhalhel K, Briglia M, Levanti M, Abbate F, Guerrera MC, D’Alessandro E, Laurà R, Germaná A. Zebrafish and flavonoids: adjuvants against obesity. Molecules. 2021;26(10):3014. doi: 10.3390/molecules26103014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mustafa et al. (2022).Mustafa S, Akbar M, Khan MA, Sunita K, Parveen S, Pawar JS, Massey S, Agarwal NR, Husain SA. Plant metabolite diosmin as the therapeutic agent in human diseases. Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery. 2022;3:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakilcioğlu-Taş & Ötleş (2021).Nakilcioğlu-Taş E, Ötleş S. Influence of extraction solvents on the polyphenol contents, compositions, and antioxidant capacities of fig (Ficus carica L.) seeds. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2021;93(1):e20190526. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202120190526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nasr, Radhakrishnan & D’Agati (2013).Nasr SH, Radhakrishnan J, D’Agati VD. Bacterial infection-related glomerulonephritis in adults. Kidney International. 2013;83(5):792–803. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naveed et al. (2018).Naveed M, Hejazi V, Abbas M, Kamboh AA, Khan GJ, Shumzaid M, Ahmad F, Babazadeh D, FangFang X, Modarresi-Ghazani F, WenHua L, XiaoHui Z. Chlorogenic acid (CGA): a pharmacological review and call for further research. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018;97:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Neha et al. (2019).Neha K, Haider MR, Pathak A, Yar MS. Medicinal prospects of antioxidants: a review. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2019;178:687–704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nishad et al. (2021).Nishad JH, Singh A, Bharti R, Prajapati P, Sharma VK, Gupta VK, Kharwar RN. Effect of the histone methyltransferase specific probe BRD4770 on metabolic profiling of the endophytic fungus diaporthe longicolla. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:725463. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.725463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paul et al. (2021).Paul P, Das S, Chatterjee S, Shukla A, Chakraborty P, Sarkar S, Maiti D, Das A, Tribedi P. 1 4-Naphthoquinone disintegrates the pre-existing biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus by accumulating reactive oxygen species. Archives of Microbiology. 2021;203:4981–4992. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02485-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pisoschi & Pop (2015).Pisoschi AM, Pop A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: a review. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2015;97:55–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ravi et al. (2022).Ravi P, Somu P, Acharya D, Gomez LA, Thathapudi JJ, Ramachandra YL, Rudraiah SB, Isaq M, Karua CS, Arifullah M, Poojari CC, Lee YR. Isolation and phytochemical screening of endophytic fungi isolated from medicinal plant mappia foetida and evaluation of its in vitro cytotoxicity in cancer. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2022;194(10):4570–4586. doi: 10.1007/s12010-022-03929-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos et al. (2020).Santos TFB, Dos Santos Carvalho C, De Almeida MA, Delforno TP, Duarte ICS. Endophytic fungi isolated from Brazilian medicinal plants as potential producers of antioxidants and their relations with anti-inflammatory activity. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(5):223. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shamsudin et al. (2022).Shamsudin NF, Ahmed QU, Mahmood S, Ali Shah SA, Khatib A, Mukhtar S, Alsharif MA, Parveen H, Zakaria ZA. Antibacterial effects of flavonoids and their structure-activity relationship study: a comparative interpretation. Molecules. 2022;27(4):1149. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shen et al. (2023).Shen N, Chen Z, Cheng G, Lin W, Qin Y, Xiao Y, Chen H, Tang Z, Li Q, Yuan M, Bu T. Diversity, chemical constituents and biological activities of endophytic fungi from Alisma orientale (Sam.) Juzep. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2023;14:1190624. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1190624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh et al. (2021).Singh P, Arif Y, Bajguz A, Hayat S. The role of quercetin in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2021;166:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stasiuk & Kozubek (2010).Stasiuk M, Kozubek A. Biological activity of phenolic lipids. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2010;67(6):841–860. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0193-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Staszowska-Karkut & Materska (2020).Staszowska-Karkut M, Materska M. Phenolic composition, mineral content, and beneficial bioactivities of leaf extracts from black currant (ribes nigrum l.), raspberry (rubus idaeus), and aronia (aronia melanocarpa) Nutrients. 2020;12(2):12020463. doi: 10.3390/nu12020463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Subedi, Vijay & Willcox (2018).Subedi D, Vijay AK, Willcox M. Overview of mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an ocular perspective. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2018;101(2):162–171. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sunil & Xu (2019).Sunil C, Xu B. An insight into the health-promoting effects of taxifolin (dihydroquercetin) Phytochemistry. 2019;166:112066. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Techaoei et al. (2020).Techaoei S, Jirayuthcharoenkul C, Jarmkom K, Dumrongphuttidecha T, Khobjai W. Chemical evaluation and antibacterial activity of novel bioactive compounds from endophytic fungi in Nelumbo nucifera. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2020;27:2883–2889. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tian et al. (2017).Tian J, Fu L, Zhang Z, Dong X, Xu D, Mao Z, Liu Y, Lai D, Zhou L. Dibenzo- α-pyrones from the endophytic fungus Alternaria sp. Samif01: isolation, structure elucidation, and their antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Natural Product Research. 2017;31(4):387–396. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1205052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tian et al. (2022).Tian F, Liao XF, Wang LH, Bai XX, Yang YB, Luo ZQ, Yan FX. Isolation and identification of beneficial orchid mycorrhizal fungi in Paphiopedilum barbigerum (Orchidaceae) Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2022;17(1):2005882. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.2005882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Toghueo (2019).Toghueo RMK. Bioprospecting endophytic fungi from Fusarium genus as sources of bioactive metabolites. Mycology. 2019;11(1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2019.1645053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valido et al. (2022).Valido E, Stoyanov J, Gorreja F, Stojic S, Niehot C, Kiefte-de Jong J, Llanaj E, Muka T, Glisic M. Systematic review of human and animal evidence on the role of buckwheat consumption on gastrointestinal health. Nutrients. 2022;15:15010001. doi: 10.3390/nu15010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2023).Wang H, Liu Z, Duan F, Chen Y, Qiu K, Xiong Q, Lin H, Zhang J, Tan H. Isolation, identification, and antibacterial evaluation of endophytic fungi from Gannan navel orange. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2023;14:1172629. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1172629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2009).Wang AN, Yi XW, Yu HF, Dong B, Qiao SY. Free radical scavenging activity of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2009;107:1140–1148. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xie et al. (2023).Xie L, Liu R, Wang D, Pan Q, Yang S, Li H, Zhang X, Jin M. Golden Buckwheat extract-loaded injectable hydrogel for efficient postsurgical prevention of local tumor recurrence caused by residual tumor cells. Molecules. 2023;28(14):28145447. doi: 10.3390/molecules28145447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2021).Xu X, Liu A, Hu S, Ares I, Martínez-Larrañaga M-R, Wang X, Martínez M, Anadón A, Martínez M.-A. Synthetic phenolic antioxidants: metabolism, hazards and mechanism of action. Food Chemistry. 2021;353:129488. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2022).Zhang M, Gao C, Xu L, Niu H, Liu Q, Huang Y, Lv G, Yang H, Li M. Melatonin and indole-3-acetic acid synergistically regulate plant growth and stress resistance. Cells. 2022;11(20):11203250. doi: 10.3390/cells11203250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2018).Zhang GF, Liu XF, Zhang S, Pan BF, Liu ML. Ciprofloxacin derivatives and their antibacterial activities. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018;146:599–612. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2019).Zhao YY, Cartabia A, Lalaymia I, Declerck S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and production of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Mycorrhiza. 2019;32(3-4):221–256. doi: 10.1007/s00572-022-01079-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2022).Zhao YY, Cartabia A, Lalaymia I, Declerck S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and production of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Mycorrhiza. 2022;32(3-4):221–256. doi: 10.1007/s00572-022-01079-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou et al. (2022).Zhou ZY, Liu X, Cui JL, Wang JH, Wang ML, Zhang G. Endophytic fungi and their bioactive secondary metabolites in medicinal leguminosae plants: nearly untapped medical resources. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2022;369(1):fnac052. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnac052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu (2016).Zhu F. Chemical composition and health effects of Tartary buckwheat. Food Chemistry. 2016;203:231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu & Chen (2019).Zhu LY, Chen LH. Progress in research on paclitaxel and tumor immunotherapy. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters. 2019;24(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s11658-019-0164-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu et al. (2023).Zhu J, Wang Z, Song LX, Fu WX, Liu L. Anti-Alzheimer’s natural products derived from plant endophytic fungi. Molecules. 2023;28(5):40. doi: 10.3390/molecules28052259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Data.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. LC-MS.
peerj-12-18529-s002.xlsx (494.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Supplementary Figures and Tables.
peerj-12-18529-s003.pdf (565.9KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Sequence.
peerj-12-18529-s004.fasta (11.4KB, fasta)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18529/supp-4

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available in the Supplemental File.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES