Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Oct 28;7(10):e2443975. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43975

Parental Health and Flourishing Among Young US Children

Brock E Polnaszek 1,, Laurie B Griffin 2, Siraj Amanullah 3, Methodius G Tuuli 2, Adam K Lewkowitz 2, Annie Gjelsvik 4
PMCID: PMC11581517  PMID: 39466246

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigates the association between parental health and flourishing among children aged 6 months to 5 years in the US.

Introduction

Flourishing is a key factor for child health trajectory.1,2,3,4,5 The National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) began collecting measures of flourishing in 2011 and reported 1 in 2 children in the US were flourishing.1,2 Subsequently, deciphering factors that promote flourishing became an important public health focus.1,2,3,4,5,6 Parental health and childhood flourishing are interrelated, yet elucidating parental health factors that are associated with childhood flourishing is needed.1,2,3,4,5,6 Our objective was to examine the association between parental health and flourishing among young children in the US.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was exempt from review because it used publicly available, deidentified data, in accordance with 45 CFR §46. Nationally representative data were analyzed from 2021 NSCH of young children aged 6 months to 5 years (n = 30 912). Survey respondents provided voluntary consent. We followed the STROBE reporting guideline. The primary outcome was flourishing defined by responding “always/usually” to the following questions: (1) Is this child affectionate and tender? (2) Does this child bounce back quickly when things do not go their way? (3) Does this child show interest and curiosity in learning new things? (4) Does this child smile and laugh? The primary outcome was dichotomized into flourishing (score = 4) and not flourishing (scores 0-3).6

The main exposure of composite overall parental health was examined from the father and/or mother response options that included “absent,” “fair/poor,” “good,” or “excellent/very good” to the following questions: “If this child’s mother/father is a primary caregiver and lives in the household, what is the mother’s/father’s physical health status?” The same structure was used to ask about father and/or mother parental mental health status. The responses to the aforementioned 16 questions for each parent were scored with −1 for “absent” to a maximum score of 2 for “excellent/very good” and combined into a composite overall parental health category. Composite scores were then split into tertiles of low (scores −4 to 2), medium (scores 3 to 7), and high (scores of 8). Additional characteristics from previous flourishing literature were assessed including child age, sex, race and ethnicity, adverse experiences, and insurance; and parent and/or caregiver education level, aggravation, emotional support, and coping with daily demands of raising a child; and family household income, family resilience, and smoking in household.1,2,3,4,5,6 Weighted baseline composite overall parent health category and flourishing characteristics were compared using the Pearson χ2 test for independence. A weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis calculated unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR (aOR) of flourishing by composite overall parental health category. Weighted subgroup analysis explored the association of father’s and mother’s physical and mental health individual responses with odds of flourishing. Several models were run in a stepwise fashion using established variables from prior flourishing literature and eliminated collinearity.1,2,3,4,5,6 Two-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE 18 (StataCorp).

Results

Among 30 912 children aged 6 months to 5 years included in the study, 15 977 (51.7%) were male and 14 935 (48.3%) were female. The majority (81%) of children aged 6 months to 5 years in the US were flourishing in this study. As overall composite parental health category increased, rates of flourishing increased (low: 5454 [75.0%]; medium: 5717 [77.0%]; high: 14 571 [86.0%]; P < .001). After adjusting for differences in Table 1 including caregiver level of education, family resilience, parental aggravation, parental coping, and emotional support with parenthood, there were no associations between composite overall parental health category and childhood flourishing. Subgroup analysis found worse mother’s physical health status was associated with reduced flourishing (“poor/very poor”: aOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.49-0.95]; “good”: aOR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97]) as compared with responses of “excellent/very good” (Table 2). Father’s physical health of “poor/very poor” was also negatively associated with flourishing (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.40-0.87]).

Table 1. Weighted Parent-Child Characteristics Among Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years in the US by Composite Overall Parental Health Categorya.

Characteristics No. (%) P value
Composite overall parents health score
Low (n = 7164) Medium (n = 7169) High (n = 16 579)
Flourishing
Scores 0-3 (not flourishing) 1710 (25.0) 1452 (23.0) 2008 (35.0) <.001
Score 4 (flourishing) 5454 (75.0) 5717 (77.0) 14 571 (86.0)
Child’s age, y
0 327 (7.6) 362 (7.6) 970 (9.1) .21
1 804 (17.0) 957 (17.0) 2362 (19.0)
2 1416 (18.0) 1537 (17.0) 3636 (19.0)
3 1463 (19.0) 1436 (21.0) 3164 (18.0)
4 1505 (20.0) 1461 (20.0) 3262 (19.0)
5 1649 (19.0) 1416 (18.0) 3185 (17.0)
Child’s sex
Male 3672 (50.0) 3680 (53.0) 8625 (51.0) .48
Female 3492 (50.0) 3489 (47.0) 7954 (49.0)
Child’s race and ethnicityb
Black, non-Hispanic 1077 (25.0) 200 (7.9) 515 (6.9) <.001
Hispanic 1322 (30.0) 925 (24.0) 1882 (21.0)
Multiracial, non-Hispanic 1251 (13.0) 919 (11.0) 2214 (12.0)
White, non-Hispanic 3514 (32.0) 5125 (57.0) 11 968 (60.0)
Income level of child’s household, % FPL
0-199 3731 (63.0) 1761 (34.0) 3071 (25.0) <.001
200-299 1174 (16.0) 1268 (21.0) 2446 (15.0)
300-399 769 (7.8) 1249 (14.0) 2575 (14.0)
≥400 1490 (14.0) 2891 (31.0) 8587 (46.0)
Adequacy of child’s insurance
Adequate 5285 (74.0) 4809 (68.0) 12 226 (73.0) <.001
Not adequate 1420 (17.0) 2149 (28.0) 3766 (22.0)
Uninsured 422 (8.3) 206 (3.7) 562 (5.4)
Current health insurance status of child
Insured 6717 (91.0) 6959 (96.0) 16 001 (95.0) <.001
Not insured 422 (8.3) 206 (3.7) 562 (5.4)
Consistency of insurance coverage of child
Consistently insured 6561 (89.0) 6827 (94.0) 15 797 (93.0) <.001
Currently uninsured/had gap 560 (11.0) 302 (6.2) 649 (6.4)
Type of health insurance
Public 3371 (55.0) 1342 (26.0) 2064 (19.0) <.001
Private 2802 (29.0) 5255 (64.0) 13,374 (72.0)
Public and private 439 (5.3) 304 (5.6) 455 (3.0)
Uninsured 422 (8.3) 206 (3.7) 562 (5.4)
Child has special health care needs
None 6002 (87.0) 6095 (86.0) 15 051 (92.0) <.001
Yes, less complex 244 (2.7) 262 (3.1) 462 (1.8)
Yes, more complex 918 (11.0) 811 (11.0) 1066 (6.4)
No. of adverse childhood experiences for child
2 or more 1642 (23.0) 459 (8.0) 232 (1.8) <.001
1 1959 (26.0) 1258 (21) 1103 (8.4)
0 3173 (46.0) 5,450 (71.0) 15 237 (90.0)
Highest education of child’s caregiver
Less than high school 373 (16.0) 79 (6.4) 187 (3.9) <.001
High school degree or GED 1733 (30.0) 735 (16.0) 1113 (11.0)
Some college/technical 2111 (25.0) 1511 (20.0) 2423 (15.0)
College degree or higher 2947 (29.0) 4844 (57.0) 12 836 (70.0)
Family resilience index scorec
0 or 1 554 (8.3) 395 (7.0) 149 (1.0) <.001
2 or 3 726 (12.0) 943 (14) 687 (4.2)
4 5,120 (70.0) 5814 (78.0) 15 681 (94.0)
Parent coping
Not very well or not at all 183 (2.3) 209 (3.9) 85 (0.6) <.001
Somewhat well 2726 (34.0) 3946 (54.0) 5337 (31.0)
Very well 4,013 (59.0) 3005 (42.0) 11 129 (68.0)
Parental aggravation
Usually/always feel aggravation 379 (4.5) 437 (6.7) 453 (2.3) <.001
Emotional help parenthood
Yes, spouse/partner 3241 (41.0) 5821 (77.0) 14,396 (83.0) <.001
Yes, not from spouse/partner 2047 (26.0) 262 (3.5) 269 (1.9)
Did not receive support 1466 (27.0) 1048 (19.0) 1813 (14.0)
Coping with daily demands of raising children
Very well 4013 (59.0) 3005 (42.0) 11 129 (68.0) <.001
Somewhat well 2726 (34.0) 3946 (54.0) 5337 (31.0)
Not very well 183 (2.3) 209 (3.9) 5337 (31.0)
Someone living in household smokes
Yes 1320 (20.0) 981 (14.0) 1048 (7.6) <.001
No 5409 (80.0) 6155 (86.0) 15 475 (92.0)

Abbreviations: FPL, federal poverty level; GED, General Educational Development.

a

Children who were institutionalized were not included.

b

Self-reported race.

c

Family resilience index score based on responses to the following 4 survey items: “When your family faces problems, how often are you likely to do each of the following?” (1) Talk together about what to do, (2) Work together to solve our problems, (3) Know we have strengths to draw on, and (4) Stay hopeful even in difficult times. Response options to the 4 items are: none of the time, some of the time, most of the time, or all of the time. To meet each individual indicator, a response of either most of the time or all of the time was required.

Table 2. Weighted Flourishing Among Young Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years in the United States by Composite Overall and Individual Physical and Mental Parental Health.

Parental health status Not flourishing, index score 0-3 Flourishing, index score 4 Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a
Composite overall parental health
High 2008 (35.0) 14 571 (52.0) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Medium 1452 (25.0) 5717 (20.0) 0.55 (0.46-0.65) 0.80 (0.67-0.96)
Low 1710 (40.0) 5454 (28.0) 0.48 (0.41-0.57) 0.83 (0.67-1.03)
Mother physical health
Excellent/very good 2882 (53.0) 18 247 (68.0) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Good 1297 (23.0) 4542 (17.0) 0.58 (0.59-0.68) 0.81 (0.67-0.97)
Poor/very poor 557 (13.0) 1366 (6.9) 0.42 (0.33-0.55) 0.68 (0.49-0.95)
Absent mother 434 (11.0) 1587 (8.3) 0.56 (0.43-0.74) 0.95 (0.69-1.30)
Mother mental health
Excellent/very good 2526 (50.0) 16 962 (66.0) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Good 1430 (25.0) 5237 (17.0) 0.54 (0.45-0.64) 0.70 (0.58-0.84)
Poor/very poor 780 (14.0) 1956 (8.8) 0.49 (0.39-0.61) 0.93 (0.71-1.23)
Absent mother 434 (11.0) 1587 (8.3) 0.55 (0.42-0.72) 0.94 (0.68-1.29)
Father physical health
Excellent/very good 2574 (45.0) 16 584 (59.0) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Good 1053 (18.0) 4359 (16.0) 0.66 (0.55-0.80) 0.86 (0.70-1.06)
Poor/very poor 426 (8.9) 1226 (5.4) 0.46 (0.35-0.62) 0.59 (0.40-0.87)
Absent father 1117 (28.0) 3573 (20.0) 0.54 (0.45-0.65) 0.84 (0.66-1.07)
Father mental health
Excellent/very good 2618 (49.0) 16 875 (62.0) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Good 949 (15.0) 3834 (13.0) 0.67 (0.55-0.81) 0.88 (0.72-1.07)
Poor/very poor 486 (8.1) 1460 (5.9) 0.58 (0.43-0.77) 0.86 (0.58-1.29)
Absent father 1117 (28.0) 3573 (20.0) 0.56 (0.47-0.68) 0.87 (0.68-1.11)
a

Adjusted for caregiver education, family resilience, parental coping, parental aggravation, and emotional support.

Discussion

Mother’s reported physical health status was associated with flourishing among young children in the US. Further investigation into the interplay of parent health, family unit, and social determinants of health such as education, income, and caregiver support are warranted. Limitations include single period, caregiver reported, and exclusion of children in long-term facilities.

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Bethell CD, Gombojav N, Whitaker RC. Family resilience and connection promote flourishing among US children, even amid adversity. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(5):729-737. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bethell C, Gombojav N, Solloway M, Wissow L. Adverse childhood experiences, resilience and mindfulness-based approaches: common denominator issues for children with emotional, mental, or behavioral problems. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016;25(2):139-156. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kandasamy V, Hirai AH, Ghandour RM, Kogan MD. Parental perception of flourishing in school-aged children: 2011-2012 National Survey of Children’s Health. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018;39(6):497-507. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim TE, Jang CY. The relationship between children’s flourishing and being overweight. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018;14(4):598-605. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836208.104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kwong TY, Hayes DK. Adverse family experiences and flourishing amongst children ages 6-17 years: 2011/12 National Survey of Children’s Health. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;70:240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Westphaln KK, Lee E, Fry-Bowers EK, Kleinman LC, Ronis SD. Examining child flourishing, family resilience, and adversity in the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022;66:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES