Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Oct 7;7(10):e2437985. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37985

Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Early Adolescents

Jason M Nagata 1,✉, Jennifer H Wong 1, Christiane K Helmer 1, Sydnie K Domingue 1, Joan E Shim 1, Abubakr Al-Shoaibi 1
PMCID: PMC11581521  PMID: 39374020

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination and its sociodemographic correlates among a large, diverse sample of early adolescents in the US.

Introduction

Sexual minority adolescents are more likely to experience sexual orientation discrimination, possibly leading to isolation, depressive symptoms, self-harm, and suicidal ideation.1 Bullying may contribute to sexual orientation discrimination by perpetuating stereotypes and reinforcing negative attitudes toward sexual minorities. In 2021, 35% of gay or lesbian and 36% of bisexual high school students experienced bullying compared with 18% of their heterosexual counterparts.2 However, little is known about sexual orientation discrimination in early adolescence, when sexual identity often begins to develop. Our study aimed to examine the prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination and sociodemographic factors associated with discrimination among a large, diverse sample of early adolescents in the US.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (year 2, 2018-2020, adolescents aged 10-13 years) were analyzed.3 Additional information on the ABCD Study’s design and measures is available in the eMethods in Supplement 1. Institutional review board approval was obtained from each study site and the University of California, San Diego. Written informed parental or caregiver consent was provided. This cross-sectional study complied with the checklist for the CROSS guideline. Sexual orientation discrimination was measured from the Perceived Discrimination Scale,4,5 which measures adolescents’ perception of being treated unfairly because of sociodemographic factors. All participants were asked, “In the past 12 months, have you felt discriminated against because someone thought you were gay, lesbian, or bisexual?” Responses included “yes” and “no.”

A multivariable Poisson regression analysis was conducted to estimate the associations of age, sex, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Latino or Hispanic, Native American, White, and other), religiosity, household income, and highest parental education level with sexual orientation discrimination. The aforementioned variables were parent and/or participant reported. Analyses were adjusted for the independent variables and study site. Stata, version 18.0 (StataCorp LLC) was used to conduct our analyses.

Results

Our sample consisted of 9345 early adolescents, with 4.9% of the total sample experiencing sexual orientation discrimination. The prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination varied by sexual orientation (Figure) and was highest among adolescents who identified as gay or bisexual (37.4%). In Poisson regression analyses of the total sample, male sex was associated with a higher prevalence of experiencing sexual orientation discrimination compared with female sex (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52) (Table). Those who identified as gay or bisexual (aPR, 13.97; 95% CI, 11.32-17.23), maybe gay or bisexual (aPR, 8.08; 95% CI, 6.23-10.46), refused to answer (aPR, 4.00; 95% CI, 2.11-7.58), or did not understand the question (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21) had a higher prevalence of experiencing sexual orientation discrimination compared with those who identified as heterosexual. Lower household income was associated with a higher prevalence of experiencing sexual orientation discrimination compared with households earning $200 000 or greater. Lower parental education was associated with a higher prevalence of experiencing sexual orientation discrimination compared with higher parental education (aPR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.93). In regression analyses limited to sexual minority adolescents, findings were mostly similar.

Figure. Distribution of Sexual Orientation Discrimination by Sexual Orientation.

Figure.

Table. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Associations With Experiencing Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (N = 9345)a.

Characteristic No. (%) No./total No. (%)b aPR (95% CI)
Total Among gay or bisexual and maybe gay or bisexual
Age, mean (SD), y 12.0 (0.7) 1.08 (0.94-1.23) 1.14 (0.96-1.36)
Sex
Female 4452 (47.6) 268/4452 (6.0) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Male 4893 (52.4) 188/4893 (3.8) 1.25 (1.03-1.52) 1.10 (0.81-1.48)
Sexual orientation
Heterosexual 8303 (88.8) 230/8303 (2.8) 1 [Reference] NA
Maybe gay or bisexual 327 (3.5) 68/327 (20.8) 8.08 (6.23-10.46) NA
Gay or bisexual 366 (3.9) 137/366 (37.4) 13.97 (11.32-17.23) NA
Do not understand the question 262 (2.8) 12/262 (4.6) 1.81 (1.02-3.21) NA
Refuse to answer 87 (0.9) 9/87 (10.3) 4.00 (2.11-7.58) NA
Race and ethnicity
Asian 557 (6.0) 23/557 (4.1) 0.88 (0.60-1.30) 0.79 (0.48-1.28)
Black 1641 (17.6) 101/1641 (6.2) 1.02 (0.79-1.31) 0.63 (0.46-0.89)
Latino or Hispanic 1545 (16.5) 68/1545 (4.4) 0.80 (0.58-1.10) 0.39 (0.24-0.63)
Native American 316 (3.4) 18/316 (5.7) 0.81 (0.51-1.29) 0.41 (0.21-0.81)
White 5207 (55.7) 242/5207 (4.6) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Otherc 79 (0.8) 4/79 (5.1) 0.84 (0.32-2.20) 0.35 (0.08-1.60)
Religiosity
Religious 6816 (72.9) 308/6816 (4.5) 0.94 (0.79-1.13) 1.08 (0.86-1.38)
Not religious 2529 (27.1) 148/2529 (5.9) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Household income, $
≤24 999 1041 (11.1) 55/1041 (5.3) 1.44 (0.94-2.21) 1.50 (0.83-2.71)
25 000-49 999 1209 (12.9) 101/1209 (8.4) 2.02 (1.42-2.90) 2.06 (1.28-3.30)
50 000-74 999 1245 (13.3) 69/1245 (5.5) 1.65 (1.14-2.38) 1.81 (1.09-3.00)
75 000-99 999 1304 (14.0) 60/1304 (4.6) 1.37 (0.95-1.98) 1.33 (0.79-2.24)
100 000-199 999 3193 (34.2) 127/3193 (4.0) 1.23 (0.89-1.71) 1.50 (0.96-2.33)
≥200 000 1353 (14.5) 44/1353 (3.3) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Highest parental education
High school education or less 879 (9.4) 59/879 (6.7) 1.45 (1.09-1.93) 1.67 (1.12-2.50)
College education or more 8466 (90.6) 397/8466 (4.7) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]

Abbreviations: aPR, adjusted prevalence ratio from Poisson regression model; NA, not applicable.

a

The model for the total sample represents the abbreviated output from the Poisson regression model with adjustment for age, sex, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, religiosity, household income, parental education, and study site. The model for gay or bisexual and maybe gay or bisexual adjusts for age, sex, race and ethnicity, religiosity, household income, parental education, and study site.

b

The number of participants experiencing sexual orientation discrimination by each sociodemographic factor category divided by the total number of participants per sociodemographic variable.

c

This subcategory was listed as “other” but with no specific racial and ethnic groups defined, although write-ins were allowed. Race and ethnicity were reported by the parent and/or caregiver of the adolescent.

Discussion

This cross-sectional analysis of early adolescents suggested that sexual minority identity, male sex, lower household income, and lower parental education were associated with higher sexual orientation discrimination. Interestingly, even adolescents who were questioning, refused to answer, or did not understand the sexual orientation question reported higher levels of sexual orientation discrimination than their heterosexual peers. It is possible that some of these early adolescents are not yet “out” given the age range of 10 to 13 years. Limitations of this study include the use of self-reported data. Structural factors may further influence sexual minority adolescents’ susceptibility to discrimination because those with lower household income or less educated parents, for example, may face compounded forms of bias. Studies have shown that sexual minority adolescents experiencing discrimination are more likely to experience mental health burdens6; therefore, these findings underscore the need to promote acceptance of diverse sexual orientations beginning in childhood to address sexual orientation discrimination among early adolescents.

Supplement 1.

eMethods.

eReference.

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Almeida J, Johnson RM, Corliss HL, Molnar BE, Azrael D. Emotional distress among LGBT youth: the influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. J Youth Adolesc. 2009;38(7):1001-1014. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9397-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clayton HB, Kilmer G, DeGue S, et al. Dating violence, sexual violence, and bullying victimization among high school students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2021. MMWR Suppl. 2023;72(1):66-74. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7201a8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heeringa S, Berglund P. A guide for population-based analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study baseline data. bioRxiv. Preprint posted online February 10, 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.10.942011 [DOI]
  • 4.Garnett BR, Masyn KE, Austin SB, Miller M, Williams DR, Viswanath K. The intersectionality of discrimination attributes and bullying among youth: an applied latent class analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43(8):1225-1239. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0073-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nagata JM, Ganson KT, Sajjad OM, Benabou SE, Bibbins-Domingo K. Prevalence of perceived racism and discrimination among US children aged 10 and 11 years: the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(8):861-863. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gordon JH, Tran KT, Visoki E, et al. The role of individual discrimination and structural stigma in the mental health of sexual minority youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024;63(2):231-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.05.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eMethods.

eReference.

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES