Skip to main content
The Neuroradiology Journal logoLink to The Neuroradiology Journal
. 2024 Nov 21;38(4):387–393. doi: 10.1177/19714009241303068

Intracranial hypertension and papilledema secondary to an unruptured arteriovenous malformation: Review of the literature

Mohammad Ghorbani 1, Christoph J Griessenauer 2, Christoph Wipplinger 3, Reza Bahrami 4, Hojjat Mirsardoo 5, Rana Sahraei 1, Abolghasem Mortazavi 6,
PMCID: PMC11583166  PMID: 39572165

Abstract

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections of arteries and veins without intermediate capillary components. As such, AVMs can remain asymptomatic or have a variety of clinical presentations ranging from mild headaches to severe symptoms like seizures, hemorrhage, and subsequent coma. Papilledema and increased intracranial pressure without hydrocephalus or hemorrhage are rare forms of presentations of cerebral AVM. The mechanism of intracranial hypertension accompanying brain AVMs is not entirely understood, and the right treatment strategy is controversial. Here, we present the treatment and outcomes of four patients with unruptured AVMs who presented with intracranial hypertension accompanied by visual symptoms, papilledema, and without evidence of hydrocephalus. In cases of AVMs accompanied by intracranial hypertension, AVM treatment should be considered the main target of management.

Keywords: Cerebral AVM, ICP, neurointervention, embolization, vascular malformaiton

Introduction

Although frequently asymptomatic, arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) may present with a broad variety of symptoms ranging from nonspecific headaches to intracerebral hemorrhage resulting in severe neurologic deficits. 1 Increased intracranial pressure, as a result of hemorrhage and hydrocephalus, is a common presentation of such malformations. However, clinical manifestation with papilledema in the absence of cerebral hemorrhage and hydrocephalus, similar to benign intracranial hypertension, is very rare. No definitive etiology has ever been reported for this kind of presentation and the suggested treatment strategies include medical therapy, CSF diversion shunts, or endovascular embolization and/or surgical resection of the lesion.13 In this article, we present four patients with visual presentations and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure who underwent endovascular treatment and provide a literature review of previous case.

Case series

Case 1

A 35-year-old male presented with intermittent headaches and blurred vision. On ophthalmologic examination, he had bilateral Papilledema. Computed Tomography (CT) 4 and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the left frontal lobe without evidence of bleeding and venous thrombosis. Subsequent Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) showed a small AVM with a compact high-flow nidus in the left frontal lobe fed by multiple branches from the left anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA). The AVM drained through four dilated and tortuous cortical veins into superior sagittal sinus as well as into the straight sinus (Grade 3 Spetzler–Martin). A diagnostic lumbar puncture revealed an opening pressure of 38 cm H2O. The patient had no predisposing factors for intracranial hypertension. Based on these findings, the embolization of the AVM was considered treatment option. Complete occlusion of the nidus using Onyx glue was achieved in one session. One-week post intervention, the patient reported significant improvement of headache and blurred vision and intracranial pressure was 28 cm H2O with lumbar puncture assessment. At the 1-month follow-up, bilateral pupil edema disappeared and intracranial pressure was 21 cm H2O.

Case 2

A 15-year-old female patient was referred to our center with a history of headache, bilateral orbital pain, intermittent blurred vision, and right hand tingling. A brain MRI revealed multiple superficial flow voids in the left parietal lobe just posterior to the hand-area on the motor cortex. A DSA showed a large high-flow nidus AVM involving two compartments that were fed by the left MCA and ACA. It also contained two large intranidal aneurysms and had multiple draining veins to the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and the left transverse-sigmoid sinus junction (Grade 3 Spetzler–Martin). Due to the bilateral papilledema and visual disturbance on ophthalmic exam, a lumbar puncture was performed and showed a pressure of 33 cm H2O. Three days after admission, complete endovascular embolization of the AVM could be achieved at one session. The patient’s symptoms improved and intracranial pressure decreased to 27 cm H2O after 1 week. At the 1-month follow-up examination, the bilateral papilledema was resolved and the intracranial pressure was 19 cm H2O.

Case 3

A 39-year-old male patient presented with history of headache, intermittently blurred vision, and progressive visual acuity decrease in the right eye (best corrected visual acuity: 20/40). An ophthalmic examination showed right optic nerve atrophy and a normal left eye. A brain MRI revealed flow voids in the right posterior frontal lobe in close proximity to the leg motor cortex. A DSA showed an AVM nidus at the medial posterior of superior frontal gyrus, fed by multiple branches derived from the right ACA as well as right external carotid artery via the right middle meningeal artery. The AVM drained via cortical veins into the SSS (Grade 3 Spetzler–Martin). A lumbar puncture revealed an opening pressure of 31 cm H2O. Because of the proximity of the AVM nidus to the motor cortex and en-passage feeder to the motor cortex, a partial AVM embolization with Onyx was performed and observation was considered. Lumbar CSF pressure decreased to 29 cm H2O after 1 week and azetazolamide 250 mg was prescribed to treat the headaches and elevated ICP. After 1 month, the lumbar puncture showed that pressure decrease to 27 cm H2O. Two months later, the lumbar puncture rose to 30 cm H2O and the patient complained about headaches and azetazolamide intolerance. Another stage of embolization was considered for this patient. At second stage, near complete occlusion of the AVM nidus with preservation of en-passage artery could be achieved. The patient experienced no new neurological deficit and the headaches resolved. A subsequent lumbar puncture showed that the pressure normalized to 24 cm H2O without medication. For complete occlusion, additional radiotherapy was performed. At the 6-month follow-up, bilateral papilledema disappeared and intracranial pressure was decreased.

Case 4

A 38-year-old female presented with history of chronic headaches and intermittent blurred vision that recently worsened with progressive visual disturbance and a right side visual field defect (right nasal quadrianopia). The fundoscopic examination showed bilateral optic disc edema. A brain MRI revealed flow voids in the right occipito-parietal region suspicious of an AVM nidus. The patient refused lumbar puncture for pressure measurement. A DSA showed a large high-flow AVM nidus fed by right MCA and posterior communicating artery (PCA) branches. The AVM had multiple draining veins into SSS and transverse-sigmoid junction (Grade 3 Spetzler–Martin). A near complete Onyx occlusion could be achieved in one session. The headache and visual disturbance improved and bilateral papilledema had resolved at the 1-month follow-up examination.

Discussion

In rare cases, unruptured AVMs can present with visual symptoms that are clinically and radiologically compatible with intracranial hypertension.13 Although the definition of benign intracranial hypertension may not be correct in the presence of cerebrovascular lesions, a coexistence of these two processes is possible.1,2 Abnormal drainage of cortical veins due to arterialization may be the underlying mechanism. A subsequent high pulse pressure in the subarachnoid space leads to increased cerebral pressure without affecting CSF resorption or cerebral blood volume.2,3,5 The prompt treatment response in our patient population supports this hypothesis.

Literature review and treatment strategies

A review of the literature yielded a total of 26 similar cases (Table 1). All described treatment strategies can be divided into two principal categories: ICP lowering treatment and AVM treatment. Symptomatic medical treatment for benign intracranial hypertension alone consists of acetazolamide, diuretics, or corticosteroids. Surgical treatments include ventriculoperitoneal shunt, lumbo-peritoneal shunt, or optic nerve sheath fenestration. They were generally used if medical treatment failed.2,8,11,12,15,1921 In some cases, however, despite treatment with ICP lowering drugs and even surgical CSF diversion without AVM treatment, symptoms did not improve (2, 10, and 17). In other reports, patients were initially treated successfully with medications, but later required surgical, neurointerventional, surgical, or radio-surgical treatment.2,12 The cases initially treated with surgical ICP management appeared to yield better outcome than those with medical therapy only.8,19

Table 1.

Summary of recent studies concerning intracranial hypertension and papilledema secondary to cerebral AVM in the worldwide.

Study Symptom duration Age (y) Gender Site of lesion Feeder Drainage Treatment One year outcome LP pressure
Kosary 6 6 months 25 Male Rt parietal ACA SSS Surgical resection Improved N/A
Ito 7 1 month 12 Male Rt frontal lobe ACA and MCA Cortical (SSS) Surgical resection N/A N/A
Weisbay 8 4 years 40 Male Rt parieto-occipital ACA and PCA N/A LP shunt N/A N/A
Vassilouths 9 3 months 11 Male Rt frontal ACA ISS and SSS Surgical resection Improvement N/A
Vanderberg (Davf) 10 2 years 65 Male Lt mastoid Left external carotid artery and meningeal branch of vertebral artery Strait sinus and vein of Galen Corticosteroids and embolization Improvement N/A
Spallon 11 10 months 9 Male Lt occipital Occipital artery Tentorial Corticosteroid and diuretics Improvement 19
Shiffer 3 2 months 31 Female Rt frontal MCA and ACA SSS and internal cereberal Surgical resection Improvement N/A
Barrow 12 (a) 3 months 21 Female Rt frontal ACA SSS Dexamethasone and azetazolamide, LP shunt, and surgical resection Improvement after surgery N/A
(b) 1 year 33 Female Lt parietal PCA, ACA, and MCA SSS and Galen Azetazolamide and furosemide Not improved
and LP serial
After surgery hemiplegia and improvement
Initially = 50
After azetazolamide = 40
Chimowitz 2 (a) 5 years 19 Female Rt parieto-occipital ACA, PCA, and MCA SSS Embolization and
surgical resection
Left hemianopia after surgery
Improvement of pupil edema after 2 months
N/A
(b) 6 weeks 21 Female Rt parietal Rt MCA SSS Corticosteroid, diuretic, and surgical resection after 3 months Optic atrophy 28
(c) 2 years 32 Female Lt frontal ACA and MCA SSS Azetazolamide, corticosterioid, furesmide for 2 years, and radiosurgery No improvement N/A
(d) 3 months 28 Male Rt parietal ACA and MCA SSS Embolization and surgery Severe hemiparesia after surgery that improved after 4 months N/A
(e) Chronic headache 44 Female Rt parieto-occipital PCA and MCA SSS Corticosteroid, azetazolamide, and furosemide Improvement N/A
(f) Acute (7 h) 24years Male Rt parieto-occipital ACA, PCA, and MCA SSS Embolization and Surgery Left hemianopia after surgery
Improvement of pupil edema after surgery and permanent optic atrophy
N/A
Rosenfield 13 1 week 32 Male Rt temporoparietal MCA and anterior choroidal Superficial (SSS) Surgical resection Hemineglect hemianopia N/A
Cockerell (a) 2 months 35 Female Left frontoparietal ACA and MCA SSS Embolization Improvement 28
(b)
(Dural avf)
3 months 65 Male Rt occipital Rt occipital Dural sinus Embolization Improvement 34
Kamite 14 N/A 14 Male Lt temporal Lt MCA and PCA Transverse sinus Surgical resection Improvement 26
David 15 1 year 29 Male Left temporoparietal Lt MCA Left transverse sinus cortical and deep Optic nerve sheathe fenestration + medical therapy Partial improvement N/A
Verm 16 3 months 11 Female Rt frontal N/A N/A Partial embolization + oral prednisolone + VP shunt Improvement 30
Vorstman 17 2 weeks 9yrsf Female AVM
parietal
PCA Superficial (SSS) Endovascular, azetazolamide, and prednisolone Improvement but mild optic atrophy after 3 months 40
Lai-wah 18 (a) Acute 13 Male Rt temporal Rt MCA Cortical
deep
Azetazolamide
radiosurgery
Cure of AVM
after 2 years
36
(b) Incidental finding 14 Male Posterior fossa Bilateral SCA Strait sinus Embolization Symptoms improved N/A
Baker 19 1 month 28 Male N/A N/A N/A VP shunt N/A “Elevated”
Kumar 20 3 months 23 Female Rt parieto-occipital diffuse Rt PCA
Rt ACA
MCA
Cortical (SSS)
deep
Diuretics
*
Improvement N/A
Yuthagovit 1 1 week 16 Female Rt temporal Rt MCA
Rt PCA
Transverse sinus and Rosenthal Embolization Improvement N/A

Y: year; SSS: superior sagittal sinus; Rt: right; Lt: left; PCA: posterior communicating artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery; ACA: anterior cerebral artery; SRS: stereotactic radiosurgery; SCA: superior cerebellar artery; *proliferative angiopathy, refuse of surgical or endovascular treatment; #history of symptomatic AVM 1 year ago.

Overall, three case reports described good response to medical treatment while six cases required additional surgical intervention including CSF diversion, optic nerve sheath fenestration, or surgical resection of the AVM.2,12,15,21 The outcome after CSF diversion was superior to medical treatment, but one patient required surgical resection of the AVM despite good functional CSF diversion. However, despite well controlled ICP, severe optic atrophy was associated with poor visual outcomes. 12

Surgical resection of the lesion

The majority of reported surgical treatments in patients with intracranial hypertension and an unruptured AVM were reported before the advent of curative endovascular AVM treatment.3,6,7,9,13,14

Endovascular treatment

Due to recent technologic advances, endovascular therapy may be used as the first line treatment in certain cases. The important point for this method is the selection of partial or complete vascular lesion treatment. Although partial embolization sufficiently treats intracranial hypertension in some cases, supplementary treatments, surgical resection, or radiosurgery are required in other cases Optionally, initial endovascular treatment can be used for pre-operative embolization. 2

Based on these findings, we chose to recommend endovascular embolization as the option if feasible. Response to the endovascular treatment was fast and effective in our case series. Clinical improvement could be observed as early as the first postoperative day. After 1 week, the opening pressure on lumbar puncture was significantly reduced, indicating a decreased ICP.

In cases with complete AVM embolization, the outcome was excellent and did not require the adjustment of long-term medical treatment. Partial embolization was associated with partial resolution of symptomatology (Figures 14).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

{Case2}: A1 left ICA AP view pre-embolization, A2 left ICA lateral view pre-embolization, A3 left ICA AP view post-embolization, A4 left ICA Lateral view post-embolization, B1 right eye papilledema pre-embolization, B2 left eye papilledema pre-embolization, C1 right eye OCT resolved papilledema 1-month post-embolization, and C2 left eye OCT resolved papilledema 1-month post-embolization.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

{Case 3}: A1 right ECA lateral view pre-embolization, A2 right ECA lateral view post-embolization, A3 right ICA lateral view pre-embolization, A4 right ICA lateral view post-embolization, A5 right ICA AP view pre-embolization, A6 right ICA AP view post-embolization, B1 right eye optic atrophy pre-embolization, B2 left eye normal pre-embolization, C1 right eye OCT 1-month partial optic atrophy post-embolization, and C2 left eye OCT 1-month normal papilla post-embolization.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

{Case1}: A1 left ICA lateral view pre-embolization, A2 left ICA AP view pre-embolization, A3 left ICA Lateral view post-embolization, A4 left ICA AP view post-embolization, B1 right eye papilledema pre-embolization, B2 left eye papilledema pre-embolization, B3 right eye resolved papilledema 1-month post-embolization, B4 left eye resolved papilledema 1 month post-embolization, C1 right eye OCT 1-month post-embolization, and C2 left eye OCT 1-month post-embolization.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

{Case 4}: A1 right VA lateral view pre-embolization, A2 right VA AP view pre-embolization, A3 right ICA lateral view pre-embolization, A4 right ICA AP view pre-embolization, A5 right VA lateral view post-embolization, A6 right VA AP view post-embolization, A7 right ICA lateral view post-embolization, and A8 right ICA AP view post-embolization.

Conclusion

Our case series as well as a review of the literature indicated that intracranial hypertension might occur as a sequel of an unruptured supratentorial AVM. Increased ICP and papilledema without hydrocephalus may therefore be an indication for AVM treatment. Any delay in the treatment of such lesions may result in irreversible damages to the optic nerve. In these patients, endovascular treatment can be used safely as primary treatment if complete or near complete AVM occlusion can be achieved. However, if complete endovascular occlusion is not possible, complementary radiosurgery or primary surgical resection might be required.

Footnotes

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Christoph J Griessenauer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-3812

Abolghasem Mortazavi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3279-6456

References

  • 1.Yuthagovit S, Tirakotai W, Lertbutsayanukul P, et al. Intracranial hypertension in unruptured arteriovenous malformation: case report. J Med Assoc Thai 2016; 99(Suppl 3): S130–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chimowitz MI, Little JR, Awad IA, et al. Intracranial hypertension associated with unruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Ann Neurol 1990; 27: 474–479. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410270504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schiffer J, Bibi C, Avidan D. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: papilledema as a presenting sign. Surg Neurol 1984; 22: 524–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, et al. Aneurysm geometry: an important criterion in selecting patients for Guglielmi detachable coiling. Neurol Med -Chir 1998; 38: 1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rossitti S. Pathophysiology of increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure associated to brain arteriovenous malformations: the hydraulic hypothesis. Surg Neurol Int 2013; 4: 42. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.109657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kosary IZ, Treister G, Tadmor R. Transient monocular amaurosis due to a contralateral cerebral vascular malformation. Neurochirurgia 1973; 16: 127–130. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1090505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ito K, Mita R, Suzuki S. [A case of frontal arteriovenous malformation with optochiasmatic arachnoiditis as an initial symptoms (author’s transl)]. Noshinkeigeka 1976; 4: 1011–1017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weisberg LA, Pierce JF, Jabbari B. Intracranial hypertension resulting from a cerebrovascular malformation. South Med J 1977; 70: 624–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vassilouthis J. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation with intracranial hypertension. Surg Neurol 1979; 11: 402–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van den Bergh R, Dralands G, Crolla D, et al. Pseudotumor cerebri due to intracranial arteriovenous malformation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1980; 82: 119–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spallone A. Benign intracranial hypertension vs. intracranial arteriovenous malformation: a possible CT dilemma. Acta Neurochir 1981; 58: 75–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barrow DL. Unruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations presenting with intracranial hypertension. Neurosurgery 1988; 23: 484–490. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198810000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosenfeld JV, Widaa HA, Adams CB. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation causing benign intracranial hypertension--case report. Neurol Med -Chir 1991; 31: 523–525. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.31.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kamite Y, Akimithu T, Ohta K, et al. [A case of intracranial arteriovenous malformation presenting with intracranial hypertension]. Noshinkeigeka 1994; 22: 485–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.David CA, Peerless SJ. Pseudotumor syndrome resulting from a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: case report. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 588–590. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199503000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verm A, Lee AG. Bilateral optic disk edema with macular exudates as the manifesting sign of a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123: 422–424. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70151-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vorstman EB, Niemann DB, Molyneux AJ, et al. Benign intracranial hypertension associated with arteriovenous malformation. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 133–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fung L-WE, Ganesan VJD. Arteriovenous malformations presenting with papilloedema. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baker J. Intracranial hypertension due to arteriovenous malformation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85: e4.4. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309236.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kumar S, Srivastava T, Tejwani S, et al. Cerebral proliferative angiopathy with papilledema. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 139: 12–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fung LW, Ganesan V. Arteriovenous malformations presenting with papilloedema. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 626–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Neuroradiology Journal are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES